Skip to main content
PMC home page
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2001;99:159–170.

Surface keratopathy after penetrating keratoplasty.

V Feiz 1, M J Mannis 1, G Kandavel 1, M McCarthy 1, L Izquierdo 1, M Eckert 1, I R Schwab 1, S Torabian 1, J L Wang 1, W Wang 1
PMCID: PMC1359006  PMID: 11797303

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the type and prevalence of epithelial abnormalities in the intermediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty and to define the donor and recipient variables that influence the status of the graft epithelium. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: We prospectively followed the clinical course of 80 patients after penetrating keratoplasty. We monitored the status of the corneal epithelium for 3 months after surgery using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining of the epithelium. Donor characteristics, recipient preoperative and postoperative variables, and postoperative medications were recorded. Epithelial abnormalities were analyzed against these variables by using univariate and combined statistical models to determine the impact of each variable on postoperative epithelial pathology. Main outcome measures included punctate keratopathy, macro-epithelial defects, hurricane keratopathy, rim defects, and filamentary keratopathy. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of all patient visits demonstrated punctate epithelial keratopathy (PEK). Hurricane keratopathy (51%) and filamentary keratopathy (14%) constituted the next most commonly observed abnormalities. Older recipient age and the use of topical antibiotics were associated with a higher prevalence of punctate epithelial keratopathy. The odds ratio (OR) for a 1-year increase in age is 1.0276 (95% CI, 1.1013-1.0442), and the OR for using topical antibiotics is 6.9028 (95% CI, 3.1506-15.1239). Use of topical ofloxacin and increased time after surgery were associated with lower prevalence of punctate keratopathy; ORs were 0.9806 (95% CI, 0.9736-0.9876) and 0.3662 (95% CI, 0.1688-0.7943), respectively. Decreased corneal sensation and the presence of anterior blepharitis preoperatively were associated with an increase in hurricane keratopathy; ORs were 8.8265 (CI, 2.3837-32.6835) and 3.2815 (CI, 1.7388-6.1931), respectively. Total storage time for the donor material was also associated with an increased prevalence of hurricane keratopathy (OR, 1.0316; CI, 1.0052-1.0220). Patients with rim defects and macro-epithelial defects were more likely to have antibiotic and topical lubrication prescribed. No specific variable was found to have a significant association with filamentary keratopathy, except possibly for death-to-preservation time, which had a P value of .0587. CONCLUSIONS: Surface keratopathy is one of the most common complications of keratoplasty. Our study demonstrates that older age, preoperative lid disease, and decreased preoperative corneal sensation appear to increase the probability of clinically significant epithelial surface abnormalities after keratoplasty. Recognition of these risk factors in advance of surgery will alert the surgeon to the need for appropriate management.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (65.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AQUAVELLA J. V., GASSET A. R., DOHLMAN C. H. CORTICOSTEROIDS IN CORNEAL WOUND HEALING. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964 Oct;58:621–626. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(64)91380-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alldredge O. C., Krachmer J. H. Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Apr;99(4):599–604. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010599002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boot J. P., van Best J. A., Stolwijk T. R., Sterk C. C. Epithelial permeability in corneal grafts by fluorophotometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(6):533–535. doi: 10.1007/BF00203316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bron A. J. Vortex patterns of the corneal epithelium. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1973;93(0):455–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang S. W., Hu F. R. The epithelial barrier function in clear corneal grafts. Ophthalmic Res. 1994;26(5):283–289. doi: 10.1159/000267490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chou L., Cohen E. J., Laibson P. R., Rapuano C. J. Factors associated with epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;25(10):700–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dua H. S., Watson N. J., Mathur R. M., Forrester J. V. Corneal epithelial cell migration in humans: 'hurricane and blizzard keratopathy'. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 1):53–58. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kikkawa Y. Normal corneal staining with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res. 1972 Jul;14(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(72)90137-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim T., Palay D. A., Lynn M. Donor factors associated with epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1996 Sep;15(5):451–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinoshita S., Friend J., Thoft R. A. Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Sep;21(3):434–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mannis M. J., Zadnik K., Miller M. R., Marquez M. Preoperative risk factors for surface disease after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mannis M. J., Zadnik K., Miller M. R., Marquez M. Preoperative risk factors for surface disease after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mathers W. D., Lemp M. A. Vortex keratopathy of the corneal graft. Cornea. 1991 Mar;10(2):93–99. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199103000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathers W. D., Lemp M. A. Vortex keratopathy of the corneal graft. Cornea. 1991 Mar;10(2):93–99. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199103000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meyer R. F., Bobb K. C. Corneal epithelium in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Aug;90(2):142–147. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74845-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Patel G. M., Chuang A. Z., Kiang E., Ramesh N., Mitra S., Yee R. W. Epithelial healing rates with topical ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ofloxacin with artificial tears after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 May;26(5):690–694. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00411-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Petroutsos G., Guimaraes R., Giraud J. P., Pouliquen Y. Corticosteroids and corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Nov;66(11):705–708. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.11.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Price F. W., Jr, Whitson W. E., Collins K. S., Marks R. G. Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun;111(6):799–805. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060087029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reed D. B., Mannis M. J., Hills J. F., Johnson C. A. Corneal epithelial healing after penetrating keratoplasty using topical Healon versus balanced salt solution. Ophthalmic Surg. 1987 Jul;18(7):525–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shimazaki J., Shimmura S., Mochizuki K., Tsubota K. Morphology and barrier function of the corneal epithelium after penetrating keratoplasty: association with original diseases, tear function, and suture removal. Cornea. 1999 Sep;18(5):559–564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stern G. A., Schemmer G. B., Farber R. D., Gorovoy M. S. Effect of topical antibiotic solutions on corneal epithelial wound healing. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983 Apr;101(4):644–647. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010644025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stulting R. D., Waring G. O., 3rd, Bridges W. Z., Cavanagh H. D. Effect of donor epithelium on corneal transplant survival. Ophthalmology. 1988 Jun;95(6):803–812. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sugar A., Bokosky J. E., Meyer R. F. A randomized trial of topical corticosteroids in epithelial healing after keratoplasty. Cornea. 1984 1985;3(4):268–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sugar A., Meyer R. F., Bahn C. F. A randomized trial of pressure patching for epithelial defects after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 May;95(5):637–640. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90382-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson S. E., Kaufman H. E. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar-Apr;34(5):325–356. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(90)90110-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES