Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2001;99:145–157.

Evolutionary attempts at 4 eyes in vertebrates.

I R Schwab 1, V Ho 1, A Roth 1, T N Blankenship 1, P G Fitzgerald 1
PMCID: PMC1359005  PMID: 11797302

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand and compare the optical, histological, and ecological differences among 4 vertebrate species that have had evolutionary attempts toward 4 eyes. METHODS: An evolutionary attempt at 4 eyes in defined as the duplication or one or more structures integral to the refraction or interpretation of the visible spectrum for that animal. We reviewed and compared the known optics, histology, and ecology of each of these vertebrate species with attempts at 4 eyes including Anableps anableps, Dialomnus fuscus, Mnierpes macrocephalus, and Bathylychnops exilis. These animals have developed portions of ancillary eyes that have diverged from the primary globe in 3 different patterns. At least 1 specimen of each of those vertebrate species known to have 4 eyes was examined histologically and compared to the animal's ecology and current cladistic relationship. RESULTS: A anabteps has 2 distinct optical systems in each eye: an upper one for aerial vision and a lower system for aquatic vision. These systems feature separate retinae and an asymmetric lens to achieve focus in the aerial and aquatic vision, but only 1 optic nerve per eye. The visual system is split horizontally to function optimally in a "prone" position in the water. D fuscus is a terrestrial feeder and has a vertically (almost perpendicular to the long axis of the fish) divided cornea using pigment and a condensation of collagen as the divider, a single pupil, and a divided retina. The split cornea allows for the fish to remain vertical with 1 cornea in air and 1 cornea in water. M macrocephalus is probably closely related to D fuscus with a similar split cornea. B exilis is a mesopelagic inhabitant living at approximately 200 to 1,000 m and has an ancillary globe that "buds" off the primary globe. This secondary globe is directed inferiorly toward the ocean floor as compared to the primary globe, which is directed 35 degrees superiorly from the horizontal. Adult species of B exilis have 2 additional scleral bodies suspected to be lenses. If so, these structures would be capable of focusing light from the inferior field onto the superior retina, presumably adding to the panoramic inferior visual field. There are other mesopelagic species, including Styleophorus chordatus, Opisthoproctus grimaldii, Scopelarchus gantheri (or guentheri), Dolichopteryx binocularis, Benthalbella infans, and Evermannella indica, that have other unusual ocular mechanisms, such as retinal diverticulae and lens pads capable of reflection, but do not meet the definition of multiple eyes, as defined for purposes of this work. CONCLUSIONS: D fuscus and M macrocephalus are terrestrial feeders requiring aquatic and aerial vision, and hence have a split cornea for this purpose, and they probably use their anterior corneae for terrestrial vision. A anableps swims at the surface with combined aerial and aquatic vision for feeding and protection from predators. B exilis is a mesopelagic feeder requiring a binocular visual field in the horizontal meridian and above, and simultaneously is a bottom scavenger using an ancillary globe and perhaps scleral lenses for recognition of bioluminescent detritus. Although 2 of these models are related (D fuscus and M macrocephalus), these 4 fish represent 3 separate, distinct, and unrelated convergent evolutionary attempts toward 4 eyes in vertebrates satisfying the ecological needs of each. The 3 different models are unrelated evolutionarily and are found in 3 separate orders.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (557.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albensi B. C., Powell J. H. The differential optomotor response of the four-eyed fish Anableps anableps. Perception. 1998;27(12):1475–1483. doi: 10.1068/p271475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albensi B. C., Powell J. H. The differential optomotor response of the four-eyed fish Anableps anableps. Perception. 1998;27(12):1475–1483. doi: 10.1068/p271475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baylor E. R. Air and water vision of the Atlantic flying fish, Cypselurus heterurus. Nature. 1967 Apr 15;214(5085):307–309. doi: 10.1038/214307a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham J. B., Rosenblatt R. H. Aerial vision: unique adaptation in an intertidal fish. Science. 1970 May 1;168(3931):586–588. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3931.586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Land M. F. On the functions of double eyes in midwater animals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 29;355(1401):1147–1150. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nilsson D. E., Pelger S. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 22;256(1345):53–58. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearcy W. G., Meyer S. L., Munk O. A 'four-eyed' fish from the deep-sea: Bathylychnops exilis Cohen, 1958. Nature. 1965 Sep 18;207(5003):1260–1262. doi: 10.1038/2071260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saidel W. M., Fabiane R. S. Optomotor response of Anableps anableps depends on the field of view. Vision Res. 1998 Jun;38(13):2001–2006. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00419-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwassmann H. O., Kruger L. Experimental analysis of the visual system of the four-eyed fish Anableps microlepis. Vision Res. 1966 Jun;5(5):269–281. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwassmann H. O., Kruger L. Experimental analysis of the visual system of the four-eyed fish Anableps microlepis. Vision Res. 1966 Jun;5(5):269–281. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shaw E., Tucker A. The optomotor reaction of schooling carangid fishes. Anim Behav. 1965 Apr-Jul;13(2):330–336. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(65)90052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sivak J. G. Accommodative lens movements in fishes: movement along the pupil axis vs movement along the pupil plane. Vision Res. 1975 Jul;15(7):825–828. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES