Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1965 May;178(1):98–110. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007617

Activation by suxamethonium of primary and secondary endings of the same de-efferented muscle spindle during static stretch

H-U Fehr
PMCID: PMC1357279  PMID: 14298114

Full text

PDF
98

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRINLING J. C., SMITH C. M. A characterization of the stimulation of mammalian muscle spindles by succinylcholine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1960 May;129:56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COOPER S., DANIEL P. M. MUSCLE SPINDLES IN MAN; THEIR MORPHOLOGY IN THE LUMBRICALS AND THE DEEP MUSCLES OF THE NECK. Brain. 1963 Sep;86:563–586. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.3.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIETE-SPIFF K. The discharge pattern of muscle spindles of the rabbit on activation of intrafusal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:282–296. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FUJIMORI B., TOKIZANE T., ELDRED E. Effect upon monosynaptic reflexes of decamethonium and succinylcholine. I. Peripheral mechanisms. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Mar;22(2):165–176. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GRANIT R., HOMMA S., MATTHEWS P. B. Prolonged changes in the discharge of mammalian muscle spindles following tendon taps or muscle twitches. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959 Jun 24;46:185–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRANIT R., SKOGLUND S., THESLEFF S. Activation of muscle spindles by succinylcholine and decamethonium, the effects of curare. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953;28(2-3):134–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1953.tb00964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HENATSCH H. D., SCHULTE F. J. Wirkungsmechanismen von Acetylcholin und Succinylcholin auf die Muskelspindeln des Frosches. Pflugers Arch. 1958;265(5):440–456. doi: 10.1007/BF00369772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. JANSEN J. K., MATTHEWS P. B. The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KUFFLER S. W., HUNT C. C., QUILLIAM J. P. Function of medullated small-nerve fibers in mammalian ventral roots; efferent muscle spindle innervation. J Neurophysiol. 1951 Jan;14(1):29–54. doi: 10.1152/jn.1951.14.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MATTHEWS P. B. MUSCLE SPINDLES AND THEIR MOTOR CONTROL. Physiol Rev. 1964 Apr;44:219–288. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1964.44.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MERRILLEES N. C. The fine structure of muscle spindles in the lumbrical muscles of the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jul;7:725–742. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. OTTOSON D. The effect of acetylcholine and related substances on the isolated muscle spindle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Nov-Dec;53:276–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SWETT J. E., ELDRED E. Relation between spinal level and peripheral location of afferents in calf muscles of the cat. Am J Physiol. 1959 Apr;196(4):819–823. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.196.4.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VERHEY B. A., VOORHOEVE P. E. ACTIVATION OF GROUP IA AND GROUP II MUSCLE SPINDLE AFFERENTS BY SUCCINYLCHOLINE AND OTHER CHOLINERGIC DRUGS. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1963 Apr;12:23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES