Abstract
Alternaria leaf blight (ALB), caused by the Alternaria species complex, is an economic threat to mustard cultivation all over the world. In this study, 700 infected leaf samples were collected from 28 blocks across six districts of the Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh, India. To assess the prevalence and distribution of Alternaria species, 28 representative isolates were selected for further study. Morphological traits separated the majority of the Alternaria isolates into three morphotypes corresponding to A. brassicae, A. brassicicola, and A. alternata, which cause leaf blight. The pathogenicity test revealed that 18 isolates were highly virulent, 6 isolates were moderately virulent, and 4 were less virulent. Molecular analyses of the 18 highly virulent isolates, based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the Alternaria-specific Alt a1 marker, confirmed the presence of A. brassicae (6 isolates), A. brassicicola (3 isolates), and A. alternata (9 isolates) in the region. Haplotype network analysis of concatenated ITS and Alt a1 sequences revealed two haplotypes among the A. alternata isolates and one haplotype each among the A. brassicae and A. brassicicola isolates. Additionally, all virulent A. alternata isolates carried the polyketide synthase genes (pksH and pksJ), indicating their genetic potential for Alternaria toxin biosynthesis. The predominance of A. alternata in mustard crops and the presence of toxin-biosynthesis-associated genes may pose a threat to edible oil production and safety, thereby raising serious concerns and warranting further investigation of toxin production. These findings highlighted the need for targeted resistance strategies against the prevalent Alternaria species in the region.
Keywords: Alternaria alternata, Alternaria brassicae, Alternaria brassicicola, leaf blight, mustard
1. Introduction
Mustard, scientifically known as Brassica juncea L. and commonly referred to as Indian mustard, is a prominent oilseed crop within the Brassica group. Despite its importance, mustard is severely affected by numerous fungal diseases, with Alternaria leaf blight (ALB) being one of the most destructive and widespread. ALB leads to significant losses in both yield (15–71%) and oil content (14–36%) (Bal and Kumar, 2014; Wang et al., 2021). In mustard, symptoms include dark brown to gray spots that may or may not be surrounded by a chlorotic halo (Siciliano et al., 2017). Concentric rings on the leaves reduce photosynthetic efficiency and ultimately result in abnormal seed development, thereby lowering both oil content and quality (Saharan et al., 2016). The genus Alternaria represents a diverse and ubiquitous group of fungi with a high degree of variability in spore shape and size, pathogenicity, and sporulation. Furthermore, conidial characteristics often overlap between closely related species, hindering the establishment of distinct and unambiguous species boundaries. Traditionally, species classification was based mainly on morphological characteristics, but this approach was influenced by environmental conditions (Simmons, 2007). Therefore, to overcome the limitations of morphological markers and complement morphological approaches to Alternaria taxonomy, various molecular markers have been used in systematic studies of Alternaria species. Recent molecular marker technologies have transformed genomic analyses of plant pathogens, facilitating their identification, early detection, and the study of genetic diversity. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is the universal DNA barcode for fungal identification and has been widely used for species delimitation in the genus Alternaria (Kashyap et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017). However, because ITS alone often provides insufficient resolution for distinguishing closely related Alternaria species, additional protein-coding loci, including glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1), histone H3 (H3), and the Alternaria major allergen gene (Alt a1), have been increasingly employed to improve species identification and phylogenetic resolution (Woudenberg et al., 2015). Among these, the Alt a1 gene has been widely recognized as a useful marker for discriminating closely related Alternaria species owing to its higher sequence variability than the ITS region (Cramer and Lawrence, 2003; Hong et al., 2005). The polyketide synthase genes (pksH and pksJ) are involved in mycotoxin biosynthesis and contribute significantly to the pathogenicity and virulence of Alternaria species. Alternariol (AOH) and alternariol methyl ether (AME) are among the most common mycotoxins in A. alternata (Saha et al., 2012). ALB remains difficult to manage because durable and broad-spectrum host resistance is still unavailable in commercially cultivated Brassica varieties, despite the identification ofseveral resistant germplasm sources and resistance-associated loci (Singh et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2024). The severity of Alternaria blight on oilseed brassicas varies from season to season, from region to region, and among individual crops in India (Chattopadhyay et al., 2005). Although ALB in brassicas is widespread and has a high economic impact under conducive weather conditions, there are no specific data on the number of causal species or detailed studies of the main aspects of the disease in mustard crops in the Bundelkhand region. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the variability and population diversity of Alternaria species occurring in the Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh, India, with the goal of generating insights into the involvement of different Alternaria species in causing ALB in oilseed brassicas.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sampling and fungal strain isolation
During the 2023–2024 rabi season, a total of 28 mustard fields were selected and surveyed across 28 blocks within six administrative districts of the Bundelkhand region (Figure 1). From each field, 25 leaf samples infected with leaf blight were randomly collected across the entire field and brought to the laboratory for isolation. First, infected leaf tissues were cut into small pieces (2–3 mm) containing both infected and healthy portions. Excised leaf pieces were surface-sterilized using a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min, rinsed three times in sterile distilled water, placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates, and cultured at 25 ± 2°C for 5 days. The colonies growing on the leaf pieces were aseptically transferred to fresh PDA plates using a sterile needle for purification.
Figure 1.

Geographical locations indicating sampling sites of Alternaria spp. Isolates.
2.2. Cultural and morphological characterization of isolates
To investigate the morphological characteristics, 5-mm mycelial discs were cut from the 7-day-old cultures, placed centrally on fresh PDA plates, and incubated for 7 days at 25°C. Cultural characteristics such as colony color, margin, and general appearance were recorded. After 12 days, conidial length and breadth and the number of septa per conidium were measured under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and all images were captured at ×40 magnification.
2.3. Pathogenicity test
The virulence of 28 purified isolates was tested on detached healthy leaves of the susceptible cultivar ‘Rohini’ using the disc inoculation method under laboratory conditions. The leaves were washed under running tap water, rinsed with autoclaved water, and wiped with 70% ethanol. A 5-mm agar disc from a 7-day-old culture was cut and aseptically placed on the leaf surface under laminar airflow. The inoculated leaves were placed on blotting paper in sterilized Petri dishes, with one leaf per dish, and maintained in a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) incubator at 25 ± 2°C. The blotting paper was kept moist by spraying it with autoclaved distilled water. Observations on the onset of disease symptoms were recorded at 24-h intervals for up to 120 h after pathogen inoculation. An uninoculated control was maintained separately for each isolate. The pathogens were reisolated from the inoculated leaves to prove Koch’s postulates.
2.4. Isolation of genomic DNA, PCR amplification, and sequencing
Based on the pathogenicity results, the 18 highly virulent isolates representing the three identified Alternaria species were selected for subsequent molecular characterization, phylogenetic analysis, and haplotype network analysis. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the 18 highly virulent isolates using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) technique (Li et al., 2013). The isolates were cultured in 50 mL of potato dextrose broth in a BOD incubator shaker at 100 rpm and 25 ± 2°C for 5–6 days. The mycelial balls were harvested using filtration and dried for DNA extraction. The concentration and purity of DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher™ Scientific, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). The quality of the genomic DNA was tested using 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis (iGeneLabserve™, New Delhi, India), and the DNA was stored at −20°C until further use. Two partial regions of the isolated fungal genome were amplified: the ITS region using the ITS-1 and ITS-4 primer pair and the Alt a1 region (Alt a1 allergen gene) using the Alt-forward and Alt-reverse primer pair, following the amplification conditions in Table 1. PCR amplification was performed in 25-μL reaction mixtures containing 1 μL of DNA template, 12.5 μL of Mastermix (HiMedia®, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India), 1 μL of each primer, and 9.5 μL of double-distilled water (ddH2O) in a Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems™, New Delhi, India). All PCR products were sequenced using the Sanger method at Eurofins Genomics, Bangalore, India.
Table 1.
Primers and PCR conditions used.
| Primer | Primer DNA sequence | PCR conditions | Amplicon size | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS1 | 5’ TCC GTA GGT GAA CCTGCG G 3′ | 94°C for 5 min; 94°C for 30 s, 48°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 90 s for 35 cycles, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min | 550 bp | Woudenberg et al. (2013) |
| ITS4 | 5’ GCT GCG TTC TTC ATCGAT GC 3′ | |||
| AltF | 5’ATG CAG TTC ACC ACC ATC GC 3′ | 95°C for 5 min; 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for 35 cycles, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min | 510 bp | Hong et al. (2005) |
| AltR | 5’ACG AGG GTG AYG TAG GCG TC 3′ | |||
| PksH | 5’GTCAACCCTCTCACACCAAC3′ | 94°C for 5 min; 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for 35 cycles, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min | 290 bp | Saleem and El-Shahir (2022) |
| PksH | 5’GACGCATCGCTTCAATAGCC3′ | |||
| PksJ | 5’GTCCCAAATTCCTACCCTCAC3′ | 94°C for 5 min; 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for 35 cycles, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min | 260 bp | Saleem and El-Shahir (2022) |
| PksJ | 5’GATAGCCATCGAAAGCATTCCC3′ |
2.5. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships and haplotype network
The obtained sequence data were subjected to BLASTn analysis using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) following alignment using ClustalW in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) version 11.0. Sequences of closely related Alternaria strains were retrieved from GenBank to construct datasets for phylogenetic analysis. The GenBank sequences were combined with the sequences obtained in this study and concatenated, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm based on the Tamura–Nei model in MEGA version 11.0 (Tamura et al., 2021), using the bootstrap method with 1,000 repetitions. Similarly, the nucleotide sequences of the ITS and Alt a1 genes were concatenated for haplotype network analysis of the Alternaria isolates using PopART version 1.7 (Leigh et al., 2015) and the Templeton–Crandall–Sing (TCS) method. Sequences were aligned and trimmed to the same length, and ambiguous regions were excluded before analysis. In the network, haplotypes were represented as nodes, with node size proportional to haplotype frequency, while different colors were used to differentiate among Alternaria species.
2.6. Detection of pksH and pksJ genes associated with toxin biosynthesis
Based on the species identification and pathogenicity results, only the virulent A. alternata isolates were selected for pksH and pksJ screening to assess their genetic potential for toxin biosynthesis. The pksH and pksJ genes, which are associated with the biosynthesis of Alternaria toxins, were amplified from the genomic DNA of the selected A. alternata isolates using gene-specific primer pairs in a 25 µL PCR reaction under the amplification conditions presented in Table 1. The PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel in 0.5 × Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer, visualized after ethidium bromide staining under UV illumination, and sequenced using the Sanger method. High-quality consensus sequences were assembled in BioEdit software and compared with NCBI GenBank entries using BLASTn. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using MEGA version 11.0 and the ML method with 1,000 bootstrap repetitions, including reference sequences of A. alternata retrieved from GenBank.
3. Results
3.1. Survey and collection of infected leaf samples
A comprehensive survey was conducted to assess the prevalence and spatial distribution of Alternaria blight in mustard during the 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 rabi seasons. Diseased leaf samples exhibiting typical Alternaria blight symptoms were randomly collected. Twenty-eight isolates were collected from different blocks across six districts in the Bundelkhand region, namely, Jhansi, Lalitpur, Banda, Mahoba, Jalaun, and Hamirpur (Figure 1; Table 2).
Table 2.
Collection of infected leaf samples from different districts of the Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh.
| District | Block | Isolate code | Latitude | Longitude | Date of collection | Host (plant part) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jhansi | Moth | Alt.1 | 25.722812 | 78.944648 | 24/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Gursarai | Alt.2 | 25.579756 | 79.171877 | 24/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Bamor | Alt.3 | 25.663403 | 79.048949 | 26/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Badagoan | Alt.4 | 25.522326 | 78.436086 | 26/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Babina | Alt.5 | 25.485539 | 78.427297 | 28/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Chirgoan | Alt.6 | 25.558965 | 78.804284 | 28/12/2023 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jhansi | Jhansi | Alt.7 | 25.516854 | 78.548648 | 15/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Talbehat | Alt.8 | 25.005046 | 78.447554 | 16/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Jakhaura | Alt.9 | 24.829845 | 78.463291 | 16/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Bar | Alt.10 | 24.783581 | 78.537326 | 17/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Mehroni | Alt.11 | 24.558954 | 78.679568 | 17/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Madawara | Alt.12 | 24.440207 | 78.659768 | 18/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Lalitpur | Birdha | Alt.13 | 24.730332 | 78.524278 | 18/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Banda | Barokhar | Alt.14 | 25.436386 | 80.37438 | 24/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Banda | Mahua | Alt.15 | 25.404935 | 80.417220 | 24/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Banda | Tindwari | Alt.16 | 25.576980 | 80.477270 | 28/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Banda | Bisanda | Alt.17 | 25.484555 | 80.675027 | 28/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Banda | Baberu | Alt.18 | 25.591355 | 80.607131 | 28/01/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Mahoba | Kabrai | Alt.19 | 25.330406 | 79.830374 | 04/02/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Mahoba | Charkhari | Alt.20 | 25.354225 | 79.749477 | 04/02/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Mahoba | Jaitpur | Alt.21 | 25.339521 | 79.605815 | 05/02/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Mahoba | Panwari | Alt.22 | 25.408815 | 79.505011 | 05/02/2024 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jalaun | Konch | Alt.23 | 26.019779 | 79.148735 | 20/01/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jalaun | Madhogarh | Alt.24 | 26.212885 | 79.169012 | 21/01/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Jalaun | Jalaun | Alt.25 | 26.154468 | 79.27396 | 21/01/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Hamirpur | Rath | Alt.26 | 25.491633 | 79.501848 | 12/02/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Hamirpur | Muskara | Alt.27 | 25.641389 | 79.776496 | 12/02/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
| Hamirpur | Maudaha | Alt.28 | 25.699492 | 80.140885 | 13/02/2025 | B. juncea (Leaf) |
3.2. Morphological characterization
Alternaria isolates showed variability in numerous phenotypic characteristics, such as colony appearance, color, margin, conidial size (µm), and longitudinal and transverse septation of conidia. The isolates displayed pronounced differences in colony color, including green, greenish white, and grayish. Mycelial appearance varied considerably, ranging from fluffy and raised to flat and smooth, and colony margins were either smooth or undulated. Microscopic observations of conidial morphology at ×40 magnification revealed variability in conidial size and the number of septa. A significant variation in their color and conidia among different isolates is depicted in Figure 2. Isolates were divided into distinct clusters based on colony appearance, color, margin, conidial size, and longitudinal and transverse septation of conidia. Based on morphological features, all 28 isolates were grouped into three clusters that were identified as species (Figure 3). Cluster I consisted of eight isolates with greenish white to grayish colony color, colony appearance ranging from smooth to raised, and mycelial margins ranging from smooth to undulated on PDA. Conidial size ranged from 21.10–41.59 × 4.12–6.51 μm, and the numbers of transverse and longitudinal septa ranged from 3–9 and 0–2, respectively. Cluster II comprised 14 isolates with green to greenish white colonies. Colony appearance was highly variable, ranging from fluffy and raised to flat and smooth, and colony margins ranged from smooth to undulated. Conidial size ranged from 8.15–21.38 × 3.10–6.61 μm, and the numbers of transverse and longitudinal septa ranged from 1–6 and 1–4, respectively. Six isolates in Cluster III exhibited green to greenish white or grayish colonies, raised, smooth, or flat colony appearances, and smooth to undulated margins. Conidial size ranged from 15.37–25.86 × 4.09–6.23 μm, and the numbers of transverse and longitudinal septa ranged from 1–6 and 0–2, respectively. The first group of 8 large-spored isolates was identified as A. brassicae; the second group, morphologically the most variable one, consisted of 14 isolates of A. alternata; and the third group of 6 small-spored isolates was A. brassicicola, according to Simmons (2007) (Table 3; Figures 3, 4).
Figure 2.

Colony morphology of Alternaria spp. on PDA (15 days old culture) and conidia formation on V8 agar medium. (a) Alt1-7, (b) Alt 8-14, (c) Alt15-21, (d) Alt 22-28.
Figure 3.

Dendrogram derived from morphological characteristics of 28 isolates of Alternaria spp. grown on PDA medium, based on colony color, appearance, margin, conidial size (µm), and the numbers of transverse and longitudinal septa.
Table 3.
Description of morphological characteristics of Alternaria spp. from mustard.
| Species (number of isolates) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphological characteristics | A. brassicae (8) | A. alternata (14) | A. brassicicola (6) |
| Mycelial texture and shape | Cottony, circular | Cottony, circular | Cottony, circular |
| Colony color | Greenish white | Green | Grayish green |
| Colony margin | Undulated | Smooth or undulated | Smooth or undulated |
| Conidial shape | Mostly obclavate | Obclavate to long ellipsoid | Ellipsoid or obclavate |
| Conidial length (μm) | 21–45 | 8.0–20 | 18–26 |
| Conidial breadth (μm) | 4.12–5.64 | 5.22–7.62 | 4.22–5.82 |
| Number of transverse septa (min.–max.) | 3–9 | 1–6 | 1–6 |
| Number of longitudinal septa | 0–2 | 1–4 | 0–2 |
Figure 4.

(1a-c) Symptoms of leaf spots on mustard; (2a-c) 7-day-old culture on PDA; (3a-c, 4a-c) conidia; a –A. brassicae, b - A. brassicicola, c - A. alternata.
3.3. In vitro pathogenicity test of Alternaria isolates
All 28 Alternaria isolates were evaluated for pathogenicity based on lesion size on the mustard cultivar ‘Rohini’ during the 2023–2024 rabi season. Of the 28 isolates, 18 isolates (Alt1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, and 27) were highly virulent and produced the largest lesions, with an average diameter of 10.0–15.0 mm, 5 days after inoculation; 6 isolates (Alt 10, 11, 16, 20, 22, and 26) caused yellowing symptoms on the inoculated leaves and were categorized as moderately virulent; and the remaining 4 isolates (Alt 12, 17, 18, and 28) did not produce any symptoms and were classified as less virulent (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Pathogenicity test showing symptoms caused by highly virulent isolates (Alt1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, and 27), moderately virulent isolates (Alt10, 11, 16, 20, 22, and 26), and less virulent isolates (Alt12, 17, 18, and 28).
3.4. Molecular identification of Alternaria isolates
In PCR analysis, the fragments of genes, ITS (~550 bp) and Alt a1 (~510 bp) were amplified in all 18 most virulent isolates. All sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database (the corresponding accession numbers are provided in Table 4) and searched using BLASTn for closely related sequences. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were performed for the collected Alternaria isolates and previously reported A. brassicae, A. brassicicola, and A. alternata isolates using the maximum likelihood (ML) method, while Fusarium verticillioides was used as an outgroup to validate the tree (Figure 6). The phylogenetic tree based on concatenated ITS and Alt a1 sequences demonstrated that the virulent strains recovered from different locations in the Bundelkhand region clustered together, confirming the homology-based identification through the formation of three distinct clades with moderate-to-high bootstrap values (Figure 6). The A. alternata isolates, namely, Alt 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 15, 19, and 25, were closely related to and grouped with the A. alternata reference strain MZ330635 YA31; the A. brassicicola isolates, namely, Alt 3, 7, and 21, were closely related to and grouped with the A. brassicicola reference strain OP096435 HB3; and the A. brassicae isolates, namely, Alt 5, 8, 13, 23, 24, and 27, were closely related to and grouped with the A. brassicae reference strain OK064153 BA200715.
Table 4.
Selected isolates used in this study and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers used in phylogenetic analyses.
| Species | District | Block | Isolates | GenBank accession number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | Alta1 | PksH | PksJ | ||||
| A. brassicae | Jhansi | Babina | Alt.5 | PQ231108 | PV258717 | – | – |
| A. brassicae | Lalitpur | Talbehat | Alt.8 | PQ197803 | PV335432 | – | – |
| A. brassicae | Lalitpur | Birdha | Alt.13 | PQ549906 | PV334935 | – | – |
| A. brassicae | Jalaun | Konch | Alt.23 | PQ482359 | PV334936 | – | – |
| A. brassicae | Jalaun | Madhogarh | Alt.24 | PQ468465 | PV296230 | – | – |
| A. brassicae | Hamirpur | Muskara | Alt.27 | PQ345721 | PV081784 | – | – |
| A. brassicicola | Jhansi | Bamor | Alt.3 | PQ222681 | PV296229 | – | – |
| A. brassicicola | Jhansi | Jhansi | Alt.7 | PQ510337 | PV334934 | – | – |
| A. brassicicola | Mahoba | Jaitpur | Alt.21 | PQ516740 | PV067054 | – | – |
| A. alternata | Jhansi | Moth | Alt.1 | PQ197634 | PV081785 | PV786833 | PV798443 |
| A. alternata | Jhansi | Gursarai | Alt.2 | PQ556156 | PV057425 | PV779693 | PV077734 |
| A. alternata | Jhansi | Badagoan | Alt.4 | PQ198413 | PV258716 | PV786835 | PV798444 |
| A. alternata | Jhansi | Chirgoan | Alt.6 | PQ345477 | PV057426 | PV167494 | PV693339 |
| A. alternata | Lalitpur | Jakhaura | Alt.9 | PQ345719 | PV067051 | PV172432 | PV164363 |
| A. alternata | Banda | Barokhar | Alt.14 | PQ197633 | PV258718 | PV786834 | PV798445 |
| A. alternata | Banda | Mahua | Alt.15 | PQ345720 | PV067053 | PV167495 | PV167491 |
| A. alternata | Mahoba | Kabrai | Alt.19 | PQ222683 | PV067052 | PV169307 | PV167493 |
| A. alternata | Jalaun | Jalaun | Alt.25 | PQ345478 | PV335431 | PV167522 | PV16749 |
Figure 6.

Phylogenetic relationship derived fromconcatenated(ITS + Alt a1) gene sequences of Alternaria spp. virulent strains by MEGA XI software using ML method and the best-fit model (TN93+G+I) based on 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The tree was rooted using sequences of Fusarium verticillioides. Support values (greater than 50%) are displayed.
3.5. Haplotype analyses
To determine the evolutionary relationships among haplotypes, a TCS network using the most parsimonious connections was constructed based on concatenated ITS and Alt a1 gene sequences (Figure 7). The results of the network were similar to the taxonomic grouping derived from the phylogenetic analysis. We identified four haplotypes (Hap_1–Hap_4) among the analyzed isolates, which formed different groups corresponding to A. alternata, A. brassicae, and A. brassicicola. The identified haplotypes clearly separated these species into independent clusters, indicating significant genetic divergence. Hap_1, which comprised A. alternata isolates, was the most frequent and centrally distributed haplotype, indicating its dominance within the population. In contrast, the smaller haplotypes (Hap_2, Hap_3, and Hap_4), which were mainly associated with A. alternata, A. brassicicola, and A. brassicae, respectively, formed distinct but closely related nodes, suggesting low-to-moderate genetic variation among these groups. The overall network showed clear genetic differentiation among species, with haplotypes separated by a small number of mutational steps and no overlap between species clusters. This clear separation suggested restricted gene flow and supported independent evolutionary lineages among the three Alternaria species. It also provided a simplified and clear visualization of genetic relationships, supported the results of the phylogenetic analysis, and confirmed species-level divergence.
Figure 7.

Haplotypes network based on TCS networkderived from concatenated sequence of ITS and Alta1 genes of Alternaria isolates obtained from Bundelkhand region (U.P), India. Each haplotype is represented with a circle and their size is proportional to the haplotype frequency.
3.6. Detection of pksH and pksJ genes in Alternaria alternata
Polyketide synthase genes (pksH and pksJ) were successfully amplified from the genomic DNA of all A. alternata isolates, producing clear and reproducible bands of the expected sizes (~290 bp for pksH and ~260 bp for pksJ), confirming the presence of genes associated with toxin biosynthesis. Sequencing of purified amplicons yielded high-quality reads and BLASTn analysis showed 100% homology with reference A. alternata sequences available in GenBank, validating gene-specific amplification. Phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated pksH and pksJ sequences using the ML method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates revealed that the isolates clustered closely with previously reported mycotoxin-producing A. alternata strains (reference species: JX103645 ATCC strain), with strong support (bootstrap = 100%) for the grouping of the test isolates, indicating high genetic relatedness (Figure 8). The detection of these genes suggests the genetic potential for toxin biosynthesis; however, the production of Alternaria toxins was not directly assessed in this study.
Figure 8.

Phylogenetic relationship among nine A.alternata isolates based on concatenated (PksJ + PksH) sequences by ML method based on 1,000 bootstrap replicatesusing MEGA 11.0 in which associated taxa clustered together.
4. Discussion
The present study describes the prevalence and distribution of Alternaria species causing leaf blight in mustard in the Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh. Morphological characterization revealed considerable variability among isolates in colony color, texture, margin, conidial dimensions, and septation patterns. Based on these features, isolates were classified into three groups corresponding to A. brassicae, A. brassicicola, and A. alternata. Such morphological variability has been widely reported and is often influenced by environmental conditions and host interactions (Simmons, 2007; Saharan et al., 2016). Notably, A. brassicae was identified as a large-spored species, A. brassicicola as a small-spored one, while A. alternata displayed a high degree of variability. Molecular analyses are essential for revealing complex species composition and inter- and intraspecies genetic relationships. While morphological and cultural characteristics are often unreliable for identification because of their variability (Lawrence et al., 2016), genetic analyses supported the results of morphological identification and enabled discrimination among the groups. The pathogenicity test revealed that 18 isolates were highly virulent and produced lesions on leaves of the susceptible cultivar ‘Rohini’, whereas 6 isolates were moderately virulent and 4 isolates were less virulent. Based on molecular characterization, the 18 highly virulent isolates comprised six A. brassicae, three A. brassicicola, and nine A. alternata. The predominance of highly virulent isolates among these three species is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that multiple Alternaria species associated with oilseed brassicas are capable of causing severe disease symptoms under favorable conditions (Meena et al., 2017).
In this study, molecular analyses using concatenated ITS and Alt a1 sequences provided robust species delimitation and validated the morphological identification. The maximum likelihood tree formed three well-supported clades corresponding to A. brassicae, A. brassicicola, and A. alternata, consistent with multilocus phylogenetic analyses reported in previous taxonomic studies (Hong et al., 2005; Somma et al., 2019). Similarly, Aneja et al. (2014) reported the presence of A. alternata, A. brassicae, and A. brassicicola on oilseed brassicas, with A. brassicae as the predominant species. The clustering of Bundelkhand isolates with reference strains reported globally highlights the genetic relatedness and potential genetic stability of these pathogens across geographical regions. This study is the first to report the involvement of multiple Alternaria species in causing ALB in mustard.
The haplotype network analysis of Alternaria species in the present study revealed the genetic structure and evolutionary relationships within and among species. A total of four haplotypes were identified, forming distinct clusters corresponding to A. brassicae, A. brassicicola, and A. alternata and indicating clear species-level differentiation, which was also supported by the phylogenetic analysis. Further network analysis revealed a low level of intraspecific variation in A. brassicicola, with most isolates grouped within a single haplotype or closely related haplotypes. This pattern reflects a high level of genetic homogeneity and is consistent with previous reports in which only a single ITS haplotype of A. brassicicola has been reported across diverse geographical regions and hosts, including rapeseed-mustard in Serbia, canola in Canada, and cruciferous crops in India (Saharan et al., 2016; Akram et al., 2019; Blagojević et al., 2020). This variability may be attributed to the conserved nature of the genomic regions analyzed or limited evolutionary divergence within this species.
Similarly, A. brassicae isolates in the present study exhibited moderate-to-low haplotype diversity, supporting previous reports of very low or poorly characterized genetic variation in ITS and protein-coding regions such as GAPDH (Saharan et al., 2016). This limited genetic variability suggests a relatively stable population structure and may indicate a narrower adaptive range compared with other Alternaria species. On the other hand, A. alternata showed comparatively higher haplotype diversity, which may be due to its wide host range, ecological adaptability, and genetic plasticity, as reported in previous studies. Overall, the haplotype network demonstrated clear but not absolute genetic separation among species, with haplotypes connected by a limited number of mutational steps. This indicated restricted gene flow alongside partial genetic relatedness, and the network structure was largely consistent with the phylogenetic analysis, supporting species delimitation while also highlighting subtle genetic connectivity among Alternaria species.
Although multiple Alternaria species were recovered from the surveyed mustard fields, their ecological interactions during disease development remain unclear. Whether these species interact synergistically, competitively, or independently under natural infection conditions was beyond the scope of the present study. Future investigations involving controlled single- and mixed-species inoculation experiments would help determine their individual and combined contributions to disease severity and epidemic development.
Alternaria species produce more than 60 secondary metabolites. Alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) are among the most common mycotoxins in A. alternata. Polyketide synthases (PKSs) are important enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of these toxins. The pksH and pksJ genes are among the essential genes associated with toxin production (Saha et al., 2012). A major outcome of this study is the detection of polyketide synthase genes (pksH and pksJ) in all A. alternata isolates. The consistent amplification of pksH and pksJ genes, together with their phylogenetic clustering with known toxigenic strains, suggests the genetic potential of these isolates to synthesize Alternaria toxins such as alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME). However, the expression of these genes and the production of AOH and AME in infected mustard tissues were not investigated in the present study. Previous studies have demonstrated that PKS genes play a crucial role in virulence, host colonization, and secondary metabolite production in A. alternata (Saha et al., 2012; Estiarte et al., 2016; Wenderoth et al., 2019). The presence of both genes in all A. alternata isolates suggests a conserved genetic potential for toxin biosynthesis, which may contribute to disease severity and pose potential risks to oilseed crop safety, echoing similar concerns in other Brassicaceae crops such as cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, and radish (Saha, 2012; Saleem and El-Shahir, 2022). The identification of A. alternata isolates with the genetic potential for toxin biosynthesis on mustard in this region represents a significant finding, indicating an emerging threat that warrants further ecological and epidemiological investigation. Future studies integrating gene expression analyses with quantitative toxin profiling will be essential to determine whether pksH and pksJ are actively expressed during infection and to establish the contribution of alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) to virulence in the mustard-Alternaria pathosystem.
Although the present study provides comprehensive insights into the diversity, pathogenicity, and toxigenic potential of the Alternaria species complex associated with ALB of mustard, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying host responses to these pathogens remain largely unexplored. Emerging approaches such as single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, together with studies on phytohormone-mediated defense signaling, may provide valuable insights into host–pathogen interactions and the molecular basis of host susceptibility and resistance, thereby facilitating the identification of candidate molecular targets for resistance breeding (Ali et al., 2026, 2025).
5. Conclusion
Collectively, these findings highlight the complexity of Alternaria leaf blight (ALB) in mustard, which is caused by multiple Alternaria species varying in virulence and genetic makeup. The combined use of morphological, pathogenicity, and molecular tools provided a comprehensive framework for accurate species identification and offered insights into the genetic potential for toxin biosynthesis in A. alternata. Importantly, the presence of highly virulent A. alternata isolates carrying conserved polyketide synthase genes associated with toxin biosynthesis underscores the need for resistance breeding programs targeting toxin-associated pathogenicity, the identification of species-specific resistant donors, and region-specific disease management strategies. Future research should focus on functional validation of the pksH and pksJ genes, their expression during host infection, and quantitative analysis of Alternaria toxins to better understand their role in host–pathogen interactions, which may open new avenues for molecular breeding and biocontrol interventions.
Acknowledgments
All the authors acknowledge their host institute for infrastructure support. All the authors read and approved the content of the manuscript for publication.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Katarzyna Otulak-Kozieł, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
Reviewed by: Muhammad Ali, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, China
Inês Diniz, Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e Veterinaria Polo de Inovacao de Alcobaca, Portugal
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.
Author contributions
CC: Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ST: Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Software, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Resources, Formal analysis, Project administration, Visualization. PT: Writing – review & editing, Software, Writing – original draft, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation. PJ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. AP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RC: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1901357/full#supplementary-material
References
- Akram W., Li G., Ahmad A., Anjum T., Ali B., Guo J., et al. (2019). Alternaria brassicicola causing leaf spot disease on broccoli in China. Plant Dis. 103, 2960–2960. [Google Scholar]
- Ali M., Shi L., Khan M. A., Ali A., Hu S., Shen J. (2025). Auxin biodynamics and its integral role in enhancing plant resilience to environmental cues. Physiol. Plant 177, e70165. doi: 10.1111/ppl.70165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali M., Wang Z., Guo Q., Wang Y., Cai Y., Du J., et al. (2026). Mapping plant cell-type-specific responses to environmental stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 31 (8), 1030–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2026.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aneja J. K., Agarwal A. A., Agnihorti A. A. (2014). Inter andintra-specific diversity in Alternaria species infecting oilseedbrassicas in India. J. Oilseed Brassica 5, 102–117. [Google Scholar]
- Bal R. S., Kumar A. (2014). Studies on the epidemiology of white rust and Alternaria leaf blight and their effect on the yield of Indian mustard. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 9, 302–306. doi: 10.5897/ajar2013.7352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Blagojević J. D., Vukojević J. B., Ivanović Z. S. (2020). Occurrence and characterization of Alternaria species associated with leaf spot disease in rapeseed in Serbia. Plant Pathology, 69 (5), 883–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chattopadhyay C., Agrawal R., Kumar A., Bhar L. M., Meena P. D., Meena R. L., et al. (2005). Epidemiology and forecasting of Alternaria blight of oilseed brassica in India-a case study. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 112 (4), 351–365. [Google Scholar]
- Cramer R. A., Lawrence C. B. (2003). Cloning of a gene encoding an Alt a 1 isoallergen differentially expressed by the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola during Arabidopsis infection. Appl. Enviromental Microbiol. 69, 2361–2364. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.4.2361-2364.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong S. G., Cramer R. A., Lawrence C. B., Pryor B. M. (2005). Alt a1 allergen homologs from Alternaria and related taxa: Analysis of phylogenetic content and secondary structure. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42, 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kashyap P. L., Rai P., Kumar S., Chakdar H., Srivastava A. K. (2017). “ DNA barcoding for diagnosis and monitoring of fungal plant pathogens,” in Molecular Markers in Mycology: Diagnostics and Marker Developments ( Springer International Publishing, Cham: ), 87–122. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence D. P., Rotondo F., Gannibal P. B. (2016). Biodiversity and taxonomy of the Alternaria alternata species complex. Mycol. Prog. 15, 3–22. doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1144-x30311153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leigh J. W., Bryant D., Nakagawa S. (2015). POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6 (9), 1110. [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Wang S., Yu J., Wang L., Zhou S. (2013). A modified CTAB protocol for plant DNA extraction. CBB 48, 72–78. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1259.2013.00072 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meena P. D., Gupta R., Meena H. S., Sharma P., Jambhulkar S. (2017). Pathogenic variability within Indian Alternaria brassicae isolates using seed, cotyledon and leaf of Brassica species. Journal of Phytopathology, 165 (4), 238–248. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra A., Khan N. A., Jha R. K., Murugesh T., Singh A. (2024). Study of resistance mechanism of Alternaria blight (Alternaria brassicicola) by biochemical markers in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. &Coss.). Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1420197. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1420197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saha D. (2012). Alternaria toxins in food and feed: An overview of occurrence, toxicity and regulation. World Mycotoxin J. 5, 127–143. [Google Scholar]
- Saha D., Mandal P., Dasgupta S. (2012). Identification of polyketide synthase genes and their correlation with mycotoxin production in Alternaria alternata. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 2625–2634. [Google Scholar]
- Saharan G. S., Mehta N., Meena P. D., Dayal P. (2016). Alternaria Diseases of Crucifers: Biology, Ecology and Disease Management Vol. 299 (Singapore: Springer Singapore; ), 87–98. [Google Scholar]
- Saleem A., El-Shahir A. A. (2022). Morphological and molecular characterization of some Alternaria species isolated from tomato fruits concerning mycotoxin production and polyketide synthase genes. Plants 11, 1168. doi: 10.3390/plants11091168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siciliano I., Gilardi G., Ortu G., Gisi U., Gullino M. L., Garibaldi A. (2017). Identification and characterization of Alternaria species causing leaf spot on cabbage, cauliflower, wild and cultivated rocket by using molecular and morphological features and mycotoxin production. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 149, 401–413. doi: 10.1007/s10658-017-1190-030311153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Simmons E. G. (2007). Alternaria: An Identification Manual ( CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht; ). [Google Scholar]
- Singh K. P., Kumari P., Rai P. K. (2021). Current status of the disease-resistant gene (s)/QTLs, and strategies for improvement in Brassica juncea. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 617405. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Somma S., Amatulli M. T., Masiello M., Moretti A., Logrieco A. F., Susca A. (2019). Alternaria species associated to wheat black point identified through a multilocus sequence approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 293, 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang B., Zhang Y., Liu J., Sheng O., Liu F., Qiu D., et al. (2021). A new leaf blight disease caused by Alternaria jacinthicola on banana in China. Horticulturae 8, 12–20. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae801001230654563 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wenderoth M., Garganese F., Schmidt-Heydt M., Soukup S. T., Ippolito A., Fischer R. (2019). Alternariol as virulence and colonization factor of Alternaria alternata during plant infection. Mol. Microbiol. 112, 131–146. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woudenberg J. H. C., Groenewald J. Z., Binder M., Crous P. W. (2013). Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 75, 171–212. doi: 10.3114/sim0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woudenberg J. H. C., Seidl M. F., Groenewald J. Z., De Vries M., Stielow J. B., Thomma B. P., et al. (2015). Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formaespeciales or pathotypes. Stud. Mycol. 82, 1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang W., Manawasinghe I. S., Zhao W., Xu J., Brooks S., Zhao X., et al. (2017). Multiple gene genealogy reveals high genetic diversity and evidence for multiple origins of Chinese Plasmopara viticola population. Sci. Rep. 7, 17304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17569-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.
