Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the most significant global public health challenges, as it represents the world’s leading infectious cause of death. The clinical efficacy of currently available anti-TB drugs is increasingly compromised due to the growing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains, side effects, and prolonged treatment times. This scenario highlights the urgent need to identify new anti-TB drugs with alternative mechanisms of action and improved anti-TB activity and bioavailability. In this context, natural products derived from microorganisms represent a key source of chemical diversity for drug discovery. Actinomycetes, fungi, and other environmental microbes produce a wide range of secondary metabolites with broad antimicrobial activity. These compounds can interfere with essential bacterial structures and processes, including membrane integrity, redox homeostasis, protein synthesis, and DNA replication. This review aims to evaluate new microbial natural products for their antibacterial activity, focusing on their efficacy, mechanisms of action, chemical nature, and potential clinical applications, with the aim of informing the development of new anti-TB agents.
Keywords: tuberculosis, mycobacteria, microbial natural products, antimycobacterial activity, anti-tubercular agents
1. Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) is currently one of the top 10 infectious causes of death worldwide. In 1993, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared TB a global health crisis [1]. Unfortunately, even after more than three decades, this infection still poses a serious threat. According to the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report 2025, approximately 10.7 million people developed TB, of whom 1.23 million died from the infection. Globally, the TB incidence is estimated at 131 cases per 100,000 population, with a case fatality rate of 11.5%. Approximately 87% of global TB cases were reported in 30 countries, including India (25%), Indonesia (10%), the Philippines (6.8%), China (6.5%), Pakistan (6.3%), Nigeria (4.8%), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (3.9%), and Bangladesh (3.6%) [2]. After three years of rising cases due to healthcare disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of cases has seen a slight decline. Specifically, incidence rates decreased by 1.7%, returning to levels observed in 2020 [3]. However, these advances are insufficient to meet the targets proposed by the WHO. In fact, from 2015 to 2024, the incidence reduction was only 12%, not 50% as expected [4].
TB is caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), which includes the following Mycobacterium species: Mycobacterium africanum (M. africanum), Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), Mycobacterium cannetti (M. canettii), Mycobacterium caprae (M. caprae), Mycobacterium microti (M. microti), Mycobacterium mungi (M. mungi), Mycobacterium orygis (M. orygis), Mycobacterium pinnipedii (M. pinnipedii), Mycobacterium suricattae (M. suricattae) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) [5]. Despite sharing more than 99% genetic homology, they exhibit significant variability in their biochemical profiles, pathogenicity, and the infected hosts. Regarding the latter aspect, MTBC includes zoonotic species and strains exclusively adapted to humans or animals. Specifically, M. tuberculosis, M. africanum, and M. canettii primarily affect humans. M. bovis, M. caprae, and M. orygis have zoonotic potential, while M. mungi and M. suricattae mainly infect animal hosts [6].
Current drug therapy for TB is severely hampered by lengthy treatment durations, side effects, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains. Drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB), defined as sensitivity to isoniazid and rifampin, is traditionally treated with a 6-month regimen of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, although shorter regimens are now available for selected patients [7]. Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) includes isoniazid-resistant (Hr-TB), rifampin-resistant (RR-TB), multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR-TB), and extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) TB. Treatment is tailored based on resistance profile and has progressively shifted toward shorter, all-oral regimens incorporating newer agents such as bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, delamanid, and clofazimine [8]. Current WHO recommendations include 6-month regimens for many patients with MDR/RR-TB, while longer, individualized regimens remain necessary for patients with more extensive drug resistance [9]. Side effects of anti-tuberculosis drugs are common with both first- and second-line drugs, with more varied and severe reactions in the latter. They generally include gastrointestinal problems, pancreatitis, hepatitis, rash, and fever [10].
Globally, 390,000 cases were reported in 2024. Approximately two-thirds of global TB cases occurred in India (25%), Indonesia (10%), the Philippines (6.8%), China (6.5%), Pakistan (6.3%), Nigeria (4.8%), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (3.9%), and Bangladesh (3.6%) [11]. Although TB remains one of the most prevalent and globally impactful mycobacterial diseases, infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) should not be underestimated and represent an emerging therapeutic challenge. NTM comprises over 150 species, including clinically relevant pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium abscessus, which cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary infections. These microorganisms exhibit intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, sharing several mechanisms of resistance with MTBC members, including reduced drug permeability due to the complex mycobacterial cell envelope, enzymatic drug modification, target alteration, and active efflux pumps. However, given the global disease burden, widespread clinical impact, and the increasing emergence of drug-resistant MTBC strains, this review focuses primarily on tuberculosis caused by MTBC.
In view of these challenges, the detection of innovative treatments with alternative mechanisms of action, shorter treatment durations, and efficacy against resistant strains becomes crucial [12].
Natural products produced by microorganisms constitute an important reservoir of biologically active compounds. They exhibit a wide variety of pharmacological properties, including antimicrobial, antitumor, and immunomodulatory activity [13]. Over the last century, microbial natural products have contributed significantly to the discovery and development of drugs for the treatment of infectious diseases. A well-known example is streptomycin, one of the first antibiotics used in TB treatment. It is an aminoglycoside antibiotic originally isolated from the soil actinomycete Streptomyces griseus (S. griseus) as a secondary metabolite. Its discovery represented a breakthrough in antimicrobial treatment and clearly highlighted the essential role of microbial-derived natural products in the development of anti-TB drugs [14].
Given the continuing public health threat posed by tuberculosis, including the rise in multidrug-resistant strains, this review examines microbial natural products with demonstrated activity against the MTBC. We describe, for each compound, its chemical characteristics, antitubercular potency, underlying mechanisms of action, and clinical translatability. This synthesis is intended to serve as a foundation for the rational design and development of next-generation anti-TB agents, in support of global tuberculosis control efforts.
2. Targets of M. tuberculosis for Drug Discovery
2.1. Cell-Wall Biosynthesis
The highly complex architecture of the MTBC cell wall plays a central role in virulence, intrinsic antibiotic resistance, and host–pathogen interactions. The mycoyl–arabinogalactan–peptidoglycan (mAGP) complex constitutes the core structure of the MTBC cell wall [15].
Peptidoglycan (PG) forms the basal layer of the mAGP and lies outside the plasma membrane. It is essential for maintaining the cell’s shape and structural integrity and provides resistance to external osmotic pressure. PG is formed by the succession of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc), linked by a β1 → 4 bond [16]. Arabinogalactan (AG) is a heteropolysaccharide that links peptidoglycan (PG) to external mycolic acids (MAs). AG is a heteropolysaccharide that links PG to external MAs. It consists of three main domains: linker, core, and outer unit. The core contains galactose chains, while the outer domain is formed by arabinan, a highly branched structure consisting of arabinofuranose (Araf) residues linked mainly by α(1 → 5) bonds, with α(1 → 3) branches [15]. The outer layer of the cell wall is composed of MAs, covalently linked to GA. They consist of very-long-chain α-alkylated and β-hydroxylated fatty acids, typically between 60 and 90 carbon atoms. Their structural variations, including oxygenated and non-oxygenated forms, enhance resistance to acid-alcohols and limit the penetration of conventional antibiotics [17]. The cell envelope also contains glycolipids and lipoglycans, including lipoarabinomannan (LAM), anchored to the plasma membrane via phosphatidylinositol, and phosphatidylinositol mannosides (PIM), which contribute to cell-wall organization, growth, virulence, immune evasion, and modulation of host responses [18] (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of mycobacterial cell envelope, characterized by peptidoglycan covalently linked to arabinogalactan, which in turn is esterified with mycolic acids. Lipoarabinomannans are present, which serve as linking structures. Glycolipids, involved in virulence and host interaction, are also present on the external surface.
Due to the enormous complexity of the MTBC cell-wall structure, several antimicrobials have been developed to block its assembly or the synthesis of precursors. Therefore, AG, LAM and MAs represent specific and major anti-TB targets [19]. AG and LAM biosynthesis is mediated by arabinosyltransferases encoded by the emb (embA, embB, embC) and aft (aftA–D) gene clusters. EmbA/B primarily catalyze AG elongation, whereas EmbC contributes to LAM biosynthesis. Aft enzymes sequentially mediate arabinan initiation, branching, extension, and the addition of terminal Araf residues required for MA attachment [20,21]. Ethambutol (EMB), the only clinically used drug acting on this pathway, inhibits the EmbABC complex, disrupting AG/LAM assembly, reducing MA attachment sites, and compromising cell-wall integrity [22]. EMB is used for active TB at 15–25 mg/kg/day in combination therapy [23]. MA biosynthesis involves two fatty acid synthase systems: FAS-I, which generates fatty acid precursors, and FAS-II, which elongates them. Within FAS-II, the NADH-dependent enoyl-ACP reductase InhA catalyzes a key step in the formation of meromycolic acids, which are subsequently incorporated into mature MAs [24]. Isoniazid (INH) and ethionamide (ETH) inhibit InhA following activation by the mycobacterial enzymes KatG and EthA, respectively, thereby disrupting MA biosynthesis [25,26]. INH is used for active and latent tuberculosis at doses of 5–15 mg/kg/day, whereas ETH is used primarily for active drug-resistant tuberculosis at doses of 15–20 mg/kg/day, both in combination with other antituberculosis drugs [25,26,27].
2.2. Targeting Nucleic Acid
The MTBC genome possesses remarkable characteristics that explain its high resistance to environmental and host factors, as well as its stable evolution over time. It is approximately 4.4 Mb in size, with a high GC content (~65%), which contributes to adaptation to extreme conditions [28]. The MTBC genome is highly conserved and primarily evolves through clonal reproduction, with minimal horizontal gene transfer. Therefore, strain diversity mainly arises from mutations accumulated through DNA replication errors, intracellular oxidative stress, and incomplete DNA repair [29]. It contains approximately 4000 genes, including 3900–3950 protein-coding genes involved in essential processes such as intermediary metabolism, DNA replication and repair, cell-wall biosynthesis, virulence, and adaptation to host and environmental stresses [30]. The remaining genes include approximately 45–50 tRNA genes, 3–4 rRNA operons, and numerous small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) involved in gene regulation in response to stress [31]. Despite their essential roles, nucleic acid biosynthesis and associated cellular processes remain largely unexplored as therapeutic targets, representing promising opportunities for antituberculosis drug discovery.
2.2.1. DNA Replication
DNA replication in MTBC is mediated by a multiprotein replisome that includes DNA polymerase III, DnaB helicase, DnaG primase, the β clamp, and the clamp-loading complex [32]. MTBC possesses simplified replication machinery compared to Escherichia coli (E. coli), lacking several accessory components while retaining functions necessary for chromosome duplication [33]. Replication is initiated by the binding of DnaA-ATP to OriC, followed by DnaB loading and DNA strand separation; notably, MTBC lacks the DnaC helicase loader present in E. coli [33]. Its replisome also lacks the χ, ψ, γ, and θ subunits, with the absence of θ possibly affecting replication fidelity [34,35,36,37,38]. Despite the essentiality of these components, no currently approved anti-tuberculosis drug directly targets the replisome or DNA polymerase machinery, highlighting this pathway as a potential target for drug discovery [39].
DNA supercoiling is regulated by topoisomerases that maintain DNA conformation during replication and transcription. In M. tuberculosis, TopA is the only type I topoisomerase, while DNA gyrase is the only type II topoisomerase and is an established target of fluoroquinolones [40]. DNA gyrase is composed of the subunits GyrA and GyrB: GyrA binds to DNA and mediates strand cleavage/religation, while GyrB provides the ATPase activity required for catalysis [41]. Fluoroquinolones, including levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, and gatifloxacin, target GyrA, stabilizing DNA cleavage intermediates and causing the accumulation of double-strand breaks [10]. The recommended doses are 400 mg/day for moxifloxacin, 10–15 mg/kg/day for levofloxacin, 400 mg/day for gatifloxacin and 400 mg twice daily for ofloxacin, administered orally or, if appropriate, intravenously in combination regimens [42].
2.2.2. DNA Repair
Continuous DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, coupled with the absence of the θ subunit involved in stabilizing polymerase proofreading, threatens the stability of the MTBC genome [43]. There are three major repair pathways, including mismatch repair (MMR), base excision repair (BER), and nucleotide excision repair (NER) [44]. The NucS-dependent MMR system corrects post-replicative mismatches through β-clamp-mediated recognition and incision, followed by DNA resynthesis and ligation. NucS deficiency markedly increases spontaneous mutation rates [45,46,47]. BER repairs oxidized, deaminated, and alkylated bases through DNA glycosylase, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerase, and ligase. Instead, NER removes bulky DNA lesions via the UvrABC complex, followed by UvrD-mediated excision, resynthesis, and ligation [48,49]. Despite their importance for genome stability, DNA repair systems are not currently targeted by approved anti-TB drugs and therefore represent promising targets for novel therapeutic strategies.
2.2.3. DNA Transcription
Bacterial RNA polymerase is the central enzyme of transcription. The enzymatic core of RNA polymerase is composed of the α2ββ′ω subunits. The α subunits mediate enzyme assembly and transcription regulation. The β′ and β subunits form the catalytic center, responsible for binding to DNA and incorporating ribonucleotides into the nascent RNA strand. Finally, the ω subunit stabilizes the enzyme complex, contributing to its functional stability [50]. RNA polymerase recognizes specific promoters owing to its bound sigma factor. During active growth, the enzyme binds to σA. It recognizes the −35 and −10 regions of the promoter via the σ4 and σ2 domains, respectively. These interactions are essential for the local unwinding of the DNA double helix and the formation of the open transcription complex (RPo) [51]. When the bacterial complex experiences stress, other sigma factors come into play, reprogramming gene expression to favor latency rather than growth, including SigH, SigE and others [52]. Among anti-TB drugs, rifampicin affects the transcriptional process. This first-line drug interacts with the β-subunit of RNA polymerase, inhibiting mRNA synthesis [53]. Rifampicin is administered orally, and in selected cases intravenously, at a daily dose of 10–20 mg/kg as part of combination regimens for the treatment of active TB and selected cases of latent TB infection [54] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of genome features, DNA replication, DNA repair, and transcription mechanisms in MTBC, focusing on differences from E. coli and associated antimicrobial drugs.
| Process/Section | Components and Enzymes Involved | Main Differences Compared to E. coli | Associated Drugs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome Characteristics | ~4000 genes (~3900–3950 protein-coding, 45–50 tRNAs, 3–4 rRNA operons, sRNAs). Size: ~4.4 Mb. GC content: 65%. | Predominantly clonal evolution, without horizontal gene transfer. High environmental and host resistance. | No antibiotics (represent a potential target for novel drug discovery). |
| DNA Replication | Replisome: DnaA-ATP, DnaB helicase, DnaG primase, beta-clamp, clamp-loading complex, core polymerase (alpha, epsilon). | The DnaC helicase loader and the chi/psi/gamma subunits are missing; the replisome is more compact. The theta subunit, which influences proofreading stabilization, is missing. | No antibiotics (represent a potential target for novel drug discovery). |
| DNA Repair | Mismatch repair: NucS system; BER enzymes; NER: UvrABC complex with UvrD helicase. | Lacks classical E. coli mismatch repair; relies on NucS; higher mutation rate when disrupted. | No current drugs targeting repair systems (emerging antimicrobial targets). |
| DNA Transcription | RNA polymerase (α2ββ′ω); sigma factors (σA, SigH, SigE, etc.). | Uses alternative sigma factor switching for stress/latency adaptation. | Rifampicin 10–20 mg/kg daily; targets β-subunit, inhibits mRNA synthesis. |
2.3. Inhibition of Protein Synthesis
Protein synthesis occurs on the ribosome, the target of nearly 40% of conventional clinical antibiotics. It consists of: (i) a small subunit responsible for decoding mRNA; and (ii) a large subunit that guides the peptide bond between the nascent polypeptide and the new amino acid. Both subunits form a functional ribosome with a sedimentation coefficient of 70S [55]. The 70S ribosome contains three tRNA-binding sites: the aminoacyl (A) site, the peptidyl (P) site, and the exit (E) site. MTBC ribosomes retain the canonical bacterial architecture, with a large 50S subunit containing 37 proteins and 23S/5S rRNA and a small 30S subunit containing 21 proteins and 16S rRNA [56]. However, they display distinctive structural features, including an extended 23S rRNA helix that forms the B9 bridge with bS6, which increases stability during intracellular latency, and additional RNA loops involved in translation regulation [57,58]. MTBC also lacks bS21, favoring the translation of leaderless mRNAs, while specific proteins bL37 and bS22 contribute to translation efficiency and modify interactions with antibiotics [56,59]. Under conditions of nutrient and zinc limitation, ribosomes can go into hibernation, which involves the replacement of C+ proteins with C− and MPY-mediated blockade of the A and P sites, thus protecting ribosomes from degradation and drug activity. A subset of ribosomes remains active for the translation of latency-associated genes [60] (Table 2).
Table 2.
Structural and functional adaptations of the MTBC ribosome associated with latency.
| Ribosomal Feature in MTBC | Molecular Mechanism/Functional Role | Impact on MTBC Persistence and Survival |
|---|---|---|
| B9 bridge between 23S rRNA and bS6 protein | Strengthens ribosome architecture and prevents premature dissociation of the 50S and 30S subunits during intracellular stress | Maintains ribosome integrity and supports long-term bacterial survival during latency |
| Additional rRNA loop conformations | Provide specific binding platforms for regulatory factors that modulate translation dynamics | Allow for fine-tuning of protein synthesis according to environmental conditions |
| Absence of bS21 protein in the small subunit | Reduces reliance on Shine–Dalgarno-mediated translation initiation and facilitates efficient recognition of leaderless mRNAs | Enables selective translation during persistence, when leaderless mRNAs become enriched |
| Presence of bL37 protein in the large subunit | Enhances peptidyl transferase center (PTC) efficiency and preserves translational activity under unfavorable conditions | Supports synthesis of essential proteins during nutrient limitation and cellular stress |
| Modified bS22 protein near the decoding center | Alters the structural configuration of the 30S decoding region and affects ribosome–antibiotic interactions | May contribute to altered antibiotic susceptibility and adaptation to antimicrobial pressure |
| C+ to C− ribosomal protein replacement during zinc limitation | Replaces zinc-binding ribosomal proteins with zinc-independent isoforms, allowing for zinc redistribution to essential cellular processes | Promotes metabolic adaptation and survival during host-induced nutritional stress |
| MPY-mediated ribosome hibernation | MPY binds the ribosomal A and P sites, reducing translation activity and protecting ribosomes from degradation and drug targeting | Preserves ribosomal pools during dormancy and enables rapid reactivation when favorable conditions return |
The main anti-TB drugs that affect protein synthesis include streptomycin (STR) and amikacin, both aminoglycosides. STR binds to the 30S subunit via the 16S and S12 rRNA, inhibiting translation initiation [61]. Otherwise, amikacin binds to the A site, altering its structure, disrupting mRNA-tRNA base pairing, and causing mistranslation [62]. STR is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily (maximum 1 g/day), while amikacin is administered intravenously at a dose of 15–20 mg/kg once daily for active tuberculosis [63].
2.4. Protein Quality-Control System
Proteostasis in bacteria is a tightly regulated and dynamic process, controlled by the balance between protein synthesis, proper folding, and degradation. This process is largely driven by environmental signals. A pathogen’s ability to perceive and respond to these stimuli is a key determinant of its adaptability and virulence [64].
The bacterial protein quality control (PQC) system consists of molecular chaperones and ATP-dependent proteases, which work together to maintain the correct conformation of cellular proteins and eliminate damaged or misfolded proteins. Specifically, molecular chaperones promote the correct folding or refolding of unfolded and misfolded proteins. Proteases, on the other hand, degrade proteins irreversibly, allowing for the recovery and reuse of individual amino acids [65]. In mycobacteria, the DnaK (Hsp70) system, together with the co-chaperones DnaJ and GrpE, is central to PQC. DnaJ recognizes and delivers misfolded proteins to DnaK, while GrpE promotes ADP release and ATP binding, enabling subsequent chaperone cycles [66].
M. tuberculosis possesses several proteolytic systems, including Clp, FtsH, and eukaryotic-like proteases [67]. Among these, the ClpC1–ClpP1P2 complex is essential for bacterial growth and survival. ClpC1 recognizes and unfolds target proteins through ATP hydrolysis and translocates them to the proteolytic core ClpP1P2, where they are degraded into peptides. By maintaining protein homeostasis, this system represents an important drug target for anti-TB drug discovery [68] (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Major cytoplasmic protein quality control pathways: DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system (chaperone-mediated refolding) and ClpC1-ClpP1P2 system (proteolytic degradation).
To date, there are no clinically approved antibiotics that directly act on the PQC system. However, several natural compounds have been identified that interfere with key components of this pathway, highlighting it as a promising target for antimicrobial drug discovery [69].
2.5. Alteration in Energy Metabolism
MTBC produces ATP through oxidative phosphorylation, a process that combines electron transport with ATP synthesis [70]. Electron transport in mycobacteria is initiated by NADH dehydrogenase (NDH) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), which transfer electrons from NADH and succinate to menaquinone (MK), forming menaquinol (MKH2). Subsequently, MKH2 delivers these electrons to various terminal complexes within the respiratory chain. Under aerobic conditions, cytochrome oxidase transfers electrons from MKH2 to oxygen, whereas under hypoxia, nitrate and fumarate reductases use nitrate and fumarate as alternative electron acceptors, producing nitrite and succinate, respectively. Electron transport generates a proton gradient across the membrane, which F1F0-ATP synthase uses to produce ATP [71]. This gradient and ATP production are maximal under aerobic conditions, but decrease during hypoxia, although a limited amount of ATP remains essential to maintain cell integrity and viability during latency [72] (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Metabolic adaptation and ATP production depending on oxygen availability. The switch of the electron transport chain from an aerobic state (active infection) to a hypoxic state (latent infection) is shown.
The electron transport chain has gained significance in the development of novel anti-TB compounds, such as bedaquiline and telacebec. These drugs act as inhibitors of ATP synthase and the mycobacterial cytochrome bc1 complex (QcrB subunit), respectively, inducing bacterial death [73,74].
3. Literature Search Strategy
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Articles published from January 2014 to present were included, using the following keywords: “microbial natural products,” “antimycobacterial activity,” “tuberculosis,” “Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” “microbial metabolites,” “antituberculosis agents,” “actinomycetes,” “fungi,” and “bioactive bacterial metabolites.” Additional studies were identified by reviewing the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The literature search identified approximately 243 potentially relevant articles. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, followed by a full-text assessment according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies reporting the antimycobacterial activity of purified natural products isolated from microorganisms against MTBC and providing experimental data supporting their activity were included. Studies investigating crude extracts, conference abstracts, or compounds evaluated exclusively against mycobacterial species outside of MTBC were excluded. Following this selection process, a total of 137 studies were included in the final review.
4. Antitubercular Activity of Microbial Natural Compounds
For several decades, natural products have been one of the most important sources for drug discovery, contributing significantly to the development of modern therapies. Indeed, a substantial portion of FDA-approved drugs are natural products or derived from naturally occurring structures. Classic examples include penicillin and streptomycin, secondary metabolites produced by the fungus Penicillium and the bacterium Streptomyces, respectively [75]. Among natural sources, products derived from microorganisms constitute one of the richest and most structurally diverse reservoirs of bioactive compounds. Bacteria and fungi can produce a wide range of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant properties, many of which have been successfully developed into clinically relevant drugs [76]. Microbial natural products have historically played a central role in the discovery of antibacterial agents and continue to provide valuable chemical frameworks for drug development. In recent years, interest in natural microbial compounds has further increased due to the growing prevalence of multidrug-resistant MTBC strains. Numerous lines of evidence have demonstrated the high antimycobacterial efficacy of several products derived from a wide variety of microorganisms, strengthening their relevance as a source of potential new anti-TB drugs [77]. The following sections provide a comprehensive overview of microbial natural products with antibacterial activity against human TB-causing mycobacteria, identified from 2014 to the present.
4.1. Actinomycetota-Derived Metabolites
Actinomycetes represent the most abundant microbial source of antimicrobial natural products. They constitute the largest phylum within the bacterial domain, in which the genus Streptomyces is the most numerous representative species. This genus includes more than 800 species, producing 80% of known bioactive compounds, including antibacterial molecules. The latter are described as stress metabolites under adverse environmental conditions, promoting competition with other microorganisms and favoring their survival [78]. In this context, a prime example of an actinomycete-derived antibiotic used in clinical practice for TB treatment is streptomycin. It is a secondary metabolite produced by S. griseus and was the first antibiotic to demonstrate activity against M. tuberculosis, thus establishing actinomycetes as a primary source for antimycobacterial drug discovery. This section reviews natural products obtained from actinomycetes, grouped according to their chemical structure into the following categories: (i) non-ribosomal peptides; (ii) polyketides; and (iii) other compounds.
4.1.1. Actinomycete-Derived Non-Ribosomal Peptides
Non-ribosomal peptides are an important class of secondary metabolites produced primarily by bacteria and filamentous fungi [79]. These compounds are synthesized independently of the mRNA-ribosome system by large, multimodular enzyme complexes called non-ribosomal peptide synthetases [80]. Unlike ribosomal peptides, non-ribosomal peptides exhibit a high structural diversity, containing non-proteinogenic amino acids, D-amino acids, and numerous post-synthetic modifications, such as methylation, glycosylation, acylation, halogenation, and cyclization. This high structural complexity translates into a wide variety of biological activities, making these peptides a valuable source of bioactive molecules, including antimycobacterials [81].
Table 3 summarizes the non-ribosomal peptides derived from Actinomycetota sp., reporting for each compound the effective antimycobacterial concentration, the bacterial strains toward which the activity was evaluated and the related mechanisms of action, when available.
Table 3.
Antimycobacterial non-ribosomal peptide produced by Actinomycetes.
| Compound | Producing Actinomycete | Structural Features | Target/ Mechanism |
Tested Strains | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyridomycin | Streptomyces sp. strain W3009 | Cyclodepsipeptide | InhA inhibitor | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | IC50 1.08 µM |
| Pyridomycin derivatives (E–F) | Streptomyces sp. strain W3009 | Linear/cyclic analogues | InhA inhibitor | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | IC50 6.9–9.14 µM |
| Actinomycin C1–C3 | S. pratensis | Cyclic chromopeptides | DNA binding | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.039–0.0625 µg/mL |
| Actinomycin D | S. parvus | Chromopeptide | DNA intercalation | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.78 µg/mL |
| Actinomycin-X2 | S. smyrnaeus | Actinomycin analogue | PknB, predicted by in silico analysis | M. tuberculosis H37Ra and H37Rv; M. bovis | MIC 1.56–2.64 µg/mL |
| Cyclomarin A | Streptomyces sp. strain CNB-982 | Cyclic heptapeptide | ClpC1 | M. tuberculosis H37Rv; clinical isolate XDR | MIC 0.5 µg/mL |
| Echinomycin | S. fuscichromogenes | Cyclic depsipeptide | DNA intercalator | M. bovis, M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.1/0.5 µg/mL |
| Rufomycins |
S.
atratus |
Cyclic heptapeptides | ClpC1 | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.02–1.7 µM |
| Ilamycins |
S.
atratus |
Cyclic heptapeptides | ClpC1 | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.0096–10 µM |
| Atrovimycin |
S.
atrovirens |
Cyclodepsipeptide | Unknown | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 1.88 µM |
| Ohmyungsamycins A/B | Streptomyces sp. strain SNJ042 | Cyclic peptides | Host-directed: AMPK-dependent autophagy induction | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | IC50 0.06–0.12 µM |
| Atratumycin |
S.
atratus |
Cyclic decapeptide | Unknown | M. tuberculosis H37Ra and H37Rv | MIC 3.8–14.6 µM |
| Ecumicin | Nonomuraea sp. | Macrolactam peptide | ClpC1 | M. tuberculosis H37Rv; Clinical isolates | MIC 0.34–1.5 µM |
| Taeanamide A | Streptomyces sp. strain AMD43 | Cyclic lipopeptide | Unknown | M. tuberculosis mc26230 | MIC50 27 µM |
| Taeanamide B | Streptomyces sp. strain AMD43 | Linear lipopeptide | Unknown | M. tuberculosis mc26230 | MIC50 63 µM |
| Thiolopyrrolone A | Streptomyces sp. strain BTBU20218885 | Dithiolopyrrolone | Unknown | M. bovis, M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 10 µM |
| Thiolutin | Streptomyces sp. strain BTBU20218885 | Dithiolopyrrolone | Unknown | M. bovis, M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 0.3125–0.625 µM |
Pyridomycin is a cyclodepsipeptide produced by the genus Streptomyces. It is characterized by a 12-membered central ring composed of two pyridyl groups, a propionic acid and a 2-hydroxy-3-methylpent-2-enoic acid. This metabolite is known for its anti-TB potential, binding to the NADH cofactor-binding site of the InhA enzyme and thus blocking the biosynthesis of mycolic acids. In the study by Lee et al., approximately 4000 actinomycete strains were analyzed, identifying Streptomyces sp. strain W3009 as the producer of the well-known antimycobacterial agent pyridomycin. Through a metabolomic approach using molecular networking mass spectrometry, they identified seven novel pyridomycin derivatives. All compounds shared a common 3-hydroxypicolinic acid–L-threonine–3-(3-pyridyl)-L-alanine (3HP–T–3PA) core and differed in the structure of their 3-methylpentanoic acid side chain, conferring distinct linear and cyclic skeletons. Pyridomycin and its derivatives C, D, E, and F have a cyclic structure, while derivatives G, H, and I have a linear structure. To evaluate their antimicrobial potential, growth inhibition assays against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and inhibition of InhA activity were performed. Pyridomycin inhibited mycobacterial growth by 50% at a concentration of 1.08 µM and approximately 80% of InhA activity. The purified derivatives showed lower antibacterial potential. Besides pyridomycin, only derivatives E and F showed antibacterial potential with IC50 values of 6.90 and 9.14 µM, inhibiting InhA activity by approximately 70%. Despite their limited antibacterial activity (IC50 > 20 µM), derivatives C, D, G, H, and I showed InhA inhibitory activity ranging from 75 to 77%. This discrepancy could be attributed to the reduced permeability of the cell wall. The authors of this study will guide future studies aimed at improving the chemical properties of these derivatives to enhance their antibacterial activity [82].
Actinomycins are chromogenic cyclic peptides isolated from cultures of various Streptomyces species. They consist of a chromophore group and two pentapeptide chains, whose amino acid composition varies. To date, 30 natural and synthetic actinomycin analogues with anti-TB activity have been identified. Shah et al. purified actinomycin C1, actinomycin C2, and actinomycin C3 from cultures of Streptomyces pratensis (S. pratensis), collected from soil samples in the Kashmir region of the northwestern Himalayas. The fermentation broth of the isolated strain was subjected to ethyl acetate extraction and subsequently to various chromatographic techniques, resulting in the isolation of pure compounds. The antimycobacterial potential of actinomycin C1, C2 and C3 was evaluated against the replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain, showing MIC values of 0.0625, 0.039 and 0.039 μg/mL [83], respectively. Subsequently, Rakhmawatie et al. investigated the antimycobacterial activity of another member of actinomycins, actinomycin D. In detail, this research group isolated 16 strains from the rhizosphere soil (mud) of a mangrove area on Pramuka Island, Indonesia. Forty-eight-hour broth cultures were extracted with ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v), and the dried crude extracts were tested against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Data showed that the supernatant extract derived from the culture of Streptomyces parvus (S. parvus) strain NBRC 14599 completely suppressed microbial growth at a dose of 25 μg/mL. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry profiling of S. parvus NBRC 14599 supernatant extract yielded 16 fractions. Fractions F1 and F2 completely inhibited mycobacterial growth at 100 and 6.25 μg/mL, respectively. F2 yielded six additional peaks. The active peak completely inhibited mycobacterial growth at 0.78 μg/mL and was identified as actinomycin D by high-resolution mass spectrometry [84]. Finally, Qureshi et al. studied the antimycobacterial potential of two novel actinomycins, actinomycin-X2 (act-X2) and actinomycin-D (act-D), isolated from the Streptomyces smyrnaeus (S. smyrnaeus) strain UKAQ_23, collected from a mangrove sediment sample. Antimycobacterial activity was evaluated against replicating strains M. tuberculosis H37Ra, M. bovis BCG, and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Data showed that act-X2 inhibited microbial growth with MIC values of 1.56, 1.56, and 2.64 µg/mL, respectively. At doses of 1.56, 1.56, and 1.80 µg/mL, act-D completely suppressed the growth of the aforementioned bacteria, respectively. In silico data showed that the protein kinase PknB was the primary target of both actinomycins. Binding energy calculations using generalized Born molecular mechanics/surface area demonstrated that act-X2 had a higher binding affinity for the enzymatic target. Therefore, act-X2 could represent a potential anti-TB drug [85]. Nurkanto et al. identified a compound structurally related to actinomycin D in S. parvus A612, exhibiting marked antimycobacterial activity. Genomic analysis identified an actinomycin D-related biosynthetic cluster (85% similarity), and the compound was structurally characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and ESI-MS spectra. In vitro assays on replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG were performed using a resazurin reduction assay, showing efficient growth inhibition with IC50 values of 0.07 and 0.02 μg/mL, respectively. To establish the mechanism of action, molecular docking studies were conducted between the actinomycin D-related compound and 21 M. tuberculosis targets. The results suggested a possible interaction with several targets, including InhA, CoaBC, shikimate kinase (MtSK), ASDH, BioA, and Ag85C. Experimental validation confirmed that the purified compound inhibits M. tuberculosis shikimate kinase (MtSK), with an IC50 of 41.2 μg/mL and a Ki of 58.0 μg/mL, showing superior activity compared to standard actinomycin D (IC50 = 89.9 μg/mL; Ki = 119.2 μg/mL). In contrast, no inhibitory activity was observed against the enzymes InhA, CoaBC, ASDH, BioA, and Ag85C. MtSK catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group from ATP to shikimate, forming shikimate-3-phosphate, a key intermediate in the shikimate pathway. This metabolic pathway is essential for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids. Extensive molecular docking analysis revealed that the actinomycin D-related compound occupies the ATP-binding site of MtSK, forming predominantly hydrophobic interactions with residues involved in nucleotide recognition. The compound showed low cytotoxicity against human colorectal adenocarcinoma (DLD-I) cells, with a selectivity index maggiore di 1100 [86].
Cyclomarins are heptapeptide cyclopeptides that share a similar core structure but have crucial differences in their side chains, conferring different anti-TB activity. Ozeki et al. tested a collection of 10.080 actinomycete strains isolated from soil samples collected at various locations in Japan. The strains were grown in liquid medium for 48 h, and the supernatants were collected, extracted, and dried. These were analyzed for mycobacterial activity using the rBCG-MDP1-luc system, which identified 137 extracts with rBCG luciferase-suppressive activity up to a dilution of 1:1600. The antimycobacterial activity of all these extracts was further evaluated against the laboratory replicating strain H37Rv and two clinical strains of M. tuberculosis XDR. The results showed that only 41 of the tested extracts inhibited the microbial growth of the laboratory strain, and that at least one strain was resistant to dilutions of up to 1:200. Of the 41 extracts, 1904-1 was selected for its lower toxicity to eukaryotic cell lines and its strong antimycobacterial potential. The toxicity of compound 1904-1 was evaluated on human pulmonary adenocarcinoma A549 cells and mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The extract showed no toxicity up to a concentration of 100 μg/mL. In terms of antimycobacterial activity, 1904-1 completely suppressed bacterial growth at concentrations of 0.13, 0.5, and 2.0–7.5 μg/mL against the rBCG luciferase system, laboratory strain H37Rv, and 2 M. tuberculosis XDR, respectively. The extract was characterized by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and 1H and 13C NMR, identifying the active compound as cyclomarin A [87]. Cyclomarin A is a cyclopeptide secondary metabolite produced by Streptomyces sp. CNB-982 and first isolated by the Fenical and Clardy groups [88]. Its antimycobacterial activity, first investigated in 2008 [89], results from interaction with the essential ClpC1 ATPase, disrupting protein degradation and leading to mycobacterial cell death [90,91].
Echinomycin is a cyclic depsipeptide antibiotic that acts as a DNA intercalator, disrupting bacterial DNA replication and gene expression. Chen et al. evaluated the antimicrobial potential of echinomycin against replicating strains M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. The research team isolated the active compound from a culture of Streptomyces fuscichromogenes (S. fuscichromogenes) obtained from the Yaoli primeval forest in Jiangxi Province, China. The structure of echinomycin was determined by UV, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS analysis. The compound completely suppressed the growth of M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv at doses of 0.1 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively, by acting as a DNA intercalator and impairing DNA replication and expression [92].
Rufomycins and ilamycins are cyclic heptapeptides characterized by an isoprenyl group attached to the nitrogen of the tryptophan ring. They are known to impair mycobacterial growth by interfering with ClpC1, a target essential for TB viability. Zhou et al. investigated the chemical and biological properties of rufomycins produced by Streptomyces atratus (S. atratus) MJM3502. Using column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC, they isolated eight new rufomycin derivatives, whose structures were confirmed by ^1H NMR and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Additional compounds, including rufomiazine, ilamycins B1 and B2, and a C-32 epimeric mixture of rufomycins I and II, were also isolated. Their antimycobacterial activity was evaluated against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv by MIC determination. The C-32 epimeric mixture of rufomycins I and II showed the strongest activity, with an MIC of 0.02 μM, followed by rufomycin NBZ8 at 0.03 μM, NBZ7 at 0.10 μM, NBZ5 at 0.11 μM, and ilamycin B2 at 0.20 μM. In contrast, NBZ4 and rufomiazine showed weak activity, with MIC values above 10 μM. Importantly, the rufomycins showed much weaker activity against non-replicating M. tuberculosis under hypoxic conditions, with MICs ranging from 4 to >10 μM. Binding studies by surface plasmon resonance confirmed interaction with ClpC1, with the most active compounds showing the strongest binding affinity. The compounds also displayed time-dependent bactericidal activity, with growth inhibition during the first seven days followed by mycobacterial cell death, and showed high selectivity toward mycobacteria in Vero cells [93]. Whereas Sun et al. isolated 12 novel ilamycin analogues from a culture of the marine actinomycete S. atratus SCSIO ZH16. The structures of the compounds were elucidated by high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, 1D and 2D NMR, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction, confirming their identity. Their antimycobacterial potential against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv was detected by MIC determination. The ilamycins suppressed microbial growth at concentrations ranging from 0.0096 to 10 μM. In detail, ilamycin J showed the highest antimycobacterial activity, with an MIC of 0.0096 μM. Ilamycin L also showed marked activity with MIC values of 0.24 μM, while ilamycins I and R had MICs of 1.2 μM. Ilamycins K, P, and Q showed MIC values of 1.4 μM, followed by ilamycin M active at a concentration of 2.3 μM. In contrast, ilamycins G and H showed less efficacy, acting at a concentration of 9.5 μM, similarly to ilamycin N and ilamycin O, which completely inhibited bacterial growth at concentrations of 9.6 and 10 μM, respectively. Only the analogous ilamycin P showed significant cellular toxicity [94].
Atrovimycin is a cyclodepsipeptide isolated from species belonging to the genus Streptomyces. Structurally, atrovimycin has a locally hydroxylated acyl cinnamic acid chain, which is important for its biological activity. Liu et al. isolated atrovimycin from Streptomyces atrovirens (S. strovirens) strain LQ13 from soil in China. The compound completely suppressed the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv with an MIC of 1.88 μM (2.5 μg/mL). Its cytotoxicity was evaluated on human tumor and non-tumor cell lines. The compound did not exhibit significant toxicity on any of the cell lines tested. The researchers determined the biosynthetic pathway driving the rapid production of atrovimycin. They identified enzymes belonging to the cytochrome P450 family and epoxide hydrolases, responsible for introducing the vicinal dihydroxyl substitution. Furthermore, a P450 modifier enzyme responsible for the β-hydroxylation of the α-phenylalanine residue was characterized [95].
Ohmyungsamycins A and B, cyclic peptides isolated from the soil actinomycete strain SNJ042, were evaluated for their antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Ohmyungsamycins A and B inhibited mycobacterial growth by 50% in vitro at doses of 0.06 and 0.12 μM, respectively. Furthermore, their antimycobacterial potential against the study strain was also evaluated in macrophages. Microbial load was significantly reduced when bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) infected with the mycobacterium were treated with ohmyungsamycins A and B at a dose of 10 μM. Subsequently, it was tested whether ohmyungsamycins A and B could enhance macrophage autophagy, thereby contributing to host antimicrobial defense. LC3 punctate formation and lipidation, indicators of autophagy induction, were assessed. The data showed that both compounds at a concentration of 10 μM significantly increased autophagy activation, comparable to the effects observed in response to rifampicin treatment. Using a Drosophila melanogaster-Mycobacterium marinum infection model, the compounds were shown to increase the survival of infected models, increase autophagy, and reduce microbial load. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), required for phagosome maturation and macrophage inflammatory responses, was also demonstrated in response to treatment [96].
Atratumycin is a cyclic decapeptide consisting of 3-(2-methylphenyl)-2(E)-propenoic acid linked to an amino acid chain. Through genomic analysis of S. atratus SCSIO ZH16, isolated from the deep sea, Sun et al. identified and isolated atratumycin, a cyclic decapeptide. Its structure was revealed through several spectroscopic experiments, X-ray diffraction data, and the Marfey method. Atratumycin completely suppressed the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Ra and H37Rv at doses of 3.8 and 14.6 μM, respectively. Furthermore, it induced low cytotoxicity in eukaryotic cell models. Although its antimycobacterial efficacy is low, the therapeutic relevance of this compound is due to its very low cytotoxicity [97].
Ecumicin possesses a complex macrolactam structure composed of numerous amino acid residues, including N-methylated and non-proteinogenic amino acids, ester groups, and hydrophobic side chains. This structure confers high stability and enhanced interaction with cellular targets. Gao et al. extracted ecumicin from the culture medium of Nonomuraea sp. strain MJM5123, isolated from soil. Its antimycobacterial potential was evaluated against replicating and non-replicating strains M. tuberculosis, including H37Rv and related clinical isolates, while its cytotoxicity was evaluated against epithelial kidney monkey Vero cell lines and J774.1 murine macrophages. Ecumicin demonstrated bactericidal activity at concentrations of 0.34 and 1.5 μM, under replicative and non-replicative growth conditions, respectively. The compound exhibits low toxicity to eukaryotic cells, with a selectivity index greater than 640. Subcutaneous administration of ecumicin in a micellar formulation to murine models at a dose of 20–32 mg/kg of body weight improved the bioavailability of the compound, resulting in a reduction in lung bacterial load of 1.3 log10 at 20 mg/kg and 1.6 log10 at 32 mg/kg, respectively. Genomic analysis of laboratory-generated M. tuberculosis strains spontaneously resistant to ecumicin identified the ClpC1 ATPase complex as a potential target. PCR and sequencing data demonstrated the presence of mutations in the clpC1 (Rv3596c), ppsC (Rv2933), and espG3 (Rv0289) genes. The identification of ClpC1 as a target was further supported by drug-protein affinity assays. ClpC1, involved in protein degradation in association with the ClpP1P2 complex, was directly modulated by ecumicin. In the wild-type strain, ecumicin binds to ClpC1 and blocks normal protein degradation by uncoupling ATPase activity from proteolysis. In resistant strains, however, binding is reduced or absent, and the ClpC1-ClpP1P2 complex continues to function normally [98].
Taeanamide A is a cyclic macrolactone molecule composed of 10 amino acid residues, including Ser, Thr, Ala, Leu, Gly, Pro, and N-Ac-Dab, and a trans-unsaturated lipid chain. On the other hand, taeanamide B shares the same peptide sequence and lipid moiety but occurs in an acyclic form with a methyl-esterified terminal group. They were isolated from a culture of Streptomyces sp. strain AMD43, collected from a muddy soil sample from Anmyeondo, Korea. Taeanamide A showed low cytotoxicity against all tested cancer cell lines: human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human colorectal carcinoma cells (HCT116), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231), human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (SK-Hep-1), and human gastric cancer cells (SNU638), with IC50 values > 20 μM, corresponding to a selectivity index > 0.74 against M. tuberculosis mc26230. Taeanamide B showed higher cytotoxicity, with IC50 values ranging from 0.26 to 1.13 μM, corresponding to selectivity indices of 0.004-0.018. Both compounds exhibited moderate antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis mc26230, with IC50 values of 27 and 63 μM, respectively [99].
Thiolopyrrolone A and thiolutin belong to the class of dithiolopyrrolones. They consist of a bicyclic pyrrolinone-dithiol nucleus, with modifications affecting the N-4 and N-7 positions. Song et al. isolated two new thiolopyrrolone derivatives, thiolopyrrolone A and 2,2-dioxidothiolutin, and a known compound, thiolutin, from a culture of Streptomyces sp. strain BTBU20218885, isolated from a mud sample collected in the coastal region of Xiamen, China. Their chemical structures were determined by high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and 1D and 2D NMR techniques. Thiopyrrolone A is a novel thiolutin analogue with a pseudo-trimeric structure comprising three thiolutin-like pyrrolone units, linked by disulfide and monosulfide bonds and bearing acetamide and N-methylamide groups. 2,2-Dioxidothiolutin is an oxidized thiolutin derivative containing two sulfoxide groups, while thiolutin is the parent compound with a simpler disulfide-containing structure. Among the isolated compounds, only thiolopyrrolone A and thiolutin showed antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. bovis and replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Specifically, thiolopyrrolone A completely suppressed their growth at doses of 10 μM. On the other hand, thiolutin completely reduced the growth of these strains at concentrations of 0.3125 and 0.625 μM, respectively [100] (Table 3).
Among the compounds discussed, ecumycin represents a particularly promising candidate, combining potent bactericidal activity against both replicating and non-replicating M. tuberculosis (0.34 and 1.5 μM, respectively) with effective targeting of the essential proteostasis machinery ClpC1 and a high selectivity index (>640). Furthermore, subcutaneous administration at 20–32 mg/kg reduced lung bacterial burden by 1.3–1.6 log10 in mice, providing further support for its preclinical potential [98].
4.1.2. Actinomycete-Derived Polyketides
Polyketides are a broad class of natural secondary metabolites characterized by high structural diversity and significant biological activity. They are organic compounds with oxidized carbon chains, often cyclic or partially cyclic, often including functional groups such as ketones, hydroxyls, conjugated double bonds, and macrolactam or macrolide systems. Polyketides are biosynthesized through the polyketide synthase pathway, multimodular enzymatic complexes that operate similarly to fatty acid synthesis. Synthesis occurs through the sequential condensation of activated acyl units, which are progressively assembled and modified along a growing chain.
Table 4 shows polyketides derived from actinomycetes, indicating the active dose at which the compound exhibits antimycobacterial activity, the strain against which the compounds are active, and any mechanisms of action.
Table 4.
Antimycobacterial Actinomycete-derived polyketides.
| Compound | Producing Actinomycete | Structural Features | Target/ Mechanism |
Tested Strains | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niphimycins C–E, 17-O-methylniphimycin | Streptomyces sp. strain IMB7-145 | Alkylguanidyl-substituted polyketides | Membrane disruption | M. tuberculosis clinical isolates | MIC 4–32 µg/mL |
| Lincolnenin A | S. lincolnensis | Isomeric bianthracene | DNA intercalation | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 0.9 µM |
| Boromycin | S. antibioticus | Boron-containing polyether macrolide | Membrane potential collapse, ATP depletion | M. tuberculosis H37Rv, BCG | MIC 0.2 µM |
| Steffimycins | Streptomyces sp. strain OPMA02852 | Anthracycline-like polyketides | Redox/DNA interference | M. bovis BCG | MIC 1.4–21.7 µM |
| Diazaquinomycins A,J,H | M. maritima strain B026 | Diazaanthraquinone core | Redox imbalance | M. tuberculosis, MDR strains | MIC 0.10–0.34 µM |
| Murayaquinone | Streptomyces sp. strain TBRC7642 | Quinone polyketide | ROS generation | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 9.65 µM |
| Furaquinocin D | Streptomyces sp. strain TBRC7642 | Quinone polyketide | Oxidative stress | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 129.40 µM |
| Dinactin | S. puniceus | Polyether macrotetrolide | Ion transport disruption | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC 1 µg/mL |
| Treponemycin | S. mutabilis | 18-membered macrolide | Threonyl-tRNA synthesis inhibition | M. tuberculosis | MIC 13.3 µg/mL |
| Desertomycin A, Desertomycin 44-1, Desertomycin 44-2 | S. flavofungini strain TRM90047 | Polyether macrolides with a macrocyclic lactone ring, multiple ether bonds, high stereochemical complexity | Multi-target activity on protein synthesis proteins (RpsL, RplC) and on the ClpC1 protein control system. | M. tuberculosis | 50% growth inhibition at 25–50 µg/mL |
| Desertomycin G | S. althioticus strain MSM3 | Polyether macrolides with a macrocyclic lactone ring, multiple ether bonds, high stereochemical complexity | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Rv, MDR strains; | MIC 16 µM |
| Azalomycin B | Streptomyces sp. strain BCC71188 | Macrodiolide polyether | Membrane disruption | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 0.78 µg/mL |
| Chrysomycin A | Streptomyces sp. strain OA161 | Angucycline polyketide | DNA damage | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 3.125 µg/mL |
| Frenolicins A,G | Streptomyces sp. strain TBRC17107 | Naphthoquinone polyketide | Redox cycling | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 25 µg/mL |
| Kimidinomycin | Streptomyces sp. strain KKTA-0263 | Aromatic polyketide | Not defined | M. bovis BCG | MIC 23.66 µg/mL |
| Nybomycin | Streptomyces sp. strain MS44 | Aromatic naphthoquinone; planar highly conjugated polycyclic core with quinone carbonyl groups conferring redox activity | Interference with DNA structure | M. bovis BCG | MIC 1.0 µg/mL |
| Aranciamycins (I, J, A) | Streptomyces sp. strain CMB-M0150 | Anthracyclines characterized by a planar aromatic tetracyclic anthraquinone nucleus containing quinone carbonyl groups involved in redox activity | Undefined | M. bovis | MIC 10 μM |
Niphimycins are macrolides composed of an alkylguanidyl side chain, known to alter the composition and integrity of cell membranes. Hu et al. collected Streptomyces sp. strain IMB7-145 from marine sediments. Through whole-genome sequence analysis, seven gene clusters responsible for the synthesis of type I polyketide synthase were identified. Detailed bioinformatic evaluations linked these genes to niphimycin biosynthesis. Guided by genomic analysis, four novel structural analogs of niphimycin, niphimycins C, D, E, and 17-O-methylniphimycin, were identified from large-scale cultures of Streptomyces sp. strain IMB7-145. The cytotoxicity of the compounds was evaluated on the human epithelial uterus tumor (HeLa) cell line, showing IC50 values ranging from 3.0 to 9.0 μM. Furthermore, they exhibit antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, with MIC values ranging from 4 to 32 μg/mL [101].
Lincolnenins A–D are isomeric bianthracene compounds isolated from cultures of Streptomyces lincolnensis (S. lincolnensis). Mohamed et al. reported four new lincolnenins, A–D, whose structures were elucidated by spectroscopic analyses. The compounds exhibit atropisomerism arising from restricted rotation around the biaryl axis, with Lincolnenins A and B occurring as stable atropisomers, whereas C and D can interconvert. Among the four compounds, Lincolnenin A exhibited significant bactericidal activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, completely reducing the bacterial load at 0.9 μM [102].
Boromycin is a macrolide containing boron in a lipophilic macrocyclic lactone complex, which confers broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. It is isolated from soil-derived cultures of Streptomyces antibioticus (S. antibioticus). Moreira et al. set out to demonstrate the antimycobacterial activity of boromycin against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG, highlighting its mechanism of action. First, the compound’s cytotoxicity was assessed on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2 and Vero) as well as on human erythrocytes. Data showed moderate activity on the eukaryotic cell models tested, with CC50 values of 35 and 25 μM in HepG2 and Vero cells, respectively, and a HC50 of 40 μM in human erythrocytes. Boromycin exhibited potent antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG, with MIC50 values of approximately 80 nM and MIC90 and MBC99 values of 200 nM. Importantly, boromycin also exhibited bactericidal activity against nonreplicating bacilli under hypoxic conditions, with a 99% bactericidal concentration (WCC99) of 200 nM, indicating a replication-independent bactericidal action. The compound exhibited a selectivity index > 300. In response to boromycin, a rapid reduction in membrane potential was observed, accompanied by a subsequent decrease in intracellular ATP levels and cytoplasmic protein leakage, consistent with potassium ionophore activity, membrane depolarization, and altered cellular bioenergetics [103].
Steffimycins belong to the anthracycline class. They are considered atypical due to the presence of a ketone group at position C-10, two methoxy groups at positions C-2 and C-8, and a neutral deoxysugar linked to C-7, generally absent in conventional anthracyclines such as nogalamicin, aclacinomycin, and daunorubicin. In the study by Koyama et al., steffimycin, 10-dihydrosteffimycin, and 8-demethoxysteffimycin were evaluated against M. bovis BCG. They were isolated from high-yield cultures of Streptomyces sp. strain OPMA02852, collected from soil samples. The cytotoxicity of steffimycin, 10-dihydrosteffimycin, and 8-demethoxysteffimycin was evaluated on HeLa cells. All three compounds completely inhibited BCG viability at 1.4, 21.7, and 5.8 μM, respectively. Cytotoxicity against HeLa cells was lower, with IC50 values of 47.2, 68.4, and 57.0 μg/mL, respectively, corresponding to selectivity indices of 58.7, 5.5, and 18.1, respectively. These results indicate that steffimycin showed the highest selectivity, whereas reduction at C-10 substantially decreased selectivity. Modifications at C-8 and C-10 therefore significantly affect both antimycobacterial activity and selectivity [104].
Diazaquinomycins are classified as secondary metabolites, consisting of a 1,8-diazaanthraquinone nucleus with two additional nitrogen atoms that confer unique electron-transfer properties, contributing to their antibacterial activity. The presence of long lipophilic side chains in some structural variants enhanced antimicrobial potential. Mullowney et al. purified diazaquinomycins A, J, and H from the culture of Micromonospora maritima (M. maritima) strain B026, isolated from lake sediments. Their antimycobacterial potential was evaluated against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and related MDR clinical isolates and M. bovis. Using the MABA assay, diazaquinomycins H and J showed MIC values of 0.04 and 0.07 μg/mL against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv, respectively, while diazaquinomycin A showed an MIC of 0.10 μg/mL and maintained activity against MDR strains. Diazaquinomycin A was also evaluated against non-replicating M. tuberculosis using the low oxygen recovery (LORA) assay, showing an MIC of 0.72 μg/mL. However, it showed a MBC99 of 0.37 μg/mL under normoxic conditions, but no significant bactericidal activity under hypoxic conditions. Cytotoxicity tests showed that diazaquinomycins H, J, and A showed no cytotoxicity against the Vero cell line at the highest concentration tested, 28 μM. Regarding the mechanism of action, previous studies have suggested that diazaquinomycin A acts on the folate metabolic pathway by inhibiting thymidylate synthase (ThyA). However, Mullowney et al. found that diazaquinomycin A did not significantly inhibit ThyA of M. tuberculosis in biochemical assays. Furthermore, overexpression of ThyA in M. tuberculosis did not alter the compound’s MIC. Therefore, these results ruled out thymidylate synthase as the primary target and suggested that diazaquinomycin A acts through an alternative, yet unidentified, mechanism [105].
Murayaquinone and furaquinocin D are quinone-based metabolites. They are characterized by a quinone system consisting of an aromatic ring fused with conjugated carbonyl groups. This system interferes with cellular redox systems, promoting the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and resulting in cellular oxidative stress. Bunbamrung et al. isolated these quinone-based compounds from the growth media of Streptomyces sp. strain TBRC7642, an endophytic actinomycete strain associated with the plant Epipremnum aureum. Both compounds showed antimycobacterial potential against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, although with different efficiencies. In fact, murayaquinone was the most active compound, completely inhibiting microbial growth at a concentration of 9.65 μM. On the other hand, the same effect was achieved with furaquinocin D at a dose of 129.40 μM. From the same microorganism, the research group also isolated iron-chelating compounds, such as methyl aeruginoate, (R)-desferri-ferritiocin methyl ester, and desferri-ferritiocin-4-hydroxyphenethyl ester. These completely suppressed mycobacterial growth at concentrations of 105.93, 139.51, and 34.91 μM, respectively. Among the isolated compounds, murayaquinone was the most active. Unfortunately, it exhibited significant cytotoxicity on eukaryotic models. However, the results suggest that murayaquinone may represent a promising structural scaffold for the development of new anti-TB agents [106]. Dinactin belongs to the family of polyether macrotetrolide ionophores, characterized by an oxygenated macrocyclic structure responsible for binding and transporting monovalent cations. Hussain et al. isolated dinactin from a culture of Streptomyces puniceus (S. puniceus), collected from soil samples collected in the Sonamarg Mountains, located in the northwestern Himalayas. Specifically, bioguided fractionation of the extract in ethyl acetate allowed for the isolation of the compound in question. Its structure was delineated by NMR and spectroscopic analyses, including High-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Dynactin exhibited antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with an MIC of 1 μg/mL determined by broth microdilution. Dynactin exhibited low cytotoxicity against the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK-293, with an IC50 of 80 μM, corresponding to a selectivity index of 80 [107].
Treponemycin is an 18-membered polyketide macrolide. Scientific evidence supports its antibacterial potential, as it inhibits the synthesis of threonyl-tRNA. Yassien et al. purified the macrolide by bioguided fractionation of the ethyl acetate extract of Streptomyces mutabilis (S. mutabilis) culture, collected from soil samples in Saudi Arabia. The structure of treponemycin was defined by comprehensive 1D and 2D NMR analysis and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Treatment with treponemycin at a dose of 13.3 µg/mL completely reduced the M. tuberculosis load. The researchers observed that treponemycin production in the culture supernatant increased significantly by modifying the growth medium, specifically by using a starch-nitrate-based medium, replacing KNO3 with corn and yeast extract or tryptone, and removing CaCO3 and K2HPO4. Macrolide production was monitored by liquid chromatography–diode array detection–mass spectrometry [108].
Desertomycins belong to the class of polyether macrolides, characterized by a macrocyclic lactone ring enriched with numerous ether bonds and a high density of stereogenic centers. This structure can alter the functionality of biological membranes and cellular macromolecules. Using genomic analysis strategies, Wang et al. identified the biosynthetic gene clusters for desertomycin in the genome of Streptomyces flavofungini (S. flavofungini) strain TRM90047. After culturing the Streptomyces strain, the metabolites were purified by preparative HPLC, yielding desertomycin 44-1, desertomycin 44-2, and desertomycin A. Their structures were determined by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy. All purified metabolites exhibited antimycobacterial activity. Specifically, treatment with desertomycin 44-1, desertomycin 44-2, and desertomycin A at concentrations of 25, 50, and 25 µg/mL reduced microbial load by 50%. Molecular docking analyses revealed that isolated desertomycins interact with the proteins RPSL, RPLC, and CLPC1, with binding values ranging from −8.89 to −6.99 kcal/mol. RpsL and RplC are ribosomal proteins involved in protein synthesis, while ClpC1 is an ATP-dependent chaperonin that regulates protein homeostasis. These findings suggest that desertomycins may inhibit mycobacterial growth by acting on multiple essential cellular processes [109]. Braña et al. purified and characterized desertomycin G from the fermentation medium of Streptomyces althioticus (S. althioticus) MSM3, isolated from intertidal Ulva sp. collected in the Cantabrian Sea. The compound was obtained through C18 solid-phase extraction and bioassay-guided C18 HPLC fractionation, and its structure was elucidated by HRMS and 1D/2D NMR spectroscopy. Initially, the compound’s cytotoxicity was evaluated on A549 human lung cancer, DLD-1 colon cancer, and MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines, as well as against healthy breast fibroblasts. Data showed that desertomycin G reduced the viability of MCF-7 and A549 cell lines and healthy breast fibroblasts by 50% at concentrations of 6.7, 8.6, and 9.2 µM after 48 h, respectively. DLD-1 cells, however, were more resistant, showing IC50 values at doses greater than 10 µM. For its antimycobacterial counterpart, at an MIC of 16 µM, desertomycin G completely suppressed the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv and two related MDR strains [110].
Efomycin G, oxohygrolidin, and 29-O-methylabierixin were obtained from the actinomycete strain BCC72023, collected from a rice stalk (Oriza sativa L.) in Chumphon Province, Thailand. The crude extract of the bacteria-free culture was sequentially fractionated by chromatography on Sephadex LH-20, followed by semi-preparative and preparative reversed-phase HPLC, yielding the pure compounds. The structures of the compounds were subsequently determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, optical rotation measurements, and high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Efomycin G, oxoigrolidine, and 29-O-methylabierixin showed antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Ra, with MIC values of 12.0, 50.0, and 50.0 μg/mL, respectively. Efomycin G exhibited cytotoxicity against human epidermoid carcinoma (KB) cells, human breast carcinoma (MCF-7) cells, human small cell lung carcinoma (NCI-H187) cells, and Vero cells, with IC50 values of 5.16, 7.86, 1.56, and 3.68 μg/mL, respectively, corresponding to a selectivity index of 0.31 based on the IC50/MIC ratio of Vero cells. Oxohygrolidine exhibited IC50 values of 4.70, 12.89, 2.96, and 15.47 μg/mL against the same cell lines, respectively, with a selectivity index of 0.31. 29-O-methylabierixin showed IC50 values of 16.86, 22.27, 10.12, and 4.29 μg/mL, respectively, corresponding to a selectivity index of 0.09 [111].
Aranciamycins are classified as anthracyclines. They have a planar aromatic tetracyclic nucleus of the anthraquinone type, containing quinone carbonyl groups responsible for their redox properties. Khalil et al. isolated Aranciamycin and its structural analogues I, J, and A from a culture of Australian marine Streptomyces sp. (CMB-M0150) by ethyl acetate extraction followed by chromatographic fractionation and subsequent purification by semi-preparative and preparative HPLC. All compounds exhibited moderate antimicrobial potential against M. bovis. In particular, aranciamycin I and J had an MIC of 10 μM, while aranciamycin and analogue A showed less activity with an MIC of 30 μM, highlighting a variability in potency related to the structural differences between the analogues. Furthermore, aranciamycin showed moderate cytotoxicity against a panel of human tumor cell lines, with IC50 values greater than 7.5 μM. Given their moderate antimycobacterial activity, aranciamycins may represent starting compounds for the development of new anti-TB drugs [112].
Gwanakosides are glycosylated polyketides characterized by an oxygen-rich polycyclic core derived from PKS, decorated with sugar moieties that contribute to their biological activity. Huynh et al. purified gwanakosides A and B from a co-culture of Streptomyces sp. strain GA02, isolated from mountain soil, and Pandoraea sp. strain GA02N. Spectroscopic analyses identified compound A as a dichlorinated naphthalene glycoside and compound B as a pentacyclic aromatic glycoside. NMR analyses established the chlorine positions and identified the sugar moiety as 6-deoxy-α-L-talopyranose, while the absolute configuration of compound B was proposed using DP4 calculations. Co-culture increased compound production approximately 100-fold. They showed cytotoxicity against various human tumor cell lines with IC50 ranging from 5.6 to 19.4 μM. Otherwise, only gwanakoside A at a concentration of 15 μg/mL reduced M. tuberculosis cell death by 50% [113].
Azalomycin B elaiophilin and 11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophilin are 16-membered macrodiolidic polyketides with a symmetrical, oxygen-rich lactone ring. The latter is an O-methylated analogue in which hydroxyl groups are replaced by methoxy groups. Both compounds were isolated from Streptomyces sp. BCC71188, a strain closely related to Streptomyces samsunensis (S. samsunensis) M1463T and Streptomyces malaysiensis (S. malaysiensis) NBRC 16446T was obtained from a soil sample in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. The crude extract of fermentation media exhibited activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra, completely inhibiting its growth at a concentration of 6.25 μg/mL. Fractionation of the crude extract by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography, combined with a bioassay-guided approach, led to the isolation of 19 compounds. Among them, two cyclic peptides, five macrolides, a novel naphthoquinone, C-nahuoic acid, several geldanamycin derivatives, cyclooctatin, germicidins A and C, actinoramide A, as well as abierixin and 29-O-methylabierixin were identified. The compounds were structurally characterized by 1H and 13C NMR and evaluated for cytotoxicity against NCI-H187, KB, MCF-7, and Vero cells, as well as for antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Ra. The only compounds that showed effective biological activity were the macrolides azalomycin B and 11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophilin. They induced cytotoxicity with IC50 values lower than 1.82 μg/mL. Specifically, azalomycin B showed IC50 values of 0.46, 0.64, 1.82, and 0.62 μg/mL on the human small cell lung carcinoma NCI-H187, human oral cancer KB, human breast cancer MCF-7, and Vero cell lines, respectively. On the other hand, 11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophilin showed IC50 values of 0.65, 0.67, 1.43, and 1.13 μg/mL, indicating similar cytotoxic activity with slight variations between cell models. Both macrolides completely totally reduced the load of M. tuberculosis H37Ra at concentrations of 0.78 and 3.13 μg/mL, respectively [114].
Chrysomycin A is an angucycline characterized by four fused aromatic rings containing carbonyl and oxygenated groups. It was isolated from Streptomyces sp. OA161, obtained from soil in Thailand. The fermentation extract was purified by chromatography and HPLC, yielding two main fractions with retention times of 26.4 and 28.7 min. The fraction eluting at 28.7 min showed significant antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra and was subsequently purified and identified as chrysomycin A by NMR analysis. Its antimycobacterial activity was assessed against M. tuberculosis using the Resazurin Microtiter Assay (REMA), showing an MIC of 3.125 μg/mL. Time-course studies revealed a bactericidal effect, with no growth after 24 h of treatment at the MIC. The cytotoxicity of chrysomycin A was assessed on the rat skeletal muscle myoblast L6, human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW480, human embryonic kidney HEK-293, and human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell lines at doses up to 10 times the MIC using MTT. The data show that the compound exhibits negligible toxicity in L6 and SW480 cells, with cell viability maintained even at the highest concentrations. Conversely, THP-1 cells showed greater sensitivity to the compound, with a more marked reduction in cell viability even at intermediate concentrations [115].
Frenolicins are aromatic naphthoquinone polyketides characterized by an oxidized 1,4-naphthoquinone nucleus, typical of redox-active systems and the main determinant of their biological properties. Frenolicins A and G were isolated from a culture of Streptomyces sp. strain TBRC17107 derived from a longkong bark-eating caterpillar. Their structures were determined by NMR and High-Resolution Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry analysis. Both compounds induced mild cytotoxicity in human cell lines. Furthermore, both compounds exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis H37Ra at a dose of 25.0 μg/mL [116].
Kimidinomycin is a complex polyketide, belonging to the 38-membered macrolide class, characterized by a side chain containing an N-methylguanidyl group and an oxygenated aromatic nucleus, which contributes to its chemical reactivity and potential redox properties. Hikima et al. purified this compound from the fermentation medium of the Streptomyces sp. KKTA-0263 strain. The fermentation medium was extracted by organic solvent extraction, followed by fractionation via HP20 column chromatography and subsequent preparative HPLC. This sequential approach allowed for the enrichment of the active fractions and the final purification of kimidinomycin. The latter inhibited the growth of M. bovis BCG at a concentration of 23.66 µg/mL [117].
Nybomycin belongs to the class of aromatic naphthoquinones. Its structure consists of a highly conjugated planar polycyclic core with quinone carbonyl groups that confer redox-active properties. Arai et al. purified nybomycin from a culture of marine-derived Streptomyces sp. strain MS44. The compound exhibited antimycobacterial activity against M. bovis BCG, completely suppressing growth of the mycobacterium at a dose of 1.0 μg/mL under both aerobic conditions of active growth and hypoxic conditions of dormancy. Evaluation of the mechanism of action indicated that the compound interferes with DNA structure, leading to cell death [118] (Table 4).
Overall, boromycin appears to be one of the most promising polyketides described, exhibiting potent antimycobacterial activity against both M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG (0.2 μM) and a mechanism associated with disruption of membrane potential and depletion of intracellular ATP. However, its moderate cytotoxicity and lack of in vivo efficacy data highlight the need for further studies to evaluate its therapeutic potential. Nonetheless, boromycin represents a valuable scaffold for anti-TB drug development, providing analogues that retain its antimycobacterial activity and mechanism of action while enhancing cytotoxicity [103].
4.1.3. Other Actinomycete-Derived Compounds
Among the various compounds isolated as secondary metabolites, structurally modified nucleosides are of particular interest. They are characterized by a nucleoside core derived from a nitrogenous base linked to a sugar, on which additional substituents, such as amino groups, modified sugars, and aromatic or acylated groups, are present, expanding their structural diversity and biological properties. Hosoda et al. isolated mavintramycins A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, and two other structurally related compounds, amycetin and plicacetin, from the culture broth of Streptomyces sp. strain OPMA4055, collected from marine sediments. The fermentation broth was extracted with ethyl acetate, and the resulting crude extract was subjected to a two-step chromatographic purification process to isolate the bioactive constituents. Structural characterization of the purified compounds was achieved by NMR analysis. All compounds shared a common backbone consisting of cytosine, amosamine, and amicetose units and differed in the chemical group attached at that position (R). Maventrimycins A–G, amycetin, and plicacetin were evaluated for antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. bovis BCG. Maventrimycin G and amycetin showed the highest activity, with MIC values of 0.39 μg/mL, followed by plicacetin with an MIC of 0.78 μg/mL. Maventrimycins A and F exhibited MIC values of 1.56 μg/mL, whereas maventrimycins B, C, D, and E showed lower activity, with MIC values of 6.25 μg/mL. Due to its high activity, maventrimycin A was further evaluated against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, showing an MIC of 0.38 μg/mL. Its cytotoxicity was assessed in both undifferentiated and differentiated THP-1 cells, with IC50 values > 10 μg/mL in both models, corresponding to a selectivity index greater than 26.3. To investigate its mechanism of action, macromolecular biosynthesis assays showed that maventrimycin A strongly inhibits protein synthesis. Resistance studies in Mycobacterium avium further supported this mechanism, as all resistant mutants harbored mutations in MAV101_007745, the gene encoding the 23S rRNA, with the 1992T>G mutation shared by all resistant strains. Furthermore, these mutants were also resistant to the structurally related compound amycetin [119].
(2S,2″S)-6-lavandulyl-7,4′-dimethoxy-5,2′-dihydroxyflavanone is a polyoxygenated flavanone featuring a C6–C3–C6 backbone, a lipophilic lavandulyl substituent at C-6, and hydroxyl/methoxyl groups on the aromatic rings, with (2S,2″S) stereochemistry. In the study conducted by Danh Cao et al., the compound was isolated from the culture of the strain Streptomyces sp. strain G248, obtained from the sponge Halichondria panicea (Pallas, 1766), collected on Son-Tra Island (Da Nang) in Vietnam. The fermentation broth was treated with XAD-16 resin, followed by fractionation using silica gel and Sephadex LH-20 chromatography. Active fractions were further purified by repeated chromatographic separations and preparative TLC. The compound’s structure was elucidated by HRESI-MS and NMR analyses. The antimycobacterial activity of the flavonone was evaluated against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Rv. At a dose of 48 μg/mL, the compound reduced the microbial load by 90%. Cytotoxicity data on KB, Hep-G2, human lung adenocarcinoma Lu-1 and MCF-7 showed IC50 values of 59.7, 32.0, 80.0 and 71.7 μg/mL, respectively [120].
2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol is an alkyl-substituted aromatic phenol (hindered phenol) with two tert-butyl groups at positions 2 and 4. The compound was isolated from the fermentation medium of Streptomyces bacillaris (S. bacillaris) strain ANS2, collected from soil samples. The culture was extracted using ethyl acetate. Using various chromatographic and spectroscopic analyses, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol was identified and purified. The compound completely suppressed the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv and its MDR clinical isolate at concentrations of 48.47 and 242.37 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, 2,4-DTBP exhibited activity against the latent/non-replicating form of M. tuberculosis H37Rv in the Wayne hypoxic model, with an MIC of 100 μg/mL, indicating activity against both replicating and persister bacilli. Against the MDR isolate, 2,4-DTBP caused 78% and 74% inhibition at 100 and 50 μg/mL, respectively. Molecular docking analyses indicated that the compound positions itself in the enzymatic pocket of lysine aminotransferase (LAT), with a predicted binding energy of −5.3 kcal/mol, suggesting interference with amino acid metabolism and supporting LAT as a potential molecular target [121].
Lassomycin belongs to the class of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides and to the subclass of lassopeptides. It consists of a cyclic ring with a terminal peptide chain spanning it. Gavrish et al. purified the compound from the culture of the strain Lentzea kentuckyensis (L. kentuckyensis), collected from soil samples. Its antimycobacterial potential was evaluated on a wide variety of M. tuberculosis strains, both standard and clinical isolates. Specifically, against the reference strain of M. tuberculosis H37Rv, it showed MIC values ranging from 0.78 to 1.56 μg/mL. Similar activity was recorded for strains resistant to anti-TB drugs such as isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and fluoroquinolones. The MIC values obtained ranged from 0.78 to 3.1 μg/mL, indicating that resistance mechanisms to conventional anti-TB drugs did not compromise the functionality of lassomycin. Furthermore, the compound showed greater activity against M. tuberculosis mc26020 strains, exhibiting MIC values ranging from 0.39 to 0.78 μg/mL. To investigate the mechanism of action of lassomycin, resistant mutants of M. tuberculosis were generated by prolonged exposure of the bacterium to the compound and subsequent selection of colonies growing on lassomycin-containing medium. Genome sequencing of the resistant mutants revealed that all had mutations in the clpC1 gene, which encodes the ClpC1 protein. This result was confirmed by biochemical tests. The findings demonstrated that lassomycin increased ATP hydrolysis 7–10-fold at a concentration comparable to the MIC, suggesting that dysregulation of its ATPase activity underlies the bactericidal effect [122].
Quigley et al. screened fermentation extracts from 10,241 bacterial strains for selective activity against M. tuberculosis. Bioactive extracts were fractionated by HPLC, leading to the isolation of four compounds whose structures were elucidated by 1D- and 2D-NMR: the novel peptide siderophores amycobactin, kitamycobactin, and streptomycobactin, and the previously characterized marfomycin D. Amycobactin possesses a cyclic macrolactone structure and was produced by Amycolatopsis, kitamycobactin has a looped peptide structure and was isolated from Kitasatospora, while streptomycobactin is a linear 20-amino-acid peptide obtained from Streptomyces. All three producers belong to the phylum Actinomycetota, whereas marfomycin D is a previously known non-ribosomal peptide. Limited cytotoxicity was recorded for the HepG2 and mouse embryonic fibroblast NIH/3T3 cell lines. Specifically, kitamycobactin showed lower toxicity with TC50 values ≥ 100 µg/mL, while amycobactin, streptomycobactin, and marfomycin D showed TC50 values in the range of 16–32 µg/mL. On the other hand, the compounds exhibited potent antimycobacterial activity. Streptomycobactin and kitamycobactin completely reduced the load of M. tuberculosis mc26020 and H37Rv at doses of 0.03 and 0.06 µg/mL. Amycobactin showed more moderate activity with MIC ranges of 4–8 µg/mL, while marfomycin D showed variable activity between the two strains, recording MICs of 1 µg/mL for the mc26020 strain and 0.03 µg/mL for the H37Rv strain. Killing kinetic studies showed that kitamycobactin showed mainly bacteriostatic activity during active growth, but moderate bactericidal activity in the stationary phase. Streptomycobactin and kitamycobactin showed bactericidal activity in the exponential phase, while only kitamycobactin maintained bactericidal activity even in the stationary phase. Marfomycin D showed a transient bacteriostatic effect during the exponential phase, with loss of efficacy after seven days. To identify the compounds’ mechanism of action, the idea was to select resistant mutants of M. tuberculosis through continuous exposure to the various compounds. For streptomycobactin, the generation of mutants was unsuccessful; so, its mechanism of action was not elucidated. Given the structural similarity of kitamycobactin and lassomycin, mutants of the latter were used to assess the presence of cross-resistance. Cross-resistance was present, therefore, kitamycobactin acts on the ClpP1P2C1 system. For amycobactin, the selection of M. tuberculosis mutants was also unsuccessful. Therefore, the researchers exploited M. smegmatis, obtaining two resistant mutants characterized by deletions in the secY gene. The production of these mutations in the M. tuberculosis strain confirmed the role of SecY, a component of the Sec secretion system, as a target of amycobactin [123] (Table 5).
Table 5.
Other actinomycete-derived compounds with antimycobacterial activity.
| Compound | Producing Actinomycete | Structural Features | Target/Mechanism | Tested Strains | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mavintramycins A–G, amycetin, plicacetin | Streptomyces sp. strain OPMA4055 | Nucleosides modified with core cytosine + amosamine + amicetose; variable substituent R | Inhibition of protein synthesis by binding to 23S rRNA | M. bovis BCG | MIC: 0.63–13.01 µg/mL |
| (2S,2″S)-6-lavandulyl-7,4′-dimethoxy-5,2′-dihydroxyflavanone | Streptomyces sp. strain G248 | C6–C3–C6 polyoxygenated flavanone with lavandularyl substituent and OMe/OH groups | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | 90% reduction to 48 µg/mL |
| 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | S. bacillaris strain ANS2 | Alkyl-substituted phenol (2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol) | Binding a lysine aminotransferase (docking) | M. tuberculosis H37Rv, MDR clinical strain | MIC: 48.47 µg/mL; 242.37 µg/mL |
| Lassomycin | L. kentuckyensis | Cyclic macrolactam ring with a threaded C-terminal peptide chain | Targets ClpC1 ATPase | M. tuberculosis H37Rv; clinical isolates resistant to INH, RIF, STR, EMB, PZA, FQ; mc26020 strain | MIC 0.78–1.56 μg/mL (H37Rv); 0.78–3.1 μg/mL (drug-resistant strains); 0.39–0.78 μg/mL (mc26020) |
| Streptomycobactin | Streptomyces | Linear peptide siderophore composed of 20 amino acids | Undefined | M. tuberculosis mc26020, H37Rv | MIC 0.03 µg/mL |
| Amycobactin | Amycolatopsis | Peptide siderophore with cyclic macrolactone structure | Target identified as SecY | M. tuberculosis mc26020, H37Rv | MIC 4–8 µg/mL |
| Kitamycobactin | Kitasatospora | Looped peptide siderophore | Targets the essential ClpP1P2C1 system | M. tuberculosis mc26020, H37Rv | MIC 0.06 µg/mL |
| Marfomycin D | Streptomyces | Non-ribosomal peptide | Undefined | M. tuberculosis mc26020, H37Rv | MIC 1 µg/mL for mc26020 and 0.03 µg/mL for H37Rv |
In conclusion, kitamycobactin emerges as a very promising antimycobacterial compound. Potent activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and mc26020 (0.06 and 0.03 μg/mL, respectively) was demonstrated, with bactericidal activity during both exponential and stationary growth phases by disrupting the ClpP1P2C1 proteolytic system. Furthermore, its relatively low cytotoxicity (TC50 ≥ 100 μg/mL) further supports its therapeutic potential. However, no in vivo efficacy data are available, and further studies are therefore needed to validate its antimycobacterial activity and evaluate its therapeutic potential in vivo [123].
4.2. Other Bacterial Metabolites
In addition to actinomycete-derived compounds, several non-actinomycete bacteria produce secondary metabolites with significant activity against MTBC. Although less studied, these organisms nevertheless represent an emerging reservoir of structurally diverse antimicrobial agents with a variety of mechanisms of action. Ling and colleagues used an innovative device, called the iChip, which allows them to cultivate soil microorganisms that are normally uncultivable in the laboratory. Extracts from 10,000 isolates obtained by growing on the iChip were evaluated for their antibacterial activity. Among these, the extract derived from Eleftheria terrae (E. terrae) showed effective activity. Teixobactin was isolated from the active fraction, and its structure was determined by mass spectrometry and NMR studies. Teixobactin exhibited potent activity against replicating M. tuberculosis, with a MIC below 1 μg/mL. No teixobactin-resistant M. tuberculosis mutants could be obtained, even when bacteria were exposed to 4× the MIC. Its activity is attributed to inhibition of cell-envelope biosynthesis through binding to conserved pyrophosphate-containing lipid intermediates. In M. tuberculosis, teixobactin is proposed to target decaprenyl-coupled precursors involved in peptidoglycan and arabinogalactan biosynthesis, providing a mechanistic explanation for its antimycobacterial activity [124].
Imai et al. evaluated the antimycobacterial efficacy of evybactin and its mechanism of action against strains of M. tuberculosis. The compound was isolated from the culture of Photorhabdus noenieputensis (P. noenieputensis) strain DSM 25462, a bacterial symbiont of entomopathogenic nematodes. The bacterium was cultured for eight days, after which the fermentation broth was extracted using XAD16N resin and purified by reversed-phase HPLC, yielding evybactin at 92% purity. Its structure was elucidated by HR-LC-MS and multidimensional NMR, revealing a cyclic depsipeptide containing 11 amino acid residues, including N-methylhistidine, N-formyltryptophan, and two β-aspartates. The absolute configurations of the amino acids were determined by Marfey’s derivatization method. Evybactin showed no toxicity against human HepG2, FaDu, and HEK293 cells at concentrations below 128 μg/mL. Furthermore, it completely suppressed the growth of replicating M. tuberculosis strains H37Rv and mc26020 at a concentration of 0.25 μg/mL. To determine the mechanism of action, M. tuberculosis H37Rv strains were selected and subsequently subjected to genomic analysis. Specifically, the strains were exposed to high concentrations of evybactin, 10 times the MIC, to select spontaneously resistant mutants. Genomic sequencing of the mutants revealed mutations in the BacA gene, which encodes a transporter involved in the compound’s entry into cells. This transporter is not an essential enzyme for bacterial life; in fact, loss of the transporter would not necessarily cause bacterial death. To identify the compound’s true target, TB strains were continuously treated at higher doses, 100 times the MIC, to avoid mutations in the bacA gene. Sequencing data showed point mutations in the gyrA gene, which encodes the A subunit of DNA gyrase. The target was confirmed by biochemical assays. The crystallographic structure of the DNA gyrase and evybactin complex showed that the compound occupies a site on DNA gyrase distinct from that occupied by fluoroquinolones and binds to the winged-helix domain of the GyrA subunit. This location highlights the novel mechanism of action and the lack of cross-resistance with fluoroquinolones [125] (Table 6).
Table 6.
Other bacterial-derived compounds with antimycobacterial activity.
| Compound | Producing Actinomycete | Structural Features | Target/Mechanism | Tested Strains | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teixobactin | E. terrae | Non-ribosomal lipo-depsipeptide containing non-canonical amino acids and a lipid moiety | Binds essential lipid intermediates involved in cell-wall precursor transport, including those required for peptidoglycan and arabinogalactan biosynthesis | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC: 0.125 µg/mL |
| Evybactin | P. noenieputensis strain DSM 25462 | Cyclic depsipeptide composed of 11 amino acid residues, including N-methylhistidine, N-formylated tryptophan and β-aspartate residues | Targets DNA gyrase A | M. tuberculosis H37Rv, mc26020 | MIC 0.25 µg/mL |
Among the mentioned products, evybactin represents the most promising antimycobacterial compound. It exhibits potent activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and mc26020 (0.25 μg/mL), by binding to the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase at a site distinct from that of fluoroquinolones, suggesting a reduced potential for cross-resistance. It showed a favorable cytotoxicity profile against several eukaryotic cell lines at doses lower than 128 μg/mL [125]. However, the lack of in vivo efficacy data highlights the need for further studies to validate its therapeutic potential and pharmacological properties.
Although actinomycetes represent the largest and most studied source of natural metabolites with antimycobacterial activity, recent studies have highlighted the emerging role of non-actinomycete bacteria as alternative reservoirs of novel bioactive molecules. Even if historically less explored, these microorganisms have demonstrated high chemical diversity and mechanisms of action, including the inhibition of essential cell-wall biosynthetic pathways and the selective targeting of key intracellular enzymes, such as DNA gyrase. The structural diversity of these metabolites and their ability to act on vital bacterial targets underscore the potential of unconventional bacterial sources in the discovery of novel therapeutic agents against TB.
4.3. Fungal-Derived Metabolites
Fungi represent another important source of bioactive secondary metabolites. These metabolites are not directly involved in fungal life processes but are important for ecological interactions through mechanisms of microbial competition, defense, and the establishment of symbiotic relationships [126]. Due to their structural diversity and broad range of biological activities, these compounds have been widely exploited in various fields, including medicine, agriculture, and industry [127]. Among the most representative examples are penicillins and cephalosporins, antibiotics currently used clinically against a broad spectrum of bacteria [128].
Luo et al. isolated 12 compounds from the marine fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01, including diketopiperazine alkaloids, fumiquinazoline alkaloids, and tetracyclic triterpenoids. Their structures were elucidated by NMR and ESI-MS and comparison with known compounds. Among the isolates, gliotoxin, 12,13-dihydroxyfumitremorgine C, and helvolic acid showed significant biological activity. Gliotoxin is an epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) containing an intracyclic disulfide bridge, 12,13-dihydroxyfumitremorgine C is a prenylated indole alkaloid, and helvolic acid is a fusidan-type steroidal triterpenoid. Gliotoxin, 12,13-dihydroxy-fumitremorgine C, and helvolic acid inhibited the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv with MIC50 values of <0.03, 2.41, and 0.894 μM, respectively. Among the purified products, only gliotoxin induced significant cytotoxicity against the human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562, the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549, and the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Huh-7, showing IC50 values of 0.191, 0.015, and 95.4 μM, respectively [129].
Andrioli et al. evaluated six fungal metabolites isolated from three different fungal species: austdiol, austdiol diacetate, mycoleptone A, and eugenitin from endophyte Mycoleptodiscus indicus (M. indicus), emodin from Penicillium citrinum (P. citrinum), and a δ-lactam derivative from Humicola grisea (H. grisea). Metabolites were extracted from the fermentation medium with ethyl acetate. The obtained crude extract was purified by chromatography on Sephadex LH-20 and silica, leading to the isolation of the above compounds, which were characterized by NMR and mass spectrometry. Austdiol, austdiol diacetate, and mycoleptone A are oxygenated fungal polyketides, whereas eugenitin and emodin are quinone derivatives. Cytotoxic activity was assessed on mouse macrophages RAW 264.7 using the MTT assay. All products exhibited CC50 values greater than 100 μM. At the highest dose, only austdiol, mycoleptone A, and emodin induced weak cellular toxicity of less than 30%. Antimycobacterial potential was assessed against replicating M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis strains H37Rv, M442, and M299. Findings showed variable antimycobacterial potential. In detail, emodin showed the greatest antimycobacterial potency, with a MIC50 of 0.4 µM against M. bovis BCG and values between 5.0 and 8.2 µM in strains of M. tuberculosis. Mycoleptone A showed good activity against M. bovis BCG with a MIC50 of 1.7 µM, while it exhibited MIC50 values between 9.2 and 37.4 µM among the different TB strains. Eugenitin did not significantly impact the growth of M. bovis BCG, while for the TB strains H37Rv, M442, and M299, the MIC50 values were 79.1, 81.2, and >100 µM, respectively. The δ-lactam derivative showed limited activity, exhibiting MIC50 of 20.5 µM for M. bovis BCG, and >100 µM for all TB strains. Conversely, austdiol exhibited the opposite pattern, showing MIC50 of 11.7 µM for the BCG strain, and between 10.8 and 33.4 µM for the TB strains. Its diacetate variant showed reduced activity. Specifically, it showed MIC50 of 23.4 µM for M. bovis BCG; otherwise, MIC50 of 93.4 and >100 µM were recorded for strains M299, H37Rv, and M442, respectively [130].
Calixto et al. purified the macrolide (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin from the culture of the endophytic fungus Sordaria tamaensis (S. tamaensis), obtained from the leaves and stem of the Tocoyena bullata plant. The fungal fermentation medium was extracted with ethanol and fractionated into hexane, ethyl acetate, butanol, and aqueous fractions. The ethyl acetate fraction (Tb1A) showed the highest antimycobacterial activity, with the active compound identified by a major chromatographic peak at 17.21 min. MS and NMR analyses identified the compound as (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin, a 12-membered macrolide containing a resorcinol moiety and a chiral center with the R configuration. Its cytotoxic activity on RAW 264.7 macrophages and antimycobacterial activity against strains M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M299 were evaluated. The pure compound induced 50% cell viability at a dose of 242.6 µg/mL. A significant antimycobacterial activity was found. The macrolide (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin showed MIC50 values of 6.7, 60.4, and 92.2 µg/mL on BCG strain and M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M299, respectively. In C57BL/6 mice infected with the hypervirulent M299 strain, intraperitoneal treatment with a dose of 20 mg/kg for 15 days led to a reduction in bacterial load of 1.5 log10 CFU. Furthermore, a 20% reduction in the area affected by pneumonia, a strong decrease in relative lung weight, a drastic reduction in the recruitment of neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes, and dendritic cells, and, finally, a blockade of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-17A) were observed. Chemogenomic and molecular docking studies have identified class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (FBPA) as a potential macrolide target in M. tuberculosis. FBPA is an enzyme involved in glycolysis and catalyzes the reversible conversion of dihydroxyacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Both conformations bind in the active site through hydrogen bonds with residues such as Gly254, Ser255, and Asn274, and hydrophobic/van der Waals interactions with residues such as Gln51, His252, and Val275. Furthermore, the methoxy group present in the (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin structure interacts with the Zn2+ ion in the catalytic site of FBPA, blocking the enzyme’s activity [131].
In the study conducted by Isaka et al., secondary metabolites produced by Ganoderma orbiforme (G. orbiforme), isolated from a dead oil palm trunk on a plantation in Klong Thom, Thailand, were isolated and characterized. The fungal strain was grown on a large scale, and the resulting fermentation medium was extracted with methanol or acetone. The resulting crude extracts were fractionated using solvents of different polarities, such as hexane and ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were concentrated and further purified by silica column chromatography and preparative reversed-phase HPLC. Among the numerous isolated compounds, several different bioactive lanostanoids were detected. They belong to the class of lanostane triterpenes. These compounds are characterized by a C30 tetracyclic skeleton of the lanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic type, with a side chain at C-17 and a carboxyl group at C-26. The structural differences between the various analogues are mainly due to the presence of hydroxyl, acetoxy, methoxy, and carbonyl groups at the C-3, C-7, C-15, and C-22 positions. The cytotoxic and antimycobacterial activities of these compounds were evaluated on the Vero cell line and on the replicating M. tuberculosis H37Ra strain. The compounds that showed the best selectivity index were (24E)-7α-Hydroxy-3-oxolanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid, (24E)-3β,15α-Diacetoxylanosta-7,9(11),24-trien-26-oic acid and ganorbiformin C. The first had an IC50 value of 103 µM in eukaryotic cells, compared to an MIC of 3.13 µg/mL against the M. tuberculosis H37Ra strain. (24E)-3β,15α-Diacetoxylanosta-7,9(11),24-trien-26-oic acid induced a 50% reduction in cell viability at a dose of 32 µM and suppressed mycobacterial growth at a concentration of 0.391 µg/mL. Finally, ganorbiformin C impacted the viability of Vero cells with an IC50 of 87 µM while showing a MIC of 1.56 µg/mL against the H37Ra strain [132].
The same experimental design was used by the same research group to purify and analyze the metabolites of the culture of the fungal strain Ganoderma sp. strain BCC 16642, obtained from a wood sample collected in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park in Thailand. Again, the fungal culture was fermented on a large scale, extracted with organic solvents, and the resulting metabolites were purified by silica chromatography and preparative reversed-phase HPLC. Forty-two metabolites were purified and classified as lanostane triterpenes. The novel compounds with a better selectivity index were (24E)-3β,15α-diacetoxy-7α-hydroxylanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid and 3β,15α-diacetoxylanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid. Their cytotoxic potency was evaluated on the Vero cell line, while the antimycobacterial activity against replicating M. tuberculosis H37Ra. (24E)-3β,15α-diacetoxy-7α-hydroxylanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid reduced cell viability by 50% at a dose of 32 μM and totally inhibited microbial growth at a MIC of 1.56 μg/mL. In contrast, 3β,15α-diacetoxy lanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid impacted the viability of Vero cells and the bacterial strain with IC50 values of 22 μM and MIC of 0.781 μg/mL [133] (Table 7).
Table 7.
Fungal-derived compounds with antimycobacterial activity.
| Compound | Producing Fungus | Structural Features | Target/Mechanism | Tested Strains | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gliotoxin | Aspergillus sp. strain SCSIO | Epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP); cyclic diketopiperazine core containing an intracyclic disulfide bridge | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC50 < 0.03 µM |
| 12,13-Dihydroxyfumitremorgine C | Aspergillus sp. strain SCSIO | Prenylated indole alkaloid; indole nucleus fused with diketopiperazine ring and hydroxyl substituents | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC50 2.41 µM |
| Helvolic acid | Aspergillus sp. strain SCSIO | Fusidane-type steroidal triterpenoid with oxygenated pentacyclic skeleton | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Rv | MIC50 0.894 µM |
| Emodin | P. citrinum | Anthraquinone derivative; aromatic system with carbonyl and hydroxyl groups | Undefined | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M442, M299 | MIC50 0.4 µM against BCG; 5.0–8.2 µM against M. tuberculosis strains |
| Mycoleptone A | M. indicus | Fungal polyketide with oxygenated aromatic structure | Undefined | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M442, M299 | MIC50 1.7 µM against BCG; 9.2–37.4 µM against M. tuberculosis strains |
| Austdiol | M. indicus | Oxygenated aromatic polyketide | Undefined | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M442, M299 | MIC50 11.7 µM against BCG; 10.8–33.4 µM against M. tuberculosis strains |
| Eugenitin | M. indicus | Quinone derivative with condensed aromatic system | Undefined | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M442, M299 | Weak activity; MIC50 79.1 µM (H37Rv), 81.2 µM (M442), >100 µM (M299) |
| δ-Lactam derivative | H. grisea | Lactam-containing fungal metabolite | Undefined | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M442, M299 | MIC50 20.5 µM against BCG and >100 µM against M. tuberculosis strains |
| (R)-(+)-Lasiodiplodin | S. tamaensis | 12-membered macrolactone ring linked to oxygenated resorcinol aromatic moiety; R-(+) chiral center | Inhibits class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase | M. bovis BCG; M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M299 | MIC50 6.7 µg/mL (BCG), 60.4 µg/mL (H37Rv), 92.2 µg/mL (M299). |
| (24E)-7α-Hydroxy-3-oxolanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid | G. orbiforme | Lanostane triterpenoid; C30 tetracyclic skeleton with hydroxylated and oxygenated groups | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 3.13 µg/mL |
| (24E)-3β,15α-Diacetoxylanosta-7,9(11),24-trien-26-oic acid | G. orbiforme | Lanostane triterpenoid with acetoxy substitutions | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 0.391 µg/mL |
| Ganorbiformin C | G. orbiforme | Lanostane triterpenoid derivative | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 1.56 µg/mL |
| (24E)-3β,15α-Diacetoxy-7α-hydroxylanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid | Ganoderma sp. strain BCC 16642 | Oxygenated lanostane triterpenoid | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 1.56 µg/mL |
| 3β,15α-Diacetoxylanosta-8,24-dien-26-oic acid | Ganoderma sp. strain BCC 16642 | Lanostane triterpenoid with acetoxy groups | Undefined | M. tuberculosis H37Ra | MIC 0.781 µg/mL |
Overall, (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin emerges as the most promising fungal metabolite described, combining significant in vitro antimycobacterial activity (MIC50 = 6.7 μg/mL against M. bovis BCG and 60.4 μg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Rv), limited cytotoxicity (CC50 = 242.6 μg/mL), and in vivo efficacy, with a 1.5 log10 reduction in pulmonary bacterial load. Although FBPA has been proposed as a potential target, further studies are required to confirm its mechanism of action. Nevertheless, (R)-(+)-lasiodiplodin represents a promising scaffold for developing analogues with improved cytotoxicity and selectivity [131].
5. Conclusions
The rapid emergence of MDR and XDR TB strains has rendered current therapeutic regimens increasingly ineffective, underscoring the urgent need for innovative drugs with alternative mechanisms of action. In this context, microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, represent an important source of natural products that exhibit potent antimycobacterial activity combined with low cytotoxicity. Several promising secondary metabolites were highlighted in this review (Figure 4). Among the most notable examples is ecumicin, isolated from the fermentation medium of Nonomuraea sp. This compound exhibited potent bactericidal activity under both replicating and non-replicating conditions, with a selectivity index greater than 640, and a novel mechanism of action, with the ClpC1 ATPase complex identified as its molecular target. Potent antimycobacterial activity, low cytotoxicity, and target specificity represent key characteristics for the development of effective therapies against drug-resistant TB.
Figure 4.

Schematic overview summarizing the major classes of microbial natural products active against MTBC, categorized by microbial source, chemical class, molecular target, and current stage of development.
The natural products discussed in this review represent promising compounds that merit further in vivo evaluation to characterize their pharmacokinetic properties, bioavailability, efficacy, and safety. However, despite the promising antimycobacterial activity of several microbial natural products, their translation into clinically useful anti-TB agents remains challenging [134]. Major limitations include unfavorable pharmacokinetic profiles, such as poor solubility, chemical instability, limited bioavailability, and suboptimal tissue penetration, compromising in vivo efficacy despite demonstrated potent in vitro activity. Another critical issue concerns safety, as potent antimycobacterial activity does not necessarily guarantee an adequate therapeutic window. Systematic evaluations of cytotoxicity, off-target effects, metabolic stability, and in vivo tolerability will therefore be necessary. The limited availability of some microbial metabolites also represents a major obstacle to preclinical development. Low fermentation yields, difficulties in isolation and purification, and the complexity of large-scale production can limit the availability of material for pharmacological studies and subsequent clinical development. In this context, optimization of fermentation processes, metabolic engineering, heterologous expression, and genome-mining strategies could help improve the production and availability of these compounds.
Finally, clinical translation requires meeting requirements related to production reproducibility, chemical characterization, purity, batch-to-batch consistency, pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and quality control [135]. The development of semisynthetic derivatives and rationally designed analogs therefore represents a particularly attractive strategy for maintaining the antimycobacterial activity of natural products while improving their pharmacokinetic properties, selectivity, and tolerability. Overall, overcoming these limitations through structural optimization, development of semi-synthetic analogues, improved manufacturing processes and rigorous preclinical validation could facilitate the transformation of the most promising natural products into anti-TB candidates with improved efficacy, selectivity and safety [136].
6. Current Limitations
Although this review reports numerous studies on the antimycobacterial activity of natural products derived from microorganisms, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. The reported evidence is based primarily on in vitro studies; therefore, the in vivo application of natural products remains uncertain. They may not exhibit the same activity in preclinical or clinical settings due to pharmacokinetic barriers, limited bioavailability, toxicity, and the complexity of host–pathogen interactions. For many compounds investigated, the mechanism of action has not been elucidated, limiting the optimization of the antimycobacterial agent and its development as a drug. Another significant limitation is that most of the reported evidence has exploited standard bacterial strains, not multi-susceptible, MDR, and XDR clinical isolates. Therefore, the reported activities may not accurately reflect the antimycobacterial potential of these compounds against clinically relevant bacterial strains. Furthermore, variability in compound purity, based on isolation methods, represents another source of heterogeneity, influencing reported antimycobacterial activity and complicating comparisons with other studies. Despite these limitations, available evidence highlights microorganisms as a valuable source of structurally diverse natural products with promising antimycobacterial activity.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) exclusively for English-language editing to improve grammar, clarity, and readability. No scientific content, interpretation, or conclusions were generated by the tool. The authors reviewed and edited the output as necessary and took full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.F.; validation, M.R.G. and L.P.; formal analysis, R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, V.F.; writing—review and editing, A.F., G.R. and F.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.World Health Organization Tuberculosis. [(accessed on 1 May 2026)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis.
- 2.World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Report 2025. [(accessed on 1 May 2026)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116924.
- 3.Sathiyamoorthi S., Tiwari U., Muralikrishnan S., Aravindakshan R., Ganapathy K. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analytical Study of Morbidity Profiles, Trends, and Patient Care in a Primary Tuberculosis Treatment Unit in India. Cureus. 2025;17:e81939. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zumla A., Sahu S., Ditiu L., Singh U., Park Y.-J., Yeboah-Manu D., Osei-Wusu S., Asogun D., Nyasulu P., Tembo J., et al. Inequities Underlie the Alarming Resurgence of Tuberculosis as the World’s Top Cause of Death from an Infectious Disease-Breaking the Silence and Addressing the Underlying Root Causes. IJID Reg. 2025;14:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang H., Liu M., Fan W., Sun S., Fan X. The Impact of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in the Environment on One Health Approach. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:994745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ekroth A.K.E., Gerth M., Stevens E.J., Ford S.A., King K.C. Host Genotype and Genetic Diversity Shape the Evolution of a Novel Bacterial Infection. ISME J. 2021;15:2146–2157. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00911-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Espinosa-Pereiro J., Sánchez-Montalvá A., Aznar M.L., Espiau M. MDR Tuberculosis Treatment. Medicina. 2022;58:188. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Treatment of Tuberculosis. [(accessed on 8 May 2026)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/tb/hcp/treatment/index.html.
- 9.Timboe K., Jackson J.B., Becker G.L. Recent Advances in Tuberculosis Treatment: Towards Shorter, Safer, and More Effective Therapies. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2026;42:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2026.100582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mereškevičienė R., Danila E. The Adverse Effects of Tuberculosis Treatment: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Medicina. 2025;61:911. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization 1.1 TB Incidence. [(accessed on 12 May 2026)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2025/tb-disease-burden/1-1-tb-incidence.
- 12.Trajman A., Campbell J.R., Kunor T., Ruslami R., Amanullah F., Behr M.A., Menzies D. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2025;405:850–866. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02479-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Folliero V., Lama S., Franci G., Giugliano R., D’Auria G., Ferranti P., Pourjula M., Galdiero M., Stiuso P. Casein-derived peptides from the dairy product kashk exhibit wound healing properties and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus: Structural and functional characterization. Food Res. Int. 2022;153:110949. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.110949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Waters M., Tadi P. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2026. Streptomycin. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Diab A., Dickerson H., Al Musaimi O. Targeting the Heart of Mycobacterium: Advances in Anti-Tubercular Agents Disrupting Cell Wall Biosynthesis. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:70. doi: 10.3390/ph18010070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Egan A.J.F., Biboy J., van’t Veer I., Breukink E., Vollmer W. Activities and Regulation of Peptidoglycan Synthases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015;370:20150031. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang H., Liu D., Zhou X. Effect of Mycolic Acids on Host Immunity and Lipid Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;25:396. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Torrelles J.B., Chatterjee D. Collected Thoughts on Mycobacterial Lipoarabinomannan, a Cell Envelope Lipoglycan. Pathogens. 2023;12:1281. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12111281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jacobo-Delgado Y.M., Rodríguez-Carlos A., Serrano C.J., Rivas-Santiago B. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cell-Wall and Antimicrobial Peptides: A Mission Impossible? Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1194923. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1194923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Angala S.K., Jackson M. Characterization of Arabinosyl Transfer Reactions in the Biosynthesis of Mycobacterial Cell Envelope (Lipo)Polysaccharides. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1954:175–186. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9154-9_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gong Y., Wei C., Wang J., Mu N., Lu Q., Wu C., Yan N., Yang H., Zhao Y., Yang X., et al. Structure of the Priming Arabinosyltransferase AftA Required for AG Biosynthesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2023;120:e2302858120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302858120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee N., Patel P., Nguyen H. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2026. Ethambutol. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beraldi-Magalhaes F., Parker S.L., Sanches C., Sousa Garcia L., Souza Carvalho B.K., Fachi M.M., de Liz M.V., Pontarolo R., Lipman J., Cordeiro-Santos M., et al. Is Dosing of Ethambutol as Part of a Fixed-Dose Combination Product Optimal for Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients with Tuberculosis? A Population Pharmacokinetic Study. Antibiotics. 2021;10:1559. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.PaweŁczyk J., Kremer L. The Molecular Genetics of Mycolic Acid Biosynthesis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014;2:MGM2-0003–2013. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0003-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shahid N.U.A., Naguit N., Jakkoju R., Laeeq S., Reghefaoui T., Zahoor H., Yook J.H., Rizwan M., Mohammed L. Use of Isoniazid Monotherapy in Comparison to Rifamycin-Based Regimen for the Treatment of Patients With Latent Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022;14:e25083. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ang M.L.T., Zainul Rahim S.Z., de Sessions P.F., Lin W., Koh V., Pethe K., Hibberd M.L., Alonso S. EthA/R-Independent Killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Ethionamide. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:710. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu Y., Wu J., Liao S., Sun Z. Treating Tuberculosis with High Doses of Anti-TB Drugs: Mechanisms and Outcomes. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2017;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0239-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ehrt S., Rhee K., Schnappinger D. Mycobacterial Genes Essential for the Pathogen’s Survival in the Host. Immunol. Rev. 2015;264:319–326. doi: 10.1111/imr.12256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sweeney M.I., Carranza C.E., Tobin D.M. Understanding Mycobacterium tuberculosis through Its Genomic Diversity and Evolution. PLoS Pathog. 2025;21:e1012956. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Warner D.F., Barczak A.K., Gutierrez M.G., Mizrahi V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Biology, Pathogenicity and Interaction with the Host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2025;23:788–804. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01201-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ostrik A.A., Azhikina T.L., Salina E.G. Small Noncoding RNAs and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. Biochemistry. 2021;86:S109–S119. doi: 10.1134/S000629792114008X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oakley A.J. A Structural View of Bacterial DNA Replication. Protein Sci. 2019;28:990–1004. doi: 10.1002/pro.3615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ditse Z., Lamers M.H., Warner D.F. DNA Replication in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017;5:1–25. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0027-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bębenek A., Ziuzia-Graczyk I. Fidelity of DNA Replication-a Matter of Proofreading. Curr. Genet. 2018;64:985–996. doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0820-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spinnato M.C., Lo Sciuto A., Mercolino J., Lucidi M., Leoni L., Rampioni G., Visca P., Imperi F. Effect of a Defective Clamp Loader Complex of DNA Polymerase III on Growth and SOS Response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms. 2022;10:423. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newcomb E.S.P., Douma L.G., Morris L.A., Bloom L.B. The Escherichia coli Clamp Loader Rapidly Remodels SSB on DNA to Load Clamps. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:12872–12884. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Simonsen S., Søgaard C.K., Olsen J.G., Otterlei M., Kragelund B.B. The Bacterial DNA Sliding Clamp, β-Clamp: Structure, Interactions, Dynamics and Drug Discovery. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2024;81:245. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05252-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rascón Pérez J.P., d’Acoz O.d., Soubry N., Xu W., Singh Parmar B., Weber S.C., Reyes-Lamothe R. Genome Integrity Relies on Rapid Recycling of DNA Pol III in Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2025;122:e2511725122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2511725122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Duprey A., Groisman E.A. The Regulation of DNA Supercoiling across Evolution. Protein Sci. 2021;30:2042–2056. doi: 10.1002/pro.4171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Garcia P.K., Martinez Borrero R., Annamalai T., Diaz E., Balarezo S., Tiwari P.B., Tse-Dinh Y.-C. Localization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Topoisomerase I C-Terminal Sequence Motif Required for Inhibition by Endogenous Toxin MazF4. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:1032320. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1032320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klostermeier D. Why Two? On the Role of (A-)Symmetry in Negative Supercoiling of DNA by Gyrase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1489. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ziganshina L.E., Titarenko A.F., Davies G.R. Fluoroquinolones for Treating Tuberculosis (Presumed Drug-Sensitive) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;2013:CD004795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004795.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wiegmans A.P., Ward A., Ivanova E., Duijf P.H.G., Adams M.N., Najib I.M., Van Oosterhout R., Sadowski M.C., Kelly G., Morrical S.W., et al. Genome Instability and Pressure on Non-Homologous End Joining Drives Chemotherapy Resistance via a DNA Repair Crisis Switch in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. NAR Cancer. 2021;3:zcab022. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcab022. Erratum in NAR Cancer 2021, 3, zcab041. https://doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcab022 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chatterjee N., Walker G.C. Mechanisms of DNA Damage, Repair, and Mutagenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2017;58:235–263. doi: 10.1002/em.22087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chakraborty U., Alani E. Understanding How Mismatch Repair Proteins Participate in the Repair/Anti-Recombination Decision. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16:fow071. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martín-Blecua I., Sastre-Domínguez J., Valverde J.R., García-Bravo P., Ruiz-Enamorado Á., Prados-Rosales R., Das L., Jacobs W.R., San Millán Á., Blázquez J., et al. The Unique Role of nucS-Mediated Noncanonical Mismatch Repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance Evolution. mBio. 2026;17:e0331025. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03310-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rivera-Flores I.V., Wang E.X., Murphy K.C. Mycobacterium smegmatis NucS-Promoted DNA Mismatch Repair Involves Limited Resection by a 5’-3’ Exonuclease and Is Independent of Homologous Recombination and NHEJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:12308–12323. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hindi N.N., Elsakrmy N., Ramotar D. The Base Excision Repair Process: Comparison between Higher and Lower Eukaryotes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:7943–7965. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03990-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Saha L.K., Wakasugi M., Akter S., Prasad R., Wilson S.H., Shimizu N., Sasanuma H., Huang S.-Y.N., Agama K., Pommier Y., et al. Topoisomerase I-Driven Repair of UV-Induced Damage in NER-Deficient Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:14412–14420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920165117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sutherland C., Murakami K.S. An Introduction to the Structure and Function of the Catalytic Core Enzyme of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase. EcoSal Plus. 2018;8:1–9. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0004-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brewer J., Delbeau M., Zoullas W.B., Darst S.A., Campbell E.A. Structural Insights into De Novo Promoter Escape by Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA Polymerase. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:9990. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-64941-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mehra S., Golden N.A., Stuckey K., Didier P.J., Doyle L.A., Russell-Lodrigue K.E., Sugimoto C., Hasegawa A., Sivasubramani S.K., Roy C.J., et al. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Stress Response Factor SigH Is Required for Bacterial Burden as Well as Immunopathology in Primate Lungs. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;205:1203–1213. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mosaei H., Zenkin N. Inhibition of RNA Polymerase by Rifampicin and Rifamycin-Like Molecules. EcoSal Plus. 2020;9:1–16. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0017-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huaman M.A., Sterling T.R. Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection-An Update. Clin. Chest Med. 2019;40:839–848. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lin J., Zhou D., Steitz T.A., Polikanov Y.S., Gagnon M.G. Ribosome-Targeting Antibiotics: Modes of Action, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Implications for Drug Design. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2018;87:451–478. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kumar N., Sharma S., Kaushal P.S. Protein Synthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a Potential Target for Therapeutic Interventions. Mol. Asp. Med. 2021;81:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2021.101002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sawyer E.B., Grabowska A.D., Cortes T. Translational Regulation in Mycobacteria and Its Implications for Pathogenicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:6950–6961. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schwenk S., Arnvig K.B. Regulatory RNA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Back to Basics. Pathog. Dis. 2018;76:fty035. doi: 10.1093/femspd/fty035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Acosta-Reyes F.J., Bhattacharjee S., Gottesman M., Frank J. How Dedicated Ribosomes Translate a Leaderless mRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2024;436:168423. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li Y., Sharma M.R., Koripella R.K., Yang Y., Kaushal P.S., Lin Q., Wade J.T., Gray T.A., Derbyshire K.M., Agrawal R.K., et al. Zinc Depletion Induces Ribosome Hibernation in Mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:8191–8196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804555115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chulluncuy R., Espiche C., Nakamoto J.A., Fabbretti A., Milón P. Conformational Response of 30S-Bound IF3 to A-Site Binders Streptomycin and Kanamycin. Antibiotics. 2016;5:38. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics5040038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Seely S.M., Parajuli N.P., De Tarafder A., Ge X., Sanyal S., Gagnon M.G. Molecular Basis of the Pleiotropic Effects by the Antibiotic Amikacin on the Ribosome. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4666. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40416-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nahid P., Dorman S.E., Alipanah N., Barry P.M., Brozek J.L., Cattamanchi A., Chaisson L.H., Chaisson R.E., Daley C.L., Grzemska M., et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;63:e147–e195. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Khodaparast L., Wu G., Khodaparast L., Schmidt B.Z., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. Bacterial Protein Homeostasis Disruption as a Therapeutic Intervention. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8:681855. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.681855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Diaz Arenas C., Alvarez M., Wilson R.H., Shakhnovich E.I., Ogbunugafor C.B. Protein Quality Control Is a Master Modulator of Molecular Evolution in Bacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 2025;17:evaf010. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hosfelt J., Richards A., Zheng M., Adura C., Nelson B., Yang A., Fay A., Resager W., Ueberheide B., Glickman J.F., et al. An Allosteric Inhibitor of Bacterial Hsp70 Chaperone Potentiates Antibiotics and Mitigates Resistance. Cell Chem. Biol. 2022;29:854–869.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bordes P., Genevaux P. Control of Toxin-Antitoxin Systems by Proteases in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8:691399. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.691399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Personne Y., Brown A.C., Schuessler D.L., Parish T. Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP Proteases Are Co-Transcribed but Exhibit Different Substrate Specificities. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Upadhyay A. Natural Compounds in the Regulation of Proteostatic Pathways: An Invincible Artillery against Stress, Ageing, and Diseases. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2021;11:2995–3014. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bao Y., Hu C., Wang B., Liu X., Wu Q., Xu D., Shi Z., Sun C. Mitochondrial Reverse Electron Transport: Mechanisms, Pathophysiological Roles, and Therapeutic Potential. Biology. 2025;14:1140. doi: 10.3390/biology14091140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Black P.A., Warren R.M., Louw G.E., van Helden P.D., Victor T.C., Kana B.D. Energy Metabolism and Drug Efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:2491–2503. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02293-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Werman J.M., Chen Y.-C., Yuan T., Yang X., Sampson N.S. A Chemoproteomic Approach to Elucidate the Mechanism of Action of 6-Azasteroids with Unique Activity in Mycobacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2023;9:1993–2004. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ahmad A., Akhtar J., Ahmad M., Khan M.I., Wasim R., Islam A., Singh A. Bedaquiline: An Insight Into Its Clinical Use in Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Drug Res. 2024;74:269–279. doi: 10.1055/a-2331-7061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.de Jager V.R., Dawson R., van Niekerk C., Hutchings J., Kim J., Vanker N., van der Merwe L., Choi J., Nam K., Diacon A.H. Telacebec (Q203), a New Antituberculosis Agent. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1280–1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1913327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim S., Lim S.-W., Choi J. Drug Discovery Inspired by Bioactive Small Molecules from Nature. Anim. Cells Syst. 2022;26:254–265. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2022.2157480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pham J.V., Yilma M.A., Feliz A., Majid M.T., Maffetone N., Walker J.R., Kim E., Cho H.J., Reynolds J.M., Song M.C., et al. A Review of the Microbial Production of Bioactive Natural Products and Biologics. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1404. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Paulos B., Bisrat D., Yeshak M.Y., Asres K. Natural Products with Potent Antimycobacterial Activity (2000–2024): A Review. Molecules. 2025;30:3708. doi: 10.3390/molecules30183708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Parra J., Beaton A., Seipke R.F., Wilkinson B., Hutchings M.I., Duncan K.R. Antibiotics from Rare Actinomycetes, beyond the Genus Streptomyces. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023;76:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Soukup A.A., Keller N.P., Wiemann P. Enhancing Nonribosomal Peptide Biosynthesis in Filamentous Fungi. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1401:149–160. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3375-4_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zwahlen R.D., Pohl C., Bovenberg R.A.L., Driessen A.J.M. Bacterial MbtH-like Proteins Stimulate Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase-Derived Secondary Metabolism in Filamentous Fungi. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019;8:1776–1787. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Prazdnova E.V., Kulikov M.P., Khmelevtsova L.E. The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes. Molecules. 2026;31:683. doi: 10.3390/molecules31040683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lee B., Hwang G.J., Jang J.-P., Park B., Won J., Kim S.Y., Woo M., Wood C., Hwang B.Y., Jang J.-H., et al. Discovery of Pyridomycin Derivatives as InhA Inhibitors from Actinomycetes through Molecular Networking and an In-House Tandem Mass Library. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting. 2026;16:25. doi: 10.1007/s13659-025-00576-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Shah A.M., Shakeel-u-Rehman, Hussain A., Mushtaq S., Rather M.A., Shah A., Ahmad Z., Khan I.A., Bhat K.A., Hassan Q.P. Antimicrobial investigation of selected soil actinomycetes isolated from unexplored regions of Kashmir Himalayas, India. Microb. Pathog. 2017;110:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Rakhmawatie M.D., Wibawa T., Lisdiyanti P., Pratiwi W.R., Damayanti E., Mustofa Potential secondary metabolite from Indonesian Actinobacteria (InaCC A758) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2021;24:1058–1068. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2021.56468.12601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Qureshi K.A., Azam F., Fatmi M.Q., Imtiaz M., Prajapati D.K., Rai P.K., Jaremko M., Emwas A.-H., Elhassan G.O. In Vitro and in Silico Evaluations of Actinomycin X2 and Actinomycin D as Potent Anti-Tuberculosis Agents. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14502. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nurkanto A., Masrukhin, Tampubolon J.C.E., Ewaldo M.F., Putri A.L., Ratnakomala S., Setiawan R., Fathoni A., Palupi K.D., Rahmawati Y., et al. Exploring Indonesian actinomycete extracts for anti-tubercular compounds: Integrating inhibition assessment, genomic analysis, and prediction of its target by molecular docking. Heliyon. 2024;10:e35648. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ozeki Y., Igarashi M., Doe M., Tamaru A., Kinoshita N., Ogura Y., Iwamoto T., Sawa R., Umekita M., Enany S., et al. A New Screen for Tuberculosis Drug Candidates Utilizing a Luciferase-Expressing Recombinant Mycobacterium Bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guéren. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0141658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Renner M.K., Shen Y.-C., Cheng X.-C., Jensen P.R., Frankmoelle W., Kauffman C.A., Fenical W., Lobkovsky E., Clardy J. Cyclomarins A−C, New Antiinflammatory Cyclic Peptides Produced by a Marine Bacterium (Streptomyces sp.) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:11273–11276. doi: 10.1021/ja992482o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Schultz A.W., Oh D.-C., Carney J.R., Williamson R.T., Udwary D.W., Jensen P.R., Gould S.J., Fenical W., Moore B.S. Biosynthesis and Structures of Cyclomarins and Cyclomarazines, Prenylated Cyclic Peptides of Marine Actinobacterial Origin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:4507–4516. doi: 10.1021/ja711188x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Barter I.K., Bedding M.J., Leodolter J., Maxwell J.W.C., Hawkins P.M.E., Stevens M.T., McNeil M.B., Jowsey W.J., Wang T., Quan D., et al. ClpC1-Targeting Peptide Natural Products Differentially Dysregulate the Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Commun. 2026;17:1725. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68423-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kazmaier U., Junk L. Recent Developments on the Synthesis and Bioactivity of Ilamycins/Rufomycins and Cyclomarins, Marine Cyclopeptides That Demonstrate Anti-Malaria and Anti-Tuberculosis Activity. Mar. Drugs. 2021;19:446. doi: 10.3390/md19080446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chen C., Chen X., Ren B., Guo H., Abdel-Mageed W.M., Liu X., Song F., Zhang L. Characterization of Streptomyces sp. LS462 with High Productivity of Echinomycin, a Potent Antituberculosis and Synergistic Antifungal Antibiotic. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021;48:kuab079. doi: 10.1093/jimb/kuab079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhou B., Shetye G., Yu Y., Santarsiero B.D., Klein L.L., Abad-Zapatero C., Wolf N.M., Cheng J., Jin Y., Lee H., et al. Antimycobacterial Rufomycin Analogues from Streptomyces Atratus Strain MJM3502. J. Nat. Prod. 2020;83:657–667. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sun C., Liu Z., Zhu X., Fan Z., Huang X., Wu Q., Zheng X., Qin X., Zhang T., Zhang H., et al. Antitubercular Ilamycins from Marine-Derived Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16 ΔilaR. J. Nat. Prod. 2020;83:1646–1657. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Liu Q., Liu Z., Sun C., Shao M., Ma J., Wei X., Zhang T., Li W., Ju J. Discovery and Biosynthesis of Atrovimycin, an Antitubercular and Antifungal Cyclodepsipeptide Featuring Vicinal-Dihydroxylated Cinnamic Acyl Chain. Org. Lett. 2019;21:2634–2638. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kim T.S., Shin Y.-H., Lee H.-M., Kim J.K., Choe J.H., Jang J.-C., Um S., Jin H.S., Komatsu M., Cha G.-H., et al. Ohmyungsamycins Promote Antimicrobial Responses through Autophagy Activation via AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:3431. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03477-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sun C., Yang Z., Zhang C., Liu Z., He J., Liu Q., Zhang T., Ju J., Ma J. Genome Mining of Streptomyces atratus SCSIO ZH16: Discovery of Atratumycin and Identification of Its Biosynthetic Gene Cluster. Org. Lett. 2019;21:1453–1457. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gao W., Kim J.-Y., Anderson J.R., Akopian T., Hong S., Jin Y.-Y., Kandror O., Kim J.-W., Lee I.-A., Lee S.-Y., et al. The Cyclic Peptide Ecumicin Targeting ClpC1 Is Active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:880–889. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04054-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cui J., Kim E., Moon D.H., Kim T.H., Kang I., Lim Y., Shin D., Hwang S., Du Y.E., Song M.C., et al. Taeanamides A and B, Nonribosomal Lipo-Decapeptides Isolated from an Intertidal-Mudflat-Derived Streptomyces sp. Mar. Drugs. 2022;20:400. doi: 10.3390/md20060400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Song F., Hu J., Zhang X., Xu W., Yang J., Li S., Xu X. Unique Cyclized Thiolopyrrolones from the Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. BTBU20218885. Mar. Drugs. 2022;20:214. doi: 10.3390/md20030214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hu Y., Wang M., Wu C., Tan Y., Li J., Hao X., Duan Y., Guan Y., Shang X., Wang Y., et al. Identification and Proposed Relative and Absolute Configurations of Niphimycins C-E from the Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. IMB7-145 by Genomic Analysis. J. Nat. Prod. 2018;81:178–187. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Mohamed O.G., Khalil Z.G., Salim A.A., Cui H., Blumenthal A., Capon R.J. Lincolnenins A-D: Isomeric Bactericidal Bianthracenes from Streptomyces lincolnensis. J. Org. Chem. 2021;86:11011–11018. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Moreira W., Aziz D.B., Dick T. Boromycin Kills Mycobacterial Persisters without Detectable Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:199. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Koyama N., Shigeno S., Kanamoto A., Tomoda H. Steffimycin E, a New Anti-Mycobacterial Agent against Mycobacterium avium Complex, Produced by Streptomyces sp. OPMA02852. J. Antibiot. 2020;73:581–584. doi: 10.1038/s41429-020-0290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Mullowney M.W., Hwang C.H., Newsome A.G., Wei X., Tanouye U., Wan B., Carlson S., Barranis N.J., hAinmhire E., Chen W.-L., et al. Diaza-Anthracene Antibiotics from a Freshwater-Derived Actinomycete with Selective Antibacterial Activity toward Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015;1:168–174. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bunbamrung N., Intaraudom C., Dramae A., Thawai C., Tadtong S., Auncharoen P., Pittayakhajonwut P. Antibacterial, Antitubercular, Antimalarial and Cytotoxic Substances from the Endophytic Streptomyces sp. TBRC7642. Phytochemistry. 2020;172:112275. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hussain A., Rather M.A., Dar M.S., Dangroo N.A., Aga M.A., Qayum A., Shah A.M., Ahmad Z., Dar M.J., Hassan Q.P. Streptomyces Puniceus Strain AS13., Production, Characterization and Evaluation of Bioactive Metabolites: A New Face of Dinactin as an Antitumor Antibiotic. Microbiol. Res. 2018;207:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.004. Erratum in Microbiol. Res. 2018, 217, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yassien M.A., Abdallah H.M., El-Halawany A.M., Jiman-Fatani A.A.M. Anti-Tuberculous Activity of Treponemycin Produced by a Streptomyces Strain MS-6-6 Isolated from Saudi Arabia. Molecules. 2015;20:2576–2590. doi: 10.3390/molecules20022576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wang L., Reheman A., Wan C. Discovery of Anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis Desertomycins from Streptomyces flavofungini TRM90047 Based on Genome Mining and HSQC-TOCSY. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:17006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65702-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Braña A.F., Sarmiento-Vizcaíno A., Pérez-Victoria I., Martín J., Otero L., Palacios-Gutiérrez J.J., Fernández J., Mohamedi Y., Fontanil T., Salmón M., et al. Desertomycin G, a New Antibiotic with Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Human Breast Tumor Cell Lines Produced by Streptomyces althioticus MSM3, Isolated from the Cantabrian Sea Intertidal Macroalgae Ulva sp. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:114. doi: 10.3390/md17020114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Supong K., Thawai C., Choowong W., Kittiwongwattana C., Thanaboripat D., Laosinwattana C., Koohakan P., Parinthawong N., Pittayakhajonwut P. Antimicrobial Compounds from Endophytic Streptomyces sp. BCC72023 Isolated from Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Res. Microbiol. 2016;167:290–298. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Khalil Z.G., Raju R., Piggott A.M., Salim A.A., Blumenthal A., Capon R.J. Aranciamycins I and J, Antimycobacterial Anthracyclines from an Australian Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2015;78:949–952. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Huynh T.-H., Lee J., Moon D.H., Nguyen T.Q., Son S., Hwang S., Du Y.E., Cui J., Jang J.-H., Nam S.-J., et al. Gwanakosides A and B, 6-Deoxy-α-l-Talopyranose-Bearing Aromatic Metabolites from a Streptomyces sp. and Coculture with Pandoraea sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2022;85:83–90. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Supong K., Sripreechasak P., Tanasupawat S., Danwisetkanjana K., Rachtawee P., Pittayakhajonwut P. Investigation on Antimicrobial Agents of the Terrestrial Streptomyces sp. BCC71188. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:533–543. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7804-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Muralikrishnan B., Dan V.M., Vinodh J.S., Jamsheena V., Ramachandran R., Thomas S., Dastager S.G., Kumar K.S., Lankalapalli R.S., Kumar R.A. Anti-Microbial Activity of Chrysomycin A Produced by Streptomyces sp. against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. RSC Adv. 2017;7:36335–36339. doi: 10.1039/C7RA05576E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Supong K., Bunbamrung N., Tanasupawat S., Auncharoen P., Nithithanasilp S., Rachtawee P., Pittayakhajonwut P. Frenolicins H and I from the Caterpillar-Associated Streptomyces sp. TBRC17107. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024;38:3773–3782. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2023.2263902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hikima A., Asamizu S., Onaka H., Zhang H., Tomoda H., Koyama N. Kimidinomycin, a New Antibiotic against Mycobacterium avium Complex, Produced by Streptomyces sp. KKTA-0263. J. Antibiot. 2022;75:72–76. doi: 10.1038/s41429-021-00494-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Arai M., Kamiya K., Pruksakorn P., Sumii Y., Kotoku N., Joubert J.-P., Moodley P., Han C., Shin D., Kobayashi M. Anti-Dormant Mycobacterial Activity and Target Analysis of Nybomycin Produced by a Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015;23:3534–3541. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Hosoda K., Koyama N., Shigeno S., Nishimura T., Hasegawa N., Kanamoto A., Ohshiro T., Tomoda H. Mavintramycin A Is a Promising Antibiotic for Treating Mycobacterium avium Complex Infectious Disease. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2024;68:e0091723. doi: 10.1128/aac.00917-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Cao D.D., Trinh T.T.V., Mai H.D.T., Vu V.N., Le H.M., Thi Q.V., Nguyen M.A., Duong T.T., Tran D.T., Chau V.M., et al. Antimicrobial Lavandulylated Flavonoids from a Sponge-Derived Streptomyces sp. G248 in East Vietnam Sea. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:529. doi: 10.3390/md17090529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Kaari M., Joseph J., Manikkam R., Kalyanasundaram R., Sivaraj A., Anbalmani S., Murthy S., Sahu A.K., Said M., Dastager S.G., et al. A Novel Finding: 2,4-Di-Tert-Butylphenol from Streptomyces bacillaris ANS2 Effective Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Cancer Cell Lines. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023;195:6572–6585. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04403-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gavrish E., Sit C.S., Cao S., Kandror O., Spoering A., Peoples A., Ling L., Fetterman A., Hughes D., Bissell A., et al. Lassomycin, a Ribosomally Synthesized Cyclic Peptide, Kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Targeting the ATP-Dependent Protease ClpC1P1P2. Chem. Biol. 2014;21:509–518. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Quigley J., Peoples A., Sarybaeva A., Hughes D., Ghiglieri M., Achorn C., Desrosiers A., Felix C., Liang L., Malveira S., et al. Novel Antimicrobials from Uncultured Bacteria Acting against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio. 2020;11:e01516-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01516-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Ling L.L., Schneider T., Peoples A.J., Spoering A.L., Engels I., Conlon B.P., Mueller A., Schäberle T.F., Hughes D.E., Epstein S., et al. A New Antibiotic Kills Pathogens without Detectable Resistance. Nature. 2015;517:455–459. doi: 10.1038/nature14098. Erratum in Nature 2015, 520, 388. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14098 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Imai Y., Hauk G., Quigley J., Liang L., Son S., Ghiglieri M., Gates M.F., Morrissette M., Shahsavari N., Niles S., et al. Evybactin Is a DNA Gyrase Inhibitor That Selectively Kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022;18:1236–1244. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01102-7. Erratum in Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024, 20, 1701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01102-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Lapiere A., Richard M.L. Bacterial-Fungal Metabolic Interactions within the Microbiota and Their Potential Relevance in Human Health and Disease: A Short Review. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2105610. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2105610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Narayanankutty A., Famurewa A.C., Oprea E. Natural Bioactive Compounds and Human Health. Molecules. 2024;29:3372. doi: 10.3390/molecules29143372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lin X., Kück U. Cephalosporins as Key Lead Generation Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022;106:8007–8020. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12272-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Luo X., Zhou X., Lin X., Qin X., Zhang T., Wang J., Tu Z., Yang B., Liao S., Tian Y., et al. Antituberculosis Compounds from a Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO Ind09F01. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017;31:1958–1962. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1266353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Andrioli W.J., Simão T.L.B.V., Ferreira D.P., Araújo M.H., Calixto S.D., Bastos J.K., Seldin L., Lasunskaia E., Muzitano M.F. Antimycobacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Metabolites from Endophytic and Soil Fungi. Phytomed. Plus. 2022;2:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2022.100312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Calixto S.D., Simão T.L.B.V., De Almeida F.M., Antunes S.S., Romeiro N.C., De Souza Borges W., Das Chagas F.O., Seldin L., De Carvalho E.C.Q., Andrioli W.J., et al. (R)-(+)-Lasiodiplodin Isolated from the Endophytic Fungus Sordaria tamaensis Exhibits Potent Antimycobacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities in Vitro and in Vivo: A Dual Approach for the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Tuberculosis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2022;74:446–457. doi: 10.1093/jpp/rgab165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Isaka M., Chinthanom P., Sappan M., Supothina S., Vichai V., Danwisetkanjana K., Boonpratuang T., Hyde K.D., Choeyklin R. Antitubercular Activity of Mycelium-Associated Ganoderma Lanostanoids. J. Nat. Prod. 2017;80:1361–1369. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Isaka M., Chinthanom P., Sappan M., Danwisetkanjana K., Boonpratuang T., Choeyklin R. Antitubercular Lanostane Triterpenes from Cultures of the Basidiomycete Ganoderma sp. BCC 16642. J. Nat. Prod. 2016;79:161–169. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Atanasov A.G., Zotchev S.B., Dirsch V.M., International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce. Supuran C.T. Natural Products in Drug Discovery: Advances and Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021;20:200–216. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Miethke M., Pieroni M., Weber T., Brönstrup M., Hammann P., Halby L., Arimondo P.B., Glaser P., Aigle B., Bode H.B., et al. Towards the Sustainable Discovery and Development of New Antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021;5:726–749. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00313-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Butler M.S., Capon R.J., Blaskovich M.A.T., Henderson I.R. Natural Product-Derived Compounds in Clinical Trials and Drug Approvals. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2026;43:20–88. doi: 10.1039/D5NP00031A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
