Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2026 Aug 21;92(9):e00527-26. doi: 10.1128/aem.00527-26

Industrial effluent-derived Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 as a bioremediator against lead toxicity in Labeo rohita

Saima Zafar 1, Asma Ashraf 1, Sehrish Fatima 1, Farkhanda Asad 1, Kafeel Ahmad 2, Yusuf Tutar 3, Mudassir Hassan 4,✉
Editor: Marina Lotti5
PMCID: PMC13599521  PMID: 42627391

ABSTRACT

Lead pollution is recognized as a major global environmental problem that poses a serious threat to ecological integrity and environmental sustainability. The current study shows the bioremedial potential of Pb-resistant Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 in Labeo rohita. The fish were divided into three experimental treatments, namely, Control (T0), Pb only (T1), and Pb + Acinetobacter sp. (T2). The treatment T2 was particularly exposed to a concentration of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL of Acinetobacter sp. along with Pb (1 mg L−1) for a period of 30 days. The results revealed that Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 could tolerate Pb concentrations up to 30 mM, along with resistance to other heavy metal ions. Pb exposure significantly increased the activity of all antioxidant enzymes, with glutathione transferase exhibiting the greatest increase (795%), followed by peroxidase (229%), superoxide dismutase (195%), catalase (104%), and ascorbate peroxidase (28%). Furthermore, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was employed to identify the functional groups involved in Pb biosorption, while intracellular accumulation was confirmed via energy dispersive X-ray and scanning electron microscopy analyses. At the end of the 1-month trial, fish in the T2 group treated with Acinetobacter sp. exhibited a significantly higher survival rate, improved growth performance, better body composition, and increased amylase and protease activities than those in the T1 group. Furthermore, the T2 treatment mitigated the negative impacts of Pb on hematological and biochemical parameters and restored histological damage in the fish organs. The current study suggests that Acinetobacter sp., due to its heavy metal tolerance, could effectively ameliorate Pb bioavailability in aquatic habitats and enhance environmental health.

IMPORTANCE

The continuously rising Pb discharge in aquatic ecosystems, particularly in the industrial regions of South Asia, jeopardizes ecological integrity and the health of economically crucial fish such as Labeo rohita, consequently affecting food security. Conventional remediation techniques are often expensive, energy-intensive, and pose ecological risks. This study addresses a significant gap by presenting a thorough bioremediation process encompassing the isolation and characterization of a newly identified multi-metal-resistant Acinetobacter sp. (PbS1A2) from industrial wastewater, which facilitates in vivo recovery in Labeo rohita contaminated with Pb. Isolated from a contaminated site, Acinetobacter sp. have evolved natural metal-resistant mechanisms under environmental stress, resulting in better remediation than lab-engineered options. This is distinguished from studies that solely address the in vitro efficiencies of Pb removal. The research offers extensive biological evidence indicating that Pb-induced damage can be effectively mitigated. The results concerning growth performance, hematological assessments, digestive enzyme activities, tissue accumulation, and histopathological evaluations suggest an economical, expandable, and scientifically validated approach to manage Pb pollution in aquatic ecosystems.

KEYWORDS: isolation, bioremediation, growth parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration, histopathology

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, urban Pb concentrations have increased globally, worsening its detrimental effects on ecosystems and the human population (1). Pb concentrations in urban soils in 174 cities worldwide (2010–2022) peaked at 5,780.00 mg/kg, much above permissible levels, highlighting an alarming global pollution problem (2). Pb’s pervasive presence in the environment stems from its diverse sources, including industrial activities like smelting, automobile and battery production, as well as natural processes like volcanic eruptions and weathering (3). Numerous health problems are associated with Pb exposure. It leads to cardiovascular, neurological, skeletal, reproductive, hematological, and renal disorders in adults and neurological and developmental issues in children (4). About 65% of human Pb exposure occurs from contaminated meals and fish (5). The contamination of aquatic ecosystems causes Pb accumulation in fish, which is naturally stimulated by variables like temperature, salinity, concentration, species, age, size, sex, nutrition, and metabolism (6). This accumulation causes behavioral changes, slows growth, and alters physicochemical factors like enzymatic activity, histopathology, hematobiochemical parameters, and oxidative stress balance (7). These biological impacts of Pb, along with its widespread environmental occurrence, reflect the broader vulnerability of aquatic ecosystems to multiple pollutants (3).

As a result, a variety of pollutants, notably heavy metals, pesticides, industrial effluents, and toxins from shipping and port operations, are posing a rising threat to aquatic ecosystems. These pollutants seriously impair water quality and upset the biological balance of aquatic environments. Because of their persistence, non-biodegradability, and propensity to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms, heavy metals like arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu) are among the most dangerous pollutants. They cause oxidative stress, hematological and biochemical disorders, tissue damage, and compromised physiological functions (8–11). Similarly, pesticide residues entering aquatic habitats through agricultural runoff also have a negative impact on fish health by affecting microbiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes, lowering organismal fitness and ecosystem stability (12). Environmental monitoring further demonstrated the accumulation of hazardous metals in edible freshwater fish, underlining both ecological hazards and possible threats to human health through the aquatic food chain (13). Furthermore, rising maritime transportation and port operations add to aquatic pollution by releasing oils, chemicals, ballast water, and other contaminants, leading to habitat deterioration and biodiversity loss (14). These pollutants together represent significant environmental threats to aquatic environments and aquatic species, underlining the necessity for continual monitoring and sustainable management of aquatic ecosystems (15).

In response to these escalating environmental concerns, various remediation strategies have been developed to remove Pb from contaminated aquatic systems. Physicochemical techniques like chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, and membrane processes for Pb pollution removal have gained a lot of interest recently (16). However, these techniques have serious disadvantages, such as low removal efficiency, high-energy costs, and sludge production that call for extra resources (17). As a result, research for more sustainable and effective technology is needed (18). A viable substitute for reestablishing environmental health is bioremediation (19).

Microbial treatment for Pb bioremediation has been marketed due to its low cost, environmental friendliness, and high reliability (20). Heavy metals like Pb can be bioremediated by a number of bacterial species. Previously, several multi-metal-resistant bacterial strains such as Brucella intermedia (21), Comamonas testosteroni, Bacillus cereus (22), and Acinetobacter haemolyticus (23) have been isolated and characterized from industrial effluents. Bacteria may metabolize and transform heavy metals into less hazardous forms through a variety of mechanisms, such as intracellular sequestration, metallothioneins, glutathione, and efflux transport (24). Mechanisms such as biosorption, precipitation, and bioaccumulation are employed in bacterial bioremediation (25). Recently, research on Acinetobacter sp. (HAR20), a Pb-resistant strain, was found in the harbor seawater of Oran and has shown promise in breaking down spent engine oil and eliminating heavy metals (26). This bacterial strain was able to remediate a variety of organic and inorganic pollutants, including pesticides, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pharmaceutical compounds, by producing emulsifiers, biosurfactants, enzymes, and phytohormones (27, 28). The ability of Acinetobacter species to thrive in polluted environments further reinforces their potential for large-scale environmental cleanup (29). In South Asia, notably Pakistan, Labeo rohita is critical to aquaculture and fisheries (30) and acts as a significant bioindicator owing to its ability to accumulate heavy metals in its organs, causing considerable physiological and histological alterations (31). Understanding Pb accumulation in bioindicator species is crucial for assessing pollution levels and the effectiveness of bioremediation strategies (32).

Utilizing L. rohita as a bioindicator, the current study aims to determine the efficiency of Acinetobacter sp. in reducing Pb accumulation in L. rohita. The primary objective of the present study was to isolate and characterize Pb-resistant bacteria from industrial effluent collected from Chokera, Faisalabad. Antioxidant enzyme profiling of isolated bacteria subjected to Pb stress was studied along with metal interaction on the surface of bacterial cells, which was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Additionally, intracellular Pb accumulation was confirmed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. This study also intends to analyze growth, hematobiochemical parameters, enzymatic activities, and histopathological alterations upon Pb accumulation in L. rohita and the role of Acinetobacter sp. in alleviating these Pb-induced deteriorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and screening of Pb-tolerant bacterial strain

Thirty-five industrial effluent samples were collected from various locations of Chokera in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Wastewater samples were collected in PVC bottles and stored at 4°C until analysis. Some physicochemical parameters of effluent samples (temperature, pH, and color) were observed at the time of sample collection. Wastewater samples were serially diluted in sterile distilled water from 10−1 to 10−3 before plating onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with 2 mM Pb(NO3)2 and incubated for 24–72 h at 37°C. Colonies with discrete morphological characteristics were selected for further study.

Evaluation of minimum inhibitory concentrations

To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (33), minimal salt medium broth composed of 1 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.05 g glucose, 0.1 g KH2PO4, 0.02 g FeSO4, 0.1 g MgSO4, 0.086 g CaCl2, and 0.15 g K2HPO4 was amended with different concentrations (0.5–35 mM) of Pb (NO3)2, AsCl3, CuSO4·5H2O, NiCl2·6H2O, and ZnSO4·7H2O. The MSM broth was inoculated with a 24-h-old bacterial culture and incubated at 37°C in a rotary shaker at 150 rpm. Each isolate exposed to a specific metal concentration was accompanied by three replicates. However, a blank was taken for every isolate. The MIC is defined as the lowest dosage that fully halts the visible growth of bacteria. The growth of bacterial isolates was assessed by measuring optical density at 600 nm.

Determination of optimum growth conditions

The parameters for optimal cultivation have been determined. To ascertain the best growth temperature, the bacterial strain PbS1A2 was cultured in a 300 mL flask with 100 mL of LB broth. The bacterial cells were subjected to various temperatures, such as 20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 37°C, 40°C, 45°C, and 50°C, over a period of 24 h. Similarly, to determine the optimal pH, Luria-Bertani broth was adjusted to different pH values (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10), inoculated with the bacterial isolate during its logarithmic growth phase, and incubated in a shaking incubator at 37°C for 24 h, and cell densities were measured at 600 nm.

The growth characteristics of bacterial isolate PbS1A2 were examined both in the presence and absence of Pb. The bacterial strains were grown in MSM broth without the presence of metal serving as a control, as well as in MSM broth medium supplemented with 2 mM Pb for the treated samples. Cell density was calculated at an optical density of 600 nm at regular intervals throughout the 24 h of incubation.

Biochemical and molecular characterization

The isolated strain PbS1A2, which has been purified, was characterized through standard biochemical tests, including catalase, oxidase, and indole tests, and morphological parameters, including shape, size, margin, motility, and elevation, according to the protocol designed by Cappuccino and Sherman (34). The molecular characterization associated with gene sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was carried out at Macrogen (South Korea). The BLAST N program was used to conduct a comparison of this sequence to other recognized sequences. The top 10 sequences were selected according to their identity scores. The sequences were aligned using ClustalW, a software program designed for multiple alignments. The strains displaying the highest similarity were selected, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by employing the MEGA X program.

Quantification of antioxidant enzymes

To evaluate the activity of antioxidant enzymes, PbS1A2 was cultured in 100 mL of MSM medium at a temperature of 37°C for a duration of 24 h. During this phase of growth, MSM medium was supplemented with 2 mM Pb and subjected to incubation. After 48 h of incubation, the culture was harvested and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, and the pellet was weighed and resuspended in phosphate buffer and sonicated. The supernatant obtained after centrifugation of sonicated pellets was used for the estimation of antioxidant enzymes.

The activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APOX) was assayed according to reference 35. Glutathione transferase (GST) activity was determined following the protocol designed by Habig et al. (33). The activities of peroxidase (POX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase were assessed by the methods of Reuveni et al., Ewing and Janero, and Beers, Jr., and Sizer (36–38), respectively.

FTIR, SEM, and EDX analysis

For FTIR analysis, bacterial samples were prepared in compliance with reference 39. In short, bacteria were grown at 37°C for 24 h with and without 2 mM Pb. After a 10-min centrifugation at 3,000 rpm, the bacterial cells were subsequently washed with a saline buffer. Bacterial pellets were then instantly freeze-dried, and their infrared spectra in the 4,000–500/cm range were recorded using an FTIR spectrophotometer. Following the guidelines in reference 40, 2 mM Pb and without Pb bacterial cultures were prepared, and suspensions were dipped on an aluminum stub and numbered. Samples were coated using a sputter coater with a gold film and observed with an energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis equipment and scanning electron microscopy (IT100LA).

Preparation of Pb-resistant strain

A Pb-resistant Acinetobacter sp. strain was cultured in nutrient broth at 37°C for 24 h to reach a concentration of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL, following the McFarland standard (41). Bacterial pellets were collected by centrifugation (4,000 × g for 10 min) and stored at 4°C for weekly experiments (42).

Acclimatization of experimental fish

Hundred clinically healthy fish (L. rohita), weighing 15–20 g and measuring 7–12 cm in length, were obtained from a local fish farm. Fish were acclimatized for 1 week in well-aerated aquaria (30 cm × 45 cm × 60 cm, 50 L capacity) with continuously monitored water quality parameters (43). They were fed a commercial diet (35% CP) at 4% body weight daily.

Experimental design

A completely randomized design was employed, dividing 72 fish into three treatment groups. To ensure statistical independence, each treatment group was established in triplicate (three independent aquaria per treatment, with eight fish per aquarium). Water was exchanged (20% daily, 100% weekly), with Pb and bacterial dosages replenished accordingly (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Different treatment groups in the experiment, each with triplicate

Group Treatment
T0 (control) + (triplicate) Fish maintained in Pb-free water
T1 (Pb-exposed) + (triplicate) Fish exposed to 1 mg/L Pb (sublethal dose)
T2 (Pb + Acinetobacter sp.) + (triplicate) Fish exposed to Pb and treated with Acinetobacter sp. (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL)

Feeding was conducted twice daily using a basal diet containing 35% crude protein, ensuring nutritional adequacy at 4% of their body weight as given in Table 2 (44).

TABLE 2.

Fish feed formulationa

Ingredient Percentage
Fish meal 28
Rice polish 16
Canola meal 19
Wheat bran 18
Rice broken 12
Fish oil 5
Vitamin premix 1
a

See reference 45.

Water quality parameters, including temperature, were measured at 24°C ± 2°C using a mercury-in-glass thermometer. On day one, the pH was roughly 6–7.5, and the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was 5–6 mg/L (46).

The physicochemical properties of the water were measured weekly, and DO levels were maintained by air pumps attached to capillaries. Water exchange and tank siphoning were performed daily, and fish health and survival were examined (43).

Growth performance and sample collection

During the 4-week trial, fish weight and length were measured fortnightly. Wt and W0 represent the final (on the 28th day) and initial weights (1st day), respectively, and t represents the duration of feeding (in days). Percent weight gain (PWG; grams per fish), specific growth rate (SGR), condition factor K, and fish survival rates were estimated (47) using the formulas below

SGR=In(Wt)−In(Wo)t×100
PWG=Wt−WoWo×100
K=Weight gainLength3×100
Survival rate=Number of fish at the end of trialNumber of fish at the start of trial ×100

Hematological and biochemical analysis

On day 30, four fish per treatment were anesthetized with clove oil (0.5 mL/L) and sacrificed. Blood samples were collected from the caudal vein using heparinized syringes and divided for hematological (WBC, RBC, Hb, and HCT) and biochemical (ALT, AST, ALP, cholesterol, urea, and creatinine) analysis using a hematology analyzer and MicroLab 300 biochemistry analyzer (48).

Histopathological examination

Three fish per treatment (each per replicate) were euthanized and dissected. The gills, spleen, liver, heart, and stomach were taken, washed, and stored in formalin. A section of formalin-fixed liver tissue was inserted in designated histology cassettes. The tissues were gradually dehydrated with increasing ethanol concentrations and then embedded in wax. Tissues were removed from wax and sectioned (about 5 µm thick) on a microtome (Histo-line MR 2258) before being mounted on albumenized glass slides. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used (49, 50). Histopathological examination was performed using a Nikon DS-Fi2 optical microscope, and representative photomicrographs were captured using an attached digital camera. Tissue evaluation was based on qualitative observations of cellular architecture and tissue integrity relative to the control group. No semi-quantitative lesion scoring system or blinded evaluation was employed; therefore, the analysis describes the observed morphological alterations and relative improvements rather than providing statistical quantification.

Enzymatic activity analysis

Sample preparation for enzyme analysis

Proteolytic and amylase activity were assessed in fish livers and digestive tracts. Tissues were homogenized in distilled water (250 mg/mL) at 4°C before centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The resultant supernatant was saved for further enzymatic investigation (51).

Protease activity assay

Proteolytic activity was measured using the casein hydrolysis method originally described by Kunitz (52) and later modified by Walter (53) over a pH range of 1.5–10.0 using specific buffer systems. Reaction mixtures containing casein, buffer, and enzyme extract were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Proteolysis was halted with 8% trichloroacetic acid, followed by chilling at 2°C and centrifugation at 1,800 × g for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 280 nm. Tyrosine was used as the standard, with one unit of activity defined as the enzyme amount releasing 1 µg of tyrosine per minute. This non-specific method was employed previously (54, 55). Total proteolytic activity was calculated by summing the enzyme activities obtained at all pH levels (56).

Amylase activity assay

Amylase activity was evaluated by starch hydrolysis using the Somogyi-Nelson colorimetric procedure. Each reaction mixture included 0.125 mL of 2% (wt/vol) starch solution, 0.125 mL of 0.1 M phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 7.5), and 0.05 mL of enzyme extract. Incubations lasted 1 h at 37°C. After incubation, the Somogyi-Nelson technique was used to assess the absorbance at 600 nm. All samples were examined in duplicate (57).

Amylase activity (U/mL)=ΔAenzyme−ΔAblankincubation time×(dilution factor)×standard factor

Standard factor = 6.5.

Pb accumulation analysis

Three fish from each treatment group (T0, T1, and T2) were euthanized and examined. Liver, muscle, and gill tissues were removed, washed, and kept at −20°C. Sample preparation followed reference 58 and FAO Technical Paper No. 212. After partially thawing the frozen samples, 1 g of composite tissue samples was digested at 100°C with 10 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 5 mL of H2O2 until clear. After cooling, the solution was diluted to 50 mL with deionized distilled water. The Pb concentration was determined using an AAS (GPC A932 version 1.1), and the findings were reported as G/g wet weight (59).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test in SPSS v27. Results are presented as mean ± SD, and graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2.

RESULTS

Sampling and screening of Pb-tolerant bacteria

Some physicochemical parameters of industrial effluent were determined at the time of sampling. It was observed that temperature varied from 22°C to 45°C, along with pH ranging from 6 to 9. A total of 40 purified isolated colonies exhibiting differences in margin, shape, elevation, along with apparent characteristics, were screened. Among the 40 purified isolates, only 15 isolates were found to have potential in the medium subjected to 2 mM Pb stress. It was found that the majority of the isolates could resist up to 12 mM. However, the isolate PbS1A2 displayed the highest MIC value, up to 30 mM. Based on Pb tolerance, PbS1A2 was chosen for further research.

Cross-metal resistance

According to the calculated minimum inhibitory concentration (33) for multiple heavy metal ions, strain PbS1A2 could survive in a wide range of ion concentrations. The PbS1A2 strain revealed that it could resist up to 30 mM Pb and is also capable of resisting other heavy metal ions, including 3 mM (Ni2+), 10 mM (Cd2+), 5 mM (Zn2+), 6 mM (Cu2+), and 8 mM (As3+). The order of resistance was Pb > Cd > As > Cu > Zn > Ni.

Biochemical and molecular characterization of bacterial isolate

Primarily, morphological and biochemical attributes were used to identify the bacterial isolate (Table 3). Based on its identification (100%) as confirmed by BLASTN analysis, the strain PbS1A2 is classified as a member of the genus Acinetobacter sp. Using the MEGA11 program, a dendrogram was generated based on similarities among various Acinetobacter sp. strains using a bootstrap value of 1,000 (Fig. 1).

TABLE 3.

Morphological and biochemical characteristics of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2

Characteristic Result
Morphological observation
 Colony color White, shiny
 Gram nature Negative
 Colony shape Round
 Edges Smooth
 Elevation Elevated
 Texture Mucoid
 Motility Non-motile
Biochemical test
 Catalase Positive
 Oxidase Negative
 DNase Negative
 Citrate Positive
 Indole Negative
 Urease Negative

Fig 1.

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of Acinetobacter sp. strain PbS1A2 with 30 homologous strains, showing bootstrap values at nodes, with PbS1A2 clustering near TMKU3 and AHM1 strains.

Phylogenetic tree of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2. The evolutionary relationship of Acinetobacter sp. was established with homologous strains. The neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap test values in MEGA11 software was used to construct the evolutionary history.

Growth conditions of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2

The optimum temperature and pH for Acinetobacter sp. were found to be 35°C–45°C and 5.0–10.0, respectively. The growth of Acinetobacter sp. was substantially decreased after 2 mM Pb stress compared to the control culture (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Line graph showing growth curves of Acinetobacter sp. measured by optical density over 48 hours. Control peaks near 1.4 at 20 hours, while Pb-treated cultures peak lower near 1.2, both declining afterward.

Growth curves of Acinetobacter sp. in MSM without Pb (control) and supplemented with 2 mM Pb (treated).

Quantification of antioxidant enzymes

The evaluation of antioxidant enzymes under Pb exposure provides particularly intriguing results. Pb presence provokes activities of all the antioxidant enzymes. A pronounced rise was observed in GST (795%), POX (229%), SOD (195%), CAT (104%), and APOX (28%) activities (Fig. 3).

Fig 3.

Bar chart showing GST activity near 900% stands highest among antioxidant enzymes in Acinetobacter PbS1A2 exposed to 2 mM Pb. POX and SOD show moderate activity; APOX remains near control levels.

Activity profile of antioxidant enzymes exhibited by Acinetobacter PbS1A2 upon exposure to 2 mM Pb, where *P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0001, and #P > 0.05.

Fourier transform infrared, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis

FTIR, SEM, and EDS/EDX spectrum of control and treated bacterial strain Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 are shown in Fig. 4. The FTIR analysis showed that the peaks of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 in metal-treated culture shifted from 1,540–1,529 and 1,055–1,060 (Fig. 4A). SEM examination revealed the alterations in cell shape after exposure to 2 mM Pb (Fig. 4B). The EDS/EDX spectrum of bacteria without Pb stress indicated specific absorption peaks of amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and phosphate groups, confirming the existence of these groups on the bacterial cell surfaces (Fig. 4C-i). Bacterial cells exposed to Pb stress showed changes in peaks; the accumulation of Pb in the cells of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 has been identified by EDX (Fig. 4C-ii).

Fig 4.

FTIR spectra show untreated Acinetobacter with peaks at 3,286, 2,933, 1,643, and 1,058 per cm, while lead-treated Acinetobacter shows reduced absorption. SEM and EDX confirm Pb peaks at 8 and 13 keV after 2 mM Pb exposure.

(A) FTIR analysis of Acinetobacter sp. and images of scanning electron microscopy (B) with energy dispersive X-ray of Acinetobacter PbS1A2 in the absence (C-i) and presence of 2 mM Pb (C-ii).

Both energy-dispersive X-ray examination and SEM analysis suggest that Pb is absorbed intracellularly.

Growth performance

Exposure to Pb appeared to be the main cause for the decline in L. rohita growth performance. The lowest values for WG (0.464 ± 0.144 g), SGR (0.009% ± 0.0002%), and final weight (14.96 ± 0.10 g) were recorded in the T1 group, which received the Pb dose. The group with the highest final weight (16.21 ± 1.24 g), maximum weight gain (1.380 ± 0.362 g), and SGR (0.049% ± 0.0014%) was the control group (T0). The growth indicators improved drastically when Pb-exposed L. rohita was remediated with Acinetobacter sp. (T2) compared with T1, with the final weight being closer to the control (15.80 ± 0.78 g). The best condition factor was observed in T0 (1.025 ± 0.012) and T2 (1.017 ± 0.009), which implies that the deviation from the normal was not as significant as it was with T1 (1.086 ± 0.015). These data confirm the effective bioremediation of the toxicological effects of Pb on fish growth with Acinetobacter sp. (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Effect of Pb bioremediated strain Acinetobacter sp. on growth performance of L. rohita during 4-week triala

Parameter Value for treatment group:
Control (T0) Pb (T1) Pb + Acinetobacter sp. (T2)
Initial weight (g) 15.53 ± 1.10a 14.75 ± 0.35cd 14.87 ± 0.29cd
Final weight (g) 16.21 ± 1.24b 14.96 ± 0.10cd 15.80 ± 0.78ab
Weight gain (WG) 1.380 ± 0.362a 0.465 ± 0.144b 0.880 ± 0.482d
SGR (%) 0.049 ± 0.0014a 0.019 ± 0.0007b 0.043 ± 0.004a
Condition factor 1.025 ± 0.012a 1.086 ± 0.015b 1.017 ± 0.009a
Survival rate (%) 95 85 98
a

SGR refers to specific growth rate. Different lowercase letters in the same column show significant differences (P < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Body composition

Significant variations were observed across several body composition parameters of L. rohita across the three treatment groups (T0, T1, and T2). The values of fish body components such as moisture (7.500 ± 0.707d), crude fat (7.500 ± 0.707b), and gross energy (439 ± 3.563b) were lowest in T1 (Pb-exposed group) compared to T0 (control) and T2 (Pb + Acinetobacter sp.). While a significant (P ≤ 0.05) recovery of these parameters (moisture, 8.500 ± 0.707a,b; crude fat, 11.500 ± 0.707a; and gross energy, 460 ± 0.629c) from Pb-induced deterioration was observed in T2. Crude protein content followed a similar trend, with T2 (14.92 ± 0.113a) showing higher values than T1 (13.96 ± 0.134b). In contrast, dry matter and nitrogen-free extract were higher in the Pb-exposed group (T1) compared to T0 and T2. As expected, the control group (T0) generally exhibited the highest values for most components, reflecting a normal physiological range. These results highlight the bioremediation potential of Acinetobacter sp. in mitigating Pb toxicity and restoring nutritional quality in L. rohita (Table 5).

TABLE 5.

Effect of Pb bioremediated strain Acinetobacter sp. on chemical body composition (means ± standard deviations) of L. rohitaa

Parameter Value for treatment group:
T0 T1 T2
Moisture (%) 9.500 ± 0.707b 7.500 ± 0.707d 8.500 ± 0.707ab
Ash (%) 85.0 ± 1.41a 84 ± 1.41a 84.5 ± 0.707a
Dry matter (%) 90.40 ± 0.400b 92.80 ± 0.200a 91.50 ± 0.707ab
Crude protein (%) 14.84 ± 0.226a 13.96 ± 0.134b 14.92 ± 0.113a
Crude fat (%) 11.000 ± 1.414a 7.500 ± 0.707b 11.500 ± 0.707a
Nitrogen-free extract (%) 64 ± 1.895a 70 ± 0.445c 65 ± 1.301a
Gross energy (Kcal g−1) 453 ± 4.242a 439 ± 3.563b 460 ± 0.629c
a

Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences among interaction means, whereas differences among means with the same lowercase letter are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05).

Digestive enzyme assay

Amylase and protease activity in L. rohita markedly decreased by Pb exposure in T1. Gut amylase decreased from 0.356 ± 0.011a U/mg in control (T0) to 0.223 ± 0.007b U/mg in Pb-exposed group (T1). Similarly, liver amylase decreased from 464 ± 0.015a in control to 303 ± 0.018b U/mg in T1. Protease activity in the liver (77.94 ± 1.49a) and gut (66.065 ± 1.25a) in control decreased to 67.81 ± 1.25b in the liver and 60.02 ± 1.44b in the gut of the Pb-exposed group (T1). Acinetobacter sp. treatment (T2) partially restored enzyme activity, with gut amylase and protease increasing to 0.312 ± 0.004c and 64.77 ± 2.22a U/mg, respectively, and liver amylase and protease increasing to 0.414 ± 0.002c and 74.24 ± 1.40a,c U/mg, respectively. These results highlight the bioremediation potential of Acinetobacter sp. in mitigating Pb-induced suppression of digestive enzyme activities in L. rohita (Table 6).

TABLE 6.

Influence of Pb bioremediated Acinetobacter sp. on amylase and protease activities of the liver and gut of L. rohita exposed to Pba

Group Gut Liver
Amylase activity
(U/mg protein)
Proteolytic activity
(U/mg protein)
Amylase activity
(U/mg protein)
Proteolytic activity
(U/mg protein)
Control (T0) 0.356 ± 0.011a 66.065 ± 1.25a 0.464 ± 0.015a 77.94 ± 1.49a
Pb (T1) 0.223 ± 0.007b 60.02 ± 1.44b 0.303 ± 0.018b 67.81 ± 1.25b
Pb + Acinetobacter sp. (T2) 0.312 ± 0.004c 64.77 ± 2.22a 0.414 ± 0.002c 74.24 ± 1.40ac
a

Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences among interaction means, whereas differences among means with the same lowercase letter are statistically non-significant (P > 0.05).

Hematological parameters

Pb exposure (T1) significantly impaired the hematological parameters of L. rohita, with reductions in Hb (10.1 ± 0.14 g/dL), RBCs (7.75 ± 0.07 × 106/µL), WBCs (4.65 ± 0.14 × 103/µL), and HCT (32.5% ± 2.12%) compared to the control group (T0). Similarly, MCV (41.94 ± 0.49 fL), monocytes (3.7 ± 0.35 × 103/µL), and eosinophils (2.5 ± 0.71 × 103/µL) were significantly lower in T1. However, bioremediation with Acinetobacter sp. (T2) resulted in marked recovery, with Hb (12 ± 0.21 g/dL), RBCs (8.5 ± 0.14 × 106/µL), WBCs (8.35 ± 0.21 × 103/µL), and HCT (39.5% ± 0.70%) approaching control levels. Improvements were also observed in MCV (46.47 ± 1.41 fL), monocytes (5.85 ± 0.21 × 103/µL), and eosinophils (3.5 ± 0.70 × 103/µL). Conversely, lymphocyte levels were reduced in T1 (18.85 ± 0.49 × 103/µL) and showed minimal recovery in T2 (19.15 ± 0.21 × 103/µL). While MCH and MCHC slightly altered across groups, T2 demonstrated improved trends. These results highlight the detrimental effects of Pb on hematological health and the partial restoration achieved through Acinetobacter sp.-mediated bioremediation (Table 7).

TABLE 7.

Effect of Pb bioremediated Acinetobacter sp. on the hematological parameters of L. rohita

Parametera Valueb for treatment group:
Control (T0) Pb (T1) Pb + Acinetobacter sp. (T2)
Hb (g dL−1) 12.4 ± 0.4242 10.1 ± 0.1414* 12 ± 0.21
RBCs (×106 µL) 9.25 ± 0.3535 7.75 ± 0.0707* 8.5 ± 0.14
WBCs (×103 µL) 6.6 ± 0.1414 4.65 ± 0.141* 8.35 ± 0.21
HCT (%) 46 ± 1.4142 32.5 ± 2.1213 39.5 ± 0.70*
MCV (fL) (60) 49.73 ± 0.636 41.94 ± 0.4949* 46.47 ± 1.414
MCH (pg) 13.41 ± 2.8991 13.03 ± 2.82 14.12 ± 1.48**
MCHC (g/dL) 26.96 ± 0.5656 31.08 ± 0.3535 30.38 ± 0.14
NEUT (%) 71 ± 0.707 67.5 ± 0.707 75 ± 1.41
LYM (%) 25.3 ± 1.20 18.85 ± 0.49 19.15 ± 0.21
Monocytes (×103/µL) 6.5 ± 0.707 3.7 ± 0.35* 5.85 ± 0.21
Eosinophils (×103/µL) 5.5 ± 0.707 2.5 ± 0.707* 3.50 ± 0.70
a

RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell; Hct, hematocrit; Hb, hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; NEUT, neutrophils; LYM, lymphocytes.

b

Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001.

Blood biochemical parameters

The blood biochemical parameters in L. rohita showed significant alteration upon Pb exposure (T1). The levels of almost all the parameters of liver function test (LFT), such as AST, ALP, and ALT, were found to be elevated in T1 and showed significant variations from the other two groups (T0 and T2). RFT of group T1 was also significantly higher. These biochemical parameters were significantly restored in T2 (Pb + Acinetobacter sp.) with LFT (AST [101 ± 0.70 U/L], ALP [1,340 ± 4.24 U/L], and ALT [160 ± 9.89 U/L]) and RFT (urea [65 ± 0.89 mg/dL] and creatinine [0.90 ± 0.00 mg/dL]) approaching control values. Lipid profile (triglycerides [372 ± 0.71 mg/dL] and cholesterol [163.5 ± 9.19 mg/dL]) also showed significant improvement, though not fully restored to control levels. HDL levels were highest in T2 (41.5 ± 2.12 mg/dL), reflecting enhanced lipid balance. These findings demonstrate the potential of Acinetobacter sp. in significantly mitigating the detrimental effects of Pb on blood biochemical parameters of L. rohita (Table 8).

TABLE 8.

Effect of Pb bioremediated Acinetobacter sp. on the blood biochemical parameters of L. rohita

Parametera Valueb for treatment group:
Control (T0) Pb (T1) Pb + Acinetobacter sp. (T2)
LFT
 AST 109.5 ± 0.707 137.5 ± 2.121* 101 ± 0.70**
 ALT 186 ± 8.485 212.5 ± 3.535** 160 ± 9.89
 ALP 883 ± 9.899 1,391 ± 15.556** 1,340 ± 4.24
RFT
 Urea 54.5 ± 0.707 94 ± 0.707** 65 ± 0.89
 Creatinine 0.85 ± 0.070 1.25 ± 0.070* 0.900 ± 0.00
Lipid profile
 Cholesterol 143.5 ± 0.707 163.5 ± 9.1923* 150 ± 0.70
 Triglyceride 129.5 ± 0.707 372 ± 0.707*** 154 ± 1.41**
 HDL 34 ± 1.41 26 ± 0.707 41.5 ± 2.12
a

HDL, high density lipoprotein; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDL, low density lipoprotein; ALT, aspartate aminotransferase; and ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

b

Values are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001.

Pb accumulation in tissues

In comparison with the control groups, L. rohita in the Pb-only group (T1) showed the highest level of Pb in the liver (0.595 ± 0.0212 µg g−1), gills (0.355 ± 0.0494 µg g−1), and muscles (0.225 ± 0.0353 µg g−1). However, treatment with Acinetobacter sp. (T2) reduced Pb accumulation in the liver (0.34 ± 0.028 µg g−1), gills (0.19 ± 0.014 µg g−1), and muscles (0.13 ± 0.028 µg g−1) compared to the T1 group. The substantial bioremediation capacity of T2 in Pb-contaminated environments was highlighted by the greatly decreased Pb accumulation (P < 0.05) in the T2 treatment groups compared to T1 (Fig. 5).

Fig 5.

Bar chart showing Pb levels in muscle, gills, and liver of L. rohita. Liver shows highest Pb accumulation in Lead group, with partial reduction after Lead plus Acinetobacter treatment.

Effect of Acinetobacter sp. on the Pb levels in tissues of L. rohita. Error bars represent the SD from the mean (n = 12).

Histopathological examinations

After 30 days of treatment, histopathological changes were observed in L. rohita gills, liver, intestine, spleen, and heart. The gills exposed to a sublethal dose (1 mg L−1) of Pb in T1 revealed degeneration of the central axis, cellular necrosis in gill filaments, and apparent hyperplasia. Gill lamellar curling, aneurysm, and epithelial lifting were also observed. In the T2 group (Pb + Acinetobacter sp.), the tissues appeared more structurally preserved compared to the maximal damage observed in the Pb group (T1). These alterations appeared less pronounced in T2 following Acinetobacter sp. treatment. These alterations were significantly (*) recovered in T2 upon Acinetobacter sp. treatment (Fig. 6). The T0 fish showed normal cardiac tissue with intact nuclei, myocardial fibers, and cardiac muscles. Pb-exposed T1 fish showed clear tissue damage, including nuclear dislocation, edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, and dilated sinusoids. In contrast, T2 fish showed improved cardiac architecture, indicating recovery from Pb-induced damage (Fig. 7). The intestine in T1 (Pb dose of 1 mg L−1) showed deterioration of the columnar epithelium, necrosis of villus tips, deformation of basement membranes, and goblet cells. While in T2, treatment with Acinetobacter sp. was associated with reduced degeneration of the intestinal tissues caused by Pb (Fig. 8). The liver revealed apparent necrosis (NC), hemolysis of hepatocytes (HPT), hepatocyte vacuolation, edema, congestion, and increased sinusoidal space in Pb-exposed fish (T1). In T2 treatment, the hepatic architecture appeared more comparable to that of the control group, with an observable reduction in necrotic markers. Both bacterial strains had normal cellular architecture (Fig. 9). Cellular infiltration, dilated cytoplasmic vacuoles, moderate necrosis, and tissue degradation were seen in the Pb-only spleen. The spleen tissues in the T2 treatment group exhibited evidence of structural restoration compared to the T1 group (Fig. 10).

Fig 6.

Histological sections show gill tissue across three groups. Normal lamellae appear in controls, while lead exposure causes hyperplasia, curling filaments, and necrosis. Acinetobacter sp. treatment reduces epithelial lifting and necrosis.

(A) The control group (T0) showed normal gill structure with primary lamellae (61) and secondary gill lamellae (SL). (B) The Pb-exposed group (T1) exhibited degeneration, hyperplasia (HP), gill bridging (46), curling filaments (CF), and cellular necrosis (CN). (C) The Pb + Acinetobacter sp. treatment group (T2) showed improved structural integrity, with reduced epithelial lifting (EL) and gill necrosis represented by an asterisk (*).

Fig 7.

Histological sections of fish heart tissue showing normal myocardial fibers in control, Pb-exposed tissue with nuclear dislocation, hemorrhage, and dilated sinusoids, and recovery of cardiac structure after treatment.

(A) T0 fish showing a normal nucleus (N), heart myocardial fiber (52), and cardiac muscle (CM). (B) T1 fish exposed to Pb showed dislocation of the nucleus (DN), edema, infiltration, thickening, necrosis, hemorrhage (HM), and dilated sinusoid (DS). (C) T2 fish showed an appearance of recovery in the normal nucleus (N), heart myocardial fiber (52), and cardiac muscle (CM). Photomicrographs were taken at 40× magnification using a light microscope. *, sign of improvement.

Fig 8.

Histological sections showing intestinal villi and lumen in controls, necrotic villi with deformed goblet cells after lead exposure, and restored mucosal and submucosal layers after Acinetobacter sp. treatment.

(A) Control group (T0) displayed normal intestinal villi (V) and lumen (L). (B) Pb-exposed group (T1) showed necrotic villi (NV) and deformed goblet cells (62). (C) Acinetobacter sp. treatment (T2) showed restoration of mucosal (M) and submucosal (SM) layers, with goblet cells appearing more intact. *, sign of improvement.

Fig 9.

Histological sections showing liver tissue across three groups. Control tissue shows normal sinusoids, while lead-exposed tissue shows necrosis and vacuolation. Acinetobacter treatment partially restores architecture.

(A) Control group (T0) displayed normal liver sinusoids, nucleus (N), and RBCs. (B) Pb-exposed group (T1) exhibited necrosis (NC), hepatocyte vacuolation (HPT), and enlarged cytoplasmic vacuoles (CV). (C) Acinetobacter sp. treatment group (T2) showed partial restoration of liver architecture, with visible improvement in RBC distribution and reduced necrosis. *, sign of improvement.

Fig 10.

Spleen histology showing normal white pulp, red pulp, and sinusoids in controls; hemorrhage, necrosis, and vacuoles after lead exposure; and structural restoration after Acinetobacter sp. treatment.

(A) Control group (T0) showed normal spleen structure with white pulp (WP), red pulp (RP) (63), and sinusoids (SN). (B) Pb-exposed group (T1) exhibited increased connective tissue, hemorrhage (BH), necrosis (NC), and vacuoles (CL). (C) The Acinetobacter sp. treatment group (T2) showed observable improvement, with restored spleen structure and reduced necrosis. *, sign of improvement.

DISCUSSION

Since industrialization and technology have developed, tremendous quantities of hazardous materials and heavy metals (such as cadmium, chromium, and lead), as well as metalloids and organic pollutants, have been released into the environment, leading to substantial damage to the ecosystem (64). Lead (62) is a non-essential metal that has been proven to be extremely harmful to people, animals, plants, and microbes. The mechanical removal of Pb2+ ions is expensive and tedious; using bacteria to accumulate Pb2+ ions might be an alternate strategy (65).

This study reports the isolation of a bacterial strain from an industrial effluent sample that is capable of resisting Pb up to 30 mM, and also exhibits tolerance to other heavy metals such as Cd2+, As3+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+. The present study is consistent with the previous study in which Pb-resistant strain of Acinetobacter was isolated from the polluted soil to check its bioremediation potential against Pb ions (66). Similarly, another study by Nil et al. (26) reported that Acinetobacter sp. HAR20 displayed resistance against multiple heavy metals such as Pb, Fe, Cu, Ni, Zn, and Cd up to 600, 300, 200, 150, 100, and 5 mg L−1, respectively.

As Pb stress induces reactive oxygen species (1), such as superoxide radicals, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide, which trigger oxidative damage and cell death, it has an immense impact on microbial antioxidant systems (67). While ROS interact with biomolecules, it leads to lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation, and DNA mutation, all of which are toxic to cells (61). The bacteria produce an array of enzymes, notably ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione transferase, and superoxide dismutase, to combat oxidative stress (68).

Antioxidant enzyme activities in the presence of lead were found in the current study and are displayed in Fig. 3. The antioxidant enzyme profile of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 with and without 2 mM Pb stress revealed captivating results. Pb presence provoked activities of all the antioxidant enzymes. A pronounced rise was observed in GST (795%), POX (229%), SOD (195%), CAT (104%), and APOX (28%) activities.

Peroxidases are also considered stress enzymes, as their production can be affected by various environmental stress factors, such as metal ion stress from elements, including Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu, drought, water, and gamma-radiation stress along with water stress, drought, and gamma radiation (69).

The current results are in association with Elahi et al. (70), who confirmed the significant rise in the production of all antioxidant enzymes under Cr stress. Our results are in good agreement with the findings of Zafar et al. (71), who also noted that Pb stress induces a profound increase in SOD, GST, and APOX. Another study by Bhadekar (72) stated higher production of superoxide dismutase under Pb stress, whereas Zafar et al. (71) demonstrated higher production of SOD and APOX under Cd stress.

The occurrence of functional chains on the active site of the cell wall is essential for biosorption caused by the nonspecific adhesion of Pb+ on the bacterial strain’s cell surface. FTIR analysis of Acinetobacter sp. PbS1A2 without Pb stress indicated specific absorption patterns of amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and phosphate groups, confirming the existence of the appropriate groups on the bacterial cell surfaces. In contrast, when exposed to Pb stress, visible changes in the peaks at 3,286–2,933 cm−1 and 1,700–1,000 cm−1 were observed. These findings are consistent with a previous study by Zafar et al. (71), who reported changes in functional groups after exposure to Pb (73).

The infrared peaks found between 3,450 and 3,200 cm−1 are distinctive for single bond NH group moieties on the cell surface and hydroxyl groups (74). The distinctive peaks for polysaccharides correlate to the broad bands at 1,100 and 1,000 cm−1 (75). Orthophosphate has been identified in the typical band area at 1,100 and 1,030 (PO43−). However, C-N stretching can also be seen at the same wavelength in the absorption spectrum, ranging from 1,350 to 1,000 cm−1 (76). SEM/EDX analysis was used to assess the Pb accumulation inside Acinetobacter sp. cells. During exposure to 2 mM Pb, Acinetobacter sp. cells exhibited alterations in shape, which were identified by SEM analysis and verified by EDX. These results are parallel with the findings of Zafar et al. (71), who reported alterations in morphology after exposure to 2 mM Pb.

Pb exposure is a well-documented stressor for fish, causing metabolic stress and impaired respiration, affecting growth through reduced food intake (77). Our findings provide credence to this, demonstrating that fish exposed to Pb (T1) exhibited reduced weight, length, SGR, and CF. This is consistent with reference 78, which showed the detrimental effects of Pb (NO3)2 in Cyprinus carpio, resulting in behavioral abnormalities, such as altered feeding and swimming behaviors, that further impede growth. The prominent decrement in CF in T1 further indicates a decline in the overall health of Pb-exposed fish. Our research demonstrates the potential of Acinetobacter sp. supplementation (T2) to reduce these harmful effects. When L. rohita was treated with Acinetobacter sp. (T2), its growth characteristics were noticeably better than those of the T1 group. Acinetobacter sp. may mitigate heavy metal toxicity in farmed fish as previously proposed by Giri et al. (79) by decreasing metal intake, boosting detoxification, and enhancing the fish’s general physiological state. This beneficial effect is explained by the bacterium’s capacity to improve food absorption and decrease Pb bioavailability (80). This work supports the well-established hypothesis that microbes may eliminate heavy metal contamination from the environment. According to a previous study by Abbasi et al. (78), an isolated strain of Bacillus sp. removed over 80% of the Pb from a growth medium. Similarly, Bacillus coagulans and Lactobacillus lactis were also reported to improve fish growth in metal-exposed environments (44, 79), proposing that a number of probiotics and isolated bacteria have been shown to promote gut health, restore fish growth, lower oxidative stress, and bind and excrete metals to prevent heavy metal toxicity in aquaculture.

Fish exposed to Pb have a lower crude protein, fat, and ash content, which are probably caused by oxidative stress and metabolic disturbance (81). Our results corroborate this by showing a prominent decline in these parameters in Pb-exposed L. rohita. Other fish species have also shown comparable detrimental effects of Pb on body composition (82). For instance, Dawood et al. (83) reported that heavy metal exposure in fish led to intestinal damage, such as histological changes, hemorrhage, and vacuolar degeneration, which impaired nutrient absorption, lowering the body composition. Supplementing with Acinetobacter sp., however, reversed these adverse effects and improved the body composition of Pb-exposed L. rohita. This study aligns with the previous research of Eissa et al. (84), who demonstrated that bacterial bioremediation can significantly lower Pb uptake and restore body composition in fish exposed to heavy metals. The study by Opiyo et al. (85) also demonstrated similar results, showing that inclusion of probiotics like Bacillus subtilis significantly increased the protein content, suppressed the crude lipid content, and enhanced the body composition of treated fish. Some Bacillus species are also involved in the synthesis of digestive enzymes, antimicrobial compounds, and immunological activation, improving digestion and nutritional absorption in the gut (86). According to the consensus, some bacteria release enzymes like protease that aid in the digestion of proteins and absorption of nutrients (87). Consequently, T2 results conclude that Acinetobacter sp. may also function similarly to these beneficial bacteria, enhancing protein content and general body composition, thereby reducing the harmful effects of Pb.

Substantial decline in the activity of digestive enzymes such as amylase and protease was detected in L. rohita upon Pb exposure (T1). These enzymes are crucial for the digestion of carbohydrates and proteins. In the past, Kumar et al. (88) have documented a similar decline in enzyme activity in fish under Pb-induced stress. Pb interferes with enzyme synthesis and activity, potentially through oxidative stress and competition for metal ion binding sites (89). This decline observed in our study reflects a wide range of digestive enzyme impairment caused by Pb in L. rohita. Our findings are also confirmed by Zafar et al. (90, 91), who reported that heavy metal exposure lowers protease and amylase activities in fish, illustrating the complex effects of heavy metals on digestive processes. The results showed that treating Pb-exposed L. rohita with Acinetobacter sp. significantly boosted the activity of digestive enzymes. The results of the current investigation are consistent with earlier research by Giri et al. (42), who showed the advantages of bacterial treatments for reestablishing the function of digestive enzymes in fish exposed to heavy metals. Additionally, Wagh et al. (92) proposed that bacteria may be able to increase nutrient absorption by Pb detoxification, thereby enhancing the antioxidant enzymatic activities. In addition to enzyme activity, bacterial treatments have also been shown to improve overall digestive morphology, highlighting their positive influence on fish digestive health (86).

This study opens up new research directions and possible applications in aquaculture and environmental management by proving that Acinetobacter sp. is efficient against Pb-induced digestive dysfunction.

In the current investigation, the liver accumulates the highest level of Pb, followed by gills and muscles. This accumulation pattern coincides with the study of Adhikary et al. (93), who demonstrated the liver as a primary heavy metal accumulation site due to its metabolic activity. The liver’s functions of detoxification, metabolism, storage, and redistribution contribute to this accumulation (94). According to recent findings, Pb accumulation in all L. rohita tissues significantly decreased in the group that was bioremediated with Acinetobacter sp. Acinetobacter haemolyticus was another potential bioremediator investigated by Kumar and Singh (23) for the in vitro removal of cadmium. Bacteria such as Aeromonas sobria (95), Gemella sp. (96), Pseudomonas putida, and Pseudomonas fluorescens (97) all demonstrated a notable in vitro heavy metal bioremediation potential. However, the utilization of particular bacterial species, such as Bacillus and Arthrobacter, represents another promising approach for mitigating heavy metal toxicity in fish (98). FTIR, SEM, and EDX analyses confirmed Pb adsorption via phosphate, carboxyl, and amide groups and intracellular Pb accumulation, indicating Klebsiella pneumoniae as a promising candidate for industrial effluent bioremediation (15). These bacteria have been shown to enhance health and reduce heavy metal accumulation in fish organs (63). In a similar study, Zhai et al. (99) found that Lactobacillus plantarum reduced Pb-induced oxidative stress in Oreochromis niloticus by decreasing Pb accumulation in fish tissues. These findings imply that numerous bacterial strains are useful tools for countering heavy metal accumulation in fish.

The hematological parameters of L. rohita, such as RBC, WBC, Hb, and HCT, were found to be notably reduced due to Pb. It matches the Pb-induced anemia and immune suppression previously reported by Abbasi et al. (78) in common carp. A comparable reduction in RBC and HCT was noted with elevated levels of chromium poisoning in L. rohita as reported by Chaudhary et al. (32). The decrease in hematocrit noted in our research might stem from hemodilution caused by an osmoregulatory imbalance, as indicated by Chaudhary et al. (32). On the other hand, treatment with Acinetobacter sp. markedly attenuated these Pb-induced hematological changes in L. rohita. In a study, Yin et al. (100) discovered that dietary B. subtilis administration efficiently protects the immune system of Pb-exposed fish through the normalization of hematological parameters and restoration of δ-ALAD levels. All these results corroborate with our results and consequently suggest that Acinetobacter sp. may be used as a protective agent in the treatment of invasive Pb damage in fish hematology.

Elevated blood biochemical markers (urea, creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, cholesterol, and LDL) observed in Pb-exposed L. rohita in the current study are indicative of metabolic disturbances and organ damage observed in Potamotrygon magdalenae (101). Similar alterations were previously observed with chromium exposure on the same species (L. rohita) reported by Ray et al. (90). These findings are in line with the findings of Reda et al. (102), who demonstrated that O. niloticus exposed to a mixture of Pb, Hg, and pendimethalin showed comparable increases in serum creatinine, urea, and liver enzymes.

These Pb-induced biochemical alterations were dramatically reversed by Acinetobacter sp. treatment, returning biochemical levels to normal. This is consistent with research by El-Kady et al. (103), who demonstrated that bacterial treatments improve certain fish parameters exposed to metals. Together, our results demonstrate how bioremediation and other mitigation techniques can abate the harmful impacts of heavy metals on fish biochemical profiles.

Histopathological alterations such as gill filament degeneration, intestinal atrophy, liver necrosis, cardiac muscle congestion, and spleen tissue necrosis were observed in the Pb-exposed group. These histopathological deteriorations align with prior findings of Mahi et al. (82), who reported dose-dependent alterations in tilapia, including gill lamellar, intestinal villus disintegration, and vacuolization. Additionally, Ali et al. (3) reported hypertrophy and epithelial necrosis in the gills, tubular damage, hepatocyte degeneration, and necrosis in the liver. While this study employed qualitative histopathological assessment rather than semi-quantitative scoring, Acinetobacter sp. reversed Pb-induced histopathological damage in L. rohita by displaying improvements in the morphological structures of the intestine, liver, and gill tissues, as well as decreased Pb accumulation. These improvements are consistent with the findings of Zannat et al. (98), who showed that different probiotic bacterial strains can mitigate these heavy metal-induced histopathological abnormalities. This suggests that Acinetobacter sp. can overcome the harmful effects of Pb on fish. Numerous bacteria, including Lactobacillus reuteri and B. coagulans, have been shown to remediate Pb buildup in fish tissues, further validating our findings (42, 104). These results imply that Acinetobacter sp. may be an advantageous bioremediation technique to lower Pb bioavailability and enhance fish health in contaminated areas, although the exact mechanisms by which this bacterium functions require further investigation. Future studies utilizing standardized lesion scoring systems will be necessary to provide a quantitative validation of these histological improvements.

Conclusion

In the current study, the optimum temperature and pH for Acinetobacter sp. were found to be 35°C–45°C and 5.0–10.0, respectively. The PbS1A2 strain could resist up to 30 mM Pb and other heavy metals.

This study reports a clear increase in GST (795%), POX (229%), SOD (195%), CAT (104%), and APOX (28%) activities. Additionally, this research also investigates the bioremedial potential of Acinetobacter sp. for reducing Pb toxicity in L. rohita. Fish subjected to a sublethal concentration of Pb (1 mg/L) in T1 demonstrated considerable physiological and health-related issues. These included diminished survival rates, inhibited growth, changes in body composition, decreased activity of digestive enzymes, alterations in hematological and biochemical profiles, as well as histological damage. However, introducing Acinetobacter sp. at a concentration of 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL (T2) significantly improved these effects. Improved survival rates, increased growth performance, restored body composition and digestive enzyme function, and minimized Pb-induced hematological, biochemical, and histological damage were observed in T2.

These findings suggest that Acinetobacter sp. reduced Pb bioavailability, thereby facilitating the recovery of L. rohita under the experimental conditions of this study. Therefore, Acinetobacter sp. may serve as a potential candidate for the bioremediation of Pb-contaminated aquatic systems. However, further studies are required to elucidate its underlying mechanisms and evaluate its biosafety, long-term effects, and field applicability before practical implementation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

S.Z. and A.A. conducted the experimental work and collected the data. S.F. performed microbial isolation and characterization. F.A. assisted in biochemical and histopathological analyses. K.A. and M.H. conceived the study and supervised the project. S.Z. and A.A. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. M.H. and K.A. revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Contributor Information

Mudassir Hassan, Email: mudassir.hassan@bgnu.edu.pk.

Marina Lotti, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The study was conducted under the ethical approval of AEC GCUF (Ref. no. GCUF/ERC/2068. Study no. 19669, IRB no. 669 5-7-2023).

DATA AVAILABILITY

The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from strain PbS1A2 has been deposted in the NCBI GenBank database under accession. no. OP984811.1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Levin R, Zilli Vieira CL, Rosenbaum MH, Bischoff K, Mordarski DC, Brown MJ. 2021. The urban lead (Pb) burden in humans, animals and the natural environment. Environ Res 193:110377. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Adewumi AJ, Ogundele OD. 2024. Hidden hazards in urban soils: ameta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its ecological and health consequences. Sustainable Environment 10:2293239. doi: 10.1080/27658511.2023.2293239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ali S, Naseer S, Rehman M, Wei Z. 2024. Recent trends and sources of lead toxicity: a review of state-of-the-art nano-remediation strategies. J Nanopart Res 26:168. doi: 10.1007/s11051-024-06081-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zafar S, Fatima S, Asad F, Nazir MM, Batool S, Ashraf A. 2025. Combating Lead (Pb) contamination: integrating biomonitoring, advanced detection, and remediation for environmental and public health. Water Air Soil Pollut 236:8. doi: 10.1007/s11270-024-07646-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M. 2021. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol 12:643972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Moiseenko TI, Gashkina NA. 2020. Distribution and bioaccumulation of heavy metals (Hg, Cd and Pb) in fish: influence of the aquatic environment and climate. Environ Res Lett 15:115013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abbf7c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shahjahan M, Taslima K, Rahman MS, Al-Emran M, Alam SI, Faggio C. 2022. Effects of heavy metals on fish physiology - a review. Chemosphere 300:134519. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Selamoglu Talas Z, Pinar Dundar S, Fuat Gulhan M, Orun I, SJIJoFS K. 2012. Effects of propolis on some blood parameters and enzymes in carp exposed to arsenic. Iran J Fish Sci 11:405–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Orun I, Talas ZS, Ozdemir I, Alkan A, Erdogan KJE, Safety E. 2008. Antioxidative role of selenium on some tissues of (Cd2+), Cr3+)-induced rainbow trout. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ates B, Orun I, Talas ZS, Durmaz G, Yilmaz I. 2008. Effects of sodium selenite on some biochemical and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum, 1792) exposed to Pb2+ and Cu2+. Fish Physiol Biochem 34:53–59. doi: 10.1007/s10695-007-9146-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Talas Z, Gulhan M, Erdogan K, Orun I. 2014. Antioxidant effects of propolis on carp Cyprinus carpio exposed to arsenic: biochemical and histopathologic findings. Dis Aquat Org 108:241–249. doi: 10.3354/dao02714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fuat Gulhan M, Duran A, Selamoglu Talas Z, Kakoolaki S, SJIJoFS M. 2012. Effects of propolis on microbiologic and biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after exposure to the pesticide. Iran J Fish Sci 11:490–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Caglar M, Canpolat O, ZJIJoFS S. 2019. Determination of some heavy metal levels in three freshwater fish in Keban Dam Lake (Turkey) for public consumption. Iran J Fish Sci 18:188–198. doi: 10.22092/ijfs.2018.117890 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Selamoglu M. 2021. The effects of the Ports and water transportation on the Aquatic ecosystem. JBGSR 10:2021. doi: 10.46718/JBGSR.2021.10.000239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zafar S, Ashraf A, Asad F, Muzammil S, Ahmad K, Sultana S, Tutar Y, Batool S, Hassan M. 2025. Exploring the bioremediation potential of nonpathogenic Pb-resistant strain Klebsiella pneumoniae in Oreochromis niloticus. Bioremediat J:1–15. doi: 10.1080/10889868.2025.2503454 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rong Y, Yan W, Wang Z, Hao X, Guan G. 2022. An electroactive montmorillonite/polypyrrole ion exchange film: ultrahigh uptake capacity and ion selectivity for rapid removal of lead ions. J Hazard Mater 437:129366. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Xiao C, Guo S, Wang Q, Chi R. 2021. Enhanced reduction of lead bioavailability in phosphate mining wasteland soil by a phosphate-solubilizing strain of Pseudomonas sp., LA, coupled with ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and sonchus (Sonchus oleraceus L.). Environ Pollut 274:116572. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Paria K, Pyne S, Chakraborty SK. 2022. Optimization of heavy metal (lead) remedial activities of fungi Aspergillus penicillioides (F12) through extra cellular polymeric substances. Chemosphere 286:131874. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Xie D, Li Y, Liu Z, Chen Q. 2019. Inhibitory effect of cadmium exposure on digestive activity, antioxidant capacity and immune defense in the intestine of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). Compar Biochem Physiol 222:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gul I, Adil M, Lv F, Li T, Chen Y, Lu H, Ahamad MI, Lu S, Feng W. 2024. Microbial strategies for lead remediation in agricultural soils and wastewater: mechanisms, applications, and future directions. Front Microbiol 15:1434921. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1434921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hu X, Yu C, Shi J, He B, Wang X, Ma Z. 2024. Biomineralization mechanism and remediation of Cu, Pb and Zn by indigenous ureolytic bacteria B. intermedia TSBOI. J Clean Prod 436:140508. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140508 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gangwar S, Tripathi V, Verma OP. 2024. Isolation and characterization of heavy metal-tolerant bacterial isolates from industrial effluents in Uttar Pradesh, India. IJECC 14:301–312. doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i44118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kumar K, Singh D. 2024. Bioremediation potential of cadmium-resistant bacteria isolated from water samples of rivulet Holy Kali Bein, Punjab, India. Bioremediat J 28:399–420. doi: 10.1080/10889868.2023.2281450 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pal A, Bhattacharjee S, Saha J, Sarkar M, Mandal P. 2022. Bacterial survival strategies and responses under heavy metal stress: a comprehensive overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 48:327–355. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1970512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Shan B, Hao R, Zhang J, Li J, Ye Y, Lu A. 2023. Microbial remediation mechanisms and applications for lead-contaminated environments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39:38. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03484-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nil S, Abi-Ayad S-M-A. 2024. Biodegradation of used engine oil by lead-resistant bacteria Acinetobacter sp.HAR20 newly isolated from harbour seawater (Oran, Algeria). Environ Technol 45:5912–5927. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2024.2311084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wang S, Hu Y, Wang J. 2018. Biodegradation of typical pharmaceutical compounds by a novel strain Acinetobacter sp. J Environ Manage 217:240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pirog TP, Lutsai DA, Muchnyk FV. 2021. Biotechnological potential of the acinetobacter genus bacteria. Mikrobiol Z 83:92–109. doi: 10.15407/microbiolj83.03.092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jung J, Park W. 2015. Acinetobacter species as model microorganisms in environmental microbiology: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2533–2548. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6439-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Islam G, Abbas F, Hafeez-ur-Rehman M, Ashraf M. 2021. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and their effect on vital organs of Labeo rohita in PONDS and natural water bodies. JAPS 31. doi: 10.36899/JAPS.2021.1.0213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ejaz A, Ullah S, Ijaz S, Bilal M, Banaee M, Mosotto C, Faggio C. 2024. Bioaccumulation and health risk assessment of heavy metals in Labeo rohita and Mystus seenghala from Jhelum River, Punjab, Pakistan. Water (Basel) 16:2994. doi: 10.3390/w16202994 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chaudhary A, Javaid K gul, Bughio E, Faisal N. 2023. Study on histo-biochemical biomarkers of chromium induced toxicity in Labeo rohita. Emerging Contaminants 9:100204. doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. 1974. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 249:7130–7139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. 2005. Microbiology: a laboratory manual. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings; San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Israr M, Sahi SV, Jain J. 2006. Cadmium accumulation and antioxidative responses in the Sesbania drummondii callus. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:121–127. doi: 10.1007/s00244-005-5029-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Reuveni R, Shimoni M, Karchi Z, Kuc J. 1992. Peroxidase activity as a biochemical marker for resistance of muskmelon(Cucumis melo) to Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Phytopathology 82:749. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-82-749 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ewing JF, Janero DR. 1995. Microplate superoxide dismutase assay employing a nonenzymatic superoxide generator. Anal Biochem 232:243–248. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.0014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. BEERS RF Jr, SIZER IW. 1952. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem 195:133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Deokar AR, Lin L-Y, Chang C-C, Ling Y-C. 2013. Single-walled carbon nanotube coated antibacterial paper: preparation and mechanistic study. J Mater Chem B 1:2639–2646. doi: 10.1039/c3tb20188k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Khan Z, Rehman A, Hussain SZ, Nisar MA, Zulfiqar S, Shakoori AR. 2016. Cadmium resistance and uptake by bacterium, Salmonella enterica 43C, isolated from industrial effluent. AMB Express 6:54. doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0225-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Aryal S. 2021. McFarland standards-principle, preparation, uses, limitations. Microbe Notes. Available from: https://microbenotes.com/mcfarland-standards/. Retrieved 16 Jun 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Giri SS, Yun S, Jun JW, Kim HJ, Kim SG, Kang JW, Kim SW, Han SJ, Sukumaran V, Park SC. 2018. Therapeutic effect of intestinal autochthonous Lactobacillus reuteri P16 against waterborne lead toxicity in Cyprinus carpio. Front Immunol 9:1824. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Association APH, Association AWW, Federation WPC, Federation WE . 1917. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Vol. 3. American Public Health Association. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kakade A, Salama E-S, Usman M, Arif M, Feng P, Li X. 2022. Dietary application of Lactococcus lactis alleviates toxicity and regulates gut microbiota in Cyprinus carpio on exposure to heavy metals mixture. Fish Shellfish Immunol 120:190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.11.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lovell R. 1991. Foods from aquaculture. Food Technol 45:87–92. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1991.45.s1.87 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Olajuyigbe FM, Adeleye OA, Kolawole AO, Bolarinwa TO, Fasakin EA, Asenuga ER, Ajele JO. 2020. Bioremediation treatment improves water quality for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under crude oil pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:25689–25702. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09020-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. BROWN ME. 1957. Experimental studies on growth, p 361–400. In The physiology of fishes [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hudaya MF, Sitaresmi PI, Noviandi CT, Widyobroto BP, Widayati DT. 2020. Behavior and blood profile in Friesian-Holstein dairy cows in the special region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. J Anim Behav Biometeorol 8:244–249. doi: 10.31893/jabb.20032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Iqbal F, Qureshi IZ, Ali M. 2005. Histopathological changes in the liver of a farmed cyprinid fish, Cyprinus carpio, following exposure to nitrate. Pak J Zool 37:297–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kakadia NP, Amin MA, Deshpande SS. 2020. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effect of Adiantum lunulatum Burm. F. leaf in alcohol-induced rat model. J Complement Integr Med 17:20180063. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2018-0063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hidalgo DA, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y. 1998. A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:722–732; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kunitz M. 1947. Crystalline soybean trypsin inhibitor II. General properties. J Gen Physiol 30:291–310. doi: 10.1085/jgp.30.4.291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Walter H. 1984. Proteases and their inhibitors. 2. 15. 2 method with haemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrate, p 270–277. In Methods of enzymatic analysis [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Clark J, MacDonald NL, Stark JR. 1985. Metabolism in marine flatfish. II. Protein digestion in Dover sole (Solea solea L.). Comp Biochem Physiol B 81:217–222. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(85)90186-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Uys W, Hecht T. 1987. Assays on the digestive enzymes of sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Pisces: Clariidae). Aquaculture 63:301–313. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(87)90080-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Munilla-Moran R, Stark JR. 1989. Protein digestion in early turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus (L.). Aquaculture 81:315–327. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(89)90156-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Robyt J, Whelan W. 1968. The β-amylases, p 477–497. In Starch and its derivates. Academic press, London. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Howell R. 1984. Manual of methods in aquatic environment research. Part 9. Analyses of metals and organochlorines in fish. Mar Pollut Bull 15:235. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(84)90298-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ghosh A, Ali S, Mukherjee SK, Saha S, Kaviraj A. 2020. Bioremediation of copper and nickel from freshwater fish cyprinus carpio using rhiozoplane bacteria isolated from Pistia stratiotes. Environ Process 7:443–461. doi: 10.1007/s40710-020-00436-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Viana LF, Cardoso CAL, Lima-Junior SE, Súarez YR, Florentino AC. 2020. Bioaccumulation of metal in liver tissue of fish in response to water toxicity of the Araguari-Amazon River, Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 192:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08696-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Juan CA, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. 2021. The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, Lipids and Proteins) and induced pathologies. Int J Mol Sci 22:4642. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chapman DG, Castillo R, Campbell JA. 1959. Evaluation of protein in foods. I. A method for the determination of protein efficiency ratios. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:679–686. doi: 10.1139/y59-074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Mohammadian T, Ghanei-Motlagh R, Jalali M, Nasirpour M, Mohtashamipour H, Osroush E, Nejad AJ. 2022. Protective effects of non-encapsulated and microencapsulated Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to lead (Pb) via diet. Annals of Animal Science 22:325–348. doi: 10.2478/aoas-2021-0026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ali A, Alghanem SMS, Al-Haithloul HAS, Muzammil S, Adrees M, Irfan E, Waseem M, Anayat A, Saqalein M, Rizwan M, Ali S, Abeed AHA. 2023. Co-application of copper nanoparticles and metal tolerant Bacillus sp. for improving growth of spinach plants in chromium contaminated soil. Chemosphere 345:140495. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Tiquia-Arashiro SM. 2018. Lead absorption mechanisms in bacteria as strategies for lead bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:5437–5444. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8969-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Alhashimi ISM, Abdul-Jabbar RA, Issa SK. 2023. The ability of Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolated from soil removes heavy elements (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni). Mater Today 80:2448–2457. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.382 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Unsal V, Dalkıran T, Çiçek M, Kölükçü E. 2020. The role of natural antioxidants against reactive oxygen species produced by cadmium toxicity: a review. Adv Pharm Bull 10:184–202. doi: 10.34172/apb.2020.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ishtiyaq S, Kumar H, Varun M, Ogunkunle CO, Paul MS. 2021. Role of secondary metabolites in salt and heavy metal stress mitigation by halophytic plants: an overview, p 307–327. In Handbook of bioremediation [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Khalid AH, Jin HJ. 2013. Heavy metal resistance of bacteria and its impact on the production of antioxidant enzymes. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:2288–2296. doi: 10.5897/AJMR12.1764 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Elahi A, Rehman A, Zajif Hussain S, Zulfiqar S, Shakoori AR. 2022. Isolation and characterization of a highly effective bacterium Bacillus cereus b-525k for hexavalent chromium detoxification. Saudi J Biol Sci 29:2878–2885. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zafar S, Ashraf A, Hayat S, Siddique MH, Waseem M, Hassan M, Qaisar H, Muzammil S. 2024. Isolation and characterization of novel cadmium-resistant Escherichia fergusonii ZSF-15 from industrial effluent for flocculant production and antioxidant enzyme activity. Environ Monit Assess 196:412. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12545-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Bhadekar A. 2018. Protein profiling and antioxidant enzyme activity of cadmium and lead tolerant Kocuria sp. BRI 36. Int J Appl Eng Res 13:8357–8363. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zafar S, Muzammil S, Asad F, Ashraf A. 2025. Multiple metal resistance and antioxidant enzyme production by Klebsiella pneumoniae PbS3A2 isolated from industrial effluent. Int J Environ Sci Technol 22:787–796. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-05706-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Park D, Yun Y-S, Park JM. 2005. Studies on hexavalent chromium biosorption by chemically-treated biomass of Ecklonia sp. Chemosphere 60:1356–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Das SK, Guha AK. 2007. Biosorption of chromium by Termitomyces clypeatus. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 60:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Mungasavalli DP, Viraraghavan T, Jin Y-C. 2007. Biosorption of chromium from aqueous solutions by pretreated Aspergillus niger: batch and column studies. Colloids Surfaces 301:214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Malik IR, Nayyab S, Mirza MR, Muzammil S, Cheema JS, Imran K, Nisar K, Hayat S, Javed M. 2024. Characterization and identification of bioactive natural products in the ethanol extracts of Acacia nilotica, Melia azedarach, and Euphorbia hirta from Cholistan desert, Pakistan. Asian J Agric Biol 2:2023180. doi: 10.35495/ajab.2023.180 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Abbasi, M, Khan I, Rehman A, Hayat A, Ur Rehman M, Shah TA, Khan AA, Ul Haq T, Aziz T, Alharbi M, Alasmari AF, Albekairi TH. 2024. Bioremediation of heavy metals contaminated soil by using Indigenous metallotolerant bacterial isolates. Appl Ecol Env Res 22:1623–1648. doi: 10.15666/aeer/2202_16231648 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Giri SS, Kim HJ, Jung WJ, Bin Lee S, Joo SJ, Gupta SK, Park SC. 2024. Probiotics in addressing heavy metal toxicities in fish farming: current progress and perspective. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 282:116755. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Sharma M, Thakur J, Verma S, Sharma P. 2019. Behavioural responses in effect to chemical stress in fish: A review. Int J Fish Aquat Stud 7:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Gupta VK, Singh S, Agrawal A, Siddiqi NJ, Sharma B. 2015. Phytochemicals mediated remediation of neurotoxicity induced by heavy metals. Biochem Res Int 2015:534769. doi: 10.1155/2015/534769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Mahi TF, Chowdhury G, Hossain MA, Baishnab AK, Schneider P, Iqbal MM. 2022. Assessment of Lead (Pb) toxicity in juvenile nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus-growth, behaviour, erythrocytes abnormalities, and histological alterations in vital organs. Toxics 10:793. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Dawood MAO, Gewaily MS, Sewilam H. 2022. The growth performance, antioxidative capacity, and histological features of intestines, gills, and livers of Nile tilapia reared in different water salinities and fed menthol essential oil. Aquaculture 554:738122. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738122 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Eissa E-S, Baghdady ES, Gaafar AY, El-Badawi AA, Bazina WK, Abd Al-Kareem OM, Abd El-Hamed NN. 2022. Assessing the influence of dietary Pediococcus acidilactici probiotic supplementation in the feed of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.)(Linnaeus, 1758) on farm water quality, growth, feed utilization, survival rate, body composition, blood biochemical parameters, and intestinal histology. Aquac Nutr 2022:5841220. doi: 10.1155/2022/5841220 [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Opiyo MA, Jumbe J, Ngugi CC, Charo-Karisa H. 2019. Different levels of probiotics affect growth, survival and body composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in low input ponds. Scientific African 4:e00103. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. James G, Das BC, Jose S, V.j RK. 2021. Bacillus as an aquaculture friendly microbe. Aquacult Int 29:323–353. doi: 10.1007/s10499-020-00630-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Abdel-Latif HMR, Chaklader MR, Shukry M, Ahmed HA, Khallaf MA. 2023. A multispecies probiotic modulates growth, digestive enzymes, immunity, hepatic antioxidant activity, and disease resistance of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus fingerlings. Aquaculture 563:738948. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738948 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Kumar M, Pakshirajan K. 2020. Novel insights into mechanism of biometal recovery from wastewater by sulfate reduction and its application in pollutant removal. Environ Tech Innov 17:100542. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100542 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Sweety RR, Mathan R, Kenneth SS, Kurunthachalam SK. 2008. Influence of zinc on cadmium induced haematological and biochemical responses in a freshwater teleost fish Catla catla. Fish Physiol Biochem 2:169–174. doi: 10.1007/s10695-007-9157-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ray A, Mondal D, Chakraborty N, Ganguly S. 2025. Toxicity effects of hexavalent chromium on hematological, biochemical and digestive enzyme profiles of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822). Ecotoxicology 34:76–88. doi: 10.1007/s10646-024-02815-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Zafar S, Fatima S, Muzammil S, Asad F, Hassan M, Waseem M, Ashraf A. 2025. Bioremediation of lead contaminated aquatic environment using non-pathogenic strain Klebsiella pneumoniae PbS3A2 in Labeo rohita. Int J Environ Sci Technol 22:12977–12990. doi: 10.1007/s13762-025-06435-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Wagh MS, Osborne WJ, Sivarajan S. 2023. Toxicity assessment of lead, nickel and cadmium on zebra fish augmented with Bacillus xiamenensis VITMSJ3: an insight on the defense mechanism against oxidative stress due to heavy metals. Food Chem Toxicol 177:113830. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Adhikary J, Maity A, Das BK, Ghosh S, Pal P. 2019. Accumulation of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in tissues of rohu fish (Labeo rohita) collected from the sewage-fed pond of Kolkata. J Entomol Zool Stud 7:146–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Habib SS, Maqaddas S, Fazio F, El Amouri R, Shaikh GS, Rahim A, Khan K, Ullah J, Mohany M, Parrino V, Al-Emam A. 2024. Evaluation of lead exposure effects on tissue accumulation, behavior, morphological and hemato-biochemical changes in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. J Trace Elem Med Biol 86:127523. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Qurbani K, Khdir K, Sidiq A, Hamzah H, Hussein S, Hamad Z, Abdulla R, Abdulla B, Azizi Z. 2022. Aeromonas sobria as a potential candidate for bioremediation of heavy metal from contaminated environments. Sci Rep 12:21235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25781-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Naveed M, Naveed R, Aziz T, Azeem A, Afzal M, Waseem M, Alharbi M, Alshammari A, Alasmari AF, Albekairi TH. 2024. Biodegradation of PVCs through in-vitro identification of Bacillus albus and computational pathway analysis of ABH enzyme. Biodegradation 35:451–468. doi: 10.1007/s10532-023-10064-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Kalaimurugan D, Balamuralikrishnan B, Durairaj K, Vasudhevan P, Shivakumar MS, Kaul T, Chang SW, Ravindran B, Venkatesan S. 2020. Isolation and characterization of heavy-metal-resistant bacteria and their applications in environmental bioremediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:1455–1462. doi: 10.1007/s13762-019-02563-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Zannat MM, Islam N, Rayhan MA, Imran AA, Nibir SS, Satter A, Taslima K, Shahjahan M. 2024. Bioremediation of chromium-induced toxic effects in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using probiotics. Environ Pollut Manage 1:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.epm.2024.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Zhai Q, Yu L, Li T, Zhu J, Zhang C, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W. 2017. Effect of dietary probiotic supplementation on intestinal microbiota and physiological conditions of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under waterborne cadmium exposure. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:501–513. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0819-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Yin Y, Yue X, Zhang D, Zhang P, Abdallah A, Yin Y, Cai Y, Li Y. 2019. Study of Bioaccumulation, hematological parameters, and antioxidant responses of carassius auratus gibelio exposed to dietary lead and Bacillus subtilis. Biol Trace Elem Res 189:233–240. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1447-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Pérez-Rojas JG, Mejía-Falla PA, Navia AF, Tarazona AM, Pardo-Carrasco SC. 2021. Hematology and blood biochemistry profile of the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon magdalenae as a tool for population assessment in artificial environments. Braz J Biol 82:e233780. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.233780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Reda RM, Zaki EM, A. A. Aioub A, Metwally MMM, Yassin AM, Mahsoub F. 2025. Behavioral, biochemical, immune, and histological responses of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) to lead, mercury, and pendimethalin exposure: individual and combined effects. Environ Sci Eur 37:11. doi: 10.1186/s12302-024-01047-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. El-Kady AA, Magouz FI, Mahmoud SA, Abdel-Rahim MM. 2022. The effects of some commercial probiotics as water additive on water quality, fish performance, blood biochemical parameters, expression of growth and immune-related genes, and histology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 546:737249. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737249 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Chang X, Chen Y, Feng J, Huang M, Zhang J. 2021. Amelioration of Cd-induced bioaccumulation, oxidative stress and immune damage by probiotic Bacillus coagulans in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture Reports 20:100678. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100678 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from strain PbS1A2 has been deposted in the NCBI GenBank database under accession. no. OP984811.1.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES