Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2026 Aug 5;37(8):1981–1989. doi: 10.1021/jasms.6c00171

Molecular Framework Modification in Mass Spectrometry: Atom Exchange, Insertion, and Deletion

Myles Q Edwards 1, Dylan T Holden 2, R Graham Cooks 1,*
PMCID: PMC13587777  NIHMSID: NIHMS2209674  PMID: 42361233

Abstract

The ionization and activation of molecules, as performed using mass spectrometry (MS), has long been known to induce unimolecular rearrangements in gas-phase ions, and in some cases, reorganization of the underlying skeletal framework. Here, we explore skeletal rearrangements occurring from the electrospray ionization process, including atom exchange, insertion, and deletion, within pre-existing ring systems. The Baeyer–Villiger oxidation, the Beckmann rearrangement, and the Favorskii rearrangement are longstanding organic reactions that are here explored in MS, alongside a unique sulfur-for-oxygen exchange reaction within a 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium scaffold. MSn and high-resolution MS are used to examine four representative transformations of molecular frameworks. Reactions across the four types emphasize the fact that ESI-MS can be intrinsically reactive. Product assignments in each case are supported by exact-mass measurements, isotopic distribution analysis, and MS/MS comparison with authentic standards or by characteristic fragmentation behavior. Beyond demonstrating framework modifications in electrospray droplets, these results point to an expanded suite of reactions for reactive MS derivatization, as well as the development of future strategies for late-stage functionalization of biomolecules.

Keywords: ambient ionization, microdroplet reactions, skeletal rearrangements, electrospray ionization, tandem mass spectrometry, reactive ionization

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2209674-f0001.webp

Introduction:

The process of recording mass spectra by classical electron impact ionization (EI) has long been known to induce molecules to undergo unexpected rearrangements.1,2 In some cases, most notably in the work of Djerassi and colleagues,3 these modifications extend past simple hydrogen rearrangements to involve skeletal reorganization of the ionized molecules.3–6 Beyond the classical unimolecular rearrangement processes studied by EI-MS, discharge ionization methods can also be accompanied by modifications of molecular frameworks, for example, through the insertion of nitrogen7–9 or oxygen atoms10 into carbon-carbon bonds7,9,10 due to the generation of reactive species (N3+, NO+, O2+., O3+.) in the high-energy ionization environment.7–10

These observations connect the ion chemistry in the mass spectrometer to the broader field of core scaffold modification reactions. The term ‘skeletal editing’ is relatively recent, but the underlying concept has long been significant to organic chemistry.11–13 Rather than constructing a new scaffold de novo, these reactions can be used to alter the elemental composition, size, or connectivity of an existing core through the selective exchange, insertion, or deletion of individual atoms. In synthetic organic and medicinal chemistry, this strategy is attractive because it allows complex drug or natural-product scaffolds to be modified both generally and selectively, avoiding the need to redesign and resynthesize each analogue from earlier reaction steps.13,14 As a result, skeletal editing provides a route to late-stage diversification and focused structure–activity relationship studies by generating bio-isosteres or shape-divergent analogues from an existing molecular framework.15–18 The recent emergence of accelerated reactions from electrospray devices19–23 and their application to late-stage functionalization of molecules in drug discovery24–28 raises the question of whether skeletal transformations in this reaction format are possible.

In the present work, we examine the possibility of skeletal editing in droplets generated by electrospray ionization. All reactions are run without external catalysts or oxidants, preheating, and occur within the short time frame it takes to mix reagents and be analyzed, in contrast to the traditional bulk conditions.

The reactions examined herein span several modes of framework remodeling (Scheme 1) and were selected to demonstrate the range of transformations accessible. The Baeyer–Villiger oxidation,29 the Beckmann rearrangement,30 and the Favorskii rearrangement31 are longstanding organic reactions that are here explored with MS, alongside a sulfur-for-oxygen exchange reaction within a triphenylpyrylium scaffold, a reaction closely related to the pyridinium synthesis from pyrylium salts.32

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Overview of the skeletal editing reactions performed in this study.

The conversion of pyrylium to pyridinium using amines is a well-established chemical transformation.33–35 This reaction is of immense analytical value and has been used in conjunction with mass spectrometry for quantitation of water content in organic liquids,36 charge labeling of peptides,37,38 and the enhanced detection of amino acid neurotransmitters in mouse brains.39 This type of O-for-N swap reaction is accessible in a variety of formats, including online reactions in microdroplets generated using ESI.40,41 The corresponding O-for-S transformation shown in Scheme 1 would generate the sulfur-containing thiapyrylium product when using a sulfide salt in the presence of water. If such a reaction is possible through droplets, this could enable rapid derivatization based online analysis of the bisulfide anion (HS−). At biological pH the bisulfide anion is the dominant species of aqueous hydrogen sulfide equilibria and an important biological signaling molecule of analytical interest.42–44

More broadly, such transformations are of analytical interest because they could expand reactive MS workflows while also revealing an unexpected and fundamentally important capability for electrospray to mediate skeletal remodeling reactions. Knowledge of the possibility of skeletal rearrangement may be significant in structural studies in the omics areas, not least in work like that of Livia Eberlin that is being celebrated in this issue of the journal.45–47

Materials and Methods

Materials:

Liquid chromatography-MS–grade water (Fisher Scientific) was utilized for all experiments containing water. Cyclohexanone, 2-chlorocyclohexanone, hydroxylamine, cyclohexanone oxime, caprolactam, caprolactone, formic acid, graphite foil (0.5 mm thickness, flexible graphite, 99.8%), and potassium sulfide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate (98+%) and acetonitrile (ACN; ACS 99.5+%) were purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific. Acetonitrile-D3 (D, 99.8%) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. High-purity compressed N2 (≥ 99.95%) was procured from Indiana Oxygen. Reactions were run using concentrations of 10 mM unless otherwise denoted. All reagents and solvents were used as received.

Methods:

Nano-electrospray ionization (nESI) tips were made from borosilicate glass capillaries (Sutter Instrument Co.; with an outer diameter of 1.5 mm, and an inner diameter of 0.86 mm) pulled to an approximate 5 μm O.D. using a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller (P-97, Sutter Instrument Company). Solutions were ionized by applying a positive or negative 1.7 kV DC spray potential (supplied from the mass spectrometer) to an electrode placed inside the nESI capillary via a copper alligator clip, unless otherwise noted. The electrosonic spray deposition apparatus used was similar to that of previous reports.48 Briefly, this apparatus was constructed using fused silica lines with 250-μm inner diameter. and 360-μm outer diameter (PolyMicro), one tee assembly, one union assembly, two NanoTight sleeves, and a silica capillary (IDEX Health and Science) at an applied potential of 4 kV. Solutions were sprayed at a graphite surface that was held at ground. To maintain the flow of reagent solution at a rate of 10 μL/min, syringe pumps (Standard Infusion PHD 22/2000, Harvard Apparatus) were utilized with gastight syringes (Hamilton Robotics). N2 was used as the nebulizing gas at 120 psi, as read on the regulator.

All ion trap full scan (also referred to as MS1, full scan, or single stage mass spectrometry) and ion trap collision-induced dissociation (IT-CID) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments were performed using an LTQ XL ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) with a helium bath gas and nESI as the ionization method. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) measurements on the products and standards were made using a Waters AQUITY Q-TOF MS with nESI as the ionization method. More information regarding instrument conditions and relevant parameters can be found in the Supplementary Information. A Bruker AV-III-400-HD with a 5mm BBFO Z-gradient SmartProbe was used for 1HNMR data.

The effects of spray distance were explored for the synthesis of caprolactam. nESI emitters were placed 64 mm away and 10 mm away from the inlet to study the effect of distance, while standards were studied 10 mm away from the inlet (i.e., non-accelerating conditions21).

No additional reagents were used to promote the ionization of each compound apart from the formation of caprolactone. This reaction was run in a solvent of 99:1 acetonitrile/H2O (% v/v) with 0.1% v/v formic acid. The formic acid was added here to give a clear reproducible signal, given that both species of interest have low ionization efficiency in positive mode and hence small aberrations in spray conditions, tip geometry, etc. can skew observed peak intensities.

Results and Discussion:

Atom Exchange:

The bulk reaction for the simplest thiapyrylium (also named thiopyrylium) is known to occur when pyrylium salts are treated with sodium sulfide in acetone, followed by reaction with acid, a replacement of the heterocyclic oxygen atom with sulfur yields the thiapyrylium salts.49,50 The speculated interfacial acidity of microdroplets generated from electrospray ionization (using positive mode ESI)20,51 suggests that acid-catalyzed pyrylium conversion to thiapyrylium may occur spontaneously (Figure 1A). This reaction was performed by spraying from a mixture of 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate and potassium sulfide in acetonitrile with 1% v/v water, onto a grounded graphite surface (Figure 1B). The reaction mixture turned blue upon mixing, indicating the formation of a highly conjugated open-chain sulfur-containing intermediate (Figure 1C, Figure S1).49,50 Figure 1A summarizes the sulfur-for-oxygen atom-exchange reaction of 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium under external acid-free electrospray ionization conditions. Shown in Figure 1B, the reaction mixture was introduced by electrospray deposition onto a grounded graphite surface, after which the deposited material was recovered and examined by nESI-MS using non-accelerating conditions. The resulting full scan mass spectrum (Figure 1C) contains the starting pyrylium ion signal at m/z 309 and the putative product at m/z 325, the latter matching the expected nominal mass of the sulfur-exchanged thiapyrylium species. High-resolution mass measurement of the nominal m/z 325 ion, experimentally observed at m/z 325.1046, agrees with the calculated theoretical value of m/z 325.1045 within a 5-ppm mass tolerance for an ion with formula C23H17S+. A minor ion observed at m/z 365 is tentatively assigned as the sodium-adducted intermediate consistent with the proposed pathway.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A) Atom exchange reaction of sulfur-for-oxygen occurs in 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium upon addition of potassium sulfide. B) Electrosonic spray deposition set-up with solutions containing the reaction mixture being spray-deposited onto a grounded graphite surface. The surface of the graphite was washed with acetonitrile which provided the single-stage mass spectrum shown in C) Ions are seen corresponding to the starting material, as well as the protonated thiapyrylium product and a putative sodium-bound intermediate. Separate exact mass measurements of these ions matched the expected molecular formulas with less than 5 ppm error. D) MS/MS spectrum of precursor ion m/z 325 showing characteristic fragmentation by loss of H2S, benzene (C6H6), and loss of both these neutral molecules.

Collision-induced dissociation of 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium reagent (Figure S2) gave characteristic product ions at m/z 294, 291, 231, 203, and 105, with m/z 231 being observed as the most abundant ion. The ions at m/z 294 correspond to a loss of •CH3, m/z 291 to loss of H2O, m/z 231 corresponds to loss of C6H6, and m/z 203 corresponds to loss of benzaldehyde (C7H6O), while m/z 105 is assigned to the formation of the benzoyl cation from a total neutral loss of C16H12. These fragment ions match previously described fragmentation channels.52

Under similar IT-CID conditions, the putative 2,4,6-triphenylthiapyrylium ion (Figure 1D) gave product ions at m/z 310, 292, 291, 247, 215, 203, 191, and 121, with m/z 247 giving the base peak. The ions correspond to losses, respectively, of H3C•, HS•, H2S, C6H6, C8H14, thiobenzaldehyde (C7H6S), C8H6S, and C16H12. Tandem MS of the m/z 325 ion supports product assignment, as does the exact mass determination. Comparison of the MS/MS spectra of the two compounds shows several distinct and parallel fragmentation channels, including heteroatom loss as H2O for the pyrylium ion and H2S/HS• for the thiapyrylium ion, C6H6 loss as the most abundant pathway in both cases, as well as benzaldehyde (C7H6O) or the parallel thioaldehyde loss (C7H6S), and C16H12 loss with retention of the cationic heteroatom-containing core. Given the limited precedent for this reaction and the absence of a commercially available standard for comparison, formation of the thiapyrylium product was further corroborated by product collection and subsequent 1H NMR (Figure S3).

The proposed intermediate implicated in the literature as leading to the ring-closing condensation associated with product formation49,50,53 observed here as the sodium-bound intermediate (m/z 365) was investigated with IT-CID (Figure S4). This species yielded substantial fragmentation at a lower normalized collision energy than both the starting material and the substitution product and yielded product ions at m/z 347, 337, 332, and 231 corresponding to neutral losses of H2O, C2H4, HS•, and C8H6S, respectively. The presence of these fragment ions and neutral losses indicates that this species contains both a sulfur and oxygen heteroatom and has fragmentation channels that overlap with both the starting material and the product.

Despite the sulfur reagent introduced being a potassium salt a sodium is shown to adduct to the intermediate. It is worth noting that sodium is an abundant and common ambient ionization contaminant.54 It is well known that sodium ions can often have a higher affinity to analytes than potassium ions; thus, the main adducted intermediate interrogated here is the sodium-bound intermediate despite the addition of potassium as a starting material.55,56 However, as expected, under different instrument settings, both the potassium-bound and sodium-bound adducts can be observed (Figure S5).

Oxygen Insertion:

In the traditional Baeyer–Villiger reaction, oxidation of a ketone with a peroxyacid reagent effects formal oxygen insertion adjacent to the carbonyl, converting acyclic ketones to esters and cyclic ketones to ring-expanded lactones.29 Prior work has indicated that Baeyer–Villiger oxidation may occur spontaneously in microdroplets during negative mode ionization, giving oxidation products from ketones without externally added peroxide.57 However, a recent theory advanced by the authors suggests that applying a positive potential results in the eventual generation of a reactive oxygen species.58

Shown in Figure 2A is oxygen insertion into a carbon framework during positive ionization, converting cyclohexanone into ε-caprolactone through a ring-expansion consistent with Baeyer–Villiger-type reactivity. Although no external H2O2 was added, the observed product profile is consistent with prior studies showing that oxidizing species, including H2O2, may be generated under reactive conditions58–60 like those shown in Figure 2B. However, it is worth noting that the mechanism of formation of H2O2 remains uncertain with reports in the literature stating the production of reactive species can arise under various conditions, including the electrochemical reactions of dissolved oxygen.59 Moreover, it remains unclear if the oxidizing species generated in the positive mode are identical to those generated in the negative mode. The corresponding single-stage mass spectrum in Figure 2C shows the starting ketone as protonated cyclohexanone, at m/z 99, and a lower-abundance peak at m/z 115 assigned to protonated ε-caprolactone. High-resolution mass measurement of the nominal m/z 115 ion, experimentally observed at m/z 115.0749, agrees with the calculated theoretical value of m/z 115.0753 within 5 ppm for an ion with formula C6H11O2+. Tandem MS of precursor ion m/z 115 (Figure 2D) provides additional support for the structural assignment, producing a dominant fragment at m/z 97 via a neutral loss of H2O and additional product ions at m/z 87, 73, and 69 arising from neutral losses of CO, C3H6, and C2H6O, respectively. Agreement of this MS/MS spectrum with that of an authentic ε-caprolactone standard (Figure S6) supports the conclusion that oxygen insertion occurs during the analysis process to furnish the ring-expanded lactone product. Formation of caprolactone during the charged spray process was further corroborated by product collection made using a deposition set-up analogous to that described in Fig. 2B, followed by 1H NMR characterization (Figure S7).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A) Oxygen insertion reaction of Baeyer-Villiger type to synthesize caprolactone. H2O2 is believed to be generated in-situ during the ionization process, none was added. B) Online nano-electrospray produces reactive droplets. C) Single-stage mass spectrum showing protonated reagent ion (m/z 99) as well as the formation of protonated ε-caprolactone (m/z 115) shown by separate exact mass measurements to match the expected mass with an error of less than 5 ppm. D) MS/MS spectrum of the protonated product (m/z 115) matches the fragmentation of the authentic product (shown in Figure S6) with neutral losses of H2O, CO, C3H6, and C2H6O.

Nitrogen Insertion:

Figure 3A expands the observed reaction scope to include nitrogen insertion by another nESI reaction, showing that cyclohexanone can be converted to ε-caprolactam through initial oxime formation followed by a Beckmann rearrangement. In this case, the reaction proceeds by initial condensation of cyclohexanone with hydroxylamine to give cyclohexanone oxime, after which activation with acetic anhydride promotes rearrangement to the ring-expanded lactam. Note that condensation reactions are commonly reported in microdroplet literature generated from positively charged sprays.19,58,61 Given that the oxime intermediate and ε-caprolactam share the same molecular formula, the positive-mode MS1 spectrum in Figure 3B is most appropriately interpreted as evidence for the formation of an ion at m/z 114 consistent with either isomer. High-resolution mass measurement of the m/z 114 ion, experimentally observed at m/z 114.0914, agrees with the calculated theoretical value of m/z 114.09134 for an ion with formula C16H12NO+. Thus, exact mass measurements support the elemental composition, but they do not distinguish between the oxime and lactam structures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A) Nitrogen insertion reaction performed through initial condensation of cyclohexanone with hydroxylamine, followed by a Beckmann rearrangement to yield caprolactam. B) Using a nESI set-up identical to the one shown for the previous insertion reaction the single-stage mass spectrum showing almost exclusively the ions (m/z 114) associated with the caprolactam product, with exact mass measurements confirming the match with less than 5 ppm mass error. C) MS/MS product ion spectrum showing formation of the cyclohexanone oxime intermediate before the addition of acetic anhydride at a sprayer distance of 64 mm from the inlet. D) MS/MS spectrum illustrating the near-complete conversion of the cyclohexanone oxime to the caprolactam with the one pot reaction including acetic anhydride at a sprayer distance of 64 mm from the inlet.

Structural assignment instead comes from the tandem mass spectra in Figures 3C and 3D. Without the inclusion of acetic anhydride (Figure 3C), IT-CID of the m/z 114 ion produced a fragmentation pattern consistent with cyclohexanone oxime indicating that. The spectrum showed product ions at m/z 97, 96, 94, 86, 81, 79, and 69, corresponding to neutral losses of NH3, H2O, H2O + H2, CO, NH2OH, H2O + NH3, and CH3NO, respectively, from the m/z 114 precursor. Although IT-CID-induced isomerization has been reported for other compounds, it does not appear to induce isomerization to the caprolactam, as the fragmentation profile matches that of the commercial cyclohexanone oxime standard (Figure S8).

With the inclusion of acetic anhydride (Figure 3D), the product ion spectrum from precursor m/z 114 changes substantially and is assigned to ε-caprolactam, with dominant fragmentation to m/z 96 by loss of H2O and comparatively higher relative abundance of product ions at m/z 79, 69, 97, and 86 arising from neutral losses of H2O + NH3, CH3NO, NH3, and CO, respectively. Unexpectedly, the synthesized caprolactam fragmentation yields the neutral loss of both heteroatoms as ammonia and water to give the second most abundant product ion at m/z 79. The formation of this product ion would most likely have to be formed through the formation of a skeletal rearrangement upon fragmentation. The product ion at m/z 79 is believed to be protonated benzene, and indeed, upon isolation and fragmentation of m/z 79 (MS3) both the standard and product show the characteristic fragment, the phenyl cation62,63 at m/z 77, formed by neutral loss of H2 (Figure S9). The resulting spectra from both MS2 and MS3 are nearly identical to that of the authentic caprolactam standard (Figure S10). Between the obtained product and the standard MS2 spectrum, however, there are small residual peaks, most noticeably one at m/z 81. The presence of this peak in the tandem MS of the product likely reflects a conversion of less than 100%, with the m/z 81 fragment ion being due to the unreacted oxime intermediate.

The extent of oxime-to-lactam conversion is expected to depend on the distance between the ionization source and the mass spectrometer inlet because this distance changes the lifetime of the sprayed droplets before sampling. At shorter distances, droplets are sampled more rapidly, limiting evaporation, desolvation and reaction time, and therefore preserving a larger population of the oxime intermediate. At longer distances, the droplets undergo greater solvent loss and have a longer reaction residence time, increasing the effective concentration of reagents within the droplet and favoring further conversion to caprolactam. Consistent with this interpretation, placing the ionization source close to the inlet (10 mm) gives a spectrum with higher relative intensities of ions associated with the cyclohexanone oxime, such as m/z 81 and m/z 94, while other ions remain at relative intensities similar to those observed for the caprolactam standard (Figure S11). In contrast, placing the nESI emitter farther from the inlet (64 mm) yields the tandem spectrum shown in Figure 3D, with noticeably lower m/z 81 and 94 abundances, indicating greater conversion to the lactam product.

Ring Contraction via Atom Deletion

Figure 4A completes the series of reactions by illustrating ring contraction through atom deletion from 2-chlorocyclohexanone to give the cyclopentane carboxylic acid under nESI aqueous conditions. In this case, the reaction is consistent with a Favorskii rearrangement, in which the six-membered α-chloroketone framework is converted into a five-membered scaffold with an exo-cyclic carboxylic moiety; no basic catalyst is added, unlike the traditional bulk reaction conditions.31 The formation of this product would then likely be driven by the enhanced autoionization of water in the droplet.20,58 The full-scan positive-mode spectrum in Figure 4B shows the starting material as protonated 2-chlorocyclohexanone at m/z 133 together with its expected chlorine isotope peak at m/z 135, while another feature at m/z 115 is assigned to protonated product, cyclopentane carboxylic acid. Exact mass measurement of the m/z 115 ion, experimentally observed as m/z 115.0750, agrees with the theoretical value of m/z 115.0754 for an ion with formula C6H11O2+. Further structural support was obtained from MS/MS spectra recorded in both positive and negative polarities. In positive mode (Figure 4C), IT-CID of the m/z 115 precursor ion gives product ions at m/z 97, 79, and 69, corresponding to neutral losses assigned in the figure as H2O, two consecutive H2O losses, and H2O + CO, respectively, from protonated cyclopentane carboxylic acid. In the negative mode (Figure 4D), IT-CID of the m/z 113 ion, assigned as deprotonated cyclopentane carboxylic acid, yields fragments at m/z 85, 83, and 69, corresponding to neutral losses of C2H4, C2H6, and C3H8, respectively. Both positive and negative mode fragmentation patterns are consistent with those of the authentic compound (Figure S12–S13).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A) Cyclopentane carboxylic acid is produced through nESI spray of 2-chlorocyclohexanone solution with equal parts acetonitrile and water. B) Using a nESI set-up identical to previous iterations positive mode mass spectrum shows the protonated reagent ion (m/z 133) and chlorine-37 isotope (m/z 135) as well as the product, the protonated cyclopentane carboxylic acid (m/z 115). C) MS/MS of m/z 115 in positive mode matches the spectrum of the authentic compound (Figure S11) with neutral losses of H2O and CO. D) MS/MS fragmentation of m/z 113 in negative mode, which matches that of the authentic compound (Figure S12), showing neutral losses of C2H4, C2H6, and C3H8.

Conclusion:

It is noteworthy that mass spectrometry serves not only to reveal, classify, and compare changes in core molecular architecture, but that the process of ionization itself can induce these changes in nESI-generated sprays; here, bimolecular reactions are responsible, whereas in the case of EI, unimolecular reactions are involved. These examples show that classic modes of skeletal framework remodeling can be produced in the nESI-MS and this may inform future biomedical workflows. The resulting data is analytically informative with unexpected fragmentation and also of fundamental interest in that previously studied skeletal rearrangements in EI mass spectrometry often have relatively low activation energies, which makes them competitive with simple cleavages.2 The energy deposited in nESI is low enough that fragmentation is not typically observed.64 Despite this, unsuspected rearrangements may still occur, and their occurrence will be reflected in the MS/MS spectra of the products, even in cases where only isomerization has occurred.

This work provides significant motivation to explore reactive derivatization, as well as droplet-based late-stage functionalization strategies based on the reactions shown. Analogies to known solution-phase chemistry deserve further detailed exploration to establish the degree of parallelism between the techniques reported here and bulk organic chemistry with respect to these transformations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at XXXX

  • 1HNMR, Tandem MS of standards (PDF)

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Nicolas Morato, Alexis Toney, and Seth Horn for their help with Q-ToF experiments. This study was supported in part by the Multi-University Research Initiative (MURI) of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-21-1-0170) via Stanford University (sub-award 62741613-204669) and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH (UG3 TR004139).

References

  • 1.McLafferty FW. Mass Spectrometric Analysis. Molecular Rearrangements. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31 (1), 82–87, DOI: 10.1021/ac60145a015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cooks RG. Bond Formation upon Electron Impact. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1969, 2 (5), 481–519, DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210020505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown P; Djerassi C. Mass Spectrometry in Structural and Stereochemical Problems. CXXX. A Study of Electron Impact Induced Migratory Aptitudes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89 (11), 2711–2719, DOI: 10.1021/ja00987a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wszolek PC; McLafferty FW; Brewster JH. Skeletal Rearrangements in Mass Spectra. Part I. Bis-Aryl Compounds. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1968, 1 (1), 127–137, DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210010112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fiedorow P; Frański R; Gierczyk B; Schroeder G. Fragmentation and Skeletal Rearrangements of Products of the Reaction between Fluorobenzenes and Bicyclic N-Bases Studied by Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 240 (1), 7–15, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2004.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Madsen J; Lawesson S-O; Bowie JH; Cooks RG. Skeletal-Rearrangement Fragments in the Mass Spectra of Substituted Thioglycollic Acids and Esters. Chem. Commun. (London) 1968, No. 12, 698, DOI: 10.1039/c19680000698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Z; Gong X; Zhang S; Yang H; Shi Y; Yang C; Zhang X; Xiong X; Fang X; Ouyang Z. Observation of Replacement of Carbon in Benzene with Nitrogen in a Low-Temperature Plasma. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3481, DOI: 10.1038/srep03481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li X; Yan X; Cooks RG. Functionalization of Saturated Hydrocarbons Using Nitrogen Ion Insertion Reactions in Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 418, 79–85, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2016.11.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li G; Li X; Ouyang Z; Cooks RG. Carbon-Carbon Bond Activation in Saturated Hydrocarbons by Field-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52 (3), 1040–1043, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201207997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Badal SP; Ratcliff TD; You Y; Breneman CM; Shelley JT. Formation of Pyrylium from Aromatic Systems with a Helium:Oxygen Flowing Atmospheric Pressure Afterglow (FAPA) Plasma Source. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 28 (6), 1013–1020, DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1625-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharma R; Arisawa M; Takizawa S; Salem MS. H. Remodelling Molecular Frameworks via Atom-Level Surgery: Recent Advances in Skeletal Editing of (Hetero)Cycles. Org. Chem. Front. 2025, 12 (5), 1633–1670, DOI: 10.1039/d4qo02157f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu FP; Tyler JL; Glorius F. Diversity-Generating Skeletal Editing Transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58 (6), 893–906, DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jurczyk J; Woo J; Kim SF; Dherange BD; Sarpong R; Levin MD. Single-Atom Logic for Heterocycle Editing. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1 (5), 352–364, DOI: 10.1038/s44160-022-00052-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim SF; Amber C; Bartholomew GL; Sarpong R. Skeletal Editing Strategies Driven by Total Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58 (11), 1786–1800, DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li EQ; Lindsley CW; Chang J; Yu B. Molecular Skeleton Editing for New Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 67 (16), 13509–13511, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma C; Lindsley CW; Chang J; Yu B. Rational Molecular Editing: A New Paradigm in Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 67 (14), 11459–11466, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Campos KR; Coleman PJ; Alvarez JC; Dreher SD; Garbaccio RM; Terrett NK; Tillyer RD; Truppo MD; Parmee ER. The Importance of Synthetic Chemistry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Science 2019, 363 (6424), eaat0805, DOI: 10.1126/science.aat0805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim KE; Kim AN; McCormick CJ; Stoltz BM. Late-Stage Diversification: A Motivating Force in Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (41), 16890–16901, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c08920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yan X; Bain RM; Cooks RG. Organic Reactions in Microdroplets: Reaction Acceleration Revealed by Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128 (42), 13152–13166, DOI: 10.1002/ange.201602270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Edwards MQ; Holden DT; Cooks RG. Abiotic Formation of Hexoses and Disaccharides in Aqueous Microdroplets. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (16), 7057–7065, DOI: 10.1039/D4SC08402K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marsh BM; Iyer K; Cooks RG. Reaction Acceleration in Electrospray Droplets: Size, Distance, and Surfactant Effects. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30 (10), 2022–2030, DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02264-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Girod M; Moyano E; Campbell DI; Cooks RG. Accelerated Bimolecular Reactions in Microdroplets Studied by Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2 (3), 501–510, DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00416b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim P; Continetti RE. Accelerated Keto-Enol Tautomerization Kinetics of Malonic Acid in Aqueous Droplets. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2021, 5 (9), 2212–2222, DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang KH; Morato NM; Feng Y; Toney A; Cooks RG. Rapid Exploration of Chemical Space by High-Throughput Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146 (48), 33112–33120, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c11037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cooks RG; Feng Y; Huang KH; Morato NM; Qiu L. Re-Imagining Drug Discovery Using Mass Spectrometry. Isr. J. Chem. 2023, 63 (7–8), e202300034, DOI: 10.1002/ijch.202300034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang KH; Ghosh J; Xu S; Cooks RG. Late-Stage Functionalization and Characterization of Drugs by High-Throughput Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. ChemPlusChem 2022, 87 (1), e202100449, DOI: 10.1002/cplu.202100449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang KH; Chen K; Morato NM; Sams TC; Dziekonski ET; Cooks RG. High-Throughput Microdroplet-Based Synthesis Using Automated Array-to-Array Transfer. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (17), 7544–7550, DOI: 10.1039/d5sc00638d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ghosh J; Cooks RG. Accelerated Click Reactions Using Boronic Acids for Heterocyclic Synthesis in Microdroplets. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (20), 8800–8806, DOI: 10.1039/d5sc00851d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baeyer A; Villiger V. Einwirkung des Caro’schen Reagens auf Ketone. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1899, 32 (3), 3625–3633, DOI: 10.1002/cber.189903203151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Donaruma LG; Heldt WZ. The Beckmann Rearrangement. In Organic Reactions; Wiley, 2011; pp 1–156, DOI: 10.1002/0471264180.or011.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Faworsky A. Über die Einwirkung von Phosphorhalogenverbindungen auf Ketone, Bromketone und Ketonalkohole. J. Prakt. Chem. 1913, 88 (1), 641–698, DOI: 10.1002/prac.19130880148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Katritzky AR. Conversions of Primary Amino Groups into Other Functionality Mediated by Pyrylium Cations. Tetrahedron 1980, 36 (6), 679–699, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)93679-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Katritzky AR; Brownlee RTC; Musumarra G. A C-13 Study of the Reaction of 2,4,6-Triarylpyrylium Cations with Amines. Tetrahedron 1980, 36 (11), 1643–1647, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)83134-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Katritzky AR; Leahy DE. Kinetics and Mechanism of the Pyrylium to Pyridinium Cation Transformation in Dichloromethane. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1985, No. 2, 171, DOI: 10.1039/P29850000171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Katritzky AR; Manzo RH; Lloyd JM; Patel RC. Mechanism of the Pyrylium/Pyridinium Ring Interconversion. Mild Preparative Conditions for Conversion of Amines into Pyridinium Ions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19 (4), 306–306, DOI: 10.1002/anie.198003061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qiu L; Saha M; Kraft S; Dziekonski ET; Welch CJ; Dai Y; Kaerner A; Cooks RG. Quantitative Determination of Water in Organic Liquids by Ambient Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (47), e202310884, DOI: 10.1002/anie.202310884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.O’Leary MH; Samberg GA. Chemical Modification of Proteins by Pyrylium Salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93 (14), 3530–3532, DOI: 10.1021/ja00743a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang S; Palanisamy S; Yu X; Wang Y; Liu D; Gong W; Zhang X. α-Active Pyrylium Salt 2,4,5-Triphenylpyrylium for Improved Mass Spectrometry-Based Detection of Peptides. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93 (32), 11072–11080, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maciel LÍL; Rodrigues Feitosa Ramalho R; Izidoro Ribeiro R; Cunha Xavier Pinto M; Pereira I; Vaz BG. Combining the Katritzky Reaction and Paper Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Enhanced Detection of Amino Acid Neurotransmitters in Mouse Brain Sections. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32 (10), 2513–2518, DOI: 10.1021/jasms.1c00153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schrader RL; Fedick PW; Mehari TF; Cooks RG. Accelerated Chemical Synthesis: Three Ways of Performing the Katritzky Transamination Reaction. J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96 (2), 360–365, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nie H; Wei Z; Qiu L; Chen X; Holden DT; Cooks RG. High-Yield Gram-Scale Organic Synthesis Using Accelerated Microdroplet/Thin Film Reactions with Solvent Recycling. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11 (9), 2356–2361, DOI: 10.1039/c9sc06265c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abe K; Kimura H. The Possible Role of Hydrogen Sulfide as an Endogenous Neuromodulator. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16 (3), 1066–1071, DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Papapetropoulos A; Pyriochou A; Altaany Z; Yang G; Marazioti A; Zhou Z; Jeschke MG; Branski LK; Herndon DN; Wang R; Szabó C. Hydrogen Sulfide Is an Endogenous Stimulator of Angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106 (51), 21972–21977, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908047106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mitchell EJ; Beecroft AJ; Martin J; Thompson S; Marques I; Félix V; Beer PD. Hydrosulfide (HS–) Recognition and Sensing in Water by Halogen Bonding Hosts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (45), 24048–24053, DOI: 10.1002/anie.202110442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang J; Sans M; DeHoog RJ; Garza KY; King ME; Feider CL; Bensussan A; Keating MF; Lin JQ; Povilaitis SC; Katta N; Milner TE; Yu W; Nagi C; Dhingra S; Pirko C; Brahmbhatt KA; Van Buren G; Carter S; Thompson A; Grogan RH; Suliburk J; Eberlin LS. Clinical Translation and Evaluation of a Handheld and Biocompatible Mass Spectrometry Probe for Surgical Use. Clin. Chem. 2021, 67 (9), 1271–1280, DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eberlin LS. Disease Detection and Diagnostics: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Address Medical Challenges. JACS Au 2023, 3 (5), 1264–1266, DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sparrapan R; Eberlin LS; Haddad R; Cooks RG; Eberlin MN; Augusti R. Ambient Eberlin Reactions via Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 41 (9), 1242–1246, DOI: 10.1002/jms.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Holden DT; Edwards MQ; Shang Z; Cooks RG. Nitrogen Fixation Using Metallic Lithium Nanoparticles Formed by Electrospray Deposition. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (28), 13048–13056, DOI: 10.1039/d5sc02558c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wizinger R; Ulrich P. Zur Kenntnis der Thiopyryliumsalze. Helv. Chim. Acta 1956, 39 (1), 207–216, DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19560390124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wizinger R; Ulrich P. Über Thiopyrylocyanine. Helv. Chim. Acta 1956, 39 (1), 217–222, DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19560390125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huang KH; Wei Z; Cooks RG. Accelerated Reactions of Amines with Carbon Dioxide Driven by Superacid at the Microdroplet Interface. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12 (6), 2242–2250, DOI: 10.1039/d0sc05625a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen H; Ouyang Z; Cooks RG. Thermal Production and Reactions of Organic Ions at Atmospheric Pressure. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45 (22), 3656–3660, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200600660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dimroth K; Wolf KH. Aromatic Compounds from Pyrylium Salts. In Newer Methods of Preparative Organic Chemistry; Foerst W; Birnbaum H, Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1964; Vol. III, pp 361–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cech NB; Enke CG. Practical Implications of Some Recent Studies in Electrospray Ionization Fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2001, 20 (6), 362–387, DOI: 10.1002/mas.10008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wei W; Chu Y; Wang R; He X; Ding C. Quantifying Non-Covalent Binding Affinity Using Mass Spectrometry: A Systematic Study on Complexes of Cyclodextrins with Alkali Metal Cations. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 29 (10), 927–936, DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ruan C; Rodgers MT. Cation-π Interactions: Structures and Energetics of Complexation of Na+ and K+ with the Aromatic Amino Acids, Phenylalanine, Tyrosine, and Tryptophan. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (44), 14600–14610, DOI: 10.1021/ja048297e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gao D; Jin F; Lee JK; Zare RN. Aqueous Microdroplets Containing Only Ketones or Aldehydes Undergo Dakin and Baeyer-Villiger Reactions. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10 (48), 10974–10978, DOI: 10.1039/c9sc05112k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Holden DT; Shira BA; Edwards MQ; Morato NM; Cooks RG. Mechanisms of Ionization and of Chemical Reactions in Charged Microdroplets. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (37), 17020–17033, DOI: 10.1039/D5SC04781A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Asserghine A; Baby A; N’Diaye J; Romo AIB; Das S; Litts CA; Jain PK; Rodríguez-López J. Dissolved Oxygen Redox as the Source of Hydrogen Peroxide and Hydroxyl Radical in Sonicated Emulsive Water Microdroplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147 (14), 11851–11858, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c16759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lee JK; Walker KL; Han HS; Kang J; Prinz FB; Waymouth RM; Nam HG; Zare RN. Spontaneous Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide from Aqueous Microdroplets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2019, 116 (39), 19294–19298, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911883116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wei Z; Li Y; Cooks RG; Yan X. Accelerated Reaction Kinetics in Microdroplets: Overview and Recent Developments. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 71, 31–55, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-121319-110654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kuck D. Mass Spectrometry of Alkylbenzenes and Related Compounds. Part II. Gas Phase Ion Chemistry of Protonated Alkylbenzenes (Alkylbenzenium Ions). Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1990, 9 (6), 583–630, DOI: 10.1002/mas.1280090602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Williams DH; Hvistendahl G. Kinetic Energy Release as a Mechanistic Probe. Role of Orbital Symmetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96 (21), 6755–6757, DOI: 10.1021/ja00828a035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nemes P; Marginean I; Vertes A. Spraying Mode Effect on Droplet Formation and Ion Chemistry in Electrosprays. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79 (8), 3105–3116, DOI: 10.1021/ac062382i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

RESOURCES