Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1966 Jun;184(4):872–882.2. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007953

Nerve implants in botulinum poisoned mammalian muscle

S Fex, B Sonesson, S Thesleff, Jirina Zelená
PMCID: PMC1357623  PMID: 4223682

Abstract

1. In albino rats the botulinum poisoned gastrocnemius muscle was supplied with an accessory motor nerve in order to investigate whether muscle fibres with structurally intact but non-transmitting synapses would accept additional innervation. As a control similar operations were made in unpoisoned rats.

2. One to three months after nerve implantation the muscles were examined histologically for the presence of a new end-plate zone. In botulinum treated muscles 1662 ± 165 (mean ± S.D.) of new end-plates were found. In the control animals only a few (90 ± 13) were observed in the immediate vicinity of the implanted nerve trunk.

3. Following recovery from the paralysing action of botulinum toxin electrical stimulation of both the implanted and the original motor nerve evoked strong mechanical twitches in the gastrocnemius muscle.

4. When the nerves were stimulated simultaneously little or no summation of tension occurred, indicating that presumably many of the muscle fibres with new end-plates also had functionally intact junctions from the original nerve. The presence of two end-plates in a muscle fibre was confirmed in a few experiments on single curarized fibres by intracellular recording of end-plate potentials on stimulation of each nerve.

Full text

PDF
872

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AITKEN J. T. PROBLEMS OF REINNERVATION OF MUSCLE. Prog Brain Res. 1965;14:232–262. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63744-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AXELSSON J., THESLEFF S. A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Jun 23;147(1):178–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambache N. The peripheral action of Cl. botulinum toxin. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 15;108(2):127–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BROOKS V. B. An intracellular study of the action of repetitive nerve volleys and of botulinum toxin on miniature end-plate potentials. J Physiol. 1956 Nov 28;134(2):264–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BROWN M. C., MATTHEWS P. B. An investigation into the possible existence of polyneuronal innervation of individual skeletal muscle fibres in certain hind-limb muscles of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;151:436–457. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DIAMOND J., MILEDI R. A study of foetal and new-born rat muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:393–408. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DRACHMAN D. B. ATROPHY OF SKELETAL MUSCLE IN CHICK EMBRYOS TREATED WITH BOTULINUM TOXIN. Science. 1964 Aug 14;145(3633):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3633.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elsberg C. A. EXPERIMENTS ON MOTOR NERVE REGENERATION AND THE DIRECT NEUROTIZATION OF PARALYZED MUSCLES BY THEIR OWN AND BY FOREIGN NERVES. Science. 1917 Mar 30;45(1161):318–320. doi: 10.1126/science.45.1161.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GEREBTZOFF M. A. Recherches histochimiques sur les acétylcholine et choline estérases. Acta Anat (Basel) 1953;19(4):366–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GUTH L., ZALEWSKI A. A. Disposition of cholinesterase following implantation of nerve into innervated and denervated muscle. Exp Neurol. 1963 Apr;7:316–326. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(63)90078-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gutmann E., Sanders F. K. Recovery of fibre numbers and diameters in the regeneration of peripheral nerves. J Physiol. 1943 Mar 25;101(4):489–518. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUNT C. C., KUFFLER S. W. Motor innervation of skeletal muscle: multiple innervation of individual muscle fibres and motor unit function. J Physiol. 1954 Nov 29;126(2):293–303. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JIRMANOVA I., SOBOTKOVA M., THESLEFF S., ZELENA J. ATROPHY IN SKELETAL MUSCLES POISONED WITH BOTULINUM TOXIN. Physiol Bohemoslov. 1964;13:467–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JOSEFSSON J. O., THESLEFF S. Electromyographic findings in experimental botulinum intoxication. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Feb-Mar;51:163–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KATZ B., MILEDI R. THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACETYLCHOLINE SENSITIVITY IN NERVE-FREE SEGMENTS OF SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:389–396. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MILEDI R. The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial devervation. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. THESLEFF S. Supersensitivity of skeletal muscle produced by botulinum toxin. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;151:598–607. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ZACKS S. I., METZGER J., SMITH C. W., BLUMBERG J. M. Localization of ferritin-labelled botulinus toxin in the neuromuscular junction of the mouse. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1962 Oct;21:610–633. doi: 10.1097/00005072-196210000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. ZELENA J., HNIK P. MOTOR AND RECEPTOR UNITS IN THE SOLEUS MUSCLE AFTER NERVE REGENERATION IN VERY YOUNG RATS. Physiol Bohemoslov. 1963;12:277–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES