Abstract
Background
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) transmission in tropical settings is often assumed to occur year-round, and preventive strategies are frequently recommended accordingly. However, sub-national variation in epidemic timing remains incompletely characterized. Granular local surveillance data may help refine timing of prevention, particularly in resource-limited settings prioritizing high-risk populations.
Method
We analyzed aggregated RSV surveillance data from the Viral Respiratory Infection Surveillance Network (VIRAL Network LATAM–Colombia) across epidemiological weeks 1–52 during 2022–2024. Data were obtained from 15 centers in 7 climatically diverse cities spanning sea level to 2640 m altitude. City-specific percentile thresholds were used to define transmission intensity. Epidemic patterns were categorized as concentrated, prolonged, or bimodal, and inter-city synchrony was assessed using pairwise Spearman correlations.
Results
Among 39 505 multiplex respiratory panels, 6699 (17.0%) were RSV-positive. RSV was detected year-round in all cities, with off-season detections accounting for 16.2%–64.5% of annual cases. Five cities exhibited a synchronized epidemic corridor between March and July with high temporal concordance (all pairwise ρ ≥ .71, P < .01). Cartagena showed delayed coastal transmission, while Cúcuta demonstrated bimodal circulation with attenuated seasonality. Overall, 2 cities met criteria for concentrated transmission, 4 for prolonged transmission, and 1 for bimodal patterns.
Conclusions
Although RSV circulated throughout the year, epidemic activity converged temporally across most Colombian cities, with notable sub-national heterogeneity. These findings suggest that improved understanding of local epidemic timing could support geographically tailored implementation of RSV preventive strategies.
Keywords: Colombia, immunization strategy, respiratory syncytial virus, seasonality, surveillance
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.

Tidbit Graphical Abstract: https://tidbitapp.io/institutional-portal/open-forum-infectious-diseases/tidbits/subnational-heterogeneity-in-rsv-seasonality-in-tropical-colombia-2022-2024/update
This multicity molecular surveillance study demonstrates substantial sub-national heterogeneity in RSV seasonality within tropical Colombia, with synchronized epidemic corridors across most cities. Findings support geographically tailored timing of maternal vaccination and long-acting monoclonal antibody strategies to optimize prevention impact.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection and hospitalization in infants worldwide, with a disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries [1, 2]. The recent availability of maternal prefusion RSV F protein (RSVpreF) vaccination and long-acting monoclonal antibodies has expanded prevention options [3, 4], but both confer time-limited protection, making alignment with local circulation patterns critical [5–7].
RSV is widely regarded as a year-round pathogen in tropical countries, although sub-national circulation patterns remain poorly defined. RSV seasonality is well characterized in temperate regions, where predictable winter epidemics facilitate seasonal immunization strategies [8]. In tropical and subtropical settings, circulation patterns are more variable and less predictable, posing substantial challenges for prevention planning [3, 8, 9]. Prior reviews have classified tropical countries as exhibiting “year-round” seasonality, but this characterization may obscure important sub-national heterogeneity. Analyses from China [10], Brazil [8, 11], and Guatemala [12] have demonstrated significant within-country variation linked to latitude, altitude, and climate, suggesting that national-level classifications may be insufficient to guide regional immunization strategies. Nevertheless, the evidence base characterizing RSV seasonality in Latin America and the Caribbean remains limited [13].
Colombia offers a unique setting for examining this heterogeneity: 7 cities spanning sea level to above 2600 m altitude, 3 distinct precipitation regimes, and temperatures from 15°C to above 28°C—all within a single national health system. In November 2025, Colombia incorporated maternal RSVpreF vaccination into its national immunization program, while Bogotá, the country's most populous city, introduced nirsevimab for infants as a complementary component of a hybrid prevention strategy, highlighting the need for sub-national data to optimize prevention. We aimed to characterize RSV seasonality across 7 Colombian cities using year-round molecular surveillance, identify distinct transmission patterns, and assess their implications for regional prevention planning and hospital preparedness.
METHODS
Study Design and Setting
We conducted a descriptive time-series analysis of aggregated RSV surveillance data from the Viral Respiratory Infection Surveillance Network (VIRAL Network LATAM–Colombia) spanning epidemiological weeks 1–52 for 2022–2024 (156 weeks total). The network comprises referral hospitals performing year-round molecular surveillance among patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness. Testing was directed at patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress, escalating oxygen requirements, or need for intensive care. Participating institutions serve both pediatric and adult populations; based on clinical profiles, an estimated >90% of panels were performed in pediatric patients.
Seven cities spanning 3 altitudinal zones contributed data (Supplementary figure 1): highland (>2000 m: Bogotá, 2640 m; Pasto, 2527 m), mid-altitude (1000–2000 m: Medellín, 1495 m; Cali, 1018 m), and lowland (<1000 m: Neiva, 442 m; Cúcuta, 320 m; Cartagena, sea level), classified per Colombia's Caldas-Lang system [14]. Fifteen centers participated: 5 in Bogotá, 3 each in Medellín and Cali, and 1 each in Cúcuta, Neiva, Pasto, and Cartagena. Complete 3-year coverage was achieved for Bogotá, Cali, and Medellín; partial coverage was available for remaining cities.
Laboratory Testing
Respiratory specimens were tested using multiplex molecular panels capable of detecting RSV alongside influenza A/B, parainfluenza, rhinovirus/enterovirus, adenovirus, and human metapneumovirus, among others. Most sites employed the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel (bioMérieux); 1 site used the Seegene Allplex Respiratory Panel. Weekly data extraction included absolute RSV-positive counts and positivity rates. Analyses used epidemiological weeks 1–52; weeks with zero panels were excluded from percentile calculations but retained in visualizations. Because this was a sentinel rather than population-based surveillance network, specimen numbers reflected pediatric catchment population, institutional complexity, local practices, and availability of molecular diagnostics. Testing volumes varied across sites and did not depend on population size. Nevertheless, standardized molecular platforms and harmonized surveillance procedures ensured comparability of temporal circulation patterns across cities.
Percentile-Based Classification Framework
Fixed RSV positivity thresholds (eg, 3%) are poorly discriminative in tropical settings where weekly positivity frequently exceeds such cutoffs year-round. We therefore adopted a city-specific percentile framework: very low (<P25), low (P25–P50), moderate (>P50–P75), high (>P75–P90), and peak-intensity (>P90). Weeks > P50 were classified as epidemic-level activity, consistent with recent analyses [13] and thresholds applied in a 10-year Hong Kong RSV study [15]. This approach is analogous to the WHO Average Curves Method [16]; however, no standardized approach exists for defining RSV epidemic timing [17].
Seasonality Metrics
All seasonality metrics were derived from 52 pooled weekly positivity values. Sustained transmission was defined as ≥2 consecutive weeks > P50, consistent with standard surveillance practice [18]. Runs separated by ≤2-week gaps below P50 were merged. Season onset and end were defined as the first and last weeks of the merged run containing the annual peak. Transmission was classified as temporally concentrated when epidemic burden was ≥75% within ≤22 weeks, following Li et al.'s framework for passive immunization planning in low- and middle-income countries [7]. Cities not meeting both criteria were classified as prolonged. Cities with 2 distinct epidemic periods ≥6 weeks apart were classified as bimodal. Inter-city synchrony was assessed using pairwise Spearman correlations of mean monthly positivity (ρ ≥ .70 = high synchrony) [19, 20]. Two-sided P values were used. Weekly series were normalized to each city's maximum for timing comparisons [21]. Data management and statistical analyses were performed using Python 3.11 (NumPy, Pandas, and SciPy, Python Software Foundation, USA).
Precipitation Seasonality
Rainfall patterns were characterized using official climatological descriptions from IDEAM [22–24]. Three operational precipitation regimes were identified among the 7 study cities: Andean bimodal with 2 wet peaks bracketing a mid-year dry period (Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, Cúcuta), transitional bimodal with an asymmetric prolonged dry season (Neiva, Pasto), and unimodal Caribbean with a single May-to-November wet season (Cartagena) [25]. The temporal relationship between precipitation and RSV timing was examined descriptively.
Ethical Considerations
The protocol received ethics committee approval from each participating institution. Data were de-identified and aggregated; informed consent was waived. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
RESULTS
Study Population
Between January 2022 and December 2024, 39,505 multiplex panels were performed across 15 centers: 11 708 (29.6%) in 2022, 14,251 (36.1%) in 2023, and 13 546 (34.3%) in 2024. Bogotá contributed 16 235 tests (41.1%), followed by Cali (9106; 23.1%), Medellín (5196; 13.2%), Cartagena (4247; 10.8%), Cúcuta (2584; 6.5%), Neiva (1362; 3.4%), and Pasto (775; 2.0%). Table 1 summarizes city characteristics.
Table 1.
RSV Surveillance Summary by Altitudinal Zone Across Colombian Cities, 2022–2024
| City | Alt. Zone | Alt. (m) | Centers | Tests | RSV Cases | Pos. (%) | Median Weekly RSV (IQR)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bogotá | Highland | 2640 | 5 | 16 235 | 3114 | 19.2 | 40 (28.0–87.2) |
| Pasto | Highland | 2527 | 1 | 775 | 161 | 20.8 | 2 (1.0–6.0) |
| Medellín | Mid-alt. | 1495 | 3 | 5196 | 765 | 14.7 | 12.5 (9.8–19.2) |
| Cali | Mid-alt. | 1018 | 3 | 9106 | 977 | 10.7 | 16 (6.8–28.5) |
| Neiva | Lowland | 442 | 1 | 1362 | 314 | 23.1 | 3.5 (1.0–9.8) |
| Cúcuta | Lowland | 320 | 1 | 2584 | 465 | 18.0 | 8 (6.8–11.0) |
| Cartagenab | Lowland | 0 | 1 | 4247 | 903 | 21.3 | 6.5 (2.0–31.5) |
| Total | — | — | 15 | 39 505 | 6699 | 17.0 | — |
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; m, meters above sea level; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
aMedian (IQR) of RSV cases summed across years per epidemiological week (n = 52).
b71 weeks (May 2023−December 2024, intermittent gaps).
RSV Burden and Temporal Patterns
RSV was detected in 6699 of 39 505 samples (overall positivity 17.0%), stable across years (17.5%, 16.0%, and 17.4% in 2022–2024, respectively). Bogotá accounted for 3114 cases (46.5%), followed by Cali (977; 14.6%), Cartagena (903; 13.5%), Medellín (765; 11.4%), Cúcuta (465; 6.9%), Neiva (314; 4.7%), and Pasto (161; 2.4%). Weekly positivity ranged from 0% to 63.2% (Pasto, week 22). Transmission onset varied by up to 18 weeks across cities (Figure 1). Four cities initiated their epidemic season in March—Bogotá and Pasto (week 10), Medellín (week 11), and Neiva (week 12)—while Cali exhibited the earliest onset in February (week 5). Cúcuta (week 22) and Cartagena (week 23) showed delayed onset in late May–June. Five cities (71%) reached peak intensity within a 4-week window in May–June (weeks 20–23), with peak positivity ranging from 30.7% to 63.2%. Cali peaked earlier in late March (week 13) and Cartagena later in early August (week 31).
Figure 1.

RSV temporal circulation patterns across Colombian cities, 2022–2024. Heatmap displaying normalized weekly RSV positivity (0%–100%, relative to each city’s maximum) across epidemiological weeks. Cities are ordered by median epidemic peak week, and white circles indicate the median peak week for each city. Most cities reached peak RSV activity between epidemiological weeks 20 and 23, whereas Cartagena exhibited a substantially delayed peak and Cúcuta showed more prolonged circulation, illustrating marked sub-national heterogeneity in RSV seasonality. Abbreviation: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Escalation from baseline to peak was gradual in 6 cities (12–18 weeks, 1.4%–4.5%/week). Cúcuta was the exception, with rapid escalation (4 weeks, 7.2%/week) driven by its elevated baseline positivity (9.7%), the highest observed. Baseline positivity ranged from 0.3% (Pasto) to 9.7% (Cúcuta). Despite these differences, all 7 cities exhibited concurrent elevated activity during weeks 23–30 (June–August).
Epidemic Season and Case Concentration
The defined epidemic period (>P50) captured 35.5%–83.8% of total RSV cases (Figure 2). Two cities exhibited concentrated transmission: Pasto (82.0% within 21 weeks) and Cartagena (80.7% within 19 weeks). Four showed prolonged transmission: Neiva (83.8%, 23 weeks), Cali (79.2%, 26 weeks), Bogotá (71.6%, 22 weeks), and Medellín (58.6%, 23 weeks). Cúcuta was the only city with a bimodal pattern, with 35.5% of cases during the primary epidemic period. Across all cities, between 51.8% and 73.7% of cases occurring within the city-specific epidemic period were concentrated during high- or peak-intensity weeks (≥P75) (Table 2). Off-season detections ranged from 16.2% (Neiva) to 64.5% (Cúcuta).
Figure 2.

RSV case distribution by epidemic period across Colombian cities, 2022–2024. Stacked bars show the proportion of RSV cases occurring during epidemic (>P50), high-intensity (P75–P90), peak (>P90), and off-season (<P50) periods. Cities are ordered by epidemic burden in descending order. Pasto and Cartagena exhibited concentrated epidemics with most cases occurring during the epidemic period, whereas Cúcuta displayed a bimodal transmission pattern with most cases occurring outside the primary epidemic period. Definitions of epidemic intensity categories and transmission pattern classifications are provided in the Methods section. Abbreviation: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Table 2.
RSV Epidemic Characteristics Across Colombian Cities, 2022–2024
| Transmission Dynamics | Case Distribution Within Epidemic Period (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onset | End | Duration | Burden (%) | Base (%) | Peak Week | Peak (%) | Vel (%/wk) | Moderate | High | Peak | High + Peak | ||
| Cali | Prolonged | Week 5 | Week 30 | 26 | 79.2 | 2.5 | 13 | 27.0 | 2.1 | 36.8 | 29.0 | 34.3 | 63.2 |
| Bogotá | Prolonged | Week 10 | Week 31 | 22 | 71.6 | 7.1 | 21 | 42.9 | 2.6 | 29.4 | 30.7 | 40.0 | 70.6 |
| Pasto | Concentrated | Week 10 | Week 30 | 21 | 82.0 | 0.3 | 22 | 63.2 | 3.6 | 33.1 | 30.3 | 36.6 | 66.9 |
| Medellín | Prolonged | Week 11 | Week 33 | 23 | 58.6 | 7.2 | 23 | 30.7 | 1.4 | 35.7 | 32.1 | 32.2 | 64.3 |
| Neiva | Prolonged | Week 12 | Week 34 | 23 | 83.8 | 2.1 | 20 | 56.8 | 3.3 | 26.3 | 38.7 | 35.0 | 73.7 |
| Cúcutaa | Bimodal | Week 22 | Week 34 | 13 | 35.5 | 9.7 | 22 | 41.5 | 7.2 | 48.2 | 26.8 | 25.0 | 51.8 |
| Cartagenab | Concentrated | Week 23 | Week 41 | 19 | 80.7 | 0.7 | 31 | 57.5 | 4.5 | 28.6 | 34.3 | 37.1 | 71.4 |
Cities ordered by epidemic onset. Onset/End = epidemic period boundaries (>P50). Dur = duration in weeks. Burd = proportion of total RSV cases within epidemic period. Base = baseline positivity. Vel = escalation velocity (%/wk).
Case distribution within epidemic period: Mod = Moderate (P50−P75); High = P75−P90; Peak = >P90; H + P = High + Peak combined (≥P75).
Pattern classifications: Concentrated = ≥ 75% epidemic burden AND ≤22 weeks duration; Prolonged = not meeting both criteria; Bimodal = 2 epidemic periods ≥6 weeks apart. Neiva exceeded the burden threshold (83.8%) but was classified as prolonged due to duration (23 weeks) exceeding ≤22-week criterion.
aSecondary high-activity period weeks 41–47.
bSurveillance initiated May 2023 (71 weeks).
Precipitation and RSV Timing
Epidemic onset coincided with rainy season transitions in 6 of 7 cities (Figure 3; Supplementary Figure 1). In Bogotá, Medellín, and Pasto, onset occurred during dry-to-wet transitions; in Neiva, during the first rainy season; and in Cúcuta and Cartagena, during established wet seasons. Cali was the exception: onset preceded the first rains, although peak RSV activity coincided with peak precipitation.
Figure 3.

Consolidated RSV circulation patterns by epidemic timing classification, Colombia 2022–2024. (A) Composite weekly RSV positivity across the 5 synchronized cities (Bogotá, Cali, Medellín, Neiva, and Pasto), illustrating the shared epidemic corridor, pooled median positivity, and inter-city variability. (B) Weekly RSV positivity in Cartagena, representing a delayed, highly concentrated epidemic with rapid escalation and a narrow transmission window. (C) Weekly RSV positivity in Cúcuta, illustrating sustained baseline transmission with bimodal epidemic activity and year-round RSV circulation. Summary metrics below each panel compare epidemic timing, duration, baseline positivity, epidemic burden, and peak characteristics across transmission patterns. Definitions of epidemic intensity categories and transmission pattern classifications are provided in the Methods section. Abbreviation: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Inter-City Synchrony
Five cities—Bogotá, Cali, Medellín, Neiva, and Pasto—shared a common high-activity window during weeks 12–30 (March–July), defining a coherent epidemic corridor (Figure 3A) that peaked at week 21 (median positivity 39.0%) and spanned weeks 10–34. Spearman correlations confirmed high temporal synchrony among these 5 cities (all 10 pairs ρ ≥ 0.71, all P < .01). Cartagena exhibited a delayed unimodal pattern peaking at week 31 (57.5%), consistent with Caribbean rainfall seasonality (Figure 3B). Cúcuta showed bimodal circulation with a primary peak at week 22 (41.5%) and a secondary period during weeks 41–47 (Figure 3C). Neither city reached the high-synchrony threshold with any of the other 5 (ρ range −0.41 to 0.55). Core epidemic months (≥5/7 cities with epidemic-level activity) spanned April through July.
DISCUSSION
We present a multicity characterization of RSV seasonality in a tropical country spanning wide altitudinal and climatic diversity within a single health system. RSV circulated year-round in all cities, but its temporal structure varied, with 3 distinct patterns—concentrated, prolonged, and bimodal—and epidemic-period burden ranging from 83.8% to 35.5% of annual cases. Despite this heterogeneity, 5 cities shared a synchronized epidemic corridor with peak activity between March and July, while 2 diverged in timing and intensity. These findings refine the prevailing view of “year-round” RSV circulation in tropical settings by demonstrating both actionable convergence and clinically relevant sub-national variation [3, 8, 9].
Despite differences spanning nearly 2200 m in altitude and more than 20-fold in baseline positivity, 5 cities—Bogotá, Cali, Medellín, Neiva, and Pasto—shared overlapping March-through-August seasons, consistent with Pan-American analyses indicating that South American RSV activity concentrates between March and August [9, 13, 26]. These cities also exhibited synchrony in peak timing: 4 reached peak intensity within a 4-week window (weeks 20–23), with pairwise Spearman correlations confirming high temporal concordance (all ρ ≥ .71, P < .01). Cali was the exception, peaking 7 weeks earlier (week 13), for reasons that remain unclear, as Londoño-Avendaño et al. previously reported no consistent association between precipitation and RSV activity in this city [27]. The shared corridor identifies a predictable window of peak RSV activity. Whether this corridor extends to other Colombian cities not yet included in the network—particularly in underrepresented regions such as the Pacific lowlands, the Orinoquía, and the Amazon—remains unknown, and expanding molecular surveillance to these areas could reveal additional transmission patterns that further refine sub-national prevention planning.
Cartagena and Cúcuta diverged from the 5-city corridor in both timing and epidemic structure. Cartagena exhibited a delayed unimodal season (onset week 23, peak week 31) consistent with Caribbean rainfall seasonality and with the south-to-north progression of RSV epidemics across the Americas, in which Southern Cone countries initiate RSV seasons around March while Caribbean countries begin around late June [13]. This pattern also aligns with the latitudinal gradient in epidemic duration described across Chinese provinces (r = −0.69, P < .0007) [10], confirmed globally in a pre-pandemic systematic review [28]. Although Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, and Neiva exhibited variable low-intensity activity during weeks 46–52 (November–December), these late-year increases were inconsistent across years and did not meet sustained epidemic criteria. In contrast, Cúcuta showed true bimodal epidemic-level activity (>P50) with the highest baseline positivity (9.7%), the lowest epidemic-period burden (35.5%), and a secondary high-activity period during weeks 41–47 not observed elsewhere. Cúcuta was the only city where RSV positivity remained elevated year-round, with little difference between epidemic and non-epidemic periods. Multimodal or year-round RSV epidemics have been described in Caribbean island nations including Barbados, Saint Lucia, Surinam, and Trinidad and Tobago [13]. The elevated baseline in Cúcuta may reflect attenuated seasonality driven by high humidity in a tropical lowland setting [29]. Local contextual factors, including the city’s high level of cross-border population mobility with Venezuela, may also contribute by facilitating repeated viral introductions and sustained community transmission, although these mechanisms were not directly evaluated in the present study. These divergent profiles illustrate that no single seasonal window captures RSV risk across all Colombian regions, posing a distinct challenge for nationally uniform immunization calendars.
The within-country heterogeneity observed in Colombia is consistent with previous reports from other geographically diverse settings but extends current evidence from Latin America by demonstrating the coexistence of multiple transmission profiles within a single national surveillance system. Guo et al. identified 4 RSV transmission zones across 21 Chinese provinces using a moving-interval immunization framework, with epidemic duration showing a significant latitudinal gradient [10]. In Brazil, the Global Epidemiology of RSV in Community and Hospitalized Care study documented marked regional variation, with median season onset ranging from week 10 in the Midwest to week 16 in the South [11]. Similarly, Hamid et al. reported onset differences of 2–10 weeks between highland and lowland regions in Guatemala [30]. In contrast to Southern Cone countries like Chile or Argentina, where RSV seasonality is generally more homogeneous, our findings demonstrate the coexistence of synchronized, delayed, and bimodal transmission profiles within a relatively small geographic area. Our findings further suggest that the observed altitudinal and climatic gradients may contribute to these differences, with tropical lowland cities exhibiting more attenuated seasonality and sustained transmission than cooler highland settings. Together, these observations reinforce that national epidemic curves may mask clinically meaningful sub-national differences and support the need for locally tailored surveillance and prevention strategies.
The distinction between concentrated and prolonged transmission has direct implications for RSV prevention strategies. In low- and middle-income countries, seasonal monoclonal antibody approaches can achieve similar effectiveness to year-round strategies with substantially greater efficiency per dose [7]. Applying a ≤22-week framework, 2 cities met criteria for concentrated transmission (Pasto, Cartagena), 4 showed prolonged patterns (Neiva, Cali, Bogotá, Medellín), and 1 exhibited bimodal circulation (Cúcuta). Neiva marginally exceeded the duration threshold, highlighting the sensitivity of categorical classifications and suggesting that continuous metrics may better capture transmission dynamics. Similar sub-national variation has been described in China, reinforcing the need for within-country profiling to guide prevention strategies. Confirmation over additional seasons will be important to inform cost-effectiveness analyses of seasonally intensified approaches.
The consistent temporal association between rainy season onset and RSV epidemic initiation in 6 of 7 cities aligns with prior observations of respiratory infection seasonality coinciding with rainy periods in Bogotá [31–33] and with broader tropical surveillance implicating rainfall as an RSV seasonality driver [9, 34]. Proposed mechanisms include indoor crowding during rainy periods, humidity-mediated effects on viral stability, and altered population mixing patterns. Haynes et al. reported that RSV peaked during wet months in countries with high annual precipitation (Bangladesh, Guatemala, and Thailand), whereas RSV peaked during cooler months in moderately hot (China) and arid (Egypt) regions [12]. Baker et al. found that the estimated effects of precipitation and humidity on RSV transmission mirror prior results described for influenza [29]. Cali was the sole exception in our data, where epidemic onset preceded the first rains, consistent with the observation by Londoño-Avendaño et al. that RSV cases in Cali peak in the first semester without a clear association with pluviosity [27], although peak RSV activity coincided with peak precipitation, suggesting rainfall may amplify rather than trigger transmission in this setting. The 3 precipitation regimes provide a descriptive ecological framework linking climate to RSV transmission profiles. Future studies incorporating continuous meteorological variables (temperature, relative humidity, air pollution, and population density) are needed to develop predictive models for epidemic timing.
The detailed quantification of baseline positivity and off-season burden adds an operational dimension rarely captured in RSV surveillance. Bogotá maintained 7.1% baseline positivity with 28.4% of cases occurring outside the epidemic period—a volume exceeding the entire annual burden of smaller cities such as Pasto—demonstrating that substantial clinical workload persists beyond the main epidemic window. Off-season detections ranged from 16.2% (Neiva) to 64.5% (Cúcuta). In the United States, RSV seasons defined by PCR detections lasted a median of 31 weeks nationally, with some regions showing activity extending well beyond seasonal peaks [35]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, unusual inter-seasonal RSV activity was documented across the European Region during the summer of 2021 [36], and in Australia RSV epidemics shifted markedly later than historically observed after easing of restrictions [37]. Although these observations reflect disrupted epidemiology, they demonstrate that RSV transmission can persist outside traditional seasonal windows, consistent with the substantial off-season burden observed in our network.
The programmatic relevance of off-season RSV burden is illustrated by Argentina's maternal RSVpreF vaccine experience. A March–August 2024 campaign was associated with a 33.6% reduction in RSV-LRTI hospitalizations among infants [38], whereas extending immunization to January–October in 2025 increased effectiveness to 59.7% and reduced the number needed to immunize (to prevent one hospitalization) from 83.9 to 36.8 [39]. These findings suggest that aligning program duration with local circulation patterns can substantially enhance impact—particularly in areas where RSV activity extends well beyond 6 months in multiple regions, such as Colombia, where 4/7 cities showed this, and where rigid semester-based campaigns may miss a substantial proportion of at-risk infants.
Overall, these findings are consistent with year-round immunization as the appropriate baseline strategy for Colombia [40], while demonstrating that sub-national circulation profiles can meaningfully inform its implementation. The recent introduction of nirsevimab for infants in Bogotá alongside the national maternal RSVpreF vaccination strategy provides a timely context in which local seasonality data may help optimize this hybrid approach. The synchronized Andean corridor (March–July) identifies a predictable window for seasonal intensification: in resource-limited settings where year-round universal coverage is not yet achievable, concentrating monoclonal antibody deployment before and during the corridor could expand reach to catch-up cohorts, high-risk infants who missed initial dosing, and those requiring protection ahead of secondary epidemic periods. The delayed Caribbean coastal pattern argues for a shifted intensification window beginning in June, while sustained year-round delivery appears most appropriate for border cities with bimodal or attenuated seasonality where no single window captures the majority of transmission. Argentina’s experience extending its immunization window from 6 to 10 months—with effectiveness nearly doubling [38, 39]—provides early real-world evidence that matching program duration to local circulation patterns substantially enhances impact. As newly available but resource-constrained prevention tools reach Latin America, this type of sub-national profiling may prove essential for maximizing the public health return on each dose administered.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths include 3 post-pandemic years of continuous multiplex PCR surveillance from 15 centers across 7 climatically diverse cities, a standardized percentile framework enabling comparison across settings with differing RSV intensity, and the incorporation of precipitation seasonality as an ecological dimension to epidemic timing. Limitations include hospital-based surveillance focused on severe illness, non-standardized testing indications across sites, reliance on aggregated positivity rather than population-based incidence or individual-level data on age, comorbidities, or RSV subtype, and a 3-year window—including shorter coverage for Cartagena (71 weeks), which may not capture stable long-term seasonality. Although multiplex molecular testing detected multiple respiratory pathogens, this analysis focused exclusively on RSV circulation and did not evaluate viral co-detections, temporal overlap with other respiratory viruses, or potential viral interference. These interactions, particularly with influenza, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses, and SARS-CoV-2 may influence RSV epidemic timing and intensity and warrant dedicated future analyses. The estimated >90% pediatric testing reflects clinical profiles of participating institutions but could not be verified with individual-level age data. The percentile-based thresholds, while internally consistent, have not been validated against external gold standards, and the categorical classification of transmission patterns is sensitive to cutoff selection, as illustrated by Neiva's borderline classification. Precipitation associations were qualitative and descriptive, not formally assessed with time-series or regression methods. Some cities were represented by single institutions, limiting generalizability within those settings. Large regions of Colombia were not included, and the transmission patterns described here should be viewed as hypothesis-generating for future prospective studies incorporating individual-level clinical data, continuous meteorological variables, and viral genomic surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS
RSV circulates year-round across climatically diverse Colombian cities, but temporal concentration of epidemic activity varies at the sub-national level. We identified 3 transmission patterns—a synchronized Andean corridor (Bogotá, Cali, Medellín, Neiva, Pasto) with peak activity March–July, a delayed Caribbean coastal pattern in Cartagena (June–October), and a bimodal border pattern in Cúcuta with attenuated seasonality. This heterogeneity is consistent with altitude, precipitation regime, and geographic location, and it has direct implications for RSV prevention. Although year-round immunization remains the appropriate baseline strategy, these country profiles can identify predictable windows for strategic intensification of monoclonal antibody deployment and maternal vaccination, extending coverage to catch-up cohorts and secondary epidemic periods that would otherwise remain unprotected. Expanding sub-national surveillance will support locally adapted prevention strategies as Latin America implements new RSV immunization tools. VIRAL Network LATAM continues to develop real-time analytical capacity to translate multi-city surveillance data into actionable guidance for national immunization programs across the region.
Supplementary Material
Notes
Author Contributions. I.F.G.T. contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, visualization and writing of the original draft. C.B.A., L.M.J.E., and A.D.D. contributed to formal analysis, visualization, writing and review of the original draft. All other authors contributed equally to data acquisition, draft review and editing. All authors approved the final version to be published.
Ethics Statement. The protocol received ethics committee approval from each participating institution. Data were de-identified and aggregated; no patient-level data were collected, and informed consent was waived by each institutional ethics committee.
Data availability. Aggregated surveillance data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional data-sharing agreements and ethics committee approval. Individual-level data are not available due to privacy and ethics restrictions.
Financial support. This work was supported by an independent, investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer, awarded to the VIRAL Network LATAM. Pfizer Tracking Number #89962425. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of results, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit for publication.
Contributor Information
Iván Felipe Gutierrez-Tobar, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Infantil Colsubsidio, Clínica Infantil Santa Maria Del Lago, Bogotá, Colombia.
Claudia Beltran-Arroyave, Clínica El Rosario, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Lisa Maria Jaramillo-Estrada, Viralnet LATAM, Medellín, Colombia.
German Camacho-Moreno, HOMI, Fundacion Hospital pediatrico la Misericordia. Department of Pediatrics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diego Galvis, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Fundacion Hospital pediatrico la Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Kelly Marquez-Herrera, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Infantil Santa Maria del Lago, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Pablo Londoño, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Infantil Colsubsidio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jaime Alberto Patiño-Niño, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Fundación Clínica Valle de Lili, Cali, Colombia.
Andres Felipe Arias, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Erasmo Meoz, Cucuta, Colombia.
Ana Maria Monsalve, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.
Christian Pallares Gutierrez, Department of Infectious Diseases, Clínica Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.
Alexandra Sierra-Garcia, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Imbanaco, Clinical Research Centro de estudios en Infectología Pediatrica (CEIP), Endpoints, Cali, Colombia.
Santiago Atehortua-Muñoz, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.
Julian Camilo Galvis Ayala, Laboratorio Médico de Referencia Clínica El Rosario, Facultad Nacional De Salud Pública, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Juan Pablo Rojas, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Universidad del Valle, Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Andres Felipe Romero-Andrade, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo, Neiva, Colombia.
Stephanie Casadiego Payares, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Infantil Napoleón Franco Pareja-Fundación UCI Doña Pilar, Cartagena, Colombia.
Yamile Karina Chaucanez-Bastidas, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Infantil Los Ángeles, Pasto, Colombia.
Juan Sebastian Bravo, Department of Infectious Diseases, Clínica Infantil Santa Maria Del Lago, Bogotá, Colombia.
Paula Andrea Araque Muñoz, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Clínica Country, Clínica La Colina, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eduardo López-Medina, Centro de Estudios en Infectología Pediátrica, Universidad del Valle and Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali, Colombia.
Alejandro Diaz-Diaz, Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Hospital General de Medellin, Medellin, Colombia.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
References
- 1. Li Y, Wang X, Blau DM, et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022; 399:2047–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shi T, McAllister DA, O'Brien KL, et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2015: a systematic review and modelling study. Lancet 2017; 390:946–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Li Y, Reeves RM, Wang X, et al. Global patterns in monthly activity of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and metapneumovirus: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7:e1031–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mazur NI, Terstappen J, Baral R, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus prevention within reach: the vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:e2–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hammitt LL, Dagan R, Yuan Y, et al. Nirsevimab for prevention of RSV in healthy late-preterm and term infants. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:837–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kampmann B, Madhi SA, Munjal I, et al. Bivalent prefusion F vaccine in pregnancy to prevent RSV illness in infants. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1451–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li Y, Hodgson D, Wang X, Atkins KE, Feikin DR, Nair H. Respiratory syncytial virus seasonality and prevention strategy planning for passive immunisation of infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21:1303–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Obando-Pacheco P, Justicia-Grande AJ, Rivero-Calle I, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus seasonality: a global overview. J Infect Dis 2018; 217:1356–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Suryadevara M, Domachowske JB. Epidemiology and seasonality of childhood respiratory syncytial virus infections in the tropics. Viruses 2021; 13:696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Guo L, Deng S, Sun S, Wang X, Li Y. Respiratory syncytial virus seasonality, transmission zones, and implications for seasonal prevention strategy in China: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12:e1005–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Staadegaard L, Caini S, Wangchuk S, et al. Defining the seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus around the world: national and subnational surveillance data from 12 countries. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021; 15:732–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Haynes AK, Manangan AP, Iwane MK, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus circulation in seven countries with global disease detection regional centers. J Infect Dis 2013; 208 Suppl 3:S246–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Couto P, Campbell H, Li Y, et al. Implications of respiratory syncytial virus seasonality for the timing of passive immunisation scenarios in Latin America and the Caribbean - a cross-sectional modelling study. Vaccine 2025; 68:127934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eslava JA, López V, Olaya G. Los climas de Colombia (Sistema de clasificación Caldas-Lang). Atmósfera 1986; 7:41–77. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Xiong Q, Rong Z, Ran J, Ren X, Li L. The seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus and its associations with meteorological factors in Hong Kong, 2014–2023. One Health 2025; 21:101175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vega T, Lozano JE, Meerhoff T, et al. Influenza surveillance in Europe: establishing epidemic thresholds by the moving epidemic method. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2013; 7:546–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Staadegaard L, Dückers M, van Summeren J, et al. Determining the timing of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) epidemics: a systematic review, 2016 to 2021; method categorisation and identification of influencing factors. Euro Surveill 2024; 29:2300244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. World Health Organization . Global epidemiological surveillance standards for influenza. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126:1763–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bloom-Feshbach K, Alonso WJ, Charu V, et al. Latitudinal variations in seasonal activity of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV): a global comparative review. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales . Atlas Climatológico de Colombia. Bogotá. Colombia: IDEAM, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales . Estudio Nacional del Agua 2018. Bogotá, Colombia: IDEAM, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales . Características Climatológicas de Ciudades Principales y Municipios Turísticos. Bogotá, Colombia: IDEAM, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Urrea V, Ochoa A, Mesa O. Seasonality of rainfall in Colombia. Water Resour Res 2019; 55:4149–62. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ciapponi A, Palermo MC, Sandoval MM, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus disease burden in children and adults from Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1377968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Londono-Avendano MA, Pelaez-Moreno M, Lopez Medina E, Moreno Turriago MS, Parra Patino B. Transmission of respiratory syncytial virus genotypes in Cali, Colombia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021; 15:521–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shan S, Zhang W, Gao H, et al. Global seasonal activities of respiratory syncytial virus before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Baker RE, Mahmud AS, Wagner CE, et al. Epidemic dynamics of respiratory syncytial virus in current and future climates. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hamid S, Grajeda LM, de Leon O, et al. Variability in the timing of respiratory syncytial virus epidemics in Guatemala, 2008–2018. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2024; 18:e13334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Piñeros JG, Baquero H, Bastidas J, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection as a cause of hospitalization in population under 1 year in Colombia. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013; 89:544–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ucrós S, Dueñas E, Gutiérrez M. Calendario y variación estacional de las afecciones respiratorias en Santa Fe de Bogotá. Rev Colomb Neumol 1997; 9:124–32. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Villamil-Osorio M, Moyano-Ariza LF, Camacho-Moreno G, Restrepo-Gualteros SM, Sossa-Briceño MP, Rodriguez-Martinez CE. Multilevel analysis identifying the factors associated with RSV detection in infants admitted for viral bronchiolitis in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Pulmonol 2023; 58:2795–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Stensballe LG, Devasundaram JK, Simoes EA. Respiratory syncytial virus epidemics: the ups and downs of a seasonal virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22:S21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rose EB, Wheatley A, Langley G, Gerber S, Haynes A. Respiratory syncytial virus seasonality—United States, 2014–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67:71–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Meslé MMI, Sinnathamby M, Mook P, et al. Seasonal and inter-seasonal RSV activity in the European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic from autumn 2020 to summer 2022. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2023; 17:e13219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Eden JS, Sikazwe C, Xie R, et al. Off-season RSV epidemics in Australia after easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Razzini JL, Parada D, Solovey G, et al. Impact and effectiveness of RSV maternal immunization on infant hospitalizations in Buenos Aires: a hospital-based, multicentre, retrospective surveillance cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Am 2025; 52:101296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Caballero MT. Real-world evidence and lessons from maternal RSV vaccination in Argentina. presented at: RSVVW’26—9th ReSViNET Foundation Conference; 2026; Rome, Italy.
- 40. World Health Organization . WHO position paper on immunization to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus disease, May 2025. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2025; 100:193–218. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
