Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1966 Mar;183(2):450–468. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007876

Electrical responses of smooth muscle to external stimulation in hypertonic solution

T Tomita
PMCID: PMC1357588  PMID: 5942820

Abstract

1. The electrical responses of single smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig taenia coli to external stimulation were studied in two times hypertonic solution and compared with the responses to intracellular stimulation.

2. Exposure to Krebs solution made two times hypertonic by adding sucrose abolished the mechanical movement and stopped the spontaneous electrical activity. The electrical response to stimulation was essentially similar to that in physiological solution.

3. When the tissue was placed between stimulating electrodes, the cells near the cathode were depolarized and produced spikes, while the cells near the anode were hyperpolarized and produced small spikes only with weak stimuli. The cells near the centre were not polarized but produced spikes with a frequency pattern similar to that near the cathode.

4. When both stimulating electrodes were put close together at one end of the tissue, the intracellularly recorded extrapolar polarization changed its polarity at 1-2 mm distance from the stimulating electrode. When an insulating partition was placed between the stimulating and recording site, the reversed polarity was no longer observed and the electrotonic potential spread decayed roughly exponentially with distance from the stimulating electrode. The time course of the electrotonic potential was similar to that predicted from the cable equation applied to nerve. The space constant was 1·68 ± 0·08 mm (S.E. of mean) and the time constant was 60-100 msec. The cable properties may be explained by assuming that many fibres, connected in series and in parallel, are aggregated as functional units.

5. The strength—duration curve was a simple hyperbola and the chronaxie was about 20 msec. The relation between extracellularly applied current and intracellularly recorded potential showed that membrane resistance decreased with depolarization and slightly increased with hyperpolarization. The spike was propagated in both directions at the same speed as in physiological solution (7·3 ± 0·7 cm/sec).

6. Long anodal current often produced electrical activity of low amplitude which seemed to be due to the spike activity near the cathode, because the same frequency modulation was seen in both activities, and external hyperpolarization reduced the size of the propagated spike. Cessation of a strong and long anodal current was followed by slow depolarization, about 1 sec in duration and up to 10 mV in amplitude, which sometimes triggered a spike.

7. The difference between responses to intracellular and to external stimulation may be explained by assuming that different parts of the cell membrane have different electrical properties. They may be: A, areas of close apposition between cells; B, areas capable of generating the slow component; C, an area capable of producing the spike, but less excitable.

Full text

PDF
450

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARR L. Transmembrane resistance of smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1961 Jun;200:1251–1255. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1961.200.6.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BULBRING E., BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. Excitation and conduction in the smooth muscle of the isolated taenia coli of the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 6;142(3):420–437. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BULBRING E. Changes in configuration of spontaneously discharged spike potentials from smooth muscle of the guinea-pig's taenia coli; the effect of electrotonic currents and of adrenaline, acetylcholine and histamine. J Physiol. 1957 Feb 15;135(2):412–425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BULBRING E. Correlation between membrane potential, spike discharge and tension in smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1955 Apr 28;128(1):200–221. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BULBRING E. Membrane potentials of smooth muscle fibres of the taenia coli of the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1954 Aug 27;125(2):302–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEWEY M. M., BARR L. A STUDY OF THE STRUCTURE AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE NEXUS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Dec;23:553–585. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.3.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dewey M. M., Barr L. Intercellular Connection between Smooth Muscle Cells: the Nexus. Science. 1962 Aug 31;137(3531):670–672. doi: 10.1126/science.137.3531.670-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GILLESPIE J. S. Spontaneous mechanical and electrical activity of stretched and unstretched intestinal smooth muscle cells and their response to sympathetic-nerve stimulation. J Physiol. 1962 Jun;162:54–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOLMAN M. E. Membrane potentials recorded with high-resistance micro-electrodes; and the effects of changes in ionic environment on the electrical and mechanical activity of the smooth muscle of the taenia coli of the guineapig. J Physiol. 1958 May 28;141(3):464–488. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HOWARTH J. V. The behaviour of frog muscle in hypertonic solutions. J Physiol. 1958 Nov 10;144(1):167–175. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KURIYAMA H., TOMITA T. THE RESPONSES OF SINGLE SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS OF GUINEA-PIG TAENIA COLI TO INTRACELLULARLY APPLIED CURRENTS, AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE SPONTANEOUS ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:270–289. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KURIYAMA H. The influence of potassium, sodium and chloride on the membrane potential of the smooth muscle of taenia coli. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:15–28. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NAGAI T., PROSSER C. L. Electrical parameters of smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1963 May;204:915–924. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.204.5.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. NAGAI T., PROSSER C. L. Patterns of conduction in smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1963 May;204:910–914. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.204.5.910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. NOBLE D. The voltage dependence of the cardiac membrane conductance. Biophys J. 1962 Sep;2:381–393. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PROSSER C. L. Conduction in nonstriated muscles. Physiol Rev Suppl. 1962 Jul;5:193–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SPERELAKIS N., TARR M. WEAK ELECTRONIC INTERACTION BETWEEN NEIGHBORING VISCERAL SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS. Am J Physiol. 1965 Apr;208:737–747. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1965.208.4.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WERMAN R., McCANN F. V., GRUNDFEST H. Graded and all-or-none electrogenesis in arthropod muscle. I. The effects of alkali-earth cations on the neuromuscular system of Romalea microptera. J Gen Physiol. 1961 May;44:979–995. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.5.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. YARBUS A. L. Eye movements during the examination of complicated objects. Biofizika. 1961;6(2):52–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES