Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Sep 23;50(6):589. doi: 10.1007/s11259-026-11505-9

Olfactory neuroblastoma in a goat

Sofía Bosco Mascaro 1, Alejandro Suárez-Bonnet 2, Bettina Dunkel 3, Sonja Jeckel 2, Bernat Martí-Garcia 2,✉
PMCID: PMC13601150  PMID: 42776310

Abstract

Nasal tumours are uncommon in goats, with lymphoma, enzootic intranasal tumours and polyps being the most commonly reported. Nasal neuroectodermal tumours are rarely described and olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), an infrequent neuroepithelial neoplasm originating from the cribriform plate, is poorly documented in this species. Herein we report the clinical presentation and necropsy findings of an 8-year-old goat with a confirmed diagnosis of ONB. The goat was presented in respiratory distress following a history of chronic respiratory noise and an intranasal, right-side infiltrative mass was detected on radiographs. Due to the poor prognosis, euthanasia was performed. Post-mortem examination revealed that the nasal cavity was bilaterally occupied by a round, creamy-grey, soft mass measuring 1 × 3 cm and extending to the nasopharynx. Histologically, a malignant neuroepithelial neoplasm was diagnosed based on its infiltrative growth and the characteristic pattern of Homer Wright and Flexner-Wistersteiner-like rosettes. Immunohistochemical characterization was performed using an antibody panel composed of cytokeratin AE1/AE3, cytokeratin 8, beta III tubulin, vimentin, COX-2, E-cadherin, chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The immunoprofile confirmed the diagnosis of an ONB, with neoplastic cells being only positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and beta-III tubulin. To the best of the authors’ knowledge this is the first description of ONB in goats.

Keywords: Nasal, Olfactory neuroblastoma, Goat

Background

Neoplasms are uncommon in small ruminants, and only a limited number of reported tumour cases involve goats. Nasal tumours, included in the respiratory system, are scarcely reported in goats and when present, epithelial tumours are the most common, followed by lymphomas (Maxie 2025); (Vasconcelos et al. 2023). Clinical signs of nasal tumours include serosanguinous or mucopurulent nasal discharge, sneezing, inspiratory noise increased respiratory effort, and ocular discharge. Advanced cases tend to cause facial deformity and exophthalmos. Differential diagnoses include rhinitis, tooth root abscesses or osteomyelitis (Lubojemska et al. 2016). Neuroepithelial and neuroendocrine tumours are exceedingly rare in veterinary species, and especially uncommon in ruminants, highlighting the need for detailed clinical descriptions and comprehensive pathological characterisation of these neoplasms.

The aim of this case report is to describe the clinical, imaging, pathological, and immunohistochemical features of a nasal mass in an adult goat, ultimately diagnosed as a poorly differentiated olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). To the authors’ knowledge, this represents the first documented case of ONB in a goat, contributing novel information to the veterinary literature.

Case presentation

An 8-year-old, male pet goat was presented to the Equine Referral hospital of the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) with acute respiratory distress following an extended history of an inspiratory noise that had not responded to treatment with antimicrobials and corticosteroids. At admission, the animal was in respiratory distress with open mouth breathing, tachypnoea, an increased inspiratory and expiratory effort and loud inspiratory and expiratory noises. Bilateral mucohaemorrhagic nasal discharge was present and airflow was significantly reduced from both nostrils necessitating an emergency tracheostomy to allow further investigation. Radiographs of the head (Fig. 1) revealed an extensive soft tissue opacity withing the right nasal cavity; no radiographic changes were observed in the thorax. Due to the poor prognosis with no realistic treatment options, humane euthanasia was elected.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Dorso-ventral radiograph of the head showing mild deviation of the nasal septum to the left and a diffuse, heterogenous soft tissue opacity (blue arrow) within the right (R) nasal and paranasal sinus system, extending caudally to involve the cornual sinus. Loss of definition of the bone structures within the right sinus system is also appreciated

Post-mortem computed tomography (CT; Fig. 2) confirmed the presence of a large, infiltrative soft tissue mass occupying the entire right nasal cavity and sinuses, extending into the left nasal passages and the right horn.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Computed tomography (CT) images of the head obtained postmortem showing the extend of the soft tissue mass, indicated by blue arrows, in a sagittal (A), transverse (B) and dorsal plane (C). The mass reaches from the nasal cavity and sinus systems into the nasopharynx and right cornual sinus

The animal was submitted to the Pathology and Diagnostic Laboratories of the RVC for a post-mortem examination (PME) as per standard local protocol. The goat was in a fair body condition (2.5/5), and upon opening the nasal cavity there was a bilateral, round to ellipsoid, 1 × 3 cm cream-grey coloured, soft mass in the caudal aspect. This mass focally effaced the oblique transverse interfrontal septum in the left side and reached the frontal sinus of the right side, where it was associated with extensive intranasal hemorrhage (hematoma). This mass also breached the nasal septum and extended into the nasopharynx (Fig. 3). All the observed masses were associated with mucoid to haemorrhagic discharge.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Right nasal cavity. Soft-tissue mass at the caudal aspect of the nasal cavity, associated haemorrhage and minimal invasion of the nasopharynx (asterisk). Photomicrograph of the nasal mass (sub-gross). The mucosa is effaced by a multi-lobular neoplasm forming anastomosing nests or sheets forming rosette-like structures (arrowheads). In the lower left side of the image, there is peri-osseous proliferation of immature fibroblasts, fragmentation of bony trabeculae (osteolysis) and increased numbers of active osteoblasts and osteoclasts (bone remodelling). Scale bar = 50 µm. Photomicrograph of the nasal mass (cellular detail). Cells are forming rosettes (arrowhead), polygonal, with scant amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm and poorly defined cytoplasmic borders. Nuclei are round, hyperchromatic, frequently fragmented (inset) and parabasal. Occasional mitotic figures are observed and anisocytosis and anisokaryosis are moderate. Scale bar = 20 µm. Neoplastic cells are consistently vimentin negative. Only stromal and rare inflammatory cells are vimentin positive. Scale bar = 50 µm. Scattered neoplastic cells are strongly positive for beta-III tubulin. Scale bar = 20 µm

Multiple tissue sections from the intra-nasal and pharyngeal mass were collected for histopathological evaluation and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, routinely processed, sectioned at 4 μm, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined with a light microscope. Microscopic examination revealed a multi-lobular neoplasm forming anastomosing nests or sheets supported by a dense fibrovascular stroma. The neoplastic cells were often palisading around a moderately eosinophilic, amorphous matrix (rosette-like patterns) or around capillaries (pseudorosettes) (Rissi and Miller 2024). The cells were polygonal, with scant amount of cytoplasm and poorly defined cytoplasmic borders. Nuclei were round, hyperchromatic and parabasal, with marked nuclear fragmentation. Anisocytosis and anisokaryosis were moderate. Mitotic figures were sparsely observed across the tumor, with 15 mitotic figures observed in 2.37 mm2 (Figs. 3 and 3). In some areas near the trabecular bone there was a marked interstitial proliferation of immature fibroblasts (scirrhous response), fragmentation of bony trabeculae (osteolysis) and evidence of increased numbers of active osteoblasts and osteoclasts (bone remodelling). Histologically, a diagnosis of a likely neuroendocrine or neuroepithelial tumour was made and immunohistochemistry (IHC) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded serial tissue sections was performed using a broad antibody panel, including cytokeratin AE1/AE3, cytokeratin 8, E-cadherin, beta-III tubulin, chromogranin A, COX-2, vimentin and synaptophysin (Table 1), to determine the phenotype of the neoplastic cells. Canine tissues, including kidney, adrenal gland, brain and skin were used as positive controls. Negative controls were produced by replacing the primary antibody with phosphate-buffered saline solution. Immunohistochemically, neoplastic cells were positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and beta III-tubulin only (Figs. 3, 3 and 3). Based on both the morphologic and immunohistochemical features, an olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) was diagnosed.

Table 1.

Summary of immunohistochemistry methodology

Antibody Source Host Type Clone Antigen Retrieval Dilution
AE1/AE3 Dako Mouse Monoclonal AE1 AE3 Citrate buffer 1 in 100
Vimentin Dako Mouse Monoclonal V9 Citrate buffer 1 in 100
CgA Dako Mouse Monoclonal DAK-A3 Tris-EDTA buffer 1 in 100
Syp Leica Mouse Monoclonal 27G12 Citrate buffer Ready to use
III beta-tubulin ThermoFisher Mouse Monoclonal 2G10 Citrate buffer 1 in 100
COX-2 ThermoFisher Mouse Monoclonal SP21 Citrate buffer 1 in 50
EMA ThermoFisher Mouse Monoclonal E29 Citrate buffer 1 in 100
CK8 Leica Mouse Monoclonal TS1 Citrate buffer 1 in 100

Discussion

Neoplasms in goats are relatively rare, and nasal tumours are particularly uncommon. Goats account for approximately 10% of reported neoplastic cases in small ruminants, with the integumentary system being the most frequently affected (Vasconcelos et al. 2023).

Based on the animal’s age, clinical signs (Namjou et al. 2018);(Jahns and Cousens 2020) and localisation, nasal adenocarcinoma, either spontaneous or caused by the enzootic nasal tumour virus type 2 (ENTV 2) (Namjou et al. 2018);(Jahns and Cousens 2020) should be considered as the primary differential diagnosis. Other differential diagnoses include nasal polyps, squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoma(Maxie 2025);(Vasconcelos et al. 2023);(Li et al. 2025), but neuroendocrine/neuroepithelial tumours would be considered very unlikely.

ONB is an extremely rare neoplasia (Maxie 2025);(Vasconcelos et al. 2023);(Lubojemska et al. 2016). Macroscopically, it grows invasively and extends to the contralateral nasal cavity, causing extensive destruction of adjacent bony structures (Löhr 2013). The neoplastic cells are presumed to originate from neuroepithelial precursor cells (Pickuth et al. 1999) and arise within the upper nasal cavity at the level of the cribriform plate (Siudak et al. 2015). Only a few cases have been described in dogs and cats (Siudak et al. 2015);(Parker et al. 2010); (Martí-García et al. 2023), cattle (Anderson and Cordy 1981) and horses (Yamate et al. 2006). Olfactory neuroepithelial cells exhibit a high degree of pluripotential differentiation into neurogenic cell types, accounting for the tumour’s neuroectodermal characteristics (Martí-García et al. 2023); (Meuten 2017).

Histologically, ONBs grow in circumscribed lobules forming pseudorosettes and rosettes, often associated with an extracellular neurofibrillary matrix (Rissi and Miller 2024).

The microscopic differential diagnoses due to their potential histological similarities include neuroendocrine carcinomas (‘carcinoids’); non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, sinonasal mucosal malignant melanoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (Lubojemska et al. 2016).

In the presented case, neuroepithelial differentiation of the tumour was suspected based on the microscopic morphology, and this was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining (Meuten 2017);(Vengušt et al. 2025);(Ninomiya et al. 2008). The histological distinction between carcinoids and neuroepithelial nasal tumours must be supported by differential expression of neuronal, epithelial and endocrine markers(Meuten 2017) (Table 2). Beta III-tubulin showed scattered positive immunoreactivity, supporting the neuroectodermal origin of the tumour and its neuroepithelial differentiation (Church et al. 2019). The negativity for neuroendocrine markers like chromogranin A and synaptophysin is supportive of the diagnosis of ONB and excludes a nasal carcinoid (Siudak et al. 2015). The expression of cytokeratin AE1/AE3 highlights the mature neurosensory cells in the olfactory mucosa which naturally express cytokeratin and further supports a neuroepithelial origin. Additionally, the negative staining for cytokeratin 8 allows exclusion of an epithelial tumour of glandular origin. (Kato et al. 2007). Expression of vimentin in ONB has been variably reported(Yamate et al. 2006);(Parker et al. 2010) and in this case was restricted to the tumour stroma. Identification of ultrastructural features of this tumour, including neurite-like processes with microtubular neurofilaments and cytoplasmic, perinuclear electron-dense secretory granules (Martí-García et al. 2023);(Church et al. 2019), would have allowed definitive confirmation. Nonetheless this is not a routine, cost-effective diagnostic test in veterinary oncopathology.

Table 2.

Immunohistochemical profile and comparison with other nasal neoplasms in goats

Neoplasm Vimentin AE1/AE3 CgA Syp III beta-tubulin COX-2 CK8 CD3/ CD20
Olfactory neuroblastoma +/- + - - + - - -
Neuroendocrine carcinoma - + + + + +/- + -
Adenocarcinoma (ENTV) - + - - - +/- + -
Squamous cell carcinoma - + - - - + + -
Nasal polyp - + - - - +/- -
Lymphoma + - - - - - - +

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the scientists at the RVC Diagnostic Laboratories for their laboratory work as well as the Experimental Histopathology Platform at the Francis Crick Institute of London for their kind technical assistance with the immunohistochemical analysis.

Author contributions

BD requested the postmortem examination and contributed to the clinical and outcome sections of the report. BMG conducted the postmortem examination and, together with SBM and ASB, reviewed the histopathology and immunohistochemistry. SBM wrote the report with editorial guidance and amendments by BMG, ASB and SJ. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Funding

Funding for the postmortem examination and any diagnostic testing completed at the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) as part of this investigation was provided by Defra and the Welsh Government through the APHA’s ‘Scanning Surveillance for Diseases of Small Ruminants in England and Wales (ED1100)’ project.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics statement

This investigation did not require ethical approval, as it was a diagnostic submission to the RVC-FAPD (Royal Veterinary College—Farm Animal Pathology and Diagnostic Services), the local surveillance pathology partner postmortem provider for the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Anderson BC, Cordy DR (1981) Olfactory Neuroblastoma in a Heifer. Vet Pathol. 10.1177/030098588101800411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Church ME, Veluvolu SM, Durham AC, Woolard KD (2019) Clinical outcomes, ultrastructure and immunohistochemical features of canine high-grade olfactory neuroblastoma. Vet Comp Oncol 17(4):578–584. 10.1111/vco.12512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jahns H, Cousens C (2020) Nasal adenocarcinoma associated with jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus infection in a sheep. J Vet Diagn Invest 32(1):152–155. 10.1177/1040638719897032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kato K, Uchida K, Nibe K, Tateyama S (2007) Immunohistochemical Studies on Cytokeratin 8 and 18 Expressions in Canine Cutaneous Adnexus and Their Tumors. J Vet Med Sci. 10.1292/jvms.69.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li L, Wang Z, Qi W, Lv Y, Yao D (2025) The pathological characteristics of enzootic nasal adenocarcinoma in goats. J Vet Res 69(1):151–157. 10.2478/jvetres-2025-0010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Löhr CV (2013) One hundred two tumors in 100 goats (1987–2011). Vet Pathol 50(4):668–675. 10.1177/0300985812471544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lubojemska A, Borejko M, Czapiewski P, Dziadziuszko R, Biernat W (2016) Of mice and men: olfactory neuroblastoma among animals and humans. Vet Comp Oncol e 14:70–82. 10.1111/vco.12102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martí-García B, Priestnall SL, Holmes E, Suárez-Bonnet A (2023) Olfactory neuroblastoma in a domestic cat and review of the literature. Vet Clin Pathol 52(3):521–526. 10.1111/vcp.13255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maxie MG (ed) (2025) Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer’s pathology of domestic animals, vol 2, 7th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis [Google Scholar]
  10. Meuten DJ (2017) Tumors in Domestic Animals, 5th edn. Ames, Iowa Wiley-Blackwell
  11. Namjou A, Shirian S, Karimi I, Nourani H, Farid M (2018) Clinical and pathological findings of enzootic nasal adenocarcinoma of goat. Comp Clin Path 27(2):539–543. 10.1007/s00580-018-2643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ninomiya F, Suzuki S, Tanaka H, Hayashi S, Ozaki K, Narama I (2008) Nasal and paranasal adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation in dogs. Vet Pathol Mar 45(2):181–187. 10.1354/vp.45-2-181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker VJ, Morrison JA, Yaeger MJ (2010) Olfactory neuroblastoma in a cat. J Feline Med Surg 12(11):867–871. 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pickuth D, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Imaging of recurrent esthesioneuroblastoma (1999) Br J Radiol 72(863):1052–1057. 10.1259/bjr.72.863.10700820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rissi DR, Miller AD (2024) Rosettes and pseudorosettes in veterinary neuropathology. Vet Pathol. 10.1177/03009858241269877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Siudak K, Klingler M, Schmidt MJ, Herden C (2015) Metastasizing Esthesioneuroblastoma in a Dog. Vet Pathol 52(4):692–695. 10.1177/0300985814559402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vasconcelos J, Pires M, dos A, Alves A, Vieira-Pinto M, Saraiva C, Cardoso L (2023) Neoplasms in Domestic Ruminants and Swine: A Systematic Literature Review. Vet Sci. 10.3390/vetsci10020163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vengušt G, Vengušt DŽ, Cantile C, Gombač M, Tekavec K, Švara T (2025) Case report: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the nasal cavity in a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Front Vet Sci. 10.3389/fvets.2025.1535432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamate J, Izawa T, Ogata K, Kobayashi O, Okajima R, Kuwamura M, Kotani T, Aoki M (2006) Olfactory Neuroblastoma in a Horse J. Vet Med Sci. 10.1292/jvms.68.495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Veterinary Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES