Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2026 Aug 24;18(8):e115116. doi: 10.7759/cureus.115116

Current Perspectives on Proteus Species: From Morphology to Multidrug Resistance

Prital B Kulkarni 1,✉, Satyajeet K Pawar 1, Satish R Patil 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC13601025  PMID: 42787251

Abstract

Proteus species are Gram-negative, highly motile opportunistic pathogens belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and are widely distributed in the environment, including the human digestive tract and animals. Among them, Proteus mirabilis is the most clinically significant species and is commonly associated with catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), wound infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and other nosocomial infections. The pathogenicity of Proteus is attributed to several virulence factors, including swarming motility, urease production, fimbriae, adhesins, hemolysin, lecithinase, and biofilm formation, which facilitate colonization, tissue invasion, immune evasion, and persistence within the host. The genus also possesses complex antigenic structures involving O, H, and K antigens that contribute to serological diversity and pathogenic variability. Increasing antimicrobial resistance among Proteus isolates, particularly through the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases, has become a major clinical concern. These resistance mechanisms significantly limit therapeutic options and complicate infection control measures. This review highlights the classification, morphology, virulence factors, pathogenicity, clinical manifestations, antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, and phenotypic characteristics of Proteus species, emphasizing their growing importance as multidrug-resistant (MDR) opportunistic pathogens.

Keywords: biofilm formation, multidrug-resistant, proteus species, swarming, virulence factors

Introduction and background

The genus Proteus belongs to the family Enterobacteriaceae and consists of Gram-negative, highly motile bacteria that are widely distributed in soil, water, sewage, and the intestinal tracts of humans and animals. Among these species, Proteus mirabilis is the most clinically significant and is frequently associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs), particularly catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) [1]. Proteus species are distinguished by their exceptional swarming motility, urease production, and characteristic bull’s-eye colony appearance on solid media. Morphologically, they are rod-shaped, non-spore-forming bacteria possessing peritrichous flagella that facilitate movement across surfaces [1]. The antigenic structure of Proteus includes O (somatic), H (flagellar), and occasionally K (capsular) antigens, which contribute to serological classification and pathogenic variability among strains. These antigens play a significant role in host interaction, immune evasion, and epidemiological identification [2]. The pathogenicity of Proteus species is mediated by numerous virulence factors, including fimbriae, adhesins, urease, hemolysin, proteases, biofilm formation, and swarming behavior. These factors facilitate adhesion to epithelial surfaces, colonization of urinary catheters, tissue invasion, stone formation, and persistence within the host [1]. Clinically, Proteus species are associated with various infections, including UTIs, wound and burn infections, bacteremia, gastrointestinal infections, and, occasionally, infective endocarditis. Their strong ability to form biofilms on indwelling medical devices significantly contributes to chronic and recurrent infections [1]. Growing antibiotic resistance among Proteus isolates has become a major concern in recent years. Resistance mechanisms, such as the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases, have complicated treatment strategies and infection control practices [2]. Therefore, understanding the classification, morphology, antigenic structure, virulence mechanisms, pathogenicity, clinical manifestations, and resistance phenotypes of Proteus species is necessary for precise diagnosis, successful treatment, and the development of preventive strategies against these clinically important opportunistic pathogens [1].

Review

Methodology

Search Strategy

A narrative literature review was conducted to summarize current evidence on the morphology, virulence factors, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial resistance of Proteus species. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online Library, were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2026 using relevant keywords related to Proteus species and antimicrobial resistance, including Proteus species, Proteus mirabilis, swarming motility, biofilm formation, virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance, and multidrug resistance (MDR). A total of 600 records were identified. After removing 160 duplicate records, 440 records were screened, of which 300 were excluded. A total of 140 full-text articles were sought for retrieval, and 120 were assessed for eligibility after excluding 20 unavailable reports. Following full-text assessment, 100 articles were excluded due to irrelevance, lack of focus on Proteus species, insufficient microbiological or clinical data, or failure to meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 20 studies were included in the qualitative review. The selected studies were critically reviewed and synthesized to provide an overview of the classification, morphology, virulence factors, pathogenicity, clinical significance, and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of Proteus species. A PRISMA flowchart of the methodology used for this review is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Search strategy.

Figure 1

n, number of studies

*Records identified from each database searched are reported separately. **Records excluded during the screening process based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

History

The ability of microorganisms belonging to the genus Proteus to swarm on solid surfaces was first reported by the German microbiologist Gustav Hauser in 1885. The genus Proteus derives its name from the Greek sea god Proteus, who was believed to have the ability to change his shape and undergo endless transformations. This name is thought to reflect the remarkable swarming motility of the organism, which is enabled by its peritrichous flagella. The characteristic "bull's-eye" colony pattern may also have contributed to the choice of the name [3-6]. The species name P. mirabilis may have originated from Latin words meaning "amazing," "marvelous," and "splendid." Hauser may have named Proteus vulgaris from a Latin term meaning "widespread" or "ordinary," as he considered it to be the more common and typical species [5].

Classification and nomenclature

Hauser described two species of the genus, P. vulgaris and P. mirabilis, based on their ability to ferment maltose. P. vulgaris strains were subsequently divided into three biogroups according to three biochemical reactions: esculin hydrolysis, salicin fermentation, and indole production. Biogroup 1 was identified as Proteus penneri, which was negative for all three reactions. In contrast, Biogroup 2 retained the name P. vulgaris and was positive for all three reactions. Biogroup 3 was positive for indole production but negative for esculin hydrolysis and salicin fermentation and was therefore named Proteus hauseri. However, genospecies 4, 5, and 6 remained unnamed because of their similar phenotypic characteristics. Furthermore, based on phylogenetic, morphological, chemotaxonomic, and genotypic investigations, six newly described species, Proteus terrae, Proteus cibarius, Proteus alimentorum, Proteus columbae, Proteus faecis, and Proteus cibi, were recently proposed. Thus, there are currently 10 officially recognized Proteus species and three unidentified genospecies. The classification of additional Proteus species and genospecies, except for these six recently identified species, was based on variations in DNA-DNA hybridization and biochemical reactions established at least 19 years ago. More recently, the boundaries separating closely related bacterial species, subspecies, and strains have been more accurately defined using multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) based on several housekeeping genes (HKGs) [4,7]. Proteus bacteria can also be distinguished by the diversity of their O antigens. To date, 80 O-antigen serogroups have been identified within the genus, some of which are further subdivided, and numerous new O serotypes continue to be discovered [5].

Morphology and cultural characteristics

Proteus bacteria are extremely polymorphic. They are Gram-negative rods measuring 0.4-0.6×1-3 µm, are motile (possessing peritrichous flagella), do not form spores, and do not possess a characteristic capsule. A thin, 2-3 nm peptidoglycan layer is interconnected with the wavy outer membrane. Beneath the periplasm lies a thin cytoplasmic membrane. Although Proteus proteins do not form traditional capsules, a fibrous capsular polysaccharide with fibers perpendicular to the cell surface has been identified in P. mirabilis [8].

Culture

Proteus spp. are easy to culture because they can grow on basic nutritional media (pH 7.2-7.4) [8]. Proteus grows as swarming colonies on blood agar and as non-lactose-fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar. Proteus exhibits urea hydrolysis, citrate utilization, H₂S production with gas formation on Triple-Sugar-Iron (TSI) agar, and a positive phenylalanine deaminase (PPA) test. The indole test distinguishes P. vulgaris (indole-positive) from P. mirabilis and P. penneri (indole-negative). P. mirabilis and P. penneri can be further differentiated using the maltose fermentation test [9-11]. Temperatures between 10°C and 43°C are suitable for the growth of Proteus. However, a temperature of approximately 37°C is optimal for strains that are part of the normal flora of humans and animals [8]. Proteus possesses peritrichous flagella, which are essential for motility. These flagella enable the bacteria to move across solid surfaces, producing a characteristic swarming pattern. When swarmer cells are suspended in a liquid medium, they differentiate into vegetative cells [3,8]. During this process, the original colony undergoes cell differentiation. The multinucleated swarmer cells range from 20-30 µm to 80-100 µm in length and possess 50-500 times more flagella than the vegetative cells from which they develop. The swarming process involves three phases. The first phase is differentiation, during which vegetative cells transform into elongated, hyperflagellated swarmer cells. The consolidation phase occurs when these swarmer cells rapidly move away from the colony over the surface of solid media. As their movement gradually ceases, the swarmer cells differentiate back into vegetative cells [8]. These three stages are repeated, resulting in the formation of concentric rings on the surface of the medium and producing the characteristic swarming appearance of the colonies. Different Proteus species can also be distinguished by their swarming behavior on the same agar plate. When two identical isolates are streaked far apart on an agar plate, the swarming edges of their colonies merge. In contrast, when two different isolates are streaked, a visible demarcation line forms where the swarming fronts meet. This line, which separates the swarming colonies of the two isolates, is called the Dienes line, and the phenomenon is known as the Dienes phenomenon [12].

Virulence factors

O, H, and K Antigens

Proteus bacteria possess a complex antigenic structure that includes O, H, and, in certain strains, K antigens. O antigens are somatic antigens composed of lipopolysaccharides (LPS). These O antigens are used to determine the serogroups of clinical Proteus strains. Approximately 20 H antigens and 50 O antigens have been identified in Proteus [8]. Limited research has been conducted on the H (flagellar) and K (capsular) antigens.

Fimbriae and Adhesins

The pathogenesis of Proteus infections depends on adhesion to epithelial surfaces. This process is initiated when molecules on the surface of the pathogen interact with molecules on host cells, resulting in physicochemical interactions that facilitate bacterial attachment. Pathogens capable of adhering to host cells produce adhesins, which are protein or glycoprotein molecules present on the surface of microbial cells. In members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, including Proteus, adhesins are primarily located on fimbriae. Members of the genus Proteus possess a variety of fimbriae that differ mainly in their structure. Thick fimbriae, measuring approximately 7 nm in diameter, are known as MR/P (mannose-resistant Proteus-like) fimbriae, whereas thin fimbriae, measuring approximately 4 nm, are referred to as MR/K (mannose-resistant Klebsiella-like) fimbriae. MR/P fimbriae have been shown to promote bacterial adherence to epithelial cells more effectively than MR/K fimbriae [2,8,13].

Urease

Urease is a cytoplasmic, nickel-dependent metalloenzyme that plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of Proteus infections. It increases the pH of urine by hydrolyzing urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide. As the urinary pH rises, calcium and magnesium phosphates precipitate from solution, leading to the formation of struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate) and apatite (calcium phosphate) crystals. This process results in the development of urinary stones, including struvite and calcium phosphate (apatite) calculi. The effects also extend to urinary catheters, where bacteria and precipitated minerals form crystalline biofilms that progressively obstruct the flow of urine. In addition, urease-mediated alkalinization of the local environment enables Proteus to survive and proliferate under otherwise unfavorable conditions [2,3,13,14].

Lecithinase

Lecithinase is widely recognized as a virulence factor that enhances the pathogenicity of numerous bacteria. P. vulgaris and P. mirabilis strains exhibiting strong lecithinase activity are frequently isolated from patients with purulent inflammatory infections. The enzyme is produced more abundantly by the O-form of these strains, particularly following their transition from the H-form to the O-form [8].

Hemolysin

Hemolysin is a potent cytotoxin that damages the membranes of host cells and serves as an important virulence factor. The genus Proteus produces two distinct cytotoxic hemolysins, HpmA and HlyA. P. mirabilis and the majority of P. vulgaris strains produce only HpmA, whereas most P. penneri strains produce HlyA. A few P. vulgaris strains produce both HpmA and HlyA. The production of these hemolysins is closely associated with the swimming-swarming cycle of the bacterial cells. Swarming cells exhibit approximately 18-fold greater cytotoxicity than swimmer cells. Furthermore, HpmA has been shown to lyse erythrocytes, bladder epithelial cells, B-cell lymphoma cells, and neutrophils. Hemolysin facilitates bacterial invasion of host tissues and the establishment of infection. Lysis of red blood cells releases essential nutrients that promote bacterial growth within the host. Additionally, hemolysin contributes to the severity and recurrence of infections by disrupting host cell membranes, thereby facilitating bacterial proliferation and evasion of the host immune response [3,13,14].

Biofilm Production

Biofilm formation is a crucial multistage virulence mechanism that protects Proteus from host immune responses and antimicrobial therapy [15]. The composition of Proteus biofilms is highly dependent on the growth medium. In laboratory broth, they form multilayered structures, whereas in urine they develop distinctive, flat crystalline biofilms [16]. The formation of these crystalline biofilms begins when bacteria adhere to biotic or abiotic surfaces, such as silicone or latex polymers used in long-term urinary catheters [15,16]. This virulence trait plays a central role in the development of CAUTIs by promoting catheter encrustation and blockage [16]. As a result, patients may develop urinary retention and painful bladder distension, which can rapidly progress to vesicoureteral reflux, pyelonephritis, or life-threatening urosepsis [15]. The pathogenicity of Proteus biofilms is further enhanced by the activity of the structurally encoded urease enzyme [16]. Urease hydrolyzes urea naturally present in urine into ammonia and carbon dioxide, resulting in a marked increase in urinary pH [15,16]. This alkaline environment promotes the precipitation of calcium phosphate (apatite) and magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) crystals [16]. These mineral aggregates become deposited on the catheter surface and are embedded within the self-produced exopolysaccharide matrix together with bacterial cells [16].

Table 1 provides a brief summary of the major virulence factors of Proteus species.

Table 1. Virulence factors summary.

CAUTIs, catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Category Factor Function Clinical significance
Virulence factor Swarming motility Mediated by peritrichous flagella; enables migration across solid surfaces and colonization of host tissues Promotes catheter colonization, biofilm formation, and dissemination of infection
O, H, and K antigens Antigenic structures involved in serological diversity and immune interaction Contribute to immune evasion and pathogenic variability
Fimbriae and adhesins (MR/P, MR/K) Facilitate attachment to epithelial cells and urinary tract surfaces Essential for colonization and initiation of infection
Urease Hydrolyzes urea into ammonia, increasing urine pH Causes urinary stone formation, catheter encrustation, and CAUTIs
Lecithinase Membrane-damaging enzyme associated with increased pathogenicity Enhances tissue damage and inflammatory responses
Hemolysin (HpmA, HlyA) Cytotoxic toxin causing lysis of erythrocytes and host cells Facilitates tissue invasion, nutrient acquisition, and persistence
Biofilm formation Produces protective extracellular matrix on biotic and abiotic surfaces Promotes chronic infection, antibiotic resistance, and catheter blockage

Clinical manifestations

Species of the genus Proteus are commonly found in humans, animals, and the environment. They can be readily isolated from sewage, soil, garden vegetables, and various other environmental sources. P. mirabilis is the most prevalent species in humans and accounts for approximately 90% of all infections caused by Proteusspp. P. mirabilis is also frequently isolated from immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with infected burn wounds, and is commonly associated with the intestinal flora of humans and animals [8,17,18]. Researchers commonly isolate P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris from human clinical specimens [17]. These bacteria can cause a wide range of infections, including CAUTIs, wound and soft tissue infections, gastrointestinal infections, infectious gastroenteritis, and various hospital-acquired infections.

CAUTIs

Proteus species are frequently associated with UTIs in individuals with long-term urethral catheterization. Their ability to form biofilms plays a crucial role in the establishment and persistence of these infections. Biofilms protect bacteria from the host immune response, reduce the penetration of antibiotics and antibodies, and facilitate nutrient availability. Colonization of urinary catheters and chronic wounds by biofilm-producing Proteus species often leads to treatment failure because of increased antimicrobial resistance [19,20]. Biofilms produced by P. mirabilis on urinary catheter surfaces have been extensively investigated. During P. mirabilis-associated UTIs, the bacterium contributes to the formation of up to 30% of all urinary tract stones. In CAUTIs, crystalline biofilms are particularly problematic because biofilm encrustation leads to catheter blockage [21]. P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris are the principal Proteus species implicated in CAUTIs because of their ability to produce biofilms [19,20].

Tissue and Wound Infections

Proteus species are common causes of wound infections, particularly among hospitalized, immunocompromised, and burn wound patients. They are frequently isolated from traumatic wounds, postoperative wounds, diabetic ulcers, burns, cellulitis, abscesses, osteomyelitis, and other pathological wounds [18]. P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris are among the most common causative species associated with these infections [17,18]. Tissue invasion is facilitated by the cytotoxin hemolysin, which damages host cells and promotes bacterial survival and multiplication within host tissues [3,13,14]. A study published in 2021 reported that Proteus spp. was the second most common cause of wound infections after Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although the study primarily focused on burn wound infections, it also highlighted that these infections are predominantly hospital-acquired and are difficult to treat because of the increasing prevalence of MDR isolates [17,18].

Gastrointestinal Infections

Proteus species are considered opportunistic pathogens of the gastrointestinal tract and are normally present as part of the intestinal flora in humans. However, under conditions such as immunosuppression, intestinal inflammation, or disruption of the normal gut microbiota, they may contribute to gastrointestinal diseases. P. mirabilis has been associated with infectious gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Its pathogenicity is attributed to virulence factors, including urease, LPS, flagella, hemolysin, and biofilm formation, which stimulate inflammatory responses and promote bacterial survival within the gastrointestinal tract. Ammonia, produced by bacterial urease through the hydrolysis of urea, serves as a source of nitrogen for respiration and amino acid synthesis. Because Proteus species are Gram-negative bacteria that produce immunostimulatory flagellin proteins and LPS, growing evidence suggests that they may directly contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Furthermore, their MDR and ability to persist within the gastrointestinal tract make them important opportunistic pathogens in hospital-acquired and chronic intestinal infections [13].

Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis caused by Proteus species is extremely rare. A study published in 2020 reported that the condition was most commonly observed in patients with UTIs. The study also suggested that the primary contributing factor was the ability of Proteus species to form biofilms. Commonly affected sites included the aortic valve, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, mural endocardium, and Eustachian valve. Clinical manifestations included persistent fever, sepsis, and, in rare cases, heart failure. Although the infection is uncommon and standardized treatment guidelines are lacking, most reported cases have been treated with aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, and aminopenicillins [22,23].

Table 2 provides a brief summary of the clinical manifestations caused by Proteus species.

Table 2. Clinical manifestations summary.

CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infections; UTI, urinary tract infections

Category Factor Characteristics Clinical significance
Clinical manifestation CAUTIs Commonly caused by Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris through biofilm formation Leads to recurrent UTIs, catheter obstruction, pyelonephritis, and urosepsis
Wound and tissue infections Frequently isolated from burns, ulcers, abscesses, cellulitis, and post-operative wounds Associated with hospital-acquired infections and multidrug resistance
Gastrointestinal infections Opportunistic involvement in gastroenteritis and inflammatory bowel disease Contributes to intestinal inflammation and chronic gastrointestinal disorders
Infective endocarditis Rare complication often associated with preceding UTI May result in persistent fever, sepsis, and heart valve involvement

Laboratory diagnosis of Proteus spp.

Phenotypic Characters

ESBL production: Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacilli is an evolving challenge due to the organisms' potential for mutation and their ability to acquire and transmit plasmids and other genetic elements that encode resistance genes. β-lactam antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents worldwide, and more than 340 distinct β-lactamases have been identified, including ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases. ESBLs are a specific group of β-lactamase enzymes produced by Gram-negative bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae that hydrolyze β-lactam antibiotics. The principal ESBL-producing organisms include Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus spp. ESBLs remain a significant clinical concern because they are plasmid-mediated and can be readily transmitted between bacterial species. The major characteristics of ESBL-mediated resistance in Enterobacteriaceae include resistance to aminopenicillins, carboxypenicillins, second-generation cephalosporins, and one or more third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, as well as aztreonam. Bacterial isolates resistant to indicator antibiotics such as ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, or cefotaxime are suspected to be ESBL producers. Several methods, including the double-disk synergy test, ESBL E-tests, the combination disk method, and automated systems such as VITEK 2, are used for the detection of ESBL-producing organisms [24-26]. Research articles published in 2016 and 2022 reported that 54% and 34.5%, respectively, of the Proteus isolates obtained from clinical specimens were ESBL producers [27,28].

AmpC β-lactamase production: AmpC β-lactamases are enzymes produced by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, including Proteus, that confer resistance to several β-lactam antibiotics. There is currently no standardized phenotypic test for the identification and confirmation of AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, as numerous detection methods have been described [29]. This presents a significant challenge in the appropriate management of bacterial infections. One commonly used screening method for AmpC β-lactamase production is based on cefoxitin susceptibility testing [30]. Another approach is the inhibitor-based method, in which inhibitors such as cloxacillin and boronic acid are used; among these, cloxacillin has been shown to be the more effective inhibitor [30]. Other methods, including E-tests and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are also employed for the detection of AmpC-producing isolates. PCR is considered the gold standard because it confirms the presence of plasmid-mediated AmpC genes, including those identified in cefoxitin-resistant P. mirabilis isolates [29,30].

Carbapenemase production: The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Proteus, particularly P. mirabilis, has become a major threat to effective infection control. Proteus exhibits multifactorial resistance to carbapenems, which is primarily mediated by the horizontal acquisition of carbapenemase enzymes belonging to Ambler classes A, B, and D. In some cases, resistance is also driven by structural alterations such as porin loss, efflux pump overexpression, and modifications of penicillin-binding proteins [31].

Class A carbapenemases are rare in Proteus species. The first case involving a carbapenemase-producing P. mirabilis strain was reported in the United States in 2008. A subsequent clinical case was identified in China, where the carbapenemase-producing strain was isolated from a patient with a bloodstream infection. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles indicate that these strains exhibit extensive MDR. They are highly resistant to carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), broad-spectrum cephalosporins (cefazolin and cefotaxime), penicillins, and several β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and ampicillin-sulbactam). In addition, resistance extends to multiple non-β-lactam antimicrobial classes, including fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin), phenicols, tetracyclines, and folate pathway inhibitors (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim). Despite this extensive resistance profile, these MDR strains have remained susceptible to a limited number of therapeutic agents, including ceftazidime, amikacin, aztreonam, and piperacillin-tazobactam [32].

Class B carbapenemases, also known as metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), are zinc-dependent enzymes capable of hydrolyzing almost all β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and carbapenems [32]. Proteus species, particularly P. mirabilis, are important opportunistic pathogens frequently isolated from both community-acquired and nosocomial infections, especially UTIs [31]. Historically, Proteus species lacked chromosomally encoded β-lactamases and were therefore naturally susceptible to β-lactam antibiotics. However, they have rapidly acquired resistance through plasmid-mediated gene transfer [31]. The acquisition of carbapenemases, particularly Class B MBLs, is a major mechanism responsible for resistance to last-line carbapenem antibiotics [32]. MBLs efficiently hydrolyze a broad range of β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, cephalosporins, and penicillins [33]. Phenotypically, these enzymes require zinc ions at their active sites for catalytic activity. This characteristic is utilized in laboratory detection methods, where metal chelators such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) inhibit MBL activity in disk synergy tests [33]. Furthermore, MBL-producing Proteus isolates frequently harbor additional resistance mechanisms, including plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases and ESBLs. Combined with their intrinsic resistance to colistin, tetracycline, and nitrofurantoin, these characteristics pose a significant public health concern by leaving clinicians with very limited therapeutic options [31-33].

Proteus species are generally highly susceptible to carbapenems. However, they can acquire Class D carbapenemase enzymes through horizontal gene transfer from other bacterial species. Unlike Class B carbapenemases, Class D enzymes are characterized by poor inhibition with conventional laboratory inhibitors such as EDTA or clavulanic acid. A major diagnostic challenge associated with Class D-producing P. mirabilis is that these enzymes often exhibit relatively weak carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity. Consequently, affected strains may appear susceptible during routine laboratory susceptibility testing with carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem, as well as with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as piperacillin-tazobactam. In addition, these Class D-producing strains frequently acquire resistance to several other first-line antimicrobial agents. Co-resistance to aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and fluoroquinolones has been reported, resulting in extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes that leave clinicians with very limited therapeutic options [31,32].

Table 3 provides a brief summary of the resistance mechanisms of Proteus species against different classes of antibiotics.

Table 3. Resistance mechanism summary.

ESBLs, extended spectrum β-lactamases; MDR, multidrug resistance; MBL, metallo-beta-lactamases; XDR, extensively drug-resistant

Category Factor Function Clinical significance
Resistance mechanism ESBLs Hydrolyze extended-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam Limits effectiveness of β-lactam antibiotics and promotes MDR
AmpC β-lactamases Confer resistance to cephamycins and multiple β-lactam agents Reduces treatment options and complicates laboratory detection
Class A carbapenemases Carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes causing broad β-lactam resistance Associated with extensive MDR
Class B carbapenemases (MBL) Zinc-dependent enzymes that hydrolyze most β-lactam antibiotics Leave very limited therapeutic options and facilitate MDR spread
Class D carbapenemases Weakly expressed carbapenemases that may escape routine detection Can result in XDR phenotypes
Plasmid-mediated gene transfer Horizontal transfer of ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase genes Accelerates dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria

Clinical outcomes

Proteus species, particularly P. mirabilis, are associated with significant clinical morbidity because of their virulence factors, biofilm-forming ability, and increasing antimicrobial resistance. CAUTIs caused by Proteus frequently result in recurrent infections, urinary stone formation, catheter blockage, pyelonephritis, and, in severe cases, urosepsis. Biofilm formation on indwelling medical devices contributes to persistent infections and treatment failure. In wound and burn infections, Proteus species are associated with delayed wound healing, prolonged hospitalization, an increased risk of secondary infections, and higher healthcare costs. Gastrointestinal involvement may contribute to chronic intestinal inflammation and disease progression in susceptible individuals. Although uncommon, invasive infections such as bacteremia and infective endocarditis can lead to severe systemic complications, including sepsis, heart valve damage, and increased mortality. The emergence of MDR strains producing ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases has significantly reduced the available treatment options, resulting in prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic consumption, higher treatment costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Therefore, early diagnosis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, effective infection control measures, and continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns are essential to reduce the clinical burden associated with Proteus infections.

Conclusions

Proteus species remain clinically significant opportunistic pathogens because of their remarkable motility, diverse virulence mechanisms, and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Their ability to swarm, produce urease, form biofilms, and express multiple adhesins and toxins contributes significantly to the development of CAUTIs, wound infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and other clinical conditions. The growing emergence of MDR strains producing ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases has further complicated treatment and infection control practices. Furthermore, the ability of these organisms to acquire and disseminate resistance determinants through plasmids poses a significant public health concern. Accurate laboratory identification, continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns, and early detection of resistant phenotypes are therefore essential for effective patient management. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms, virulence factors, and resistance profiles of Proteus species will facilitate the development of more effective diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive strategies against these increasingly challenging infections.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Prital B. Kulkarni, Satyajeet K. Pawar, Satish R. Patil

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Prital B. Kulkarni, Satyajeet K. Pawar, Satish R. Patil

Drafting of the manuscript:  Prital B. Kulkarni, Satyajeet K. Pawar, Satish R. Patil

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Prital B. Kulkarni, Satyajeet K. Pawar, Satish R. Patil

Supervision:  Satyajeet K. Pawar, Satish R. Patil

References

  • 1.Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Schaffer JN, Pearson MM. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:17. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis infection. Armbruster CE, Mobley HLT, Pearson MM. EcoSal Plus. 2018;8:9. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0009-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Overview of Proteus mirabilis pathogenicity and virulence: Insights into the role of metals. Chakkour M, Hammoud Z, Farhat S, El Roz A, Ezzeddine Z, Ghssein G. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1383618. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015. Dai H, Lu B, Li Z, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:152. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Significance and roles of Proteus spp. bacteria in natural environments. Drzewiecka D, Binghuai Lu, Zhenpeng Li. Microb Ecol. 2016;72:741. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0720-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pulmonary manifestations and management of Proteus syndrome. Li CY, Chang YL, Chen WC, Lee YC. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109:397. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Classification of Proteus vulgaris biogroup 3 with recognition of Proteus hauseri sp. nov., nom. rev. and unnamed Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6. O’Hara CM, Brenner FW, Steigerwalt AG, et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:1869. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-5-1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bioecology and pathogenicity of Proteus bacteria: a literature review. Kozlovska G. Ukr J Vet Sci. 2023;14:91. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Phenotypic detection and antibiogram of β-lactamase-producing Proteus species in a tertiary care hospital, India. Pal N, Hooja S, Sharma R, Maheshwari RK. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016;6:267–273. doi: 10.4103/amhsr.amhsr_413_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Phenotypic characterisation of Proteus species isolated from different clinical samples with special reference to antibiotic resistance pattern in a tertiary care centre. Priya PS, Manonmoney Manonmoney, Leela KV. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16:15–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prevalence of Proteus species in clinical samples, antibiotic sensitivity pattern and ESBL production. Pandey JK, Narayan A, Tyagi S. https://www.ijcmas.com/vol-2-10/Jitendra%20Kumar%20Pandey,%20et%20al.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2013;2:253–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.The Dienes phenomenon: competition and territoriality in swarming Proteus mirabilis. Budding AE, Ingham CJ, Bitter W, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Schneeberger PM. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:3892–3900. doi: 10.1128/JB.00975-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Proteus spp. as putative gastrointestinal pathogens. Hamilton AL, Kamm MA, Ng SC, Morrison M. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31:85–17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Proteus mirabilis: Insights into biofilm formation, virulence mechanisms, and novel therapeutic strategies. Kynshi MAL, Kharkamni E, Borah VV. The Microbe. 2025;8:100450. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Proteus mirabilis biofilm: development and therapeutic strategies. Wasfi R, Hamed SM, Amer MA, Fahmy LI. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:414. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Proteus mirabilis biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Jacobsen SM, Shirtliff ME. Virulence. 2011;2:460–465. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prevalence of multidrug resistant (MDR) Proteus spp. in burn wound infection of a tertiary care hospital, Rajshahi. Tasnim A, Alam MS, Yusuf MA, Khan FA, Ferdose J, Sultana M. Int J Infect Dis Ther. 2021;6:65–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Incidence of Proteus species in wound infections and their sensitivity pattern in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Mordi RM, Momoh MI. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJB/article-full-text-pdf/67741AB5596 Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:725. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.A study of bio-film production and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Proteus species isolated from pus and urine samples. Kavuri P, Gunti R, Gorinka RK. https://www.saspublishers.com/article/16999/ Sch J App Med Sci. 2018;6:4485–4488. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Study of biofilm production and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in clinical isolates of Proteus species at a tertiary care hospital. Karthik R, Ambica R, Nagarathnamma T. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7:574–586. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Jacobsen SM, Stickler DJ, Mobley HL, Shirtliff ME. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:26. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Infective endocarditis by Proteus species: a systematic review. Ioannou P, Vougiouklakis G. Germs. 2020;10:229–239. doi: 10.18683/germs.2020.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Treatment of endocarditis due to Proteus species: a literature review. Kalra A, Cooley C, Tsigrelis C. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15:0–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Characterization of genus Proteus isolated from various clinical specimens and detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production. Anju M, Kuruvilla TS. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2023;10:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Detection of beta-lactamases (ESBL and MBL) producing gram-negative pathogens in National Public Health Laboratory of Nepal. Shrestha A, Acharya J, Amatya J, Paudyal R, Rijal N. Int J Microbiol. 2022;2022:5474388. doi: 10.1155/2022/5474388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide. Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, Jarlier V. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:90–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01846.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Characterization of Proteus species and detection of multi drug resistant (MDR) with special reference to ESBL strains. Syntem S, Dutta H, Kalyani M. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2016;5:153–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC, and carbapenemases in Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates. Shaaban M, Elshaer SL, Abd El-Rahman OA. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22:247. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02662-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Practical approach for reliable detection of AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Polsfuss S, Bloemberg GV, Giger J, Meyer V, Böttger EC, Hombach M. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2798–2803. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00404-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infections in Egyptian hospitals. Helmy MM, Wasfi R. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:171548. doi: 10.1155/2014/171548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dissemination of integrons and carbapenemase-encoding genes among multidrug resistant Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infections in Egypt. Zaki S, Kotb DN, Abdelrahim SS. BMC Infect Dis. 2026;26:179. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-12447-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Evolution of β-lactam antibiotic resistance in Proteus species: from extended-spectrum and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases to carbapenemases. Bedenić B, Pospišil M, Nad M, Bandić Pavlović D. Microorganisms. 2025;13:508. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Metallo-β-lactamases: structure, function, epidemiology, treatment options, and the development pipeline. Boyd SE, Livermore DM, Hooper DC, Hope WW. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:397–320. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00397-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES