Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2026 Sep 23;110:284. doi: 10.1007/s00253-026-14040-4

Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste

Aylin Nur Erkmen 1,✉, Roland Ulber 2,#, Thomas Jüstel 1,#, Mirjam Altendorfner 1,#
PMCID: PMC13601489  PMID: 42776259

Abstract

Abstract

This study systematically investigates the biogenic production of oxalic acid (OA, H2C2O4) via submerged fermentation to establish a sustainable reagent for critical metal recovery applications. Preliminary shake-flask experiments evaluated Aspergillus niger strains (ATCC 1015 and CECT 2807), optimal carbon sources, and the influence of pH adjustment. Despite inherent biological variance across replicates, A. niger ATCC 1015 demonstrated a superior production trajectory, yielding 71.0 ± 27.7 mM OA in 5 days. Intermittent pH adjustment above 4.0 significantly enhanced secretion to 90.4 ± 5.8 mM, while glucose was identified as the optimal carbon source (YP/S ≈ 0.4 g/g). Building upon these preliminary findings, process intensification was conducted in a 10 L stirred-tank bioreactor. Transitioning to a fed-batch strategy with pulsed feeding and continuous pH control effectively contributed to substantially higher OA titers, achieving a peak OA titer of 260.1 ± 4.8 mM over 14 days. Co-production of gluconic acid and acidogenesis inhibition posed a challenge in attaining higher product yields. Collectively, these findings establish a robust, scalable bioprocess for sustainable OA generation, directly supporting its emerging application as a highly selective leaching agent for critical metal recovery from electronic waste streams.

Key points

  • A.niger strain ATCC1015 was pinpointed as a suitable strain for biogenic OA production

  • Fed-batch with pulsed feeding maximizes OA titer in scale-up.

  • Gluconic acid and phosphate excess hinder selective OA production.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14040-4.

Keywords: Oxalic acid, ATCC1015, Submerged fermentation, Fed-batch, Particle, Morphology, Bioleaching

Introduction

Oxalic acid (sum formula: H2C2O4) is a dicarboxylic organic acid widely used in various industrial branches, among which the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, textile and leather, and chemical and food industries can be counted (Schuler et al. 2021). The first synthesis of OA was established by Scheele in 1776 through sugar oxidization utilizing nitric acid, followed by an alternative protocol developed by Wöhler using cyanogen hydrolysis in 1824 (Verma et al. 2019). At present, OA is predominantly produced through chemical synthesis routes such as propylene, ethylene oxidation, and dialkyl oxalate processes, while Rhône-Poulenc is the largest manufacturer on a global scale (Schuler et al. 2021).

Filamentous fungi, specifically Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp., are widely used as microbial cell factories for the secretion of organic acids such as citric, oxalic, and gluconic acid through their metabolic processes (Gadd and Gadd 1999). Notably, owing to its high productivity and industrial viability, Aspergillus niger is extensively used for citric acid fermentation (Książek 2023). Early observations by Wehmer (1893) laid the foundation by distinguishing Aspergillus niger as an OA accumulator compared to Penicillium glaucum, which was later broadened by Currie and Thom (1915) to include Penicillium oxalicum (Currie and Thom 1915).

Further research into the metabolism of Aspergillus niger revealed a cytoplasmic, TCA-independent pathway for oxalate formation mediated by the enzyme oxaloacetate hydrolase (OAH) (Kubicek et al. 1988). Kubicek et al. (1988) pinpointed the C-C splitting of oxaloacetate through OAH enzyme at pH levels above 4 (Kubicek et al. 1988). In the same vein, Ruijter et al. (1999) demonstrated citric acid production by A.niger mutant lacking OAH at pH 5 in the presence of manganese ions, conditions that are typically inhibitory to the wild type (Ruijter et al. 1999). In light of these findings regarding the cytoplasmic pathway driven by OAH enzyme, several studies have tackled the optimization of OA secretion by A. niger at different scales, adopting various methodologies with a primary focus on carbon source and pH regulation (Strasser et al. 1994; Cameselle et al. 1998). The key findings from these fermentation studies are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of literature studies on OA production parameters and operational strategies

Strain ID Vessel C-source Mode Adopted strategy OA [mM] Reference
WU-2223 Shake-flask Glucose Batch pH > 4.0 321 Kobayashi et al. (2014)
B60 Shake-flask Glucose Batch pH > 4.0 88.9 Kubicek et al. (1988)
ATCC 6275 Shake-flask Whey Batch C (%)a 4.0 Brown et al. (2018)
ATCC 9029 Shake-flask Whey Batch C (%)a 7.0 Brown et al. (2018)
CMB 120.49 STR (2 L) Sucrose Fed-batch pH > 4 427.0 Strasser et al. (1994)
1120 Shake-flask Whey Batch pH ≈ 6.0 410.9 Santoro et al. (1999)
1120 Biostat E (10 L) Whey Batch pH ≈ 6.0 kLab 459.9 Bohlmann et al. (1998)
1120 Biostat E (10 L) Whey Batch pH ≈ 6 375.4 Cameselle et al. (1998)
1120 Biostat E Whey Batch pH ≈ 6.0 375.4 Cameselle et al. (1998)
XPc STR (2 L) Rapeseed oil Batch pH ≈ 5 764.2 Rymowicz and Lenart (2003)
W78C Biostat A (6 L) Sucrose Batch pH > 6 714.2 Walaszczyk et al. (2018)
F22 BioCnS (50 L) Fructose Batch kLa 83.1 Lee et al. (2018)
NJDL-12 Shake-flask Glucose Batch pH = 6.5 26.1 Li et al. (2016)
NJDL-03d Shake-flask Glucose Batch pH = 6.5 10.0 Li et al. (2016)

a C(%): Adjustment in the concentration of the carbon source

bkLa: Optimization through the kLa value by adjusting the stirrer speed (rpm) and aeration (vvm)

c XP: Modified A.niger strain through UV-mutagenesis

dNJDL-03: Penicillium oxalicum strain

While the OA secretion by Aspergillus niger is well-documented, the primary industrial application of A. niger has been for citric acid fermentation, where research efforts are often directed toward the suppression of OA as a by-product to maximize target yields (Gadd and Gadd 1999; Książek 2023). Recently, metal recycling represents another novel application area for OA, garnering significant attention in light of escalating electronic waste (e-waste) crisis and growing concerns regarding the long-term supply of critical metals, such as gallium (Ga) and rare earth elements (REEs), which are indispensable for manufacturing electronic devices such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), tablets, smartphones, and so on. Therefore, OA serves as a strategic and sustainable alternative to conventional inorganic reagents, which are used in on-going metal recycling operations, such as hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4), for dissolving end-of-life (EoL) devices and recovering these valuable materials.

Specifically, OA establishes robust octahedral coordination compounds with hard metals via complexolysis, specifically trivalent metals such as Al(III), Fe(III), Ga(III), and so on, and serves as a selective precipitant for divalent metal ions such as for REE (Weber and Birgit 2023; Verma et al. 2019). Erkmen et al. (2025b) pinpointed that OA under optimized conditions (710.55 acid concentration, at 84.5 ∘C, 50 g/L of waste loading) could recover up to 37% Ga from waste minerals (Erkmen et al. 2025a). This supports the earlier findings by Zhou et al. (2019) who demonstrated a 90.36% of Ga recovery from waste surface-mounted light-emitting diodes (SMD-LEDs) under optimized conditions at 90 ∘C, 10 g/L solid loading, and 700 mM acid concentration (Zhou et al. 2019). In this context, OA presents a promising solution owing to its dual functionality, enabling a dissolution and robust formation of complexes, which is alluring for targeted metal recovery (Verma et al. 2019; Erkmen et al. 2025a; Gerold et al. 2024).

Nonetheless, despite offering a promising alternative compared to conventional harsh reagents, Choi et al. (2022) pinpointed that OA failed to meet the classification criteria of green chemicals (Choi et al. 2022). Their assessment considered both a metal recovery (%) and toxicity (LD50), revealing OA exhibiting a higher LD50 than sulfuric acid (H2SO4), raising concerns about its environmental impact (Choi et al. 2022). This conundrum is rooted in the entire life-cycle of OA, as it is primarily derived from petrochemical processes, which are associated with volatile intermediates and significant CO2 emissions (Schuler et al. 2021).

Aligning with the aims of the European Union (EU) to achieve climate neutrality by year 2050 by prioritizing renewable energies and transitioning from fossil feed-stocks into the sustainable alternatives for material production gives an incentive for biogenic oxalic acid production as well as sustainable metal recovery from waste resources (Commission 2019; Schuler et al. 2021). In this regard, fermentation processes involving filamentous fungi emerge as a viable and sustainable strategy to address both 350,000-ton annual OA demand and the crisis in critical raw material supply, promoting selective secondary production based on a “key-lock” principle (Schuler et al. 2021; Erkmen et al. 2025a).

To bridge this gap, this research addresses the aforementioned limitations by establishing a comprehensive framework for submerged OA fermentation by Aspergillus niger. Through a systematic study including strain comparison, pH regulation, process intensification on a larger scale (10 L) whilst evaluating different fermentation modes, this study establishes fundamentals for an industrially viable OA production. The developed process is designed to yield a biogenic agent rich in OA, specifically conceptualized for the recovery of critical metals such as gallium from e-waste and other secondary waste streams, leveraging the enhanced performance often attributed to synergistic secondary metabolites in fungal fluids (Maneesuwannarat et al. 2016). Consequently, by transitioning away from petrochemical routes, this study positions fungal fermentation as a stand-alone green technology, contributing to sustainable bioprocess development for strategic metal recovery in alignment with the European Union’s 2050 circular economy goals.

Materials and methods

Strain, subculture, and inoculum preparation

Aspergillus niger strains used in this study included ATCC 1015 (LGC Standards) and CECT 2807 (University of Valencia culture repository). Accordingly, strains were subcultured periodically (5–7 days) on potato-dextrose agar (PDA) plates under sterile conditions and incubated at 30 ∘C. PDA composition: 4 g/L Potato infusion; 20 g/L Glucose; 15 g/L Agar; pH 5.6 ± 0.2 (from Carl Roth GmbH+Co. KG; acc. to Ph. Eur./USP, for microbiology)

For spore inoculum preparation, cultures were aseptically scraped from PDA plates using sterile disposable scalpels into a solution of 0.9 N KCl and 10 μL/L Triton-X. Spore concentrations were determined using a Neubauer-improved hemocytometer via serial dilution, in which inoculum concentrations were adjusted to 106-107 spores/ml for shake-flask experiments and 108 spores/mL for fermenter experiments. Pre-cultures in glycerol solutions were stored in cryo-vials at -20 ∘C.

Fermentation experiments

Shake-flask experiments

The nutrient media used in the shake-flask experiments were adapted from Bosshard et al. (1996) and contained (g/L): Glucose (30), NaNO3 (1.5), KH2PO4 (0.5), MgSO4.7H2O (0.025), KCl (0.025), yeast extract (1.6) (Bosshard et al. 1996). This medium was supplemented with 100 mM phosphate buffering, and the pH was adjusted to 6.0 ± 0.2 with concentrated (3 N) NaOH. All reagents were of analytical grade. Sterilization of nutrient and agar media was performed in closed sterile vessels at 120 ∘C for 20 min under 1.5 psi pressure. Preceding the inoculum, 99 ml of sterile nutrient media was aseptically dispensed into 250 ml baffled Duran Erlenmeyer flasks under a vertical laminar flow hood. Subsequently, each flask was inoculated with spore solution (106 spores/mL) to a final inoculum density of 1% (v/v).

Sampling was conducted aseptically on sporadic intervals spanning over 240 h using sterile pipette tips and sample holders to prevent cross-contamination. pH fluctuations and OA concentration were measured throughout the experiment. In buffering tests, pH was maintained at 6.0 ± 0.2 using 3 N NaOH. At each interval, the pH of the culture medium was monitored using a digital pH meter with a DO sensor, calibrated prior to use with pH 4.0 and 7.0 standard buffers.

All shake-flask experiments were performed in biological triplicate (n = 3). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. To account for the loss in nutrient solution volume as a result of intermittent sampling and evaporation during cultivation, upon sampling, double-distilled water (ddH2O) was added under aseptic conditions to maintain the total volume of 100 ml.

Following fermentation, fungal pellets were separated from the biogenic supernatant solutions using Nalgene vacuum filters (0.2 μm). The cell-free supernatant was stored at 4 ∘C for subsequent glucose and organic acid analysis.

Fermenter (10 L) experiments

A Biostat-C (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany) bioreactor with a 15-L total volume (10-L working volume) and an H:D ratio of 1:3 was used for all large-scale fermentation experiments. The nutrient medium, adapted from Bosshard et al. (1996), contained (g/L): Glucose (150), NaNO3 (1.5), KH2PO4 (0.5), MgSO4·7 H2O (0.025), KCl (0.025), and yeast extract (1.6) (Bosshard et al. 1996). This was further supplemented with 100 mM phosphate buffering, and the pH was maintained at 6 ± 0.2 using concentrated (3 N) NaOH. All reagents used were of analytical grade.

Mixing was provided by a triple six-blade Rushton turbine impeller, and aeration was supplied through a ring sparger. The reactor temperature was controlled via a cooling jacket. Process parameters including temperature, volumetric airflow (L/min), dissolved oxygen (DO (%)), and pH were continuously monitored and controlled using an integrated amplifier system. The DO level was maintained using a cascade control system that adjusted the stirrer speed and/or aeration rate.

The pH was measured and controlled using a Mettler-Toledo S7 pH sensor, pre-calibrated using analytical pH 4 and 7 buffer solutions. Dissolved oxygen was measured with a Hamilton OxyFerm (pO2) sensor, calibrated with a two-point method (0% after nitrogen sparging and 100% after full aeration).

Sterilization of the fermenter was performed in three stages (heating, sterilization, cooling) using the sterilization mode. The sparging was adjusted to sterilization mode, and the aeration valve and cooling water were turned off. Sterilization occurred at 120 ∘C and up to 1.5 atm of gauge pressure for 25 min. During the cooling step, cooling water was turned on once the reactor temperature reached 85 ∘C to expedite the process.

For fermentation experiments, the vessel was initially filled with 8.8 L of nutrient medium, accounting for ≈ 0.8 L loss during sterilization. After sterilization, 0.2 v/v % Pluronic F68 (foam-suppressing agent) and 0.1 N buffer solution were added through a syringe equipped with a 0.2 μm membrane filter. An inoculum of 1%, prepared from pre-grown pellet cultures (72–96 h exponential phase), was transferred aseptically from sterile culture flasks to the fermenter via a peristaltic pump. To enhance OA production, filter-sterilized (0.2 μm) 3 N NaOH was integrated via peristaltic pumps after the initial lag and growth phase (48 h) to maintain the fermentation medium pH at 6 ± 0.2. The following operational modes were investigated:

  • Batch: The fermentation was performed with an initial glucose concentration of 150 g/L without further feeding.

  • Fed-batch: Based on preliminary data, a pulsed feeding strategy was employed. After an initial batch phase (initial glucose concentration: 30 g/L), pulses of a concentrated glucose solution (stock concentration: 300 g/L) were added at 72-h intervals to maintain a target substrate level, with the total glucose added over the 15-day fermentation for constituting the total sum of 150 g/L.

Samples (20–25 mL) were withdrawn aseptically at 24-h intervals via a steam-sterilized port at the base of the bioreactor to monitor residual glucose and organic acid concentrations. Biomass was not quantified due to the dispersed mycelial morphology and the difficulty in accurately subtracting the pre-grown inoculum mass.

Glucose and organic acid determination

Collected samples were syringe-filtered (0.45μm) directly and analyzed for residual glucose using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay (Miller 1959). The DNS reagent was prepared by dissolving 10 g of DNS and 300 g of Rochelle salt in 800 mL of 0.5 N NaOH, with the final volume complemented to 1 L with double-distilled H2O. For the DNS assay, 100 μL of the diluted sample was mixed with 400 μL of the prepared DNS reagent. The mixture was heated in a heating block for 5 min at 95 ∘C. Subsequently, samples were promptly placed in an ice bath. Next, the prepared samples for glucose quantification were pipetted into a sterile F-type 96-well plate, in which the absorbance at 570 nm using a micro-plate reader was measured.

OA concentration in the filtrate was determined via Capel-105 M fully automated capillary electrophoresis instrument (Lumex Instruments, Canada). Direct samples from the fermentation liquid were syringe-filtered (0.45μm) and serially diluted with ddH2O. Before sample analysis, daily conditioning on Capel-105 M was performed, which comprised the serial flushing of capillaries with 1 N NaOH, ddH2O, and a buffer solution consisting of chromium (VI) oxide (10 mM), diethanolamine solution (30 mM), and Hexadecyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (CTA-OH) (3 mM). Subsequently, the samples were loaded into the autosampling unit and hydrodynamically injected into the capillary at 30 mbars for 5 s for analysis. Samples were then hydrodynamically injected (30 mbars for 5 s) and analyzed at -25 kV for 8–10 min, with indirect UV detection at 254 nm. Analyte concentrations were calculated via peak area against a linear regression of analytical standards (oxalic, citric, gluconic acids and nitrate, phosphate, chloride, sulfate ions). All measurements were performed in triplicate (95% CI).

While this comprehensive suite of analytes was monitored throughout all cultivations to ensure nutrient sufficiency and metabolic profiling, only components exhibiting significant quantitative accumulation or demonstrating a direct influence on the fermentation kinetics are reported. For the preliminary shake-flask experiments, secondary organic acids remained below the quantification limit and are therefore omitted.

Results

Comparative study of two strains for biogenic oxalic acid production

To differentiate the OA production capabilities between the selected A. niger fungal strains, small-scale batch fermentation experiments were conducted and monitored over a 240-h period. Figure 1 presents the comparative analysis of OA secretion (mM) and pH fluctuations between ATCC1015 and CECT2807 strains.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

OA secretion and the detected pH during comparative strain test in small-scale shake fermentation experiments. In the bar chart stacked with a line plot, bars correspond to the secreted OA amount (mM), and lines to the measured pH in the secondary y-axis (pHinitial = 6.0 ± 0.2). The data represents the mean of biological replication experiments (n = 3). Error bars on both the bar and line plot denote the standard deviation of the biological triplicates

As outlined in Fig. 1, ATCC1015 showed a notably higher mean OA secretion compared to CECT2807 throughout the fermentation spanning over 240 h. While no clear distinction could have been made in terms of acid production in the initial phase (24 h), ATCC1015 exhibited rapid OA secretion in the latter sampling times, reaching a peak at 71.0 ± 27.7 at 240 h. The trend in acid peak was corroborated by the change in pH, in which ATCC1015 exhibited sharp decline in the pH (pH = 3.8 ± 0.7) at 72 h, whereas the strain CECT2807 exhibited a relatively lower pH decline at the same sampling time (pH = 4.5 ± 0.2). After sampling at 72 h, pH of the fermentation medium was adjusted to 6.0 ± 0.2 to prevent the suppression of OAH enzyme, leading to a progress in the OA secretion in the latter stages of the fermentation.

pH regulation

As numerous studies attributed the significant biogenic OA secretion to the pH regulation by keeping pH > 4, complementary to the strain comparison, sporadic pH adjustment on days 1, 4, and 7 was implemented in the small-scale shake cultures. In addition, a separate fermentation batch was conducted where the culture medium’s pH was maintained at a neutral state (pH 6.0 ± 0.2) throughout the experiment. Owing to the prolonged lag phase in this set of experiments (≈ 26–28 h), neither acid secretion nor pellet formation could be detected at 24 h.

As shown in Fig. 2, following the OA production induction phase (≈ 24 h), both groups experienced a significant drop in pH to ≈ 2.9 and secreted comparable OA by 96 h. After adapting the initial pH regulation on day 4 (96 h), the pH-regulated cultures demonstrated a ≈ 7-fold surge in the secretion at 168 h, ultimately reaching a final titer of 90.4 ± 5.8 mM acid at 240 h.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The influence of pH regulation on OA secretion in shake-flask cultures. The bars (primary y-axis) represent the mean concentration of secreted OA (mM) in cultures with intermittent pH control (“Controlled pH”) versus unregulated cultures (“Natural pH shift”). The lines (secondary y-axis) indicate the measured pH at each sampling point over the 240-h fermentation. All data points represent the mean of three biological replicates (n = 3), with error bars indicating the standard deviation

On the other hand, the control group, where no pH regulation was integrated, secreted notably lower OA. As indicated on the secondary y-axis of Fig. 2, the pH of the non-regulated group remained below the critical threshold at pH 4, suppressing therefore the regulation of the OAH enzyme. As the fermentation progresses toward 168 h, the discrepancy in acid generation by both groups were doubled and persisted until the finalization of the fermentation at 240 h.

Thus, these results confirm that even sporadic pH regulation on small-scale batch cultures is a highly effective strategy for boosting OA yields.

Carbon source

To determine the impact of carbon source on the OA generation in the shake cultures of A. niger, the media described in the methods and materials were adjusted by implementing glucose, sucrose, and lactose at 30 g/L for each. As given in Fig. 3, the choice of substrate influenced the OA generation and the overall product yield per g substrate.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of carbon sources for OA secretion. The primary y-axis (bars) corresponds to the secreted OA concentration (mM), while the secondary y-axis (lines) represents the product yield on substrate (YP/S, (g/g)). All data points represent the mean of three biological replicates (n = 3), with error bars indicating the standard deviation

The choice of carbon source significantly influenced both the final OA titer and the product yield. As shown in Fig. 3, glucose proved to be the most effective substrate over the 240-h fermentation, resulting in the highest titer (136.9 ± 69.4 mM) and a product yield (YP/S) of 0.4 (g/g). Fermentation on sucrose resulted in a final yield of 82.8 ± 55.0 mM (YP/S=≈ 0.25), which was notably lower than that of glucose. In contrast, lactose was the least effective substrate, with production peaking at approximately 72.1 ± 14.6 mM (YP/S=≈ 0.2) by 72 h before a subsequent decline.

These results in Fig. 3 suggest that while ATCC1015 can metabolize all three sugars, its metabolic pathways most efficiently channel the monosaccharide glucose towards OA synthesis over the full course of the fermentation. In contrast, the conversion of sucrose and lactose appeared to be less efficient or become inhibited as the fermentation progressed.

Larger scale oxalic acid fermentation: process intensification across different operational modes

Building on the preliminary shake-flask experiments, process intensification experiments aimed at generating higher oxalate titers on a larger fermenter scale (10 L) were performed in batch and fed-batch operational modes. The performance of each strategy was assessed in terms of substrate consumption (g/L), the secreted OA amount (mM), product formation rate (rP), and attained theoretical yield (YP/S). Figure 4 presents the 384-h fermentation profiles in both processes, allowing a direct comparison of the different fermentation strategies.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparative performance of different fermentation strategies. The panels illustrate key process parameters over time for batch, fed-batch, and repeated fed-batch operations. a) Glucose consumption profile. b) OA production profile. c) Instantaneous product yield (Yinst). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3)

As shown in Fig. 4, OA fermentation in batch mode exhibited distinct phases over the 384-h process. Following an initial lag phase until ≈ 72 h, after which OA was gradually secreted. A transition to an accelerated production phase occurred only after 312 h, which coincided with the residual glucose concentration falling below ≈ 20 g/L. By the end of fermentation (384 h), the final OA titer reached 155.2 mM, corresponding to an overall volumetric product formation rate (rP) of 0.036 g.L.1.h-1.

The fed-batch strategy, utilizing intermittent pulsed feeding, effectively promoted acid secretion following the initial lag phase (≈ 28–30 h). This approach resulted in a cyclical production pattern comprising a gradual and consistent surge in the acid secretion, corresponding to 72 h intervals of pulse feeding. By the end of the second cycle at 144 h, the titer has already reached ≈ 100 mM (rP ≈ 0.06 g.L-1.h-1).

In the final exponential production phase (312–384 h), glucose consumption plateaued, and rP, the volumetric production rate, signaled a stagnation, indicating the end of the productive period.

Overall, the fed-batch strategy significantly outperformed batch fermentation, achieving a final OA titer of 260.1 ± 4.8 mM, a theoretical yield of 0.194 g/g and rP of 0.061 g.L-1.h-1. A detailed comparison of the final product titers (mM), maximum attainable theoretical yields (YP/S), and product formation rates (rP) for both operation modes is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Comparison of theoretical yields, volumetric product formation rates, and secreted oxalic acid (OA) titers across fermentation modes at 384 h

Mode YP/S (g/g)a rP (g L-1 h-1) OA (mM)
Batch 0.122 0.036 155.2 ± 3.1
Fed-batch 0.194 0.061 260.1 ± 4.8

a Theoretical product yield representing the maximum conversion rate of substrate into OA, assuming all metabolic activity is channeled into product formation

Discussion

This study systematically investigated biogenic OA production using submerged fermentation by filamentous fungi species, in particular Aspergillus niger, focusing on the interplay between strain selection, pH control, carbon source, and fermentation strategy. The findings of this study confirm that these factors are critically interconnected and must be co-optimized to maximize product yield. By integrating these variables, this work establishes a more comprehensive framework for OA fermentation than previously reported in disparate studies.

Strain comparison test

Comparative study of strains confirmed that biogenic OA production is strain-dependent, as previous investigations also indicated considerable disparities in theoretical yields across various strains in organic acid fermentation (Ruijter et al. 1999). Similarly, over the course of 240 h, ATCC1015 secreted higher OA (71.0 ± 27.7 mM at 240 h) compared to CECT2807 (37.9 ± 7.1 mM at 240 h). These findings also align with the preliminary studies, including Mendes et al. (2022), who reported 155 mM from sucrose medium ( 100 g/L) using the strain ATCC1015 within 7 days, ≈ 6.6 times higher than an engineered mutant lacking OafA (oxalate titer ≈ 23.27 mM) (OA repression factor) (Mendes et al. 2022).

Nevertheless, large deviations across biological replicates (n = 3) were observed, particularly for ATCC1015, highlighting inherent biological variability of filamentous fungi fermentation (Bauer et al. 2022; Coban 2020). Variations in spore germination, pellet formation, hyphal branching, and oxygen diffusion gradients can be attributed to inconsistencies (Cairns et al. 2023; Veiter et al. 2018; Amenaghawon et al. 2024). Consequently, this morphological heterogeneity accounts for the drastic discrepancies in reported oxalic acid (OA) yields for ATCC1015, which range from 2 mM to over 150 mM in preliminary investigations (Brisson et al. 2016; Castro et al. 2023; Mendes et al. 2022).

Yet, confined to only three biological replicates, the present study struggles to completely isolate this inherent biological variability from extrinsic factors, such as sampling variance and experimental handling. Concerning the variations in pellet morphology, implementing advanced agitation or particle-enhanced strategies to stabilize pellet morphology, ensuring consistent leaching agent quality across industrial batches (Coban 2020; Mandal et al. 2005). Therefore, meticulous and systematic investigations comprising larger reproducibility studies are required to decouple these effects and standardize the biosynthesis of OA by ATCC1015.

Influence of carbon source

The results suggested in Fig. 3 that the choice of a carbon source significantly influenced the OA secretion. Accordingly, glucose proved to be the most effective substrate, yielding 1.6-fold and 4.8-fold more OA than sucrose and lactose, respectively. This can be associated with the direct entry of simple sugars such as glucose into the glycolytic pathway, providing, hence, an efficient and forthright flux of carbon towards oxaloacetate, the immediate precursor of OA acid (Strasser et al. 1994; Walaszczyk et al. 2018). Used as a primary substrate, glucose can attain ≈ 75% of theoretical OA acid yield (Handayani and Suratman 2009). In contrast, more complex sugars such as sucrose and lactose require preceding enzymatic steps for break-down, thus diverting the metabolic flux in favor for the formation of other metabolites (Kubicek et al. 1988; Cameselle et al. 1998).

pH influence and buffering dynamics

Our findings on pH regulation unequivocally demonstrated the decisive role of pH in the OA secretion. As shown in Fig. 2, in cultures where intermittent pH regulation was implemented to maintain the medium above pH 4, the final OA concentration attained 90.4 ± 5.8 mM. Conversely, the cultures without any pH control experienced a pH drop to approximately to 3, yielding a substantially lower concentration of 61.7 ± 1.6 mM. In support of the findings of Kubicek et al. (1988) regarding the oxaloacetate hydrolase (OAH)-dependent biosynthesis of oxalate at pH levels above 4, the findings presented in this study emphasize that maintaining the culture pH above 4 is not merely beneficial but essential for maximizing OA yields (Kubicek et al. 1988).

However, the buffering system employed during scale-up introduced a critical, albeit paradoxical, influence on fermentation kinetics. While 0.1 M phosphate buffering successfully mitigated acid-induced product inhibition, the surplus phosphate simultaneously favored exponential biomass growth at the direct cost of acidogenesis (Brown et al. 2018; Mandal et al. 2005; Manohar and Divakar 2002). This trade-off is starkly reflected in the fed-batch fermentation profile (Fig. 4a), where the onset of exponential OA secretion was delayed until the later stages of cultivation (≈ 312 h). This strongly suggests that substantial acid production only commenced once the initial phosphate excess had been depleted, inducing a metabolic shift consistent with phosphate-starvation-driven acid synthesis (Upton et al. 2017).

Furthermore, maintaining the bioreactor at a slightly acidic-to-neutral pH (≈ 6) to favor OAH activity inadvertently triggered the substantial co-production of gluconic acid (226.1±8.6 mM at 384 h). This pH range is highly conducive for glucose oxidase (GOD), which rapidly oxidizes glucose into gluconic acid (Cameselle et al. 1998). While this did not hinder the absolute OA titer, it presents a downstream processing complication for selectively separating these two organic acids in industrial applications. Consequently, future investigations should focus on decoupling these effects by evaluating alternative buffering systems that facilitate high oxalate titers while minimizing biomass diversion. This should be complemented by systematic profiling of the phosphate-retardation effect to identify the precise phosphorus threshold required for a rapid metabolic switch from primary growth to secondary acidogenesis.

Large-scale submerged oxalic acid fermentation

The scale-up comparison between batch and fed-batch operations provided critical insights into operational determinants in the large-scale submerged fermentation of OA. As the results in Fig. 4a suggested, the fed-batch strategy proved to be the most effective, achieving the highest final OA concentration (260.1 ± 4.8 mM) and maximum attainable theoretical yield YP/S (0.195 g/g). By intermittently feeding of the substrate through pulsed feeding in 72 h of cycles, the residual glucose concentration was maintained below the inhibitory threshold of 20 g/L. This approach prevented carbon catabolite repression, mitigated severe pH fluctuations, and sustained a prolonged exponential production phase, a trend also observed in other organic acid fermentation processes (Schmitt et al. 2022; Demir et al. 2021).

Conversely, batch fermentation on a larger scale (10 L) exhibited a prolonged lag phase, with substantial oxalate secretion only commencing after ≈192 h, which can be attributed to inhibitory influences such as drastic pH fluctuations needed constant monitoring and control, and high initial glucose loading (150 g/L). What is more, high substrate loading can undermine oxygen transfer through osmotic pressure and increased viscosity, thus hindering organic acid generation (Xue et al. 2021; Anastassiadis and Rehm 2006). As indicated in Fig. 4a, the exponential production phase commenced only after the residual glucose concentration fell below ≈ 20 g/L.

When compared with the previous reports as outlined in Table 3, the volumetric product rates (rP) obtained from various scales and mode of operations in this study were substantially lower. This variance can be attributed to distinct disparities in experimental parameters, adopted feeding strategies, bioreactor geometries, and the inherent metabolic capacities of the specific fungal strains employed (Sitanggang et al. 2010; Keitel et al. 2024). However, an internal comparison between the small-scale batch and large-scale fed-batch cultivations demonstrates a highly successful bioprocess translation. By implementing strict pH control, strategic nutrient feeding, and an extended production phase, the scaled-up bioreactor system facilitated a substantially higher volumetric productivity for oxalate secretion compared to the preliminary flask data.

Table 3.

Comparison of volumetric product formation (rP with the preliminary findings concerning the oxalic acid generation across different scales and fermentation modes)

Operation Scale rP (g.L-1.h-1) Reference
Batch STR (10 L) 0.036 This study
Fed-batch STR (10 L) 0.061 This study
Batch Shake flask 0.051 This study
Batch STR (10 L) 0.283 Bohlmann et al. (1998)
Batch Shake flask 0.104 Cameselle et al. (1998)
Fed-batch STR (2 L) 0.26 Strasser et al. (1994)
Batch STR (10 L) 0.375 Cameselle et al. (1998)
Batch Shake flask 0.142 Santoro et al. (1999)

Conclusions

This study underscores the decisive parameters governing biogenic OA generation via submerged fermentation. Among the evaluated strategies, fed-batch operation combined with intermittent pulsed feeding and robust pH control above 4.0 proved most effective, achieving a highly consistent titer of 260.1±4.8 mM with A. niger ATCC 1015. While the volumetric product formation rates were lower than highly specialized literature benchmarks, the primary goal of this research was not to maximize absolute yield at the cost of operational fragility. Rather, this work successfully established a simplified, robust framework suitable for direct integration into industrial critical metal recycling. By avoiding the extreme complexity and high capital expenditure of specialized fermentation systems, this optimized fed-batch method provides a reliable and sufficient supply of the biogenic agent necessary for critical metal (e.g., Gallium) leaching, offering superior industrial relevance for real-world e-waste recovery applications.

Supplementary information

Supplementary material is available.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Prof. Dr. Thomas Schupp and Sebastian Makran for providing tools and assistance with sugar and acid quantification. In addition, authors extend gratitude towards Dr. Vadim Okum for providing technical support on the Capel-105 M system, for insights into its fine-tuning, and for input that improved the manuscript’s technical details on capillary electrophoresis.

Author contribution

AE conceived, designed and conducted the experiments. MA and RU supervised the research. AE performed sample measurements and data analysis, data visualization. AE wrote the original manuscript. TJ, MA, and RU reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Not applicable.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed on the publication.

Competing interests

Roland Ulber is a member of the Editorial Board of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and was not involved in the peer review process of the editorial decision-making for this manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Roland Ulber, Thomas Jüstel, and Mirjam Altendorfner are contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. Amenaghawon AN, Ayere JE, Amune UO et al (2024) A comprehensive review of recent advances in the applications and biosynthesis of oxalic acid from bio-derived substrates. Environ Res 251:118703. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anastassiadis S, Rehm HJ (2006) Citric acid production from glucose by yeast Candida Oleophila ATCC 20177 under batch, continuous and repeated batch cultivation. Electron J Biotechnol 9(1):26–39. 10.2225/vol9-issue1-fulltext-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer I, Abt B, Yap A et al (2022) Online biomass monitoring enables characterization of the growth pattern of Aspergillus fumigatus in liquid shake conditions. J Fungi 8(10):1013. 10.3390/jof8101013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohlmann JT, Cameselle C, Nunez M et al (1998) Oxalic acid production by Aspergillus Niger: Part II: optimisation of fermentation with milk whey as carbon source. Bioprocess Eng 19(5):337–342. 10.1007/PL00009022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosshard PP, Bachofen R, Brandl H (1996) Metal leaching of fly ash from municipal waste incineration by Aspergillus niger. Environm Sci Technol 30(10):3066–3070. 10.1021/es960151v [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brisson VL, Zhuang WQ, Alvarez-Cohen L (2016) Bioleaching of rare earth elements from monazite sand. Biotechnol Bioeng 113(2):339–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown K, Harrison J, Bowers K (2018) Production of oxalic acid from Aspergillus niger and whey permeate. Water Air Soil Pollut 229(1). 10.1007/s11270-017-3662-4 [DOI]
  8. Cairns TC, de Kanter T, Zheng XZ et al (2023) Regression modelling of conditional morphogene expression links and quantifies the impact of growth rate, fitness and macromorphology with protein secretion in Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod 16(1):9. 10.1186/s13068-023-02345-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameselle C, Cameselle C, Bohlmann JT et al (1998) Oxalic acid production by Aspergillus Niger. Influence of sucrose and milk whey as carbon source. Bioprocess Engineeri, Part I. 10.1007/pl00009017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro L, Gomez-Alvarez H, Gonzalez F et al (2023) Biorecovery of rare earth elements from fluorescent lamp powder using the fungus Aspergillus Niger in batch and semicontinuous systems. Miner Eng 201:10821. 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108215 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi JW, Cho CW, Yun YS (2022) Organic acid based linear free energy relationship models for green leaching of strategic metals from spent lithium ion batteries and improvement of leaching performance. J Hazard Mater 423:12721. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coban HB (2020) Organic acids as antimicrobial food agents: applications and microbial productions. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43(4):569–591. 10.1007/s00449-019-02256-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Commission EU (2019) Going climate-neutral by 2050: a strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral eu economy. Publications Office of the EU. 10.2834/02074 [DOI]
  14. Currie JN, Thom C (1915) An oxalic acid producing Penicillium. J Biol Chem 22(2):287–293. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)87646-3, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021925818876463 [DOI]
  15. Demir HT, Bezirci E, Becker J et al (2021) High level production of itaconic acid at low ph by Ustilago maydis with fed-batch fermentation. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 44(4):749–758. 10.1007/s00449-020-02483-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Juestel T et al (2025a) Leaching behavior and kinetics of gallium with organic acids: foundations for e-waste recovery and bioleaching applications. Scientific Report. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7030914/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Jüstel T et al (2025b) Fundamental insights into gallium leaching for sustainable electronic waste recovery. Sci Rep 15:43023. 10.1038/s41598-025-30908-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Gadd GM, Gadd GM (1999) Fungal production of citric and oxalic acid: importance in metal speciation, physiology and biogeochemical processes. Advances in Microbial Physiolo. 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60165-4, tex.mag_id: 1606745945 tex.pmcid: null [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Gerold E, Kadisch F, Lerchbammer R et al (2024) Bio-metallurgical recovery of lithium, cobalt, and nickel from spent NMC lithium ion batteries: a comparative analysis of organic acid systems. J Hazard Mater Adv 13:10039. 10.1016/j.hazadv.2023.100397 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Handayani S, Suratman S (2009) Production of oxalic acid by Aspergillus niger. Indonesian Min J 12(2):85–89 [Google Scholar]
  21. Keitel L, Miebach K, Rummel L et al (2024) Process analysis of the anaerobe Phocaeicola Vulgatus in a shake flasks and fermenter reveals pH and product inhibition. Annals Microbiol 74(1):7. 10.1186/s13213-023-01745-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kobayashi K, Kobayashi K, Hattori T et al (2014) Oxalic acid production by citric acid-producing Aspergillus niger overexpressing the oxaloacetate hydrolase gene oahA. J Indust Microbiol Biotechnol. 10.1007/s10295-014-1419-2, tex.mag_id: 2064021443 tex.pmcid: null [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Książek E (2023) Citric acid: properties, microbial production, and applications in industries. Molecules 29(1):22. 10.3390/molecules29010022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kubicek CP, Schreferl-Kunar G, Wöhrer W et al (1988) Evidence for a cytoplasmic pathway of oxalate biosynthesis in Aspergillus Niger. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(3):633–637. 10.1128/aem.54.3.633-637.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee SI, Lee KJ, Chun HH et al (2018) Process development of oxalic acid production in submerged culture of Aspergillus niger F22 and its biocontrol efficacy against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 41(3):345–352. 10.1007/s00449-017-1867-y, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00449-017-1867-y [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Li Z, Bai T, Dai L et al (2016) A study of organic acid production in contrasts between two phosphate solubilizing fungi: Penicillium oxalicum and Aspergillus niger. Sci Rep 6:25313. 10.1038/srep25313, https://www.nature.com/articles/srep25313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Mandal SK, Mandal SK, Banerjee P et al (2005) Submerged production of oxalic acid from glucose by immobilized Aspergillus niger. Process Biochemist. 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.013 [DOI]
  28. Maneesuwannarat S, Teamkao P, Vangnai AS, et al (2016) Possible mechanism of gallium bioleaching from gallium nitride (GAN) by Arthrobacter creatinolyticus: role of amino acids/peptides/proteins bindings with gallium. Process Safety Environment Protect 103. 10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.036 [DOI]
  29. Manohar B, Divakar S (2002) Application of central composite rotatable design to lipase catalysed synthesis of m-cresyl acetate. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18(8):745–75. 10.1023/A:1020446105194 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mendes GO, Dyer T, Csetenyi L et al (2022) Rock phosphate solubilization by abiotic and fungal-produced oxalic acid: reaction parameters and bioleaching potential. Microb Biotechnol 15(4):1189–1202. 10.1111/1751-7915.13792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3):426–428. 10.1021/ac60147a030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruijter GJG, van de Vondervoort PJI, Visser J (1999) Oxalic acid production by Aspergillus niger: an oxalate-non-producing mutant produces citric acid at pH 5 and in the presence of manganese. Microbiology 145(9): 2569–2576. 10.1099/00221287-145-9-2569, https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-145-9-2569, publisher: Microbiology Society, [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Rymowicz W, Lenart D (2003) Oxalic acid production from lipids by a mutant of Aspergillus niger at different ph. Biotech Lett 25(12):955–95. 10.1023/A:1024082130677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Santoro R, Cameselle C, Rodriguez-Couto S et al (1999) Influence of milk whey, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration on oxalic acid production by Aspergillus niger. Bioprocess Eng 20(1):1–5. 10.1007/PL00009032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmitt V, Derenbach L, Ochsenreither K (2022) Enhanced l-malic acid production by Aspergillus oryzae DSM 1863 using repeated-batch cultivation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:76050. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.760500, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.760500/full [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Schuler E, Demetriou M, Shiju NR et al (2021) Towards sustainable oxalic acid from CO and biomass. ChemSusChem 14(18). 10.1002/cssc.202101272, https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cssc.202101272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  37. Sitanggang AB, Wu H, Wang S (2010) Fermentation strategies: nutritional requirements. Industrial Fermentation: Food Processes, Nutrient Sources and Production Strategies; Nova Science Pub Inc: Hauppauge, NY, USA, pp 217–247
  38. Strasser H, Burgstaller W, Schinner F (1994) High-yield production of oxalic acid for metal leaching processes by Aspergillus niger. FEMS Microbiol Lett 119(3):365–370. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06914.x, https://academic.oup.com/femsle/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06914.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Upton DJ, McQueen-Mason SJ, Wood AJ (2017) An accurate description of Aspergillus niger organic acid batch fermentation through dynamic metabolic modelling. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(1):258. 10.1186/s13068-017-0950-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Veiter L, Rajamanickam V, Herwig C (2018) The filamentous fungal pellet—relationship between morphology and productivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(7):2997–3006. 10.1007/s00253-018-8818-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Verma A, Kore R, Corbin DR et al (2019) Metal recovery using oxalate chemistry: a technical review. Indust Eng Chem Res 58(34):15381–1539. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02598, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02598 [DOI]
  42. Walaszczyk E, Podgórski W, Janczar-Smuga M et al (2018) Effect of medium pH on chemical selectivity of oxalic acid biosynthesis by Aspergillus niger W78C in submerged batch cultures with sucrose as a carbon source. Chem Pap 72(5):1089–109. 10.1007/s11696-017-0354-x, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11696-017-0354-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  43. Weber B, Birgit W (2023) Coordination chemistry. Basics and Current Trends; Springer: Berlin, Germany. 10.1007/978-3-662-66441-4 [DOI]
  44. Wehmer C (1893) Beitr. zur Kenntnis einheimscher Pilse, Hannover, 1893, No. 1.2
  45. Xue X, Bi F, Liu B et al (2021) Improving citric acid production of an industrial Aspergillus niger cgmcc 10142: identification and overexpression of a high-affinity glucose transporter with different promoters. Microb Cell Fact 20(1):168. 10.1186/s12934-021-01659-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhou J, Zhu N, Liu H et al (2019) Recovery of gallium from waste light emitting diodes by oxalic acidic leaching. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:366–372. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.002 [DOI]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES