Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroscience
. 2026 Sep 1;20:1909908. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2026.1909908

Cognitive dysfunction in MASLD is linked to platelet activation

Jiaqin Chen 1, Chi Cheng 1,*, Haiying Wang 1, Tian Yu 2
PMCID: PMC13575992  PMID: 42746166

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is one of the most common systemic diseases causing chronic liver diseases. Current evidence indicates that cognitive-related deficits occur frequently in MASLD, causing significant impacts on patients and their families, and even possibly increasing the economic and psychological burdens on healthcare, productivity, and nursing staff. However, there are currently no effective treatment methods. This article reviews the pathogenesis of cognitive dysfunction in MASLD, finding that platelet activation is elevated. Furthermore, recent studies have found that platelets can send and receive signals to the central nervous system (CNS), serving as an important bridge between the brain and peripheral organs. This article reviews changes in platelets associated with MASLD and investigates the role of platelet activation, with the goal of offering novel approaches for diagnosing and treating cognitive dysfunction in MASLD.

Keywords: central nervous system, cognitive dysfunction, fatty liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, platelet activation

1. Introduction

MASLD is a systemic disorder characterized not only by hepatic manifestations—including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma-but also by extrahepatic complications such as cardiovascular disease and cognitive impairment (Yu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2025; Vataja et al., 2025). Recent studies have established a link between MASLD and cognitive impairment, particlarly in the domains of attention and memory, which substantially reduces patients’ quality of life. Studies have found that platelets play a significant role in MASLD progression, and in this condition, platelets are activated (Ye and Xu, 2026). Evidence suggests that platelets may play an important role in connecting peripheral metabolic and inflammatory pathways to the CNS (Narayanan, 2024). Their cargo of neurotransmitters enables them to modulate neuronal and blood–brain barrier function, suggesting a role in transmitting pathological signals via the liver-brain axis (Malehmir et al., 2019). Furthermore, clinical trials hint that antiplatelet therapy could slow liver disease progression (Li S. Y. et al., 2022; Gautam et al., 2023). However, the underlying mechanisms mediating this association remain largely unknown. In particular, the dual role of platelets—as both a peripheral inflammatory mediator and a potential bridge linking hepatic pathology to central nervous system dysfunction—remains to be fully elucidated. Therefore, targeting platelet function offers a dual prospect: as a potential diagnostic indicator for early identification of cognitive risk, and as a novel therapeutic strategy for MASLD-associated cognitive decline-an approach that, to our knowledge, has not been systematically investigated.

2. Underlying mechanisms: cognitive impairment in MASLD

MASLD, currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease, is frequently associated with cognitive dysfunction (Le et al., 2025). Cross-sectional studies have reported that the prevalence of cognitive impairment in NAFLD (the former term for MASLD) ranges from 12 to 41%, depending on the assessment method used (Parikh et al., 2024). Recent literature indicates that MASLD is negatively correlated with cognitive function and cerebral integrity, and increases the risk of cerebrovascular lesions (He et al., 2025). Although the growing body of epidemiological and imaging evidence suggests a connection between the brain and the liver, it does not reveal the underlying causal pathways. Hepatic lipid accumulation, insulin resistance, inflammation, immune activation, intestinal barrier disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, and vascular lesions may all represent common pathways linking the liver and the brain. Platelets, as key sensors and amplifiers of systemic inflammation, are increasingly recognized as potential mediators of the liver–brain axis. However, direct evidence for this link—particularly regarding MASLD-associated cognitive decline—remains scarce, underscoring the need for further investigation (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Diagram illustrating the interplay between liver dysfunction, immune response, intestinal barrier disruption, and activated platelets in MASLD leading to blood-brain barrier impairment and cognitive dysfunction, with labeled pathways for platelet activation, inflammation, and mitochondrial rupture.

Mechanism of platelets participating in cognition dysfunction in MASLD. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, inflammation and immune response, intestinal barrier damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and cerebrovascular disease lead to platelet activation. The activated platelets damage the blood–brain barrier through multiple ways, resulting in cognitive dysfunction in MASLD. Created with Figdraw 2.0.

2.1. Lipid toxicity mediates cognitive impairment in MASLD

Dyslipidemia is a hallmark of MASLD, primarily characterized by elevated levels of triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (Syed-Abdul, 2023; Rao et al., 2023). When hepatic de novo lipogenesis increases and mitochondrial β-oxidation is insufficient, the influx of free fatty acids (FFA) rises, and excessive FFA intake further overwhelms the very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) transport capacity, leading to lipid accumulation, fatty degeneration of hepatocytes, and ultimately elevated TG levels (Chen et al., 2025). In MASLD, activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP-2) promotes cholesterol synthesis and increases VLDL secretion, providing LDL precursors, while downregulation of hepatic LDL receptor impairs LDL clearance, collectively resulting in elevated LDL-C (Syed-Abdul, 2023). MASLD-associated lipotoxicity impairs cognitive function through a self-reinforcing cascade that begins in the cerebral vasculature and culminates in platelet hyperactivation. Elevated triglycerides and LDL cholesterol initiate vascular damage by promoting amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, atherosclerosis, and endothelial dysfunction, with oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) further exacerbating blood–brain barrier disruption and neuroinflammation (Li H. et al., 2025; Wen et al., 2024; Farias et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2017). This compromised vascular milieu not only directly injures neural tissue but also sets the stage for platelet-mediated thrombosis. Indeed, both LDL and ox-LDL directly prime platelets for activation, adhesion, and aggregation via the arachidonic acid-TXA2 pathway and enhanced procoagulant activity (Kelem et al., 2023; Pedreno et al., 2001). Moreover, the broader lipotoxic environment—independent of specific lipoprotein fractions—potentiates platelet responsiveness by increasing fibrinogen binding, upregulating activation marker P-selectin (CD62-P), and activating PPARα-dependent signaling cascades (Ye and Xu, 2026; van Geffen et al., 2020). Thus, via this integrated vascular-platelet axis, lipotoxicity establishes a vicious cycle wherein endothelial injury and platelet hyperreactivity mutually reinforce one another, ultimately driving cerebral hypoperfusion, neurovascular unit dysfunction, and cognitive decline (Li L. et al., 2022).

2.2. Insulin resistance (IR) mediated cognitive impairment in MASLD

IR is a key pathophysiological mechanism in MASLD and a significant risk factor for neurodegeneration and cognitive dysfunction. Hepatic lipid overload promotes the generation of lipotoxic metabolites—including diacylglycerol and ceramides—that directly impair IRS/PI3K/AKT signaling, thereby inducing IR (Truong and Lee, 2025; Gastaldelli et al., 2026). IR drives cognitive impairment through a bifurcated pathogenic axis, encompassing both direct central neurotoxicity and peripheral platelet-mediated cerebrovascular compromise. On the central front, IR disrupts neuronal insulin signaling via reduced receptor expression and impaired IRS1/PI3K pathway, leading to increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, which directly inflict neuronal damage and synaptic impairment (Yavari et al., 2025; Nuzzo et al., 2015; Gutierrez-Tordera et al., 2025; Ahlawat et al., 2025). This central insulin signaling defect further exacerbates microtubule-associated protein (tau) hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation, and blood–brain barrier (BBB) compromise, collectively fostering a neurotoxic milieu (Sedzikowska and Szablewski, 2021; Malin et al., 2022). Concurrently, IR-induced hypometabolism reduces cerebral glucose utilization and perfusion, which not only impairs Aβ clearance but also promotes its accumulation and deposition (Nakhaee et al., 2024). Compounding these direct cerebral effects, IR exerts profound systemic influences on platelet function. Hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia prime platelets for heightened reactivity (Arnoldussen and Witkamp, 2021), enhancing aggregation, fibrinogen binding, and TXA2 production, which promote microthrombus formation and compromise cerebral blood flow (Dalbeni et al., 2022). Moreover, in the IR state, platelets become hyperresponsive to subthreshold stimuli, accelerating their consumption and further amplifying thrombotic risk (Gonzalez-Mendoza et al., 2025). Ultimately, the neuroinflammation further amplifies platelet reactivity, while platelet thrombi exacerbate cerebral hypoxia, together accelerating the trajectory toward cognitive impairment.

2.3. Inflammatory pathways leading to cognitive dysfunction in MASLD

A persistent low-grade inflammatory state permeates the entire pathological course of MASLD. Excessive hepatic lipid accumulation and IR can significantly increase the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and others, thereby amplifying systemic inflammation and driving the progression of MASLD and its related complications (Zisis et al., 2025; Li et al., 2024b). Furthermore, the increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines has been closely associated with cognitive dysfunction, suggesting that systemic inflammation may serve as a key mechanistic link between MASLD and neurocognitive decline. Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 released from the fatty liver cross the BBB to activate neuroinflammation and synaptic impairment (Gu et al., 2025). This direct pathway facilitates the fusion of cytokines with neuronal lipid rafts or platelet-derived exosomes, enabling their transport into the brain parenchyma, where they amplify neuroinflammatory signals and activate astrocytes and microglia (Boncler et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2021). Simultaneously, inflammatory mediatorscompromise cerebral perfusion by increasing blood viscosity, erythrocyte aggregation, and platelet reactivity. These neuroinflammatory and hemodynamic disturbances establish a synergistic cycle—neuroinflammation impairs vascular function, while hypoperfusion reduces clearance of inflammatory mediators—culminating in progressive cognitive decline (Li et al., 2024a).

2.4. Involvement of immune cells in MASLD cognitive impairment

Sustained activation of immune signaling pathways promotes the progression of MASLD. Furthermore, metabolic dysregulation has been shown to drive immune cell polarization, whereby polarized immune cells assault the CNS through both direct and indirect pathways, collectively accelerating cognitive decline in MASLD (Schwarzler et al., 2024). On the direct front, pro-inflammatory immune cells infiltrate adipose tissue, secreting a wide array of inflammatory mediators that sustain systemic inflammation (Wang et al., 2025; Frasca and Blomberg, 2020). This systemic inflammatory milieu subsequently facilitates the recruitment of these activated immune cells across the BBB into the brain parenchyma, where they directly induce astrocyte death and neuronal dysfunction, thereby igniting neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment (Coulibaly, 2022). Emerging evidence highlights that platelets play a critical role in the innate immune system (Mandel et al., 2022). Under inflammatory conditions, activated platelets adhere to and interact with circulating immune cells-most notably (Hally et al., 2020) promoting neutrophil activation and recruitment, which elevates IL-6 levels and exacerbates cognitive dysfunction (Coulibaly, 2022). Furthermore, platelet-derived mediators recruit T cells to sites of inflammation and exacerbate T-cell-dependent cerebrovascular and BBB injury, thereby impairing neurocognitive function (Koupenova et al., 2022). Critically, these direct immune-mediated neuronal injury and indirect platelet-immune crosstalk do not operate in isolation; rather, they establish a synergistic feedback loop wherein platelet activation enhances immune cell infiltration, while immune-derived cytokines further prime platelet reactivity, collectively amplifying the neuroinflammatory burden and hastening cognitive decline in MASLD.

2.5. Intestinal barrier disruption mediates cognitive impairment in MASLD

During the development of MASLD, levels of various microbial products and host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are elevated. Of these, the most extensively studied are lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), whose upregulation is indicative of increased intestinal permeability and microbial translocation (Yang et al., 2023). During MASLD progression, gut dysbiosis accompanies elevated bile acids (BA). The gut microbiota comprises predominantly Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota, and is involved in nutrient metabolism, immune system maturation, maintenance of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and pathogen resistance (Zhu et al., 2024). In MASLD, this delicate equilibrium is disrupted, manifesting as increased abundance of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, alongside a significant reduction in Bacteroidetes—a signature of pronounced dysbiosis (Garcia-Mateo et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2025). The altered Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio disrupts the intestinal barrier by compromising tight junction integrity and degrading the mucus layer, thereby increasing permeability (Suppli et al., 2021; Kirundi et al., 2023). Concurrently, specific bacterial taxa exert distinct pathogenic effects. For instance, elevated Proteobacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae, serve as a reservoir of LPS-endotoxin, directly fueling in intestinal permeability leads to inflammation (Soto et al., 2024). Conversely, among Firmicutes, Romboutsia and Turicibacter exhibit increased abundance (Yang et al., 2026). This alteration disrupts energy provision for colonic epithelial cells and attenuates anti-inflammatory signaling essential for epithelial homeostasis. Adding to this structural compromise, the downregulation of interleukin-22 (IL-22)—a protective antimicrobial cytokine secreted by small intestinal lymphocytes—impairs epithelial cell differentiation and maturation, promoting excessive absorption of lipids and carbohydrates and further weakening barrier function (Zhang et al., 2024). Compounding these microbial-driven defects, elevated bile acids in MASLD damage cellular membranes, stimulate ROS production, and interfere with Farnesoid X receptor/Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5(FXR/TGR5)-mediated protective signaling, collectively promoting tight junction disassembly and perpetuating increased permeability (Zhou et al., 2025; Ji et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2025). This leaky gut permits translocation of microbial products—most notably LPS—into the portal circulation, where they activate hepatic TLR-4/NF-κB signaling and drive pro-inflammatory cytokine release (Shi et al., 2023). These inflammatory mediators, in turn, further compromise intestinal barrier integrity, establishing a self-reinforcing loop that sustains systemic inflammation. Through the microbiota–gut–brain axis, this systemic inflammatory burden reaches the CNS, triggering neuroinflammation and contributing to cognitive decline (Wu et al., 2021). Notably, the gut microbiome also exerts distal effects via platelet modulation: dysbiosis-associated microbial metabolites entering the plasma induce platelet hyperactivation and degranulation, as evidenced by positive correlations between Firmicutes abundance and platelet activation markers (CD62P, PAC-1) (Liu et al., 2020). This platelet hyperactivation releases 5-HT and amplifies pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, further disrupting BBB integrity and driving neurocognitive dysfunction (Rust et al., 2023). Thus, the gut microbiota impacts brain health through both direct inflammatory pathways and indirect platelet-mediated mechanisms, which converge in a synergistic axis linking intestinal dysbiosis to cognitive impairment in MASLD (Rust et al., 2023).

2.6. Mitochondrial dysfunction involves cognitive impairment in MASLD

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key pathological feature of MASLD and bridges MASLD to cognitive decline via a platelet-dependent cascade (Li X. et al., 2025). In the early stages of MASLD, mitochondria transiently redistribute to perinuclear lipid droplets as a compensatory mechanism to buffer fatty acid overload and mitigate lipotoxicity. With disease progression, however, this adaptive sequestration collapses, unleashing lipotoxic stress that drives overt mitochondrial dysfunction (Sun et al., 2024). Given that neurons are exquisitely dependent on mitochondrial integrity due to their immense metabolic demands, even mild bioenergetic deficits can destabilize synapses and precipitate cognitive impairment. This neuronal vulnerability is exacerbated by a vicious cycle in which mitochondrial dysfunction drives cellular and brain aging via impaired energy generation, excessive ROS production, disrupted dynamics, and defective mitophagy—abnormalities that reciprocally interact with Aβ and tau pathology to sustain neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegeneration (D'Alessandro et al., 2025). Mitochondrial–platelet crosstalk in MASLD operates as a reciprocal amplification loop: mitochondrial dysfunction activates platelets via P-selectin upregulation, and activated platelets, in turn, release ATP that promotes DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation in hepatocytes via purinergic receptor P2X7-NIMA-related kinase 7 (P2X7-NEK7) signaling (Michailidou et al., 2023; Cao et al., 2026). This feeds back to exacerbate mitochondrial injury, while platelet-derived mitochondria accumulating at synapses drive oxidative stress, energy failure, and synaptic dysfunction—ultimately accelerating cognitive decline (Bhat et al., 2024). Thus, the bidirectional mitochondrial–platelet axis propagates pathology from liver to brain and represents a potential therapeutic target.

2.7. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and MASLD-related cognitive impairment

Platelet hyperactivation plays a pivotal role in shaping the neurovascular and inflammatory environment of AD, linking metabolic liver disease to Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration (Weinstein et al., 2022). AD and MASLD share overlapping mechanisms as evidenced by common phenotypes (reduced brain volume, impaired perfusion, and platelet hyperreactivity) ms (Mai and Mao, 2023) and AD (Falcon et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024; Ge, 2024). Chronically hyperactivated platelets in MASLD contribute to AD-like pathology by elevating Aβ burden, promoting its aggregation, and forming microthrombi that reduce cerebral perfusion (Moretti et al., 2022; Yilmaz et al., 2023; Palix et al., 2022; Xiong et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2023; Ramos-Cejudo et al., 2022; Koch-Paszkowski et al., 2025). Moreover, activated platelets release matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which degrade fibrous cap collagen and precipitate atherosclerotic plaque destabilization. Plaque rupture exposes highly thrombogenic substrates, triggering massive platelet aggregation, occlusive cerebral thrombosis, and subsequent cognitive decline (Jebari-Benslaiman et al., 2022). Therefore, the MASLD-AD connection is not unifactorial but emerges from synergistic crosstalk between vascular components and platelets, which collectively link metabolic-associated liver disease to AD’s pathology.

In summary, MASLD-related cognitive impairment is likely to be mediated by multiple interacting mechanisms, including insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction and intestinal barrier disruption. Platelet activation plays a pivotal role in each of these pathways, exacerbating brain injury through the promotion of thrombosis, neuroinflammation, and Aβ deposition. Thus, platelet activation serves not only as a convergence point for diverse pathogenic signals underlying MASLD-associated cognitive decline but also as a functional bridge linking peripheral organ damage to central neurodegenerative changes.

3. Platelet changes in cognitive dysfunction of MASLD

Notably, platelets have emerged as candidate biomarkers for assessing liver fibrosis and the progression of liver failure (Michalak et al., 2021). MASLD drives a multifaceted platelet alteration, marked not only by thrombocytopenia but also by an activated morphological profile—including elevated Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW)—and heightened granule secretion, collectively indicating a state of enhanced platelet reactivity. Given their broad phenotypic and functional remodeling during MASLD progression, platelets may serve as mechanistic intermediaries linking hepatic pathology to extrahepatic complications, including cognitive dysfunction.

3.1. Decreased platelet count in MASLD

The liver serves as the primary regulatory organ for platelets, promoting their production through the secretion of thrombopoietin (TPO). MASLD presents a paradoxical platelet phenotype, characterized by a quantitative reduction in platelet count coexisting with a state of qualitative hyperactivation. This thrombocytopenia arises from a dual-hit mechanism: persistent inflammation and fibrosis. Fibrosis develops secondary to impaired platelet production caused by diminished hepatic TPO synthesis, and enhanced peripheral consumption mediated by interleukin-1(IL-1)-driven von Willebrand factor (vWF) release from activated endothelium (Nanizawa et al., 2024; Reiche et al., 2024). Paradoxically, although reduced platelet counts are epidemiologically linked to MASLD progression, accumulating evidence indicates that this numerical decline does not equate to functional silencing. Instead, the residual platelets in advanced liver disease exhibit heightened activation, as supported by elevated urinary levels of 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (11-dh-TXB2), a stable marker of in vivo platelet activity. Moreover, the very the very clearance mechanism responsible for platelet elimination-via interactions between (Castelli et al., 2025). surface receptors on target cells- may paradoxically precipitate this hyperactive state (Minciuna et al., 2024). Ultimately, these hyperresponsive platelets are posited to disrupt brain homeostasis by damaging the blood–brain barrier, inducing cerebral microthrombi, and releasing neurotoxic substances, thereby linking hepatic inflammation to cerebral dysfunction.

3.2. Elevated MPV in MASLD

Patients with MASLD typically exhibit an elevated MPV. Two potential mechanisms may account for this phenomenon. The first involves a pro-inflammatory drive: upregulated IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α stimulate hepatic thrombopoietin synthesis, The first involves a pro-inflammatory drive: IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-αstimulate hepatic thrombopoietin synthesis, which promotes megakaryocyte ploidy and cytoplasmic expansion thereby generating larger andmore reactive platelets (Korniluk et al., 2019). The second mechanism operates through a. vascular anti-aggregatory deficit insulin resistance suppresses endothelial production of prostacyclin and nitric oxide, removing critical vasodilatory and platelet-inhibitory signals, which further sensitizes platelets and contributes to MPV elevation (Varol et al., 2010). The combined effect—oversized platelets operating in a permissive vascular environment—establishes a hyperreactive phenotype that links MASLD to thrombotic and cognitive risks.

3.3. Increased platelet distribution width (PDW) in MASLD

Patients with MASLD typically present with an elevated PDW compared to healthy controls (Milovanovic Alempijevic et al., 2017). The chronic inflammatory milieu characteristic of MASLD releases a spectrum of inflammatory mediators, driving platelet activation and subsequent morphological and structural remodeling—ultimately culminating in increased PDW (Ferencova et al., 2023). Concurrently, heightened platelet consumption in MASLD accelerates the release of larger, newly generated platelets from the bone marrow as a compensatory response, further contributing to PDW elevation (Chen et al., 2022; Zhang and Wang, 2025). These two processes are not independent but functionally intertwined: inflammation-driven platelet activation not only remodels existing platelets but also accelerates their clearance, thereby amplifying the demand for megakaryocyte output and perpetuating the release of immature, oversized platelets. This reflects systemic platelet hyperreactivity underlying the vascular risks associated with MASLD.

3.4. Increased release of platelet granules in MASLD

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) has been implicated in the progression of MASLD. PAF binds to PAFR on the platelet membrane to directly trigger platelet activation. Activated platelets subsequently release bioactive mediators including 5-HT and CD40L, thereby driving disease progression. First, pathological conditions- inflammation, IR, and oxidative stress-induce platelets to generate PAF,which upon receptor binding triggers platelet activation and promotes 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release. Notably, elevated 5-HT levels correlate positively with the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS), establishing a clinically relevant autocrine loop that perpetuates platelet hyperreactivity (Yin et al., 2022). Second, activated platelets surface-translocate and secrete CD40 ligand (CD40L), from α-granules,a molecule that bridge platelet activation with adaptive immunity and vascular inflammation, thereby amplifying the systemic inflammatory milieu beyond the platelet compartment (Ma et al., 2022). Third, platelet-derived C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CXCL5), directly enhance hepatocyte lipotoxicity in high-fat diet models (Kushiro et al., 2025) Together, these pathways position platelets as a pathogenic hub that amplify their own activation and injure hepatocytes.

Collectively, studies have shown that platelet activation markers (such as MPV and PDW) are elevated in MASLD. Several platelet-related indices have emerged as promising predictors of disease severity, such as the platelet-to-hepatocyte ratio (PHR), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). These observations underscore the pivotal role of platelets in MASLD progression. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms driving platelet activation in this context remain incompletely understood and warrant further investigation.

4. Platelet activation in neurodegenerative diseases

Platelet activation is the process in which resting platelets are stimulated by physiological or pathological factors. This may lead to platelet activation-a process involving a cascade of biochemical, structural, and morphological changes, notably the development of pseudopodia (Liao et al., 2025; Peng et al., 2024). This process is primarily mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs). Upon receptor engagement, downstream signaling cascades are initiated, facilitating integrin activation and granule exocytosis, which collectively drive platelet aggregation and further amplify activation (Nieman and Neeves, 2023). Through mechanisms such as thrombus formation, release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and dynamic crosstalk with various cell types, platelet activation contributes to the pathogenesis of multiple diseases (Tian et al., 2025). Studies have also shown that platelet activation biomarkers, such as the glycoprotein (IIb–IIIa αIIbβ3) complex and P-selectin, can serve as potential predictive biomarkers of cognitive decline in patients with neurodegenerative diseases (Rodriguez Moore et al., 2024).

4.1. Platelet activation and AD

AD is the most common neurodegenerative disorder. Its core pathological features include the deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ), hyperphosphorylation of tau, chronic neuroinflammation, and neuronal loss (Song et al., 2024). The evidence indicates that the structural integrity of vulnerable brain regions in AD patients is associated with platelet activation (Palix et al., 2022). Upon activation, platelets secrete platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) to induce cerebral pericyte dysfunction. This cascade reaction is supported by a cohort study in Molecular Neurodegeneration showing elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β(PDGFRβ) levels in cognitively impaired patients and an association between decreased plasma sPDGFRβ and BBB damage in Alzheimer’s (Li et al., 2026) This observation implies that persistent platelet activation and excess PDGF-BB may trigger progressive pericyte loss, disrupt cerebrovascular homeostasis, and aggravate AD neuropathology. In AD patients, platelets serve as key peripheral reservoirs of Aβ (Rodriguez Moore et al., 2024). These cells accelerate AD-related neurodegeneration via Aβ-induced platelet activation, cerebral microthrombosis, and tau-mediated synaptic injury, collectively constituting a self-amplifying pathogenic loop (Rodriguez Moore et al., 2024; Slachevsky et al., 2017). These processes, centered on platelet activation, drive Aβ pathology, thrombus formation, and tau aggregation, thereby accelerating AD neurodegeneration.

4.2. Platelet activation and PD

PD is characterized by core pathological changes including apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons, abnormal α-synuclein aggregation, Lewy body formation, and chronic neuroinflammation (Musaro et al., 2026). In patients with PD, comparable platelet activation processes – including adhesion, aggregation, and degranulation – were observed (Beura et al., 2022). First, activated platelets release high levels of α-synuclein, which can induce misfolding and aggregation of α-synuclein in brain neurons, thereby promoting Lewy body formation-a process supported by the observation of comparable platelet activation (adhesion, aggregation, degranulation) in PD patients (Gautam et al., 2023; Maszka et al., 2023). Second, platelet-derived ROS and inflammatory factors exacerbate oxidative stress and apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons (Takahashi and Takahashi, 2019). Third, at the mitochondrial level, platelets from patients with PD exhibit decreased complex I activity-a defect that mirrors the well established mitochondrial dysfunction in the substantia nigra-and impairment induces excessive ROS, further accelerating neuronal loss (Beura et al., 2022). Finally, beyond these structural and metabolic abnormalities, platelets harbor synaptic pathology: their dense granules store dopamine and its transporter; however, activated platelets exhibit decreased expression of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 mRNA expression, which impairs vesicular dopamine packaging and may contribute to the synaptic failure in PD (Gautam et al., 2023; Beura et al., 2022). Together, these processes establish platelets as a peripheral readout of central neurodegeneration and active contributors to disease progression.

4.3. Platelet activation and multiple sclerosis (MS)

MS is an autoimmune neurodegenerative disease characterized by CNS inflammatory demyelination, blood–brain barrier disruption, and neuronal damage (Matias-Guiu et al., 2017). In MS, platelets show an abnormal activation state (Langer et al., 2012). The activation of platelets actively participates in the pathological process of MS by simultaneously attacking the myelin sheath of the CNS and the vascular barrier, thereby jointly exacerbating neuroinflammation and tissue damage. First, platelet activation induces the transition of macrophages and other immune cells from a resting to a reactive state, promoting excessive myelin damage and resulting in axonal demyelination and tissue injury (Ferrer-Raventos and Beyer, 2021). Second, activated platelets release large amounts of substances, including MMPs. MMPs degrade the vascular basement membrane, thereby increasing blood–brain barrier permeability. This allows peripheral immune cells and toxic substances to invade the CNS parenchyma and initiate local demyelinating lesions (Cheng et al., 2024). Therefore, in addition to their typical role in hemostasis, platelets exert immunomodulatory and vascular-damaging effects in MS. Their activation can exacerbate neuroinflammation and tissue damage associated with MS.

4.4. Platelet activation and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative disease of motor neurons, characterized by motor neuron apoptosis, axonal degeneration, neuroinflammation, and aberrant glial cell activation (Gunner et al., 2025). In patients with ALS, platelets are activated (Kiktenko et al., 2005; Strijkova et al., 2022). Activation of platelets leads to neuronal excitotoxicity, disruption of the vascular microenvironment, and mitochondrial metabolic failure, all of which cause damage to motor neurons and jointly accelerate the progression of ALS. First, the level of glutamine synthetase is abnormally elevated in these activated platelets, leading to glutamate excitotoxicity and accelerating excitotoxic damage to motor neurons. Second, the release of glycoproteins from platelet α-granules is significantly increased in ALS patients. Platelet aggregation induces vascular damage and disrupts the blood–brain barrier, further compromising the survival microenvironment of motor neurons (Espinosa-Parrilla et al., 2019; Saul et al., 2020). In addition, platelet mitochondrial dysfunction—itself closely linked to systemic metabolic derangements in ALS—adds an energetic failure component to the neurodegenerative cascade (Shrivastava et al., 2011; Ehinger et al., 2015). The important point is that these three pathways do not function independently but are interrelated. Of these, platelets occupy a crucial role, acting as both indicators of central pathology and active drivers of disease progression.

4.5. Platelet activation and Huntington’s disease (HD)

HD is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by the aggregation of mutant huntingtin (mHtt) protein (Ananbeh et al., 2021). Platelets express the highest levels of huntingtin protein among peripheral blood cells, and mHtt localizes to the plasma membrane, α-granules, and open canalicular system. Upon, activation, these platelets release enhanced quantities of factors that promote mHtt aggregation or toxicity in neurons, thereby directly contributing to neuronal dysfunction and death—the hallmark of HD (Denis et al., 2019). In addition, platelets harbor tau proteins whose abnormal phosphorylation and truncation, detaches from microtubules (MTs), and forms intracellular aggregates. The resulting collapse of microtubules and disruption of axonal transport leads to loss of cell integrity and neuronal dysfunction (Alpaugh et al., 2025). These platelet-derived mHtt and tau pathologies constitute a peripheral reservoir of neurotoxic proteins that, upon activation, deliver a dual pathogenic assault on neurons, linking platelet activation to HD progression.

In conclusion, platelet activation contributes to the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases. A strong correlation exists between platelets and the nervous system (Wei and Tang, 2025). Activated platelets serve as a key driver of cognitive and motor decline through mechanisms including neuroinflammation, blood–brain barrier disruption, and excitotoxicity.

4.6. Platelet activation and cognitive impairment in MASLD

MASLD is a chronic, progressive metabolic disorder. As noted earlier, MASLD and cognitive dysfunction share common pathological pathways, including inflammatory response, insulin resistance, gut microbiota dysbiosis, vascular dysfunction and platelet activation. This suggests that the two diseases may share common preventive strategies. In MASLD patients, platelet activation and a hyperreactive state have been clearly demonstrated, along with cognitive dysfunction such as attention deficits. Furthermore, platelet activation has been confirmed to participate in the pathological processes of various neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, incorporating MASLD-related cognitive impairments into the framework of “cognitive impairments in degenerative diseases” would facilitate systematic research by leveraging the known pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Evidence from the role of platelets in neurodegenerative diseases and the pathways linking MASLD to cognitive dysfunction suggests that platelet activation may act as a molecular link between hepatic metabolic disorders and brain dysfunction, thereby contributing to MASLD-induced cognitive impairment. (1) In the context of MASLD, platelets exhibit an activated or highly reactive state, characterized by a decreased platelet count and elevated activation markers such as PDW, MPV, and CD40L. (2) Platelet activation parameters, including MPV and PDW, are significantly correlated with cognitive decline (Xiong et al., 2025), whereas platelet count is negatively associated with cognitive impairment (Zhang et al., 2023). Platelets mediate the link between NAFLD and cerebrovascular/cognitive impairment through complementary evidence: Lombardi et al. established enhanced platelet activity and procoagulant imbalance as mechanistic drivers of cerebrovascular risk (Lombardi et al., 2019), while Guo et al. (2025) quantified, using structural equation modeling in a UK Biobank cohort, that platelet abnormalities statistically mediate liver disease effects on brain function—confirming this mediation in NAFLD patients. Importantly, inhibiting platelet activation has been shown to alleviate blood–brain barrier damage and improve cognitive decline (Xu et al., 2025). Based on the mechanisms underlying MASLD-induced cognitive impairment discussed above, activated platelets may act on the brain both indirectly and directly—via inflammatory responses, insulin resistance, immune dysregulation, cerebrovascular dysfunction, and the gut–liver–brain axis—thereby contributing to the progression of cognitive impairment in MASLD. These pieces of evidence collectively confirm that platelets are a key node in the liver–brain axis, suggesting that platelet-targeted interventions may alleviate cognitive complications associated with liver diseases.

In conclusion, platelet activation is not only a shared pathological mechanism in classic neurodegenerative diseases—including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—but also a likely key driver of cognitive decline in MASLD patients.

5. Conclusion

Cognitive dysfunction represents a significant extrahepatic complication of MASLD, for which no curative pharmacological interventions currently exist. Antiplatelet therapy has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for MASLD and its associated complications. Clinical evidence suggests that antiplatelet therapy may reduce liver volume and hepatic fat content in patients with MASLD complicated by cardiovascular disease (Shepardson et al., 2011). Clinical studies indicate that antiplatelet therapy could decrease liver volume and fat content among patients with NAFLD (now reclassified as MASLD) complicated by cardiovascular diseases. Preclinical studies have further demonstrated that aspirin can slow the progression of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, thereby mitigating the deleterious effects of lipotoxicity on cognitive function (Violi et al., 2024). Beyond its canonical role in reducing intrahepatic platelet aggregation and alleviating hepatic steatohepatitis, antiplatelet therapy has been shown to mitigate blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption. This cerebroprotective effect is achieved through the inhibition of platelet activation, which reduces cerebral Aβ accumulation and attenuates hippocampal neuronal damage—ultimately preserving cognitive function. Based on these premises, antiplatelet therapy may ameliorate MASLD-associated cognitive impairment through the following potential mechanisms: (1) By suppressing platelet activation, antiplatelet therapy inhibits platelet transmigration across the BBB and curbs their direct pro-inflammatory effects within the CNS, thereby alleviating neuroinflammation. (2) Given that activated platelets frequently engage in crosstalk with immune cells, antiplatelet therapy reduces immune cell infiltration into the CNS. This dampens the activation of neuroinflammatory cascades and contributes to the preservation of cognitive function. (3) Indirectly, antiplatelet therapy facilitates the release of anti-inflammatory mediators from platelets—such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-which suppress microglial overactivation and attenuate neuronal injury (Boccatonda et al., 2024). (4) Additionally, by inhibiting the activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and reducing hepatic fibrosis, antiplatelet therapy may confer cognitive benefits indirectly through the amelioration of underlying MASLD pathology (Thongtan et al., 2022). But the application of antiplatelet therapy in the context of cognitive impairment remains controversial—primarily due to the associated risk of bleeding (Kitt et al., 2023; Jacobs et al., 2015; Hilkens et al., 2021). Patients with chronic liver diseases, particularly those with MASLD or cirrhosis, often present with comorbidities including portal hypertension, esophagogastric varices, and coagulation disorders, all of which may further increase bleeding risk. Therefore, in clinical practice, the use of antiplatelet drugs requires careful balancing of therapeutic benefits against adverse effects to achieve an optimal equilibrium. Conventional antiplatelet drugs—including aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, dipyridamole, and tirofiban—are associated with well-recognized side effects. In managing the side effects of antiplatelet therapy, the “de-escalation” strategy is both effective in reducing bleeding risk and the most widely employed approach. This includes de-escalating potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors to less potent agents, shortening DAPT duration, or transitioning to monotherapy after initial DAPT (Guo et al., 2025). There are also scenarios in which multiple drugs are administered in combination; however, such regimens may exacerbate adverse effects, including hepatotoxicity and systemic immune disorders (Alhawiti, 2026). Therefore, future antiplatelet therapies should prioritize more precise, patient-tailored strategies. Current antiplatelet therapy is expanding to new targets such as GPVI and PCSK9, with the aim of inhibiting thrombosis while reducing the risk of bleeding (Hay et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2026). Platelets have been shown to exert neuroprotective effects on glial cells by serving as carriers for mitochondrial delivery to the brain, raising the possibility that mitochondria themselves could serve as therapeutic targets for antiplatelet intervention (Inaba et al., 2020). This hypothesis is further supported by the identification of platelet mitochondrial PDK2/4 and PKM2 as critical metabolic checkpoints. Pharmacological modulation of these targets selectively suppresses pathological platelet activation and arterial thrombosis while preserving surface receptor function—a feature that enables patient stratification and paves the way for precision antiplatelet therapy (Yao et al., 2026). Ultimately, this approach offers a promising solution to the long-standing clinical dilemma of balancing antithrombotic efficacy with bleeding risk. Overall, antiplatelet therapy is advancing toward safer, more precise, and individualized regimens. However, this progress also underscores the pressing need for strategies that minimize bleeding risk, particularly in vulnerable populations such as those with MASLD, cirrhosis, or cognitive impairment—who face heightened susceptibility to both thrombosis and hemorrhage.

The pathogenesis of cognitive dysfunction in MASLD is complex and multifactorial. Although accumulating evidence supports a key regulatory role for platelets in both MASLD progression and cognitive function, they are unlikely to be the sole host cellular factors linked to MASLD-mediated cognitive decline. Other mechanisms discussed in this study—including immune cell infiltration, lipotoxicity, and the gut-brain axis—may also contribute to cognitive impairment. For instance, serum Klotho levels have been independently associated with cognitive performance in NAFLD patients, suggesting that multiple parallel pathways exist. A comprehensive investigation of all potential mediators, however, is beyond the scope of the present study. Nevertheless, platelets possess unique attributes—including their small size and ability to cross vascular barriers—that position them as critical circulating signal carriers, linking peripheral metabolic organs with the central nervous system. This concept is supported by the work of Inaba et al. (2020), who demonstrated that platelets can serve as vehicles to deliver mitochondria to ischemic brain regions, exerting neuroprotective effects. We therefore propose that platelets represent one of the signaling conduits between the liver and the brain. By targeting this intermediary role, our findings may offer novel therapeutic avenues for MASLD-associated cognitive impairment and provide potential predictive biomarkers for early diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

Graphics were created using Figdraw 2.0 during manuscript preparation.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Guizhou Provincial Population and Health Foundation, Guizhou Joint Medical Fund for High‑quality Development of Heath (2024GZYXKYJJM0104); Zunyi Bureau of Industry and Science and Technology, Science and Technology Fund (No. Zunkehe Hz (2024) 197); the Guizhou Provincial Clinical Key Specialty Project (Dengfeng Program) (Grant No. GZWJWDF2005006), and the Key Discipline of Anesthesiology in Southwest China (Grant No. xm040222).

Edited by: Giuseppe Caruso, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, Italy

Reviewed by: George Grant, Independent Researcher, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Yudhisman Imran, Trisakti University, Indonesia

Abbreviations: MASLD, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease; NASH, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis; IRS1, Insulin Receptor Substrate 1; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ox-LDL, oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein; CD62-P, P-selectin; PPARα, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α; TLR4, Toll-like receptor; PAC-1, Platelet Activation Complex Protein 1; SVD, Cerebral small vessel disease; MMPs, Matrix metalloproteinases; 11-dh-TXB2, 11-dehydrothromboxane B2; vWF, von Willebrand Factor; PAF, Platelet-activating Factor; MS, Multiple Sclerosis; ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; HD, Huntington’s disease; mHtt, Huntington protein.

Author contributions

JC: Writing – original draft. CC: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. HW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. TY: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Ahlawat A., Walia V., Garg M. (2025). Brain insulin resistance mediated cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration: Type-3 diabetes or Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurol. Belg. 125, 941–969. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02706-7, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alhawiti N. M. (2026). Platelet-mediated progression of fatty liver disease in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a pathophysiological review. Front. Med. 13:1728096. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1728096, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alpaugh M., Lantero-Rodriguez J., Benedet A. L., Manseau U., Boutin M., Maiuri M., et al. (2025). Tau levels in platelets isolated from Huntington's disease patients serve as a biomarker of disease severity. J. Neurol. 272:254. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-12966-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ananbeh H., Vodicka P., Kupcova S. H. (2021). Emerging roles of exosomes in Huntington's disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4085. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084085, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnoldussen I. A. C., Witkamp R. F. (2021). Effects of nutrients on platelet function: a modifiable link between metabolic syndrome and neurodegeneration? Biomolecules 11:1455. doi: 10.3390/biom11101455, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beura S. K., Panigrahi A. R., Yadav P., Singh S. K. (2022). Role of platelet in Parkinson's disease: insights into pathophysiology & theranostic solutions. Ageing Res. Rev. 80:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101681, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhat A. A., Moglad E., Goyal A., Afzal M., Thapa R., Almalki W. H., et al. (2024). Nrf2 pathways in neuroprotection: alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction and cognitive impairment in aging. Life Sci. 357:123056. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123056, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boccatonda A., Del Cane L., Marola L., D'Ardes D., Lessiani G., di Gregorio N., et al. (2024). Platelet, antiplatelet therapy and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A narrative review. Life (Basel). 14:473. doi: 10.3390/life14040473, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boncler M., Bartczak K., Rozalski M. (2024). Potential for modulation of platelet function via adenosine receptors during inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 181, 547–563. doi: 10.1111/bph.16146, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao W. J., Su R., Fu H. L., Wu J. J., Huang L. S., Liu F. F., et al. (2026). Supplementation of L-aspartate corrects MASLD and MASH in mice by inhibiting platelet-hepatocyte interaction-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation via the ATP-P2X7-NEK7-DRP1 axis. Exp. Mol. Med. 58, 533–547. doi: 10.1038/s12276-026-01648-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castelli M., Zoncape M., Meneguzzi A., Mantovani A., Sacerdoti D., Minuz P., et al. (2025). Platelet functional profile is altered in metabolic dysfunction-associated Steatotic liver disease. Liver Int. 45:e70231. doi: 10.1111/liv.70231, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Y., Lei K., Liu Y., Liu J., Wei K., Guo J., et al. (2025). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: from a very low-density lipoprotein perspective. Biomolecules 15:990. doi: 10.3390/biom15070990, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen X., Li J., Liu Y., Li L., Deng X., Sheng Y., et al. (2026). Platelet Rubicon bidirectional regulation of GPVI and integrin αIIbβ3 signaling mitigates stroke infarction without compromising hemostasis. Adv. Sci. 13:e07509. doi: 10.1002/advs.202507509, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen S. H., Tsai S. C., Lu H. C. (2022). Platelets as a gauge of liver disease kinetics? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:11460. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911460, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng X. D., Zhang C. X., Zhang Q., Zhou S., Jia L. J., Wang L. R., et al. (2024). Predictive role of pre-thrombolytic neutrophil-platelet ratio on hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 30:10760296231223192. doi: 10.1177/10760296231223192, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Coulibaly A. P. (2022). Neutrophil modulation of behavior and cognition in health and disease: the unexplored role of an innate immune cell. Immunol. Rev. 311, 177–186. doi: 10.1111/imr.13123, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalbeni A., Castelli M., Zoncape M., Minuz P., Sacerdoti D. (2022). Platelets in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front. Pharmacol. 13:842636. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.842636, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. D'Alessandro M. C. B., Kanaan S., Geller M., Pratico D., Daher J. P. L. (2025). Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 107:102713. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102713, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Denis H. L., Lamontagne-Proulx J., St-Amour I., Mason S. L., Rowley J. W., Cloutier N., et al. (2019). Platelet abnormalities in Huntington's disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 90, 272–283. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318854, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ehinger J. K., Morota S., Hansson M. J., Paul G., Elmer E. (2015). Mitochondrial dysfunction in blood cells from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J. Neurol. 262, 1493–1503. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7737-0, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Espinosa-Parrilla Y., Gonzalez-Billault C., Fuentes E., Palomo I., Alarcon M. (2019). Decoding the role of platelets and related MicroRNAs in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 11:151. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00151, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Falcon C., Montesinos P., Vaclavu L., Kassinopoulos M., Minguillon C., Fauria K., et al. (2024). Time-encoded ASL reveals lower cerebral blood flow in the early AD continuum. Alzheimers Dement. 20, 5183–5197. doi: 10.1002/alz.14059, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Farias H. R., Ramos J. M. O., Griesang C. T., Santos L., Junior O. V. R., Souza D. G., et al. (2025). LDL exposure disrupts mitochondrial function and dynamics in a hippocampal neuronal cell line. Mol. Neurobiol. 62, 6939–6950. doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04476-y, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferencova N., Visnovcova Z., Ondrejka I., Hrtanek I., Bujnakova I., Kovacova V., et al. (2023). Peripheral inflammatory markers in autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder at adolescent age. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:11710. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411710, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferrer-Raventos P., Beyer K. (2021). Alternative platelet activation pathways and their role in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 159:105512. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105512, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Frasca D., Blomberg B. B. (2020). Obesity accelerates age defects in mouse and human B cells. Front. Immunol. 11:2060. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02060, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garcia-Mateo S., Rondinella D., Ponziani F. R., Miele L., Gasbarrini A., Cammarota G., et al. (2024). Gut microbiome and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: pathogenic role and potential for therapeutics. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 72:101924. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101924, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gastaldelli A., Scoditti E., Macedo M. P. (2026). Metabolic drivers of MASLD and MASH: from hormonal imbalance to fibrosis. Diabetologia. doi: 10.1007/s00125-026-06774-7, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gautam D., Naik U. P., Naik M. U., Yadav S. K., Chaurasia R. N., Dash D. (2023). Glutamate receptor dysregulation and platelet glutamate dynamics in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: insights into current medications. Biomolecules 13:1609. doi: 10.3390/biom13111609, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ge Y. (2024). Vascular contributions to healthy aging and dementia. Aging Dis. 15, 1432–1437. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.1719, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gonzalez-Mendoza D. E., Fernandez-Nogueira F., Uribe M., Chavez-Tapia N. C., Nuno-Lambarri N. (2025). Hemostatic alterations in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and their link to venous thromboembolism (VTE). Thromb. Res. 253:109395. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109395, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gu C., Kang X., Chen X., Long Z., Yang F., Luo W. (2025). A significant atypical U-shaped relationship exists between lipid accumulation product and depression prevalence among Chinese middle-aged and elderly men: a cross-sectional study based on CHARLS. Front. Nutr. 12:1561990. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1561990, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gunner G., Basu H., Lu Y., Bergstresser M., Sun L., Neel D., et al. (2025). Gasdermin D is activated but does not drive neurodegeneration in SOD1(G93A) model of ALS: implications for targeting pyroptosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 214:107048. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107048, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guo H. H., Gao P. Y., Zhang W., Fu Y., Chi H. C., Zhang Z. H., et al. (2025). Liver diseases and brain disorders: genetic mechanisms and biomarker pathways in a prospective cohort study from the UK biobank. J. Neurochem. 169:e70066. doi: 10.1111/jnc.70066, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gutierrez-Tordera L., Panisello L., Garcia-Gonzalez P., Ruiz A., Cantero J. L., Rojas-Criollo M., et al. (2025). Metabolic signature of insulin resistance and risk of Alzheimer's disease. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 80:glae283. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae283, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hally K., Fauteux-Daniel S., Hamzeh-Cognasse H., Larsen P., Cognasse F. (2020). Revisiting platelets and toll-like receptors (TLRs): at the interface of vascular immunity and thrombosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:6150. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176150, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hay R., Cullen B., Graham N., Lyall D. M., Aman A., Pell J. P., et al. (2022). Genetic analysis of the PCSK9 locus in psychological, psychiatric, metabolic and cardiovascular traits in UK biobank. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 1380–1390. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01107-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. He H., Gao H., Zhang Y., Wang Q., Li Z., Wu S., et al. (2025). Impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on cognition and brain changes: a comprehensive review. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 615–643. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2024-0149, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hilkens N. A., Algra A., Diener H. C., Bath P. M., Csiba L., Hacke W., et al. (2021). Balancing benefits and risks of Long-term antiplatelet therapy in Noncardioembolic transient ischemic attack or stroke. Stroke 52, 3258–3265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031755, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang X., Hussain B., Chang J. (2021). Peripheral inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption: effects and mechanisms. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 27, 36–47. doi: 10.1111/cns.13569, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Inaba T., Miyamoto N., Hira K., Kijima C., Miyauchi Y., Xu H. B., et al. (2020). Mitochondrial intercellular transfer via platelets after physical training exerts neuro-glial protection against cerebral ischemia. MedComm 7:e70590. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70590, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jacobs V., Woller S. C., Stevens S. M., May H. T., Bair T. L., Crandall B. G., et al. (2015). Percent time with a supratherapeutic INR in atrial fibrillation patients also using an antiplatelet agent is associated with Long-term risk of dementia. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 1180–1186. doi: 10.1111/jce.12776, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jebari-Benslaiman S., Galicia-Garcia U., Larrea-Sebal A., Olaetxea J. R., Alloza I., Vandenbroeck K., et al. (2022). Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:3346. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063346, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ji Y., Yin Y., Sun L., Zhang W. (2020). The molecular and mechanistic insights based on gut-liver axis: nutritional target for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:3066. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093066, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kelem A., Adane T., Shiferaw E. (2023). Insulin resistance-induced platelet hyperactivity and a potential biomarker role of platelet parameters: a narrative review. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 16, 2843–2853. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S425469, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kiktenko A. I., Zlobina G. P., Brusov O. S., Zakharova M. N. (2005). Structure of peripheral blood platelets surface in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis. Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S S Korsakova 105, 40–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kirundi J., Moghadamrad S., Urbaniak C. (2023). Microbiome-liver crosstalk: a multihit therapeutic target for liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 29, 1651–1668. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1651, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kitt K., Murphy R., Clarke A., Reddin C., Ferguson J., Bosch J., et al. (2023). Antiplatelet therapy and incident cognitive impairment or dementia-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Age Ageing 52:afad197. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad197, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Koch-Paszkowski J., Sennett C., Pula G. (2025). Alzheimer's disease-thrombosis comorbidity: a growing body of evidence from patients and animal models. Cells 14:1069. doi: 10.3390/cells14141069, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Korniluk A., Koper-Lenkiewicz O. M., Kaminska J., Kemona H., Dymicka-Piekarska V. (2019). Mean platelet volume (MPV): new perspectives for an old marker in the course and prognosis of inflammatory conditions. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2019/9213074, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Koupenova M., Livada A. C., Morrell C. N. (2022). Platelet and megakaryocyte roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Circ. Res. 130, 288–308. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319821, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kushiro K., Hirono H., Ohkoshi S. (2025). Platelet-activating cytokines potentially associated with MASLD-induced liver injury significantly decreased following CPAP therapy: a translational study using a fatty liver mouse model. Sleep Med. 130, 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.03.011, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Langer H. F., Choi E. Y., Zhou H., Schleicher R., Chung K. J., Tang Z., et al. (2012). Platelets contribute to the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Circ. Res. 110, 1202–1210. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.256370, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Le P., Tatar M., Dasarathy S., Alkhouri N., Herman W. H., Taksler G. B., et al. (2025). Estimated burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated Steatotic liver disease in US adults, 2020 to 2050. JAMA Netw. Open 8:e2454707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54707, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li X., Chen W., Jia Z., Xiao Y., Shi A., Ma X. (2025). Mitochondrial dysfunction as a pathogenesis and therapeutic strategy for metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26:4256. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094256, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li S. Y., Johnson R., Smyth L. C., Dragunow M. (2022). Platelet-derived growth factor signalling in neurovascular function and disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 145:106187. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2022.106187, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Li H., Ke X., Feng B., Tian H., Cai Z., Zhang A., et al. (2025). Research progress on the mechanism and markers of metabolic disorders in the occurrence and development of cognitive dysfunction after ischemic stroke. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 16:1500650. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1500650, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Li Y., Li Y. J., Fang X., Chen D. Q., Yu W. Q., Zhu Z. Q. (2024a). Peripheral inflammation as a potential mechanism and preventive strategy for perioperative neurocognitive disorder under general anesthesia and surgery. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 18:1365448. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1365448, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li J., Li A., Ye C., Zhang L., Jiang M., Lan G., et al. (2026). Plasma platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta decrease correlates with blood-brain barrier damage in Alzheimer's disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 21:12. doi: 10.1186/s13024-026-00926-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li Y., Qi P., Song S. Y., Wang Y., Wang H., Cao P., et al. (2024b). Elucidating cuproptosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 174:116585. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116585, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li L., Zhou J., Wang S., Jiang L., Chen X., Zhou Y., et al. (2022). Critical role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in promoting platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis under hyperlipidemia. Haematologica 107, 1358–1373. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279770, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liao L., Li X., Xu H., Tang J., Li B., Tang Y., et al. (2025). Systematic analysis of the interaction mechanism between platelets and coronary heart disease: from molecular pathways to new strategies for plant based antiplatelet therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1586265. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1586265, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu C., Cheng L., Ji L., Li F., Zhan Y., Wu B., et al. (2020). Intestinal microbiota dysbiosis play a role in pathogenesis of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Thromb. Res. 190, 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.03.012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lombardi R., Fargion S., Fracanzani A. L. (2019). Brain involvement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review. Dig. Liver Dis. 51, 1214–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.015, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ma C., Fu Q., Diggs L. P., McVey J. C., McCallen J., Wabitsch S., et al. (2022). Platelets control liver tumor growth through P2Y12-dependent CD40L release in NAFLD. Cancer Cell 40, 986–998.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.004, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mai Z., Mao H. (2023). Causal effects of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on cerebral cortical structure: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 14:1276576. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1276576, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Malehmir M., Pfister D., Gallage S., Szydlowska M., Inverso D., Kotsiliti E., et al. (2019). Platelet GPIbalpha is a mediator and potential interventional target for NASH and subsequent liver cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 641–655. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0379-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Malin S. K., Stewart N. R., Ude A. A., Alderman B. L. (2022). Brain insulin resistance and cognitive function: influence of exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 133, 1368–1380. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00375.2022, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mandel J., Casari M., Stepanyan M., Martyanov A., Deppermann C. (2022). Beyond hemostasis: platelet innate immune interactions and thromboinflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:3868. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073868, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Maszka P., Kwasniak-Butowska M., Cysewski D., Slawek J., Smolenski R. T., Tomczyk M. (2023). Metabolomic footprint of disrupted energetics and amino acid metabolism in neurodegenerative diseases: perspectives for early diagnosis and monitoring of therapy. Meta 13:369. doi: 10.3390/metabo13030369, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Matias-Guiu J. A., Cortes-Martinez A., Valles-Salgado M., Oreja-Guevara C., Pytel V., Montero P., et al. (2017). Functional components of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional investigation. Front. Neurol. 8:643. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00643, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Michailidou D., Grayson P. C., Hermanson P., Chapa J. A. G., Cuthbertson D., Khalidi N. A., et al. (2023). Mitochondrial-mediated inflammation and platelet activation in giant cell arteritis. Clin. Immunol. 255:109746. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109746, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Michalak A., Cichoz-Lach H., Guz M., Kozicka J., Cybulski M., Jeleniewicz W. (2021). Plateletcrit and mean platelet volume in the evaluation of alcoholic liver cirrhosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021:8867985. doi: 10.1155/2021/8867985, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Milovanovic Alempijevic T., Stojkovic Lalosevic M., Dumic I., Jocic N., Pavlovic Markovic A., Dragasevic S., et al. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of platelet count and platelet indices in noninvasive assessment of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 1–5. doi: 10.1155/2017/6070135, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Minciuna I., Taru M. G., Procopet B., Stefanescu H. (2024). The interplay between liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, platelets, and neutrophil extracellular traps in the development and progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. J. Clin. Med. 13:1406. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051406, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Moretti R., Giuffre M., Croce L. S., Gazzin S., Tiribelli C. (2022). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and altered neuropsychological functions in patients with subcortical vascular dementia. J. Pers. Med. 12:1106. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071106, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Musaro D., Damato M., Coppola C., Greco M., Maffia M. (2026). Copper overload affects alpha-synuclein clearance mechanisms in a Parkinson's disease in vitro model. Adv. Biol. 10:e00274. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202500274, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nakhaee S., Azadi R., Salehinia H., Moodi M., Zarban A., Sharifi F., et al. (2024). The role of nitric oxide, insulin resistance, and vitamin D in cognitive function of older adults. Sci. Rep. 14:30020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81551-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nanizawa E., Tamaki Y., Yakura T., Otsuka S., Hatayama N., Naito M. (2024). The impact of a short-term high-fat diet on coagulation function in a mouse model and its role in exacerbating concanavalin A-induced liver injury. BMC Nutr. 10:158. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00966-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Narayanan P. (2024). PAR for the liver course: preserving platelet function mitigates outcomes in cirrhosis. Hepatology 80, 991–992. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001072, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Nieman M. T., Neeves K. B. (2023). Flipping the script: defining the reversibility of platelet activation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 21, 1102–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.02.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Nuzzo D., Picone P., Baldassano S., Caruana L., Messina E., Marino Gammazza A., et al. (2015). Insulin resistance as common molecular denominator linking obesity to Alzheimer's disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 12, 723–735. doi: 10.2174/1567205012666150710115506, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Palix C., Felisatti F., Gonneaud J., Kuhn E., Mezenge F., Landeau B., et al. (2022). Relationships between diabetes-related vascular risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 118, 25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.06.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Parikh N. S., Wahbeh F., Tapia C., Ianelli M., Liao V., Jaywant A., et al. (2024). Cognitive impairment and liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMJ Neurol. Open 6:e000543. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000543, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Pedreno J., Hurt-Camejo E., Wiklund O., Badimon L., Masana L. (2001). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) binds to a G-protein coupled receptor in human platelets. Evidence that the proaggregatory effect induced by LDL is modulated by down-regulation of binding sites and desensitization of its mediated signaling. Atherosclerosis 155, 99–112. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00545-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Peng D., Sun S., Zhao M., Zhan L., Wang X. (2024). Current advances in nanomaterials affecting functions and morphology of platelets. J. Funct. Biomater. 15:188. doi: 10.3390/jfb15070188, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Qin L. N., Yu Y. F., Ma L., Yu R. (2025). Intestinal bacteria-derived extracellular vesicles in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Mol. Cells 48:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100216, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ramos-Cejudo J., Johnson A. D., Beiser A., Seshadri S., Salinas J., Berger J. S., et al. (2022). Platelet function is associated with dementia risk in the Framingham heart study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 11:e023918. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023918, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Rao G., Peng X., Li X., An K., He H., Fu X., et al. (2023). Unmasking the enigma of lipid metabolism in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: from mechanism to the clinic. Front. Med. 10:1294267. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1294267, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Reiche W. S., Walters R. W., Schutte B. F., Mukherjee S., Buaisha H. M. (2024). Mild thrombocytopenia, a predictor of outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: assessment of surgical risk in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 58, 507–515. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001926, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rodriguez Moore G., Melo-Escobar I., Stegner D., Bracko O. (2024). One immune cell to bind them all: platelet contribution to neurodegenerative disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 19:65. doi: 10.1186/s13024-024-00754-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rust C., Malan-Muller S., van den Heuvel L. L., Tonge D., Seedat S., Pretorius E., et al. (2023). Platelets bridging the gap between gut dysbiosis and neuroinflammation in stress-linked disorders: a narrative review. J. Neuroimmunol. 382:578155. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2023.578155, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Saul J., Hutchins E., Reiman R., Saul M., Ostrow L. W., Harris B. T., et al. (2020). Global alterations to the choroid plexus blood-CSF barrier in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 8:92. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-00968-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Schwarzler J., Grabherr F., Grander C., Adolph T. E., Tilg H. (2024). The pathophysiology of MASLD: an immunometabolic perspective. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 20, 375–386. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294046, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sedzikowska A., Szablewski L. (2021). Insulin and insulin resistance in Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:9987. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189987, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Shepardson N. E., Shankar G. M., Selkoe D. J. (2011). Cholesterol level and statin use in Alzheimer disease: I. Review of epidemiological and preclinical studies. Arch. Neurol. 68, 1239–1244. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.203, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Shi L., Jin L., Huang W. (2023). Bile acids, intestinal barrier dysfunction, and related diseases. Cells 12:1888. doi: 10.3390/cells12141888, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Shrivastava M., Vivekanandhan S., Pati U., Behari M., Das T. K. (2011). Mitochondrial perturbance and execution of apoptosis in platelet mitochondria of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Int. J. Neurosci. 121, 149–158. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2010.537416, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Slachevsky A., Guzman-Martinez L., Delgado C., Reyes P., Farias G. A., Munoz-Neira C., et al. (2017). Tau platelets correlate with regional brain atrophy in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimer's Dis 55, 1595–1603. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160652, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Song Z., He J., Yu W., He C., Yang M., Li P., et al. (2024). Exploring the multifaceted therapeutic mechanism of Schisanlactone E (XTS) in APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease through multi-omics analysis. Front. Microbiol. 15:1440564. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1440564, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Soto A., Spongberg C., Martinino A., Giovinazzo F. (2024). Exploring the multifaceted landscape of MASLD: a comprehensive synthesis of recent studies, from pathophysiology to organoids and beyond. Biomedicine 12:397. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020397, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Strijkova V., Todinova S., Andreeva T., Langari A., Bogdanova D., Zlatareva E., et al. (2022). Platelets' nanomechanics and morphology in neurodegenerative pathologies. Biomedicine 10:2239. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092239, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sun X., Yu Q., Qi Y., Kang B., Zhao X., Liu L., et al. (2024). Peridroplet mitochondria are associated with the severity of MASLD and the prevention of MASLD by diethyldithiocarbamate. J. Lipid Res. 65:100590. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100590, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Suppli M. P., Bagger J. I., Lelouvier B., Broha A., Demant M., Konig M. J., et al. (2021). Hepatic microbiome in healthy lean and obese humans. JHEP Rep. 3:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100299, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Syed-Abdul M. M. (2023). Lipid metabolism in metabolic-associated Steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Meta 14:12. doi: 10.3390/metabo14010012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Takahashi M., Takahashi K. (2019). Water-soluble CoQ10 as a promising anti-aging agent for neurological dysfunction in brain mitochondria. Antioxidants 8:61. doi: 10.3390/antiox8030061, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Thongtan T., Deb A., Vutthikraivit W., Laoveeravat P., Mingbunjerdsuk T., Islam S., et al. (2022). Antiplatelet therapy associated with lower prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 41, 119–126. doi: 10.1007/s12664-021-01230-3, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tian Y., Zong Y., Pang Y., Zheng Z., Ma Y., Zhang C., et al. (2025). Platelets and diseases: signal transduction and advances in targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 10:159. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02198-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Truong X. T., Lee D. H. (2025). Hepatic insulin resistance and steatosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: new insights into mechanisms and clinical implications. Diabetes Metab. J. 49, 964–986. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2025.0644, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. van Geffen J. P., Swieringa F., van Kuijk K., Tullemans B. M. E., Solari F. A., Peng B., et al. (2020). Mild hyperlipidemia in mice aggravates platelet responsiveness in thrombus formation and exploration of platelet proteome and lipidome. Sci. Rep. 10:21407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78522-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Varol E., Akcay S., Ozaydin M., Erdogan D., Dogan A., Altinbas A. (2010). Mean platelet volume is associated with insulin resistance in non-obese, non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. J. Cardiol. 56, 154–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.03.005, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Vataja E., Viitanen M., Rinne J. O., Lehtisalo J., Erlund I., Ngandu T., et al. (2025). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease as a predictor of cognitive performance: An 11-year population-based follow-up study. Dig. Liver Dis. 57, 1035–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.01.197, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Violi F., Pastori D., Pignatelli P., Cammisotto V. (2024). Endotoxemia and platelets: 2 players of intrahepatic microthrombosis in NAFLD. Basic Transl. Sci. 9, 404–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.07.003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang J., Yang R., Miao Y., Zhang X., Paillard-Borg S., Fang Z., et al. (2025). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is associated with accelerated brain ageing: a population-based study. Liver Int. 45:e70109. doi: 10.1111/liv.70109, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wei X. X., Tang X. Q. (2025). Platelets: a new therapeutic target for neurological diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 112:102874. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102874, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Weinstein G., O'Donnell A., Davis-Plourde K., Zelber-Sagi S., Ghosh S., DeCarli C. S., et al. (2022). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver fibrosis, and regional amyloid-beta and tau pathology in middle-aged adults: the Framingham study. J. Alzheimer's Dis 86, 1371–1383. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215409, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wen J., Hao X., Jia Y., Wang B., Pang J., Liang F. (2024). Sex differences in the association between LDL/HDL with cognitive decline in older adults: National Health and nutrition examination survey. J. Alzheimer's Dis 98, 1493–1502. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231195, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wu M. L., Yang X. Q., Xue L., Duan W., Du J. R. (2021). Age-related cognitive decline is associated with microbiota-gut-brain axis disorders and neuroinflammation in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 402:113125. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113125, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Xiong S. Y., Zhao Y. L., Fu Y., Li Q. Y., Hao Q., Zhang D. D., et al. (2025). Associations between platelet indices and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in cognitively intact adults: the CABLE study. Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 17:124. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01755-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Xu F., Hu J., Li X., Yang L., Jiang S., Jiang T., et al. (2025). Inhibition of platelet activation alleviates diabetes-associated cognitive dysfunction via attenuating blood-brain barrier injury. Brain Res. Bull. 221:111211. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111211, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang F., Meng T., Torben-Nielsen B., Magnus C., Liu C., Dejean E. (2023). A machine learning approach to support triaging of primary versus secondary headache patients using complete blood count. PLoS One 18:e0282237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282237, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Yang W., Shi H., Zhang J., Shen Z., Zhou G., Hu M. (2017). Effects of the duration of hyperlipidemia on cerebral lipids, vessels and neurons in rats. Lipids Health Dis. 16:26. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0401-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Yang H., Tang Y. M., Han S. C., Wang P. Q., Tao Y. X., Yang H. Q., et al. (2026). Unraveling the mechanisms of wuling powder against MASLD by integrated metabolomics-gut microbiota-serum pharmacochemistry. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 19:557. doi: 10.3390/ph19040557, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Yang M., Wang H., Bukhari I., Zhao Y., Huang H., Yu Y., et al. (2023). Effects of cholesterol-lowering probiotics on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in FXR gene knockout mice. Front. Nutr. 10:1121203. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1121203, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Yao Y. Z., Yin T., Yao Y. M. (2026). Platelet mitochondria: a promising target for antiplatelet therapy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 45, 265–292. doi: 10.1177/15230864261452350, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Yavari M., Kalupahana N. S., Harris B. N., Ramalingam L., Zu Y., Kahathuduwa C. N., et al. (2025). Mechanisms linking obesity, insulin resistance, and Alzheimer's disease: effects of polyphenols and Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nutrients 17:1203. doi: 10.3390/nu17071203, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ye B., Xu C. (2026). Systemic metabolic dysfunction drives platelet-mediated inflammation, fibrogenesis, and hepatocarcinogenesis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 32, 1158–1185. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2026.0218, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Yilmaz P., Alferink L. J. M., Cremers L. G. M., Murad S. D., Niessen W. J., Ikram M. A., et al. (2023). Subclinical liver traits are associated with structural and hemodynamic brain imaging markers. Liver Int. 43, 1256–1268. doi: 10.1111/liv.15549, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Yin H., Shi A., Wu J. (2022). Platelet-activating factor promotes the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 15, 2003–2030. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S367483, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Yu Y., Ding Y., Wang S., Jiang L. (2025). Gut microbiota dysbiosis and its impact on type 2 diabetes: from pathogenesis to therapeutic strategies. Meta 15:397. doi: 10.3390/metabo15060397, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Yu Q., He R., Jiang H., Wu J., Xi Z., He K., et al. (2022). Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and cognitive impairment. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 10, 1034–1041. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00490, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Zhang P., Liu J., Lee A., Tsaur I., Ohira M., Duong V., et al. (2024). IL-22 resolves MASLD via enterocyte STAT3 restoration of diet-perturbed intestinal homeostasis. Cell Metab. 36, 2341–2354.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.08.012, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhang Y., Liu J., Wei Z., Mei J., Li Q., Zhen X., et al. (2023). Elevated serum platelet count inhibits the effects of brain functional changes on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1088095. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1088095, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Zhang Z., Wang J. (2025). Correlation between PLT, MPV, PDW and liver fibrosis and inflammatory activity in patients with NAFLD: a retrospective case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 104:e43815. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043815, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhou M., Lv J., Chen X., Shi Y., Chao G., Zhang S. (2025). From gut to liver: exploring the crosstalk between gut-liver axis and oxidative stress in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Ann. Hepatol. 30:101777. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101777, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhou T. D., Zhang Z., Balachandrasekaran A., Raji C. A., Becker J. T., Kuller L. H., et al. (2024). Prospective longitudinal perfusion in probable Alzheimer's disease correlated with atrophy in temporal lobe. Aging Dis. 15, 1855–1871. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0430, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhu G., Yan L., Fang L., Fan C., Sun H., Zhou X., et al. (2024). Possible immune mechanisms of gut microbiota and its metabolites in the occurrence and development of immune thrombocytopenia. Front. Microbiol. 15:1426911. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1426911, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zisis M., Chondrogianni M. E., Androutsakos T., Rantos I., Oikonomou E., Chatzigeorgiou A., et al. (2025). Linking cardiovascular disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): the role of cardiometabolic drugs in MASLD treatment. Biomolecules 15:324. doi: 10.3390/biom15030324, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES