Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2026 Sep 15;8(9):001229.v3. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.001229.v3

Analysis of the genome of a Pseudomonas monsensis isolate that produces the antifungal dipeptide maculosin

Priyanka Sharma 1,†, Alexander D H Kingdon 1,†, Jack K Bradley 1,2, Ellie Allman 1, Song Ang 3, Matthew Pye 2, Angus M O’Ferrall 1, Amy McLeman 1, Claudia McKeown 1, W David Hong 2, Adam P Roberts 1,*
PMCID: PMC13577705  PMID: 42746667

Abstract

Candida species have been attributed to causing ~647,000 deaths annually. Candida albicans has been identified by the WHO as a priority pathogen for targeted antifungal drug development. To this end, we have screened microbial strains from the public outreach project Swab and Send for anti-Candida activity. This process identified Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14, which displayed potent activity against C. albicans, both on agar and in a cell-free supernatant assay. Whole-genome sequence analysis identified this strain as Pseudomonas monsensis. It contains several biosynthetic gene clusters, suggesting that it can produce hydrogen cyanide, lokisin, pyoverdine and colicin/carocin, which may contribute to the observed antifungal activity. However, an active compound was separated by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography and identified through high-resolution mass spectrometry as maculosin [cyclo(Pro-Tyr)]. This cyclic dipeptide has previously been found to possess antifungal activity, but the exact biosynthetic mechanism remains undetermined. Reporting this genome alongside the associated evidence of maculosin production represents a valuable resource for biosynthetic investigations.

Keywords: biosynthetic gene clusters, Candida albicans, cyclo(Pro-Tyr), genome sequencing, high-performance liquid chromatography, Swab and Send, citizen science

Data Summary

The genomics data are available as part of BioProject PRJNA1161700. The assembled and annotated genome has been deposited in GenBank under accession no. JBXOEP000000000. The version described in this paper is version JBXOEP010000000. The raw MS data have been deposited to MassIVE under dataset ID MSV000102665, accessible at doi: 10.25345 /C5T727W6K.

Introduction

Fungal infections represent a growing public health concern, with ~6.5 million annual invasive fungal infections, resulting in ~2.5 million attributable deaths [1]. When focusing on invasive candidiasis and Candida bloodstream infections, these account for 1,565,000 infections and ~647,000 attributable deaths [1]. The majority of candidiasis infections are caused by six species: Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei and Nakaseomyces glabratus (formerly Candida glabrata) [2, 3]. C. albicans is the most common cause of candidiasis, responsible for ~65% of cases [2].

There are three main classes of antifungals used clinically: azoles, echinocandins and polyenes. These classes target either the fungal cell membrane (azoles and polyenes) or the cell wall (echinocandins). Azoles inhibit ergosterol synthesis, echinocandins inhibit β-(1,3)-d-glucan synthesis, and polyenes bind to ergosterol and induce pore formation [4]. Resistance in C. albicans is uncommon, but it has been increasing to all three of these classes of antifungals [5–7]. In particular, resistance to azoles has been increasing through mutations within the ERG11 gene [8–10]. The World Health Organization has highlighted that the current pipeline of antifungal drugs in clinical and preclinical development is insufficient to meet future clinical need [11]. Only four drug candidates currently undergoing clinical evaluation have activity against C. albicans, and only one is being trialled for use against C. albicans [11]. The discovery and development of additional antifungal compounds are required to address this growing issue.

Swab and Send is a citizen science antimicrobial discovery project [12] that involves screening microbes for antimicrobial activity against bacterial and fungal isolates of interest. We identified a species of Pseudomonas, designated as SS1954.14, which was cultured from a Winogradsky column and displayed potent antifungal activity against C. albicans. Genome analysis revealed several possible antifungal compounds that were likely encoded. However, purification from the antifungal cell-free supernatant (CFS) of the strain, by activity tracking, identified the cyclic dipeptide natural product maculosin [cyclo(Pro-Tyr)].

Methods

Bacterial isolation

Sterile TRANSWAB Amies Charcoal swabs (MWE) were shared as part of Swab and Send, and once a sample of interest was swabbed, the swabs were stored in Amies charcoal agar at room temperature for up to 3 days and then at 4 °C thereafter. The swabs were spread onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar and incubated at room temperature for 2 days until colonies developed. Those with distinct morphologies were picked into BHI broth (100 µl) and incubated statically at room temperature for a further 2 days. Strains were stored by adding 40% glycerol in BHI broth (100 µl) to each well, resulting in a final glycerol volume of 20% (v/v), followed by freezing at –70 °C.

Agar testing

The isolate was screened on agar on top of a lawn of test strains C. albicans or Escherichia coli. The lawn was prepared by diluting an overnight culture of the test strains to an OD600 4.0 (C. albicans) or 0.15 (E. coli) in BHI broth and spreading it with a sterile swab across the surface of a BHI agar plate. The isolates were stamped out using a 96-pin replicator from a glycerol stock, within 30 min of preparing the lawn, transferring ~5 µl on top of the lawn. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 2 days until clear growth of the test organism was observed, and any zones of growth inhibition could be recorded.

Cell-free supernatant assay

Test organisms E. coli (NCTC 86) and C. albicans (ATCC 90028) were plated onto BHI agar and incubated at room temperature for 48 h. Test organism colonies were then selected and used to inoculate 8 ml of BHI broth and grown overnight (18–20 h) at 180 r.p.m., 37 °C. Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 was transferred to BHI broth and allowed to grow overnight (18–20 h) at 37 °C. An aliquot of overnight culture (1 ml) was centrifuged at 14,800 g for 1 min. Supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane to remove any test organism cells. Samples of the filtered supernatant (100 µl per well) were added to clear 96-well plates, alongside 100 µl of BHI broth in the control wells. The OD600 of the test strain was normalized to ~0.1 through the addition of 80 µl of the overnight test organism’s culture to 4.5 ml sterile BHI and adjusted to obtain a 0.5 McFarland standard (OD600 ~0.1). For C. albicans, 100 µl of the OD600 0.1 test organism was added to 4,900 µl (1 : 50) of BHI broth to obtain OD600 ~0.002. For E. coli, 1 µl of the OD600 0.1 test organism was added to 4,999 µl (1 : 5,000) of BHI broth to obtain OD600 ~0.00002. Then, 100 µl of OD600 0.002 (Candida) or 0.00002 (E. coli) solution was added to the supernatant and control wells, becoming OD600 0.001 (C. albicans) or 0.00001 (E. coli). The OD600 was then monitored every 10 min for 19 h using a CLARIOstar plus microplate reader (BMG Labtech).

Whole-genome sequencing

Genus was identified prior to sending the strain for whole-genome sequencing (WGS); hence, 16S rRNA PCR was undertaken using a colony of the SS1954.14 isolate as input DNA. The 27F (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT) primers were used to amplify a 1.3 kB region of the strain. The amplified section was sent for Sanger sequencing using GENEWIZ sequencing services (https://www.genewiz.com/), and the DNA sequence was searched for matches using EZTaxon to assign the genus [13].

DNA extraction, short-read sequencing, genome assembly and annotation were performed by MicrobesNG, as outlined in [14]. Briefly, the isolate was grown to mid-log in BHI broth, and 10 ml of culture was pelleted, washed with PBS and resuspended in DNA/RNA shield (Zymo Research). The cell suspension was lysed in Tris-EDTA buffer with lysozyme, MetaPolyzyme and RNase A before the addition of proteinase K and SDS. The DNA was purified using solid-phase reversible immobilization beads and resuspended in elution buffer. Library preparation used the Nextera XT library prep kit, and sequencing was undertaken using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 for short-read sequencing using a 250 bp paired-end protocol. For data processing, the reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic v.0.30 [15], with a sliding-window cut-off of Q15. Assembly was undertaken using SPAdes v.3.7 [16], and the genome annotated using NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation pipeline v.6.8 [17].

Genome analysis

Preliminary species assignment was undertaken by comparing the gyrB (DNA gyrase subunit B) nucleotide sequences of reference strains of Pseudomonas spp. taken from [18]. Sequence alignment was undertaken using Clustal OMEGA [19]. A maximum-likelihood tree was inferred using IQ-TREE v.1.6.1 [20], with 1,000 bootstraps. The TIM2+F+R3 model was selected using ModelFinder [21], and the resulting phylogenetic tree was displayed using iTOL [22].

The genome was assessed for completeness using CheckM v.1.1.2 with the lineage_wf workflow [23] to confirm that the standards for a high-quality draft genome were met [24]. The species was further investigated using the Genome Taxonomy Database toolkit v. 2.1.1 [25] on the assembled genome using the classify_wf workflow. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis was undertaken using JSpeciesWS, with blast to obtain the ANIb values [26]. Based on the closest matched species being part of the Pseudomonas koreensis subgroup, the WGSs of all 23 representative species were downloaded from NCBI, alongside a Pseudomonas aeruginosa WGS as an outgroup [27] (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material). The genomes were annotated using Prokka v1.11 [28]. The core-genome alignment across all strains was undertaken using the aligner MAFFT within Panaroo v.1.6.0 [29], using strict mode, and variant sites were extracted using SNP-sites v.2.1.5 [30]. A maximum-likelihood tree was inferred using IQ-TREE v.1.6.1 [20], with 1,000 bootstraps. The TIM2+F+ASC+R4 model was selected using ModelFinder [21]. The phylogenetic tree figure was visualized using iTOL [22].

The assembled genome was analysed using antiSMASH v8.0 [31] and BAGEL4 [32]. For antiSMASH, the known matches of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) to the MiBIG database were manually evaluated to assess the likelihood of each compound being encoded. For BAGEL4 outputs, the predicted bacteriocins were compared with the BACTIBASE database [33].

Hydrogen cyanide assay

This assay, adapted from [34, 35], tested for hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production in three different conditions. (1) SS1954.14 streaked onto BHI agar; (2) 5 µl SS1954.14 (adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards) added to 100 µl BHI broth in a 96-well plate; (3) 100 µl CFS, derived from an overnight culture of SS1954.14, added to a 96-well plate. The plates were overlaid with Feigl–Anger reagent paper [36], prepared as outlined. Copper (II) ethyl acetoacetate (5 mg ml−1) and 4,4'-methylenebis (N,N-dimethylaniline) (5 mg ml−1) were dissolved in chloroform. Whatman 3 MM chromatography paper was soaked in the chloroform solution. After complete solvent evaporation, the paper was placed under the plate lids and incubated at room temperature in a fume cupboard for 48 h. The colour change from light green to blue was visually inspected to indicate HCN production, as a binary: production or no production outcome.

Extraction of unknown natural product

SS1954.14 colonies were grown on BHI agar, subsequently picked and inoculated into 10 ml BHI broth and grown overnight (16–20 h) at 180 r.p.m., 37 °C. The 10 ml BHI broth culture was added to an additional 400 ml of BHI broth and incubated at 180 r.p.m., 37 °C for a further 24 h. The culture was centrifuged at 2,630 g for 20 min at room temperature, supernatant collected and pellet discarded. A crude extract was obtained from the supernatant via three consecutive extractions using ethyl acetate in a 1 : 1 ratio (v/v). To obtain clear partitioning of the layers during solvent extraction, 5 g of sodium chloride was added. Residual water was removed from the ethyl acetate by passing it through sodium sulphate packed inside a funnel with Whatman I filter paper. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator with the water bath set at 40 °C. The crude product was purified by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using water and acetonitrile, with an elution gradient of 5 to 25% acetonitrile across 180 min, then isocratic at 25% acetonitrile for 20 min. Column: Agilent PLRP-S (reverse phase); 8 µm, 100 Å, 25 mm inner diameter. Injection vol: 500 µl×3. Flow rate: 6 ml min−1. UV signals detected: 210 nm and 280 nm at room temperature.

Mass spectrometry

High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using an Agilent QTOF 6500 series, equipped with an electrospray interface and operated in positive or negative ion mode.

HPLC analysis

Elution profiles were compared using an Agilent 1260 infinity analytical HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump, standard autosampler and multiple-wavelength detector. The HPLC method was undertaken at 25 ℃, using solvents of water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid. The run was isocratic at 5% acetonitrile for 1 min, then had a gradient from 5 to 95% acetonitrile across 11 min and then isocratic at 95% acetonitrile for 4 min. Column: ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 (reverse phase); 3.5 µm, 4.6 mm×100 mm. Injection vol: 20 µl for the isolated compound and 10 µl for the commercial maculosin compound. Flow rate: 1.0 ml min−1. UV signal detected at 210 nm.

Minimum inhibitory concentration assay

C. albicans was inoculated in potato dextrose broth (PDB), whereas E. coli was inoculated into BHI broth. Both sets were incubated for 16–20 h at 180 r.p.m., 37 °C. For C. albicans, PDB was used throughout and for E. coli, BHI broth was used. The overnight culture was diluted by adding 25 µl to 5 ml fresh broth and vortexed. The OD was adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard (OD600 0.095–0.1) and diluted 1 : 50 in broth (i.e. 100 µl diluted culture to 4.9 ml broth). This suspension was further diluted 1 : 1 in broth (i.e. 2.5 ml diluted culture to 2.5 ml broth) and vortexed. A 96-well plate was prepared to contain 95 µl per well of selected compounds or fractions, which were serially diluted from 256 to 1 μg ml−1 in broth. The diluted test cultures were added to each well at 5 µl per well. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for ~20 h; if full growth was not observed, the plates were incubated for a further 20 h. Wells containing no visual growth were used to read the MIC.

RESULTS

Isolate SS1954.14 demonstrated antimicrobial activity against C. albicans

A beige colony was isolated from a swab taken from a Winogradsky column and designated as strain SS1954.14. In an agar plate-based screening assay, the isolate inhibited the growth of C. albicans ATCC 90028 and demonstrated a weaker impact on growth against E. coli NCTC 86 (Fig. S1). Given the promising growth inhibition shown by isolate SS1954.14 on agar, we chose to investigate this further by looking at antimicrobial production when the isolate was grown alone in broth. Following 20 h of growth in BHI broth, we tested the CFS of this isolate for its ability to inhibit the growth of C. albicans (Fig. 1). In the CFS assay, the strain exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against C. albicans, resulting in a 98.82% reduction in area under the curve over 19 h relative to the control (C. albicans grown in C. albicans CFS).

Fig. 1. Growth curves of C. albicans with and without SS1954.14 CFS. Control 1 is growth of C. albicans in fresh BHI (orange), and control 2 is growth of C. albicans in C. albicans CFS (purple), allowing for comparison.

Line graph showing OD600 over 19 hours where SS1954.14 CFS completely suppresses C. albicans growth, while both controls reach OD600 above 1.0 after exponential growth beginning near hour 8.

WGS of SS1954.14 suggested it was a P. monsensis strain

The strain was identified as a Pseudomonas sp. through comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence using the EZTaxon server database [13]. The strain was then WGS using short-read sequencing. The assembled genome was 6.36 Mb in length, with a GC content of 60.13%. The genome had a coverage of 37.7×, and the N50 of the genome was 504,156 bp. The assembled genome contained 66 contigs and 5,575 predicted genes, including four complete rRNAs and 63 tRNAs. The completeness of the genome was 99.39% with 0.32% contamination, using the Pseudomonas CheckM marker set.

The gyrB (encoding DNA gyrase subunit B) gene was taken from the genome and compared with other gyrB sequences found to be part of different multilocus sequence analysis groups of the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex [18]. The most similar gyrB sequences were found in the P. koreensis strains included in the analysis (Fig. S2). The closest match was to P. koreensis LMG 21318 [37], and this strain had an ANI of 88.53 (77.22% coverage) to our Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 strain’s genome. However, due to the low ANI value/percentage coverage, we reassessed the species identification based on the WGS against the Genome Taxonomy Database [25]. This identified P. monsensis LMG 32033 as the closest match, with an ANI of 96.38 (95% coverage) calculated by the Genome Taxonomy Database toolkit or an ANIb of 98.55 (93.54% coverage) calculated by JSpeciesWS [25–27]. P. koreensis A9 was the second-closest match, with an ANI of 90.3 (95% coverage). P. monsensis has recently been included in the P. koreensis subgroup based on ANI comparisons across all Pseudomonas spp. [27]. The WGSs of all 23 species grouped within the P. koreensis subgroup were compared based on a core-genome alignment and by comparing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were present within these core genes (Fig. 2). This highlighted that Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 grouped most closely with the P. monsensis type strain, in support of ANI-based identification of Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 belonging to the P. monsensis species.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree based on SNPs present within a core-genome alignment, comparing all P. koreensis subgroup species with SS1954.14 (highlighted in teal). P. aeruginosa was used as the outgroup. Type-strain information is provided in Table S1. The tree was created using IQ-TREE, with 1,000 bootstrap replicates performed and displayed using iTOL [20, 22]. The tree scale represents SNPs per site within the core-genome alignment.

Phylogenetic tree of P. koreensis subgroup species with Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 highlighted, using P. aeruginosa as outgroup. Tree scale 0.1 SNPs per site shows divergence across taxa.

Genome analysis indicated several possible antimicrobial compounds

Given the initial anti-Candida activity of the isolate, we analysed the genome for BGCs using antiSMASH 8.0 (Table 1) [38]. Only two BGCs had high-similarity matches: those predicted to encode HCN and lokisin. Although HCN production has been linked to suppression of fungal growth [35, 39], this has primarily been on agar, and it is unlikely to contribute to the CFS activity observed against C. albicans. The non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) BGC identified in region 5.3 had 100% similarity matches listed in antiSMASH to several BGCs (defined as all genes in the NRPS region as >45% amino acid identity across >40% coverage [40]), including lokisin, anikasin, viscosinamide A, bananamide 1, putisolvin and gacamide A. Hence, the NRPS was manually checked to confirm that it was predicted to encode the Leu-Asp-Thr-Leu-Leu-Ser-Leu-Ser-Leu-Ile-Asp amino acid sequence, which represents the core structure of lokisin. The three NRPS genes in region 5.3 were most similar to the lokisin BGCs, with each pair of genes having 90% amino acid identity (99% coverage), 91% identity (100% coverage) and 88% identity (100% coverage) for ctg5_338, 339 and 340, respectively.

Table 1. Analysis of predicted BGCs using antiSMASH 8.0. If no similar BGCs were present in the MiBIG database, this column was left blank.

Region Type of BGC Position on contig Most similar BGC in MiBIG Similarity confidence
1.1 NRP metallophore 94,600–178,063 Pf-5, pyoverdine Low
1.2 RiPP-like 425,019–435,858 N/A
2.1 RiPP-like 168,445–179,290 N/A
5.1 β-Lactone 42,739–66,001 Fengycin N/A
5.2 Hydrogen cyanide 192,619–205,591 HCN High
5.3 NRPS 349,953–427,417 Lokisin High
5.4 RiPP-like 511,538–523,742 N/A
6.1 NRPS 16,420–69,418 Pf-5 pyoverdine Low
6.2 NAGGN 210,452–225,332 N/A
7.1 RiPP-like 44,312–55,199 N/A
8.1 HCN 279,654–292,471 N/A
10.1 Terpene-precursor 246,130–267,017 N/A
10.2 RRE-containing 285,582–306,715 N/A
12.1 Redox-cofactor 77,830–99,986 Lankacidin C N/A
19.1 NRPS-like 1–17,407 N/A

The lower-percentage similarity matches included pyoverdine, fengycin and lankacidin C. The pyoverdine BGC appears to have been split across several contigs during the genome assembly process, suggesting repetitive DNA sequences internal to the 100 kbp genome region [41]. The weak match to fengycin was based on two genes with 48% nucleotide identity (68 and 95% coverage) located upstream of the five main biosynthetic genes encoding proteins involved in fengycin production [42, 43]. Hence, this cluster is unlikely to encode fengycin in Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14. The low-similarity match in region 12.1 was matched to lankacidin C, on the basis of two genes with 46 and 49% nucleotide identity (88 and 89% coverage). However, the matching genes appear to encode pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis proteins C and E. These are part of a five-gene BGC encoding pyrroloquinoline quinone [44], which is adjacent to the lankacidin C BGC found in Streptomyces rochei [45].

We also analysed the genome for bacteriocins and other antimicrobial peptides using BAGEL4 [32]. This analysis identified two regions of interest on contigs 4 and 16, neither of which had been highlighted by antiSMASH (Table 2). These encode putative colicin-like bacteriocins, which are a class of antimicrobial peptides produced by bacteria. Both genes were directly followed by genes encoding colicin immunity proteins, which likely provide self-immunity from the toxin.

Table 2. Analysis of predicted bacteriocins and RiPPs using BAGEL4. The most similar bacteriocins were identified using BACTIBASE.

Region Position on contig Class Most similar bacteriocin % amino acid identity (% coverage)
4 245,639–266,836 Colicin-like bacteriocin Carocin D 21 (58)
16 14,945–35,332 Colicin-like bacteriocin Pyocin S1 20 (42)

Once the putative bacteriocins had been identified, the translated sequences of the predicted genes were compared against the BACTIBASE database of bacteriocins [33]. These were compared using BLASTp against the bacteriocins database and found two low amino acid identity matches (Table 2). These bacteriocins were identified in Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum for carocin D and P. aeruginosa for pyocin S1 [46, 47].

HCN was not detected in the CFS of SS1954.14

As the SS1954.14 strain encoded BGCs linked to the production of HCN, we performed a detection assay using Feigl–Anger reagent paper. It was observed that the strain produced HCN when grown on BHI agar and in BHI broth, but there was no detection of HCN when the reagent paper was placed above wells containing only CFS derived from SS1954.14 (Fig. S3). For the antimicrobial activity experiments and downstream extractions, CFS of SS1954.14 was used, and hence it is unlikely HCN was responsible for the antimicrobial effect against C. albicans.

Preparative HPLC fractionation identified maculosin as the active compound

Ethyl acetate extraction of the CFS from Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 was performed to remove growth media and other impurities. The extract was further purified via preparative HPLC using an elution gradient of 5 to 25% acetonitrile. All nine fractions were collected and screened for antifungal and antibacterial activity to identify the most bioactive compounds within the sample (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Chromatogram of the HPLC separation and fractionation of SS1954.14 ethyl acetate-extracted CFS, highlighting the nine groups of fractions collected. Above each fraction number is the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the fraction against C. albicans ATCC 90028 in µg ml−1. Overlaid are the detection at 210 nm (blue) and 280 nm (green).

HPLC chromatogram of nine fractions from SS1954.14 ethyl acetate extract, detected at 210 nm and 280 nm. Fraction 3 shows the tallest peak near 105 min with MIC of 32; fractions 2 and 8 show moderate activity.

Fraction 3 was found to show the highest purity and exhibit the strongest inhibition activity, with the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) recorded at 32 µg ml−1 against C. albicans (Fig. 3). No activity was observed for any of the fractions when tested against E. coli (MIC at >256 µg ml−1).

As fraction 3 had the strongest activity against C. albicans, we selected this fraction for downstream evaluation. We performed HRMS on this fraction and identified several peaks (Fig. S4). One of the major peaks found was at 261.1247 Da (positive-ion ESI-MS, m/z) (Fig. 4). This matched the reported masses of 261.1241 Da [48] and 261.124 Da [49] found to correspond to cyclo(Pro-Tyr), also known as maculosin. We purchased maculosin from a commercial source (Bachem) and repeated the MIC testing. This gave the same MIC of 32 µg ml−1 against C. albicans that was obtained for fraction 3. In addition, we compared the HPLC elution profile of the extracted natural product to the commercial maculosin compound (Fig. S5). The two compounds had consistent retention times and identical chromatographic behaviour.

Fig. 4. HRMS identifying peak at 261.1247 Da (positive -ion ESI-MS, (m/z)) and corresponding cyclo-(Pro-Tyr) structure.

Mass spectrum of cyclo(Pro-Tyr) with chemical formula C14H16N2O3 shows a dominant peak at m/z 261.1247.

Discussion

A strain of P. monsensis has been identified that displayed antifungal activity against C. albicans, and we confirmed that this strain likely produced maculosin. Within the reported genome, we have also identified several BGCs, but none of them has been associated with maculosin biosynthesis.

Maculosin has been found in the CFS of Pseudomonas spp. and has previously been reported to have anti-quorum-sensing activity [50, 51]. The production of maculosin was also found to be negatively regulated by the LasI quorum-sensing system in P. aeruginosa [52]. The exact route of maculosin biosynthesis in known bacterial producers has not been identified yet. Production could be through a cyclodipeptide synthase enzyme, of which an expressed enzyme from Diplorickettsia massiliensis 20B was shown to produce cyclo(l-Pro-l-Tyr) 23% of the time [53]. However, this is the only report of a cyclo(l-Pro-l-Tyr)-producing cyclodipeptide synthase that we could identify, with an overall low frequency of this type of cyclodipeptide being associated with the tRNA-dependent enzymes [54]. We searched the Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 genome sequence using the nucleotide sequences corresponding to the characterized cyclodipeptide synthase protein from D. massiliensis 20B and from other Pseudomonas spp. that produced cyclo(l-Glu-l-Ala) and cyclo(l-Leu-l-Glu) [53, 54]. However, no matches were identified. The production of maculosin has been shown to be affected by gene deletions in other Pseudomonas BGCs [51]. This may suggest that there is an alternative pathway for synthesis, which is the case for several other cyclodipeptides containing either tyrosine or proline [51, 54]. The other pathway for synthesis of cyclodipeptides is NRPS BGCs [55], of which only the NRPS on contig 19 of the Pseudomonas sp. SS1954.14 genome is not associated with a known compound. The NRPS gene present at 2,970–6,362 bp had a similarity score of 0.61 to the peramine BGC producing an l-Pro, l-Arg dipeptide [56], and of 0.59 to the fungisporin BGC producing a cyclic tetrapeptide of d-Phe-l-Phe-d-Val-l-Val [57]. However, the contig 19 NRPS is shorter and predicted to only add one aliphatic, branched, hydrophobic amino acid to a compound, with the protein amino acid identity of 28.4% (72% coverage) to the peramine NRPS gene and 26.9% (52% coverage) to the fungisporin NRPS gene. To investigate the role of the P. monsensis BGCs in the synthesis of maculosin, knockout mutations within individual BGC genes could be produced to observe loss of compound production.

Maculosin has previously been found to have antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus, C. albicans, Colletotrichum truncatum, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium expansum and Rhizoctonia solani [58–60]. Against C. albicans specifically, it has been found to have MICs of 27 µg ml−1 [59] and 32 µg ml−1 [58], but another group reported no activity, suggesting putative inhibition would require >256 µg ml−1 [61]. Finally, a further group reported no zone of clearance following addition of 500 µg ml−1 to a sterile disc [62]. All four results were derived using different testing methods, preventing direct comparisons, with two papers not reporting the growth media used in either their broth microdilution assay [59] or their disc diffusion assay [62]. In addition, the strains of C. albicans used were different, being C. albicans ATCC2091 [58], C. albicans ATCC MYA-2876 [61] and two unspecified C. albicans spp. [59, 62]. The most comparable method to ours used broth microdilution in PDB and found the same MIC of 32 µg ml−1 [58]. The other broth microdilution approach used yeast nitrogen base broth and found an MIC of >256 µg ml−1 [61]. As both media have similar pH, this suggests that the difference in MIC was unlikely to be due to media acidity. This may indicate that the C. albicans ATCC MYA-2876 genome encodes resistance to maculosin that is not present in C. albicans ATCC 90028 or ATCC 2091.

The exact stereoisomer of cyclo(Pro-Tyr) present within our extracted fraction cannot be confirmed based on the mass spectrometry match, which would be identical for the four possible configurations: cyclo(l-Pro-l-Tyr), cyclo(d-Pro-l-Tyr), cyclo(l-Pro-d-Tyr) and cyclo(d-Pro-d-Tyr). In addition to maculosin, we found references only to the activity of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Tyr) against C. albicans, with reported MICs of 32 and 51.25 µg ml−1 [58, 63]. We suspect our extracted compound is maculosin [cylco(l-Pro-l-Tyr)], as only the ll form has previously been isolated from Pseudomonas spp.; no epimerization domains (associated with d-amino acids) were present in unassigned BGCs in the genome; and the HPLC elution profile and MIC were identical to commercially obtained maculosin (Fig. S5). Future work will undertake supercritical fluid chromatography separation to compare our extracted compound with other stereoisomers to confirm the identity and explore their activity against C. albicans.

Given the limited number of approved antifungal compounds in clinical use and only a handful of new compounds within the pipeline, the development of additional antifungal compounds is needed. Testing maculosin or its analogues against drug-resistant C. albicans isolates could provide greater incentive for its continued development, given the increasing levels of drug resistance. This study highlights that maculosin, as a bacterial natural product, may offer a potential antifungal compound requiring further drug development. Our work also shows that a public outreach project can engage participants and enthuse future scientists about antimicrobial drug discovery [12], while also investigating antimicrobial compounds.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1.
acmi-8-01229-s001.pdf (824.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.001229.v3

Acknowledgements

E. coli NCTC 86 was a gift from the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC), UK.

Abbreviations

ANI

average nucleotide identity

BGC

biosynthetic gene cluster

BHI

brain heart infusion

CFS

cell-free supernatant

HCN

hydrogen cyanide

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

HRMS

high-resolution mass spectrometry

NRPS

non-ribosomal peptide synthetase

PDB

potato dextrose broth

SNP

single-nucleotide polymorphism

WGS

whole-genome sequencing

Footnotes

Funding: This project was funded by UKRI through the Strength in Places (grant no. SIPF 36348), as part of the Infection Innovation Consortium (iiCON).

Author contributions: A.P.R.: Conceptualization. P.S., A.D.H.K., J.K.B., E.A., S.A., M.P., A.M.O., A.M. and C.M.: Investigation. P.S., J.K.B., E.A., S.A., A.M.O. and C.M.: Methodology. P.S., A.D.H.K. and J.K.B.: Data curation. W.D.H. and A.P.R.: Resources. A.D.H.K. and J.K.B.: Writing – original draft. All authors: Writing – review and editing. W.D.H. and A.P.R.: Supervision. A.P.R.: Funding acquisition.

Contributor Information

Priyanka Sharma, Email: priya10.sharma03@gmail.com.

Alexander D. H. Kingdon, Email: alexander.kingdon@lstmed.ac.uk.

Jack K. Bradley, Email: Jack.Bradley@lstmed.ac.uk.

Ellie Allman, Email: Ellie.Allman@lstmed.ac.uk.

Song Ang, Email: jnuangsong@126.com.

Matthew Pye, Email: cc0u929c@liverpool.ac.uk.

Angus M. O’Ferrall, Email: angus.moreoferrall@lstmed.ac.uk.

Amy McLeman, Email: Amy.McLeman@lstmed.ac.uk.

Claudia McKeown, Email: Claudia.McKeown@lstmed.ac.uk.

W. David Hong, Email: Davidhwq@liverpool.ac.uk.

Adam P. Roberts, Email: Adam.Roberts@lstmed.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Denning DW. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24:e428–e438. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00692-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turner SA, Butler G. The Candida pathogenic species complex. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4:a019778. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lionakis MS, Chowdhary A. Candida auris infections. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:1924–1935. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2402635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Branda F, Petrosillo N, Ceccarelli G, Giovanetti M, De Vito A, et al. Antifungal agents in the 21st century: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Infect Dis Rep. 2025;17:91. doi: 10.3390/idr17040091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization . WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action, 1st ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gurajala S, Challapilla M. A quiet but growing threat: global perspectives on antifungal resistance and future therapeutic approaches. Indian J Pharmacol. 2026;58:35–45. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_1129_25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kilbas I, Kahraman Kilbas EP, Horhat FG, Ciftci IH. Twenty-year course of antifungal resistance in Candida albicans in Türkiye: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Fungi. 2025;11:603. doi: 10.3390/jof11080603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh S, Islahi S, Das K, Gupta S, Singh S. Investigating the increasing azole resistance in candida infections among critically ill patients: experience from a tertiary-level setup in north india. Cureus. 2025 doi: 10.7759/cureus.98425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishimoto AT, Sharma C, Rogers PD. Molecular and genetic basis of azole antifungal resistance in the opportunistic pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:257–270. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bédard C, Gagnon-Arsenault I, Boisvert J, Plante S, Dubé AK, et al. Most azole resistance mutations in the Candida albicans drug target confer cross-resistance without intrinsic fitness cost. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:3025–3040. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01819-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization . Antifungal Agents in Clinical and Preclinical Development Overview and Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roberts AP. Swab and send: a citizen science, antibiotic discovery project. Future Sci OA. 2020;6:FSO477. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chun J, Lee J-H, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, et al. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:2259–2261. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kingdon ADH, D’Arcy K, Breen A, McKeown C, Allman E, et al. Draft genome sequence of Flavobacterium aquidurense strain, isolated from untreated wastewater. Access Microbiol. 2025;7:1–5. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000976.v3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garrido-Sanz D, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Martín M, Rivilla R, et al. Genomic and genetic diversity within the pseudomonas fluorescens complex. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies | molecular biology and evolution | oxford academic. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics. 2022;38:5315–5316. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Girard L, Lood C, Höfte M, Vandamme P, Rokni-Zadeh H, et al. The ever-expanding Pseudomonas genus: description of 43 new species and partition of the Pseudomonas putida group. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1766. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G, et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 2020;21:180. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000056. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL, et al. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:W32–W38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van Heel AJ, de Jong A, Song C, Viel JH, Kok J, et al. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hammami R, Zouhir A, Ben Hamida J, Fliss I. BACTIBASE: a new web-accessible database for bacteriocin characterization. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Castric KF, Castric PA. Method for rapid detection of cyanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:701–702. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.701-702.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pacheco-Moreno A, Stefanato FL, Ford JJ, Trippel C, Uszkoreit S, et al. Pan-genome analysis identifies intersecting roles for Pseudomonas specialized metabolites in potato pathogen inhibition. Elife. 2021;10:e71900. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Feigl F, Anger V. Replacement of benzidine by copper ethylacetoacetate and tetra base as spot-test reagent for hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen. Analyst. 1966;91:282–284. doi: 10.1039/an9669100282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kwon SW, Kim JS, Park IC, Yoon SH, Park DH, et al. Pseudomonas koreensis sp. nov., Pseudomonas umsongensis sp. nov. and Pseudomonas jinjuensis sp. nov., novel species from farm soils in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:21–27. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02326-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W46–W50. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Michelsen CF, Stougaard P. Hydrogen cyanide synthesis and antifungal activity of the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens In5 from Greenland is highly dependent on growth medium. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58:381–390. doi: 10.1139/w2012-004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Blin K, Medema MH, Kazempour D, Fischbach MA, Breitling R, et al. antiSMASH 2.0--a versatile platform for genome mining of secondary metabolite producers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W204–12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stintzi A, Johnson Z, Stonehouse M, Ochsner U, Meyer JM, et al. The pvc gene cluster of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: role in synthesis of the pyoverdine chromophore and regulation by PtxR and PvdS. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:4118–4124. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.13.4118-4124.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Steller S, Vollenbroich D, Leenders F, Stein T, Conrad B, et al. Structural and functional organization of the fengycin synthetase multienzyme system from Bacillus subtilis b213 and A1/3. Chemistry & Biology. 1999;6:31–41. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Schneider K, Vater J, et al. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J Biotechnol. 2009;140:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Goosen N, Huinen RG, van de Putte P. A 24-amino-acid polypeptide is essential for the biosynthesis of the coenzyme pyrrolo-quinoline-quinone. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1426–1427. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.4.1426-1427.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suwa M, Sugino H, Sasaoka A, Mori E, Fujii S, et al. Identification of two polyketide synthase gene clusters on the linear plasmid pSLA2-L in Streptomyces rochei. Gene. 2000;246:123–131. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Roh E, Park T-H, Kim M-I, Lee S, Ryu S, et al. Characterization of a new bacteriocin, Carocin D, from Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Pcc21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:7541–7549. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03103-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sano Y, Matsui H, Kobayashi M, Kageyama M. Molecular structures and functions of pyocins S1 and S2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:2907–2916. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2907-2916.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Paudel B, Maharjan R, Rajbhandari P, Aryal N, Aziz S, et al. Maculosin, a non-toxic antioxidant compound isolated from Streptomyces sp. KTM18. Pharm Biol. 2021;59:933–936. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2021.1946091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thapa BB, Huo C, Budhathoki R, Chaudhary P, Joshi S, et al. Metabolic comparison and molecular networking of antimicrobials in Streptomyces species. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:4193. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Holden MTG, Ram Chhabra S, De Nys R, Stead P, Bainton NJ, et al. Quorum‐sensing cross talk: isolation and chemical characterization of cyclic dipeptides from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram‐negative bacteria. Molecular Microbiology. 1999;33:1254–1266. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.González O, Ortíz-Castro R, Díaz-Pérez C, Díaz-Pérez AL, Magaña-Dueñas V, et al. Non-ribosomal peptide synthases from Pseudomonas aeruginosa play a role in cyclodipeptide biosynthesis, quorum-sensing regulation, and root development in a plant host. Microb Ecol. 2017;73:616–629. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0896-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ortiz-Castro R, Díaz-Pérez C, Martínez-Trujillo M, del Río RE, Campos-García J, et al. Transkingdom signaling based on bacterial cyclodipeptides with auxin activity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:7253–7258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006740108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jacques IB, Moutiez M, Witwinowski J, Darbon E, Martel C, et al. Analysis of 51 cyclodipeptide synthases reveals the basis for substrate specificity. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:721–727. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Skinnider MA, Johnston CW, Merwin NJ, Dejong CA, Magarvey NA, et al. Global analysis of prokaryotic tRNA-derived cyclodipeptide biosynthesis. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:45. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4435-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bojarska J, Mieczkowski A, Ziora ZM, Skwarczynski M, Toth I, et al. Cyclic dipeptides: The biological and structural landscape with special focus on the anti-cancer proline-based scaffold. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1515. doi: 10.3390/biom11101515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tanaka A, Tapper BA, Popay A, Parker EJ, Scott B. A symbiosis expressed non-ribosomal peptide synthetase from a mutualistic fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrass confers protection to the symbiotum from insect herbivory. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:1036–1050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ali H, Ries MI, Lankhorst PP, van der Hoeven RAM, Schouten OL, et al. A non-canonical NRPS is involved in the synthesis of fungisporin and related hydrophobic cyclic tetrapeptides in Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kumar N, Mohandas C, Nambisan B, Kumar DRS, Lankalapalli RS. Isolation of proline-based cyclic dipeptides from Bacillus sp. N strain associated with rhabditid [corrected] entomopathogenic nematode and its antimicrobial properties. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;29:355–364. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen S, Zhang D, Chen M, Zhang Z, Lian X-Y. A rare diketopiperazine glycoside from marine-sourced Streptomyces sp. ZZ446. Nat Prod Res. 2020;34:1046–1050. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1544978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Castaldi S, Cimmino A, Masi M, Evidente A. Bacterial lipodepsipeptides and some of their derivatives and cyclic dipeptides as potential agents for biocontrol of pathogenic bacteria and fungi of agrarian plants. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:4591–4598. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c08139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim H, Hwang J-Y, Shin J, Oh K-B. Inhibitory effects of diketopiperazines from marine-derived Streptomyces puniceus on the isocitrate lyase of Candida albicans. Molecules. 2019;24:2111. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cain CC, Lee D, Waldo RH, 3rd, Henry AT, Casida EJ Jr, et al. Synergistic antimicrobial activity of metabolites produced by a nonobligate bacterial predator. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2113–2117. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2113-2117.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sekar J, Parasuraman G, Dharumadurai D, Dileep Kumar BS, Natesan S. Of candida albicans virulence factor by cyclic dipeptides derived from aeromonas veronii V03. bioRxiv. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.10.24.619162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1.
acmi-8-01229-s001.pdf (824.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.001229.v3

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES