ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) is a pancreatic cystic lesion with a generally favorable prognosis; however, malignant transformation can occur. Anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of pancreatic cancer. Anaplastic transformation arising from MCN is extremely rare, and its clinicopathological features remain unclear. Herein, we report a case in which surgical resection was performed following systemic chemotherapy, highlighting a discrepancy between tumor marker levels and tumor progression.
CASE PRESENTATION
A woman in her 40s presented with abdominal pain. CT revealed a 14-cm multilocular cystic lesion with a solid component in the pancreatic body and tail, accompanied by peritoneal nodules. The tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level was elevated (2100.0 U/mL). The clinical diagnosis was MCN with an associated invasive carcinoma and suspected peritoneal dissemination, and systemic chemotherapy was initiated. Following treatment, the solid component showed progressive enlargement, whereas the CA19-9 level decreased to 33.6 U/mL, and the peritoneal nodules regressed. The tumor subsequently perforated the colon and was complicated by intratumoral infection, requiring percutaneous drainage and laparoscopic ileostomy. Laparoscopic exploration revealed no obvious peritoneal dissemination, and ascitic fluid cytology was negative for malignancy (CY0). Therefore, distal pancreatectomy with partial gastrectomy and partial colectomy was performed. The resected specimen showed a 19-cm solid tumor with scattered multilocular cystic areas. Histopathology revealed highly atypical spindle, pleomorphic, and multinucleated tumor cells in the solid component, while the cystic component was lined by mucinous epithelium exhibiting carcinomatous atypia and associated ovarian-type stroma. The final pathological diagnosis was MCN with an associated invasive carcinoma with pleomorphic-type anaplastic carcinoma. Despite adjuvant chemotherapy, peritoneal recurrence occurred 3 months after surgery, and the patient died 5 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN is extremely rare and exhibits aggressive clinical behavior with a poor prognosis, even after surgical resection. Tumor markers may not accurately reflect disease activity and should be interpreted with caution.
KEYWORDS: anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas, mucinous cystic neoplasm, mucinous cystic carcinoma, ovarian stroma
Abbreviations
- CA19-9
carbohydrate antigen 19-9
- CEA
carcinoembryonic antigen
- MCN
mucinous cystic neoplasm
INTRODUCTION
MCN is a pancreatic cystic lesion characterized by ovarian-type stroma,1) typically occurring in middle-aged women and arising in the body and tail of the pancreas.2) Although MCN generally has a favorable prognosis, malignant transformation can occur in rare cases.3,4) Anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma with an extremely poor prognosis compared with other variants.5,6) Anaplastic transformation arising from MCN is exceedingly rare, and its clinicopathological features and prognosis remain unclear. Herein, we report a case of anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN that underwent surgical resection following systemic chemotherapy.
CASE PRESENTATION
A woman in her 40s presented with abdominal pain. CT revealed a 14-cm multilocular cystic lesion in the pancreatic body and tail with an enhancing solid component (Fig. 1A, 1B). Peritoneal nodules surrounding the pancreas were also observed (Fig. 1C). MRI demonstrated diffusion restriction in these nodules, suggestive of peritoneal dissemination (Fig. 1D). The tumor marker CA19-9 level was elevated (2100.0 U/mL). Based on these findings, the clinical diagnosis was MCN with an associated invasive carcinoma and suspected peritoneal dissemination. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy was initiated without pathological confirmation. After 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX, the CA19-9 level decreased to 33.6 U/mL, and CT showed disappearance of the peritoneal nodules. However, 3 months after the initial diagnosis, the patient developed worsening abdominal pain. CT revealed enlargement of the solid component, tumor perforation into the splenic flexure of the transverse colon, and intratumoral infection (Fig. 1E). Percutaneous abscess drainage and laparoscopic ileostomy were subsequently performed. Laparoscopic exploration revealed the known tumor in the left upper abdomen with adhesion to the upper abdominal wall. No visible peritoneal nodules were identified within the observable abdominal cavity, including the area where peritoneal dissemination had been suspected on the initial imaging studies; therefore, peritoneal biopsy was not performed. A small amount of serous ascites was present in the pelvis, and cytological examination of the ascitic fluid was negative for malignancy (CY0) (Fig. 2). Following improvement of her symptoms, one additional cycle of mFOLFIRINOX was administered; however, chemotherapy was discontinued owing to recurrent intratumoral infection accompanied by fever. Although the tumor had increased in size to 14.7 cm (Fig. 1F, 1G), tumor marker levels had decreased, imaging findings showed improvement in the peritoneal nodules, and laparoscopy revealed no evidence of peritoneal dissemination. In addition, continuation of chemotherapy had become difficult because of recurrent intratumoral infection. Therefore, conversion surgery with curative intent and infection control was planned 6 months after the initial diagnosis (Fig. 3). A large tumor was identified in the pancreatic body and tail, invading the stomach and colon, and distal pancreatectomy with partial gastrectomy and partial colectomy was performed (Fig. 4A, 4B). The operative time was 487 min, and the blood loss was 1987 mL. Gross examination of the resected specimen showed a 19-cm solid tumor with scattered multilocular cystic areas (Fig. 4C–4E). Histopathological examination revealed that the solid component, accounting for more than 90% of the tumor, consisted of highly atypical spindle, pleomorphic, and multinucleated tumor cells (Fig. 4F, 4G). In contrast, the cystic component, accounting for less than 10% of the tumor, was lined by mucinous epithelium with carcinomatous atypia and accompanied by ovarian-type stroma that was positive for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and calretinin (Fig. 4F, 4H–4K). Tumor invasion into the stomach and colon was observed, with exposure of the tumor on the gastric and colonic mucosal surfaces. Histopathological assessment of the invasion of the splenic artery and vein was difficult. All surgical margins were negative. The final pathological diagnosis was MCN with an associated invasive carcinoma with pleomorphic-type anaplastic carcinoma. According to the Japan Pancreas Society 8th edition classification, the tumor was classified as Pbt, TS4 (190 mm), nodular and cystic type, med, INFa, Ly0, V0, Pn1a, mpd0, ypT3, ypCH0, ypDU0, ypS1, ypRP1, ypPVX, ypAX, ypPLX, ypOO1 (stomach, colon), ypPCM0, ypDPM0, R0, ypN1a (2/17), M0, ypStage IIB. According to the Union for International Cancer Control 9th TNM classification, the tumor was classified as T3N1M0, Stage IIB. The postoperative course was complicated by a pancreatic fistula, which improved with drainage. The patient was discharged 1 month after surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was initiated; however, peritoneal dissemination recurred 3 months after surgery (Fig. 5), whereas CA19-9 levels remained within the normal range (Fig. 6). mFOLFIRINOX was subsequently initiated, but tumor progression was observed after a single cycle. The regimen was then changed to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; however, treatment was discontinued after 1 cycle owing to deterioration of the patient’s general condition. The patient died of the disease 5 months after surgery.
Fig. 1. Preoperative imaging. (A–D) Initial presentation: coronal (A) and axial (B) CT images showing a 14-cm multilocular cystic lesion in the pancreatic body and tail with an enhancing solid component (arrows). (C) Peritoneal nodules around the pancreas (arrowheads). (D) MRI showing diffusion restriction in these nodules (arrowheads). (E) Three months after the initial diagnosis: CT showing enlargement of the solid component (arrows), tumor perforation into the colon, and intratumoral infection. (F) Five months after the initial diagnosis: CT showing enlargement of the solid component to 12.6 cm (arrows). (G) Six months after the initial diagnosis: CT showing further enlargement of the solid component to 14.7 cm (arrows).

Fig. 2. Laparoscopic findings at the time of diverting ileostomy. (A) The known tumor (T) in the left upper abdomen showing adhesion to the upper abdominal wall. (B) No visible peritoneal nodules were identified in the area where peritoneal dissemination had been suspected on initial imaging studies. (C) A small amount of serous ascites was present in the pelvis, and cytological examination of the ascitic fluid was negative for malignancy (CY0).

Fig. 3. Preoperative clinical course. CA19-9 levels markedly decreased after initiation of mFOLFIRINOX, despite enlargement of the solid tumor component.

5-FU, fluorouracil; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen
Fig. 4. Intraoperative and pathological findings. (A) A large cystic tumor (T) was identified in the pancreatic body and tail, invading the stomach (S) and colon (C). (B) The tumor (T) was dissected, and distal pancreatectomy with partial gastrectomy and partial colectomy was performed. (C–E) Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen showed a solid tumor with scattered multilocular cystic areas. (F) The tumor consisted of both solid (arrows) and cystic (arrowheads) components (hematoxylin and eosin staining; original magnification, low). (G) The solid component consisted of highly atypical spindle, pleomorphic, and multinucleated tumor cells (hematoxylin and eosin staining; original magnification, ×100). (H) The cystic component was lined by mucinous epithelium with carcinomatous atypia (arrows) and accompanied by ovarian-type stroma (arrowheads) (hematoxylin and eosin staining; original magnification, ×100). (I–K) The ovarian-type stroma was positive for estrogen receptor (I), progesterone receptor (J), and calretinin (K) (immunohistochemical staining; original magnification, ×400).

Fig. 5. Postoperative imaging. (A, B) CT revealed peritoneal recurrence 3 months after surgery (arrows).

Fig. 6. Postoperative clinical course. CA19-9 levels normalized after surgery and remained within the normal range even after recurrence of peritoneal dissemination.

CA19-9, Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; GnP, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel
DISCUSSION
In the present case, the tumor comprised both cystic and solid components. The cystic component showed mucinous epithelium with ovarian-type stroma, which is characteristically positive for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and calretinin,7,8) consistent with our findings. In contrast, the solid component demonstrated pleomorphic-type anaplastic carcinoma. Although no clear transitional zone was identified, the clinical course, characterized by a predominantly cystic lesion at initial presentation followed by rapid growth of the mural nodule, together with the histopathological findings, supported the diagnosis of anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN. This entity is extremely rare. A PubMed search using the keywords “anaplastic carcinoma,” “mucinous cystic neoplasm,” and “mucinous cystic carcinoma” identified 20 reports comprising 22 cases of anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN (Table 1).9–28) The mean patient age was 47 years, and 20 patients (90.9%) were female. The tumors predominantly occurred in the pancreatic body and tail, with a mean maximum diameter of 12.7 cm. Combined resection of adjacent organs was performed in 6 cases (27.3%). These findings suggest that even when arising from MCN, an anaplastic carcinoma component may confer aggressive local invasiveness. None of the previously reported cases received preoperative chemotherapy, and all underwent upfront surgical resection. Similar to previously reported cases, our patient was a middle-aged woman with a large tumor arising from the pancreatic body and tail. However, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case in which surgical resection was performed after systemic chemotherapy.
Table 1. Reported surgically resected cases of anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas arising from MCN.
| Year | Authors | Age/Sex | Tumor location | Maximum tumor size (cm) | Surgical procedure | Histological subtype | Preoperative CA19-9 (U/mL) | Recurrence | Site | Time to recurrence | Outcome | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | Logan9) | 35/F | Tail | 17 | DP+gastrectomy | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Local | 3.5 weeks | Dead | 1.5 months |
| 1991 | Rego10) | 45/F | Body and tail | 11 | DP+colectomy | Pleomorphic | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 16 months |
| 1995 | Marinho 11) | 70/F | Body and tail | 4.5 | DP | ND | ND | ND | – | – | ND | – |
| 1995 | Bergman 12) | 77/F | Head | 5 | PD | Osteoclast-like giant cell | ND | ND | – | – | ND | – |
| 1997 | Lane13) | 25/F | Tail | 15 | DP+hepatectomy | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Liver | 6 months | Alive | 6 months |
| 1997 | Nishihara 14) | 52/F | Tail | 10 | DP | Pleomorphic | 655 | Yes | Liver | 10 months | Dead | 19 months |
| 1997 | Wenig15) | 67/M | Tail | 19 | DP | Spindle cell | ND | Yes | Peritoneum | few months | Dead | 15 months |
| 48/F | Tail | ND | DP | Spindle cell | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 12 months | ||
| 65/F | Tail | 30 | DP | Spindle cell | ND | Yes | Peritoneum, pleura | few months | Dead | 9 months | ||
| 2001 | Suda16) | 35/F | Tail | 11 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 14 years |
| 2006 | Bloomston 17) | 67/F | Head | 4 | PD | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Liver, peritoneum | few months | Dead | 4 months |
| 2007 | Pan18) | 70/F | Body and tail | 14 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 4 months |
| 2008 | Hirano19) | 26/F | Body and tail | 17 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | 15 | Yes | Local | 7 months | Alive | 8 months |
| 2008 | Hakamada 20) | 40/F | Tail | 14 | DP+gastrectomy | Osteoclast-like giant cell | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 4 years |
| 2013 | Asberry 21) | 40/F | Tail | 8 | DP | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Local | 9 months | Alive | 48 months |
| 2016 | Aldaoud 22) | 37/F | Body and tail | 16 | DP+gastrectomy+colectomy | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Peritoneum | 5 weeks | Dead | 7 months |
| 2016 | Munekage 23) | 25/F | Body and tail | 12.5 | DP+colectomy | Pleomorphic | ND | Yes | Peritoneum | 20 months | Dead | 32 months |
| 2017 | Paniccia 24) | 36/F | Tail | 10 | DP | Pleomorphic | 1175 | No | – | – | Alive | 8 months |
| 2019 | Fan25) | 54/M | Body | 6 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | 30 | No | – | – | Alive | 6 months |
| 2021 | Hisanaga 26) | 20s/F | Tail | 16 | DP | Spindle cell | ND | No | – | – | Alive | 6 months |
| 2024 | Kapatia 27) | 62/F | Body | 16 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | ND | ND | – | – | Dead | 10 months |
| 2025 | Kono28) | 34/F | Body and tail | 11 | DP | Osteoclast-like giant cell | 19 | No | – | – | Alive | 6 months |
| 2025 | Our Case | 40s/F | Body and tail | 19 | DP+gastrectomy+colectomy | Pleomorphic | 2100/33.6* | Yes | Peritoneum | 3 months | Dead | 5 months |
*For the present case, the preoperative CA19-9 values represent the initial and post-chemotherapy values.
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; DP, distal pancreatectomy; F, female; M, male; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; ND, not described in the original report; PD, pancreaticoduodenectomy
The mechanism underlying anaplastic transformation in MCN remains unclear. Kono et al.28) suggested that hormone receptor signaling may contribute to anaplastic transformation in a pregnancy-associated case. In the present case, the patient had delivered a child 9 years before the initial diagnosis; therefore, the involvement of hormone receptor signaling could not be assessed.
Tumor markers may not adequately reflect tumor activity in anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN. Previous studies have reported that elevations of tumor markers are relatively uncommon in anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas. Strobel et al.29) reported that among 18 patients with anaplastic carcinoma, elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels were observed in only 19% and 14% of patients, respectively. Similarly, Imaoka et al.5) reported that among 55 patients with unresectable anaplastic carcinoma, the median CA19-9 level was 35.7 U/mL (IQR, 16.4–556.0 U/mL), indicating that many cases did not show significant elevation. Furthermore, among previously reported cases of anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN, preoperative CA19-9 levels were within the normal range in 3 of 5 evaluable cases.14,19,24,25,28) In the present case, a discrepancy between tumor marker levels and tumor progression was observed. Chemotherapy led to improvement of peritoneal dissemination and normalization of CA19-9 levels, whereas the solid tumor component showed rapid progression. This discordance may be related to the transition from adenocarcinoma to anaplastic carcinoma during tumor progression. One possible explanation is that chemotherapy reduced the adenocarcinoma component, which produces tumor markers, whereas the anaplastic carcinoma component was less responsive to treatment. However, as no pathological assessment was performed before chemotherapy, this explanation remains speculative.
The present case suggests that tumor marker levels may not accurately reflect disease activity in histologically heterogeneous tumors such as anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN. Molecular alterations, including KRAS and TP53 mutations, have been reported in anaplastic pancreatic carcinoma5); however, no reliable biomarker for monitoring disease activity or treatment response has been established. Therefore, when rapid growth of mural nodules is observed during follow-up of MCN, the possibility of anaplastic transformation should be considered, and evaluation should rely on imaging findings and clinical course rather than tumor marker levels alone.
MCN generally has a favorable prognosis after complete resection; however, the development of anaplastic carcinoma is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Among 19 cases with reported outcomes, recurrence occurred in 10 cases (52.6%). The most common sites of recurrence were peritoneal dissemination, liver metastasis, and local recurrence. Two patients died within 6 months after surgery, indicating the aggressive nature of this disease. Prognosis may vary according to histological subtype. Among 21 cases with reported subtypes, 8 (38.1%) were of the osteoclast-like giant cell type, and only 1 of these cases developed recurrence. This finding suggests that the osteoclast-like giant cell type may be associated with a more favorable prognosis than other subtypes, consistent with observations in conventional pancreatic anaplastic carcinoma.30) In the present case, the tumor was classified as the pleomorphic type, which was consistent with its aggressive clinical course.
CONCLUSIONS
We report a rare case of anaplastic carcinoma arising from MCN. Rapid growth of mural nodules during the follow-up of MCN may suggest anaplastic transformation. Tumor marker levels may not accurately reflect tumor activity, and careful evaluation using imaging and clinical findings is essential. Even after complete resection, this disease is associated with a poor prognosis and a high risk of early recurrence, necessitating close postoperative surveillance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. Yukiko Sasahara (Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan) for the pathological diagnosis and valuable comments.
DECLARATIONS
Funding
The authors received no financial support.
Authors’ contributions
SH contributed to literature review, clinical management of the patient, and drafting of the manuscript.
MK, RN, and TT contributed to clinical management of the patient and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
MS, SK, and NG contributed to the discussion and reviewed the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work did not require ethical approval. Informed consent was obtained from the patient using our institutional consent form.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1).Reddy RP, Smyrk TC, Zapiach M, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm defined by ovarian stroma: demographics, clinical features, and prevalence of cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 1026–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2).Gardner TB, Park WG, Allen PJ. Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2024; 167: 454–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3).Jang KT, Park SM, Basturk O, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of 29 invasive carcinomas arising in 178 pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms with ovarian-type stroma: implications for management and prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39: 179–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4).Yun WG, Jang JY. An updated review about the possibility of surveillance strategy in non-resected mucinous cystic neoplasms. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2026; 33: 50–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5).Imaoka H, Ikeda M, Umemoto K, et al. Comprehensive review of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: from epidemiology to treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53: 764–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6).Clark CJ, Graham RP, Arun JS, et al. Clinical outcomes for anaplastic pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 627–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7).Ishida K, Sasano H, Moriya T, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of steroidogenic enzymes in ovarian-type stroma of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms: comparative study of subepithelial stromal cells in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pathol Int 2016; 66: 281–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8).Gurzu S, Bara T, Molnar C, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition induces aggressivity of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with neuroendocrine component: an immunohistochemistry study. Pathol Res Pract 2019; 215: 82–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9).Logan SE, Voet RL, Tompkins RK. The malignant potential of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. West J Med 1982; 136: 157–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10).García Rego JA, Valbuena-Ruvira L, Alvarez García A, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with pseudosarcomatous mural nodules. a report of a case with immunohistochemical study. Cancer 1991; 67: 494–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11).Marinho A, Nogueira R, Schmitt F, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with a mural nodule of anaplastic carcinoma. Histopathology 1995; 26: 284–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12).Bergman S, Medeiros LJ, Radr T, et al. Giant cell tumor of the pancreas arising in the ovarian-like stroma of a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Int J Pancreatol 1995; 18: 71–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13).Lane RB Jr., Sangueza OP. Anaplastic carcinoma occurring in association with a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 533–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14).Nishihara K, Katsumoto F, Kurokawa Y, et al. Anaplastic carcinoma showing rhabdoid features combined with mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 1104–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15).Wenig BM, Albores-Saavedra J, Buetow PC, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm with sarcomatous stroma: a report of three cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21: 70–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16).Suda K, Takase M, Oyama T, et al. An osteoclast-like giant cell tumor pattern in a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas with lymph node metastasis in a patient surviving over 10 years. Virchows Arch 2001; 438: 519–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17).Bloomston M, Chanona-Vilchis J, Ellison EC, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the pancreas arising in a mucinous cystic neoplasm. Am Surg 2006; 72: 351–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18).Pan ZG, Wang B. Anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas associated with a mucinous cystic adenocarcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. JOP 2007; 8: 775–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19).Hirano H, Morita K, Tachibana S, et al. Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells arising in a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. Pathol Int 2008; 58: 383–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20).Hakamada K, Miura T, Kimura A, et al. Anaplastic carcinoma associated with a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas during pregnancy: report of a case and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 132–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21).Asberry DE, Youngberg GA, Al-Abbadi MA. Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with neuroendocrine cells and malignant stroma. Saudi Med J 2013; 34: 80–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22).Aldaoud N, Joudeh A, Al-Momen S, et al. Anaplastic carcinoma arising in a mucinous cystic neoplasm masquerading as pancreatic pseudocyst. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 44: 538–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23).Munekage M, Kohsaki T, Uemura S, et al. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas with anaplastic carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2016; 4: 483–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24).Paniccia A, Torphy R, Devaraj K, et al. Anaplastic pancreatic carcinoma arising within a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report and a brief review of the literature. J Pancreat Cancer 2017; 3: 40–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25).Fan X, Wang WY, Li C, et al. An osteoclast-like giant cell tumor embedded in the mural nodule of a pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e15246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26).Hisanaga E, Sano T, Yoshida Y, et al. A mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas containing an undifferentiated carcinoma component and harboring the NRAS driver mutation. Clin J Gastroenterol 2021; 14: 910–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27).Kapatia G, Jindal A, Kaushal G, et al. Case of undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells associated with a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a diagnostic conundrum. Korean J Gastroenterol 2024; 84: 128–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28).Kono K, Shibayama R, Murakami H, et al. Progressive estrogen receptor acquisition during malignant transformation: insights from MCN-derived anaplastic pancreatic carcinoma. Pathol Int 2026; 76: e70061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29).Strobel O, Hartwig W, Bergmann F, et al. Anaplastic pancreatic cancer: presentation, surgical management, and outcome. Surgery 2011; 149: 200–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30).Muraki T, Reid MD, Basturk O, et al. Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells of the pancreas: clinicopathologic analysis of 38 cases highlights a more protracted clinical course than currently appreciated. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 1203–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article.
