Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Aug 26;17:10198. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77070-6

Uncover the strength of polyhedral dicarbaboranes as the next generation of superbases in organocatalysis

Jan Vrána 1,✉, Zuzana Kapustová 1, Martin Kamlar 2, Peter Šramel 1, Petr Vosáhlo 1, Zdeňka Růžičková 1, Josef Holub 3, Jan Veselý 2,✉, Aleš Růžička 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13612482  PMID: 42786240

Abstract

Although boron compounds appear in many chemical transformations, it is hard to imagine, these usually Lewis acidic, species would act as Lewis bases or even base-catalysts. Here we show that the adduct o-2, formed by the reaction of closo−1,2-dicarbadecaborane(10) with two equivalents of an N-heterocyclic carbene, exhibits superbasic properties with proton affinity surpassing that of the parent carbene as well as commercial superbases. It reacts selectively with C-acids, solvents and water, with its reactivity strongly influenced by substrate pKA. o-2 facilitates various Lewis base-catalyzed transformations—including aldol condensation, the Thorpe reaction, Michael addition, Robinson annulation and β-nitrostyrene polymerization—with exceptional efficiency and selectivity. Moreover, o-2 effectively catalyzes highly diastereoselective conjugate additions of 4-substituted pyrazolones to electron-poor olefins and spirocyclizations of pyrazolones with dibenzylideneacetones. A notable tolerance of catalyst to significant amounts of water and base-sensitive functional groups has also been observed.

Subject terms: Organocatalysis, Chemical bonding, Organometallic chemistry


The authors synthesize a compound derived from a carborane bearing N-heterocyclic carbene, which exhibits superbasic properties with proton affinity surpassing that of the parent carbene as well as commercial superbases. The base facilitates various Lewis base-catalyzed transformations, including aldol condensation, the Thorpe reaction, Michael addition and Robinson annulation, with high efficiency and selectivity.

Introduction

Modern chemistry of boranes—compounds containing electron-deficient boron, hydrogen, and other elements—has expanded across diverse fields, from hydroboration agents1–3, Lewis acid promoters4–8, Frustrated Lewis Pairs9–11, to organocatalysts12–15 as well as medicinal16,17 and material applications18–23. Clusters composed of multiple boron atoms—polyhedral boranes and, later, heteroboranes—have fascinated many chemists by their structural diversity and broad applications. Since their discovery more than a century ago, these have traditionally been considered electron-deficient and thus electrophilic, likely due to the presence of numerous electron-deficient boron atoms within their frameworks. In fact, the formation of boron clusters—especially when a heteroatom is present in the polyhedron—results in some of the most thermodynamically stable molecular compounds known to date, made possible by extensive electron density delocalization24. A contrasting interpretation of electron deficiency has emerged for dianionic closo-boranes and certain anionic or neutral closo-heteroboranes, which possess an ideal electron count and are now understood as three-dimensional aromatic species.

To date, most reactivity studies of polyhedral (carba)boranes have focused on skeletal transformations, metallation, nucleophilic substitution at C–H positions, and electrophilic or photochemical reactions involving halogenating and other agents. Although the vast majority of catalytic applications of polyhedral heteroboranes is associated with their metal complexes—classified into three categories, where24: i) the metal is part of the cage, ii) the metal is exoskeletal, but the substituted cage is part of the ligand system, or iii) the heteroborane acts as a weakly coordinating anion—some examples of direct catalytic activity do exist. One such example is the thermal oligomerization of isophthalonitrile to form triazines25. Carborane-supported, highly electrophilic silylium compounds have been reported as long-lived catalysts for hydrodefluorination of trifluoromethyl and nonafluorobutyl groups using readily available silanes under mild conditions26. Iodinated carboranes have demonstrated superior activity in halide abstraction reactions—comparable to superacidic agents—and some have shown organocatalytic activity in nitro-Michael reactions when used at 20 mol. % loading27 attributed to halogen bonding. The single-site, neutral Lewis superacidic character is further exemplified by C-substituted tris(ortho-carboranyl)borane28, which is capable of activating C-F bonds via a catalytic process. A similar phenomenon is observed in metal-free methane activation under mild conditions by a borenium cation bearing an electron-withdrawing cage C-substituent29. The electronic versatility of heteroborane cages—described as a dichotomy30—is further illustrated by electron-rich B9-connected carboranylphosphines30,31. A sulfonium complex has also been proposed to facilitate halogen transfer to arenes with the assistance of AgSbF632.

In addition to reported molecular clusters used in acidic catalysis, efforts to heterogenize polyhedral boranes include the partial pyrolysis of decaborane(14) and the use of the resulting material, which contains Lewis-acid centers, for catalytic activation of silanes in the hydrogenation of various small molecules33,34.

Redox-active cluster compounds represent a rapidly developing area for application in organic synthesis35. For instance, Peters developed a diaryl-o-carborane radical anion appended with a Brønsted acid, acting as a proton-coupled electron transfer reagent capable of reducing azobenzenes, nitroarenes and fumarates36.

Another behavior in series of relatively unexplored boron nucleophiles is to react with various electrophiles. For example, magnesium diboranate complex with 4-dimethylaminopyridine is shown to act as an unambiguous nucleophile through its reactions with iodomethane, benzophenone and N,N‘-di-isopropyl carbodiimide37. The tetraaryl μ-hydridodiborane(4) anion revealed increased nucleophilicity of B–B bond proven by smooth reactivity with several substrates38. Similarly, the nucleophilic character of closo-hexaborate cluster anion was uncovered also in polyhedral borane series. The anion can engage in a nucleophilic substitution reaction with a wide variety of organic and main-group electrophiles39.

To the best of our knowledge, the only Lewis-base polyhedral (hetero)borane catalyst is bismethylthio-C-substituted meta-carborane capable of promoting halogenation of activated arenes under mild conditions using N-halosuccinimides32.

Generally, it is rare to find cluster compounds occupying positively charged regions within molecular structures. With few exceptions—where the positive charge resides on the organic or inorganic shell surrounding the inner (hetero)boron cluster40 —no examples of such cationic clusters were known before 2020, when Spokoyny’s seminal report on peralkoxidated radical cation [B12(OR)12]·+ was disclosed (Fig. 1A)41. Inspired by Spokoyny’s strategy, we applied a similar approach by introducing adjacent electron density to ten-vertex dicarbaboranes or twelve-vertex chalcogenaboranes via N-heterocyclic-carbene coordination, followed by oxidation. The first thermally robust cationic ten-vertex dicarbaboranes (Fig. 1B)42 were synthesized through protonation of their bis-carbene adducts using HCl. The outcome of the reaction depends not only on the positions of the carbon atoms in original cluster, where the reaction of 1,2-dicarba isomer reacts to the nido-type cluster and the 1,10-dicarba isomer to the closo cation (Fig. 1B), but also on steric demand of the carbene used. Bigger carbene, decorated with bulky Dipp groups, reacts with the 1,10-dicarba isomer after protonolysis to monocationic cluster, while the presence of smaller isopropyl-substituted carbene enabled the formation of dicationic species (Fig. 1C)43. In parallel, cationic twelve-vertex chalcogenaboranes (Fig. 1D)44 were obtained via protonolysis with tropylium or tritylium tetrafluoroborate, followed by closo-cluster formation.

Fig. 1. Pathways to cationic polyhedral heteroboranes.

Fig. 1

Examples of peralcoxylated 12-vertex radical cation (A), 10-vertex dicarbaborane cations (B), 10-vertex dicarbaborane dications (C) and 12-vertex thia/selenaborane cations (D).

The isolation of stable and easily accessible cationic ten-vertex dicarbaboranes with a nido structure (Fig. 1B – o-2a) inspired us to explore potential reactivity arising from the proximity of hydrogen atoms, where the terminal hydrogen atom could act as a hydride, while the bridging hydrogen could serve as a proton source. The primary working hypothesis in this paper was to use o-2a in catalytically driven organic transformations exploiting its structural behavior, which is virtually not that far from the arrangement of zwitterionic species after a hydrogenation of frustrated Lewis pairs. In this paper, we show in contrast to our hypotheses o-2a is nearly inactive in acid-promoted reactions and hydrogenations, but its precursor exhibit unexceptional basic character and is able to promote several organic chemistry transformations.

Results and discussion

Several reactions of high synthetic interest—leading to precursors of biologically active compounds or functional materials—were evaluated. These included: guanylation reaction between anilines and carbodiimides, ring-opening polymerization of lactides, catalytic spirocyclization yielding spiro-heterocyclic compounds with a benzofuranone motif, and a formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition affording cyclohexanone derivatives. Unfortunately, the use of o-2a (Fig. 1B), as an initiator or catalyst in these transformations generally resulted in either no conversion or negligible formation of the desired products. Details of these unsuccessful attempts are provided in SI. o-2a showed only partial success as a promoter of hydroboration reactions. For instance, the reaction of neat phenylacetylene with 1.2 molar equivalents of HBpin and 3 mol. % of o−2a at room temperature yielded the corresponding olefin in 26% yield after 18 h (see SI for details). Raising the temperature to 60 °C improved the yield to 66% under identical conditions. Solvent effects were detrimental: only traces of olefin were observed in toluene, and a 12% yield was obtained in THF. Catalyst loading also influenced the outcome, with 62% yield at 1 mol. % and 70% yield at 15 mol. % of o−2a. However, these results remain inferior to the best-performing systems in the literature. Applying the same protocol to styrene hydroboration led to less than 5% conversion at room temperature.

Basicity of o-2

In parallel with the primary catalytic-activity evaluation of o-2a, computational investigations were also conducted on its neutral precursor, o−2. The most striking result of the computational studies was the exceptionally high proton affinity of o-2, calculated to be 1142 kJ/mol at the M06-2X(D3)/6–311 + G(d,p) level. This value exceeds that of its parent carbene, IPr:, by 66 kJ/mol, placing o−2 among the strongest known basic organocatalysts. Experimental validation of this behavior was primarily carried out through reactivity studies of o-2a. This cationic carborane showed no reactivity with strong mineral acids or commonly used organic bases such as Et3N, DMAP or DBU. Complete deprotonation to regenerate neutral o-2 occurred only in the presence of strong bases such as LDA or tBuOK. To assess the superbasic nature of o-2 further, we performed a deprotonation test using the hydrochloride salt of 1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene (Proton Sponge), a benchmark compound at the threshold of superbase classification. o-2 was able to deprotonate the substrate essentially quantitatively, yielding free proton sponge and providing direct experimental evidence of its superbasic character. In addition, similar competitive reactions of protonated form of o-2, o-2a with strongest—by 6—9 orders of magnitude stronger than Proton Sponge—commercially available superbasic guanidines and phosphazenes (SB, Fig. 2) were carried out to explore these properties. Both guanidines and the phosphazene P1-H deprotonated o-2a partially forming a similar dynamic equilibrium between the neutral and ionized form shifted significantly towards the parent o-2a. Interestingly, the o-2/o-2a ratio was nearly identical (~15/85). Thus, we assume that the protonation/deprotonation of o-2 is driven kinetically and the pKA cannot fully evaluate the basicity of this carborane. The phosphazene P1-tBu revealed no deprotonation of o-2a, most probably due to the steric reasons. To screen the reversibility of the reactions, we tested also the reversed reactions (SBH+ and o-2) in acetonitrile as the most suitable solvent previously used to describe the o-2/weak acid equilibria. The NMR spectra (CD3CN, 500 MHz) were recorded immediately over the temperature range of −20 to 60 °C, and no effect of temperature was observed. Inspecting all the spectra, the same result was obtained, the SBH+ has been only partially deprotonated (~15%), confirming there is no thermodynamic equilibrium.

Fig. 2. Reactivity of o-2a towards selected superbases (SB).

Fig. 2

Appropriate proton affinities (kJ/mol at M06-2X(D3)/6–311 + G(d,p) level) and pKA values in DMSO (in italics in parentheses) are given below the abbreviation of each compound.

Therefore, we calculated the protonation affinities, which revealed, that o-2 is overpasses all the SBs by 100 kJ/mol (Fig. 2), being thus one of the strongest neutral bases. The most striking difference between o-2 and the tested superbases is the behavior towards water. Guanidines and phosphazenes are hygroscopic and the interaction with water implies higher loading in catalytic reactions or the water has to be removed, e. g. by molecular sieves. On the contrary, o-2 fully tolerates water. When o-2 is dissolved in water (combined with acetonitrile for increase solubility), compound o-2w is isolated, from which, after solvent vacuo evaporation at room temperature pure o-2 is recovered. To the best of our knowledge, this phenomenon has not been described for any base.

The superbasic properties of o-2 prompted us to investigate its reactivity with a range of acids, solvents and water. As schematically illustrated in Fig. 3, four distinct types of reactions have been identified. Depending on the nature and acidity of the substrate, an equilibrium is established between the strong base and its conjugate. The equilibrium has been monitored by analyzing the reaction mixtures using both 1H (CD3CN, 500 MHz) and 11B NMR spectroscopy.

Fig. 3. Reactivity of o-2 towards C-acids and protic solvents.

Fig. 3

Appropriate pKA values in DMSO are given in italics in parentheses.

In the first group of reactions, involving relatively strong acids, the chemical equilibria are shifted entirely toward the products. Specifically, hydrogen chloride (or hydrochloric acid – Ha), hexafluoroacetylacetone (Hb), triethyl methanetricarboxylate (Hc) and Meldrum’s acid (Hd) react smoothly via protonation of o-2, yielding the corresponding anions and the cation o-2H+. The reaction of the less acidic phenol (He) also proceeded well, although the isolated product was an adduct of o-2e with two phenol molecules. The reaction of o-2 with malononitrile (Hf) is even more complex: one molar equivalent of Hf reacts more slowly, and the equilibrium can be shifted by using less polar solvents (e.g. hexanes, benzene, diethyl ether), from which the product o-2f precipitates. This compound appears to be highly reactive because it cleaves otherwise inert solvents such as dichloromethane or acetonitrile. When an excess of malononitrile is used, its condensation with malononitrilate (Thorpe reaction) leads to the formation of o-2f’. A similar reaction with 2-coumaranone (Hg) consistently proceeds with a 1:2 stoichiometry regardless of the initial ratio, yielding a Claisen-condensation product of the two heterocycles (see Supplementary page S34).

In the second group of substrates, equilibria are established between o-2 and less acidic compounds, such as acetylacetone and diphenyl-1,3-propanedione (Hh and Hi), and their ionized forms, with an 85:15 ratio (see Supplementary Figs. S42, S49). These equilibria are only marginally affected by temperature variations in the range of −40–60 °C. However, the products tend to precipitate as colorless powders in less polar solvents, similar to o-2f. The addition of two molar equivalents of the organic substrate is sufficient to maximize product yield, as confirmed by both 1H (CD3CN, 500 MHz) and 11B NMR spectra (Supplementary Figs. S47, S48). This transformation is also visually evident: The parent o-2 is yellow, whereas all products are colorless.

The reactivity of carborane o-2 with third-group substrates—methanol, dimethyl malonate and nitromethane—resembles that observed with diketones. However, the equilibrium is strongly biased toward the starting compounds. For example, in the 1H NMR spectra of reactions involving o-2 with one, three or ten equivalents of methanol, no protonation was detected. Interestingly, dissolving o-2 in neat methanol led to immediate discoloration, indicating full conversion to o-2j. A parallel reaction with deuterated methanol has confirmed the incorporation of deuterium at the B–B bridging position, as corroborated by the disappearance of the corresponding signal in the 1H NMR spectrum (see below). Notably, this compound can only be prepared in solution, because any attempt to remove the solvent shifts the equilibrium back to the starting compounds—even at room temperature. Dimethyl malonate and nitromethane protonate o-2 more efficiently, because increasing concentrations of the corresponding products have been identified in reactions with one, three or ten equivalents of the organic substrate (Supplementary Figs. S60–S67). Full conversion to the desired compounds o-2k and o-2l was achieved only when o-2 was treated with neat reagent. Surprisingly, the reaction of o-2 with water—typically a dead end for most of carboranes with other than 12 vertexes—proceeds to an equilibrium similar to that seen with methanol, yielding protonated o-2 and most likely the OH⁻ counterion (Supplementary Figs. S68–S71. Since the resulting anions are only weakly coordinated to the cationic moieties (specifically the CH=CH units of the carbenes), they exhibit high reactivity. For instance, anions derived from weaker acids slowly deprotonate dichloromethane.

Unfortunately, within all three substrate groups, no clear correlation could be established between the acidity of the substrate (pKA value) and the extent of the respective acid–base equilibrium, even though the KA values of the substrates (excluding HCl) differ by more than eight orders of magnitude.

It is worth mentioning that all the reactions are readily monitored by 1H (CD3CN, 500 MHz)13,C and 11B NMR spectroscopy. In particular, the resonances of the bridging hydrogen atoms in B–H–B moieties appeared in a narrow range −4.18–(−4.25) ppm, serving as clear indicators of cation formation. A more complex, yet feasible, approach involved tracking broad signals in the 11B NMR spectra, with integral intensity ratios of 2:2:1:2:1 corresponding to both neutral and cationic species. Only minor differences in chemical shifts were observed for the B1, B3, B6, and B9 atoms. The 1H and 13C spectra of the anions did not show any major differences from those of the neutral precursors, except for the signals of the deprotonated C–H groups, which—as reported in the literature42—were shifted downfield.

The molecular structures of o-2b, o-2c, o−2f’, o-2g, and o-2i have been unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The cationic moieties in these compounds exhibit structural parameters identical to those previously reported for o-2a. Among the anionic components, two organic anions—(acac-F6)− and (PhCOCHCOPh)−—are known in their free forms. However, the [C(COOEt)3]− anion, derived from o-2c, has not yet been reported as uncoordinated to a metal center. The negative charge is delocalized across the planar C(COO)3 core, as evidenced by the narrow ranges of C–C (1.419(2)–1.467(2) Å) and C=O (1.226(2)–1.227(2) Å) bond lengths. This anion interacts weakly through delocalized bonds and oxygen atoms with the hydrogen atoms of the carbene moieties, which are perpendicularly coordinated from both sides of the anion. The structure of the [NCC(=C(NH2)CHCN)CN]− anion (from o-2f’) closely resembles that of a neutral malononitrile-derived condensation product, with the only exception of the shortened C67–C68 bond (Supplementary Fig. S34), measured at 1.379(3) Å (Δ = 0.123 Å), which is consistent with the formation of a multiple bond. X-ray diffraction analysis has also confirmed the structure of the [2-(CH2CO(C8H5O2))C6H4O]− anion, originating from 2-coumaranone in o-2i.

Based on the collected data, it is possible to hypothesize several potential applications of o-2 in organic synthesis and catalysis: i) Base-catalyzed transformations: Owing to its superbasic character, o-2 may serve as an efficient catalyst in base-mediated reactions. This is further supported by its reversible interactions with weaker acids and its stability across various solvent systems, ii) C–C coupling reactions: Stoichiometric evaluations using the Claisen condensation and the Thorpe reaction of Hf and Hg have prompted further exploration of o-2 in diverse coupling methodologies, iii) The activation of weak electrophiles: The reactivity of “naked” anions derived from weak acids that o-2 could facilitate transformations involving otherwise unreactive electrophilic substrates, iv) Ring-opening polymerization: the observed γ-lactone ring opening in 2-coumaranone implies that o-2 may be applicable in initiating ring-opening polymerizations, and v) Hydroelementation reactions: finally, o-2 shows promise in hydroelementation processes, potentially expanding its utility in selective bond-forming reactions.

Organocatalysis

Organocatalyzed reactions leading to the formation of new carbon–carbon (C–C) bonds are among the major objectives in synthetic organic chemistry, yet and (carba)boranes have never been employed in Lewis-base organocatalysis. Therefore, we decided to investigate the catalytic properties of the carborane derivative o-2 in different types of C–C bond-forming reactions, such as conjugate addition and aldol reactions.

The first test reaction was the Knoevenagel condensation of malononitrile and benzaldehyde. The first reaction was carried out as an NMR experiment at room temperature in deuterated acetonitrile, using 5 mol. % of o-2 as the catalyst. Upon mixing, the catalyst was fully protonated, and the condensation proceeded with complete conversion within two hours. It is worth noting that the water formed during the reaction had no influence on the catalyst’s performance. Next, to compare the activity with other superbases, we conducted the Knoevenagel condensation catalyzed by o-2, MTBD and P1-H (Table 1). The SB catalyzed condensations required considerably higher amount of the superbase, highlighting again the water-tolerance of the carborane o-2. Moreover, o-2 facilitates selectively the condensation, while MTBD and P1-H revealed the byproduct of Thorpe reaction, prepared in the stoichiometric reaction of o-2 with malononitrile (o-2f’).

Table 1.

Knoevenagel condensation of malononitrile and benzaldehyde catalyzed by o-2

graphic file with name 41467_2026_77070_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry Catalyst Cat. loading (mol%) Conversiona (%) Time A/B ratioa (%)
1 o-2 0.5 60 24 60/0
2 o-2 0.5 90 48 90/0
3 o-2 1 21 2 65/0
4 o-2 1 99 16 99/0
5 o-2 3 79 2 79/0
6 o-2 3 97 6 97/0
7 o-2 5 99 2 99/0
8 MTBD 5 56 2 53/3
9 MTBD 5 94 24 89/5
10 MTBD 10 61 1 56/5
11 MTBD 10 65 2 59/6
12 MTBD 20 97 1 87/10
13 MTBD 20 88 2 78/10
14 P1–H 10 85 1 76/9
15 P1–H 10 91 2 79/12
16 P1–H 20 80 1 60/20
17 P1–H 20 82 2 62/20

aDetermined by 1H NMR (CD3CN, 500 MHz).

To broaden the scope of catalyzed reactions, the classical base-induced aldol condensation was selected. The aldol condensation reaction is a fundamental organic transformation that facilitates the formation of C–C bonds45. This reaction can be catalyzed by various Lewis or Brønsted acids or bases. Our objective (Table 2) was to utilize o-2 as a basic catalyst in the model aldol-condensation reaction of butanal to form 2-ethylhex-2-enal under mild conditions. The catalyst o-2 was investigated as a non-nucleophilic base where the α-hydrogen of butanal is deprotonated to form the enolate, which subsequently undergoes a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl group of another butanal molecule. The reaction was conducted at 21 °C under an argon atmosphere, resulting in a poor yield of 32% within 24 h using 10 mol. % of the catalyst (entries 1 and 2). Reducing the catalyst loading to 2 mol. % provided an excellent yield of 92% (entries 3 and 4) within two hours, whereas 1 mol. % was still sufficient, giving a 97% yield after 24 h. The improved performance is likely a consequence of the shift in equilibrium between the neutral and anionic forms of o-2 described above. Further reduction of the catalyst loading led to poorer results, likely due to the presence of poisoned and deactivated catalyst, which did not catalyze the reaction. In these reactions, the catalyst performance was sensitive to air contamination. Interestingly, it not negatively affected by the water produced during the aldol condensation, but the addition of water counterintuitively increased the yield of 2-ethylhex-2-enal (entries 7–10). This may be attributed to the protonation of the catalyst and the formation of [o-2H]+ (OH)⁻, which remains catalytically active, or to the above-described equilibria involving stoichiometric addition of weak acids to o-2. Conversely, a higher amount of water protects the catalytically active species by shifting the equilibrium in the desired direction. At higher catalyst concentrations, an induction period of approximately one hour was observed. This can be attributed to the gradual formation of water, slowly shifting the equilibrium from o-2 to o-2H+, thereby accelerating the reaction. A significant increase in activity was observed when reactions conducted at 30 °C instead of 21 °C were directly compared (Fig. 1, entries 11 and 12 vs. 3 and 4), while catalyst decomposition was observed above 60 °C.

Table 2.

Aldol condensation of butyraldehyde catalyzed by o-2

graphic file with name 41467_2026_77070_Tabb_HTML.gif
Entry Catalyst Cat. loading (mol%) Time (h) Yield (%)a
1 o-2 10 1 <5
2 o-2 10 24 32
3 o-2 2 1 24
4 o-2 2 2 92
5 o-2 1 2 71
6 o-2 1 24 97
7 o-2 10b 2 24
8 o-2 10b 24 90
9 o-2 2b 2 32
10 o-2 2b 24 99
11 o-2 2c 1 57
12 o-2 2c 2 95
13 MTBD 1 1 <5
14 MTBD 1 24 76
15 MTBD 5 2 <5
16 MTBD 5 24 98
17 P1-H 1 2 <5
18 P1-H 1 24 <5
19 P1-H 5 2 25
20 P1-H 5 24 97

aDetermined by 1H NMR (CD3CN, 500 MHz).

b20 mol. % of water was added with the catalyst.

c30 °C.

Similar trend as for Knoevenagel condensation has been found in the aldol condensation of butyraldehyde. MTBD and P1-H required five times higher loading to match the performance of o-2.

The catalytic activity of o-2 was further evaluated in the cross-aldol reaction between butyraldehyde and non-enolizable benzaldehyde. In this case, the formation of the desired aldol product was negligible. Instead, only products resulting from self- and cross-aldol condensation were detected (for details, see SI). These findings suggest that the catalyst o-2 does not exert a significant influence on the selectivity of the cross-aldol reaction.

Among the many developed methods, the Michael-type reaction has been extensively investigated over the past decades and has proven to be a highly significant tool for constructing valuable and complex organic compounds46–48. Aminocatalysis and Lewis-base catalysis, commonly represented by Cinchona alkaloids, also play an important role in this area49–51. As a model reaction for optimization, we selected the Michael conjugate addition of acetylacetone to trans-chalcone (Fig. 4). We primarily tested the influence of catalyst o-2 loading, the reaction time, temperature and solvent. Interestingly, it was discovered that, in addition to the desired Michael adduct 1a’, a cyclic intermediate product 1a” of the Robinson annulation is also formed. The final product ratio strongly depends on the parameters mentioned above. The best results in terms of trans-chalcone conversion—exceeding 80%—were achieved with 3 mol. % of o-2 and a reaction time of over two hours (an initiation period of one hour is needed at RT). Selectivity toward the Michael product is higher at shorter reaction times, while Robinson products dominate after extended reaction periods. More detailed information is summarized in Supplementary Tables S10–12.

Fig. 4. The model Michael addition of acetylacetone to trans-chalcone and subsequent dehydration to the Robinson annulation product keto-1a”.

Fig. 4

Conditions: i) 1–4 mol. % o-2; ii) 80 °C, two days, or I2 (1.1 eq), RT, two days; iii) 1–4 mol. %, 80 °C, two days.

Based on the obtained optimization data and our practical experience with model reactions, we concluded that a subsequent reaction scope should be carried out. Specifically, reactions of trans-chalcone or β-nitrostyrene with various donors were performed using 3 mol. % of o-2 in CD3CN at room temperature, with 1H-NMR progress monitoring after 1 h, 1 day and 7 days. More detailed information is summarized in Supplementary Tables S14, S15.

To summarize the reaction scope (Fig. 5), the most acidic substrates a–f, with pKA values between 5 and 9, readily react with β-nitrostyrene to form the desired products but remain unreactive toward trans-chalcone. Both transformations are feasible for substrates g–j, which possess medium acidity (pKA values of 9–13), while the most basic substrates (pKA ~13–16) in the series k–m react exclusively with trans-chalcone. When β-nitrostyrene is exposed to substrates k–m under identical conditions, it undergoes quantitative polymerization. The polymerization result is the same as reported in the literature, totally insoluble gummy material with no chance to perform GPC measurement in any solvent, melting point of 285 °C and absence of peak around 1630 cm−1 (attributable to vibration of double bond)52. This behavior is attributed to the presence of the most acidic proton in the system and may serve as a precedent for the polymerization of other polar monomers53. Despite reasonable acidity, some reagents have proven unsuitable due to steric hindrance (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5. Acidity-dependent reactivity of Michael-donor substrates catalyzed by o-2.

Fig. 5

Michael addition reactions of β-nitrostyrene and trans-chalcone (A). The correlation between the reaction outcome (B) is illustrated using the pKA values of the acids a–m in DMSO. Unreactive Michael-donors are presented in (C).

Moving into a more specific area of a catalytically driven reactivity with potential applications, we selected a model reaction involving conjugate addition of pyrazolone derivatives. These compounds are known for their strong nucleophilicity, notable biological activity54,55 and ability to react with electron-deficient olefins to form spirocyclic compounds via a double Michael cascade—sometimes even in an enantioselective fashion56,57. Specifically, we investigated the catalytic performance of o-2 in the 1,4-addition reaction between β-nitrostyrene derivatives and pyrazolones. Our study began with screening the reaction between 4-benzyl-5-methyl-2-phenylpyrazol-3-one (4d) and β-nitrostyrene 5a in various solvents, using 20 mol. % o-2 catalyst loading (Table 3).

Table 3.

The optimization of the conjugate addition between pyrazolone 4d and β-nitrostyrene 5a

graphic file with name 41467_2026_77070_Tabc_HTML.gif
Entry Cat. loadinga Solvent Temperature (°C) Time (h) Drb Yield of 6a (%)c
1 20 Toluene 25 20 7:1 65
2 20 DMSO 25 20 6:1 68
3 20 DCM 25 10 7:1 75
4 10 DCM 25 10 8:1 85
5 5 DCM 25 10 8:1 95

aThe catalyst o-2 (mol%) was treated with nitrostyrene 5a (2 equiv.) followed by the solvent (1 mL) and pyrazolone derivative 4d (1 equiv.) addition.

bRatio determined by 1H (CD3CN, 500 MHz) NMR of crude reaction mixture.

cIsolated yield.

To our delight, the model reaction carried out in toluene afforded the corresponding Michael adduct 6a after 20 h in a reasonable yield of 65%, isolated as an inseparable mixture of two diastereoisomers (Dr. 7:1) (Table 3, entry 1). Switching the solvent to DMSO resulted in a comparable reaction time and yield (68%), although a slight decrease in diastereoselectivity (Dr. 6:1) was observed. When DCM was employed as the solvent, full conversion was achieved within 10 h, and the desired product 6a was isolated in a high yield of 75%, again as an inseparable diastereoisomeric mixture (Dr. 7:1) (Table 3, entry 3). Further optimization in the catalyst loading revealed that the reaction proceeded efficiently even with 5 mol. % o-2 catalyst loading, reaching full conversion after 40 h. Notably, under these conditions, an excellent yield of 95% and improved diastereoselectivity (Dr. 8:1) of the corresponding adduct 6a were obtained (Table 3, entry 5).

With these optimal reaction conditions in hand, we proceeded to evaluate the substrate scope of the reaction (Fig. 6). First, the substitution on the aromatic ring of β-nitrostyrene was examined with respect to diastereoselectivity and the yield of the corresponding adducts 6. As summarized in Fig. 6, the reaction tolerated not only the model unsubstituted β-nitrostyrene 4a but also the electron-rich p-methoxy-β-nitrostryrene 5b, which afforded the Michael adduct 6b in 82% yield after 40 h. Nearly quantitative yields were obtained with the p-Br- and p-Cl-substituted β-nitrostyrenes 5c and 5d, yielding as much as 92% for the bromo-substituted product 6c and 96% for the chloro-substituted product 6d. In a superbase-driven transformations, the obvious drawback is often an intolerance of catalyst to various functional groups of substrates. To proof a compatibility of o-2 catalyst with such functional groups as nitriles or esters, the reaction of 4d with 5e and 5f, respectively, were carried out at the same conditions. In the cases of o-2 catalyzed reactions, only a slight decrease in activity and diastereoselectivity, when compared to other substrates, to 6e and 6f was observed, while the reactions driven by superbases or KOtBu gave mixtures of various products. The sterically more demanding pyrazolone, 4-benzyl-2,5-diphenylpyrazol-3-one (4e), reacted with the model β-nitrostyrene 5a to give the product 6g with enhanced diastereocontrol (Dr. 10:1) and a high yield of 94% after 12 h. The structure and the relative configuration of 6g were confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. To expand the scope further, model pyrazolone derivative 4d was reacted with trans-chalcone as a Michael acceptor. Unfortunately, the reaction carried out with 5 mol. % of the catalyst o-2 was sluggish, and full conversion required 10 mol. % of o-2. Under these conditions, the corresponding product 6h was obtained after 48 h as an inseparable mixture of two diastereoisomers (Dr. 2:1), but in an almost quantitative yield of 96%, which corroborates our observations from the model Michael addition.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The substrate scope of the conjugate addition reaction between the pyrazolones 4d–e and the olefins 5a–f.

In spite of the low diastereocontrol observed in this reaction, we recognized that a dibenzylideneacetone derivative—as an extended chalcone moiety—could act as a double Michael acceptor in a diastereoselective conjugate cascade reaction with unsubstituted pyrazolones under carborane o-2 catalysis, leading to the formation of spiropyrazolones.

The strategy of employing double conjugate addition to divinyl ketones under chiral primary amine catalysis has been previously applied to a range of heterocycles, including oxindols58,59, pyrazolones57, benzofuranones60,61, as well as benzothiophenones and rhodanines56. However, these protocols typically required relatively high catalyst loading (20 mol. %) and acidic additives to generate the key reactive intermediate, a chiral iminium.

To validate this concept, we investigated the cascade reaction of 2-phenyl-5-methyl-pyrazol-3-one (4a) with unsubstituted dibenzylideneacetone 7a in DCM as a solvent using 10 mol. % of the catalyst o-2 at room temperature. To our delight, full conversion was achieved after 5 h, and the corresponding spirocycle 8a was isolated in an acceptable yield of 50% as a single diastereoisomer. Solvent screening revealed high tolerance of the reaction toward non-polar, polar aprotic, chlorinated and etheric solvents, consistently providing excellent diastereoselectivity (Dr. >20:1) in all cases (Table 4, entries 2–6). Further optimization of catalyst loading demonstrated that o-2 retained excellent catalytic activity even at 1 mol. % loading in DCM at 45 °C (Table 4, entry 9). Under these conditions, full conversion was reached after 6 h, and the corresponding spiropyrazolone 8a was isolated in a high yield of 88% as a single diastereoisomer.

Table 4.

The optimization of the reaction condition between pyrazolone 4a and dibenzylideneacetone 7a

graphic file with name 41467_2026_77070_Tabd_HTML.gif
Entry Cat. loading (mol. %) Solvent Temperature (°C) Time (h) Drᵃ (%) Yield of 8a (%)ᵇ
1 10 DCM 25 5 >20:1 50
2 10 MeCN 25 16 >20:1 48
3 10 THF 25 16 >20:1 43
4 10 CHCl₃ 25 8 >20:1 65
5 10 PhMe 25 16 >20:1 48
6 10 DMSO 25 10 >20:1 75
7 5 CHCl₃ 25 12 >20:1 40
8 5 DCM 25 12 >20:1 41
9 1 DCM 45 6 >20:1 88
10 1 DMSO 45 3 >20:1 25

The cat. o-2 (mol. %) was treated with 7a (1.5 equiv.) followed by the solvent (1 mL) and 4a (1 equiv.).

aDetermined by the 1H (CD3CN, 500 MHz) NMR of the crude reaction mixture.

bIsolated yield.

Next, the scope of the spirocyclization reaction was explored using various substituted dibenzylideneacetone derivatives (Fig. 7). Initially, derivatives bearing methyl substituents in the para- and meta-positions of the aromatic ring were tested with model pyrazolone 4a in a cascade reaction. Both corresponding spirocycles 8b and 8c were isolated as single diastereoisomers in yields of 65% for the para-methyl-substituted product 8b and 51% for the meta-methyl-substituted product 8c. Furthermore, dibenzylideneacetone 7d, bearing a slightly electron-withdrawing chlorine substituent in the para-position, was successfully employed, affording spiropyrazolone 8d as a single diastereoisomer in a good yield of 61%. The heteroaryl derivative 1,5-di(thiophen-2-yl)penta-1,4-dien-3-one (7e) also underwent spirocyclization, yielding spiropyrazolone derivative 8e in 67% yield. Additionally, the sterically more demanding, fully aromatic substituted 2-phenyl-5-phenyl-pyrazol-3-one (4b) was tested with model dibenzylideneacetone 7a, achieving full conversion after 20 h and affording the corresponding product 8g in a high yield of 73%. The structure of the compound and the relative configuration of both phenyl rings on the cyclohexanone moiety were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, revealing the product as a trans-isomer. Similarly as for conjugate addition, the tolerance of o-2 catalytic system towards sensitive functional groups is demonstrated on spirocyclization leading to 8h, where no unwanted byproducts were identified.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The substrate scope of the spirocyclization between the pyrazolones 4a–c and the dibenzylideneacetones 7a–f.

To conclude, mentioned findings highlight the unique reactivity profile of the carborane-based Lewis base o-2. While its cationic counterpart o-2a exhibits minimal activity, o-2 engages in diverse reactions with C-acids, solvents and water. Depending on the pKA of the substrate, the reaction equilibrium shifts either toward the protonated form for stronger acids or remains with the reactants for more basic species. This behavior, along with its calculated proton affinity, supports the classification of o-2 as a superbase with low nucleophilicity. Under the applied conditions, certain substrates undergo co-condensation via C–C-bond formation. When used catalytically, o-2 demonstrates exceptional activity in Lewis-base-mediated transformations such as aldol condensation, Thorpe reaction, Michael addition, followed by the Robinson annulation and related processes—universal reactivity that is rare not only among carboranes but also for most compounds reported in the literature. The catalytic performance correlates with the acidity (pKA) of the substrates, yielding distinct conversions and products. Although, similar reactions can be performed also by moisture-stable conjugates of superbases with carboxylic acids, the reactivation of the superbase by epoxides, prolonged warming and water intolerance is reported62. Moreover, conjugate-addition reactions between 4-substituted pyrazolone derivatives and electron-deficient olefins (e.g. β-nitrostyrene and trans-chalcone derivatives) catalyzed by o-2 furnished the products 6a–h with excellent yields (82–96%) and moderate to high diastereoselectivity (Dr. 2:1 to 10:1), featuring two newly formed quaternary and tertiary carbon centers. Furthermore, o-2 proved to be an efficient catalytic platform for highly diastereoselective spirocyclization between unsubstituted pyrazolones and dibenzylideneacetones with only 1 mol. % of catalyst loading, delivering the spiropyrazolones 8a–h in good to high yields (51–88%) as single diastereoisomers. The described processes are not only selective; they also demonstrate tolerance for superbase-sensitive functional groups like nitriles and esters. These results demonstrate that umpolung of polyhedral (car)boranes via increasing the electron density at the boron atoms and even inside the cluster—such as through carbene adduct formation—and their application in Lewis-base catalysis or anionic polymerization may offer a powerful and versatile strategy for future developments in synthetic chemistry.

Methods

Synthesis

The synthesis of o-2b–o-2w was carried out under an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk tube technique. Solvents were dried using a Pure Solv–Innovative Technology equipment under argon gas atmosphere. Starting compound 6,9-IPr2-5,10-C2B8H10 (o-2) was prepared according to the published procedure42 from toluene solution of closo-o-C2B8H10 (1.030 g, 8.54 mmol) (10 mL), which was added dropwise to a stirred solution of IPr (7.302 g, 18.8 mmol) in toluene (100 mL) at room temperature. The yellow reaction mixture was stirred for one hour and then the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The crude product was washed with hexane (2 × 30 mL) to remove the excess of IPr. The yellowish powder of o-2 was dried in vacuo. Yield 7.286 mg, 95%. The spectral data agreed with the previously published42. Starting pyrazolones 4a–4b are commercially available. Detailed description of synthesis and catalysis (including generalized Procedures A-I) is given in the Supplementary Information file.

NMR spectroscopy

1H (400.1, 500.1 and 600.1 MHz)11,B (160.4 MHz) and 13C (101.6, 125.8 and 150.9 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 500 and 600 MHz spectrometers or Bruker Ultrashield 400 MHz, using 5 mm tuneable broad-band probes. Appropriate chemical shifts in 1H and 13C NMR spectra were related to the residual signals of the solvents (CDCl3: δ(1H) = 7.24 ppm and δ(13C) = 77.23 ppm; acetone-d6: δ(1H) = 2.05 ppm and δ(13C) = 29.92 ppm; CD2Cl2: δ(1H) = 5.33 ppm and δ(13C) = 54.24 ppm; THF-d8: δ(1H) = 1.73 and 3.58 ppm and δ(13C) = 25.37 and 67.57 ppm)11.B chemical shifts were related to external standard BF3•OEt2 (δ(11B) = 0.0 ppm).

sc-XRD

Full-sets of diffraction data for o-2b, o-2c, o-2f’, o-2g, o-2i, enol-1a”, 6g and 8g were collected at 150(2)K with a Bruker D8-Venture diffractometer equipped with Mo (Mo/Kα radiation; λ = 0.71073 Å) microfocus X-ray (IµS) source, Photon CMOS detector and Oxford Cryosystems cooling device was used for data collection. The frames were integrated with the Bruker SAINT software package using a narrow-frame algorithm. Data were corrected for absorption effects using the Multi-Scan method (SADABS). Obtained data were treated and structures solved and refined by XT-version 2014/5 and SHELXL-2014/7 software implemented in APEX3 v2016.5-0 or APEX4 v2021.10-0 (Bruker AXS) system63.

Hydrogen atoms were mostly localized on a difference Fourier map, however, to ensure uniformity of treatment of crystal, all ‘organic’ hydrogens were recalculated into idealized positions (riding model) and assigned temperature factors Hiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq (pivot atom) or of 1.5Ueq (methyl). Hydrogen atoms in methyl, methine, methylene C–H moieties and aromatic rings were placed with C–H distances of 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, 1.00 and 0.93 Å, while hydrogens in N–H, O–H or B–H groups were placed according to the maxima on the Fourier maps and refined freely. Some of the B–H moieties from the carborane units were placed with distances of 1.1 and 1.25 Å for terminal and bridging hydrogen atoms, respectively.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Prof. Jędrzej Walkowiak (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland), dr. Tomáš Chlupatý and Dipl.-Eng. Lukáš Vlk (both, University of Pardubice) are recognized for conducting hydroelementation and guanylation experiments.

Author contributions

J.Vr. and A.R. designed the study. Z.K. and J.H. synthesized the compounds. J.Vr. measured the NMR spectra. A.R. and Z.R. determined and refined the structures by scXRD and performed the computations. J.Ve., M.K., P.V. and P.Š. performed the catalytic studies. J.Vr. and A.R. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

The work was supported by Science Foundation of the Czech Republic (grant nr. 22-03945S), ERC-CZ, project Nr. LL2309 and the Programme Johannes Amos Comenius under the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [No. CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0008593].

Data availability

The crystallographic data for structural analysis have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC nos. 2404722-2404729. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EY, UK (fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk). The NMR data have been deposited at Figshare.com and are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30163174.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jan Vrána, Email: jan.vrana@upce.cz.

Jan Veselý, Email: jan.vesely@natur.cuni.cz.

Aleš Růžička, Email: ales.ruzicka@upce.cz.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77070-6.

References

  • 1.Brown, H. C. Organic Syntheses via Boranes (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975).
  • 2.Dhillon, R. S. Hydroboration and Organic Synthesis: 9-Borabicyclo [3.3.1] Nonane (9-BBN) (Springer, 2007).
  • 3.Brown, H. C. & Zaidlewicz, M. Organic Syntheses via Boranes, 2 (WI: Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, 2001).
  • 4.Parks, D. J. & Piers, W. E. Tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron-catalyzed hydrosilation of aromatic aldehydes, ketones, and esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc.118, 9440–9441 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fazal, T., Ali, F., Hosmane, N. S. & Zhu, Y. Chapter four - boron compounds for catalytic applications. Adv. Catal.71, 169–199 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Süsse, L., Hermeke, J. & Oestreich, M. The asymmetric piers hydrosilylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 6940–6943 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang, J., Park, S. & Chang, S. Selective C−O bond cleavage of sugars with hydrosilanes catalyzed by Piers’ borane generated in-situ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 13757–13761 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patrick, E. A. & Piers, W. E. Twenty-five years of bis-pentafluorophenyl borane: a versatile reagent for catalyst and materials synthesis. Chem. Commun.56, 841–853 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Welch, G. C., San Juan, R. R., Masuda, J. D. & Stephan, D. W. Reversible, metal-free hydrogen activation. Science314, 1124–1126 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stephan, D. W. The broadening reach of frustrated Lewis pair chemistry. Science354, 6317 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li, J., Tsang, S. C. E. & Li, G. Recent advances in heterogeneous frustrated Lewis pair: synthesis, characterization, and catalysis. Adv. Mater. 37, 2502101, (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Khanam, A., Ansari, A. & Mandal, P. K. Advances in organoboron-catalyzed regio- and stereoselective glycosylation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 28, 2500552, (2025).
  • 13.Graham, B. J. & Raines, R. T. Emergent organoboron acid catalysts. J. Org. Chem.89, 2069–2089 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hall, D. G. Boronic acid catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 3475–3496 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Taylor, M. S. Catalysis based on reversible covalent interactions of organoboron compounds. Acc. Chem. Res.48, 295–305 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hey-Hawkins, E. & Viñas Teixidor, C. Boron-Based Compounds: Potential and Emerging Applications in Medicine (Wiley, 2018).
  • 17.Grams, R. J. et al. The rise of boron-containing compounds: advancements in synthesis, medicinal chemistry, and emerging pharmacology. Chem. Rev.124, 2441–2511 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jäkle, F. Advances in the synthesis of organoborane polymers for optical, electronic, and sensory applications. Chem. Rev.110, 3985–4022 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fernández, E. & Whiting, A. Synthesis and Application of Organoboron Compounds (Springer, 2015)
  • 20.Mao, X. et al. Tuning the structure of borane-nitrogen derivatives towards high-performance carbon nanotubes-based n-type thermoelectric materials. Chem. Eng. J.405, 126616 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Demirci, U. B., Miele, P. & Yot, P. G. Boron-based (nano-)materials: fundamentals and applications. Crystals6, 118 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thakur, A. K. et al. Recent advances in boron- and nitrogen-doped carbon-based materials and their various applications. Adv. Mater.9, 2101964 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xia, Q. et al. Synthesis, structure and property of boron-based metal–organic materials. Coord. Chem. Rev.435, 213783 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grimes, R. N. Carboranes, 3rd edn (Academic Press, 2016).
  • 25.Klingen, T. J. & Johnson, B. M. Jr Thermal oligomerization of isophthalonitrile catalyzed by o-carborane. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed.17, 619–626 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Douvris, C. & Ozerov, O. V. Hydrodefluorination of perfluoroalkyl groups using silylium-carborane catalysts. Science321, 1188–1190 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vonnemann, C. J. et al. Ortho-carborane-derived halogen bonding organocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202424072 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Akram, M. O., Tidwell, J. R., Dutton, J. L. & Martin, C. D. Tris(ortho-carboranyl)borane: an isolable, halogen-free, Lewis superacid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202212073 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu, Y., Dong, W., Li, Z. H. & Wang, H. Methane activation by a borenium complex. Chem. 7, 1843–1851 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spokoyny, A. M. New ligand platforms featuring boron-rich clusters as organomimetic substituents. Pure Appl. Chem.85, 903–919 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spokoyny, A. M. et al. A coordination chemistry dichotomy for icosahedral carborane-based ligands. Nat. Chem.3, 590–596 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kona, C. N. et al. Aromatic halogenation using carborane catalyst. Chem. 10, 402–413 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lamač, M. et al. “Activated borane”: a porous borane cluster polymer as an efficient Lewis acid-based catalyst. ACS Catal. 13, 14614–14626 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Udnoor, A. et al. Catalytic dehalogenation with activated borane, a porous borane cluster polymer. Catal. Sci. Technol.14, 4458–4465 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ready, A. D., Nelson, Y. A., Torres Pomares, D. F. & Spokoyny, A. M. Redox-active boron clusters. Acc. Chem. Res.57, 1310–1324 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adillon, E. A. & Peters, J. C. Carborane-derived proton-coupled electron transfer reagent. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 30204–30211 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pécharman, A.-F. et al. Easy access to nucleophilic boron through diborane to magnesium boryl metathesis. Nat. Commun.8, 15022–15028 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Trageser, T., Bolte, M., Lerner, H.-W. & Wagner M. B-B Bond Nucleophilicity in a Tetraaryl μ-Hydridodiborane(4) Anion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 7726 –7731 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Mu, X. et al. Sterically unprotected nucleophilic boron cluster reagents. Chem. 5, 2461–2469 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hamilton, E. J. N. et al. Unusual cationic tris(dimethylsulfide)-substituted closo-boranes: preparation and characterization of [1,7,9-(Me2S)3-B12H9]BF4 and [1,2,10-(Me2S)3-B10H7]BF4. Inorg. Chem.51, 2374–2380 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stauber, J. M. et al. A super-oxidized radical cationic icosahedral boroncluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 12948–12953 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vrána, J. et al. Access to cationic polyhedral carboranes via dynamic cage surgery with N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nat. Commun.12, 4971 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Němec, V. et al. The far side of carboranes: anticancer active monocations and ambiently stable dications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 65, e21595 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Holub, J. et al. Cationic polyhedral chalcogenaboranes: activation without breaking Wade’s rules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202419677 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fringuelli, F., Piermatti, O. & Pizzo, F. Organic Synthesis in Water (Thomson Science, London, 1998).
  • 46.Pasuparthy, S. D. & Maiti, B. Enantioselective organocatalytic michael addition reactions catalyzed by proline/prolinol/supported proline based organocatalysts: an overview. ChemistrySelect7, e202104261 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang, Y. & Wang, W. Recent advances in organocatalytic asymmetric Michael reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol.2, 42–53 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bhanja, C., Jena, S., Nayak, S. & Mohapatra, S. Organocatalytic tandem Michael addition reactions: A powerful access to the enantioselective synthesis of functionalized chromenes, thiochromenes and 1,2-dihydroquinolines. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.8, 1668–1694 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Trubitsõn, D. et al. Enantioselective organocatalytic michael addition to unsaturated indolyl ketones. Org. Lett.23, 1820–1824 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shim, J. H., Lee, M. J., Lee, M. H., Kim, B.-S. & Ha, D.-C. Enantioselective organocatalytic Michael reactions using chiral (R,R)−1,2-diphenylethylenediamine-derived thioureas. RSC Adv.10, 31808–31814 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang, J., Li, H., Zu, L. & Wang, W. Enantioselective organocatalytic Michael addition reactions between N-heterocycles and nitroolefins. Org. Lett.8, 1391–1394 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Berry, R. W. H. & Mazza, R. D. Anionic polymerization of β-nitrostyrene. Polymer14, 173–174 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hong, M., Chen, J. & Chen, E. Y.-X. Polymerization of polar monomers mediated by main-group Lewis acid–base pairs. Chem. Rev.118, 10551–10616 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gupta, P., Gupta, J. K., Bansal, S. & Halve, A. K. Synthesis and in-vitro antimicrobial studies of some new pyrazolones. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res.7, 25–29 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mariappan, G. et al. The diverse pharmacological importance of pyrazolone derivatives: a review. J. Pharm. Res.3, 2856–2859 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Géant, P.-Y., Urban, M., Remeš, M., Císařová, I. & Veselý, J. Enantioselective organocatalytic synthesis of sulfur-containing spirocyclic compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 7979–7988 (2013).
  • 57.Wu, B. et al. Highly enantioselective synthesis of spiro[cyclohexanone-oxindoles] and spiro[cyclohexanone-pyrazolones] by asymmetric cascade [5+1] double michael reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 1318–1327 (2012).
  • 58.Luo, X. et al. Asymmetric double michael reaction catalyzed by simple primary amine catalysts: a straightforward approach to construct spirocyclic oxindoles. Chin. J. Chem.30, 1185–1188 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang, L.-L. et al. A highly organocatalytic stereoselective double Michael reaction: efficient construction of optically enriched spirocyclic oxindoles. Chem. Commun.47, 5593–5595 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li, X. et al. Synthesis of optically enriched spirocyclic benzofuran−2-ones by bifunctional thiourea-base catalyzed double-michael addition of benzofuran-2-ones to dienones. Chem. Asian J.8, 997–1003 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luo, X. et al. Organocatalytic asymmetric double michael reaction of benzofuranone with dienones to construct spirocyclic benzofuranones. Chin. J. Chem.30, 2703–2706 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sujansky, S. J., Hoteling, G. A. & Bandar, J. S. A strategy for the controllable generation of organic superbases from benchtop-stable salts. Chem. Sci.15, 10018–10026 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT – Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The crystallographic data for structural analysis have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC nos. 2404722-2404729. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EY, UK (fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk). The NMR data have been deposited at Figshare.com and are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30163174.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES