The authors regret not identifying inaccuracies in the reference list that arose during the importation of bibliographic metadata into the reference management system and subsequent citation process. The corrected references are listed below.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
[2] Department of Education, Australian Framework for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Schools. Australian Government, (2023). https://www.education.gov.au/download/17416/australian-framework-generative-artificial-intelligence-ai-schools/35400/australian-framework-generative-ai-schools/pdf.
[10] O. Delémont, S. Bitzer, M. Jendly, O. Ribaux, The Practice of Crime Scene Examination in an Intelligence-based Perspective. The Routledge International Handbook of Forensic Intelligence and Criminology, (2018), p. 86-101. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315541945.
[27] The University of Technology Sydney, Mitigating the Risks of Artificial Intelligence, and Harnessing its Potential, Through Assessment Reform and Course Transformation (2024). https://wordpress-futures-prod.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/29145413/UTS-TEQSA-RFI-Response-July-2024-1.pdf.
[32] I. Bani Hani, O. Hujran, M. Anwar, The integration of AI with human judgement and critical thinking in decision-making process: a focus on design phase, J. Decis. Syst. 35 (2026), 10.1080/12460125.2026.2652347.
[33] S. Kift, The quest for the holy grail of student engagement: curriculum as the engagement integrator. Research handbook on the student engagement in higher education, (2024), p. 7-27. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035314294.00011.
[35] CAST (2024). CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org (last accessed 3 September 2026).
[50] L. Medina-Gual, L. Medina-Velázquez, J.-L. Parejo, A tridimensional model of AI literacy: An empirical analysis of student performance and demographic patterns in higher education. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 41 (2025) 37–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10596.
[51] B. Jose, J. Cherian, A.M. Verghis, S.M. Varghise, M. S, S. Joseph, The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion. Front. Psychol. 16 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550621.
[58] S. Kift, Articulating a Transition Pedagogy: First year curriculum principles. Australian Learning & Teaching Council. (2009), https://transitionpedagogy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/KiftTransitonPedagogySixPrinciples_16Nov09-1.pdf (last accessed 3 September 2026).
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process.
During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Microsoft Copilot to assist with literature searching for one academic source supporting the development of Figure 1 (timeline) and Supplementary Table S1. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed and edited all content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.