Abstract
The main objective of this work is to assess whether ibogalogs decrease headache-like behaviors in rats using the cortical spreading depression (CSD) and medication overuse headache (MOH) models. The CSD and MOH results showed that tabernanthalog (TBG), ibogainalog (IBG), and ibogaminalog (DM506) significantly decreased allodynia induced by acute injection of KCl or repetitive administration of sumatriptan. The effect of ibogalogs in the CSD model was sex-independent. The observed effects lasted 6-8 h, with TBG showing comparatively higher efficacy in both models. We also assessed the potential role of serotonin type 2 receptor (5-HT2R) and 5-HT1B/1DR subtypes the effects of ibogalogs using selective antagonists such as ketanserin and GR127935, respectively. The antagonist effects were headache type-dependent: in acute headache, GR127935 inhibited ibogalogs’ activity during the first hour but subsequently enhanced their effects, whereas ketanserin enhanced their activities; in chronic headache, GR127935 abolished ibogalog’s effects during the first 3 h, whereas ketanserin inhibited IBG’s effect during the first 2 h but enhanced TBG’s effect. These results suggested that the antiheadache effects of ibogalogs are mediated by co-modulation of 5-HT1R and 5-HT2R subtypes. The functional results showed the ibogalogs activate 5-HT1R subtypes with the following selectivity: 5-HT1FR ~ 5-HT1DR > 5-HT1BR >> 5-HT1ER. Thus, we compared the activity of ibogalogs between wild type (WT) and 5-HT1FR knockout (KO) mice in the MOH model. The results in WT mice showed that ibogalogs increase the facial withdrawal threshold with the following efficacy: TBG > IBG > DM506. Moreover, ibogalog antiallodynic effects were reduced in KO mice after 4 h, supporting a role for the 5-HT1FR in the actions of ibogalogs in headache attenuation. In conclusion, ibogalogs significantly reduce acute and chronic headache-like behaviors by a co-modulatory mechanism between 5-HT1R and 5-HT2R subtypes.
Keywords: Ibogalogs, migraine, 5-HT1 receptors, 5-HT2 receptors
Introduction
Migraine is a complex, multi-phasic neurological disorder where one of the most important symptoms, throbbing head pain, is more severe and longer-lasting (up to several days) than common headaches[1]. Migraines can be triggered by different stimuli (e.g., stress, hormonal and environmental factors, and certain foods), and are typically accompanied by other symptoms, including nausea/vomiting, irritability, insomnia, and sensory hypersensitivity, interfering with daily activities. There are several medications for the treatment (e.g., triptans) and prevention (e.g., erenumab) of migraine attacks. One of the most effective treatments is based on the activation of different serotonin type 1 receptor subtypes (5-HT1R) (reviewed in [2, 3]). For instance, triptans activate the presynaptic 5-HT1DR, which inhibits dural vasodilation and neurogenic inflammation, as well as activate brainstem 5-HT1B/1DR subtypes, inhibiting trigeminal nuclei cell excitability, and vascular 5-HT1BRs, inducing meningeal, dural cerebral, and pial vasoconstriction. Nevertheless, chronic use of triptans and other antimigraine drugs may induce secondary chronic headache, so called “rebound headache” [4-7]. These mechanisms supported the hypothesis that overstimulation of the trigeminovascular system is the culprit of migraine [8]. However, lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1FR agonist, reduces migraine symptoms without vasoconstriction, supporting trigeminal inhibition as a critical mechanism [9], although it is no longer used clinically because of safety concerns about its side effects [10]. Notably, previous studies discovered 5-HT1FR agonist activity mediated by mianserin and mirtazapine, two antidepressants with efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of migraine, further highlighting the underappreciated role of this receptor in antimigraine activity [11-13].
Ibogalogs are synthetic compounds that maintain part of the structure of iboga alkaloids (see molecular structures in Fig. 1) but present different pharmacological profiles at metabotropic serotonin (5-HT) receptors. These compounds modulate the activity of different metabotropic serotonin receptors, including the 5-HT1R and 5-HT2R subfamilies [14-21]. Pre-clinical studies in rodents showed that ibogalogs induce antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like activity [16, 18] as well as reduce chronic pain [15, 17, 21], which might be important for a potential antimigraine activity. Our laboratory recently determined that ibogalogs also induce antiseizure activity in rodents [20]. The main mechanism of action of these behavioral effects seems to be centered in the activation of 5-HT2A/2CRs. Seizures, similar to migraine, induce cortical spreading depression (CSD), a wave of cortical hyperactivity followed by a wave of inhibitory activity (reviewed in [22]). Although we do not know the exact mechanism supporting seizure and migraine comorbidity, it is possible that ibogalogs can also attenuate migraine symptoms via 5-HTR modulation. In this regard, studies herein assessed whether TBG, IBG, and ibogaminalog (DM506) reduce migraine-like periorbital allodynia using rat models of CSD and medication overuse headache (MOH) induced by sumatriptan [4-7]. To assess the potential role of different 5-HT receptor subtypes, selective antagonists, including ketanserin (5-HT2R) and GR127935 (5-HT1B/1DR) [23, 24] as well as 5-HT1FR knockout (KO) mice were employed in behavioral experiments. The functional activities of several TBG, IBG, and DM506 at the 5-HT1BR, 5-HT1ER, and 5-HT1FR subtype were also assessed.
Figure 1.

Molecular structures for DM506 (ibogaminalog), IBG (ibogainalog), and TBG (tabernanthalog).
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Materials
Recombinant HEK293 cells overexpressing each human 5-HT1BR, 5-HT1ER, and 5-HT1FR, HTRF IP-One Gq Detection Kit, and Unifilter® GF/C plates were obtained from Revvity (Waltham, MA, USA; Zurich, Switzerland). The HEK293-T cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®) (Manassas, VA, USA). NIH/3T3 cells, serotonin hydrochloride (5-HT), pargyline hydrochloride, and ascorbic acid were purchased from Merck (Buchs, Switzerland). Sumatriptan was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and isoflurane was purchased from VetOne (IL, USA). Ketanserin tartrate was purchased from Adooq Bioscience LLC (Irvine, CA, USA), and GR127935 hydrochloride from Bio-techne Tocris (Bristol, UK). The GloSensor was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Polyethyleneimine was purchased from Merck (Buchs, Switzerland) and Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). Poly-l-lysine-coated clear-bottom 384-well plates were obtained from Greiner Bio One (Monroe, NC, USA). D-luciferin was obtained from Gold Biotechnology Inc. (St. Louis., MO, USA). Opti-MEM plates were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Scintillation vials (6 mL), Ultima Gold and MicroScint-20 or -PS scintillation cocktails were obtained from PerkinElmer (Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). Penicillin, streptomycin, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Corning Cellgro (Manassas, VA, USA). Ibogainalog hydrochloride (IBG), nor-IBG (base), ibogaminalog hydrochloride (DM506), tabernanthalog fumarate (TBG), and catharanthalog (base) (CAG) were synthesized by Ambeed, Inc. (Arlington Hts, IL, USA), according to previously described protocols [14, 25]. Salts, bases, buffers, and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and were used as received.
2.2. Animals
Adult female and male Sprague Dawley rats (7–8 weeks on arrival, 150–250 g) were purchased from Envigo (Indianapolis, IN) and wild-type C57Bl/6J (WT) mice (7–8 weeks on arrival) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Cohorts were habituated to the vivarium for at least 1 week and were handled daily to mitigate stress. Male and female 5-HT1FR KO mice (9-12 months) were kindly provided by Dr. Rick Schnellmann. Animals were housed in groups in standard cages with free access to standard laboratory diet and tap water. All animals were kept in a ventilated room, at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C, under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle (light between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.). All experimental procedures were conducted during the 12-hour light cycle, under the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the policies and recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Pain, and with approval from the Regional Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Arizona (#17-223).
2.3. Effect of ibogalogs on cortical spreading depression (CSD)-induced periorbital allodynia in rats
To induce periorbital allodynia, a symptom commonly found in patients suffering from migraine [26, 27], a protocol adapted from previously established methods [7, 28, 29] was used. Briefly, male and female rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of a ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine cocktail (45/5/2 mg/kg). Vital signs, including heart and respiratory rates, skin color, and responsiveness to toe pinch, were continuously monitored to ensure adequate anesthesia depth and physiological stability throughout the surgical procedure. Animals were secured in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting Co.), and a midline incision (approximately 1.5–2 cm) was made to expose the skull. Connective tissue was gently cleared as needed. A small burr hole was drilled at coordinates −6.0 mm posterior and −3.0 mm lateral to bregma (Ram Productions MICROLAB 350/450), taking care not to penetrate the dura. A 22-gauge stainless steel guide cannula (#C313G, Plastics One) was positioned just above the dura (0.5 mm from the skull surface) and affixed with cyanoacrylate adhesive. Two additional anchoring holes were drilled rostral and contralateral to the cannula for stainless-steel screws (#MPX-080–3F-1 M; Small Parts). The assembly was secured with dental acrylic, and a dummy cap (#C313DC; Plastics One) was inserted to maintain cannula patency.
For cortical stimulation, lightly restrained awake rats received a focal cortical injection through the implanted guide cannula using a Hamilton microsyringe (30 GA, #80308 701 SN; Hamilton Company). The injector extended 1.0 mm beyond the guide cannula to reach the occipital cortex and delivered a 0.5 μL bolus of 1 M KCl solution, prefiltered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter. The KCl injection was designated as t = 0 min for all subsequent behavioral assessments.
Rats were grouped based on their postsurgical baseline to ensure equivalent pre-injection thresholds (6–8 g) at 7 to 10 days. Animals with post-cannulation, pre-cortical injection thresholds of 6–8 g were included, whereas animals with a periorbital withdrawal threshold at baseline or post-surgical baselines of < 6 g were excluded according to protocol. Rats were acclimated to the testing box 1 h prior to evaluation of periorbital mechanical allodynia with calibrated von Frey filaments (1, 1.4, 2, 4, 6, and 8 g) using the up-down method [30, 31].
Rats were then randomly assigned to four groups and administered (i.p.) one of the following: 10 mg/kg IBG hydrochloride [equivalent to 8.6 mg/kg IBG (base)], 25 mg/kg DM506 hydrochloride [equivalent to 21 mg/kg DM506 (base)], 40 mg/kg TBG fumarate [equivalent to 26.6 mg/kg TBG (base)] (all dissolved in 1% DMSO, 1% Tween 80, and 0.9% saline; [18]), or vehicle. To assess the role of specific receptor subtypes, rats were injected (i.p.) 1 mg/kg ketanserin (5-HT2R antagonist; [23]) or 0.1 mg/kg GR127935 (5-HT1B/1DR antagonist; dose modified from [32]) 30 min prior to ibogalog treatment.
2.4. Effect of ibogalogs on overuse headache (MOH) in female rats
MOH was induced in female rats by sustained sumatriptan infusion [28]. Only animals with a periorbital withdrawal threshold of 6 g or greater before surgery were included. Sustained infusion was attained using osmotic minipumps (model 2001) (Alzet, Cupertino, CA, USA) with a flow rate of 1 μL/h for 7 d. The minipumps were implanted subcutaneously under anaesthesia with isoflurane (flow rate = 2 L/min in 100% O2). A 4–5 mm incision was made between the shoulder blades, and the osmotic minipump was inserted under the skin. The incision site was closed with wound clips. The day of the pump implant was considered as day 0. Sumatriptan was administered at 0.6 mg/kg/day.
On day 7, rats were acclimated to the testing box for 1 h prior to the evaluation of periorbital mechanical allodynia using calibrated von Frey filaments (1, 1.4, 2, 4, 6, and 8 g), followed by post infusion baseline assessment of periorbital allodynia.
Ibogalog and antagonist treatments were the same as that described in section 2.3. Following drug administration, the facial withdrawal threshold was measured at baseline and at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360 min, and 24 h post-injection, using a modified version of the Dixon up-down method [29]. von Frey filaments were applied perpendicularly to the midline of the forehead at the level of the eyes with enough force to cause the filament to slightly bend while held for 5 s. A response was indicated by a sharp withdrawal of the head, vocalization, or severe batting at the filament with attempts to bite it.
2.5. Effect of ibogalogs on overuse headache (MOH) in wild type and 5-HT1FR knockout mice
Given that ibogalogs activate the 5-HT1FR with high potency (Table 1), we evaluated their efficacy against chronic headache using the MOH model in WT and 5-HT1FR KO mice (n = 7 per strain, split between male and female in each treatment). After 5 days of habituation and exposure to the environment and monofilaments, periorbital mechanical thresholds were evaluated using a series of von Frey filaments (0.008, 0.04, 0.07, 0.16, 0.4, 0.6, 1, and 2 g). Only animals with a periorbital withdrawal threshold of ≥1.4 g were included in the study. MOH was induced in both female and male mice through daily sumatriptan injection (0.6 mg/kg, i.p.) for seven consecutive days. Periorbital mechanical thresholds were evaluated daily from day 7 to 14. In addition, mice received ibogalog injections on days 7, 9, 11, and 13, according to a within-subjects, randomized Latin square design following the completion of daily threshold assessments [33, 34].
Table 1.
Functional activity of ibogalogs at different 5-HT1R subtypes.
| Receptor Subtype |
Compound | EC50 (nM) | Emax (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-HT1BR | 5-HT | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 100 ± 11 |
| DM506 | 202 ± 29 | 91 ± 5 | |
| TBG | 737 ± 267 | 69 ± 11 | |
| IBG | >10 μM | ~50 | |
| Nor-IBG | >10 μM | ~40 | |
| CAG | >10 μM | ~40 | |
| 5-HT1DRa | 5-HT | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 100 ± 18 |
| DM506 | 110 ± 20 | 89 ± 3 | |
| TBG | 209 ± 58 | 61 ± 7 | |
| IBG | 661 ± 182 | 59 ± 12 | |
| Nor-IBG | 447 ± 134 | 75 ± 7 | |
| CAG | 407 ± 164 | 40 ± 6 | |
| 5-HT1ER | 5-HT | 5.9 ± 4.3 | 100 ± 0 |
| DM506 | 1,341 ± 923 | 85 ± 4 | |
| TBG | 1,119 ± 739 | 35 ± 5 | |
| IBG | 2,043 ± 1,698 | 38 ± 10 | |
| Nor-IBG | 1,352 ± 667 | 75 ± 9 | |
| CAG | >10 uM | ~20 | |
| 5-HT1FR | 5-HT | 12 ± 5 | 100 ± 18 |
| DM506 | 101 ± 14 | 66 ± 7 | |
| TBG | 841 ± 703 | 43 ± 11 | |
| IBG | 469 ± 298 | 67 ± 10 | |
| Nor-IBG | 171 ± 76 | 73 ± 9 | |
| CAG | >10 μM | ~43 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
The EC50 and Emax values were obtained from Figure 7.
The Emax percentages were calculated considering 100% activation by 5-HT.
Values (taken from Chagraoui et al., 2026) included for comparative purposes
2.6. Functional activity of ibogalogs at 5-HT1B/1E/1FR subtypes
The pharmacological activity of ibogalogs was assessed at the 5-HT1BR, 5-HT1ER, and 5-HT1FR using previously published TRUPATH reporter constructs [35]. Assays were essentially performed as previously described [13, 36]. In brief, each receptor, as well as RLuc8-Gαi1, Gβ3, and eGFP-Gγ9 constructs were transfected with polyethyleneimine into HEK293-T cells using a ratio of 1:1:1:1 (human 5-HT1:Gα:Gβ:Gγ). Typically, 6-7 million cells in DMEM supplemented with 1% (v/v) dFBS in a 10 cm plate were transfected with a total of 8 μg of DNA. The next day, 20,000 cells/well were plated into poly-L-lysine-coated white-bottom 384-well plate in DMEM supplemented with 1% dFBS. The following day, the media was aspirated and the cells were washed with HBSS supplemented with 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). 45 μL of drug solutions at indicated concentrations in HBSS supplemented with 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.1% (w/v) FBS, and 0.01% (w/v) ascorbic acid were then added to the cells. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C followed by addition of 15 μL of freshly prepared 30 μM coelenterazine 400a. Plates were then immediately read in a Victor NIVO plate reader (Perkin Elmer) with 395 nm (RLuc8-coelenterazine 400a) and 510 nm (GFP2) emission filters at integration times of 1 s per well. Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) ratios were computed as the ratio of the GFP2 emission to RLuc8 emission.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
The experimental data were analyzed using the Prism software (GraphPad 10.4.0, Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and R (version 4.4.2). Time-course behavioral data in rats were analyzed using mixed-design two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with drug treatment and time as factors. For transgenic mice, data were analyzed using repeated-measures (RM) two-way ANOVA to account for the within-subjects design. These analyses were performed separately for each antagonist condition. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from the time-course data. For rats, AUC values were analyzed separately under each antagonist condition using one-way ANOVA to compare the efficacy of different treatments. To further assess sex differences, AUC data from all antagonist conditions were combined and analyzed using a three-way ANOVA with drug, antagonist condition, and sex as between-subject factors. Similarly, drug effects in mice were compared within each strain using RM one-way ANOVA. To combine the genotype factor, AUC data were processed using a two-way ANOVA. To integrate all behavioral data and analyze the most efficient time points for the interaction between drug and antagonist condition (in rats) or genotype (in mice), a mixed three-way ANOVA with factors of ibogalogs, time, and antagonist condition or genotype was performed. Tukey’s post-hoc test was applied following significant main or interaction effects. To quantify the proportion of variance contributed by each factor and its interactions, partial eta squared () was calculated as an indicator of effect size. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the behavioral differences between the antagonist-alone group and the vehicle control in rats, as well as the differences between WT and KO mice receiving vehicles. Additionally, for the functional assays, unpaired t-test was used to compare the slopes of each ibogalogs. All data points are displayed as the mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05; when appropriate F-values are reported. Based on a priori power analysis (G*Power 3.1), the sample size was determined to provide 80% power to detect a 20% difference (α = 0.05) at a significance level in behavioral experiments.
3. Results
3.1.a. Ibogalogs reduce CSD-associated periorbital allodynia in rats
Cortical KCl–induced periorbital allodynia was assessed in male and female rats to model CSD (Fig. 2). In both sexes, cortical injection of KCl (0.5 μL, 1 M) produced periorbital allodynia within 30 min, and facial allodynia persisted for 24 h compared to rats receiving vehicle injections (Fig. 2A). To assess whether ibogalogs reduce KCl-induced facial allodynia, rats were administered TBG [26.6 mg/kg (base)], IBG [8.6 mg/kg (base)], DM506 [21 mg/kg (base)], or vehicle. Two-way ANOVA analysis of the results revealed significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 20.416; p < 0.001] and time [F(11,396) = 54.367; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(33,396) = 5.828; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests indicated that, compared to the vehicle group, IBG and TBG robustly reduced CSD-induced periorbital allodynia over the 6-h observation period, whereas DM506 produced only a modest reduction. The analgesic effects of all compounds subsided at 24 h post-administration, indicating short-lasting effects. AUC analysis further confirmed group differences compared to the vehicle group [F(3,36) = 20.811; p <0.001], exhibiting significantly higher AUC values than that for DM506 (Fig. 2B). Given that the dose for IBG was 3-fold lower than that for TBG, we can state that IBG is the most potent ibogalog.
Figure 2.

Effect of ibogalogs on periorbital allodynia induced by cortical KCl injection in rats. Pretreated rats were administered (i.p.) 8.6 mg/kg IBG (base) (•), 21 mg/kg DM506 (base) (•), 26.6 mg/kg TBG (base) (•), or vehicle (○). Facial withdrawal thresholds were measured at baseline (BL), post-cortical KCl injection baseline (pBL), 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360 min, and 24 h post-injection. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (mean ± SEM; n = 10 per group) for (A) effects of ibogalogs administration, (C) interaction between ketanserin (Keta) and ibogalogs, and (E) interaction between GR127935 (GR) and ibogalogs. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for (B) ibogalogs administration, (D) Keta and ibogalogs interaction, and (F) GR and ibogalogs interaction within 24 h. Panels A, C, and E: IBG vs vehicle, *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001; DM506 vs vehicle, ^p <0.05, ^^p <0.01, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs vehicle, #p <0.05, ##p <0.01, ###p <0.001. Panels B, D, and F: ibogalogs vs vehicle, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001; TBG and IBG vs DM506, #p <0.05, ##p <0.01, ###p <0.001.
3.1.b. Ketanserin enhances the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs in the CSD model
To assess the involvement of different 5-HT2R subtypes in the anti-allodynic actions of ibogalogs in the CSD model, 1 mg/kg ketanserin, a selective 5-HT2A/2CR antagonist [23], was administered (i.p.) 30 min prior to ibogalog treatment (Fig. 2C). Two-way ANOVA analysis of the results revealed significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 16.628; p <0.001] and time [F(11,396) = 66.324; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(33,396) = 6.451; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests showed that ketanserin potentiated the anti-allodynic responses produced by all three ibogalogs. More specifically, ketanserin significantly increased DM506 activity between 40 min (p <0.01) and 6 h (p <0.001) post-injection. AUC analysis further identified significant group differences [F(3,36) = 17.302; p <0.001], and post-hoc comparisons indicated that ketanserin co-administration significantly increased the AUC for TBG (p <0.001), IBG (p <0.001), or DM506 (p <0.01), relative to the ketanserin (alone) group (Fig. 2D). Notably, ketanserin combined with TBG produced a greater AUC value than that combined with DM506 (p <0.05). However, ketanserin did not induce any effect per se compared to the vehicle group [AUC unpaired T-test: t(18) = 0.956; p >0.05]. These findings suggest that the anti-allodynic activity of ibogalogs is, in part, modulated via 5-HT2Rs.
3.1.c. GR127935 reveals a biphasic effect of ibogalogs in reducing CSD-induced periorbital allodynia
To examine the role of 5-HT1B/1DR subtypes in ibogalog-induced analgesia in the CSD model, 0.1 mg/kg GR127935, a selective 5-HT1B/1DR antagonist [32], was administered (i.p.) 30 min prior to ibogalog treatment (Fig. 2E). Two-way ANOVA analysis of the results showed significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 19.219; p <0.001] and time [F(11,396) = 94.608; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(33,396) = 7.611; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s analyses indicated that GR127935 attenuated the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs during the first hour but subsequently enhanced their effects from 1 to 6 h post-treatment (p <0.001), which subsided at 24 h. AUC analysis further demonstrated significant group differences [F(3,36) = 19.128; p <0.001], with GR127935 co-administration producing significantly higher AUC values for all ibogalogs compared to the GR127935 group (p <0.001; Fig. 2F). However, GR127935 did not induce any effect per se compared to the vehicle group [AUC unpaired T-test: t(18) = 2.030; p >0.05]. These findings suggest that the anti-allodynic activity of ibogalogs is partially mediated by 5-HT1B/1DRs.
3.1.d. Assessment of sex as a biological variable in drug- and antagonist-mediated modulation of CSD
Induction of the CSD model is reported to present in a sex dependent manner [7]. To assess potential sex-dependent effect of the ibogalogs on CSD, time-course von Frey behavioral data under CSD at different antagonist conditions were analyzed separately by sex (Figs. 3A-F; n = 5 per group). Within each sex, two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant main effects of drug and time, as well as significant drug-by-time interactions (all p <0.01). AUC data were further analyzed using a three-way ANOVA including drug type, antagonist condition, and sex (Fig. 3G). This analysis showed significant main effects of antagonist condition [F(2, 96) = 14.691; p <0.001; ] and drug [F(3, 96) = 53.465; p <0.001; ] but not sex [F(1,96) = 3.604; p =0.061; ]. No significant two-way or three-way interactions were observed (all p >0.05), further suggesting sex-independent effects of the ibogalogs.
Figure 3.


Effect of ibogalogs on periorbital allodynia induced by cortical KCl injection in male (A, C, and E) or female rats (B, D, and F). Pretreated rats were administered (i.p.) 8.6 mg/kg IBG (base) (•), 21 mg/kg DM506 (base) (•), 26.6 mg/kg TBG (base) (•), or vehicle (○). Facial withdrawal thresholds were measured at baseline (BL), post-cortical KCl injection baseline (pBL), 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min, and at 24 h post-injection. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (mean ± SEM; n = 5 per group) were used to analyze (A and B) effects of ibogalogs administration, (C and D) interaction between ketanserin (Keta) and ibogalogs, and (E and F) interaction between GR127935 (GR) and ibogalogs. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses performed by three-way ANOVA (drug, antagonist condition, and sex). Panels A-F: IBG vs vehicle, *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001; DM506 vs vehicle, ^p <0.05, ^^p <0.01, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs vehicle, #p <0.05, ##p <0.01, ###p <0.001.
3.2.a. Ibogalogs reduce MOH associated periorbital allodynia in female rats
Initial results showed that rats developed periorbital mechanical allodynia after 7 d of sumatriptan infusion (Fig. 4A). To assess whether ibogalogs reduce sumatripan-induced facial allodynia, rats were administered TBG [26.6 mg/kg (base)], IBG [8.6 mg/kg (base)], DM506 [21 mg/kg (base)], or vehicle. Two-way ANOVA analysis showed significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 9.519; p <0.001] and time [F(10,360) = 27.033; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(30,360) = 3.927; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests compared to the vehicle group revealed that: (1) TBG markedly reduced periorbital allodynia throughout the 6-h observation period; (2) DM506 exerted a significant decrease within 90 min post-injection; and (3) IBG produced a bimodal effect pattern, with maximal effects at 40 min and between 4-6 h. The analgesic effects of all ibogalogs subsided at 24 h post-administration. AUC analysis further confirmed that ibogalogs significantly increased AUC values compared to the vehicle group with the same efficacy for all [F(3,36) = 10.281; p <0.001] (Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that all three ibogalogs produce transient anti-allodynic effects in the MOH model with similar efficacy.
Figure 4.


Periorbital von Frey testing in a sumatriptan-induced medication overuse headache (MOH) model in female rats. After 7 d of continuous sumatriptan infusion, rats were tested for baseline facial withdrawal thresholds. Subsequently, they received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 8.6 mg/kg IBG (base) (•), 21 mg/kg DM506 (base) (•), 26.6 mg/kg TBG (base) (•), or vehicle (○). Facial withdrawal thresholds were measured at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min, and at 24 h post-injection. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (mean ± SEM; n = 10 per group) for (A) effects of ibogalogs administration, (C) interaction between ketanserin (Keta) and ibogalogs, and (E) interaction between GR127935 (GR) and ibogalogs. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for (B) ibogalogs administration, (D) Keta–ibogalogs interaction, and (F) GR–ibogalogs interaction within 24 h. Panels A, C, and E: IBG vs vehicle, *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001; DM506 vs vehicle, ^p <0.05, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs vehicle, #p <0.05, ##p <0.01, ###p <0.001. Panels B, D, and F: ibogalogs vs vehicle, *p <0.05, ***p <0.001; TBG vs IBG, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs DM506, ###p <0.001.
3.2.b. Ketanserin revealed divergent effects among different ibogalogs in reducing periorbital allodynia
To evaluate the involvement of 5-HT2A/2CRs in the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs in MOH, rats were administered ketanserin (1 mg/kg) 30 min before ibogalog treatment (Fig. 4C). Two-way ANOVA analysis demonstrated significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 30.291; p <0.001] and time [F(10,360) = 73.606; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(30,360) = 8.861; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s analysis indicated that ketanserin abolished the effects of IBG during the first 2 h but enhanced the anti-allodynic effects of TBG. Three hours after ketanserin, all ibogalogs showed a similar pattern of periorbital allodynia reduction. AUC analysis revealed a significant difference among treatment groups [F(3,36) = 31.336; p <0.001] (Fig. 4D). Post-hoc Tukey’s comparisons showed that ketanserin co-administration significantly increased the AUC for all ibogalogs relative to the ketanserin (alone) group (p <0.001), with TBG showing higher efficacy than IBG or DM506 (p <0.001; Fig. 4D). However, ketanserin did not induce any effect per se compared to the vehicle group [AUC unpaired T-test t(18) =1.029; p >0.05]. These findings suggest that the ibogalog-induced attenuation of chronic headache-like allodynia is modulated via 5-HT2Rs.
3.2.c. GR127935 blocked the effects of ibogalogs in reducing MOH periorbital allodynia
To assess the role of 5-HT1B/1DR subtypes underlying the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs in MOH, rats were administered 0.1 mg/kg GR127935 30 min prior to ibogalog treatment to examine the receptor mechanism (Fig. 4E). Two-way ANOVA analysis identified significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 3.016; p <0.05] and time [F(10,360) = 105.424; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(30,360) = 5.417; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests showed that GR127935 abolished the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs during the first 3 h but not between 4-6 h. AUC analysis demonstrated a significant difference among the treatment groups [F(3,36) = 3.430; p <0.05] (Fig. 4F). Post-hoc comparisons revealed that co-administration of GR127935 with TBG, but not with IBG or DM506, significantly increased AUC compared to the TBG group (p <0.041). However, GR127935 did not induce any effect per se compared to the vehicle group [AUC unpaired T-test: t(18) = 0.946; p >0.05]. These results idicate that 5-HT1B/1DRs are required for the early anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs during MOH.
3.2.d. Effect of ibogalogs in MOH associated periorbital allodynia in wild type and 5-HT1FR KO mice
The results showed that both WT (Fig. 5A) and 5-HT1FR KO mice (n=7/genotype) (Fig. 5C) developed periorbital mechanical allodynia after 7 d of sumatriptan injections [Unpaired T-test t(12) =1.133; p >0.05]. This indicates that 5-HT1FRs are not playing a specific role in MOH induction.
Figure 5.

Periorbital von Frey testing in a sumatriptan-induced medication overuse headache (MOH) model in wild type and 5-HT1FR KO mice. After 7 d of continuous sumatriptan injection, mice were tested for baseline facial withdrawal thresholds. Subsequently, they received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 8.6 mg/kg IBG (base) (•), 21 mg/kg DM506 (base) (•), 26.6 mg/kg TBG (base) (•), or vehicle (○). Facial withdrawal thresholds were measured at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min, and at 24 h post-injection. Data were analyzed by RM two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (mean ± SEM; n = 7) for effects of ibogalogs administration in (A) WT mice, and (C) 5-HT1FR KO mice. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses performed by RM one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for (B and D) ibogalogs administration within 24 h. Panels A, and C: IBG vs vehicle, *p <0.05, ***p <0.001; DM506 vs vehicle, ^p <0.05, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs vehicle, ##p <0.01, ###p <0.001. Panels B, and D: ibogalogs vs vehicle, *p <0.05, ***p <0.001; TBG vs IBG, ^^p <0.01, ^^^p <0.001; TBG vs DM506, ###p <0.001.
To assess whether ibogalogs reduce established sumatriptan-induced facial allodynia, WT and KO mice were administered TBG [26.6 mg/kg (base)], IBG [8.6 mg/kg (base)], DM506 [21 mg/kg (base)], or vehicle with a within-subject design. RM two-way ANOVA analysis of the results in WT mice showed significant main effects of drug [F(3,18) = 42.917; p <0.001] and time [F(10,60) = 24.586; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(30,180) = 4.804; p <0.001] (Fig. 5C). The post-hoc Tukey's test analysis of the results in WT mice revealed that TBG markedly reduced periorbital allodynia throughout the 6-h observation period compared with the vehicle group. The patterns of ibogalog-induced analgesia in mice (Fig. 4A) and rats (Fig. 5A) aligned with respect to duration of effect during the testing time-frame and bimodal peaks, indicating that all three ibogalogs produce anti-allodynic effects in both rodents. AUC analysis showed a significant difference among treatment groups [F(3,18) = 42.783; p <0.001] (Fig. 5B). Post-hoc Tukey’s comparisons indicated that ibogalogs significantly increased AUC values compared to the vehicle group (p <0.001 for all), with TBG yielding a larger AUC than IBG (p <0.01) and DM506 (p <0.001), respectively.
Figure 5C illustrates the effect of ibogalogs using 5-HT1FR KO mice. RM two-way ANOVA analysis showed significant main effects of drug [F(3,18) = 20.943; p <0.001] and time [F(10,60) = 16.313; p <0.001], as well as a significant drug-by-time interaction [F(30,180) = 6.922; p <0.001]. Post-hoc Tukey’s tests compared to the vehicle group revealed that (see Fig. 5C): (1) TBG markedly reduced periorbital allodynia throughout the 4-h observation period; (2) DM506 significantly decreased allodynia within the first 90 min post-injection; and (3) IBG significantly attenuated headache like behavior. The analgesic effects of all ibogalogs subsided at 5 h post-administration which was not observed in WT mice. AUC analysis revealed a significant difference among treatment groups [F(3,18) = 21.343; p <0.001] (Fig. 5D). Post-hoc Tukey’s comparisons showed that TBG (p <0.001), IBG (p <0.05), and DM506 (p <0.05) increased the AUC relative to the vehicle group, where the effect of TBG was significantly larger than that for IBG or DM506 (p <0.001). Two-way ANOVA comparison of AUC values between WT and 5-HT1FR KO showed that loss of 5-HT1FR significantly attenuated the antiallodynic effect of ibogalogs independently with significant main effects of drug [F(3,36) = 60.328; p <0.001] and genotype [F(1,12) = 6.374; p = 0.027], but no significant interaction [F(3,36) = 2.266; p = 0.098]. While AUC analysis reveals global reductions in efficacy across treatments without capturing temporal dynamics, further three-way ANOVA across time points was subsequently employed to capture the detailed interaction profiles and time-dependent effects of ibogalogs and gene modulation. Overall, these results showed that the anti-allodynic activity ibogalogs is attenuated in KO mice, supporting a role for the 5-HT1FR in MOH.
3.3. Temporal dynamics and interaction profiles of ibogalogs and serotonin receptors
To analyze the temporal dynamics of the interaction between ibogalogs and 5-HTRs, the three-way ANOVAs were used to evaluate the effects of ibogalogs-antagonists and ibogalogs-genotypes across different time points, which are illustrated in heat maps for rats in CSD (Fig. 6A-C) and in MOH (Fig. 6D), and for mice in MOH (Fig. 6E).
Figure 6.



Heat maps illustrating the anti-headache activity of ibogalogs with 5-HT antagonists in rats and gene knockout mice across time points. Following three-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed to evaluate the interaction effects of ibogalogs and 5-HT antagonists in the CSD model for (A) both sexes and separated into (B) males, and (C) females, as well as (D) the MOH model in rats, and (E) the MOH model in wild-type (WT) and 5-HT1FR knockout (KO) mice. P-values are indicated, with the color spectrum representing pain levels ranging from high pain (red) to low pain (blue). Abbreviation: baseline (BL), post-cortical KCl injection baseline (pBL), ibogalogs alone control (cont), ketanserin (Keta), GR127935 (GR), WT mice (WT), and 5-HT1FR KO mice (1FKO).
In CSD data, the three-way ANOVA revealed a significant drug-antagonist condition-time interaction [F(66,1188) = 2.526; p <0.001] (Fig. 6A). Tukey's post-hoc analysis showed that ketanserin boosted the pain-relieved effects of IBG at 20, 40, and 360 min and of DM506 after 120 min, but not with TBG; however, GR127935 abolished the analgesia at the 40- and 60-min time points with IBG and TBG, respectively, but reduced pain responses with DM506 at the 240- and 300-min time points. Furthermore, this three-way interaction remained significant when the data were analyzed separately for male [F(66,528) = 2.136; p <0.001] (Fig. 6B) and female rats [F(66,528) = 1.347; p = 0.043] (Fig. 6C). In male rats, ketanserin enhanced the analgesic effects of IBG at 20, 40, and 360 min and of DM506 after 300 min, but again, not with TBG. On the other hand, GR127935 abolished the analgesia at 90 min with IBG and at 20 min with TBG, but reduced pain responses with IBG and DM506 at the 360-min time point. For female rats, ketanserin only boosted the pain-relieved effects with DM506 at 40 min and from 120 to 240 min. However, GR127935 induced more pain with IBG at 40 min and with TBG from 20 to 60 min.
For the MOH model, three-way ANOVA revealed a significant drug-antagonist condition-time interaction [F(60,1080) = 2.902; p <0.001] (Fig. 6D). Tukey's post-hoc analysis showed that co-treatment with ketanserin increased the pain responses in rats treated with IBG or DM506 in the first 60 min, but decreased pain with TBG from 60 to 120 min and from 300 to 360 min. Similarly, GR127935 increased pain in rats treated with IBG and DM506 in the first 60 min, while the effect on TBG lasted until 120 min and prevented pain after 300 min. Three-way ANOVA analysis of the mice data showed a significant drug-genotype-time interaction [F(30,360) = 2.467; p <0.001] (Fig. 6E). The 5-HT1FR KO mice showed higher pain responses than WT mice when treated with IBG, DM506, and TBG after 240 min, although a decrease in pain was observed at 60 min when treated with TBG. These findings highlight that the temporal dynamics of ibogalogs' analgesic effects are tightly regulated by distinct 5-HT receptor subtypes, exhibiting time-dependent profiles across different pain models.
3.4. Functional activity of ibogalogs at 5-HT1B/1D/1FR subtypes
To determine the functional activity of ibogalogs at the human 5-HT1BR (Fig. 7A), 5-HT1ER (Fig. 7B), and 5-HT1FR subtypes (Fig. 7C), BRET assays were performed in HEK293-T cells expressing each receptor subtype. The concentration-response curves (mean ± SEM; n = 4) at the 5-HT1BR showed that the potency for 5-HT [EC50 (half-maximal stimulatory concentration) = 1.4 ± 0.3 nM] was higher than that for ibogalogs (Fig. 7A; Table 1). Nevertheless, some differences were observed among ibogalogs. DM506 (202 ± 29 nM) was more potent than TBG (703 ± 267 nM) in activating the 5-HT1BR, whereas IBG, nor-IBG, and CAG were much weaker (>10 μM) (Table 1). The observed ibogalog efficacies (Emax) at 10 μM, compared to the maximal response for 5-HT (100 ± 11%), indicated that DM506 (91 ± 5%) is close to a full agonist, whereas TBG (69 ± 11%) acts as a partial agonist. Since the fitted curves for IBG, nor-IBG, and CAG did not reach saturation at concentrations up to 10 μM, their potencies and efficacies could not be determined with accuracy.
Figure 7.

Functional activity of ibogalogs at the human 5-HT1B/1E/1FR subtypes. HEK293-T cells transfected with 5-HT1BR (A), 5-HT1ER (B), or 5-HT1FR (C) were incubated (30 min) with DM506 (◊), IBG (▲), nor-IBG (▼), CAG (•), or TBG (■) (0.1 nM-10 μM), and the activity compared to that for 5-HT (■). Concentration-response curves (mean ± SEM; n = 3-4) indicated that ibogalogs activate the 5-HT1BR (A), 5-HT1ER (B), and 5-HT1FR (C) with different potency (EC50) and efficacy (Emax) values (listed in Table 1).
The concentration-response curves (mean ± SEM; n = 3) for ibogalogs at the 5-HT1ER showed overall lower potencies (EC50 = 1.1-2.0 μM) compared to that for the other 5-HT1R subtypes (Fig. 7B; Table 1). They acted as partial agonists, where DM506 (1,341 ± 923 nM; 85 ± 4%) and nor-IBG (1,352 ± 667 nM; 75 ± 10%) showed relatively higher potencies and Emax values (compared to the full agonist 5-HT (Fig. 7B; Table 1). Since the curve for CAG did not reach saturation at concentrations up to 10 μM, its potency and efficacy could not be determined with accuracy.
At the 5-HT1FR, most ibogalogs appear to be partial agonists with Emax values that range from ~43% to 73% compared to the full agonist 5-HT (Fig. 7C; Table 1). The concentration-response curves (mean ± SEM; n = 3) provided potencies that follow the sequence: DM506 (101 ± 14 nM) ~ nor-IBG (171 ± 76 nM) > IBG (469 ± 298 nM) ~ TBG (841 ± 703 nM) ≫ CAG (Fig. 7C; Table 1). Since the curve for CAG did not reach saturation at concentrations up to 10 μM, its potency and efficacy could not be determined with accuracy. Including previous data (Chagraoui et al., 2026), we were able to obtain the following receptor selectivity: 5-HT1FR ~ 5-HT1DR > 5-HT1BR ≫ 5-HT1ER ⋙ 5-HT1AR (no activity at >10 μM). This suggests structural divergences in the interaction with the orthosteric site of each 5-HT1R subtype, a topic that will be developed in future studies.
4. Discussion
In this study, we assessed whether ibogalogs such as IBG, DM506, and TBG reduce headache-like symptoms in rats after acute (KCl) and repeated treatments (sumatriptan) using the respective CSD and MOH models, and potential sex-dependence using the CSD model. We also assessed the role of different 5-HT1R and 5-HT2R subtypes in their effects using selective antagonists, as well as 5-HT1FR KO mice. In addition, we determined the functional activity of a variety of ibogalogs at the respective 5-HT1D/1E/1FR subtype.
The CSD results showed that TBG and IBG, but not DM506, decrease KCl-induced facial allodynia, an effect that lasted for 6 h. These results could be easily explained considering that TBG and IBG, but not DM506, functionally behave as competitive antagonists of the 5-HT2BR [18, 19]. It is very well documented that compounds that inhibit the 5-HT2R, 5-HT3R, or 5-HT7R subtype may prevent or reduce the occurrence of migraine attacks in rodents and human beings ([37, 38]; reviewed in [3]). Functional results showed that ibogalogs practically do not affect the 5-HT3R and act as weak inverse agonists at the 5-HT7R [14, 16], ruling out the involvement of these receptor subtypes in the anti-allodynic activity of ibogalogs. The anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs were sex independent in the CSD model despite the model may discern sex dependent phenotypes [7]. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate sex-dependent regulation of 5-HTR subtypes in this model.
Based on the CSD results, it is possible that TBG/IBG-induced 5-HT2BR inhibition may decrease acute allodynia. In meningeal blood vessels, activation of 5-HT2BRs expressed in endothelial cells increases nitric oxide, which can induce migraine attacks [39]. However, when ketanserin was co-injected with each ibogalog, enhancement, but not inhibition, of the anti-allodynic activity was observed. A potential explanation is that ketanserin blocks the stimulatory activity of ibogalogs at 5-HT2A/2CRs, without modifying the inhibitory activity of TBG/IBG at the 5-HT2BR, finally producing more complete inhibition of these receptors and consequently more efficient anti-allodynic effect. Given that ketanserin binds to the 5-HT2AR (Ki = 1.13 nM) with higher affinity than that at the 5-HT2CR (Ki = 88 nM) and 5-HT2BR (Ki = 233 nM) supports such idea. Indeed, ketanserin induced anti-nociceptive activity (ED50 ~0.6-1.5 mg/kg, depending on the used test) likely via supraspinal 5-HT2R-evoked inhibition of descending nociceptive neurotransmission [2]. However, it does not explain that the least active ibogalog, DM506, improved its overall efficacy between 2-6 h post-injection. Our CSD and MOH results showed that ketanserin does not induce any effect per se, supporting previous studies [40].
A hypothetical scenario for the anti-acute headache activity of ibogalogs can be based on previous studies with triptans showing that presynaptic 5-HT1DR activation induces cranial vasoconstriction and decreases the release of inflammatory neuropeptides such as calcitonin receptor peptide (CGRP) from the trigeminal sensory nerve ending, whereas 5-HT1D/1ER activation may also inhibit trigeminal nuclei excitability ([24]; reviewed in [41]). Unfortunately, our behavioral study cannot discern ibogalog activity between 5-HT1B/1DRs expressed in vascular smooth muscles and trigeminal neurons. However, we were able to determine the functional activity of several ibogalogs at these receptor subtypes in vitro. These and previous results [20] showed that the potency sequence at the 5-HT1B/1D/1ERs (DM506 higher than TBG/IBG) does not support the efficacy observed in our behavioral tests, where IBG/TBG were more efficient than DM506. In this regard, we assessed the role of 5-HT1B/1DRs using the selective antagonist GR127935. Our results showed that this antagonist mitigates the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs observed between 1-3 h but not after 3 h. These results aligned with a previous study showing that GR127935 reduces zolmitriptan-induced 5-HT1B/1DR stimulation with the subsequent inhibition of trigeminal ganglion neurons [42]. According to previous results, GR127935 was unable to modulate presynaptic receptors [43], ruling out this potential negative feedback mechanism.
The MOH results showed that repeated sumatriptan treatment induces chronic headache-like periorbital allodynia, as observed in experimental animals and human beings [5, 44-47]. Although ibogalogs showed a bimodal profile across the experimental duration, all tested compounds significantly reduced chronic headache with similar efficacy, which lasted for up to 6 h. This is an important difference with the CSD results, where DM506 failed to decrease acute allodynia. The observed differences may arise because prolonged use of sumatriptan overstimulates 5-HT1B/1DRs on primary afferent neurons, producing neuronal sensitization, while 5-HT1B/1DR inhibition completely prevents such process. Sumatriptan-evoked overstimulation induces protein kinase Cε-dependent type I hyperalgesic priming, finally enhancing CGRP, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) signaling, among other effects [44-47].
There is ample information indicating functional crosstalk between 5-HT1R and 5-HT2R subtypes in neuronal and non-neuronal cells [48-50]. For instance, the excitatory activity mediated by 5-HT1AR activation is reduced in the presence of 5-HT2BRs, whereas 5-HT2AR activation decreased 5-HT1AR-agonist activity, and 5-HT1BR activation accelerated 5-HT2BR internalization. Considering the existence of a co-regulatory mechanism between 5-HT2AR and 5-HT1B/1DR, a possible ibogalog-driven mechanism might be occurring, where 5-HT2AR activation decreases sumatriptan-mediated 5-HT1B/1DR overstimulation. Our results in the CSD model showed that ketanserin enhanced the anti-allodynic effects of ibogalogs, while in the MOH model only TBG actions were enhanced. In contrast, GR127935 induces a clearer inhibitory effect in both models. GR127935-induced 5-HT1B/1DR inhibition may counteract the allodynic activity mediated by chronic sumatriptan stimulation, improving further the antiallodynic activity of ibogalogs via 5-HT2AR activation. The enhancing effect of ketanserin, on the other hand, might be based on its inhibitory action on upregulated 5-HT2ARs observed during chronic headache (Zheng et al., 2020). These mechanisms will be tested in future studies.
Pharmacokinetics, metabolic, and/or pharmacodynamic features might be implicated in the higher efficacy of TBG/IBG vs DM506 in the CSD experiments and bimodal time-course in MOH. Based on similar lipophilicity (LogP = 2.5-2.6) and brain penetration (LogBBB = 0.62-0.75) features for TBG, IBG, and DM506 (Arias et al., 2025b), we can discard pharmacokinetics differences. We also know that TBG (50 mg/kg; i.p.) rapidly reaches the brain (~15 min) and remains for ~3 h [14]. However, we do not know the metabolism for IBG or DM506. Based on their physicochemical parameters, we expect different receptor interactions as observed in 5-HT2R subtypes [19, 51]. As an attempt to address possible pharmacodynamics differences among ibogalogs, the functional activity of TBG, DM506, IBG, nor-IBG, and CAG was determined at the 5-HT1BR, 5-HT1ER, and 5-HT1FR subtypes, complementing previous studies at the 5-HT1AR and 5-HT1DR subtypes [20]. The functional assays showed that ibogalogs are in general partial agonists at different 5-HT1R subtypes. Regarding ibogalog potency at each receptor subtype, the following sequence for the most efficient compound, DM506, was observed: 5-HT1FR (101 ± 14 nM) ~ 5-HT1DR (110 ± 20 nM) > 5-HT1BR (202 ± 29 nM) ≫ 5-HT1ER (1,341 ± 923 nM) ⋙ 5-HT1AR (>10 μM). Based on our functional results showing a comparatively lower activity for ibogalogs at the 5-HT1ER, a nil activity of IBG at the 5-HT1BR, but a potent agonistic activity at the 5-HT1DR and 5-HT1FR, we suggest a potential role for the latter two receptor subtypes in the anti-headache activity of ibogalogs. Thus, to assess the potential role of the 5-HT1FR, we compared the anti-allodynic activity of ibogalogs between WT and 5-HT1FR KO mice. The results showed that the anti-allodynic activity ibogalogs in the MOH model is attenuated in KO mice at later timepoints. This indicates a time-dependent role for the 5-HT1FR in the activity of ibogalogs.
The role of 5-HT1FR in migraine therapy has gained significant attention due to the clinical application of lasmiditan. Unlike triptans, which act as 5-HT1B/1DR agonists and induce vasoconstriction, the 5-HT1FR agonist lasmiditan achieves therapeutic efficacy without associated cardiovascular side effects [52]. Like 5-HT1B/1DRs, the 5-HT1FR has been shown to be expressed in the brain (reviewed in [53]), cerebrovascular tissues [54], and peripheral arteries [55]. The current data support the idea that the 5-HT1FR plays a role in headache subtypes (e.g., medication overuse headache). However, the specific mechanisms underlying the anti-migraine effects of 5-HT1FR activation remain poorly understood.
In conclusion, ibogalogs can alleviate acute headache-like behaviors in a sex-independent manner as well as chronic migraine induced by sumatriptan. The antagonist findings suggest that ibogalogs decrease acute headache-like symptoms by a co-modulatory mechanism involving both 5-HT2R and 5-HT1R subtypes, whereas chronic headache is reduced by co-modulatory mechanisms that also include the 5-HT1FR. This work provides strong evidence to support future studies to investigate the dynamics of 5-HTR expression and signaling in acute and chronic headache models and use of ibogalogs in the treatment of headache.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Rick Schnellmann for kindly providing the 5HT1F KO mice at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Declaration of Competing Interest
This research was supported by NIH/NINDS (R01NS126752) and NIH/NIDA (P30DA051355) grants (to TML-M), NIH grant (GM133504) (to DW), and by the Office of Research (Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences) (to HRA). The other authors declare no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the research presented in this study.
Abbreviations:
- 5-HT
serotonin
- 5-HTxR
serotonin receptor subtypes (x = 1A, 1B, 1D, 1E, 1F, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- GABA
γ-aminobutyric acid
- MOH
medication overuse headache
- CSD
cortical spreading depression
- DM506 (ibogaminalog)
3-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indole
- TBG (tabernanthalog)
8-methoxy-3-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indole
- IBG (ibogainalog)
9-methoxy-3-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indole
- nor-IBG
3-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indol-9-ol
- CAG (catharanthalog)
methyl 3-methyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1H-azepino[4,5-b]indole-5-carboxylate
- BRET
bioluminescence resonance energy transfer
- RT
room temperature
References
- 1.Silberstein SD (2018) Headache in Clinical Practice. doi: 10.4324/9780203752210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alhaider AA (1991) Antinociceptive effect of ketanserin in mice: involvement of supraspinal 5-HT2 receptors in nociceptive transmission. Brain Res 543 (2):335–340. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90046-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Villalón CM, VanDenBrink AM (2017) The Role of 5-Hydroxytryptamine in the Pathophysiology of Migraine and its Relevance to the Design of Novel Treatments. Mini Rev Med Chem 17 (11):928–938. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160728121050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bigal ME, Lipton RB (2008) Excessive acute migraine medication use and migraine progression. Neurology 71 (22):1821–1828. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335946.53860.1d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Felice M, Ossipov MH, Wang R, Lai J, Chichorro J, Meng I, Dodick DW, Vanderah TW, Dussor G, Porreca F (2010) Triptan-induced latent sensitization: a possible basis for medication overuse headache. Ann Neurol 67 (3):325–337. doi: 10.1002/ana.21897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Green AL, Gu P, De Felice M, Dodick D, Ossipov MH, Porreca F (2014) Increased susceptibility to cortical spreading depression in an animal model of medication-overuse headache. Cephalalgia 34 (8):594–604. doi: 10.1177/0333102413515344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaur M, Ward NA, Karlage KL, Morgans CW, Aicher SA, Largent-Milnes TM (2025) Sex differences in photophobic behaviors following cortical spreading depression in rats. Cephalalgia 45 (1):3331024241310550. doi: 10.1177/03331024241310550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lambert GA, Truong L, Zagami AS (2011) Effect of cortical spreading depression on basal and evoked traffic in the trigeminovascular sensory system. Cephalalgia 31 (14):1439–1451. doi: 10.1177/0333102411422383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oswald JC, Schuster NM (2018) Lasmiditan for the treatment of acute migraine: a review and potential role in clinical practice. J Pain Res 11:2221–2227. doi: 10.2147/jpr.S152216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.VanderPluym JH (2026) The implications of losing treatment options: Why lasmiditan's discontinuation matters. Headache 66 (2):554–555. doi: 10.1111/head.70041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Monro P, Swade C, Coppen A (1985) Mianserin in the prophylaxis of migraine: a double-blind study. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 320:98–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb08083.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lévy E, Margolese HC (2003) Migraine headache prophylaxis and treatment with low-dose mirtazapine. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18 (5):301–303. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000080803.87368.01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zilberg G, Parpounas AK, Warren AL, Fiorillo B, Provasi D, Filizola M, Wacker D (2023) Structural Insights into the Unexpected Agonism of Tetracyclic Antidepressants at Serotonin Receptors 5-HT1eR and 5-HT1FR. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.05.561100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cameron LP, Tombari RJ, Lu J, Pell AJ, Hurley ZQ, Ehinger Y, Vargas MV, McCarroll MN, Taylor JC, Myers-Turnbull D, Liu T, Yaghoobi B, Laskowski LJ, Anderson EI, Zhang G, Viswanathan J, Brown BM, Tjia M, Dunlap LE, Rabow ZT, Fiehn O, Wulff H, McCorvy JD, Lein PJ, Kokel D, Ron D, Peters J, Zuo Y, Olson DE (2021) A non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analogue with therapeutic potential. Nature 589 (7842):474–479. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3008-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arias HR, Micheli L, Rudin D, Bento O, Borsdorf S, Ciampi C, Marin P, Ponimaskin E, Manetti D, Romanelli MN, Ghelardini C, Liechti ME, Di Cesare Mannelli L (2024) Non-hallucinogenic compounds derived from iboga alkaloids alleviate neuropathic and visceral pain in mice through a mechanism involving 5-HT(2A) receptor activation. Biomed Pharmacother 177:116867. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arias HR, Rudin D, Hines DJ, Contreras A, Gulsevin A, Manetti D, Anouar Y, De Deurwaerdere P, Meiler J, Romanelli MN, Liechti ME, Chagraoui A (2024) The novel non-hallucinogenic compound DM506 (3-methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indole) induces sedative- and anxiolytic-like activity in mice by a mechanism involving 5-HT(2A) receptor activation. Eur J Pharmacol 966:176329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arias HR, Micheli L, Jensen AA, Galant S, Vandermoere F, Venturi D, Manetti D, Romanelli MN, Ghelardini C, Marin P, Di Cesare Mannelli L (2025) Ibogalogs decrease neuropathic pain in mice through a mechanism involving crosstalk between 5-HT(2A) and mGlu(2) receptors. Biomed Pharmacother 184:117887. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.117887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arias HR, Rudin D, Luethi D, Valenta J, Leśniak A, Czartoryska Z, Olejarz-Maciej A, Doroz-Płonka A, Manetti D, De Deurwaerdère P, Romanelli MN, Handzlik J, Liechti ME, Chagraoui A (2025) The psychoplastogens ibogaminalog and ibogainalog induce antidepressant-like activity in naïve and depressed mice by mechanisms involving 5-HT(2A) receptor activation and serotonergic transmission. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 136:111217. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arias HR, Rudin D, Ren X, Liechti ME, Huang N (2026) Ibogalogs and their pyridoindole homologs activate or inhibit the 5-HT2B receptor by modulating the distance between transmembrane segments TM3 and TM6 in the orthosteric site. European Journal of Pharmacology 1026:178918. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2026.178918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chagraoui A, Kazmierska-Grebowska P, Byache O, Abraham A, Rudin D, Caban B, Kowalczyk T, Liechti ME, Wacker D, Aman C, Deurwaerdère P, Arias HR (2026) Ibogalogs induce antiseizure activity in rodents by a mechanism involving 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor activation with a major role of 5-HT(2A) receptors in the hippocampal CA3 subfield. Biochem Pharmacol 247:117799. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2026.117799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Younkin J, Koseli E, Buzzi B, Choi E, Honaker T, Davis RL, Manetti D, Romanelli MN, Cetinkaya-Fisgin A, Arias HR, Hoke A, Gonzalez-Maeso J, Damaj MI (2026) Activity of Nonhallucinogenic Ibogalogs on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Mice. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 17 (10):1945–1954. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5c01002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rogawski MA (2012) Migraine and Epilepsy—Shared Mechanisms within the Family of Episodic Disorders. In: Noebels JL, Avoli M, Rogawski MA, Olsen RW, Delgado-Escueta AV (eds) Jasper's Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies. National Center for Biotechnology Information (US) Copyright © 2012, Rogawski Michael A, Delgado-Escueta Antonio V, Noebels Jeffrey L, Avoli Massimo and Olsen Richard W., Bethesda (MD), [Google Scholar]
- 23.Casey AB, Cui M, Booth RG, Canal CE (2022) "Selective" serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonists. Biochem Pharmacol 200:115028. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kilinc E, Guerrero-Toro C, Zakharov A, Vitale C, Gubert-Olive M, Koroleva K, Timonina A, Luz LL, Shelukhina I, Giniatullina R, Tore F, Safronov BV, Giniatullin R (2017) Serotonergic mechanisms of trigeminal meningeal nociception: Implications for migraine pain. Neuropharmacology 116:160–173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tae HS, Ortells MO, Tekarli BJ, Manetti D, Romanelli MN, McIntosh JM, Adams DJ, Arias HR (2023) DM506 (3-Methyl-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazepino[4,5-b]indole fumarate), a Novel Derivative of Ibogamine, Inhibits α7 and α9α10 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by Different Allosteric Mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci 14 (14):2537–2547. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa ZH (2000) An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 47 (5):614–624 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.De Logu F, Landini L, Janal MN, Li Puma S, De Cesaris F, Geppetti P, Nassini R (2019) Migraine-provoking substances evoke periorbital allodynia in mice. J Headache Pain 20 (1):18. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0968-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Levine A, Liktor-Busa E, Karlage KL, Giancotti L, Salvemini D, Vanderah TW, Largent-Milnes TM (2020) DAGLα Inhibition as a Non-invasive and Translational Model of Episodic Headache. Front Pharmacol 11:615028. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.615028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liktor-Busa E, Levine AA, Palomino SM, Singh S, Wahl J, Vanderah TW, Stella N, Largent-Milnes TM (2023) ABHD6 and MAGL control 2-AG levels in the PAG and allodynia in a CSD-induced periorbital model of headache. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 4:1171188. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1171188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dixon WJ (1980) Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 20:441–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.20.040180.002301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Edelmayer RM, Vanderah TW, Majuta L, Zhang ET, Fioravanti B, De Felice M, Chichorro JG, Ossipov MH, King T, Lai J, Kori SH, Nelsen AC, Cannon KE, Heinricher MM, Porreca F (2009) Medullary pain facilitating neurons mediate allodynia in headache-related pain. Ann Neurol 65 (2):184–193. doi: 10.1002/ana.21537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hosseini R, Fakhraei N, Malekisarvar H, Mansourpour D, Nili F, Farahani M, Dehpour AR (2022) Effect of sumatriptan on acetic acid-induced experimental colitis in rats: a possible role for the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 395 (5):563–577. doi: 10.1007/s00210-022-02215-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Srinivasu P, Rambhau D, Rao BR, Rao YM (2000) Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between sumatriptan and naproxen. J Clin Pharmacol 40 (1):99–104. doi: 10.1177/00912700022008621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rygula R, Papciak J, Popik P (2014) The effects of acute pharmacological stimulation of the 5-HT, NA and DA systems on the cognitive judgement bias of rats in the ambiguous-cue interpretation paradigm. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 24 (7):1103–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Olsen RHJ, DiBerto JF, English JG, Glaudin AM, Krumm BE, Slocum ST, Che T, Gavin AC, McCorvy JD, Roth BL, Strachan RT (2020) TRUPATH, an open-source biosensor platform for interrogating the GPCR transducerome. Nat Chem Biol 16 (8):841–849. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0535-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Warren AL, Lankri D, Cunningham MJ, Serrano IC, Parise LF, Kruegel AC, Duggan P, Zilberg G, Capper MJ, Havel V, Russo SJ, Sames D, Wacker D (2024) Structural pharmacology and therapeutic potential of 5-methoxytryptamines. Nature 630 (8015):237–246. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07403-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Panconesi A, Sicuteri R (1997) Headache induced by serotonergic agonists--a key to the interpretation of migraine pathogenesis? Cephalalgia 17 (1):3–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1701003.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sommer C (2006) Is serotonin hyperalgesic or analgesic? Curr Pain Headache Rep 10 (2):101–106. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0020-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schmuck K, Ullmer C, Kalkman HO, Probst A, Lubbert H (1996) Activation of meningeal 5-HT2B receptors: an early step in the generation of migraine headache? Eur J Neurosci 8 (5):959–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01583.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mylecharane EJ (1991) 5-HT2 receptor antagonists and migraine therapy. J Neurol 238 Suppl 1:S45–52. doi: 10.1007/bf01642906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tanaka M, Tˆrˆk N, VÈcsei L (2021) Are 5-HT(1) receptor agonists effective anti-migraine drugs? Expert Opin Pharmacother 22 (10):1221–1225. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1910235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Morikawa T, Matsuzawa Y, Makita K, Katayama Y (2006) Antimigraine drug, zolmitriptan, inhibits high-voltage activated calcium currents in a population of acutely dissociated rat trigeminal sensory neurons. Mol Pain 2:10. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-2-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hutson PH, Bristow LJ, Cunningham JR, Hogg JE, Longmore J, Murray F, Pearce D, Razzaque Z, Saywell K, Tricklebank MD, et al. (1995) The effects of GR127935, a putative 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, on brain 5-HT metabolism, extracellular 5-HT concentration and behaviour in the guinea pig. Neuropharmacology 34 (4):383–392. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00016-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Godínez-Chaparro B, López-Santillán FJ, Argüelles CF, Villalón CM, Granados-Soto V (2013) Role of 5-HT1B/1D receptors in the reduction of formalin-induced nociception and secondary allodynia/hyperalgesia produced by antimigraine drugs in rats. Life Sci 92 (22):1046–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.03.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Araldi D, Ferrari LF, Levine JD (2016) Gi-protein-coupled 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist sumatriptan induces type I hyperalgesic priming. Pain 157 (8):1773–1782. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zheng Z, Shi X, Xiang Y, Zhang A, Fang Y (2021) Involvement of 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor 2A in the Pathophysiology of Medication-Overuse Headache. J Pain Res 14:453–461. doi: 10.2147/jpr.S283734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ryu S, Zhang J, Simoes R, Liu X, Guo Z, Feng L, Unsinger J, Hotchkiss RS, Cao YQ (2024) Regulatory T cells require peripheral CCL2-CCR2 signaling to facilitate the resolution of medication overuse headache-related behavioral sensitization. J Headache Pain 25 (1):197. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01900-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Janoshazi A, Deraet M, Callebert J, Setola V, Guenther S, Saubamea B, Manivet P, Launay JM, Maroteaux L (2007) Modified receptor internalization upon coexpression of 5-HT1B receptor and 5-HT2B receptors. Mol Pharmacol 71 (6):1463–1474. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.032656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Borroto-Escuela DO, Li X, Tarakanov AO, Savelli D, Narváez M, Shumilov K, Andrade-Talavera Y, Jimenez-Beristain A, Pomierny B, Díaz-Cabiale Z, Cuppini R, Ambrogini P, Lindskog M, Fuxe K (2017) Existence of Brain 5-HT1A-5-HT2A Isoreceptor Complexes with Antagonistic Allosteric Receptor-Receptor Interactions Regulating 5-HT1A Receptor Recognition. ACS Omega 2 (8):4779–4789. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Benhadda A, Delhaye C, Moutkine I, Marques X, Russeau M, Le Magueresse C, Roumier A, Lévi S, Maroteaux L (2023) 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2B) receptor interaction and co-clustering regulate serotonergic neuron excitability. iScience 26 (8):107401. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rudin D, Ren X, Liechti ME, Huang N, Arias HR (2026) Ibogalogs Activate the 5-HT(2A) Receptor through a Mechanism Involving Outward and Inward Movements of the Respective Transmembrane Segment TM6 and TM7. Neurochem Res 51 (2). doi: 10.1007/s11064-026-04727-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kuca B, Silberstein SD, Wietecha L, Berg PH, Dozier G, Lipton RB (2018) Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. Neurology 91 (24):e2222–e2232. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vila-Pueyo M (2018) Targeted 5-HT(1F) Therapies for Migraine. Neurotherapeutics 15 (2):291–303. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0615-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bouchelet I, Cohen Z, Case B, Séguéla P, Hamel E (1996) Differential expression of sumatriptan-sensitive 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in human trigeminal ganglia and cerebral blood vessels. Mol Pharmacol 50 (2):219–223 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nilsson T, Longmore J, Shaw D, Pantev E, Bard JA, Branchek T, Edvinsson L (1999) Characterisation of 5-HT receptors in human coronary arteries by molecular and pharmacological techniques. Eur J Pharmacol 372 (1):49–56. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00114-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
