Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Oct 28;28(1):562–573. doi: 10.1111/dom.70230

Adipocyte-specific deletion of the mineralocorticoid receptor improves glucose homeostasis and associates with FGF21-adiponectin signaling in obese male mice

Meghan Blair Turner 1, Helen-Rose Pangilinan 1, Sehyung Park 2, Botshelo Angoma 1, Robert N Helsley 2, Analia S Loria 1
PMCID: PMC13573306  NIHMSID: NIHMS2205209  PMID: 41153082

Abstract

Aims

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a ubiquitous nuclear receptor that is increased during obesity. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) is a hepatokine that enhances glucose metabolism by binding and activating fibroblast growth factor receptors in complex with the beta-klotho co-receptor (β-klotho). This study tested the hypothesis that adipocyte MR contributes to the development of glucose intolerance in obesity settings by impairing FGF-21-mediated glucose handling in adipose tissue.

Materials and Methods

An adipocyte-specific inducible MR knockout (AdipoMRwKO) mouse model was generated to investigate metabolic effects during obesity. Tamoxifen-induced MR deletion was performed in 14-week-old male and female mice after 9 weeks on high fat diet (HFD). MR floxed (AdipoMRfl) mice served as control littermates. Body weight, body composition, oral glucose tolerance, insulin tolerance, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), and adipokines were measured 4 weeks post-treatment.

Results

Body weight and composition were not significantly different before or after MR deletion in mice of either sex. In HFD-fed male AdipoMRKO mice, glucose tolerance and HOMA-IR were improved, while insulin sensitizing genes including β-klotho were increased in perigonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) compared with AdipoMRfl mice. Notably, adipocyte MR deletion increased plasma FGF-21, which was associated with increased FGF-21 and adiponectin protein expression in gWAT. Conversely, MR deletion in HFD-fed female mice did not influence body adiposity, glucose homeostasis, or gWAT gene expression.

Conclusions

Deletion of the adipocyte MR activates the FGF-21/β-klotho/adiponectin axis in obese male mice only. Thus, these data indicate that dysfunctional FGF-21/β-klotho/adiponectin axis is associated with impaired glucose handling in a sex-specific manner.

Keywords: Mineralocorticoid receptor, glucose homeostasis, adipocyte, sex differences

Introduction

Obesity is a rapidly rising global health epidemic that decreases longevity and quality of life1. Clinically, obesity is defined by a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2, however metabolically unhealthy obesity is characterized by visceral fat expansion, chronic low-grade inflammation, and impaired glucose homeostasis2,3. Increased waist circumference is an indicator of abdominal obesity, associated with a higher risk of metabolic syndrome. In mice, perigonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) represents a predominant visceral fat depot that expands rapidly in diet-induced obesity, providing a translational model to investigate the mechanisms underpinning this process4,5.

Adipose tissue has increasingly been recognized not only as an energy storage depot but also as a dynamic endocrine organ central to the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism6-8. Adipocytes expand and increase in number in response to overnutrition. Adipose tissue responds to metabolic demands by releasing stored lipids (e.g. free fatty acids) used as fuel during periods of starvation9, and secreting hormones known as adipokines, which target central and peripheral tissues11. In addition to mature adipocytes, which serve to store lipids in large intracellular droplets, adipose tissue is composed of other cell types, including preadipocytes and immune cells, all contributing to the process of adipose tissue remodeling to adapt to the increasing metabolic demands 6. Although adipose tissue accounts for approximately 10-20% of systemic glucose handling, fat expansion is speculated to be a driving factor in the development of insulin resistance10.

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a ubiquitous nuclear receptor particularly increased in the visceral adipose tissue of obese patients12,13. Though classically known for its role in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis in the kidney, the adipocyte MR has gained attention in recent years as a regulator of metabolic and endocrine functions, and mineralocorticoid antagonists are popular in the treatment of obesity-related comorbidities such as resistant hypertension14,15. Upon binding to mineralocorticoids (i.e. aldosterone) or glucocorticoids (i.e. cortisol), MRs translocate to the nucleus and act as a transcriptional regulator of target genes by binding to hormone response elements upstream of gene promoters16. Several studies have demonstrated that MR activation is required for the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes and is necessary for the intracellular accumulation of lipids17,18. Pharmacological blockade of the MR has been shown to improve glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in rodent models of diet-induced obesity17,19. Conversely, in genetic models where MR is overexpressed in adipose tissue, fasting insulin and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) are worsened12. Moreover, adipocyte MR modulates the secretion of adipokines such as adiponectin and leptin, key endocrine mediators of appetite and glucose homeostasis via central and peripheral mechanisms20.

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21), a hepatokine secreted by the liver under fasting conditions, has also been shown to improve glucose tolerance in the obese state and is being investigated as a clinical target in obesity and metabolic syndrome21. FGF-21 acts on the adipocyte via FGF-21 receptor 1 and its obligate co-receptor, β-klotho22, leading to both acute and sustained insulin-sensitizing effects in insulin-resistant ob/ob and diet-induced obese (DIO) rodent models23. These effects are attributed to both reduced hepatic glucose output and increased adipocyte glucose uptake23. When insulin binds the insulin receptor (Insr), insulin receptor substrate 1 (Irs1) is phosphorylated, leading to the translocation of glucose transporters such as glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) to the cytosolic membrane, allowing the import of glucose24,25. β-klotho has been shown to impair the regulation of insulin-induced Glut4 expression and translocation, as well as the insulin signaling cascade26, and is known to be downregulated during HFD feeding27.

Mechanistic studies investigating the role of MR in adipocyte metabolic homeostasis in settings of obesity and metabolic syndrome are limited. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that the adipocyte MR contributes to the development of glucose intolerance in the obese state by impairing FGF-21-induced glucose transport expression. We developed an adipocyte-specific MR knockout model (AdipoMRKO), where male and female mice were subjected to DIO and then treated with tamoxifen to assess the role of adipocyte MR on body weight, body composition, adipose tissue-derived FGF-21, leptin and adiponectin levels, as well as glucose homeostasis and HOMA-IR.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The study, which followed ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines and those of the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, was approved and monitored by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Kentucky. Adipocyte-specific inducible MR knockout mice were generated using a cre-lox system, by crossing mice with floxed MR locus on a C57bl/6 background (Nr3c2fl/fl; generously provided by Pierre Chambon, Institute of Genetics, Molecular and Cellular Biology (GIE-CERB), Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France). with mice expressing the inducible Cre-recombinase under the adiponectin (Adipoq) promoter (C57BL/6-Tg(Adipoq-cre/ERT2)1Soff/J, Stock No: 025124, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbour, ME). Male and female Nr3c2fl/fl AdipoqCre/+ (AdipoMRKO) were generated for this study, and Nr3c2fl/fl Adipoq+/+(AdipoMRfl) littermates served as controls. Genotypes were determined using real-time PCR with specific probes designed and validated for each gene (Transnetyx, Inc., Cordova, TN).

Experimental design

Mice were weaned to normal rodent chow on postnatal day 21 (Teklad 2918, Inotiv, Madison, WI) and switched to high fat diet (HFD; D12492, 60% Kcal from fat, Research Diets Inc, New Brunswick, NJ) at five weeks of age. Beginning at four weeks of age for a total of 9 weeks, body weight was recorded weekly. Body composition was measured using Echo Magnetic Resonance Imagining (Echo-MRI; Echo Medical System, Houston, TX) at 6, 10, 14, 16, and 18 weeks of age. At week 14, tamoxifen was administered daily for five consecutive days in all groups (Sigma T5648, 40 mg/kg in corn oil, i.p. injection) to activate adipocyte iCre, inducing deletion of the MR gene, Nr3c2. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed before and after MR deletion, at weeks 14 and 18. In a subset of mice, an insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed at week 18. After a 3-day recovery from the last OGTT/ITT, mice were fasted overnight and euthanized via cardiac exsanguination under anesthesia (ketamine/xylazine 100/10 mg/kg I.P. injection). Whole blood was collected in EDTA and stored briefly on ice, and plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 RPM for 10 minutes at 4°C. Plasma, liver, kidney and adipose tissue were collected and either flash-frozen and stored at −80°C.

PCR for MR genomic DNA

DNA was extracted from gWAT, liver and kidney (AS1610, Promega Maxwell® RSC Tissue Minikit) for determination of tissue-specific gene excision. 20 ng of DNA was amplified with forward and reverse primers surrounding the floxed region of MR, and an additional reverse primer within the floxed region: 5’-CCACTTGTATCGGCAATACAGTTTAGTGTC-3’; 5’CACATTGCATGGGGACAACTGACTTC-3’; 5’-CTGTGATGCGCTCGGAAACGG-3’. The products were separated using gel electrophoresis (2% agarose gel) and compared against a standard ladder (N0559S, New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts).

Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and mature adipocyte (MAT) isolation

Stromal vascular cells were isolated by collagenase digestion using at least 1 gram of adipose tissue from each mouse as previously reported28. After 3 washes with PBS, the MAT supernatant was separated from the pellet (SVF) and both were flash-frozen and stored at −80°C for the subsequent RNA isolation.

Metabolic testing

OGTT was performed after 15-hour overnight fast by administration of oral glucose gavage (2g/kg) as previously reported29. Blood glucose was measured by tail nick prior to gavage, then 15-, 30-, 60-, and 120-minutes post-gavage using Accu-check Aviva Plus glucometer and test strips (Roche diagnostics). HOMA-IR was calculated in the fasting state using the following formula: insulin (μIU/mL) x glucose (mmol/mL)/22.530,31. ITT was performed after 6-hour fast during the light phase by intraperitoneal injection of insulin (Humalin-R, Eli-Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 0.1 U/kg). The area under the curve (AUC) for OGTT and ITT was calculated via the trapezoidal method.

Plasma and explant measurements

Plasma aldosterone, leptin, FGF-21, insulin, and adiponectin were measured via commercial ELISA kits (Cayman cat # 501090, Cayman cat #10007609, Bio-techne cat # MF2100, Crystal Chem cat # 900808, Bio-techne cat# MRP300, respectively) following the manufacturer’s specifications. For tissue explants, ~100 mg of gWAT tissue was incubated in 100 μL, or ~40mg of liver was incubated in 200 μL DMEM+2% FFA-free BSA, in a sterile incubator for 1 hour at 37°C. The explant media was flash frozen and stored at −80°C before used to perform ELISAs. Values were normalized per mg of tissue.

qRT-PCR

RNA was extracted using the Aurum Total RNA Mini Kit (BioRad laboratories, Hercules, CA, #7326820). 1 ug of RNA was converted to cDNA using iScript gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad #1725035). qRT-PCR was performed by amplifying cDNA for 40 cycles using either iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad #1725121) or 2x TaqMan Advanced Fast Master Mix (Applied Biosystems™ 4444557). Validation of MR deletion was confirmed via SYBR Green PCR assays using primers as follows: 18s, 5’-AGTCGGCATCGTTTATGGTC-3’, 5’-CGAAGCATTTGCCAAGAAT-3’; Nr3c2, 5’-GAAGAGCCCCTCTGTTTGCAG-3’, 5’-TCCTTGAGTGATGGGACTGTG-3’. Additional gene expression was measured using the following TaqMan assays: HpRT (housekeeper), Mm030024075_m1; Insulin receptor substrate 1 (Irs1), Mm01278327_m1; Insulin receptor (InsR), Mm01211875_m1; Glucose transporter 4 (Glut4), Mm00436615_m1; β-klotho (Klb), Mm00473122_m1; Leptin (Lep), Mm00434759_m1; Adiponectin (Adipoq), Mm04933656; Fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21), Mm07297622_g1; Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Pparg), Mm00440940_m1, Phosphoenolpyruvate caboxykinase (Pck1), Mm01247058_m1; and Glucose-6-Phosphatase (G6pc), Mm04207416_m1.

Statistical analysis

Body weight and body composition at each time point was analyzed by a 2-way RM ANOVA. At the endpoint, differences due to genotype were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test for each sex using a threshold of p = 0.05. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. Gene expression was compared using ΔΔCT2 and analyzed using Student’s unpaired t test. Correlations were analyzed using the F-test and the F-statistic is reported at a threshold of p=0.05. Number of mice per group, and the report of excluded mice showing a mean >2xSD from the group are reported in supplementary table 1. Data from mice that died after the tamoxifen treatment was removed from the study.

Results

Deletion of MR is adipose tissue-specific in male and female mice fed a HFD.

Deletion of MR from genomic DNA was confirmed using a three-primer system, in which the forward primer corresponds to a DNA region directly upstream of the first loxP site, the first reverse primer is located within the floxed region, and the second reverse primer is located directly downstream of the second loxP site. Using this design, the intact MR gene was amplified by the forward and first reverse primer during PCR and yielded a product ~350 base pairs in length. The non-functional MR gene was amplified by the forward and second reverse primer, yielding a product of ~400 base pairs (Figure 1A). When the PCR products from adipose tissue, kidney and liver of AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice were run through gel electrophoresis, the 400 base pair excised-gene band was only present in adipose tissue of AdipoMRKO mice for both males and females (Figure 1B). Despite MR expression in whole adipose tissue (gWAT) was greater in females compared to males (Supplementary Fig. 1), the deletion reduced MR expression in both sexes, mRNA expression of the MR gene is reduced by approximately 75% in male AdipoMRKO adipose tissue (gWAT) compared to AdipoMRfl (Figure 1C) and approximately 85% in females (Figure 1D), while gene expression in liver and renal cortex was similar between groups.

Figure 1: The MR is deleted in a tissue-specific manner in both male and female obese AdipoMRKO mice and does not affect body weight or body composition:

Figure 1:

A) Schematic diagram of the primer locations used to verify that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) deletion is occurring. In cells expressing MR, the forward primer and reverse 1 primer will produce a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of ~350 base pairs (bp); B) In mature adipocytes in which exons 5 and 6 of the MR gene have been excised, the forward primer and reverse 2 primer will produce a PCR product of ~400 bp; Agarose gel of PCR products from adipose tissue, liver and kidney AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO male and female mice. In HFD-fed male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, C) mRNA expression of MR in adipose tissue, liver and kidney, and plasma aldosterone. In HFD-fed female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, D) mRNA expression of MR in adipose tissue, liver and kidney, and plasma aldosterone. Weekly body weight across the duration of the study, percentage of fat mass and lean mass of E) male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice and f) female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice. Results are expressed as means ± SEM and were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. n = 5-10 animals/group. Each timepoint was analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test and was found insignificant at a threshold of p = 0.05.

AdipoMRfl=mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) floxed mice; AdipoMRKO= MR knock out mice.

In a subset of mice, we determined the cell type-specific MR deletion. MR mRNA expression in SVF was similar between AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO; however, reduced MR mRNA expression was found only in the MAT fraction from AdipoMRKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). Additionally, we verified that MR deletion did not affect circulating aldosterone levels (Figure 1C-D).

Deletion of the adipocyte MR does not affect body weight or body composition of mice fed a HFD.

Weekly body weights and the percentage of fat and lean mass were not different between genotypes across the duration of the study for male (Figure 1E) or female (Figure 1F) mice. As expected, body weight and percent fat mass slightly decreased in all mice following tamoxifen administration; however, body composition recovery was achieved before the end of the study. At the end of the study, there were no differences in the masses of liver, kidney or various fat depots, including gWAT, subcutaneous (scWAT), perirenal (prWAT), and brown adipose tissue (BAT) between AdipoMRKO and AdipoMRfl groups in the tissues collected at the endpoint (Supplementary table 2).

Glucose homeostasis is improved only in male AdipoMRKO male mice fed a HFD.

Before MR deletion, OGTT was similar between Adipoq+/+ and AdipoqCre/+ mice fed a HFD for both male (Figure 2A&B) and female mice (Figure 2D&E). Four weeks after the deletion, OGTT was improved in AdipoMRKO male mice compared to AdipoMRfl mice. The AUC calculated from the OGTT was reduced in AdipoMRKO male mice (Figure 2B). Furthermore, the change in AUC before and after MR deletion was significantly reduced in AdipoMRKO male mice compared to controls (Figure 2C). Unlike males, AUC for OGTT, HOMA-IR were similar between female AdipoMRKO and AdipoMRfl mice (Figure 2D-F). Fasting blood glucose was not influenced by MR deletion in either sex (Figure 2A&2D, inset).

Figure 2: Glucose tolerance is improved in male AdipoMRKO mice fed a HFD, but not in females:

Figure 2:

In HFD-fed male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, A) blood glucose after challenge with an oral gavage of glucose (OGTT) prior to MR deletion at 14 weeks of age and after deletion at 18 weeks, and B) accompanying area under the curve (AUC) calculated from glucose levels over 120 minutes. C) Change in AUC from 14 weeks to 18 week of age. In HFD-fed female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, D) blood glucose during OGTT before and after MR deletion, and E) accompanying AUC. F) Change in AUC from 14 weeks of age to 18 week of age. Male and female fasting blood glucose in inset A) and D), respectively. Results are expressed as means ± SEM and were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. n = 5-10 animals/group, α= 0.05.

AdipoMRfl=mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) floxed mice; AdipoMRKO= MR knock out mice.

Fasting insulin was decreased in male AdipoMRKO mice (Figure 3A), which drives an improvement in HOMA-IR, a measure of insulin sensitivity (Figure 3B). However, direct insulin sensitivity measured by ITT was not different (Figure 3C). In addition, we found that the liver expression of gluconeogenic genes, Pck1 and G6pc, was similar between AdipoMRKO and AdipoMRfl mice (Supplementary Table 3). Nevertheless, the metabolic improvement displayed by AdipoMRKO male mice was accompanied by the upregulation of genes related to insulin-mediated glucose handling in gWAT, including Irs1, Glut4, and InsR., as well as Klb (Figure 3D).

Figure 3. Insulin homeostasis is improved in male AdipoMRKO mice fed HFD:

Figure 3.

In HFD-fed male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, A) plasma insulin, B) Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) index, and C) blood glucose during insulin tolerance test (ITT) and area under the curve (AUC, inset). D) Expression of Insulin receptor (InsR), Insulin receptor substrate 1 (Irs1), Glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) and β-klotho (Klb) in gWAT. In HFD-fed female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, E) Plasma insulin, f) HOMA-IR, and g) blood glucose during ITT and AUC inset. F) InsR, Irs1, Glut4 and Klb expression in gWAT. Plasma results are visualized on a violin plot with the median represented by solid black bar and interquartile range indicated by dashed lines within the violin and were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. n = 5-12 animals/group.

AdipoMRfl=mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) floxed mice; AdipoMRKO= MR knock out mice.

Unlike male mice, deletion of adipocyte MR did not influence insulin levels or gWAT gene expression in female mice (Figure 3E-H).

Plasma FGF-21 is increased in male mice fed a HFD with adipocyte MR deletion.

Male AdipoMRKO mice showed increased circulating levels of plasma FGF-21 (Figure 4A), while plasma adipokines implicated in the FGF-21 signaling pathway, adiponectin and leptin, were not different from AdipoMRfl mice (Figure 4B and 4C, respectively). Notably, the positive correlation between gWAT mass and circulating levels of FGF-21, typically reported clinically in obesity and metabolic disease, was overturned by adipocyte MR deletion (Figure 4D).

Figure 4. Deletion of adipocyte MR increases plasma FGF-21 and inverts the correlation between FGF-21 and gWAT only in male mice:

Figure 4.

In HFD-fed male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, A) Plasma levels of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21), B) adiponectin and C) leptin, and D) correlation between plasma FGF-21 and gWAT mass. In HFD-fed female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice E) Plasma levels FGF-21, F) adiponectin and G) leptin in female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, and H) correlation between plasma FGF-21 and gWAT mass in female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice. Results are visualized on a violin plot with the median represented by solid black bar and interquartile range indicated by dashed lines within the violin and were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. n = 6-12 animals/group. For B) and D), correlation significance was determined using F-test and are expressed as the F-statistics.

AdipoMRfl=mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) floxed mice; AdipoMRKO= MR knock out mice.

Conversely, female AdipoMRKO and AdipoMRfl mice showed similar plasma FGF-21, adiponectin, and leptin, and deletion of the adipocyte MR did not improve the relationship between plasma FGF-21 and gWAT mass (Figure 4E-H).

Deletion of the adipocyte MR is associated with local activation of the FGF-21-Adiponectin axis in adipose tissue of male mice fed HFD

To determine the source of increased circulating FGF-21 levels, we measured the contributions from liver and gWAT. In male AdipoMRKO mice, FGF-21 in liver explant media was not statistically different from AdipoMRfl (Figure 5A); however, MR deletion increased gWAT FGF-21 and adiponectin, but not leptin, in explant media compared to tissues with intact adipocyte MR (Figure 5B-D). Accordingly, MR deletion also increased the gene expression of Fgf21 and Adipoq, but not Lep, in gWAT (Supplementary Table 2).

Figure 5. Deletion of adipocyte MR activates the local FGF-21-adiponectin axis in adipose tissue:

Figure 5.

In HFD-fed male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, A) Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) from liver tissue explants, B) FGF-21 from gWAT tissue explants, C) leptin from gWAT tissue explants, and D) adiponectin from gWAT tissue explants. In HFD-fed female AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, E) FGF-21 from liver tissue explants, F) FGF-21 from gWAT tissue explants, G) leptin from gWAT tissue explants, and H) adiponectin from gWAT tissue explants. Results are visualized on a violin plot with the median represented by solid black bar and interquartile range indicated by dashed lines within the violin and were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. n = 4-12 animals/group.

AdipoMRfl=mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) floxed mice; AdipoMRKO= MR knock out mice.

Once again in female mice, deletion of adipocyte MR did not influence the levels of liver- or gWAT-derived FGF-21 and adiponectin production (Figure 5E-H and Table S2).

Discussion

This study is the first to show that adipocyte-specific deletion of the MR can improve glucose homeostasis in a sex-specific manner, independent of changes in fat mass. Male mice fed a HFD displayed improved glucose homeostasis associated with the activation of the FGF-21-adiponectin axis in adipose tissue. In addition, adipocyte-specific MR deletion reduced fasting insulin and HOMA-IR, as well as upregulated the insulin receptor, insulin substrate receptor, glucose transporter 4, and β-klotho, a co-receptor required for functional FGF-21 signaling. Furthermore, mice undergoing MR deletion displayed increased gWAT-derived FGF-21 and adiponectin, which could play an important role in mediating the local insulin-sensitizing actions of FGF-21. Notably, these metabolic improvements in AdipoMRKO mice were present in male counterparts only. This data suggest that adipocyte MR deletion contributes to metabolic improvements in a sex-specific manner.

In the obese state, FGF-21 has actions in the liver and pancreas but does not affect insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle. In the liver, FGF-21 improves glucose handling similarly to the fat, in addition to improving insulin clearance, which could be a critical factor to reduce plasma insulin levels35,36. In the pancreas, FGF-21 can induce insulin secretion in the diabetic primary islet cells, but this effect is not observed in healthy cells37. Though FGF-21 is responsible for improvements in metabolic function and inflammation, including enhanced insulin signaling and lipolysis, it is paradoxically increased in obesity23,32. This has led to the controversial hypothesis of obesity as an FGF-21-resistant state32-34. However, in addition to further increased FGF-21, our male AdipoMRKO mice displayed increased expression of β-klotho. Accordingly, MR deletion in obesity settings abrogated the positive correlation between FGF-21 and adiposity displayed by AdipoMRfl mice. This data supports the idea that adipocyte MR deletion promotes beneficial metabolic actions that could be mediated by FGF-21.

Hyperleptinemia mediates central nervous system-dependent production of liver FGF-2138,39, which has been shown to stimulate the production of adiponectin, a metabolically protective adipokine. Adiponectin improves insulin sensitivity through reduced inflammation, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, reactive oxygen species generation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) activation40-42. Studies have demonstrated that adiponectin is a key regulator of the insulin-sensitizing actions of FGF-2140,43. In our model, both FGF-21 and adiponectin were increased in the media explant from gWAT, but not in circulation, indicating an autocrine/paracrine effect on glucose handling limited to the adipose tissue. Remarkably, as we did not find reduced gluconeogenic gene expression in the liver, decreased fasting insulin without differences in ITT after MR deletion suggests that increases in FGF-21 displayed by mice with adipocyte MR deletion could affect insulin homeostasis in other tissues.

Of note, metabolic improvements associated with adipocyte MR deletion were absent in female mice. In fact, glucose tolerance and HOMA-IR in female mice, regardless of genotype, were closer to the AdipoMRKO male mice than AdipoMRfl male mice. This could be taken as an indication that female mice did not develop as severe of a metabolic syndrome-like phenotype as male mice; however, this study did not utilize low-fat diet controls, which would allow to determine the extent of metabolic improvement in each sex. It is known that female rodents have an inherent resistance to diet-induced obesity, including lower insulin resistance44. Thus, female mice might require a longer exposure to HFD in order to develop a distinct metabolic phenotype that could be corrected by deletion of the adipocyte MR.

Plasma levels of aldosterone were not affected by MR deletion, confirming that our mice did not develop any compensatory responses to the genetic manipulation that could affect the outcomes of the study. Overactivation of MR by aldosterone in cells other than the adipocyte has the potential to confound studies of obesity, a complex systemic disease. For example, aldosterone mediates water and electrolyte homeostasis in the kidneys, inducing hypertension45. MR activation in immune cells can potentiate chronic systemic inflammation present in the obese state and exacerbate hypertension and cardiovascular disease 46,47. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that increases in aldosterone are not a confounding variable in our model.

Previous studies have investigated the effects of adipocyte MR deletion on body composition and glucose handling, reporting only outcomes in male mice 48,49. A study by Feraco et al. 48 used an MR flox mouse line generated by Dr. Berger 50, in which exon 3 of the Nr3c2 gene is floxed, as opposed to exons 5 and 6 in the genetic mouse model used in our study 51. This flox was crossed with the Offerman Adipocre mouse line 52, whereas our study used the Rosen Adipocre. Additionally, Ferguson et al.49 reported the outcomes of an adipocyte-specific MR knockout, also using the Berger MR flox; however, this line was crossed with the same Adipocre model used in our study. While all of these genetic lines are generated on a C57bl/6J background, genetic drift and founder effects have the potential to impact phenotypic outcomes between studies.

Perhaps of greater significance, in both of these previous studies, tamoxifen treatment was administered in young mice between 6-8 weeks of age, prior to HFD exposure, whereas our study was designed to investigate the effects of MR deletion in mature adult mice already exhibiting metabolic dysfunction. Therefore, we administered tamoxifen using similar dosing procedures in mice undergoing a chronic HFD feeding. Additionally, both the Feraco and Ferguson studies used diets with ~45% kcal from fat, while our study utilized a more aggressive model of diet-induced obesity using a 60% kcal/fat diet. Studies of metabolic disturbances in diet-induced obesity frequently use the 60% HFD to rapidly progress the onset of weight gain and metabolic dysfunction in order to model a more progressed disease state in a more efficient timeframe53. Therefore, the magnitude of metabolic disease achieved in 13-16 weeks of 60% HFD feeding will greater than in mice fed 45% HFD54. The lower fat content of the diets used in previous studies may contribute to the lack of noticeable effects in glucose-handling. Additionally, deletion of the adipocyte MR in 6-8-week-old mice represents a different physiological context both at the age of deletion (prior to diet-induced obesity), and at the age of metabolic assessment (several months after the intervention). One potential explanation for the outcomes we report in our study could be that deleting the gene during a state of metabolic dysfunction can benefit glucose homeostasis, whereas deleting the gene prior to the onset of obesity does not prevent the development of glucose intolerance. Further, Feraco et al found that the AdipoMRKO mice had a blunted adipogenic response to HFD feeding, however in our model, body weight and body composition were not different between groups during the 4 weeks post-deletion. Of note, tamoxifen treatment significantly decreased body weight in all experimental animals during the first two weeks; however, mice recovered from their weight loss at the end-point of the study, not showing differences between genotypes. Whether feeding AdipoMRKO mice a HFD for a longer period of time may reduce body adiposity could be further investigated. However, these studies would require additional validation showing that deletion of the adipocyte MR persists for longer periods of time in obese adult mice. Because the cre line we used is specific to the mature adipocyte, and because obesity induces increased adipocyte differentiation from preadipocytes55, we speculate that a longer period of time on HFD after deletion may increase the proportion of MR-expressing adipocytes in the tissue.

Of note, our study is the first to report differences in glucose homeostasis not previously observed in male mice, though methods of assessment were unique between all three studies. Feraco et al. and Ferguson et al. assessed glucose tolerance by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of glucose, and in one case after only 4 hours of fasting49, whereas our mice were challenged with an oral gavage of glucose after overnight fasting. The present study utilized overnight fasting, a more severe fast which induces a catabolic state and depletes glycogen stores. While overnight fasting is widely used in metabolic testing, more recent guidelines recommend shorter fasting periods between 2-4 hours to prevent weight loss and impaired counterregulatory response56,57. Additionally, oral administration of glucose provides a more physiologically-relevant assessment of glucose tolerance, as IP injection bypasses the enteroendocrine regulation of incretin hormones, including GLP-1, ghrelin and gastrin, which play important roles in glucose homeostasis58. Additionally, the Feraco and Ferguson studies used a lower dose of glucose to challenge their mice, 1g/kg compared to the 2g/kg used in the current study. It is also documented that administration of tamoxifen itself is can influence glucose tolerance in a sex- and strain-specific manner59. In our hands, we observed an overall effect of tamoxifen improving glucose tolerance in female mice, which was unaffected by genotype, as shown by delta AUC. Male AdipoMRfl mice also demonstrated a modest reduction in glucose tolerance after tamoxifen treatment, however only the AdipoMRKO male mice experienced significant improvements. In this sense, it is worth considering that while total AUC in OGTT highlights overall differences in glucose handling, this significance is lost when baseline glucose is accounted for in the calculation of AUC, referred to as integrated AUC (iAUC). The lack of difference in iAUC between obese male AdipoMRfl and AdipoMRKO mice, while total AUC remains significant, alludes to the subtlety of the differences in glucose tolerance in our model. While MR antagonism is known to improve glucose tolerance60,61; our findings suggest that systemic MR antagonism, and possibly off-target receptor effects also contribute to this regulation.

In conclusion, our data indicate that adipocyte MR deletion could facilitate the upregulation of FGF-21/β-klotho/adiponectin axis, contributing to increase the expression of insulin sensitizing genes expression in adipose tissue, and improving glucose homeostasis in male mice fed a HFD. Thus, we have identified a potential sex-specific MR-dependent pathway contributing with the worsening of metabolic function in setting of obesity.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Pierre Chambon for generously providing the MR floxed mouse line, as well as Dr. Hong Lu for providing technical support for the tamoxifen administration and Mark Ensor for technical support with DNA work.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by the Center of Research in Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease COBRE (P20 GM103527), the National Institutes of Health-NHLBI (R01 HL135158 to ASL), the UK Energy Balance and Body Composition core facility (RRID:SCR 018825), the National Institute Of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (R01DK139147; K01DK128022 to RNH) and the American Heart Association (23CDA1051959 to RNH).

Footnotes

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Global Buden Disease Collaborators. Global Burden of 88 Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2162–2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Longo M, Zatterale F, Naderi J, et al. Adipose Tissue Dysfunction as Determinant of Obesity-Associated Metabolic Complications. Int J Mol Sci. May 13 2019;20(9)doi: 10.3390/ijms20092358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. Jul 2016;22 Suppl 3:1–203. doi: 10.4158/ep161365.Gl [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bushita H, Ozato N, Mori K, et al. Effect of visceral fat on onset of metabolic syndrome. Sci Rep. May 30 2025;15(1):19012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01389-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sam S, Haffner S, Davidson MH, et al. Hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype predicts increased visceral fat in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. Oct 2009;32(10):1916–20. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coelho M, Oliveira T, Fernandes R. Biochemistry of adipose tissue: an endocrine organ. Arch Med Sci. Apr 20 2013;9(2):191–200. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.33181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scherer PE. Adipose tissue: from lipid storage compartment to endocrine organ. Diabetes. Jun 2006;55(6):1537–45. doi: 10.2337/db06-0263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kershaw EE, Flier JS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 2004;89(6):2548–56. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hirsch J, Fried SK, Edens NK, Leibel RL. The Fat Cell. Medical Clinics of North America. 1989/January/01/1989;73(1):83–96. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30693-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iozzo P. Viewpoints on the way to the consensus session: where does insulin resistance start? The adipose tissue. Diabetes Care. Nov 2009;32 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S168–73. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farkhondeh T, Llorens S, Pourbagher-Shahri AM, et al. An Overview of the Role of Adipokines in Cardiometabolic Diseases. Molecules. Nov 9 2020;25(21)doi: 10.3390/molecules25215218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Urbanet R, Nguyen Dinh Cat A, Feraco A, et al. Adipocyte Mineralocorticoid Receptor Activation Leads to Metabolic Syndrome and Induction of Prostaglandin D2 Synthase. Hypertension. 2015;66(1):149–157. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.04981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirata A, Maeda N, Nakatsuji H, et al. Contribution of glucocorticoid–mineralocorticoid receptor pathway on the obesity-related adipocyte dysfunction. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2012;419(2):182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bakris G, Yang YF, Pitt B. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Hypertension Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: BLOCK-CKD Trial. Hypertension. Jul 2020;76(1):144–149. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yugar-Toledo JC, Modolo R, de Faria AP, Moreno H. Managing resistant hypertension: focus on mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017;13:403–411. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gomez-Sanchez E, Gomez-Sanchez CE. The multifaceted mineralocorticoid receptor. Comprehensive Physiology. 2014;4(3):965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hirata A, Maeda N, Hiuge A, et al. Blockade of mineralocorticoid receptor reverses adipocyte dysfunction and insulin resistance in obese mice. Cardiovasc Res. Oct 1 2009;84(1):164–72. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoppmann J, Perwitz N, Meier B, et al. The balance between gluco- and mineralo-corticoid action critically determines inflammatory adipocyte responses. Journal of Endocrinology. 01 Feb. 2010 2010;204(2):153–164. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wada T, Kenmochi H, Miyashita Y, et al. Spironolactone improves glucose and lipid metabolism by ameliorating hepatic steatosis and inflammation and suppressing enhanced gluconeogenesis induced by high-fat and high-fructose diet. Endocrinology. May 2010;151(5):2040–9. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guo C, Ricchiuti V, Lian BQ, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade reverses obesity-related changes in expression of adiponectin, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, and proinflammatory adipokines. Circulation. Apr 29 2008;117(17):2253–61. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.748640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.BonDurant LD, Ameka M, Naber MC, et al. FGF21 Regulates Metabolism Through Adipose-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. Cell Metab. Apr 4 2017;25(4):935–944.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kilkenny DM, Rocheleau JV. Chapter Two - The FGF21 Receptor Signaling Complex: Klothoβ, FGFR1c, and Other Regulatory Interactions. In: Litwack G, ed. Vitamins & Hormones. Academic Press; 2016:17–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu J, Stanislaus S, Chinookoswong N, et al. Acute glucose-lowering and insulin-sensitizing action of FGF21 in insulin-resistant mouse models--association with liver and adipose tissue effects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. Nov 2009;297(5):E1105–14. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00348.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kovacs P, Hanson RL, Lee Y-H, et al. The Role of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Gene (IRS1) in Type 2 Diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes. 2003;52(12):3005–3009. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.12.3005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leto D, Saltiel AR. Regulation of glucose transport by insulin: traffic control of GLUT4. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2012/June/01 2012;13(6):383–396. doi: 10.1038/nrm3351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hasannejad M, Samsamshariat SZ, Esmaili A, Jahanian-Najafabadi A. Klotho induces insulin resistance possibly through interference with GLUT4 translocation and activation of Akt, GSK3β, and PFKfβ3 in 3T3-L1 adipocyte cells. Res Pharm Sci. Aug 2019;14(4):369–377. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.263627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Markan KR, Naber MC, Small SM, Peltekian L, Kessler RL, Potthoff MJ. FGF21 resistance is not mediated by downregulation of beta-klotho expression in white adipose tissue. Mol Metab. Jun 2017;6(6):602–610. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leachman JR, Cincinelli C, Ahmed N, et al. Early life stress exacerbates obesity in adult female mice via mineralocorticoid receptor-dependent increases in adipocyte triglyceride and glycerol content. Life Sci. Sep 1 2022;304:120718. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murphy MO, Herald JB, Leachman J, Villasante Tezanos A, Cohn DM, Loria AS. A model of neglect during postnatal life heightens obesity-induced hypertension and is linked to a greater metabolic compromise in female mice. International Journal of Obesity. 2018;42(7):1354–1365. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0035-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. Jul 1985;28(7):412–9. doi: 10.1007/bf00280883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Knopp JL, Holder-Pearson L, Chase JG. Insulin Units and Conversion Factors: A Story of Truth, Boots, and Faster Half-Truths. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2019;13(3):597–600. doi: 10.1177/1932296818805074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang X, Yeung DC, Karpisek M, et al. Serum FGF21 levels are increased in obesity and are independently associated with the metabolic syndrome in humans. Diabetes. May 2008;57(5):1246–53. doi: 10.2337/db07-1476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fisher FM, Chui PC, Antonellis PJ, et al. Obesity is a fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21)-resistant state. Diabetes. Nov 2010;59(11):2781–9. doi: 10.2337/db10-0193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hale C, Chen MM, Stanislaus S, et al. Lack of Overt FGF21 Resistance in Two Mouse Models of Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Endocrinology. 2012;153(1):69–80. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gong Q, Hu Z, Zhang F, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 improves hepatic insulin sensitivity by inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 in mice. Hepatology. Aug 2016;64(2):425–38. doi: 10.1002/hep.28523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Emanuelli B, Vienberg SG, Smyth G, et al. Interplay between FGF21 and insulin action in the liver regulates metabolism. J Clin Invest. Feb 2014;124(2):515–27. doi: 10.1172/jci67353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singhal G, Fisher fM, Chee MJ, et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Protects against High Fat Diet Induced Inflammation and Islet Hyperplasia in Pancreas. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mazuecos L, Pintado C, Rubio B, Guisantes-Batán E, Andrés A, Gallardo N. Leptin, Acting at Central Level, Increases FGF21 Expression in White Adipose Tissue via PPARβ/δ. Int J Mol Sci. Apr 28 2021;22(9)doi: 10.3390/ijms22094624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Asrih M, Veyrat-Durebex C, Poher AL, Lyautey J, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Jornayvaz FR. Leptin as a Potential Regulator of FGF21. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;38(3):1218–25. doi: 10.1159/000443070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Holland WL, Adams AC, Brozinick JT, et al. An FGF21-adiponectin-ceramide axis controls energy expenditure and insulin action in mice. Cell Metab. May 7 2013;17(5):790–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lin Z, Tian H, Lam KS, et al. Adiponectin mediates the metabolic effects of FGF21 on glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in mice. Cell Metab. May 7 2013;17(5):779–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yanai H, Yoshida H. Beneficial Effects of Adiponectin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Progression: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. Mar 8 2019;20(5)doi: 10.3390/ijms20051190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goetz R. Adiponectin—a mediator of specific metabolic actions of FGF21. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2013/September/01 2013;9(9):506–508. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Varghese M, Griffin C, McKernan K, et al. Sex Differences in Inflammatory Responses to Adipose Tissue Lipolysis in Diet-Induced Obesity. Endocrinology. Feb 1 2019;160(2):293–312. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Scott JH, Menouar MA, Dunn RJ. Physiology, Aldosterone. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van der Heijden C, Bode M, Riksen NP, Wenzel UO. The role of the mineralocorticoid receptor in immune cells in cardiovascular disease. Br J Pharmacol. Jul 2022;179(13):3135–3151. doi: 10.1111/bph.15782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bene NC, Alcaide P, Wortis HH, Jaffe IZ. Mineralocorticoid receptors in immune cells: emerging role in cardiovascular disease. Steroids. Dec 2014;91:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2014.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Feraco A, Armani A, Urbanet R, et al. Minor role of mature adipocyte mineralocorticoid receptor in high-fat diet-induced obesity. Journal of Endocrinology. 2018;239(2):229–240. doi: 10.1530/joe-18-0314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ferguson D, Hutson I, Tycksen E, Pietka TA, Bauerle K, Harris CA. Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Adipogenesis and Obesity in Male Mice. Endocrinology. Feb 1 2020;161(2)doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqz010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Berger S, Wolfer DP, Selbach O, et al. Loss of the limbic mineralocorticoid receptor impairs behavioral plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(1):195–200. doi:doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503878102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McCurley A, Pires PW, Bender SB, et al. Direct regulation of blood pressure by smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptors. Nature Medicine. 2012;18(9):1429–1433. doi: 10.1038/nm.2891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sassmann A, Offermanns S, Wettschureck N. Tamoxifen-inducible Cre-mediated recombination in adipocytes. Genesis. Oct 1 2010;48(10):618–25. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Speakman JR. Use of high-fat diets to study rodent obesity as a model of human obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 2019/August/01 2019;43(8):1491–1492. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0363-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yang Y, Smith DL Jr., Keating KD, Allison DB, Nagy TR. Variations in body weight, food intake and body composition after long-term high-fat diet feeding in C57BL/6J mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). Oct 2014;22(10):2147–55. doi: 10.1002/oby.20811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao J, Zhou A, Qi W. The Potential to Fight Obesity with Adipogenesis Modulating Compounds. Int J Mol Sci. Feb 19 2022;23(4)doi: 10.3390/ijms23042299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moro C, Magnan C. Revisited guidelines for metabolic tolerance tests in mice. Lab Animal. 2025/January/01 2025;54(1):16–23. doi: 10.1038/s41684-024-01473-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ayala JE, Samuel VT, Morton GJ, et al. Standard operating procedures for describing and performing metabolic tests of glucose homeostasis in mice. Dis Model Mech. Sep-Oct 2010;3(9-10):525–34. doi: 10.1242/dmm.006239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Drucker DJ. The role of gut hormones in glucose homeostasis. J Clin Invest. Jan 2007;117(1):24–32. doi: 10.1172/jci30076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ceasrine AM, Ruiz-Otero N, Lin EE, Lumelsky DN, Boehm ED, Kuruvilla R. Tamoxifen Improves Glucose Tolerance in a Delivery-, Sex-, and Strain-Dependent Manner in Mice. Endocrinology. Apr 1 2019;160(4):782–790. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Garg R, Adler GK. Role of mineralocorticoid receptor in insulin resistance. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. Jun 2012;19(3):168–75. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283533955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jia G, Lockette W, Sowers JR. Mineralocorticoid receptors in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and related disorders: from basic studies to clinical disease. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2021;320(3):R276–R286. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00280.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES