Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Sep 15;21(9):e0358125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358125

Esketamine exerts a protective effect against skeletal muscle injury induced by hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice by regulating autophagy

Jingwang Liu 1, Jiaxin Liu 1, Tianyi He 1, Penghui Zhang 1, Nan Zhao 1, Maozheng Wei 1, Yuxin Guan 2, Peng Liu 1, Shuang Zhao 1, Xiuli Wang 1,*
Editor: Atsushi Asakura3
PMCID: PMC13577385  PMID: 42743119

Abstract

Tourniquet-associated lower limb ischemia-reperfusion can induce skeletal muscle inflammation, edema, and early functional impairment, in which autophagy dysregulation may be involved. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of esketamine (ESK) on skeletal muscle injury following lower limb ischemia-reperfusion in mice and its relationship with autophagy regulation. A mouse model of left hindlimb ischemia for 3 hours followed by 24 hours of reperfusion was established, and changes in hindlimb perfusion, functional outcomes, tissue injury, inflammatory response, and autophagy-related markers were examined after intervention with ESK alone or in combination with chloroquine phosphate (CQ). The results showed that ESK attenuated the abnormally elevated perfusion after reperfusion, improved motor performance and partial muscle contractile function, yet exerted limited effects on mechanical pain threshold and nerve stimulation-induced muscle contraction. Concurrently, ESK alleviated histological damage, edema, and sarcolemmal integrity disruption in the gastrocnemius muscle, reduced serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha and Interleukin-6 levels, and downregulated the expression of several inflammation-related genes. With respect to autophagy, ESK increased the microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 II/I ratio while decreasing sequestosome 1 levels and the phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin/total mechanistic target of rapamycin ratio; these protective effects were partially abrogated by CQ. Collectively, these findings indicate that ESK mitigates acute-phase skeletal muscle injury and improves selected early functional outcomes after lower limb ischemia-reperfusion in mice, and that its protective actions may be associated with suppression of inflammation and modulation of autophagy.

Background

In orthopedic surgery, tourniquets are widely used because they effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding and provide a clear surgical field [1]. However, during tourniquet application, patients often develop the so-called “tourniquet response,” characterized by progressive pain and sympathetic excitation caused by sustained limb ischemia, which manifests as increases in blood pressure and heart rate. This poses considerable challenges for intraoperative anesthetic management, requiring anesthesiologists to repeatedly balance adequate analgesia and sedation, hemodynamic stability, and the avoidance of drug overdose [2,3]. Meanwhile, the adverse effects induced by tourniquet use do not completely cease at the end of surgery. After tourniquet release and restoration of blood flow, the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) process can further trigger excessive generation of reactive oxygen species and inflammatory cascade responses, resulting in injury to multiple tissues, including muscle, nerve, and vasculature [4]. Clinically, this is manifested as early postoperative lower-limb pain, weakness, restricted mobility, and delayed functional recovery, all of which markedly reduce patient comfort and willingness to ambulate, thereby slowing postoperative rehabilitation [4,5]. This has become one of the important factors limiting the broader implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in orthopedics.

I/R injury is essentially a multifaceted form of tissue trauma. Previous studies have shown that it can simultaneously damage the muscular, neural, and vascular systems, leading to disruption of myofiber architecture, impaired nerve conduction, and microcirculatory perfusion deficits. The underlying mechanisms involve complex pathological processes, including enhanced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, elevated inflammatory cytokines, local edema, and apoptosis [6,7]. As an important metabolic process for maintaining neuronal and muscular cellular homeostasis, autophagy plays a “double-edged sword” role in I/R injury: moderate autophagy can remove damaged proteins and mitochondria, thereby alleviating oxidative stress and neuroinflammation; however, insufficient or excessive autophagy may both aggravate cellular injury [8,9]. Therefore, whether modulation of autophagy can be used to ameliorate I/R injury has become a current focus of research.

Esketamine (ESK) is a highly selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that is widely used in perioperative anesthetic management because of its prominent sedative and analgesic effects [10,11]. In orthopedic surgery, particularly in procedures requiring prolonged tourniquet application, ESK can effectively alleviate intraoperative pain and sympathetic excitation caused by the tourniquet response, and has therefore become one of the commonly used agents for optimizing anesthetic regimens in orthopedics [2,12]. Notably, beyond its analgesic properties, accumulating evidence in recent years suggests that ESK may exert protective effects under pathological conditions such as I/R and oxidative stress by regulating autophagy and controlling inflammation [13,14]. However, under the condition of hindlimb I/R, systematic evidence is still lacking as to whether ESK can likewise confer protection. Therefore, the present study aimed to establish a mouse hindlimb I/R model to evaluate the effects of ESK on hindlimb I/R-related functional outcomes and tissue injury, thereby providing a new theoretical basis and experimental evidence for optimizing anesthetic strategies in orthopedic surgery and promoting rapid postoperative recovery.

Materials and methods

Animals

This experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Hebei Medical University (Approval No. IACUC-Hebmu-2025129; approval date: December 17, 2025). The animals used in this study were specific pathogen-free male C57BL/6 mice (n = 70), aged 8–10 weeks and weighing 20–25 g, supplied by Hebei Zizhen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The mice were housed in an animal facility under a 12 hours (h) light/12 h dark cycle, at an ambient temperature of 20–24°C and a relative humidity of 40%–60%, with ad libitum access to food and water. All mice were acclimated for 7 days before the start of the experiment. General health status was assessed preoperatively, and only healthy mice without obvious signs of disease or behavioral abnormalities were included in the subsequent experiments. Mice with body weights outside the specified range or with unsuccessful model establishment were excluded. All animals meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis, with no additional exclusions. All animal procedures were conducted in strict accordance with the institutional guidelines for animal experimentation, and the study was reported in compliance with the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines.

In this study, humane endpoints were predefined for all animals. If an animal exhibited severe pain or distress, euthanasia was performed promptly. Animal health status and behavior were monitored throughout the experiment, with continuous observation during anesthesia and recovery, and twice-daily monitoring after surgery to ensure animal welfare. The specific humane endpoints included inability to eat or drink; severe lethargy with no response to stimulation; severe dyspnea; progressive marked swelling, ulceration, or necrosis of the affected hindlimb; evidence of self-mutilation tendency or obvious tissue loss; or a body weight loss of more than 20% relative to baseline. Once any of these endpoint criteria were met, immediate euthanasia was carried out. In this study, no animal died before meeting the euthanasia criteria.

The experimental duration for each animal consisted of 3 h of hindlimb ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion. At the end of the 24 h reperfusion period, all animals were euthanized at the predetermined experimental endpoint after completion of the corresponding experimental procedures. A total of 70 animals were used, and all animals ultimately underwent humane euthanasia. All surgeries and procedures were performed under isoflurane anesthesia (1.5-3%), and measures such as the use of heating pads were implemented to minimize pain and stress as much as possible. Euthanasia was performed by carbon dioxide inhalation. All experiments were conducted by trained researchers in accordance with relevant ethical and technical standards.

Experimental design and animal grouping

A total of 70 mice were included in this study. The main experimental cohort consisted of 60 mice, which were allocated into five groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence, with 12 mice per group: the Sham group, I/R group, ESK + I/R group, ESK + chloroquine phosphate (CQ) + I/R group, and CQ + I/R group. The Sham group underwent the same anesthesia and procedural manipulations but without tourniquet application, whereas the other groups were all subjected to the left hindlimb I/R model. The doses of esketamine (10 mg/kg; Hengrui Pharmaceutical, Jiangsu, China) and chloroquine phosphate (60 mg/kg; Aladdin, Shanghai, China) were determined based on previous animal studies and the results of preliminary experiments [15,16]. These agents were administered intraperitoneally 20 min and 30 min before ischemia, respectively. The I/R and Sham groups received an equal volume of normal saline.

To accommodate the assessment of different outcome measures, the mice in each group were further divided into two subgroups (n = 6 each). Subgroup 1 was used for mechanical pain threshold testing, skeletal muscle contractile force measurement, and wet-to-dry weight ratio analysis. Subgroup 2 was used for the rotarod test, serum inflammatory cytokine assays, and histological and molecular biological analyses of the gastrocnemius muscle. On the day of model establishment, laser speckle blood perfusion imaging was performed in all groups before ischemia, after ischemia, and at 24 h after reperfusion. At 24 h after reperfusion, after completion of the mechanical pain threshold and skeletal muscle contractile force assessments, the left gastrocnemius muscle from subgroup 1 was harvested for wet-to-dry ratio analysis. After completion of the rotarod test, blood samples and the left gastrocnemius muscle were collected from subgroup 2 for the analysis of serum inflammatory cytokines, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). With the exception of blood collection, all tissue sampling procedures were performed after euthanasia.

An additional 10 mice were used as an independent animal cohort, with two mice per group. The same randomization procedure, treatment regimen, ischemia/reperfusion modeling protocol, and tissue collection time points were applied to increase the number of biological replicates for Western blot and RT-qPCR analyses.

Establishment of the hindlimb I/R model

After induction of anesthesia with inhaled isoflurane, a McGivney hemorrhoidal ligator was used to apply an orthodontic rubber band to the proximal left hindlimb, thereby inducing ischemia of the left hindlimb for 3 h, followed by reperfusion for 24 h after release of the rubber band [17]. Throughout the ischemic period, anesthesia was maintained only during the application of the orthodontic rubber band, and body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a heating pad until the animals regained consciousness. Laser speckle imaging was performed after tourniquet application and before tourniquet release to confirm near-complete ischemia of the affected hindlimb, thereby verifying successful model establishment.

Blood perfusion imaging

A laser speckle contrast imaging system was used to assess hindlimb blood perfusion in mice. After anesthesia with 1.5% inhaled isoflurane, the mice were placed on a black imaging platform, and blood perfusion in the plantar regions of both hind paws was measured using a blood perfusion imaging device (RFLSI III, RWD, Shenzhen, China). During the experiment, perfusion images were acquired before ischemic treatment, after tourniquet application, and at 24 h after tourniquet release and reperfusion. The images were analyzed using the accompanying software, and the level of blood perfusion was expressed as the perfusion ratio of the ischemic hindlimb to the contralateral healthy hindlimb.

Rotarod test

Mice underwent rotarod pre-acclimation training for 3 consecutive days before model establishment, and performance was assessed using a mouse rotarod fatigue apparatus (ZS-RDM-XS, Zhongshi Dichuang, Beijing, China). The pre-acclimation training was performed in the accelerating mode, with an initial speed of 4 revolutions per minute (rpm), an acceleration of 20 rpm/min, and a maximum speed of 30 rpm for 5 min; each mouse was trained twice daily. Formal testing was conducted at 24 h after reperfusion, and the latency to fall was recorded using the same accelerating protocol. Each mouse was tested three times, and the mean value was used for statistical analysis. After the rotarod test, the mice were allowed to rest for 1 h before subsequent experiments.

Mechanical pain threshold assessment

Baseline mechanical pain threshold measurements were performed for 3 consecutive days before model establishment. Prior to testing, mice were placed in transparent chambers with a metal mesh floor and allowed to acclimate for 1 h. The plantar surface of the affected hind paw was then stimulated perpendicularly using von Frey filaments (Touch Test, North Coast Medical, Gilroy, CA, USA), and the 50% paw withdrawal threshold was determined using the up-down method [18]. Formal testing was conducted again at 24 h after reperfusion using the same procedure.

Skeletal muscle contractile force measurement

At 24 h after reperfusion, skeletal muscle contractile force was measured in mice. Under isoflurane anesthesia, the mice were placed in the prone position, and body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a heating pad. The left gastrocnemius muscle was kept continuously moistened with warm normal saline, and the distal tendon of the left gastrocnemius was connected to a high-precision force transducer (ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA). After incision of the left biceps femoris to expose the sciatic nerve, the nerve was transected, and the distal nerve stump was stimulated using bipolar platinum electrodes to evoke gastrocnemius contraction. The parameters for nerve stimulation were as follows: twitch contraction, 10 V, 1 Hz, 1 ms; tetanic contraction, 10 V, 100 Hz, 1 ms, sustained for 2 s. For direct muscle stimulation, the electrodes were placed at the proximal end of the gastrocnemius, and the maximal force of twitch contraction (20 V, 1 Hz, 1 ms) and tetanic contraction (20 V, 100 Hz, 1 ms, sustained for 2 s) was recorded, with an interval of 2 min between each stimulation. Muscle contractile force data were recorded and analyzed using a PowerLab 8/30 data acquisition system and LabChart 8 software (ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA).

Skeletal muscle wet-to-dry weight ratio

At 24 h after reperfusion, the intact left gastrocnemius muscle was harvested from each mouse. After gently removing surface blood and moisture, the wet weight was measured. The tissue was then dried in an oven at 80°C for 48 h until a constant weight was reached, and the dry weight was recorded. The wet-to-dry weight ratio was subsequently calculated to assess the degree of tissue edema.

Measurement of inflammatory cytokine levels

At 24 h after reperfusion, orbital blood was collected from the mice, and serum was isolated by centrifugation and stored at −80°C until further analysis. Serum levels of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured using chemiluminescent immunoassay kits purchased from Wuhan Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd. (catalog numbers: GLM0010-100T, GLM0005-100T, and GLM0004-100T). All procedures were performed strictly in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.

Assessment of skeletal muscle injury

At 24 h after reperfusion, the left gastrocnemius muscle was harvested from the mice for histological evaluation. The tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned transversely. After deparaffinization and rehydration, the sections were subjected to H&E staining, and images were observed and acquired under a bright-field microscope.

Western blot analysis

At 24 h after reperfusion, samples of the left gastrocnemius muscle were collected from the mice and stored at −80°C. The gastrocnemius tissue was homogenized and lysed in RIPA buffer, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4°C to collect the total protein in the supernatant. Protein concentration was then determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China). One-fourth volume of 5 × loading buffer was added to the protein samples, which were then denatured at 95°C for 10 min. Equal amounts of total protein (20 μg/lane) were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes by constant-current electrophoretic transfer. After transfer, the membranes were blocked with a protein-free rapid blocking solution for 20 min. According to the molecular weight of the target proteins, the membranes were cut and incubated separately with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: rabbit anti-microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 II/I (LC3-II/I) antibody (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; ET1701−65; 1:2000), rabbit anti-sequestosome 1 (p62) antibody (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; HA721171; 1:2000), rabbit anti-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) antibody (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; ET1608−5; 1:5000), rabbit anti-phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) antibody (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; HA60094; 1:1000), and rabbit anti-β-actin antibody (Servicebio, Wuhan, China; GB15003; 1:5000). After washing with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween, the membranes were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody (Servicebio, Wuhan, China; GB23303; 1:10000). After further washing, protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent substrate (Applygen, Beijing, China; P1050), and band densitometric analysis was performed using ImageJ software, with β-actin as the internal reference for normalization.

Immunofluorescence

At 24 h after reperfusion, the left gastrocnemius muscle was collected from the mice for immunofluorescence analysis. Gastrocnemius injury was evaluated by laminin immunostaining combined with detection of endogenous IgG extravasation [19]. Fresh gastrocnemius tissue was embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature compound and stored at −80°C, and 10 μm transverse sections of the gastrocnemius were subsequently prepared.

For staining, the sections were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% bovine serum albumin containing 0.3% Triton X-100. After removal of the blocking solution, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary antibody against laminin (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; HA721532; 1:1000). On the following day, the sections were rewarmed to room temperature and washed with PBS. They were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the dark with the following fluorescent secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; HA1121; 1:500) for detection of the laminin signal, and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (HUABIO, Hangzhou, China; HA1126; 1:500) for detection of endogenous IgG extravasation in the tissue. After PBS washing, the sections were mounted with an anti-fade mounting medium containing DAPI, and images were observed and acquired under a fluorescence microscope.

All immunofluorescence images were acquired using identical parameters. Quantitative analysis was performed using ImageJ software after background subtraction. For each mouse, two transverse gastrocnemius sections were analyzed. From each image, 30 muscle fibers with clear boundaries and intact structure were randomly selected, and the mean fluorescence intensity of endogenous IgG within the muscle fibers was measured. The average value from the two images was taken as the result for that mouse.

RT-qPCR

At 24 h after reperfusion, the left gastrocnemius muscle was collected from the mice for RT-qPCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted using the FastPure Complex Tissue/Cell Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China; RC113). Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) contamination was removed and cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s instructions using HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, Nanjing, China; R323). Real-time quantitative PCR was then performed on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (96-well, 0.2 mL block) using the SYBR Green method with ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China; Q711). The total reaction volume was 20 μL per well, and primer concentrations were prepared according to the manufacturer’s recommended conditions. The amplification protocol was as follows: 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 seconds (s). After amplification, melt curve analysis was performed under the following conditions: 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and then a gradual increase to 95°C at 0.05°C/s with continuous fluorescence signal acquisition to verify amplification specificity. Gene expression levels were analyzed using the 2^-ΔΔCt method [20], with β-actin as the internal reference gene and the Sham group as the calibrator for relative expression. The primer sequences used are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR.

Genes Forward (5′ to 3′) Reverse (5′ to 3′)
Casp1 TGCCTGGTCTTGTGACTTGG GTCACCCTATCAGCAGTGGG
Ccl2 TGACCCCAAGAAGGAATGGG ACCTTAGGGCAGATGCAGTT
Il10 GGTGAGAAGCTGAAGACCCTC GCCTTGTAGACACCTTGGTCTT
Il1b GCCACCTTTTGACAGTGATGAG GACAGCCCAGGTCAAAGGTT
Nlrp3 ATTACCCGCCCGAGAAAGG TCGCAGCAAAGATCCACACAG
β-actin GATCAGCAAGCAGGAGTACGA GGGTGTAAAACGCAGCTCA

Abbreviations: Casp1, caspase-1; Ccl2, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; Nlrp3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, USA). Under the assumptions of normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, comparisons among multiple groups were conducted using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple-comparisons test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The researchers were blinded to the group allocation during outcome assessment and data analysis.

Results

ESK attenuated hyperperfusion at 24 h after hindlimb I/R

Laser speckle imaging was used to dynamically assess blood perfusion in both hindlimbs of mice. The results showed that blood perfusion in the ischemic hindlimb was markedly reduced in all groups during tourniquet application, whereas perfusion recovered and developed into a hyperperfusion state at 24 h after reperfusion.

Before tourniquet application, there was no statistically significant difference in the hindlimb perfusion ratio (ischemic side/contralateral side) among the groups. During tourniquet application, the perfusion ratio of the ischemic hindlimb in each intervention group was significantly decreased compared with baseline, with no statistically significant difference among groups. At 24 h after reperfusion, the perfusion ratio in the I/R group was significantly higher than that in the Sham group, whereas ESK treatment significantly reduced this ratio. After co-administration of CQ, the effect of ESK showed a decreasing trend; CQ alone did not improve hyperperfusion. These findings suggest that ESK can attenuate the hyperperfusion state induced by I/R (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Effects of esketamine on blood perfusion after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice.

Fig 1

(A) Laser speckle images at different stages, where red indicates high perfusion and blue indicates low perfusion.(B) Quantitative analysis before ischemia.(C) Quantitative analysis during ischemia.(D) Quantitative analysis at 24 h after reperfusion. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

ESK improved motor function at 24 h after I/R

The rotarod test showed that the latency to fall was significantly shorter in the I/R group than in the Sham group, whereas ESK treatment significantly prolonged the latency to fall. This improvement was abolished by co-administration of CQ, and CQ alone did not improve motor function. These findings indicate that ESK can improve motor function after I/R.

The von Frey test showed that the 50% paw withdrawal threshold in the Sham group was lower than that in all other groups, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed among the I/R-treated groups. These results indicate that the mechanical withdrawal threshold was elevated at 24 h after reperfusion, and that neither ESK nor CQ treatment significantly affected this parameter (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Effects of esketamine on motor performance and mechanical sensitivity after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice.

Fig 2

(A) Rotarod test results, in which motor coordination was represented by the latency to fall from the accelerating rotarod.(B) Mechanical nociception test results, in which the paw withdrawal threshold of the hind paw was measured using von Frey filaments to assess mechanical sensitivity.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

ESK improved muscle contractile force at 24 h after I/R

Under direct muscle stimulation, both twitch force and tetanic force were significantly lower in the I/R group than in the Sham group, whereas ESK treatment partially restored both parameters. This improvement was attenuated after co-administration of CQ, while CQ alone produced no significant improvement. These findings indicate that ESK can partially ameliorate the decline in muscle contractile function induced by I/R, and that CQ can weaken this effect.

Under sciatic nerve electrical stimulation, the evoked twitch force and tetanic force were extremely low in all groups except the Sham group, with no statistically significant differences among groups. These results suggest that at 24 h after reperfusion, ESK did not restore nerve stimulation-driven muscle contraction, and CQ treatment did not alter this trend (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Effects of esketamine on muscle contractile force after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice.

Fig 3

(A) Twitch contraction, tetanic contraction, and quantitative analysis under electrical stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle.(B) Twitch contraction, tetanic contraction, and quantitative analysis under electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

ESK attenuated I/R-induced skeletal muscle histopathological injury, edema, and disruption of sarcolemmal integrity

H&E staining showed that, in the Sham group, gastrocnemius muscle fibers were regularly arranged, structurally intact, and separated by relatively small interstitial spaces. In contrast, the I/R group exhibited marked muscle injury, characterized by disorganized muscle fiber arrangement, widened interstitial spaces, and aggravated structural disruption. These histopathological changes were alleviated in the I/R + ESK group, as evidenced by relatively preserved muscle fiber morphology and reduced interstitial expansion. In the I/R + ESK + CQ group, however, structural damage and interstitial expansion were more pronounced than those in the I/R + ESK group, while the I/R + CQ group still displayed obvious histological injury.

To further quantify tissue edema, the wet-to-dry weight ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured. The results showed that the wet-to-dry ratio was significantly increased in the I/R group compared with the Sham group, whereas ESK treatment significantly reduced this ratio. This beneficial effect was attenuated after co-administration of CQ, while the wet-to-dry ratio remained at a relatively high level in the CQ-alone group.

Laminin staining combined with endogenous IgG immunofluorescence was used to evaluate skeletal muscle membrane integrity. The results showed that almost no IgG-positive signal was observed within muscle fibers in the Sham group, whereas IgG fluorescence intensity was markedly increased in the I/R group. ESK treatment significantly reduced IgG extravasation, and this effect was partially attenuated by co-administration of CQ; CQ alone did not produce an obvious improvement. Taken together, these findings indicate that ESK can attenuate I/R-induced gastrocnemius tissue injury, edema, and disruption of sarcolemmal integrity, whereas CQ can partially weaken its protective effects (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Effects of esketamine on skeletal muscle histopathology, edema, and sarcolemmal integrity after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion.

Fig 4

(A) Longitudinal and transverse H&E-stained sections of the gastrocnemius muscle.(B) Representative images of the gastrocnemius muscle from each group before and after drying.(C) Immunofluorescence images of transverse gastrocnemius sections showing DAPI, IgG, Laminin, and merged staining in each group.(D) Quantitative analysis of the wet-to-dry weight ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle (n = 6).(E) Quantitative analysis of IgG fluorescence intensity (n = 3).Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

ESK attenuated the systemic inflammatory response induced by I/R and downregulated the transcription of certain inflammation-related genes

To evaluate the systemic inflammatory response induced by I/R, serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were measured in each group using chemiluminescent immunoassay. The results showed that serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly elevated in the I/R group, whereas ESK treatment significantly reduced both. This anti-inflammatory effect was attenuated after co-administration of CQ. In contrast, no significant differences in IL-1β levels were observed among the groups.

RT-qPCR was further performed to assess the transcript levels of inflammation-related genes in the gastrocnemius muscle. The results showed no statistically significant difference in Casp1 mRNA expression among the groups. Compared with the Sham group, the I/R group exhibited increased mRNA expression of Ccl2 and Nlrp3. Following ESK treatment, the expression levels of these genes were reduced relative to those in the I/R group. After combined treatment with CQ, Il1b mRNA expression was significantly increased, whereas Ccl2, Il10, and Nlrp3 mRNA expression showed no consistent trend (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Effects of esketamine on the systemic inflammatory response and inflammation-related gene expression after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion.

Fig 5

(A) mRNA expression levels of target genes in each group, normalized to the internal reference gene and presented as relative expression levels (n = 5). (B) Heatmap of the relative expression levels of target genes in each group. Data are shown as log2(2^-ΔΔCT), and color variation indicates the relative level of gene expression. (C) Serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in each group are also shown (n = 6).Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

ESK suppressed mTOR phosphorylation and induced autophagy-related changes, which were attenuated by CQ

To clarify the effect of ESK on autophagy-related pathways after I/R, the expression of autophagy-related proteins in the gastrocnemius muscle was assessed at 24 h of reperfusion. The results showed that, compared with the I/R group, ESK treatment increased the LC3 II/I ratio, decreased p62 expression, and reduced the p-mTOR/mTOR ratio, suggesting that ESK treatment is associated with inhibition of mTOR signaling and alterations in the expression of autophagy-related proteins.

Following co-treatment with CQ, the LC3-II/I ratio remained elevated, while p62 expression tended to increase compared with that in the ESK-alone group. The CQ-alone group similarly exhibited an elevated LC3-II/I ratio and marked p62 accumulation. These findings suggest that CQ may partially inhibit the ESK-associated autophagic degradation process, resulting in the accumulation of LC3-II and the autophagic substrate p62. (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Effects of esketamine on autophagy-related proteins in skeletal muscle after hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice.

Fig 6

(A) Representative immunoblot bands of each protein.(B) Densitometric quantification of each protein.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5). Intergroup comparisons labeled with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that, during the acute phase of tourniquet-related hindlimb I/R injury, ESK attenuated tissue damage and improved certain functional outcomes. Its protective effects may be associated with the suppression of inflammation and the modulation of autophagy-related pathways.

The tourniquet-induced hindlimb I/R model has good clinical relevance. In orthopedic surgery, although tourniquets can reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve surgical field exposure, their release is often followed by local edema, amplified inflammation, and neuromuscular dysfunction, thereby affecting early postoperative mobilization and rapid recovery [4,21]. Particularly in the context of ERAS, 24 h after reperfusion (postoperative day 1) is often used as a clinical observation time point for evaluating tourniquet-related early recovery, local tissue changes, and functional outcomes [22,23]. Therefore, this study selected this time point for observation, which can, to some extent, reflect perioperative early tissue injury and the effects of intervention, and thus has certain translational significance.

In the present study, hyperperfusion was observed in the ischemic hindlimb at 24 h after I/R. This phenomenon more likely reflects microcirculatory imbalance in the setting of post-reperfusion inflammatory vasodilation, reactive hyperemia, and tissue edema, rather than a true improvement in perfusion recovery. Previous studies have suggested that, under conditions of active inflammation and marked tissue edema, local blood flow distribution, vascular permeability, and tissue optical properties may all be altered [24,25], thereby affecting laser speckle imaging readouts. ESK reduced this abnormal hyperperfusion, and, together with its effects in alleviating edema and inflammation, this finding suggests that ESK may help improve local microcirculatory disturbances after reperfusion.

Notably, the effects of ESK on different components of the neuromuscular system were not entirely uniform. ESK improved rotarod performance and partially restored contractile capacity under direct stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle, but had limited effects on the mechanical withdrawal threshold and sciatic nerve stimulation-evoked muscle contraction. This suggests that, within the acute 24 h reperfusion window, neural dysfunction may still be prominent and may recover more slowly than local muscle function. In terms of motor output, the lack of clear recovery in nerve stimulation-induced contraction indicates that nerve-driven output remained restricted. On the sensory input side, the elevated mechanical withdrawal threshold suggests that the von Frey findings may not reflect typical mechanical hypersensitivity, but rather a reduction in sensation or a “numbness-like” change. These findings indicate that the protective effects of ESK during the acute phase may be more pronounced at the muscular level, while being insufficient to reverse neural dysfunction within a short period. Given that peripheral nerve injury often involves more complex processes, including impaired neural microcirculation, axonal and myelin damage, and compression caused by local edema, recovery generally depends more on time and structural reconstruction [26,27], which may explain this phenomenon.

The attenuation of skeletal muscle injury and tissue edema may constitute an important basis for the beneficial effects of ESK on early functional outcomes. Local edema developing after reperfusion not only disrupts the mechanical environment surrounding muscle fibers and limits contractile efficiency, but may also aggravate secondary injury by compressing the microcirculation and adjacent neural structures [28]. At the same time, IgG extravasation reflects not merely simple interstitial fluid retention, but also suggests impairment of sarcolemmal barrier integrity [29]. Therefore, the protective effects of ESK may involve not only the alleviation of inflammatory edema, but also the maintenance of sarcolemmal barrier stability and the restriction of abnormal plasma component entry into muscle fibers. The partial attenuation of this effect after co-administration of CQ further suggests that such structural protection may be related to autophagy-associated regulation.

Inflammation may represent an important entry point underlying the protective effects described above. After I/R, systemic inflammatory cytokines were elevated, accompanied by upregulated local transcription of inflammation-related genes, indicating that inflammatory responses play a key role in this model. ESK reduced the levels of certain inflammatory cytokines and the expression of inflammation-related genes, suggesting that it may suppress the sustained amplification of inflammation after reperfusion. Given that chemokine recruitment, inflammasome activation, and cytokine release can collectively lead to immune cell infiltration, endothelial activation, and microcirculatory dysfunction, this anti-inflammatory effect is likely closely associated with its ability to attenuate edema, improve the local tissue environment, and promote functional recovery [30,31]. It should be noted that CQ intervention produced inconsistent changes in the expression of different inflammation-related genes, suggesting a complex regulatory mechanism. In addition to being a classical autophagy inhibitor, CQ also exerts immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects [32]. Therefore, the observed alterations in inflammation-related gene expression may have been jointly influenced by multiple confounding factors, including autophagy inhibition, the intrinsic pharmacological effects of CQ, and other related factors. Accordingly, the current findings only support the conclusion that ESK alleviates the inflammatory response, whereas the specific relationship between its anti-inflammatory effects and autophagy regulation remains difficult to delineate and requires further investigation.

The Western blot results suggest that the protective effects of ESK observed in this study may be associated with the inhibition of mTOR activation and the restoration of autophagy-related homeostasis in skeletal muscle. After I/R, if damaged mitochondria, abnormal proteins, and other injury-related intracellular components in skeletal muscle cells are not cleared in a timely manner, they may continuously trigger oxidative stress and amplify inflammation, thereby further disrupting local tissue structure and microenvironmental homeostasis [33,34]. At the same time, intensified inflammatory responses and cellular structural damage may increase vascular and sarcolemmal permeability, leading to tissue edema, loss of membrane integrity, and impaired functional recovery [7,35]. Therefore, autophagy in this process may represent not merely a simple intracellular degradation pathway, but also an important mechanism linking injury clearance, inflammation control, and structural protection [36]. Notably, mitochondrial dysfunction is also a key pathological feature of skeletal muscle I/R injury and may manifest as impaired mitochondrial respiration, reduced calcium retention capacity, and the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products [37]. Mitophagy, an important form of selective autophagy, plays a critical role in removing damaged mitochondria and maintaining mitochondrial quality control and organelle homeostasis [38]. Based on the present findings, ESK may protect against skeletal muscle I/R injury by regulating overall autophagy-related homeostasis. However, whether mitophagy and the regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis are involved in this protective effect remains to be further verified. Taken together, based on this mechanism, the findings of the present study may not be independent of one another, but rather reflect an integrated protective effect of ESK through improving autophagy-related processes and reducing secondary tissue injury. This suggests that the protective effect of ESK on skeletal muscle after I/R may not act separately on individual aspects such as inflammation, edema, or functional impairment; instead, it may more likely alleviate secondary inflammatory responses and tissue injury by restoring autophagy-related homeostasis, ultimately manifesting as reduced edema and improved muscle function. The partial attenuation of ESK’s protective effects after co-administration of CQ further indicates that the intervention of ESK in I/R injury may result from the combined action of multiple mechanisms, among which autophagy-related regulation may constitute an important component and may be closely associated with its anti-inflammatory effects and improvement of the local tissue microenvironment.

This study has several limitations. First, it focused primarily on an acute observation window of 24 h after reperfusion, which captured early inflammatory responses, edema, tissue injury, and functional impairment but did not determine whether the protective effects of ESK were sustained. Future studies should include longer-term observation time points to further evaluate its effects on skeletal muscle regeneration, fibrosis, and neuromuscular functional recovery. Second, this study mainly investigated the effects of ESK on inflammation and overall autophagy-related homeostasis in skeletal muscle, without directly assessing mitochondrial function or mitophagy-related markers. Therefore, whether ESK protects against I/R injury by regulating mitochondrial homeostasis requires further investigation. Third, although pharmacological intervention with CQ provided evidence supporting the involvement of autophagy, its multitarget effects limited further elucidation of the specific mechanisms. Finally, only a single dose and administration regimen were evaluated; thus, the optimal dose, timing of administration, and approach for integrating ESK into perioperative anesthesia and analgesia protocols remain to be determined.

In summary, this study demonstrates that, during the acute phase of tourniquet-related hindlimb I/R injury, ESK can attenuate early secondary skeletal muscle injury and improve certain functional outcomes. Its protective effects may be associated with the suppression of inflammation and the regulation of mTOR-related autophagy. These findings suggest that, beyond its role in perioperative analgesia and sedation, ESK may also possess a certain degree of tissue-protective potential and may provide a new perspective for the intervention of tourniquet-related I/R injury.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Blood perfusion raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s001.xlsx (11.8KB, xlsx)
S2 Data. Wet-to-dry weight ratio raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s002.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
S3 Data. Rotarod test and mechanical pain threshold raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s003.xlsx (9.5KB, xlsx)
S4 Data. Muscle contractile force raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s004.xlsx (37.1KB, xlsx)
S5 Data. Inflammatory cytokine levels raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s005.xlsx (9.6KB, xlsx)
S6 Data. Western blot raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s006.xlsx (12.2KB, xlsx)
S7 Data. PCR raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s007.xlsx (31.2KB, xlsx)
S8 Data. Immunofluorescence raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0358125.s008.xlsx (16.1KB, xlsx)
S1 Fig. Uncropped and unadjusted Western blot images.

(PDF)

pone.0358125.s009.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
S1 File. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: author checklist.

(PDF)

pone.0358125.s010.pdf (137.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Data Availability

All relevant data underlying the findings of this study are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the 2025 Medical Science Research Project of the Hebei Provincial Health Commission (Project No. 20250650) awarded to Xiuli Wang. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. URL of the funder: http://wsjkw.hebei.gov.cn/.

References

  • 1.Farhan-Alanie MM, Trompeter AJ, Wall PDH, Costa ML. Tourniquet use in lower limb trauma and fracture surgery. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(5):809–12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-2070.R1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang K, Zhao W-Q, Liu H, Ji F-H, Peng K. Esketamine infusion for the prevention of tourniquet-induced intra-operative hypertension during below-knee orthopaedic surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2026;81(1):134–7. doi: 10.1111/anae.70027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xu F, Wang X, Li Y, Gao F, Yin C, Yu J, et al. Combined femoral artery block and femoral nerve block reduces thigh tourniquet-induced hypertension. J Clin Anesth. 2023;85:111039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.111039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leurcharusmee P, Sawaddiruk P, Punjasawadwong Y, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. The Possible Pathophysiological Outcomes and Mechanisms of Tourniquet-Induced Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury during Total Knee Arthroplasty. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:8087598. doi: 10.1155/2018/8087598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao J, Dong X, Zhang Z, Gao Q, Zhang Y, Song J, et al. Association of Use of Tourniquets During Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly Patients With Post-operative Pain and Return to Function. Front Public Health. 2022;10:825408. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang M, Liu Q, Meng H, Duan H, Liu X, Wu J, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01688-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barnig C, Lutzweiler G, Giannini M, Lejay A, Charles A-L, Meyer A, et al. Resolution of Inflammation after Skeletal Muscle Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Focus on the Lipid Mediators Lipoxins, Resolvins, Protectins and Maresins. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(6):1213. doi: 10.3390/antiox11061213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang L, Zhang W, Liao Y, Wang W, Deng X, Wang C, et al. Autophagy: a double-edged sword in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2025;30(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s11658-025-00713-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sheng R, Qin Z. The divergent roles of autophagy in ischemia and preconditioning. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2015;36(4):411–20. doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang J-S, Hu Q, Cao R-Y, Liu W-K, Guo M-L, Lin Y, et al. Progress in the Application of Esketamine During the Perioperative Period. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2026;20:579462. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S579462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hung K-C, Kao C-L, Ho C-N, Hsing C-H, Chang Y-J, Wang L-K, et al. The impact of perioperative ketamine or esketamine on the subjective quality of recovery after surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2024;132(6):1293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Min M, Du C, Chen X, Xin W. Effect of subanesthetic dose of esketamine on postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03728-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gao Y, Li L, Zhao F, Cheng Y, Jin M, Xue F-S. Esketamine at a Clinical Dose Attenuates Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Inhibiting AKT Signaling Pathway to Facilitate Microglia M2 Polarization and Autophagy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025;19:369–87. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S504179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tang Y, Liu Y, Zhou H, Lu H, Zhang Y, Hua J, et al. Esketamine is neuroprotective against traumatic brain injury through its modulation of autophagy and oxidative stress via AMPK/mTOR-dependent TFEB nuclear translocation. Exp Neurol. 2023;366:114436. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang A, Chen Y, Wang S, Du H, Guan A, Wu H, et al. Esketamine ameliorates post-stroke anxiety by modulating microglial HDAC3/NF-κB/COX1 inflammatory signaling in ischemic cortex. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;947:175667. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Le TV, Phan-Thi H-T, Huynh-Thi M-X, Dang TM, Holterman AXL, Grassi G, et al. Autophagy Inhibitor Chloroquine Downmodulates Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Damage in Bile-Duct-Ligated Mice. Cells. 2023;12(7):1025. doi: 10.3390/cells12071025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crawford RS, Hashmi FF, Jones JE, Albadawi H, McCormack M, Eberlin K, et al. A novel model of acute murine hindlimb ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292(2):H830-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00581.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;53(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang T, Feng X, Dong J, Xu Z, Feng B, Haas KM, et al. Cardiac troponin T and autoimmunity in skeletal muscle aging. Geroscience. 2022;44(4):2025–45. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00513-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Palanne R, Rantasalo M, Vakkuri A, Madanat R, Olkkola KT, Lahtinen K, et al. Effects of anaesthesia method and tourniquet use on recovery following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(5):762–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stocks GW, Odoemene M, Gex J, Vidal EA, Sawyer K, Jones SL, et al. Quadriceps Strain and TKA: Contribution of the Tourniquet and Intramedullary Rod to Postoperative Thigh Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105(6):455–61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, Middleton RG, Reed M, Sahota O, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(1):3–19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jacques SL. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(11):R37-61. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/R37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pober JS, Sessa WC. Evolving functions of endothelial cells in inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(10):803–15. doi: 10.1038/nri2171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tu H, Zhang D, Corrick RM, Muelleman RL, Wadman MC, Li Y-L. Morphological Regeneration and Functional Recovery of Neuromuscular Junctions after Tourniquet-Induced Injuries in Mouse Hindlimb. Front Physiol. 2017;8:207. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sundaram VK, Schütza V, Schröter NH, Backhaus A, Bilsing A, Joneck L, et al. Adipo-glial signaling mediates metabolic adaptation in peripheral nerve regeneration. Cell Metab. 2023;35(12):2136-2152.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sleboda DA, Roberts TJ. Internal fluid pressure influences muscle contractile force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(3):1772–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914433117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dubuisson N, Versele R, Planchon C, Selvais CM, Noel L, Abou-Samra M, et al. Histological Methods to Assess Skeletal Muscle Degeneration and Regeneration in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):16080. doi: 10.3390/ijms232416080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barnett KC, Li S, Liang K, Ting JP-Y. A 360° view of the inflammasome: Mechanisms of activation, cell death, and diseases. Cell. 2023;186(11):2288–312. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Claesson-Welsh L, Dejana E, McDonald DM. Permeability of the Endothelial Barrier: Identifying and Reconciling Controversies. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27(4):314–31. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schrezenmeier E, Dörner T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(3):155–66. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Costa D, Ielapi N, Perri P, Minici R, Faga T, Michael A. Molecular insight into acute limb ischemia. Biomolecules. 2024;14(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vringer E, Tait SWG. Mitochondria and cell death-associated inflammation. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(2):304–12. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-01094-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vestweber D, Claesson-Welsh L, McDonald DM, Williams T, Schwartz MA, Scallan J, et al. Report from the 2023 workshop on endothelial permeability, edema and inflammation. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2023;2(12):1120–4. doi: 10.1038/s44161-023-00385-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scalabrin M, Engman V, Maccannell A, Critchlow A, Roberts LD, Yuldasheva N, et al. Temporal analysis of skeletal muscle remodeling post hindlimb ischemia reveals intricate autophagy regulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022;323(6):C1601–10. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00174.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Paradis S, Charles A-L, Meyer A, Lejay A, Scholey JW, Chakfé N, et al. Chronology of mitochondrial and cellular events during skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2016;310(11):C968-82. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00356.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anzell AR, Maizy R, Przyklenk K, Sanderson TH. Mitochondrial Quality Control and Disease: Insights into Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(3):2547–64. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0503-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Atsushi Asakura

23 Jun 2026

Dear Dr. Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 07 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

As the corresponding author, your ORCID iD is verified in the submission system and will appear in the published article. PLOS supports the use of ORCID, and we encourage all coauthors to register for an ORCID iD and use it as well. Please encourage your coauthors to verify their ORCID iD within the submission system before final acceptance, as unverified ORCID iDs will not appear in the published article. Only  the individual author can complete the verification step; PLOS staff cannot  verify ORCID iDs on behalf of authors.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Atsushi Asakura, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

5. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Minor revision requirieds. Changes and suggestions PDF file. Minor revision requirieds. Changes and suggestions PDF file. Minor revision requirieds. Changes and suggestions PDF file. Minor revision requirieds. Changes and suggestions PDF file.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by Liu et al addresses the pressing issue of perioperative skeletal muscle protection in tourniquet-associated ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) of the lower extremity. The authors chose esketamine, a well-known analgesic and sedative agent in anesthesiology, as their study agent. In recent years, esketamine has attracted attention for its potential tissue-protective effects in various pathological conditions associated with ischemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation. The study was performed on a mouse model using a comprehensive multiparametric approach, including assessment of regional perfusion using laser speckle imaging, functional tests, histological analysis, measurement of systemic inflammatory cytokines, and molecular biological methods (Western blotting, real-time PCR) to study autophagy and inflammatory signaling pathways. This design allowed the authors to evaluate both the damaging effects of I/R and the protective potential of esketamine. I would consider the thoughtful use of a pharmacological inhibitor of autophagy (chloroquine phosphate) a strength of the study. This allowed the authors not only to document the activation of autophagy by esketamine but also to demonstrate a partial abolition of the protective effect when it was blocked. This confirms the involvement of the autophagic pathway in the protective effect of esketamine. Furthermore, in my opinion, the separate study of contractility during direct muscle stimulation and stimulation via the sciatic nerve is noteworthy. This allowed the authors to identify an important detail related to the predominant effect of esketamine on the muscle component rather than the nerve component in the acute 24 h phase after reperfusion. This level of detail lends additional translational value to the study.

Below are the main comments and recommendations for revision of the manuscript.

1. The study only covers the acute period (24 hours after reperfusion). Selecting only an early time point does not allow for the assessment of muscle tissue recovery dynamics, regeneration of damaged fibers, possible normalization of neuromuscular transmission, and long-term functional outcomes. Including additional time points, for example, 7 and 14 days after reperfusion, would allow not only to track the development of esketamine's protective effect over time but also to assess whether the observed improvement is transient or persists over a longer period. Furthermore, long-term analysis would allow for the drug's effect on tissue remodeling, fibrosis, and contractile function restoration. This is a critical point.

2. For Western blotting and real-time PCR, n=3 was used. This is the minimum acceptable sample size for such analyses. This sample size greatly reduces statistical power and makes the study more vulnerable to random outliers. This sample size should be increased (at least to n=5). This is a critical comment.

3. In the ESK+CQ group, a heterogeneous gene expression response was observed (like decreased Ccl2, but increased Il1b). The authors attribute this to the complexity and time-dependence of the inflammatory response. However, I believe this could be a consequence of the small sample size (n=3). See above.

4. The authors focus on autophagy and inflammation, but do not evaluate the development of mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscles, which plays a crucial role in I/R. Meanwhile, I/R damage is known to be accompanied by impaired mitochondrial respiratory function, decreased calcium retention capacity, and accumulation of lipid peroxidation products (doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00356.2015; doi:10.32604/biocell.2025.061798; doi:10.1007/s12035-017-0503-9). In addition, there is data in the literature on the possible effect of esketamine on oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function in general. Including these aspects in the discussion, or at least acknowledging this limitation, would allow for a more complete characterization of the mechanisms underlying the observed effects and identify promising directions for future research.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-26-18635_reviewer.pdf

pone.0358125.s011.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Sep 15;21(9):e0358125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358125.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Jul 2026

Dear Editor,

We sincerely thank you for your careful evaluation of our manuscript and for giving us the opportunity to revise and improve our work. We greatly appreciate the constructive comments and valuable suggestions provided by you and the reviewers.

In accordance with the journal requirements, we have carefully revised the manuscript format to ensure compliance with the PLOS ONE style and submission guidelines. We have also removed all funding-related information from the manuscript text and added captions for the Supporting Information files at the end of the manuscript. In addition, we have provided the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying the Western blot results as Supporting Information, in accordance with the journal’s requirements for blot and gel reporting.

We sincerely appreciate the time and effort devoted by the Editor and the reviewers to evaluating our manuscript. Their comments and suggestions have been invaluable in improving the quality, clarity, and rigor of our work.

Our detailed point-by-point responses to the reviewers’ comments are provided below.

Response to Reviewer #1

We sincerely thank the reviewer for the careful evaluation of our manuscript and for the detailed comments and annotations provided in the PDF file. We have carefully considered all of the reviewer’s suggestions and revised the manuscript accordingly where appropriate. The major revisions include the following:

• All abbreviated terms have been spelled out at their first occurrence in the manuscript.

• The total number of animals used in the study has been added.

• The concentration of isoflurane used for anesthesia has been specified.

We would also like to provide clarification regarding the following two points:

1. “SYBR”

Thank you for pointing this out. SYBR is used as the name of the fluorescent dye and is not an abbreviation requiring expansion. Therefore, we have retained “SYBR” as written in the manuscript.

2. P values in Results subsection headings

Because each outcome involves five experimental groups, listing all pairwise P values in the headings would make them lengthy and difficult to read. Instead, we have used the compact-letter display in all figures: groups not sharing a letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), and this convention is explained in the figure legends. We believe this is both clear and reader-friendly, and we have retained the descriptive headings. We hope these responses are satisfactory and thank the reviewer again for the helpful feedback.

Response to Reviewer #2

We sincerely thank the reviewer for the careful evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered each comment and revised the manuscript accordingly. Our point-by-point responses are provided below.

Comment 1:

The study only covers the acute period (24 hours after reperfusion). Selecting only an early time point does not allow for the assessment of muscle tissue recovery dynamics, regeneration of damaged fibers, possible normalization of neuromuscular transmission, and long-term functional outcomes. Including additional time points, for example, 7 and 14 days after reperfusion, would allow not only to track the development of esketamine's protective effect over time but also to assess whether the observed improvement is transient or persists over a longer period. Furthermore, long-term analysis would allow for the drug's effect on tissue remodeling, fibrosis, and contractile function restoration. This is a critical point.

Response:

We sincerely thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We agree that additional observation time points would be meaningful for evaluating the persistence of the protective effect of esketamine and the long-term recovery of skeletal muscle.

However, the primary objective of the present study was to investigate the protective effect of esketamine during the acute phase of skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury. Therefore, we selected 24 h after reperfusion as the observation time point to evaluate acute tissue injury, inflammatory responses, functional impairment, and autophagy-related molecular changes.

We acknowledge that the present study cannot determine whether the protective effect of esketamine persists into the later stages of muscle repair and remodeling. This limitation was already acknowledged in the original manuscript, and we have carefully avoided extending our conclusions beyond the acute phase of ischemia-reperfusion injury. In addition, we have further clarified in the manuscript that future studies should include later observation time points to investigate skeletal muscle regeneration, fibrosis, neuromuscular recovery, and long-term restoration of contractile function.

We sincerely thank the reviewer again for this important suggestion.

Comment 2:

For Western blotting and real-time PCR, n=3 was used. This is the minimum acceptable sample size for such analyses. This sample size greatly reduces statistical power and makes the study more vulnerable to random outliers. This sample size should be increased (at least to n=5). This is a critical comment.

Response:

We sincerely thank the reviewer for this important comment. We agree that increasing the number of biological replicates can improve the statistical robustness and reliability of the molecular analyses.

In response to the reviewer’s suggestion, we performed additional experiments using an independent animal cohort under the same experimental conditions as those used in the original study. Two additional biological samples were included in each group, thereby increasing the sample size for both Western blot and RT-qPCR analyses from n=3 to n=5 per group.

The corresponding analyses were repeated using the expanded sample size. The overall trends and main findings were generally consistent with those observed in the original analyses, although minor changes were observed in some statistical comparisons after increasing the sample size. The relevant Methods, Results, figures, and figure legends have been updated accordingly.

We sincerely thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion, which has improved the robustness and reliability of our molecular findings.

Comment 3:

In the ESK+CQ group, a heterogeneous gene expression response was observed (like decreased Ccl2, but increased Il1b). The authors attribute this to the complexity and time-dependence of the inflammatory response. However, I believe this could be a consequence of the small sample size (n=3). See above.

Response:

We sincerely thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. We agree that the relatively small sample size in the original RT–qPCR analysis may have made the results more susceptible to inter-individual variability. Following the reviewer’s suggestion, we increased the number of independent biological replicates in each group from n = 3 to n = 5 and repeated the statistical analysis. After incorporating the additional independent biological samples, the overall gene expression trends remained largely consistent with those observed in the original analysis, and the discordant expression changes of Ccl2 and Il1b in the ESK + CQ group persisted.

In addition to inhibiting autophagy, CQ may affect inflammatory mediators through other pharmacological actions. However, the available data remain insufficient to elucidate the biological basis underlying these differences in expression, and the uncertainty associated with the limited sample size cannot be completely excluded. Therefore, in the revised manuscript, we have adopted a more cautious mechanistic interpretation of the RT–qPCR results. We present the pleiotropic pharmacological effects of CQ only as a possible explanation and explicitly state that further studies are required to validate this observation.

We again thank the reviewer for this valuable comment, which has helped us interpret the relevant findings with greater caution and rigor.

Comment 4:

The authors focus on autophagy and inflammation, but do not evaluate the development of mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscles, which plays a crucial role in I/R. Meanwhile, I/R damage is known to be accompanied by impaired mitochondrial respiratory function, decreased calcium retention capacity, and accumulation of lipid peroxidation products (doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00356.2015; doi:10.32604/biocell.2025.061798; doi:10.1007/s12035-017-0503-9). In addition, there is data in the literature on the possible effect of esketamine on oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function in general. Including these aspects in the discussion, or at least acknowledging this limitation, would allow for a more complete characterization of the mechanisms underlying the observed effects and identify promising directions for future research.

Response:

We sincerely thank the reviewer for this valuable comment. We agree that mitochondrial dysfunction is an important pathological mechanism in skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury.

In the revised Discussion, we have added a description of mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction, impaired calcium retention capacity, and lipid peroxidation during skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury, together with relevant references. We have also discussed the possible relationship between mitochondrial homeostasis, mitophagy, and the autophagy-related changes observed in the present study.

In the limitations section, we have further clarified that mitochondrial function and mitophagy-related indicators were not directly evaluated in this study. Therefore, whether esketamine protects skeletal muscle by regulating mitochondrial homeostasis remains to be determined in future studies.

We thank the reviewer again for this suggestion, which has helped us provide a more complete and balanced discussion of the possible protective mechanisms of esketamine.

We hope that the revisions and responses provided above have adequately addressed the concerns raised by the reviewers. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Xiuli Wang

On behalf of all authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0358125.s012.docx (22.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Atsushi Asakura

28 Aug 2026

<p>Esketamine exerts a protective effect against skeletal muscle injury induced by hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion in mice by regulating autophagy.

PONE-D-26-18635R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Atsushi Asakura, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Accept submission. Accept submission. Accept submission. Accept submission. Accept submission.

Reviewer #2: The authors conducted additional experiments, increasing n from 3 to 5 for Western blotting and RT-PCR, which significantly increased the statistical reliability of the results. The main trends remained, confirming the original conclusions. The discussion was also strengthened, the authors added a section on mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy, and the limitations section was made more transparent. Responses to all comments were well-reasoned, and the text was edited appropriately. The manuscript has been significantly improved. I recommend acceptance.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Atsushi Asakura

PONE-D-26-18635R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Wang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS One and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS One Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Atsushi Asakura

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Blood perfusion raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s001.xlsx (11.8KB, xlsx)
    S2 Data. Wet-to-dry weight ratio raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s002.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
    S3 Data. Rotarod test and mechanical pain threshold raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s003.xlsx (9.5KB, xlsx)
    S4 Data. Muscle contractile force raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s004.xlsx (37.1KB, xlsx)
    S5 Data. Inflammatory cytokine levels raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s005.xlsx (9.6KB, xlsx)
    S6 Data. Western blot raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s006.xlsx (12.2KB, xlsx)
    S7 Data. PCR raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s007.xlsx (31.2KB, xlsx)
    S8 Data. Immunofluorescence raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0358125.s008.xlsx (16.1KB, xlsx)
    S1 Fig. Uncropped and unadjusted Western blot images.

    (PDF)

    pone.0358125.s009.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
    S1 File. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: author checklist.

    (PDF)

    pone.0358125.s010.pdf (137.1KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-26-18635_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0358125.s011.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0358125.s012.docx (22.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data underlying the findings of this study are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES