Abstract
During development, the chemokine receptor CXCR4 directs axon guidance, but it is not known if CXCR4 regulates axon targeting in the adult organism as well. We utilized the remarkable feature of the olfactory epithelium to replace damaged neurons throughout life to understand the role of CXCR4 in adult neurogenesis. Through targeting Cxcr4 in horizontal basal stem cells of the olfactory epithelium, we investigated the role of CXCR4 during injury-induced neurogenesis in adult mice by a combination of RNA-seq analysis, bioinformatic methods, behavioral experiments, and microscopical approaches. Conditional knockout mice lacking Cxcr4 initially displayed enhanced regeneration after injury of the olfactory system, resulting in increased numbers of sensory neurons and enhanced sense of smell. Moreover, we found that absence of CXCR4 alters expression of axon guidance proteins. Despite accelerated early neurogenesis, loss of CXCR4 ultimately impaired the reconstruction of the dorsomedial olfactory epithelium, leading to disrupted glomerular organization and reduced avoidance responses to aversive odors. Transcriptomic analysis revealed altered stress response pathways, suggesting impaired cellular adaptation in Cxcr4-cKO mice during regenerative repair. An increased level of ER stress in horizontal basal cells led to instability of the basal lamina, respiratory metaplasia in the dorsomedial part of the olfactory epithelium, and Bowman gland regeneration failure.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-026-06215-x.
Keywords: CXCR4, Olfactory, Axon guidance, Horizontal basal cell, NQO1, Stress response
Introduction
To promote functional recovery in the adult mammalian central nervous system, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms is needed that enables coordinated neuronal tissue repair, long-distance axon regeneration, and re-establishment of neuronal circuits. The expression pattern of specific transcription factors selects combinations of receptors for attraction/repulsion molecules, cell–cell contact proteins, and molecules involved in synaptic partner matching going to be expressed on the cell surface and allowing the neurons to make proper connections.
The olfactory epithelium is a unique model to study neurogenesis and regeneration, as it continuously replaces OSNs (olfactory sensory neurons), which reside in the nasal cavity and project their axons to the olfactory bulb. OSNs are responding to odors in the environment and transmit the information to higher brain centers. Neuronal identity is determined by the stochastic choice of one olfactory receptor out of more than 1000 receptors in the mouse genome, and the choice of the receptor determines the connection in the olfactory bulb [1]. All neurons expressing the same receptor target a specific glomerulus or a small set of glomeruli; olfactory receptor identities therefore are essential for proper axonal projections. The mechanism by which G protein-coupled olfactory receptors are converted into the guidance molecules required for proper glomerular segregation involves cAMP signaling [2, 3], as well as the regulation of the unfolded protein response [4]. In addition, odorant receptors at the axon terminals could respond to molecules originating in the olfactory bulb thereby acting as axon guidance cues [5]. Despite the remarkable regenerative capacity of the olfactory epithelium, the molecular mechanisms that coordinate neuronal replacement with accurate circuit reconstruction remain incompletely understood.
The G-protein coupled receptor CXCR4 (CXC-motif chemokine receptor 4) plays a role in neurogenesis and axon pathfinding in different neuronal tissues during development. Its ligand CXCL12 (CXC-motif chemokine ligand 12) is a repulsive cue for efferents of rat cerebellar neurons [6] but also an attractant for other axons such as retinal ganglion cells [7] and OSNs in zebrafish [8]. CXCL12 reduces the repellent activities of SLIT-2 on cultured retinal ganglion cell axons, of semaphorin 3 A on dorsal root ganglion sensory axons, and of semaphorin 3 C on sympathetic axons [9]. Segregation of retinal ganglion cell axons at the optic chiasm depends on CXCL12 being expressed by the meninges bordering the optic pathway and on expression of CXCR4 [10]. Axonal CXCR4 and CXCL12 secreted by tissues surrounding the neural tube are required for ventral motor neurons to establish the essential connection between brain and periphery [11]. Despite the multiple studies showing the importance of CXCR4 during developmental axon pathfinding, little is known if CXCR4 also contributes to adult neurogenesis. In the adult olfactory epithelium, CXCR4 is expressed by immediate neuronal progenitor cells and immature OSNs and plays a role in olfactory neurogenesis [12, 13]. CXCL12 is expressed in the lamina propria of the olfactory epithelium [14] and therefore might serve as a chemoattractant that guides axons of OSNs to the bulb or could create a permissive environment for axon outgrowth.
We here investigate the role of CXCR4 during injury-induced regeneration of OSNs from adult stem cells. Combining transcriptomic analysis, molecular profiling, histological approaches, and behavioral assessment, our findings identified CXCR4 as a critical regulator of proper axon extension and accurate targeting of their axons to their appropriate glomeruli in the olfactory bulb. Moreover, we found that absence of CXCR4 alters the molecular properties of stem cells and ultimately impairs proper regeneration of the dorsomedial parts of the olfactory epithelium.
Material and Methods
Experimental Models
Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the EC directive 86/609/European Economic Community guidelines for animal experiments and permitted by the local government (Thüringer Landesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Verbraucherschutz). Mice were kept under 12-h light/dark cycles with ad libitum access to food and water. C57BL/6J wild-type mice and Tg(Krt14-Cre)1Amc mice (#004782 [15]) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Sulzfeld, Germany). Krt14 is expressed in horizontal basal cells of the olfactory epithelium [16]. Expression of tdTomato was used to control for the expected localization of promoter activation (Tg(Krt14-cre);R26CAG-LSL-tdT). Cxcr4LoxP/LoxP mice [17] were on a C57BL/6J background. Tg(Krt14-cre);Cxcr4LoxP/LoxP mice were generated in order to delete Cxcr4 in Krt14-expressing horizontal basal cells. For the regeneration experiments, mice at 2 m.o. (month of age) or 18 m.o. were injected intraperitoneally with either 50 mg/kg methimazole or 0.9% sodium chloride (control). Mice were euthanized with an overdose of isoflurane (5%) at 1, 3, 14, 28, and 42 days post-injection (dpi). Mice of both sexes were used for the experiments.
Tissue Preparation
To prepare the olfactory epithelium, vomeronasal bones, zygomatic bones and plate, nasal bones, the lower jaw, incisors, and the anterior maxillae were removed according to a modified protocol [18]. For immunofluorescence, the olfactory epithelium was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C, cryopreserved in 30% sucrose in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) for at least 24 h at 4 °C, and frozen in 2-methylbutane (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, GER). For in situ hybridization, the olfactory epithelium was frozen in 2-methylbutane without prior fixation. The tissue samples were embedded in tissue freezing medium (Leica, Germany) and sectioned coronally at 18-µm thickness. For quantitative PCR, tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Immunofluorescence
In brief, slides were washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), incubated in citrate buffer (0.1 mol/l trisodium citrate dihydrate, 0.5% Tween-20, pH 6) at 97–99 °C for 15 min to unmask epitopes, and blocked with TBS Plus (2% bovine serum albumin, 3% normal donkey serum, 0.1% Triton in TBS) for at least 1 h. The slides were incubated with the primary antibody (Supplementary Table S1) overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the slides were incubated in the secondary antibody solution for 2 h at room temperature (1:500 in TBS Plus, Supplementary Table S2). The detection of aggresomes was performed with Proteostat® Aggresome Kit (ENZ-51035, Enzo Life Sciences GmbH, DE-79540 Lörrach, Germany) as recommended in the manufacturer’s protocol. Aggresomes are inclusion bodies of aggregated, misfolded proteins that form in response to cellular stress. Slides were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in assay buffer with Proteostat® aggresome detection reagent (1:500) and Hoechst (1:1000), followed by washing in PBS.
3,3-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) Staining
After washing in TBS and epitope unmasking in 0.1 mol/l citrate buffer (97–99 °C for 15 min), slides were incubated in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide and washed in TBS. Slides were blocked in TBS Plus for 1 h and incubated with the primary antibody solution at 4 °C overnight (Supplementary Table S1). After washing in TBS, the slides were incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature (Supplementary Table S2), followed by the avidin–biotin complex for 1 h. Slides were stained with 0.7 mg/ml DAB in combination with 1.6 mg/ml hydrogen peroxide in 0.06 M Tris buffer.
High Iron Diamine (HID)–Alcian Blue Staining
To characterize the production of acidic mucins by the Bowman’s glands, high iron diamine (HID)–Alcian Blue staining was performed. HID staining predominantly labels sulfated acidic mucins, resulting in a dark brown to black staining; Alcian Blue labels nonsulfated acidic mucins [19, 20]. The HID solution was prepared by dissolving 120-mg N,N-dimethyl-m-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride and 20-mg N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride in 50-ml distilled water supplemented with 1.4-ml 10% ferric chloride solution. The slides were incubated in the HID solution for 18 h under constant agitation in the dark, washed in TBS, and incubated in Alcian Blue for 2 min.
NADPH Diaphorase Assay
For the NADPH diaphorase assay, slides were washed in 100 mM Tris–HCl pH8 und incubated for 2 h at RT in 1 mM β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), 0.8 mM nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and 0.3% Triton X-100 (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, GER) according to a modified protocol [21]. Afterwards, slides were washed in Tris–HCl, dehydrated, and mounted with Entellan™.
In Situ Hybridization
Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed on 20-µm cryosections of olfactory epithelium from 2 m.o. mice. Sections were fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h and permeabilized in 0.4% Triton X triethanolamine buffer (pH 8) and acetic anhydride. For probe construction, mouse Atf5 cDNA was amplified from murine olfactory epithelium mRNA by PCR and cloned into pcDNA3 (amplified region 299–1151 nt; 853 bp; gene ID 107503; NM030693). The riboprobe for the detection of Perk (Eif2ak3) transcripts was generated using the plasmid PERK.WT.9E10 in pCDNA as a gift from David Ron [22] (Addgene, #21814). For hybridization, sections were incubated with 2 µg/ml Atf5 or Perk riboprobe in hybridization buffer for 20 h at 60 °C in a humid chamber containing 50% formamide. Sections were washed in 1 × SSC (trisodium citrate dihydrate) at room temperature, incubated in RNAse solution for 30 min at 42 °C, and washed again in 0.2 × SSC. Sections were transferred into maleic acid and incubated in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were incubated in anti-digoxigenin-POD Fab fragments (1:500, 30 min), washed in maleic acid, and incubated with TSA™ Plus Cyanine 3 Amplification Kit (Akoya Biosciences, Cat# NEL704A001KT). Slides were mounted with Fluoromount-G™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Microscopy and Quantification of Microscopical Images
Brightfield images were taken using a Zeiss Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, GER) equipped with Progres Gryphax Arktur camera (Jenoptik AG, Jena, GER). Fluorescence was detected with a confocal laser scanning microscope with TCS SPE system (Leica DM2500, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, GER) or with a Zeiss LSM900 equipped with Airy-Scan technology (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, GER).
For quantification of immunofluorescent images, same-sized Z-stacks were selected and four images per region (D-zone, V-zone, Fig. S1) were analyzed in 3–6 animals per group. Four to six cryosections were quantified and averaged. Sections were stained in parallel, and images taken for quantification were taken with the same microscope (TCS SPE system or Zeiss LSM900). Measurements of areas and cell counts were performed on digital pictures using LAS X, ImageJ, or ZEN 3.0. Cell counts were normalized to 1-mm OE. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to the background; the background intensity was determined in cells that do not express the protein of interest based on visual inspection. Data from each animal were averaged and used for statistical analysis; a minimum of three different mice were analyzed per condition. Images were further processed using LAS AF (Leica Microsystems), ImageJ, Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, CA, USA), and ZEN 3.0 (blue edition) (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, GER). Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 5.01; data were represented as mean ± SEM. Data were tested for normal distribution and homogeneity. Statistical significance was set at *probability (p) < 0.05 and analyzed using Student’s t test.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA from 2 m.o. wild-type (WT) and Krt14-Cre; Cxcr4loxP/loxP mice was isolated from olfactory mucosa samples using Purelink RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 12183018 A); cDNA was generated with High Capacity cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 4368814). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on a Quant Studio® 3 Real-Time PCR Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific Germany Ltd. & Co. KG, Bonn, GER) using predesigned Quantitect primers (Qiagen) for Gapdh, Ano2, Ascl1, Atf5, Cnga2, Exoc4, Hspa5, NQO1, Olf16, Olfr545, OMP and Power Up SYBR® Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A25778). qPCR conditions were 2 min 50.0 °C, 2 min 95.0 °C denaturation, and 44 cycles consisting of 15 s 95 °C, 1 min 55 °C. At the end of the cycles, the sample was kept at 10 °C. Three independent runs were performed with each sample. Expression levels of mRNA were determined using the ΔΔCT method and displayed as 2−ΔΔCT values [23].
RNA Sequencing and Transcriptomic Analysis
Main olfactory epithelium was collected from 8 m.o. WT and Krt14-Cre;Cxcr4LoxP/LoxP mice (three animals per genotype). RNA isolation was done using Purelink RNA Mini Kit; RNA concentration and purity were determined by NanoDrop Lite (Thermo Fisher Scientific Germany Ltd & Co. KG, Bonn, GER). RNA integrity was controlled on denaturing agarose gels. Transcriptional sequencing and DE analysis were performed by Eurofins Genomics Germany GmbH (Ebersberg, GER); the dataset was filtered for an adjusted p value cutoff of 0.05. To determine the cellular localization and average expression, differentially expressed genes were identified in a published RNA single cell-sequencing dataset GSE169011 [24]. Visualization was done using the DotPlot function of the R software package Seurat V4 [25]. Gene ontology enrichment and network analysis was accomplished using ShinyGO 0.76.3 [26] for GO biological processes and FDR cutoff of 0.05.
In Silico Perturbation Analysis Using CellOracle
Perturbation analysis, including lineage tracing as a prerequisite, was performed using the Python library CellOracle [27]. CellOracle version 0.14.0 was installed in an Anaconda environment running Python 3.8 on an ARM MacBook Pro with macOS Sonoma 14.0. The installation was performed using the GCC compiler and Xcode command line tools, following the guidelines provided in the CellOracle documentation. The web-based Jupyter Notebook application was utilized for code execution. We utilized the publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE169011, representing the main olfactory epithelium [24], to generate a neuronal subset comprising the cell identities INP, iOSN, and OSN. This neuronal subset dataset was exported as a matrix file using the R software package DropletUtils 1.18.1 [28] and subsequently loaded into CellOracle. For clustering and UMAP projection, parameters were set to n_neighbors = 20 and n_pcs = 10. The cell identity V3M1_TCGAACATCGATACAC was designated as the root cell for pseudotime calculation. For creation of a custom gene regulatory network (GRN) for the adult main olfactory epithelium, we used the published single-nucleotide transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (snATACseq) fragments file GSM7159487 [29]. The fragments file was processed with the R package Signac 1.12.0 [30] and converted into matrix, peaks, and barcode files with parameters set to a total counts cutoff value of > 1000, min.cells = 10, and min.features = 200. Gene annotations were based on the Ensembl “EnsDb.Mmusculus.v79” database [31]. Further processing and formatting to generate the main olfactory epithelium base GRN were performed using the R package Cicero 1.3.9 [32] and Python 3.8, according to the CellOracle documentation for input data preparation. The perturbation analysis was conducted following the standard workflow outlined in the CellOracle documentation.
Cell Type Deconvolution from Bulk RNA Data Using CIBERSORTx
For in silico identification of different cell types within bulk RNA sequencing datasets, the analytical tool CIBERSORTx was used [33]. To calculate the abundance for each cell type of the main olfactory epithelium represented in our bulk RNA data, a main olfactory epithelium-specific signature matrix file was generated (Cibersort supplements). The resulting file comprised uniquely expressed barcode genes for each cell type to serve as a template to impute cell fractions within bulk RNA data. Additionally, a source gene expression profile (sourceGEP) file for batch correction was built by CIBERSORTx during this process. The signature matrix file and sourceGEP file were built from a public single-cell RNA sequencing dataset of the main olfactory epithelium (GSE169011) [24]. Using the “subset” function of the R module Seurat 5.0.1 [34], the dataset was down-sampled to 100 cells for each cell type identity. Subsequently, the RNA counts for each gene in each cell were exported and provided to the CIBERSORTx application as a single-cell reference sample file (Cibersort supplements). For calculation of the cell type barcode genes, the input data type was set to “scRNA-Seq” and recommended presets were used. Determination of cell types in each bulk RNA expression sample was done utilizing the “Impute Cell Fractions” analysis module. Normalized sample-wise gene read counts for each condition and genotype, reflecting the mixed cell population for each tested animal, were provided as mixture file input. The main olfactory epithelium-specific signature file along with the sourceGEP file was used for cell type deconvolution in absolute mode including enabled batch correction in B-mode and disabled quantile normalization.
Behavioral Tests
To increase the motivation for food searching behavior, the mice were not fed for 18 h before the cookie finding test. WT and Krt14-Cre; CXCR4loxP/loxP mice (n = 9–21/time point and genotype, 81 mice in total) were placed in a clean cage with bedding for a 5-min habituation phase; afterwards, a Froot Loop® was hidden in the bedding and mice were placed back in the cage. For 900 s (15 min), the time to find the cookie was recorded. Latency and hit rate (found or not in 900 s) were measured.
For the avoidance test at 42 dpi, WT and Krt14-Cre; Cxcr4loxP/loxP mice (n = 9–12/time point and genotype, 24 in total) were transferred into the test cage including a Petri dish. The behavior was recorded with a fixed video camera on top. At the beginning, 100-µl water as a control was dropped on a filter paper in the petri dish and the behavior was recorded for 3 min. Afterwards, 100-µl hexanal (1:10) was added on a filter paper and placed into the cage. The behavior was recorded again for 3 min. Movements were analyzed using the free ICY Software Mice Profiler Tracker [35].
Results
CXCR4-cKO in Horizontal Basal Cells Causes Mild Phenotypic Changes Under Homeostatic Conditions
CXCR4 is expressed by globose basal cells, immediate neuronal progenitors, and immature neurons [13] and is equally distributed along the anterior posterior axis of the olfactory epithelium (Fig. S2a). The olfactory epithelium contains two progenitor populations. Under homeostatic conditions and during development, the differentiation of actively proliferating globose basal cells sustains olfactory neurogenesis [36–38]. Horizontal basal cells do not contribute significantly to developmental or homeostatic neurogenesis but form sustentacular cells, supporting cells of the olfactory epithelium [39]. Horizontal basal cells are quiescent stem cells that appear in the epithelium only after birth but become activated to repair the system after severe damage with loss of differentiated cells and globose basal cells [40–42]. To specifically investigate the role of CXCR4 in adult neurogenesis and not during development, we deleted the gene in horizontal basal cells to study injury-induced neurogenesis. KRT14 is a marker for horizontal basal cells throughout the olfactory epithelium (Fig. S2b) [16, 43]. We therefore generated transgenic mice expressing Cre-recombinase under the control of the Krt14 (Keratin 14) promoter (Tg(Krt14-cre)1Amc;Cxcr4Loxp/LoxP, named Cxcr4-cKO) to delete Cxcr4 in horizontal basal cells.
Before investigating injury-induced regeneration, we started by analyzing the phenotype of the noninjured mice at steady state. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that Cxcr4-cKO did not significantly affect CXCR4 expression in any region of the olfactory epithelium (Fig. 1a, Fig. S2c). This was expected, since Cxcr4 is predominantly expressed in proliferating globose basal cells [13] which do not express Krt14. Despite similar protein expression, quantitative PCR of the olfactory mucosa revealed a reduction of Cxcr4 mRNA in Cxcr4-cKO mice compared to WT (wild-type) controls under steady-state conditions (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1.

Reduced CXCR4 levels are linked to mild phenotypic changes under homeostatic conditions. a CXCR4 expression was not significantly reduced in Cxcr4-cKO mice, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence analysis in the D-zone of the epithelium. b Quantitative PCR from olfactory epithelium mRNA isolated from adult WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals showed a reduction of Cxcr4 by around 50% in knockout mice. Immunofluorescent staining for GAP43 (c) and DCX (d) exhibited no obvious differences between WT and Cxcr4-cKO in the D-zone of the olfactory epithelium. e Quantitative PCR from olfactory epithelium mRNA isolated from adult WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals. There was no significant difference comparing markers for neuronal precursor cells (NeuroD) and for immature neurons (Gap43, Dcx) between WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals. f Left Overview image of olfactory marker protein (OMP) in the olfactory epithelium showing equal distribution of OMP in WT and Cxcr4-cKO. Right Higher magnification of the D-zone showing immunolabeling of OMP is slightly increased in Cxcr4-cKO mice. g Quantification of OMP staining intensities did not show significant differences between WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice. h Quantitative PCR from olfactory epithelium mRNA isolated from WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals at steady state. Expression of ubiquitous mature OSN markers Omp, Ano2, and Cnga2 was increased in Cxcr4-cKO. Immunofluorescent labeling of OMP (i) and SYN1 (synaptophysin 1, j) in the olfactory bulb of adult WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice. OMP was clearly visible in the outer nerve layer and within the round structured glomeruli in both, WT and Cxcr4-cKO. There was also no difference in SYN1 labeling, indicating normal axonal outgrowth and targeting in Cxcr4-cKO mice. Lines represent the border between outer nerve layer (ONL) and glomerular layer (GL). k Immunostaining of NQO1, a marker for neurons in the D-zone, was more intense in Cxcr4-cKO animals and the staining was expanded into the ventral part (V-zone) of the olfactory epithelium. l Quantification of NQO1 staining intensities, showing a significant increase of NQO1 in Cxcr4-cKO animals. m Quantitative PCR from olfactory epithelium mRNA isolated from WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals at steady state. Expression of D-zone markers Nqo1 and olfactory receptors Olfr16 and Olfr545 was increased. n In Cxcr4-cKO mice, there were fewer proliferating cells stained with MCM2 (minichromosome maintenance protein 2). o Quantification of MCM2-positive cells in the D-zone and the V-zone of the olfactory epithelium. Proliferation was significantly reduced in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice compared to WT, without differences in the V-zone. p In situ hybridization for Atf5 in noninjured epithelium showing increased Atf5 expression in Cxcr4-cKO mice compared to WT in the D-zone and V-zone of the epithelium. q NADPH diaphorase labeling, a histochemical marker for nitrosative stress showing NADPH-dependent reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium to diformazan. r 3,3-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) labeling of 4-HNE showing no obvious differences between WT and Cxcr4-cKO. Scale bars: a, c, d, f right, k right, n, p, q, r 20 μm. f left, k left, i, j 50 µm. Dotted lines represent the basal lamina of the epithelium. Quantification of n = 3 animals per group, Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001
Protein and mRNA levels of neuronal precursors (NeuroD (neuronal differentiation 1)) and immature neurons (Gap43 (growth-associated protein 43), Dcx (doublecortin)) were not different between WT and Cxcr4-cKO (Fig. 1c-–e, Fig. S2d, e). Staining of mature neurons with OMP (olfactory marker protein) appeared slightly increased in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1f, Fig. S2f). However, quantification did not reveal any significant differences (Fig. 1g), probably because of the high overall levels of OMP expression, which prevented small differences from being detected by immunohistochemistry; mRNA expression levels of Omp and other markers for mature OSNs, Ano2 (anoctamin 2) and Cnga2 (cyclic nucleotide gated channel A2), were increased (Fig. 1h). Immunofluorescent staining of the olfactory bulb with OMP and SYN1 (synaptophysin 1) revealed no obvious differences in glomerular organization in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1i, j).
The olfactory epithelium is divided into distinct spatial zones with specific odorant receptor genes and other molecular marker patterns. The enzyme NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) is selectively expressed by mature sensory neurons located within the dorsomedial region (D-zone, but not in neurons in the ventral part (V-zone) of the olfactory epithelium [44] (Fig. S1). Interestingly, Cxcr4-cKO mice exhibited elevated levels of the D-zone marker protein NQO1 and an expansion of NQO1-positive cells in the ventral region, when compared with WT animals (Fig. 1k, l, Fig. S2g). Increased abundance of dorsomedial neurons was also reflected by increased expression of Nqo1 mRNA and olfactory receptors Olfr16 (olfactory receptor 16) and Olfr545 (olfactory receptor 545) (Fig. 1m), known to be specifically expressed in the D-zone of the epithelium [45, 46]. Moreover, cell proliferation activity also showed regional differences. While the number of MCM2 (minichromosome maintenance complex component 2)–positive cells was similar in the V-zone, we detected a significant reduction of cycling cells in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1n, o, Fig. S2h). Together with the increased expression of Olfr16, Olfr545, and Nqo1, this indicates increased differentiation of neurons in the D-zone.
As NQO1 is involved in antioxidant responses, we next examined the expression of the transcription factor ATF5 (activating transcription factor 5) that is involved in cellular differentiation and promotes cellular adaptation to stress [47]. Higher levels of Atf5 expression indicated elevated stress levels in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1p). ATF5 is also important for maturation and survival of OSNs [48]; increased expression may also explain the slight increase in mature OSNs. Moreover, we found increased labeling of NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase) in the olfactory epithelium of Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1q). Increased NADPH diaphorase labeling indicates increased redox signaling and indicates elevated levels of either oxidative stress or ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress [49]. However, since antibody staining against the lipid peroxidation marker 4-HNE (4-hydroxynonenal) did not reveal major oxidative stress in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 1r), increased NADPH diaphorase labeling points toward ER stress.
Overall, we found no major changes in olfactory epithelium morphology after Cxcr4 knockout in horizontal basal cells at steady state, as expected. However, there was higher cell stress. Additionally, we observed a change in the zonal organization of the epithelium. The D-zone, which is characterized by the expression of Nqo1 and certain olfactory receptors, extended further into the ventral epithelium than in wild-type animals. The next objective was to analyze injury-induced regeneration in Cxcr4-cKO mice.
Absence of CXCR4 Improves the Activation of Horizontal Basal Cells After Injury
Following injury induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of methimazole, all cells of the olfactory epithelium are destroyed, except the horizontal basal cells. These are activated to regenerate globose basal cells (neuronal stem cells), as well as all other cells of the olfactory epithelium [50]. We therefore used methimazole to study injury-induced neurogenesis in Cxcr4-cKO mice. Three days after injection (3 dpi, days post-injection), the olfactory epithelium has almost completely detached, leaving only the horizontal basal cells and the lamina propria (Fig. 2a). In WT mice, CXCR4 expression was not found in quiescent horizontal basal cells [13] but was expressed in activated horizontal basal cells after injury (Fig. 2b). Additionally, activated horizontal basal cells expressed SOX2 (SRY-box transcription factor 2) and expanded (Fig. 2c) but still expressed KRT14 and KRT5, as seen in the quiescent state. In this early phase of activation, the thickness of the olfactory epithelium was increased in Cxcr4-cKO compared to WT animals, but difference was only significant in the D-zone of the epithelium (Fig. 2d). Before injury, the thickness of the epithelium was not different between WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2.

Initial phase of injury-induced regeneration in Cxcr4-cKO olfactory epithelium. a Confocal images of the olfactory epithelium along the dorsal–ventral axis in WT control animals and WT mice 3 days post-injection (3 dpi) of methimazole, showing most complete detachment of the olfactory epithelium at 3 dpi, apart from activated horizontal basal cells (white, syndecan 1 (SCD1)) and the lamina propria (visible by staining with laminin (LAM)). b Olfactory epithelium at 3 dpi, showing activated horizontal basal cells express KRT14 (red) and CXCR4 (green) in WT mice. The epithelium in Cxcr4-cKO mice was thicker compared to WT and contained fewer CXCR4-labeled cells. c All cells of the epithelium expressed the basal cell markers KRT5 (green) and SOX2 (red) at 3 dpi. Arrows illustrate increased thickness of the epithelium in Cxcr4-cKO mice. d Quantification of epithelium thickness (control and 3 dpi) in the dorsal (D-zone) and ventral (V-zone) part of the epithelium. Scale bars: a 20 µm; b, c 10 μm. Dotted lines represent the basal lamina and the apical border of the epithelium. Quantification of n = 3 animals per group, Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05
Improved Injury-Induced Neurogenesis in the Olfactory Epithelium of Cxcr4-cKO Mice
Two weeks after injury (14 dpi), elevated neurogenesis was observed throughout the epithelium, albeit with pronounced regional differences. In general, the D-zone contained fewer mature OMP-positive neurons compared to the V-zone (Fig. 3a), consistent with previous findings showing faster maturation of V-zone neurons [51]. In Cxcr4-cKO mice, neuronal regeneration was faster compared to WT mice with more OMP-expressing mature neurons in all regions (Fig. 3a, b). Increased ciliary localization of CNGA2 in Cxcr4-cKO also indicates faster neuronal regeneration (Fig. 3c, d). Moreover, the number of NQO1-positive cells in the D-zone was increased in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 3e), similar to the homeostatic conditions.
Fig. 3.

Accelerated regeneration in Cxcr4-cKO after injury. a OMP-positive neurons in the D- and V-zone of the olfactory epithelium (14 dpi). c Quantification of OMP staining intensities, showing increased labeling in the V-zone of the WT and Cxcr4-cKO but no significant difference in the D-zone. c CNGA2 (cyclic nucleotide-gated channel alpha 2) was localized in neuronal cell somata in the D-zone; ciliary labeling was mostly detectable in the V-zone. d Quantification of CNGA2 staining intensities, showing significantly improved regeneration in the Cxcr4-cKO. e Quantification of D-zone-specific NQO1-positive cells indicated an increase in the Cxcr4-cKO. f At 14 dpi, WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice were slower than noninjured controls in finding a hidden cookie; Cxcr4-cKO mice were faster than WT mice. g Hit rate after 900-s exploration time. Cxcr4-cKO mice were significantly better in cookie finding at 14 dpi. Scale bars: a, c 20 μm. Dotted lines represent the basal lamina of the epithelium. Quantification of n = 3 animals per group (b, d, e), n = 9 (f, g). Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
To investigate if these changes are functionally relevant, we analyzed Cxcr4-cKO mice in a general olfactory ability assessment test, where we observed mice as they locate a piece of food hidden within bedding material based on olfactory cues, called hidden cookie test [52]. In agreement with the observation that the olfactory epithelium showed increased numbers of OSNs in Cxcr4-cKO mice, mice were faster to find the hidden cookie at 14 dpi (Fig. 3f) and showed more success in finding the cookie (Fig. 3g). At later time points, when the epithelial regeneration was more advanced (28 dpi and 42 dpi), the cookie finding performance was similar in WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 3f, g).
Taken together, we describe here an enhanced early phase of injury-induced olfactory epithelium regeneration in Cxcr4-cKO mice, characterized by the accelerated formation of functional sensory neurons.
Perturbation Analysis of Regulated Transcription Factors Supports Increased Neuronal Differentiation in Cxcr4-cKO Mice
In order to get a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of CXCR4 on neurogenesis, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis. Visualization of the differential expression (DE) analysis showed that samples of WT and Cxcr4-cKO control mice were highly similar (Fig. S3a), as expected. At 14 dpi, we identified 152 genes down and 423 genes upregulated in Cxcr4-cKO mice (applying a threshold of FC > 1.5 and p adjusted < 0.05, Fig. S3b). We then identified the specific cell types contributing to the changes in gene expression by employing transcriptomic expression-based analysis using published single-cell RNA sequencing data [24]. We found that regulated genes in the early phase of regeneration (14dpi) are mostly expressed in the neuronal lineage (Fig. S3c). As Cxcr4 is expressed by neuronal precursor cells [13], the absence of Cxcr4 could explain dysregulated gene expression in the neuronal lineage.
Furthermore, we found that most of the differentially expressed transcription factors were also expressed by cells of the neuronal lineage (Fig. 4a, b). To analyze the effects of the regulated transcription factors on cell identities, we used CellOracle analysis to perform in silico transcription factor perturbations. CellOracle is a machine learning–based approach to model changes in phenotypes as a result of transcription factor perturbation [27]. UMAP (uniform manifold approximation and projection) presentations were used to show the position of cell types of the olfactory epithelium throughout neurogenesis (Fig. 4c). Immediate neuronal progenitor cells express Plk4 (serine/threonine-protein kinase 4), immature neurons Gap43, and mature OSNs Omp. In addition, the position of the D-zone neurons in the map is revealed by Nqo1 expression (Fig. 4c). Pseudotime analysis shows the developmental trajectory, from olfactory progenitors (blue) to mature neurons (red) (Fig. 4d). UMAPs of transcription factors that were downregulated in Cxcr4-cKO mice showed Neurod1 in immediate neuronal progenitor cells, Nhlh2 (nescient helix loop helix 2) and Olig2 (oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2) in immediate neuronal progenitor cells and immature neurons, and Lhx2 (Lim homeobox 2) and Id4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4) throughout the neuronal lineage (Fig. 4e). We then employed in silico perturbation to simulate downstream shifts in gene expression following knockout of these transcription factors and visualized the respective results as vector maps (Fig. 4f). In all cases analyzed, we found positive perturbation scores (green) in immediate neuronal progenitors/immature neurons (Fig. 4f, encircled green), indicating that reduced expression of the transcription factors promotes neuronal differentiation. This is in perfect agreement with the observed increased number of neurons and improved cookie smelling of Cxcr4-cKO animals at 14 dpi (Fig. 3). In Neurod1, Nhlh2, Lhx2, and Id4 simulations, negative perturbation scores were detected in a subpopulation of neurons expressing Nqo1 (Fig. 4f, encircled purple). Accordingly, the knockout is predicted to delay or block differentiation of Nqo1-positive neurons located in the dorsomedial part of the epithelium. Moreover, we detected noticeable negative scores for a very small cluster of mature neurons in case of Olig2, Lhx2, and Id4 in silico knockout results (Fig. 4f, purple arrowheads). Interestingly, genes contributing to this cluster were odorant binding proteins and lipocalins (Fig. S3d, e) and were among the most markedly regulated genes in the transcriptomic analysis. A distinct cluster of mature vomeronasal neurons also expressing odorant binding proteins and lipocalins, usually enriched in nonneuronal supporting or secretory gland cells, has been described as putative secretory vomeronasal sensory neurons [53].
Fig. 4.

CXCR4 depletion activates transcription factors involved in neurogenesis. a, b Dot plots (14 dpi) visualizing localization of regulated transcription factors mainly in the neuronal lineage. Dot size represents the relative proportion of cells expressing the gene; color indicates average expression level. HBC: horizontal basal cell; GBC: globose basal cell; INP: immediate neuronal precursor; iOSN: immature olfactory sensory neuron; OSN: olfactory sensory neuron; MV: microvillar cell; SUS: sustentacular cell; RLC: respiratory-like cells. c UMAP presentations of the neuronal lineage of the olfactory epithelium: immediate neuronal progenitor cells Plk4, immature neurons Gap43, mature OSNs Omp, D-zone neurons Nqo1. d Pseudotime analysis showing the developmental trajectory, from blue olfactory progenitors to red mature neurons. e UMAP presentations showing localization of regulated transcription factors Neurod1 (immediate neuronal progenitors), Nhlh2 and Olig2 (immediate neuronal progenitor cells and immature neurons), and Lhx2 and Id4 throughout the neuronal lineage. f In silico transcription factor knockout (CellOracle analysis) of Neurod1, Nhlh2, Olig2, Lhx2, and Id4, transcription factors that were downregulated in Cxcr4-cKO mice. Vector maps show transitions in cell identity; color codes show the directionality of the perturbation vector to the natural differentiation vector. Positive perturbation scores (green) in immature neuronal progenitors/immature neurons (encircled green areas) indicate that reduced expression of these transcription factors promotes neuronal differentiation. Negative perturbation scores (purple) in the D-zone show reduced differentiation into D-zone neurons. Olig2, Lhx2, and Id4 simulations show noticeable negative scores for a very small cluster of mature neurons (purple arrowhead). Immunofluorescence labeling of the olfactory epithelium of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice at 14 dpi. g KDM1A. h DCX. i UCHL1. Quantification of immunofluorescence intensities (j, k, l) and cell numbers (m, n, o) of KDM1A, DCX, and UCHL1 in WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice (n = 3–5 animals per group, Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Scale bars 10 µm. Dotted lines represent the basal lamina
The increased abundance of immature neurons was also detectable by immunohistochemistry. Cxcr4-cKO mice showed increased staining of KDM1A (lysine (K)-specific demethylase 1 A, LSD1) (Fig. 4g, j), which is highly expressed in dividing globose basal cells and declines around the time when OSNs mature [54]. However, cell number quantification of KDM1A-positive cells did not reach significance (Fig. 4m). Other markers for immature neurons such as DCX (Fig. 4h, k, n) and TUBB3 (tubulin beta 3) (Fig. S3f) were also increased. Similar cell numbers but enhanced staining intensities were also observed for UCHL1 (ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1, also called PGP9.5) (Fig. 4i, l, o), which is a ubiquitous neuronal protein expressed in the late stages of maturation. In addition, increased staining intensities of synapsin-1 (SYN1, Fig. S3g) and GM130 (Golgi matrix protein of 130 kDa, Fig. S3h, i) showed that olfactory neurons in Cxcr4-cKO mice underwent faster maturation.
Taken together, perturbation analysis of the regulated transcription factors and the increased abundance of immature neurons and mature neuronal cells in the olfactory epithelium of Cxcr4-cKO mice confirmed improved differentiation or survival of neuronal cells.
Axonal Outgrowth Is Increased in Cxcr4-cKO Mice
Next, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of genes regulated in Cxcr4-cKO mice at 14 dpi. To improve the power to detect significant pathways, we separated the up- and downregulated genes in the enrichment analysis, since genes in a pathway that is disturbed tend to be up- or downregulated similarly, owing to their functional links [55]. The top 20 GO terms of the downregulated genes within the biological process category, filtered by significance using p-adjusted values, were exclusively neurogenesis-related terms, the top terms being linked to axonogenesis (Fig. 5a). Network analysis of the GO terms revealed tight clustering, showing that neurogenesis represents the most relevant affected process in Cxcr4-cKO olfactory epithelium (Fig. 5b). Analysis of the transcriptomic data moreover revealed differential expression of well-known axon guidance genes in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 5c). Decreased levels of ROBO2 (roundabout guidance receptor 2), a protein that is enriched in the D-zone [56], were confirmed in the axon bundles of the lamina propria (Fig. 5d). Analysis of ubiquitous marker proteins for olfactory neurons (DCX and UCHL1) in axon bundles of the lamina propria revealed increased levels in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 5e–h). Together, these findings suggest that Cxcr4 deletion alters axonal development within the lamina propria, with reduced expression of axon guidance-associated ROBO2 and increased abundance of immature axonal markers.
Fig. 5.

CXCR4 depletion affects axon extension. a Dot plot visualization of GO term enrichment for biological processes for the downregulated genes from Cxcr4-cKO olfactory epithelium identified exclusively neuron morphogenesis-related pathways, highlighted based on gene count (dot size), fold enrichment (position), and significance (color) as determined by adjusted p values in the GO analysis. Similar GO terms are summarized for simplification. b Network analysis of GO term enrichment for biological processes showing tight clustering of the affected processes. c Axon guidance molecules show altered expression in Cxcr4-cKO mice (HBC horizontal basal cell, GBC globose basal cell, INP immediate neuronal progenitor cell, iOSN immature olfactory neurons, OSN mature olfactory neuron). d Immunohistochemical staining of ROBO2 (roundabout homolog 2) in the D- and V-zone of the olfactory epithelium at 14 dpi showing reduced labeling in Cxcr4-cKO mice. D-zone of the olfactory epithelium of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice at 14 dpi; immunofluorescent labeling of DCX (e) and UCHL1 (g) in axon bundles in the lamina propria. Quantification of immunofluorescent staining of DCX (f) and UCHL1 (h) in lamina propria axon bundles of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice, showing increased labeling in Cxcr4-cKO mice. i Basal olfactory epithelium and the lamina propria. Immature OSNs express CXCR4 (red). CXCR4 activation is shown by poor labeling with UMB-2 antibody (green), which stains only nonphosphorylated CXCR4. CXC4 is activated in most but not all neurons (arrow pointing to neuron with co-labeling of CXCR4 and UMB-2). Axon bundles (encircled area) are not labeled by UMB-2 (green), showing CXCR4 activation in the lamina propria. j Images of the olfactory system showing immunolabeling of CXCR4 (red) and nonactivated CXCR4 (UMB-2, green). CXCR4 is present on axon bundles in the lamina propria and in the outer nerve layer surrounding the olfactory bulb. Low intensity of UMB-2 labeling in axon bundles shows marked activation of the receptor (n = 3 animals per group, Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Scale bars: 50 µm (d), 20 µm (e, g, i), 100 µm (j). Dotted lines represent the basal lamina or axon bundles
Olfactory axons projecting through the lamina propria are positive for CXCR4 (Fig. 5i). As expected from the marked expression of the CXCR4 ligand CXCL12 in the lamina propria [14], CXCR4 seems to be fully activated in the axon bundles of the lamina propria. Nonactivated and thereby nonphosphorylated CXCR4 was specifically labeled with the anti-CXCR4 antibody UMB-2, which recognizes the C-terminal CXCR4 epitope only when the 346SSS348 cluster is not phosphorylated [57]. Absence of UMB-2 labeling therefore shows activation of CXCR4 in the axons growing through the lamina propria (Fig. 5i, j). Combined, we show that CXCR4 deficiency promotes axon extension in lamina propria during early injury-induced neurogenesis.
Disturbed Axonal Projection in Cxcr4-cKO Mice
Axons of olfactory neurons grow through the lamina propria and finally project to the olfactory bulb. In the outer nerve layer of the olfactory bulb, OSN axons defasciculate before synapsing with mitral cells in the glomeruli. These glomeruli showed only sparse CXCR4 labeling with only few CXCR4-positive axons in WT mice (Fig. 6a), consistent with rapid decline of CXCR4 expression during neuronal maturation [13] and with rapid internalization of the receptor at high ligand concentrations.
Fig. 6.

Reduced CXCR4 expression impairs axon targeting. a CXCR4 (green) was present in the outer nerve layer surrounding the olfactory bulb; the glomeruli showed only sparse immunostaining (white arrows). Border of the glomerulus (encircled area) was identified by OMP-labeling (red). b Confocal images of coronal sections through the olfactory bulb showing the outer nerve layer at the medial site of the bulb of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice at 14 dpi; immunofluorescence shows labeling of DCX, UCHL1, and OMP. The glomerular layer showed only sparse labeling in Cxcr4-cKO. c Quantification of immunofluorescent staining intensities in the outer nerve layer showing lower levels of DCX, UCHL1, and OMP in Cxcr4-cKO mice (14 dpi). d Immunohistochemical DAB staining of OMP at 42 dpi in the olfactory bulb showing not only decreased OMP-labeling in Cxcr4-cKO mice but also disturbed glomerular refinement. e Staining of nuclei with Hoechst in the olfactory bulb displayed altered structures of the glomeruli. f Immunohistochemical DAB staining for NQO1 indicating obviously reduced staining in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb after regeneration in Cxcr4-cKO mice. g Immunohistochemical DAB staining of ROBO2 at 42 dpi showed strong labeling of ROBO2 within the glomeruli in the Cxcr4-cKO compared to WT. For quantification, n = 3 animals per group were used (Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Scale bars 50 µm (a, b, d, f, g), 20 µm (e). ONL: outer nerve layer, GL: glomerular layer. Dotted lines represent the separation between GL and ONL or glomeruli
There is a strong correlation between the location of the olfactory neurons within the epithelium and axon targeting in the olfactory bulb. Neurons of the D-zone project to the dorsal region of the olfactory bulb, whereas V-zone neurons innervate the ventral region [58]. Despite the fact that axonal outgrowth in the lamina propria of Cxcr4-cKO mice was increased at 14 dpi (Fig. 5), the dorsal olfactory bulb displayed reduced staining of DCX, UCHL1, and OMP (Fig. 6b, c) may be due to the observed altered expression of adhesion genes. Additionally, after injury-induced neurogenesis was nearly completed in the olfactory epithelium (42 dpi), Cxcr4-cKO mice lacked clear glomerular structures in the dorsal region of the olfactory bulb (Fig. 6d). Glomeruli often displayed wider, more diffuse borders, and nuclear staining failed to reveal the typical circular arrangement of periglomerular cells (Fig. 6e). Axon terminals that were positive for NQO1, a marker for the D-zone neurons of the olfactory epithelium, were absent from the dorsal olfactory bulb (Fig. 6f). In addition, the axon targeting protein ROBO2, which is also expressed in a high dorsomedial to low ventrolateral gradient [56], was barely detectable in glomeruli of the WT olfactory bulb and was mislocalized and clearly detected in glomeruli of Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 6g). Therefore, the deletion of Cxcr4 promotes the growth of axons in the lamina propria during regeneration. However, it impairs the subsequent targeting of axons and the organization of glomeruli in the dorsal olfactory bulb.
Loss of CXCR4 Impairs Long-Term Regeneration and Maintenance of D-Zone Olfactory Neurons
Mistargeted olfactory axons that fail to make functional synaptic connections have been shown to cause cell death over a period of up to 10 weeks [59]. Four weeks after injury (28 dpi), the olfactory epithelium of Cxcr4-cKO mice appeared similar to the WT epithelium. However, we observed an absence of OMP labeling in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice during the subsequent regeneration process (Fig. 7a, arrows). By 42 dpi, the epithelium had almost completely regenerated, containing several layers of sensory neurons. However, OMP expression continued to increase until 92 dpi (Fig. S4).
Fig. 7.

CXCR4 depletion leads to loss of D-zone neurons. a Immunofluorescence labeling of OMP. At 28 dpi, OMP labeling appeared similar in WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice; at 42 dpi, the D-zone showed signs of degeneration in Cxcr4-cKO mice. L = lateral; V = ventral, D = dorsal, arrows point to degenerated parts. b Quantification of caspase 3 labeling in the D- and V-zone at 14, 28, and 42 dpi showing more dying cells at 14 dpi in Cxcr4-cKO. b 3,3-Diaminobenzidine labeling of OMP-positive neurons in the D-zone at 42 dpi. Immunofluorescent staining for NQO1-positive (c) or ADCY3-positive (d) mature neurons in the D-zone of the epithelium; both proteins were absent in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO (42 dpi). e Quantification of the total thickness of the olfactory epithelium in both zones, indicating a difference in the D-zone of in Cxcr4-cKO mice at 28 and 42 dpi. Quantitative PCR from WT and Cxcr4-cKO animals (42 dpi). Expression of mature neuron markers Omp, Ano2, and Cnga2 was reduced in Cxcr4-cKO (f); globose basal cell markers Exoc4 and Ascl1 were similar between WT and Cxcr4-cKO (g). h Quantification of MCM2-positive globose basal cells at 42 dpi, showing significant reduction of proliferating cells in the D-zone of in Cxcr4-cKO mice. i Immunofluorescent labeling of MCM2 in the D-zone and V-zone of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice. j Immunofluorescent labeling of LHX2 (LIM homeobox 2, green) and DCX (red) showing that neuronal precursors and immature neurons are almost absent in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice at 42 dpi. k Tracks of mice moving around in the cage (3 min). WT mice avoid the hexanal source; Cxcr4-cKO mice enter the area close to the hexanal source (red, danger zone) more frequently at 42 dpi. l Avoidance index calculated by comparing the distance of mice from the hexanal source with the water control. WT mice avoid hexanal; Cxcr4-cKO mice do not. m WT mice were much faster to leave the danger zone than Cxcr4-cKO mice at 42 dpi. n Quantification of the distance (in pixels) traveled showing that Cxcr4-cKO mice stayed longer in the danger zone. a, f, g, h n = 3 animals per group; k, l, m n = 9 animals per group; Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Scale bars 20 µm (b, c, d, i, j), 100 µm (a). Dotted lines represent basal lamina
Higher magnification of the D-zone confirmed absence of OMP-positive OSNs and showed a pseudostratified columnar epithelium (Fig. 7b). NQO1-positive D-zone neurons were nearly absent (Fig. 7c), and ciliary localization of adenylate cyclase type 3 (ADCY3) was missing (Fig. 7d). Measurement of the total thickness of the epithelium revealed a reduced thickness in the D-zone, while other zones were not affected (Fig. 7e). In accordance with the loss of OSNs, expression levels of mature neuronal genes Omp, Ano2, and Cnga2 were lower in Cxcr4-cKO animals (Fig. 7f). Overall mRNA expression levels of Exoc4 and Ascl1, markers of globose stem cells which regenerate the neuronal lineage, were reduced but showed no significant differences (Fig. 7g). However, cell proliferation (Fig. 7h, i) was markedly reduced in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice, indicating absence of proliferating globose basal cells in the D-zone. In addition, staining of immature neurons with LHX2 and DCX (Fig. 7j) was barely detectable in the epithelium.
The D-zone contains specific populations of olfactory sensory neurons involved in the detection of aversive odorants. WT mice show avoidance behaviors toward predator odorants and spoiled smells, and mice lacking D-zone neurons spend much longer time investigating otherwise aversive acids, aldehydes, amines, ketones, and predator odors, among them hexanal [60]. We therefore tested if Cxcr4-cKO mice were able to smell hexanal as aversive odorant after degeneration of the D-zone neurons. 42 dpi WT mice clearly avoided the areas of a test cage close to a source of hexanal, while the Cxcr4-cKO mice did not do so (Fig. 7k and Movies 1–3). Analysis of the mean displacement of the mice from the hexanal source compared to a water sample showed that WT mice, but not Cxcr4-cKO mice, avoided hexanal (Fig. 7l). Cxcr4-cKO mice spent more time exploring the hexanal area (Fig. 7m) and moved around more in the hexanal area (Fig. 7n), demonstrating impaired avoidance behavior.
Together, these results show that after initial fast onset of neurogenesis, knockout of Cxcr4 ultimately leads to loss of neurons in the D-zone of the olfactory epithelium.
Cxcr4-cKO Causes Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress
The finding that knocking out Cxcr4 caused loss of neurons in the D-zone of the olfactory epithelium some weeks after injury led us to investigate possible explanations. Specific GO term analysis of upregulated genes in Cxcr4-cKO mice identified genes involved in “protein targeting to the ER (endoplasmic reticulum),” “cytoplasmic translation,” and “responses to unfolded proteins” (Fig. 8a). The ER stress marker Proteostat® confirmed the increased abundance of misfolded proteins in Cxcr4-cKO mice and their accumulation over time (Fig. 8b). Moreover, caspase 3 labeling showed more apoptotic neurons in the D-zone at the beginning of neurogenesis and axon outgrowth (14 dpi, Fig. 8c). Increased apoptosis and the activation of ER stress–related pathways contribute to age-related pathologies. An analysis of injury-induced regeneration in aged WT animals (18 m.o.) in fact showed that neurons in the D-zone did not regenerate, despite regeneration of other segments of the olfactory epithelium (Fig. 8d).
Fig. 8.

Loss of CXCR4 is associated with ER stress. a Dot plot visualization of GO term enrichment for biological processes for the upregulated genes from Cxcr4-cKO olfactory epithelium at 42 dpi. Gene counts are represented by dot size, fold enrichment by x-axis position, and significance as determined by adjusted p values in the GO analysis by color. b Quantification of labeling with Proteostat® Aggresome Kit at 14 dpi and 42 dpi. c Quantification of caspase 3-labeled cells in the olfactory epithelium at 14, 28, and 42 dpi, showing a significant increase of dying cells at 14dpi in Cxcr4-cKO mice. d Immunofluorescent labeling of OMP in 18M old control WT mice and at 28 dpi after methimazole treatment. After injury, the epithelium regenerated, except parts of the D-zone. e In situ hybridization for Perk showing higher expression in the neuronal layer of the olfactory epithelium in Cxcr4-cKO mice at 14 dpi and 42 dpi. f Immunofluorescent staining of phosphorylated PERK at 14 dpi and 42 dpi, indicating an increase of p-PERK in the horizontal basal cells of Cxcr4-cKO mice. g Quantification of p-PERK staining intensities in horizontal basal cells (HBCs) showing an increase in Cxcr4-cKO mice. h Quantitative PCR from olfactory mucosa mRNA at 14 dpi and 42 dpi. The ER stress marker Hspa5 was increased at 14 dpi in Cxcr4-cKO animals. b, c, g, h n = 3 animals per group; Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars 50 µm (d, e), 10 µm (f)
PERK (protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase, gene name EIF2AK3 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 3)) is a key sensor protein in the ER which is activated during ER stress, when unfolded proteins build up. In situ hybridization of Perk mRNA revealed increased expression throughout the olfactory epithelium in Cxcr4-cKO mice, possibly as a result of elevated cell stress (Fig. 8e). In the canonical PERK pathway, sensing of misfolded proteins induces PERK auto-phosphorylation, and phosphorylated PERK subsequently phosphorylates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eif2α) to attenuate global protein translation and to upregulate chaperone expression. There was a higher level of phosphorylated PERK in horizontal basal cells of WT mice during ongoing regeneration (14 dpi) compared to the time point when neurogenesis has largely been completed (Fig. 8f, g), suggesting ER stress during activation. PERK phosphorylation in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice was more pronounced, consistent with upregulation of ER stress–related proteins. Moreover, PERK phosphorylation in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice did not decline over time (42 dpi, Fig. 8f, g). Furthermore, PERK phosphorylation could lead to increased expression of Hspa5 (heat shock protein family member 5), an ER chaperone (Fig. 8h).
It has been shown that ER stress regulates expression of axon guidance and cell adhesion genes in olfactory neurons [4]. A number of genes associated with axon guidance found to be regulated in Cxcr4-cKO mice (PLXNA4, NRP2, ROBO2, PCDH17, CNTN4, TENM2, and GAP43, shown in Fig. 5c) are also known to be regulated by ER stress [4]. Hence, the increased stress response in Cxcr4-cKO animals might also cause the loss of D-zone neurons as well as altered glomerular targeting.
Basal Cells of the Metaplastic Epithelium are Different from Horizontal Basal Cells
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the degeneration of the D-zone in Cxcr4-cKO mice, we used CIBERSORTx [33] to estimate the abundances of cell types in the olfactory epithelium after loss of neurons in the D-zone. A published scRNA-seq dataset [24] was used to generate the deconvolution signature matrix, needed to enumerate cell fractions from our transcriptome analysis at 42 dpi. Under homeostatic conditions, we found no alteration in the cellular composition of both genotypes (Fig. 9a). Calculated cell numbers revealed decreased numbers of neurons in Cxcr4-cKO mice at 42 dpi (Fig. 9b), demonstrating that the RNA-seq dataset represents the observed phenotype. The analysis also revealed an increased abundance of cells initially classified as “ependymal cells” [24] (here renamed RLC (respiratory-like cells), Fig. 9b), possibly representing the cells in the aneuronal D-zone. Classification as respiratory-like cells was based on analysis of the expression of respiratory epithelium marker genes in the reference dataset. Respiratory epithelium-specific genes were derived from single-cell RNA-seq data of ciliated airway epithelial cells of the human lung [61] and from the Monarch Initiative [62] (Fig. S5a, b). Both datasets showed that the cell cluster classified as “ependymal cells” displays marked similarities to ciliated respiratory cells. Staining with the respiratory epithelium marker MARCKS (myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate) and acetylated tubulin confirmed that the metaplastic D-zone cells were ciliated and bore a marked resemblance to respiratory epithelial cells (Fig. 9c).
Fig. 9.

Basal cells of the metaplastic D-zone are different from horizontal basal cells of the olfactory epithelium. a, b Cell type deconvolution from bulk RNA-seq data via CIBERSORTx, shown as relative fractions normalized to 1 across all cell subsets. Significant differences are highlighted by bold letters. a No difference in the relative fractions of cell types between WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice at steady state. b Cell type deconvolution of 42 dpi data shows reduced numbers of OSNs and increased numbers of respiratory-like cells in Cxcr4-cKO compared to WT mice. c Labeling of acetylated tubulin (red) and MARCKS (green) in the olfactory epithelium (D-zone) and in the respiratory epithelium (RE) of WT and Cxcr4-cKO mice. d Immunofluorescent labeling of IP3R3 indicates increased activation of basal cells in Cxcr4-cKO mice at 42 dpi. e Quantification of IP3R3 staining intensities in basal cells showing a significant increase in Cxcr4-cKO mice. f Immunofluorescent labeling of SCD1 in horizontal basal cells was increased in Cxcr4-cKO animals. g Immunohistochemical DAB staining for KRT5 also indicates stronger labeling of basal cells in Cxcr4-cKO mice. Furthermore, Cxcr4-cKO mice show marked invaginations of the basal lamina, which were not found in WT mice. h Quantification of basal lamina invaginations. i Immunofluorescent staining of laminin indicates reduced labeling of the basal lamina in Cxcr4-cKO mice. j Immunofluorescent labeling of horizontal basal cells with ICAM1 (green) and HOECHST (blue), showing a rounded cell morphology in Cxcr4-cKO mice. k Quantification of the distance between the nucleus and the cell membrane (labeled by ICAM1). The distance was increased in Cxcr4-cKO mice, demonstrating the difference in cell morphology. l Quantification of AQP5 staining intensities in horizontal basal cells. Increased immunofluorescent staining of AQP5 (m) or AQP4 (n) (red) in Cxcr4-cKO mice, basal cells are stained with ICAM1 (green). o Immunofluorescent labeling of CX43 (red) as a marker for gap junctions together with ICAM1 indicates increased cell–cell contacts between basal cells of Cxcr4-cKO mice. p Quantification of CX43 in horizontal basal cells. q Quantification of Bowman glands (stained with AQP5) in the olfactory mucosa showing a significant reduction of Bowman glands in the lamina propria of the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice. Immunofluorescent staining for AQP4 (r) and SOX10 (s) also shows the absence of Bowman glands in Cxcr4-cKO mice. e, h, k, l, p, q n = 3 animals per group; Student’s t test, error bars represent SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars 5 µm (j), 10 µm (c, d, e, m, n, o), 20 µm (r, s)
IP3-mediated calcium signaling occurs in activated horizontal basal cells and correlates with the appearance of respiratory barrier cells instead of sensory neurons [63]. Increased levels of IP3R3 (inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate-receptor, type 3, ITPR3) in basal cells in the metaplastic zone therefore indicates activation (Fig. 9d, e). The basal cells of the metaplastic D-zone expressed markers for horizontal basal cells such as SCD1 (syndecan 1) and KRT5 but at higher levels (Fig. 9f, g). Moreover, we found that the basal lamina, which always appears as straight line in WT mice, showed multiple invaginations (Fig. 9g, h). Moreover, we found reduced levels of laminin at the basal lamina in Cxcr4-cKO mice (Fig. 9i). Analysis of published scRNA-seq data [24] revealed that horizontal basal cells express laminins, components of the basal lamina (Fig. S5c). Together, differences of basal cells in the metaplastic epithelium compared to normal horizontal basal cells could explain the altered stability of the basal lamina.
More detailed analysis of the cell morphology revealed an increased distance between the plasma membrane (stained by ICAM1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1) and the nucleus in Cxcr4-cKO mice, resulting in a more rounded morphology (Fig. 9j, k). Cell swelling is likely caused by marked overexpression of aquaporins (AQP5 and AQP4) in the activated basal cells (Fig. 9l-–n). In addition, basal cells in the metaplastic zone showed increased expression of GJA1 (gap junction protein alpha 1, also called Connexin 43), indicating increased cell–cell communication (Fig. 9o, p). Moreover, basal cells in the metaplastic epithelium were ciliated, similar to WT horizontal basal cells, but the cilia were longer (Fig. S5d-f).
Following methimazole-induced injury, a subset of horizontal basal cells repopulates all microvillar cells and Bowman glands [64]. We therefore analyzed if basal cells in Cxcr4-cKO mice can still regenerate Bowman glands. Analysis of expression of AQP4 and AQP5 revealed that the number of glands in the lamina propria was markedly reduced in the D-zone (Fig. 9q, r; Fig. S5g). Moreover, staining of SOX10 showed absence of gland ducts extending throughout the epithelium (Fig. 9s). In addition, analysis of mucin secretion confirmed absence of secreting Bowman gland cells (Fig. S5h).
Together, we found that basal cells in the degenerated D-zone showed similarities to horizontal basal cells, the stem cells present in the WT olfactory epithelium. Differences in the molecular properties impaired their capacity to regenerate cells of the neuronal lineage but also Bowman gland cells.
Discussion
During injury-induced neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium, axon fasciculation ensures coordinated growth in the lamina propria, whereas defasciculation and rearrangement in the olfactory bulb are required to project to specific glomeruli. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling regulates neuronal migration, cell positioning, and axon wiring during development of the zebrafish olfactory system [8], in mammalian motor neurons [11], oculomotor axons [65, 66], the enteric nervous system [67], and in retinal ganglion axons [10]. Our study demonstrates that CXCR4 is not only a developmental guidance cue but also a key regulator of tissue reconstruction, stress response, and axon pathfinding during adult injury-induced neurogenesis. The results of the study are summarized in Fig. S6.
Regeneration of the Olfactory Epithelium in Cxcr4-cKO Mice is Initially Faster than in WT Mice
Absence of Cxcr4 during injury-induced neurogenesis alters the expression of transcription factors known to be involved in neuronal differentiation [68–70] but also of transcription factors that have not been implicated in olfactory neurogenesis so far, such as ID4. CellOracle [27] revealed that the absence of NEUROD1, BCL11B (B cell-lymphoma/leukemia 11B), LHX2, and OLIG2 could speed up the progression through the neuronal lineage. In agreement with CellOracle analysis, expression levels of axon pathfinding molecules were altered and initial outgrowth of new axons through the lamina propria was faster in the regenerating epithelium of Cxcr4-cKO mice. Enhanced neuronal differentiation was also observed on a functional level, since we found improved detection of olfactory cues during the early phase of regeneration. Although most OSNs appearing at 14 dpi are not fully mature, immature OSNs have been shown to provide odor input to the olfactory bulb and successfully perform odor detection and discrimination tasks [71]. CellOracle analysis also predicted that some of the regulated transcription factors delay or block the differentiation of Nqo1-positive neurons located in the dorsomedial part of the epithelium.
Axon Guidance Depends on CXCR4 Expression
The regulation of axon guidance gene expression could be a result of the observed altered expression of transcription factors. For example, LHX2 is known to regulate expression of SEMA3A [72] and ROBO2 [73]. Alternatively, the reduced expression of Gαi-coupled CXCR4 could influence axon guidance by altering cAMP levels, since expression of guidance genes in OSNs has been shown to depend on cAMP signaling [3] and CXCR4 signaling is known to reduce the activities of axonal guidance cues by regulating cAMP levels in the spinal cord [9]. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis of Cxcr4-cKO mice 6 weeks after injury showed greater abundance of GO terms relating to the unfolded protein response ER stress has been shown to regulate the glomerular coalescence of olfactory axons and the specificity of their projections during development by differential expression of axon guidance genes [4, 74].
D-Zone Degeneration in Cxcr4-cKO Mice Could Depend on Axon Mistargeting
Finally, after early successful epithelial regeneration, Cxcr4 knockout results in neural degeneration in the D-zone. OSNs located in the dorsomedial (D-zone) and ventrolateral (V-zone) region of the olfactory epithelium send their axons to the dorsal and ventral region of the olfactory bulb, respectively. Consistent with the known role of D-zone neurons in the innate response to aversive odors [60], degeneration of the D-zone in Cxcr4-cKO mice also caused impaired aversive behavior in response to predator odors. Cookie finding performance was indistinguishable from WT in this late phase of regeneration, consistent with previous reports showing that wiring errors and altered organization of the olfactory system have relatively minor effects on olfactory abilities of mice [75, 76]. Since staining of OSN axons in the olfactory bulb was reduced and axonal coalescence in the glomeruli of the olfactory bulb was disturbed, the absence of OSNs could be the consequence of a failure in axon pathfinding. Axons that extend beyond the target layer into the deeper layers of the olfactory bulb degenerate during development [77]. This raises the question of why only the D-zone neurons degenerate, despite CXCR4 being expressed throughout the olfactory epithelium.
The zones of the olfactory epithelium are inherently distinct, resulting in differences in cellular homeostasis that modulate the capacity of the regions to adjust to extrinsic influences. OSNs in the D-zone show differences in axon extension, which may cause different susceptibility to the alteration of axon guidance gene expression in Cxcr4-cKO mice. These neurons are generated earlier in development, which correlates with faster axonal extension and emergence of glomerular structures in the olfactory bulb [78]. Furthermore, D-zone neurons are more susceptible to axonal transport inhibition, since impaired neurofilament-based slow axonal transport caused by application of IDPN (3,3′-Iminodipropionitrile) results in specific D-zone degeneration in young adult rats [79]. In addition, expression of axon guidance genes depends on ER stress, and D-zone neurons tend to have higher ER stress scores than neurons from the V-zone [4].
D-Zone Degeneration in Cxcr4-cKO Mice Could Depend on Cellular Stress
Cell death in the D-zone of regenerating Cxcr4-cKO mice may also occur entirely independent of the described axon pathfinding and wiring phenotype. ER stress and oxidative stress are two closely associated events and can coincide as protein folding is influenced by the redox state of the ER [80]. OSNs in the D-zone, but not in the ventral part, express NQO1, an enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of a broad range of cytotoxic quinones resulting in protection from oxidative stress [81]. Subtle changes in NQO1 have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases. For example, NQO1 is expressed in the substantia nigra and has been found to be markedly increased in the early and intermediate stages of Parkinson disease but decreases in the end stage of the disease when dopaminergic neurons die [82]. The observed degeneration of D-zone neurons during injury-induced neurogenesis in aged WT mice could therefore indicate an altered stress level as the underlying cause. Aging, eventually leading to cellular dysfunction, is driven significantly by a dysregulated unfolded protein response [83] and by dysregulation of antioxidant systems resulting in increased oxidative stress [84]. In addition, sleep deprivation, which causes oxidative stress in both brain and peripheral tissues [85], led to impaired regeneration of OSNs in the D-zone during injury-induced neurogenesis [86].
The NQO1-positive OSNs in the D-zone are also lost when animals are under long-term caloric restriction or protein restriction [87–89], although caloric and protein restriction reduce oxidative stress in most tissues. The treatments are suggested to cause an unexpected increase in oxidative stress in D-zone neurons, possibly due to NQO1 bioactivation [87]. On the other hand, long-term caloric restriction or protein restriction are conditions that cause perturbations of ER homeostasis and induce ER stress, which could as well impact cell survival or axon extension mechanisms. The increased number of NQO1-positive neurons and the increased mRNA expression of markers for mature OSNs in Cxcr4-cKO mice under steady-state conditions further indicate enhanced differentiation of OSNs in the absence of CXCR4. These changes were accompanied by an increased ATF5 expression in Cxcr4-cKO mice reflecting an enhanced stress adaption to maintain OSN homeostasis under noninjured conditions. However, during injury-induced regeneration, this adaptive response appears insufficient to sustain long-term tissue integrity. Consequently, the initial advantage of accelerated neurogenesis (14 dpi) is followed by a progressive decline of regenerative capacity, resulting in the D-zone degeneration and irreversible loss of functional olfactory epithelium (42 dpi).
Respiratory Metaplasia Depends on Activation of Horizontal Basal Cells
The degenerated D-zone was composed of basal cells and ciliated respiratory-like cells. The basal cells showed increased IP3 receptor expression which has been shown to correlate with the appearance of respiratory barrier cells instead of sensory neurons [63]. Furthermore, basal cells in the metaplastic D-zone expressed markers related to horizontal basal cells at higher levels, while laminin expression seemed to be reduced, affecting basal lamina stability. In addition, basal cells in the metaplastic zone showed increased expression of aquaporins which correlated with a change from a flat to a rounded cellular morphology, known to occur during activation of horizontal basal cells. Apart from a failure to sustain neurogenesis, another marked difference was observed in Cxcr4-cKO mice with regard to the regeneration of Bowman glands. Bowman glands are derived from horizontal basal cells during injury-induced regeneration of the olfactory mucosa [64]. Basal cells in the D-zone of Cxcr4-cKO mice did not regenerate secretory gland cells in the lamina propria or gland ducts extending through the epithelium.
Conclusion
Inhibitory factors, aberrant synaptogenesis, and the limited intrinsic regenerative capacity of adult neurons are obstacles to axon regeneration in the central nervous system, resulting in permanent disabilities after spinal cord injury or stroke. Our study identifies CXCR4 as a key determinant of regenerative success during injury-induced neurogenesis. Despite the faster replacement of lost neurons in Cxcr4-cKO mice, axon guidance and glomerular targeting were impaired, perhaps as a result of altered adaptive stress response. In Cxcr4-cKO mice, initial rapid regeneration was followed by long-term degeneration of the sensory epithelium, indicating that coordination and maintenance of regenerative capacity are critical for functional recovery.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1: Response of WT mice to the water control stimulus. (MOV 21.8 MB)
Supplementary Material 2: WT mice avoid hexanal. (MOV 20.4 MB)
Supplementary Material 3: Cxcr4-cKO mice do not avoid hexanal. (MOV 21.5 MB)
Supplementary Material 4 (PDF 6.50 MB)
Supplementary Material 5 (PDF 6.81 MB)
Acknowledgements
We thank Stefan Bechmann for excellent technical assistance and Ralf Stumm and Dagmar Schütz (University Hospital Jena) for supplying mice. We are very grateful to Stavros Lomvardas and Tiberiu S. Mihaila (Columbia University, New York) for their valuable suggestions with antibody stainings. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, NE 755/6-1).
Abbreviations
- OSN
Olfactory sensory neuron
- ER
Endoplasmic reticulum
- D-zone
Dorsomedial part of the olfactory epithelium
- V-zone
Ventral part of the olfactory epithelium
- UMAP
Uniform manifold approximation and projection
- dpi
Days post injection
- m.o.
Month of age
- WT
Wild type
- cKO
Conditional knockout
Author Contribution
Conceptualization, E.M.N., K.S.; Methodology, K.S., A.D., E.M.N.; Formal analysis, K.S., A.D.; Investigation, K.S., A.D., J.K., E.M.N.; Writing-Original Draft E.M.N., K.S.; Writing – Review and Editing, A.D., Visualization, K.S., E.M.N. A.D., Supervision, E.M.N.; Funding acquisition, E.M.N.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, NE 755/6-1).
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics Approval
Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the EC directive 86/609/European Economic Community guidelines for animal experiments and permitted by the local government (Thüringer Landesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Verbraucherschutz).
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Vassar R, Ngai J, Axel R (1993) Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Cell 74(2):309–318. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90422-m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chesler AT, Zou DJ, Le Pichon CE, Peterlin ZA, Matthews GA, Pei X, Miller MC, Firestein S (2007) A G protein/cAMP signal cascade is required for axonal convergence into olfactory glomeruli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(3):1039–1044. 10.1073/pnas.0609215104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Imai T, Suzuki M, Sakano H (2006) Odorant receptor-derived cAMP signals direct axonal targeting. Science 314(5799):657–661. 10.1126/science.1131794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shayya HJ, Kahiapo JK, Duffié R, Lehmann KS, Bashkirova L, Monahan K, Dalton RP, Gao J et al (2022) ER stress transforms random olfactory receptor choice into axon targeting precision. Cell 185(21):3896-3912.e3822. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.08.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Zamparo I, Francia S, Franchi SA, Redolfi N, Costanzi E, Kerstens A, Fukutani Y, Battistutta R et al (2019) Axonal odorant receptors mediate axon targeting. Cell Rep 29(13):4334-4348.e4337. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiang Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Cui K, Wang S, Yuan XB, Wu CP, Poo MM et al (2002) Nerve growth cone guidance mediated by G protein-coupled receptors. Nat Neurosci 5(9):843–848. 10.1038/nn899 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Li Q, Shirabe K, Thisse C, Thisse B, Okamoto H, Masai I, Kuwada JY (2005) Chemokine signaling guides axons within the retina in zebrafish. J Neurosci 25(7):1711–1717. 10.1523/jneurosci.4393-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miyasaka N, Knaut H, Yoshihara Y (2007) Cxcl12/Cxcr4 chemokine signaling is required for placode assembly and sensory axon pathfinding in the zebrafish olfactory system. Development 134(13):2459–2468. 10.1242/dev.001958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chalasani SH, Sabelko KA, Sunshine MJ, Littman DR, Raper JA (2003) A chemokine, SDF-1, reduces the effectiveness of multiple axonal repellents and is required for normal axon pathfinding. J Neurosci 23(4):1360–1371. 10.1523/jneurosci.23-04-01360.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Le VH, Orniacki C, Murcia-Belmonte V, Denti L, Schütz D, Stumm R, Ruhrberg C, Erskine L (2024) CXCL12 promotes the crossing of retinal ganglion cell axons at the optic chiasm. Development. 10.1242/dev.202446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lieberam I, Agalliu D, Nagasawa T, Ericson J, Jessell TM (2005) A Cxcl12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling pathway defines the initial trajectory of mammalian motor axons. Neuron 47(5):667–679. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McIntyre JC, Titlow WB, McClintock TS (2010) Axon growth and guidance genes identify nascent, immature, and mature olfactory sensory neurons. J Neurosci Res 88(15):3243–3256. 10.1002/jnr.22497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Senf K, Karius J, Stumm R, Neuhaus EM (2021) Chemokine signaling is required for homeostatic and injury-induced neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Stem Cells 39(5):617–635. 10.1002/stem.3338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dietz A, Senf K, Karius J, Stumm R, Neuhaus EM (2023) Glia cells control olfactory neurogenesis by fine-tuning CXCL12. Cells. 10.3390/cells12172164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dassule HR, Lewis P, Bei M, Maas R, McMahon AP (2000) Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development 127(22):4775–4785. 10.1242/dev.127.22.4775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Holbrook EH, Szumowski KE, Schwob JE (1995) An immunochemical, ultrastructural, and developmental characterization of the horizontal basal cells of rat olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol 363(1):129–146. 10.1002/cne.903630111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nie Y, Waite J, Brewer F, Sunshine MJ, Littman DR, Zou YR (2004) The role of CXCR4 in maintaining peripheral B cell compartments and humoral immunity. J Exp Med 200(9):1145–1156. 10.1084/jem.20041185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dunston D, Ashby S, Krosnowski K, Ogura T, Lin W (2013) An effective manual deboning method to prepare intact mouse nasal tissue with preserved anatomical organization. J Vis Exp (78). 10.3791/50538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Spicer SS (1965) Diamine methods for differentiating mucosubstances histochemically. J Histochem Cytochem 13(3):211–234. 10.1177/13.3.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reid PE, Owen DA, Fletcher K, Rowan RE, Reimer CL, Rouse GJ, Park CM (1989) The histochemical specificity of high iron diamine-alcian blue. Histochem J 21(8):501–507. 10.1007/bf01845800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rebeck GW, Marzloff K, Hyman BT (1993) The pattern of NADPH-diaphorase staining, a marker of nitric oxide synthase activity, is altered in the perforant pathway terminal zone in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 152(1–2):165–168. 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90509-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D (1999) Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature 397(6716):271–274. 10.1038/16729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmittgen TD, Lee EJ, Jiang J (2008) High-throughput real-time PCR. Methods Mol Biol 429:89–98. 10.1007/978-1-60327-040-3_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang IH, Murray E, Andrews G, Jiang HC, Park SJ, Donnard E, Durán-Laforet V, Bear DM et al (2022) Spatial transcriptomic reconstruction of the mouse olfactory glomerular map suggests principles of odor processing. Nat Neurosci 25(4):484–492. 10.1038/s41593-022-01030-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, Lee MJ, Wilk AJ et al (2021) Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184(13):3573-3587.e3529. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ge SX, Jung D, Yao R (2019) ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 36(8):2628–2629. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kamimoto K, Stringa B, Hoffmann CM, Jindal K, Solnica-Krezel L, Morris SA (2023) Dissecting cell identity via network inference and in silico gene perturbation. Nature 614(7949):742–751. 10.1038/s41586-022-05688-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lun ATL, Riesenfeld S, Andrews T, Dao TP, Gomes T, Marioni JC (2019) EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol 20(1):63. 10.1186/s13059-019-1662-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pourmorady AD, Bashkirova EV, Chiariello AM, Belagzhal H, Kodra A, Duffie R, Kahiapo J, Monahan K et al (2024) RNA-mediated symmetry breaking enables singular olfactory receptor choice. Nature 625(7993):181–188. 10.1038/s41586-023-06845-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stuart T, Srivastava A, Madad S, Lareau CA, Satija R (2021) Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat Methods 18(11):1333–1341. 10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bais AS, Kostka D (2020) Scds: computational annotation of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 36(4):1150–1158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pliner HA, Packer JS, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Cusanovich DA, Daza RM, Aghamirzaie D, Srivatsan S, Qiu X et al (2018) Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol Cell 71(5):858–871. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Newman AM, Steen CB, Liu CL, Gentles AJ, Chaudhuri AA, Scherer F, Khodadoust MS, Esfahani MS et al (2019) Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry. Nat Biotechnol 37(7):773–782. 10.1038/s41587-019-0114-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski MH, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A, Srivastava A, Molla G et al (2024) Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol 42(2):293–304. 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Chaumont F, Coura RD, Serreau P, Cressant A, Chabout J, Granon S, Olivo-Marin JC (2012) Computerized video analysis of social interactions in mice. Nat Methods 9(4):410–417. 10.1038/nmeth.1924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Caggiano M, Kauer JS, Hunter DD (1994) Globose basal cells are neuronal progenitors in the olfactory epithelium: a lineage analysis using a replication-incompetent retrovirus. Neuron 13(2):339–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Graziadei P, Monti Graziadei G (1979) Neurogenesis and neuron regeneration in the olfactory system of mammals. I. Differentiation and structural organization of the olfactory sensory neurons. J Neurocytol 8:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schwob JE, Huard JM, Luskin MB, Youngentob SL (1994) Retroviral lineage studies of the rat olfactory epithelium. Chem Senses 19(6):671–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fletcher Russell B, Prasol Melanie S, Estrada J, Baudhuin A, Vranizan K, Choi Yoon G, Ngai J (2011) p63 regulates olfactory stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Neuron 72(5):748–759. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwob JE, Youngentob SL, Mezza RC (1995) Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide-induced lesion. J Comp Neurol 359(1):15–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leung CT, Coulombe PA, Reed RR (2007) Contribution of olfactory neural stem cells to tissue maintenance and regeneration. Nat Neurosci 10(6):720–726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iwai N, Zhou Z, Roop DR, Behringer RR (2008) Horizontal basal cells are multipotent progenitors in normal and injured adult olfactory epithelium. Stem Cells 26(5):1298–1306. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Packard A, Schnittke N, Romano RA, Sinha S, Schwob JE (2011) DeltaNp63 regulates stem cell dynamics in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. J Neurosci 31(24):8748–8759. 10.1523/jneurosci.0681-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gussing F, Bohm S (2004) NQO1 activity in the main and the accessory olfactory systems correlates with the zonal topography of projection maps. Eur J Neurosci 19(9):2511–2518. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03331.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hirota J, Omura M, Mombaerts P (2007) Differential impact of Lhx2 deficiency on expression of class I and class II odorant receptor genes in mouse. Mol Cell Neurosci 34(4):679–688. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kolterud A, Alenius M, Carlsson L, Bohm S (2004) The Lim homeobox gene Lhx2 is required for olfactory sensory neuron identity. Development 131(21):5319–5326. 10.1242/dev.01416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sears TK, Angelastro JM (2017) The transcription factor ATF5: role in cellular differentiation, stress responses, and cancer. Oncotarget 8(48):84595–84609. 10.18632/oncotarget.21102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang SZ, Ou J, Zhu LJ, Green MR (2012) Transcription factor ATF5 is required for terminal differentiation and survival of olfactory sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(45):18589–18594. 10.1073/pnas.1210479109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Seckler JM, Shen J, Lewis THJ, Abdulameer MA, Zaman K, Palmer LA, Bates JN, Jenkins MW et al (2020) NADPH diaphorase detects S-nitrosylated proteins in aldehyde-treated biological tissues. Sci Rep 10(1):21088. 10.1038/s41598-020-78107-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gadye L, Das D, Sanchez MA, Street K, Baudhuin A, Wagner A, Cole MB, Choi YG et al (2017) Injury activates transient olfactory stem cell states with diverse lineage capacities. Cell Stem Cell 21(6):775-790.e779. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liberia T, Martin-Lopez E, Meller SJ, Greer CA (2019) Sequential maturation of olfactory sensory neurons in the mature olfactory epithelium. eNeuro. 10.1523/eneuro.0266-19.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wersinger SR, Caldwell HK, Martinez L, Gold P, Hu S-B, Young WS 3rd (2007) Vasopressin 1a receptor knockout mice have a subtle olfactory deficit but normal aggression. Genes Brain Behav 6(6):540–551. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00281.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hills M, Ma L, Fang A, Chiremba T, Malloy S, Scott A, Perera A, Yu CR (2024) Molecular, cellular, and developmental organization of the mouse vomeronasal organ at single cell resolution. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2024.02.22.581574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Coleman JH, Lin B, Schwob JE (2017) Dissecting LSD1-dependent neuronal maturation in the olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol 525(16):3391–3413. 10.1002/cne.24259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hong G, Zhang W, Li H, Shen X, Guo Z (2014) Separate enrichment analysis of pathways for up- and downregulated genes. J R Soc Interface 11(92):20130950. 10.1098/rsif.2013.0950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cho JH, Lépine M, Andrews W, Parnavelas J, Cloutier JF (2007) Requirement for Slit-1 and Robo-2 in zonal segregation of olfactory sensory neuron axons in the main olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 27(34):9094–9104. 10.1523/jneurosci.2217-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mueller W, Schütz D, Nagel F, Schulz S, Stumm R (2013) Hierarchical organization of multi-site phosphorylation at the CXCR4 C terminus. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64975. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Miyamichi K, Serizawa S, Kimura HM, Sakano H (2005) Continuous and overlapping expression domains of odorant receptor genes in the olfactory epithelium determine the dorsal/ventral positioning of glomeruli in the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 25(14):3586–3592. 10.1523/jneurosci.0324-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang F, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Axel R (1998) Odorant receptors govern the formation of a precise topographic map. Cell 93(1):47–60. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81145-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kobayakawa K, Kobayakawa R, Matsumoto H, Oka Y, Imai T, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Ikeda T et al (2007) Innate versus learned odour processing in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nature 450(7169):503–508. 10.1038/nature06281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Everman JL, Sajuthi S, Saef B, Rios C, Stoner AM, Numata M, Hu D, Eng C et al (2019) Functional genomics of CDHR3 confirms its role in HRV-C infection and childhood asthma exacerbations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 144(4):962–971. 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Putman TE, Schaper K, Matentzoglu N, Rubinetti VP, Alquaddoomi FS, Cox C, Caufield JH, Elsarboukh G et al (2023) The Monarch Initiative in 2024: an analytic platform integrating phenotypes, genes and diseases across species. Nucleic Acids Res 52(D1):D938–D949. 10.1093/nar/gkad1082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Håglin S, Berghard A, Bohm S (2020) Increased retinoic acid catabolism in olfactory sensory neurons activates dormant tissue-specific stem cells and accelerates age-related metaplasia. J Neurosci 40(21):4116–4129. 10.1523/jneurosci.2468-19.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weng P-L, Vinjamuri M, Ovitt CE (2016) Ascl3 transcription factor marks a distinct progenitor lineage for non-neuronal support cells in the olfactory epithelium. Sci Rep 6(1):38199. 10.1038/srep38199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lerner O, Davenport D, Patel P, Psatha M, Lieberam I, Guthrie S (2010) Stromal cell-derived factor-1 and hepatocyte growth factor guide axon projections to the extraocular muscles. Dev Neurobiol 70(8):549–564. 10.1002/dneu.20796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Whitman MC, Nguyen EH, Bell JL, Tenney AP, Gelber A, Engle EC (2018) Loss of CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling causes oculomotor nerve misrouting and development of motor trigeminal to oculomotor synkinesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(12):5201–5209. 10.1167/iovs.18-25190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Halasy V, Szőcs E, Soós Á, Kovács T, Pecsenye-Fejszák N, Hotta R, Goldstein AM, Nagy N (2023) CXCR4 and CXCL12 signaling regulates the development of extrinsic innervation to the colorectum. Development. 10.1242/dev.201289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Berghard A, Hägglund AC, Bohm S, Carlsson L (2012) Lhx2-dependent specification of olfactory sensory neurons is required for successful integration of olfactory, vomeronasal, and GnRH neurons. Faseb J 26(8):3464–3472. 10.1096/fj.12-206193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang YZ, Fan H, Ji Y, Reynolds K, Gu R, Gan Q, Yamagami T, Zhao T et al (2020) Olig2 regulates terminal differentiation and maturation of peripheral olfactory sensory neurons. Cell Mol Life Sci 77(18):3597–3609. 10.1007/s00018-019-03385-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Monahan K, Schieren I, Cheung J, Mumbey-Wafula A, Monuki ES, Lomvardas S (2017) Cooperative interactions enable singular olfactory receptor expression in mouse olfactory neurons. Elife. 10.7554/eLife.28620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Huang JS, Kunkhyen T, Rangel AN, Brechbill TR, Gregory JD, Winson-Bushby ED, Liu B, Avon JT et al (2022) Immature olfactory sensory neurons provide behaviourally relevant sensory input to the olfactory bulb. Nat Commun 13(1):6194. 10.1038/s41467-022-33967-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang J-L, Bertolesi G, Hehr C, McFarlane S (2020) Lhx2/9 and Etv1 transcription factors have complementary roles in regulating the expression of guidance genes slit1 and sema3a. Neuroscience. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Marcos-Mondéjar P, Peregrín S, Li JY, Carlsson L, Tole S, López-Bendito G (2012) The lhx2 transcription factor controls thalamocortical axonal guidance by specific regulation of robo1 and robo2 receptors. J Neurosci 32(13):4372–4385. 10.1523/jneurosci.5851-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dalton RP, Lyons DB, Lomvardas S (2013) Co-opting the unfolded protein response to elicit olfactory receptor feedback. Cell 155(2):321–332. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Knott TK, Madany PA, Faden AA, Xu M, Strotmann J, Henion TR, Schwarting GA (2012) Olfactory discrimination largely persists in mice with defects in odorant receptor expression and axon guidance. Neural Dev 7:17. 10.1186/1749-8104-7-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fleischmann A, Shykind BM, Sosulski DL, Franks KM, Glinka ME, Mei DF, Sun Y, Kirkland J et al (2008) Mice with a “monoclonal nose”: perturbations in an olfactory map impair odor discrimination. Neuron 60(6):1068–1081. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Amaya DA, Wegner M, Stolt CC, Chehrehasa F, Ekberg JA, St John JA (2015) Radial glia phagocytose axonal debris from degenerating overextending axons in the developing olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 523(2):183–196. 10.1002/cne.23665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Eerdunfu IN, Ligao B, Ikegaya Y, Takeuchi H (2017) Differential timing of neurogenesis underlies dorsal-ventral topographic projection of olfactory sensory neurons. Neural Dev 12(1):2. 10.1186/s13064-017-0079-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Genter MB, Llorens J, O’Callaghan JP, Peele DB, Morgan KT, Crofton KM (1992) Olfactory toxicity of β,β′-iminodipropionitrile in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263(3):1432–1439 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ong G, Logue SE (2023) Unfolding the interactions between endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress. Antioxidants (Basel) 12(5):981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ross D, Siegel D (2021) The diverse functionality of NQO1 and its roles in redox control. Redox Biol 41:101950. 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.van Muiswinkel FL, de Vos RA, Bol JG, Andringa G, Jansen Steur EN, Ross D, Siegel D, Drukarch B (2004) Expression of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase in the normal and Parkinsonian substantia nigra. Neurobiol Aging 25(9):1253–1262. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wodrich APK, Scott AW, Shukla AK, Harris BT, Giniger E (2022) The unfolded protein responses in health, aging, and neurodegeneration: recent advances and future considerations. Front Mol Neurosci 15:831116. 10.3389/fnmol.2022.831116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Santos DF, Simão S, Nóbrega C, Bragança J, Castelo-Branco P, Araújo IM, Consortium AS (2024) Oxidative stress and aging: synergies for age related diseases. FEBS Lett 598(17):2074–2091. 10.1002/1873-3468.14995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Davinelli S, Medoro A, Savino R, Scapagnini G (2024) Sleep and oxidative stress: current perspectives on the role of NRF2. Cell Mol Neurobiol 44(1):52. 10.1007/s10571-024-01487-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Han B, Kikuta S, Kamogashira T, Kondo K, Yamasoba T (2022) Sleep deprivation induces delayed regeneration of olfactory sensory neurons following injury. Front Neurosci 16:1029279. 10.3389/fnins.2022.1029279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tuerdi A, Kikuta S, Kinoshita M, Kamogashira T, Kondo K, Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T (2018) Dorsal-zone-specific reduction of sensory neuron density in the olfactory epithelium following long-term exercise or caloric restriction. Sci Rep 8(1):17300. 10.1038/s41598-018-35607-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schwob JE, Youngentob SL, Ring G, Iwema CL, Mezza RC (1999) Reinnervation of the rat olfactory bulb after methyl bromide-induced lesion: timing and extent of reinnervation. J Comp Neurol 412(3):439–457. 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990927)412:3<439::aid-cne5>3.0.co;2-h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tuerdi A, Kikuta S, Kinoshita M, Kamogashira T, Kondo K, Yamasoba T (2020) Zone-specific damage of the olfactory epithelium under protein restriction. Sci Rep 10(1):22175. 10.1038/s41598-020-79249-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Response of WT mice to the water control stimulus. (MOV 21.8 MB)
Supplementary Material 2: WT mice avoid hexanal. (MOV 20.4 MB)
Supplementary Material 3: Cxcr4-cKO mice do not avoid hexanal. (MOV 21.5 MB)
Supplementary Material 4 (PDF 6.50 MB)
Supplementary Material 5 (PDF 6.81 MB)
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
