Skip to main content
PMC home page
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2003;101:223–230.

The value of preoperative tests in the selection of blind patients for a permanent microelectronic implant.

Douglas Yanai 1, Rohit R Lakhanpal 1, James D Weiland 1, Manjunatha Mahadevappa 1, Gretchen Van Boemel 1, Gildo Y Fujii 1, Robert Greenberg 1, Sean Caffey 1, Eugene de Juan Jr 1, Mark S Humayun 1
PMCID: PMC1358992  PMID: 14971581

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the best candidates (ie, those requiring lowest current levels delivered to the retina to elicit visual perceptions) for long-term implantation of a microelectronic retinal implant through a series of preoperative visual, psychophysical, and electrophysiological tests. METHODS: This study protocol was granted an investigational device exemption by the Food and Drug Administration and was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Southern California. After informed consent was obtained, all subjects underwent the following preoperative tests: dark-adapted bright flash and 30-Hz flicker electroretinograms, electrical evoked responses (EERs) using a Burian-Allen corneal electrode to stimulate the globe, and psychophysical tests to evaluate the light and electrically elicited visual perceptions. Intraocular stimulation (IOS) of the retina was performed by an array of electrodes positioned on the internal limiting lamina. RESULTS: Lower vision correlated with less sensitive psychophysical responses (P<.0001). Lower vision and less sensitive psychophysical tests correlated with higher EER values for stimulus pulse widths of 2 ms (P<.0008) and 4 ms (P<.0002). Lower IOS currents correlated with more sensitive psychophysical responses (P<.02) and lower EER values at 4 ms (P<.04). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative testing, especially psychophysical and electrophysiological tests to assess light and electrically driven visual responses, can help in evaluating patients for suitability for receiving a permanent microelectronic retinal implant. Further study is warranted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chow Alan Y., Pardue Machelle T., Perlman Jay I., Ball Sherry L., Chow Vincent Y., Hetling John R., Peyman Gholam A., Liang Chanping, Stubbs Evan B., Jr, Peachey Neal S. Subretinal implantation of semiconductor-based photodiodes: durability of novel implant designs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 May-Jun;39(3):313–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dobelle W. H. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J. 2000 Jan-Feb;46(1):3–9. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200001000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Humayun M. S. Intraocular retinal prosthesis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:271–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Humayun M. S., Prince M., de Juan E., Jr, Barron Y., Moskowitz M., Klock I. B., Milam A. H. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jan;40(1):143–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr, Dagnelie G., Greenberg R. J., Propst R. H., Phillips D. H. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;114(1):40–46. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130038006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr, Weiland J. D., Dagnelie G., Katona S., Greenberg R., Suzuki S. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2569–2576. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00052-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim S. Y., Sadda S., Pearlman J., Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr, Melia B. M., Green W. R. Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with disciform age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2002 Aug;22(4):471–477. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200208000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maynard E. M., Nordhausen C. T., Normann R. A. The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Mar;102(3):228–239. doi: 10.1016/s0013-4694(96)95176-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nadig M. N. Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;110(9):1545–1553. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Potts A. M., Inoue J., Buffum D. The electrically evoked response of the visual system (EER). Invest Ophthalmol. 1968 Jun;7(3):269–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Potts A. M., Inoue J. The electrically evoked response (EER) of the visual system. II. Effect of adaptation and retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969 Dec;8(6):605–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Potts A. M., Inoue J. The electrically evoked response of the visual system (EER). 3. Further contribution to the origin of the EER. Invest Ophthalmol. 1970 Oct;9(10):814–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ross R. D. Is perception of light useful to the blind patient? Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;116(2):236–238. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Santos A., Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr, Greenburg R. J., Marsh M. J., Klock I. B., Milam A. H. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;115(4):511–515. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150513011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shandurina A. N., Panin A. V., Sologubova E. K., Kolotov A. V., Goncharenko O. I., Nikol'skii A. V., Logunov VYu Results of the use of therapeutic periorbital electrostimulation in neurological patients with partial atrophy of the optic nerves. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 1996 Mar-Apr;26(2):137–142. doi: 10.1007/BF02359417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stone J. L., Barlow W. E., Humayun M. S., de Juan E., Jr, Milam A. H. Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Nov;110(11):1634–1639. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230134038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Veraart C., Raftopoulos C., Mortimer J. T., Delbeke J., Pins D., Michaux G., Vanlierde A., Parrini S., Wanet-Defalque M. C. Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res. 1998 Nov 30;813(1):181–186. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00977-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES