Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1965 Apr;177(3):463–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007605

Presynaptic action of hemicholinium at the neuromuscular junction

D Elmqvist, D M J Quastel
PMCID: PMC1357260  PMID: 14321493

Full text

PDF
463

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLACKMAN J. G., GINSBORG B. L., RAY C. On the quantal release of the transmitter at a sympathetic synapse. J Physiol. 1963 Jul;167:402–415. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOWMAN W. C., HEMSWORTH B. A., RAND M. J. Triethylcholine compared with other substances affecting neuromuscular transmission. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1962 Aug;19:198–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1962.tb01440.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOWMAN W. C., RAND M. J. Actions of triethylcholine on neuromuscular transmission. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1961 Oct;17:176–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1961.tb01278.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BOYD I. A., MARTIN A. R. The end-plate potential in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Apr 27;132(1):74–91. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BROOKS V. B., THIES R. E. Reduction of quantum content during neuromuscular transmission. J Physiol. 1962 Jul;162:298–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BULL G., HEMSWORTH B. A. INHIBITION OF BIOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS OF ACETYLCHOLINE BY TRIETHYLCHOLINE. Nature. 1963 Aug 3;199:487–488. doi: 10.1038/199487b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BURGEN A. S., BURKE G., DESBARATSSCHONBAUM M. L. The specificity of brain choline acetylase. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1956 Sep;11(3):308–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1956.tb01071.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CANEPA F. G. ACETYLCHOLINE QUANTA. Nature. 1964 Jan 11;201:184–185. doi: 10.1038/201184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ELMQVIST D., HOFMANN W. W., KUGELBERG J., QUASTEL D. M. AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION IN MYASTHENIA GRAVIS. J Physiol. 1964 Nov;174:417–434. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ELMQVIST D., JOHNS T. R., THESLEFF S. A study of some electrophysiological properties of human intercostal muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Dec;154:602–607. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KRNJEVIC K., MILEDI R. Presynaptic failure of neuromuscular propagation in rats. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:1–22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LILEY A. W. The quantal components of the mammalian end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):571–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MACINTOSH F. C. Effect of HC-3 on acetylcholine turnover. Fed Proc. 1961 Jul;20:562–568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MARTIN A. R., ORKAND R. K. Postsynaptic action of HC-3 on neuromuscular transmission. Fed Proc. 1961 Jul;20:579–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MARTIN A. R., ORKAND R. K. Postsynaptic effects of HC-3 at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1961 Feb;39:343–349. doi: 10.1139/o61-034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. REITZEL N. L., LONG J. P. The neuromuscular blocking properties of alpha, alpha, dimethylethanolamino 4,4' biacetophenone (hemicholinium). Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1959 Mar 1;119(1-2):20–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SCHUELER F. W. The mechanism of action of the hemicholiniums. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1960;2:77–97. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. THIES R. E., BROOKS V. B. Postsynaptic neuromuscular block produced by hemicholinium no. 3. Fed Proc. 1961 Jul;20:569–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES