Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2001;99:213–218.

Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.

J T Wilensky 1, A Hawkins 1
PMCID: PMC1359012  PMID: 11797309

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between large-letter contrast sensitivity, high-contrast visual acuity, and visual field defects in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or ocular hypertension whose visual acuity was 20/40 (logMAR = 0.3) on better were included in the study. Visual acuity was measured using the Lighthouse visual acuity charts. Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pell-Robson (PR) chart. The mean depression (MD) score from the most recent Humphrey visual field was used to quantify the visual field defect. RESULTS: A total of 120 eyes were studied. The PR contrast sensitivity score correlated more strongly with the MD of the visual field (r = .589, P < .001) than did the logMAR visual acuity (r = .193, P = .035). When just the eyes with open-angle glaucoma were considered (N = 54), the correlation was even greater for the PR score (r = .638). In ocular hypertensive eyes (N = 25), the correlations to PR and logMAR were not that different (r = .394 for PR, r = .303 for logMAR). Pseudophakic eyes did not show as strong a correlation (r = .335) as did phakic eyes (r = .591). CONCLUSION: For glaucomatous eyes with visual acuity of 20/40 or better, a decrease in the contrast sensitivity correlates with increased visual field loss. We speculate that this decrease in contrast sensitivity in glaucoma patients may account for their complaints of poor vision despite normal or near normal visual acuity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (268.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamsons I., Rubin G. S., Vitale S., Taylor H. R., Stark W. J. The effect of early cataracts on glare and contrast sensitivity. A pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Aug;110(8):1081–1086. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080200061025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elliott D. B., Sanderson K., Conkey A. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Jan;10(1):21–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haymes S., Guest D., Heyes A., Johnston A. Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables. Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Oct;73(10):621–637. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199610000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuyk T., Elliott J. L. Visual factors and mobility in persons with age-related macular degeneration. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999 Oct;36(4):303–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ross J. E., Bron A. J., Clarke D. D. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;68(11):821–827. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.11.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sample P. A., Juang P. S., Weinreb R. N. Isolating the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma on the contrast sensitivity function. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep 15;112(3):308–316. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76732-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stamper R. L. Psychophysical changes in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;33 (Suppl):309–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tan J. C., Spalton D. J., Arden G. B. The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment. Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr;106(4):703–709. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wood J. M., Lovie-Kitchin J. E. Evaluation of the efficacy of contrast sensitivity measures for the detection of early primary open-angle glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Mar;69(3):175–181. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199203000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zulauf M., Flammer J. Correlation of spatial contrast sensitivity and visual fields in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993 Mar;231(3):146–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00920937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES