Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1966 Feb;182(3):465–483. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007832

The relation between mechanical displacements applied to a cat's pad and the resultant impulse patterns

D R G Fuller, J A B Gray
PMCID: PMC1357482  PMID: 5942998

Abstract

1. A way of determining an approximation to the distribution of impulses resulting from certain mechanical stimuli to a cat's pad is described. In essence this consists of calculating the results from a model of the way in which the impulses are set up.

2. The results of these calculations have been compared with results of experiments of a type different from those on which the calculations were based. Total numbers of impulses have been found by measuring mass action potential areas under appropriate conditions. The ranges of absolute numbers of impulses are similar for both calculated and direct results. The curves relating changes of number to changes of stimulus strength are similar in the two cases as are the effects of changing the position of the stimulus. Similar comparisons using two pulses at different times and distances apart have also been made. The over-all time distribution has been checked by reconstructing mass action potentials from the calculations and comparing these with those observed.

3. The calculations were carried out with values which were chosen in advance and which were based on previous experimental evidence; the results were in reasonable agreement with the experimental checks. It is therefore concluded that the results are a sufficiently good approximation to the neural responses of cats' pads to this type of stimulation to justify applying them in answering the questions posed in the Introduction.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARMETT C. J., HUNSPERGER R. W. Excitation of receptors in the pad of the cat by single and double mechanical pulses. J Physiol. 1961 Sep;158:15–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armett C. J., Gray J. A., Hunsperger R. W., Lal S. The transmission of information in primary receptor neurones and second-order neurones of a phasic system. J Physiol. 1962 Dec;164(3):395–421. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIAMOND J., GRAY J. A., INMAN D. R. The depression of the receptor potential in pacinian corpuscles. J Physiol. 1958 Apr 3;141(1):117–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRAY J. A. B., MALCOLM J. L. The initiation of nerve impulses by mesenteric Pacinian corpuscles. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950;137(886):96–114. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GRAY J. A., SATO M. Properties of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles. J Physiol. 1953 Dec 29;122(3):610–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray J. A., Lal S. Effects of mechanical and thermal stimulation of cats' pads on the excitability of dorsal horn neurones. J Physiol. 1965 Jul;179(1):154–162. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. INMAN D. R., PERUZZI P. The effects of temperature on the responses of Pacinian corpuscles. J Physiol. 1961 Feb;155:280–301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ISHIKO N., LOEWENSTEIN W. R. Effects of temperature on the generator and action potentials of a sense organ. J Gen Physiol. 1961 Sep;45:105–124. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ISHIKO N., LOEWENSTEIN W. R. Spontaneous fluctuations in generator potential in a receptor membrane. Nature. 1959 Jun 20;183(4677):1725–1726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KATZ B. Depolarization of sensory terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle. J Physiol. 1950 Oct 16;111(3-4):261–282. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SATO M., OZEKI M. RESPONSE OF THE NON-MYELINATED NERVE TERMINAL IN PACINIAN CORPUSCLES TO MECHANICAL AND ANTIDROMIC STIMULATION AND THE EFFECT OF PROCAINE, CHOLINE AND COOLING. Jpn J Physiol. 1963 Dec 15;13:564–582. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.13.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WERNER G., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. NEURAL ACTIVITY IN MECHANORECEPTIVE CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS: STIMULUS-RESPONSE RELATIONS, WEBER FUNCTIONS, AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:359–397. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES