Skip to main content
International Journal of Nanomedicine logoLink to International Journal of Nanomedicine
. 2026 Sep 14;21:633255. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S633255

Precision Multimodal Nanodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer: From Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Platforms to Cell-Death Reprogramming and Immune Remodeling

Keyi Gou 1,2,3,*, Zhongsong Zhang 1,2,3,*, Sixiang Yi 3, Xinrui Zhu 3, Fayun Zhou 3, Jingfeng Zhou 3, Tao Xu 4, Na Huang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13588255  PMID: 42761669

Abstract

Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide and is characterized by a complex tumor microenvironment (TME), including severe hypoxia, acidosis, elevated glutathione levels, and pronounced immunosuppression. These pathological conditions compromise the efficacy of conventional therapies and contribute to drug resistance, tumor recurrence, and metastasis. Nanodynamic therapy (NDT) is an emerging therapeutic paradigm that employs nanomaterials to amplify reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in response to endogenous or exogenous stimuli, thereby enabling localized tumor ablation and immune reprogramming. This review systematically summarizes the biological basis of NDT in lung cancer. Particular emphasis is placed on the sequential biological processes of TME responsiveness, programmed cell death (PCD) pathway reprogramming, and immune remodeling. We comprehensively review the therapeutic applications and translational potential of four major NDT modalities—sonodynamic therapy (SDT), chemodynamic therapy (CDT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and radiodynamic therapy (RDT)—in lung cancer. We further highlight recent advances in the integration of these modalities with lung cancer–specific therapeutic strategies. These advances include immunogenic cell death (ICD)-mediated conversion of immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors, as well as synergistic strategies incorporating EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, anti-angiogenic treatment, and inhalable pulmonary delivery systems. Finally, we critically examine major barriers to the clinical translation of NDT, including the limited availability of clinically relevant in situ models, inadequate material consistency, insufficient long-term pulmonary toxicity data, and the lack of standardized physical activation parameters. We further propose priorities for future research and clinical translation. Collectively, this review provides a systematic and integrative framework for lung cancer NDT, spanning mechanistic design, therapeutic optimization, and potential clinical translation.

Keywords: lung cancer, nanodynamic therapy, nanomedicine, tumor microenvironment, synergistic therapy, immune response

Introduction

Lung cancer is among the malignant tumors with the highest global incidence and mortality, and its disease burden continues to rise. According to the latest estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022, there are approximately 2.48 million new lung cancer cases and 1.82 million related deaths worldwide. The age-standardized incidence and mortality rates are 23.6 per 100,000 and 16.8 per 100,000, respectively.1 In China, lung cancer accounted for 1.06 million new cases and 0.73 million deaths in 2022, with age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of 40.8 and 26.7 per 100,000 (1.7-fold and 1.6-fold higher than global averages, respectively).2 Notably, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are present in approximately 48.7% of Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations being the most prevalent subtypes.3 Moreover, MET amplification, a major mechanism of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, has been detected in 7%–18% of patients progressing on osimertinib, underscoring the urgent clinical need for resistance-overcoming therapeutic strategies. In addition, the C797S tertiary mutation represents another critical on‑target resistance mechanism against osimertinib. It occurs in 10–26% of first‑line and 30–40% of second‑line progressive patients. Currently, no effective targeted therapy exists for this mutation. This gap further underscores the necessity of exploring ROS‑based nanodynamic strategies to overcome resistance. The incidence and mortality of lung cancer in China and the United States are expected to continue increasing significantly by 2050.1 Among histological types, NSCLC accounts for approximately 84%–85% of all lung cancers.4 Its high proportion, combined with a poor prognosis, poses a serious public health challenge. In recent years, the treatment pattern of lung cancer has undergone profound changes due to a series of means, such as advanced surgery, widespread radiotherapy, standardized platinum based dual drug chemotherapy, molecular targeted drug iteration, and the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors.5 However, current therapeutic approaches still encounter numerous limitations. Molecular targeted therapy frequently leads to drug tolerance, persistent cell survival and acquired resistance.6 Immunotherapy is constrained by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and primary resistance. Although surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy can achieve local tumor control, the reported risk of local recurrence remains approximately 20%–50%, depending on disease stage, treatment modality, and follow-up duration, particularly in resected early-stage disease and locally advanced NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.7 These treatments are also accompanied by severe systemic side effects and impaired quality of life.8 More importantly, the lung cancer TME exhibits key characteristics such as hypoxia, acidic pH, high glutathione (GSH) levels, and dense extracellular matrix. These characteristics not only promote tumor invasion and metastasis but also severely compromise the efficacy of conventional therapies and induce immune escape.9 Therefore, relying solely on a single treatment modality makes it difficult to break the vicious cycle of drug resistance, metastasis, and recurrence. There is an urgent need for novel combination strategies that can simultaneously achieve local precision ablation and systemic immune activation in clinical practice.

In recent years, the field of NDT for lung cancer has expanded rapidly. It encompasses multiple treatment modalities, including PDT, RDT, SDT, and CDT.10 Its core principle involves using nanomaterials to amplify the generation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) under endogenous tumor stimulation or exogenous energy, thereby inducing selective tumor damage. This approach covers the design of efficient nanosensitizers, tumor-targeted delivery strategies, and integration with synergistic therapies (eg, immunotherapy), highlighting unique advantages for novel lung cancer treatment. Unlike simple drug delivery, NDT integrates nanocatalysis, energy conversion, TME response, and immune regulation into a single therapeutic platform, offering a novel technological pathway to overcome the complex lung cancer microenvironment.11,12 Anatomically, lung cancer lesions are often located in the lung parenchyma, bronchial lumen, or near the mediastinum. This localization poses severe pulmonary toxicity challenges for systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.13 Therefore, compared with traditional systemic treatments that carry high toxicity, locally controllable energy activation methods are theoretically more suitable for achieving precise tumor targeting while maximizing protection of normal lung tissue and respiratory function.14 NDT precisely meets this clinical demand (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

A diagram illustrating various dynamic therapies for cancer treatment. The diagram illustrates different dynamic therapies for cancer treatment, including photodynamic, sonodynamic, thermodynamic, electrodynamic, piezodynamic and radiodynamic therapies. Photodynamic therapy involves electron transfer and biomolecules, leading to singlet oxygen production. Sonodynamic therapy uses ultrasound cavitation effects. Thermodynamic therapy includes P-TDT, ALPHA, MTD and MDT. Electrodynamic therapy features nanosheets. Piezodynamic therapy involves piezoelectric polarization. Radiodynamic therapy uses X-rays and scintillators. Chemotherapy dynamic therapy involves Fenton reactions with hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. The central focus is on cancer, with reactive oxygen species (ROS) playing a key role. Symbols represent reactive oxygen species, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, singlet oxygen, nitric oxide and superoxide anion.

Classification and Mechanisms of Nanodynamic Therapy. Schematic illustration of four major NDT modalities. PDT: light-activated ROS generation, limited by tissue penetration depth (visible light: mm scale; NIR-I: ~1 cm). RDT: X-ray/γ-ray activation, enabling deep tissue penetration. SDT: ultrasound activation (20–100 kHz), penetrates >5 cm with minimal attenuation. CDT: endogenous TME-driven catalysis utilizing H2O2 and acidic pH, independent of external energy input. SDT and RDT overcome thoracic barriers for deep lesions; CDT functions independently of tumor location. Adapted from Li Y, Jin L, Tao B, et al Nanodynamic therapy for cancer: mechanistic innovations, targeting strategies and multimodal treatments. J Transl Med. Copyright © 2025 by Li et al.15

These approaches are systematically combined into an integrated NDT system.16 They can be collectively defined as a therapeutic strategy that uses endogenous or exogenous energy to activate nanoplatforms and intensify reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species or metal-catalyzed damage within tumor tissues.16 NDT activates nanosensitizers by locally producing ROS or other cytotoxic intermediates and reprogramming the immunosuppressive microenvironment to an immune-activated state,17 ultimately achieving precise tumor cell clearance.18,19 But when applied alone, each of these modalities faces significant clinical translation bottlenecks. The penetration depth of PDT light is insufficient to reach deep tumor lesions,20 and the hypoxic tumor microenvironment severely weakens its oxygen-dependent ROS generation efficiency;21 SDT commonly faces issues such as insufficient tumor enrichment;22 RDT is constrained by hypoxic radiation resistance resulting from tumor heterogeneity and abnormal vascular distribution.23 As for CDT, its catalytic efficiency is severely limited by three factors: insufficient concentration of endogenous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in tumors, precipitation-induced deactivation of Fe3⁺ at physiological pH, and spatial heterogeneity of the acidic microenvironment.24 Leveraging the unique physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, nanomedicine offers a new direction for breakthroughs in NDT-based diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. For example, upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) can convert near-infrared light into visible light to activate deep-seated photosensitizers, while nanocomponents such as manganese dioxide catalyze the in situ decomposition of H2O2 within tumors to produce oxygen, thereby alleviating hypoxia and restoring ROS generation efficiency.25 Hollow mesoporous titanium dioxide, metal oxide nanoparticles, and biomimetic cell membrane-coated nanoplatforms have achieved tumor-specific enrichment through homologous targeting or ligand modification.26 In the field of RDT, high-Z element nanoparticles enhance local radiation energy deposition and Compton scattering effects, thereby improving tumor radiosensitivity while reducing systemic radiation dose. Additionally, oxygen-loaded nanocarriers reverse radiation resistance by improving tumor oxygenation status.23 Regarding CDT, recent research has overcome bottlenecks such as insufficient H2O2 and Fe3⁺ precipitation in the TME by optimizing nanocatalyst composition and structure. This significantly enhances the ROS amplification effect.27

At present, several reviews have discussed tumor therapies based on nanotechnology and energy dependence, focusing on the basic mechanisms and general strategies of modalities such as PDT and SDT.16,28,29 Nevertheless, targeted and in depth analysis of nanodynamic therapies for lung cancer remains lacking. This tumor has a unique anatomical location. Notably, existing reviews have not sufficiently addressed lung-cancer-specific challenges. They rarely explore the potential of inhalable local delivery systems or the synergistic application of ferroptosis and cuproptosis in the pulmonary microenvironment.30 Moreover, a comparative assessment of tissue penetration and ROS generation efficiency across PDT, SDT, CDT, and RDT modalities remains lacking. This review explores the biological mechanisms underlying nanodynamic therapy for lung cancer. It synthesizes the sequential biological processes including TME response, death pathway reprogramming and immune transformation, and summarizes research advances across various nanodynamic treatment modalities. At the same time, it lists several combination therapy methods, highlighting the interdisciplinary and distinctive nature of current cancer research. Finally, it critically analyzes the challenges hindering the clinical translation of nanodynamic materials and proposes innovative solutions and unique perspectives. By addressing these gaps, the present review aims to provide a more precise and clinically relevant framework for lung cancer nanodynamic therapy. Our aim is to provide new ideas and insights for lung cancer treatment.

Biological Basis of Nanodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer

Tumor Microenvironment and Nanodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer

TME exhibits pathological features that differ significantly from those of normal lung tissue. These include hypoxia, acidification, high interstitial pressure, vascular abnormalities, inflammatory disorders, excessive accumulation of endogenous H2O2, high GSH expression, and profound immunosuppression (Figure 2). These features collectively form the biochemical basis for tumor progression, metastasis, and treatment resistance.31,32

Figure 2.

Diagram of tumor microenvironment in lung cancer showing interactions, immune suppression and therapeutic targets. The diagram illustrates the tumor microenvironment in lung cancer, highlighting various cellular and molecular interactions. Central to the image is a cluster of tumor cells surrounded by immune cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Arrows indicate processes like high interstitial pressure, angiogenesis, inflammation, hypoxia and low pH. Key molecules involved include matrix metalloproteinases, lysyl oxidase, vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor beta. The diagram also shows immune suppression through interleukin 10, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and adenosine. Therapeutic strategies like CAR-T therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, gut microbiota and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment are listed. The image emphasizes the complex interactions contributing to tumor progression and potential therapeutic interventions.

Tumor microenvironment of lung cancer. TME is composed of various cells and molecules, and immune suppressive cells interact with tumor cells through multiple molecular pathways to form characteristics such as hypoxia, acidification, interstitial hypertension, vascular structural abnormalities, chronic inflammation, and immune suppression. Adapted from Wang L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wu P, Zhang Y, Chen X. Advances in targeting tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy. Front Immunol. Copyright© 2024 by Wang et al.33

However, these “pathological” features provide a unique endogenous activation window for NDT. The hypoxic state activates various transcription programs by stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and HIF-2α, thereby promoting glycolysis, angiogenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and immune escape.34 The weakly acidic environment and overexpressed H2O2 serve as ideal catalysts and substrates for Fenton and Fenton-like reactions in CDT.35 Metal nanoparticles such as iron, copper, and manganese can convert low toxicity H2O2 in tumors into highly toxic hydroxyl radicals (·OH). This amplifies ROS mediated damage.36 The reducing capacity of GSH also provides a redox-responsive design approach for nanoplatforms. For example, Cu2⁺, manganese dioxide (MnO2), and Fe3⁺ achieve GSH depletion through redox reactions with GSH, accompanied by the reduction of metal ion valence states. This not only removes the antioxidant barrier but also enhances the catalytic efficiency of Fenton and Fenton-like reactions.37 In addition, the immune “cold” microenvironment in lung cancer TME—characterized by infiltration of immunosuppressive cells (eg, regulatory T cells and tumor-associated macrophages) and high expression of immune checkpoint molecules—limits spontaneous activation of the anti-tumor immune response. However, it also creates a substantial therapeutic window for achieving “cold-to-hot” immune transformation following immunogenic cell death induced by NDT, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immunity (Figure 3).38

Figure 3.

Diagram of strategies to convert cold tumors to hot, focusing on immune modulation and metabolic reprogramming. The diagram presents methods to convert cold tumors into hot tumors through six strategies: modulating immunosuppression, addressing metabolic dysregulation, blocking communications, activating dormant immune pathways, enhancing immune infiltration and combining strategies. Immunosuppression modulation targets Tregs, disrupts MDSCs and reprograms TAMs. Metabolic dysregulation is tackled by targeting glycolysis, lactate, nutrient balance and mitochondrial function. Communication blocking employs CRISPR-Cas9, sphingomyelinase blockers and RNA-based exosome-editing. Dormant immune pathways are activated by boosting adaptive and innate immunity and using immunotherapy enhancers. Immune infiltration is improved with angiogenesis inhibitors, ECM-degrading enzymes and CAF reprogramming. Combining strategies involves immuno-metabolic reprogramming, vascular remodeling, immune co-activation, dynamic immune-network modulation and next-gen adaptive combinations.

TME-driven strategies for converting cold lung tumors into hot tumors. In the tumor microenvironment, immunosuppressive cells, abnormal metabolism, intercellular communication barriers, physical and biochemical barriers, and vascular abnormalities collectively limit anti-tumor immune responses, resulting in a typical “cold tumor” state. Strategies that target regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) can regulate immune suppression and activate dormant immune pathways involving NK cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and T cells. When combined with vascular remodeling, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) reprogramming, metabolic regulation, and immune network co-activation, these approaches promote immune cell infiltration and enhance both adaptive and innate immune responses. Consequently, the immunosuppressive “cold” microenvironment of lung cancer can be transformed into an immunostimulatory “hot” microenvironment. This transformation provides a strategic basis for immune conversion induced by NDT and for precise combination therapy. Adapted from Yu J, Kong X, Feng Y. Tumor microenvironment-driven resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: strategies for Cold-to-Hot tumor transformation. Cancer Drug Resist. Copyright © 2025 by Yu et al.39

Nonetheless, this seemingly adaptive pathological landscape also constitutes a key bottleneck for the efficacy of NDT. Hypoxia is a common feature of solid tumors. It severely restricts oxygen dependent modalities such as PDT, SDT, and radiation therapy. These therapies rely on oxygen to generate singlet oxygen (1O2) or free radicals. In hypoxic areas, PDT efficiency is significantly impaired.40 SDT itself also consumes substantial oxygen, further exacerbating tumor hypoxia and creating a vicious cycle of treatment resistance.41 On the other hand, GSH is the main endogenous antioxidant. Its overexpression in tumor cells can directly scavenge ROS generated by nanodynamic therapy. This significantly weakens the net oxidative damage and offsets the therapeutic effect.38 In addition, the immunosuppressive properties of the TME not only hinder immune-mediated recognition and clearance of tumor cells but also prevent NDT-induced immunogenic cell death from effectively transforming into a sustained systemic anti-tumor immune response. This can lead to post-treatment recurrence and metastasis.42 Therefore, the lung cancer TME serves not only as a unique endogenous trigger for NDT but also as a barrier to its therapeutic efficacy.

Nanodynamic Therapy Induces Key Cell Damage and Programmed Cell Death

ROS is an inevitable byproduct of cellular metabolism and exert dynamic effects on the tumor growth microenvironment.43 The “double-edged sword effect” of ROS is reflected in their excessive accumulation, which leads to increased oxidative stress, damage to cellular biomacromolecules (eg, nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids), and promotion of tumorigenesis. However, as ROS concentration increases, both endogenous and exogenous ROS can mediate the activation of various pro-apoptotic signals, thereby inducing tumor cell death.44 Therefore, NDT adopts a pro-oxidative pathway to generate large amounts of ROS/RNS, disrupting the cellular redox balance and thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. The ROS/RNS generated by NDT are not simply end-stage toxic molecules. Instead, they act as first messengers to initiate a series of subcellular damage responses. First, ROS/RNS can disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential, leading to oxidative phosphorylation uncoupling and ATP synthesis disruption, thereby releasing pro-apoptotic factors.1 Shi et al constructed an acid-responsive PLM/PPA/β-Lap nanosystem that utilizes tumor-specific high expression of NQO1 to catalyze substantial ROS generation from β-Lap. This further induces NO release and in situ production of peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻), ultimately leading to DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby hindering tumor metastasis.45 In addition, excessive ROS can increase lysosomal membrane permeability (LMP), promoting leakage of proteases (eg, cathepsin B) into the cytoplasm and activating non-caspase-dependent lysosomal cell death pathways, which are distinct from classical PCD pathways.46 At the same time, ROS triggers a chain reaction of lipid peroxidation by extracting hydrogen atoms from membrane phospholipids. This process not only directly damages the integrity of cell membranes and organelles,47 but also generates highly ·OH in lysosomes via the Fenton reaction, further exacerbating membrane damage.48 In a study by Wang et al, two-dimensional Ca2Mn8O16 nanosheets (CMO NSs) were shown to consume glucose in the acidic TME to generate H2O2, which then catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to ·OH, while depleting GSH and inhibiting glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) activity. This leads to the accumulation of lipid peroxides (LPO) in lung cancer cells, thereby triggering ferroptosis, a key iron-dependent PCD pathway.49

The aforementioned subcellular damage does not take place as separate events. These processes interact with each other and produce mutual amplification effects. Specifically, mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization releases cytochrome c. This substance activates the caspase 3/7/9 cascade and further promotes the classical apoptotic pathway.40 When the apoptotic pathway is blocked, mitochondrial ROS can initiate necroptosis via the RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL signaling axis, thereby clearing drug-resistant cells through programmed necrosis.50 High-dose photodynamic therapy can also directly induce non-programmed necrosis.51 As a non-apoptotic cell death mode driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis is characterized by GSH depletion and GPX4 inactivation, which prevents the reduction of lipid peroxides to non-toxic lipid alcohols and ultimately leads to cell membrane rupture.49 In a study by Li et al, Cu2O@Au cascade catalytic nanoenzymes were reported to induce a “tumor starvation” effect through GOx-like activity, increase H2O2 levels, and generate ·OH via a POD-like reaction, while downregulating solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) expression to block cysteine uptake. This creates a positive feedback loop involving ROS amplification, GSH depletion, and ferroptosis.49 Notably, cuproptosis has recently emerged as a novel mode of cell death. Copper ions induce protein aggregation and toxic stress by targeting acylated tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle proteins within mitochondria (eg, DLAT, FDX1), thereby providing a new target for bypassing traditional apoptosis resistance.52 The dendritic mesoporous silicon nanobomb (DNCPID) designed by Fan et al achieved dual supply of superoxide (O2•⁻) and NO via the Haber-Weiss reaction. The two species then synthesize peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻) in a controlled manner at the tumor site, synchronously inducing upregulation of MMP-2/9. This process breaks down the collagen barrier and induces cuproptosis to aggravate mitochondrial damage. It ultimately realizes therapy combining deep penetration and multimodal synergism.53 In summary, nanodynamic therapy has established a multi-node, multi-pathway cell death regulatory network mediated by ROS/RNS, providing a multidimensional biological basis for overcoming treatment resistance in lung cancer and achieving immune transformation.

Nanodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer Activates Immune Response and Reshapes the Tumor Ecology

The true value of NDT in lung cancer lies not only in local oxidative killing but also in its immune activation potential to transform “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors.54 NDT responds to endogenous and exogenous energy stimuli to generate ROS, induces ICD in tumor cells, and reshapes the TME to reverse immune escape. Ultimately, this achieves local tumor killing and stimulates systemic immune responses, thereby inhibiting tumor recurrence and metastasis. Nevertheless, the immune activation effect of NDT does not occur spontaneously. Its efficacy is greatly restricted by the immunosuppressive network formed by intrinsic cellular components in the TME of lung cancer,39 as well as by specific physicochemical characteristics such as hypoxia and dense matrix barriers.55 To address tumor hypoxia, studies have reported that gold nanocages (AuNCs) mediate ROS production as intrinsic inorganic photosensitizers (PS). Moreover, due to local electric fields (LEFs),56,57 gold nanomedicines can enhance the PDT efficiency of other PS. Based on these principles, Liang et al designed a TME-responsive core–shell nanostructure, AuNC@MnO2 (AM).58 Under acidic TME conditions, the MnO2 shell degrades and catalyzes the reaction of intracellular H2O2 to produce substantial oxygen. This self-generated O2 further enhances the ROS production of AM under light by alleviating tumor hypoxia. More importantly, compared with PDT alone using AuNCs, oxygen-enhanced PDT induces stronger ICD, thereby enhancing the anti-tumor immune response.54,58 In addition, Wu et al constructed a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticle functionalized with epidermal growth factor and co-loaded with 5-fluorouracil and perfluorocarbon (PFC) for targeted cancer therapy.59 The results showed that PFC alleviated tumor hypoxia by delivering oxygen to the tumor. Furthermore, Murphy et al60 encapsulated MnO2 nanoparticles (NPs) in PLGA to efficiently catalyze the degradation of H2O2 in tumor tissues, thereby generating oxygen. Compared with unencapsulated MnO2 NPs, PLGA-MnO2 NPs exhibited better biocompatibility and enhanced penetration, along with reduced expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Although the oxygen-generating nanoplatform effectively enhanced the immune response after PDT treatment, the immunosuppressive TME ultimately hindered the efficacy of PDT-mediated cancer immunotherapy by inhibiting cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation.61 To address this issue, Liu et al prepared a light-responsive hydrogel containing Ce6-modified catalase (CAT), degradable PEGDA, and the R837 nanoadjuvant. This induced strong ICD and regulated macrophage polarization.61 Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) play a critical role in determining immunotherapy efficacy and are typically classified into anti-tumor M1 and pro-tumor M2 phenotypes.62 Studies have shown that the ATONPs@AucRGD + UTMD + laser combination effectively promotes the reprogramming of M2 to M1 macrophages within the TME, thereby remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhancing immune killing responses.63 In addition, the light-enhanced CDT mediated by the Cu2⁺-coordinated tetracycline-porphyrin self-assembled nanoplatform (LP/CuTT) induces ICD, significantly promotes dendritic cell (DC) maturation, and reprograms tumor-associated macrophages from the pro-tumor M2 to the anti-tumor M1 phenotype. Ultimately, this enhances the infiltration density of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells within the tumor.64 These “reprogrammed” TAMs promote CTL recruitment and enhance memory T cell-mediated tumor killing. This strategy effectively eradicates tumors, inhibits metastasis, and prevents recurrence, offering promising prospects for effective cancer immunotherapy. Vascular normalization can also reduce the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. To alter the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and prevent tumor angiogenesis and progression, Wei et al developed a lipoprotein complex (F-PLP/pBIM). This complex consists of folic acid-personalized liposomes (F-PLP) and a BIM-S plasmid (pBIM), and is designed to simultaneously target cancer cells and folate receptor β-positive TAMs. The results showed that F-PLP/pBIM significantly induced apoptosis of M2 macrophages in LL/2 and A549 tumor models.65 In addition, Chen et al66 normalized tumor vasculature using erlotinib, which significantly enhanced tumor perfusion and oxygenation in mice, while also reversing the immunosuppressive microenvironment and improving the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 tumor immunotherapy. CAFs are the most abundant stromal cells in the TME. Their excessive activation leads to secretion of large amounts of collagen and formation of a dense stromal barrier, which impedes the infiltration of drugs and immune cells.67 One study showed that NO can block TGF-β transduction via the sGC-cGMP pathway.68 NO donor-loaded liposomes (Lip-SNAP) inhibit dense stroma production by suppressing TGF-β expression and its downstream pro-fibrotic signaling, thereby enhancing the tumor penetration ability of gemcitabine-loaded liposomes. Because downregulating ECM expression or degrading pre-existing ECM can improve the delivery efficiency of drug delivery systems in tumor tissues, Wang et al69 conjugated hyaluronidase onto biocompatible dextran via acid-sensitive bonds to prepare DEX-HAase nanoparticles. When passively targeted to tumor tissues, these nanoparticles loosen the ECM structure and enhance the penetration of oxygen and photosensitizer-loaded liposomes into the tumor, thereby achieving improved tumor immunotherapy outcomes when combined with anti-PD-L1. In summary, the clinical value of NDT in lung cancer depends fundamentally on its ability to overcome the lung cancer microenvironment, achieve the transformation from a “cold” to a “hot” tumor, and activate systemic immune memory.

Progress in the Application of Different Nanodynamic Therapies for Lung Cancer

In recent years, NDT has developed rapidly in lung cancer treatment. The core paradigm is shifting profoundly from single drug delivery to multifunctional intelligent platform integration. This new direction encompasses intelligent response, immune activation, targeted delivery, and energy triggering in a multi module collaborative manner.70,71 For example, the STRIDE nanoplatform reported by Chen et al achieves precise tumor targeting and responsive endosomal/lysosomal release through rational peptide modification, successfully co-delivering siGLI1 and a cisplatin prodrug. The results showed that in a lung adenocarcinoma resistance model, the tumor regained sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs, demonstrating the dual advantages of intelligent response and targeted delivery.72 At the level of immune activation, a biomimetic coating of Fe3O4 nanoparticles based on the macrophage membrane was constructed—the HMME@MPs platform. This platform utilizes the natural recognition properties of immune cell membranes to achieve efficient tumor targeting, while synchronously inducing ferroptosis and sonodynamic effects under US stimulation. It thereby effectively demonstrates the feasibility of synergistically integrating NDT with immune regulation.73 Zhang et al further designed a multifunctional apigenin-based nanoplatform that combines metabolic regulation with photodynamic perturbation. On one hand, it reshapes the immunosuppressive microenvironment by inhibiting glycolysis; on the other hand, it destroys mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum by targeting photosensitizers to dual organelles. In a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancer, the platform achieved a tumor inhibition rate of 97% for primary lesions and 80% for distant metastases, fully demonstrating the enormous potential of NDT platforms to enhance treatment depth through metabolic, photodynamic, and immune multi-pathway synergy.74 Notably, recent research has also created local administration strategies based on inhalation NDT platforms. The LMS nanoplatform designed by Wang et al achieved efficient accumulation of ferroptosis inducers in lung cancer via nebulization delivery. By utilizing the multi-enzyme catalytic activity of nanoenzymes to trigger oxidative stress storms and lipid peroxidation bursts, this platform promotes dendritic cell maturation and enhances T cell immune responses while inducing ferroptosis. This design not only significantly increases local drug concentration but also effectively avoids systemic toxic side effects.75 Recently, Liu et al developed a tumor‑cell‑membrane‑coated nanozyme. This nanozyme generates oxygen and delivers curcumol. It achieves precise catalytic therapy for lung cancer. The approach follows a “source‑saving and expenditure‑reducing” strategy. It shows excellent tumor suppression in subcutaneous and orthotopic lung cancer models.76 The LMS platform has demonstrated that local drug delivery for NDT in lung cancer does not rely solely on intravenous injection. Instead, it can be achieved through non invasive administration routes (such as respiratory inhalation, microneedles, and even dry powder inhalers) to achieve precise accumulation and controlled release in lung lesions. This provides a more feasible administration paradigm for the clinical translation of NDT. In addition to immune activation, multimodal integration of energy-triggered mechanisms is also a prominent focus in current NDT platform design. Liao et al constructed a GSH-responsive polycarbonate nanoplatform that co-delivers a NO donor and the acoustic sensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6). When triggered to disintegrate by high concentrations of GSH in tumor cells, the platform released NO, which alleviated hypoxia by downregulating HIF-1α and synergistically generated highly toxic peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻) with ultrasound-stimulated ROS, thereby significantly amplifying SDT efficacy. The IC50 value was reduced approximately 2.5-fold compared with that of free Ce6.77 In addition, Cao et al reported an ultrasound‑responsive DNA nanoflower‑based nanocarrier (DHA‑DDF). This nanocarrier carries hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) antisense sequences, achieving synergistic hypoxia modulation and sonodynamic therapy in the Lewis lung carcinoma model. It significantly inhibits tumor angiogenesis and prolongs survival.26 This section focuses on four main NDT technologies: SDT, CDT, PDT, and RDT. It systematically explains their unique mechanisms, TME responsive strategies, and immune transformation effects in nanodynamic therapy for lung cancer (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Therapeutic Characteristics of Lung Cancer-Related NDT Nanosensitizers

Nanosensitizer/Nanoplatform NDT Modality Lung Cancer Model/Indication TME-responsive or Targeting Design Therapeutic Mechanism Translational Relevance Source
Ce6–erlotinib carrier-free nanoparticles (EC-NPs) SDT + EGFR-targeted therapy NSCLC Carrier-free self-assembly of chlorin e6 and erlotinib Ultrasound activates Ce6 to generate 1O2/ROS; erlotinib blocks EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis Combines SDT with clinically relevant EGFR inhibition; suitable for EGFR-driven NSCLC [78]
Ultrasound-driven nanomachine SDT + immunotherapy NSCLC Tumor-targeting biomimetic nanomachine with ultrasound activation Ultrasound triggers localized ROS generation and lysosomal disruption, promoting tumor antigen release, dendritic-cell activation, and CD8⁺ T-cell recruitment Links local SDT ablation with systemic antitumor immunity [79]
Biomimetic anlotinib-loaded FePc-silicate nanoparticles SDT + anti-angiogenesis + immunotherapy NSCLC Biomimetic delivery and dual PD-L1 modulation FePc-silicate mediates US-triggered ROS production; anlotinib inhibits VEGFR2/JAK2/STAT3 signaling and downregulates PD-L1, enhancing T-cell infiltration Integrates SDT, anti-angiogenic therapy, and immune checkpoint modulation [80]
cRGD-targeted gold-based nanoparticles Low-temperature PTT + SDT EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cRGD-mediated tumor targeting Gold-based nanoparticles enhance mild photothermal effects and SDT-induced ROS, helping overcome EGFR-TKI resistance Relevant to acquired EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC [81]
Cationic liposomal hydroxycamptothecin + 5-ALA Chemo-SDT Metastatic lung cancer Pulmonary delivery to improve local lung deposition 5-ALA is metabolized to PpIX as an endogenous sonosensitizer; ultrasound-triggered ROS synergizes with hydroxycamptothecin chemotherapy Demonstrates inhalation/pulmonary delivery as a practical route for lung lesions [82]
Inhalable immune-activation nanoplatform Ferroptosis-enhanced NDT + immunotherapy Lung cancer Inhalable local delivery to lung tumors Nanoplatform enhances ferroptosis-mediated immunosensitization, promotes dendritic-cell maturation, and strengthens T-cell immune responses Highlights inhalable NDT for local accumulation with reduced systemic toxicity [75]
CLDCu inhalable nanoparticles CDT + cuproptosis + cGAS–STING immunotherapy Lung metastasis Acid-responsive inhalable Cu2⁺/disulfiram release system Acidic TME triggers Cu2⁺ and disulfiram release to form CuET; Cu⁺ accumulation induces cuproptosis and activates cGAS–STING-mediated immunity Strong example of lung-localized precision nanomedicine and immune conversion [83]
Diethyldithiocarbamate–Cu4O3 nanocomplex Copper-based CDT/cuproptosis-related therapy NSCLC Copper nanocomplex responsive to intracellular redox imbalance Induces mitochondrial dysfunction, telomerase inhibition, oxidative stress, and copper-associated tumor-cell death Provides a metal-ion strategy for NSCLC cell-death reprogramming [84]
MgFe2O4@ZOL nanoplatform CDT + microwave dynamic therapy + selective microwave thermal therapy Lung cancer bone metastasis GSH depletion-enhanced Fenton-like catalytic system Releases iron species under acidic TME, consumes GSH, catalyzes H2O2 to ·OH, and combines microwave-triggered dynamic/thermal effects Specifically addresses lung cancer bone metastasis and oxidative microenvironment remodeling [37]
Osimertinib–copper–ICG self-assembled nanomedicine Chemo-photo-CDT + cuproptosis NSCLC Metal–organic coordinated carrier-free assembly Osimertinib targets EGFR-mutant NSCLC; Cu-mediated Fenton-like reaction amplifies ROS; ICG enables photoactivation; copper overload promotes cuproptosis Suitable for precision treatment of EGFR-mutant or TKI-resistant NSCLC [85]
Pulmonary theranostic nanoclusters CDT + radiation-enhanced ferroptosis Lung cancer Pulmonary delivery and imaging-guided nanoclusters Nanoclusters enhance ROS generation, promote ferroptosis, and sensitize tumors to radiation-mediated oxidative damage Combines local lung delivery, diagnosis, CDT, ferroptosis, and radiotherapy [86]
Doxorubicin-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles + 5-ALA RDT/radiotherapy sensitization + chemotherapy Lung cancer Polymeric nanoparticle delivery of doxorubicin combined with 5-ALA 5-ALA-mediated porphyrin accumulation and radiation exposure enhance ROS production; doxorubicin adds chemotherapy-induced DNA damage Represents radiation-driven ROS amplification for lung cancer combination therapy [87]
Albumin-modified gold nanoparticles Radiodynamic/radiosensitization therapy Lung cancer Albumin modification improves dispersion and tumor interaction Gold nanoparticles enhance local radiation energy deposition and ROS-mediated DNA damage Uses clinically familiar radiotherapy as an external trigger for nanodynamic amplification [88]
Biodegradable iridium-coordinated nanodrugs PDT + immunotherapy Lung cancer Biodegradable iridium-coordinated nanodrug design Iridium coordination potentiates PDT-induced ROS and immunogenic cell death, enhancing antitumor immune responses Connects PDT-mediated oxidative killing with immune remodeling in lung cancer [89]
Pyropheophorbide-a-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (PPa-PLGA NPs) PDT Floating lung cancer cells PLGA nanoformulation improves hydrophobic photosensitizer dispersion Light activation of PPa generates ROS to ablate floating lung cancer cells Potentially useful for residual, disseminated, or exfoliated lung cancer cells [90]
660 nm-activated polymeric nano-photosensitizer carriers loaded with osimertinib PDT + EGFR-targeted therapy NSCLC Polymeric photosensitizer carrier for osimertinib delivery 660 nm irradiation activates PDT-generated ROS, while osimertinib suppresses EGFR signaling Combines optical activation with molecularly targeted precision therapy [91]
Dihydroartemisinin-assisted Ce6 system PDT + ferroptosis Lung cancer DHA-mediated ferroptosis sensitization DHA inhibits GPX4 and enhances ROS/lipid peroxidation, thereby facilitating Ce6-induced PDT Demonstrates death-pathway reprogramming from PDT to ferroptosis-enhanced killing [92]

SDT: The Most Realistic Exogenous Activation Axis for Lung Cancer

SDT uses US to activate sonosensitizers, which in turn generate ROS to kill cancer cells.93 This modality offers several unique advantages, including non-invasiveness, suitability for treating deep-seated tumors, and precise tumor targeting achieved through selective US activation.94,95 The main mechanisms of cell death in SDT involve cavitation (eg, the generation and rupture of microbubbles)96 and thermal effects (Figure 4).97,98

Figure 4.

SDT diagram: cavitation, thermal effects, ROS cause diverse cell death. A schematic diagram illustrates the anti-tumor mechanism of sonodynamic therapy (SDT). At the center, ultrasound (US) waves are depicted as an external energy source. On the left, cavitation and thermal effects are shown leading to necrosis. Cavitation is represented by waves and bubbles, while thermal effect is symbolized by flames. On the right, the activation of sonosensitizers mediates the conversion of oxygen into reactive oxygen species (ROS), indicated by O subscript 2 and O superscript 1 O subscript 2. This process induces various forms of programmed cell death, including ferroptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, oxeiptosis, apoptosis and NETosis. Each type of cell death is represented by distinct cellular illustrations. The diagram visually explains the multi-pathway synergistic tumor-killing approach of SDT through oxidative stress and mechanical damage.

Schematic diagram of the anti-tumor mechanism of SDT. As an external energy source, US directly causes mechanical damage and necrosis of tumor cells by inducing acoustic cavitation and thermal effects. On the other hand, activation of sonosensitizers mediates the conversion of oxygen into ROS, such as 1O2, which induces various forms of programmed cell death—including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis—through oxidative stress, ultimately achieving multi-pathway synergistic tumor killing. Adapted from Shan Q, Li R, Ying B, et al Organic Sonosensitizers-based SDT with enhanced ROS generation. Ultrason Sonochem. Copyright © 2025 by Shan et al.99

Traditional PDT is limited in its ability to effectively treat deep lung tumors due to the shallow penetration depth of light.100 SDT utilizes low-frequency ultrasound for activation. The penetration depth of ultrasound in tissues far exceeds that of near-infrared light, achieving a significant tumor suppression rate of over 70% in clinical studies.101 Low-frequency ultrasound can penetrate tissues up to several centimeters deep and deliver energy to lesions located deep within the lung parenchyma, adjacent to the mediastinum, or inside the bronchial lumen, without damaging the chest wall or normal lung tissue. This provides a minimally invasive and accessible treatment option for central and peripheral NSCLC.102 This physical advantage has been robustly validated in representative studies in recent years. Xiao et al delivered 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) via endotracheal administration, which was metabolized into the endogenous sonosensitizer protoporphyrin IX within lung cancer cells. In vitro experiments showed that this combined chemotherapy–sonodynamic regimen demonstrated stronger tumor cell-killing effects than other single or combination regimens. In vivo studies have also confirmed that this regimen exhibits excellent anti-tumor effects in mouse models of metastatic lung cancer.82 Li et al synthesized four BODIPY derivatives (BDP1–BDP4) and systematically evaluated their potential in SDT for the first time. The results showed that BDP4 exhibited excellent acoustic sensitivity and high SDT efficiency against cancer cells and tumors in tumor-bearing mice.103

Due to the low ROS yield of sonosensitizers and the complexity of the TME, SDT is still in its infancy and has not yet achieved widespread clinical translation.104 Nanotechnology provides effective strategies to improve SDT efficacy, specifically by enhancing ultrasound cavitation, improving sonosensitizer delivery, and modulating the TME.105,106 Incorporating acoustically responsive nanomaterials into SDT enables precise control over drug release and activation, thereby minimizing damage to healthy tissues.107,108 Currently, nanomaterials used to enhance SDT efficacy are mainly classified into three categories: organic sonosensitizers, inorganic sonosensitizers, and organic–inorganic hybrid sonosensitizers. As an example of organic sonosensitizers, Zhang et al109 developed an ultrasound-responsive nanosystem with Ce6 as the core. This nanosystem efficiently generates 1O2 upon US activation and synergizes with two key effects: tumor enrichment mediated by bridging glycoprotein 3, and burst drug release triggered by perfluoropentane ultrasound phase transition. These combined actions significantly enhance the oxidative killing efficacy of SDT. Meanwhile, Tian et al78 created a carrier-free nanoparticle system (EC NPs) based on one-step self-assembly of Ce6 and erlotinib. The system activates Ce6 via ultrasound to generate ROS while releasing erlotinib to exert synergistic chemotherapeutic effects, thereby significantly inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation in NSCLC cells and xenograft tumor models. Inorganic nanomaterials can themselves serve as efficient sonosensitizers, offering advantages such as structural stability, tunable sonosensitizing activity, and ease of functionalization. Ping et al79 developed an ultrasound-driven nanomachine featuring a gold nanoparticle core, surface-modified engineered macrophage exosomes, and S11e aptamers. This biomimetic nanoplatform specifically targets NSCLC cells, breaking down lysosomal membranes and releasing tissue proteases upon US activation. Meanwhile, the cleaved tumor antigens effectively activate dendritic cells and recruit CD8⁺ T cells, thereby organically linking local SDT killing with systemic immune activation. In addition, Wang et al110 constructed an efficient composite sonosensitizer system based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets, loaded with zinc oxide (ZnO) and gold (Au) nanoparticles, and surface-modified with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). ZnO nanoparticles generate separated electron–hole pairs upon US activation, while the narrow bandgap structure of rGO promotes electron migration from ZnO to gold nanoparticles. This effectively suppresses electron–hole pair recombination and greatly enhances ROS generation efficiency. Organic–inorganic hybrid sonosensitizers leverage the complementary advantages of both components, effectively overcoming the limitations of single-component systems and achieving synergistic performance enhancement. This provides a foundation for combination therapy of tumors with other treatment modalities. For example, Liu et al80 designed a biomimetic nanomedicine (APSNM) composed of a PD-L1 antibody-modified macrophage membrane coating loaded with iron phthalocyanine silicate (FePc silicate) and anlotinib. Anlotinib downregulates intracellular PD-L1 expression by inhibiting the VEGFR2/JAK2/STAT3 pathway, while membrane-surface antibodies block extracellular PD-L1 signaling. Upon US activation, FePc silicate generates ROS and enhances anti-tumor immunity, ultimately promoting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) expression. This achieves deep integration of anti-angiogenesis, sonodynamic therapy, and immune checkpoint regulation. Recently, Zheng et al reported aptamer-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for NO-enhanced targeted sonodynamic therapy of lung cancer, where aptamer-mediated active targeting enabled tumor-specific accumulation and NO gas synergistically boosted ultrasound-triggered ROS production.111 Besides, Wei et al112 developed a novel titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based sonosensitizer coated with a malignant melanoma cell membrane (B16F10) and functionally modified with programmed death ligand 1 antibody (aPD-L1). This achieves a dual-targeting strategy combining homologous targeting and immune checkpoint blockade with sonodynamic therapy. The nanoplatform first extracts TiO2-based sonocatalytic nanoparticles coated with the B16F10 melanoma cell membrane, then modifies aPD-L1 antibodies via PEG chains and an EDC/NHS coupling reaction. This yields a functional nanoformulation that combines homologous targeting and immune checkpoint blockade. This nanoformulation achieves tumor-homologous targeted enrichment via the B16F10 cell membrane, while the surface-conjugated aPD-L1 specifically binds to tumor cell PD-L1 and blocks the immunosuppressive pathway. Under US irradiation, the TiO2 core is activated, catalyzing the generation of abundant ROS within the tumor and inducing tumor cell apoptosis. Furthermore, the synergistic effect of SDT-induced ICD and aPD-L1-mediated immune checkpoint blockade promotes interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion and activates systemic anti-tumor immunity, thereby achieving a dual anti-tumor effect combining local killing with systemic immune activation (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Biomimetic nanoplatform for sonodynamic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma. The diagram depicts the creation and antitumor action of a biomimetic nanoplatform for improved sonodynamic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Titanium dioxide-based nanoparticles are coated with B16F10 melanoma cell membranes, PEGylated and conjugated with anti-PD-L1 to form SCN@B16F10M/PEG-aPD-L1. This setup allows tumor targeting via cell membrane coating and immune checkpoint targeting through anti-PD-L1. Ultrasound triggers the sonosensitizer to produce reactive oxygen species, causing oxidative damage and tumor-cell apoptosis. Blocking PD-1/PD-L1 enhances immune activation and interferon-gamma production, combining tumor-targeted therapy with immune checkpoint blockade for better antitumor results. The diagram illustrates homologous targeting, immune checkpoint targeting and sonodynamic therapy effects, leading to apoptosis and interferon-gamma production.

Schematic illustration of the fabrication and antitumor mechanism of a biomimetic dual-targeted nanoplatform for enhanced sonodynamic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. B16F10 melanoma cell membranes (B16F10M) are employed to coat TiO2-based sonosensitizing nanoparticles (SCN), followed by PEGylation with DSPE-PEG2000-NH2 and conjugation of anti-PD-L1 (aPD-L1) via EDC/NHS chemistry to obtain SCN@B16F10M/PEG-aPD-L1. The B16F10 cell-membrane coating enables homologous tumor targeting, whereas surface-conjugated aPD-L1 facilitates PD-L1-mediated immune checkpoint targeting. Upon ultrasound irradiation, the TiO2-based sonosensitizer generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing oxidative damage and tumor-cell apoptosis. Meanwhile, blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis enhances antitumor immune activation and promotes interferon-γ production, thereby integrating tumor-targeted sonodynamic therapy with immune checkpoint blockade for improved antitumor efficacy. Adapted from Wei X, Feng Z, Huang J, et al Homology and Immune Checkpoint Dual-Targeted Sonocatalytic Nanoagents for Enhancing Sonodynamic Tumor Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. Copyright © 2021 by Wei et al.112

The priority of SDT in lung cancer is not due to a single technological advantage, but rather the synergistic effect of its deep penetration capability and multifunctional design of nano platforms. These research advances not only validate the feasibility of SDT as an exogenous activation axis for lung cancer, but also reveal its key path towards evolving into a local systemic combination therapy paradigm.

CDT: The Core Means of Endogenous Disruption in the Tumor Microenvironment

CDT, as the only endogenous activation mode in nanodynamic therapy systems that does not rely on external energy input, exhibits unique pathological adaptability in the treatment of lung cancer.113,114 It uses Fenton or Fenton-like agents containing metal ions to generate highly cytotoxic ROS—such as ·OH—within lung cancer cells, thereby inducing apoptosis. The inherent weak acidity (pH 6.5–6.9), excessive accumulation of H2O2, and high GSH expression in the lung cancer TME precisely constitute the natural catalytic field and substrate reservoir for Fenton and Fenton-like reactions.115 In recent years, researchers have systematically explored the adaptability and synergistic strategies of CDT in lung cancer through metal ion carrier engineering, nanoenzyme catalytic activity optimization, and ion homeostasis regulation. For example, Wang et al prepared NIR-II-responsive iron-doped carbon nanoparticles (FDCNs) using iron-doped carbon as the matrix via a one-pot hydrothermal method. The obtained material exhibits a mesoporous structure with a particle size exceeding 225 nm and acid-responsive properties. It not only releases iron ions to catalyze the generation of ·OH from H2O2 for chemodynamic therapy but also absorbs 1064 nm near-infrared light for photothermal conversion.116 Additionally, Xie et al constructed an integrated theranostic platform of FePd TPP/ADM nanocrystals using a thermal decomposition method, which utilizes ·OH generation from tumor H2O2 to achieve chemodynamic therapy. Moreover, the repulsion effect between palladium (Pd) and hydrogen atoms further enhances Fenton oxidation efficiency.117 In another study, Wang et al constructed two-dimensional ultra-thin Cu-TCPP metal–organic framework nanosheets. Under the action of peroxidase-like activity and Cu2⁺ within the nanosheets, the acidic H2O2 oxidizes the TCPP ligand to generate peroxide radicals. Based on Russell’s principle, 1O2 is selectively generated in situ, while intracellular glutathione is depleted, ultimately leading to efficient targeted tumor cell killing.118 Furthermore, Wang et al first prepared hollow HMnO2 nanoparticles via PLGA reduction and acetone etching, loaded them with bufalin, and then coated them with a platelet membrane to construct a PLTM-HMnO2@Bu biomimetic nanoplatform. This platform releases drugs and Mn2⁺ in response to pH and GSH within the tumor microenvironment, achieving both MRI-targeted imaging and ·OH production via a Mn2⁺-mediated Fenton reaction, thereby effectively inhibiting tumors synergistically with chemotherapy.119 Meanwhile, glucose oxidase (GOD) has been loaded into an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-responsive Fenton system to enhance cancer treatment.120 The GOD@ZIF@MPN (metal-polyphenol network) shell is degraded into Fe3⁺ and tannic acid (TA), exposing the internal GOD upon internalization into ATP-overexpressing tumor cells. Subsequently, TA reduces Fe3⁺ to Fe2⁺, and GOD reacts with endogenous glucose to catalyze the Fenton reaction for Fe2⁺, producing abundant H2O2.121

However, the deeper bottleneck of traditional CDT strategies is that simply increasing ·OH production is no longer sufficient to overcome multidrug resistance or establish long-term immune memory in lung cancer treatment. The value of CDT in lung cancer is undergoing a paradigm shift—from merely supplementing ROS to reshaping cell death patterns. Future research will focus on deeply coupling the oxidative stress generated by metal ion catalysis with multiple programmed cell death pathways. For example, in the context of ferroptosis coupling, targeting ferroptosis has become an important strategy for enhancing CDT efficacy, as low expression of GPX4 and FSP1 in lung adenocarcinoma has been shown to be significantly associated with poor patient prognosis.84 Specifically, the heterogeneous nanoparticles designed by Yu et al, consisting of uniformly distributed copper and Fe3O4, achieved extended ·OH lifetime and sustained ROS generation through intraparticle electron transfer.84 In addition, the MgFe2O4@ZOL nanoplatform constructed by Shu et al confirms the feasibility of coupling CDT with ferroptosis. This platform releases Fe3⁺ in the acidic tumor microenvironment, which consumes intracellular GSH and catalyzes the generation of ·OH from H2O2. It has achieved significant anti-tumor efficacy and bone repair in a lung cancer bone metastasis model.37 Yang et al synthesized amino-functionalized MIL-101 nano metal–organic frameworks (nMOFs) with peroxidase-like activity and a porous structure using aminoterephthalic acid and ferric chloride hexahydrate as raw materials via a solvothermal method. Leveraging the high specific surface area and pore-loading characteristics of the material, they loaded the traditional Chinese medicine monomer dihydroartemisinin (DHA) into its interior, thereby successfully constructing a tumor microenvironment-responsive system—the DHA@MIL-101 nanoplatform. This platform is responsive to degradation within the TME, releasing Fe3⁺/Fe2⁺ and DHA. Fe2⁺ catalyzes the Fenton reaction to produce ·OH, while DHA synergistically generates ·OH, depletes GSH, inhibits GPX4, and induces lipid peroxidation (LPO) accumulation, ultimately triggering ferroptosis and apoptosis (Figure 6).122

Figure 6.

Diagram of DHA@MIL-101 nanoplatform for tumor therapy via CDT/ferroptosis mechanism. A schematic diagram illustrates the DHA@MIL-101 nanoplatform. In section A, the preparation process is shown: FeCl subscript 3 6H subscript 2O is used to synthesize MIL-101 via a solvothermal method at 120 degrees Celsius for 24 hours, followed by DHA loading to form DHA@MIL-101. Section B depicts the mechanism of CDT/ferroptosis therapy. The nanoplatform degrades in the tumor microenvironment, releasing Fe ions and DHA. Fe ions mediate the Fenton reaction, producing hydroxyl radicals, which are amplified by DHA to deplete GSH and inhibit GPX4, leading to lipid peroxidation, DNA damage and ultimately ferroptosis and apoptosis. The diagram also shows the EPR effect and injection of DHA@MIL-101 nanoparticles into a mouse with a tumor. The process includes transferrin, Fe superscript 3 plus, Fe superscript 2 plus and DHA. The text reads: ′Tumor microenvironment triggered CDT-Ferroptosis′ and ′DHA enhanced CDT-Ferroptosis′.

Schematic diagram of the DHA@MIL-101 nanoplatform: preparation and synergistic CDT/ferroptosis therapy mechanism for tumors. (A) Preparation process of the DHA@MIL-101 nanoreactor: MIL-101 was synthesized via a solvothermal method using FeCl3·6H2O as the precursor, and then loaded with DHA to obtain DHA@MIL-101. (B) Mechanism of CDT/ferroptosis synergistic therapy triggered by the tumor microenvironment in the DHA@MIL-101 nanoreactor: The nanoreactor degrades under acidic and high-GSH conditions, releasing Fe ions and DHA. Fe ions mediate the Fenton reaction to produce ·OH, which is further amplified by DHA to deplete GSH and inhibit GPX4. This leads to lipid peroxidation (LPO) accumulation and DNA damage, ultimately inducing ferroptosis and apoptosis. Adapted from Yang XX, Xu X, Wang MF, et al A nanoreactor boosts chemodynamic therapy and ferroptosis for synergistic cancer therapy using molecular amplifier dihydroartemisinin. J Nanobiotechnology. Copyright© 2022 by Yang et al.122

The cuproptosis pathway, which develops in parallel with ferroptosis, has become another frontier for CDT coupling due to its unique mitochondrial protein toxicity mechanism. The core mechanism of cuproptosis involves excessive binding of copper ions to thiolated proteins in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, leading to loss of iron–sulfur cluster proteins and protein toxicity stress.123 For example, the OIC nanoparticles created by Liu et al are self-assembled from osimertinib, copper ions, and indocyanine green. In NSCLC models, copper ions catalyze the Fenton reaction to generate ROS and deplete GSH, while targeting cuproptosis-related proteins such as FDX1 and lipoic acid synthase. The nanoparticles successfully overcame resistance of EGFR-mutant lung cancer to single tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy while achieving a tumor inhibition rate of up to 99.8%.85 The prospective study by Tsvetkov et al elucidated the close relationship between cuproptosis and mitochondrial respiration, as well as the lipoic acid pathway. Subsequent studies have further revealed a significant synergistic effect between ferroptosis and cuproptosis, mediated by a mitochondrial ROS cross-cascade.124 Based on this collaborative mechanism, a Cu-MOF nanoplatform has been developed for lung cancer treatment. This platform degrades and releases copper ions within the acidic microenvironment of tumor cell lysosomes. On one hand, it catalyzes the Fenton reaction to generate ·OH, inducing oxidative damage and apoptosis. On the other hand, under the mediation of FDX1, it binds copper ions to the mitochondrial protein DLAT, leading to loss of iron–sulfur cluster proteins and aggregation of thioacylated proteins, ultimately triggering cuproptosis induced by protein toxicity stress.125 Existing studies have also documented other collaborative mechanisms. Hu et al designed a biodegradable nanocomposite with variable charge and size that overcomes tumor hypoxia and synergistically amplifies CDT-mediated cuproptosis and ferroptosis through dual disturbances of glycolysis and redox balance. This provides a powerful technical solution for co-activating dual death pathways in the hypoxic microenvironment of lung cancer.126 Jiang et al reported CACuPDA that simultaneously induce ferroptosis and cuproptosis through a dual GSH/GPX4 depletion strategy, and synergized with immune checkpoint blockade to significantly enhance antitumor immune responses in lung cancer models.127 Furthermore, a functional nanozyme system (CussOMEp) using copper-based nanocarriers loaded with omeprazole inhibited copper efflux while augmenting copper accumulation, synergistically activating cuproptosis and ferroptosis pathways, and in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody markedly suppressed lung metastasis.128 In recent years, coupling CDT with broader mitochondrial damage and non-classical death pathways has further expanded the conceptual boundaries of “reshaped death patterns”. A groundbreaking study constructed a porous Fe3O4 nanoplatform loaded with both lactate oxidase and the mitochondrial uncoupling agent carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP). The acid-responsive release of Fe2⁺/Fe3⁺ initiates the Fenton reaction, while lactate oxidase converts lactate in the tumor microenvironment into H2O2 as a self-supplying substrate. CCCP amplifies ROS leakage by disrupting the mitochondrial membrane potential. The synergy of these three factors triggers mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress, blocks autophagic flux, and ultimately drives an atypical death pathway characterized by extensive cytoplasmic vacuolization—pyroptosis. This study is the first to shift iron-based nanomedicine CDT from the classical apoptotic pathway toward pyroptosis, and to stimulate strong anti-tumor immunity in combination with anti-PD-L1, thereby significantly inhibiting the growth of primary and distant metastases.129 Moreover, Ding et al designed a mitochondria-targeted covalent organic framework nanoprodrug, COF-31@P. By releasing Fenton-like copper complexes and the catalase inhibitor 3-aminotriazole (3-AT) via GSH-responsive disulfide bonds, this system blocks H2O2 degradation while targeting mitochondria. This achieves efficient accumulation of ·OH in the cellular energy center, as well as a functional closed loop from ROS amplification to mitochondrial damage and cell death.130 Owing to the unique anatomical structure of the lungs, the CLDCu nanodevice designed for inhalable delivery achieved a drug accumulation rate of 63.6% in lung lesions through its Cu2⁺-chitosan shell and LMWH-TOS core structure—a rate 56.5 times higher than that achieved with intravenous injection. After inhalation administration, the acidic microenvironment triggers the synergistic release of Cu2⁺ and disulfiram to generate CuET, which blocks the Cu2⁺ efflux protein ATP7B and forms toxic Cu2⁺ species, thereby significantly enhancing the cuproptosis effect. Meanwhile, the release of chitosan synergizes with cuproptosis-induced activation of the STING pathway, significantly enhancing dendritic cell maturation and both innate and adaptive immune responses.83 Thus, the frontier of CDT in lung cancer has advanced beyond simple catalytic ROS production and evolved into systematic reshaping of tumor cell death modalities. This approach is no longer limited to passive oxidative damage; instead, it precisely regulates multiple programmed death pathways, synchronously optimizes the tumor microenvironment, and overcomes drug resistance. By moving from superficial killing to deep mechanistic intervention, it opens a new practical path toward efficient and precise anti-tumor treatment.

PDT: Dominant Paradigm of Photosensitive Targeting for Superficial Solid Tumors

Among the four major NDT modalities covered in this review, PDT is the oldest and most clinically established. ROS generation in PDT occurs mainly via two pathways: Type I reactions produce free radicals—such as superoxide (O2•⁻) and ·OH—through electron or hydrogen atom transfer from substrates; Type II reactions generate 1O2 through energy transfer from the triplet-state photosensitizer to ground-state molecular oxygen. As a low-risk, highly selective ablative therapy, PDT has been successfully integrated into modern multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment systems for lung cancer due to its advantages, including minimal invasiveness, limited tissue damage under non-ionizing radiation, no cross-resistance, and the ability to be repeated over short intervals.131 In clinical practice, PDT is particularly suitable for carcinoma in situ (CIS) and superficial T1-stage lesions with a diameter of ≤1 cm. By introducing a 630 nm laser fiber via bronchoscopy, the photosensitizer accumulated in tumor tissue is activated at an irradiation dose of 200–400 J/cm2 to generate ROS and induce tumor cell apoptosis or necrosis, while maximizing preservation of airway structure and lung function.132 Therefore, PDT is particularly suitable for early-stage lung cancer patients who cannot tolerate surgical resection due to advanced age, insufficient cardiopulmonary reserve, or comorbidities, as well as for palliative treatment of obstructive airway lesions caused by advanced central tumors.133 Meanwhile, several traditional photosensitizers have been approved globally for lung cancer diagnosis. However, photosensitizers used in clinical practice often have a single mechanism of action and fail to achieve significant therapeutic effects.134 Currently, the emergence of nanomaterials greatly enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PDT in lung cancer treatment (Table 2).

Table 2.

Approved Photosensitizer Commonly Used in Lung Cancer Treatment

PS Active Ingredients WV(nm) Major Characteristics Indications Ref.
Photofrin Porfimer sodium (HpD derivative, mixture of porphyrin oligomers) 630 Selective retention of tumors, significant skin phototoxicity (avoiding light for 4–6 weeks), low molar extinction coefficient (1170 M ⁻1 cm ⁻1) Advanced lung cancer, early lung cancer, esophageal cancer, bladder cancer, Barrett’s advanced esophageal neoplasia [135]
Laserphyrin Talaporfin Sodium (NPe6, Mono-L-Aspartic Acid Hypochlorin e6) 664 Chlorophyll aspartic acid conjugate has high water solubility, high singlet oxygen quantum yield, and excellent tumor selectivity. Normal tissue clearance is fast, skin phototoxicity is low, and the light avoidance period is short (about 2 weeks) Early central lung squamous cell carcinoma (approved by Japan PMDA in 2003), malignant brain tumors, recurrent esophageal cancer [136]
DHA@MIL-101 Dihydroartemisinin + Fe-MOF N/A (CDT) Acidic TME responds to degradation, Fe 2 ⁺ catalyzes Fenton reaction, DHA synergistically exhausts GSH, inhibits GPX4, ultimately leading to iron death and apoptosis NSCLC [122]
Curcumin NiMs Curcumin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles in microparticles 430–470 Inhalable Nano in Microparticles with FPF of 64.94% and MMAD of 3.02 μ m, compatible with pulmonary surfactant, LED activation for selective killing Lung cancer [137]
PPa-PLGA NPs Pyropheophorbide-a @ PVA/TPGS-PLGA nanoparticles 670 Dual emulsifier stability, hydrophobic PPa water-soluble conversion, photodynamic ablation of planktonic lung cancer cells with low light bleaching Lung cancer [90]

In lung cancer treatment, the anti-tumor effect of PDT is not limited to the direct cytotoxicity mediated by ROS generated after photosensitizer activation; rather, it operates through a multi-level mechanism. First, ROS can induce various cell death modes in lung cancer cells, including apoptosis, necrosis, and ferroptosis. Second, PDT can damage tumor-associated blood vessels, reduce tumor blood supply, and exacerbate local metabolic stress. Third, and most importantly, PDT-induced immunogenic cell death promotes tumor antigen release, dendritic cell maturation, and effector T cell infiltration, thereby helping to transform the immunosuppressive “cold” microenvironment of lung cancer into an immunostimulatory “hot” microenvironment (Figure 7).138

Figure 7.

Photodynamic therapy: tumor cell and vessel destruction, immune response activation.

Multilevel antitumor mechanisms of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in lung cancer. Upon light activation, photosensitizers generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly singlet oxygen, which exert direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells and induce multiple forms of cell death, including apoptosis, necrosis, and ferroptosis. PDT also damages tumor-associated vasculature, leading to vascular occlusion, reduced tumor perfusion, and enhanced local metabolic stress. In parallel, PDT-induced immunogenic cell death promotes tumor antigen release, inflammatory responses, dendritic cell maturation, and effector T-cell infiltration, thereby activating antitumor immunity and facilitating the conversion of an immunosuppressive “cold” tumor microenvironment into an immunostimulatory “hot” microenvironment. Adapted from Correia JH, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta S, Dong T, Yang Z. Photodynamic Therapy Review: Principles, Photosensitizers, Applications, and Future Directions. Pharmaceutics. Copyright © 2021 by Correia et al.139

PDT utilizes photoactivated photosensitizers (PS) to generate cytotoxic ROS, targeting supportive stromal cells within the TME that promote tumor growth. This modality not only reduces tumor burden but also shifts the TME toward a state that is detrimental to tumor progression. Mitochondria are among the core targets of ROS attack in PDT. As the main source of intracellular ROS and the central regulator of redox balance, mitochondria are highly sensitive to PDT-induced oxidative stress. In a study by Zheng et al, the novel photosensitizer DTPP-mediated PDT significantly increased ROS and NO levels, decreased GSH content and mitochondrial membrane potential in LA795 lung cancer cells, upregulated Bax and cytochrome c expression, inhibited Bcl-2 expression, and induced cascade activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3, ultimately triggering apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway.140 Similarly, the NO-releasing photosensitizer ZnPc-2NO reported by Xu et al has been shown to reduce cellular oxygen consumption, inhibit ATP production, and alter mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in A549 lung cancer cells. It retains the ability to generate ROS and induce cytotoxicity under hypoxic conditions.141 PDT can directly damage endothelial cells within the TME and subsequently interfere with the blood supply to cancer cells. This makes PDT a precise, minimally invasive, and synergistic anti-tumor strategy, particularly suitable for solid tumors with abundant blood supply. A study found that L-PD upregulates expression of the tumor endothelial cell adhesion molecule E-selectin by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby significantly enhancing intratumoral infiltration of CD3⁺CD8⁺ granzyme B⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in NSCLC and malignant pleural mesothelioma models, effectively inhibiting tumor progression.142 Guan et al reported that PDT-induced tumor vascular disruption promotes dendritic cell maturation, followed by secretion of interleukin-12 (IL-12) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), thereby activating T lymphocytes via upregulation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell differentiation clusters. In addition, downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 also reduced the tumor metastasis rate.143 The vascular disruptive effect of PDT has also been successfully applied to locally enhance chemotherapy drug delivery. Wang et al found that low-dose Visudyne-mediated PDT significantly enhances the uptake of liposomal doxorubicin in various lung tumor models, including pulmonary sarcoma, mesothelioma, and adenocarcinoma. The degree of enhancement correlates with the basal vascular density of the tumor but has no significant effect on normal lung tissue.144 When immune surveillance is impaired, tumor cells can continue to proliferate and form malignant tumors.145 What’s more, tumor cells can evade immune system barriers through various mechanisms, which is the primary reason for the low clinical efficacy of most anti-tumor treatments.146 PDT induces a strong acute inflammatory response at the tumor site due to photodamage to the tumor and its microenvironment.147 Subsequently, it stimulates the immune system and leads to infiltration of host innate immune cells, which clear damaged cells in the treatment area,147,148 reverse immune suppression, achieve local tumor control, and provide systemic inhibition for long-term anti-cancer metastasis prevention. Lan et al149 designed a new nanophotosensitizer, Fe-TBP, which exhibited a release efficiency of 90% under hypoxic conditions after 2 hours of irradiation. This metal–organic framework (MOF) effectively stimulates the ICD effect in tumors, thereby inducing cytotoxic T cell infiltration and generating anti-tumor immune responses.150,151 The NTR-activated photosensitizer NO2/BDP-BT developed by Chen et al using an “integrated” molecular design strategy combines tumor mitochondrial targeting, hypoxia-responsive fluorescence enhancement, and in situ generation of type I/II ROS. This photosensitizer achieved a tumor inhibition rate of 93.2% in a lung cancer mouse model and significantly enhanced the anti-tumor immune response through the synergistic effect of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and ICD.152 Wang et al reviewed nanocarrier‑based photodynamic therapy for lung cancer. Targeting ligand modification improves photosensitizer accumulation and reduces self‑quenching. Combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapeutics enhances antitumor efficacy and inhibits metastasis.153 Chriqui et al found that low‑dose PDT activates the NF‑κB pathway. It upregulates vascular E‑selectin and enhances cytotoxic T lymphocyte infiltration in NSCLC and mesothelioma. This effectively inhibits tumor progression.142

However, the clinical utility of traditional PDT is limited by several issues, including poor water solubility of photosensitizers, photobleaching, and skin phototoxicity. Additionally, the rapid attenuation and scattering of light within the lung parenchyma further restrict its applicability to deep-seated lesions. In addition, oxygen consumption and vascular damage during PDT may exacerbate tumor hypoxia, potentially shifting its effects from pro-apoptotic to anti-apoptotic.154,155 These challenges have positioned nanotechnology as a key driver in overcoming the limitations of PDT. The core design of nano-PDT platforms involves multiple strategies—including liposomes, polymer micelles, metal nanomaterials, and carbon-based nanocarriers—to systematically enhance photosensitizer solubility, tumor enrichment efficiency, and cellular uptake.156 Liposomes, owing to their phospholipid bilayer structure, can effectively encapsulate hydrophobic photosensitizers, protecting them from physiological degradation while achieving passive tumor targeting via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.157 Chen et al constructed a hybrid biomimetic nanoparticle, HLP@SiTGF-β1, which uses a ZIF-8 core to load TGF-β1-targeted siRNA. The outer layer is encapsulated with a hybrid membrane formed by fusing liposomes with the Lewis lung cancer cell membrane. Through homologous targeting, this nanoparticle achieves effective dual inhibition of both primary lung cancer lesions and brain metastases.158 A key advantage of liposomes is their compatibility with nebulized inhalation for non-invasive pulmonary delivery. A study encapsulated two near-infrared photosensitizers—indocyanine green (ICG) and DiR—in liposomes based on archaeal tetraether lipids (TEL). After nebulization and delivery to A549 cells, the IC50 of DiR-loaded liposomes under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation was only 9.65 µg/mL, and the liposomes maintained excellent colloidal stability both before and after nebulization.159 Polymeric nanoparticles can achieve intelligent controlled release of photosensitizers.157 Zeng et al designed a 660 nm-excited polylactic acid (PLA)-based nanoparticle photosensitizer carrier for the co-delivery of osimertinib and hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME). This polymeric system achieved synergistic enhancement of PDT and EGFR-targeted therapy in a subcutaneous tumor model of HCC827 non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation.91 Meanwhile, Pramual et al used PVA and TPGS as dual emulsifiers to stabilize PLGA nanoparticles and encapsulate pyropheophorbide-a (PPa), thereby transforming the water solubility challenge of PPa into a delivery advantage.90 Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have become another research focus in lung cancer PDT owing to their unique surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect, favorable biocompatibility, and customizable surface chemistry. AuNPs can compensate for the poor water solubility of traditional photosensitizers by improving their dispersion stability in hydrophobic environments, while their SPR effect enhances local light absorption efficiency and amplifies ROS production. A laboratory study by Crous and Abrahamse combined PDT with AuNPs for the targeted ablation of lung cancer stem cells (CSCs). The results showed that AuNPs-mediated nano-PDT induced specific cell death in A549 lung cancer stem cells, while significantly reducing stem cell migration and proliferation activity, but had minimal effect on normal lung cells.160

In the context of lung cancer PDT, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) not only efficiently load photosensitizers via π–π stacking or hydrophobic interactions—thereby overcoming the delivery bottlenecks of traditional photosensitizers, such as poor water solubility and self-quenching—but also promote nanocomposite penetration through cell membranes to achieve efficient intracellular delivery.161 Compared with CNTs, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) represent another important class of carbon-based nanomaterials, known for their smaller size, tunable photoluminescence properties, and low cytotoxicity. For example, Zhou et al set up a multimodal synergistic therapy nanoplatform based on graphene oxide (GO), designated GO-CisPt-Ce6@MnO2. Its core function is to address tumor hypoxia and redox imbalance while simultaneously enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy and PDT. Carboxylated GO nanosheets serve as multifunctional carriers for loading cisplatin (CisPt) and the photosensitizer Ce6, followed by in-situ growth of MnO2. Within the tumor microenvironment, MnO2 decomposes endogenous H2O2 to generate O2, alleviates tumor hypoxia, improves oxygen-dependent PDT efficacy, and depletes intracellular GSH to amplify oxidative stress. After irradiation, Ce6-mediated PDT generates cytotoxic ROS—including 1O2 and ·OH—while the released CisPt exerts chemotherapeutic effects, thereby achieving enhanced synergistic anti-tumor therapy. To overcome monotherapy resistance, PDT is often combined with other modalities, including photothermal therapy (PTT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. These combinations leverage complementary mechanisms to enhance efficacy and reduce toxicity and side effects at low doses. Apart from that, these combinations integrate active targeting, stimulus-responsive drug release, and multimodal combination therapy. This review summarizes the nanodesigns that have been incorporated into lung cancer PDT strategies (Table 3).

Table 3.

Summary of Nanomaterial Designs That Have Been Incorporated Into Multimodal Lung Cancer PDT Strategies

Nanoparticles Targeting Ligand Responsive Mechanisms Combination Therapy Tumor Cells Ref.
TBPPN (GSH responsive AIE photosensitizer) — (passive EPR) GSH responsive dinitrobenzene cleavage, aggregation induced luminescence (AIE) activation PDT+GSH depletion NSCLC [162]
MnO2@Ce6-MSCs Mesenchymal stem cell membrane MnO 2 catalyzes H 2 O 2 to produce O 2 and alleviates hypoxia; 633 nm laser activated Ce6 PDT+hypoxia relief LLC lung cancer cells [163]
GNPs@PEG/Ce6-PD-L1 peptide PD-L1 660 nm laser activated Ce6, surface plasmon enhanced PTT of GNPs PDT+PTT+immune checkpoint targeting NSCLC [164]
IPC nanodrugs (Ce6-Iridium-PVP) — (Passive EPR, self-assembly) 630 nm laser activated Ce6, iridium ion catalyzed depletion of GSH, simulating catalase production of O 2 PDT+hypoxia relief+immune regulation Lung cancer [89]
ROS-responsive biomimetic nano-platform — (Biomimetic nano platform) ROS responsive drug release, photothermal enhanced PDT, and immune regulation PDT+PTT+Immunotherapy Lung cancer [165]
Gefitinib-PLGA NPs + 5-ALA — (Local deposition in the lungs) 630 nm laser activation of 5-ALA metabolite PpIX, synergistic with gefitinib chemotherapy PDT+chemotherapy (CPDT)+anti angiogenesis Lung cancer [166]

Besides, at the level of active targeting, ligand coupling strategies targeting receptors that are highly expressed in lung cancer have demonstrated significant advantages. The EGFR is frequently overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma. Coupling of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies or nanobodies with nanoparticles enables precise delivery of photosensitizers to EGFR-positive tumor cells.156 Hyaluronic acid (HA) serves as a natural ligand for CD44 receptors, and HA-modified nanocarriers enhance tumor cell uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Researchers have constructed a UiO-SNO@CuS/HA nanocomposite, in which HA confers CD44 targeting ability, CuS generates a photothermal effect under 1064 nm laser irradiation and simultaneously triggers the release of NO and the dissolution of Cu2⁺. The generated Cu⁺ then generates ·OH via a Fenton-like reaction, achieving triple synergistic therapy combining photothermal, gas, and chemodynamic effects.167 Furthermore, the HA targeting strategy has also been extended to combined chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy. Wang et al developed a GEM@HA-(HAP/PSI) nanoplatform, which uses a hydroxyapatite/poly(succinimide) core for drug loading and is surface-coupled with HA to achieve CD44 targeting. In an A549 xenograft model, this platform demonstrated significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved safety compared with free gemcitabine.168 From simple cellular uptake enhancement to multimodal therapy synergy and immune microenvironment remodeling, active targeting is driving the functional evolution of PDT from “precise killing” toward “precise regulation”, thereby providing key technical support for overcoming drug resistance and immune evasion in lung cancer treatment.

RDT: Key Pathway for Enhancing Radiotherapy Efficacy in Deep-Seated Tumors

Lung cancer is one of the solid tumors most frequently treated with radiation therapy worldwide. From curative to palliative settings, and from early to advanced stages, lung cancer treatment heavily relies on radiotherapy, which provides a natural foundation for the integration and clinical translation of RDT.169–171 For locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with immune consolidation therapy has become the current standard treatment paradigm.169,170 For patients with oligometastasis or oligoprogression, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to significantly prolong progression-free survival and reshape systemic treatment paradigms.172 The extensive reliance on radiotherapy throughout the entire disease course means that RDT can be directly integrated into existing frameworks. These include SBRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. No independent energy delivery system is needed. Using widely available X-ray or gamma ray-activated nanoplatforms, ROS can be generated, which naturally meets the anatomical treatment requirements of deep lung cancer lesions.173 In recent years, various nanosystems have successfully validated this concept in lung cancer models. For example, Cai et al reported two-dimensional metal–organic framework nanosheets (Hf-TCP NSs) based on hafnium porphyrin. Their high-Z Hf6 clusters efficiently generate 1O2 by transferring energy to porphyrin ligands under X-ray irradiation. These nanosheets exhibited strong radiodynamic killing effects in both subcutaneous and orthotopic models of NSCLC, reducing tumor volume by over 80%.174 Meanwhile, Zhong et al constructed monodisperse NaCeF4:Gd,Tb nanoscintillators loaded with the photosensitizer Ce6. These scintillators convert X-rays into visible light to activate Ce6, achieving ROS burst and growth inhibition in deep lung cancer lesions.175 RDT operates on a distinct mechanism compared with conventional nanoradiosensitization. Typical high-Z nanosensitizers like nanoparticles based on gold, hafnium and gadolinium boost local physical dose deposition mainly via the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering and Auger electron emission. The core principle behind this approach lies in amplifying energy deposition.176,177 RDT functions by amplifying reactive oxygen species on nanoplatforms under radiation exposure. This approach produces large quantities of ROS using radiation-activated photosensitizers or nanomaterials and belongs to the category of chemical sensitization.87,173 There is an overlap between the two mechanisms in terms of energy conversion: high-Z elements can both physically enhance radiosensitivity and act as catalysts to participate in ROS generation. Nonetheless, the starting points and biological endpoints of the two mechanisms differ. The former focuses on the advantages of physical dosimetry and enhancement of direct DNA damage, while the latter emphasizes active activation of oxidative stress pathways and chemical regulation of cell death modalities.173,176 Therefore, classifying RDT merely as an advanced form of radiosensitization will obscure the distinctions between physical and chemical sensitization and may also lead to inappropriate positioning for its clinical application. At present, research on nanoradiosensitization for lung cancer has become relatively mature, laying a solid preclinical and early clinical foundation for the combined application of RDT. Numerous studies have confirmed that high-Z nanoparticles achieve radiosensitization by amplifying oxidative stress, enhancing DNA double-strand breaks, and activating immune responses. For example, Chen et al used the human serum albumin-manganese dioxide nanoplatform (HSA-MnO2) to catalyze the production of O2 from H2O2 in tumors, thereby overcoming hypoxia. Simultaneously, the released Mn2⁺ was converted into ·OH via a radiation-mediated Fenton-like reaction, thereby amplifying the oxidative damage cascade. The radiotherapy efficacy in NSCLC tumor-bearing mice was improved nearly threefold.178 Another research team constructed albumin-modified gold nanoparticles (Alb-GNPs) to enhance lung cancer radiotherapy. These nanoparticles utilize the high atomic number properties of gold to enhance local energy deposition from X-rays, while albumin modification improves their biocompatibility, stability, and tumor enrichment ability. This platform showed significant radiosensitizing effects in the A549 non-small cell lung cancer model. This study suggests that high-Z gold nanomaterials modified with albumin can serve as a low toxicity platform for lung cancer RDT and radiosensitization. The cascade involving tumor enrichment, radiation energy deposition and amplified DNA damage enables precise radiotherapy enhancement for deep-seated lung cancer lesions (Figure 8).88 Gold nanoparticles carrying SP1 small interfering RNA (AuNPs-si-SP1) increase the sensitization enhancement ratio (SER) of A549 cells to 2.13 by downregulating SP1 expression, upregulating granzyme B (GZMB), and inducing G2/M phase arrest, thereby achieving a synergistic effect of gene silencing and physical sensitization.179 Furthermore, recent studies have confirmed that silver nanoparticles induce ROS bursts, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inhibition of DNA damage repair in A549 and cisplatin-resistant A549/DDP cells, thereby overcoming chemotherapy resistance and enhancing radiosensitivity.180 The study of gadolinium-based nanoparticles (AGuIX) provides another important dimension for lung cancer radiosensitization. Du et al confirmed that AGuIX significantly exacerbates radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and inhibits DNA damage repair in H1299 NSCLC cells by emitting low-energy photoelectrons and interacting with Auger electrons, thereby effectively inhibiting tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model.181 Bismuth-based nanoparticles (BiNPs), owing to their extremely high X-ray absorption coefficient (atomic number Z = 83), emit a cascade of photoelectrons, Auger electrons, and Compton electrons upon irradiation. Through water radiolysis, abundant ·OH are generated, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and irreversible oxidative damage, including DNA double-strand breaks.182 In terms of immune regulation, the cRGD peptide-targeted AGuIX-Bi nanoparticles (AGuIX-Bi-cRGD) constructed by the Lux/Reinforcement team not only achieve physical sensitization by enhancing DNA double-strand breaks in Lewis lung cancer models but also induce overexpression of the immunogenic cell death marker HMGB1 and significantly increase the density of tumor-infiltrating CD3⁺CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells.172 In the interdisciplinary field combining RDT and CDT, pH-sensitive superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoclusters (SPIONCs) constructed by Li et al dissociate and release Fe2⁺ in the acidic tumor microenvironment following local pulmonary delivery. Following a single X-ray irradiation, mitochondrial superoxide anions are converted into H2O2 by superoxide dismutase, which then generates highly toxic ·OH via the Fenton reaction, ultimately driving lipid peroxidation and synchronously inducing apoptosis and ferroptosis. This strategy cleverly integrates the triple mechanisms of RDT, CDT, and ferroptosis into a single nanoplatform, not only breaking through the efficacy bottleneck of monotherapy but also highlighting the unique advantages of local delivery in reducing pulmonary systemic toxicity.86 Clark et al, in a preclinical study, confirmed that RDT combined with 5-ALA significantly delayed metastatic progression and improved survival outcomes in a small-cell lung cancer metastasis model; both low-dose (0.1 Gy) and high-dose (2 Gy) RDT groups showed superior survival benefits over conventional radiotherapy (p < 0.004), suggesting that RDT holds promise as a systemic therapeutic strategy for metastatic lung cancer.183 Therefore, RDT for lung cancer is most appropriately defined as radiotherapy combined with nanodynamic therapy. This approach applies nanodynamic techniques to intensify radiation-triggered oxidative stress, DNA damage and immunogenic cell death. We should not regard it as a fully developed treatment that can independently address the challenges posed by deep-seated lesions. Integrating RDT into current SBRT and chemoradiotherapy regimens and remodeling the tumor microenvironment via physical sensitization alongside chemical ROS amplification can drive lung cancer radiotherapy forward. This evolution moves the treatment focus beyond local dose escalation toward systematic reprogramming of cell death pathways and immune modulation.

Figure 8.

Diagram of albumin-modified gold nanoparticles synthesis and radiosensitization mechanism in cancer treatment. The diagram illustrates the synthesis and mechanism of albumin-modified gold nanoparticles (Alb-GNPs) for cancer treatment. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are synthesized using the Turkevich method with HAuCl subscript 4 and sodium citrate. These GNPs are then coated with human serum albumin (HSA) through desolvation to form Alb-GNPs. The lower section shows Alb-GNPs injected intravenously into a mouse, targeting cancer cells. Under X-ray irradiation, Alb-GNPs enhance local energy deposition, releasing secondary electrons (e superscript -), which interact with DNA, causing gamma-H subscript 2 AX-related damage. This process increases radiosensitization, making cancer cells more sensitive to radiotherapy. The diagram highlights the interaction between Alb-GNPs and SPARC, facilitating uptake by cancer cells and the distinction between cancer and normal cells.

Albumin-modified gold nanoparticles enhance radiotherapy-induced oxidative DNA damage in lung cancer. This figure illustrates the preparation process of albumin-modified gold nanoparticles (Alb-GNPs) and their radiosensitization mechanism. First, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) were synthesized using the Turkevich method, with HAuCl4 as the gold source and sodium citrate as the reducing agent. Subsequently, Alb-GNPs were formed by coating the GNPs with human serum albumin (HSA). After intravenous injection, Alb-GNPs become enriched in lung cancer tissues and promote tumor cell uptake through SPARC-mediated interactions. Under X-ray irradiation, gold nanoparticles enhance local energy deposition and release secondary electrons, thereby amplifying ROS generation and γH2AX-related DNA damage. This increases the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to radiotherapy and inhibits tumor growth. Adapted from Chen Y, Liu S, Liao Y, et al Albumin-Modified Gold Nanoparticles as Novel Radiosensitizers for Enhancing Lung Cancer Radiotherapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023;18:1949–1964. Copyright © 2023 by Chen et al183.

Nanodynamics Synergistic Precise Combination Therapy for Lung Cancer

Although NDT alone can induce tumor cell death, the high heterogeneity, complex TME, and multidrug resistance mechanisms of lung cancer often limit its therapeutic efficacy. In recent years, combination strategies based on molecular typing and anatomical features have become a key approach to overcoming these bottlenecks. On one hand, ROS generated by NDT can reshape tumor redox homeostasis and overcome drug resistance synergistically with targeted agents. On the other hand, NDT-induced ICD can provide a “hot start” signal for immunotherapy. More importantly, as the lungs are directly connected to the respiratory tract, the unique anatomical structure of lung cancer provides unparalleled pharmacokinetic advantages for inhalation and local pulmonary delivery compared with other solid tumors. This enables spatial and temporal coupling of NDT with exogenous activation (eg, ultrasound, X-rays) or endogenous catalysis (eg, Fenton reactions triggered by the acidic microenvironment). This review summarizes NDT combination therapy systems constructed around three dimensions: EGFR molecular typing, anti-angiogenic pathways, and local pulmonary delivery. This framework not only aligns with the biological essence of lung cancer but also represents a necessary pathway to advance NDT from “proof of concept” to “clinical translation”. We have summarized several combination therapies (Table 4).

Table 4.

Nanodynamic Therapy-Based Precision Combination Strategies for Lung Cancer

Combination Strategy Representative Nanoplatform NDT Modality Lung Cancer Model/Indication Precision or Synergistic Component Main Therapeutic Mechanism Relevance to Precision Lung Cancer Therapy Ref.
NDT + EGFR-TKI Ce6–erlotinib carrier-free nanoparticles (Ce6-Erl NPs/EC-NPs) SDT + targeted therapy NSCLC Erlotinib-mediated EGFR inhibition Ultrasound activates Ce6 to generate ROS/1O2, while erlotinib suppresses EGFR/PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling, jointly inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. Provides a dual “signal blockade + oxidative killing” strategy for EGFR-driven NSCLC. [78]
NDT + EGFR-TKI resistance reversal cRGD-targeted gold-based nanoparticles Low-temperature PTT + SDT EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cRGD targeting and photothermal sensitization Gold-based nanoparticles enhance mild hyperthermia and SDT-induced ROS, helping bypass adaptive resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Directly addresses acquired EGFR-TKI resistance, a major clinical barrier in advanced NSCLC. [81]
NDT + osimertinib-based precision therapy Osimertinib–copper–ICG self-assembled nanomedicine Chemo-photo-CDT + cuproptosis NSCLC Osimertinib targeting EGFR-mutant tumor cells Osimertinib blocks EGFR signaling, copper catalyzes Fenton-like ROS production and promotes cuproptosis, while ICG enables photoactivation. Integrates molecular targeting, metal-ion catalysis, photoactivation, and cuproptosis for EGFR-mutant or TKI-resistant NSCLC. [85]
NDT + anti-angiogenic therapy Biomimetic anlotinib-loaded FePc-silicate nanoparticles SDT + anti-angiogenesis + immunotherapy NSCLC Anlotinib-mediated VEGFR2/JAK2/STAT3 inhibition FePc-silicate produces ROS under ultrasound; anlotinib inhibits angiogenic signaling and downregulates intracellular PD-L1, enhancing CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration. Combines vascular normalization/anti-angiogenesis, SDT, and immune activation in NSCLC. [80]
NDT + chemotherapy Cationic liposomal hydroxycamptothecin + 5-ALA Chemo-SDT Metastatic lung cancer Pulmonary delivery of chemotherapeutic drug and endogenous sonosensitizer precursor 5-ALA is metabolized into PpIX, which generates ROS under ultrasound; hydroxycamptothecin provides chemotherapy-induced DNA damage. Demonstrates local lung delivery of chemo-SDT for metastatic lung cancer with reduced systemic exposure. [82]
Inhaled NDT + chemo-sonodynamic therapy Size-transformable pulmonary nanoparticles SDT + chemotherapy Lung cancer Size transformation for tumor accumulation and deep penetration Larger nanoparticles improve lung retention; after tumor deposition, smaller inner particles penetrate deeper and release chemotherapeutic drug plus sonosensitizer for ultrasound-triggered ROS generation. Represents a “large-size delivery–small-size penetration–external activation”paradigm for lung-localized NDT. [184]
NDT + radiation therapy Pulmonary theranostic nanoclusters CDT + radiation-enhanced ferroptosis Lung cancer Pulmonary delivery and imaging-guided treatment Acidic TME triggers iron release and Fenton reaction; radiation increases H2O2/ROS production, jointly inducing ferroptosis and tumor suppression. Combines local lung delivery, diagnostic guidance, CDT, radiotherapy, and ferroptosis. [86]
NDT + radiotherapy sensitization Albumin-modified gold nanoparticles Radiodynamic/radiosensitization therapy Lung cancer Albumin modification for improved biocompatibility and tumor interaction Gold nanoparticles enhance local radiation energy deposition and ROS-mediated DNA damage, thereby improving radiotherapy efficacy. Uses clinically established radiotherapy as an external trigger to amplify nanodynamic oxidative damage. [88]
NDT + chemotherapy + radiotherapy Doxorubicin-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles + 5-ALA RDT/radiotherapy sensitization + chemotherapy Lung cancer Polymeric delivery of doxorubicin and 5-ALA 5-ALA-mediated porphyrin accumulation enhances radiation-induced ROS production, while doxorubicin contributes chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity. Provides a multimodal chemo-radiodynamic strategy for lung cancer. [87]
NDT + ferroptosis Dihydroartemisinin-assisted Ce6 system PDT + ferroptosis Lung cancer DHA-mediated GPX4 inhibition DHA inhibits GPX4 and increases lipid peroxidation, thereby sensitizing lung cancer cells to Ce6-mediated PDT. Links PDT-induced ROS generation with ferroptosis-based death-pathway reprogramming. [92]
Inhaled NDT + ferroptosis Nebulized iron-based nanoparticles Iron-based CDT/ferroptosis Early orthotopic lung cancer Nebulized local delivery and macrophage-regulated ferroptosis Iron-based nanoparticles promote ferroptosis of cancer stem-like cells and remodel the immune microenvironment in orthotopic lung cancer. Highlights inhaled ferroptosis-inducing nanomedicine for early lung-localized lesions. [185]
NDT + NRF2 modulation + ferroptosis NRF2 nano-modulator Ferroptosis-associated nanotherapy Lung cancer NRF2 redox pathway modulation NRF2 inhibition weakens antioxidant defense, promotes ferroptosis, and induces an immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment. Targets the oxidative stress defense axis, especially relevant to redox-adapted or therapy-resistant lung cancer. [186]
NDT + cuproptosis + immunotherapy CLDCu inhalable nanoparticles CDT + cuproptosis + cGAS–STING activation Lung metastasis Acid-responsive inhalable Cu2⁺/disulfiram release Acidic TME triggers Cu2⁺ and disulfiram release to form CuET; copper accumulation induces cuproptosis and activates cGAS–STING-mediated antitumor immunity. Strongly supports lung-localized precision therapy integrating metal-ion death and innate immune activation. [83]
NDT + photoimmunotherapy Biodegradable iridium-coordinated nanodrugs PDT + immunotherapy Lung cancer Iridium coordination and immune activation Iridium-coordinated nanodrugs potentiate PDT-induced ROS generation and immunogenic cell death, thereby enhancing antitumor immune responses. Connects PDT-mediated oxidative killing with immune remodeling in lung cancer. [89]

Combining NDT with EGFR-TKIs: Precise Combination Therapy for Molecular Typing of Lung Cancer

EGFR mutation is one of the most clinically significant molecular subtypes in NSCLC. Although EGFR-TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) have become the standard first-line treatment for this patient population, acquired resistance and local progression have remained persistent bottlenecks restricting long-term survival.187 Among resistance mechanisms to third-generation TKIs such as osimertinib, the C797S tertiary mutation is a prominent on-target alteration, occurring in 10–26% of first-line and up to 30–40% of second-line progressive patients, for which no effective targeted therapy is yet available. Notably, the resistance mechanisms of EGFR-TKIs are often closely related to the remodeling of redox homeostasis. Drug-resistant cells construct a powerful antioxidant defense barrier by upregulating NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity and glutathione synthesis. Disrupting this barrier provides a precise natural interface for NDT.188 In this context, the NRF2‑KEAP1 axis serves as the central hub of this antioxidant defense. Under TKI pressure, NRF2 upregulates heme oxygenase-1 (HO‑1), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), and SLC7A11 to expand the glutathione pool. NDT‑generated ROS dismantle this network through three interconnected pathways. First, ROS cause oxidative modification of KEAP1 cysteine residues, which impairs NRF2 ubiquitination. Second, ROS downregulate SLC7A11 via the ATF4/CHOP axis, leading to cysteine and GSH depletion. Third, ROS directly inactivate GPX4 through lipid peroxidation‑mediated covalent modification. Collectively, these actions remove the terminal antioxidant checkpoint and resensitize resistant cells, including those with the C797S mutation, to TKI‑induced apoptosis. Therefore, the ROS burst generated by NDT bypasses the compensatory activation of downstream EGFR signaling pathways, directly damages mitochondrial DNA, and induces lipid peroxidation, thereby integrating the “signal blockade” of TKIs with the “oxidative killing” of NDT. Meanwhile, TKI agents such as erlotinib themselves reduce cellular antioxidant capacity by inhibiting the EGFR/PI3K/AKT pathway, thereby creating a synergistic amplification effect of “sensitization-killing”.188

In recent years, several representative studies have deeply integrated NDT with EGFR-targeting strategies. Tian et al reported a carrier-free nanoparticle (Ce6-Erl NPs) based on Ce6 and erlotinib, which achieved synergistic inhibition of SDT and the EGFR signaling pathway upon ultrasound activation. This nanoparticle utilizes Ce6 as a sonosensitizer to generate 1O2 under ultrasound irradiation, while erlotinib continuously blocks the downstream PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways of EGFR, thereby synergistically inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. This research establishes a dual-mechanism model combining targeted inhibition and oxidative killing for the precise combination treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It also demonstrates that carrier-free approaches offer notable strengths in streamlining preparation procedures and elevating drug loading capacity.78 Additionally, Fu et al synthesized the cationic polymer PβAE to compress DNA plasmids into a stable core, and then prepared osimertinib (OST)-loaded liposomes via the thin-film dispersion method. This core was then loaded into the aqueous cavity of the liposomes, and finally, a stem cell membrane highly expressing pulmonary surfactant protein B (SP-B) was fused onto the liposome surface. After inhalation in mice, SP-B helps the MPDOLs penetrate lung tissue and become internalized by tumor cells, releasing OST and DNA plasmids upon cellular entry. OST directly inhibits the EGFR signaling pathway to prevent tumor growth, while the DNA plasmids stimulate tumor cells to self-assemble and secrete extracellular vesicles that express RVG protein and carry IGF2BP3 siRNA, simultaneously inhibiting IGF2BP3 expression and thereby enabling targeted treatment of brain metastases. While this research centers on gene therapy instead of nanodynamic therapy, its design combining inhalation delivery and EGFR targeting offers valuable insights for the spatiotemporal integration of NDT and TKIs (Figure 9).189

Figure 9.

MPDOLs target lung/brain cancer via nebulization, deposition, EGFR inhibition and brain targeting. The schematic illustrates the therapeutic application of MPDOLs against lung and brain cancer. It shows a nebulization process where MPDOLs are inhaled by a mouse, targeting orthotopic lung cancer and metastatic brain cancer. The inset details deposition and penetration in the lung, with MPDOLs spreading through pulmonary surfactant in the alveolus, reaching tumor cells and blood vessels. The process of endocytosis is depicted, where MPDOLs release osimertinib and DNA plasmids inside the cell, inhibiting the EGFR signaling pathway and suppressing IGF2BP3 expression. The diagram also shows brain targeting with RVG-EXO(si) and CD63-RVG, indicating transcription and translation processes for further targeting of brain metastases.

Schematic illustration depicting the therapeutic application of MPDOLs against primary pulmonary lesions and cerebral metastases in NSCLC. Following nebulization, MPDOLs achieved effective tumor deposition and deep tissue penetration facilitated by SP-B. Upon intracellular uptake, the nanocarriers discharged osimertinib and DNA plasmids into the cytoplasm, wherein the former exerted targeted inhibition of the EGFR signaling cascade, while the latter suppressed IGF2BP3 expression and initiated the self-assembly and secretion of RVG-EXOs(si) for subsequent brain metastasis targeting. Adapted from Fu X, Shi Y, Wu H, et al Inhalable liposomal delivery of osimertinib and DNA for treating primary and metastasis lung cancer. Copyright© 2025 by Fu et al196.

The cRGD-targeted gold-based nanoparticles combined with low-temperature photothermal therapy and sonodynamic therapy reported by Lv et al, although focusing on overcoming EGFR-TKI resistance rather than directly combining TKIs, also confirms the key value of oxidative stress intervention in reversing TKI resistance by blocking the TGF-β/PDLIM5/SMAD resistance pathway and inducing mitochondrial apoptosis.81 The chondroitin sulfate-based nanoparticles co-loaded with curcumin and cinnamaldehyde designed by Lee et al exhibit strong resistance reversal ability in NSCLC models resistant to paclitaxel and cisplatin by increasing intracellular ROS and depleting GSH, ultimately inhibiting GPX4 and inducing ferroptosis.190 This study suggests that the combination of NDT-induced ROS burst and GSH depletion can effectively break down the antioxidant defense line of drug-resistant cells, thereby providing a transferable nanoplatform strategy for overcoming EGFR-TKI resistance. The self-assembling nanoplatform of osimertinib, copper ions, and indocyanine green (OIC NPs) reported in 2025 further expands the combined therapeutic dimension. This system integrates near-infrared light-activated photodynamic therapy, copper ion-mediated chemodynamic therapy, and osimertinib chemotherapy, achieving a tumor inhibition rate of 99.8% in NSCLC models by depleting GSH, amplifying oxidative stress, and inducing cuproptosis.85 Collectively, these studies indicate that the combination of NDT and EGFR-TKIs has progressed from concept validation to mechanistic deepening. TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC is essentially an adaptive remodeling of redox homeostasis, and NDT represents a precise strategy to disrupt this homeostasis.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy Combined with NDT: Reshaping the Tumor Vascular Microenvironment to Enhance Lung Cancer Nanodynamic Therapy

Anti-angiogenic therapy has a solid clinical foundation in the comprehensive management of NSCLC. From the established role of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC to the widespread use of ramucirumab in multi-line therapy, anti-angiogenic drugs have become an indispensable component of systemic lung cancer treatment. They inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) signaling pathway to block tumor angiogenesis and promote vascular normalization.191 Of particular importance is the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib, independently developed in China, which has demonstrated clear anti-tumor activity in clinical practice by simultaneously blocking angiogenesis-related receptors such as VEGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). The ALTER0303 randomized Phase III clinical trial confirmed that anlotinib, as a third-line or later treatment, significantly prolongs median overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. It has been approved for use in patients with advanced NSCLC who have previously received two lines of systemic chemotherapy.192 Further studies have shown that anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors produces significant synergistic effects in advanced NSCLC, achieving a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 25.4 months, and reverses the immunosuppressive microenvironment by downregulating PD-L1 expression in vascular endothelial cells.192 This clinical evidence indicates that anti-angiogenic therapy not only directly inhibits tumor blood supply but also reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment. However, anti-angiogenic therapy alone often faces the dilemma of compensatory pathway activation and drug resistance. The ROS generated by NDT can overcome this bottleneck. For example, Liu et al constructed a biomimetic nanodrug (APSNM) loaded with iron phthalocyanine silicate (FePc silicate) and anlotinib, and modified the macrophage membrane with a PD-L1 antibody. This nanoplatform achieves a triple therapeutic effect in orthotopic lung cancer models. Anlotinib inhibits the VEGFR2/JAK2/STAT3 pathway to reduce intracellular PD-L1 expression. Membrane-bound antibodies block extracellular PD-L1 signaling. Ultrasound-activated FePc silicate produces reactive oxygen species and strengthens antitumor immunity.80 In addition, Guo et al constructed an SPIO@SiO2-ANB nanoplatform that combines superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs) with a silica shell, loads anlotinib on the surface, and precisely releases the drug in the acidic tumor microenvironment via a pH-responsive release mechanism. This nanoplatform not only inhibits angiogenesis via anlotinib but also utilizes the Fenton reaction activity of iron-based materials to induce ferroptosis in tumor cells and amplify oxidative stress levels. The results demonstrated superior cytotoxicity compared with free anlotinib in A549 and H460 NSCLC cells, while also significantly inhibiting tumor growth and promoting apoptosis in an in vivo xenograft model (Figure 10).193 The combination of NDT and anti-angiogenic treatment carries greater significance. It highlights how remodeling the tumor microenvironment acts as a key factor in combined therapeutic regimens. In the future, with advances in dynamic monitoring technology and the continued iteration of multimodal nanoplatforms, this combination strategy is expected to evolve from a synergistic approach into a new paradigm for systemic treatment of advanced NSCLC. Still, current research in this area remains extremely limited, and further studies are urgently needed.

Figure 10.

Three-part diagram of SPIO@SiO subscript 2-ANB nanoplatform preparation and effects on tumor growth and cell death. A three-part diagram illustrates the preparation and effects of the SPIO@SiO subscript 2-ANB nanoplatform. A shows the preparation process: FeCl subscript 3 6H subscript 2O with Na-citrate and NaAC at 200 degrees Celsius for 8 hours forms SPIO, followed by magnetic separation. SPIO suspension undergoes TEOS stirring with NH subscript 3 H subscript 2O, forming SPIO@SiO subscript 2, which is combined with ANB at 50 rpm for 16 hours to create SPIO@SiO subscript 2-ANB. B depicts inhibition of tumor growth, showing a mouse with injected nanoplatforms affecting tumor vasculature. C illustrates induction of tumor cell death, highlighting SPIO@SiO subscript 2-ANB′s role in generating ROS, downregulating GPX4, upregulating COX and xCT and inducing ferroptosis in non-small cells, leading to tumor cell death.

The SPIO@SiO2-ANB nanoplatform for synergistic anti-angiogenic and ferroptosis therapy in NSCLC. (A) Preparation process of the SPIO@SiO2-ANB nanoplatform: SPIOs were synthesized using FeCl3·6H2O as a precursor, modified with a SiO2 shell, and loaded with anlotinib to form pH-responsive nanoplatforms. (B) SPIO@SiO2-ANB accumulates at the tumor site in vivo and inhibits NSCLC tumor growth. (C) In the acidic tumor microenvironment, the platform releases anlotinib to inhibit angiogenesis, while SPIOs mediate the Fenton reaction to amplify ROS generation, downregulate GPX4, upregulate COX and xCT, induce ferroptosis, and promote lung cancer cell death. Adapted from Guo M, Xue L, Li J, Zhu M, Long H, Peng J. Heterogeneous inorganic nanomedicine delivery system loaded with anlotinib for enhanced treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. Copyright © 2026 by Guo et al.193

Inhalation and Local Pulmonary Delivery Strategies for NDT in Lung Cancer

Because the lungs are directly connected to the external environment, their unique anatomical features provide unparalleled advantages for local nanomedicine delivery (Table 5). Inhalation atomization allows nanoparticles to bypass hepatic filtration and deposit directly in the bronchial epithelium and alveolar regions, thereby reducing systemic toxicity while increasing local tumor exposure.193 The integration of local delivery and exogenous activation makes lung cancer a highly suitable candidate for combination therapy based on nanodynamic treatment. Preclinical and early clinical evidence has robustly confirmed the feasibility of this approach. Phase I clinical trials of aerosolized liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) showed that inhalation administration increases lung drug concentrations to 4–10 times plasma levels, with controllable systemic toxicity and observable initial tumor responses.194 The phase I trial of nebulized IL-2 liposomes further confirmed that inhalation delivery can be safely implemented in outpatient settings, significantly stimulating local pulmonary immune function without notable systemic toxicity. These early clinical investigations have laid a solid foundation for the inhalation delivery of NDT nanoplatforms.194

Table 5.

Applications of Inhalable NDT Nanoformulations for Lung Cancer

Inhalation Formulation NDT/Therapeutic Mechanism Lung Cancer Model Key Feature and Translational Relevance Ref.
Spray-dried inhalable Nano-in-Microparticles PDT; LED-activated ROS generation A549 cells Respirable formulation; FPF 64.9%, MMAD 3.02 μm; early proof of inhalable PDT formulation [195]
Nebulizable DHA/CaP liposomes ROS amplification and ferroptosis; Ca2⁺-burst/ER-stress reinforcement Orthotopic lung tumor mice ~6.8-fold higher drug accumulation in lung lesions than i.v.; couples pulmonary deposition with ferroptosis amplification [196]
Nebulized nanocatalytic formulation Iron-mediated nanocatalysis/ferroptosis Early orthotopic lung cancer TAM-mediated targeting of cancer stem-cell niches; particularly relevant to early pulmonary microlesions [185]
Inhalable OPDEA-coated Cu-MOF Cuproptosis + ICD + anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy Lung metastasis model Mucus penetration and prolonged lung retention; siPDK suppresses glycolysis/ATP7B-mediated Cu⁺ efflux [197]
Inhalable Cu2⁺/DSF nanodevice Cuproptosis + cGAS–STING activation Lung metastasis model 63.6% accumulation in lung lesions and 56.5-fold higher than i.v.; links local cuproptosis with innate/adaptive immunity [83]
Nebulized macrophage-membrane nanoreactor RT-induced ROS/ONOO⁻ + ferroptosis Orthotopic lung cancer ~70-fold higher pulmonary accumulation than i.v. at 12 h; 93.91% tumor inhibition in the reported model [198]
Nebulized inhalable nanozyme Nanozyme-driven oxidative stress + ferroptosis + immune sensitization In situ lung cancer model Local statin delivery; promotes DC maturation and T-cell responses with limited systemic toxicity [75]
Inhalable transferrin-targeted nanomicelles Lysosomal ROS amplification + ferroptosis Lung cancer in vitro/in vivo TfR-mediated lysosomal targeting; Fe3⁺/DHA/sorafenib jointly amplify ROS and ferroptosis [199]

Traditional inhaled nanomedicine often focuses on local enrichment of chemotherapy drugs. In contrast, Ma et al reported a size-convertible nanocarrier loaded with small particles of approximately 28 nm to carry both chemotherapy drugs and sonosensitizers. Following intratracheal instillation, size transformation occurs within the tumor tissue, releasing the small particles to achieve deep penetration.184 This strategy increased the exposure of SN38 in lung cancer lesions by 199% and simultaneously achieved a synergistic effect of sonodynamic therapy and chemotherapy upon ultrasound activation. The three-tier design featuring large-size delivery, small-size penetration and exogenous activation sets a new model for achieving precise spatiotemporal regulation of NDT within lung tissues. Meanwhile, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) overcome the limitations of traditional solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), including low drug loading and drug efflux upon storage. As a next generation delivery system, NLCs efficiently deliver chemotherapy drugs and siRNA to the lungs via inhalation. They accurately target lung cancer cells while protecting healthy lung tissue. For example, when used in combination with intravenous docetaxel, celecoxib-loaded NLCs (CXB-NLCs) produced a 67% ± 4% reduction in tumor volume in NSCLC models, which was significantly better than any monotherapy.200

Ferroptosis, as a lipid peroxidation-dependent cell death modality, is highly consistent with the oxidative stress characteristics of lung cancer. The pH-sensitive SPIONCs reported by Li et al, following local pulmonary delivery, dissociate and release Fe2⁺ in the acidic tumor microenvironment, generating ·OH via the Fenton reaction while simultaneously inducing apoptosis and ferroptosis.86 Upon a single X-ray irradiation, mitochondrial superoxide anions are converted into H2O2 by superoxide dismutase, further amplifying the efficiency of the Fenton reaction and achieving triple synergy of RDT, CDT, and ferroptosis. This research shows that local pulmonary delivery can produce highly toxic reactive oxygen species. The effect is realized through endogenous catalysis within the acidic microenvironment and exogenous activation induced by radiation. Apart from that, various iron-based nanoplatforms have demonstrated unique advantages in lung delivery-induced ferroptosis. The zero-valent iron nanoparticles (ZVI NPs) created by Hsieh et al promote NRF2 proteasome degradation by activating the AMPK/mTOR/GSK3β/β-TrCP axis, downregulate antioxidant genes such as GPX4 and SLC7A11, and thereby sensitize lung cancer cells to ferroptosis.186 The dextran-coated iron nanoparticles (DFHC) designed by Feng et al target CD206⁺ tumor-associated macrophages and tumor stem cells following nebulization inhalation, achieving immune microenvironment reprogramming through ROS and lipid peroxidation accumulation.185 In the interdisciplinary field combining photodynamic/sonodynamic therapy and ferroptosis, various nanoplatforms have also shown potential for pulmonary applications. Han et al confirmed that DHA, acting as a GPX4 inhibitor, effectively sensitizes Ce6-mediated photodynamic therapy and enhances lung cancer clearance efficiency by synergistically inducing ferroptosis.92 Biomimetic nanoparticles developed by Zhu et al (PIOC@CM), loaded with Fe3O4 as the core and the sonosensitizer Ce6, enter tumor cells through homologous targeting, generate abundant ROS upon ultrasound activation, and enhance the ferroptosis effect.201

The ROS generated by NDT is not only a direct cytotoxic agent but also a “thermal switch” that reshapes the immune microenvironment. Recent studies have confirmed that inhalation-based nanoplatforms can effectively integrate ROS generation with immune activation. Zhu et al reported an inhalation-based nanovesicle (aPD-L1 NVs@cGAMP) co-loaded with the STING agonist 2′3′-cGAMP. After nebulization, this nanovesicle activates the STING pathway in lung tumors, enhances CAR-T cell efficacy, and induces abscopal effects.202 Following nebulization inhalation, the pulmonary bioluminescence intensity of the nanovesicles increased 5.5-fold compared with the intravenous injection group. Moreover, only 2% of the free STING agonist dose was required to induce equivalent secretion levels of IFN-β, IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, while avoiding systemic inflammatory reactions.203 The combination of a nanodiamond-doxorubicin conjugate with PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy synergistically transforms TAMs into a tumor-killing state, redirecting macrophages to attack lung cancer cells. After encapsulating TGF-β receptor 1 inhibitors within nanoparticles on the macrophage membrane, the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors can be significantly enhanced by preventing TAMs from acquiring the M2 phenotype, inhibiting tumor metastasis, and expanding cytotoxic T cells.190 Also, inhaled immunotherapy has evolved from early cytokine delivery to more complex integration with gene therapy and cell therapy. KB707, an inhaled viral particle expressing IL-2 and IL-12, is currently undergoing phase I clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors. Preliminary data show that no grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 39 patients, and that KB707 can induce local immune responses.204 The biomimetic lipid nanoparticles (MPDOLs) developed by Fu et al were delivered via inhalation of osimertinib combined with an IGF2BP3 siRNA plasmid. This approach not only inhibited EGFR signaling but also triggered endogenous exosome-mediated epigenetic regulation, achieving dual inhibition of both primary lesions and brain metastases.189 The inhaled delivery of IL-12 mRNA via extracellular vesicles reported by Liu et al induces local inflammation and promotes systemic anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer lesions.205 Recently, Sakkal et al reviewed inhalable nanoparticle systems for NSCLC therapy. Nanotechnology improves inhaled chemotherapy by enhancing drug solubility, stability, and resistance to degradation.200 Wu et al developed an exosome‑mimetic inhalable nanocarrier (PDSA‑HSA) for targeted delivery of disulfiram to the lungs. This provides a new strategy for integrating inhaled NDT with cuproptosis therapy.206 The fusion of local lung delivery and NDT essentially transforms the anatomical features of lung cancer into therapeutic advantages, achieving in-situ deposition of nanomedicine through nebulization inhalation, deep penetration and controllable activation through size conversion and intelligent response, and ultimately achieving systemic immune response through ROS release and reprogramming of death pathways. In the future, inhalable nanoplatforms loaded with sonosensitizers, radiosensitizers, STING agonists and ICB antibodies are expected to trigger a sequential immune sensitization process. This process starts with local reactive oxygen species production, followed by immunogenic cell death and antigen presentation, then STING pathway activation and ultimately systemic T cell responses. It will create a new approach to shift lung cancer treatment from localized intervention to systemic immune regulation.

Challenges and Future Research Directions

NDT is at a critical stage, transitioning from concept validation to clinical practice. In the next 3–5 years, SDT-guided deep lesion interventions, inhalable NDT platforms, ferroptosis/cuproptosis coupling strategies, and the precise combination of NDT with immunotherapy, anti-angiogenesis, and EGFR-TKIs will constitute the most valuable research frontiers. However, this field still faces several challenges. First, there are four prominent shortcomings in current research methodology. Currently, the vast majority of preclinical studies still rely on subcutaneous xenograft models, which cannot accurately simulate the airway microenvironment, respiratory mechanics, or immune landscape of orthotopic lung cancer models. This results in serious deficiencies in pharmacokinetics and efficacy prediction.207 The distribution of direct evidence for lung cancer treated with the four NDT modalities is extremely uneven. SDT and CDT are relatively well represented. RDT, however, has significantly fewer lung cancer specific data. Most studies rely on a single endpoint. Examples include tumor volume or cell survival rate. These studies lack long term evaluations of survival benefits, distant metastasis control, and systemic immune memory.208 Second, nanoplatforms face practical challenges, including poor batch-to-batch consistency during scale-up production, vague quality control metrics, and steep cost curves.209 This also explains why carrier free self assembled nanoparticles have gained favor in recent years. These include natural polyphenol small molecule coordination assemblies and Cu2⁺ sensitizer coordination particles. They offer one step synthesis, minimal composition, and high batch to batch reproducibility.210 Furthermore, material safety concerns are amplified in the context of local pulmonary administration. After inhalation delivery of metal based nanoparticles (such as iron, copper, gold, and gadolinium), their alveolar capillary barrier penetration, macrophage uptake, lymphatic drainage, and long term biological retention behavior are entirely different from those observed with intravenous administration. Chronic accumulation of metal ions may induce local inflammation, fibrosis, and even genotoxicity. Nevertheless, current long-term toxicology data remain almost entirely absent.211,212 In addition, the lack of standardization of physical activation parameters severely restricts comparability across studies and hampers clinical protocol design.

To bridge the gap between preclinical promise and clinical reality, future research directions in lung cancer NDT should be strategically stratified into three tiers based on translational readiness and timelines. The first tier, short-term clinical transformation, should prioritize the development of inhalable NDT platforms for postoperative residual lesions and locally recurrent tumors that are unsuitable for re-irradiation or repeat surgery.213 This tier leverages the unique anatomical accessibility of the pulmonary system and the established safety profiles of clinically validated sonosensitizers and photosensitizers, rendering it the most pragmatic and low-risk entry point for first-in-human translational studies. The second tier, representing medium-term mechanistic innovation, should prioritize the development of multi-cell-death-coupled nanozyme systems that concurrently orchestrate ferroptosis, cuproptosis, and pyroptosis within a unified nanoplatform architecture.214 These systems are designed to overcome resistance mechanisms by engaging multiple, non-cross-resistant death pathways simultaneously,214 and their development requires deeper understanding of the molecular crosstalk between different PCD modalities within the lung TME. The third tier, long-term systemic immunotherapy, envisions the combination of inhalable NDT with STING agonists and immune checkpoint inhibitors to achieve robust systemic anti-tumor immunity and abscopal effects.203 This tier represents the ultimate goal of transforming lung cancer from a locally destructive disease into a systemically manageable condition, but its realization depends on resolving complex questions regarding optimal sequencing, dosing, and biomarker-driven patient selection.

To operationalize these stratified research directions, we propose a comprehensive translational roadmap comprising three sequential phases. Phase I (Formulation Optimization and GLP Toxicology) should focus on developing inhalable NDT nanoplatforms with rigorously characterized aerodynamic particle size distribution, high fine particle fraction (FPF > 50%), and excellent shear-stress stability during nebulization.215 Concurrently, Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant toxicology studies in rodent and non-rodent species must evaluate both acute and chronic pulmonary toxicity, including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis, histopathological examination of lung tissues, and assessment of systemic metal ion biodistribution and clearance.216 Phase II (Large Animal Validation) should employ clinically relevant large animal models, such as porcine or non-human primate orthotopic lung cancer models, to validate the pharmacokinetics, local deposition efficiency, and therapeutic efficacy of lead formulations under clinically simulated inhalation conditions.194 This phase should also establish standardized physical activation parameters tailored to the anatomical constraints of the thorax. Phase III (First-in-Human Phase I Inhalable Clinical Trials) should adopt a dose-escalation design with primary endpoints of safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints of local tumor response and immune biomarker modulation.190 Importantly, patient stratification in these early trials should be guided by molecular and TME characteristics, prioritizing populations most likely to benefit: EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC, KEAP1/NRF2-mutant tumors, and “cold tumors” with low baseline PD-L1 expression.217 This phased roadmap, if systematically executed, will provide the regulatory-grade data necessary to advance lung cancer NDT from bench to bedside while mitigating the translational risks that have historically plagued nanomedicine development.

Despite various challenges, the clinical translation of NDT for lung cancer has a definite direction. It features clear stratification based on clinical scenarios and patient populations. In terms of clinical scenarios, locally recurrent lesions, residual microscopic lesions after surgery, unresectable but localized advanced lesions, and second-line sensitization combined with immunotherapy constitute the most likely “transformation window” to be first breached. The common characteristics of these scenarios include relatively limited lesion burden, susceptibility to local ROS bursts, and clear unmet needs in existing treatment modalities. For the beneficiary population, stratified screening based on molecular subtyping and TME features will be key. Patients with low PD-L1 expression in “cold tumors” may achieve an immune “hot start” through NDT-induced ICD. EGFR-TKI-resistant populations are more susceptible to ROS overload strategies due to compensatory activation of the oxidative stress defense pathway. Redox-dependent tumors (eg, those with KEAP1/NRF2 mutations) and subgroups with abnormal copper/iron metabolism (eg, high SLC31A1 expression and low ferritin expression) may gain selective killing advantages from cuproptosis/ferroptosis coupling strategies. In the future, the development of lung cancer NDT will follow three major trends. First, inhalation NDT will move from concept validation to systematic integration of formulation engineering and device coupling. Future research must address the engineering requirements of dry powder inhalers (DPIs), soft mist inhalers (SMIs), and vibrating mesh nebulizers, focusing on core issues such as nanoparticle shear stress stability during atomization, aerodynamic particle size grading, and mucociliary clearance and escape following alveolar deposition.200 Resolving these obstacles will help realize the practical application of inhalable nanodynamic therapy. Regarding cell death mechanisms, research is evolving from simple reactive oxygen species elevation toward the integration of multiple cell death pathways. Recent studies have revealed that the 1O2 produced by SDT not only directly damages organelles but also depletes GSH and inhibits GPX4, thereby introducing apoptotic signals into the ferroptosis pathway. The copper based nanoplatform releases Cu ⁺ under ultrasound activation, triggering cuprotosis by directly binding to acylated DLAT protein. Meanwhile, cuprous ions trigger Fenton-like reactions to further boost reactive oxygen species levels. This creates a mutually reinforcing cell death network that integrates sonodynamic therapy, cuproptosis and chemodynamic therapy.218 Recently, a carbon-dot-sensitized Cu3P sonoenzymatic system, through heterojunction construction, achieved amplified ROS production integrated with cuproptosis-enhanced cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) activation, resulting in primary tumor elimination and distant tumor growth inhibition in lung cancer models.219 Another study developed a tumor-microenvironment-responsive self-oxygenating nanoplatform (CaO2-MD) that synergistically enhanced cuproptosis and sonodynamic therapy, achieving an 80% tumor inhibition rate when combined with PD-L1 blockade.220 Design strategies focused on crosstalk between cell death pathways will take the place of earlier methods that only aimed to boost reactive oxygen species production. Furthermore, the pairing of nanodynamic therapy and immunotherapy is moving beyond the simple use of PD-1 antibodies toward systematic reconstruction of the immune network. Inhaled STING agonist nanocapsules have been shown to activate the cGAS-STING pathway, promote CAR-T cell infiltration, and induce abscopal effects in lung cancer lesions.202 IL-12 mRNA exosomes, following inhalation, reshape the local pulmonary immune microenvironment and stimulate systemic anti-tumor immunity.190 The integration of TAM reprogramming and T cell exhaustion reversal strategies will provide an immune amplification circuit for NDT-induced local oxidation. Moreover, a nanomedicine approach that modulates the pre-metastatic niche and inhibits metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (PSMP) via dual mechanisms of PD-L1 blockade and STING pathway activation offers a new paradigm for the deep integration of inhaled NDT and immunotherapy.221

Conclusion

NDT achieves the integration of precise local tumor killing and systemic immune transformation in lung cancer by amplifying ROS in response to the TME. This review systematically elaborates on the adaptation mechanisms and collaborative strategies of four NDT modalities—SDT, CDT, PDT, and RDT—in lung cancer from three perspectives: TME-endogenous activation, multimodal PCD pathway reprogramming, and immune “cold-to-hot” transformation. SDT, owing to its deep penetration advantage, has become the modality best suited to the anatomical characteristics of lung cancer. CDT utilizes acidic pH and H2O2) accumulation to achieve endogenous catalysis, while RDT is naturally embedded within the intensive treatment framework of lung cancer radiotherapy. The coupling of death networks effectively circumvents the resistance dilemma induced by single-pathway apoptosis while releasing tumor antigens through ICD, thereby creating favorable response conditions for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Inhalable nanoplatforms turn the anatomical characteristics of the lung into favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Examples include size-transformable nanoparticles and nanocapsules carrying STING agonists, which prove capable of achieving lung retention, intelligent response and controllable activation. At the clinical translation level, the main challenges include the lack of orthotopic models, imbalanced evidence across modalities, over-engineering of nanoplatforms, absent safety data for metal ion accumulation in the lungs, and inconsistent physical activation parameters. In the future, locally recurrent lesions, postoperative residual disease, unresectable focal lesions, and immune-combined second-line sensitization are the scenarios most likely to be first addressed by NDT strategies. Patient stratification based on molecular subtyping and TME characteristics will be key to unlocking the clinical value of NDT. These characteristics include low PD-L1 expression in “cold tumors”, EGFR TKI resistant populations, KEAP1/NRF2 mutations, and subgroups with abnormal copper and iron metabolism. Lung cancer nanodynamic therapy is evolving in multiple dimensions: from merely boosting reactive oxygen species to linking diverse cell death pathways, from the supplementary use of PD 1 antibodies to rebuilding the immune network, and from preliminary concept verification to integrated formulation design and device combination. It is poised to become a core driver that reshapes lung cancer treatment strategies from local intervention to systemic management.

Acknowledgments

During the writing process of this work, the authors used DeepSeek in order to improve language only. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication. Importantly, all the scientific content, literature selection, data interpretation, conclusions, and the final version of the manuscript were independently developed and verified by the authors.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by General Program of the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology–Education Joint Fund Project (2025NSFSC2150) and 2025 Sichuan Provincial Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project (YS000177).

Data Sharing Statement

No new data has been generated, all references are cited in the manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethics statement is not applicable.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Guo L, Zhu C, Cai L, et al. Global burden of lung cancer in 2022 and projected burden in 2050. Chin Med J. 2024;137(21):2577–41. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ding YM, Jiang BJ, Tao HQ, et al. [Epidemiological characteristics of lung cancer in China and worldwide]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2025;47(9):850–857. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240905-00385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou J, Song XB, He H, Zhou Y, Lu XJ, Ying BW. Prevalence and clinical profile of EGFR mutation in non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients in Southwest China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):965–971. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.3.965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ganti AK, Klein AB, Cotarla I, Seal B, Chou E. Update of incidence, prevalence, survival, and initial treatment in patients with non–small cell lung cancer in the US. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(12):1824–1832. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(7):640–649. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Russo M, Chen M, Mariella E, et al. Cancer drug-tolerant persister cells: from biological questions to clinical opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024;24(10):694–717. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00737-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cancilla F, Martorana A, Fiorica C, et al. Development and characterization of injectable, bioadhesive, pH-responsive hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels for enhanced postoperative cancer therapy. Int J Pharm. 2025;685:126233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang L, Liu F, Li J. Obstructive sleep apnea and lung cancer: molecular underpinnings and clinical translational prospects. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2026;14. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1764594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yu C, Xia H, Wang Y, Liu X. Smart nanoplatforms for early detection and immune modulation in lung cancer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026;13. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1734570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ding Q, Li W, Mei L, et al. Tailoring advanced metal-based nanomedicines for adaptable nanodynamic disease therapies and theranostics. Adv Mater. 2026;38(1):e13609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guan L, Tao S, Lu X, et al. A lysosome-targeted Iridium(III) complex inducing pyroptosis for enhanced sonodynamic therapy of colorectal cancer. J Med Chem. 2025;68(13):14008–14018. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin S, Yang M, Chen J, Feng W, Chen Y, Zhu Y. Two-dimensional FePS3 nanosheets as an integrative sonosensitizer/nanocatalyst for efficient nanodynamic tumor therapy. Small. 2023;19(8):e2204992. doi: 10.1002/smll.202204992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Long K, Suresh K. Pulmonary toxicity of systemic lung cancer therapy. Respirology. 2020;25(Suppl 2):72–79. doi: 10.1111/resp.13915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cardoso VM, Bistaffa MJ, Sterman RG, et al. Nanomedicine innovations for lung cancer diagnosis and therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(9):13197–13220. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c16840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li Y, Jin L, Tao B, et al. Nanodynamic therapy for cancer: mechanistic innovations, targeting strategies and multimodal treatments. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):1300. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07277-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang B, Huang Y, Huang Y. Advances in nanodynamic therapy for cancer treatment. Nanomaterials. 2024;14(7):648. doi: 10.3390/nano14070648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou X, Feng S, Xu Q, et al. Current advances in nanozyme-based nanodynamic therapies for cancer. Acta Biomater. 2025;191:1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wen D, Feng J, Deng R, Li K, Zhang H. Zn/Pt dual-site single-atom driven difunctional superimposition-augmented sonosensitizer for sonodynamic therapy boosted ferroptosis of cancer. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9359. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53488-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu S, Wang Q, Du J, et al. Bi-Pt heterojunction cascade reaction platform for sono-immunotherapy of tumors via PANoptosis and ferroptosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(30):e2401697. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou Z, Song J, Nie L, Chen X. Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(23):6597–6626. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00271D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gunaydin G, Gedik ME, Ayan S. Photodynamic therapy—current limitations and novel approaches. Front Chem. 2021;9:691697. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.691697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gong Z, Dai Z. Design and challenges of sonodynamic therapy system for cancer theranostics: from equipment to sensitizers. Adv Sci. 2021;8(10):2002178. doi: 10.1002/advs.202002178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.He M, Chen S, Yu H, et al. Advances in nanoparticle-based radiotherapy for cancer treatment. iScience. 2024;28(1):111602. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun Y, Ma X, Hu H. Application of nano-drug delivery system based on cascade technology in cancer treatment. Ijms. 2021;22(11):5698. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.El-Sadek MZ, El-Aziz MKA, Shaaban AH, Mostafa SA, Wadan AHS. Advancements and emerging trends in photodynamic therapy: innovations in cancer treatment and beyond. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2025;24(8):1489–1511. doi: 10.1007/s43630-025-00765-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cao Y, Shen S, Xiang J, et al. Sonodynamic therapy-based DNA nanocarriers with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α silencing activation for precision lung cancer therapy. Biomater Res. 2025;29:0230. doi: 10.34133/bmr.0230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cao C, Wang X, Yang N, Song X, Dong X. Recent advances of cancer chemodynamic therapy based on Fenton/Fenton-like chemistry. Chem Sci. 2022;13(4):863–889. doi: 10.1039/d1sc05482a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodrigues JA, Correia JH. Photodynamic therapy for colorectal cancer: an update and a look to the future. IJMS. 2023;24(15):12204. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen Q, Zhang M, Huang H, et al. Single atom-doped nanosonosensitizers for mutually optimized sono/chemo-nanodynamic therapy of triple negative breast cancer. Adv Sci. 2023;10(6):2206244. doi: 10.1002/advs.202206244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Angelopoulos PA, Passaro A, Attili I, et al. Management of MET-driven resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Genes. 2025;16(7):772. doi: 10.3390/genes16070772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang Z, Xiang H, Tang X. Smart inorganic nanomaterials for tumor microenvironment modulation. Inorganics. 2025;13(10):337. doi: 10.3390/inorganics13100337 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cai W, Sun T, Qiu C, et al. Stable triangle: nanomedicine-based synergistic application of phototherapy and immunotherapy for tumor treatment. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:635. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02925-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wu P, Zhang Y, Chen X. Advances in targeting tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1472772. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1472772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sureka N, Maheshwari R, Agravat A, et al. Hypoxic microenvironment in cancer: role in metabolic reprogramming. Front Oncol. 2026;16:1771365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1771365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abdukarimova G. Overcoming tumor hypoxia and acidic microenvironment to convert photodynamic therapy into a systemic antitumor immune response. IJMHR. 2026;4(1):01–11. doi: 10.61424/ijmhr.v4i1.666 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen S, Zhang X, Li H, et al. Dual-enzyme inhibiting nanomedicines for enhanced cancer chemodynamic therapy by inducing intratumoral acidosis. Int J Pharm. 2024;663:124568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shu M, Wang J, Xu Z, et al. Targeting nanoplatform synergistic glutathione depletion-enhanced chemodynamic, microwave dynamic, and selective-microwave thermal to treat lung cancer bone metastasis. Bioact Mater. 2024;39:544–561. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang J, Wang S, Zhang D, et al. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems to enhance cancer immunotherapy in solid tumors. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1230893. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1230893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yu J, Kong X, Feng Y. Tumor microenvironment-driven resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: strategies for cold-to-hot tumor transformation. Cancer Drug Resist. 2025;8:21. doi: 10.20517/cdr.2025.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tao J, Yuan Z, Zhou M. Recent advances in mitochondria-targeted porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks for enhanced cancer therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2026;17. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1764901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang B, Chen S, Pei W, et al. Oxygen-sufficient nanoplatform for chemo-sonodynamic therapy of hypoxic tumors. Front Chem. 2020:8. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mishra V, Tripathi V, Yadav P, Singh MP. Beta glucan as an immune stimulant in tumor microenvironment — insight into lessons and promises from past decade. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;234:123617. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aggarwal V, Tuli H, Varol A, et al. Role of reactive oxygen species in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms and recent advancements. Biomolecules. 2019;9(11):735. doi: 10.3390/biom9110735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rincheval V, Bergeaud M, Mathieu L, et al. Differential effects of Bcl-2 and caspases on mitochondrial permeabilization during endogenous or exogenous reactive oxygen species-induced cell death: a comparative study of H2O2, paraquat, t-BHP, etoposide and TNF-α-induced cell death. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2012;28(4):239–253. doi: 10.1007/s10565-012-9219-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shi M, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Tumor-specific nitric oxide generator to amplify peroxynitrite based on highly penetrable nanoparticles for metastasis inhibition and enhanced cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2022;283:121448. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yamashima T. Lysosomal membrane-permeabilization (LMP) and -rupture (LMR) are distinct for cell death. Front Cell Death. 2025;4. doi: 10.3389/fceld.2025.1669955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adzavon KP, Zhao W, He X, Sheng W. Ferroptosis resistance in cancer cells: nanoparticles for combination therapy as a solution. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1416382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Qi K, Mu Y, Hu Y, Li J, Liu J. Comprehensive landscape of cell death mechanisms: from molecular cross-talk to therapeutic innovation in oncology. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025;13. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1611055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu Y, Zhang K, Ye Z, et al. Nanomedicine initiates ferroptosis for enhanced lung cancer therapy. Drug Deliv. 2025;32(1):2527752. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2025.2527752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luobin L, Wanxin H, Yingxin G, et al. Nanomedicine-induced programmed cell death in cancer therapy: mechanisms and perspectives. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02121-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tao J, Yuan Z, Zhou M. Targeted photodynamic therapy: enhancing efficacy through specific organelle engagement. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1667812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deng W, Zhong Z, Shang H, et al. Nanoparticles induced cuproptosis to enhance antitumor immunotherapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03616-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fan C, Xi Z, Zhou Y, et al. Peroxynitrite self-supplied nanobomb based on the Haber-Weiss reaction for achieving tumor deep penetration and multimodal synergistic therapy. Chem Eng J. 2025;522:167453. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.167453 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jin L, Shen S, Huang Y, Li D, Yang X. Corn-like Au/Ag nanorod-mediated NIR-II photothermal/photodynamic therapy potentiates immune checkpoint antibody efficacy by reprogramming the cold tumor microenvironment. Biomaterials. 2021;268:120582. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao X, Liu D, Li G, Xu W, Wu G. Nanomedicines reshape the tumor microenvironment: multidimensional strategies from modulating “barriers” to metabolic intervention. IJN. 2026;21:1–24. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S570411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li Y, Wen T, Zhao R, et al. Localized electric field of plasmonic nanoplatform enhanced photodynamic tumor therapy. ACS Nano. 2014;8(11):11529–11542. doi: 10.1021/nn5047647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pang B, Yang X, Xia Y. Putting gold nanocages to work for optical imaging, controlled release and cancer theranostics. Nanomedicine. 2016;11(13):1715–1728. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liang R, Liu L, He H, et al. Oxygen-boosted immunogenic photodynamic therapy with gold nanocages@manganese dioxide to inhibit tumor growth and metastases. Biomaterials. 2018;177:149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu P, Zhou Q, Zhu H, Zhuang Y, Bao J. Enhanced antitumor efficacy in colon cancer using EGF functionalized PLGA nanoparticles loaded with 5-Fluorouracil and perfluorocarbon. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06803-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 60.Murphy DA, Cheng H, Yang T, Yan X, Adjei IM. Reversing hypoxia with PLGA-encapsulated manganese dioxide nanoparticles improves natural killer cell response to tumor spheroids. Mol Pharm. 2021;18(8):2935–2946. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Meng Z, Zhou X, Xu J, et al. Light-triggered in situ gelation to enable robust photodynamic-immunotherapy by repeated stimulations. Adv Mater. 2019;31(24):1900927. doi: 10.1002/adma.201900927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vitale I, Manic G, Coussens LM, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Macrophages and metabolism in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):36–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qiu Y, Wu Z, Chen Y, et al. Nano ultrasound contrast agent for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy and enhanced immunotherapy against liver cancer and metastasis. Adv Sci. 2023;10(21):2300878. doi: 10.1002/advs.202300878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sun X, Wang X, Li X, et al. Orchestrated Cu2+-coordinated tetracycline-porphyrin self-assembly remodels tumor microenvironment for photo-enhanced immuno-chemodynamic therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03486-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tie Y, Zheng H, He Z, et al. Targeting folate receptor β positive tumor-associated macrophages in lung cancer with a folate-modified liposomal complex. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0115-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen Q, Xu L, Chen J, et al. Tumor vasculature normalization by orally fed erlotinib to modulate the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer nanomedicine and immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2017;148:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chen Q, Liu G, Liu S, et al. Remodeling the tumor microenvironment with emerging nanotherapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39(1):59–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen X, Jia F, Li Y, et al. Nitric oxide-induced stromal depletion for improved nanoparticle penetration in pancreatic cancer treatment. Biomaterials. 2020;246:119999. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang H, Han X, Dong Z, Xu J, Wang J, Liu Z. Hyaluronidase with pH-responsive dextran modification as an adjuvant nanomedicine for enhanced photodynamic-immunotherapy of cancer. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(29):1902440. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201902440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tian M, Xin X, Wu R, Guan W, Zhou W. Advances in intelligent-responsive nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2022;178:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jiao W, Feng Y, Liang C, et al. Reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment via nanomaterial-mediated dynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2023;16(12):13100–13112. doi: 10.1007/s12274-023-6042-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen G, Liu M, Sun Y, et al. Smart, tumor-targeted, and responsive intracellular delivery engineering (STRIDE) nanoplatform: co-delivery of siGLI1 and cisplatin prodrug to overcome lung adenocarcinoma chemoresistance. Chem Eng J. 2026;527:172159. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.172159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang H, Zhuang Y, Song J, Shao F, Shi W. Biomimetic nanoplatform based on macrophage membrane-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for synergistic ferroptosis and sonodynamic therapy of lung cancer. IJN. 2026;21:1–14. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S573349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhang G, Zhu G, Yan W, et al. Apigenin based nanoplatform achieves non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy through glycolysis inhibition and photodynamic co-perturbation of organelles. J Nanobiotechnology. 2026. doi: 10.1186/s12951-026-04418-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chen Z, Yin Y, Yang C, et al. Efficiently enhancing ferroptosis-mediated immunosensitization in lung cancer by an inhalable immune activation nanoplatform. Mater Today Bio. 2025;35:102566. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu M, Cai Y, Yang Y, et al. Tumor cell membrane-coated oxygen-evolving carbon nitride nanozymes combined with curcumenol delivery for lung cancer therapy via ‘open-source throttling’ strategy. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(29):e02510. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202502510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liao H, Xiong Y, Li J, et al. GSH-triggered nitric oxide-releasing polycarbonate nanoplatform for synergistic gas-sonodynamic antitumor therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2025;26(11):7632–7645. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5c01149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tian S, Li J, Wang D, Han Y, Dai H, Yan L. Sonodynamic-chemotherapy synergy with chlorin e6-based carrier-free nanoparticles for non-small cell lung cancer. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12(13):3282–3291. doi: 10.1039/D4TB00009A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ping W, Zhang X, Zeng H, Zhu T, Zhang N, Yan Q. Ultrasound-driven nanomachine for enhanced sonodynamic therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(44):59803–59813. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c11546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liu Y, Zhang T, Jiao Y, et al. Biomimetic anlotinib-loaded FePc-silicate nanoparticles for sonodynamic and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer via dual PD-L1 modulation. Colloids Surf B. 2025;256:115003. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.115003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lv W, Wu H, Zhang Y, et al. cRGD-targeted gold-based nanoparticles overcome EGFR-TKI resistance of NSCLC via low-temperature photothermal therapy combined with sonodynamic therapy. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(5):1677–1691. doi: 10.1039/D2BM01825J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Xiao Z, Zhuang B, Zhang G, Li M, Jin Y. Pulmonary delivery of cationic liposomal hydroxycamptothecin and 5-aminolevulinic acid for chemo-sonodynamic therapy of metastatic lung cancer. Int J Pharm. 2021;601:120572. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yan C, Lv H, Feng Y, Li Y, Zhao Z. Inhalable nanoparticles with enhanced cuproptosis and cGAS–STING activation for synergistic lung metastasis immunotherapy. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2024;14(8):3697–3710. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Abu-Serie MM, Blasco MA. Diethyldithiocarbamate-Cu4 O3 nanocomplex induced mitochondrial and telomerase dysfunction in non-small cell lung cancer. Nanomedicine. 2025;20(11):1267–1280. doi: 10.1080/17435889.2025.2502321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liu RG, Zhao RR, Yu ZW, Liu FJ, Liu CZ, Wu X. Metal-organic coordinated self-assembled nanomedicine for enhanced cuproptosis-mediated chemo-photo-chemodynamic synergistic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Chem Eng J. 2025;509:161305. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.161305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li Y, Yang J, Gu G, et al. Pulmonary delivery of theranostic nanoclusters for lung cancer ferroptosis with enhanced chemodynamic/radiation synergistic therapy. Nano Lett. 2022;22(3):963–972. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Han J, Yang W, Li Y, et al. Combining doxorubicin-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles and 5-aminolevulinic acid for enhancing radiotherapy against lung cancer. Bioconjugate Chem. 2022;33(4):654–665. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chen Y, Liu S, Liao Y, et al. Albumin-modified gold nanoparticles as novel radiosensitizers for enhancing lung cancer radiotherapy. Int J Nanomed. 2023;31:1949–1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li J, Yi H, Fu Y, et al. Biodegradable iridium coordinated nanodrugs potentiate photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy of lung cancer. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;680:9–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.10.156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pramual S, Arnoux P, Lirdprapamongkol K, et al. Photodynamic ablation of floating lung cancer cells using PVA and TPGS emulsified PLGA nanoparticles loaded with pyropheophorbide-a. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2026;274:113318. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2025.113318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zeng F, Huang Y, Peng D, et al. Osimertinib delivery using 660 nm-activated polymeric nano-photosensitizer carriers for combined photodynamic and EGFR-targeted therapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Nanomedicine. 2026;74:102940. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2026.102940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Han N, Li LG, Peng XC, et al. Ferroptosis triggered by dihydroartemisinin facilitates chlorin e6induced photodynamic therapy against lung cancer through inhibiting GPX4 and enhancing ROS. Eur J Pharmacol. 2022;919:174797. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Son S, Kim JH, Wang X, et al. Multifunctional sonosensitizers in sonodynamic cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49(11):3244–3261. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00648F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhang Y, Du D, Fang C, et al. Epigenetics disruptions enabled by porphyrin-derived metal-organic frameworks disarm resistances to sonocatalytic ROS anti-tumor actions. Fundam Res. 2025;5(1):296–306. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.06.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.He Y, Wang T, Song Y, et al. Targeting vascular destruction by sonosensitizer-free sonocatalytic nanomissiles instigates thrombus aggregation and nutrition deprivation to starve pancreatic cancer. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(30):2315394. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202315394 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhang C, Pu K. Organic sonodynamic materials for combination cancer immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2023;35(51):2303059. doi: 10.1002/adma.202303059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yang F, Lv J, Ma W, Yang Y, Hu X, Yang Z. Engineering sonosensitizer-derived nanotheranostics for augmented sonodynamic therapy. Small. 2024;20(44):2402669. doi: 10.1002/smll.202402669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wang Y, Nomikou N. Nanotechnology-based systems for enhancing the efficacy of sonodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Adv Ther. 2024;7(12):2400309. doi: 10.1002/adtp.202400309 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shan Q, Li R, Ying B, et al. Organic sonosensitizers-based SDT with enhanced ROS generation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2025;122:107625. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yang M, Wang X, Peng M, et al. Nanomaterials enhanced sonodynamic therapy for multiple tumor treatment. Nanomicro Lett. 2025;17(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s40820-025-01666-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Uinarni H, Ismailova M, Hasan TF, Jabir MS, Kadhum WR. Theranostic potential of ultrasound-guided sonodynamic therapy for cancer: a systematic review of preclinical studies. Discov Oncol. 2026;17(1):459. doi: 10.1007/s12672-026-04638-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cressey P, Abd shukor SB, Thanou M. Sonodynamic therapy: transforming sound into light for hard-to-treat tumours. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2025;226:115696. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Li X, Sun X, Chen H, et al. Exploring BODIPY derivatives as sonosensitizers for anticancer sonodynamic therapy. Eur J Med Chem. 2024;264:116035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.116035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang H, Liu X, Yan X, et al. A MXene-derived redox homeostasis regulator perturbs the Nrf2 antioxidant program for reinforced sonodynamic therapy. Chem Sci. 2022;13(22):6704–6714. doi: 10.1039/d1sc07073h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(2):101–124. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0090-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Fan D, Cao Y, Cao M, Wang Y, Cao Y, Gong T. Nanomedicine in cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):293. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01536-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Alphandéry E. Ultrasound and nanomaterial: an efficient pair to fight cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01243-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wang X, Zhong X, Gong F, Chao Y, Cheng L. Newly developed strategies for improving sonodynamic therapy. Mater Horiz. 2020;7(8):2028–2046. doi: 10.1039/D0MH00613K [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhang J, Luo X, Yang X, et al. Ultrasound-responsive nanodelivery system of GPC3-targeting and sonosensitizer for visualized hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. IJN. 2024;19:7015–7031. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S470847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wang F, Wang B, You W, Chen G, You YZ. Integrating Au and ZnO nanoparticles onto graphene nanosheet for enhanced sonodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2022;15(10):9223–9233. doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4599-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zheng F, Zhang P, Zhang Y, et al. Aptamer-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticle for nitric oxide-enhanced targeted sonodynamic therapy against lung cancer. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2025;8(10):5179–5192. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.5c00088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wei X, Feng Z, Huang J, et al. Homology and immune checkpoint dual-targeted sonocatalytic nanoagents for enhancing sonodynamic tumor therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(28):32810–32822. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c08105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lin L, Wang S, Deng H, et al. Endogenous labile iron pool-mediated free radical generation for cancer chemodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(36):15320–15330. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c05604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sang Y, Cao F, Li W, et al. Bioinspired construction of a nanozyme-based H2 O2 homeostasis disruptor for intensive chemodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(11):5177–5183. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.He Y, Tian X, Zhang M, et al. Fenton-like nanoparticles capable of H2O2 self-supply and glutathione consumption for chemodynamic and chemotherapy of cancer. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(21):5534–5546. doi: 10.1039/d4bm00930d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wang X, Song T, Wu X, et al. NIR-II responsive fe-doped carbon nanoparticles for photothermal-enhanced chemodynamic synergistic oncotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(35):46079–46089. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c09215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Xie W, Zhang G, Guo Z, et al. Ultra-sensitive iron-doped palladium nanocrystals with enhanced hydroxyl radical generation for chemo-/chemodynamic nanotherapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(12):2107518. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202107518 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang C, Cao F, Ruan Y, Jia X, Zhen W, Jiang X. Specific generation of singlet oxygen through the Russell mechanism in hypoxic tumors and GSH depletion by Cu-TCPP nanosheets for cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(29):9846–9850. doi: 10.1002/anie.201903981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wang H, Bremner DH, Wu K, et al. Platelet membrane biomimetic bufalin-loaded hollow MnO2 nanoparticles for MRI-guided chemo-chemodynamic combined therapy of cancer. Chem Eng J. 2020;382:122848. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122848 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang L, Wan SS, Li CX, Xu L, Cheng H, Zhang XZ. An adenosine triphosphate-responsive autocatalytic fenton nanoparticle for tumor ablation with self-supplied H2 O2 and acceleration of Fe(III)/Fe(II) conversion. Nano Lett. 2018;18(12):7609–7618. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wan X, Song L, Pan W, Zhong H, Li N, Tang B. Tumor-targeted cascade nanoreactor based on metal–organic frameworks for synergistic ferroptosis–starvation anticancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):11017–11028. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yang XX, Xu X, Wang MF, et al. A nanoreactor boosts chemodynamic therapy and ferroptosis for synergistic cancer therapy using molecular amplifier dihydroartemisinin. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01455-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Tsvetkov P, Coy S, Petrova B, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science. 2022;375(6586):1254–1261. doi: 10.1126/science.abf0529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Chen L, Wang H, Qi H, et al. Harnessing nanomedicine to orchestrate ferroptosis-cuproptosis crosstalk for precision antitumor therapy: novel insights and future perspectives. Coord Chem Rev. 2026;548:217150. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Li K, Wu L, Wang H, et al. Apoptosis and cuproptosis co-activated Copper-based metal-organic frameworks for cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02828-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hu Y, Chen H, Chen B, et al. Charge and size-variable biodegradable nanocomposites for self-reinforcing CDT, PTT, and chemotherapy: augmented cuproptosis and ferroptosis against tumor hypoxia via glycolysis/redox dual disruption. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(45):2503038. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202503038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jiang C, Li X, Wan S, et al. Copper-doped polydopamine nanoparticles-mediated GSH/GPX4-depleted ferroptosis and cuproptosis sensitizes lung Tumor to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Small. 2025;21(23):2503208. doi: 10.1002/smll.202503208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Gu L, Sun Y, Bai T, et al. Functional nanozyme system for synergistic tumor immunotherapy via cuproptosis and ferroptosis activation. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03284-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yu Z, Ren H, Li H, et al. Multi-organelle stress-induced paraptosis by a ROS-amplifying nanocatalyst for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci. 2026;13(26):e20031. doi: 10.1002/advs.202520031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ding Q, Wang B, Zhan Z, et al. MitoSiege-driven catalase collapse: a GSH-responsive, mitochondria-targeted COF prodrug for amplified chemodynamic therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2025;64(44):e202509183. doi: 10.1002/anie.202509183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sun W, Zhang Q, Wang X, Jin Z, Cheng Y, Wang G. Photodynamic therapy of lung cancer: the present and the future. Chinese Med J. 2024;137(23):2890–2892. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Moise-Crintea A, Constantin AM, Jianu EM, et al. Advancing lung cancer treatment: a comprehensive review of photodynamic therapy and nanoparticle applications. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(12):1579. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17121579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sun W, Zhang Q, Wang X, Jin Z, Cheng Y, Wang G. Clinical practice of photodynamic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in different scenarios: who is the better candidate? Respiration. 2024;103(4):193–204. doi: 10.1159/000535270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Verger A, Brandhonneur N, Molard Y, et al. From molecules to nanovectors: current state of the art and applications of photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy. Int J Pharm. 2021;604:120763. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sondermann T, Darwiche K, Freitag L, et al. Photodynamic therapy for central early-stage lung cancer: a retrospective comparative study of photofrin, chlorine 6, and foscan. Respiration. 2026:1–11. doi: 10.1159/000550182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nagai K, Akimoto J, Fukami S, et al. Efficacy of interstitial photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium and a semiconductor laser for a mouse allograft glioma model. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9137. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59955-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kadry H, Wadnap S, Xu C, Ahsan F. Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;135:60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Donohoe C, Senge MO, Arnaut LG, Gomes-da-silva LC. Cell death in photodynamic therapy: from oxidative stress to anti-tumor immunity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2019;1872(2):188308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Correia JH, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta S, Dong T, Yang Z. Photodynamic therapy review: principles, photosensitizers, applications, and future directions. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(9):1332. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zheng L, Li Z, Wang R, et al. A novel photosensitizer DTPP-mediated photodynamic therapy induces oxidative stress and apoptosis through mitochondrial pathways in LA795 cells. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2024;45:103894. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Xu F, Wang M, Dotse E, Chow KT, Lo P. Inducing immunogenic cancer cell death through oxygen-economized photodynamic therapy with nitric oxide-releasing photosensitizers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2024;63(37):e202404561. doi: 10.1002/anie.202404561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Chriqui LE, Marie DN, Sifis A, et al. Low-dose photodynamic therapy promotes vascular E-selectin expression in chest malignancies, improving immune infiltration and tumor control. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13(6):e009482. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Guan M, Zhou Y, Liu S, et al. Photo-triggered gadofullerene: enhanced cancer therapy by combining tumor vascular disruption and stimulation of anti-tumor immune responses. Biomaterials. 2019;213:119218. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Wang Y, Gonzalez M, Cheng C, et al. Photodynamic induced uptake of liposomal doxorubicin to rat lung tumors parallels tumor vascular density. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(4):318–324. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chen H, Dai Z. Antitumor immune responses induced by photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy: a narrative review. J Bio-X Res. 2021;04(02):77–86. doi: 10.1097/JBR.0000000000000080 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pitt JM, Marabelle A, Eggermont A, Soria JC, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: removing obstruction to anticancer immune responses and immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1482–1492. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Reginato E. Immune response after photodynamic therapy increases anti-cancer and anti-bacterial effects. WJI. 2014;4(1):1. doi: 10.5411/wji.v4.i1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Beltrán Hernández I, Yu Y, Ossendorp F, Korbelik M, Oliveira S. Preclinical and clinical evidence of immune responses triggered in oncologic photodynamic therapy: clinical recommendations. JCM. 2020;9(2):333. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Lan G, Ni K, Xu Z, Veroneau SS, Song Y, Lin W. Nanoscale metal–organic framework overcomes hypoxia for photodynamic therapy primed cancer immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(17):5670–5673. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hu X, Zhang M, Quan C, Ren S, Chen W, Wang J. ROS-responsive and triple-synergistic mitochondria-targeted polymer micelles for efficient induction of ICD in tumor therapeutics. Bioact Mater. 2024;36:490–507. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kim M, Lee JI, Choi J, Kim SY. Reactive oxygen species-responsive nanocomposite hydrogels for accurate drug delivery and localized PDT/PTT/chemo synergistic cancer therapy. Eur Polym J. 2025;224:113683. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Chen J, She M, Xie X, et al. All-in-one molecular design of activatable phototheranostic platform for potent hypoxia-tolerant photodynamic immunotherapy of cancer. Biomaterials. 2026;328:123900. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wang Y, Li T, Zhou H, Liu C. Advancements in nanocarrier delivery systems for photodynamic therapy in lung cancer. IJN. 2025;20:6853–6874. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S521444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Larue L, Myrzakhmetov B, Ben-Mihoub A, et al. Fighting hypoxia to improve PDT. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12(4):163. doi: 10.3390/ph12040163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kim TE, Chang JE. Recent studies in photodynamic therapy for cancer treatment: from basic research to clinical trials. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(9):2257. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Simelane NWN, Abrahamse H. Approaches to enhance photodynamic therapy of lung cancer: potential application of nanoparticles. Adv NanoBiomed Res. 2025;5(12):2400192. doi: 10.1002/anbr.202400192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Zhu J, Lee H, Huang R, et al. Harnessing nanotechnology for cancer treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025:12. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1514890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang W, et al. Photoimmunotherapy biomimetic nanoplatform for lung cancer and brain metastasis. Mater Des. 2025;257:114497. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114497 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Munir R, Schöne L, Ullah A, et al. Assessment of pulmonary delivery efficacy of archaeal tetraether lipids based ICG- and DiR-loaded liposomes for antitumoral photodynamic therapy. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2026;216:107362. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Crous A, Abrahamse H. Inhibition of lung cancer stem cell migration and growth through nano-photodynamic therapy. J-BPE. 2024;10(4):040301. doi: 10.18287/JBPE24.10.040301 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Abdollahi Boraei SB, Kamalinejad F, Kiaei N. The cutting-edge applications and properties of carbon nanotubes in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: a review. Front Biomater Sci. 2025;4:1500758. doi: 10.3389/fbiom.2025.1500758 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Qi B, Xiao Z, Huang J, et al. Photothermal and ROS-mediated cellular apoptosis using copper-driven Prussian blue analog nanoparticles with bimetallic reaction centres. Chem Eng J. 2024;498:155432. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155432 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Thongwong P, Wattanathorn J, Thukhammee W, Tiamkao S. The potential role of the novel orodispersible film from rice polymer loaded with silkworm pupae hydrolysate and the combined extract of holy basil and ginger for the management of stroke with stress. Biomaterials. 2023;299:122175. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Liu B, Qiao G, Han Y, et al. Targeted theranostics of lung cancer: PD-L1-guided delivery of gold nanoprisms with chlorin e6 for enhanced imaging and photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;117:361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Yan H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. A ROS-responsive biomimetic nano-platform for enhanced chemo-photodynamic-immunotherapy efficacy. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(22):6583–6600. doi: 10.1039/D2BM01291J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Zhang T, Bao J, Zhang M, et al. Chemo-photodynamic therapy by pulmonary delivery of gefitinib nanoparticles and 5-aminolevulinic acid for treatment of primary lung cancer of rats. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2020;31:101807. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Xue Y, Chen X, Chen X, Xue S, Qian M, Wang D. A self-reinforcing nanoplatform for triple-synergistic therapy: NIR-triggered photothermal/gas/chemodynamic therapy of tumors. Front Chem. 2025;13:1742786. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1742786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Yu F, Cao J, Fan X, et al. Targeted delivery of gemcitabine to lung cancer cells via a hyaluronic acid-based nanoplatform. RSC Adv. 2026;16(28):25944–25963. doi: 10.1039/D6RA02076C [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Heinzerling JH, Mileham KF, Robinson MM, et al. Primary lung tumour stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by concurrent mediastinal chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, single-arm, Phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(1):85–97. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00573-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Bradley JD, Sugawara S, Lee KH, et al. Simultaneous durvalumab and platinum-based chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: the phase III PACIFIC-2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(33):3610–3621. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Tsai CJ, Yang JT, Shaverdian N, et al. Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2024;403(10422):171–182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01857-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Muradova Z, Carmès L, Brown N, et al. Targeted-theranostic nanoparticles induce anti-tumor immune response in lung cancer. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23:466. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03542-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Yang DM, Cvetkovic D, Chen L, Ma CMC. Therapeutic effects of in-vivo radiodynamic therapy (RDT) for lung cancer treatment: a combination of 15MV photons and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022;8(6):065031. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac9b5c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Zhou W, Liu Z, Wang N, Chen X, Sun X, Cheng Y. Hafnium-based metal–organic framework nanoparticles as a radiosensitizer to improve radiotherapy efficacy in esophageal cancer. ACS omega. 2022;7(14):12021–12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zhong X, Wang X, Zhan G, et al. NaCeF4:Gd,Tb Scintillator as an X-ray responsive photosensitizer for multimodal imaging-guided synchronous radio/radiodynamic therapy. Nano Lett. 2019;19(11):8234–8244. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Fan L, Wang W, Wang Z, Zhao M. Gold nanoparticles enhance antibody effect through direct cancer cell cytotoxicity by differential regulation of phagocytosis. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6371. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26694-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Verry C, Dufort S, Villa J, et al. Theranostic AGuIX nanoparticles as radiosensitizer: a Phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with multiple brain metastases (NANO-RAD trial). Radiother Oncol. 2021;160:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Prasad P, Gordijo CR, Abbasi AZ, et al. Multifunctional albumin–MnO2 nanoparticles modulate solid tumor microenvironment by attenuating hypoxia, acidosis, vascular endothelial growth factor and enhance radiation response. ACS Nano. 2014;8(4):3202–3212. doi: 10.1021/nn405773r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Zhuang M, Jiang S, Gu A, Chen X, M E. Radiosensitizing effect of gold nanoparticle loaded with small interfering RNA-SP1 on lung cancer. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(12):101210. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Wong TY, Wang Y, Kwan KKL, et al. Exploring the potentials of silver nanoparticles in overcoming cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma: insights from proteomic and xenograft mice studies. ACS Nano. 2025;19(39):34708–34723. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c09056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Du Y, Sun H, Lux F, et al. Radiosensitization effect of AGuIX, a gadolinium-based nanoparticle, in nonsmall cell lung cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(51):56874–56885. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c16548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Aghanwa CI, Umoke NH, Adanigbo P, et al. Radiotherapy-chemodynamic cancer therapy using bismuth-based nanoparticles: a synergistic approach for enhanced cancer treatment. RSC Adv. 2025;15(40):32956–32994. doi: 10.1039/d5ra03984c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Clark AT, Cvetkovic D, Yang DM, Chen L, CMC M. Radiodynamic therapy as a potential strategy for metastatic control in small-cell lung cancer: a preclinical study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025;11(5):055017. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/adf8f0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Ma S, Cong Z, Wei J, et al. Pulmonary delivery of size-transformable nanoparticles improves tumor accumulation and penetration for chemo-sonodynamic combination therapy. J Control Release. 2022;350:132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Feng Q, Fang W, Guo Y, Hu P, Shi J. Nebulized therapy of early orthotopic lung cancer by iron-based nanoparticles: macrophage-regulated ferroptosis of cancer stem cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(44):24153–24165. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c08032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Hsieh CH, Hsieh HC, Shih FH, et al. An innovative NRF2 nano-modulator induces lung cancer ferroptosis and elicits an immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment. Theranostics. 2021;11(14):7072–7091. doi: 10.7150/thno.57803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Novak J, Salgia R, West H, et al. Ablative radiotherapy as a strategy to overcome TKI resistance in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Cancers. 2022;14(16):3983. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Lin W, Wang X, Diao M, et al. Promoting reactive oxygen species accumulation to overcome tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2024;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12935-024-03418-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Fu X, Shi Y, Wu H, et al. Inhalable liposomal delivery of osimertinib and DNA for treating primary and metastasis lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3336. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58312-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Lee H, Sajid K, Lee J. Engineered nanocarriers for targeted lung cancer therapy: mechanistic innovations and recent clinical progress. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2025;6:1002339. doi: 10.37349/etat.2025.1002339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Sun L, Chen B, Wang B, et al. Combination immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy shows promising efficacy in NSCLC patients with recurrent or refractory brain metastases and negative driver genes. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1684759. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1684759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Wei J, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective real-world study conducted in East China. BMC Pulm Med. 2025;25:170. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03635-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Guo M, Xue L, Li J, Zhu M, Long H, Peng J. Heterogeneous inorganic nanomedicine delivery system loaded with anlotinib for enhanced treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Colloids Surf B. 2026;263:115586. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2026.115586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Safdar I, Mahmood S, Abdulwahab MK, Mohd Noor S, Ge Y, Mohamed Sofian Z. Inhalable nanomaterial discoveries for lung cancer therapy: a review. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(8):996. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17080996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Baghdan E, Duse L, Schüer JJ, et al. Development of inhalable curcumin loaded nano-in-microparticles for bronchoscopic photodynamic therapy. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;132:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.02.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Fu F, Wang W, Wu L, et al. Inhalable biomineralized liposomes for cyclic Ca2+-burst-centered endoplasmic reticulum stress enhanced lung cancer ferroptosis therapy. ACS Nano. 2023;17(6):5486–5502. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c10830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Yan C, Liu Y, Zhao G, et al. Inhalable metal–organic framework-mediated cuproptosis combined with PD-L1 checkpoint blockade for lung metastasis synergistic immunotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024;14(5):2281–2297. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Chen Y, Huang X, Hu R, et al. Inhalable biomimetic polyunsaturated fatty acid-based nanoreactors for peroxynitrite-augmented ferroptosis potentiate radiotherapy in lung cancer. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23:338. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03409-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Guo M, Liang Y, Zhang M, et al. Lysosome-hijacking inhalable nanomimosa enhances ferroptosis for lung cancer therapy. J Control Release. 2025;386:114101. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Sakkal M, Abdelmoteleb RWA, Al Ali A, Jardan YAB, Löbenberg R, Sarfraz M. Inhalable nanoparticle-based drug delivery system for non-small cell lung cancer therapy: promises and challenges. Saudi Pharm J. 2025;33(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00046-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Zhu M, Wu P, Li Y, Zhang L, Zong Y, Wan M. Synergistic therapy for orthotopic gliomas via biomimetic nanosonosensitizer-mediated sonodynamic therapy and ferroptosis. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(14):3911–3923. doi: 10.1039/D2BM00562J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Immunosuppression | Nature Communications. Available from: https://www.nature.com/subjects/immunosuppression/ncomms. Accessed May 30, 2026.
  • 203.Zhu T, Xiao Y, Chen Z, et al. Inhalable nanovesicles loaded with a STING agonist enhance CAR-T cell activity against solid tumors in the lung. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):262. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55751-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Breathing New Life Into Cancer Treatment: Inhaled KB707 | Cleveland Clinic. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/podcasts/cancer-advances/breathing-new-life-into-cancer-treatment-inhaled-kb707. Accessed May 30, 2026.
  • 205.Liu M, Hu S, Yan N, Popowski KD, Cheng K. Inhalable extracellular vesicle delivery of IL-12 mRNA to treat lung cancer and promote systemic immunity. Nature Nanotechnol. 2024;19(4):565–575. doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01580-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Wu X, Li Y, Ren X, An X. Exosome-camouflaged inhalable (PDSA-HSA) nanocarrier for targeted disulfiram delivery in lung cancer therapy. Biomater Adv. 2026;180:214597. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Picabea B, Orive D, Rodríguez C, et al. Establishment and characterization of an orthotopic implanted lung cancer model to mimic human tumor structure, microenvironment, and metastatic spread. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025;14(11):4868. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Yadav B, Chauhan M, Singh RP, Sonali, Shekhar S. Recent progress and challenges in clinical translation of nanomedicines in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Current Drug Targets. 2024;25(1):12–24. doi: 10.2174/0113894501273651231201061144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Yin W, Pan F, Zhu J, et al. Nanotechnology and nanomedicine: a promising avenue for lung cancer diagnosis and therapy. Engineering. 2021;7(11):1577–1585. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Wu D, Zhou B, Liu Y, Zhu X, Li B, Liang H. Tailoring carrier-free nanoparticles based on natural small molecule assembly for synergistic anti-tumor efficacy. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2025;20(1):100992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Nanoparticle Induced Lung Toxicity Studies | nanotoxicology, Health and Safety | medical Biotechnology | Health sciences | Topics | Nature Index. Available from: https://www.nature.com/nature-index/topics/l4/nanoparticle-induced-lung-toxicity-studies. Accessed May 31, 2026.
  • 212.Zhang Z, Wang R, Chen L. Nanomaterials targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts to overcome stromal barriers in cancer immunotherapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2026. doi: 10.1186/s12951-026-04567-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Wang Z, Liao L, Wang F, et al. Inhalable chemotactic liposome for targeted modulation of pulmonary pre-metastatic niche. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(22):2419583. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202419583 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Tian Y, Ke J, Yang M, Gong P, Xin F, Wang L. Multifunctional nanozyme-mediated synergistic activation of cuproptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis for potent antitumor therapy. Colloids Surf B. 2026;261:115415. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2026.115415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Zhang R, Wu C, Yu L, Peng C, Li S, Kuai R. Low-dose inhalable amino acid-modified multilamellar nanoparticles activate STING for safe and effective regression of lung metastases. J Control Release. 2025;386:114061. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Hussain Z, Abdulelah AA, Tahseen SH, Mashkoor AA, Thu HE. Stimuli-responsive nanomedicines for lung cancer therapy: design strategies, advances, challenges, and future directions. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2026;116:107900. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107900 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Huang Q, Ding C, Wang W, et al. An “AND” logic gate–based supramolecular therapeutic nanoplatform for combatting drug-resistant non–small cell lung cancer. Sci Adv. 2024;10(39):eadp9071. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp9071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Zhou JJ, Feng YC, Song CY, Fan YT, Wang GQ, Zhao XB. Cuproptosis meets sonodynamics: a nanomedicine platform for multimodal cancer therapy. RSC Adv. 2026;16(22):19636–19656. doi: 10.1039/d6ra01867j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Xu S, Wu Y, Cai J, et al. Carbon dot sensitized Cu3P sonozymes for cuproptosis-enhanced and heterojunction-amplified sono-immunotherapy through activating cGAS-STING pathway. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03877-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Tang Y, Ge L, Zhu D, et al. A tumor microenvironment-responsive self-oxygenating nanoplatform for dual-enhanced cuproptosis and sonodynamic synergistic immunotherapy. ACS Nano. 2025;19(45):39228–39240. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c12847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Wu X, Li B, Liao H, et al. Nanodrug modulates premetastatic niche and suppresses metastatic lung adenocarcinoma via programmed cell death ligand 1 blockade and STING pathway activation. ACS Nano. 2025;19(26):23893–23907. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c05274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data has been generated, all references are cited in the manuscript.


Articles from International Journal of Nanomedicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES