Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2026 Sep 10;17:1782596. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1782596

Crosstalk between the microbiome and immune microenvironment in the pathogenesis and treatment of thyroid carcinoma: a narrative review

Wanzhi Chen 1, Jichun Yu 1, Guoxue Fu 1, Zhenquan Hong 1, Xinxin Zhang 2, Meijun Zhong 3,*
PMCID: PMC13601906  PMID: 42787629

Abstract

Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is the most common cancer of the endocrine system worldwide, and its incidence has remained stable over the past forty years. Complex hormonal and environmental factors influence TC progression. The gut microbiome, a pivotal mediator in maintaining host physiology and the development of pathology, serves as a biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer immunotherapy. The microbiome-assisted tumor microenvironment (TME) sustains tumors through the modulation of multiple mechanisms. Immune suppression in the TME induces a metastatic phenotype of tumor cells by modulating signaling pathways, cell differentiation, and the innate immune response. Current research has confirmed that gut dysbiosis, bacterial outer membrane components (such as lipopolysaccharides and LPS), and metabolites (such as short-chain fatty acids and SCFAs) have bidirectional regulatory effects on thyroid function. However, the role of the local microbiome in modulating treatment responses and its interactions with the immune TME of TC remains unknown. The literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords associated with “microbiome” and “thyroid carcinoma”. Research articles, clinical trials, letters, and meta-analyses were published by January 2026. This narrative review summarizes the role of the intratumor microbiome in tumor progression, interactions with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. The associations between the microbiome and the immune TME of cancers, as well as the characteristics of the immune TME and alterations in the gut/intratumor microbiome in patients with TC receiving different therapies, are discussed. Mediating microbiome and metabolites might be potential strategies for optimizing personalized therapeutic interventions against TC. Future research should focus on defining microbial signatures associated with treatment success and developing targeted strategies to improve patient outcomes on the basis of microbiome modulation.

Keywords: cancer immunotherapy, immune microenvironment, microbiome, progression, review, thyroid carcinoma

1. Introduction

Thyroid cancer (TC) is among the most prevalent endocrine tumors and head and neck tumors. Its pathological origins can be divided into two main categories: thyroid follicular epithelial cells and parafollicular cells (1). The main subtypes include papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, 80–85%), follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC, 10–15%), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC, <2%), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC, <2%) (2). Among these, PTC is the most common and has a favorable prognosis. Global epidemiological data has shown that the age-standardized incidence of TC was 10.1 cases per 100,000 females and 3.1 cases per 100,000 males in 2020 (3). Since 1970, the incidence of TC has remained stable. These inconsistencies may result from variations in sample processing and experimental detection methods across studies as well as that each person has a unique microbiome (above 7. Conclusion). The five-year survival rate of TC is about 98% (4, 5). Pathological diagnoses vary among TC subtypes. PTC is usually diagnosed when the patient or clinical examination results in gland enlargement, often accompanied by difficulty swallowing or breathing (6). FTC typically manifests as a single thyroid nodule with thyroid inflammation or nodular hyperplasia, which is challenging to confirm through simple palpation and usually requires pathological examination to reveal follicular cells lacking nuclear heterogeneity. The diagnosis is primarily based on capsular and vascular invasion (7). MTC presents similarly to PTC and FTC as thyroid nodules, but MTC is characterized by excessive calcitonin secretion. Diagnosis typically involves measuring serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels (8). ATC usually presents as a rapidly growing hard mass that has already metastasized at diagnosis and is classified as a stage IV tumor. Therefore, ATC diagnosis requires ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy to assess tumor extent, local infiltration, and possible distant metastases (9).

Traditional treatments for TC include thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine therapy, which have achieved good outcomes in most TC patients (10). However, for some aggressive FTCs and advanced ATCs with invasive and metastatic characteristics, traditional therapies are less effective (11). Recent advancements in immunotherapy (primarily checkpoint inhibitors) (12) and molecular targeted therapies (13) have shown significant efficacy for highly malignant TC subtypes such as ATC. Conventional treatments for TC are often associated with various side effects. For example, thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy can lead to hypothyroidism. Radioactive iodine therapy is associated with complications such as gastrointestinal symptoms, bone marrow suppression, and radiation thyroiditis in the early stages and with secondary tumors and pulmonary fibrosis in the later stages (14).

The tumor microenvironment (TME) refers to the internal environment of a tumor, including tumor cells, the tumor microbiome (TM), immune cells, surrounding blood vessels, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and the extracellular matrix, which play critical roles in the initiation and progression of cancer (15). Among the immune cells in the TME, M2 macrophages (TAMs) and Tregs promote tumor growth by inducing immunosuppression. B cells exhibit both antitumor and protumor effects in cancer. NK cells have potent anticancer effects by eliminating cancer-transforming cells and enhancing T-cell and antibody responses (16). TMs typically originate from the gut microbiome (GM), and also from the oral cavity and adjacent tissues (17). TMs have been confirmed to be involved in the progression of various cancers, such as liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer (18), and uveal melanoma (19). Studies have revealed that the TM can directly intervene in tumor progression. For example, Akkermansia muciniphila (Akk) migrates into the bloodstream, colonizes lung cancer tissues, and subsequently inhibits tumorigenesis by influencing the TM and reprogramming tumor metabolism (20). Metabolites produced by the TM can modulate tumor progression by mediating metabolic and immune homeostasis. For instance, the metabolite indole-3-lactic acid produced by Lactobacillus L168 affects dendritic cells (DCs), promoting the production of IL-12 to activate CD8+ T cells and ultimately suppressing colorectal cancer progression (21). Additionally, the metabolite butyrate produced by Roseburia induces M2-type TAM polarization, thereby promoting lung cancer metastasis (22).

Both the TM and the GM have been shown to have significant regulatory effects and therapeutic potential in TC. The TM of TC constitutes a core component of the TME and can interact directly with TME components such as tumor cells, immune cells, and tumor-associated fibroblasts, thereby participating in the remodeling of the local microenvironment of TC. Recently, several studies have sparked widespread interest in the TM in TC using advanced high-throughput sequencing technologies (23). However, further cellular and animal experiments are needed to comprehensively elucidate the interactions between TMs and TCs. Therefore, investigating the diagnostic roles and regulatory mechanisms of the microbiome in TC represents an exciting and rapidly evolving area of research in cancer biology and therapeutic development. This review systematically outlines the role of the TM in cancer progression, summarizes the alterations in the TM and TME in TC and their impact on TC progression, and further explores the potential mechanisms of the TM and TME in TC treatment, aiming to provide new insights for adjuvant therapeutic strategies in TC.

2. Methods

This study is a narrative review. A systematic search was conducted in major domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Literature was searched from the inception of each database to June 2026. The search strategy combined subject headings with free-text terms. Associated keywords were selected based on the core research themes, including “thyroid carcinoma”, “microbiome”, “immune microenvironment”, “progression”, and “cancer immunotherapy”. Clinical trials were searched on ClinicalTrials (https://clinicaltrials.gov/). Additionally, a manual search of the references in the included studies and reviews in related fields was conducted to identify any omitted literature.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) formally published English literature whose research topics are closely related to the content of this review; (2) article types including clinical trials (human), research articles (human, animals, and in vitro experiments), meta-analyses, and letters; and (3) the literature must be complete, and the full text must be available.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) conference abstracts, case reports, and noncore gray literature; (2) duplicated publications or literature with highly overlapping content; and (3) literature with obvious flaws in study design or missing key information.

3. Immune microenvironment in TC

A growing body of evidence indicates that the TME affects the biological behavior of TC via distinct immune states. Multiple interrelated components of the immune system are involved in tumor invasion and are closely associated with TC metastasis. On the basis of an analysis of data from the TCGA database, Liang et al. suggested that in TC, the infiltration of M2-TAMs, resting mast cells, and DCs is significantly increased, whereas the infiltration of CD8-positive cells, M1-TAMs, activated mast cells, and eosinophils is reduced (24). Similarly, on the basis of data from the TCGA database, Xie et al. also suggested that PTC has increased infiltration of M2-TAMs, Tregs, monocytes, neutrophils, DCs, mast cells, and M0-TAMs, which promote tumor progression, whereas M1-TAMs, CD8+ T cells, B cells, NK cells, and follicular helper T cells have antitumor effects. During the development and progression of PTC, immune cells become activated, and the abundance and proportion of protumor immune cells significantly increase, indicating intensified immune evasion (25). The TME in TCs is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Diagram illustrating multiple molecular pathways by which bacterial metabolites and toxins influence tumor cells, DNA damage, apoptosis, autophagy, metastasis, immune cell modulation, and cancer stem cell regulation through interactions such as JAK2-STAT3-MMP9, ROS, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Immune microenvironment in TC. The TME in TC includes multiple cellular components, including cancer cells, CSCs, B cells, M1/M2-TAMs, T cells, NK cells, endothelial cells, and so on. Upregulated STAT6, DPP4, CAPN8, and HS3ST3A1 can either suppress the activity of CD8+T cells or NK cells, thus participating in the development of the immunosuppressive phenotype of the TME. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

3.1. Characteristics of T lymphocytes in terms of TC

Hou et al. performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) of human thyroid cancer tissues. They suggested that compared with PTC tissues, MTC tissues contain a lower proportion of immune cells (including T cells, B cells, myeloid cells, and, notably, CD45+ cells) but a greater proportion of basal cells. Therefore, MTC is believed to have an immunosuppressive microenvironment (26). Han et al. compared the differences in immune environments between PTC and ATC using scRNA-Seq analysis of human tumor tissues. The results revealed that cytotoxic cells (including CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells) are significantly more abundant in PTC samples than in ATC samples (27). Wang et al. analyzed human cancer datasets from the TCGA database. Compared with those in normal samples, the proportions of CD8+ T cells and Tregs are greater in PTC samples (28). In contrast, compared with ATCs, PTCs are more common (27). Through human samples, Zhang et al. demonstrated that CD8+ T cells in ATCs display severe metabolic dysfunction and an exhausted phenotype, whereas CD8+ T cells in PTCs exhibit relatively mild exhaustion (29).

Several biomarkers promote the progression of TC by activating oncogenic pathways and regulating the immunosuppressive microenvironment (30, 31). For example, Jing et al. performed bioinformatics analysis using datasets from the TCGA and GEO databases and confirmed that DPP4 is highly expressed in PTC and can induce CD8+ T-cell exhaustion and activate the IL13-IL13RA2 axis, facilitating the formation of an immunosuppressive TME (32). Furthermore, we explored how drugs influence immune responses through multiple pathways to exert therapeutic effects on TC. For example, curcumin has been shown to enhance CD8+ T-cell function in ATCs and augment antitumor immune responses by inhibiting the AKT/mTORC1/STAT3/PD-L1 signaling axis (33). In summary, modulating immune responses and targeting specific molecules, such as STRA6 and DPP4, can regulate the TME, providing new insights and potential approaches for immunotherapy in TC treatment.

3.2. Dendritic cells in the TC microenvironment

DCs are considered the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells (34) and key regulators of antitumor immunity (35). DCs can promote the activation of potent antitumor T cells and immune responses through various mechanisms, thereby influencing immune tolerance and cancer progression (36). In recent years, the role of DCs in cancer development has also been confirmed. DC-specific expression of the deoxyribonuclease DNASE1L3 can increase CD8+ T-cell infiltration, reduce TME exhaustion, significantly slow tumor growth, and increase anti-PD-L1 responses (37).

Existing studies have also demonstrated the critical role of DCs in treating TC. For instance, Wang et al. performed scRNA-Seq analysis using human samples (including 18 adjacent tissue samples and nonprogressive PTC and progressive PTC samples). They demonstrated that progressive PTC has high infiltration of lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 (LAMP3+) dendritic cells (DCs), which are associated with advanced T stage and poor prognosis (30). Another study through the TCGA and GEO databases revealed that annexin A1 interacts with the formyl peptide receptor type 1 receptor in DCs, which can regulate the immune microenvironment in TC. Inhibiting this interaction reduces DC activity, ultimately suppressing the occurrence and development of TC (38). Therefore, mediating DC activity is believed to be a potential immunotherapy strategy against TC.

3.3. TAMs in the TC microenvironment

TAMs are among the major components of the TME and are closely associated with malignant progression and tumor metastasis (39). Previous studies have suggested increased infiltration of M2-TAMs and decreased infiltration of M1-TAMs in TC (24, 25). Lv et al. established a coculture system using TC cells and M2-TAMs. Ex vitro experiments have suggested that M2-TAMs can promote the dedifferentiation, proliferation, migration, and invasion of TC cells by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling (40). In turn, human monocytes undergo “M2” polarization when cocultured with senescent thyrocytes or TC cells through the activation of PGE2 secretion, thus increasing tumor invasiveness (41). The interaction between TAMs and TCs in the TME plays an essential role in TC development. Future investigations targeting M2-TAM polarization could offer new strategies for the immunotherapy of TC.

3.4. CAFs and mast cells in the TC microenvironment

CAFs are a major component of the TME and play key roles in regulating tumor progression and immune escape. CAFs participate in the regulation of malignant tumor behaviors through the release of exosomes. Exosomal CREB1 derived from CAFs can promote TC cell proliferation and immune escape by positively regulating CCL20 expression (42). Additionally, in vitro studies have shown that CD36 expression in CAFs significantly enhances the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of PTC cells while inhibiting their apoptosis (43). Therefore, we speculate that targeted inhibition of CAF proliferation may become a novel approach to block TC progression and enhance immune activity.

Mast cells, as a type of innate immune cell, are often distributed in tumors. They can release presynthesized soluble mediators and suppress the body’s immune response to tumors. Compared with that in adjacent normal tissues, mast cell infiltration in TC tissues is significantly greater (23–25). In vitro experiments have confirmed that mast cells exert protumor effects on TC through the expression of galectin-9 to inhibit the antitumor function of CD8+ T cells. They also promote disease progression through the release of various cytokines and alterations in tumor stromal structure (44). Therefore, we hypothesize that intervening in mast cell proliferation may restore the antitumor immune activity of CD8+ T cells, thereby enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy for TC.

4. TM and cancer progression

Potential sources of the TM include infiltration from the oral cavity, gut, and adjacent tissues into the tumor site. TMs play a crucial role in cancer progression by regulating various malignant tumor phenotypes, including DNA damage (45–52), cell proliferation and growth (53–59), metastasis (60–63), and the stemness of tumor cells (64–67). Meanwhile, TMs have significant effects on the TME and therapeutic sensitivity (Figure 2). Notably, the colonization patterns and functional regulation of the intratumoral microbiome significantly differ across different cancer types. Influenced by the organ microenvironment, endocrine properties, and local immune context, the mechanisms underlying microbiome–tumor interactions vary markedly among different tumors.

Figure 2.

Diagram illustrating cellular and molecular interactions in the tumor microenvironment, showing various immune cells, cytokines, signaling pathways, and their effects on tumor cells, cancer stem cells, and related mechanisms.

Effects of the TM on malignant behavior and TME. The TM exerts regulatory effects, such as DNA damage, metastasis, apoptosis, autophagy, proliferation, and TME of tumors. BFT, Bacteroides fragilis toxin; CDT, cytolethal distending toxin; CSCs, cancer stem cells; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; OMVs, outer membrane vesicles; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SMO, spermine oxidase; TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; TM, tumor microbiome; TME, tumor microenvironment; γH2AX, histone H2AX. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

4.1. Effect of the TM on cancer proliferation and growth

The rapid proliferation and growth of tumor cells are key factors leading to the rapid development of cancer. Recent studies have shown that TM can influence the proliferation and growth of tumor cells, with some TMs directly promoting tumor cell growth. For example, in vitro experiments have confirmed that F. nucleatum can accelerate cancer cell growth by increasing the levels of protumor proteins such as YAP1 and c-Met (53). This bacterium can also induce PC cells to secrete cytokines, enhancing PC cell proliferation (54); Sha et al. (55) demonstrated that lipopolysaccharide (LPS), produced by Escherichia-Shigella and unclassified f:Enterobacteriaceae, can activate the TLR4-mTOR-NF-κB-IL-6 axis and drive NSCLC cell proliferation. Wild-type mice exhibited significant liver inflammation, fibrosis, and dysplasia when they received fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from patients. The abundance of Klebsiella pneumoniae, a gut pathogen, was enriched in the liver tissues of mice following FMT. Mechanistically, the K. pneumoniae surface protein PBP1B interacts with and activates TLR4 in HCC cells, thereby promoting HCC cell proliferation and the activation of oncogenic signaling. This bacterium can also disrupt the intestinal barrier (56). Deng et al. established a CRC mouse model and verified that F. mortiferum and its metabolite 5-aminonorvaline can activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to promote tumor progression and significantly increase CRC cell proliferation (57).

Additionally, studies have revealed that TM and its metabolites inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells through various pathways. For example, in vitro experiments have confirmed that Lactobacillus johnsonii (L. johnsonii) suppresses PTC cell proliferation by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (58). Yang et al. isolated Lactobacillus paracasei (L. paracasei) ZJUZ2–3 from GC patients and administered it to mice, confirming that this strain secretes indole-3-acetic acid, which inhibits GC cell survival by suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathway (59).

On this basis, TM has been confirmed to directly regulate the proliferation and growth of tumor cells through multiple pathways, bidirectionally influencing cancer progression. This may be related to the type of microorganism (probiotic or pathogenic) and the role of its metabolites in tumor proliferation.

4.2. TM and cancer metastasis

Cancer metastasis is the leading cause of death in cancer patients. Recent research has shown that TM and its metabolites can regulate the metastatic process through various mechanisms.

TM and its metabolites can directly promote cancer metastasis by regulating metabolism and immune suppression. For example, through human samples, Gu et al. demonstrated that E. coli can promote CRC liver metastasis by enhancing intratumoral glycolysis and lactate production (60). He et al. performed animal experiments and suggested that C. jejuni-produced CDT promotes liver or lung metastasis in CRC mice through the JAK2-STAT3-MMP9 signaling pathway, with the prometastatic effect primarily dependent on the CDT subunit cdtB (61). Xu et al. demonstrated that patients with CRC had an increased abundance of F. nucleatum in feces and tumors. Further cellular and animal studies suggest that F. nucleatum promotes TAM infiltration via CCL20 activation while inducing M2-TAM polarization, thereby enhancing CRC lung metastasis (62). In vitro experiments have confirmed that this bacterium also enhances adhesion between CRC cells and endothelial cells, induces ICAM1 expression, and subsequently activates the ALPK1/NF-κB/ICAM1 axis to promote distant CRC metastasis (63). Moreover, Ma et al. demonstrated that Roseburia-derived butyrate promotes LC metastasis by inhibiting HDAC expression, upregulating H19 expression in tumor cells, and inducing M2-TAM polarization (22). On this basis, targeting TM to inhibit its cancer-promoting metastatic functions could advance tumor therapy development.

4.3. TM and cancer immune microenvironment

TMs play a crucial role in cancer progression by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment. The TME contains a large number of immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), TAMs, DCs, B cells, and neutrophils. These cells significantly influence tumor proliferation and development, with the main mechanisms illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Diagram illustrating the tumor microenvironment in thyroid cancer, showing various immune and cancer cell types, metastasis to lymph nodes, lung, and liver, and a pathway map highlighting specific molecular targets involved in tumor progression and immune cell interactions.

Mechanisms of the TM in the immune TME. TM exerts regulatory roles in the immune TME by multiple pathways: such as IL-1β, cGAS-STING, PERK, NUMB-NOTCH1-HEY1, IL-17, NF-κB, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CCL5. BFT, Bacteroides fragilis toxin; CSCs, cancer stem cells; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; DC, dendritic cells; IL-10, interleukin-10; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; NK, natural killer cells; TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; TAMO, trimethylamine N-oxide; TM, tumor microbiome; TME, tumor microenvironment. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

TMs can mediate tumor immunity through various pathways to influence tumor progression. For example, Jiang et al. confirmed that fecal transplantation from CRC patients into germ-free mice allows succinate, a metabolite produced by F. nucleatum, to inhibit the cGAS-STING pathway, thereby suppressing the transport of CD8+ T cells in vivo and converting TAMs into immunosuppressive cells, exacerbating colorectal cancer (68). Zhang et al. (69) determined the abundance of the intratumoral fecal microbiome transplantationin human gastric cancer tissues and reported that F. nucleatum was significantly enriched in tumor tissues with lymph node metastasis and associated with poor prognosis. Animal studies have suggested that F. nucleatum infection induces chronic gastritis, promotes gastric mucosa dysplasia, activates the NF-κB signaling pathway, promotes the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, and facilitates immune evasion in gastric cancer. Tan et al. (70) established a PC mouse model and verified that P. gingivalis promotes the progression of pancreatic cancer by increasing the secretion of neutrophil chemokines and neutrophil elastase.

It has been confirmed that targeting the TM can inhibit tumors by affecting the immunosuppressive TME. TM can also suppress tumor progression by regulating immune responses. In mice bearing breast cancer cells, combining Megasphaera with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy increases the number of CD4+ T cells and dendritic cells (DCs). The combination of these two approaches can inhibit tumor growth by influencing the TME, thereby achieving therapeutic effects (71). Additionally, colonizing Streptococcus in mice with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma promoted the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and enhanced the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, revealing its potential role in cancer treatment (72). Furthermore, metabolites produced by TMs also play a role in tumor therapy. For instance, the metabolite butyrate, produced by Butyrivibrio, Clostridium, and Faecalibacterium, can increase the sensitivity of endometrial cancer patients to progesterone and induce ferroptosis through CISD1 downregulation, thereby reducing progesterone resistance (73). Using three different homologous mouse models of lung cancer, Liu et al. demonstrated that A. sydowii can promote lung tumor progression by mediating IL-1β-dependent expansion and activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, leading to reduced cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and inhibition of PD-1+ CD8+ T-cell accumulation (74). In summary, TM can exert immunosuppressive effects through targeted therapy on tumor development and reduce drug resistance via its metabolites, highlighting the potential clinical value of TM in treating tumors through its ability to regulate the tumor immune microenvironment.

4.4. TM and cancer apoptosis, autophagy and chemoresistance

TMs play important roles in multiple stages of tumor development. By specifically targeting the TM and regulating its composition or function, it is expected to become a new adjuvant therapeutic approach to enhance the efficacy of existing therapies and inhibit tumor progression. TM can promote cancer apoptosis. For example, Sugimura et al. demonstrated that Lactobacillus gallinarum can increase the abundance of probiotics in a CRC mouse model and reduce intestinal pathogens and that its secreted indole-3-lactic acid can promote CRC apoptosis, thereby inhibiting tumorigenesis (75). In vitro experiments have confirmed that Streptococcus thermophilus secretes β-galactosidase, which can induce CRC cell cycle arrest in the G0/1 phase and subsequently trigger apoptosis (76).

Studies have confirmed that TM can induce cancer cell autophagy. Chen et al. used a mouse model of lung cancer and reported that F. nucleatum-secreted outer membrane vesicles (Fn OMVs) increase the mRNA levels of Beclin-1, ATG3, and ATG7. Fn OMVs activate intracellular autophagy pathways and induce the expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins, thus promoting lung metastasis in tumor-bearing mice (77). On the basis of human samples, Yu et al. demonstrated that F. nucleatum was more abundant in CRC tissues from patients with recurrence after chemotherapy than in those from nonrecurrent patients. High abundance of F. nucleatum in CRC patients is associated with shorter recurrence-free survival and five-year recurrence survival (78).

A relatively high abundance of F. nucleatum has been detected in patients with cancer with chemoresistance (78, 82). Yu et al. further confirmed that when CRC cells were cocultured with F. nucleatum, the autophagy pathway was activated, thus inducing resistance to oxaliplatin and 5-FU (78). Dong et al. established a mouse CRC model using azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS). FMT enhanced radiation-mediated antitumor effects in this model and prevented adverse events. More Roseburia intestinalis accumulated in the gastrointestinal tract after FMT. Oral gavage of Roseburia intestinalis and butyrate synergistically increased radiation sensitivity but alleviated intestinal toxicity by promoting CRC cell autophagy (79). Furthermore, TM can induce chemotherapy resistance in cancer cells. Roseburia intestinalis enhances CRC cell chemosensitivity through the butyrate/OR51E1/RALB axis (79). Ding et al. established a CRC mouse model and verified that B. fragilis can activate the Notch1 signaling pathway to induce EMT and inhibit apoptosis, thereby promoting chemoresistance in CRC cells and xenografts (80). In vitro experiments have confirmed that E. coli produces colibactin, which induces lipid droplet accumulation, increases ROS levels, and promotes chemoresistance (81). Cellular and animal experiments have confirmed that F. nucleatum upregulates BIR3 expression via the TLR4/NF-κB pathway, thus promoting CRC cell resistance to 5-Fu (82).

In summary, TM and its metabolites can inhibit tumors by suppressing cancer apoptosis, but they can also promote cancer cell autophagy and increase chemoresistance, thereby advancing tumor progression.

5. The alterations and roles of TM in TC development

The TM in the TC typically originates from the gut (83), oral cavity (23), and adjacent normal tissues (Figure 4). In recent years, studies have reported significant alterations in the GM and TM of patients with TC (83, 84). For instance, compared with healthy controls, TC patients exhibit increased abundances of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Lactococcus at the phylum level, while the abundance of Bacteroidetes is reduced (85, 86). The combination of 8 metabolites and 5 genera was highly effective at distinguishing TC patients from HCs (AUC = 0.97), suggesting that the altered GM has potential as a diagnostic biomarker (85). Notably, animal experiments have verified that thyroid dysfunctions that are induced by chemical or surgical methods cause significant changes in GM compositions (87). In turn, alterations of GM are supposed to affect TM (20) and thyroid functions (88). Those studies indicate the crucial crosstalk among GM, TM, and TC (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Diagram illustrating gut and oral microbiota influencing the tumor microenvironment in the thyroid, with detailed insets showing bacterial diversity, and includes comparison to normal tissue adjacent to the tumor.

The potential origins of the intratumor. The microorganisms in the thyroid tissue of the TC primarily originate from the oral cavity, intestines, and adjacent normal tissues of the tumor. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

Figure 5.

Infographic showing GM, OM, and intratumoral microbiota dysbiosis profiles in TC, listing specific bacterial taxa with arrows indicating abundance changes, and a diagram linking these taxa to mechanisms contributing to TC progression and prognosis.

GM and TM profiles in TC. The GM, OM and TM characteristics and their interaction mechanisms associated with TC. The GM dysbiosis profile involves four taxonomic levels (phylum, family, genus, and species) with significant abundance abnormalities. The OM dysbiosis profile is centered on the order and genus taxonomic levels. The TM profile exhibited abnormal abundance characteristics of microorganisms colonizing tumor tissues. In addition, the right side of the figure shows the interactions between microorganisms and TC. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

5.1. TM characteristics in TC

An increasing number of studies have focused on exploring the characteristics of the TM in patients with TC. Dai et al. collected tumor tissues and adjacent peritumor tissues from 30 patients with TC and conducted 16S rRNA gene sequencing. They reported significant differences in microbial composition and diversity between tumor tissues and adjacent tissues. Specifically, Sphingomonas, Comamonas, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Microvirgula, and Soonwooa composed the core microbiome of the thyroid. The abundances of Sphingomonas and Aeromonas markedly increased in tumor tissues, whereas the abundances of Comamonas, Acinetobacter, and Peptostreptococcus significantly increased in adjacent tissues (83). In addition, Qiu et al. reported that the abundance of Delftialacustiris is significantly lower (P = 0.0057) in PTC tissues than in normal thyroid tissues (89).

Current research on the TM of TC focuses primarily on PTC, the most prevalent subtype of TC. The incidence of PTC differs significantly across sexes, with a higher incidence in female patients, while male patients are often diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease (90). Investigations based on the TCGA database revealed that 88 species of fungi and archaea are significantly dysregulated in females, whereas only 11 species of fungi and archaea are significantly dysregulated in males (91). The microbiome composition in TC also varies between males and females (92). Wang et al. suggested that the distribution of the same microorganism also differs by sex. Synechococcus sp. CC9311 is enriched in normal male samples but is more prevalent in tumor tissues in females (93). Additionally, Yuan et al. collected tumor samples from 80 patients with PTC and analyzed the TM using 16S RNA sequencing. Compared with male patients, male patients exhibited the greatest number of uniquely dysregulated pathways in tumor suppression-related groups, whereas female patients exhibited the most uniquely dysregulated pathways in DNA checkpoints and damage-related groups. Furthermore, compared with patients with earlier-stage disease (T1 or T2), patients with advanced-stage disease (T3 or T4) have significantly greater tumor bacterial α diversity (94). These studies suggest that alterations in the tumor microbiome are closely related to TC progression.

5.2. Effects of the TM on the malignant behaviors of TC cells

Microorganisms may play pivotal roles in modulating immune cell expression and regulating immune and cancer-related pathways to impede cancer progression (Figure 6). On the basis of 55 tumor tissues from PTC patients and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis, TC-enriched bacteria and various carcinogenic pathway-related genes were found to be positively correlated. Cellular and animal experiments have suggested that L. johnsonii can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of PTC cells by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, suggesting that the development and progression of thyroid tumors are closely related to intratumoral microbial dysbiosis (58).

Figure 6.

Infographic diagram illustrating tumor microbiome effects on thyroid cancer via metabolic regulation, genetic and epigenetic modifications, signaling pathways, and chronic inflammation. Pathways include metabolic processes, DNA damage, immune cell activation, cytokine involvement, and relevant genes and microbial taxa linked to cancer development and progression.

Potential roles and mechanisms of TM in TC development. TMs mediate multiple regulatory mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of TC, covering metabolic regulation, immune regulation, activation of signaling pathways, genetic and epigenetic modifications, and chronic inflammation. TC, thyroid carcinoma; CDT, cytolethal distending toxin; NK, natural killer cells; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; SMO, spermine oxidase; TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; TM, tumor microbiome. (Created by Figdraw, ID: SISYR41e7e).

TMs are typically found in organs with mucosal surfaces, such as the colon, pancreas, cervix, and lungs (95). These organs have cavities exposed to the external environment. During tumorigenesis, the mucosal barrier may be disrupted, creating opportunities for microorganisms on the mucosal surface to invade the tumor (96). Microbiome-produced metabolites, such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate, have potent effects on regulating immune responses and inflammation (97). Butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid derived from the fermentation of carbohydrates by the microbiome. It has been shown to slow tumor growth by influencing immune cells, tumor cells, and healthy gut cells (22, 98). Research has revealed a notable decline in the abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria, including Blautia, Lachnoclostridium, Eisenbergiella, Flavonifractor, and Hungatella, in PTC (99). In vitro experiments have suggested that TC cells exhibited enhanced sensitivity and DNA damage to radiotherapy following sodium butyrate treatment (100). Therefore, targeting butyrate by supplementation of sodium butyrate and/or in combination with components that stimulate the production of butyrate (e.g., dietary fiber, omega-3 fatty acids) might be a potential therapeutic strategy for TC (101).

6. Challenges and future perspectives

While preclinical and clinical investigations have revealed the essential roles of TM in the immune microenvironment and therapeutic responses of cancers, such as HCC, lung cancer, CRC, and ESCC, current research on TC is mostly limited to comparative analyses of the microbial composition between TC patients and healthy people. Studies based on large-scale clinical samples and diverse experimental verification methods are lacking, particularly in mechanistic investigations. Existing research on TM in TC focuses heavily on the PTC subtype, with insufficient systematic data on TM composition, microbe–immune crosstalk, and regulatory mechanisms in other TC subtypes. Moreover, most studies have been performed on the basis of single microbial sources, and investigations of the interplay between microbes across different ecological niches are lacking. Thus, this review has limitations in performing cross-subtype comparisons or establishing a universal microbe–immune interaction framework covering all TC subtypes—another major limitation of this review.

To overcome these limitations, standardized sample collection procedures, as well as optimized sequencing and bioinformatics pipelines, should be used, thus reducing clinical bias and improving the reproducibility and comparability of the results. Future research is urgently needed to explore the association between TM multiomics and the tumor immune microenvironment in FTC, MTC, and ATC. These findings clarify microbial heterogeneity across TC subtypes and facilitate the establishment of integrated subtype-specific models for microbiome–immune interaction analysis. Although FMT shows promising therapeutic potential for TC, its clinical application is associated with non-negligible safety risks, including pathogen transmission (due to inadequate donor screening), short-term gastrointestinal adverse events (abdominal distension, diarrhea, abdominal pain), and unclarified long-term risks (e.g., metabolic disorders and immune imbalance), and large-scale long-term follow-up verification is lacking.

Microbial communities play crucial roles in the initiation and progression of TC. However, several inconsistent findings merit future exploration. Chang et al. compared the differences in abundance of the microbiome in thyroid tissues and oral/fecal samples. They reported that these three sources had similar microbial diversity patterns, indicating potential microbial translocation or systemic interactions in the body (102). Compared with matched peritumor tissue samples, TC tumor tissue samples exhibit lower richness and diversity of the microbiome (83). Fernandes et al. (103) suggested that the abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was lower in TC patients than in volunteers. However, Jiang et al. (104) reported that Faecalibacterium was more abundant in healthy individuals than in DTC patients. These inconsistencies may result from variations in sample processing and experimental detection methods across studies.

7. Conclusion

Thyroid microbiome in TC exhibits prominent alterations in terms of richness and diversity compared with adjacent thyroid tissues and normal thyroid tissues, serving as potential diagnostic biomarkers. TM and metabolites impact the malignant phenotypes of human cancers and regulate immunotherapeutic efficacy by remodeling the immune TME in a context-dependent manner. Notably, alterations of thyroid microbiome and metabolites (e.g., cholesterol and butyrate) are associated with TC progression and heterogeneous activation of immune cells in the TME of PTs, MTCs, and ATCs. Emerging strategies include dietary modulation, FMT, probiotics, and rational combination therapies. In future research, longitudinal multi-omics analyses and prospective clinical validation should be employed to uncover causal mechanisms and establish reproducible biomarkers grounded in functional assessment. Targeting the interactions between the microbiome and immune microenvironment might be a potential strategy for optimizing TC therapies in the clinic.

Glossary

A.sydowii

Aspergillus sydowii

Akk

Akkermansia muciniphila

ATC

Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

B.fragilis

Bacteroides fragilis

BC

Breast Carcinoma

BCa

Bladder Carcinoma

BFT

Bacteroides fragilis toxin

C.Jejuni

Campylobacter. Jejuni

CAFs

Cancer-associated fibroblasts

CCA

Cholangiocarcinoma

CDT

Cytolethal distending toxin

CRC

Colorectal Carcinoma

CSCs

Cancer stem cells

CTL

Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte

DC

Dendritic Cells

DSBs

DNA double-strand breaks

E.coli

Escherichia coli

EAC

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

ECM

Extra Cellular Matrix

EMT

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition

ESCC

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

FMT

Fecal microbiota transplantation

F.nucleatum

Fusobacterium nucleatum

FTC

Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma

GC

Gastric Carcinoma

GIST

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

GM

Gut microbiome

HCC

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

L.johnsonii

Lactobacillus johnsonii

L.paracasei

Lactobacillus paracasei

LAMP3+

Lysosomal associated membrane protein 3

LLC

Lewis Lung Carcinoma

LPS

Lipopolysaccharides

LSCC

Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

LUAD

Lung Adenocarcinoma

MTC

Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

NK

Natural killer cell

NSCLC

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

OSCC

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PC

Pancreatic Carcinoma

PD-1

Programmed death-1

PDAC

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PD-L1

Programmed cell death ligand 1

PSA

Prostate Carcinoma

PTC

Papillary Thyroid Cancer

SMO

Spermine oxidase

TAM

Tumor-associated macrophages

TC

Thyroid Carcinoma

TM

Tumor microbiome

TME

Tumor Microenvironment

Tregs

Regulatory T cells

TSH

Thyroid stimulating hormone

γH2AX

Histone H2AX

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.82460577), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 20232BAB206130; 20252BAC250083), and the Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 202510311; 202310493).

Footnotes

Edited by: Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States

Reviewed by: Chen Xue, Zhejiang University, China

Fatemeh Mahmoudian, Semnan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran

Author contributions

WC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JY: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GF: Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZH: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1. Liu J, Huo J, Zhang Z, Xiao X, Li S, Wu Y, et al. Metabolomics-based analysis of the correlation between lipid metabolites and thyroid carcinoma. BMC Bio/Technol. (2025) 25:107. doi:  10.1186/s12896-025-01045-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Laha D, Nilubol N, Boufraqech M. New therapies for advanced thyroid cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2020) 11:82. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2020.00082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pizzato M, Li M, Vignat J, Laversanne M, Singh D, La Vecchia C, et al. The epidemiological landscape of thyroid cancer worldwide: GLOBOCAN estimates for incidence and mortality rates in 2020. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2022) 10:264–72. doi:  10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00035-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. (2025) 75:10–45. doi:  10.3322/caac.21871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Popoveniuc G, Jonklaas J. Thyroid nodules. Med Clin North Am. (2012) 96:329–49. doi:  10.1016/j.mcna.2012.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ali M, Abedulla S, Abed ZA, Jawhar NM. Neck masses as the first presentation of occult papillary thyroid carcinoma case series. Egypt J Hosp Med. (2023) 1:465–70. doi:  10.21608/ejhm.2023.279662 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ashorobi D, Anastasopoulou C, Lopez PP. Follicular thyroid cancer. In: Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL: (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pelizzo MR, Mazza EI, Mian C, Merante Boschin I. Medullary thyroid carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. (2023) 23:943–57. doi:  10.1080/14737140.2023.2247566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Menon G, Kashyap S, Naing PT, Mathias PM, Giwa AO. Anaplastic thyroid cancer. In: Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL: (2025). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Forma A, Kłodnicka K, Pająk W, Flieger J, Teresińska B, Januszewski J, et al. Thyroid cancer: Epidemiology, classification, risk factors, diagnostic and prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:5173. doi:  10.3390/ijms26115173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McIver B, Hay ID, Giuffrida DF, Dvorak CE, Grant CS, Thompson GB, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a 50-year experience at a single institution. Surgery. (2001) 130:1028–34. doi:  10.1067/msy.2001.118266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cabanillas ME, Dadu R, Ferrarotto R, Gule-Monroe M, Liu S, Fellman B, et al. Anti-programmed death ligand 1 plus targeted therapy in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. (2024) 10:1672–80. doi:  10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. da Silva TN, Rodrigues R, Saramago A, Pires C, Rito M, Horta M, et al. Target therapy for BRAF mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer: a clinical and molecular study. Eur J Endocrinol. (2023) 188:31–8. doi:  10.1093/ejendo/lvac011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sun C, Liao L. Research progress of the molecular mechanism of antithyroid cancer activity of shikonin. Curr Mol Pharmacol. (2024) 17:e040923220678. doi:  10.2174/1874467217666230904104414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Erasha AM, El-Gendy H, Aly AS, Fernández-Ortiz M, Sayed RKA. The role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in advancing cancer therapies: Immune system interactions, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the role of exosomes and inflammasomes. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:2716. doi:  10.3390/ijms26062716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gou H, Yang H, Cheng J, He S, Luo C, Chen X, et al. YY2 serves as a novel prognostic biomarker correlated with immune microenvironment and glycolysis in esophageal carcinoma. Curr Genomics. (2025) 26:312–28. doi:  10.2174/0113892029358348250124064940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang S, Huang J, Jiang Z, Tong H, Ma X, Liu Y. Tumor microbiome: roles in tumor initiation, progression, and therapy. Mol BioMed. (2025) 6:9. doi:  10.1186/s43556-025-00248-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Xue C, Chu Q, Zheng Q, Yuan X, Su Y, Bao Z, et al. Current understanding of the intratumoral microbiome in various tumors. Cell Rep Med. (2023) 4:100884. doi:  10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liang D, Zhang Q, Pang Y, Yan R, Ke Y. SGSM2 in uveal melanoma: Implications for survival, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity. Protein Pept Lett. (2024) 31:894–905. doi:  10.2174/0109298665341953240926041613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhu Z, Cai J, Hou W, Xu K, Wu X, Song Y, et al. Microbiome and spatially resolved metabolomics analysis reveal the anticancer role of gut Akkermansia muciniphila by crosstalk with intratumoral microbiota and reprogramming tumoral metabolism in mice. Gut Microbes. (2023) 15:2166700. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2023.2166700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jia D, Kuang Z, Wang L. The role of microbial indole metabolites in tumor. Gut Microbes. (2024) 16:2409209. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2024.2409209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ma Y, Chen H, Li H, Zheng M, Zuo X, Wang W, et al. Intratumor microbiome-derived butyrate promotes lung cancer metastasis. Cell Rep Med. (2024) 5:101488. doi:  10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Jiao J, Zheng Y, Zhang Q, Xia D, Zhang L, Ma N. Saliva microbiome changes in thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:989188. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2022.989188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Liang Z, Gao J, Zheng Q. Multi-omics analysis reveals intratumoral microbiota as modulators of the immune environment within thyroid cancer. Transl Cancer Res. (2025) 14:6681–93. doi:  10.21037/tcr-2025-762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Xie Z, Li X, He Y, Wu S, Wang S, Sun J, et al. Immune cell confrontation in the papillary thyroid carcinoma microenvironment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2020) 11:570604. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2020.570604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hou Y, Lin B, Xu T, Jiang J, Luo S, Chen W, et al. The neurotransmitter calcitonin gene-related peptide shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in medullary thyroid cancer. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:5555. doi:  10.1038/s41467-024-49824-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Han PZ, Ye WD, Yu PC, Tan LC, Shi X, Chen XF, et al. A distinct tumor microenvironment makes anaplastic thyroid cancer more lethal but immunotherapy sensitive than papillary thyroid cancer. JCI Insight. (2024) 9:e173712. doi:  10.1172/jci.insight.173712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wang T, Shi J, Li L, Zhou X, Zhang H, Zhang X, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals inter-tumor heterogeneity in bilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:840811. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.840811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhang Q, Song K, Li C, Song X, Zhou J. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals the potential heterogeneous mechanism of CD8(+) T cell immune dysfunction in thyroid cancer. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:35861. doi:  10.1038/s41598-025-19995-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wang Z, Ji X, Zhang Y, Yang F, Su H, Zhang H, et al. Interactions between LAMP3+ dendritic cells and T-cell subpopulations promote immune evasion in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. (2024) 12:e008983. doi:  10.1136/jitc-2024-008983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. He W, Sun Y, Ge J, Wang X, Lin B, Yu S, et al. STRA6 regulates tumor immune microenvironment and is a prognostic marker in BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid carcinoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1076640. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2023.1076640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jing R, Wu N, Zhang Q, Liu J, Zhao Y, Zeng S, et al. DPP4 promotes an immunoenhancing tumor microenvironment through exhausted CD8+ T cells with activating IL13-IL13RA2 axis in papillary thyroid cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. (2025) 145:113760. doi:  10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zheng J, Liu W, Wang X, Li H, Wang Z, Ai Z. Curcumin enhances anti-tumor immunity in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma by elevating CD8+ T cell function and downregulating the AKT/mTORC1/STAT3/PD-L1 axis. Pathol Res Pract. (2025) 269:155898. doi:  10.1016/j.prp.2025.155898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Galati D, Zanotta S. Dendritic cell and cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:4253. doi:  10.3390/ijms24044253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ma T, Chu X, Wang J, Li X, Zhang Y, Tong D, et al. Pan-cancer analyses refine the single-cell portrait of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells. Cancer Res. (2025) 85:3596–613. doi:  10.1158/0008-5472.Can-24-3595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Heras-Murillo I, Adán-Barrientos I, Galán M, Wculek SK, Sancho D. Dendritic cells as orchestrators of anticancer immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2024) 21:257–77. doi:  10.1038/s41571-024-00859-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen D, Jin Z, Chu H, Wu Y, Bian Y, Yuan T, et al. DNASE1L3-expressing dendritic cells promote CD8(+) T cell function and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy efficacy by degrading neutrophil extracellular traps. Cancer Cell. (2025) 43:1758–1775.e8. doi:  10.1016/j.ccell.2025.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Jiang H, Kuang L, Zhang T, Zhao X. Annexin A1-FPR1 interaction in dendritic cells promotes immune microenvironment modulation in thyroid cancer. Cell Biol Toxicol. (2025) 41:97. doi:  10.1007/s10565-025-10042-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gao J, Liang Y, Wang L. Shaping polarization of tumor-associated macrophages in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:888713. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.888713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lv J, Feng ZP, Chen FK, Liu C, Jia L, Liu PJ, et al. M2-like tumor-associated macrophages-secreted Wnt1 and Wnt3a promotes dedifferentiation and metastasis via activating β-catenin pathway in thyroid cancer. Mol Carcinog. (2021) 60:25–37. doi:  10.1002/mc.23268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mazzoni M, Mauro G, Erreni M, Romeo P, Minna E, Vizioli MG, et al. Senescent thyrocytes and thyroid tumor cells induce M2-like macrophage polarization of human monocytes via a PGE2-dependent mechanism. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2019) 38:208. doi:  10.1186/s13046-019-1198-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zheng C, Hei H, Zhai Y, Gong W, Zhang R, Zhang S. CAFs-released exosomal CREB1 promotes cell progression and immune evasion in thyroid cancer via the positive regulation of CCL20. Autoimmunity. (2025) 58:2458324. doi:  10.1080/08916934.2025.2458324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wang Y, Li X, Gang Q, Huang Y, Liu M, Zhang H, et al. Pathomics and single-cell analysis of papillary thyroid carcinoma reveal the pro-metastatic influence of cancer-associated fibroblasts. BMC Cancer. (2024) 24:710. doi:  10.1186/s12885-024-12459-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hou Y, Wang Q, Su L, Zhu Y, Xiao Y, Feng F. Increased tumor-associated mast cells facilitate thyroid cancer progression by inhibiting CD8+ T cell function through galectin-9. Braz J Med Biol Res. (2023) 56:e12370. doi:  10.1590/1414-431X2023e12370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cuevas-Ramos G, Petit CR, Marcq I, Boury M, Oswald E, Nougayrède JP. Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers genomic instability in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:11537–42. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1001261107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zhang JW, Zhang D, Yin HS, Zhang H, Hong KQ, Yuan JP, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression and chemoresistance by enhancing the secretion of chemotherapy-induced senescence-associated secretory phenotype via activation of DNA damage response pathway. Gut Microbes. (2023) 15:2197836. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2023.2197836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Łaniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Urol. (2020) 17:232–50. doi:  10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fahrer J, Huelsenbeck J, Jaurich H, Dörsam B, Frisan T, Eich M, et al. Cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) is a radiomimetic agent and induces persistent levels of DNA double-strand breaks in human fibroblasts. DNA Repair (Amst). (2014) 18:31–43. doi:  10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. He Z, Gharaibeh RZ, Newsome RC, Pope JL, Dougherty MW, Tomkovich S, et al. Campylobacter jejuni promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through the action of cytolethal distending toxin. Gut. (2019) 68:289–300. doi:  10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nougayrède JP, Homburg S, Taieb F, Boury M, Brzuszkiewicz E, Gottschalk G, et al. Escherichia coli induces DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Science. (2006) 313:848–51. doi:  10.1126/science.1127059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Dejea CM, Fathi P, Craig JM, Boleij A, Taddese R, Geis AL, et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis harbor colonic biofilms containing tumorigenic bacteria. Science. (2018) 359:592–7. doi:  10.1126/science.aah3648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Goodwin AC, Destefano Shields CE, Wu S, Huso DL, Wu X, Murray-Stewart TR, et al. Polyamine catabolism contributes to enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-induced colon tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:15354–9. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1010203108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhao F, An R, Ma Y, Yu S, Gao Y, Wang Y, et al. Integrated spatial multi-omics profiling of Fusobacterium nucleatum in breast cancer unveils its role in tumour microenvironment modulation and cancer progression. Clin Transl Med. (2025) 15:e70273. doi:  10.1002/ctm2.70273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Udayasuryan B, Ahmad RN, Nguyen TTD, Umaña A, Monét Roberts L, Sobol P, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces proliferation and migration in pancreatic cancer cells through host autocrine and paracrine signaling. Sci Signal. (2022) 15:eabn4948. doi:  10.1126/scisignal.abn4948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sha G, Wu Z, Wang B, Ding Y, Xiao Z, Zhang W, et al. Intratumorally specific microbial-derived lipopolysaccharide contributes to non-small cell lung cancer progression. Virulence. (2025) 16:2548626. doi:  10.1080/21505594.2025.2548626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wang X, Fang Y, Liang W, Cai Y, Wong CC, Wang J, et al. Gut-liver translocation of pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae promotes hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Nat Microbiol. (2025) 10:169–84. doi:  10.1038/s41564-024-01890-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Deng J, Zhang J, Su M, Li J, Su Y, Zhong Q, et al. Fusobacterium mortiferum and its metabolite 5-aminovaleric acid promote the development of colorectal cancer in obese individuals through Wnt/β-catenin pathway by DKK2. Gut Microbes. (2025) 17:2502138. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2025.2502138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Xie M, Yang T, Liu Q, Ning Z, Feng L, Min X. The influence of Lactobacillus johnsonii on tumor growth and lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Commun Biol. (2025) 8:419. doi:  10.1038/s42003-025-07856-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Yang R, Yang Y, Wu L, He K, Bi D, Teng L. Lactobacillus paracasei ZJUZ2-3 inhibits gastrointestinal tumors via the IAA-induced AHR/MTDH/NF-κB axis. Int J Biol Sci. (2025) 21:6522–41. doi:  10.7150/ijbs.114602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Gu J, Xu X, Li X, Yue L, Zhu X, Chen Q, et al. Tumor-resident microbiota contributes to colorectal cancer liver metastasis by lactylation and immune modulation. Oncogene. (2024) 43:2389–404. doi:  10.1038/s41388-024-03080-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. He Z, Yu J, Gong J, Wu J, Zong X, Luo Z, et al. Campylobacter jejuni-derived cytolethal distending toxin promotes colorectal cancer metastasis. Cell Host Microbe. (2024) 32:2080–2091.e6. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2024.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Xu C, Fan L, Lin Y, Shen W, Qi Y, Zhang Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer metastasis through miR-1322/CCL20 axis and M2 polarization. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1980347. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2021.1980347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zheng S, Li M, Xu C, Jia D, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer cells adhesion to endothelial cells and facilitates extravasation and metastasis by inducing ALPK1/NF-κB/ICAM1 axis. Gut Microbes. (2022) 14:2038852. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2022.2038852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in cancer progression and therapy. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:8381–95. doi:  10.1002/jcp.27740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ma W, Zhang L, Chen W, Chang Z, Tu J, Qin Y, et al. Microbiota enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-secreted BFT-1 promotes breast cancer cell stemness and chemoresistance through its functional receptor NOD1. Protein Cell. (2024) 15:419–40. doi:  10.1093/procel/pwae005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Cui B, Luo H, He B, Liu X, Lv D, Zhang X, et al. Gut dysbiosis conveys psychological stress to activate LRP5/β-catenin pathway promoting cancer stemness. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2025) 10:79. doi:  10.1038/s41392-025-02159-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Chen YF, Fan CS, Hung YC, Chien PJ, Tsai WH, Yeh YT, et al. Heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GMNL-346 exerts anti-oral cancer effect by suppressing cancer stem cell activity and rebalancing gut microbiota dysbiosis. Int J Biol Macromol. (2025) 334:149033. doi:  10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.149033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Jiang SS, Xie YL, Xiao XY, Kang ZR, Lin XL, Zhang L, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum-derived succinic acid induces tumor resistance to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cell Host Microbe. (2023) 31:781–797.e9. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2023.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Zhang T, Li Y, Zhai E, Zhao R, Qian Y, Huang Z, et al. Intratumoral Fusobacterium nucleatum recruits tumor-associated neutrophils to promote gastric cancer progression and immune evasion. Cancer Res. (2025) 85:1819–41. doi:  10.1158/0008-5472.Can-24-2580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Tan Q, Ma X, Yang B, Liu Y, Xie Y, Wang X, et al. Periodontitis pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis via neutrophil elastase from tumor-associated neutrophils. Gut Microbes. (2022) 14:2073785. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2022.2073785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Huang Y, Zhu N, Zheng X, Liu Y, Lu H, Yin X, et al. Intratumor microbiome analysis identifies positive association between Megasphaera and survival of Chinese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:785422. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.785422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wu H, Leng X, Liu Q, Mao T, Jiang T, Liu Y, et al. Intratumoral microbiota composition regulates chemoimmunotherapy response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. (2023) 83:3131–44. doi:  10.1158/0008-5472.Can-22-2593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Li X, Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang J, Qi Y, Bi X, et al. Intratumor microbiome-derived butyrate enhances progesterone sensitivity by inducing ferroptosis in endometrial cancer. Pharmacol Res. (2025) 219:107902. doi:  10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Liu NN, Yi CX, Wei LQ, Zhou JA, Jiang T, Hu CC, et al. The intratumor mycobiome promotes lung cancer progression via myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Cell. (2023) 41:1927–1944.e9. doi:  10.1016/j.ccell.2023.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Sugimura N, Li Q, Chu ESH, Lau HCH, Fong W, Liu W, et al. Lactobacillus gallinarum modulates the gut microbiota and produces anti-cancer metabolites to protect against colorectal tumourigenesis. Gut. (2021) 71:2011–21. doi:  10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Li Q, Hu W, Liu WX, Zhao LY, Huang D, Liu XD, et al. Streptococcus thermophilus inhibits colorectal tumorigenesis through secreting β-galactosidase. Gastroenterology. (2021) 160:1179–1193.e14. doi:  10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Chen G, Gao C, Jiang S, Cai Q, Li R, Sun Q, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane vesicles activate autophagy to promote oral cancer metastasis. J Adv Res. (2024) 56:167–79. doi:  10.1016/j.jare.2023.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to colorectal cancer by modulating autophagy. Cell. (2017) 170:548–563.e16. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Dong J, Wang B, Xiao Y, Liu J, Wang Q, Xiao H, et al. Roseburia intestinalis sensitizes colorectal cancer to radiotherapy through the butyrate/OR51E1/RALB axis. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:113846. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ding X, Ting NL, Wong CC, Huang P, Jiang L, Liu C, et al. Bacteroides fragilis promotes chemoresistance in colorectal cancer, and its elimination by phage VA7 restores chemosensitivity. Cell Host Microbe. (2025) 33:941–956.e10. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2025.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. de Oliveira Alves N, Dalmasso G, Nikitina D, Vaysse A, Ruez R, Ledoux L, et al. The colibactin-producing Escherichia coli alters the tumor microenvironment to immunosuppressive lipid overload facilitating colorectal cancer progression and chemoresistance. Gut Microbes. (2024) 16:2320291. doi:  10.1080/19490976.2024.2320291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhang S, Yang Y, Weng W, Guo B, Cai G, Ma Y, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil by upregulation of BIRC3 expression in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2019) 38:14. doi:  10.1186/s13046-018-0985-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Dai D, Yang Y, Yang Y, Dang T, Xiao J, Wang W, et al. Alterations of thyroid microbiota across different thyroid microhabitats in patients with thyroid carcinoma. J Transl Med. (2021) 19:488. doi:  10.1186/s12967-021-03167-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Yu X, Jiang W, Kosik RO, Song Y, Luo Q, Qiao T, et al. Gut microbiota changes and its potential relations with thyroid carcinoma. J Adv Res. (2021) 35:61–70. doi:  10.1016/j.jare.2021.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Feng J, Zhao F, Sun J, Lin B, Zhao L, Liu Y, et al. Alterations in the gut microbiota and metabolite profiles of thyroid carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer. (2019) 144:2728–45. doi:  10.1002/ijc.32007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao C, Xu Q, Liang C, Yang Y, et al. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is associated with thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules and correlated with clinical index of thyroid function. Endocrine. (2019) 64:564–74. doi:  10.1007/s12020-018-1831-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Shin NR, Bose S, Wang JH, Nam YD, Song EJ, Lim DW, et al. Chemically or surgically induced thyroid dysfunction altered gut microbiota in rat models. FASEB J. (2020) 34:8686–701. doi:  10.1096/fj.201903091RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Ludgate ME, Masetti G, Soares P. The relationship between the gut microbiota and thyroid disorders. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2024) 20:511–25. doi:  10.1038/s41574-024-01003-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Qiu K, Xie Q, Zeng D, Huang Y, Lin T. Intratumor microbiota Delftialacustiris correlated with METTL3 to control development of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. (2026) 26:103. doi:  10.1186/s12935-026-04183-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Lim H, Devesa SS, Sosa JA, Check D, Kitahara CM. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1974-2013. Jama. (2017) 317:1338–48. doi:  10.1001/jama.2017.2719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. John D, Yalamarty R, Barakchi A, Chen T, Chakladar J, Li WT, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals dysregulation of the mycobiome and archaeome and distinct oncogenic characteristics according to subtype and gender in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:3148. doi:  10.3390/ijms24043148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Gou J, Hu Z, Cai M, Zhang S, Zhou S, Feng X, et al. Microbial biomarkers and sex-associated gut microbiota characteristics of thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer. (2025) 25:1688. doi:  10.1186/s12885-025-14986-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Gnanasekar A, Castaneda G, Iyangar A, Magesh S, Perez D, Chakladar J, et al. The intratumor microbiome predicts prognosis across gender and subtypes in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. (2021) 19:1986–97. doi:  10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Yuan L, Yang P, Wei G, Hu X, Chen S, Lu J, et al. Tumor microbiome diversity influences papillary thyroid cancer invasion. Commun Biol. (2022) 5:864. doi:  10.1038/s42003-022-03814-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Wong-Rolle A, Wei HK, Zhao C, Jin C. Unexpected guests in the tumor microenvironment: microbiome in cancer. Protein Cell. (2021) 12:426–35. doi:  10.1007/s13238-020-00813-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Liu S, Xiong X, Hao T, Shi X, Zhao Y. The intratumor microbiota and thyroid cancer: a review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2025) 16:1536155. doi:  10.3389/fendo.2025.1536155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Duan H, Wang L, Huangfu M, Li H. The impact of microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids on macrophage activities in disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 165:115276. doi:  10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sun J, Chen S, Zang D, Sun H, Sun Y, Chen J. Butyrate as a promising therapeutic target in cancer: From pathogenesis to clinic (Review). Int J Oncol. (2024) 64:44. doi:  10.3892/ijo.2024.5632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Chen L, Wang C, Zhang H, Wu Y, Li F, Shi H, et al. Characterization of microbiota dysbiosis in papillary thyroid carcinoma and benign thyroid nodules: low abundance of intestinal butyrate-producing bacteria. BMC Microbiol. (2025) 25:691. doi:  10.1186/s12866-025-04427-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Perona M, Thomasz L, Rossich L, Rodriguez C, Pisarev MA, Rosemblit C, et al. Radiosensitivity enhancement of human thyroid carcinoma cells by the inhibitors of histone deacetylase sodium butyrate and valproic acid. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2018) 478:141–50. doi:  10.1016/j.mce.2018.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka K, Marano L, Merola E, Roviello F, Połom K. Sodium butyrate in both prevention and supportive treatment of colorectal cancer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:1023806. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2022.1023806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Chang W, Kang L, Lan T, Zhou C, Pang B, Jiang X, et al. Multi-niche microbial profiling in papillary thyroid carcinoma and thyroid nodules: linking oral, gut, and tissue microbiota. J Inflammation Res. (2025) 18:14391–404. doi:  10.2147/JIR.S552936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Fernandes A, Oliveira A, Carvalho AL, Soares R, Barata P. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in differentiated thyroid cancer patients treated with radioiodine. Nutrients. (2023) 15:2680. doi:  10.3390/nu15122680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Jiang X, Liu Q, Xu D, Pang H, Shi Y. Integrated microbiome and metabolome analysis reveals a novel interplay between gut microbiota and metabolites in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. BMC Microbiol. (2025) 25:346. doi:  10.1186/s12866-025-03877-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES