Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2026 Sep 15;8(9):001168.v3. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.001168.v3

Fever of unknown origin and splenomegaly in an immunosuppressed Swiss patient: case report of a Neoehrlichia mikurensis infection in a changing climate and review of the literature

R Martischang 1,*, C P Buclin 2, R Bonnet 2, N Bürgisser 2, O Opota 3, A Huttner 1, G Greub 3,4,5
PMCID: PMC13577652  PMID: 42746457

Abstract

Neoehrlichia mikurensis is an emerging tick-borne pathogen that is increasingly reported and can cause fever of unknown origin in immunocompromised individuals. We report a case of neoehrlichiosis occurring after B-cell-depleting treatment. Despite the availability of effective and inexpensive treatment, patients often experience significant care delays due to diagnostic challenges and insufficient awareness.

Keywords: fever of unknown origin, intracellular bacteria, Neoehrlichia mikurensis, pancytopenia, tick-borne infection, zoonotic infection

Data Summary

All data associated with this work are reported within the article.

Introduction

Neoehrlichia mikurensis, a Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacterium (family Anaplasmataceae), is an emerging tick-borne pathogen. First detected in 1960 in a tick collection [1], it was only identified as a human pathogen in 2010 in Sweden and Switzerland [2, 3]. Since then, it has been increasingly reported across Europe and Asia [4].

This pathogen is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in western Europe and Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Europe and Asia. In Europe, the prevalence of tick-borne infections is rising due to greater human exposure during outdoor activities and expansion of tick habitats associated with climate change. In Switzerland, the proportion of territory colonized by ticks increased from 16% in 2009 to 25% in 2019, largely driven by rising temperatures [5]. A parallel increase in N. mikurensis prevalence has also been documented in neighbouring Alsace, France, with an estimated N. mikurensis prevalence among ticks of 5.42% between 2013 and 2020, and an increasing trend over the years [6]. In Switzerland, a similar prevalence of Neoehrlichia (5.7%) was documented on ticks by PCR [7].

Neoehrlichiosis generally presents with nonspecific symptoms such as fever, malaise, night sweats, weight loss, fatigue and polyarthralgia. Skin rash (resembling erysipelas or erythema nodosum) and hepatosplenomegaly have also been reported. Complications may include vascular or thromboembolic events, liver cytolysis, cholestasis and cytopenia [4], ranging from isolated leucopenia or thrombocytopenia to bicytopenia and pancytopenia. Additionally, N. mikurensis has been associated with arterial aneurysms [4]. Co-infection between N. mikurensis and Borrelia burgdorferi has been reported and should be further investigated [4, 8]. Such co-infections might modify the pathophysiology of each pathogenic agent and their infectivity, potentially explaining unusual clinical presentations misattributed to Borrelia.

We aim to summarize the epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic and treatment strategy of neoehrlichiosis based on a case of fever of unknown origin (FUO). The patient provided written informed consent for publication of clinical data. This case report was prepared in accordance with the CAse REport guidelines [9].

Case presentation

A 50-year-old woman was hospitalized in December 2024 in the internal medicine department of a Swiss tertiary hospital for FUO. Her history included multiple sclerosis treated with rituximab, which was discontinued in 2022 due to secondary immunoglobulin deficiency. She experienced persisting lymphopenia (CD4, CD56+CD16+ NK and CD19+) and pan-hypogammaglobulinaemia; complement levels were normal (Table 1). History also included immune-mediated diabetes of the adult, polyarthralgia of unclear aetiology since 2021 and chronic cholestasis, previously investigated by a liver biopsy in 2022, demonstrating numerous biliary microhamartomas. Three weeks prior to the current hospitalization, she experienced a COVID-19 infection. Two years earlier, she was hospitalized twice for a Campylobacter bacteraemia (in July 2022 and March 2023).

Table 1. Diagnostic strategy and management.

Category Investigations Results (reference range)
Laboratory values Complete blood count Pancytopenia with lymphopenia 0.36 g l−1 (1.0–4.5), thrombocytopenia 90 g l−1 (150–350), anaemia 65 g l−1 (120–160)
Bone marrow biopsy and haematological workup No evidence of haematological malignancy, haemophagocytosis or intracytoplasmic morulae
C-reactive protein (CRP) 15–50 mg l−1 (<10)
Ferritin 252 µg l−1 (7–171)
Procalcitonin 0.48 µg l−1 (<0.50)
Creatinine 68 µmol l−1 (44–80)
Alanine aminotransferase 19 U l−1 (9–42)
Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase 69 U l−1 (9–35)
IgA 0.31 g l−1 (0.70–4.00)
IgM <0.05 g l−1 (0.40–2.30)
IgG 5.44 g l−1 (7.00–16.00)
IgG1 subclass 3.1 g l−1 (4.1–10.1)
IgG3 subclass 0.1 g l−1 (0.1–0.8)
Complement levels Within normal limits (C3 and C4)
Lymphocyte subsets
(from 24/12/2024 to 22/04/2025)
CD3+ T lymphocytes: 673 → 984 cells/µl (690–2,540);
CD56+/CD16+ NK cells: 3 → 42 cells/µl (50–590);
CD19+ B lymphocytes: 1 → 133 cells/µl (90–660)
Imaging Thoraco-abdominal computed tomography and Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) Splenic infarcts without pathological hypermetabolism or lymphadenopathy
Transthoracic echocardiography No significant abnormality
Fundoscopic examination No retinal or ocular abnormalities
Viral investigation Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Positive at admission; negative after 2 weeks
Epstein-Barr virus, Cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19 Negative by serology and PCR
Hepatitis A Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus serology Negative
HIV screening Negative
Bacterial/zoonotic investigation Blood cultures Negative
Interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) Negative
Serology for Bartonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Brucella spp., Rickettsia spp., B. burgdorferi Negative
16S rRNA eubacterial PCR Positive for N. mikurensis*
Real-time TaqMan N. mikurensis PCR Positive (Ct 21.6)
Treatment Antimicrobial therapy Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 28 days
Follow-up/outcome Clinical response Complete resolution of fever, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss, polyarthralgia and pancytopenia
Molecular response
(Follow-up N. mikurensis PCR)
Day 4: Ct 29.2
Day 18–28: negative
Three-month follow-up Sustained clinical remission, negative PCR, normalization of cytopenias and lymphocyte subsets
*

By amplicon sequencing.

The patient presented with fatigue, fever (38–38.8 °C), night sweats, weight loss and gastrointestinal symptoms from August 2024 onwards, including nausea, intermittent non-localized abdominal cramps, self-resolving mucous diarrhoea and ageusia. The polyarthralgia transiently improved after treatment with prednisone 20 mg daily but then relapsed. No neurological symptoms were reported.

The patient travelled to northern Italy (Lake Maggiore region) in 2020, where she had mosquito bites and occasionally hiked but detected no tick bites. She had regular contact with domestic cats and dogs but no exposure to farm animals or wildlife. She had no history of blood transfusions.

Laboratory findings showed pancytopenia and mildly elevated inflammatory markers (Table 1). The diagnostic approach in this patient with anti-CD20-associated immunodeficiency and FUO was ultimately guided by standard recommendations, as outlined in recent literature [10] and summarized in Table 1. This workup, including an additional bone marrow biopsy, was non-contributory, except for splenic infarcts on the PET-CT.

Given the presence of hypogammaglobulinaemia and lymphopenia, targeted viral investigations, including EBV, CMV, parvovirus B19, human immunodeficiency virus, viral hepatitis and SARS-CoV-2, were non-contributory (Table 1). Screening for HHV-6 and HHV-7 was not performed, given the absence of suggestive clinical features and the relatively moderate degree of immunosuppression.

Given the patient’s immunosuppression and exposure history (travel to Italy, cat contact and possible tick exposure), investigations for vector-borne and intracellular zoonotic pathogens were initially negative (Table 1). Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Neoehrlichia spp. were investigated at a later stage, upon our request, using a 16S rRNA broad-range PCR performed at CHUV in Lausanne (Switzerland).

Tuberculosis was screened using an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA). However, its sensitivity is reduced in immunocompromised patients, and it does not exclude active disease. In the absence of relevant exposure, respiratory symptoms and with a non-suggestive FDG PET-CT, the likelihood of tuberculosis was considered low. Investigations for non-infectious causes, including rheumatologic, endocrine and drug-related aetiologies, were conducted in parallel (Rheumatoid factor, Antinuclear Antibody, and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone). The patient was discharged with planned outpatient follow-up.

Shortly after discharge, the broad-range 16S rRNA PCR was positive, and amplicon sequencing identified N. mikurensis. A species-specific N. mikurensis quantitative PCR confirmed this result (Ct of 21.6). Treatment with doxycycline 100 mg bid was initiated. Clinical, biological and viral clearance documented at day 28 (Table 1) supported discontinuation of her treatment, after a minimum treatment duration of 21 days. A reassessment at 3 months post-treatment confirmed bacteriological clearance and sustained remission. Notably, the patient’s T and B lymphopenia, initially attributed to anti-CD20 therapy, shortly resolved after treatment completion (Table 1).

Discussion

Until 2023, only 16 human N. mikurensis infections have been reported in Switzerland [11]. The patient’s clinical presentation aligns with previously reported cases in the literature, including case reports and case series [4, 8, 12–14], presenting mainly with FUO, polymyalgia, pancytopenia, elevated inflammatory markers, mild liver test abnormalities and hepatosplenomegaly.

Human infections are mainly documented among immunocompromised individuals, with splenectomy, B-lymphocyte-depleting therapy, autoimmune disease or haematologic neoplasms [15]. In Norway, N. mikurensis seroprevalence was detected in 7.4% of 163 immunocompromised patients compared to 1.2% of 85 immunocompetent patients [16]. Specifically, B-lymphocyte-depleting therapies have been associated with N. mikurensis infection, likely due to impaired antibody production, reduced cytokine secretion and the disruption of B-lymphocyte antigen presentation to T lymphocytes [4, 12]. Among patients with multiple sclerosis, a recent case series observed an association between infection risk and B-cell depletion (CD19/20) but not with hypogammaglobulinaemia [14]. In this case, the patient’s lymphopenia likely contributed to persistent symptoms and the inability to control the N. mikurensis infection.

N. mikurensis is believed to target polymorphonuclear neutrophils and endothelial cells. Morulae are observed in infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis, though never described with N. mikurensis. The presumed reservoirs of N. mikurensis include the liver, spleen, bone marrow and possibly the skin. Hepatosplenomegaly is frequently observed, likely due to splenic sinusoid and intrasinusoidal hepatic T-cell infiltration [4, 8]. Pancytopenia is occasionally reported, with N. mikurensis linked to bone marrow T-lymphocyte infiltration and considered a potential trigger for haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [8]. The rapid resolution of both T- and B-cell lymphopenia shortly after treatment suggests that Neoehrlichia may have contributed to transient bone marrow dysfunction and impaired immune control. However, in the absence of additional testing (e.g. eubacterial PCR on the bone marrow biopsy), the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain.

The patient was asymptomatic from her travel in Italy (2020) until 2024, possibly due to a persistent infection. Persistent asymptomatic infection reactivating under B-cell-depleting treatment has been described in a population with B-cell lymphoma, exhibiting prior N. mikurensis-specific T-cell response at treatment initiation [13]. This prompts the need for an exhaustive history when determining the epidemiological exposure.

In the present case, the diagnosis was only confirmed after 5 months. The median diagnostic delay for this pathogen has been estimated at 60 days in a report of 11 cases [17]. In the absence of a clinical emergency, we recommend considering Anaplasma spp. and Neoehrlichia spp. as part of a second-line investigation for non-neutropenic anti-CD20-associated immunodeficiency FUO, even in the absence of a tick bite history.

Because N. mikurensis is an obligate intracellular bacterium and cannot be cultured on axenic media, diagnosis relies mainly on molecular methods, which demonstrate very good performance on blood, particularly given high bacterial load and lack of sensitivity of traditional culturing methods, and they should be considered first-line [18]. Available assays include the pan-bacterial 16S rRNA PCR, nested PCR targeting all members of the Anaplasmataceae family and N. mikurensis-specific PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA gene or groEL genes [4, 8, 18].

At the Swiss National Reference Center for Tick-Borne Infections (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), a broad-range eubacterial 16S rRNA PCR is performed on blood to detect members of the Anaplasmataceae family, including Ehrlichia, Anaplasma and Neoehrlichia species. Positive amplicons are subsequently subjected to Sanger sequencing and compared with public databases (e.g. NCBI) for species identification. In parallel, the CHUV laboratory also performs two real-time TaqMan quantitative PCRs targeting specifically A. phagocytophilum and N. mikurensis. These TaqMan PCRs are performed using an automated platform that combines (i) Magnapure 96-well DNA extraction robots (Roche, Switzerland), (ii) Applied Biosystems PCR machines and (iii) Hamilton pipetting robots [19]. They offer greater sensitivity (detection limit of 102–103 DNA copies per reaction vs 10³–104 DNA copies per millilitre), with a shorter time to result (~6 h vs 48 h). This complementary approach combines the broad detection spectrum of 16S rRNA PCR, which can identify other Neoehrlichia species and members of the Ehrlichia genus, with the advantages of species-specific quantitative PCR, namely faster turnaround times through avoidance of sequencing, higher sensitivity and the ability to monitor bacterial load during treatment. The lack of a commercial serological assay limits diagnosis and epidemiological data. Immunofluorescence using whole bacteria as antigen may be used with an empirical cut-off of 1/32 for IgM and 1/64 for IgG by analogy with rickettsial and chlamydial serology. However, access to molecular testing and immunofluorescence remains limited. This highlights the importance of identifying nearby reference centres providing such molecular testing.

In the absence of guidelines, treatment consists of doxycycline 100 mg bid for 21 days, remaining an effective treatment, although shorter courses might cause relapse [8]. Given the potentially prolonged delays before reporting results (7–29 days in our case), empirical doxycycline therapy may be considered while awaiting microbiological confirmation, particularly in urgent clinical situations and when pre-test probability is high.

Conclusions

The increasing use of B-cell-depleting therapies combined with the rising prevalence of ticks and N. mikurensis infections raises concerns about future trends, particularly given potential severe complications. Despite available PCR tests and effective treatment, low awareness among clinicians contributes to significant diagnostic delays. Future priorities should be given to developing immunofluorescence- and ELISA-based assays to allow for large seroprevalence surveys and to combine molecular- and serological-based diagnosis. Greater clinical recognition of N. mikurensis as a cause of persisting febrile illness in immunocompromised patients is warranted.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge (i) the diagnostic support from ADMED (Rue de Chasseral 20, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds) in conducting the first pan-Anaplasmataceae 16S rRNA PCR and (ii) the diagnostic support from the microbiology laboratory of CHUV (Rue du Bugnon 48, Lausanne).

Abbreviations

FUO

fever of unknown origin

Footnotes

Funding: The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: A.H. and G.G.; data curation: R.M., A.H. and G.G.; formal analysis: R.M. and G.G.; funding acquisition: G.G.; investigation: R.M., C.P.B., R.B., N.B., A.H., G.G. and O.O.; methodology: R.M., A.H., G.G. and O.O.; project administration: G.G.; resources: R.M., C.P.B., R.B., N.B., G.G. and O.O.; software: R.M.; supervision: A.H. and G.G.; validation: G.G.; visualization: R.M.; writing (original draft): R.M., C.P.B., R.B., N.B., A.H. and O.O.; writing (review and editing): R.M., A.H. and G.G.

Consent to publish: A written consent for publication has been obtained from the patient.

Contributor Information

R. Martischang, Email: romainmartischang@gmail.com;romain.martischang@hug.ch.

C. P. Buclin, Email: clement.buclin@hug.ch.

N. Bürgisser, Email: nils.burgisser@hug.ch.

A. Huttner, Email: angela.huttner@hug.ch.

G. Greub, Email: Gilbert.Greub@chuv.ch.

References

  • 1.Movila A, Toderas I, Uspenskaia I, Conovalov J. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in Ixodes ricinus from Moldova collected in 1960. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:359–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Welinder-Olsson C, Kjellin E, Vaht K, Jacobsson S, Wennerås C. First case of human “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” infection in a febrile patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1956–1959. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02423-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fehr JS, Bloemberg GV, Ritter C, Hombach M, Lüscher TF, et al. Septicemia caused by tick-borne bacterial pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Emerg Infect Dis . 2010;16:1127–1129. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.091907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wennerås C. Infections with the tick-borne bacterium Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:621–630. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rochat E, Vuilleumier S, Aeby S, Greub G, Joost S. Nested species distribution models of Chlamydiales in Ixodes ricinus (Tick) hosts in Switzerland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;87:e01237-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01237-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boyer PH, Baldinger L, Degeilh B, Wirth X, Kamdem CM, et al. The emerging tick-borne pathogen Neoehrlichia mikurensis: first French case series and vector epidemiology. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10:1731–1738. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1973347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ackermann-Gäumann R, Tritten ML, Lienhard R. Pathogen Prevalence in Ticks Parasitizing Humans. Swiss Society of Microbiology; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gynthersen RMM, Stensvold CR, Nielsen SL, Møller HJ, Nielsen HV, et al. Neoehrlichia mikurensis-An emerging opportunistic tick-borne infection in immunosuppressed patients. J Intern Med. 2023;293:782–790. doi: 10.1111/joim.13638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int. 2013;110:603–608. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haidar G, Singh N. Fever of Unknown origin. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:463–477. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2111003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hämmerli P, Tamagni A, Roggo L, Geib V, Staehelin C, et al. Neoehrlichiose : maladie rare transmise par les tiques, aussi en Suisse. Rev Med Suisse. 2024;20:1810–1814. doi: 10.53738/REVMED.2024.20.890.1810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Portillo A, Santibáñez P, Palomar AM, Santibáñez S, Oteo JA. ‘Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis’ in Europe. New Microbes New Infect. 2018;22:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wass L, Lewerin C, Jaén-Luchoro D, Lingblom C, Wennerås C. Latent Neoehrlichia mikurensis infections may be reactivated in patients with B-cell lymphomas treated with rituximab. Immunology. 2026;178:307–317. doi: 10.1111/imm.70120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ditlevsen Regen E, Victor D, Hendrikx T. Neoehrlichiosis in patients with multiple sclerosis in Halmstad, Sweden: a case series. J Neuroimmunol. 2026;410:578787. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2025.578787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.von Loewenich FD, Geissdörfer W, Disqué C, Matten J, Schett G, et al. Detection of “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in two patients with severe febrile illnesses: evidence for a European sequence variant. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2630–2635. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00588-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Quarsten H, Salte T, Lorentzen ÅR, Hansen IJW, Hamre R, et al. Tick-borne pathogens detected in the blood of immunosuppressed norwegian patients living in a tick-endemic area. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:e2364–e2371. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grankvist A, Andersson P-O, Mattsson M, Sender M, Vaht K, et al. Infections with the tick-borne bacterium “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” mimic noninfectious conditions in patients with B cell malignancies or autoimmune diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1716–1722. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jenkins A, Raasok C, Pedersen BN, Jensen K, Andreassen Å, et al. Detection of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Norway up to the northern limit of Ixodes ricinus distribution using a novel real time PCR test targeting the groEL gene. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:199. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1502-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Greub G, Sahli R, Brouillet R, Jaton K. Ten years of R&D and full automation in molecular diagnosis. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:403–425. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES