Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2026 Jun 10;13:1341. doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-07551-2

A highly contiguous chromosome-level genome assembly of the Chilean jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi

Sandra Ferrada-Fuentes 1,2,#, Claudio Quevedo 3,#, Victoria Herrera-Yáñez 1, Cristian B Canales-Aguirre 4,5,6, Felipe Aguilera 3,7,8,✉
PMCID: PMC13601552  PMID: 42270666

Abstract

The Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) is an economically important pelagic fish widely distributed across the South Pacific Ocean. Due to intense fishing pressure and the lack of high-quality genomic resources, the development of sustainable fisheries management strategies has been hindered. Here, we present a highly contiguous chromosome-level genome assembly of T. murphyi using PacBio and Hi-C sequencing data. The assembled genome spans 818.31 Mb, with a contig N50 length of 24.89 Mb and a scaffold N50 length of 34.34 Mb. The assembly is anchored on 24 pseudo-chromosomes, covering 95.80% of the genome. BUSCO analysis indicates a high level of completeness at 99.0%. Telomeric repeat motifs were detected at 12 single chromosome ends, whereas putative centromeric regions were identified on 12 chromosomes. Repetitive sequences account for 23.86% of the total genome, and 47,734 protein-coding genes were annotated, 90.98% of them with assigned function. This high-quality genome assembly serves as a valuable resource for studying the genetic diversity and population structure of the Chilean jack mackerel and provides a solid foundation for future management and conservation efforts.

Background & Summary

Jack mackerels are pelagic fish species of the genus Trachurus, found in all world´s oceans except the Arctic and Antarctic waters. They belong to the Carangidae family, a group of ray-finned fishes that includes jacks, pompanos, and trevallies1, and are classified into 14 species2. These species play a crucial role in marine ecosystems due to their trophic position in the marine food web3 and their importance as valuable fishery resources worldwide4. They are commercially exploited in many countries and are consumed fresh, frozen, smoked, or canned. Among Trachurus species, the Chilean jack mackerel (T. murphyi) fishery has been one of the largest globally, with catches peaking at nearly 5 million tons in the mid-1990s4. T. murphyi is distributed across the South Pacific Ocean5, allowing it to exploit a wide range of environmental conditions due to its presence in regions with highly heterogenous oceanographic and prey dynamics6–8. T. murphyi is valued by consumers for providing an excellent source of high-quality proteins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals9. It could be that for those reasons, this species has been harvested for human consumption since at least the Early Holocene10,11.

Over the past decades, the Chilean jack mackerel population has declined significantly due to a combination of factors, including overfishing and variability with the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)4,12–15. Consequently, the implementation of effective fisheries management strategies is crucial. Previous studies have explored the species´ fishery biology and genetics16–20. Population genetic analyses have revealed that T. murphyi constitutes a single, large panmictic population across its entire geographic range18,21–24. Additionally, recent research has identified a ZW sex determination system in T. murphyi25. Despite these findings, genomic and transcriptomic resources for T. murphyi remain limited to the mitochondrial genome, which was being only recently described26. Whole genome sequence assemblies are currently available only for the two Trachurus species, the Atlantic jack mackerel (Trachurus trachurus)27 and the Japanese jack mackerel (Trachurus japonicus)28 but no homologous assembly is available for T. murphyi.

Despite its ecological and economic importance, the lack of a high-quality, chromosome-level reference genome has limited detailed investigation of population structure, adaptive variation, and genomic responses to environmental change in Trachurus murphyi. Therefore, a contiguous genome assembly is essential to support fisheries management, conservation strategies, and comparative studies within Carangidae. Here, we have generated a nearly complete and highly contiguous chromosome-level assembly of the T. murphyi genome using PacBio Hi-Fi long-read and Omni-C/Hi-C sequencing. The generation of such a resource provides a foundational framework for future molecular and evolutionary research.

Methods

Sample preparation and DNA sequencing

The specimen used in this study was provided by commercial fisheries as a fish carcass. It was not subjected to experimental manipulation and handling when it was alive in the context of this work. According to Chilean regulations, institutional animal ethics committee approval is not required for the use of fishery-derived specimens. A single adult individual of Trachurus murphyi (fork length of 45.4 cm and weights 1.395 kg) was obtained from commercial fisheries in the Biobío Region, Chile (36.94°S, 73.75°E) in June 2022 and used for genome sequencing. The specimen exhibited no visible signs of diseases, parasitic infection, or developmental abnormalities, and showed normal external morphology (Fig. 1A). Once collected, the individual was transported to the laboratory on ice to minimize DNA degradation and muscle tissue was dissected and immediately stored at -80 °C until shipped on dry ice to Cantata Bio (https://cantatabio.com/) for DNA extraction, genomic DNA sequencing, and Hi-C library construction. The sex of the individual could not be determined through visual gonad inspection prior to DNA extraction and sequencing. No molecular sex-identification assays were performed. Given this limitation, the assembled genome reported here represents a chromosome-scale baseline pending sex-aware phasing.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Chromosome-level genome assembly of Trachurus murphyi. (A) Adult T. murphyi specimen used for whole-genome sequencing. (B) Square-binned blob plot showing contig distribution according to GC proportion (x-axis) and sequencing coverage (y-axis, log10 scale). Each square represents contigs with a defined bin, colored according to taxonomic assignment against the NCBI nr database, with blue indicating similarity to Chordata sequences and gray indicating no significant similarity, and scaled by cumulative span. Marginal histograms display the distribution of GC content and coverage across contigs. The inset highlights the main density of contigs to improve visualization and interpretability. The predominance of contigs assigned to Chordata, together with the absence of non-chordata clusters, supports the lack of detectable contamination in the assembly. (C) Omni-C/Hi-C interaction heatmap displaying genomic coordinates along both axes in megabases (Mb). Color intensity reflects contact frequency between genomic loci. Strong interaction signals along the diagonal indicate high intra-chromosomal contact frequency and support chromosome-scale scaffolding. Chromosome boundaries indicated by grid lines. (D) BUSCO assessment of the T. murphyi genome using the Actinopterygii database (actinopterygii_odb10; n = 3,640 orthologs). Categories represent Complete (C), including Single-copy (S) and Duplicated (D), Fragmented (F), and Missing (M) orthologs. Exact BUSCO values are provided in the main text for clarity.

High-quality DNA, in terms of quantity and purity, was used to construct two PacBio Hi-Fi SMRTbell® libraries and one Dovetail Omni-C® sequencing library for assembling the T. murphyi genome. The PacBio libraries were sequenced with circular consensus sequencing (CCS) mode on a PacBio Sequel II system, generating 7,058,275 High-Fidelity (HiFi) reads, totaling 86.5 Gb of data, which covered the genome at 108-fold, with a N50 read length of 12,194 bp. For the Dovetail Omni-C® library, chromatin was first crosslinked with formaldehyde within the nucleus before extraction. The fixed chromatin was then digested with DNAseI, followed by end repair and ligation to a biotinylated bridge adapter, enabling proximity ligation of adapter-containing ends. After ligation, crosslinks were reversed, and the DNA was purified. Biotin that was not internal to ligated fragments were removed, and the sequencing library was prepared using NEBNext Ultra enzymes and Illumina-compatible adapters. Biotin-containing fragments were enriched using streptavidin beads before PCR amplification. The final library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeqX platform using 2 × 150 bp reads, generating 87,721,376 read pairs, amounting to 28.6 Gb of data, with a coverage of 32.1-fold across the genome.

Chromosome-level genome assembly with PacBio and Hi-C data

The genome assembly was generated using PacBio HiFi reads and Hifisiam29 (v0.15.4-r347) with default parameters to generate both the primary and haplotigs-alternative sequences for regions where heterozygosity was detectable within primary contigs using long reads (Table 1). Given the high per-base accuracy of HiFi reads and the consensus accuracy achieved by hifisiam29,30, no additional polishing steps were applied. The assembled contigs were then screened for potential contamination using the BlobToolKit31 (v4.4.3) and the BLAST non-redundant database (Fig. 1B). Contigs identified as potential contamination were removed from the assembly (Table 1). Finally, purge_dups32 (v1.2.5) was applied to eliminate haplotigs and overlapping contigs. Following these steps, the contig-level genome assembly spans 802.27 Mb, comprising 337 contigs with an N50 length of 24.89 Mb (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary statistics of the assembled contigs and scaffolds of Trachurus murphyi.

Features Hifiasm assembly Hifiasm + BlopToolKit assembly Purge_dups assembly Dovetail HiRise assemly
Total sequences 562 562 337 523
Total bases (bp) 818,306,126 818,306,126 802,744,728 818,265,206
Longest sequence (bp) 50,717,993 50,717,993 50,717,993 43,616,551
N50 length (bp) 24,885,125 24,885,125 24,885,125 34,335,234
N90 length (bp) 6,328,993 6,328,993 6,633,185 25,125,839
Ns (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

To achieve a chromosome-level assembly, we used the contig-level genome assembly and Dovetail OmniC® reads as input for HiRise, a software pipeline specifically designed to scaffold genome assemblies using proximity ligation data33. Briefly, Dovetail OmniC® reads were mapped to the contig-level genome assembly using BWA (https://github.com/lh3/bwa) with a minimum quality threshold of 50 (MQ > 50). HiRise then analyzed the separation of Dovetail OmniC® read pairs mapped within draft scaffolds to generate a likelihood model for genomic distances. This model was used to identify and correct putative misjoins, score prospective joins, and execute those joins above a set threshold. Following these steps, we generated a Hi-C contact map and manually reviewed it using Juicebox34 (v1.11.08) to correct any misjoins and position unplaced contigs.

No gap-filling or telomere extension procedures were applied during genome assembly. The differences in total assembly length between the contig-level assembly (802.27 Mb) and the final scaffolded assembly (818.31 Mb) reflects differences in the assembly stage accounting rather than sequence addition. Specifically, the contig-level assembly length corresponds to the primary assembly after haplotig removal using purge_dups32, whereas the final assembly includes the 24 pseudo-chromosome and all retained scaffolds following Hi-C-based scaffolding, including unplaced sequences that were excluded from intermediate statistics (Fig. 1C, Table 1, Table 2). Consistent with this, the final assembly contains no ambiguous bases (Ns), indicating no artificial gap filling was performed (Table 1).

Table 2.

Chromosome lengths and telomere statistics of Trachurus murphyi.

Chromosome name Length (bp) GC (%) Telomere Left length (bp) / Right length (bp) of telomere sequence
Chr1 43,616,551 42.17 No 0 / 0
Chr2 40,697,839 41.62 No 0 / 0
Chr3 39,753,857 41.81 Left 3,420 / 0
Chr4 39,403,342 41.91 Right 0 / 4,326
Chr5 38,686,146 42.20 No 0 / 0
Chr6 36,848,658 42.03 Right 0 / 1,782
Chr7 36,663,105 41.79 No 0 / 0
Chr8 36,082,001 42.16 Right 0 / 1,362
Chr9 35,151,152 42.16 No 0 / 0
Chr10 34,807,739 42.01 Left 1,212 / 0
Chr11 34,335,234 41.94 No 0 / 0
Chr12 33,135,089 42.20 Left 5,460 / 0
Chr13 32,997,167 41.80 No 0 / 0
Chr14 32,784,410 41.70 No 0 / 0
Chr15 32,188,078 42.45 No 0 / 0
Chr16 30,992,529 42.29 Right 0 / 3,660
Chr17 30,849,155 41.81 No 0 / 0
Chr18 30,703,906 41.91 Left 1,266 / 0
Chr19 28,653,432 42.02 Left 828 / 0
Chr20 27,799,838 42.19 Right 0 / 1,104
Chr21 25,177,033 42.28 Right 0 / 5,094
Chr22 25,125,839 42.19 Right 0 / 5,760
Chr23 24,528,291 42.13 No 0 / 0
Chr24 12,959,388 43.22 No 0 / 0
Unplaced scaffolds 34,308,866 48.44 - -
ChrMT 16,561 46.59 - -

Identification of telomere and centromere regions in the chromosome-level genome assembly

Given the high quality and gapless nature of our chromosome-level genome assembly (Table 1), we sought to determine whether it meets the criteria for a telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genome assembly. Telomeric repeat identification was performed by sequence motif detection only, and no sequence extension or telomere reconstruction was attempted. To identify telomeric regions, we searched the Chilean jack mackerel genome for the (TTAGGG)n sequence, the canonical telomere repeat found in most animals35. Telomere identification was carried out using the TeloExplorer function of the quarTeT36 (v1.2.5) software with the “-c animal” option. A visual representation of the telomere distribution is provided in Fig. 2A.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Telomeric and centromeric regions in the chromosome-level genome assembly of Trachurus murphyi. (A) Chromosome ideograms scaled according to chromosome length (Mb). Telomeric repeat regions (blue circles) and putative centromeric regions (red rectangles) were identified using the TeloExplorer and CentroMiner modules implemented in quarTeT36. Telomeric signals were detected at single chromosome ends where present, whereas centromeric regions were identified on 12 chromosomes. (B) Omni-C/Hi-C chromatin interaction maps at 50 kb resolution for representative chromosomes. Axes represent genomic coordinates in kilobases (kb). Putative centromeric regions are characterized by reduced interaction frequency and distinct patterns consistent with centromere-associated chromatin organization.

To identify centromeric regions, which are characterized by large stretches of repetitive satellite DNA or tandem repeats ranging in size from hundreds of kilobases to megabases37, we used the CentroMiner tool of the quarTeT36 (v1.2.5) software with default parameters. Briefly, this tool detects all tandem repeat monomers in a genome assembly and selects those most likely to be centromeric repeats on each chromosome based on their period and copy number. These monomers are then clustered to reduce redundancy and aligned to the corresponding chromosomes. Continuous matching regions are added to the candidates set, and scores are assigned based on total match length and retrotransposon content to ultimately determine the locations and predominant monomer repeats36. Our analyses revealed that putative centromeric regions range in length from 0.3 Mb to 2.1 Mb (Fig. 2A, Table 3). These regions are characterized by a low density of protein-coding genes and a high abundance of repetitive elements, with LTR/Gypsy, LINE/L2 and simple repeats representing the predominant repeat classes (Table 3), consistent with the typical structural arragement of centromeres38. In addition, centromeric regions display large interaction-depleted (“blank”) domains in Omni-C contact maps (Fig. 2B), a hallmark feature of centromeres that has also been reported in other gap-free or chromosome-level genome assemblies where centromeres have been resolved39,40. No single conserved core centromeric repeat unit was identified; instead, centromeres appear to consist of heterogeneous arrays of dispersed repeats, reflecting the species-specific and rapidly evolving nature of centromeric DNA in teleost fishes41–43. Therefore, centromere positions were inferred at regional level based on repeat composition and Hi-C interaction patterns, rather than by a single consensus repeat sequence. The inferred centromere locations are indicated on chromosome ideograms (Fig. 2A).

Table 3.

Summary statistics and presence of repetitive sequences in the putative centromere regions of T. murphyi.

Chromosome Start position (bp) End position (bp) Length (Mb) LTR/Gypsy (%) LINE/L2 (%) Simple repeats (%) # of genes
Chr1 29,500,000 31,600,000 2.1 1.73 1.24 0.0 112
Chr2 — — — — — — —
Chr3 10,900,000 12,200,000 1.3 2.57 6.93 0.0 63
Chr4 9,100,000 9,600,000 0.5 4.22 0.03 0.11 16
Chr5 34,100,000 34,600,000 0.5 1.79 0.65 0.43 19
Chr6 29,900,000 31,200,000 1.3 3.30 1.30 0.0 104
Chr7 — — — — — — —
Chr8 5,900,000 6,500,000 0.6 3.81 0.51 0.38 26
Chr9 — — — — — — —
Chr10 — — — — — — —
Chr11 — — — — — — —
Chr12 — — — — — — —
Chr13 — — — — — — —
Chr14 21,100,000 21,600,000 0.5 1.14 0.27 0.0 9
Chr15 24,700,000 25,100,000 0.4 0.92 0.19 0.68 12
Chr16 7,400,000 8,000,000 0.6 0.62 0.22 1.24 26
Chr17 7,200,000 7,600,000 0.4 0.97 0.24 0.81 23
Chr18 — — — — — — —
Chr19 — — — — — — —
Chr20 9,000,000 9,500,000 0.5 1.65 0.30 0.22 28
Chr21 7,900,000 8,200,000 0.3 1.76 0.03 1.22 8
Chr22 — — — — — — —
Chr23 — — — — — — —
Chr24 — — — — — — —

Telomeric repeat sequences were identified at one end of 12 out of 24 pseudo-chromosomes, while no chromosome exhibited telomeric repeats at both ends. Centromeric regions were identified on multiple chromosomes based on repeat composition and Omni-C/Hi-C interaction patterns.

Repetitive sequence annotation

To identify repetitive sequences in the Chilean jack mackerel genome, we generated a custom repeat library using a combination of de novo and homology-based approaches. This included RepeatModeler44 (v2.0.1), TransposonPSI45 (v1.0.0), LTRharvest46 (v1.6.2), LTRdigest47 (v1.6.2), TIRvish48 (v1.6.2), MITE Tracker49 (v1.0), and HelitronScanner50 (v1.1), all executed with default parameters. The individual repeat libraries were concatenated, and sequences sharing more than 80% similarity were merged to remove redundancy using USEARCH51 (v11.0.667). The resulting non-redundant repeat library was then classified with RepeatClassifier44 (v2.0.1). To filter out protein-coding sequences, repetitive elements were mapped against a custom database, containing the annotated protein-coding sequences of Danio rerio, Seriola lalandi dorsalis, Cyclopterus lumpus, Xiphophorus couchianus, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and Salmo salar, using BLASTn52 (v2.9.0 + ) with an e-value threshold of 0.001. Any sequences matching protein-coding genes were removed from the library. The final repeat library was then used in RepeatMasker53 (v4.1.1) to generate a genome report repeat content and to mask the genome for subsequent annotation with the BRAKER3 pipeline. RepeatMasker was run in standard mode, resulting in a hard-masked genome in which repetitive regions were replaced with ambiguous nucleotides prior to gene prediction.

A summary of repetitive sequence content in the Trachurus murphyi genome, including the relative contribution of major transposable element classes, their copy numbers, genomic distribution, and sequence divergence profiles, is provided in Table 4 and Fig. 3. A full subclassification of transposable elements with summation rows is provided in the Supplementary Table 1.

Table 4.

Repeat content and their proportion in the T. murphyi genome.

Type of repetitive element Length (bp) Percentage (%)
Retroelements 68,263,474 8.34
DNA transposons 72,717,968 8.89
Rolling-circles (Helitrons) 4,329,195 0.53
Unclassified repeats 100,161 0.01
Satellites 508,595 0.06
Simple repeats 45,640,029 5.58
Low complexity 3,683,752 0.45
Total repetitive sequences 195,243,174 23.86

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Transposable elements (TE) in the genome of Trachurus murphyi. (A) Proportion of the assembled genome classified into major repeat categories based on RepeatMasker annotation. Percentages represent the faction of the total assembly length occupied by each repeat class. For percentage of each major TE categories, refers to Supplementary Table S1. (B) Hierarchical classification of transposable element families detected in the genome. Bars represent the number of TE copies per family, grouped into major TE categories (DNA transposons, LINEs, LTRs, PLE, rolling-circle transposons, and SINEs). Color intensity reflects copy number abundance. For the exact copy number per family, refers to Supplementary Table 1. (C) Repeat landscape showing the genomic proportion of major TE classes plotted against CpG-corrected Kimura divergence from their consensus sequences. The y-axis represents the percentage of the genome occupied by repeats within each divergence bin, and stacked colors indicate contributions from different TE classes. Lower divergence values correspond to more recent insertions, whereas higher values represent older elements. (D) Circos plot showing the chromosomal distribution of major TE classes across the 24 chromosomes. Repeat density was calculated in fixed genomic windows (500 kb), with radial axis values representing the proportion of each window occupied by the corresponding repeat class. Colors indicate DNA transposons (red), LINEs (yellow), LTRs (pink), SINEs (dark blue), and rolling-circle transposons (dark teal).

Analysis of transposable element divergence showed that 48.2% of annotated repeats exhibit low genetic distance (Kimura divergence ≤ 10%) from their respective consensus sequences (Fig. 3C). Among major element classes, LINEs, LTRs, and DNA transposons show enrichment of very low-divergence copies, with 18.9% of LINEs, 22.8% of LTRs, and 21.5% of DNA transposons displaying divergence values between 0 and 5%, consistent with relatively recent transposable element activity.

Gene prediction and functional annotation

To annotate protein-coding sequences in the Chilean jack mackerel genome, we used the BRAKER354 (v3.0.8) along with reference proteins from 18 species: Anabas testudineus (GCA_900324465.3), Carassius auratus (GCA_003368295.1), Clupea harengus (GCA_900700415.2), Danio rerio (GCA_000002035.4), Gadus morhua (GCA_902167405.1), Gasterosteus aculeatus (GCA_016920845.1), Oreochromis aureus (GCA_013358895.1), Oreochromis niloticus (GCA_001858045.3), Oryzias javanicus (GCA_003999625.1), Poecilia formosa (GCA_000485575.1), Salmo salar (GCA_905237065.2), Sander lucioperca (GCA_008315115.1), Scleropages formosus (GCA_900964775.1), Seriola dumerili (GCA_002260705.1), Seriola lalandi dorsalis (GCA_002814215.1), Sparus aurata (GCA_900880675.1), Trachurus trachurus (GCA_905171665.1), and Xiphophorus couchianus (GCA_001444195.1). All protein sequences were obtained from Ensembl Release 112. All reference proteomes were concatenated and used directly as input for BRAKER3 without prior manual curation, allowing the pipeline to internally select relevant protein evidence during gene prediction. It is worthy to mention that gene prediction was performed in protein-supported mode because RNA-seq transcriptomic data were not available, as high-quality total RNA suitable for sequencing could not be obtained due to technical limitations. Consequently, transcript-supported gene prediction was not performed.

Briefly, GeneMark-EPT55 was used to identify genomic loci where extrinsic evidence support reliable gene predictions. These high-confidence predictions were then used to train the statistical model implemented in AUGUSTUS56. Further refinements incorporated protein-derived extrinsic evidences from the reference proteomes listed above, with gene predictions subsequently optimized using TSEBRA57. Functional annotation of the predicted protein-coding genes was conducted using DIAMOND58 (v2.1.11) against the following public databases: NCBI non-redundant (nr), SwissProt, TrEMBL, and eggNOG. Protein domain searches were performed using Pfam with HMMER59 v(3.3.2) and InterProScan60 (v5.74.105). Gene Ontology (GO) terms were extracted from the InterProScan output, and KEGG Orthology (KO) annotation was conducted using KofamScan61 and the KOfam database.

Mitogenome assembly and annotation

To assemble the mitochondrial (mtDNA) genome of T. murphyi, we employed a strategy that utilizes the reference mitogenome of a closely related species from NCBI (accession number PP935111.1 in this case). This reference was used to capture mitochondrial PacBio HiFi reads, which were then assembled into a single circularized contig using MitoHiFi62 (v3.2.1). In addition to the annotation provided by MitoHiFi, the assembled mitogenome was further annotated using MITOS2 web server63. To evaluate the depth of coverage, all PacBio HiFi reads were mapped back to the assembled mitogenome using minimap264 v(2.29). We used BLASTn52 (v2.10.1) to identify matches between the mitochondrial genome assembly and the nuclear genome assembly. Nuclear contigs showing > 99% sequence identity and shorter lengths than the mitochondrial genome assembly were filtered out from the mitochondrial genome assembly. The resulting mitogenome assembly and its annotations were visualized using the Proksee web tool65. Mitochondrial protein-coding gene arrangements among Trachurus species were compared using MITOS2 GFF annotation data. Protein-coding genes were ordered according to their genomic coordinates and strand orientation, and gene arragements were compared across species to assess collinearity. Homologous genes were identified based on gene annotation names, and gene order conservation was evaluated by direct coordinate-based comparisons. As the analysis focused on structural gene arrangement rather than sequence divergence, no statistical tests were applied. The organization of the T. murphyi mitochondrial genome, read coverage across the assembled sequence, and collinearity with mitochondrial genomes from other Trachurus species are presented in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mitochondrial genome of Trachurus murphyi. (A) Circular representation of the T. murphyi mitochondrial genome (16,561 bp). Protein-coding genes (CDS), transfer RNAs (tRNAs), and ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) are indicated by distinct colors. Gene orientation is shown relative to the reference strand. Genomic coordinates are indicated in kilobases (kb). (B) Coverage depth across the mitochondrial genome based on mapped PacBio HiFi reads. The x-axis represents genomic position (bp), and the y-axis indicates read depth. Coverage is relatively uniform across the genome, with localized variation likely associated with repetitive or low-complexity elements. (C) Gene order comparison among mitochondrial genomes of six Trachurus species. Homologous genes are connected by black lines, illustrating collinearity of gene arrangement. The dendrogram indicates phylogenetic relationships among the species based on mitochondrial sequence similarity.

Data Records

The datasets generated in this study include raw sequencing reads, genome assemblies, and genome annotation files for Trachurus murphyi, have been deposited in public repositories such as NCBI and figshare66. All sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive67 database under BioProject accession PRJNA1420201 and BioSample accession SAMN55211191, including PacBio HiFi reads (SRR37159638-SRR37159640) and Omni-C reads (SRR37159637). The nuclear genome assembly has been deposited in GenBank68 under accession GCA_055096975.1, and the mitochondrial genome under accession PZ051637.

Data Overview

The genomic datasets generated for Trachurus murphyi comprise a highly contiguous chromosome-level nuclear genome assembly and a complete mitochondrial genome. The nuclear genome assembly spans 818.321 Mbp across 532 scaffolds, with a scaffold N50 of 34.34 Mb, an N90 of 25.13 Mb, and a GC content of 42.31% (Table 1, Table 2). A total of 24 pseudo-chromosomes account for 95.80% of the assembled genome, with 34.31 Mb remaining as unplaced scaffolds and no ambiguous bases present (Table 2). BUSCO analysis indicated 99.0% completeness, including 97.9% single-copy, 1.1% duplicated genes, with 0.3% fragmented and 0.7% missing genes (Fig. 1D). Repetitive sequence comprises 195.24 Mb (23.86%) of the T. murphyi genome. Interspersed repeats account the majority of repetitive DNA, with retroelements representing 8.34% of the genome, DNA transposons 8.89%, rolling-circle transposons 0.53%, and unclassified repeats 0.01%. In addition, simple repeats comprise 5.58%, satellites 0.06%, and low-complexity regions 0.45% of the genome (Table 4). Gene annotation identified 47,734 predicted protein-coding genes with a total of 370,799 exons. The mean exon length is 189 bp (median = 126 bp), with 50% of exons ranging between 86 and 179 bp. These values are consistent with the typical exon size distribution observed in teleost genome69. The average gene length is 7.0 kb, with a mean coding sequence (CDS) length of 1.35 kb. Genes contain an average of 7.8 exons and 6.8 introns (mean = 979 bp) (Fig. 5), consisting with gene structure characteristics observed in teleost genomes69; functional annotation assigned homologous matches to 43,427 genes (90.98%) across public databases, with 9,080 genes supported by all eight annotation resources used (Fig. 5). The mitochondrial genome was assembled as a single circular contig of 16,561 bp, containing 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, and two rRNA genes, with PacBio HiFi reads mapping indicating uniform coverage across most of the genome (Fig. 4).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Characteristics and functional annotation of predicted protein-coding genes in Trachurus murphyi. (A) Violin plots showing the distribution of gene lengths and coding sequence (CDS) lengths (log10 scale). (B) Violin plot showing the distribution of exon counts per gene (log10 scale). (C) Distribution of exon and intron lengths (log10 scale). (D) UpSet plot summarizing functional annotation overlap among eight public databases (NCBI nr, SwissProt, TrEMBL, EGGnog, Pfam, InterProScan, GO, and KOfam). Vertical bars represent the number of genes in each intersection set, while connected dots below indicate the combination of databases contributing to each intersection. Horizontal bars on the right show the total number of genes annotated by each database.

Technical Validation

To evaluate the quality of our genome assembly and gene annotation, we employed several complementary approaches. First, we assessed potential contamination in the genome assembly using BlopToolKit31 (v4.4.3) to analyze GC content and sequencing depth. Contigs identified as contaminants were removed from the assembly (Table 1). After decontamination, we observed that nearly all GC content points clustered around 40%, indicating the absence of exogenous contamination from bacteria or other species (Fig. 1B). Second, we mapped the Omni-C reads to the assembled genome using BWA (https://github.com/lh3/bwa) to generate a Hi-C contact map. The resulting heatmap displayed high consistency across all chromosomes, providing strong evidence for the accurate sequencing, ordering, and orientation of contigs in the Chilean jack mackerel genome assembly (Fig. 1C). Third, we predicted centromeric and telomeric sequences in the T. murphyi genome and found that at least 12 chromosomes contained one of these characteristic chromosomal features (Fig. 2A, Table 2, Table 3).

Fourth, we evaluated assembly completeness using BUSCO70 (v5.3.2). The analysis, based on the actinopterygii_odb10 database, revealed a completeness score of 99.0%, comprising 97.9% complete single-copy, 1.1% duplicated, 0.3% fragmented, and 0.7% missing genes (Fig. 1D). These results underscore the high completeness and accuracy of the Chilean jack mackerel genome assembly. Fifth, we assessed per-base consensus accuracy using Merqury71 (v1.3). The assembly shows very high consensus accuracy (QV = 52.8), corresponding to a base-level accuracy of 99.999%. The low number of missing k-mers (90 kb out of 818.321 Mb) indicates a nearly complete and high accurate assembly, with few sequence errors, indicative of a nearly error-free assembly. Sixth, we aligned PacBio HiFi reads to the assembled genome using minimap264 (v2.17), resulting in a mapping rate of 99.97%, further supporting the high consensus accuracy of the assembly. Seventh, we evaluated assembly contiguity using QUAST72 (v5.3.0), obtaining contig N50, scaffold N50, and additional key metrics (Table 5), all demonstrating the highly contiguous quality of the genome assembly.

Table 5.

QUAST evaluation of the T. murphyi genome assembly quality.

Assembly Metric
# contigs ( >  = 0 bp) 523
# contigs ( >  = 1000 bp) 523
# contigs ( >  = 5000 bp) 523
# contigs ( >  = 10000 bp) 523
# contigs ( >  = 25000 bp) 523
# contigs ( >  = 50000 bp) 523
Total length ( >  = 0 bp) 818,310,266
Total length ( >  = 1000 bp) 818,310,266
Total length ( >  = 5000 bp) 818,310,266
Total length ( >  = 10000 bp) 818,303,047
Total length ( >  = 25000 bp) 814,740,251
Total length ( >  = 50000 bp) 807,049,109
# contigs 523
Largest contig 43,616,551
Total length 818,310,226
GC (%) 42.31
N50 34,335,234
N90 25,125,839
L50 11
L90 22

Eighth, we assessed the completeness of the predicted protein-coding sequences with BUSCO70 (v5.3.2), achieving a BUSCO completeness score of 91.6% (S: 78.2%, D: 13.4%, F: 4.4%, M: 4.0%) for CDS and 91.7% (S: 78.3%, D: 13.4%, F: 4.7%, M: 3.6%) for proteins against the Actinopterygii database (Fig. 6). The predicted gene count (47,734 protein-coding genes) exceeds that reported for many diploid teleost genomes69. To investigate whether this reflects unresolved haplotypic duplication or annotation artifacts, we assessed BUSCO duplication rates at the gene model level. BUSCO analysis of the predicted coding sequences and proteins recovered 13.4% duplicated BUSCOs, indicating redundancy within the annotated gene set. In contrast, BUSCO analysis of the genome assembly showed high completeness with low duplication (97.9% complete single-copy and 1.1% duplicated BUSCOs), suggesting that haplotypic duplication was largely resolved at the assembly stage. To assess the effect of protein evidence selection on gene prediction, an additional BRAKER3 run was performed using Trachurus trachurus (GCA_905171665.2) as a sole reference proteome, yielding 45,540 predicted protein-coding genes, comparable to the 47,734 genes obtained using multiple proteomes, indicating robustness of gene prediction to protein input choice. Detailed results of this analysis are provided in Supplementary Table 2. The elevated number of predicted protein-coding genes is likely attributable to annotation-related factors, including the absence of RNA-seq data, the use of multiple heterologous protein datasets for training, and the use of a hard-masked genome during gene prediction, which together may contribute to fragmented or redundant gene models. Therefore, the current annotation should be considered a preliminary gene set that may be refined in future studies incorporating transcriptomic data.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

BUSCO completeness analysis of predicted protein-coding genes in the Trachurus murphyi. BUSCO assessment was performed using the Actinopterygii database (actinopterygii_odb10; n = 3,640 orthologs) Bars represent the percentage of Complete (including single-copy and duplicated), Fragmented, and Missing ortholgos for coding sequence (CDS) and translated protein predictions.

Finally, a total of 43,427 (90.98%) protein-coding genes were successfully annotated in at least one database, and 9,080 (19.02%) genes were supported by all eight databases used (Fig. 5D), indicating high-quality, accurate, and comprehensive annotation of the protein-coding genes in the T. murphyi genome. Taken together, all these lines of evidence confirm the accuracy, reliability, and high-quality of the Chilean jack mackerel genome assembly and annotation.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1 (18.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 2 (14.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the scientific observers from the Instituto de Investigación Pesquera (Inpesca) for collecting the Chilean jack mackerel samples. CC-A thanks to ANID Núcleo Milenio INVASAL NCN16_034 and NCN2021_056, ANID Fondecyt 1251604, and ANID Centro de Interés Nacional IRIS CIN250047.

Author contributions

S.F.-F., C.C.-A., and F.A. conceived and designed the study. S.F.-F. and V.H.-Y. collected the Chilean jack mackerel samples and conducted laboratory procedures. C.Q. and F.A. conducted the bioinformatic analyses. F.A. drafted the initial version of the manuscript. All authors reviewed, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding provided by the Fondo de Investigación Pesquera y Acuicultura of Chile, FIPA N°2021-28 and FIPA N°2023-18 to SFF, Agencia Nacional de Investigación (ANID) grants: Fondecyt Regular 1220708 and Fondequip EQM200056 to FA. CC-A received partial support from ANID Fondecyt Regular grant 1251604 and ANID CIN250047.

Data availability

All raw sequencing reads, genome assemblies, and associated metadata are available through the National Center for Biotecnology Information (NCBI). Raw sequencing data are accessible via the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession PRJNA1420201. The chromosome-level nuclear genome assembly and mitochondrial genome are available through GenBank under accessions GCA_055096975.1 and PZ051637, respectively. Genome annotation files generated in this study are available through Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31304044.

Code availability

No custom codes or script were used in this study. All bioinformatics tools and pipelines were executed following the instructions and manuals provided by the respective software developers. The specific software versions and corresponding parameters, where applicable, are detailed in the Methods subsection. Unless stated otherwise, default parameters were used for all analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Sandra Ferrada-Fuentes, Claudio Quevedo.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07551-2.

References

  • 1.Gushiken, S. Phylogenetic relationships of the perciform genera of the family Carangidae. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology34, 443–461 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cárdenas, L. et al. Origin, diversification, and historical biogeography of the genus Trachurus (Perciformes: Carangidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution35, 496–507 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Romero, J. et al. Diet and trophic position of two mackerel species in the archipielago of Madeira, Portugal. Journal of Fish Biology99, 831–843 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gerlotto, F., Gutiérrez, M. & Bertrand, A. Insight on population structure of the Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi). Aquatic Living Resources25, 341–355 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Serra, R. Important life history aspects of the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi. Investigación Pesquera. Chile36, 67–83 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bertrand, A. et al. Diel vertical behaviour, predator–prey relationships, and occupation of space by jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) off Chile. ICES Journal of Marine Science61, 1105–1112 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bertrand, A., Barbieri, M. A., Gerlotto, F., Leiva, F. & Córdova, J. Determinism and plasticity of fish schooling behaviour as exemplified by the South Pacific jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi. Marine Ecology Progress Series311, 145–156 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alegre, A. et al. Diet diversity of jack and chub mackerels and ecosystem changes in the northern Humboldt Current system: A long-term study. Progress in Oceanography137, 299–313 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bastías, J. M., Balladares, P., Acuña, S., Quevedo, R. & Muñoz, O. Determining the effect of different cooking methods on the nutritional composition of salmon (Salmo salar) and chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) fillets. PLoS ONE12, e0180993 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lavallée, D. et al. Quebrada de los burros. Los primeros pescadores del litoral pacífico en el extremo sur peruano. Chungará (Arica)43, 333–351 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rebolledo, S., Béarez, P., Salazar, D. & Fuentes, F. Maritime fishing during the Middle Holocene in the hyperarid coast of the Atacama Desert. Quaternary International391, 3–11 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arcos, D. F., Cubillos, L. A. & Núñez, S. P. The jack mackerel fishery and El Niño 1997–98 effects off Chile. Progress in Oceanography49, 597–617 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li, G., Zou, X., Chen, X., Zhou, Y. & Zhang, M. Standardization of CPUE for Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) from Chinese trawl fleets in the high seas of the Southeast Pacific Ocean. Journal of Ocean University of China12, 441–451 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu, G. et al. Does life history connectivity explain distributions of Chilean jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi caught in international waters prior to decline of the southeastern Pacific fishery? Fisheries Research151, 20–25 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lima, M., Canales, T. M., Wiff, R. & Montero, J. The interaction between stock dynamics, fishing and climate caused the collapse of the Jack mackerel stock at Humboldt current ecosystem. Frontiers in Marine Science7, 123 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ashford, J., Serra, R., Saavedra, J. C. & Letelier, J. Otolith chemistry indicates large-scale connectivity in Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi), a highly mobile species in the Southern Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Research107, 291–299 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cerna, F. et al. Bomb radiocarbon, otolith daily increments and length modes validate age interpretations of Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi). Frontiers in Marine Science9, 906583 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferrada-Fuentes, S., Galleguillos, R., Herrera-Yáñez, V. & Canales-Aguirre, C. B. Population genetics of Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920, (Pisces, Carangidae), in waters of the South Pacific Ocean. Fishes8, 162 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oliva, M. E. Metazoan parasites of the jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi (Teleostei, Carangidae) in a latitudinal gradient from South America (Chile and Peru). Parasite6, 223–230 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vásquez, S., Correa-Ramírez, M., Parada, C. & Sepúlveda, A. The influence of oceanographic processes on jack mackerel (Trahucurs murphyi) larval distribution and population structure in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science70, 1097–1107 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Canales-Aguirre, C. B., Ferrada, S. & Galleguillos, R. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi Nicols, 1920). Conservation Genetics11, 1235–1237 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cárdenas, L. et al. Genetic population structure in the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi (Nichols) across the South-eastern Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Research100, 109–115 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Galleguillos, R., Canales-Aguirre, C. B. & Ferrada, S. Genetic variability in jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi Nichols: new SSRs loci and application. Gayana (Concepción76, 58–62 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Canales-Aguirre, C. B., Ferrada-Fuentes, S. & Galleguillos, R. Temporal and spatial population genetic variation in Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi). Biology14, 510 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Canales-Aguirre, C. B. et al. Heterogametic females reveal a ZW sex determination system and a putative sex chromosome for the Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murpyhi. Molecular Ecology Resources, e70034 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Asorey, C. M., Larraín, M. A. & Araneda, C. The complete mitochondrial genome of Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi Nichols, 1920 (Teleostei, Carangidae). Mitochondrial DNA9, 1455–1459 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Genner, M. & Collins, R. The genome sequence of the Atlantic horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus (Linnaeus 1758). Wellcome Open Research7, 118 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hirao, A. S. et al. Genome-wide SNP analysis coupled with geographic and reproductive-phenological information reveals panmixia in a classical marine species, the Japanese jack mackerel (Trachurus japonicus). Fisheries Research279, 107146 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nature Methods18, 170–175 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sharma, P., Kharabian MAsouleh, A., Topp, B., Furtado, A. & Henry, R. J. De novo chromosome level assembly of a plan genome from long read sequence data. The Plant Journal109, 727–736 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Challis, R., Richards, E., Rajan, J., Cochrane, G. & Blaxter, M. BlobToolKit – Interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics10, 1361–1374 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guan, D. et al. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics36, 2896–2898 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Putnam, N. H. et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Research26, 342–350 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Systems3, 99–101 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gomes, N. M. V., Shay, J. W. & Wright, W. E. Telomere biology in Metazoa. FEBS Letters584, 3741–3751 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lin, Y. et al. quarTeT: a telomere-to-telomere toolkit for gap-free genome assembly and centromeric repeat identification. Horticulture Research10, uhad127 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miga, K. H. Completing the human genome: the progress and challenge of satellite DNA assembly. Chromosome Research23, 421–426 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rocchi, M., Archidiacomo, N., Schempp, W., Capozzi, O. & Stanyon, R. Centromere repositioning in mammals. Heredity108, 59–67 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pei, T. et al. Gap-free genome assembly and CYP450 gene family analysis reveal the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in Scutellaria baicalensis. Horticulture Research10, uhad235 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li, M. et al. Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of sorghum. Scientific Data11, 835 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cui, Y. et al. T2T genomes unveil centromere architecture and adaptive divergence in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Advanced Science12, e06374 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Peichel, C. L. et al. Assembly of the threespine stickleback Y chromosome reveals convergent signatures of sex chromosome evolution. Genome Biology21, 177 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Voleníková, A. et al. Fast satellite DNA evolution in Nothobranchius annual killifishes. Chromosome Research31, 33 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery oftransposable element families. PNAS117, 9451–9457 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Haas, B. TransposonPSI: an application of PSI-Blast to mine (retro-) transposon ORF homologies. https://transposonpsi.sourceforge.net/ (2007).
  • 46.Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinformatics9, 18 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Steinbiss, S., Willhoeft, U., Gremme, G. & Kurtz, S. Fine-grained annotation and classification of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Research37, 7002–7013 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gremme, G., Steinbiss, S. & Kurtz, S. GenomeTools: A aomprehensive software library for efficient processing of structured genome annotations. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics10, 645–656 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crescente, J. M., Zavallo, D., Helguera, M. & Vanzetti, L. S. MITE Tracker: an accurate approach to identify miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in large genomes. BMC Bioinformatics19, 348 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xiong, W., He, L., Lai, J., Dooner, H. K. & Du, C. HelitronScanner uncovers a large overlooked cache ofHelitron transposons in many plant genomes. PNAS111, 10263–10268 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics26, 2460–2461 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Camacho, C. et al. BLAST + : architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics10, 421 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tarailo-Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics4(4.10), 11–14 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gabriel, L. et al. BRAKER3: Fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Research34, 769–777 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bruna, T., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark-ETP significantly improves the accuracy of automatic annotation of large eukaryotic genomes. Genome Research34, 757–768 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stanke, M. & Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Research33, W465–W467 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gabriel, L., Hoff, K. J., Bruna, T., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. TSEBRA: transcript selector for BRAKER. BMC Bioinformatics22, 566 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nature Methods18, 366–368 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Johnson, L. S., Eddy, S. R. & Portugaly, E. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics11, 431 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics30, 1236–1240 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics36, 2251–2252 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Uliano-Silva, M. et al. MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio high fidelity reads. BMC Bioinformatics24, 288 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Donath, A. et al. Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research47, 10543–10552 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics34, 3094–3100 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Grant, J. R. et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research51, W484–W492 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ferrada-Fuentes, S. et al. Genome annotation files for Trachurus murphyi. figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.31304044 (2026). [DOI]
  • 67.NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP675507 (2026).
  • 68.NCBI GenBank https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_055096975.1 (2026).
  • 69.Howe, K. et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature496, 498–503 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: Novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution38, 4647–4654 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biology21, 245 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics29, 1072–1075 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1 (18.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 2 (14.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All raw sequencing reads, genome assemblies, and associated metadata are available through the National Center for Biotecnology Information (NCBI). Raw sequencing data are accessible via the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession PRJNA1420201. The chromosome-level nuclear genome assembly and mitochondrial genome are available through GenBank under accessions GCA_055096975.1 and PZ051637, respectively. Genome annotation files generated in this study are available through Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31304044.

No custom codes or script were used in this study. All bioinformatics tools and pipelines were executed following the instructions and manuals provided by the respective software developers. The specific software versions and corresponding parameters, where applicable, are detailed in the Methods subsection. Unless stated otherwise, default parameters were used for all analyses.


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES