Abstract
Context
Insulin deficiency (ID) causes severe metabolic defects and death if untreated, while insulin therapy does not fully restore metabolic homeostasis. Leptin therapy corrects metabolic abnormalities and promotes survival in rodents unable to produce insulin, suggesting the existence of insulin-independent glucoregulatory mechanisms.
Objective
To characterize hepatic translational remodeling in severe insulin deficiency and determine whether leptin-responsive translational changes can reveal novel glucoregulatory factors.
Methods
We used mice with diphtheria toxin-induced pancreatic β-cell ablation, resulting in severe ID. We assessed hepatic translation by polysome profiling, ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq), and RNA sequencing. To identify leptin-responsive hepatic factors, we compared the hepatic translatome during intracerebroventricular leptin treatment and following leptin withdrawal. Regenerating islet-derived protein 3 alpha (Reg3α) was subsequently overexpressed in the liver of ID mice to assess its metabolic effects.
Results
ID suppresses hepatic mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling and global protein synthesis while extensively remodeling the hepatic translatome. Translation of anabolic and glucose-metabolism pathways is reduced, whereas transcripts involved in lipid metabolism are selectively enhanced. Leptin treatment markedly increases hepatic Reg3α translation. Hepatic Reg3α overexpression significantly improves hyperglycemia in ID mice without altering insulin-stimulated AKT phosphorylation in key metabolic tissues. These findings identify hepatic translational rewiring as an important feature of ID and Reg3α as an insulin-independent glucoregulatory factor.
Keywords: insulin, diabetes, mRNA translation
The hormone insulin is secreted by the pancreatic β cells in response to changes in circulating nutrients, in particular glucose (1-5). The central importance of insulin for normal metabolic homeostasis is underscored by the consequence of insulin deficiency (ID), which arises when β cells are severely dysfunctional or lost such as in type 1 diabetes mellitus, late-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus, or following complete pancreatectomy (4, 6, 7). If untreated, ID is a lethal catabolic condition characterized by hyperglycemia, ketoacidosis, hyperglucagonemia, and many other abnormalities. Tens of millions of individuals are affected by ID worldwide, and this number is projected to increase (8-10). While insulin therapy (the cornerstone approach currently available) converts a lethal disease into a manageable condition, it remains unsatisfactory. Indeed, most insulin-treated ID patients do not reach glycemic targets and are at higher risk of developing life-threatening comorbidities (eg, stroke and heart attack) (11-14). Moreover, owing to its potent glycemia-lowering action, insulin therapy can cause iatrogenic hypoglycemia that can be disabling or even fatal (accounting for ∼4%-10% of deaths in type 1 diabetes mellitus) (15-17). Therefore, due to the large number of people affected by ID and the shortcomings of current treatment, it is of paramount medical and societal importance that more adequate therapy be developed. Efforts to address this need have largely focused on insulin itself. Novel insulin analogues or conjugates have been developed to improve pharmacokinetic profiles (18-20), and advanced delivery systems, including artificial pancreas platforms (21), improve the coupling between insulin administration and circulating glucose levels. β-Cell replacement approaches aiming at restoring endogenous insulin secretion from transplanted donor islets (22) or stem-cell–derived cells (23) have also made progress. Nevertheless, these emerging methods fail to fully restore metabolic regulation and remain associated with considerable limitations (eg, lifelong immunosuppressive therapy), highlighting the need for novel and complementary therapeutic strategies for ID. These complementary approaches can be uncovered by investigating insulin-independent mechanisms permitting life without insulin. One of these mechanisms is triggered by leptin monotherapy, an approach that corrects ID-induced metabolic defects and promotes survival of rodents unable to produce insulin (5, 24-26). The fact that the effects of leptin are mediated by hypothalamic neurons (24, 25, 27-29) and the possibility of developing leptin resistance hampered the translational applicability of leptin therapy itself in this context. However, the possibility of treating ID patients with molecules underlying the beneficial effects of leptin led to the identification of new approaches. In previous work, quantitative proteomic analysis of plasma from leptin-treated ID mice identified S100A9 as a peripheral mediator of leptin action (30). S100A9 exerts potent anti-inflammatory effects and normalizes hyperketonemia and hypertriglyceridemia in ID mice (31-33). However, although S100A9 therapy improves hyperglycemia, it does not recapitulate the hyperglycemia-normalizing action of leptin in ID (24-26, 29, 34-36). These findings indicate that additional mediators of leptin's antidiabetic action remain to be identified.
To address this issue, we undertook an approach focused on hepatic translational regulation. The liver is one of the most translationally active organs and plays a central role in maintaining systemic metabolic homeostasis (37). Notably, under conditions of reduced insulin availability, such as fasting, global hepatic protein synthesis is suppressed whereas the translation of specific metabolic pathways remains selectively maintained. In particular, transcripts involved in gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis escape suppression, thereby sustaining continued hepatic glucose production and energy homeostasis (18, 32, 38, 39). These observations suggest that understanding translational regulation is important for defining how the liver adapts its metabolism during nutrient stress. While the hepatic translatome has been partially characterized in acute fasting (40), the consequences of ID on hepatic messenger RNA (mRNA) translation are unknown. Here, to define global and selective changes in hepatic translation, we combined polysome profiling, ribosome footprinting (Ribo-seq), and transcriptomic analysis in a well-validated mouse model of ID. We examined how ID alters hepatic mRNA translation globally and selectively.
To identify hepatic mediators of leptin treatment, we further examined how leptin reshapes the hepatic translatome in ID. Using this approach, we identified regenerating islet-derived protein 3α (Reg3α, also known as hepatocarcinoma-intestine-pancreas/pancreatitis-associated protein HIP/PAP) as a novel insulin-independent glucoregulatory factor. Although Reg3α has been implicated in protecting β cells from inflammatory and cytokine-induced damage, its role in glucose metabolism in the absence of insulin is unknown (41, 42). Here, we show that increased Reg3α levels markedly reduce hyperglycemia in ID mice via a mechanism independent of insulin receptor signaling. These findings uncover a previously unappreciated layer of hepatic translational regulation in ID and unveil a potential new strategy for improving the treatment of diabetes.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
All animal research carried out in this study complies with all relevant ethical regulations of the University of Geneva, within the procedures approved by the animal care and experimentation authorities of the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland (animal protocol Nos. GE112B and GE512A). Mice were maintained with a standard chow diet and water available ad libitum in a light- and temperature-controlled environment with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Tissues were collected between 3 and 4 Pm corresponding to ZT7 and 8. All the experiments were conducted in male mice (aged 10-12 weeks). RIP-DTR mice weighing between 25 and 30 g were used as an insulin-deficient model as previously done (32). Diphtheria toxin (DT, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl and intraperitoneally administered (0.5 μg/kg BW) on experimental day 0, 2, and 4 to induce ID. A healthy control group was injected with saline. Metabolic assessments were performed between 4 and 6 days after the last DT injection. Animals displaying undetectable insulin serum levels were selected as ID animals for the study. For chronic leptin treatment, leptin was intracerebroventricularly (icv) administered with a cannula positioned stereotaxically into the cerebral lateral ventricles connected to a small osmotic pump (ALZET) implanted subcutaneously as previously described (25). Leptin (AF-450-31-1MG, PrepoTech) was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (pH = 7.4; Invitrogen) solution. DT animals that underwent 10 days of icv leptin treatment are referred to as “ID; icv-leptin.” DT animals that underwent 8 days of icv leptin treatment and were then withdrawn from leptin administration for the following 2 days are referred to as “ID; icv-leptin-STOP.” Overexpression of Reg3α using hydrodynamic tail vein injection (HTVI) in mice was performed based on previous studies (30). Overexpression of Reg3α is achieved by using pLIVE vectors (Myrus) that allow expression under the control of the albumin promoter. Each mouse received 50 μg of vector encoding for Reg3α or empty vector as control. These animals are referred to as “ID; pLIVE-Reg3α” and “ID; pLIVE.” For acute insulin treatment experiments, mice were intraperitoneally injected with human insulin (5 U/kg) and euthanized 10 minutes after injection. These animals are referred to as “ID; pLIVE-Reg3α + 5 U/kg insulin.” On experimental end point day, mice were fasted for 3 hours to avoid confounding effects of food. The animals were euthanized by pentobarbital injection and then the liver, heart, gastrocnemius muscle, perigonadal white adipose tissue, and brown adipose tissue were harvested. The number of mice used in each experiment is mentioned in the corresponding figure legend. Care of mice at University of Geneva was within the procedures approved by animal care and experimentation authorities of the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland.
Protein extraction and immunoblotting
Mice were euthanized, tissues quickly removed, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at −80 °C. Proteins were extracted by homogenizing samples in lysis buffer (Tris 20 mM, EDTA 5 mM, and NP-40 1% [v/v]), protease inhibitors (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich) and phosphatase inhibitors (P5726, P0044; Sigma-Aldrich) then resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and lastly transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked with blocking buffer (927-60003; LICORbio) for 1 hour. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4 °C. The following antibodies were used: 4E-BP1 (Cell Signaling Technology catalog No. 9644, RRID:AB_2097841; 1:1000), Phospho-4E-BP1 (Cell Signaling Technology catalog No. 2855, RRID:AB_560835; 1:1000), Reg3α (Sino Biological catalog No. catalog No. 50185-RP01, RRID:AB_3753733; 1:1000), phospho-AKT(Ser473) (Cell Signaling Technology catalog No. 4060, RRID:AB_2315049; 1:2000), AKT Cell Signaling Technology catalog No. 2920, RRID:AB_1147620; 1:1000), α-tubulin (Proteintech catalog No. 11224-1-AP, RRID:AB_2210206; 1:1000), and β-actin (abcepta catalog No. AM1829b, RRID:AB_10664137; 1:1000). Membranes were washed with TBS-tween before being incubated with a 1:10 000 secondary antibody solution (LICORbio catalog No. 926-32211, RRID:AB_621843; LICORbio catalog No. 926-68070, RRID:AB_10956588) for 1 hour at room temperature, before detection with the LICOR Odyssey Imaging System.
Circulating substrates
To avoid postprandial confounding effects, food was removed 3 hours prior measurement. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation of tail vein blood in EDTA-coated tubes (Kent Scientific) (3000g; 15 minutes; 4 °C). Circulating glucose and ketone body levels (mmol/L) were assessed using a glucose and ketone meter (Statstrip Xpress, Nova Biomedical) on tail vein blood. Plasmatic insulin (Crystal Chem catalog No. 90080, RRID:AB_2783626) and triglycerides (291-94501, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals Europe GmbH) were measured according to manufacturer's instructions.
Hepatic lipid extraction
Total lipids were extracted from approximately 30 mg of liver homogenate by using an adapted Bligh and Dyer method (43). Samples were maintained on ice prior to processing and, when necessary, sectioned in phosphate-buffered saline. Homogenization was performed in 2-mL protein LoBind tubes containing 2 prewashed metal beads (rinsed with Milli-Q water until no foaming and air-dried). Each sample was mixed with 100 µL of water and 500 µL of methanol and disrupted using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen) at 30 Hz for 40 seconds. Lysates were transferred to glass tubes (Wheaton), and residual material was recovered by rinsing the original tubes with 1 mL of water, which was pooled with the lysate. Lipids were extracted through 2-step liquid–liquid extractions by sequential addition of methanol, chloroform, and ultrapure water to achieve phase separation. Specifically, 900 µL of water, 2 mL of methanol, and 2.3 mL of chloroform were added, followed by thorough vortexing and centrifugation (2000g, 2 minutes, 4 °C). The lower organic phase was collected and subjected to additional washing steps with chloroform and water, including re-extraction of the remaining aqueous phase to maximize lipid recovery. After each addition, samples were vortexed thoroughly and centrifuged under the same conditions using a swinging bucket rotor.
The pooled organic phases were collected, while aqueous phases were discarded, and solvents were evaporated under vacuum at room temperature for 2 hours to obtain dried lipid extracts. Lipid films were stored at −20 °C until further use. For downstream analysis of neutral lipids, dried extracts were resuspended in chloroform:methanol:water (20:9:1, v/v/v), vortexed thoroughly, and centrifuged (2000g, 2 minutes, 4 °C). Samples were overlaid with argon to minimize oxidation and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Lipid measurement by high-performance thin-layer chromatography
Lipid separation was performed by high-performance thin-layer chromatography as previously described (44). Lipid extracts were spotted on Silica Gel 60 plates (1.05631.0001; Merck) using an automated spotter (CAMAG ATS 4). Plates were prewashed in chloroform/methanol (1:1; v/v) and dried under vacuum prior to use. Lipid standards (cholesterol, cholesteryl ester, triacylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine) and liver extracts resuspended in chloroform/methanol/water (20:9:1; v/v/v) were spotted onto the plates. Separation was achieved using a 2-step solvent system: Plates were first developed in chloroform/methanol/ammonium hydroxide (65:25:4: v/v/v) to a migration distance of 5 cm, air-dried briefly, and subsequently developed in hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid (80:20:2; v/v/v) to 9 cm. Following chromatographic separation, plates were dried under vacuum for 30 minutes, and the lipids were visualized by charring with copper sulfate/orthophosphoric acid reagent as described previously (45). The solution was freshly prepared by dissolving 2.5 g of CuSO4 in 20 mL of filtered water, then mixing with 2.35 mL of 85% orthophosphoric acid and adjusting to 25 mL with water. Plates were immersed in 10 mL of staining solution for 1 minute, excess reagent was removed, and plates were dried under vacuum for 15 minutes. Lipids were then charred at 145 °C for 7.5-9.5 minutes. Plates were imaged under visible light and fluorescence at 488 and 546 nm (ChemiDoc MP; Bio-Rad), and lipid spots were quantified by densitometry using ImageJ (ImageJ distribution) (46).
Histological analysis
After tissue collection, fresh liver from a subset of animals was fixed in 4% formalin. Formalin-fixed liver samples were dehydrated before being embedded in paraffin blocks. Embedded tissues were sectioned in 5 µm slices, then mounted onto glass slides. After deparaffinization and rehydration, the slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Hepatocyte cross-sectional area (µm2) was measured using QuPath (47).
Ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) libraries were prepared by the BioCode RNA-to-Proteins Core Facility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva. There were 3 to 5 animals per cohort. Briefly, mouse liver tissues were ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 140 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mg/mL heparin, 100 µg/mL cycloheximide, 1 mM DTT, 25 U/mL Turbo DNase I, and protease inhibitors). Lysates containing 400 µg of total RNA were treated with RNase I (250 U/mg total RNA) for 45 minutes at 22 °C and monosomes were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography using S-400 spin columns. Ribosome-protected fragments (RPFs) of 25 to 34 nucleotides were size-selected by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, dephosphorylated, and ligated to a preadenylated 3′ adapter. Following ribosomal RNA depletion (RiboCop V2, Lexogen), RPFs were reverse-transcribed, circularized, and polymerase chain reaction–amplified with indexed primers. Library quality was assessed by TapeStation and Qubit fluorometry. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 at the iGE3 Genomics Platform, University of Geneva (single-end, 1 × 100 bp, ∼100 million reads per library).
RNA sequencing (total RNA isolation, library preparation, and sequencing)
Total RNA was isolated from the same tissue lysates used for ribosome profiling. RNA was extracted by adding QIAzol reagent directly to cleared lysate aliquots, followed by purification with the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus kit. RNA integrity was assessed by Bioanalyzer; only samples with an RNA Integrity Number of 8.8 or greater were used for library preparation. Stranded mRNA libraries were prepared and sequenced by the iGE3 genomics platform of the University of Geneva on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (single-end, 1 × 100 bp, 60 000 000 reads per library).
Ribosome profiling quality control, mapping, and analysis
Raw reads were adapter-trimmed and quality-filtered using Cutadapt (v1.18) (48), retaining only trimmed reads of 25 to 34 nt corresponding to the expected ribosome-protected fragment size. Reads were aligned to the Mus musculus genome (GRCm38/mm10) using HISAT2 (v2) (49), and reads mapping to ribosomal RNA loci and repetitive elements (RepeatMasker annotation, GRCm38) were excluded using BEDTools (50). Only primary alignments were retained using SAMtools (51). Filtered reads were subsequently mapped to a canonical Mus musculus transcriptome (Ensembl GRCm38, longest CDS per gene) using Bowtie2 (v2.3.5.1) (52). P-site offsets were estimated per read length using riboWaltz (53) in R, based on metagene profiles at annotated start and stop codons. Data quality was confirmed by verifying 70% or more of P-sites in the zero reading frame across CDS regions, consistent with 3-nucleotide periodicity. P-site counts overlapping CDS regions were quantified and normalized by CDS length and sequencing depth to yield RPKM values. Genes with fewer than 10 raw counts across all samples were excluded. Per-codon occupancy was normalized to mean CDS coverage per transcript to correct for gene-level expression differences, and metagene profiles were generated by binning each CDS into 20 equal segments. Differential A-site occupancy between conditions was assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests across biological replicates, including analyses restricted to the first 60 nucleotides of each CDS to capture initiation-proximal pausing.
RNA-sequencing mapping (counting) and analysis
Raw single-end reads were trimmed using Cutadapt (v1.18) (48) following the same parameters as those for Ribo-seq. Reads shorter than 15 nucleotides after trimming were discarded. Trimmed reads were aligned to the Mus musculus reference genome (GRCm38/mm10) using HISAT2 (49) with default splice-aware parameters. Mapping quality was assessed using the SAMtools (51) flagstat. Genes with fewer than 10 raw counts in all samples were excluded from the downstream analyses.
Differential expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis
Differential expression analysis was performed on Ribo- and RNA-seq datasets independently using DESeq2 (54) in R from raw counts. Genes with fewer than 10 counts across all samples were excluded prior to testing. Differentially expressed genes were defined by a Benjamini-Hochberg–adjusted P value less than .05 and log2 fold change (FC) greater than or equal to 1. Translational efficiency (TE) was estimated as the ratio of normalized Ribo-seq to RNA-seq counts per gene, and differential TE was assessed using a DESeq2 interaction term model (55). Overrepresentation analysis was performed on differentially expressed gene lists using clusterProfiler (56), with gene sets retrieved from MSigDB (57), including GO Biological Process, KEGG, Reactome, and BioCarta collections. Enrichment was tested by Fisher exact test against a background of all expressed genes, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction applied (false discovery rate < 0.05). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed on the full ranked gene list using fgsea (58). Genes were ranked by sign(log2FC), and the same MSigDB collections were tested, excluding gene sets with fewer than 15 or more than 500 members. Normalized enrichment scores (NES) were computed across 1000 permutations, and gene sets with NES greater than 1.5 and a false discovery rate less than 0.25 were considered significantly enriched. GSEA was applied independently to RNA-seq and Ribo-seq ranked lists.
Statistical analysis
All experimental results are represented as the mean ± SEM. Values representation and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software 11 (GraphPad Software Inc). Statistical analyses of non-omics data were performed using 2-tail unpaired t test when 2 groups were compared, or one-way analysis of variance followed by a multiple comparison ad hoc test (Tukey post hoc test). Statistical significance was set at P less than .05.
Results
Insulin deficiency alters hepatic protein translation
To address the effect of ID on hepatic mRNA translation, we modeled human ID by using mice carrying the RIPDTR allele. This allele encodes the diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) sequence under the control of the rat insulin promoter (RIP), enabling selective pancreatic β-cell depletion and consequential ID following DT administration (32). After DT treatment (Fig. 1A), depletion of insulin-producing β cells was achieved. Indeed, DT-treated RIPDTR mice (referred to here as ID) had undetectable levels of circulating insulin, reduced body weight, and increased blood glucose levels (which are key symptoms of ID) as compared to their sex- and age-matched saline-treated RIPDTR controls (hereafter referred to as healthy) (Supplementary Fig. S1A-S1C) (59). As expected, ID mice had diminished hepatic mTORC1 activity, as indicated by reduced phosphorylation status of 4E-BP1 in the liver of these mice compared to their controls (Fig. 1B). Because mTORC1 regulates protein and lipid metabolism and cellular growth (38, 60), we assessed liver weight, hepatocyte size, and hepatic protein and lipid contents. Data shown in Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S1D (59) indicate that liver weight is significantly lower in ID mice compared to their controls, a defect associated with decreased hepatocyte size (Fig. 1D). Hepatic protein content was significantly reduced in ID mice compared to their controls (Fig. 1E). On the other hand, our results shown in Supplementary Fig. S1E to S1H (59) indicate an accumulation of triglycerides and other classes of lipids such as cholesterol, phosphatidylcholine, and phosphatidylethanolamine in ID mice compared to controls. Altogether, these findings are consistent with major hepatic metabolic rewiring and reduced global protein synthesis in ID.
Figure 1.

Insulin deficiency (ID) alters hepatic translation. (A) Schematic representation of the treatment protocol of experimental groups. Male RIP-DTR mice aged 10 to 12 weeks were injected intraperitoneally with saline or diphtheria toxin (DT) at day 0 (D0), day 2 (D2), and day 4 (D4). (B) Representative immunoblots of liver lysates from healthy and ID mice at day 7 (D7) and ratio of p-4E-BP1/4E-BP1 protein levels. Measured by densitometry quantification of phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (p-4E-BP1) at Thr37/46 and total 4E-BP1 (n = 4). (C) Percentage liver weight to body weight (n = 9 for healthy, n = 11 for ID). (D) Representative histological images (hematoxylin and eosin staining) of liver sections (scale bar, 200 µm) and hepatocyte quantification of mean area (µm2) of healthy and ID mice at D7 (n = 5). (E) Total hepatic protein content (mg/g) (n = 8). (F) Representative polysome profiles of liver samples and histograms showing the relative ratio between polysome:subpolysome fractions (AUC, area under the curve) from healthy and ID mice at D7 (n = 4). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-tailed unpaired t test;*P < .05; **P < .01.
To investigate the effect of ID on hepatic protein translation, we first assessed hepatic polysome profiles. Separation of hepatic lysates by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation revealed a marked reduction in polysome abundance in ID mice. Consistent with this, the ratio of polysomes to subpolysomal fractions was significantly lower in ID mice than in healthy controls (Fig. 1F). This shift was accompanied by an accumulation of free mRNAs and/or ribonucleoprotein particles as well as monosomes (Fig. 1F). These data indicate a global impairment of mRNA translation in the liver of ID mice.
To further investigate the consequence of ID on hepatic translation, we employed Ribo-seq, a method that provides a direct proxy for the rate of protein synthesis by deep sequencing ribosome-protected mRNA fragments (RPFs) (61). Ribo-seq libraries were prepared from liver lysates of ID and healthy mice and subjected to deep sequencing. RPKM-normalized values were used for pairwise sample-correlation analysis as part of Ribo-seq quality control (Supplementary Fig. S2C) (59). Quality-control analyses of the Ribo-seq data revealed the expected triplet periodicity, with the majority of ribosomal footprint P-sites mapping to frame 0, consistent with correct codon decoding of annotated open reading frames (ORFs) (Supplementary Fig. S2A) (59). Moreover, RPF lengths were within the expected range of 27 to 30 nucleotides (Supplementary Fig. S2B) (59), and pairwise correlation analysis demonstrated high concordance between samples (Supplementary Fig. S2C) (59). Metagene analysis revealed a tendency of global reduction in RPF density within 5′ untranslated regions and across the first approximately 30 nucleotides downstream of annotated start codons in ID liver compared with healthy controls (Fig. 2A). The decrease in ribosome occupancy was not attributable to altered codon usage (Supplementary Fig. S2D) (59) and was followed by a recovery of read density further into the coding sequence, reaching levels comparable to controls (Fig. 2A). These results suggest altered translation initiation and early elongation in ID.
Figure 2.

Identification of insulin deficiency (ID) effect on the hepatic translatome. (A) Metagene analysis showing ribosomal protected fragments (RPF) distribution at the 5′ untranslated region up to 200 nucleotides after the start codon of the open reading frames in healthy and ID mice. (B) Volcano plot of genes upregulated and downregulated in the Ribo-seq analysis. (log2FC| > 1, adjusted P<.05). Selected genes are labeled. (C) Bar chart of top enriched terms for the genes upregulated and downregulated in Ribo-seq of liver of ID mice (GO term, –log10–adjusted P). (D) GO terms associated with the mTORC/PI3 K signaling pathway in our gene set enrichment analysis (GO term, normalized enrichment score, NES). (E) Volcano plot of translation efficiency of genes upregulated and downregulated detected by integrative analysis of Ribo-seq and RNA-seq in liver under ID vs healthy conditions. Selected genes are labeled (n = 5).
Genes with differentially abundant RPF counts between ID and healthy mice are depicted in the volcano plot shown in Fig. 2B. These data reveal widespread alterations in ribosome engagement across several hepatic mRNAs in ID mice (Fig. 2B). Notably, despite the overall reduction in global translation inferred from polysome profiling (Fig. 1E and 1F), some mRNAs were more highly translated in ID vs healthy conditions (Fig. 2B). In total, 107 transcripts were translationally downregulated and 104 were upregulated in ID livers (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Table S1) (59).
GSEA of ribosome occupancy data uncovered marked divergence between translationally upregulated and downregulated biological processes. Translationally upregulated genes sets were predominantly associated with lipid metabolism, in particular fatty acid and monocarboxylic acid metabolic processes (Fig. 2C). Additional enriched terms included detoxification pathways and eicosanoid biosynthesis, suggesting broader remodeling of hepatic lipid handling and metabolic function. In contrast, translationally downregulated gene sets reflected suppression of lipid biosynthetic and immune response pathways (Fig. 2C). In line with data shown in Fig. 1B, GSEA of Gene Ontology biological process (GO:BP) terms related to mTOR/PI3K signaling revealed predominantly negative enrichment across this pathway (Fig. 2D). Curated pathway terms exhibiting negative NES included TOR signaling, response to rapamycin, insulin receptor signaling pathway, and PI3K-AKT signal transduction. Notably, the only positively enriched term was negative regulation of TOR signaling, further supporting an attenuation of mTOR activity at the translational level. Collectively, these findings indicate a coordinated shift in the hepatic translatome from anabolic to catabolic lipid metabolic programs under ID conditions.
To assess how efficiently individual mRNAs are translated (translatability), we performed differential TE analysis by computing the ratio of RPF abundance to mRNA abundance for each gene and plotted the resulting log2FC against statistical significance as a volcano plot (Fig. 2E). Using thresholds of log2FC of 1 or greater and adjusted P value less than .05 (−log10(Padj) ≥ 1.3), we identified 331 translationally dysregulated genes out of 6475 detected genes. Among these, 117 and 214 genes displayed significantly increased or decreased TE in ID vs healthy controls, respectively (see Fig. 2E).
Among genes with reduced TE, several are functionally linked to metabolic regulation. Cidec, which is known to enhance triglyceride-rich lipid droplets accumulation in hepatocytes; Per2, a core circadian clock gene whose disruption impairs hepatic glucose metabolism and insulin signaling; and Pex14, a peroxisomal membrane protein known to stimulate peroxisomal lipid oxidation in hepatocytes, displayed reduced translational efficiency in ID compared with healthy controls. Conversely, the genes with increased TE included Txnip, which is known to promote hepatic glucose production while driving triglyceride and lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, and Ndufv1, a structural subunit of mitochondrial complex I driving hepatic oxidative phosphorylation whose dysfunction has been associated with the onset and the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, point to the dysregulation of mitochondrial energy metabolism in the liver. These observations indicate that ID affects translational control of metabolic gene networks beyond steady-state mRNA regulation.
Consistent with this notion, ID markedly altered the translation of genes involved in glucose metabolism and hepatic steatosis susceptibility. Gck, a key glycolytic enzyme, and Fabp5, which participates in fatty acid transport, were among the most strongly downregulated genes, highlighting suppression of hepatocytic glucose utilization and lipid-handling pathways (Fig. 2B). At the transcript abundance level, Gck was significantly reduced, while Fabp5 followed a similar downward trend at both the mRNA and translational levels. Additionally, Pklr, encoding the final enzyme of glycolysis, and Acly, a key enzyme linking glucose metabolism to lipid synthesis, were downregulated at the mRNA abundance level (Supplementary Fig. S3A) (59).
Conversely, pathway enrichment analysis of translationally upregulated transcripts revealed strong associations with lipid metabolism (Fig. 2C). Several of these transcripts play established roles in lipid storage and lipid droplet dynamics, including Apoa4, Cidec, G0s2, and Plk3 (see Fig. 2B). Coordinated translational upregulation of these factors may promote hepatic lipid accumulation in ID mice (Fig. 2B and 2C; Supplementary Figs. S3A and S3B) (59). Together, our results indicate that ID reprograms the hepatic translatome through global suppression of anabolic and glucose metabolic pathways, accompanied by selective translational activation of genes involved in lipid metabolism.
Leptin therapy reshapes hepatic protein translation in insulin deficiency
Icv leptin administration improves hyperglycemia, hyperketonemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and other metabolic abnormalities associated with ID in rodents (24, 25). To identify the mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of leptin, we generated two experimental groups: (i) DT-treated RIPDTR mice that underwent icv leptin treatment for 10 days (hereafter referred to as ID; icv-leptin) and (ii) DT-treated RIPDTR mice treated with icv leptin for 8 days followed by withdrawal of leptin for the subsequent 2 days (hereafter referred to as ID; icv-leptin-STOP) (Fig. 3A). As previously reported (30), hyperglycemia emerged within 2 days of leptin withdrawal in ID mice (Fig. 3B). Accordingly, on day 10, mice in the ID; icv-leptin-STOP group displayed significantly higher circulating blood glucose levels compared with continuously treated ID; icv-leptin mice, with hyperglycemia already evident on day 9 (see Fig. 3B). We hypothesized that changes in the hepatic translatome may contribute to the re-emergence of hyperglycemia following leptin withdrawal. We first investigated the activity of the mTORC1 pathway by assessing phosphorylation of 4E-BP1. Consistent with earlier observations (Fig. 1B), ID was associated with reduced 4E-BP1 phosphorylation in the liver (Fig. 3C). Notably, both ID; icv-leptin and ID; icv-leptin-STOP mice exhibited similarly reduced levels of phospho-4E-BP1 compared with healthy mice (see Fig. 3C), suggesting that central leptin administration does not control this parameter in the liver of ID mice. To identify translatome changes induced by leptin, we performed Ribo-seq on liver samples obtained from ID; icv-leptin-STOP and ID; icv-leptin mice at day 10. Metagene analysis indicated a good frame distribution of the RPFs with a higher percentage of P-sites in frame 0, consistent with accurate decoding of annotated ORFs (Supplementary Fig. S4A) (59), and pairwise analysis further revealed high concordance between samples (Supplementary Fig. S4B) (59).
Figure 3.

Central leptin reshapes hepatic translatome by increasing translation of genes involved in tissue regeneration, lipid catabolism, and immune response. (A) Schematic representation of the treatment protocol of experimental groups. Male RIP-DTR mice aged 10 to 12 weeks are treated with saline or diphtheria toxin (DT). DT-treated animals receive leptin via intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion from day 0 (D0). ID; icv-leptin group received continuous treatment through D10, while insulin deficiency (ID) icv-leptin-STOP cohort had treatment interrupted at D8 (n = 4-5). (B) Glycemia (mmol/L) levels over treatment and interrupted treatment. (C) Representative immunoblots of liver lysates from healthy, ID, ID; icv-Leptin and ID; icv-Leptin-STOP cohorts at D10 and ratio of p-4E-BP1E/4E-BP1 protein levels. Measured densitometry quantification of phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (p-4EBP1) at Thr37/46 and total 4E-BP1, and α-tubulin (n = 4-5; cropped image at dashed line). (D) Volcano plot of genes upregulated (red) and downregulated (green) in the Ribo-seq analysis comparisons made between ID; icv-leptin vs ID; icv-leptin-STOP (log2FC| > 1, adjusted P < .05). Selected genes are labeled. (E) Bar chart of top enriched terms for the genes upregulated and downregulated in Ribo-seq of liver of ID mice (GO term, normalized enrichment score, NES). (F) Codon-level ribosome occupancy across the Reg3α coding sequence (CDS) in healthy (blue, lower) and ID (purple, upper) mice, derived from Ribo-seq. Each bar represents normalized ribosome density at a given amino acid (AA) position, from the START to the STOP codon. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test; *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
DE analysis indicates substantial reprogramming of the hepatic translatome induced by leptin, with 18 transcripts translationally downregulated and 16 upregulated in ID; icv-leptin compared to ID; icv-leptin-STOP mice (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Table S2) (59). Gene ontology and biological process analysis revealed enrichment of pathways suppressed (eg, steroid hormone metabolism) or enhanced (eg, epithelial cell differentiation, response to oxidative stress) in ID; icv-leptin compared to ID; icv-leptin-STOP mice (Fig. 3E). Notably, the mRNA of regenerating islet-derived protein 3α (Reg3α) was the most upregulated at the translational level by leptin treatment (Fig. 3D). Ribosome occupancy across the Reg3α ORF was greatly increased in the liver of ID; icv-leptin compared to ID; icv-leptin-STOP mice, an effect that was independent of changes in total Reg3α mRNA levels (Fig. 3F). These findings highlight Reg3α as a leptin-responsive hepatic transcript under ID conditions and warrant further investigation of its potential contribution to leptin-mediated metabolic improvements.
Reg3α improves hyperglycemia in insulin deficiency
To directly test the hypothesis that Reg3α overexpression exerts beneficial actions in ID, we employed HTVI, an approach known to target the liver (62), to deliver plasmids encoding Reg3α under the control of the albumin promoter (pLIVE-Reg3α) or a control empty vector (pLIVE). HTVI and the first DT administration were performed in RIPDTR mice the same day (Fig. 4A). DT-treated RIPDTR mice receiving pLIVE (ID; pLIVE) or pLIVE-Reg3α (ID; pLIVE-Reg3α) displayed comparable levels of severe hypoinsulinemia (Supplementary Fig. S5A) (59). As expected, hepatic Reg3α mRNA levels were significantly increased in ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice compared to ID; pLIVE controls (Fig. 4B). These results confirm that both experimental groups were ID and that hepatic Reg3α levels were specifically elevated in ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice.
Figure 4.

Reg3α improves metabolic control independently of canonical insulin signaling. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental timeline for hepatic overexpression studies. Male RIP-DTR mice aged 10 to 12 weeks were injected intraperitoneally with saline or diptheria toxin (DT) at day 0 (D0), day 2 (D2), and day 4 (D4). Hydrodynamic tail vein injection (HTVI) of pLIVE-Reg3α, or empty pLIVE vector was performed simultaneously with the start of insulin deficiency (ID) induction. (B) Hepatic messenger RNA levels of Reg3α normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA in ID; pLIVE, and ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice (n = 5-7). (C) Glycemia (mmol/L) levels at D9 (n = 5-6). (D) and (E), Representative immunoblots and densitometric quantification of pAKTS473, total AKT, and tubulin in (D) hepatic tissue, and in (E), gastrocnemius muscle tissue lysates, from ID and ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice, with or without acute insulin challenge (5 U/kg) compared to tubulin. (n = 4-6). All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test or unpaired t test as appropriate. *P < .05; **P < .01; ****P < .0001.
In ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice, hyperglycemia was significantly reduced compared to ID; pLIVE controls (Fig. 4C); moreover, they showed a trend toward improved circulating triglyceride and β-hydroxybutyrate levels (Supplementary Figs. S5B and S5C) (59). Importantly, these metabolic improvements were not secondary to changes in body weight as this parameter was similar between ID; pLIVE-Reg3α and ID; pLIVE mice (Supplementary Fig. S5D) (59).
To determine whether the metabolic effects of Reg3α were mediated through insulin signaling, we assessed insulin-stimulated AKT phosphorylation at serine 473, a canonical downstream marker of insulin receptor activation (63), in multiple metabolically relevant tissues. ID; pLIVE-Reg3α and ID; pLIVE mice received an acute intraperitoneal injection of insulin (5 U/kg) or saline, and tissues were collected 10 minutes later. Basal phospho-AKT/AKT ratios were similar in saline-injected ID; pLIVE-Reg3α and ID; pLIVE mice in the liver, gastrocnemius muscle, interscapular brown adipose tissue, and perigonadal white adipose tissue (Fig. 4D and 4E; Supplementary Figs. S5E and S5F) (59). As expected, insulin administration increased phospho-AKT/AKT ratios relative to saline in all tissues examined in both ID; pLIVE and ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice (Fig. 4D and 4E; Supplementary Figs. S5D-S5F) (59). However, the magnitude of insulin-induced AKT phosphorylation did not differ between ID; pLIVE and ID; pLIVE-Reg3α mice in the tissues analyzed (Fig. 4D and 4E; Supplementary Figs. S5E and S5F) (59). These results demonstrate that overexpression of Reg3α improves hyperglycemia without affecting insulin receptor signaling in ID mice.
Discussion
Our study identifies translational remodeling as a central feature of the hepatic response to ID. ID emerges as a state of selective translational rewiring in which global hepatic translation and mTORC1 signaling are suppressed (Figs. 1B, 1E, 1F, and 2D). Yet translational output is not uniformly inhibited. Instead, it is redirected toward a restricted set of transcripts, with lipid-metabolism genes prominently represented (Fig. 2C). These data argue that ID also reorganizes hepatic translation, rather than simply repressing it. This interpretation is consistent with the established role of hepatic mTORC1 as a nutrient- and insulin-responsive regulator of anabolic metabolism (18, 38). It is also broadly compatible with observations in fasting, during which hepatic global translational repression coexists with continued translation of adaptive metabolic programs (18, 64). Direct comparison of fasting and ID hepatic translatomes may help resolve which translational responses reflect a general adaptation to reduced anabolic signaling and which instead define a distinct diabetes-associated program, particularly in relation to lipid metabolism.
Among the translational changes induced by ID, several genes showing altered ribosome occupancy provide plausible links to the metabolic phenotype of ID. Reduced ribosome occupancy of Gck may contribute to impaired hepatic glucose utilization (65), whereas increased ribosome occupancy of genes involved in lipid handling and storage, including G0s2 (66) and Cidec (67), may contribute to the hepatic lipid accumulation observed in ID. Scd1 and Scd2, encoding rate-limiting enzymes of monounsaturated fatty acid synthesis (68), were among the most strongly downregulated transcripts at the level of ribosome occupancy, consistent with the broader suppression of fatty acid biosynthetic processes revealed by GO enrichment analysis (see Fig. 2C). In addition, Leap2 showed markedly reduced ribosome occupancy (see Fig. 2B). As Leap2 encodes a hepatokine involved in the regulation of food intake and glucose homeostasis (69), its downregulation raises the possibility that reduced LEAP2 activity may contribute to the hyperphagia and hyperglycemia characteristic of ID. Although their causal contribution remains to be established, these factors represent candidate effectors for future mechanistic studies and may reveal potential targets for therapeutic intervention in ID states.
Leptin antidiabetic effect, potentially driven by improved insulin sensitivity, has been observed both in animal models of obesity and type 2 diabetes (5) and, importantly, in humans affected by severe insulin resistance as for example in the context of lipodystrophy (5). Importantly, in severe ID, leptin exerts powerful antidiabetic effects through insulin-independent, largely central nervous system–mediated, mechanisms (24, 25). We therefore examined how central leptin treatment reshapes the hepatic translational state in ID mice. As expected, central leptin administration normalized hyperglycemia in ID mice, whereas leptin withdrawal rapidly reinstated hyperglycemia (see Fig. 3B). Despite this marked metabolic rescue, hepatic mTORC1 activation remained low in leptin-treated ID mice and was comparable to that observed in ID mice that underwent leptin withdrawal (see Fig. 3C), indicating that leptin improved systemic metabolism without affecting hepatic mTORC1. Metagene analysis similarly suggested little recovery of global translation, although our Ribo-seq data revealed substantial selective remodeling of the hepatic translatome in response to leptin (see Figs. 3D and 3E). Together, these findings indicate that metabolic rescue and restoration of the canonical anabolic translation axis are separable events in the context of ID. Our data therefore raise the possibility that leptin does not restore a hepatic healthy state but instead establishes an alternative adaptive state that remains metabolically beneficial despite persistently low mTORC1 activity. In this context, our data refine the current view of leptin action by suggesting that leptin-mediated rescue and mTORC1-dependent anabolic reactivation represent mechanistically distinct layers of hepatic adaptation. They also raise several important questions: Which central nervous system–to-liver signals drive this translational reprogramming, why hepatic mTORC1 remains suppressed despite systemic metabolic rescue, and whether the leptin-rescued liver represents a true return toward homeostasis or instead a distinct metabolically favorable state that remains molecularly altered. Previous studies have indicated that the antidiabetic actions of central leptin in ID are not explained solely by reduced food intake (70), do not require increased peripheral adrenergic activity (71), and do not appear to require hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression (36). Future studies aimed at assessing the contribution of neuroendocrine signals and autonomic outputs on leptin-induced hepatic translational reprogramming are warranted.
Among the leptin-responsive translational changes identified here, Reg3α emerged as a particularly compelling candidate. Reg3α was not detectable in healthy or ID liver by Ribo-seq analysis; yet it was robustly induced by leptin (see Fig. 3D), suggesting that it is part of a leptin-engaged hepatic program rather than a marker of the diabetic state itself. Indeed, we initially prioritized Reg3α for functional follow-up because previous studies had suggested a potential role for Reg3α in improving glucose metabolism in models of insulin resistance (42). In this context, our data extend that view by showing that hepatic Reg3α improves metabolic control in ID mice through an insulin-independent mechanism. In fact, Reg3α overexpression ameliorated hyperglycemia, hyperketonemia, and hypertriglyceridemia (see Fig. 4C; Supplementary Figs. S5B and S5C) (59), yet did not enhance insulin sensitivity or acute insulin-stimulated AKT phosphorylation in key metabolic tissues (Fig. 4D and 4E; Supplementary Figs. S5E and S5F) (59). The mechanisms underlying these insulin-independent effects remain to be established. Further studies are needed to determine whether Reg3α exerts its glucoregulatory action by engaging insulin-independent pathways affecting endogenous glucose production and/or glucose utilization. Thus, while Reg3α has previously been linked to improved glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant settings, our findings uncover its previously unknown insulin-independent metabolic function. More broadly, these results provide proof of concept that translatome analysis can identify functionally relevant hepatic factors with the potential to mediate the restorative metabolic effects of leptin in ID. At the same time, several key questions remain: whether hepatic Reg3α is required for the full metabolic response to leptin, whether its action is liver-autonomous or mediated through secretion, and which downstream signaling pathways underlie its insulin-independent effects. An important next step will also be to determine whether the insulin-independent actions of Reg3α can complement insulin therapy, including whether combined treatment reduces insulin requirements, improves glycemic stability, or provides additional metabolic benefits. Such studies will help establish the potential of Reg3α as an adjunct to insulin therapy in ID. Importantly, given the central role of the liver in systemic glucose homeostasis, further interrogation of our Ribo-seq dataset may reveal additional candidate effectors and help define the broader hepatic program through which leptin sustains metabolic homeostasis in an insulin-independent manner. Finally, as the present study was conducted exclusively in male mice, whether the hepatic translational responses to ID and leptin, as well as the metabolic effects of Reg3α, are conserved in females remains to be determined.
Taken together, our findings position translational control as a central layer of hepatic adaptation to ID and as a key readout of the metabolic state restored by leptin. Rather than simply mirroring systemic endocrine changes, the hepatic translatome appears to encode distinct pathological and leptin-responsive programs, with Reg3α providing proof of principle that functionally relevant effectors can be identified from this layer. More broadly, these results suggest that leptin-induced metabolic recovery may depend not only on correction of systemic metabolism, but also on selective posttranscriptional rewiring within the liver. Answering these questions will be important not only for understanding how leptin reprograms the diabetic liver, but also for establishing whether translational remodeling is itself a tractable therapeutic layer in ID.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Olesya Panasenko (for Ribo-seq assessments) at the BioCode Facility of the University of Geneva (https://www.unige.ch/medecine/r2p/R2P) and Dr George E. Allen (for bioinformatics analysis) at the Biomedical Data Science Facility of the University of Geneva (https://www.unige.ch/medecine/bdsf/en). We thank Dr David Gatfield (University of Lausanne) and Pr Claes Wollheim for critical reading of the manuscript. Artificial intelligence software (ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet 4.6) was used to help with writing.
Abbreviations
- DT
diphtheria toxin
- FC
fold change
- GSEA
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
- HTVI
hydrodynamic tail vein injection
- icv
intracerebroventricularly
- ID
insulin deficiency
- mRNA
messenger RNA
- mTORC1
mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1
- NES
normalized enrichment scores
- ORFs
open reading frames
- Reg3α
regenerating islet-derived protein 3 α
- Ribo-seq
ribosome profiling
- RNA-seq
RNA sequencing
- RPFs
ribosome-protected fragments
- TE
translational efficiency
Contributor Information
Pryscila D. S. Teixeira, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Sarah Mathilda Vincent, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Romane Meurs, Center for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Gloria Ursino, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Szabolcs Zahoran, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Giulia Lucibello, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Marcella M. Authiat, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Anne-Claude Gavin, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Giorgio Ramadori, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Roberto Coppari, Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; Diabetes Center of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Funding
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant Nos. 184767, 219229, and 214870 to R.C.), The Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2405-06952 to G.R.), and DiaGen Association; https://www.diagenassociation.com (G.L. and P.D.S.T.).
Disclosures
G.R. and R.C. are cofounders, directors, and stockholders of Diatheris SA. G.R. and R.C. are listed as inventors in patent applications related to S100A9 protein. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: G.R. and R.C. Methodology: G.L., G.U., G.R., P.D.S.T., S.Z., S.M.V., R.M., M.M.A, and A.C.G. Funding acquisition: G.R., R.C. Writing—original draft: G.R. and R.C. Writing—review, editing: G.L., G.U., P.D.S.T., S.Z., S.M.V., R.M., M.M.A., A.G., G.R., and R.C.
Data availability
RNA-seq and Ribo-seq data have been deposited at GEO at accession numbers: GSE331248 and GSE331062. Any additional information required is available from the lead contact on request. Supplementary figures (59) and Supplementary tables (Tables S1 and S2) (59) can be found in the Figshare Repository https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33265221.
References
- 1. Komatsu M, Takei M, Ishii H, Sato Y. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: a newer perspective. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4(6):511‐516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wiederkehr A, Wollheim CB. Mitochondrial signals drive insulin secretion in the pancreatic β-cell. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;353(1-2):128‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Talchai C, Xuan S, Lin HV, Sussel L, Accili D. Pancreatic β cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic β cell failure. Cell. 2012;150(6):1223‐1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Butler PC, Meier JJ, Butler AE, Bhushan A. The replication of beta cells in normal physiology, in disease and for therapy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(11):758‐768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Coppari R, Bjørbæk C. Leptin revisited: its mechanism of action and potential for treating diabetes. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(9):692‐708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Accili D, Talchai SC, Kim-Muller JY, et al. When β-cells fail: lessons from dedifferentiation. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(Suppl 1):117‐122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ferrannini E. The stunned beta cell: a brief history. Cell Metab. 2010;11(5):349‐352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ogle GD, Wang F, Haynes A, et al. Global type 1 diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality estimates 2025: results from the International diabetes Federation Atlas, 11th Edition, and the T1D Index Version 3.0. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;225:112277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989-2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(3):408‐417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021;64(12):2609‐2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Larsen J, Brekke M, Sandvik L, Arnesen H, Hanssen KF, Dahl-Jorgensen K. Silent coronary atheromatosis in type 1 diabetic patients and its relation to long-term glycemic control. Diabetes. 2002;51(8):2637‐2641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Orchard TJ, Olson JC, Erbey JR, et al. Insulin resistance-related factors, but not glycemia, predict coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes: 10-year follow-up data from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1374‐1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Umpierrez G, Korytkowski M. Diabetic emergencies - ketoacidosis, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and hypoglycaemia. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(4):222‐232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bulsara MK, Holman CD, Davis EA, Jones TW. The impact of a decade of changing treatment on rates of severe hypoglycemia in a population-based cohort of children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2293‐2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(6):E1115‐E1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cryer PE. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure and its component syndromes in diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54(12):3592‐3601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Daneman D. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):847‐858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Byles V, Cormerais Y, Kalafut K, et al. Hepatic mTORC1 signaling activates ATF4 as part of its metabolic response to feeding and insulin. Mol Metab. 2021;53:101309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mizuno S, Minatoya M, Osaga S, Chin R, Imori M. Investigation of severe hypoglycemia risk among patients with diabetes treated with ultra-rapid lispro in Japan. Adv Ther. 2025;42(1):413‐426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mizuno S, Minatoya M, Osaga S, Chin R, Imori M. Correction: investigation of severe hypoglycemia risk among patients with diabetes treated with ultra-rapid lispro in Japan. Adv Ther. 2026;43(5):2320‐2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Silva JD, Lepore G, Battelino T, et al. Real-world performance of the MiniMed™ 780G system: first report of outcomes from 4120 users. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022;24(2):113‐119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Erbasan E, Aliciaslan M, Erendor F, Dandin O, Sanlioglu S. Lantidra (donislecel) in type 1 diabetes: an in-depth analysis of pharmacology, clinical effectiveness, safety, and the therapeutic role of the first FDA-approved allogeneic islet cell therapy. Diabet Med. 2026;43(1):e70168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Strakosch T, Forbes S. A UK key opinion leader perspective: navigating the immunological and logistical transformation brought by stem cell-derived islets for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2026;43(3):e70230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fujikawa T, Berglund ED, Patel VR, et al. Leptin engages a hypothalamic neurocircuitry to permit survival in the absence of insulin. Cell Metab. 2013;18(3):431‐444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Fujikawa T, Chuang JC, Sakata I, Ramadori G, Coppari R. Leptin therapy improves insulin-deficient type 1 diabetes by CNS-dependent mechanisms in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(40):17391‐17396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fujikawa T, Coppari R. Living without insulin: the role of leptin signaling in the hypothalamus. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Vianna CR, Coppari R. A treasure trove of hypothalamic neurocircuitries governing body weight homeostasis. Endocrinology. 2011;152(1):11‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Meek TH, Matsen ME, Dorfman MD, et al. Leptin action in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus is sufficient, but not necessary, to normalize diabetic hyperglycemia. Endocrinology. 2013;154(9):3067‐3076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Perry RJ, Zhang XM, Zhang D, et al. Leptin reverses diabetes by suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Nat Med. 2014;20(7):759‐763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ramadori G, Ljubicic S, Ricci S, et al. S100a9 extends lifespan in insulin deficiency. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ursino G, Lucibello G, Teixeira PDS, et al. S100a9 exerts insulin-independent antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Sci Adv. 2024;10(1):eadj4686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ursino G, Ramadori G, Hofler A, et al. Hepatic non-parenchymal S100A9-TLR4-mTORC1 axis normalizes diabetic ketogenesis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lucibello G, Ursino G, Teixeira PDS, et al. Harnessing distinct tissue-resident immune niches via S100A9/TLR4 improves ketone, lipid, and glucose metabolism. Endocrinology. 2025;166(10):bqaf131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang MY, Chen L, Clark GO, et al. Leptin therapy in insulin-deficient type I diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(11):4813‐4819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yu X, Park BH, Wang MY, Wang ZV, Unger RH. Making insulin-deficient type 1 diabetic rodents thrive without insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(37):14070‐14075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Morton GJ, Meek TH, Matsen ME, Schwartz MW. Evidence against hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in the antidiabetic action of leptin. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(12):4587‐4591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Scagliola A, Miluzio A, Biffo S. Translational control of metabolism and cell cycle progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168(6):960‐976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sengupta S, Peterson TR, Laplante M, Oh S, Sabatini DM. mTORC1 controls fasting-induced ketogenesis and its modulation by ageing. Nature. 2010;468(7327):1100‐1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yang H, Zingaro VA, Lincoff J, et al. Remodelling of the translatome controls diet and its impact on tumorigenesis. Nature. 2024;633(8028):189‐197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ding Y, Xu Y, Shuai X, et al. Reg3α overexpression protects pancreatic β cells from cytokine-induced damage and improves islet transplant outcome. Mol Med. 2015;20(1):548‐558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gonzalez P, Dos Santos A, Darnaud M, et al. Antimicrobial protein REG3A regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in obese diabetic mice. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911‐917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lindner K, Beckenbauer K, van Ek LC, et al. Isoform- and cell-state-specific lipidation of ApoE in astrocytes. Cell Rep. 2022;38(9):110435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Churchward MA, Rogasevskaia T, Brandman DM, et al. Specific lipids supply critical negative spontaneous curvature–an essential component of native Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion. Biophys J. 2008;94(10):3976‐3986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671‐675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, et al. Qupath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10‐12. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907‐915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841‐842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10(2):giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357‐359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lauria F, Tebaldi T, Bernabò P, Groen EJN, Gillingwater TH, Viero G. riboWaltz: optimization of ribosome P-site positioning in ribosome profiling data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(8):e1006169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Chothani S, Adami E, Ouyang JF, et al. deltaTE: detection of translationally regulated genes by integrative analysis of Ribo-seq and RNA-seq data. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2019;129(1):e108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(3):100141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1(6):417‐425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Korotkevich G Sukhov V,Budin N,Shpak B,Artyomov MN,Sergushichev A. fgsea: Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. R package version 1.34.2. Bioconductor. 2024. Accessed September 3, 2026. https://bioconductor.org/packages/fgsea.
- 59. Pryscila T, Sarah V, Romane M et al. Figshare Repository, Supplementary Material_Figures_and_FigureLegends.docx. 2026. Doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.33265221. [DOI]
- 60. Liu B, Han Y, Qian SB. Cotranslational response to proteotoxic stress by elongation pausing of ribosomes. Mol Cell. 2013;49(3):453‐463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 2009;324(5924):218‐223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Suda T, Liu D. Hydrodynamic gene delivery: its principles and applications. Mol Ther. 2007;15(12):2063‐2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Aras E, Ramadori G, Kinouchi K, et al. Light entrains diurnal changes in insulin sensitivity of skeletal muscle via ventromedial hypothalamic neurons. Cell Rep. 2019;27(8):2385‐2398.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Geisler CE, Hepler C, Higgins MR, Renquist BJ. Hepatic adaptations to maintain metabolic homeostasis in response to fasting and refeeding in mice. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016;13(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Matschinsky FM. Assessing the potential of glucokinase activators in diabetes therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(5):399‐416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Zhang X, Heckmann BL, Campbell LE, Liu J. G0s2: a small giant controller of lipolysis and adipose-liver fatty acid flux. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2017;1862(10 Pt B):1146‐1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Langhi C, Baldán Á. CIDEC/FSP27 is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and plays a critical role in fasting- and diet-induced hepatosteatosis. Hepatology. 2015;61(4):1227‐1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ntambi JM. The role of Stearoyl-CoA desaturase in hepatic de novo lipogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;633:81‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Valdés-Calero I, Frühbeck G, Rodríguez A. The ghrelin-LEAP2 system in obesity and diabetes: pathophysiological roles and therapeutic potential. Curr Obes Rep. 2026;15(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. German JP, Thaler JP, Wisse BE, et al. Leptin activates a novel CNS mechanism for insulin-independent normalization of severe diabetic hyperglycemia. Endocrinology. 2011;152(2):394‐404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. da Silva AA, Tallam LS, Liu J, Hall JE. Chronic antidiabetic and cardiovascular actions of leptin: role of CNS and increased adrenergic activity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291(5):R1275‐R1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Pryscila T, Sarah V, Romane M et al. Figshare Repository, Supplementary Material_Figures_and_FigureLegends.docx. 2026. Doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.33265221. [DOI]
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq and Ribo-seq data have been deposited at GEO at accession numbers: GSE331248 and GSE331062. Any additional information required is available from the lead contact on request. Supplementary figures (59) and Supplementary tables (Tables S1 and S2) (59) can be found in the Figshare Repository https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33265221.
