Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jul 3;42(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s10565-026-10224-w

The application progress of organoid technology in the toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants

Guojie Zhao 1, Yishuang Cui 9, Hongjiao Wu 2, Ye Jin 3,5,6,7,8, Junqing Gan 2,7, Weinan Yao 2,4,6, Yanna Bi 2,4,6, Yanlei Ge 2,4,5,6,7,✉, Guogui Sun 2,3,4,5,6,7,✉
PMCID: PMC13601163  PMID: 42399588

Abstract

Human production activities and daily life are the main sources of environmental pollutants, and their potential health impacts have attracted growing attention. Currently, the assessment of environmental pollutant toxicity depends heavily on animal models and some cell culture models. However, these approaches have inherent limitations, such as their inability to recapitulate the in vivo microenvironment and the presence of interspecies differences. Organoids not only recapitulate cell types and tissue structures of human organs, but also exhibit key physiological functions, rendering them ideal alternative models for assessing the health risks of environmental pollutants. In this review, we briefly introduce the development history of organoids as models for environmental pollutant toxicity assessment. Additionally, organoids are categorized by cell sources, and current mainstream organoid culture techniques are systematically summarized. Next, we highlight the application value of typical organoids including lung, brain, cardiac, intestine, liver and kidney organoids in environmental pollutant toxicity assessment. Finally, we thoroughly analyze the strengths and limitations of organoid models for such toxicity testing. Therefore, this review aims to advance organoid technology, and provide new insights into the toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants and the exploration of relevant toxic mechanisms.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 10565_2026_10224_Figa_HTML.webp

Keywords: Environmental pollutant, Organoids, Toxicity test models, Risk assessment, In vitro

Introduction

Environmental pollutants spread and accumulate in soil, air and water, threatening ecological security and human health. Common types include microplastics (MPs), nanoplastics (NPs), endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), pesticides, air pollutants and heavy metals (Puri et al. 2023; Ji et al. 2026). Prolonged or repeated human exposure can pose severe health hazards, including developmental abnormalities, carcinogenesis, reproductive damage and immune dysfunction (Shetty et al. 2023). Although existing toxicological studies are abundant, the molecular mechanisms of pollutant toxicity remain poorly understood (Lakhdar et al. 2022). Traditionally, toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants has relied primarily on two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models and animal models. Conventional 2D cultures fail to recapitulate the complex in vivo microenvironment, while animal models have inherent interspecies differences. In addition, animal experiments are restricted by ethical issues, high costs and long cycles, which hinder large-scale application (Hogberg et al. 2021). Therefore, novel physiologically relevant models are urgently needed for environmental toxicology research (Pamies and Hartung 2017). Recent advances in organoid, 3D bioprinting, gene editing and organ-on-a-chip technologies have broken through the drawbacks of traditional methods and improved the accuracy of toxicity prediction (Zhao et al. 2024). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration encourages the adoption of new approach methodologies to replace animal experiments. It endorses the application of organ-on-a-chip, organoids, AI-based toxicology models and other technologies in toxicological assessment, aiming to gradually reduce the use of animal testing and drive the shift toward a human biology-based research and development system. For regulatory review of data generated by new approach methodologies, the core validation principles are defined as clear application scope, human biological relevance, technical reliability and fit-for-purpose performance.

Organoids are 3D tissue-like constructs generated from stem cells, somatic cells, primary cells, or cells derived from tumor and normal tissues under defined culture conditions. By faithfully recapitulating human-specific tissue architectures, cellular crosstalk, and toxicological response patterns, organoids effectively avoid interspecies biases inherent in animal models. Therefore, they serve as a superior physiological platform over traditional 2D cultures and animal models to explore human toxic reactions and pollutant toxicity mechanisms (Faiola et al. 2023). Common organoid culture methods include suspension culture, air–liquid interface (ALI) culture, rotating bioreactor culture and gel scaffold culture. Advanced techniques such as 3D bioprinting and organoid-on-a-chip are also widely applied in this field (Ding et al. 2025). With tissue-mimicking functions, organoids are ideal in vitro models for studying cell crosstalk, tissue development and pollutant toxicity, and help predict pollutant-induced health damage in humans. Currently, organoids are extensively used in disease modeling, drug screening, cancer therapy and regenerative medicine. They also show great promise for multi-organ toxicology research (Kim and Park 2025; Wang et al. 2026). As an established research tool in toxicology, organoid technology presents great potential for evaluating the toxic risks of environmental pollutants and deserves further in-depth exploration (Zhang et al. 2024a; Yin et al. 2025).

With the rapid advancement of organoid research, several reviews on its application progress and research value in environmental pollutant toxicity assessment have been published in recent years. For instance, Yang et al. reviewed the research status of organoid models in the exposure assessment of emerging pollutants, but they failed to focus on the application value and core advantages of different types of organoids as toxicity testing models in the toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants (Yang et al. 2024a). Cong et al. merely elaborated on the application progress and prospects of organoids in assessing the human health risks posed by single-type environmental pollutants (Cong et al. 2024). In addition, the research scope of some reviews is relatively limited, which mainly focuses on the application progress of organoids constructed by a single culture technology in the toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants (Du and Yang 2024; Cho and Yoon 2017). Against this background, the present review comprehensively elaborates the latest progress of organoid-based pollutant toxicity assessment. It first briefly introduces the development history of related models, and classifies organoids by cell sources alongside routine culture methods. Then it emphasizes the application potential of various organoids, with a special focus on recent findings and unique merits of lung, brain, intestinal, liver, kidney and heart organoids in toxicological studies. This paper also analyzes the strengths and inherent limitations of current pollutant exposure models. By synthesizing existing studies, we point out research gaps and future trends, and clarify the core role of human organoids in hazard assessment. This work is expected to provide references for developing new strategies in environmental toxicology.

Development of organoids as models for toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants

In recent years, organoid technology has developed rapidly with fruitful achievements (Fig. 1). The relevant research dates back to 1907, when Wilson found that dissociated sponge cells could reaggregate and self-organize into organisms with normal physiological functions, laying a theoretical and experimental foundation for organoid self-assembly (Wilson 1907). The term "organoid" was officially coined in 1954, marking the initial establishment of the conceptual framework in this field (Pomerat et al. 1954). In 1981, mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) were successfully isolated for the first time. This breakthrough provided core seed cells for organoid research and also paved the way for the application of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in organoid construction (O'Connor et al. 1981). Advances in stem cell technology are the core driving force behind the development of organoids. In 1971, Friedenstein’s team first isolated human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow (Friedenstein and Kuralesova 1971). In 1998, Thomson et al. successfully cultured human ESCs with typical biological characteristics (Thomson et al. 1998). In 2007, Takahashi et al. generated iPSCs via cellular reprogramming, representing a major breakthrough for stem cell and organoid research (Takahashi et al. 2007). Currently, most non-tumor-derived human organoids are differentiated from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) or iPSCs, which greatly facilitates their application in simulating organ physiological functions. In 2009, Clevers’ team constructed intestinal organoids with crypt-villus structures using Lgr5+ adult stem cells (ASCs) (Sato et al. 2009). Since then, retinal, cerebral and other types of organoids have been developed, which can replicate tissue development and serve for disease research (Eiraku et al. 2011; Lancaster et al. 2013). From 2014 onward, organ-specific organoids such as prostate, lung and mammary gland organoids were established successively, marking the gradual maturity of relevant preparation techniques (Corrò et al. 2020). In 2018, organoid technology was named the 2017 Method of the Year by Nature Methods.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Development history of organoids. This figure outlines the key milestone studies and breakthroughs that have advanced the establishment of diverse organoid technology systems (denoted by purple arrows in the figure) and presents a timeline of organoids’ evolution as a model for environmental pollutant toxicity testing (denoted by green arrows in the figure)

Over the past decade, tissue- and stem cell-derived organoids have been widely adopted for the toxicological evaluation of environmental pollutants. The year 2013 marked the starting point of organoid-based toxicity testing for environmental contaminants, and this field has experienced rapid growth thereafter (Ju et al. 2013). A large body of application-oriented studies has since emerged, focusing on mainstream pollutants including air pollutants, heavy metals, endocrine disruptors, MPs and related nanomaterials. In 2014, Astashkina et al. fabricated 3D proximal renal tubule organoids using medical-grade hyaluronic acid hydrogel to evaluate the toxic effects of nanoparticles. The results revealed that the reductions in cell viability and fluctuations in renal biomarkers induced by nanoparticles were consistent with the reference baseline obtained from rodent experiments. Different from traditional animal models, these human-derived organoids can recapitulate human-specific toxic responses, serving as a superior system for toxicity assessment (Astashkina et al. 2014). Subsequently, organoids have been progressively integrated into the alternative model system for environmental pollutant toxicity testing, serving as a novel tool that more closely recapitulates physiological conditions for in vitro assessments in this domain. In 2015, Hofmann et al. used a co-culture system of organotypic lung tissues and immortalized alveolar macrophages to quantify inflammatory responses triggered by silica, a typical air pollutant, further proving the reliability of organoid platforms for toxicological analysis (Hofmann et al. 2015). As research progressed, organoid models were applied to assess endocrine-disrupting chemicals. In 2016, Park et al. reported that 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin could inhibit the growth of mouse crypt- and Lgr5⁺ cell-derived organoids (Park et al. 2016). Heavy metal toxicity has also become a major research direction. In 2018, Yin et al. combined brain organoids with organ-on-a-chip systems to explore neurological damage caused by cadmium exposure (Yin et al. 2018). Alongside technical improvements, research has shifted from phenotypic observation to mechanistic exploration. In 2020, combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics revealed that diesel particulate matter, a typical air pollutant, exerted adverse toxicogenomic effects on human brain organoids and hindered fetal brain development (Bilinovich et al. 2020). Bisphenol A and benzophenone-3, ubiquitous endocrine disruptors, were found to disrupt protein synthesis and transcriptional regulation during mammary gland organoid differentiation (Altamirano et al. 2020). In 2022, Hua et al. observed that polystyrene microplastics caused developmental defects in forebrain cortical organoids in a size- and concentration-dependent fashion (Hua et al. 2022). Reproductive and developmental toxicities are key research focuses in this field. In 2024, endometrial organoids were constructed to evaluate the reproductive damage caused by bisphenol A (Abady et al. 2024). Since then, more sophisticated organoid models have been applied to identify the toxic hazards of environmental pollutants to specific target organs, including retinal organoids (Wang et al. 2023a; Gao et al. 2025), thyroid organoids (Yoo et al. 2024), and pancreatic organoids (Chen et al. 2025).

Classification and culture methods of organoids

Classification of organoids

The emergence of organoid technology relies on dual foundations: technological innovations in stem cell and developmental biology, as well as solid theoretical and experimental bases from classical developmental theories and cell isolation and reaggregation studies. A variety of classification systems have been established to categorize organoids based on different criteria, such as tissue origin, germ layer derivation, and cell source. Among these classification strategies, typing according to the source cell type is the most fundamental and widely adopted standard, because it essentially determines the differentiation potency, structural characteristics, functional properties, and applicable research scenarios of different organoid models (Fig. 2) (Yu et al. 2021). PSCs, consisting of ESCs and iPSCs, are characterized by superior pluripotent differentiation capacity. With precise in vitro directional induction and culture regulation, PSCs are capable of differentiating into organoids that simulate the structures and functions of almost all vital human organs, covering the brain, liver, kidney, lung and other key tissues. Importantly, PSC-derived organoids possess unique technical and ethical advantages: they support long-term unlimited in vitro expansion to meet the demands of repeated experiments and large-scale sample acquisition, and successfully avoid the ethical controversies inherent to human embryonic material usage. In addition, such organoids can faithfully recapitulate the complete genetic background of individual donors, rendering them ideal research models for exploring developmental toxicological mechanisms and analyzing personalized biological responses to environmental pollutants and exogenous stimuli (Tang et al. 2022). Different from PSC-derived organoids, ASC-derived organoids are generated from tissue-resident stem cell populations distributed in mature somatic tissues, with typical representatives including Lgr5⁺ intestinal crypt stem cells and mammary gland stem cells. Such ASCs possess unique tissue-specific differentiation potency and only differentiate into cell types matching their original tissues, which endows them with stable tissue regeneration capacity under optimized in vitro three-dimensional culture conditions. These somatic stem cells can spontaneously self-assemble and differentiate into intact organoid structures that highly simulate the morphological characteristics and physiological functions of primary tissues. A mature and classical culture system is established for intestinal organoids: isolated mouse intestinal crypt Lgr5⁺ stem cells can develop into standardized intestinal organoids with complete and mature crypt-villus structures in medium containing key regulatory factors (Wnt3a, R-spondin1, etc.), which stably retain the inherent absorption and secretory physiological functions of normal intestinal tissues (Parente et al. 2024). Notably, the construction of different germ layer-derived organoids presents distinct cell dependence and technical specificity. Neuroectodermal organoids (brain organoids, optic cup organoids) and mesoderm-derived kidney organoids can only be successfully constructed through directed differentiation of PSCs due to their complex developmental characteristics. In comparison, surface ectoderm-derived glandular organoids, represented by salivary gland and mammary gland organoids, mainly depend on ASCs or isolated primary adult tissue cells for in vitro reconstruction. Differently, endodermal organoids including intestinal, hepatic and pulmonary organoids exhibit flexible cell source compatibility, which can be efficiently constructed via either PSC directed differentiation or ASC in vitro culture (Eiraku et al. 2008; Linnemann et al. 2015). As another vital research model, tumor-derived organoids are established using clinical tumor biopsy tissues or surgically resected tumor specimens based on the self-assembly ability of endogenous cancer stem cells. This type of organoid model can faithfully preserve the core biological characteristics of primary tumors, including tumor heterogeneity, genetic mutation spectra and clinical drug sensitivity. Benefiting from the accurate simulation of tumor microenvironment and pathological features, tumor-derived organoids have become advanced in vitro platforms for anti-tumor drug screening and tumor mechanism research, and also provide new technical support for exploring the carcinogenic risk and molecular toxicological mechanisms of environmental pollutants (Heinzelmann et al. 2024).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Different cell sources, culture methods and types of organoids

Methods of organoid culture

Organoid culture is essentially a dynamic process that guides cells to self-assemble into functional structures by simulating the in vivo organ microenvironment. The academic community generally acknowledges four key elements for organoid formation and in vitro maintenance, including differentiation-competent stem cells, key factors regulating stem cell proliferation and lineage-specific differentiation, extracellular matrix (ECM) components for structural support, and nutrient-rich culture media to sustain cell survival and development (Kim et al. 2020a). Following years of exploration, researchers have successfully developed diverse organoid models, enabling the cultivation of organoids from distinct cellular sources. From a technical classification perspective, organoid cultivation techniques can be roughly grouped into four types, such as suspension culture, ALI culture, rotating bioreactor culture, and gel scaffold culture. In addition, innovative technologies like 3D bioprinting and organoid-on-a-chip have been widely adopted in organoid research. These technologies provide critical technical support for boosting organoid growth efficiency, accelerating their maturation, and enhancing functional stability (Fig. 2).

Organoid culture methods

Suspension culture is a scaffold-free 3D organoid fabrication method, where cells aggregate spontaneously, construct structures with self-secreted ECM and interact with each other to form intact organoids without adherent growth (Acharya et al. 2024). To avoid ECM hydrogels, Gong et al. developed a Matrigel-free suspension system for self-renewable hepatic ductal organoids; optimized culture yielded qualified organoids verified by viability, lineage and duct marker expression (Fig. 3A) (Gong et al. 2025). The scaffold-free suspension method may reform organoid culture for broader biomedical use. Baek’s suspension system mimics in vivo conditions to study nanoparticle distribution/uptake and facilitates nanomaterial toxicity evaluation (Baek et al. 2024). Suspension culture is easy and cost-saving without Matrigel, yet resultant organoids have loose structure, poor nutrient supply and immature function, limiting application and translation (Deng et al. 2020).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Methods of organoid culture. (A) A novel matrigel‐free suspension culture enhanced the generation of high‐quality human liver ductal organoids (Gong et al. 2025). (B) Kidney organoids can be efficiently generated from human iPSCs using bioreactor technology (Przepiorski et al. 2018). (C) A 3D model of human nasal RPMI 2650 cells was successfully established based on the ALI culture technology (Wang et al. 2025b). (D) Protocol for differentiating human iPSCs into liver organoids using Biomimesys® HA (Roudaut et al. 2024). (E) A novel sVEB has been developed based on organ-on-a-chip technology and microfluidic technology (Maiullari et al. 2025). (F) Distinct toxicity of MPs/TBBPA co-exposure to bioprinted liver organoids from hiPSCs of healthy and patient donors (Liang et al. 2024)

Rotary bioreactor is a typical dynamic 3D culture system. Continuous rotation builds fluidic and mechanical microenvironments to boost nutrient exchange and organoid maturation, supporting large-scale cultivation and translational development of organoids (Phelan et al. 2018). Przepiorski et al. used rotating bioreactor-based floating culture to induce embryoid body differentiation into kidney organoids, which formed functional nephron structures within 14 days (Fig. 3B) (Przepiorski et al. 2018). This low-cost, scalable approach facilitates renal developmental and pathological research. Qian et al. developed a mini rotary bioreactor SpinΩ to produce region-specific human brain organoids from iPSCs that recapitulate human cerebral developmental features at multiple levels (Qian et al. 2018). This compact system improves throughput and reproducibility for brain disease modeling and drug screening. Rotary bioreactors enable large-scale organoid culture for high-throughput toxicology tests of pollutant exposure, yet they suffer from high cost, complicated operation, harmful shear stress and incomplete organoid maturation; further optimization combined with co-culture or scaffold techniques is required (Achilli et al. 2012).

ALI culture exposes one side of organoids to air and the other to medium, creating a polarized microenvironment to drive tissue-specific structure formation and functional maturation of organoids (Usui et al. 2018). ALI culture suits organs with natural air–liquid interface including airway, skin and cornea. Wang et al. established an ALI-based RPMI 2650 nasal 3D model with respiratory epithelial and olfactory neuronal features including intact tight junctions, mucus secretion and neuronal differentiation, which supports combined respiratory and neurotoxicity assessment of airborne pollutants (Fig. 3C) (Wang et al. 2025b). ALI culture promotes maturation of intestinal organoids for gut research and drug screening. Santos built an ALI culture from human small intestinal tissues containing native epithelium, mesenchyme and immune cells without exogenous reconstruction (Santos et al. 2024). In addition, Tian et al. generated intact endometrial organoids via modified ECM combined with ALI co-culture of epithelial and stromal cells (Tian et al. 2023). ALI culture is promising for organoid toxicology especially PM2.5 pulmonary injury research, despite drawbacks in operation, scale-up and long-term culture sustainability (Wakamatsu et al. 2022).

Emerging organoid technologies

Gel scaffold culture uses biomimetic ECM gels to support organoid formation. tunable physical and biochemical properties of gels guide cell differentiation and self-assembly to form functional organ-specific structures (Luo et al. 2023; Kozlowski et al. 2021). Matrigel is widely used as gel scaffold for organoid disease and toxicology research. Ayabe team constructed patient-derived multi-structural biliary organoids in Matrigel, which recapitulated biliary epithelium and peribiliary glands and matured via TGF-β suppression (Ayabe et al. 2025). In addition, Cao et al. established Matrigel-based forebrain organoids recapitulating multiple steps of early human cortical development. The model was verified with BPA for environmental neurotoxicity evaluation (Cao et al. 2023). Matrigel’s complex components, batch inconsistency and immunogenicity restrict its clinical translation (Gan et al. 2023). Defined natural/synthetic hydrogels with adjustable structures and mechanics offer advantages; optimized biosignals, biophysical cues and crosslinking help mimic native microenvironment for reliable organoid studies (Cruz-Acuña et al. 2018). Wang et al. 3D-bioprinted islet organoids using pancreatic ECM and methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MAHA) bioinks (Wang et al. 2023d). Decellularized scaffolds direct cell adhesion, migration and proliferation and are promising for tissue regeneration and organ substitution. Fabricating ECM-mimicking hydrogels for human iPSC culture is difficult. Against this backdrop, Roudaut’s HA hydrogel supports iPSC aggregation and differentiation into functional liver organoids (Fig. 3D) (Roudaut et al. 2024). Low hydrogel solid content causes structural flaws, poor mechanics and over-swelling restricting organoid growth. Optimized crosslinking improves PEG-peptide hydrogel properties at low solid content to support mouse and human intestinal organoids with crypt formation comparable to Matrigel, advancing Matrigel-free organoid culture translation (Rezakhani et al. 2020). By virtue of their precise regulation of the microenvironment, hydrogels can flexibly fulfill the requirements for physical support, biosignals, and dynamic metabolic needs essential to organoid growth.

Organs-on-chips combine microfluidics and organoid culture to build biomimetic dynamic microenvironments, overcoming static culture drawbacks and enabling more physiologically relevant in vivo-like organoid modeling (Juguilon et al. 2025). Traditional models lack perfusion, expandability and complex microenvironment compatibility, limiting translational application. Therefore, Maiullari et al. developed a microfluidic small vascular environment bioreactor (sVEB) chip to mimic perivascular niche for breast cancer research; co-culture of endothelial cells, breast cancer organoids and modified T cells recapitulates angiogenesis and tumor‑immune crosstalk for mechanistic and therapeutic studies (Fig. 3E) (Maiullari et al. 2025). Organoids fail to fully recapitulate organ physiology owing to missing cell subtypes like neurons. Here, Fredrikson’s organ-chip generates stable mature neural networks and co-cultures organoids to resolve asynchronous developmental signaling (Fredrikson et al. 2025). Various organs-on-chips for major organs are under global development, yet complicated fabrication and high cost hinder their extensive application (Özkan et al. 2024).

3D bioprinting is an interdisciplinary approach depositing cell-containing bioinks layer-by-layer to fabricate structurally intact and functional tissue/organ constructs (Maharjan et al. 2024). 3D bioprinting surpasses conventional cell-seeding-based tissue engineering with precise structural control, homogeneous cell distribution and personalized manufacturing feasibility (Hu et al. 2025a). 3D-bioprinted organoids support developmental and toxicology research. Photo-crosslinking bioprinting generates testicular organoids resembling native testis in structure, cell arrangement and gene expression (Feng et al. 2025). Additionally, Yao’s team bioprinted patient-derived and healthy iPSC-based liver organoids mimicking hepatic space of Disse to explore MP-triggered hepatotoxicity, verifying the critical role of fibrosis-related genes (Fig. 3F) (Liang et al. 2024). Therefore, 3D-bioprinted biomimetic organ models mimic human physiology for precise assessment of drug efficacy and organ toxicities, minimizing interspecies biases of animal trials for drug and toxicology studies.

The application of organoids as a model for assessing the toxicity of environmental pollutants

Organoids have been widely used as toxicity testing models in toxicology, with particular significant value demonstrated in drug toxicity assessment. However, there remains a relative scarcity of review studies focusing on their application in environmental pollutant risk assessment. Therefore, this review takes lung, brain, heart, intestinal, liver and kidney organoids as the core research subjects. On the one hand, these organs are the major target organs most vulnerable to environmental pollutants after entering the human body. On the other hand, abundant achievements have been made in toxicological research on pollutants using the above organoids, and their culture and detection technical systems are well established (Table 1).

Table 1.

Application of organoids technology in toxicity testing of environmental pollutants

Organoids Sources Culture methods Pollutants Dose Toxicological effects Refs
Lung Lung epithelial progenitors Matrigel Diesel exhaust particles 0, 50, 100 and 200 μg/mL The number and average diameter of airway and alveolar organoids have significantly decreased (Wu et al. 2022)
Normal tissues of the distal lung airways Matrigel PM2.5 50 μg/mL Low-level PM2.5 induced early lung injury by regulating circ_0092363 (Xu et al. 2024)
ASCs Matrigel 1-NP 1, 10 and 50 μM Massive production of ROS and abnormal lipid metabolism (Zhou et al. 2024a)
ESCs Matrigel PM2.5 0, 12.5 and 25 μg/mL Inhibition of the proliferative activity and decreased expression levels of specific markers (NKX2.1, SOX2, SOX9) (Wang et al. 2023b)
PSCs Suspension culture Diesel PM2.5 0, 50, 100 and 200 μg/mL Potential alveolar developmental toxicity and increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 of diesel PM2.5 (Kim et al. 2020b)
Primary human bronchial epithelial cells Matrigel Tire wear particles 0, 50 and 100 μg/mL TWPs induced significant cell apoptosis and oxidative stress (Jiang et al. 2023)
ESCs Matrigel Particulate matter 250 μg/mL Particulate matter exacerbated cellular damage by increasing stress granule formation (Choi et al. 2022a)
ESCs Matrigel PHMG-p 2.5 μg/ml PHMG-p induced severe lung toxicity under stress conditions (Choi et al. 2022b)
Cerebral ESCs Suspension culture CdCl2 1, 3, or 6 μM Cadmium exposure induced partial arrest in the development of brain organoids (Hu et al. 2025b)
ESCs Suspension culture Al(OH)3 0, 5, 25 μg/ml Exposure to aluminum hydroxides inhibited the differentiation of brain organoids and significantly altered their transcriptomic profiles (Wang et al. 2023c)
ESCs Suspension culture PFAS 10 ng/ml PFOS and PFOA, and 1 ng/ml PFHxS PFAS exposure induced Alzheimer's disease-like neurotoxicity in cerebral organoids (Lu et al. 2024)
iPSCs 3D bioprinting DPM 30 mg DPM interfered with the neural development process and increased the potential risk of autism spectrum disorder (Liang et al. 2024)
Mice and human iPSCs Suspension culture PP-NPs 10, 25, and 50 µg/mL Human cerebral organoids exposed to PP-NPs exhibit reduced growth and neuronal differentiation, with significant downregulation of key neuronal markers such as TUJ1, MAP2, and PAX6 (Huang et al. 2025)
iPSCs Suspension culture MPs 2.5 mg/mL Exposure to 50-nm MPs significantly reduced the viability of organoids and mediated neurotoxic effects by activating the kynurenine pathway (Park et al. 2025)
cardiac iPSCs Suspension culture 6PPD 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μM 6PPD induces multiple cardiac injuries including apoptosis, electrophysiological disorders, DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress in a dose-dependent manner (Hyun et al. 2025)
iPSCs Organs-on-chips PS-NPs 0, 30, 60, and 120 μg/mL PS-NPs impair cardiac structure and function in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Zhang et al. 2024b)
iPSCs Matrigel TCC 1, 2, 5 μmol/L TCC induces myocardial hypertrophy and metabolic reprogramming in human cardiac organoids (Yang et al. 2025)
Intestinal Small intestinal tissue Matrigel CdCl2 30 μM Cadmium ingestion exacerbated Salmonella infection, with a loss of goblet cells through activation of notch signaling pathways in the intestine organoids (Xie et al. 2020)
Intestinal epithelial cells Scaffold culture MPs 50 mg/L Exposure to MPs impaired the ZO-1, thereby damaging the integrity of the cellular barrier and resulting in a significant decrease in TEER values (Liang et al. 2021)
ISCs Matrigel TCS and TCC 10 μM Exposure to TCS and TCC significantly impaired the self-renewal capacity and differentiation process of ISCs (Cheng et al. 2024)
Mouse pelleted crypts Matrigel PSMP@B(a)P 60 μg/mL PSMP@B(a)P promoted colonic barrier injury via oxidative stress-mediated notch signaling (Shaoyong et al. 2023)
Liver Mouse liver tissue Scaffold culture PFAS 100 mM Long-chain PFAs induced abnormal cell morphology and impairment of ALT/GDH enzymes, whereas no changes in acute toxicity-related endpoint indicators or cell apoptosis were detected in response to short-chain PFAs (Palazzolo et al. 2022)
Mouse liver tissue Matrigel 6-PPDQ 0, 40, 80, and 160 μg/L Exposure to 6-PPDQ can significantly activate signaling pathways related to DNA replication and repair, carcinogenesis, and inflammatory responses, thereby inducing hepatotoxicity (Ge et al. 2025)
ESCs Matrigel HFRs 10 nM HFRs disrupted hESC hepatic differentiation and promoted the proliferation of differentiated cells partly via up-regulation of the FGF10 signaling pathway (Yang et al. 2021)
Duct cells Matrigel TBPH 5 and 50 μM TBPH promoted the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by disrupting endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts (Zhou et al. 2025)
Kidney iPSCs Matrigel PS-MPs 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 μg/mL PS-MPs induced mitochondrial oxidative stress, activated the Bcl-2 protein family, and triggered cell apoptosis via the Bcl-2/Bax/caspase-9/caspase-3 signaling pathway (Zhang et al. 2025)
iPSCs Matrigel PS-MPs 0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL PS-MPs reduced the size of kidney organoids by decreasing cell proliferation and increasing cell apoptosis (Zhou et al. 2024b)
Kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell Scaffold culture Gold NPs 3.5 and 56.6 μg/mL Exposure to NPs induced the production of in vivo-relevant renal biomarkers and led to specific changes in cell viability (Astashkina et al. 2014)
iPSCs Matrigel PS-MPs 2.5 μg/mL PS-MPs induced nephrotoxicity through DDIT4-mediated autophagy and apoptosis (Wang et al. 2025a)
Thyroid ESCs Matrigel BAP 10 µM BAP alone upregulated genes involved in cell cycle regulation, response to reactive oxygen species, and cell apoptosis (Nazzari et al. 2024)
Endometrial Endometrial glands Matrigel BPA 0.1, 0.5 µM BPA induced structural and molecular damage in organoids, affecting cytoskeletal proteins, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and epithelial/mesenchymal markers (Abady et al. 2024)
Retinal ESCs Matrigel Pesticides, flame retardants, PPCPs, and other typical pollutants 10, 100, and 1000 nM Exposure to pollutants caused varying degrees of cell detachment (Wang et al. 2023a)
Testicular Rat testicular cells Matrigel MEHP and cadmium chloride MEHP (0.5, 1, 1.5 µM); cadmium chloride (0.01, 0.05, 0.25, 1.25 µM) After exposure to MEHP and cadmium chloride, organoids exhibited loss of the tight junction protein Claudin 11 and changes in the transcriptional levels of somatic cell markers (Sakib et al. 2022)
Trophoblast Villi in first trimester placental tissue Scaffold culture EHDPP 100, 1000 or 10,000 nM EHDPP disrupted placental formation in trophoblast organoids (Xu et al. 2022)

Pulmonary toxicity

The lung is the core respiratory organ responsible for gas exchange, and it also mediates physiological stress responses to drugs, chemicals and environmental pollutants. Inhalation is a major route for human exposure to environmental pollutants. Over the past decade, various in vitro lung organoid models have been developed and widely applied to explore pollutant-induced pulmonary toxicity (Petpiroon et al. 2023). Lung organoids co-cultured with fibroblasts and alveolar epithelial progenitors have been used to investigate the toxicity of diesel exhaust particles (DEP). Results demonstrated that DEP disrupts alveolar epithelial signaling niches, thereby suppressing the growth and maturation of lung organoids (Wu et al. 2022). Human PSC-derived lung organoids, which closely simulate native tissue structures and functions, serve as reliable models for airway toxicology research. Using human ESC-derived lung bud tip organoids, Xu et al. found that PM2.5 inhibits cell proliferation and dysregulates lung development-related genes. They also identified circ_0092363 as a potential biomarker for early PM2.5-induced lung injury (Xu et al. 2024). Additionally, airway epithelial organoids derived from ASCs were adopted to evaluate 1-nitropyrene (1-NP) toxicity. 1-NP exposure triggers excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and disturbs lipid and phospholipid metabolism in organoids (Zhou et al. 2024a). Epidemiological studies have confirmed that heavy metals, POPs and air pollutants impair lung development. Superior to traditional 2D models, lung organoids faithfully recapitulate early organogenesis, making them ideal platforms to investigate pollutant-induced developmental pulmonary toxicity (Li et al. 2022). Wang et al. utilized human ESC-derived lung bud tip progenitor organoids (LPOs) to simulate fetal lung development. Their data revealed that PM2.5 suppresses cell proliferation and alters the expression of lung progenitor markers (SOX9, SOX2, NKX2.1) (Wang et al. 2023b). Kim et al. further reported that diesel fine particulate matter (dPM2.5) interferes with the differentiation of PSC-derived alveolar epithelial cells and 3D alveolar organoids, accompanied by elevated NADPH oxidase expression and inflammatory reactions (Kim et al. 2020b). MPs have become a global public health concern. MPs ranging from 12 to 2475 μm can enter the respiratory tract via inhalation and accumulate in lung tissues. Jiang et al. used airway organoids to assess the toxicity of tire wear particles (TWPs), a typical MP derivative. TWPs dose-dependently inhibit organoid growth, induce cell apoptosis and provoke intense oxidative stress (Fig. 4A) (Jiang et al. 2023). Moreover, particulate matter aggravates cellular damage in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-infected lung organoids by promoting stress granule formation (Choi et al. 2022a). Similarly, polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-P) elevates stress granule levels in RSV-infected 3D lung organoids, which exacerbates lung tissue injury caused by viral infection (Choi et al. 2022b).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The application of organoids as a model for assessing the toxicity of environmental pollutants. (A) The airway toxicological effects of TWPs were evaluated based on the human airway organoid (Jiang et al. 2023). (B) Exposure to aluminum hydroxide induced neurodevelopmental impairment in brain organoids derived from human ESCs (Wang et al. 2023c). (C) 6PPD exerts multiple cardiotoxic effects on hiPSC-derived cardiac organoids, including decreased cell viability, activated apoptosis, electrophysiological dysfunction and transcriptomic molecular alterations (Hyun et al. 2025). (D) TCS/TCC impaired the self-renewal capacity and differentiation process of intestinal stem cells by inhibiting the activity of the Wnt signaling pathway (Cheng et al. 2024). (E) Liver organoids uncovered tire-derived 6-PPDQ-induced hepatotoxicity (Ge et al. 2025). (F) The potential effects of MPs on the early renal development process were investigated using a kidney organoid derived from human iPSCs (Zhou et al. 2024b)

Neurotoxicity

Brain organoids can faithfully recapitulate the microenvironment of early human brain development and form functional neuronal networks and synapses. As a sensitive in vitro platform for neurotoxicity evaluation, they reduce animal reliance and enable high-throughput screening, facilitating mechanistic research on pollutant-induced neural damage (Yan et al. 2024). The developing fetal brain is highly vulnerable to environmental pollutants, which may cause developmental defects and raise the risk of neurological disorders. It is therefore critical to clarify the neurotoxic effects and molecular mechanisms of pollutants for public neurological health protection. Using human ESC-derived brain organoids, Gao et al. demonstrated that Cadmium exposure causes severe damage and disordered patterns in neural development. This process is closely associated with the depletion of neural progenitor cells, impaired organoid integrity and ectopic compensatory cell proliferation (Hu et al. 2025b). In addition, Aluminum hydroxide exposure was found to reduce neuron numbers, disturb synaptogenesis and neuronal migration, and alter the transcriptome of brain organoids (Fig. 4B) (Wang et al. 2023c). Brain organoids are also applied to explore pollutant-related neurological disease risks. Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHx), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) induce Alzheimer’s disease-like neuropathological changes and disrupt lipid metabolism, ultimately leading to Alzheimer’s disease-like lesions in brain organoids (Lu et al. 2024). Additionally, DPM impaired cellular respiration and mitochondrial function, potentially interfering with neurodevelopment and increasing the risk of autism spectrum disorder (Liang et al. 2024). MPs can adsorb environmental toxins, yet research on their neurotoxicity and accumulation in the brain remains limited. Human iPSC-derived brain organoids help address this research gap. During the early developmental stage of human brain organoids, polypropylene nanoparticles suppressed the growth and neuronal differentiation of developing brain organoids, accompanied by downregulation of key neuronal markers including PAX6, MAP2 and TUJ1 (Huang et al. 2025). Park et al. reported that 50 nm MPs decreased organoid viability and activated the kynurenine pathway, which elevated neurotoxic quinolinic acid levels (Park et al. 2025). However, A major limitation of conventional brain organoids is the lack of a native blood–brain barrier (BBB), which makes it impossible to simulate the physiological process of toxicants crossing the barrier. To solve this problem, Dao et al. constructed a miniature human brain model with intact functional BBB using neural stem cells (Dao et al. 2024). This advanced model provides a powerful tool for studying BBB function and accurately assessing the neurotoxicity of environmental pollutants and drugs.

Cardiotoxicity

Human PSC-derived cardiac organoids are powerful tools to evaluate pollutant cardiotoxicity. These 3D multicellular structures faithfully reproduce human cardiac physiology and electrophysiology, supporting quantitative detection of pollutant-triggered heart injury (Xu and Wang 2026; Hua et al. 2026). Validated as robust in vitro platforms, human iPSC-derived cardiac organoids show that the tire additive 6PPD causes dose-dependent cardiomyocyte apoptosis and electrophysiological disorders. Cardiac dysfunction emerges even at non-cytotoxic low doses, supplying humanized evidence for 6PPD cardiovascular risk evaluation (Fig. 4C) (Hyun et al. 2025). However, traditional cardiomyocyte cell lines cannot mimic native cardiac biological traits. To overcome this drawback, Zhang et al. constructed a cardiac organoid-on-a-chip system for polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NPs) toxicity testing. PS-NPs impair cardiac structure and function in a dose- and time-dependent way, and low concentrations exacerbate hypoxia plus norepinephrine-mediated myocardial damage (Zhang et al. 2024b). In addition, with transcriptomic and proteomic analyses, cardiac organoids resolve molecular toxic mechanisms. Yang et al. confirmed that TCC alters endothelial arginine metabolism and breaks NO homeostasis in cardiac organoids. Rising TCC doses induce ROS accumulation and iNOS overactivation, triggering endothelial nitrosative stress, inflammation and dysfunction, which ultimately drive myocardial hypertrophy (Yang et al. 2025). Although insufficient vascularization and lack of immune microenvironment restrict current applications, optimized culture and chip technologies will render cardiac organoids a core in vitro model for pollutant cardiovascular toxicology research.

Enterotoxicity

Oral intake is a major route for human exposure to environmental pollutants, and the intestine serves as a primary target organ for their toxicity. Conventional in vitro gastrointestinal models cannot fully recapitulate the intestinal microenvironment, while intestinal organoids overcome this limitation and serve as superior platforms for evaluating pollutant penetration, intestinal barrier damage and related molecular mechanisms (Wang et al. 2024). Studies have shown that Cadmium exposure induces excessive ROS production in intestinal organoids and further activates the Notch pathway. This pathway dysregulation reduces goblet cell numbers and mucin secretion, weakening intestinal mucosal defense and increasing susceptibility to Salmonella typhimurium infection (Xie et al. 2020). The intestinal organoids with complex structures can accurately reflect the effects of environmental pollutants on the intestinal barrier and the underlying toxic mechanisms. NPs can trigger ROS accumulation, mediate intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis and aggravate intestinal barrier damage (Liang et al. 2021). In addition, triclosan (TCS) and triclocarban (TCC) inhibit the Wnt signaling pathway, impairing the self-renewal and differentiation of intestinal stem cells (Fig. 4D) (Cheng et al. 2024). Polystyrene microplastics loaded with benzo[a]pyrene (PSMP@B(a)P) trigger oxidative stress and activate the Notch pathway, eventually causing colonic barrier injury (Shaoyong et al. 2023). Beyond toxicological assessment, intestinal organoids also show great potential in developing and screening radioprotective agents. They can be used to test protective efficacy and optimize relevant protocols, so as to reduce occupational radiation hazards (Singh and Seed 2022).

Hepatotoxicity

Liver organoids are generally derived from human iPSCs or ASCs. Their multicellular, biomimetic structures faithfully recapitulate hepatic metabolism and toxic responses, serving as superior alternatives to traditional 2D cell and animal models (Cheng et al. 2025). Liver organoids constructed via co-culture of hepatocyte-like cells, vascular endothelial cells and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells develop intact CD31⁺ vascular networks and CK19⁺ bile duct structures, with improved albumin synthesis, glycogen storage, drug transport and xenobiotic metabolism (Yang et al. 2026). Liver organoids are powerful tools for assessing the hepatotoxicity, genotoxicity, teratogenicity and carcinogenicity of environmental pollutants. Studies on perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs) revealed distinct toxic effects by carbon chain length: long-chain PFAs altered cell morphology and suppressed alanine transaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase activities, while short-chain PFAs caused no obvious acute toxicity or cell apoptosis (Palazzolo et al. 2022). With high CYP450 activity and stable gene expression, liver organoids are well suited for toxicological research. Ge et al. adopted a stable liver organoid model to assess the hepatotoxicity of N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine quinone (6-PPDQ). Transcriptomic analysis indicated significant activation of pathways related to DNA repair, carcinogenesis and inflammation (Fig. 4E) (Ge et al. 2025). This model also facilitates in-depth exploration of pollutant-induced molecular changes. Using human ESC-derived liver organoids, Yang et al. found that halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) accelerate hepatoblast proliferation via the FGF10 signaling pathway (Yang et al. 2021). Zhou et al. further reported that bis(2-ethylhexyl)−2,3,4,5-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH) downregulates mitofusin 2 (MFN2). The decreased MFN2 disrupts endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial contacts and phospholipid transport, ultimately leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Zhou et al. 2025).

Renal toxicity

The in vitro self-assembled kidney organoid models provide a novel research perspective for the development of kidney microphysiological platforms that can more reliably simulate the in vivo environment, and are anticipated to play a key role in the efficient screening of environmental pollutant-induced renal toxicity. Kidney organoids, as a novel 3D in vitro model, can not only precisely simulate the physiological development process of the kidney, but also serve as an ideal experimental model for exploring the mechanism of early kidney morphogenesis (Gu et al. 2023). For example, polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) disrupted the development of kidney organoids through oxidative stress and the Bcl-2/Bax/caspase pathway (Zhang et al. 2025). Additionally, Xie et al. systematically explored the potential impacts of MPs on the early nephrogenesis process using kidney organoids derived from human iPSCs. The study not only uncovered the toxic effects of MPs on the structural integrity of renal tubules and the progression of kidney development, but also supplemented critical theoretical basis for research on kidney developmental toxicity induced by environmental MPs (Fig. 4F) (Zhou et al. 2024b). Kidney organoids can assess the health risks of environmental pollutants by simulating biological effects under different pollutants and exposure levels. Astashkina et al. assessed the renal toxicity of NPs and gold NPs by 3D kidney organoids constructed from mouse proximal tubules suspended in a hydrogel based on biomedical-grade HA (Astashkina et al. 2014). In addition, after exposing kidney organoids to PS-MPs across different concentration ranges for 24 h, it was found that the overall size of the organoids was significantly reduced. Meanwhile, the expression levels of nephron-specific markers were substantially decreased, and the normal formation processes of both proximal and distal tubules were significantly impaired. These changes intuitively illustrate the renal toxicity of PS-MPs (Wang et al. 2025a).

Application of organoids in other toxicity studies

Beyond the aforementioned organ types, a range of other organoid types have also been successfully constructed and applied to the toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants. Endocrine and reproductive organoids have emerged as precise and efficient in vitro models for exploring the toxic mechanisms of environmental EDC. In thyroid toxicity studies, Nazzari et al. adopted ESC-derived thyroid follicles to evaluate EDC toxicity. Both single and combined exposure to male mixed hormones and B(a)P significantly upregulated genes involved in lipid transport and metabolism (Nazzari et al. 2024). To address the technical limitations and ethical issues of traditional animal assays, reproductive organoid models have been increasingly applied to clarify pollutant-induced reproductive damage. Abady et al., for example, utilized endometrial organoids to characterize the reproductive toxicity of BPA. BPA exposure induced structural and molecular disorders in endometrial organoids, altered cytoskeletal protein expression, disturbed Wnt/β-catenin signaling homeostasis, and remodeled the expression profile of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (Abady et al. 2024). In testicular toxicological evaluation, Sakib et al. established testicular organoids using a microwell culture system. Exposure to mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and cadmium chloride resulted in the loss of tight junction protein 11 and substantial transcriptional dysregulation of somatic cell markers (Sakib et al. 2022). In addition to mechanistic toxicological analysis, organoid platforms support high-throughput screening of environmental toxicants. Xu et al. developed a human trophoblast organoid-based immunofluorescence screening system to screen organophosphorus flame retardants with developmental toxicity. Three aryl organophosphate flame retardants markedly inhibited trophoblast organoid proliferation. Mechanistically, 2-ethylhexyl-diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP) disrupts insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor signaling, suppresses cellular aerobic respiration, and ultimately impairs trophoblast development and proliferation (Xu et al. 2022). However, current research on the toxic mechanisms of environmental pollutants remains insufficient, particularly regarding the processes of distribution, metabolism, excretion, and damage after organisms ingest environmental pollutants. The establishment of relevant organoid models is anticipated to offer support for a more thorough understanding of research on the toxic mechanisms of environmental pollutants in vivo.

Advantages and challenges of organoids in toxicity testing of environmental pollutants

The application of organoids in pollutant exposure assessment is a frontier field bridging environmental toxicology and in vitro model research. Related technological advances have improved the risk assessment system for environmental pollutants and overcome the drawbacks of conventional evaluation methods. Featuring prominent biomimetic superiority to recapitulate in vivo physiological microenvironments, organoids are promising alternatives to animal models and traditional 2D cell models. Toxicological data derived from organoid assays show better consistency with in vivo animal measurements compared with standard 2D cell culture, attracting extensive academic attention. Animal experiments serve as a classic approach for the toxicity evaluation of environmental pollutants. Nevertheless, this method consumes abundant laboratory animals with long experimental cycles and high costs. In addition, discrepancies in species and exposure routes lead to physiological differences between humans and experimental animals, making it difficult to directly extrapolate animal experimental results to humans and resulting in evident limitations (Imai et al. 2024). As a novel in vitro model, organoids consist of multiple cell types and can mimic the structural and physiological functions of human organs. For instance, cardiac and intestinal organoids recapitulate myocardial contraction and intestinal crypt-villus architecture, respectively. They can accurately reflect organ toxicity induced by pollutants and overcome the limitations of traditional 2D cell culture and animal models (Truskey 2018). Zhang et al. fabricated cardiac organoid-on-a-chip by combining cardiac organoid and organ-on-a-chip technologies. Equipped with multiple cardiomyocyte-specific cell types, this chip can mimic cardiac mechanical signal transduction and physiological myocardial contraction, providing a reliable in vitro research model for evaluating nanoparticle-induced cardiac toxicity (Zhang et al. 2024b). Compared with animal experiments, toxicity tests based on organoids feature shorter cycles and higher efficiency, reduce the consumption of laboratory animals and experimental costs, and comply with the internationally recognized 3R ethical principles for animal research (Yang et al. 2024b). In addition, combined with transcriptome sequencing and gene editing technologies, organoids can be used to dissect the toxicological mechanisms of pollutants. Existing studies have verified that nanoparticle exposure triggers mitochondrial oxidative stress, activates the P38/Erk MAPK pathway and blocks autophagic flux in cardiac organoids, further inhibiting the pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells, which provides experimental evidence for clarifying the underlying mechanisms of nanoparticle cardiotoxicity (Li et al. 2024). Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the EU Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals Regulation have formally incorporated organoids into its regulatory assessment system and further promoted the adoption of non-animal testing to replace animal experiments. It emphasizes that organoid-derived data can serve as part of weight-of-evidence evaluation. Particularly in chemical safety assessment, such data may substitute for or complement conventional animal experiment data to assess risks including toxicity and carcinogenicity. In summary, organoids are expected to replace traditional in vivo models, facilitate the exploration of toxic effects and action mechanisms of environmental pollutants, and possess promising prospects for accurately evaluating the human health risks posed by pollutants.

However, for organoid models to truly replace traditional exposure models, several limitations and key issues still need to be addressed. Firstly, limited availability of seed cells constitutes the primary bottleneck for organoid culture. Restricted by large sample demand and ethical regulations, stable acquisition of initial cells for cultivation remains difficult (Nijiati et al. 2024). Cell heterogeneity is a critical pending issue in organoid research. Single-cell sequencing enables precise subtype classification of cells and improves the reliability of molecular mechanism interpretation. In addition, insufficient nutrient supply, shortage of bioactive factors and poor gas exchange hinder the differentiation and maturation of organoids, and it is difficult to precisely control their size, cellular composition and spatial structure. Therefore, it is urgent to establish standardized culture systems for developing pollutant exposure evaluation models with favorable repeatability and accuracy (Cheng et al. 2023). On the other hand, current organoids lack blood vessels, nerves and immune cells, limiting studies on pollutant metabolism and immunotoxicity and accurate toxicity evaluation (Kim et al. 2022). Therefore, 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip technologies can build organoid vascular networks and supplement nerve and immune cells to improve organoid physiological simulation for precise pollutant toxicity testing. Furthermore, organoid construction and culture are affected by cell sources and culture approaches, causing batch-to-batch variation that impairs experimental reproducibility and comparability. Inconsistent manual operations further hamper standardization and restrict organoid applications in toxicity assays (Fritsche et al. 2021). Standardized and automated culture procedures, culture medium and cell selection are essential to lower variation and enhance experimental reproducibility in the future. Finally, organoids possess short lifespan, restricting long-term pollutant exposure tests and relevant researches on pollutant chronic toxicity and chronic disease progression. They fail to satisfy research demands for long-term monitored toxic outcomes like pollutant carcinogenicity (Choi et al. 2025). Therefore, novel biomimetic hydrogels are vital to optimize organoid culture microenvironment and prolong organoid lifespan. Such materials support long-term pollutant exposure assays and facilitate precise analysis of pollutant chronic toxicity and chronic disease progression.

Conclusions

With their core advantage of simulating the structure and function of human organs, 3D organoids are reshaping the environmental toxicology evaluation system with high biomimetic precision. They effectively address the limitations of traditional 2D cell culture (lack of physiological structure and cell–cell interactions) and animal models (interspecies differences). Although organoids cannot yet fully replace animal models, organoid-based exposure assessment models remain ideal alternative tools for in vitro evaluation of the toxic effects of environmental pollutants. These models can cover a variety of organoids, including intestinal, renal, brain, hepatic, and pulmonary organoids. By systematically detecting the toxic responses of different organoids, they provide key support for clarifying the multi-target toxic mechanisms of environmental pollutants. The development of organoid technology not only responds to animal experiment phase-out initiatives but also drives toxicology toward the era of precision through high throughput, low cost, and ethical compliance. Ultimately, it will achieve full-chain breakthroughs from environmental pollutant early warning to personalized health protection. In general, future research needs to overcome current limitations. By deepening the interdisciplinary integration of 3D organoid technology with environmental toxicology, materials science, molecular biology, bioengineering, and artificial intelligence, we can fully unleash the application potential of organoids in the study of the toxic mechanisms of environmental pollutants. This will provide scientific support for improving the human health risk assessment system and optimizing environmental protection strategies, thereby promoting the high-quality development of undertakings in related fields.

Author contribution

G.Z.: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation. Y.C.: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. H.W.: Conception & design, Writing–review & editing. Y.J.: Writing–review & editing. Junqing Gan: Writing–review & editing. W.Y.: Writing–review & editing. Y.B.: Writing–review & editing. Y. G.: Writing–review & editing. G.S.: Conception & design, Writing–review & editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Graduate Student Innovation Fund of North China University of Science and Technology (Grant No. CXZZBS2026131), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. H2023209083), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82172658), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82472636), the 2025 Academic Research Program for Industry-University-Research Collaboration of Higher Education Institutions in Hebei Province, issued by the Department of Education of Hebei Province (Grant No. CXZX2025020), Tangshan Municipal Science and Technology Planning Project (Grant No. 24150218 C), Medical Science Research Project of Hebei (Grant No. 20250179).

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yanlei Ge, Email: 495732196@qq.com.

Guogui Sun, Email: guogui_sun2021@sina.com.

References

  1. Abady MM, Saadeldin IM, Han A, Bang S, Kang H, Seok DW, et al. Melatonin and resveratrol alleviate molecular and metabolic toxicity induced by Bisphenol A in endometrial organoids. Reprod Toxicol. 2024;128:108628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acharya P, Joshi P, Shrestha S, Choi NY, Jeong S, Lee MY. Uniform cerebral organoid culture on a pillar plate by simple and reproducible spheroid transfer from an ultralow attachment well plate. Biofabrication. 2024;16(2):025005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Achilli TM, Meyer J, Morgan JR. Advances in the formation, use and understanding of multi-cellular spheroids. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12(10):1347–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altamirano GA, Gomez AL, Schierano-Marotti G, Muñoz-de-Toro M, Rodriguez HA, Kass L. Bisphenol A and benzophenone-3 exposure alters milk protein expression and its transcriptional regulation during functional differentiation of the mammary gland in vitro. Environ Res. 2020;191:110185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Astashkina AI, Jones CF, Thiagarajan G, Kurtzeborn K, Ghandehari H, Brooks BD, et al. Nanoparticle toxicity assessment using an in vitro 3-D kidney organoid culture model. Biomaterials. 2014;35(24):6323–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayabe H, DePasquale EAK, Amarachintha SP, Mourya R, Li W, Nalluri S, et al. Cellular crosstalk mediated by TGF-β drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition in patient-derived multi-compartment biliary organoids. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):6575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baek A, Kwon IH, Lee DH, Choi WH, Lee SW, Yoo J, et al. Novel organoid culture system for improved safety assessment of nanomaterials. Nano Lett. 2024;24(3):805–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bilinovich SM, Uhl KL, Lewis K, Soehnlen X, Williams M, Vogt D, et al. Integrated RNA sequencing reveals epigenetic impacts of diesel particulate matter exposure in human cerebral organoids. Dev Neurosci. 2020;42(5–6):195–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao Y, Hu D, Cai C, Zhou M, Dai P, Lai Q, et al. Modeling early human cortical development and evaluating neurotoxicity with a forebrain organoid system. Environ Pollut. 2023;337:122624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen H, Bin J, Cao Z, Luo Y, Song P, He J, et al. Role of low-dose cadmium exposure to the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Environ Pollut. 2025;382:126718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng W, Zhou Y, Xie Y, Li Y, Zhou R, Wang H, et al. Combined effect of polystyrene microplastics and bisphenol A on the human embryonic stem cells-derived liver organoids: The hepatotoxicity and lipid accumulation. Sci Total Environ. 2023;854:158585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng X, Shen H, Zhang W, Chen B, Xu S, Wu L. Characterizing the effects of triclosan and triclocarban on the intestinal epithelial homeostasis using small intestinal organoids. J Hazard Mater. 2024;479:135734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng W, You Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Feng Y, Wang Y. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics to explore the varied hepatic toxicity induced by aged- and pristine-microplastics: in vivo and human-originated liver organoids-based in vitro study. Environ Res. 2025;280:121820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cho S, Yoon JY. Organ-on-a-chip for assessing environmental toxicants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;45:34–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi S, Kim EM, Kim SY, Choi Y, Choi S, Cho N, et al. Particulate matter exposure exacerbates cellular damage by increasing stress granule formation in respiratory syncytial virus-infected human lung organoids. Environ Pollut. 2022a;315:120439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Choi S, Choi S, Choi Y, Cho N, Kim SY, Lee CH, et al. Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate increases stress granule formation in human 3D lung organoids under respiratory syncytial virus infection. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022b;229:113094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Choi MA, Rose S, Langouët S. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as potentiators of hepatotoxicity in an exposome framework: current challenges of environmental toxicology. Toxicology. 2025;515:154167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cong J, Wu J, Fang Y, Wang J, Kong X, Wang L, et al. Application of organoid technology in the human health risk assessment of microplastics: A review of progresses and challenges. Environ Int. 2024;188:108744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Corrò C, Novellasdemunt L, Li VSW. A brief history of organoids. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;319(1):C151–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cruz-Acuña R, Quirós M, Huang S, Siuda D, Spence JR, Nusrat A, et al. PEG-4MAL hydrogels for human organoid generation, culture, and in vivo delivery. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(9):2102–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dao L, You Z, Lu L, Xu T, Sarkar AK, Zhu H, et al. Modeling blood-brain barrier formation and cerebral cavernous malformations in human PSC-derived organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31(6):818-833.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Deng J, Li M, Zhang L, Tang P. Three-dimensional hanging-drop culture of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of tissue injury. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2020;24(7):1101–6. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ding Z, Chang X, Qu X, Hua K, Qiu J. Gynecological malignancy organoids: A game changer for personalized medicine. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2025;1880(5):189405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Du XY, Yang JY. Biomimetic microfluidic chips for toxicity assessment of environmental pollutants. Sci Total Environ. 2024;919:170745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Eiraku M, Watanabe K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kawada M, Yonemura S, Matsumura M, et al. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(5):519–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472(7341):51–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Faiola F, Yin N, Yang R. Environmental toxicology: the importance of disease-specific in vitro models. Environ Health (Wash). 2023;2(2):65–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Feng T, Wei L, Zhou C, Li S, Li Y, Fang Y, et al. Light-based 3D bioprinting of testicular organoid as an in vitro model for reproductive toxicity assessment. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(7):4357–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fredrikson JP, Roth DM, Cosgrove JA, Sener G, Crow LA, Eckenstein K, et al. Engineering neuronal networks in granular microgels to innervate bioprinted cancer organoids on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 2025;25(14):3467–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Friedenstein A, Kuralesova AI. Osteogenic precursor cells of bone marrow in radiation chimeras. Transplantation. 1971;12(2):99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fritsche E, Haarmann-Stemmann T, Kapr J, Galanjuk S, Hartmann J, Mertens PR, et al. Stem cells for next level toxicity testing in the 21st century. Small. 2021;17(15):e2006252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gan Z, Qin X, Liu H, Liu J, Qin J. Recent advances in defined hydrogels in organoid research. Bioact Mater. 2023;28:386–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao X, Yuan Y, Lan Y, Lai T, Zhu L, Xu L, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics induced retinal toxicity: size-, dose-, and developmental stage-dependent effects on human neural retina organoids. J Hazard Mater. 2025;497:139573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ge Y, Yang S, Zhang T, Luo K, Zhang J, Wei Y, et al. Liver organoids uncover tire-derived 6-PPDQ-induced hepatotoxicity: a preliminary application of environmental toxicology and safety assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;296:118215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gong S, He K, Liu Y, Luo X, Ashraf K, He J, et al. Scalable Matrigel-free suspension culture for generating high-quality human liver ductal organoids. Cell Prolif. 2025;58(9):e70033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gu S, Wu G, Lu D, Wang Y, Tang L, Zhang W. Human kidney organoids model of Esculentoside A nephrotoxicity to investigate the role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition via STING signaling. Toxicol Lett. 2023;373:172–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heinzelmann E, Piraino F, Costa M, Roch A, Norkin M, Garnier V, et al. iPSC-derived and patient-derived organoids: applications and challenges in scalability and reproducibility as pre-clinical models. Curr Res Toxicol. 2024;7:100197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hofmann F, Bläsche R, Kasper M, Barth K. A co-culture system with an organotypic lung slice and an immortal alveolar macrophage cell line to quantify silica-induced inflammation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(1):e0117056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hogberg HT, de Cássia da Silveira E Sá R, Kleensang A, Bouhifd M, Cemiloglu Ulker O, Smirnova L, et al. Organophosphorus flame retardants are developmental neurotoxicants in a rat primary brainsphere in vitro model. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95(1):207–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hu Y, Zhu T, Cui H, Cui H. Integrating 3D bioprinting and organoids to better recapitulate the complexity of cellular microenvironments for tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025a;14(3):e2403762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hu D, Cao Y, Cai C, Wang G, Zhou M, Peng L, et al. Establishment of human cerebral organoid systems to model early neural development and assess the central neurotoxicity of environmental toxins. Neural Regen Res. 2025b;20(1):242–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hua T, Kiran S, Li Y, Sang QA. Microplastics exposure affects neural development of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical spheroids. J Hazard Mater. 2022;435:128884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hua X, Sun Z, Liang Z, Huang Y, Mo H, Dong F, et al. Engineered T cell therapy for the treatment of cardiac fibrosis during chronic phase of myocarditis. Theranostics. 2026;16(4):2037–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang F, You H, Tang X, Su Y, Peng H, Li H, et al. Early-life exposure to polypropylene nanoplastics induces neurodevelopmental toxicity in mice and human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hyun SA, Park JH, Ko MY, Min E, Kim M, Kang SW, et al. Human cardiac organoids highlight cardiotoxicity of the tire rubber antioxidant 6PPD. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;308:119496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Imai T, Ishigamori R, Naruse M, Ochiai M, Maru Y, Hippo Y, et al. Bridging toxicological properties of environmental chemicals between animals and humans using healthy organoid systems. J Toxicol Sci. 2024;49(10):425–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ji Z, Chen L, Ming D. Persistent organic pollutants: Neurotoxic mechanisms and insights from organoid models. Toxicology. 2026;522:154408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jiang Y, Lu L, Du C, Li Y, Cheng W, Bi H, et al. Human airway organoids as 3D in vitro models for a toxicity assessment of emerging inhaled pollutants: tire wear particles. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;10:1105710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ju S, Mu J, Dokland T, Zhuang X, Wang Q, Jiang H, et al. Grape exosome-like nanoparticles induce intestinal stem cells and protect mice from DSS-induced colitis. Mol Ther. 2013;21(7):1345–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Juguilon C, Khosravi R, Radisic M, Wu JC. In vitro modeling of interorgan crosstalk: multi-organ-on-a-chip for studying cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Circ Res. 2025;136(11):1476–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kim H, Park HJ. Current hPSC-derived liver organoids for toxicity testing: Cytochrome P450 enzymes and drug metabolism. Toxicol Res. 2025;41(2):105–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim J, Koo BK, Knoblich JA. Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020a;21(10):571–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim JH, Kim J, Kim WJ, Choi YH, Yang SR, Hong SH. Diesel particulate matter 2.5 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and upregulation of SARS-CoV-2 receptor during human pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar organoid development. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020b;17(22):8410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim H, Im I, Jeon JS, Kang EH, Lee HA, Jo S, et al. Development of human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatic organoids as an alternative model for drug safety assessment. Biomaterials. 2022;286:121575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kozlowski MT, Crook CJ, Ku HT. Towards organoid culture without Matrigel. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lakhdar R, Mumby S, Abubakar-Waziri H, Porter A, Adcock IM, Chung KF. Lung toxicity of particulates and gaseous pollutants using ex-vivo airway epithelial cell culture systems. Environ Pollut. 2022;305:119323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501(7467):373–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Li M, Gong J, Gao L, Zou T, Kang J, Xu H. Advanced human developmental toxicity and teratogenicity assessment using human organoid models. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;235:113429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li J, Weng H, Liu S, Li F, Xu K, Wen S, et al. Embryonic exposure of polystyrene nanoplastics affects cardiac development. Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liang B, Zhong Y, Huang Y, Lin X, Liu J, Lin L, et al. Underestimated health risks: polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics jointly induce intestinal barrier dysfunction by ROS-mediated epithelial cell apoptosis. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2021;18(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Liang SJ, Luo YX, Su YJ, Zhang DW, Wang SJ, Xu ME, et al. Distinct toxicity of microplastics/TBBPA co-exposure to bioprinted liver organoids derived from hiPSCs of healthy and patient donors. int J Bioprinting. 2024;10(3):245–60. [Google Scholar]
  62. Linnemann JR, Miura H, Meixner LK, Irmler M, Kloos UJ, Hirschi B, et al. Quantification of regenerative potential in primary human mammary epithelial cells. Development. 2015;142(18):3239–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lu S, Zhu X, Zeng P, Hu L, Huang Y, Guo X, et al. Exposure to PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS induces Alzheimer’s disease-like neuropathology in cerebral organoids. Environ Pollut. 2024;363(Pt 1):125098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Luo L, Liu L, Ding Y, Dong Y, Ma M. Advances in biomimetic hydrogels for organoid culture. Chem Commun (Camb). 2023;59(64):9675–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Maharjan S, Ma C, Singh B, Kang H, Orive G, Yao J, et al. Advanced 3D imaging and organoid bioprinting for biomedical research and therapeutic applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024;208:115237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Maiullari F, Ceraolo MG, Presutti D, Fratini N, Galbiati M, Fasciani A, et al. Modeling breast cancer dynamics through modulable small Vessel Environment Bioreactor (sVEB). Biomaterials. 2025;323:123441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Nazzari M, Romitti M, Kip AM, Kamps R, Costagliola S, van de Beucken T, et al. Impact of benzo[a]pyrene, PCB153 and sex hormones on human ESC-derived thyroid follicles using single cell transcriptomics. Environ Int. 2024;188:108748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nijiati N, Wubuli D, Li X, Zhou Z, Julaiti M, Huang P, et al. The construction of stem cell-induced hepatocyte model and its application in evaluation of developmental hepatotoxicity of environmental pollutants. Stem Cells Dev. 2024;33(21–22):575–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. O’Connor NE, Mulliken JB, Banks-Schlegel S, Kehinde O, Green H. Grafting of burns with cultured epithelium prepared from autologous epidermal cells. Lancet. 1981;317(8211):75–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Özkan A, LoGrande NT, Feitor JF, Goyal G, Ingber DE. Intestinal organ chips for disease modelling and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21(11):751–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Palazzolo S, Caligiuri I, Sfriso AA, Mauceri M, Rotondo R, Campagnol D, et al. Early warnings by liver organoids on short- and long-chain PFAS toxicity. Toxics. 2022;10(2):91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pamies D, Hartung T. 21st century cell culture for 21st century toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol. 2017;30(1):43–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Parente IA, Chiara L, Bertoni S. Exploring the potential of human intestinal organoids: applications, challenges, and future directions. Life Sci. 2024;352:122875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Park JH, Choi AJ, Kim SJ, Cheong SW, Jeong SY. AhR activation by 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin inhibit the development of mouse intestinal epithelial cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;43:44–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Park SB, Jo JH, Kim SS, Jung WH, Bae MA, Koh B, et al. Microplastics accumulation induces kynurenine-derived neurotoxicity in cerebral organoids and mouse brain. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2025;33(3):447–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Petpiroon N, Netkueakul W, Sukrak K, Wang C, Liang Y, Wang M, et al. Development of lung tissue models and their applications. Life Sci. 2023;334:122208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Phelan MA, Lelkes PI, Swaroop A. Mini and customized low-cost bioreactors for optimized high-throughput generation of tissue organoids. Stem Cell Investig. 2018;5:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Pomerat CM, Lefeber CG, Smith M. Quantitative cine analysis of cell organoid activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1954;58(7):1311–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Przepiorski A, Sander V, Tran T, Hollywood JA, Sorrenson B, Shih JH, et al. A simple bioreactor-based method to generate kidney organoids from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;11(2):470–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Puri M, Gandhi K, Kumar MS. Emerging environmental contaminants: A global perspective on policies and regulations. J Environ Manage. 2023;332:117344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Qian X, Jacob F, Song MM, Nguyen HN, Song H, Ming GL. Generation of human brain region-specific organoids using a miniaturized spinning bioreactor. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(3):565–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rezakhani S, Gjorevski N, Lutolf MP. Low-defect Thiol-Michael addition hydrogels as Matrigel substitutes for epithelial organoid derivation. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(48):2000761. [Google Scholar]
  83. Roudaut M, Caillaud A, Souguir Z, Bray L, Girardeau A, Rimbert A, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived liver organoids grown on a Biomimesys® hyaluronic acid-based hydroscaffold as a new model for studying human lipoprotein metabolism. Bioeng Transl Med. 2024;9(4):e10659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sakib S, Lara NLEM, Huynh BC, Dobrinski I. Organotypic rat testicular organoids for the study of testicular maturation and toxicology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:892342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Santos AJM, van Unen V, Lin Z, Chirieleison SM, Ha N, Batish A, et al. A human autoimmune organoid model reveals IL-7 function in coeliac disease. Nature. 2024;632(8024):401–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459(7244):262–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Shaoyong W, Jin H, Jiang X, Xu B, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Benzo [a] pyrene-loaded aged polystyrene microplastics promote colonic barrier injury via oxidative stress-mediated notch signalling. J Hazard Mater. 2023;457:131820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Shetty SS, Deepthi D, Harshitha S, Sonkusare S, Naik PB, Kumari NS, et al. Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Singh VK, Seed TM. Acute radiation syndrome drug discovery using organ-on-chip platforms. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2022;17(8):865–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Tang XY, Wu S, Wang D, Chu C, Hong Y, Tao M, et al. Human organoids in basic research and clinical applications. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tian J, Yang J, Chen T, Yin Y, Li N, Li Y, et al. Generation of human endometrial assembloids with a luminal epithelium using air-liquid interface culture methods. Adv Sci. 2023;10(30):e2301868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Truskey GA. Human microphysiological systems and organoids as in vitro models for toxicological studies. Front Public Health. 2018;6:185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Usui T, Sakurai M, Umata K, Yamawaki H, Ohama T, Sato K. Preparation of human primary colon tissue-derived organoid using air liquid interface culture. Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2018;75:22.6.1-22.6.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wakamatsu T, Ogawa H, Yoshida K, Matsuoka Y, Shizuma K, Imura Y, et al. Establishment of organoids from human epithelioid sarcoma with the air-liquid interface organoid cultures. Front Oncol. 2022;12:893592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang Y, Yin N, Yang R, Zhao M, Li S, Zhang S, et al. Development of a simplified human embryonic stem cell-based retinal pre-organoid model for toxicity evaluations of common pollutants. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2023a;42(4):264–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang R, Kang N, Zhang W, Chen B, Xu S, Wu L. The developmental toxicity of PM2.5 on the early stages of fetal lung with human lung bud tip progenitor organoids. Environ Pollut. 2023b;330:121764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang L, Mei L, Zang Z, Cai Y, Jiang P, Zhou L, et al. Aluminum hydroxide exposure induces neurodevelopmental impairment in hESC-derived cerebral organoids. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023c;256:114863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang D, Guo Y, Zhu J, Liu F, Xue Y, Huang Y, et al. Hyaluronic acid methacrylate/pancreatic extracellular matrix as a potential 3D printing bioink for constructing islet organoids. Acta Biomater. 2023d;165:86–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang Z, Chen S, Guo Y, Zhang R, Zhang Q, Jiang X, et al. Intestinal carcinogenicity screening of environmental pollutants using organoid-based cell transformation assay. Arch Toxicol. 2024;98(6):1937–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang Y, Zhang A, Liang T, Chen L, Feng S, Zhao Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induce nephrotoxicity through DDIT4-mediated autophagy and apoptosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025a;294:118066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang H, Xu T, Han J, Zhang H, Hu S, Wei S, et al. Three-dimensional cultured human nasal epithelial cell model for testing respiratory toxicity and neurotoxicity of air pollutants. Environ Sci Technol. 2025b;59(13):6452–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wang J, Wang F, Jiang Y, Bai L, Chen X, Su J. Organoid-driven nanomedicine platform development. Biomaterials. 2026;325:123611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wilson HV. A new method by which sponges may be artificially reared. Science. 1907;25(649):912–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu X, Ciminieri C, Bos IST, Woest ME, D’Ambrosi A, Wardenaar R, et al. Diesel exhaust particles distort lung epithelial progenitors and their fibroblast niche. Environ Pollut. 2022;305:119292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Xie S, Jiang L, Wang M, Sun W, Yu S, Turner JR, et al. Cadmium ingestion exacerbates Salmonella infection, with a loss of goblet cells through activation of Notch signaling pathways by ROS in the intestine. J Hazard Mater. 2020;391:122262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Xu YY, Wang ZM. Cardiac organoids: emerging tools for investigating environmental roles in cardiomyopathy pathogenesis and therapeutic development. Biomed Environ Sci. 2026;39(1):82–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Xu C, Ma H, Gao F, Zhang C, Hu W, Jia Y, et al. Screening of organophosphate flame retardants with placentation-disrupting effects in human trophoblast organoid model and characterization of adverse pregnancy outcomes in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2022;130(5):57002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Xu J, Ni M, Wang J, Zhu J, Niu G, Cui J, et al. Low-level PM2.5 induces the occurrence of early pulmonary injury by regulating circ_0092363. Environ Int. 2024;187:108700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Yan Y, Yang Z, Chen L. High-quality models for assessing the effects of environmental pollutants on the nervous system: 3D brain organoids. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;284:116876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Yang R, Liu S, Liang X, Yin N, Jiang L, Zhang Y, et al. TBBPA, TBBPS, and TCBPA disrupt hESC hepatic differentiation and promote the proliferation of differentiated cells partly via up-regulation of the FGF10 signaling pathway. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Yang JY, Zhang X, Liu ZS, Yang CX, Li S, et al. The impact of emerging contaminants exposure on human health effects: A review of organoid assessment models. Chem Eng J. 2024a;489:155882. [Google Scholar]
  114. Yang H, Niu S, Guo M, Xue Y. Applications of 3D organoids in toxicological studies: a comprehensive analysis based on bibliometrics and advances in toxicological mechanisms. Arch Toxicol. 2024b;98(8):2309–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Yang N, Chen J, Zhu Y, Shan W, Cao Z, Fu Y, et al. Human cardiac organoid model reveals antibacterial triclocarban promotes myocardial hypertrophy by interfering with endothelial cell metabolism. Sci Bull. 2025;70(3):342–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Yang K, Chu X, Wang X, Zhang W, Lu J, Xu C, et al. Novel vascularized human liver organoids for modeling alcohol-induced liver injury and developing hepatoprotective therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2026;13(9):e11169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Yin F, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Qin J. Engineering brain organoids to probe impaired neurogenesis induced by cadmium. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(5):1908–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Yin J, Wu D, Chen X, Ye Z, Li Q. Organoid for air pollution toxicity assessment: advances and environmental applicability. Environ Health (Wash). 2025;3(12):1456–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Yoo MH, Kim Y, Lee BS. Thyroid cancer risk associated with perfluoroalkyl carboxylate exposure: assessment using a human dermal fibroblast-derived extracellular matrix-based thyroid cancer organoid. J Hazard Mater. 2024;479:135771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Yu D, Cao H, Wang X. Advances and applications of organoids: a review. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2021;37(11):3961–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhang Y, Liu K, He H, Xiao H, Fang Z, Chen X, et al. Innovative explorations: unveiling the potential of organoids for investigating environmental pollutant exposure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024a;31(11):16256–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhang T, Yang S, Ge Y, Yin L, Pu Y, Gu Z, et al. Unveiling the heart’s hidden enemy: dynamic insights into polystyrene nanoplastic-induced cardiotoxicity based on cardiac organoid-on-a-chip. ACS Nano. 2024b;18(45):31569–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang A, Wang Y, Xue Q, Yao J, Chen L, Feng S, et al. Polystyrene microplastics disrupt kidney organoid development via oxidative stress and Bcl-2/Bax/caspase pathway. Chem Biol Interact. 2025;419:111642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhao Y, Yin N, Yang R, Faiola F. Recent advances in environmental toxicology: Exploring gene editing, organ-on-a-chip, chimeric animals, and in silico models. Food Chem Toxicol. 2024;193:115022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhou Y, Li C, Chen Y, Yu Y, Diao X, Chiu R, et al. Human airway organoids and multimodal imaging-based toxicity evaluation of 1-nitropyrene. Environ Sci Technol. 2024a;58(14):6083–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Zhou B, Wei Y, Chen L, Zhang A, Liang T, Low JH, et al. Microplastics exposure disrupts nephrogenesis and induces renal toxicity in human iPSC-derived kidney organoids. Environ Pollut. 2024b;360:124645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhou Y, Li B, Zhao J, Ren X, Guo Y, Yang L, et al. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrabromophthalate promotes NASH progression through disrupting endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts. Environ Sci Technol. 2025;59(28):14302–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Cell Biology and Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES