Table 5.
Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank pairwise comparison of the five FWCs at the three different speeds for RSh.
| FWCi vs. FWCj | v | p | r | Effect size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOK | MIZ | v 1 | 1.000 | 0.09 | negligible | |
| v2 | 1.000 | 0.29 | small | |||
| v 3 | 0.298 | 0.47 | medium | |||
| HOK | PUM | v 1 | 1.000 | 0.33 | medium | |
| v2 | 0.033 | * | 0.64 | large | ||
| v 3 | 0.024 | * | 0.66 | large | ||
| HOK | SAU | v 1 | 1.000 | 0.19 | small | |
| v2 | 0.087 | 0.57 | large | |||
| v 3 | 0.208 | 0.50 | large | |||
| HOK | OWN | v 1 | 0.033 | * | 0.64 | large |
| v2 | 0.037 | * | 0.63 | large | ||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.30 | small | |||
| MIZ | PUM | v 1 | 1.000 | 0.35 | medium | |
| v2 | 1.000 | 0.25 | small | |||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.00 | negligible | |||
| MIZ | SAU | v 1 | 0.386 | 0.45 | medium | |
| v2 | 1.000 | 0.13 | small | |||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.21 | small | |||
| MIZ | OWN | v 1 | 0.008 | * | 0.73 | large |
| v2 | 0.630 | 0.41 | medium | |||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.13 | small | |||
| PUM | SAU | v 1 | 1.000 | 0.12 | small | |
| v2 | 1.000 | 0.25 | small | |||
| v 3 | 0.420 | 0.44 | medium | |||
| PUM | OWN | v 1 | 0.273 | 0.48 | medium | |
| v2 | 1.000 | 0.16 | small | |||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.26 | small | |||
| SAU | OWN | v 1 | 0.041 | * | 0.63 | large |
| v2 | 0.735 | 0.39 | medium | |||
| v 3 | 1.000 | 0.01 | negligible | |||
*, Statistically significant (p < 0.05), r, effect size of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Footwear conditions: HOK, Hoka Rocket X2; MIZ, Mizuno Wave Rebellion Pro; PUM, Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite; SAU, Saucony Endorphin Pro 3; and OWN, own pair of non-carbon plate running shoes.