Abstract
Background.
Interventions for transgender youth include puberty suppression and gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). Studies have begun to show changes in cardiometabolic outcomes in adolescent transgender males (TGM) and females (TGF). We hypothesized that in TGM and TGF youth, GAHT would increase total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), insulin resistance (IR) and adiposity, while decreasing HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
Methods.
We measured IR (oral glucose tolerance test), lipid profile and endothelial function (flow mediated vasodilation) prior to and following six months of GAHT in TGM (n=3) and TGF (n=2).
Results.
This case series shows attenuated endothelium-mediated vasodilation in TGM, but improved endothelium-mediated vasodilation in TGF. Our data also support earlier findings showing reduced HDL-C with GAHT in TGM. Two of three TGM showed increased while one TGF showed decreased IR following GAHT.
Conclusion.
These data indicate rapid, but divergent, changes in lipids and endothelial function in TG youth with GAHT.
Keywords: androgens, estrogens, flow mediated vasodilation, cardiovascular risk, cross-sex hormone therapy, dyslipidemia
NEW AND NOTEWORTHY
While these data are preliminary, they show changes in FMD in transgender youth and suggest divergent responses, indicating attenuated FMD in and lower HDL-C in males, while some improvement in endothelial function and little impact on lipids in females.
INTRODUCTION
The practice of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is increasing in pediatric patients (1). In the United States approximately 0.7–1.8% of youth identify as transgender (2). Gender affirming hormone therapy reduces natal sex characteristics and induces those of the desired sex. GAHT is the primary medical intervention sought by transgender people and is recognized by multiple academic medical organizations, including the Endocrine Society, Pediatric Endocrine Society (3), and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health as medically necessary. The Endocrine Society (4) and World Professional Association for Transgender Health (5) guidelines recommend an approach of the timing of initiation of GAHT based on the individual’s emotional and intellectual maturity, capacity to understand risks and benefits, and balancing potential benefits of early medical intervention on physical and mental health outcomes. In transgender male (TGM) and female (TGF) youth, the goals of therapy are to achieve estrogen and testosterone levels comparable to their cis gender (CG) counterparts, achieve the physical and physiological changes that are consistent with their affirmed gender, and optimize safety.
In adults, some studies have found that GAHT in both transgender men and women can increase cardiometabolic risk (6–8), including dyslipidemia, increased blood pressure (BP) (9–11) and compromised endothelial function (8). In transgender women, GAHT can increase thrombosis risk (7). However, in both sexes these lipid and vascular outcomes are variable across studies (8, 12, 13), estrogen may improve vascular function in males (12) and show little change in insulin resistance (IR) associated with GAHT in adults (14). Several studies in transgender youth have shown increased low density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) (6, 9), and IR (7) in adolescent TGM and TGF. However, recent investigations demonstrated little impact of testosterone therapy on IR or endothelial function in TGM youth, and that these effects may be associated with puberty blocking (15, 16).
Our goal was to assess the cardiometabolic effects of GAHT on TGM and TGF over the early period of GAHT. We tested the hypothesis that GAHT would increase serum total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, IR and adiposity, while decreasing HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in TGM and TGF youth at six months of GAHT. In this case series, we present data on three TGM and two TGF individuals and three cisgender (CG) adolescents for comparison. While these conclusions are preliminary, we consider it important to share our findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical Approval.
All participants (and in the case of minors, a parent/guardian) gave written informed consent to participate, which conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Human Investigation Committee of Yale School of Medicine (HIC Protocol no. 2000030999).
Participants
We recruited three TGM, two TGF and three CG individuals (2 females, 1 male), all in Tanner Stage 5, age 16–19 yrs. All our participants identified as non-Hispanic White, indicated no health conditions when interviewed about their medical history, and females reported regular menstrual cycles (26–32 days) with no gynecological abnormalities. We excluded participants who smoked or vaped, had diabetes or hypertension, or were taking insulin sensitizing, cardiovascular medications or hormonal contraception for at least four weeks prior to participating in these protocols.
Experimental Design
We tested TGM and TGF at baseline (BSL), prior to starting and following six months of GAHT; CG came back to the laboratory six months after their first test. BSL TGM and CG were tested in females in the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycle. The GAHT medication regimens varied among the participants depending on their treatment goals (4). All TGM subjects were treated with a GnRH agonist for menstrual suppression (beginning with hormone treatment), and one TGM also received norethindrone. Testosterone doses were 38 mg weekly in one TGM and 44 mg weekly in the other two TGM. Both TGF received GnRH agonist (beginning with hormone treatment); estradiol doses were 1 mg daily in one participant and 2 mg in the other.
Oral glucose tolerance test
Participants reported to the laboratory in the morning after an overnight fast. We placed an intravenous catheter in an antecubital vein with the participant semi-recumbent. Following baseline (−15, 0 min) samples for glucose and insulin, the participant ingested 75 g of glucose; glucose and insulin samples were then collected at 30, 45, 60, 90, 120- and 180-min.
Physiology Studies
On a separate day from the OGTT, participants reported to the laboratory in the morning after an overnight fast. The participants avoided alcohol and strenuous activity/exercise during the 24 hours prior to the studies. We confirmed hydration status with a urine sample (urine specific gravity, USG ≤ 1.020). Height was recorded, and body mass measured on a beam balance.
Body Composition
We used the BodPod® (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) to determine body fat and lean mass. The BodPod® is an air displacement plethysmograph that uses whole body densitometry to determine body composition (fat vs. lean). The BodPod® is based on the underwater weighing technique (17) but uses air instead of water to measure body volume and is comparable to Dual x-ray absorptiometry and reliable across multiple days under the same conditions (18).
Endothelial Function
We used flow mediated vasodilation (FMD) to assess brachial artery endothelial function. Prior to baseline measures, participants performed three isometric maximal voluntary contractions using a handgrip dynamometer to determine maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Continuous measures of brachial artery diameter and blood flow velocity were simultaneously measured using the Sonoscope S2 ultrasound imaging system. After 15 minutes of supine rest, a two-minute longitudinal image of the brachial artery was recorded. Forearm ischemia was then induced by rapidly inflating a blood pressure cuff to supra-systolic pressure (i.e. ≥160–180 mmHg). Upon cuff release, blood flow increases to the ischemic tissue (reactive hyperemia, RH-FMD). The increase in shear stress associated with this rapid blood flow increase stimulates nitric oxide release from endothelial cells, causing vasodilation. We recorded the change in brachial artery diameter 15 seconds prior to cuff deflation and continuously thereafter for 2 minutes. Brachial artery measures were then obtained continuously for 3 minutes following cuff deflation. Participants completed a standard 5-minute occlusion followed by reactive hyperemia, and an enhanced stimulus of a 3-minute occlusion concomitant with ischemic handgrip exercise at 20% MVC (IE-FMD) (19). The order of the RH-FMD and IE-FMD protocols were randomized across participants, and participants rested supine for 15 minutes between trials.
Data Analysis for FMD
Machine-learning software (Brachial Analyzer for Research, Medical Imaging Applications, USA) was used to analyze ultrasound video files and %FMD was calculated using standardized protocols and equations as described Adler et al (19).
Microvascular endothelial function
Following FMD measurements, we used local forearm skin heating combined with Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) to measure skin blood flow (SkBF). Participants rested semirecumbent for at least 30 min during instrumentation for beat-to-beat BP measures with a Finometer Pro (Finapres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Blood pressure and SkBF were recorded with a 16-channel computerized data-acquisition system at a sampling Speed of 400 Hz (ADI instruments PowerLab 9, Castle Hill, Australia). We measured resting SkBF using two LDF probes equipped with local heaters, which both control and measure local skin temperature. After 10 min of rest, the temperature of the local heaters was increased to 42°C to induce local vasodilation for 30 min. After this heating period, the temperature of the local heaters was increased to a local skin temperature of 43°C, where it was clamped ~10 min combined with transdermal-nitroglycerin patch (0.6 mg/hr) to induce maximal vasodilation. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC=LDF/MAP) was calculated and normalized to %CVCmax (20).
Blood parameters
We collected blood samples for 17 β-estradiol (E2), testosterone, glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C), LDL-C, HDL-C, and TC at the time of the baseline sample for the OGTT. An aliquot was transferred into a tube without anticoagulant for the determination of lipids and T (S[T]) and E2 (SE2). S[T], SE2, using LC/MS; TC, HDL-C were analyzed with enzymatic colorimetric methods (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine). LDL-C was calculated using the Martin-Hopkins calculation (21). Lipid profiles were not collected for CG. Blood for HbA1C was collected in EDTA and assayed using immunoturbidimetry.
Data analysis
Due to the low sample size, we show individual data points in graphs and effect sizes using Cohen’s dz for paired measures (the mean of the difference scores/standard deviation the difference scores, G-Power 3.1, Heinnrich Heine Universtat, Dusseldolf). We did not calculate dz in TGF because our sample of n=2 did not allow standard deviation calculation. Total and incremental areas under the glucose and insulin response curves over 180 min were calculated by the trapezoidal method.
RESULTS
We collected complete data on two CG, three TGM and two TGF (Table 1). The changes in FMD were variable in CG participants on follow-up (dz=0.74 ± 0.98, Fig 1) with two of three TGM participants showing declines in FMD (dz=1.79 ± 1.22) during testosterone treatment, while one TGM showed no change. In contrast, both TGF showed increased FMD (Δ 7.1, 6.4). Skin blood flow showed similar trends in both the TGM and TGF, although one TGM (the same TGM who showed no change in FMD) showed increased peripheral endothelial mediated vasodilation (Fig 1). Area under the curve for IR appeared increased in two of three of our TGM (from 6699 to 15702, and 24835 to 38089 IU) and decreased in our TGF (from 13907 to 6926 IU) (Fig 2). Finally, there was little consistent change in lipid profile across participants except HDL-C decreased in TGM (Table 1).
Table 1. Subject Characteristics.
Mean (± SD) data are from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) experiment in Cisgender Controls, Transgender male and female participants. Body mass index (BMI), glucose and insulin are area under the curve (AUC) are from the OGTT testing day. Systolic (SBP), Diastolic (DBP), and Mean (MAP) arterial pressures as measured by Finipres during skin blood flow measurements. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoproteins (LDL-C), high density lipoproteins (HDL-C) are from the OGTT testing day. Fat and lean weight are based on measurements from the BodPod® measurement.
| Cisgender n=3 |
Transgender male n=3 |
Transgender female n=2 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Age, y | 18 ± 1 | 17 ± 2 | 16, 17 | |||
| Height, cm | 171.9 ± 16.9 | 164.3 ± 6.4 | 175.3, 180.3 | |||
| Weight, kg | 67.3 ± 9.3 | 64.8 ± 7.6 | 65.6 ± 22.0 | 70.0 ± 17.4 | 63.5, 68.8 | 61.2, 62.7 |
| BMI kg/m2 | 23.0 ± 3.1 | 22.2 ± 2.7 | 24.2 ± 7.4 | 25.6 ± 7.0 | 20.7, 21.1 | 19.9, 19.3 |
| Fat weight, kg | 18.5 ± 13.3 | 16.0 ± 7.2 | 24.2 ± 13.8 | 22.9 ± 11.2 | 7.7, 14.1 | 10.4, 9.6 |
| Lean weight, kg | 48.8 ± 13.5 | 48.9 ± 8.4 | 41.2 ± 8.2 | 46.2 ± 6.9 | 55.9, 54.4 | 50.8, 53.2 |
| % Body fat | 27.3 ± 17.5 | 24.6 ± 9.8 | 34.7 ± 10.8 | 31.5 ± 11.2 | 12.2, 20.6 | 17.1, 15.2 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 5.4, 5.2 | 5.6,5.1 | ||
| SBP, mm HG | 114 ± 6 | 113 ± 10 | 117 ± 6 | 127 ,120 | 138,117 | |
| DBP, mm HG | 61 ± 5 | 60 ± 10 | 67 ± 3 | 60 ± 3 | 72,64 | 70,60 |
| MAP mm HG | 79 ± 5 | 78± 10 | 82 ± 4 | 79 ± 3 | 90,80 | 93,79 |
| AUC glucose, g/dl | 18030, 24413 | 21405,26318 | 23177 ± 2534 | 26601 ± 3662 | 20407,18615 | 21413, 18420 |
| AUC insulin, UI | 7153, 29429 | 7706,24944 | 22458 ± 7781 | 28749 ± 3983 | Missing,13907 | 5718, 6926 |
| TC, mg/dl | 138, 173 | 170,123 | 171,165 | 111, 162 | ||
| LDL-C, mg/dl | 52, 108 | 115,70 | 99, 104 | 63, 95 | ||
| HDL-C mg/dl | 72, 82 | 41, 35 | 59, 51 | 37, 58 | ||
Figure 1: Flow mediated vasodilation (FMD, % change) and changes in skin blood flow (SkBF) expressed as relative cutaneous vascular conductance (%CVCmax) in Cisgender (CG) Controls, Transgender male (TGM) and female (TGF).

Data show individual values pre and post six months of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in the transgender participants and repeat testing in the cisgender controls (Pre, Post).
Figure 2. Area under the curve (AUC) for insulin changes during an oral glucose tolerance test in Cisgender (CG) Controls, Transgender male (TGM) and female (TGF) participants.

Data show individual values pre and post six months of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in the transgender participants and repeat testing in the cisgender controls (Pre, Post).
DISCUSSION
An earlier study (15) using a larger population over twelve months demonstrated that decreased endothelial function with testosterone administration to TGM youth was dependent on blocking puberty using a GnRH analog. Our case series supports these findings in that all pediatric transgender participants were taking GnRH analogs with testosterone treatment and showed changes in brachial artery and peripheral microcirculatory endothelial function. However, we saw such changes despite our subjects having passed through puberty. Endothelial dysfunction is a predictor of atherosclerosis, hypertension and diabetes, and an important marker for clinical cardiovascular risk; thus, a reduction in endothelial function is striking to be noted in these young TGM after only six months of GAHT. In contrast, we saw improved endothelial function in our TGF participants similar to longer term TGF (12). Endothelial mediated vasodilation in the brachial artery (22, 23) and microcirculation in cisgender females and males occurs primarily through nitric oxide (NO) dependent mechanisms (20). Thus, the providing estrogen to the TGF may have contributed to vasodilation during FMD by increasing availability of NO. Studies that determine the mechanism involved in the impact of estrogen on male vasculature has not been explored in humans, although estrogen appears to induce vasodilation in both males and females in a mouse model through an NO pathway (24). In both TGM and TGF we saw similar changes in the peripheral microvasculature as those noted changes in FMD, indicating that changes in the brachial artery were reflected in the peripheral microvasculature with GAHT.
Our findings in these younger participants are consistent with earlier data showing decreased HDL-C associated with GAHT in TGM. We did not see consistent changes in other cardiometabolic variables, including TC or LDL-C also consistent with a recent report (15). Earlier studies have shown adverse effects of testosterone on lipid levels and blood pressure in adults (9, 25) and youth (26), raising concern for increased cardiometabolic risk with chronic testosterone exposure in TGM. However, while adult TGM lipid levels may increase with testosterone treatments they often stay within normal limits (8) and typically are not associated with IR (14).
Our case series supports cross-sectional studies showing early changes in HDL-C. In these earlier studies, dyslipidemia appears driven by the androgen therapy (27) and is the most consistent finding across studies (9, 28). Testosterone exposure is also a risk factor for dyslipidemia in cisgender females (29). Importantly, our we found similar changes in lipids in this younger population than found in earlier studies in young TGM in which puberty was blocked using a GnRH analog (15). In the present study, although we used a GnRH analog, all the subjects were post-puberty, and the TGM were menstruating regularly prior to beginning the study. It bears noting that other factors, such as BMI, family history of cardiometabolic risk, social determinants of health, and acute and chronic mental health stressors may also contribute significantly to the risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes (7, 11, 30).
There is thus a delicate balance to the determination of timing for initiation of GAHT: definitive larger-scale clinical trials in youth have clearly demonstrated that earlier initiation of GAHT can improve mental health outcomes including depression, anxiety and scores of body congruence (31), but increases the duration of exposure to the potentially adverse effects of hormone therapy, compared to starting in adulthood. Our case series suggests that the impact of GAHT on both TGM and TGF appear mild in the early months, but it is crucial to understand the cardiovascular and metabolic changes associated with GAHT in youth and evaluate optimal monitoring and intervention strategies, including exercise and medication as needed, to optimize health and safety in youth undergoing GAHT.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the volunteer participants and Michele Alguard for her assistance with data collection and management.
FUNDING SOURCES
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under award number R21HD107609. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
REFERENCES
- 1.Spack NP, Edwards-Leeper L, Feldman HA, Leibowitz S, Mandel F, Diamond DA, and Vance SR. Children and Adolescents With Gender Identity Disorder Referred to a Pediatric Medical Center. Pediatrics 129: 418, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Johns MM, Lowry R, Andrzejewski J, Barrios LC, Demissie Z, McManus T, Rasberry CN, Robin L, and Underwood JM. Transgender Identity and Experiences of Violence Victimization, Substance Use, Suicide Risk, and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among High School Students - 19 States and Large Urban School Districts, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 68: 67–71, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The Endocrine Society. Transgender Health 2020.
- 4.Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, Hannema SE, Meyer WJ, Murad MH, Rosenthal SM, Safer JD, Tangpricha V, and T’Sjoen GG. Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102 Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018. Jul 1;103(7):2758–2759.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, Brown GR, de Vries ALC, Deutsch MB, Ettner R, Fraser L, Goodman M, Green J, Hancock AB, Johnson TW, Karasic DH, Knudson GA, Leibowitz SF, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL, Monstrey SJ, Motmans J, Nahata L, Nieder TO, Reisner SL, Richards C, Schechter LS, Tangpricha V, Tishelman AC, Van Trotsenburg MAA, Winter S, Ducheny K, Adams NJ, Adrián TM, Allen LR, Azul D, Bagga H, Başar K, Bathory DS, Belinky JJ, Berg DR, Berli JU, Bluebond-Langner RO, Bouman MB, Bowers ML, Brassard PJ, Byrne J, Capitán L, Cargill CJ, Carswell JM, Chang SC, Chelvakumar G, Corneil T, Dalke KB, De Cuypere G, de Vries E, Den Heijer M, Devor AH, Dhejne C, D’Marco A, Edmiston EK, Edwards-Leeper L, Ehrbar R, Ehrensaft D, Eisfeld J, Elaut E, Erickson-Schroth L, Feldman JL, Fisher AD, Garcia MM, Gijs L, Green SE, Hall BP, Hardy TLD, Irwig MS, Jacobs LA, Janssen AC, Johnson K, Klink DT, Kreukels BPC, Kuper LE, Kvach EJ, Malouf MA, Massey R, Mazur T, McLachlan C, Morrison SD, Mosser SW, Neira PM, Nygren U, Oates JM, Obedin-Maliver J, Pagkalos G, Patton J, Phanuphak N, Rachlin K, Reed T, Rider GN, Ristori J, Robbins-Cherry S, Roberts SA, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rosenthal SM, Sabir K, Safer JD, Scheim AI, Seal LJ, Sehoole TJ, Spencer K, St. Amand C, Steensma TD, Strang JF, Taylor GB, Tilleman K, T’Sjoen GG, Vala LN, Van Mello NM, Veale JF, Vencill JA, Vincent B, Wesp LM, West MA, and Arcelus J. Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health 23: S1–S259, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Emi Y, Adachi M, Sasaki A, Nakamura Y, and Nakatsuka M. Increased arterial stiffness in female-to-male transsexuals treated with androgen. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34: 890–897, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Millington K, Schulmeister C, Finlayson C, Grabert R, Olson-Kennedy J, Garofalo R, Rosenthal SM, and Chan YM. Physiological and Metabolic Characteristics of a Cohort of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Youth in the United States. J Adolesc Health 67: 376–383, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gulanski BI, Flannery CA, Peter PR, Leone CA, and Stachenfeld NS. Compromised endothelial function in transgender men taking testosterone. Clin Endocrinol 92: 138–144, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maraka S, Singh Ospina N, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Davidge-Pitts CJ, Nippoldt TB, Prokop LJ, and Murad MH. Sex Steroids and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Transgender Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102: 3914–3923, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Irwig MS. Cardiovascular health in transgender people. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 3: 243–251, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Borger O, Perl L, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Sides R, Brener A, Segev-Becker A, Sheppes T, Weinstein G, Oren A, and Lebenthal Y. Body Composition and Metabolic Syndrome Components in Transgender/Gender Diverse Adolescents and Young Adults. LGBT Health 11: 359–369, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.New G, Duffy SJ, Harper RW, and Meredith IT. Long-term oestrogen therapy is associated with improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the forearm resistance circulation of biological males. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 27: 25–33, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Suksom D, Saitong A, Naeowong W, and Tanaka H. Systemic vascular and organ functions in transgender women receiving feminizing hormone therapy. J Appl Physiol (1985) 141: 29–37, 2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Spanos C, Bretherton I, Zajac JD, and Cheung AS. Effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy on insulin resistance and body composition in transgender individuals: A systematic review. World J Diabetes 11: 66–77, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nokoff NJ, DuBose L, Bothwell S, Cree MG, Kelsey MM, Nadeau KJ, and Moreau KL. Impact of Testosterone on Endothelial Function Varies by GnRH Agonist Treatment. J Endocr Soc 9: bvaf086, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nokoff NJ, Bothwell S, Rice JD, Cree MG, Kelsey MM, Moreau KL, Zeitler P, and Nadeau KJ. Insulin sensitivity, body composition and bone mineral density after testosterone treatment in transgender youth with and without prior GnRH agonist therapy. J Clin Transl Endocrinol 36: 100356, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katch FI, and Katch VL. The body composition profile. Techniques of measurement and applications. Clin Sports Med 3: 31–63, 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schubert MM, Seay RF, Spain KK, Clarke HE, and Taylor JK. Reliability and validity of various laboratory methods of body composition assessment in young adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 39: 150–159, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adler TE, Usselman CW, Takamata A, and Stachenfeld NS. Blood pressure predicts endothelial function and the effects of ethinyl estradiol exposure in young women. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 315: H925–H933, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Minson CT, Berry LT, and Joyner MJ. Nitric oxide and neurally mediated regulation of skin blood flow during local heating. J Appl Physiol 91: 1619–1626, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, and Jones SR. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. Jama 310: 2061–2068, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thijssen DH, Black MA, Pyke KE, Padilla J, Atkinson G, Harris RA, Parker B, Widlansky ME, Tschakovsky ME, and Green DJ. Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300: H2–12, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wray DW, Witman MA, Ives SJ, McDaniel J, Trinity JD, Conklin JD, Supiano MA, and Richardson RS. Does brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation provide a bioassay for NO? Hypertension 62: 345–351, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Elsaid B, Kopaliani I, Zatschler B, Seif A, Speier S, and Deussen A. Endothelial and non-endothelial actions of estrogen receptor subtypes in male and female mouse Aorta. Vascul Pharmacol 161: 107559, 2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Streed CG Jr., Harfouch O, Marvel F, Blumenthal RS, Martin SS, and Mukherjee M. Cardiovascular Disease Among Transgender Adults Receiving Hormone Therapy: A Narrative Review. Ann Intern Med 167: 256–267, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klaver M, de Mutsert R, van der Loos M, Wiepjes CM, Twisk JWR, den Heijer M, Rotteveel J, and Klink DT. Hormonal Treatment and Cardiovascular Risk Profile in Transgender Adolescents. Pediatrics 145: 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Asscheman H, Gooren LJ, Megens JA, Nauta J, Kloosterboer HJ, and Eikelboom F. Serum testosterone level is the major determinant of the male-female differences in serum levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and HDL2 cholesterol. Metabolism 43: 935–939, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nokoff NJ, Scarbro SL, Moreau KL, Zeitler P, Nadeau KJ, Juarez-Colunga E, and Kelsey MM. Body Composition and Markers of Cardiometabolic Health in Transgender Youth Compared With Cisgender Youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105: 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fruzzetti F, Perini D, Lazzarini V, Parrini D, and Genazzani AR. Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome showing different phenotypes have a different metabolic profile associated with increasing androgen levels. Fertil Steril 92: 626–634, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen D, Berona J, Chan YM, Ehrensaft D, Garofalo R, Hidalgo MA, Rosenthal SM, Tishelman AC, and Olson-Kennedy J. Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones. N Engl J Med 388: 240–250, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tordoff DM, Wanta JW, Collin A, Stepney C, Inwards-Breland DJ, and Ahrens K. Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care. JAMA Netw Open 5: e220978, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
