Skip to main content
PMC home page
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2002;100:181–186.

The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

George L Spaeth 1, Jeffrey Henderer 1, Connie Liu 1, Muge Kesen 1, Undraa Altangerel 1, Atilla Bayer 1, L Jay Katz 1, Jonathan Myers 1, Douglas Rhee 1, William Steinmann 1
PMCID: PMC1358961  PMID: 12545692

Abstract

PURPOSE: The major objective of this study was to test the reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic disc damage in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: The Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) is based on the appearance of the neuroretinal rim of the optic disc corrected for disc diameter. The eight stages, extending from no damage to far advanced damage, are based on the width of the neuroretinal rim or the circumferential extent of absence of neuroretinal rim. Reproducibility was measured by two masked observers staging 48 optic nerve stereoscopic photographs by two different methods, the cup/disc ratio (c/d) and the DDLS. Also, reproducibility was assessed by three observers examining 34 eyes of 24 patients. RESULTS: With regard to the photographs, the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was better using the DDLS than the c/d ratio (98% versus 85% for intraobserver of reproducibility, and 85% versus 74% for interobserver reproducibility). The DDLS correlated better with the Humphrey Visual Field than did any Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameter. CONCLUSION: In a clinical setting, the DDLS is as reproducible as, or more reproducible than, the c/d ratio system of estimating the amount of disc damage in patients with glaucoma.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armaly M. F. Genetic determination of cup/disc ratio of the optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;78(1):35–43. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1967.00980030037007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Douglas G. R., Drance S. M., Schulzer M. A correlation of fields and discs in open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1974 Oct;9(4):391–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eid T. M., Spaeth G. L., Katz L. J., Azuara-Blanco A., Agusburger J., Nicholl J. Quantitative estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer height in glaucoma and the relationship with optic nerve head topography and visual field. J Glaucoma. 1997 Aug;6(4):221–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feuer William J., Parrish Richard K., 2nd, Schiffman Joyce C., Anderson Douglas R., Budenz Donald L., Wells Maria-Cristina, Hess Ditte J., Kass Michael A., Gordon Mae O. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):19–28. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01338-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guthauser U., Flammer J., Niesel P. The relationship between the visual field and the optic nerve head in glaucomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225(2):129–132. doi: 10.1007/BF02160344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haslett R. S., Batterbury M., Cuypers M., Cooper R. L. Inter-observer agreement in clinical optic disc measurement using a modified 60 D lens. Eye (Lond) 1997;11(Pt 5):692–697. doi: 10.1038/eye.1997.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatch W. V., Trope G. E., Buys Y. M., Macken P., Etchells E. E., Flanagan J. G. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography. J Glaucoma. 1999 Apr;8(2):99–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jonas J. B., Gusek G. C., Naumann G. O. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226(6):531–538. doi: 10.1007/BF02169200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz L. J., Spaeth G. L., Cantor L. B., Poryzees E. M., Steinmann W. C. Reversible optic disk cupping and visual field improvement in adults with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 May 15;107(5):485–492. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90492-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kintner R. L., Brandt C. R. The effect of viral inoculum level and host age on disease incidence, disease severity, and mortality in a murine model of ocular HSV-1 infection. Curr Eye Res. 1995 Feb;14(2):145–152. doi: 10.3109/02713689508999926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klein B. E., Magli Y. L., Richie K. A., Moss S. E., Meuer S. M., Klein R. Quantitation of optic disc cupping. Ophthalmology. 1985 Dec;92(12):1654–1656. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lichter P. R., Henderson J. W. Optic nerve infarction. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1977;75:103–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lim C. S., O'Brien C., Bolton N. M. A simple clinical method to measure the optic disc size in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1996 Aug;5(4):241–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mikelberg F. S., Douglas G. R., Schulzer M., Airaksinen P. J., Wijsman K., Mawson D. The correlation between cup-disk ratio, neuroretinal rim area, and optic disk area measured by the video-ophthalmograph (Rodenstock analyzer) and clinical measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan 15;101(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90458-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spaeth G. L., Fellman R. L., Starita R. L., Katz L. J., Poryzees E. M. A new management system for glaucoma based on improvement of the appearance of the optic disc or visual field. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1985;83:268–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tielsch J. M., Katz J., Quigley H. A., Miller N. R., Sommer A. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988 Mar;95(3):350–356. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Varma R., Spaeth G. L., Steinmann W. C., Katz L. J. Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Apr;107(4):526–529. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010540027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Varma R., Steinmann W. C., Scott I. U. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992 Feb;99(2):215–221. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31990-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolfs R. C., Ramrattan R. S., Hofman A., de Jong P. T. Cup-to-disc ratio: ophthalmoscopy versus automated measurement in a general population: The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1999 Aug;106(8):1597–1601. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90458-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES