Abstract
Background
Osteoporosis (OP) is a metabolic skeletal disease characterized by reduced bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration, with Osteoporotic pain (OPP) as its most common clinical symptom, which markedly impairs quality of life. Modern pharmacologic treatments’ limitations are obvious with population aging, so the cost-effective interventions for OPP are urgently needed. As an empirical formula, Rumo zhentong Yin has been created by the national renowned veteran Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioner Yao Shujin for blood-stasis pain. Hence, this trial was designed to investigate the efficacy of Rumo zhentong Yin in treating blood-stasis-type OPP.
Methods
A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Rumo zhentong Yin combined with standard therapy for OPP. Eligible OPP patients were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to form either the control or treatment group. Both groups received standard treatment. The intervention lasted 3 months, with follow-up evaluations every 4 weeks. Primary outcome was pain scores; secondary outcomes included bone mineral density (BMD), bone-turnover markers, inflammatory cytokines, blood-stasis syndrome score and hematological indices.
Anticipated Results
To our knowledge, this trial is the first clinical study of Rumo zhentong Yin for OPP, with the primary objective to provide robust clinical evidence supporting the integration of Traditional Chinese and Western medicine for OPP.
Trial Registration
The trial was registered at the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (www.itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn) on 2026-01-08 (ITMCTR2026000740).
Keywords: blood-stasis syndrome, osteoporotic pain, randomized controlled trial, Rumo zhentong Yin, traditional Chinese medicine
Introduction
As global aging accelerates, osteoporosis (OP) has become one of the emblematic disorders of the aging era. Characterized by continuous loss of bone mass and deterioration of bone micro-architecture, OP leads to increased skeletal fragility and a higher risk of fracture. Clinically, it presents as low-back pain, aching in the extremities, loss of height and, in many cases, fragility fractures (Chinese Medical Association Branch of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Diseases, 2022). More than 200 million people are affected globally, with women bearing the greatest burden (National Center for Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases, 2021).
Osteoporotic pain (OPP) is the chief complaint that brings patients to medical attention and the principal factor limiting their daily activities. About 85% of individuals with OP report pain (Dinges, 2026), comprising both acute fracture-related nociceptive pain and chronic persistent pain (Vellucci et al., 2018). This substantially compromises quality of life in elderly patients who frequently have multiple comorbidities and may precipitate anxiety, depression and other psychological problems (Lisowska et al., 2018).
Current pharmacologic management includes anti-osteoporotic agents and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). These therapies, however, carry risks such as hypersensitivity reactions, fever, peptic ulceration and increased cardiovascular-thrombotic events. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers a safer and effective alternative. Herbal formulae not only relieve pain but also correct underlying constitutional imbalances, reduce dependence on analgesics, minimize adverse reactions and improve overall quality of life (Shima et al., 2016).
Blood stasis is not only a causative factor of osteoporotic pain (OPP) but also a pathological consequence of the condition itself. As a result, blood-stasis syndrome (BSS) represents one of the most commonly observed traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) patterns in patients with osteoporotic pain (OPP). Its cardinal manifestations include aching, weakness and stabbing pain localized in the lower back and knees—or throughout the body—together with limitation of movement. Applying the Practical Diagnostic Criteria for Blood-Stasis Syndrome (Table 1) markedly enhances the accuracy and reliability of BSS identification in clinical practice.
TABLE 1.
Schedule of trial.
| Study phase Tests |
Screening period (Day) | Treatment period (Day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit window | −3∼0 | Day 30 of treatment | Day 60 of treatment | Day 90 of treatment | |
| Basic history taking | |||||
| Informed-consent signature | × | | | | |
| Demographics | × | | | | |
| General data form | × | | | | |
| Medical and prior-treatment history | × | | | | |
| Inclusion/exclusion check | × | | | | |
| Randomisation and enrolment | × | | | | |
| Screening variables | |||||
| Bone-mineral density (BMD) | × | | | | |
| Treatment administration | |||||
| Test group | | × | × | × | |
| Control group | | × | × | × | |
| Efficacy end-points (assessment visits) | |||||
| BMD measurement | × | | | × | |
| TCM syndrome score | × | × | × | × | |
| Pain score (VAS) | × | × | × | × | |
| Bone-turnover markers (β-CTX, PINP) | × | × | × | × | |
| Inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1) | × | × | × | × | |
| Blood-stasis syndrome score | × | × | × | × | |
| Blood-cell indices | × | × | × | × | |
| Safety observations | |||||
| Height | × | | | × | |
| Blood pressure | × | | | × | |
| Electrocardiogram | × | | | × | |
| Haematology | × | | | × | |
| Liver function | × | × | × | × | |
| Renal function | × | × | × | × | |
| Coagulation profile | × | | | × | |
| Adverse-event log | | × | × | × | |
| Other items | |||||
| Concomitant medication / therapy | × | ||||
| Study closeout | Withdrawals and drop-outs | × | |||
| Compliance and safety evaluation form | × | ||||
| Abnormalfindings record | × | ||||
| Studycompletion status | × | ||||
| Review & sign-off | × | ||||
Rumo zhentong Yin—composed of Ruxiang (frankincense), Moyao (myrrh), Xuejie (dragon’s blood), Jiangxiang (dalbergia wood), Sumu (sappan wood), Gansong (nardostachys), Xixin (asarum), and Tubiechong (ground beetle)—is an empirical formula created by national TCM master Yao Shujin for blood-stasis pain. Although preclinical studies support the anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and bone-protective effects of its ingredients, robust clinical evidence is still lacking (Shima et al., 2016; Lisowska et al., 2018).
Methods and analysis
Study design and setting
The protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Xi’an Hospital Affiliated to Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine (approval No. LLSCYJ2025085) and registered at the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (ITMCTR2026000740). The experimental flowchart is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Trial flow chart.
This is a single-centre, two-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 participants will be recruited through advertisements and referrals by outpatient and inpatient clinicians. Eligible patients will be informed about the study when they attend the outpatient clinic or are admitted to the hospital. A detailed face-to-face interview will be conducted to explain the study’s purpose, interventions, assessment procedures, and follow-up schedule. Following the provision of written informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either the treatment group or control group. Both groups will receive standard care throughout the intervention period. In addition, the treatment group will receive Rumo zhentong Yin decoction, while the control group will receive standard care alone. The intervention will continue for up to 3 months, unless a participant withdraws consent, is lost to follow-up, or dies. Follow-up visits will be scheduled every 4 weeks, as outlined in Table 1.
Participants
Recruitment will be conducted through outpatient and inpatient departments of geriatrics, spine, and trauma at Xi’an Hospital of TCM.
Inclusion criteria
Participants are eligible if they meet ALL of the following: Voluntary agreement to take part and signed informed consent.
Diagnosis of primary osteoporosis according to Western-medicine criteria. TCM syndrome differentiation of “blood-stasis syndrome”. ndividuals aged between 45 and 70 years, regardless of gender.Low-back or limb-joint pain for ≥3 months.
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be excluded if ANY of the following apply:
Fracture within the past 6 months.
Concomitant endocrine or metabolic diseases (hyperparathyroidism, Cushing’s syndrome, hyperthyroidism, gonadal hyper-function, diabetes), hematological diseases (myeloma, leukaemia), severe gastrointestinal diseases, or psychiatric/neurological disorders. Low-back pain attributable to lumbar-disc herniation, cervical spondylosis, or other clear causes.
Severe cardio-cerebrovascular disease, hepatic or renal insufficiency. Psychosis or inability to give informed consent. Participation in another clinical trial or completion of another drug trial within 3 months.
Withdrawal/discontinuation criteria
Participants will be withdrawn or discontinued if ANY of the following occur: violation of inclusion criteria or fulfillment of any exclusion criterion during the study. Receipt of study treatment for fewer than 30 consecutive days or evidence of poor compliance. Occurrence of serious side-effects, adverse reactions, or allergic reactions. Initiation or modification of concomitant therapies that could influence outcomes without prior approval from the investigator. Withdrawal of informed consent by the participant or their legally authorized representative. Significant disease progression or the development of a new medical condition requiring urgent or alternative.
Drop-out criteria
Participants are considered drop-outs if ANY of the following occur: Failure to attend scheduled visits on time.
Are lost to follow-up.
Voluntarily withdraw before completing the full course.
Do not adhere to the protocol to an extent that efficacy evaluation is compromised.
Intervention
Basic therapy: Alendronate sodium (MSD PHARMA [SINGAPORE] PTE.LTD.; Import Drug Registration No. H20160100; 70 mg) 70 mg orally once weekly; Calcium carbonate D3 (Wyeth Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; National Drug Approval No. H10950029; 600 mg) 600 mg orally daily; Calcitriol soft capsules (Catalent Germany Eberbach GmbH; Import Drug Registration Nos. H20140597 & H20140598; 0.25 µg) 0.5 µg orally once daily; and Elcatonin injection (Shandong Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; National Drug Approval No. H20040338; 1 mL:10IU)was administered intramuscularly at 1 mL per dose,twice weekly (all injections were administered by trained hospital nurses). Treatment duration: 3 months. Control group: Conventional intervention only.
Observation group: Conventional intervention plus Rǔ-Mò Analgesic Decoction (10 g Frankincense, 10 g Myrrh, 3 g Dragon’s Blood, 6 g Dalbergia wood, 10 g Sappan wood, 10 g Chinese spikenard, 3 g Asarum root, 6 g Ground beetle).Table 2 summarises the key components of Rumo zhentong Yin.
TABLE 2.
Key Components of Rumo zhentong Yin.
| Chinese name | Latin name/English name | Source organism/Plant part | Quantity (g per day) | Components of Rumo zhentong Yin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruxiɑng | Olibanum | Boswellia sacra Flück | 10 |
|
| Moyɑo | Myrrha | Commiphora wightii | 10 |
|
| Xuejie | Draconis sanguis | Daemonorops draco Bl | 3 |
|
| Jiɑngxiɑng | Dalbergiae odoriferae lignum | Dalbergia odorifera T.C.Chen | 6 |
|
| Sumu | Sappan lignum | Biancaea sappan | 10 |
|
| Gɑnsong | Nardostachyos radix et rhizoma | Nardostachys jatamansi (D.Don) DC. | 10 |
|
| Xixin | Asari radix et rhizoma | Asarum sieboldii miq. | 3 |
|
| Tubiechong | Eupolyphaga seu polyphaga | Eupolyphaga sinensis | 6 |
|
| | | 土鳖虫不是植物,所以这是他的学名不是 source plant | | |
All herbal ingredients of Rumo Zhentong Yin were provided by the Pharmacy Department of Xi’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and met the quality standards of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2020 Edition). Each batch underwent hospital incoming quality inspection. Processing was conducted in accordance with hospital standards; impurities and non-medicinal parts were removed. Specifically, only dried roots and rhizomes of Asarum were used, excluding aerial parts.
Prescriptions were decocted centrally in the hospital decoction room with automatic herbal decoction machines under a unified protocol, including standardized soaking, water addition, boiling time and filtration. The finished decoction was sealed and dispensed to participants. Batch inspection was performed to maintain consistent preparation during the trial.
Concomitant-therapy rules
Throughout the trial, participants are prohibited from using any concomitant medication or intervention that could interfere with the assessment of efficacy or safety. If a participant has a chronic comorbidity requiring ongoing treatment, all concurrent therapies must be documented in the Case Report Form (CRF).
Throughout the trial, participants are forbidden to use any concomitant medication or intervention that could interfere with the assessment of efficacy or safety. If a participant suffers from a chronic co-morbidity that requires continuous treatment, all concurrent therapies must be documented in the Case Report Form (CRF).
Outcomes
Primary endpoints: Pain score: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); Mechanism indicators: 1.Bone-mineral density (BMD); 2.Bone-turnover markers: β-CTX and PINP; 3.Inflammatory cytokines: TNF-α and IL-1.
Secondary endpoints:1.Blood-stasis syndrome score; 2.Hematological indices: serum MCV, RDW-CV, MPV and PDW.
Safety endpoints:Height, blood pressure, 12-lead ECG, routine hematology, liver and renal function tests, and coagulation profile.
Randomisation and blinding
Simple randomisation was used. The allocation sequence was generated using SPSS version 24.0. Each unique allocation code was placed in a sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope (numbered 1–114) and stored by an independent custodian. After obtaining informed consent, the next envelope in sequence was opened, and the participant was assigned to either the control or treatment group (n = 57 per group). Because the two interventions could not be blinded to participants, only the outcome assessors, data managers, and statisticians were masked to group assignment. In the Case Report Form (CRF), group labels were replaced with the identifiers“A” and “B.” The master randomisation list (containing the sealed code linking A/B to actual groups) was generated by an external statistician using SAS software and is securely stored by the study administrator. It will remain concealed until after final database lock.
Sample size
This is a parallel, two-arm, superiority RCT. A pilot study (Tong-bi Bushen formula for osteoporosis with kidney-deficiency/blood-stasis pattern) showed mean ± SD VAS improvements of 2.45 ± 0.53 (combination) vs. 2.07 ± 0.53 (Western medicine alone). Using an independent-samples t-test in PASS 15.0.1 (α = 0.05 two-sided, power = 0.95, 1:1 ratio) gave 51 participants per arm; allowing 10% attrition, 114 participants (57 per arm) will be enrolled. Data collection and registration All data will be captured in a paper/e-CRF. Investigators will be trained in patient communication, CRF completion and all rating scales. After consent, baseline demographics, BMD, TCM syndrome score, VAS, bone-turnover markers (β-CTX, PINP), inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1), blood-stasis score and haematological indices (MCV, RDW-CV, MPV, PDW) will be collected. Follow-up visits occur every 4 weeks for 3 months. Original data and biological samples will be retained for a minimum of 5 years following the conclusion of the study.
An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) consisting of external clinical epidemiologists, data managers and biostatisticians with no conflicts of interest will review safety, CRF accuracy and participant confidentiality every 6 months and will advise on protocol modification or early termination if warranted.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses will be performed with SPSS 24.0. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ±standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as median (P25, P75) otherwise. Categorical variables will be summarised as frequencies and percentages (n [%]). Between-group comparisons of continuous endpoints be conducted using independent-samples t-test (normal) or Mann–Whitney U test (non-normal). Within-group changes over multiple visits will be analysed with repeated-measures ANOVA (normal) or generalised estimating equations (non-normal). If an interaction is significant, simple-effects analysis will follow. Unordered categorical variables will be compared with χ2 or Fisher’s exact test. Ordered categorical variables with the rank-sum test. All tests will be two-tailed, with a significance level set at P < 0.05. Missing values will be imputed by last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method.
Trial status
Participant recruitment was initially projected to start in January 2025 and close in June 2026, with follow-up assessments expected to finish in December 2026. However, due to preparatory delays, actual enrollment commenced on 12 September 2025, as registered with the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry. Recruitment will continue until the registered closing date of 31 December 2026.
Ethics and dissemination
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the SPIRIT 2013 statement and the SPIRIT-TCM Extension 2018. Ethical a pproval has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Xi’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, affiliated to Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine (approval No. LLSCYJ2025085). The trial is registered with the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (ITMCTR2026000740). Any protocol amendments will be promptly submitted to the ethics committee for review and approval. Only individuals who provide written informed consent will be enrolled in the study. On completion, the findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Clinical insights and trial experience will be shared with participants and the wider public through conferences and publications. Authorship of the final report will be determined by individual contributions to the research.
Discussion
The latest national epidemiological survey shows that the prevalence of osteoporosis among Chinese residents aged ≥50 years is 19.2% (32.1% in women, 6.9% in men), rising to 32% in those ≥65 years (51.6% in women, 10.7% in men). These figures correspond to roughly 90 million affected individuals nationwide and an estimated annual direct medical cost of 174.5 billion RMB, making osteoporosis a major public-health challenge (National Center for Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases, 2021; Si et al., 2018). Osteoporotic pain (OPP) is the most common clinical symptom prompting medical consultation. Apart from chronic low-back pain, OPP is frequently accompanied by sensory/motor dysfunction, sleep disturbance and psychological distress (Si et al., 2018; Nees and Becker, 2017). As bone mass declines and micro-architecture deteriorates, intermittent pain may become continuous, markedly impairing quality of life.
Current Western approaches to managing osteoporotic pain include anti-osteoporosis medications, NSAIDs, opioids and non-pharmacological measures such as exercise therapy, nerve block, radio-frequency ablation, percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty (Shima et al., 2016; Nees and Becker, 2017; Gongyi, 2003; Valet et al., 2009; Vellucci et al., 2018). However, none of these options is fully satisfactory. Anti-osteoporosis agents can provide partial pain relief but are associated with adverse effects including fever, oedema, gastrointestinal ulceration, osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fracture (Gong et al., 2003). NSAIDs increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events and interfere with fracture healing (Cummings et al., 1998). Long-term opioid use is linked to an elevated risk of falls, fractures, endocrine dysfunction and mood deterioration (Lisowska et al., 2018; Liberman et al., 1995). Minimally invasive procedures are safe but expensive and highly selective. Given these limitations, an effective, safe and affordable treatment is urgently needed.
In recent years, the therapeutic advantages of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the management of osteoporotic pain (OPP) have become increasingly evident. By delaying bone loss, regulating bone metabolism, alleviating pain symptoms, and simultaneously addressing associated psychological and somatic discomforts, TCM offers a more holistic and patient-centered approach to OPP treatment.Wu Weiping et al. (Wu and Chao, 2009) enrolled 55 patients with OPP and administered a TCM regimen aimed at tonifying the kidney, strengthening the spleen, promoting blood circulation, and removing blood stasis, in addition to conventional therapy. The overall response rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Similarly, Wang Wenzheng et al. (Wang et al., 2016) combined Shufu Tablets (Shufu Pian), which are known for their blood-activating and stasis-resolving properties, with Bushen Zhuanggu Tang (Kidney-Tonifying and Bone-Strengthening Decoction). Their findings demonstrated that this combination therapy produced superior improvements in nocturnal pain, daytime resting pain, and activity-related pain (e.g., pain during turning over) in patients with osteoporosis.
From a TCM theoretical perspective, the principal pathological mechanisms underlying OPP involve “pain due to obstruction” (Bu Tong Ze Tong) and “pain due to lack of nourishment” (Bu Rong Ze Tong). These mechanisms arise from liver–kidney deficiency, depletion of marrow and essence, qi stagnation and blood stasis, as well as the invasion of external pathogenic factors. Among these, blood stasis serves not only as a key etiological factor but also as a pathological consequence in the progression of osteoporotic pain.
“Rǔ-Mò Zhèn-Tòng-Yǐn” (Frankincense-Myrrh Analgesic Decoction) is an empirical formula created by the national TCM master Yao Shu-jin for blood-stasis pain. Its bio-active components exhibit potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties through multiple molecular pathways.
Frankincense triterpenoid (3-oxo-tirucosta-8,24-dien-21-oic acid, KTDA) and myrrh sesquiterpenoid (2-methoxy-5-acetyl-furanogermacr-1 (10)-en-6-one, FSA) suppress MAPK/AKT phosphorylation, inhibit NF-κB nuclear translocation and downregulate IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA (Lihui et al., 2022).Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA) reduces Ti-particle-induced osteolysis and promotes osteoblast differentiation via GSK-3β/β-catenin (Wang, 2020). Asarum alcohol extract decreases NO, PGE2 and MDA, elevates SOD and activates GABAa receptors to produce analgesia (Yuan and Sun, 2009; Liu et al., 2021). Ground beetle (Eupolyphaga) suppresses TRPV1 expression, mitigates neuropathic pain, increases osteoblast number and accelerates callus mineralisation (Liguo et al., 2015). Dragon’s-blood chalcones inhibit osteoclast formation via p38/MAPK, JNK and Keap1/Nrf2/ARE pathways (Liu, 2019).
Collectively, these pharmacological actions support the potential of Rǔ-Mò Zhèn-Tòng-Yǐn to alleviate osteoporotic pain OPP. However, high-quality, well-designed randomised clinical trials evaluating TCM formulas as add-on therapy are scarce.
Limitations of the present trial
The study does not include dose-escalation or de-escalation arm—precluding exploration of dose–response relationships. Furthermore, all participating sites are located in Xi’an, limiting generalizability of the results. Larger, multi-centre studies with diverse populations are warranted. This prospective, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rǔ-Mò Zhèn-Tòng-Yǐn combined with standard Western therapy versus standard therapy alone in patients with OPP. The primary end-points are improvement in BMD and pain relief. Secondary end-points include changes in bone-turnover markers, inflammatory cytokines and TCM syndrome scores. The findings are expected to provide robust evidence for the integrative management of osteoporotic pain.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (grant No. 2025SF-YBXM-072).
Footnotes
Edited by: Sashank Reddy, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Reviewed by: Liu-Cheng Li, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China
Xinmiao Yao, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Xi’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, xi’an, China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
QZ: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Validation, Investigation. YS: Writing – original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation. BN: Investigation, Validation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis. ML: Methodology, Project administration, Investigation, Writing – original draft. JY: Validation, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. YT: Data curation, Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization. HW: Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Chinese Medical Association Branch of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Diseases (2022). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary osteoporosis. Chin. J. Osteoporos. Bone Mineral Dis. 15 (6), 573–611. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings S. R., Black D. M., Thompson D. E., Applegate W. B., BarrettConnor E., Musliner T. A., et al. (1998). Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the fracture intervention trial. JAMA 280, 2077. 10.1001/jama.280.24.2077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinges G. (2026). Schmerztherapie Bei Osteoporose -Medikamentöse Konzepte: Nutzen Und Risiken Osteoporosis Pain Management. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gongyi H. (2003). Osteoporotic fracture and treatment principles. Foreign Medical-Section Endocrinology 23 (2), 111–113. [Google Scholar]
- Liberman U. A., Weiss S. R., Bröll J., Minne H. W., Quan H., Bell N. H., et al. (1995). Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The alendronate phase III osteoporosis treatment study group. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1437–1443. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lihui Z., Zizhang Z., Jiashang L., Shulan S., Yue Z., Dawei Q., et al. (2022). A study on the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects and mechanisms of the active components KTDA and FSA from frankincense and myrrh, and their compound formulations. New Chin. Med. Clin. Pharmacol. 33 (11), 1460–1465. [Google Scholar]
- Lisowska B., Kosson D., Domaracka K. (2018). Positives and negatives of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in bone healing: the effects of these drugs on bone repair. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 12, 1809–1814. 10.2147/DDDT.S164565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y. (2019). A Study on the Regulation of Hormone-Induced Osteonecrosis Repair by Dragon’s Blood Extract in the OB/OC System. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. 10.27044/d.cnki.ggzzu.2019.000578 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu T., Hongxia Z., Gao W., Chen X., Wen T., Yang Z., et al. (2021). A study on the effects of asarum alcohol extract on transient receptor potentials vanilloid receptor 1 and the mechanism underlying its alleviation of neuropathic pain in mice. J. Traditional Chin. Med. 36 (08), 4998–5001. [Google Scholar]
- Liguo Z., Dongsheng M., Jiajia C., Lijun N. (2015). A comparison of the anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and osteoblast-repairing activities of essential oils and water extracts from traditional Chinese medicines. New Traditional Chin. Med. Clin. Pharmacol. 26 (1), 34–39. [Google Scholar]
- National Center for Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (2021). “Chinese center for disease control and Prevention,Chinese medical association branch of osteoporosis and bone mineral diseases,” in Epidemiological Survey Report on Osteoporosis in China (2018). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
- Nees F., Becker S. (2017). Psychological processes in chronic pain: influences of reward and fear learning as key mechanismsbehavioral evidence, neural circuits, and maladaptivechanges. Neuroscience. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shima K., Nemoto W., Tsuchiya M., Tan-No K., Takano-Yamamoto T., Sugawara S., et al. (2016). The bisphosphonates clodronate and etidronate exert analgesic effects by acting on glutamate-and/or ATP-Related pain transmission pathways. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 39 (5), 770–777. 10.1248/bpb.b15-00882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Si L., Winzenberg T. M., Jiang Q., Chen M., Palmer A. J. (2018). Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010–2050. Osteoporos. Int. 26 (7), 1929–1937. 10.1007/s00198-015-3093-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valet M., Gündel H., Sprenger T., Sorg C., Mühlau M., Zimmer C., et al. (2009). Patients with pain disorder show gray-matter loss in pain-processing structures: a voxel-based morphometric study. Psychosom. Med. 71 (1), 49–56. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818d1e02 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vellucci R., Terenzi R., Kanis J. A., Kress H. G., Mediati R. D., Reginster J. Y., et al. (2018). Understanding osteo-porotic pain and its pharmacological treatment. Osteoporos. Int. 29, 1477–1491. 10.1007/s00198-018-4476-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z. (2020). A Study on the Effects and Mechanisms of Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic Acid on Titanium Particle-Induced Osteolysis and Osteogenesis. Soochow University. [Google Scholar]
- Wang W., Wang Y., Haijun Z. (2016). A clinical study on the efficacy of kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening decoction combined with woodlouse tablets in treating osteoporosis-related pain. Hebei Med. 38 (09), 1381–1382. [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., Chao J. (2009). Clinical experience with the method of tonifying the kidneys, strengthening the spleen, and promoting blood circulation to remove stasis in the treatment of pain associated with primary osteoporosis. Trace Elem. Health Res. 26 (06), 29–31. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan X., Sun L. (2009). A preliminary experimental study on the mechanism of the analgesic effect of asarum essential OilAdvances in modern biomedicine. 9(4):718–720. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
