Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2026 May 26;138(4):1239–1258. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcag141

First record of a termite–fungus association in Oligocene evergreen oak wood type (Quercoxylon) from Central Europe

David Krejčíř 1,✉, Jakub Sakala 2, Vladimír Gryc 3, František Zelenka 4, Josef Kašák 5
PMCID: PMC13595237  PMID: 42189168

Abstract

Background and Aims

The Eocene–Oligocene transition (∼33.5 Ma) brought major climatic change with lasting effects on terrestrial ecosystems. Termites are important indicators of palaeoenvironmental conditions in terrestrial ecosystems, and here we report hexagonal termite coprolites (Microcarpolithes hexagonalis Vangerow) preserved within anatomically well-characterized silicified evergreen oak wood type (Quercoxylon aff. helladae) from the Oligocene Menilite Formation of Central Europe.

Key Results

The material, recovered from Quaternary terraces of the Bečva River (Czech Republic), represents redeposited silicified wood originally derived from Menilite facies. Thin sections and micro-computed tomography reveal termite galleries filled with coprolites, closely associated with clamp-bearing hyphae and pocket-rot features consistent with white-rot Basidiomycota, documenting a close spatial co-occurrence of termite-produced coprolites and fungal structures within a single specimen and providing new insight into decay processes in Oligocene forest ecosystems.

Conclusions

The observed association highlights the complexity of saproxylic communities in Oligocene forests of Central Europe and is consistent with the presence of locally warm, humid (subtropical) conditions despite global cooling.

Keywords: Bioindication, Fagaceae, Isoptera, fossil wood, coprolites, heartwood rot, Palaeogene

INTRODUCTION

The Eocene–Oligocene transition (∼33.5 Ma) marked the shift from greenhouse to icehouse conditions driven by Antarctic glaciation and global cooling (Eldrett et al., 2007, 2009; Zachos et al., 2008). This ∼0.5-Myr interval caused profound environmental reorganization in Central Europe, with stronger seasonality, regional aridification and restructuring of terrestrial ecosystems (Pound et al., 2012). While both marine and continental records document progressive cooling and drying, sclerochronological δ18O profiles from Glycymeris shells reveal pronounced seasonality and episodic humid phases during the Rupelian (Walliser et al., 2015). Plant macrofossils likewise indicate that humid–subtropical vegetation persisted locally in parts of Central Europe throughout the early Oligocene (Kovar-Eder, 2003; Teodoridis and Kvaček, 2015).

Kalotermitid termites are saproxylic, i.e. dependent on dead wood at various stages of decay, and play an important role in decomposition processes and nutrient cycling, with their success relying on complex symbioses with gut microorganisms and fungi that enable efficient lignocellulose degradation (Roisin, 2000; Wilson and Hölldobler, 2005; Rouland-Lefèvre et al., 2006; Engel, 2019). Because their ecology is tightly bounded to tropical and subtropical environments, termite ichnofossils – particularly coprolite-filled galleries in wood – serve as valuable palaeoenvironmental indicators. Their presence in Palaeogene deposits demonstrates that warm subtropical conditions persisted in Central Europe even during intervals of global cooling (Genise, 2017; Zhao et al., 2020). In the fossil record, termites are represented not only by ichnofossils but also as body fossils in fine-grained lacustrine deposits (Jarzembowski, 1981; Martínez-Delclòs and Martinell, 1995; Engel et al., 2007) and amber inclusions (Engel et al., 2011; Engel et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2020, 2021). Termite nests (Genise and Bown, 1994; Duringer et al., 2007; Kaulfuss et al., 2010; Roberts et al., 2016) and coprolite-filled galleries (Jarzembowski, 1990; Rozefelds and Baar, 1991; Sutherland, 2003; Francis and Harland, 2006; Pires and Sommer, 2009; Colin et al., 2011; Massini and Pujana, 2013; Jud et al., 2017; Moreau et al., 2020) occur from the Cretaceous to the Pliocene, documenting the long-term persistence of termite activity across diverse ecosystems and forming part of the broader evolutionary history of burrowing invertebrates (Humphreys, 2003).

Hexagonal termite coprolites, owing to their distinctive morphology and unequivocal biological origin, represent excellent palaeoenvironmental indicators with a fossil record spanning multiple intervals and regions. The oldest reliable occurrences date back to the Early Cretaceous (Pires and Sommer, 2009; Heřmanová et al., 2021). Mesozoic records, particularly from the Cretaceous, include well-documented examples from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian–Maastrichtian) of Texas (Rohr et al., 1986), the Albian–Cenomanian of Australia (McLoughlin et al., 2024), the Lower Cretaceous (Hauterivian–Aptian) Upper Strzelecki Group of southeastern Australia (Edwards et al., 2025), the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian) Huolinhe Formation of eastern Inner Mongolia, China (Dong et al., 2022), Paraphyllanthoxylon-type woods from British Columbia (Conician) (Jud et al., 2017), silicified conifer woods of the Kachaike Formation (Albian) in Argentinean Patagonia (Greppi et al., 2023) and Early Cretacous (Barremian) softwoods of the UK (Francis and Harland, 2006). Cenozoic (Palaeogene) occurrences are known from the Late Cretaceous–Palaeogene (Cenomanian) Klikov Formation of the Czech Republic (Heřmanová et al., 2021), Eocene–Oligocene (Priabonian–Rupelian) conglomerates of southern France (Moreau et al., 2020) and Oligocene (Rupelian) deposits of Australia (Rozefelds and Baar, 1991). Neogene occurrences include Miocene strata of Argentina (Massini and Pujana, 2013), fossil woods (Aquitanian–Burdigalian) from New Zealand (Lindquist and Isaac, 1991; Sutherland, 2003) and Brazilian fossil woods (Pires and Sommer, 2009), whereas Pliocene opalized woods from California were described by Rogers (1938).

Collectively, these records highlight the long evolutionary continuity of this distinctive trace fossil and provide a framework for interpreting new Oligocene finds from Central Europe.

Basidiomycota are among the most diverse and widespread fungal lineages and play a major role in decomposition and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems (Lindahl and Tunlid, 2015). Fungal decay in fossil wood is known throughout geological history, with preservation from hyphae and spores to reproductive structures. The oldest record comes from Callixylon in the Upper Devonian (Stubblefield et al., 1985) and Permo-Triassic gymnosperms from Antarctica (Stubblefield and Taylor, 1986). Jurassic examples include tyloses with fungal interactions in a conifer from Antarctica (Harper et al., 2012), Xenoxylon from the USA (Xie et al., 2023), and diverse decay morphologies in Jurassic–Cretaceous woods from Asia and South America (Boura et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2015; Wan et al., 2016a, b; Rombola et al., 2022). Later records include Palaeocene Araucariaceae (Pujana et al., 2015), Eocene ascomycetes (Wilkinson, 2003), the Oligocene Tetracoccosporium eocenum (Biradar and Mahabale, 1972), and Miocene–Pliocene wood-decaying fungi from New Zealand, India and Italy (Lindquist and Isaac, 1991; Sen, 2020; Greppi et al., 2022). Collectively, these records emphasize the persistence and ecological significance of wood-decaying fungi through geological time.

Although termite damage and fungal decay are widespread in fossil woods (Genise, 2017), no previous study has documented hexagonal termite coprolites directly associated with fungal structures in well-preserved Palaeogene wood from Central Europe. Here we report the first such occurrence, providing direct evidence of a termite–fungus association and new insight into decay processes within Oligocene forest ecosystems. Evergreen Fagaceae, including Quercoxylon and Eotrigonobalanus, were widespread across Europe and extended into parts of Asia during the Palaeogene, but today persist mainly as relict taxa in subtropical and tropical regions, while also occurring in warm-temperate ecosystems, including Mediterranean-type plant communities such as Californian chaparral and oak woodlands (Velitzelos et al., 1999; Napton, 2012; Nixon, 2006; Sari et al., 2021). This study details the first such occurrence from Central Europe, offering direct evidence of a termite–fungus association and demonstrating the methodological potential of silicified wood, using combined anatomical analysis, thin section microscopy, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), to document interactions that are otherwise rarely preserved in the fossil record.

GEOLOGICAL SETTING

The fossil site near Želatovice (Přerov County, northern Moravia; 49°27′06.6″N, 17°27′28.7″E; Fig. 1) lies within the Outer Flysch Belt of the Western Carpathians (Pícha and Stráník, 1999; Pícha et al., 2006). Although collected from Quaternary terraces of the Bečva River, the wood shows strong silicification and a bituminous odour, indicating redeposition from the Oligocene Menilite Formation, which is widespread in Moravia and yields both marine and terrestrial fossils. Anatomically comparable silicified woods have been documented from Loučka (Jirman et al., 2020), Krumvíř, Lipník nad Bečvou (Bubík et al., 2019), Hranice, Měnín, Žabčice, Mouchnice and other nearby localities (Továrková, 2011), consistently pointing to a Menilite source. Palaeobotanical evidence is congruent: the Šitbořice Beds with redeposited Menilite sediments yielded leaves of Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis, the foliar analogue of Quercoxylon helladae (Stráník et al., 1974; Kvaček and Bubík, 1990). In contrast, Miocene oaks from Moravia are only weakly silicified, show distinct growth rings and represent deciduous taxa derived from Badenian tuffs (Továrková, 2009, 2011).

Fig. 1.

The map was not reproduced directly from Jirman et al. (2020). Instead, it was independently redrawn and recreated using a new graphic design. The colour scheme, legend, labels, typography, inset maps, locality highlighting, north arrow, scale bar, and overall layout were redesigned and newly produced. Only the geological interpretation and spatial distribution of the mapped units were retained from the original source, which is cited accordingly.

Geological map of the Western Carpathians showing the position of the Přerov fossil locality (star symbol) near the boundary between the Žďánice Unit and the Carpathian Foredeep. Modified from Jirman et al. (2020).

Characteristics of the Menilite Formation

The Menilite Formation was deposited during the Early Oligocene in isolated Paratethyan basins under dysoxic to anoxic conditions with restricted circulation (Roth, 1981; Golonka et al., 2006). Sedimentation occurred mainly at mesopelagic depths (200–1000 m), as indicated by fish taxa with photophores (Brzobohatý, 1981). The succession is dominated by organic-rich, commonly silicified pelites, with silica derived from diatoms and sponge spicules. Lithologies include laminated claystones, siliceous shales, marls and tuffs, whereas carbonates are scarce. Regionally, the Menilite Formation extends across the Žďánice, Silesian and Subsilesian nappes and into Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Ukraine and southeastern Poland, typically reaching thicknesses of <100 m (Krhovský, 1981; Krhovský and Djurasinović, 1993; Stráník, 1981).

Sedimentary and palaeobotanical context

The Menilite Formation comprises alternating bituminous shales, siliceous claystones, and marl-rich beds, reflecting fluctuating redox conditions and variable biogenic productivity in deep-water, dysoxic to anoxic settings (Švábenická et al., 2007). Episodic blooms of siliceous plankton – radiolarians, diatoms and sponges – provided silica that promoted selective silicification of both marine and terrestrial material (Chlupáč et al., 2002). Rapid burial under limited bioturbation further facilitated the exceptional permineralization of plant remains described here.

The flora of the Šitbořice Member comprises numerous angiosperms, notably Eotrigonobalanus (Dryophyllum) furcinervis (Rossm.) Walther & Kvaček, Platanus neptuni (Ettingsh.) Bůžek, Holý & Kvaček, Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brongniart) Unger, Laurophyllum pseudoprinceps Weyland & Kilpper and Engelhardia (Palaeocarya) orsbergensis (Weber) Jähnichen, Mai & Walther, accompanied by Quercus sp. and Apocynospermum striatum Reid & Chandler. Conifers include Taxodium cf. balticum, Sequoia abietina (Brongniart) Knobloch and Pinus sp. (Kvaček and Bubík, 1990).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation and microscopy

We processed 92 fossil wood specimens, cut with a diamond saw, ground (F80–F1200) and polished with cerium oxide. Thin sections of three representative samples (Pr_17, Pr_42, Zab_183 reference) were prepared in transverse (TS), radial (RLS) and tangential (TLS) planes (50–150 µm). Polished fragments were studied with a Nikon SMZ-2B stereomicroscope and thin sections with a Nikon Eclipse E400 light microscope. Images were obtained using an EPSON V600 scanner and a Leica DM2000 microscope with a DFC295 camera.

Two anatomically similar wood samples with insect coprolites and fungal remains were selected for detailed study. Sample Pr_17 (Fig. 2A), lighter and more translucent, was better suited for coprolite morphology, whereas Pr_42 (Fig. 2C), darker and more heavily colonized, preserved extensive fungal hyphae. Both originate from the Přerov locality, share consistent anatomical traits, and were cross-validated to account for intraspecific variability and preservation.

Fig. 2.

Polished transverse sections of fossil oak wood (Quercoxylon aff. helladae) from Moravia. Three specimens from Přerov and Žabčice are shown, illustrating similarities in wood structure, preservation, and silicification among fossil oak trunks from different localities.

Polished transverse sections of fossil Quercoxylon aff. helladae from Moravia. (A) Pr_17, Přerov (Martin Charamza); (B) Zab_183, Žabčice (reference sample); (C) Pr_42, Přerov (Martin Charamza). Scale bars = 4 cm.

Anatomical and taxonomic analysis

Wood anatomy was measured in ImageJ following International Association of Wood Anatomists IAWA committee,1989 and compared with both fossil and extant references (e.g. Cutler, 1964; Iamandei et al., 2012; Wheeler and Manchester, 2021). For comparison, 39 thin sections of Quercoxylon aff. helladae Petrescu, Velitzelos & Stavropodis from the Hamburg University collections were examined. Primary anatomical classification and subsequent taxonomic assignment were based on tangential sections, which allowed a detailed assessment of ray structure. Additional comparisons were made with recent thin sections of Trigonobalanus excelsa Lozano, Hern. Cam. & Henao and T. verticillata Forman.

Coprolite and micro-CT analysis

A total of 67 termite coprolites were examined in cross-section and compared with fossil and extant analogues (Rogers, 1938; Massini and Pujana, 2013; Jud et al., 2017; Greppi et al., 2022). Selected samples (6.14 × 5.07 × 15.25 mm) were scanned by micro-CT (Heliscan), enabling 3D reconstructions of galleries and volumetric analysis of 23 coprolites. For comparison, a still image was extracted from a publicly available video of Kalotermes flavicollis (Fabricius) colony behaviour (Tretyakov, 2020).

Fungal identification

Fungal structures were identified by comparative morphology with reference to published descriptions of fossil and extant wood-decaying fungi (e.g. Stubblefield and Taylor, 1986; Lindquist and Isaac, 1991; Srivastava, 2008; Feng et al., 2015; Biswas et al., 2020; Philippe et al., 2022).

Provenance and taxonomic attribution were constrained by (1) the distribution of the Žďánice Unit and its reworked deposits, (2) the proximity of samples to Menilite outcrops and (3) corroborating palaeobotanical evidence, notably leaf impressions of the same taxa within the Žďánice Unit.

RESULTS

Ninety fossil wood specimens were collected from an ∼40 × 60-m area of Quaternary terrace deposits near Přerov. The assemblage exhibits consistent taphonomic features: variable silicification with chalcedony- or quartz-filled cavities, grey–brown patina where abrasion is minimal, and polished section colours ranging from white and brown to dark blue and black. Evidence of biological degradation – including insect borings, fungal galleries and fractures – occurs in 33 specimens (Appendix 1).

Of the 90 specimens, 52 were gymnosperms (58 %), 31 angiosperms (34 %), two Palmoxylon (2 %), one Osmunda (1 %) and four unassigned (4 %). Among the angiosperms, 17 specimens were assigned to Quercoxylon and five to Platanoxylon; six of the Quercoxylon specimens contained coprolites hexagonal in cross-section. The identified taxa comprise Cupressaceae and Pinaceae among gymnosperms, and Platanoxylon and Fabaceae-type wood among angiosperms. The distribution, stratigraphic assignment, and taxonomic composition of fossil wood localities in Moravia are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Fossil wood localities in Moravia (Appendix 2) with stratigraphic assignment, taxonomic affiliation and depositional context.

Stratigraphic assignment Angio Conif Both Oli Mio Both In situ Sec. Žďán. un. (km) direct.
Přerov X X X Y 6 E
Pavlovice u Přerova X X X Y 0
Lipník N. Bečvou X X X Y 6 SE
Hranice X X X Y 2 E
Loučka X X X Y 8 SE
Soběchleby X X X Y 0
Kelč X ? X X Y 0
Kroměříž-Zdounky X X X Y 2 W
Vážany N. Litavou X X X Y 1 S
Měnín X X X Y 5 E
Žabčice X X X Y 4.5 E
Velké Němčice-Šitbořice X X X Y 0
Krumvíř X X X Y 0
Nemotice-Mouchnice X X X Y 1 W
Mikulov X X X Y 0

‘In situ’ = preserved within Menilite strata (not necessarily in growth position); other occurrences = reworked. ‘Žďán. un.’ = Žďánice Unit nearby. The last two columns indicate presence of the Žďánice Unit and distance/direction to the nearest Menilite outcrop (‘0’ = within or adjacent; data from geological map, 1:50 000 (Czech Geological Survey (Česká geologická služba), 2025). Abbreviations: Angio = angiosperm; Conif = conifer; Both = angiosperm + conifer; Oli = Oligocene; Mio = Miocene; Sec. = secondary occurrence (reworked); Y = yes, presence confirmed; X = presence in record (literature or observation); ? = uncertain; Directions (E, S, W, N) = east, south, west, north.

Fossil wood

Family: Fagaceae Dumortier, 1829

Genus: Quercoxylon R. Kräusel, 1939

Species: Quercoxylon (Lithocarpoxylon) aff. helladae Petrescu, Velitzelos & Stavropodis

Materials

Two fossil wood specimens, designated Pr_17 and Pr_42 (Fig. 2), are housed in the collections of the Department of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic).

Macroscopic description

Samples Pr_17 (12 × 4.5 × 8 cm) and Pr_42 (5 × 3 × 5 cm) both contain coprolite-filled galleries and fungal remains. Surfaces bear a white to yellow patina, while polished sections range from light to dark brown with grey to black patches.

Microscopic description

Sample Pr_17 (Figs 2A). Growth rings are indistinct. Smaller vessels occur locally and only rarely; however, their frequency and distribution cannot be reliably assessed due to pronounced pathological alteration of the wood. Wood diffuse–porous, occasionally forming flame-like vessel arrangement. Vessels oval, rounded or elliptical in cross-section, mainly solitary. Vessel walls 5–10 µm thick. Vessel lumina 66–190 µm (n = 46, mean=134 µm, s.d. = 27 µm) in tangential diameter and 76–255 µm (n = 33, mean=185 µm, s.d. = 37 µm) in radial diameter. Mean vessel frequency 3.6 vessels mm–2. Vascular cell length 144–869 µm. Perforation plates: exclusively simple. Intervessel pits bordered, circular, alternate, quite dense, small to medium, 3.4–8 µm. Vessel-ray pits with much reduced borders to apparently simple: pits horizontal (scalariform, gash-like) to vertical (palisade). No helical thickenings present. Tyloses in vessels frequent. Fibres thin- to thick-walled, non-septate. Vasicentric tracheids present. Axial parenchyma abundant, banded reticulate (mostly uniseriate bands of parenchyma regularly spaced), apotracheal diffuse-in-aggregates, scanty paratracheal. Prismatic crystals in chambered axial parenchyma present.

Rays are heterocellular, with body ray cells predominantly procumbent and a single row of upright marginal cells. Two principal ray types are present: uniseriate rays and multiseriate rays. Vessel-associated rays are semi-compound, typically 2–4-seriate, occasionally reaching 5–6-seriate, and may form short vertical aggregates of semi-compound rays. Ray width ranges from 23 to 42 µm (N = 44, mean = 32 µm, s.d. = 4.6 µm), and ray height varies between 192 and 630 µm (N = 49, mean = 375 µm, s.d. = 91 µm), comprising 7–27 cells in height. Ray frequency is 16–21 rays mm–1 in the uniseriate portion and 27–28 rays mm–1 in aggregate zones. Ray cell dimensions (height × width × length) are as follows: square cells 21–31 × 16–46 × 41–94 µm; upright cells 28–68 × 27–56 × 40–76 µm (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Microscopic views of fossil oak wood (Quercoxylon aff. helladae) showing key anatomical features used for identification. The images illustrate diffuse-porous wood, axial parenchyma, tyloses, vessel–ray pits, crystals, heterocellular rays, vasicentric tracheids, aggregate rays, and semi-compound rays, together with a comparison to modern Trigonobalanus excelsa.

Pr_17. Wood anatomy of Quercoxylon aff. helladae. (A–C) Transverse sections; (D, E, H) radial sections; (F, G, CH, I–J) tangential sections. (A) Diffuse-porous wood with vessels in radial to flame-like patterns; growth rings absent. (B) Reticulate axial parenchyma (arrows) and tyloses (arrow). (C) Aggregate ray. (D) Tyloses in vessel lumina (arrow). (E) Palisade-type vessel-ray pits. (F) Crystals in axial parenchyma. (G) Crystal in axial parenchyma of modern Trigonobalanus excelsa for comparison. (H) Heterocellular ray with upright, square and procumbent cells. (CH) Vessel lumen encircled by vasicentric tracheids (arrows). (I) Aggregate rays mostly uniseriate, rarely biseriate, with transition to semi-compound rays. (J) Semi-compound rays associated with aggregated vessels. Scale bars: A = 2 cm; B–F, H–J = 100 μm; G = 50 μm.

IAWA features: 2 5 7 9 13 22 25 32 42 46 50 56 60 66 69 77 78 87 96 97 101 102 302 106 116 142

Comparison with fossil woods

A combination of anatomical features, including diffuse porosity, indistinct or absent growth rings, simple perforation plates, alternate intervessel pits, vessel-ray pits with reduced borders, absence of helical thickenings, vasicentric tracheids, diffuse-in-aggregates axial parenchyma and semi-compound to aggregated rays, is characteristic of the fossil genera Lithocarpoxylon Petrescu and Quercoxylon Hofmann (Fagaceae; InsideWood, 2004–onwards). Fossil oak taxa used for comparison were selected based on growth-ring distinctness, vessel density, porosity type, cellular composition of vessel ray, occurrence of crystals in axial parenchyma and geological age.

A key diagnostic criterion for distinguishing fossil oaks concerns the architecture and cellular composition of vessel rays (Mantzouka et al., 2021). Evergreen members of Trigonobalanus – including the fossil genera Quercoxylon and Lithocarpoxylon – are characterized by semi-compound and aggregated rays (Wheeler et al., 2022) that result from the partial vertical fusion of uniseriate rays, forming broader heterocellular structures typically 2–10 cells wide. Table 2 summarizes the key diagnostic characters discussed here, whereas a comprehensive comparison of all examined fossil and extant oak woods is provided in Table A1.

Table 2.

Diagnostic wood anatomical features used for comparison.

Por IVP AP Ex1s Agg Ray2 RayCmp RT Cry Age
Fossil
Pr_17 D A DA, B, ScP Y Y N He S-C, C-A? AP Oli
Pr_42 D A DA, B, ScP Y Y Y He S-C, C-A AP Oli
Zab_183 D A DA, B, ScP Y Y Y He S-C, C-A AP Oli
L. helladae S X D, DA Y Y Y He S-C, C-A AP Oli
L. nanningensis D A DA, B, ScP Y Y Y Ho C AP, RN Oli
Q. intermedium D,S O, A D, DA Y Y Y He C AP Mio
Modern
T. doichagensis D A DA, B Y Y N He, Ho C AP
T. verticillata D ? D, DA, B Y Y N He C AP
T. excelsa D A D, DA, B Y Y N He C AP
L. edulis D A DA, B Y Y Y He C N

The table summarizes the most important anatomical characters relevant for distinguishing fossil and extant Fagaceae woods. Abbreviations: Por = porosity: D = diffuse–porous; S = semi-ring porous. IVP = intervessel pitting: A = alternate; O = opposite; X = not observed; ? = uncertain. AP = axial parenchyma: D = diffuse; DA = diffuse-in-aggregates; B = banded; ScP = scanty paratracheal. Ex1s = exclusively uniseriate rays (Y = yes). Agg = aggregate rays (Y = yes). Ray2 = rays of two distinct size classes (Y = yes). RayCmp = ray composition: He = heterocellular; Ho = homocellular. RT = ray type: S-C = semi-compound; C-A = compound-aggregate. Cry = crystals: AP = in axial parenchyma; RN = in ray parenchyma; N = none. Age = stratigraphic age of fossil specimens (Oli = Oligocene; Mio = Miocene).

Lithocarpoxylon nanningensis Huang, Jin, Quan et Oskolski sp. nov. (Huang et al., 2018), from the upper Oligocene of Guangxi, South China, differs from our specimen by its markedly denser vessel distribution and a more pronounced radial vessel arrangement, occasionally forming diagonal or flame-like patterns. It is further characterized by predominantly uniseriate, homocellular rays, only rarely biseriate, and by the presence of prismatic crystals chambered within axial parenchyma cells. These rays consist mainly of procumbent cells, with upright or square marginal cells occurring only sporadically. In contrast, the Přerov specimen exhibits a more complex ray architecture with well-developed semi-compound rays, typically 2–6 cells wide and often forming aggregated structures. The rays are consistently heterocellular, with clearly differentiated marginal upright or square cells, indicating a higher degree of stratification. Moreover, the Přerov material displays distinctly palisade-like vessel-ray pits with reduced borders – an anatomical feature not reported in L. nanningensis – further supporting their distinction.

Quercoxylon intermedium Petrescu & Velitzelos from the Oligocene of Rhodopes, Bulgaria (Iamandei et al., 2012, 2016), and from the Late Miocene of Moldavia (Iamandei et al., 2022) shares anatomical feature such as chambered parenchyma containing crystals. However, it differs markedly in having a semi-ring porous wood structure with a distinct transition from large earlywood vessels to small latewood vessels arranged in radial bundles – features typical of deciduous white oaks. In contrast, our specimen exhibits a diffuse–porous vessel distribution, with no distinct growth ring boundaries. Moreover, the rays in Q. intermedium are frequently dissected by libriform fibres and form compound–aggregate structures, while the Přerov wood possesses narrower, undivided semi-compound rays that are aggregated but structurally continuous. This combination of diffuse porosity, undissected semi-compound rays and palisade-like vessel-ray pits distinguishes the Přerov material from Q. intermedium and supports its closer affinity to evergreen Quercoxylon species.

Quercoxylon (Lithocarpoxylon) helladae is a fossil wood species attributed to evergreen members of Fagaceae. The type material consists of silicified trunks preserved in volcaniclastic deposits of Lesbos, Kastoria and Thrace (northeastern Greece), dated to the middle–late Oligocene (ca. 28–23 Ma).

To assess the taxonomic affinity of the Přerov fossil wood, we compared it with Quercoxylon (Lithocarpoxylon) helladae from Selmeier’s reference collection. The type material from Thrace exhibits indistinct growth-rings, semi-ring porosity, solitary vessels in dendritic to flame-like arrangements, vasicentric tracheids and chambered axial parenchyma with prismatic crystals. Particularly diagnostic is the ray system, where multiseriate rays that are compound-aggregate alternate with semi-compound rays arranged in vertical aggregates.

A primary diagnostic difference concerns wood porosity and growth-ring expression: Pr_17 shows a diffuse-porous structure with indistinct growth boundaries, whereas the Greek type material exhibits semi-ring-porous wood with well-defined boundaries.

Ray variation is present among the Czech samples: Pr_42 and Zab_183 develop compound–aggregate rays dissected by libriform fibres, locally reaching 8–14 cells in width, while semi-compound rays in Pr_42 are only weakly developed, similar to the Greek material. In contrast, Pr_17 exhibits only semi-compound rays, 2–6 cells wide, locally aggregated but not dissected by libriform fibres. The Greek material more frequently displays compound–aggregate rays dissected by libriform fibres, locally up to 16 cells wide, with semi-compound rays remaining only weakly developed (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Tangential sections of fossil oak wood (Quercoxylon aff. helladae) showing two ray types. Images A–C illustrate semi-compound rays from specimens from the Czech Republic and Greece, whereas images D–F show compound-aggregate rays. The figure highlights variation in ray structure used for anatomical comparison and taxonomic identification.

Tangential sections of fossil wood assigned to Quercoxylon aff. helladae (A–F). (A–C) Semi-compound rays: Czech Republic (A) Přerov County (Pr_17); (B) Žabčice (Zab_183). Greece (C) Selmeier Collection, Thrace. (D–F) Compound–aggregate rays: Czech Republic (D) Přerov County (Pr_42); (E) Žabčice (Zab_183). Greece (F) Selmeier Collection, Thrace. Scale bars: 100 µm (A–C); 50 µm (D–F). Classification and comparison of ray types are based on vessel-ray types after Petrescu (1976), Noshiro and Sasaki (2011) and Wheeler et al. (2022), as applied in the table of Mantzouka et al. (2021).

The absence of compound–aggregate rays dissected by libriform fibres in sample Pr_17 is probably attributable to taphonomic loss or intrastem variation rather than any taxonomic difference (Schweingruber et al., 2011). Overall, these ray characteristics correspond to those observed in evergreen oak lineages (Aloni, 1991; Suzuki and Ohba, 1991; Carlquist, 2001; Kobayashi et al, 2019; Gupta and Gupta, 2020; Wheeler et al., 2022).

In comparison with the Greek reference material (Fig. 4), all four specimens exhibit a similar ray system dominated by heterogeneous cell composition, with uniseriate to biseriate rays that locally merge into semi-compound or aggregated forms. Broad multiseriate rays in Pr_42 and Zab_183 match those in the Greek sample, while they are absent in Pr_17. Collectively, these observations support assignment of the Czech material to Quercoxylon aff. helladae.

Comparison with modern woods

Specimen Pr_17 from Želatovice displays solitary, rounded vessels, a dendritic vessel arrangement and aggregate rays – features that are diagnostic of the family Fagaceae. Additional anatomical traits, including indistinct growth rings, vasicentric tracheids, vessel-ray pits with reduced borders (palisade type) and predominantly uniseriate rays, correspond well to wood anatomy of evergreen Fagaceae genera such as Quercus, Lithocarpus and Castanopsis (Suzuki and Ohba, 1991).

A comparative search using the InsideWood database (2004–present), based on a combination of features (diffuse–porous wood, simple perforation plates, alternate intervessel pits, absence of helical thickenings, presence of vasicentric tracheids, axial parenchyma and aggregate rays), yielded the closest matches with T. excelsa, T. verticillata and T. doichagensis (A.Camus) Nixon & Crepet, and Lithocarpus edulis (Makino) Nakai.

Among these taxa, Trigonobalanus (Colombobalanus) excelsa differs from the fossil wood mainly in having slightly larger tangential vessel diameters (100–200 vs. 66–190 µm) and a more consistently expressed heterogeneous ray structure. Axial parenchyma in the fossil specimen also includes locally scanty paratracheal forms not regularly observed in T. excelsa. These differences are relatively minor and mostly quantitative.

Trigonobalanus verticillata differs by smaller mean vessel diameters (50–100 µm), an apparent absence of crystals in ray cells and weaker evidence for stratified ray structure.

Trigonobalanus (Formanodendron) doichangensis differs by more frequent homocellular ray sectors and a lower degree of ray stratification; it also shows significantly smaller tangential vessel diameters (Cutler, 1964; Itoh et al., 2022) and lacks well-developed septate/chambered axial parenchyma.

Lithocarpoxylon edulis , in contrast, more commonly exhibits homocellular rays with limited marginal cell differentiation, lacks prismatic crystals in ray tissue, and displays a more uniform, less complex ray architecture – yielding a poorer anatomical match to the fossil material.

Growth ring comparison: Fossil woods of the evergreen-type Fagaceae assigned to the genera Lithocarpoxylon and Quercoxylon are characterized predominantly by indistinct to absent growth rings, as documented in Oligocene occurrences of Quercoxylon helladae (Selmeier and Velitzelos, 2000) and Q. intermedium (Iamandei et al., 2012, 2016) as well as in Lithocarpoxylon nanningensis (Huang et al., 2018). In contrast, younger fossil material of Q. intermedium of Miocene age (Iamandei et al., 2022) already exhibits distinctly developed growth rings, showing a contrast between older and younger fossil material. Comparison with extant evergreen Fagaceae, particularly the genus Trigonobalanus, indicates a similar pattern dominated by absent to weakly expressed growth rings, while clearly developed seasonal growth zonation remains uncommon (Cutler, 1964; Mennega, 1980; Itoh et al., 2022).

Although intraspecific variability is well documented within extant Fagaceae, the combined evidence from vessel dimensions, ray heterogeneity and the presence of prismatic crystals in chambered axial parenchyma indicates that Pr_17 most closely corresponds to Trigonobalanus excelsa among the compared living taxa.

Fossil woods resembling Trigonobalanus have been reported from various Palaeogene and Neogene sites in Europe and Asia, suggesting a formerly broader range. Today, the lineage persists as a few relict species in subtropical and tropical montane forests of South America and Southeast Asia (T. excelsa, T. doichagensis, T. verticillata) (Manos et al., 2008).

In conclusion, the Přerov fossil wood shows the closest anatomical affinity to evergreen Fagaceae and most closely resembles Trigonobalanus spp., particularly T. excelsa. This affinity is consistent with a warm-temperate to subtropical environment in the Western Carpathians during the Oligocene. However, due to the limited fossil record and possible anatomical convergence within evergreen Fagaceae, the assignment remains tentative at the genus level.

Fossil coprolites

The distinctive hexagonal cross-sectional outline of the coprolites (Fig. 5), visible in cross-section, provides a key diagnostic feature for identifying their biological origin. This geometry is characteristic of faecal pellets produced by termites of the basal family Kalotermitidae, as documented in numerous studies (Light, 1929; Rogers, 1938; Knobloch, 1971; Rohr et al., 1986; Boucot, 1990; Rozefelds and Baar, 1991; Cabrera and Scheffrahn, 2001; Brammer and Scheffrahn, 2002; Sutherland, 2003; Francis and Harland, 2006; Pires and Sommer, 2009; Colin et al., 2011; Massini and Pujana, 2013; Jud et al., 2017; Bobadilla et al., 2020; Knaus, 2020; Moreau et al., 2020; Zega et al., 2020; Greppi et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; McLoughlin et al., 2024).

Fig. 5.

Fossil termite coprolites preserved in fossil oak wood. The figure shows galleries filled with coprolites, distinct hexagonal faecal pellets, associated fungal hyphae, a three-dimensional micro-CT reconstruction of a coprolite-filled gallery, and a modern example of Kalotermes flavicollis producing and using faecal pellets to seal openings.

Pr_17. Kalotermite coprolites. (A–B) Transverse polished sections: star-like (arrow) and rounded (blue arrow) galleries, some containing coprolites. (C–E) Transverse thin sections: galleries filled with coprolites (arrows), with hyphae extending from pellets (arrow) into adjacent wood; distinct hexagonal forms visible. (F–G) Radial thin sections: star-like galleries occluded by coprolites and detail of a hexagonal pellet. (H) 3D micro-CT reconstruction of a coprolite-filled gallery showing dense packing consistent with termite activity. (CH) Modern analogue: Kalotermes flavicollis colony sealing a hole with excrement (arrow) and producing a slightly hexagonal pellet (arrow) (after Tretyakov, 2020). Scale bars: A–D, F, H–CH = 5 mm; E = 1 mm; G = 100 μm.

The hexagonal cross-section of the coprolites reflects the action of six rectal pads lining the termite hindgut, which compress and dewater the faecal material during pellet formation. The resulting geometry is therefore best interpreted as a mechanical consequence of this compression process, while the associated water reabsorption represents a key physiological adaptation in dry-wood habitats (Sutherland, 2003; Moreau et al., 2020).

Type ichnospecies: Microcarpolithes hexagonalis  Vangerow, 1954

Description

The galleries within the degraded wood (Pr_17, Pr_42) form a network of interconnected corridors that create vertically oriented cavities aligned with the trunk axis, with occasional radial expansions. Their arrangement in relatively regular rows suggests a correspondence with tentative growth-ring boundaries. Two main gallery types can be distinguished:

  1. star–shaped in cross-section and spindle-like in radial section varying in dimensions from 60 × 50 to 20 × 20 mm; and

  2. rounded to elongate with dimensions of about 0.3 × 1 mm.

In polished cross-sections, the galleries are bordered by degraded and corrugated vessel rays. While rarely interconnected, they are frequently filled with coprolites and frass embedded in a translucent quartz–chalcedony matrix. Tyloses in vessel lumina are occasionally removed by insect or fungal decay, resulting in partially collapsed vessel structures.

Coprolites are present within galleries and also in vessel lumen. They are not dispersed but rather densely accumulated in direct contact with one another and show random orientation. They are small, light brown, cylindrical to slightly prismatic, hexagonal in cross-section, sometimes with slightly rounded edges, and ovoid in radial section view. Their sides are relatively flat, though occasionally slightly concave. Internally, the coprolites are largely homogeneous, consisting predominantly of organic material with only minor inclusions of fragmented wood debris. In some cases, they also contain scattered, rounded conidia-like bodies and occasional remnants of fungal hyphae.

Coprolite sizes range from 167–357 µm (n = 67, mean = 270 µm, s.d. = 41 µm) in cross-section to 359–673 µm in radial section (n = 58, mean = 491 µm, s.d. = 79 µm). Volume ranges from 1.6 × 106 to 7.3 × 106 µm3 (n = 22, mean = 3.2 × 106 µm3, s.d. = 0.8 × 106 µm3), and the surface area ranges from 2.0 × 105 to 9.3 × 105 µm2 (n = 22, mean = 5.1 × 105 µm2, s.d. = 0.9 × 105 µm2). The sizes of conidia-like bodies in coprolites range from 6 to 17 µm (n = 14, mean = 10 µm, s.d. = 3 µm). The quantitative parameters of the coprolites are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Quantitative parameters of coprolites.

Structure Size range Mean s.d. n
Coprolite diameter (cross-section) (µm) 167–357 270 41 67
Coprolite diameter (radial-section) (µm) 359–673 491 79 58
Coprolite volume (µm3) 1.6 × 106–7.3 × 106 3.2 × 106 0.8 × 106 22
Coprolite surface area (µm2) 2.0 × 105–9.3 × 105 5.1 × 105 0.9 × 105 22
Conidia-like bodies in coprolites (µm) 6–17 10 3 14

Ichnotaxonomic affinities of coprolites. Following the differential diagnostic criteria of Colin et al. (2011), McLoughlin et al. (2024) and Knaus (2020), Microcarpolithes hexagonalis is characterized by cylindrical to rod-shaped, columnar to rounded coprolites with a generally homogeneous internal composition and a distinctive hexagonal to subhexagonal cross-section indicative of a termite origin.

This morphology distinguishes them from superficially similar coprolites of curculionid larvae, which may produce subhexagonal forms but are typically irregular, lack a consistently developed hexagonal geometry, include rough frass and do not form discrete, well-organized pellets comparable to those produced by termites. Based on our own observations of faecal pellets produced by larvae of various groups of extant beetles (e.g. Curculionidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Ptinidae) we found no meaningful morphological correspondence with the studied material. Therefore, termites are considered the most plausible producers.

The coprolites described here conform to the diagnostic criteria of M. hexagonalis in both overall morphology and cross-sectional geometry. Their morphology and internal structure are consistent with those produced by kalotermitid termites and differ from coprolites attributed to mastotermitids, which are typically less regular, lack a well-defined hexagonal cross-section and exhibit greater internal heterogeneity. Although both Kalotermitidae and Mastotermitidae may produce hexagonal faecal pellets, the studied material more closely resembles kalotermitid pellets in its regular geometry and relatively homogeneous internal composition. The consistent morphology, relatively uniform size and occurrence as dense accumulations within gallery systems further support a termite origin and distinguish these coprolites from superficially similar structures produced by other arthropods.

The diagnostic features summarized in Table 4 are based on comparisons with both fossil and extant material described in previous studies (e.g. Rohr et al., 1986; Boucot, 1990;; Francis and Harland, 2006; Colin et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2022; McLoughlin et al., 2024), which provide a framework for distinguishing termite-derived pellets from morphologically similar coprolites of other arthropods.

Table 4.

Diagnostic comparison of coprolite features in Kalotermitidae and Mastotermitidae.

Feature Kalotermitidae Mastotermitidae
Size Highly variable Generally larger
Shape Regular hexagonal to sub-hexagonal (cylindrical pellets) Sub-hexagonal to less regular, more variable
Internal structure Generally homogeneous More heterogeneous
Occurrence Dense accumulations within galleries Less organized accumulation

A comparison with published data (Table 5) shows that coprolite dimensions attributed to M. hexagonalis span a wide range across different stratigraphic intervals including recent Kalotermes faecal pellets and geographical regions. The studied specimens fall within this variability, toward the lower to intermediate size range, and overlap with values presented in Table 5. This variation is not considered taxonomically significant, as size alone is not a primary criterion for differentiating ichnotaxa (Bertling et al., 2022) and may instead reflect differences in producer size, ontogenetic stage or potentially taxonomic variability among producers, as suggested by the diversity of extant kalotermitid taxa.

Table 5.

Comparison of published and studied coprolite dimensions of Microcarpolithes hexagonalis.

Authors Year Geological age Locality Dimensions (mm)
This study Oligocene Czechia 0.17–0.36 (0.27) × 0.36–0.67 (0.49)
Minimum and maximum values (published studies) 0.26–3.21 × 0.22–1.16
Dong et al. (2022) Aptian Inner Mongolia 0.67–3.21 (1.94) × 0.25–1.16 (0.7)
Greppi et al. (2022) Albian Argentina 0.52–1.17 (0.8) × 0.41–0.77 (0.59)
Francis and Harland (2006) Barremian UK 0.4–0.6 (0.5) × 0.4–0.5 (0.45)
Colin et al. (2011) Late Albian France 0.26–1.45 (0.85) × 0.30–0.40 (0.35)
McLoughlin et al. (2024) Albian–Cenomanian Australia 0.97–1.62 (1.29) × 0.59–1.0 (0.79)
Jud et al. (2017) Coniacian Canada 1.13 × 0.73
Heřmanová et al. (2021) Cenomanian Czechia 0.7 × 1–0.5
Rohr et al. (1986) Upper Cretaceous USA 0.75 × 0.5
Moreau et al. (2020) Priabonian–Rupelian France 0.47–0.62 (0.54) × 0.22–0.32 (0.27)
Knobloch (1971) Palaeogene Czechia 0.7–1.75 (1.2) × 0.45–0.94 (0.6)
Rozefeld and DeBaar (1991) Rupelian Australia 2.0–2.6 (2.3) × 0.8–1.0 (0.9)
Massini and Pujana (2013) Miocene Argentina 0.91 × 0.45
Sutherland (2003) Aquitanian–Burdigalian New Zealand 1.0 × 0.5
Rogers (1938) Neogene (Pliocene) USA 0.7–0.9 (0.8) × 0.3–0.5 (0.4)
Colin et al. (2011) Recent (Holocene) Africa 0.64 × 0.30

Dimensions are reported as length × width. Values in parentheses represent calculated mean values, while the accompanying values indicate the ranges reported by the original authors.

Fungal remains

Both fossil wood specimens (Pr_17, Pr_42) exhibit clear evidence of white rot, specifically of the pocket-rot type, indicated by characteristic macroscopic pocket-like cavities (Černý, 1989). Microscopic observations show that fungal degradation predominantly affected the secondary xylem, with hyphae extensively penetrating the tissue. The decay pattern corresponds to selective delignification, in which lignin is removed while cellulose-rich cell walls remain largely intact (Blanchette, 1982; Otjen and Blanchette, 1984; Blanchette, 1984). Such a mode of decay is typical of basidiomycetes responsible for wood degradation in oxygenated environments.

Microscopic description

Fungal hyphae form irregular filamentous networks throughout the fossil wood matrix, commonly occupying cell lumina, vessel-ray parenchyma, vasicentric tracheids, galleries and decay pockets. The hyphae are tubular, regularly septate and frequently branch into dense mycelial structures, with secondary filaments narrower than the parent hyphae. Both simple septa and clamp connections are present, and in some cases the proliferation of new hyphae through clamp connections was observed.

The regions surrounding vessels and vessel-ray cells are particularly degraded, with poorly preserved palisade pits and widespread disruption of the secondary xylem. Numerous rounded fungal structures, interpreted as conidia, occur in association with pigmented hyphal clusters. These bodies are thin-walled, ellipsoid to spherical, and contain distinctly demarcated nuclei surrounded by a pigmented rim, indicating asexual reproduction typical of anamorphic fungi (Fig. 6D). These may represent asexual propagules or residual products of fungal decay.

Fig. 6.

Fungal structures associated with termite galleries in fossil oak wood. The figure shows hyphae, dense mycelial networks, clamp connections, spores, conidia, and enigmatic fungal structures preserved within delignified wood tissues and coprolite-filled galleries, illustrating the close spatial association between fungal colonization and termite activity.

Pr_42. Fungal structures associated with termite galleries. (A–B) Hyphae embedded within coprolite-filled galleries and dense mycelial networks in delignified pockets. (C–E) Clamp connection (arrow), spores (arrows) and (D) conidia (arrows) associated with hyphae within a delignified pocket of the wood, and (E) dense mycelial network and hyphae proliferating into wood punctures. (F) Schematic reconstruction of fungal structures of uncertain affinity with an expanded head (arrow) and stalk (arrow). (G–H) Structures of uncertain affinity in thin section, consisting of a stipe (arrows) and a tufted capitulum (arrows), arising from the hyphal network (arrows). (CH) Detail of a clamp connection (arrow). Scale bars: A, B, G–H = 200 μm; C–F, CH = 20 μm.

A septate, fusiform hypha with thin to moderately thick walls and occasional lateral outgrowths was also documented, probably representing an actively growing generative hypha. In one degraded region, a tangle of thick-walled, pigmented hyphae occurred together with a cluster of fungal spores (2–5 µm in diameter), indicating advanced stages of decay (Fig. 6C).

From some of these hyphal networks, bristle-like tufts (Fig. 6F–H) emerge, interpreted as putative fungal structures of uncertain affinity, commonly occurring adjacent to vessel walls and surrounded by vasicentric tracheids. These structures exhibit a bipartite organization, consisting of a basal stipe (approximately two-thirds of the total length) and a terminal portion (one-third). The basal part represents a localized concentration of hyphae of varying diameter that extend into the surrounding wood tissue, whereas the terminal portion appears as a bristle-like structure composed of fine filamentous elements. These filaments locally display reddish to brownish coloration, which may reflect original biological pigments (e.g. melanin or phenolic compounds) or diagenetic staining by iron oxides. The morphology of these structures has no clear analogue in the available literature; however, their occurrence within hyphal aggregates suggests a fungal origin, although their precise affinity cannot be determined with confidence (Fig. 6).

The width of hyphae ranges from 4 to 13 µm (n = 16, mean = 9 µm, s.d. = 2 µm). Conidia-like bodies range in diameter from 9 to 32 µm (n = 26, mean = 18 µm, s.d. = 5 µm). The central nucleus within the conidia ranges from 7 to 22 µm (n = 25, mean = 12 µm, s.d. = 4 µm), while the outer rim measures 4–6 µm (n = 25, mean = 4 µm, s.d. = 0.9 µm). Fungal spores, observed in clusters within hyphal networks, measure between 2 and 5 µm in diameter (n = 17, mean = 3.6 µm, s.d. = 0.8 µm), indicating a smaller reproductive stage distinct from conidia. The total size of fungal structures of uncertain affinity ranges from 136 to 299 µm (n = 15; mean = 221 µm; s.d. = 51 µm). The quantitative parameters of the fungal structures are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6.

Quantitative parameters of fungus.

Structure Size range (µm) Mean (µm) s.d. (µm) n
Width of hyphae 4–13 9 2 16
Diameter of conidia-like bodies 9–32 18 5 26
Diameter of conidial nucleus 7–22 12 4 25
Conidial outer rim 4–6 4 0.9 25
Diameter of fungal spores 2–5 3.6 0.8 17
Structures of uncertain affinity 136–299 221 51 15

Possible affinities of the fungus. The occurrence of branched mycelium invading vessel lumina, ray cells and tracheids (Fig. 6E), together with septate hyphae and clamp connections, provides reliable anatomical evidence for fungal infection. These features are characteristic of extant basidiomycetes, particularly those responsible for white pocket rot, which preferentially colonize vessels and ray tissues (Käärik, 1974). Among the most consistently reported attributes of this fungal group is the presence of hyphal clamp connections, documented across numerous studies (Stubblefield et al., 1985; Stubblefield and Taylor, 1986; Lindquist and Isaac, 1991; Srivastava et al., 2009; Feng et al., 2015; Taylor et al., 2015; Wan et al., 2016a, b; Biswas et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2023).

The presence of clamp connections (Fig. 6C, H) indicates that the fungus can be assigned to the Basidiomycota. Within the wood structure, bristle-like tufts attached to cell lumina were observed, interpreted as structures of uncertain affinity, tentatively attributed to a possible fungal origin. Spores were also observed within the mycelium; however, their preservation does not permit evaluation of diagnostic characters. Consequently, the systematic affinities of the fungus cannot be resolved with confidence beyond the basidiomycete level.

DISCUSSION

The fossil wood specimens studied here exhibit diagnostic anatomical features consistent with Quercoxylon helladae, including diffuse–porous wood, indistinct growth rings, solitary vessels and semi-compound rays – traits characteristic of evergreen thermophilous oaks within Fagaceae. These features closely match those observed in material from Oligocene sites in the Thrace region of Greece, where Q. helladae co-occurs with leaf imprints of Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis (Velitzelos et al., 1999; Velitzelos et al., 2014; Selmeier and Velitzelos, 2000). The Přerov material likewise shares these diagnostic traits, supporting a comparable palaeoenvironmental origin. This taxonomic and ecological association is reinforced by the co-occurrence of E. furcinervis and Quercoxylon-type wood in redeposited Menilite facies at several sites across the Western Carpathians, including the Šitbořice Beds.

A key feature in this context is the indistinct to absent growth ring structure, which is also observed in the Přerov material. This phenomenon warrants ecological interpretation beyond anatomical description.

Synthesis of taxonomic, taphonomic and stratigraphic evidence

Anatomical features of Quercoxylon helladae, the morphology of hexagonal coprolites, associated fungal structures, stratigraphic parallels (e.g. Pavlovice, Krumvíř, Žabčice) and the co-occurrence with Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis collectively indicate that the Přerov fossil wood was redeposited from Oligocene Menilite facies rather than formed in situ within Badenian tuffs (Továrková, 2009, 2011) or Quaternary alluvium. Together with the Žabčice specimen, these finds fit into a broader regional pattern of Menilite-derived fossil wood redeposited into younger sediments, underscoring the role of the Menilite facies as a primary source of exceptionally silicified plant remains that preserve biotic interactions otherwise rarely recorded in the fossil record.

Taphonomic sequence of fossil wood

Because the taphonomic processes of silicified woods redeposited from the Menilite Formation remain insufficiently understood, we propose a plausible reconstruction based on anatomical evidence, fungal–termite interactions and sedimentological context. The initial stages of this sequence, including colonization of the wood by clamp-bearing basidiomycete hyphae and subsequent termite activity, are directly supported by anatomical observations (e.g. white pocket rot and coprolite-filled galleries). These features suggest that fungal degradation probably preconditioned the wood for colonization by drywood termites (Kalotermitidae), which subsequently utilized or locally expanded pre-existing decay zones.

The later stages of the taphonomic sequence, particularly those involving transport and redeposition, are more interpretative and are not directly supported by the available evidence. The studied material was recovered from Quaternary terraces; however, comparable silicified woods are also known directly from the Menilite Formation, which represents a marine depositional environment. The studied localities occur in close spatial proximity (on the order of a few kilometres) to this formation or are associated with its weathering cover (see Table 5). It is therefore likely that the wood underwent transport from its original terrestrial setting into the marine system, for example via fluvial input followed by transport within coastal or marine environments. The extent of transport cannot be determined directly; however, the consistent macroscopic and anatomical characteristics of the silicified woods, including their bituminous odour, coloration and chalcedony textures, indicate a common source within the Menilite Formation. Even in the case of transport, the original source area would thus remain within the Central European domain. The proposed sequence should therefore be understood as a combination of directly supported observations and plausible taphonomic interpretation.

Termite activity and fungal co-occurrence in fossil wood

Several specimens contain hexagonal coprolites consistent with the faecal pellets of basal Kalotermitidae. In extant species such as Kalotermes flavicollis, nesting behaviour involves the accumulation of faecal material and wood debris within galleries (Roisin, 2000; Nalepa, 2015). While fungal symbioses are well documented in some termite groups (e.g. Macrotermitinae), such associations are not established for Kalotermitidae. The basidiomycete structures documented here are therefore more plausibly interpreted as environmental wood-decay fungi that either co-occurred with termite activity or were opportunistically exploited. Although the fossil record of termite–fungus associations is rare, comparable co-occurrences of coprolitic structures and fungal remains have been reported from fossil wood (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005; Genise, 2017). The Přerov specimens document a close spatial association between fungal structures and termite-produced coprolites; however, this association is interpreted cautiously and may reflect co-occurrence within the same substrate, potentially indicating opportunistic fungivory.

Interpreting growth ring absence in palaeobotanical contexts

In both fossil and extant woods, growth rings may be absent or poorly defined, a feature typically associated with species growing under aseasonal climatic regimes (Worbes, 2002; Brienen and Zuidema, 2005; Sass-Klaassen et al., 2008). In tropical and subtropical environments with minimal variation in temperature and precipitation, cambial activity may proceed year-round, preventing the formation of distinct ring boundaries. Evergreen trees with slow or episodic growth likewise lack regular dormancy, further contributing to indistinct increments (Carlquist, 2001). Anatomically, this condition is expressed in diffuse-porous wood with irregular parenchyma distribution and relatively homogeneous vessel diameters, complicating ring boundary recognition (IAWA Committee, 1989). The indistinct nature of growth-ring boundaries is widely documented in tropical and subtropical taxa and reflects both ecological controls and anatomical properties of the wood, particularly diffuse-porous structure and overall homogeneity of the xylem, which limit the formation of distinct growth increments (Tarelkin et al., 2016). While taphonomic and pathological processes may locally reduce the visibility of growth-ring boundaries, this feature is not diagnostic on its own. However, in the present material, the consistent occurrence of indistinct or absent rings in otherwise well-preserved specimens is more plausibly interpreted as reflecting growth under stable, humid conditions with weak seasonality (Brienen and Zuidema, 2005; Tarelkin et al., 2016), rather than solely a taphonomic overprint.

By analogy with modern relatives, two scenarios are plausible for Oligocene forests with Quercoxylon helladae. One possibility is humid evergreen rainforests resembling present-day tropical and subtropical cloud forests of Southeast Asia, where Trigonobalanus verticillata (Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines) and T. doichangensis (southern China, Vietnam, Thailand) grow under perhumid conditions. A third extant analogue – Trigonobalanus excelsa from the Andean cloud forests of Colombia – shows the closest anatomical affinity to the Přerov material and likewise occupies warm, extremely humid montane forests with low seasonality. Alternatively, these Oligocene forests may have formed part of mixed mesophytic assemblages with evergreen oaks and subtropical conifers, comparable to relict evergreen broad-leaved forests that persist today in southern China in mountainous regions with stable high humidity and dominance of Lithocarpus, Quercus sect. Cyclobalanopsis and related Fagaceae. All three analogues imply a perhumid climate with limited seasonality that supported complex saproxylic communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Fossil wood assigned to Quercoxylon helladae from the Oligocene Menilite facies, together with associated saproxylic traces, provides a basis for reconstructing warm subtropical climate conditions in Central Europe during this interval. Evidence includes: (1) the occurrence of Q. helladae, taxonomically allied to Trigonobalanus that today grows exclusively in warm evergreen forests; (2) hexagonal termite coprolites, indicative of tropical and subtropical habitats; and (3) co-occurring leaves of Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis, an indicator of evergreen broad-leaved forests. Collectively, these lines of evidence offer valuable insight into the ecological dynamics and evolutionary history of saproxylic interactions in Oligocene ecosystems. Their close resemblance to Greek material – where Q. helladae co-occurs with Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis – supports a palaeobiogeographical link to warm-temperate to subtropical evergreen forests extending on a larger continental scale during the Oligocene.

Several converging lines of evidence reinforce this interpretation.

  • Anatomical traits such as diffuse porosity, solitary vessels and semi-compound rays forming occasional short aggregates correspond to evergreen thermophilous oaks within Fagaceae.

  • Hexagonal coprolites assignable to Microcarpolithes hexagonalis indicate the activity of drywood termites (Kalotermitidae). Their ecology, closely tied to decomposition of dry, well-aerated wood in warm climates, suggests similar conditions prevailed during fossilization.

  • Microscopic fungal structures – including septate hyphae with clamp connections, selective delignification and associated spores – are consistent with white-rot Basidiomycota.

  • The close spatial association of fungal structures with termite coprolites suggests possible fungivory or simple co-occurrence within the same substrate.

  • Despite advanced biological degradation, cellular preservation is exceptional, pointing to early mineralization under low-oxygen, organic-rich conditions typical of Menilite facies.

  • Silicification patterns, bituminous odour and regional comparisons (Žabčice, Pavlovice, Kelč, Krumvíř) reveal a consistent pattern of redeposition from Menilite strata across Moravia.

  • Comparative anatomy with modern Trigonobalanus excelsa supports a palaeoecological reconstruction of moist subtropical forests with aseasonal growth conditions, reflected in the indistinct growth-ring boundaries of the fossil material.

  • Micro-CT analysis provided novel 3D evidence of termite galleries and coprolite accumulations in fossil wood, further confirming ichnotaxonomic assignment and degradation pathways.

  • The occurrence of Microcarpolithes hexagonalis in these Oligocene deposits represents a well-constrained record from Central Europe and contributes to refining the stratigraphic and palaeogeographical distribution of the ichnotaxon.

  • The close resemblance of the Přerov specimens to Greek Quercoxylon helladae strengthens the palaeobiogeographical interpretation of a once broader distribution of evergreen fagaceous lineages, today restricted to relict populations of Trigonobalanus in Southeast Asia and South America.

This study provides the first direct evidence of a termite–fungus interaction in anatomically preserved Oligocene wood from Central Europe. It highlights the role of fungal decay in facilitating termite colonization and underscores the potential for mutualistic relationships in deep time.

Beyond its palaeoecological implications, the material demonstrates the exceptional archival value of permineralized wood for reconstructing biotic interactions, palaeoenvironmental conditions and diagenetic pathways in the Menilite palaeoecosystem.

Future work should aim to identify similar associations in other Menilite localities and across broader palaeogeographical settings, thereby refining the climatic and environmental framework of Oligocene Central Europe. Such evidence would help determine whether subtropical evergreen forests with saproxylic termite–fungus communities were regionally widespread or restricted to localized refugia within the Northern Hemisphere.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Nela Doláková for her patient supervision, expert guidance and critical insights throughout this study, and to Miroslav Konopáč, Vojtěch Liška, Ingrid Továrková, Miroslav Bubík, Antonín Přichystal, Jindřich Kynický, Václav Pecina, Daniel Cigánek, Tomáš Viktorýn, Tomáš Svoboda, Oldřich Krejčí, David Buriánek, Alois Kovařčík, and Dan Volf for their valuable support, consultations, material and field collaboration. We thank the anymous reviewers and to editors for their constructive comments and suggestions. We also thank Dimitra Mantzouka for assistance with comparative wood anatomical analyses. Special thanks are due to Martin Charamza for the first discovery of the studied material, which formed the essential basis for this research, and to Ondřej Sháněl (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno) for his assistance and for opening new research perspectives during the micro-CT analyses. Sample processing was carried out at the Institute of Geology, Charles University in Prague, and the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, and we further thank stonemason Jakub Horák for preparing, cutting and polishing thin sections at the Supreme Panthers stonemasonry workshop in Mladkov 26–Boskovice. This research was supported by the Department of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno. I would also like to acknowledge the Chief Editor of Annals of Botany, Rowan Sage, for his kind and supportive approach throughout the editorial process.

APPENDIX

Appendix 1

Fig. A1.

Comparison of Tertiary fossil woods from Moravia. Miocene specimens from Žabčice (A–B) show a thick light patina, incomplete silicification, and distinct growth rings, whereas Oligocene specimens from Přerov (C–D) show a thin patina, chalcedony infilling, and indistinct growth rings. The figure illustrates differences in preservation and silicification between Neogene and Paleogene fossil woods.

(A–B) Neogene (Miocene) specimens from Žabčice with a thick light patina, incomplete silicification without chalcedony and distinct growth rings: (A) Quercoxylon sp.; (B) Ulmoxylon sp. (C–D) Palaeogene (Oligocene) specimens from Přerov with a thin patina, chalcedony infilling and no distinct growth rings: (C) coniferous wood; (D) Quercoxylon aff. helladae.

Appendix 2

Fig. A2.

Overview of representative fossil wood specimens from numerous localities across Moravia, arranged geographically from north to south. The figure illustrates the diversity of silicified woods, including coniferous, oak-type, Platanus-type, palm, and Spiroplatanoxylon woods, highlighting differences in preservation, morphology, and taxonomic composition among localities.

Fossil wood specimens arranged approximately from north to south Moravia. (A) Conifer, Hranice (Oldřich Krejčí, ČGS); (B) conifer, Kelč (Alois Kovařčík); (C) conifer, Soběchleby (Miroslav Bubík, ČGS); (D–F) Platanus-type wood, Přerov; (G) Palmoxylon, Přerov; (H) conifer within silicified concretion, Přerov (Martin Charamza); (CH) conifer, Přerov; (I) conifer, Mouchnice; (J) evergreen oak wood type, Kroměříž; (K) evergreen oak woodtype, Měnín (David Buriánek, ČGS); (L) Spiroplatanoxylon, Vážany nad Litavou (after Továrková et al. 2014); (M) Platanus-type wood, Mouchnice; (N) conifer, Lipník nad Bečvou (Antonín Přichystal); (O) Platanus-type wood, Měnín; (P) conifer, Měnín; (Q) conifer, Krumvíř; (R) conifer, Velké Němčice; (S) conifer, Mikulov (Dan Volf); (T) conifer, Jestřabice; (U) conifer, Nemotice. Scale bar = 5 cm.

Appendix 3

Table A1.

Overview of diagnostic characters in fossil and modern oak woods (Fagaceae) compared with Pr_17, Pr_42 and Zab_183.

Por VArr VGrp PP IVP VRP HT MVTD (µm) VT FP AP Ex1s Agg Ray2 RayCmp Cry Age
Fossil wood
Pr_17 D R, Dg ExSol Si A R N 66–190 Y D Da, B, ScP Y Y N? He Ap Oli
Pr_42 D R, Dg ExSol Si A R N 75–180 Y D Da, B, ScP Y Y Y He Ap Oli
Zab_183 D R, Dg ExSol Si A R N 90–200 Y D Da, B, ScP Y Y Y He Ap Oli
Q. helladae S R, Dg ExSol Si X R N 112–220 Y D D, Da Y Y Y He N Oli
L. microporosum * D R ExSol Si X R N 53–302 Y I D Y Y Y Ho N Pli
L. nanningensis D R ExSol Si A R N 45–243 Y I Da, B, ScP Y Y Y Ho(He) Ap,Rp Upper Oli
L. ashwilii S,D R, Dg ExSol Si X R N 208–215;160–260 Y D D, Da Y Y Y Ho(He) Ap Eo
L. radioporosum D R ExSol Si X R N 80–150 Y D Da, B Y Y Y Ho Ap,Rp Eo
Q. intermedium S,D R ExSol Si O, A R N 200–350;40–150 Y D D, Da Y Y Y He Ap Upper Mio
C. nanningensis D R, Dg ExSol, RM, (4+) Si, Sc A R N 54–289;21–90 Y D Da, B, ScP Y Y Y Ho(He) Ap Upper Oli
C. guangxiensis D R ExSol(RM) Si A R N 56–247 Y D Da, B, ScP Y Y N Ho(He) Ap Upper Oli
C. bulgarica D(S) Dd ExSol Si O, A X N 50–130 Y D Da, ScP, Vsi Y Y Y He N Late Mio-Early Pli
C. makinoi S R ExSol Si X R N 35–195;43–252 Y I Da Y N N Ho Ap Pli
C. uchiuraensis R R ExSol Si, Sc A R N 120–260 Y I X Y N N Ho(He) Ap Oli,Early Mio
Modern wood
T. doichagensis D R, Dg ExSol Si A R N 66–190 Y D Da, B Y Y N He(Ho) Ap
T. verticillata D R, Dg ExSol Si ? X N 50–100 Y D Da, B Y Y N He N
T. excelsa D R ExSol Si A R N 100–200 Y D D, Da, B Y Y N He Ap
L. edulis D Dg, R ExSol Si A R N 100–200 Y D Da, B Y Y Y Ho N
L. kawakami D Dg, R, D ExSol Si A R N 100–200 Y D ScP, Da, B Y Y Y Ho N
L. indica D Dg, R ExSol Si A R N 100–200;<200 Y ? Da, B Y Y N Ho Ap,Rp

Abbreviations: Por – porosity type [D, diffuse–porous; S, semi-ring porous; R, ring–porous; D(S), transitional diffuse/semi-ring]; VArr – vessel arrangement (R, radial; Dg, diagonal; Dd, dendritic); VGrp – vessel grouping [ExSol, exclusively solitary vessels; RM, radial multiples; (4+), groups of more than four vessels]; PP – perforation plates (Si, simple); IVP – intervessel pits (A, alternate; O–A, opposite to alternate; Sc, scalariform); VRP – vessel-ray pits (R, reduced; N, normal); HT – helical thickenings (X, absent; N, not observed); MVTD – mean vessel-tube diameter (µm); VT – vessel tyloses (Y, present; I, indistinct or rare); FP – fibre pits (D, distinct; I, indistinct); AP – axial parenchyma (Da, diffuse apotracheal; B, banded; ScP, scanty paratracheal; Vsi, vasicentric); Ex1s – exudates or crystals in vessels (Y, yes; N, no); Agg – aggregate rays (Y, yes; N, no); Ray2 – presence of two ray size classes (uniseriate and multiseriate); RayCmp – ray composition [He, heterogeneous; Ho, homogeneous; Ho(He), homogeneous with some heterogeneous features; He(Ho), heterogeneous with homogeneous tendency]; Cry – crystals (Ap, prismatic; Rp, rhomboidal; N, none); Age – stratigraphic age (Oli, Oligocene; Upper Oli, Upper Oligocene; Eo, Eocene; Upper Mio, Upper Miocene; Pli, Pliocene; Late Mio–Early Pli, Late Miocene to Early Pliocene).

Contributor Information

David Krejčíř, Department of Geological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jakub Sakala, Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Vladimír Gryc, Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

František Zelenka, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Josef Kašák, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

AI ASSISTANCE

The authors acknowledge the use of artificial intelligence-based language tools, which assisted in linguistic editing and minor stylistic improvements of the manuscript text.

REFERENCES

  1. Aloni  R. 1991. Wood formation in deciduous hardwood trees. In: Raghavendra  AS. ed. Physiology of trees. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 175–197. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertling  M, Buatois  LA, Knaust  D, et al.  2022. Names for trace fossils 2.0: theory and practice in ichnotaxonomy. Lethaia  55: 1–19. doi: 10.18261/let.55.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biradar  NV, Mahabale  TS. 1972. On the occurrence of an imperfect fungus Tetracoccosporium eocenum n. sp. obtained from a fossil wood belonging to the Deccan intertrappean series, M.P., India. The Palaeobotanist  21: 223–226. doi: 10.54991/jop.1972.1484 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biswas  A, Bera  M, Khan  MA, et al.  2020. Evidence of fungal decay in petrified legume wood from the Neogene of the Bengal Basin, India. Fungal Biology  124: 958–968. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2020.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanchette  RA. 1984. Screening wood decayed by white rot fungi for preferential lignin degradation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology  48: 647–653. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.3.647-653.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobadilla  I, Martínez  RD, Martínez-Ramírez  M, Arriaga  F. 2020. Identification of Cryptotermes brevis (Walker, 1853) and Kalotermes flavicollis (Fabricius, 1793) termite species by detritus analysis. Forests  11: . doi: 10.3390/f11040408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boucot  AJ. 1990. Evolutionary palaeobiology of behavior and coevolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boura  A, Pons  D, Vozenin-Serra  C, Phú My  B. 2013. Mesozoic fossil wood of Kiên Giang Province, southwestern Vietnam. Palaeontographica Abteilung B  290: 11–40. doi: 10.1127/palb/290/2013/11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brammer  AS, Scheffrahn  RH. 2002. Drywood termite, Cryptotermes cavifrons Banks (Insecta: Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Gainesville, USA: University of Florida, IFAS Extension, EENY-279, December 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brienen  RJW, Zuidema  PA. 2005. Relating tree growth to rainfall in Bolivian rain forests: a test for six species using tree ring analysis. Oecologia  146: 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0160-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brzobohatý  R. 1981. Isolated fish remains of the Menilitic Formation in the Žďánice Unit, Moravia. Zemní plyn a nafta  26: 79–87. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bubík  M, Gilíková  H, Otava  J, Petrová  PT, Vít  J. 2019. Nové poznatky o terciéru a kvartéru získané geologickým mapováním okolí Lipníka nad Bečvou. Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku  26: 1–2. doi: 10.5817/gvms2019-1-2-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cabrera  BJ, Scheffrahn  RH. 2001. Western drywood termite, Incisitermes minor (Hagen) (Insecta: Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Gainesville, USA: University of Florida, IFAS Extension, EENY-248. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlquist  S. 2001. Comparative wood anatomy: systematic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  15. Černý  A. 1989. Parazitické dřevokazné houby. Praha: SZN. [Google Scholar]
  16. Česká geologická služba . 2025. Geovědní mapy 1: 50 000 (GEOČR50). Praha: Česká geologická služba. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheng  YM, Wang  YF, Liu  FX, et al.  2018. The Neogene wood flora of Yuanmou, Yunnan, southwest China. IAWA Journal  39: 427–474. doi: 10.1163/22941932-20170214 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chlupáč  I, Brzobohatý  R, Kovanda  J, Stráník  Z. 2002. Geologická minulost České republiky. Praha: Academia. [Google Scholar]
  19. Colin  J-P, Néraudeau  D, Nel  A, Perrichot  V. 2011. Termite coprolites (Insecta: Isoptera) from the Cretaceous of western France—a palaeoecological insight. Revue de Micropaléontologie  54: 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.revmic.2011.06.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cutler  DF. 1964. Anatomy of vegetative organs of Trigonobalanus Forman (Fagaceae). Kew Bulletin  17: 401–409. doi: 10.2307/4113788 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong  C, Shi  G-L, Wang  Z-X, Huang  D-Y. 2022. Termite coprolites (Blattodea: Isoptera) from the Early Cretaceous of eastern Inner Mongolia, northeast China. Palaeoentomology  5: 006–019. doi: 10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.1.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Duringer  P, Genise  JF, Mackaye  HT, Vigneaude  P, Brunet  M. 2007. New termite trace fossils: galleries, nests and fungus combs from the Chad basin of Africa (Upper Miocene–Lower Pliocene). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology  251: 323–353. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards  JP, Martin  AJ, Parker  WMG, et al.  2025. Earliest trace fossil evidence of wood-eating termites (Isoptera) and mites (Oribatida) in circumpolar environments of Australia: Upper Strzelecki Group (Lower Cretaceous), Victoria. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology  675: 113059. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2025.113059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eldrett  JS, Greenwood  DR, Harding  IC, Huber  M. 2009. Increased seasonality through the Eocene to Oligocene transition in northern high latitudes. Nature  459: 969–973. doi: 10.1038/nature08069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Eldrett  JS, Harding  IC, Wilson  PA, Butler  E, Roberts  AP. 2007. Continental ice in Greenland during the Eocene and Oligocene. Nature  446: 176–179. doi: 10.1038/nature05591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Engel  MS. 2019. Termite evolution: a primal knock on wood or a hearty mouthful of dirt. Current Biology  29: R1126–R1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Engel  MS, Azar  D, Soriano  C, et al.  2011. New, primitive termites (Isoptera) from Early Cretaceous ambers of France and Lebanon. Palaeodiversity  4: 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  28. Engel  MS, Barden  P, Riccio  M, Grimaldi  DA. 2016. Morphologically specialized termite castes and advanced sociality in the Early Cretaceous. Current Biology  26: 522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Engel  MS, Grimaldi  DA, Krishna  K. 2007. Primitive termites from the Early Cretaceous of Asia (Isoptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie)  371: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  30. Feng  Z, Wei  HB, Wang  CL, Chen  YX, Shen  JJ, Yang  JY. 2015. Wood decay of Xenoxylon yunnanensis Feng sp. nov. from the Middle Jurassic of Yunnan Province, China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology  433: 60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.05.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Francis  JE, Harland  BM. 2006. Termite borings in Early Cretaceous fossil wood, Isle of Wight, UK. Cretaceous Research  27: 773–777. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2006.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Genise  JE, Bown  TM. 1994. New trace fossils of termites (Insecta: Isoptera) from the late Eocene–early Miocene of Egypt, and the reconstruction of ancient isopteran social behavior. Ichnos  3: 155–183. doi: 10.1080/10420949409386386 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Genise  JF. 2017. Ichnoentomology: insect traces in soils and paleosols. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  34. Golonka  J, Gahagan  L, Krobicki  M, Marko  F, Oszczypko  N, Slaczka  A. 2006. Plate tectonic evolution and paleogeography of the circum-Carpathian region. AAPG Memoir  84: 11–46. doi: 10.1306/985606m843066 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Greppi  CD, Alvarez  B, Pujana  RR, Ibiricu  LM, Casal  GA. 2022. Fossil woods with evidence of wood-decay by fungi from the Upper Cretaceous (Bajo Barreal Formation) of central Argentinean Patagonia. Cretaceous Research  136: 105229. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105229 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Greppi  CD, Massini  JLG, Rombola  CF, Pujana  RR. 2023. Borings and coprolites of termites in fossil woods from the Lower Cretaceous (Kachaike Formation) of Argentinean Patagonia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  308: 104800. [Google Scholar]
  37. Grimaldi  D, Engel  MS. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gupta  P, Gupta  S. 2020. Wood anatomy of Indian oaks, with reference to systematic, ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Nordic Journal of Botany  38: e02570. doi: 10.1111/njb.02570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Harper  CJ, Bomfleur  B, Decombeix  AL, Taylor  EL, Taylor  TN, Krings  M. 2012. Tylosis formation and fungal interactions in an Early Jurassic conifer from northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  175: 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.02.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Heřmanová  Z, Kvaček  J, Friis  EM. 2021. Plant mesofossils from the Late Cretaceous Klikov Formation, Czech Republic. Fossil Imprint  77: 256–270. doi: 10.37520/fi.2021.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang  L, Jin  J, Quan  C, Oskolski  AA. 2018. Mummified fossil woods of Fagaceae from the upper Oligocene of Guangxi, South China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences  152: 39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.11.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Humphreys  GS. 2003. Evolution of terrestrial burrowing invertebrates. In: Roach  IC. ed. Advances in regolith. Canberra: CRC LEME, 211–215. [Google Scholar]
  43. Iamandei  S, Iamandei  E, Bozukov  V, Tsenov  B. 2012. Oligocene fossil wood from Rhodopes, Bulgaria. Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae  9: 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  44. Iamandei  S, Iamandei  E, Bozukov  V, Tsenov  B. 2016. New Oligocene fossil woods from Rhodopes, Bulgaria. Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae  12: 47–65. [Google Scholar]
  45. Iamandei  S, Iamandei  E, Ursachi  L. 2022. Late-Miocene Moldavian petrified forest. Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae  19: 61–85. doi: 10.35463/j.apr.2023.01.07 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. IAWA Committee (International Association of Wood Anatomists) . 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bulletin  10: 219–332. [Google Scholar]
  47. InsideWood . 2004–onwards. Published on the Internet. Available at: http://insidewood.lib.ncsu.edu/search (5 June 2026, , date last accessed).
  48. Itoh  T, Pan  B, Sano  Y, et al.  2022. Anatomical database and atlas of Chinese woods. Otsu, Japan: Kaiseisha Press. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jarzembowski  EA. 1981. An Early Cretaceous termite from southern England (Isoptera: Hodotermitidae). Systematic Entomology  6: 91–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.1981.tb00018.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jarzembowski  EA. 1990. Boring beetle from the Wealden of the Weald. In: Boucot  AJ. ed. Evolutionary palaeobiology of behavior and coevolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jirman  P, Geršlová  E, Bubík  M, Sachsenhofer  RF, Bechtel  A, Więcław  D. 2020. Depositional environment and hydrocarbon potential of the Oligocene Menilite Formation in the Western Carpathians (Czech Republic). Marine and Petroleum Geology  107: 334–350. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.05.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jud  NA, Rothwell  GW, Stockey  RA. 2017. Angiosperm wood from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian) of British Columbia, Canada. IAWA Journal  38: 141–161. doi: 10.1163/22941932-20170164 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Käärik  AA. 1974. Decomposition of wood. In: Dickinson  CH, Pugh  CJF. eds. Biology of plant litter decomposition, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press, 129–174. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaulfuss  U, Harris  AC, Lee  DE. 2010. A new fossil termite (Isoptera, Stolotermitidae, Stolotermes) from the early Miocene of Otago, New Zealand. Acta Geologica Sinica—English Edition  84: 705–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00275.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Knaus  D. 2020. Invertebrate coprolites and cololites revised. Papers in Palaeontology  6: 385–423. doi: 10.1002/spp2.1297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Knobloch  E. 1971. Neue Samenfunde im südböhmischen Senon. Sborník geologických věd, Ústřední ústav geologický  13: [stránky neuvedeny]. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kobayashi  K, Yamada  T, Okuyama  T, Sugiyama  J. 2019. Anatomical features of Fagaceae wood statistically extracted by computer vision approaches: some relationships with evolution. PLoS One  14: e0220762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kovar-Eder  J. 2003. Vegetation dynamics in Europe during the Neogene. In: Reumer  JWF, Wessels  W. eds. Distribution and migration of Tertiary mammals in Eurasia. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Natuurhistorisch Museum, Vol. 10. Deinsea, 373–392. [Google Scholar]
  59. Krhovský  J. 1981. Stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Menilite Formation of the Žďánice Unit and diatomites of the Pouzdřany Unit (Western Carpathians, Czechoslovakia). Zemní plyn a nafta  26: 45–62. [Google Scholar]
  60. Krhovský  J, Djurasinović  M. 1993. The nannofossil chalk layers in the early Oligocene of Šitbořice Member (Žďánice Unit, Czech Republic): orbitally forced changes in paleoproductivity. Zemní plyn a nafta  15: 33–53. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kvaček  Z, Bubík  M. 1990. Oligocene flora of the Šitbořice Member and geology at Bystřice nad Olší (NE Moravia). Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického  65: 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  62. Light  SF. 1929. Fossil termite pellets from the Seminole Pleistocene. Journal of Paleontology  3: 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lindahl  BD, Tunlid  A. 2015. Ectomycorrhizal fungi–potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytologist  205: 1443–1447. doi: 10.1111/nph.13201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lindquist  JK, Isaac  MJ. 1991. Silicified conifer forests and potential mining problems in seam M2 of the Gore Lignite Measures (Miocene), Southland, New Zealand. International Journal of Coal Geology  17: 149–169. doi: 10.1016/0166-5162(91)90008-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Manos  PS, Cannon  CH, Oh  SH. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic status of the paleoendemic Fagaceae of western North America: recognition of a new genus. Notholithocarpus. Madroño  55: 181–190. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mantzouka  D, Ivanov  M, Bozukov  V. 2021. The first report of an ‘evergreen Castanopsis-type’ wood (Fagaceae) for the Late Miocene–Early Pliocene of Europe (Bulgaria). Geological Journal  56: 786–803. doi: 10.1002/gj.3919 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Martínez-Delclòs  X, Martinell  J. 1995. The oldest known record of social insects. Journal of Paleontology  69: 594–599. doi: 10.1017/S0022336000034983 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Massini  JL, Pujana  RR. 2013. Silicified termite coprolites in mesquite-like wood from the Miocene of La Rioja, Argentina. International Journal of Plant Sciences  174: 585–591. doi: 10.1086/668226 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. McLoughlin  S, Santos  AA, Donaldson  S, Pott  C, McCurry  M. 2024. Termite activity in the mid-Cretaceous of Australia. Palaeontologia Electronica (Online)  27: 1–30. doi: 10.26879/1420 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mennega  AMW. 1980. Wood structure of Trigonobalanus excelsa (Fagaceae). Caldasia  13: 7–101. [Google Scholar]
  71. Moreau  JD, Trincal  V, Nel  A, et al.  2020. Hidden termite coprolites revealed by Synchrotron microtopography inside Eocene-Oligocene filled wood-borings from the Malzieu basin, Lozére, southern France. Lethaia  53: 106–117. doi: 10.1111/let.12344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nalepa  CA. 2015. Origin of termite eusociality: trophallaxis integrates the social, nutritional, and microbial environments. Ecological Entomology  40: 323–335. doi: 10.1111/een.12197 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Napton  DE. 2012. Southern and central california chaparral and oak woodlands ecoregion. In: Sleeter BM, Wilson TS, Acevedo W, eds. Status and trends of land change in the western United States—1973 to 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1794-A. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
  74. Nixon  KC. 2006. Global and neotropical distribution and diversity of oak (genus Quercus) and oak forests. In: Kappelle M. eds. Ecology and conservation of neotropical montane oak forests. Berlin: Springer, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  75. Noshiro  S, Sasaki  Y. 2011. Identification of Japanese species of evergreen Quercus and Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). IAWA Journal  32: 383–393. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Otjen  L, Blanchette  RA. 1984. Xylobolus frustulatus decay of oak: patterns of selective delignification and subsequent cellulose removal. Applied and Environmental Microbiology  47: 670–676. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.4.670-676.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Petrescu  I. 1976. Asupra unor lemne de stejari (Quercoxylon) din Neogenul de la sud de Câmpulung (jud. Argeș) [On some oak woods (Quercoxylon) from Neogene of South Câmpulung (jud. Argeș)]. Contribuții Științifice ale Grădinii Botanice “Babeș-Bolyai” (1976–1977): 179–185. Cluj-Napoca. Romania: Grădina Botanică Cluj-Napoca (in Romanian). [Google Scholar]
  78. Philippe  M, McLoughlin  S, Strullu-Derrien  C, et al.  2022. Life in the woods: Taphonomic evolution of a diverse saproxylic community within fossil woods from Upper Cretaceous submarine mass flow deposits (Mzamba Formation, southeast Africa). Gondwana Research: International Geoscience Journal  109: 113–133. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.04.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pícha  FJ, Stráník  Z. 1999. Late Cretaceous to Early Miocene deposits of the Carpathian foreland basin in southern Moravia. International Journal of Earth Sciences: Geologische Rundschau  88: 475–495. doi: 10.1007/s005310050280 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Pícha  FJ, Stráník  Z, Krejčí  O. 2006. Geology and hydrocarbon resources of the Outer Western Carpathians and their foreland, Czech Republic. AAPG Memoir  84: 49–175. doi: 10.1306/985607m843067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pires  EF, Sommer  MG. 2009. Plant–arthropod interaction in the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) of the Araripe Basin, Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences  27: 50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2008.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Pound  MJ, Haywood  AM, Salzmann  U, Riding  JB. 2012. A Tortonian (Late Miocene, 11.6–7.2 Ma) global vegetation reconstruction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology  342–343: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.11.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pujana  RR, Marenssi  SA, Santillana  SN. 2015. Fossil woods from the Cross Valley Formation (Paleocene of Western Antarctica): Araucariaceae-dominated forests. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  222: 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.07.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Roberts  EM, Todd  CN, Aanen  DK, et al.  2016. Oligocene termite nests with in situ fungus gardens from the Rukwa Rift Basin, Tanzania, support a Paleogene African origin for insect agriculture. PLoS One  11: e0156847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Rogers  AF. 1938. Fossil termite pellets in opalized wood from Santa Maria, California. American Journal of Science  36: 389–392. doi: 10.2475/ajs.s5-36.215.389 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Rohr  DM, Boucot  AJ, Miller  J, Abbott  M. 1986. Oldest termite nest from the Upper Cretaceous of west Texas. Geology  14: 87–88. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<87:OTNFTU>;2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Roisin  Y. 2000. Diversity and evolution of caste patterns. In: Abe  T, Bignell  DE, Higashi  M. eds. Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Dordrecht: Springer, 95–119. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rombola  CF, Greppi  CD, Pujana  RR, Massini  JLG, Bellosi  ES, Marenssi  SA. 2022. Brachyoxylon fossil woods with traumatic resin canals from the Upper Cretaceous Cerro Fortaleza Formation, southern Patagonia (Santa Cruz Province, Argentina). Cretaceous Research  130: 105065. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Roth  Z. 1981. Menilitic Formation of the Carpathians and its palaeogeographic position. Zemní plyn a nafta  26: 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  90. Rouland-Lefèvre  RC, Inoue  T, Johjima  T. 2006. Termitomyces/termite interactions. In: König H, Varma A. eds.Intestinal microorganisms of termites and other invertebrates. Berlin: Springer, 335–350. [Google Scholar]
  91. Rozefelds  AC, Baar  MD. 1991. Silicified Kalotermitidae (Isoptera) frass in conifer wood from a mid-Tertiary rainforest in central Queensland, Australia. Lethaia  24: 439–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1991.tb01498.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sari  MK, Gülen  B. 2021. The first record of Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis (Fagaceae) from the Oligocene of the Thrace Basin, western Turkey. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science  906: 012135. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/906/1/012135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Sass-Klaassen  U, Couralet  C, Sahle  Y, Sterck  FJ. 2008. Shedding light on tree-ring formation in tropical trees: a review. IAWA Journal  29: 361–374. [Google Scholar]
  94. Schweingruber  FH, Börner  A, Schulze  E-D. 2011. The plant stem: a microscopic aspect of plant form. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  95. Selmeier  A, Velitzelos  E. 2000. Neue Ansammlungen von verkieselten Holzresten aus tertiären Schichten Griechenlands (Lesbos, Kastoria, Thrakien). Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geologie  40: 213–227. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sen  I. 2020. Wood-rotting fungus in a fossil wood of Shorea sp. from Garbeta, West Bengal. Explore  19, unpaginated. [Google Scholar]
  97. Srivastava  R. 2008. Fossil woods resembling Sonneratia with fungal infection from the Deccan Intertrappean sediments of Seoni District, Madhya Pradesh. Geophytology  37: 87–92. doi: 10.54991/jop.2010.195 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Srivastava  R, Kapgate  DK, Chatterjee  S. 2009. Permineralized fungal remains in the fossil wood of Barringtonia from the Deccan Intertrappean sediments, Yavatmal District, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Palaeosciences  58: 11–19. doi: 10.54991/jop.2009.77 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Stráník  Z. 1981. Lithofacies and correlation of the Menilitic Formation in the Carpathian Flysch Belt of Moravia. Zemní plyn a nafta  26: 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  100. Stráník  Z, Benešová  E, Cicha  I, Gabriel  M, Kolářová  M, Žůrková  I. 1974. Vysvětlující text k základní geologické mapě 1: 25 000M-33-106-D-C (Šitbořice). Praha: ÚÚG. [Google Scholar]
  101. Stubblefield  SP, Taylor  TN. 1986. Wood decay in silicified gymnosperms from Antarctica. Botanical Gazette  147: 116–125. doi: 10.1086/337577 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Stubblefield  SP, Taylor  TN, Beck  CB. 1985. Studies of Paleozoic fungi. IV. Wood-decaying fungi in Callixylon newberryi from the Upper Devonian. American Journal of Botany  72: 1765–1774. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1985.tb08449.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sutherland  JI. 2003. Miocene petrified wood and associated borings and termite fecal pellets from Hukatere Peninsula, Kaipara Harbour, North Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand  33: 395–414. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2003.9517736 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Suzuki  M, Ohba  H. 1991. A revision of fossil wood of Quercus and its allies in Japan. Japanese Botany  66: 255–274. [Google Scholar]
  105. Švábenická  L, Bubík  M, Stráník  Z. 2007. Biostratigraphy and paleoenvironmental changes on the transition from the Menilite to Krosno lithofacies (Western Carpathians, Czech Republic). Geologica Carpathica: The Journal of Geological Institute of Slovak Academy of Sciences  58: 237–262. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tarelkin  Y, Delvaux  C, De Ridder  M, El Berkani  T, De Cannière  C, Beeckman  H. 2016. Growth-ring distinctness and boundary anatomy variability in tropical trees. IAWA Journal  37: 275–S277. doi: 10.1163/22941932-20160134 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. Taylor  TN, Krings  M, Taylor  EL. 2015. Fossil fungi. Amsterdam: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  108. Teodoridis  V, Kvaček  Z. 2015. Palaeoenvironmental evaluation of Cainozoic plant assemblages from the Bohemian Massif (Czech Republic) and adjacent Germany. Bulletin of Geosciences  90: 695–720. doi: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1553 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Tian  N, Wang  Y, Zheng  S, Zhu  Z. 2020. White-rotting fungus with clamp-connections in a coniferous wood from the Lower Cretaceous of Heilongjiang Province, NE China. Cretaceous Research  105: 104014. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2018.11.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Továrková  I. 2009. Terciérní silicifikovaná dřeva Moravy. Bakalářská práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. [Google Scholar]
  111. Továrková  I. 2011. Systematické studium terciérních silicifikovaných dřev Moravy. Diplomová práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. [Google Scholar]
  112. Továrková  I, Gryc  V, Sakala  J. 2014. First anatomically characterized wood from the Tertiary of Moravia: Spiroplatanoxylon from the area of Austerlitz (Southern Moravia, Czech Republic). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis  59: 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  113. Tretyakov  V. 2020. Kalotermes flavicollis termites colony are fixing the hole with excrement [video]. YouTube. Duration: 13 min 36 s. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DqAVOMEw0A (5 June 2024, date last accessed).
  114. Vangerow  EF. 1954. Megasporen und andere pflanzliche Makrofossilien aus der Aachener Kreide. Palaeontographica Abteilung B  96: 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  115. Velitzelos  D, Bouchal  JM, Denk  T. 2014. Review of the Cenozoic floras and vegetation of Greece. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  204: 56–117. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.02.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Velitzelos  E, Kvaček  Z, Walter  H. 1999. Erster Nachweis von Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis (Rossm.) Walter et Kvaček (Fagaceae) in Griechenland. Feddes Repertorium  110: 349–358. doi: 10.1002/fedr.19991100506 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Walliser  EO, Schöne  BR, Tütken  T, Zirkel  J, Grimm  KI, Pross  J. 2015. The bivalve Glycymeris planicostalis as a high-resolution palaeoclimate archive for the Rupelian (Early Oligocene) of central Europe. Climate of the Past  11: 653–668. doi: 10.5194/cp-11-653-2015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wan  M, Yang  W, He  X, Liu  L, Wang  J. 2016a. First record of fossil basidiomycete clamp connections in cordaitalean stems from the Asselian–Sakmarian (Lower Permian) of Shanxi Province, North China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology  466: 353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wan  M, Yang  W, Liu  L, Wang  J. 2016b. Plant–arthropod and plant–fungus interactions in Late Permian gymnospermous woods from the Bogda Mountains, Xinjiang, northwestern China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  235: 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wheeler  EA, Baas  P, Manchester  SR. 2022. Wood anatomy of modern and fossil Fagales in relation to phylogenetic hypotheses, familial classification, and patterns of character evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences  183: 61–86. doi: 10.1086/717328 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wheeler  EA, Manchester  SR. 2021. A diverse assemblage of Late Eocene woods from Oregon, western USA. Fossil Imprint  77: 299–329. doi: 10.37520/fi.2021.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilkinson  HP. 2003. Fossil actinomycete filaments and fungal hyphae in dicotyledonous wood from the Eocene London Clay, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, England. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society  142: 383–394. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00179.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wilson  EO, Hölldobler  B. 2005. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA  102: 13367–13371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505858102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Worbes  M. 2002. One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics—a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia  20: 217–231. doi: 10.1078/1125-7865-00018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Xie  A, Gee  CT, Tian  N. 2023. Ancient Basidiomycota in an extinct conifer-like tree, Xenoxylon utahense, and a brief survey of fungi in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, USA. Journal of Paleontology  97: 754–763. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2023.12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Zachos  JC, Dickens  GR, Zeebe  RE. 2008. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature  451: 279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature06588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Zega  SLD, Fajar  A, Himmi  SK, et al.  2020. Examination of fecal pellet physical characteristics of an invasive drywood termite, Cryptotermes dudleyi (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae): a potential approach for species marker and non-destructive monitoring method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering  935: 012050. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/935/1/012050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Zhao  Z, Engel  MS, Delclòs  X, Azar  D, Cai  C, Huang  D. 2021. Termite communities and their early evolution and ecology trapped in Cretaceous amber. Cretaceous Research  117: 104612. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104612 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhao  Z, Yin  C, Taiping  G, Ren  D. 2020. Termite colonies from mid-Cretaceous Myanmar demonstrate their early eusocial lifestyle in damp wood. National Science Review  7: 381–390. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES