Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2026 Sep 21;9(9):e2634777. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.34777

Public Attitudes About Preventive Dementia Vaccine Among US Adults

J Felipe Montano-Campos 1,✉, Geoffrey F Joyce 2, Julie Margaretta Zissimopoulos 1
PMCID: PMC13595182  PMID: 42804699

Abstract

This survey study assesses the willingness of US adults aged 50 years or older to receive a low-cost, multidose vaccine to prevent dementia and stratifies this willingness by respondent age, sex, and race and ethnicity.

Introduction

Dementia is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide and imposes a substantial and growing economic burden.1,2 Efforts to address this burden are increasingly focused on prevention, including interventions before symptom onset. Several preventive strategies are under development, including immunotherapies and vaccine-based approaches that delay or reduce the risk of Alzheimer disease.3,4 Recent studies linking shingles vaccination to lower dementia risk have increased public and scientific interest in vaccine-based dementia prevention.5,6 The success of these strategies will depend not only on clinical effectiveness but also on population-level acceptance. However, little is known about how individuals perceive preventive dementia vaccines or whether willingness to adopt varies across sociodemographic groups.

In this study, we used survey data to examine US public attitudes toward a preventive dementia vaccine. Our objective was to ascertain whether willingness to receive this vaccine differed by age, sex, and race and ethnicity.

Methods

We analyzed the 2025 Dementia and Medication survey data from the Understanding America Study, a nationally representative internet panel of US adults (eTable in Supplement 1).7 We recruited Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black (hereafter Black), and non-Hispanic White (hereafter White) respondents aged 50 years or older (eMethods in Supplement 1 provides additional details). Participants provided electronic informed consent. The University of Southern California Institutional Review Board approved this survey study. We followed the AAPOR reporting guideline.

Respondents were asked about their willingness to receive a low-cost, multidose vaccine that would reduce dementia risk by 50%, assuming a high risk of future dementia. Response options were on a 7-point scale: definitely no, very unlikely, unlikely, not sure/neutral, likely, very likely, or definitely yes (eFigure in Supplement 1). The multidose formulation reflects the design of vaccine candidates under investigation in dementia prevention trials.3,4 Differences in willingness to adopt were assessed using ordered logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Survey weights were applied to produce nationally representative estimates.

Two-sided P < .05 indicated statistical significance. Data analysis was performed using R 4.5.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing).

Results

Among 1529 respondents, the weighted sample had a mean (SD) age of 65.6 (9.3) years and was 52.5% female. Additionally, 45.7% of respondents had a college degree or higher and 11.7% self-identified as Black, 14.6% as Hispanic, and 73.7% as White.

Overall, 72.1% of respondents reported willingness to adopt (likely, very likely, definitely yes), 20.8% reported hesitation (not sure/neutral), and 7.2% reported no willingness (definitely no, very unlikely, unlikely). Patterns varied systematically across sociodemographic groups. Willingness to adopt increased with age, with definitely-yes responses increasing from 31.1% among respondents aged 50 to 59 years to 35.1% among those 70 years or older. Hesitation was highest at 26.0% among respondents aged 50 to 59 years. Females were more likely than males to report hesitation (23.0% vs 18.5%) and less likely to select definitely yes (29.1% vs 38.5%). By race and ethnicity, Black respondents exhibited the highest levels of hesitation and the lowest share of definitely-yes responses (25.9% and 19.4%) compared with White respondents (19.8% and 35.8%, respectively); Hispanic respondents showed patterns broadly similar to those of White respondents (Figure).

Figure. Bar Graphs of Willingness to Adopt a Preventive Dementia Vaccine Overall and by Age, Sex, and Race and Ethnicity.

Four-panel bar charts of willingness to adopt, overall and by age, sex, and race. Four panels arranged in a two by two grid, labeled A, B, C, and D in small boxed letters near the upper left of each panel. All panels use vertical bars and the same horizontal axis labeled Willingness to adopt with seven categories, left to right: Definitely no, Very unlikely, Unlikely, Not sure or neutral, Likely, Very likely, Definitely yes. All panels use a vertical axis labeled Respondents, percent, with tick marks from 0 to 40. Panel A title Full sample. Single dark teal bars: Definitely no about 2 percent; Very unlikely about 2 to 3 percent; Unlikely about 3 percent; Not sure or neutral about 21 percent; Likely about 17 percent; Very likely about 21 to 22 percent; Definitely yes about 34 percent. Panel B title By age with a legend in the upper left: dark teal 50 to 59 y, n equals 508; orange 60 to 69 y, n equals 609; light gray 70 y or more, n equals 412. For Definitely no: about 2, 3, and 1 percent respectively. Very unlikely: about 3, 2, and 1 percent. Unlikely: about 5, 3, and 1 percent. Not sure or neutral: about 26, 18, and 18 percent. Likely: about 15, 18, and 19 percent. Very likely: about 18, 21, and 25 percent. Definitely yes: about 31, 35, and 34 percent. Panel C title By sex with legend: light blue Male, n equals 561; pink Female, n equals 968. Definitely no about 2 percent for both. Very unlikely about 2 percent male and about 3 percent female. Unlikely about 1 to 2 percent male and about 4 percent female. Not sure or neutral about 18 to 19 percent male and about 23 percent female. Likely about 16 to 17 percent male and about 18 percent female. Very likely about 21 to 22 percent for both. Definitely yes about 38 percent male and about 29 percent female. Panel D title By race and ethnicity with legend: orange Hispanic, n equals 401; green Non-Hispanic Black, n equals 559; pale yellow Non-Hispanic White, n equals 569. Definitely no about 5, 3 to 4, and 1 percent. Very unlikely near 0, about 3, and about 2 to 3 percent. Unlikely about 3, about 3 to 4, and about 3 percent. Not sure or neutral about 22, about 26, and about 20 percent. Likely about 17, about 23, and about 16 to 17 percent. Very likely about 19, about 22, and about 22 percent. Definitely yes about 33, about 19 to 20, and about 36 percent.

These patterns persisted after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (Table). Older respondents compared with those aged 50 to 59 years were more willing to receive a dementia vaccine (60-69 years: odds ratio [OR], 1.46 [95% CI, 1.16-1.85], P = .002; ≥70 years: OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.26-2.02], P < .001). Females were less willing than males to receive a vaccine (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90; P = .002). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents were less willing (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .03), while no significant difference was observed for Hispanic respondents (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80-1.39; P = .69).

Table. Factors Associated With Willingness to Receive a Preventive Dementia Vaccine.

Variable OR (95% CI) P value
Race and ethnicitya
Hispanic 1.06 (0.80-1.39) .69
Non-Hispanic Black 0.72 (0.54-0.97) .03
Non-Hispanic White 1 [Reference] NA
Age group, y
50-59 1 [Reference] NA
60-69 1.46 (1.16-1.85) .002
≥70 1.60 (1.26-2.02) <.001
Sex
Male 1 [Reference] NA
Female 0.74 (0.62-0.90) .002
Household income, $
<30 000 1 [Reference] NA
30 000-60 000 0.83 (0.64-1.09) .18
>60 000-100 000 1.12 (0.86-1.47) .41
>$100 000 1.64 (1.22-2.20) .001
Educational level
<College 1 [Reference] NA
≥College degree 1.44 (1.17-1.78) <.001
Relative or someone close has dementia
No/do not know 1 [Reference] NA
Yes 1.43 (1.19-1.73) <.001

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.

a

Race and ethnicity were self-reported by participants. Hispanic ethnicity was assessed separately from race, and respondents were classified for this analysis as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, or non-Hispanic White. These groups were selected because they represent the largest racial and ethnic populations in the US and because Black and Hispanic adults experience a disproportionate burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias.

Socioeconomic gradients were observed. Higher-income respondents (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.20; P = .001) and those with a college degree or higher (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.78; P < .001) were more willing to receive a vaccine. Respondents who reported that they or someone close to them had dementia were also more willing to receive the vaccine (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.73; P < .001).

Discussion

In this nationally representative survey of US adults, willingness to receive a preventive dementia vaccine was generally high, with most respondents expressing willingness and relatively few expressing no intent, suggesting that uncertainty rather than opposition may be the principal barrier to adoption. Willingness varied systematically across sociodemographic groups, with greater intent among older respondents and less intent among women and Black respondents.

These findings are consistent with prior survey-based and related studies showing that willingness to adopt medical therapies varies across demographic groups.8,9,10 Recent studies reporting associations between shingles vaccination and dementia risk among women5,6 raise the possibility that women may benefit more from preventive vaccination; paradoxically, female respondents in our study were less willing to receive such a vaccine.

A study limitation is that willingness to receive a preventive vaccine was assessed using hypothetical vignettes and may not fully capture clinical decision-making. Our findings have important implications for the implementation of emerging preventive dementia vaccines, suggesting the need for targeted communication and engagement to ensure equitable uptake.

Supplement 1.

eMethods. Data Source, Survey Design, and Study Sample

eFigure. Preventive Dementia Vaccine Survey Question

eTable. Descriptive Characteristics of the Study Sample

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Guidelines WHO. Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia. World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed May 11, 2026. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542796/ [PubMed]
  • 2.Thunell J, Tysinger B, Baumgart M, et al. The cost of dementia in the United States in 2026. Alzheimers Dement. 2026;22(6):e71480. doi: 10.1002/alz.71480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cummings J, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Taghva K. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2021. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021;7(1):e12179. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McDade E, Llibre-Guerra JJ, Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Bateman RJ. The informed road map to prevention of Alzheimer disease: a call to arms. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00467-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Taquet M, Dercon Q, Todd JA, Harrison PJ. The recombinant shingles vaccine is associated with lower risk of dementia. Nat Med. 2024;30(10):2777-2781. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03201-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hayes KN, Harris DA, McConeghy KW, et al. Dementia risk after recombinant herpes zoster vaccination in older adults with a recent skilled-nursing facility stay: a target trial emulation. Ann Intern Med. 2026;179(7):958-967. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-25-04689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kapteyn A, Angrisani M, Darling J, Gutsche T. The Understanding America Study (UAS). BMJ Open. 2024;14(10):e088183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zissimopoulos J, Jacobson M, Chen Y, Borson S. Knowledge and attitudes concerning aducanumab among older Americans after FDA approval for treatment of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148355. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oshman L, Kirch M, Solway E, et al. Older adults’ views on insurance coverage for weight management medications. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(3):e252008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montano-Campos JF, Hahn EE, Haupt EC, Radich J, Bansal A. Oncologist-patient concordance and treatment adherence in chronic myeloid leukemia. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(4):e258039. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eMethods. Data Source, Survey Design, and Study Sample

eFigure. Preventive Dementia Vaccine Survey Question

eTable. Descriptive Characteristics of the Study Sample

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES