Skip to main content
World Journal of Surgical Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Surgical Oncology
. 2026 Jun 30;24:375. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03965-1

Radioligand therapy, vascular deprivation and surgical resection as a step-up-approach for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine bleeding mass

Giacomo Deiro 1,✉,#, Marsia Tancredi 1,#, Donata Campra 1, Andrea Discalzi 2, Roberta Tutino 1, Alberto Bona 1, Alberto Nieri 3, Mirko Bartolomei 3, Mauro Santarelli 1
PMCID: PMC13587308  PMID: 42374572

Abstract

Background

Surgery for symptomatic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) represents the only definitive curative treatment option and improves the overall survival rate. The new frontier in locally advanced NF-PanNETs treatment is Radioligand therapy (RLT) in a neoadjuvant setting. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare complication that requires immediate treatment with a multidisciplinary approach.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 36-year-old male diagnosed with locally advanced non-functioning PanNET in the pancreatic body-tail diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). RLT, proposed to reduce mass dimension in the planning of surgical resection, was performed to obtain a downstaging tumor and enabling access to radical surgery. For the acute onset of hemorrhagic shock caused by lower gastrointestinal bleeding, tumor endovascular embolization was performed using microspheres and gelatin sponge. On vascular deprivation day 4, a posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (P-RAMPS), left lateral duodenectomy (III and IV portion) and resection of the left colic flexure were performed. Reconstruction of intestinal continuity was ensured by isoperistaltic side-to-side duodeno-jejuno and colo-colic anastomosis. The patient had a short hospital stay with quick recovery and a good outcome at 6 months follow-up after the surgery.

Conclusions

Symptomatic non-functioning PanNETs are infrequent slow-growing tumors and some of them may present in advanced stages with local involvement of surrounding structures. Our case suggests that a step-up-approach for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine bleeding mass is mandatory and aggressive surgical management is a mainstay.

Keywords: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, Radioligand therapy, Artery embolization, Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy

Background

Non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) represent a heterogeneous group of primary neoplasms of the pancreas. Symptomatic NF-PanNETs are diagnosed in most cases following mass effects symptoms [1, 2]. Prognosis takes into account tumor size, tumor site, and local invasiveness [3, 4].

Surgery is recommended for resectable tumors in young patients and is required for cases with signs of local invasiveness, such as main pancreatic duct dilation, jaundice, or suspected nodal involvement [5]. Standard pancreatectomy with lymphadenectomy is mandatory for symptomatic NF-PanNETs, regardless of tumor size [6].

In the case of advanced or metastatic NF-PanNETs, the goals of treatment include extending survival, enhancing quality of life, and managing both tumor growth and symptoms. To obtain these results, in addition to the surgical approach, many therapies are currently available, including somatostatin analogues (SSA), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. Sunitinib), mTOR inhibitors (e.g. everolimus), chemotherapy and radioligand therapy, which have become mainstays of advanced PanNETs treatment [7–10].

Herein, we present the case of locally advanced NF-PanNET of the pancreatic body and tail with left colon and adrenal gland involvement. This report is the first to describe a multistep approach for spontaneous lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to tumor infiltration of the colonic wall seven days after the first administration of RLT. Preoperative vascular artery embolization and posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) were performed.

Case presentation

A 36-year-old man presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain, profuse diarrhea, and an 8 kg weight loss. A mass was present in the upper left abdominal quadrant on examination. Subsequent computed tomography (CT) showed a well-demarcated, enhanced lesion located on the pancreatic body and tail, measuring 90 × 80 mm in diameter, with colic left flexure and left adrenal gland infiltration and obstruction of the splenic vein due to either thrombosis formation and neighboring mass effect resulted in left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) (Fig. 1A and B). In addition to the splenic artery, the lesions demonstrated aberrant vascularization by branches of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), left branch of middle colic artery (MCA), left colic artery (LCA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (Fig. 1D). An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-guided FNA) was planned and confirmed the presence of a hypoechoic, well-defined pancreatic mass (93 × 85 mm), with a sign of Treitz’s ligament infiltration and lymphadenopathy. Histological examination revealed a grade 2 (G2) non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-PanNET) according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System [11]. [18 F]F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC-positron emission tomography (DOTATOC-PET) were performed. In FDG-PET the mass showed a moderate increase in glucose metabolism (SUVmax of 8.7) while it showed an intense uptake on DOTATOC-PET (SUVmax 58.2) (Fig. 1C and D). During the diagnostic framework, for the occurrence of occasional episodes of hematochezia without anemia, the patient performed martial supplementation and colonoscopy examination that showed an ab-extrinsic compression of the colonic wall without mucosal infiltration.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A and B computed tomography (CT) showed a well-demarcated, enhanced lesion located on the pancreatic body and tail, measuring 90 × 80 mm in diameter. C [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC-positron emission tomography (DOTATOC-PET). D: aberrant vascularization by branches of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), left branch of middle colic artery (MCA), left colic artery (LCA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). E: an intense uptake on DOTATOC-PET (SUVmax 58.2)

After a multidisciplinary discussion, we proposed a Radioligand therapy (RLT) as a neoadjuvant treatment and a subsequent Distal Pancreatectomy (DP). The patient performed the first of four administrations of RLT with Lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide (Lutathera→), without early complication (no hematological or renal toxicity occurred and no aggravation of preexisting hematochezia).

On post-RLT day 7, the patient was admitted to our emergency department for acute onset of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and initial hemodynamic instability treated with blood transfusions. Since stabilization was promptly reached, a CT scan angiography was performed that showed active bleeding. Therefore, a preoperative endovascular embolization of peripheral aberrant branches of the SMA, MCA, LCA, IMA and left gastroepiploic artery (LGEA) was performed using a mixture of microspheres (HydroPearl 400 micron, Terumo, Japan) and gelatin sponge (Embocube 2.5 mm, Merit, USA) (Fig. 2). CT scans taken 3 days after embolization confirmed successful outcome of the procedure without intraluminal blushing. On post-embolization day 4, a posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (P-RAMPS), left lateral duodenectomy (III and IV portion), and resection of the left colic flexure was performed (Fig. 3A and B). Reconstruction of intestinal continuity was ensured by isoperistaltic side-to-side duodeno-jejuno and colo-colic anastomosis. The postoperative course was characterized by a grade A chyle fistula. Histological examination confirmed a ypT4N1 (4/21) - G2 PanNET. 6-month follow-up was regular (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A Computed tomography (CT) scan angiography showed aberrant branches of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (1), angiography before (2) and after (3) endovascular embolization. B Computed tomography (CT) scan angiography showed aberrant branches of the left gastroepiploic artery (LGEA) (1), angiography before (2) and after (3) endovascular embolization. C Computed tomography (CT) scan angiography showed aberrant branches of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), left branch of middle colic artery (MCA) (1), angiography before (2) and after (3) endovascular embolization

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A and B Posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (P-RAMPS), left lateral duodenectomy (III and IV portion) and resection of the left colic flexure. C Computed tomography (CT) before surgery. D Computed tomography (CT) 6-month after surgery

Discussion and conclusions

Symptomatic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) usually present with signs related to mass effects, pancreatitis, and distant metastases [1, 2]. To our knowledge, very few case reports are available in the literature on spontaneous bleeding NF-PanNETs [11, 12].

The discussion of this complex clinical case consists of three main topics, which treated in sequence provide an understanding of the step-by-step clinical management of NF-PanNET mass-forming determined hemorrhagic shock.

In pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, surgery represents the only definitive curative treatment option. The 5-year survival rate is more than 60% in resectable tumors, whereas it drops to less than 30% in unresectable lesions [13]. The role of debulking surgery in advanced Pan-NETs is unclear. It is recommended for alleviating symptoms of carcinoid syndrome or mass compression symptoms.

The new frontier in NET treatment is represented by the RLT in the neoadjuvant setting to obtain downstaging of the tumor, enabling access to radical surgery. In fact, the intensification of therapy improves outcomes for patients with locally advanced NF-Pan NETs [7].

RLT is a tumor-directed systemic treatment exploiting the abundance of SSTRs, especially sst2, on the cell membrane of well-differentiated NETs [14]. Usually, it represents a second line of treatment, introduced after inefficiency or no possibility of primary therapy, and with disease progression [15, 16]. The advantage of RLT is based on the fact that its proven efficacy has few, mostly non-serious side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, while more serious side effects, e.g. rectal bleeding, are generally uncommon. In the NETTER-1 trial, a randomized phase 3 trial, RLT was shown to significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with midgut NETs and was not correlated to major hematologic or renal toxicity in any patient [7, 17]. Following this trial, other studies demonstrate the same efficacy even in Pan-NET- and, recently, the NETTER-2 study demonstrated that RLT with Lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide (Lutathera→) should be considered the first-line therapy in locally advanced NF-PanNETs [8, 9]. The use of RLT as a neoadjuvant for NF-PanNET is desirable and to be evaluated, as in the case we presented, in young patients with a good prognosis.

In addition, recent evidence demonstrates the efficacy of RLT as neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PanNETs to induce intratumoral changes that result in the facilitation of subsequent surgery, hypothetically also in locally advanced/unresectable NF-Pan NETs with vascular involvement or lymph node invasion [17–20].

Here, we reported a case of major bleeding of NF-PanNETs that occurred seven days after the first administration of RLT. The patient presented acute onset of rectal bleeding due to aberrant irroration associated with ab-extrinsic erosion and massive full-thickness infiltration of the left colic flexure. Considering the initial hemodynamic stability, preoperative embolization was performed, following the WSES guidelines for acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The recommended first-line treatment for pancreatic bleeding is transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), with success rates of 67–97% and mortality rates of 4–19%. [15] Surgery is indicated only if TAE fails or is not feasible since it leads to higher morbidity and mortality in urgent settings and re-operations are needed in up to one-third of the patients [21]. After urgent pancreatic surgery, abdominal sepsis, diffuse bleeding, and ischemic complications turn out to be frequently fatal. [22, 23]

Vascular deprivation, shifting the setting from urgent to elective, allows one to perform an oncological radical surgery.

Embolization allows to stop of severe coagulopathy development and massive transfusion multiorgan injuries. In addition, organs with extensive collateral circulation like the pancreas, tolerate well relatively large areas of embolization, minimizing ischaemic risks. In the present case, vascular deprivation of the hemorrhagic NF-PanNet al.lowed patient stabilization, avoided pancreatitis, like in the trauma setting, and offered to the patient the best available treatment, a planned (semi-urgent) oncologic radical intervention. A P-RAMPS, partial duodenectomy and resection of the left colic flexure were performed. The advantages of P-RAMPS include improved exposure of the pancreaticoduodenal region, better lymph node dissection, and reduced risk of positive surgical margins compared to traditional methods [16]. RAMPS was described in 2003 by Strasberg to achieve negative posterior resection margins. Oncologic safety with R0 was obtained in more than 85% of case series. [24, 25] Lymph node metastasis, an independent prognostic factor in NF-PanNETs, is detected significantly more in the RAMPS procedure than in the standard procedure. In fact, celiac (n° 9) and left side of SMA (n°14) lymph nodes are removed in addiction of n°10, 11 and 18 according to Japanese classification. In conclusion, symptomatic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are infrequent slow-growing tumors and some of them may present in advanced stages with local involvement of surrounding structures.

This case represents a good example of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in NF-PanNET with even innovative aspects such as the use of RLT for neoadjuvant purposes followed by the surgical approach, as suggested by recent scientific evidence. Rarely, during preparatory phases, as in the neoadjuvant treatment course, they can present acute gastrointestinal bleeding. In case of this occurrence, a step-up-approach can manage the bleeding without compromising the surgical plan.

Abbreviations

NF-PanNETs

Non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

RLT

Radioligand therapy

EUS-FNA

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

P-RAMPS

Posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy

SSA

Somatostatin analogues

CT

Computed tomography

LSPH

Left-sided portal hypertension

SMA

Superior mesenteric artery

MCA

Middle colic artery

LCA

Left colic artery

IMA

Inferior mesenteric artery

G2

Grade 2

WHO

World Health Organization

18FDG-PET

[18F] F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

68Ga DOTATOC-PET

[68Ga] Ga-DOTA-TOC-positron emission tomography

SUV

Standardized uptake value

DP

Distal pancreatectomy

LGEA

Left gastroepiploic artery

TAE

Transcatheter arterial embolization

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work: G. D. and M. T.: wrote the manuscript, drafting the work; critical revision for important intellectual content. G. D., A. N., M. B., R. T. and A. D. supervised the paper and made definitive changes on final version. All Authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sources of funding for your research: none.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’ Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Giacomo Deiro and Marsia Tancredi contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Achilli P, Chiarelli M, Giustizieri U, et al. Spontaneous rupture of a non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor A case report of a rare cause of acute abdomen. Ann Ital Chir. 2020;91:88–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schütte K, Bornschein J, Kuester D, Wieners G, Malfertheiner P. Fulminante duodenalblutung Als erstmanifestation eines neuroendokrinen Pankreaskopfkarzinoms. Med Klin. 2010;105(4):291–5. 10.1007/s00063-010-1043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Franko J, Feng W, Yip L, Genovese E, Moser AJ. Non-functional neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, tumor biology, and outcomes in 2,158 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(3):541–8. 10.1007/s11605-009-1115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuo JH, Lee JA, Chabot JA. Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(3):689–708. 10.1016/j.suc.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnston Ii ME, Carter MM, Wilson GC, Ahmad SA, Patel SH. Surgical management of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(3):578–89. 10.21037/jgo.2019.12.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pavel M, Öberg K, Falconi M, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):844–60. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Strosberg JR, Caplin ME, Kunz PL, et al. 177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high–dose long-acting octreotide in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-1): final overall survival and long-term safety results from an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(12):1752–63. 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00572-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brabander T, Van Der Zwan WA, Teunissen JJM, et al. Long-Term efficacy, survival, and safety of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4617–24. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Singh S, Halperin D, Myrehaug S, et al. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus long-acting octreotide versus high–dose long-acting octreotide for the treatment of newly diagnosed, advanced grade 2–3, well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-2): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2024;403(10446):2807–17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00701-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kos-Kudła B, Castaño JP, Denecke T, et al. European neuroendocrine tumour society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol. 2023;35(12):e13343. 10.1111/jne.13343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76(2):182–8. 10.1111/his.13975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Viknesh M, Bin Hisham F, Sankaran P, Kong Choon S. Azim Bin Nik Abdullah N. Bleeding and malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A Malaysian case series. Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis. 2019;9(2):1–6. 10.5348/100084Z04MV2019CS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parghane RV, Bhandare M, Chaudhari V, et al. Surgical feasibility, determinants, and overall efficacy of neoadjuvant 177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT for locally advanced unresectable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(11):1558–63. 10.2967/jnumed.120.258772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sabet A, Biersack HJ, Ezziddin S. Advances in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46(1):40–6. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nykänen T, Udd M, Peltola EK, Leppäniemi A, Kylänpää L. Bleeding pancreatic pseudoaneurysms: management by angioembolization combined with therapeutic endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(2):692–703. 10.1007/s00464-016-5023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chun YS. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):46–50. 10.1245/s10434-016-5675-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pusceddu S, Prinzi N, Tafuto S, et al. Association of upfront peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with Progression-Free survival among patients with enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e220290. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urso L, Nieri A, Rambaldi I, et al. Radioligand therapy (RLT) as neoadjuvant treatment for inoperable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a literature review. Endocrine. 2022;78(2):255–61. 10.1007/s12020-022-03170-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Partelli S, Bertani E, Bartolomei M, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or potentially resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Surgery. 2018;163(4):761–7. 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Partelli S, Landoni L, Bartolomei M, et al. Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NEOLUPANET): multicentre phase II study. Br J Surg. 2024;111(9):znae178. 10.1093/bjs/znae178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boullier M, Fohlen A, Viennot S, Alves A. How to manage lower Gastrointestinal bleeding in 2022? J Visc Surg. 2022;159(6):486–96. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee KF, Kung JWC, Fung AKY, et al. A case series of emergency pancreaticoduodenectomies: what were their indications and outcomes? Ann Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2023;27(4):437–42. 10.14701/ahbps.23-035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strobel O, Schneider L, Philipp S, Fritz S, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Emergency pancreatic surgery—demanding and dangerous. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(7):837–41. 10.1007/s00423-015-1321-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133(5):521–7. 10.1067/msy.2003.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):244–9. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from World Journal of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES