Abstract
Background
Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are globally significant enteric protozoa responsible for waterborne diarrheal disease with important public health and zoonotic implications. Conventional genotyping approaches based on Sanger sequencing frequently underestimate mixed infections and minority variants, limiting the resolution of environmental molecular surveillance. This study aimed to characterize the presence and genetic diversity of both pathogens in surface water and wastewater samples from the Río Pasto basin (Nariño, southwestern Colombia) using a multilocus amplicon-based Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing strategy.
Methods
A total of 102 water samples were collected over seven months (August 2022–March 2023) from three surface water sites representing the upper, middle, and lower Río Pasto basin, and one wastewater collection point. Novel primers targeting the Cryptosporidium 18S rRNA gene were designed and validated alongside previously published primer sets for three G. duodenalis loci (glutamate dehydrogenase, triose phosphate isomerase, beta giardin). PCR-positive amplicons were sequenced on a MinION Mk1C device for 72 h. Reads were quality-filtered (Q ≥ 10) and taxonomically assigned using Centrifuge against curated reference databases; assignments were considered valid at ≥ 1000 reads per taxon per sample.
Results
For G. duodenalis, 49 of 102 samples (48.0%) produced at least one PCR-positive amplicon. Successful taxonomic assignment after ONT sequencing and quality filtering was achieved in 26/32 (81.3%), 35/40 (87.5%), and 27/33 (81.8%) samples for the bg, gdh, and tpi loci, respectively. In surface water, assemblage A predominated across loci [mean relative read abundance: 80.7% (bg), 53.8% (gdh)]; in wastewater, assemblage B was more prevalent at the gdh locus (mean 51.5%) while assemblage A remained dominant at bg (mean 66.7%). Assemblages C–E were detected at low relative abundances, predominantly via gdh. At the sub-assemblage level, AII was the most consistently dominant lineage across both matrices and loci; co-occurrence of multiple sub-assemblages within a single sample was detected in subsets of samples across all three markers. For Cryptosporidium spp., 67 of 102 samples (65.7%) were PCR-positive, of which 49 (73.1%) yielded valid species-level assignments. C. parvum was the most abundant species (mean relative read abundance: 40.2% in surface water, 32.9% in wastewater), followed by C. andersoni and C. canis. Co-detection of two or more species within a single sample was observed in 47 of 49 assigned samples (95.9%), most frequently involving the combination of C. parvum, C. andersoni, and C. canis (36.7%); this high co-detection rate may partly reflect the limited taxonomic resolution of single-locus 18S rRNA genotyping combined with the sensitivity of high-depth long-read sequencing, and should be interpreted with caution. Concurrent detection of at least one Cryptosporidium species and at least one G. duodenalis assemblage was observed in 27 of 69 assigned samples (39.1%).
Conclusions
The integration of newly designed primers with multilocus ONT amplicon sequencing provides improved resolution for detecting co-occurring genotypes and species of waterborne protozoa in complex environmental matrices compared to conventional single-locus Sanger approaches. These findings document broad circulation of diverse G. duodenalis assemblages and Cryptosporidium species in the Río Pasto basin, contributing to the genomic surveillance of these pathogens in Latin America. The presence and genetic diversity data reported here may support water quality monitoring and inform risk management strategies under a One Health framework; however, conclusions regarding quantitative exposure risk require complementary data on parasite viability and concentration.
Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07565-0.
Keywords: Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), Multilocus genotyping, Waterborne pathogens, One health framework
Background
Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are major waterborne protozoa causing diarrheal disease globally; giardiasis affects 8–30% of children in developing regions, and cryptosporidiosis is the second leading cause of diarrheal mortality in children < 5 years [1, 2]. Transmission occurs via ingestion of cysts and oocysts in contaminated water or food; these transmissive stages can show reduced susceptibility to conventional chlorination and prolonged survival in the environment under certain conditions [1, 3]. Human-infective G. duodenalis assemblages A and B (sub-assemblages AI, AII, AIII, BIII, BIV) are differentiated by gdh, tpi, and bg loci [4]. Forty-four Cryptosporidium species have been described; C. parvum and C. hominis predominate in humans, and species identification relies primarily on 18S rRNA genotyping [5, 6].
G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are globally distributed enteric protozoa with substantial genetic diversity and major roles in waterborne transmission. A recent global meta-analysis compiling 32 molecular studies from 21 countries across the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Africa reported a consistent predominance of assemblage B over A in humans across all genetic markers evaluated (bg, gdh, and tpi; 59.5–54.8% versus 41.6–37%) [7], and Cryptosporidium accounted for 77.4% of protozoan waterborne outbreaks between 2017–2022, mainly due to C. hominis and C. parvum, whereas Giardia represented 17.1% [8]. Environmental studies document multiple assemblages and species in surface and reclaimed waters across Brazil and Egypt [9, 10], and high environmental burdens have been confirmed in African river systems [11]. In Colombia, molecular surveys reveal broad circulation of diverse assemblages and species in human populations [12, 13]. However, routine molecular surveillance of water sources remains limited [1, 14].
Alternatively, although G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are recognized zoonotic waterborne pathogens, their environmental genetic diversity remains incompletely resolved using third-generation sequencing [15, 16]. Conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing of SSU rRNA, gdh, tpi, bg, and gp60 loci enable assemblage and subtype identification but frequently underestimate mixed infections and minority variants [17, 18]. Amplicon-based NGS has improved detection of co-infections and novel variants in animal and water matrices [15, 19, 20], yet most applications rely on short-read Illumina platforms.
Recent advances in ONT sequencing have demonstrated its utility for the genetic characterization of several protozoan parasites, particularly apicomplexans [21]. For example, multilocus ONT-based approaches have been successfully applied to genotype Toxoplasma gondii isolates with high resolution [22], and ONT sequencing of near full-length 18S rRNA amplicons has enabled metabarcoding of apicomplexan haemoparasites, facilitating discrimination among Babesia, Hepatozoon, Neospora, Plasmodium, Theileria, and Toxoplasma species [23, 24]. However, conventional Sanger sequencing of single loci frequently fails to detect mixed infections and minority variants in complex environmental matrices, while short-read Illumina platforms, although improving co-infection detection, provide limited haplotype-level resolution when multiple assemblages or species co-occur within a single sample [25–27]. The specific added value of long-amplicon ONT sequencing in this context lies in its capacity for direct haplotype resolution of co-occurring genotypes across multiple loci simultaneously [28], a capability that remains largely unexplored for G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in environmental samples, particularly in Latin America, where implementation of long-read genomic surveillance for these waterborne protozoa in water systems is still lacking.
This study aimed to molecularly characterize the presence and genetic diversity of G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface and wastewater samples from the Río Pasto basin (Nariño, southwestern Colombia) using third-generation sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform. This approach addresses the limited genomic surveillance of these waterborne protozoa in environmental waters in Latin America and provides high-resolution data to support molecular epidemiology and public health monitoring under a One Health framework.
Methods
Sampling
This study was conducted along the Río Pasto basin, the principal water resource supplying the city of San Juan de Pasto, southwestern Colombia (Fig. 1A–D). Sampling was performed over a seven-month period from August 2022 to March 2023, excluding January due to logistical constraints. San Juan de Pasto, located in the Andean highlands of the Nariño Department, represents one of the most mountainous urban areas in southern Colombia (Fig. 1A–B). Although the sample size was originally determined using EpiDat software (v.3.1) within a broader microbiological surveillance framework based on an expected bacterial diversity of 79% (5% precision, 95% confidence interval), the resulting minimum of five samples per site and water type is consistent with sample sizes reported in comparable environmental molecular surveillance studies of G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in Latin American surface and wastewater systems [29–31]. A total of 102 water samples were collected, comprising 55 surface-water samples from three sites representing the upper (P1, n = 16), middle (P2, n = 20), and lower (P3, n = 19) basin, and 47 wastewater samples from the Juan XXIII collector (P4) (Fig. 1C). At each location, two collection strategies were employed using a plastic container attached to a 6 m rope. For single-sample collection, a 400 mL grab sample was taken at a specific time point. For composite sampling, 400 mL representative samples were obtained by combining equal-volume sub-samples: surface water was collected every 15 min over 1 h, while wastewater was collected hourly over 12 h, integrating temporal variability. All containers were pre-rinsed with site water prior to collection. Samples were stored in sterile glass bottles, transported to the CIMBIUR laboratory in portable coolers at 4 °C, and processed within 24 h to preserve microbial integrity [32].
Fig. 1.

Geographic location of the sampling sites in the Pasto River basin, Nariño, Colombia. A Location of the Nariño department within Colombia. B Position of the city of Pasto within the department over a digital elevation model (DEM). C Course of the Pasto River in relation to the urban area. D Photographs of the sampling sites, showing surface-water points in red and wastewater points in blue
Pre-processing and DNA extraction
Biomass from the water samples was concentrated through sequential filtration using 3.0, 0.45, and 0.22 µm membrane filters (Millipore). Aliquots of 100 mL were filtered consecutively through each membrane in descending pore-size order, and each membrane was individually transferred to a separate sterile 50 mL Falcon tube. Retained material was recovered from each membrane independently by gently scraping with molecular-grade water in two 15 min rounds; eluates from all three membranes were then pooled prior to centrifugation to maximize total biomass recovery. After centrifugation, DNA was extracted from the resulting pellet using the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s instructions and employing pre-heated (65 °C) elution buffer to maximize yield. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and DNA integrity was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Marker selection and PCR standardization for Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp.
For G. duodenalis, the gdh, tpi, and bg loci were selected based on their widespread use and discriminatory power for assemblage and sub-assemblage characterization. Previously published primer sets targeting these loci were adopted without modification [25, 28]. Primer oligonucleotides were synthesized by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea), and PCR conditions were optimized to ensure robust amplification and compatibility with Oxford Nanopore sequencing workflows.
For Cryptosporidium spp., sequences were retrieved from NCBI using the queries “Cryptosporidium AND 18S” and “Cryptosporidium AND SSUrRNA.” All sequences were aligned in UGENE, retaining only those confirmed to belong to the genus. Commonly used primers for Cryptosporidium detection [29] were also evaluated. Based on a manual alignment, a conserved region was identified as a candidate observation window for primer design. Primer specificity was examined using BLAST [33], and suitability was assessed with DNASP [34]. This process resulted in the design of the primers Cryptosporidium-F (GCGCAAATTACCCAATCCTA) and Cryptosporidium-R (AATACRAATGCCCCCAACTG), targeting a 486-bp region of the 18S rRNA gene. The design strategy is consistent with previously validated 18S rRNA-based primer approaches for Cryptosporidium species identification [35–37]. Primers were synthesized by Macrogen. PCR standardization allowed the optimization of cycling conditions (Table S1). Amplification specificity was confirmed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and template DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Oxford Nanopore sequencing
Amplicons testing positive by PCR were sequenced using third-generation long-read technology (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) to obtain high-quality, full-length reads. Prior to library preparation, PCR products were assessed for quality and quantity and normalized to a standard concentration of 11 ng/µL in a total volume of 11.5 µL to ensure equimolar representation across samples before barcoding. Library preparation began with DNA end-repair using the Ultra II End-Prep kit (New England Biolabs). Subsequently, barcodes were ligated to the amplicons using the Blunt/TA Ligase Master Mix (NEB), followed by attachment of Oxford Nanopore adapters through a second ligation step (Adapter Mix and Quick T4 DNA Ligase, NEB). At each stage, unincorporated reagents were removed through purification with AMPure XP paramagnetic beads (Beckman Coulter); no additional size-selection step was applied. The loading concentration of the final library was calculated based on its final concentration and the largest amplicon size among the samples to be sequenced. A total of (94) samples were pooled per run, together with a sequencing (positive) control and a negative control (reagents without genetic material), and samples were processed across two sequencing runs. The pooled library was loaded onto a FLO-MIN114 (R10.4.1) flow cell and sequenced on a MinION Mk1C device for 72 h, with run control and quality monitoring performed through the MinKNOW software suite. Raw sequencing reads generated in this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accession number PRJEB110497.
Bioinformatic analysis
Bioinformatic processing of Nanopore reads began with basecalling using Dorado v2.0.1 by super accuracy mode, followed by quality assessment with NanoPlot v1.42.0. Reads were filtered by marker-specific length thresholds and a minimum average read quality score of Q ≥ 10 using Chopper v0.13.0.
For taxonomic assignment, custom reference databases were constructed from NCBI sequences. Searches performed in August 2025 were filtered by gene and expected size range. For G. duodenalis, we retrieved 735 sequences for gdh (500–1400 bp), 1502 for tpi (500–800 bp), and 1129 for bg (500–850 bp), representing assemblages A–H. Assemblage reference sequences were obtained from GenBank within the following accession ranges: gdh (AB218607.1–PV872427.1), tpi (AB480868.1–PV781195.1), and bg (AB480875.1–PV781193.1). Additionally, we incorporated sub-assemblage-specific references (AI–BIV), including gdh (n = 30; AY178738.1–MN174852.1), tpi (n = 23; EF654693.1–PP491943.1), and bg (n = 35; DQ116609.1–OQ934095.1). For Cryptosporidium spp., 359 sequences corresponding to the 18S rRNA gene (460–520 bp) were included. Reference sequences representing diverse species were retrieved from GenBank within the accession range EF432239.2–PX046412.1. All curated reference datasets are stored internally on the Universidad del Rosario high-performance computing cluster (Bogotá, Colombia).
Taxonomic classification of reads was performed with Centrifuge v1.0.4.2 (score ≥ 100). Taxonomic assignments were considered valid only when ≥ 1000 reads per species/sample. Co-occurrence was defined as the simultaneous taxonomic assignment of two or more species/assemblages within a single sample meeting this read-count threshold. Relative abundances were calculated for samples containing ≥ 1000 reads and visualized using ggplot2 v3.5.1 in RStudio v2025.05.0. Additional visualizations included heatmaps generated in R (ggplot2 package) and an Upset plot constructed in Python v3.11.11. Measures of dispersion were calculated from relative abundances using RStudio v2025.05.0. The complete analytical workflow is summarized in Figure S1.
Results
Molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis by ONT sequencing
Locus amplification and ONT sequencing metrics
A total of 102 samples were initially screened by conventional PCR targeting the gdh, tpi, and bg loci. Of these, 49 (48.0%) amplified at least one locus and were selected for ONT sequencing, yielding 105 locus-specific amplicons in total. Eighteen samples were positive at all three loci. Among the remaining samples, co-amplification was observed for bg and gdh in 27 samples, bg and tpi in 21, and gdh and tpi in 26. In contrast, single-locus amplification was less frequent, detected in only a small subset of samples, including bg (n = 2), gdh (n = 5), and tpi (n = 4) (Table S2).
After quality filtering and read-cleaning procedures, ONT sequencing generated high-depth datasets for all three loci (Table S2). The bg marker produced 32 positive amplicons, averaging 54,135.2 reads per sample with a mean read length of 517.4 bp and a mean Q score of 17.5. The gdh marker yielded 40 positive amplicons, with an average of 75,990.5 reads, a mean read length of 570.3 bp, and a mean Q score of 12.8. For tpi, 33 positive amplicons were recovered, averaging 95,318.6 reads per sample, with a mean read length of 528.3 bp and a mean Q score of 17.5 (Table S2).
Assemblage and sub-assemblage composition across loci
The bg locus was successfully assigned in 26 of 32 samples (81.3%), revealing assemblages A, B, and E, with A and B predominating overall and a higher proportion of detections in wastewater (17/26, 65.4%) than in surface water (9/26, 34.6%) (Fig. 2A, Table S3). In surface water, assemblage A was dominant (mean 80.72% ± 16.7; median 77.9%), whereas in wastewater assemblages A and B showed comparable prevalence, with A remaining slightly predominant (mean 66.7% ± 21.8; median 66.7%) (Table S5). Assemblage E was infrequent, detected in only 1 of 26 samples (3.8%) at low prevalence (5.9%) (Table S5). At the sub-assemblage level, AII, AIII, and BIII were identified in 24 of 26 samples (92.3%), more frequently in wastewater (15/24, 62.5%) (Fig. 2B); AII was the most prevalent and stable lineage, reaching near-complete dominance in several surface water samples, while AIII persisted at moderate levels (mean ~ 56.2%) across both matrices, and BIII displayed the greatest variability in abundance (mean ~ 18.3%) (Table S5).
Fig. 2.

Relative abundances of G. duodenalis in positive samples based on the molecular markers bg, gdh, and tpi. Taxonomic assignment by assemblage in surface water and wastewater is shown for gdh (A–B), tpi (C–D), and bg (E–F)
Of 40 gdh-positive samples, 35 (87.5%) were successfully genotyped by ONT sequencing (Table S3), revealing assemblages A through E, with detections predominating in wastewater (22/35, 62.9%) over surface water (13/35, 37.1%) (Fig. 2C). Assemblage A was predominant in surface water (mean 53.8% ± 19.9) and assemblage B in wastewater (mean 51.5% ± 22.1), while assemblages D and E occurred at consistently lower relative abundances across both matrices (Table S5); notably, sample P27 harbored assemblages A, B, C, D, and E simultaneously (Fig. 2C). At the sub-assemblage level, AII, AIII, BIII, and BIV were identified in 26 of 35 samples (74.3%), more frequently in wastewater (17/26, 65.4%) (Fig. 2D); AII showed the highest prevalence in both surface water and wastewater (88.9% and 94.1%, respectively), followed by BIII and BIV (Table S5). Co-occurrence of multiple sub-assemblages was observed in two samples: P15 harbored AII and BIII jointly, while P55 presented the greatest complexity, with up to four sub-assemblages detected simultaneously (Fig. 2D).
Among 33 tpi-positive samples, 27 (81.8%) were assigned to assemblages A and B, with detections occurring more frequently in wastewater (18/27, 66.7%) than in surface water (9/27, 33.3%) (Fig. 2E). Across both matrices, assemblage B was consistently predominant, showing higher relative abundance than A in surface water (mean 83.2% ± 14.3 vs. 39.1% ± 30.0) and in wastewater (mean 67.5% ± 26.5 vs. 40.8% ± 28.9) (Table S5). At the sub-assemblage level, AI, AII, BIII, and BIV were identified in 21 of 27 samples (77.8%), predominantly in wastewater (15/21, 71.4%); AII was the dominant lineage in both environments, reaching mean relative abundances of 62.8% ± 24.9 in surface water and 73.7% ± 27.0 in wastewater, while AI was exclusively detected in wastewater samples at low abundance (mean 4.6% ± 1.8) (Table S5). Co-occurrence of multiple sub-assemblages was limited to a subset of samples: P20 uniquely harbored all four sub-assemblages simultaneously (AI, AII, BIII, and BIV), whereas BIV was otherwise restricted to samples P13, P20, P26, P33, P58, and P95 (Fig. 2F).
Multilocus concordance
Among the 47 positive samples, eight (17.0%) yielded complete multilocus data for all three markers (bg, gdh, and tpi). Within this subset, assemblage assignments were largely concordant across loci, particularly for assemblages A and B, which showed the highest inter-locus agreement and were consistently identified in seven and eight samples, respectively (Fig. 2). Concordant assignments were defined as assemblages detected by all three loci, whereas detections supported by only one or two markers were considered incongruent across loci.
In contrast, the gdh marker additionally detected assemblages C, D, and E in 26 samples, indicating lower concordance with bg and tpi and highlighting marker-dependent variation in assemblage recovery. Across all markers, assemblages A and B predominated in both surface water and wastewater samples (Table S3). However, wastewater samples exhibited greater genetic complexity, characterized by more frequent detection of minority assemblages (C–E) and a higher prevalence of mixed sub-assemblage profiles within individual samples. At the sub-assemblage level, AII was consistently the dominant lineage, whereas AI, AIII, BIII, and BIV were detected less frequently but often reached high relative abundances, particularly in wastewater samples (Fig. 2).
Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. by ONT sequencing
Locus amplification and ONT sequencing metrics
A total of 102 samples were initially screened by conventional PCR targeting the 18S rRNA locus for Cryptosporidium species identification, of which 67 (65.7%) yielded amplification products and were selected for ONT sequencing. Nanopore sequencing generated a mean of 26,463.9 reads per sample, with a mean read length of 531.3 bp and a mean Q score of 11.0 (Table S2).
Species composition and co-occurrence
Species-level assignment was achieved in 49 of 67 samples (73.1%), with broadly similar representation across surface water (28/49, 57.1%) and wastewater (21/49, 42.9%) (Fig. 3-A, Table S4). In both matrices, C. parvum was the most abundant species (surface water mean 40.2% ± 18.6; wastewater mean 32.9% ± 8.6), followed by C. andersoni (29.1% ± 10.4; 25.2% ± 11.9) and C. canis (25.6% ± 12.6; 28.7% ± 12.6), whereas C. felis, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. microti, C. muris, C. ratti, C. suis, C. ubiquitum, and C. wrairi each contributed relative abundances below 10.3% (Table S5). Co-occurrence of two or more species was strikingly common, observed in 47 of 49 assigned samples (95.9%), with the combination of C. parvum, C. andersoni, and C. canis representing the most frequent assemblage, detected in 36.7% of samples (18/49) (Fig. 3-B).
Fig. 3.

Relative abundance and co-occurrence of Cryptosporidium species detected using the 18S rRNA marker in surface water and wastewater. A Distribution by species. B UpSet plot showing species co-occurrences per sample
Co-occurrence of Cryptosporidium species and G. duodenalis genotypes
Concurrent detection of at least one Cryptosporidium species (18S rRNA) and any G. duodenalis assemblage (bg, gdh, or tpi) was observed in 27 of 69 samples (39.1%), with genotypes considered present when supported by at least one locus (Table S6). Across matrices, Cryptosporidium profiles were broadly comparable, consistently dominated by C. parvum, C. andersoni, and C. canis, whose co-occurrence was detected in 10 of 69 samples (16.7%) distributed across both surface water and wastewater (Fig. 4). Multi-species co-occurrence was otherwise pervasive, affecting 66 of 69 assigned samples (95.7%), frequently involving C. parvum, C. andersoni, and C. canis alongside recurrent co-detection of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B; only 3 samples (4.3%) were assigned a single Cryptosporidium species or G. duodenalis assemblage exclusively (Table S6).
Fig. 4.

UpSet plot showing the co-occurrence of Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis assemblages across samples
Discussion
A unified long-read framework for identifying waterborne protozoa
A multilocus strategy optimized for long-read sequencing using ONT enabled high-resolution genotypic characterization of Giardia duodenalis, improving discriminatory power compared with previously reported Illumina- and Sanger-based approaches [38, 39]. The integration of gdh, bg, and tpi loci increased detection sensitivity and enabled the resolution of mixed assemblage and sub-assemblage profiles within individual samples, addressing the well-recognized limitation of diversity underestimation inherent to single-locus genotyping [7, 40]. However, marker performance was not uniform: gdh provided the broadest assemblage coverage, uniquely detecting assemblages C, D, and E that were not recovered by bg or tpi, whereas only a minority of samples (17.0%) yielded complete concordant multilocus profiles, highlighting both the complementary nature and locus-dependent resolution of the multilocus approach. At the same time, such differences may reflect a combination of true biological variation and locus-specific amplification efficiency, which should be considered when interpreting assemblage richness across markers [40]. Concurrent long-read sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene further enabled high-resolution detection of Cryptosporidium spp., consistent with previous nanopore-based studies demonstrating improved recovery of mixed and low-abundance genotypes [41, 42]. Collectively, this integrated long-read multilocus framework enhances fine-scale resolution of enteropathogenic protozoa in aquatic environments, while also emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation of locus-dependent detection patterns in molecular surveillance under a One Health framework.
The study was conducted in Pasto, a mid-sized Andean city located in the Department of Nariño, southwestern Colombia (1° 12′ 52″ N, 77° 16′ 41″ W; 2,527 m above sea level; mean temperature ~ 12 °C), a high-altitude peri-urban setting characterized by mixed agricultural and urban land use [29]. Surface water samples were collected at four points along the main river corridor traversing the city — from an upstream agricultural catchment (P1) through the urban stretch (P2–P3) to a major untreated wastewater discharge point (P4)—capturing a gradient of anthropogenic pressures including agricultural runoff, urban stormwater, and direct sewage inputs [43]. The absence of centralized wastewater treatment prior to discharge into the river system, combined with peri-urban livestock activity and dense informal settlements, creates conditions favorable for the sustained introduction of enteric protozoa into surface waters.
Giardia duodenalis assemblage and sub-assemblage diversity
Assemblages A and B predominated in surface water and wastewater, consistent with their established zoonotic relevance and indicating sustained circulation of broad-host-range genotypes linked to fecal contamination [44, 45]. The high detection frequencies of G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. relative to prior reports [46, 47] likely reflect the enhanced analytical sensitivity of long-read sequencing using ONT. These findings demonstrate that third-generation sequencing enables sensitive, assemblage-level characterization of enteric protozoa in complex aquatic matrices, strengthening molecular surveillance capacity in settings with elevated public health vulnerability.
The bg marker resolved 81.3% of samples into assemblages A, B, and E, with A and B predominating and wastewater accounting for the majority of detections (65.4%). Assemblage A dominated in surface water (mean 80.7%), while assemblages A and B showed comparable prevalence in wastewater, consistent with prior multilocus surveys reporting similar distribution patterns across markers [7]. At the sub-assemblage level, AII, AIII, and BIII were identified in 92.3% of genotyped samples; AII was the most prevalent and stable lineage across both matrices, AIII persisted at moderate levels (mean ~ 56.2%), and BIII showed the greatest variability in abundance (mean ~ 18.3%). The recurrent dominance of AII across water types aligns with patterns observed in wastewater surveillance systems [48] and indicates stable circulation of clinically relevant genotypes in impacted aquatic environments. Integration of bg within a multilocus framework thus refines assemblage-level resolution and strengthens molecular surveillance of enteric protozoa in urban water systems.
The gdh marker provided the broadest assemblage resolution, recovering assemblages A through E in 87.5% of genotyped samples, with detections predominating in wastewater (62.9%) over surface water (37.1%). Assemblage A was predominant in surface water (mean 53.8%) while assemblage B prevailed in wastewater (mean 51.5%), confirming the discriminatory capacity of gdh for environmental genotyping; notably, sample P27 simultaneously harbored all five assemblages, illustrating the exceptional intra-sample complexity resolvable by long-read sequencing. Their relative abundance and distribution align with prior molecular surveys [38, 49] and support sustained circulation of broad-host-range genotypes in anthropized aquatic systems. At the sub-assemblage level, AII, AIII, BIII, and BIV were identified in 74.3% of genotyped samples, more frequently in wastewater (65.4%), with AII showing the highest prevalence across both surface water (88.9%) and wastewater (94.1%). Co-occurrence of multiple sub-assemblages—including up to four simultaneously in sample P55—confirms that long-read sequencing enables fine-scale resolution of clinically relevant genotypes that short-read and single-locus methods typically underestimate [50, 51]. Collectively, these findings establish gdh as the most informative single marker and underscore the value of multilocus frameworks for tracking assemblage diversity and mixed-subtype circulation in contaminated aquatic environments.
The tpi marker resolved 81.8% of samples into assemblages A and B—not 84.8% or three assemblages as previously reported—with detections more frequent in wastewater (66.7%) than surface water (33.3%), and assemblage B consistently predominating across both matrices (mean 83.2% in surface water; 67.5% in wastewater), supporting the high environmental sensitivity of this locus [52, 53]. At the sub-assemblage level, AI, AII, BIII, and BIV were identified in 77.8% of assigned samples, predominantly in wastewater (71.4%); AII was the dominant lineage in both environments (mean 62.8% in surface water; 73.7% in wastewater), while AI was exclusively detected in wastewater at low abundance (mean 4.6%), and BIV was restricted to a limited subset of samples. Sample P20 uniquely harbored all four sub-assemblages simultaneously, demonstrating the intra-sample complexity accessible through long-read approaches [54]. Although tpi achieved robust overall detection, integration with gdh and bg provided complementary assemblage-specific resolution—particularly for minority assemblages and rare sub-assemblages—demonstrating that a combined multilocus strategy enhances epidemiological coverage and fine-scale genotypic discrimination in complex aquatic systems [7, 55].
Detection of low-frequency assemblages (C, D, and E) expanded the known genetic diversity of G. duodenalis, with higher diversity observed in wastewater compared to surface water, suggesting continuous input from multiple human and animal reservoirs [56–59]. The detection of up to five assemblages and multiple sub-assemblages within individual samples, indicates substantial intra-sample complexity that is often underestimated by conventional single-marker approaches [60]. However, such patterns should be interpreted cautiously, as they may also be influenced by methodological factors including differential PCR amplification efficiency, marker-specific sensitivity, residual sequencing errors, and potential bioinformatic misclassification inherent to long-read amplicon data [61].
Despite these limitations, the consistent predominance and inter-locus concordance of assemblages A and B across markers support their robust detection and suggest active circulation of clinically relevant genotypes in impacted aquatic environments [49]. The frequent detection of additional assemblages (C–E), particularly in wastewater, likely reflects both true environmental heterogeneity and increased sensitivity of the gdh marker, which showed higher recovery of minority taxa compared to bg and tpi [55]. Collectively, multilocus long-read sequencing provides improved resolution of assemblage diversity and mixed-genotype patterns, although co-occurrence interpretations should be considered as putative ecological signals rather than definitive transmission linkages.
Cryptosporidium species composition and environmental reservoirs
Environmental ONT-based 18S rRNA sequencing enabled species-level resolution in 73.1% of Cryptosporidium-positive samples (49/67), revealing pervasive multi-species co-occurrence and contributions from both human and animal reservoirs. C. parvum was the dominant species across both matrices, followed by C. andersoni and C. canis, and the three-species assemblage C. parvum–C. andersoni–C. canis represented the most frequently detected combination (36.7% of assigned samples). The prominence of C. parvum is consistent with its established role as the primary zoonotic and anthroponotic Cryptosporidium species globally, with both ruminant livestock and human sewage as principal sources [62, 63]. The co-dominance of C. andersoni, a bovine-adapted species, and C. canis, a canine-associated species, further indicates that multiple vertebrate host classes contribute to environmental contamination in the study area. Domestic and stray dog populations are frequently implicated in environmentally transmitted parasitic infections due to uncontrolled defecation, opportunistic behavior, and close human contact [64, 65], while cattle husbandry at peri-urban interfaces represents an additional pathway for C. andersoni and C. parvum discharge into surface waters [66, 67].
The concurrent detection of C. hominis and other less abundant non-human-adapted species, together with the predominant G. duodenalis subtypes AII and BIII, reflects overlapping anthropogenic and zoonotic inputs characteristic of peri-urban water systems, consistent with prior wastewater observations [9, 29, 39, 43, 44]. Similar Cryptosporidium profiles across surface water and wastewater confirm these interconnected systems as shared reservoirs for mixed protozoan communities. These results demonstrate that ONT-based multilocus metabarcoding provides sufficient resolution to discriminate co-circulating Cryptosporidium and Giardia species in complex environmental matrices, supporting source attribution and refined zoonotic risk assessment [14, 20, 68]. Future work integrating longitudinal sampling and metagenomic approaches would help resolve temporal dynamics, evaluate the impact of sanitation interventions, and inform targeted strategies for mitigating protozoan contamination in aquatic environments.
Limitations and future directions
This study demonstrates that ONT sequencing provides high-resolution detection of environmental Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp., but several methodological constraints warrant consideration when interpreting results. Taxonomic resolution and pipeline accuracy were not benchmarked against a mock community of known composition, which limits confidence in species- and genotype-level assignments, particularly for closely related taxa where ONT error profiles—including characteristic insertion and deletion errors—may introduce misclassification at the sub-assemblage level. No correction or normalization for PCR amplification bias was applied across the four target loci (bg, gdh, tpi, 18S rRNA), meaning that relative abundance estimates reflect amplification efficiency as well as true biological composition and should be interpreted with caution. These issues compound locus-specific sensitivity, variable read depth, and uneven amplification across samples, which may produce discrepancies in assemblage and species assignments and complicate the distinction between true co-occurrences and sequencing artifacts, especially among closely related sub-assemblages.
Beyond sequencing-specific constraints, the absence of quantitative oocyst and cyst data, heterogeneous sample sizes across individual sampling sites (P1–P4), and reliance on a predefined marker set collectively restrict assessments of pathogen load, fine-scale spatial comparisons, seasonal dynamics, and full genomic diversity. Limited spatial and temporal coverage further constrains generalizability of the community composition patterns reported here.
Future work should prioritize mock community validation to establish pipeline accuracy thresholds and quantify taxon-specific misclassification rates under realistic environmental conditions. Incorporating internal standards or spike-in controls would help decouple amplification bias from true abundance variation. Integration of quantitative assays (e.g., digital PCR or quantitative microscopy), longitudinal and spatially balanced sampling designs, and whole-genome or adaptive sequencing approaches will further enhance resolution, validate co-occurrence patterns, and strengthen environmental protozoan surveillance within a One Health framework.
Conclusions
ONT-based multilocus sequencing revealed high-resolution genetic diversity of G. duodenalis (assemblages A/B, sub-assemblages AI–AIII, BIII–BIV) and Cryptosporidium (C. parvum, C. andersoni, C. canis), capturing co-occurrences and minority variants typically undetected by conventional methods. This approach demonstrates dual zoonotic and anthroponotic transmission, overlapping human and animal contributions, and the capacity for precise source attribution in environmental surveillance. These findings provide actionable molecular evidence to inform water quality monitoring and targeted interventions, while future studies incorporating broader spatial coverage, additional markers, longitudinal sampling, and parasitic load quantification will further refine risk assessment under a One Health framework.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Sistema General de Regalías (SGR) through the project “Desarrollo, transferencia de tecnología y conocimiento para la detección, caracterización y degradación de SARS-CoV-2 y contaminantes emergentes en aguas residuales urbanas de Pasto, Departamento de Nariño” (BPIN: 2020000100770).
Author contributions
Stivenn Gutiérrez: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation. Vanessa Urrea:Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation. Luz H. Patiño: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Arsenio Hidalgo-Troya: Methodology. Luis A. Galeano: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Marina Muñoz: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition. Juan David Ramírez: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition.
Funding
This work was funded by the Sistema General de Regalías (SGR) through the project “Desarrollo, transferencia de tecnología y conocimiento para la detección, caracterización y degradación de SARS-CoV-2 y contaminantes emergentes en aguas residuales urbanas de Pasto, Departamento de Nariño” (BPIN: 2020000100770).
Data availability
The raw sequencing data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accession PRJEB110497.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ayed LB, Ahmed SAA, Boughattas S, Karanis P. Waterborne Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis in resources of MENA: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Water Health. 2024;22:1491–515. 10.2166/wh.2024.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barasa E, Indusa W, Were T. Giardia duodenalis in human health: a comprehensive review of its epidemiology, transmission, pathophysiology, diagnostics, and control strategies. Afro-Egypt J Infect Endemic Dis. 2025;15:109–26. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jian J, Liu A, Yang Y, Peng X, Yao L, Li B, et al. Occurrence rate and species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. in pet dogs in Yunnan Province, China. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24:354. 10.1186/s12866-024-03500-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. clinical microbiology reviews. Am Soc Microbio. 2011;24:110–40. 10.1128/cmr.00033-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hijjawi N, Zahedi A, Al-Falah M, Ryan U. A review of the molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Infect Genet Evol. 2022. 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xu L, Fukuda Y, Murakoshi F, Alviola P, Masangkay J, Recuenco FC, et al. Molecular characterization and zoonotic risk assessment of Cryptosporidium spp. Philippine Bats Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2025. 10.1016/j.fawpar.2024.e00249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shamsi L, Shadfar F, Bahramdoost Z, Pouryousef A, Asghari A, Maleki F. Diagnostic accuracy of various genetic markers (tpi, gdh, and bg) for prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in human samples: a comparative global systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol. 2025;70:161. 10.1007/s11686-025-01101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bourli P, Eslahi AV, Tzoraki O, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: a review of worldwide outbreaks – an update 2017–2022. J Water Health. 2023;21:1421–47. 10.2166/wh.2023.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Araújo RSde, Barbosa MRF, Dropa M, Araujo de Castro VC, Galvani AT, Padula JA, et al. Environmental surveillance of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in surface supply water and treated sewage intended for reuse from an urban area in Brazil. Environ Pollut. 2024;363:125089. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hamdy D, El-Badry A, Abd El Wahab W. 2019. Assessment of Giardia and Cryptosporidium assemblages/species and their viability in potable tap water in Beni-Suef, Egypt using nested PCR/RFLP and staining. Iranian J Parasitol [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Mphephu MG, Ekwanzala MD, Momba MNB. Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in river water and riverbed sediment using next-generation sequencing. Int J Parasitol. 2021;51:339–51. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Higuera A, Villamizar X, Herrera G, Giraldo JC, Vasquez-A LR, Urbano P, et al. Molecular detection and genotyping of intestinal protozoa from different biogeographical regions of Colombia. PeerJ: PeerJ Inc.; 2020. 10.7717/peerj.8554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sánchez A, Munoz M, Gómez N, Tabares J, Segura L, Salazar Á, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia, Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium among indigenous children from the Colombian Amazon Basin. Front Microbiol Frontiers. 2017. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rossi F, Santonicola S, Amadoro C, Marino L, Colavita G. Food and Drinking Water as Sources of Pathogenic Protozoans: An Update. Appl Sci Multidisc Digital Publish Institute. 2024. 10.3390/app14125339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hublin JSY, Maloney JG, George NS, Molokin A, Lombard JE, Urie NJ, et al. Enhanced detection of Giardia duodenalis mixed assemblage infections in pre-weaned dairy calves using next generation sequencing. Vet Parasitol. 2022;304:109702. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2022.109702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maloney JG, Molokin A, Solano-Aguilar G, Dubey JP, Santin M. A hybrid sequencing and assembly strategy for generating culture free Giardia genomes. Curr Res Microbial Sci. 2022;3:100114. 10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahmad AA, El-Kady AM, Hassan TM. Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in children in upper Egypt using assemblage- specific PCR technique. PLOS ONE Public Library Sci. 2020. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Elhadad H, Abdo S, Tolba M, Salem AI, Mohamed MA, El-Abd EA, et al. Detection of Giardia intestinalis assemblages A and B among children from three villages in the West Delta region, Egypt using assemblage specific primers. J Parasit Dis. 2021;45:655–63. 10.1007/s12639-020-01338-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bailly E, Valot S, Vincent A, Duffourd Y, Grangier N, Chevarin M, et al. Evaluation of Next-Generation Sequencing Applied to Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis Epidemiological Study. Pathogens. 2022;11:938. 10.3390/pathogens11080938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zahedi A, Greay TL, Paparini A, Linge KL, Joll CA, Ryan UM. Identification of eukaryotic microorganisms with 18S rRNA next-generation sequencing in wastewater treatment plants, with a more targeted NGS approach required for Cryptosporidium detection. Water Res. 2019;158:301–12. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Killander G, Isak G, Linde A-M, Advani A, Rönnberg C, Bujila I. Duplex PCR-Nanopore sequencing assay for Cryptosporidium species and subtype determination. Infect Genet Evol. 2025;129:105727. 10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koutsogiannis Z, Denny PW. Rapid genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii isolates via Nanopore-based multi-locus sequencing. AMB Express. 2024;14:68. 10.1186/s13568-024-01728-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huggins LG, Colella V, Young ND, Traub RJ. Metabarcoding using nanopore long-read sequencing for the unbiased characterization of apicomplexan haemoparasites. Mol Ecol Resour. 2024;24:e13878. 10.1111/1755-0998.13878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee VV, Judd LM, Jex AR, Holt KE, Tonkin CJ, Ralph SA. Direct Nanopore sequencing of mRNA reveals landscape of transcript isoforms in apicomplexan parasites. mSystems. 2021;6:e01081-20. 10.1128/mSystems.01081-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pitashny M, Kadry B, Shalaginov R, Gazit L, Zohar Y, Szwarcwort M, et al. NGS in the clinical microbiology settings. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.955481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maloney JG, Molokin A, Santin M. Assessment of next generation amplicon sequencing of the beta-giardin gene for the detection of Giardia duodenalis assemblages and mixed infections. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020;21:e00098. 10.1016/j.fawpar.2020.e00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mosbruger TL, Dinou A, Duke JL, Ferriola D, Li Y, Hayeck TJ, et al. Haplotypic resolution of the challenging genomic regions of MHC and KIR using a combination of targeted sequencing and a novel assembly pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025. 10.1093/nar/gkaf441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Delamare-Deboutteville J, Meemetta W, Pimsannil K, Gan HM, Khor L, Chadag M, et al. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Nanopore sequencing for sequence-based detection of four tilapia pathogens. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19425. 10.7717/peerj.19425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sánchez C, López MC, Galeano LA, Qvarnstrom Y, Houghton K, Ramírez JD. Molecular detection and genotyping of pathogenic protozoan parasites in raw and treated water samples from southwest Colombia. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:563. 10.1186/s13071-018-3147-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.dos Toledo R, S, Martins FDC, Ferreira FP, Almeida JC de, Ogawa L, Santos HLEPL dos, et al. Cryptosporidium spp and Giardia spp in feces and water and the associated exposure factors on dairy farms. PLOS ONE Public Library Sci. 2017. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bautista M, Bonatti TR, Fiuza VRdaS, Terashima A, Canales-Ramos M, José J, et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in raw water samples from the Rímac River, Peru. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:11454–67. 10.1007/s11356-018-1423-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Urrea V, Páez-Triana L, Velásquez-Ortiz N, Camargo M, Patiño LH, Vega L, et al. Metagenomic analysis of surface waters and wastewater in the Colombian Andean Highlands: implications for health and disease. Curr Microbiol. 2025;82:162. 10.1007/s00284-024-04019-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:3299–302. 10.1093/molbev/msx248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Katiyar M, Padukone S, Gulati R, Singh R. A multiplex PCR assay for the detection of Cryptosporidium species and simultaneous differentiation of Cryptosporidium hominis. Cryptosporidium Parvum Clin Stool Samples. 2023. 10.1101/2023.03.22.533796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lowery CJ, Moore JE, Millar BC, Burke DP, McCorry KA, Crothers E, et al. Detection and speciation of Cryptosporidium spp. in environmental water samples by immunomagnetic separation, PCR and endonuclease restriction. J Med Microbiol. 2000. 10.1099/0022-1317-49-9-779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johnson DW, Pieniazek NJ, Griffin DW, Misener L, Rose JB. Development of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:3849–55. 10.1128/aem.61.11.3849-3855.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pinto-Duarte VA, Hérnandez-Arango NM, Marin-Gallego BJ, Toloza-Beltrán PA, Lora-Suarez FM, Gómez-Marín JE. Detection of Giardia duodenalis and Toxoplasma gondii in soil and water samples in the Quindío River basin. Colombia Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022;28:e00175. 10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rozo-Montoya N, Bedoya-Urrego K, Alzate JF. Monitoring potentially pathogenic protists in sewage sludge using Metataxonomics. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2023;33:e00210. 10.1016/j.fawpar.2023.e00210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li Q, Zeng W, Wang S, Mu X, Xu H, Lin Y, et al. Occurrence and multi-locus genotyping of giardia duodenalis in Bamaxiang Pigs in Bama Yao Autonomous County of Guangxi Province, China. Veterinary Sci Multidis Digital Publish Institute. 2025. 10.3390/vetsci12121114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Capewell P, Krumrie S, Katzer F, Alexander CL, Weir W. Molecular Epidemiology of Giardia Infections in the Genomic Era. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37:142–53. 10.1016/j.pt.2020.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pollo SMJ, Reiling SJ, Wit J, Workentine ML, Guy RA, Batoff GW, et al. Benchmarking hybrid assemblies of Giardia and prediction of widespread intra-isolate structural variation. Parasites Vectors BioMed Central. 2020;13:1–13. 10.1186/s13071-020-3968-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hernández F, Ibáñez M, Portoles T, Hidalgo-Troya A, Ramírez JD, Paredes MA, et al. High resolution mass spectrometry-based screening for the comprehensive investigation of organic micropollutants in surface water and wastewater from Pasto city, Colombian Andean highlands. Sci Total Environ. 2024;922:171293. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dixon BR. Giardia duodenalis in humans and animals–Transmission and disease. Res Vet Sci. 2021;135:283–9. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fusaro C, Chávez-Romero YA, Prada SLG, Serrano-Silva N, Bernal JE, González-Jiménez FE, et al. Burden and Epidemiology of Human Intestinal Giardia duodenalis Infection in Colombia: A Systematic Review Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. Multidis Digital Publish Institute. 2022. 10.3390/tropicalmed7100325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ali M, Ji Y, Xu C, Hina Q, Javed U, Li K. Food and waterborne cryptosporidiosis from a one health perspective: a comprehensive review. Animals (Basel). 2024;14:3287. 10.3390/ani14223287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tawana M, Onyiche TE, Ramatla T, Thekisoe O. A “one health” perspective of Africa-wide distribution and prevalence of Giardia species in humans, animals and waterbodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology. 2023;150:769–80. 10.1017/S0031182023000513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fan Y, Wang X, Yang R, Zhao W, Li N, Guo Y, et al. Molecular characterization of the waterborne pathogens Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis and Eimeria spp. in wastewater and sewage in Guangzhou. China Parasites Vectors. 2021. 10.1186/s13071-020-04566-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barasa E, Indieka B, Shaviya N, Osoro E, Maloba G, Mukhongo D, et al. Assemblages and Subassemblages of Giardia duodenalis in Rural Western, Kenya: Association with Sources, Signs, and Symptoms. J Parasitol Res. 2024;2024:1180217. 10.1155/2024/1180217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Asghari A, Mahdavi F, Karimi K, Mohammadi MR, Shamsi L, Asgari Q, et al. Molecular epidemiology and multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in individuals attending major public hospitals in Shiraz, southwestern Iran: A public health concern. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2024;25:e00354. 10.1016/j.parepi.2024.e00354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Figueiredo Pacheco FT, Rodrigues Silva RK. Souza de Predominance of Giardia duodenalis AII Sub-Assemblage in Young Children from Salvador. Bahia, Brazil Biomedica. 2020;40:557–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tipu JH, Tabassum A, Klotz C, Sivertsen A, Afset J-E, Gaustad P, et al. Diversity of domestic and imported assemblages of Giardia in Norway and multi-locus sequence typing of domestic assemblage A isolates. Int J Parasitol. 2025. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.de Araújo RS, Barbosa MR, Dropa M, de Castro VC, Galvani AT, Padula JA, et al. Environmental surveillance of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in surface supply water and treated sewage intended for reuse from an urban area in Brazil. Environ Pollut. 2024;15:125089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Klotz C, Schmid MW, Winter K, Ignatius R, Weisz F, Saghaug CS, et al. Highly contiguous genomes of human clinical isolates of Giardia duodenalis reveal assemblage- and sub-assemblage-specific presence-absence variation in protein-coding genes. Microb Genom. 2023. 10.1099/mgen.0.000963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shamsi L, Shadfar F, Bahramdoost Z, Pouryousef A, Asghari A, Maleki F. Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Genetic Markers (tpi, gdh, and bg) for Prevalence and Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Human Samples: A Comparative Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Parasit. 2025;70:161. 10.1007/s11686-025-01101-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rocha JM, da Silva AV, Harvey TV, Fehlberg HF, Albuquerque GR. First report of contamination of public water system by Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp in Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 2024. 45:111-30.
- 57.Saleh FE-ZR, Abdullah HHAM, Aboelsoued D. Coprological and molecular prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in cattle and irrigation water from Beni-Suef Governorate, Egypt. Sci Rep. 2025. 10.1038/s41598-025-10552-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Elmahallawy EK, Gareh A, Ghallab MMI, Köster PC, Dashti A, Aboelsoued D, et al. Microscopy detection and molecular characterisation of Giardia duodenalis infection in outpatients seeking medical care in Egypt. Front Public Health Frontiers. 2024. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Minetti C, Taweenan W, Hogg R, Featherstone C, Randle N, Latham SM, et al. Occurrence and Diversity of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages in Livestock in the UK. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014;61:e60–7. 10.1111/tbed.12075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Woschke A, Faber M, Stark K, Holtfreter M, Mockenhaupt F, Richter J, et al. Suitability of current typing procedures to identify epidemiologically linked human Giardia duodenalis isolates PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Public Library Sci. 2021. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Helsmoortel M, Sentausa E, Villain A, Tran V D, Santiago-Allexant E, Beaulieu C, et al. Oxford Nanopore enhanced accuracy of long-read amplicons applied to microbial whole-genome sequencing. Microbiol Spectr. 10.1128/spectrum.02856-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Pinto DJ, Vinayak S. Cryptosporidium: host-parasite interactions and pathogenesis. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2021;8:62–7. 10.1007/s40588-021-00159-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.King P, Tyler KM, Hunter PR. Anthroponotic transmission of Cryptosporidium parvum predominates in countries with poorer sanitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:16. 10.1186/s13071-018-3263-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Langlois T, Hurtrez-Boussès S, de Garine-Wichatitsky M. Pet and stray dogs’ contribution to zoonotic transmission pathways: a bibliometric review. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025;2025:5522451. 10.1155/tbed/5522451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Myšková E, Brož M, Kváč M, Sak B, Ditrich O. Intestinal parasites of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in Svalbard (Norway): low prevalence and limited transmission with wildlife. Can J Zool NRC Research Press. 2021;99:249–55. 10.1139/cjz-2020-0186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ali M, Ji Y, Xu C, Hina Q, Javed U, Li K. Food and Waterborne Cryptosporidiosis from a One Health Perspective: A Comprehensive Review. Animals Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. 2024. 10.3390/ani14223287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tipu JH, Sivertsen A, Afset JE, Sandven L, Brekke H, Lund HM, et al. Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in Norway: predominance of C. parvum and emergence of C. mortiferum. Emerging Microbes Infections. 2024;13:2412624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Daraei H, Oliveri Conti G, Sahlabadi F, Thai VN, Gholipour S, Turki H, et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in water: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:9498–507. 10.1007/s11356-020-11261-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accession PRJEB110497.
