Skip to main content
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science logoLink to The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
. 2026 Jul 10;88(9):1407–1418. doi: 10.1292/jvms.26-0186

The Na+/Ca2+ exchanger: molecular structure, functional regulation, and mode-selective modulation

Naoshige ONO 1, Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA 1, Yasu-Taka AZUMA 1,*
PMCID: PMC13612953  PMID: 42438007

Abstract

The Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) is a key regulator of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, mediating bidirectional ion transport in response to electrochemical gradients. NCX plays essential roles in diverse physiological processes, including cardiac contraction, neuronal signaling, and hormone secretion, while its dysregulation is implicated in a wide range of pathophysiological conditions such as heart failure, ischemia, and neurodegenerative diseases. Recent advances in structural biology, particularly cryo-electron microscopy, have provided detailed insights into the molecular architecture of eukaryotic NCX, revealing the mechanisms underlying ion transport, regulation, and inactivation. These studies have highlighted the functional importance of conserved structural elements, including the α1- and α2-repeats and cytosolic regulatory domains, in governing exchanger activity. In parallel, pharmacological studies have identified a variety of NCX modulators with distinct mode and isoform selectivity. While classical inhibitors predominantly target the reverse mode, emerging compounds—including highly selective inhibitors and novel activators—demonstrate diverse mechanisms of action, often involving allosteric modulation rather than direct interaction with the ion-binding site. This review integrates current knowledge of NCX structure, function, and pharmacology, with a particular focus on the relationship between structural determinants and transport mode selectivity. We also discuss the challenges that have limited the clinical translation of NCX-targeting drugs and outline future perspectives for the rational design of next-generation NCX modulators.

Keywords: action potential, Ca2+ signaling, ion channels, Na+/Ca2+ exchanger

INTRODUCTION

Since the discovery of calcium as a second messenger, it has been implicated in an increasing number of biological functions [10]. Calcium ions (Ca2+) serve as ubiquitous signaling molecules that orchestrate diverse physiological processes across all cell types. Ca2+ regulates fundamental cellular processes such as proliferation, protein synthesis, and differentiation, as well as specialized functions including muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, electrical excitability, and synaptic plasticity [4]. This broad involvement highlights the remarkable versatility of Ca2+ as a signaling molecule. A defining feature of Ca2+ signaling is the steep concentration gradient across the plasma membrane: while extracellular Ca2+ is maintained at relatively high concentrations (1 to 2 mM) [11], cytosolic Ca2+ is kept at extremely low concentrations (~100 nM at rest), creating a gradient of approximately 20,000-fold. This gradient enables Ca2+ to function as a rapid and reversible signaling molecule, whereby even subtle changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration can trigger profound cellular responses. Consequently, precise spatiotemporal regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels is essential for maintaining normal cellular function [11].

Ca2+ homeostasis refers to the maintenance of stable intracellular Ca2+ concentration across different cellular compartments [60]. This process is governed by Ca2+ fluxes between the extracellular space and the cell, as well as Ca2+ transport within intracellular organelles [60]. Cells can be broadly classified into excitable cells, which generate action potentials, and non-excitable cells, which do not. At the molecular level, cytosolic Ca2+ is regulated by channels, adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-driven pumps, and ion exchangers located on both the plasma membrane and intracellular membranes, as well as by Ca2+-binding proteins in the cytosol [53]. At the plasma membrane, voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) and receptor-operated Ca2+ channels (ROCCs) mediate Ca2+ influx. In contrast, intracellular Ca2+ stores—primarily the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)—release Ca2+ via inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs). In addition, organelles such as the ER and mitochondria contribute to the regulation of cytosolic Ca2+ through coordinated interactions [74, 79, 104]. Following cellular signaling events, cytosolic Ca2+ must be rapidly restored to basal levels. This is achieved by Ca2+ extrusion and sequestration mechanisms, the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), which pumps Ca2+ into intracellular stores, and plasma membrane transport systems such as the plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA) and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), which extrude Ca2+ from the cell [14, 15].

Among Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms, NCX plays a particularly important role, especially in excitable cells such as cardiomyocytes and neurons, where large and rapid Ca2+ fluxes occur. NCX exhibits low affinity but high capacity for Ca2+, whereas PMCA displays high affinity but low capacity [16]. This complementary relationship reflects their distinct functional roles: NCX removes large elevations in cytosolic Ca2+, whereas PMCA finetunes Ca2+ concentration near basal levels [16]. The physiological significance of NCX is supported by quantitative studies; for example, it accounts for approximately 70% and 90% of Ca2+ extrusion in pancreatic β-cells and the heart, respectively [6, 108]. Beyond Ca2+ removal, NCX couples Ca2+ transport to the transmembrane Na+ gradient, exchanging three Na+ ions for one Ca2+ ion in an electrogenic process that is regulated by ionic gradients and membrane potential.

A defining characteristic of NCX is its bidirectional transport capability. NCX mediates Ca2+ fluxes in exchange for Na+, operating either in the forward mode (Ca2+ efflux) or reverse mode (Ca2+ influx), with directionality determined by ionic gradients and membrane potential [56]. Under normal physiological conditions, NCX predominantly operates in the forward mode, extruding Ca2+ from the cytosol. Although forward-mode activity represents the primary physiological function of NCX, transient reversal may contribute to excitation-contraction (EC)-coupling, vascular constriction, and synaptic transmission [56]. However, when the Na+ electrochemical gradient is diminished or reversed—such as during membrane depolarization or elevated intracellular Na+—NCX switches to the reverse mode, resulting in Ca2+ influx. In pathological conditions, reverse-mode activity often becomes predominant [56]. For example, in ischemia, heart failure, and stroke, elevated intracellular Na+ drives sustained Ca2+ influx via reverse-mode NCX, leading to Ca2+ overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, and ultimately cell death. These observations highlight the central role of NCX in the dysregulation of Ca2+ homeostasis under disease conditions. Accordingly, NCX is increasingly recognized as a key therapeutic target in cardiovascular and neurological disorders.

Mammals express three NCX isoforms—NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3—each exhibiting distinct tissue distribution and functional properties. These isoforms, together with their splice variants, are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and contribute to a wide range of physiological processes, including cardiac contractility, neuronal plasticity and learning, blood pressure regulation, renal Ca2+ reabsorption, immune responses, neurotransmitter and insulin secretion, apoptosis, cell proliferation, and mitochondrial bioenergetics [56]. NCX1 is widely expressed in both excitable tissues (e.g., heart and brain) and non-excitable tissues (e.g., kidney and pancreas), where it plays critical roles in cardiac contractility, renal Ca2+ reabsorption, and insulin secretion [38, 94]. NCX2 is predominantly expressed in the brain and spinal cord, contributing to neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis and synaptic plasticity [58, 94], while NCX3 is expressed in the brain and skeletal muscle [77, 78]. The existence of multiple splice variants for each isoform further expands the functional diversity of NCX-mediated Ca2+ regulation, enabling fine-tuned control of Ca2+ dynamics in different cellular contexts. Understanding the molecular basis of NCX function—including its three-dimensional structure, ion transport mechanism, and regulatory properties—is essential for the developing isoform-selective therapeutic strategies.

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the NCX, integrating recent structural insights with functional and pharmacological perspectives to better understand its roles in physiology and disease. We highlight how advances in structural biology have elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying the unique bidirectional transport and regulatory properties of NCX, and how this knowledge is being leveraged to develop selective NCX inhibitors and activators as potential therapeutic agents. Given the growing recognition of NCX as a central regulator of Ca2+ dysregulation in major human diseases—including heart failure, arrhythmias, stroke, and neurodegenerative disorders—a deeper understanding of this transporter holds significant promise for future drug discovery.

CALCIUM HOMEOSTASIS AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLES OF NCX

Intracellular Ca2+ concentration varies widely depending on cellular location [3]. At rest, cytosolic Ca2+ is maintained at extremely low concentrations (~100 nM) [34], approximately 20,000-fold lower than extracellular Ca2+ concentrations. This steep concentration gradient is fundamental to Ca2+ signaling, enabling rapid and reversible cellular responses. However, dysregulation of Ca2+ homeostasis can have deleterious effects, including apoptosis and cell death [3, 34, 89]. Because Ca2+ regulates nearly all aspects of cellular function, its concentration and signaling dynamics must be tightly controlled (Fig. 1). The plasma membrane plays a central role in regulating Ca2+ entry and exit through various ion channels and transport systems [3]. Ca2+ channels are broadly classified into two major types based on their activation mechanisms. VGCCs are activated by changes in membrane potential and are primarily expressed in excitable cells, where they serve as the major pathways for Ca2+ influx [20, 21, 35, 115]. Excitable cells—including neurons, muscle cells (skeletal, smooth, and cardiac), and certain endocrine and germ cells—are capable of generation action potentials that enable electrical signaling [41]. In contrast, most other cell types are considered non-excitable [61] and generally express low levels of VGCCs [61]. Therefore, Ca2+ influx in non-excitable cell types is primarily mediated by ROCCs, which are activated downstream of receptor stimulation, typically via G protein-coupled signaling pathways [61]. In contrast to ligand-gated ion channels (ionotropic receptors), which are directly activated by ligand binding, ROCCs are indirectly regulated through intracellular signaling cascades. Several types of ROCCs have been identified [110], including members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel family [83]. In addition, ligand-gated ion channels such as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) [50, 102] and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPARs) mediate Ca2+ influx through direct ligand binding, particularly in the central nervous system [50]. Furthermore, store-operated Ca2+ entry is mediated by Orai (CRACM) channels, which are activated by stromal interaction molecule (STIM) proteins following depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic representation of membrane proteins regulating intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate intracellular signaling through heterotrimeric G proteins. Ca2+ influx is mediated by plasma membrane channels (Orai, voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCC), and receptor-operated Ca2+ channels (ROCC)), while Ca2+ extrusion is controlled by transporters such as Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) and plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA). Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics are further regulated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized proteins including 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3R), ryanodine receptors (RyR), and sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). Stromal interaction molecule (STIM) 1 acts as an ER Ca2+ sensor that detects Ca2+ depletion and subsequently activates Orai channels to induce store-operated Ca2+ entry.

Increases in intracellular Ca2+ arise either from Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane or from release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, primarily the ER or, in muscle cells, the SR [96]. The ER is the largest intracellular organelle and extends throughout much of the cell, serving as a high-capacity reservoir for Ca2+ [5, 103]. Two major Ca2+ release channels mediate signaling-induced Ca2+ release from the ER lumen to the cytosol [7, 27]. The first is the IP3R, an intracellular ligand-gated Ca2+ channel localized to the ER membrane [7, 27]. Its ligand, IP3, is a second messenger generated by activation of phospholipase C (PLC) downstream of Gq-coupled or receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways [51]. PLC hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to produce IP3 and diacylglycerol (DAG) [7, 27]. Ca2+ itself acts as an allosteric modulator of the IP3R, playing a key role in shaping the IP3R-mediated Ca2+ signals [27, 107]. The second major ER Ca2+ release channel is the RyR, a high-conductance and relatively nonspecific cation channel (~100–150 pS for Ca2+) [70]. The mammalian genome encodes three RyR isoforms (RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3), which share approximately 70% sequence homology [25]. Ca2+ is the principal activator of all three isoforms [28, 39], a process known as calcium-induced calcium release (CICR), in which Ca2+ promotes its own release from intracellular stores [96]. Both IP3Rs and RyRs exhibit CICR, enabling signal amplification and spatiotemporal patterning of Ca2+ signals.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane receptors that play a central role in intracellular signaling pathways, including those regulating Ca2+ dynamics [23]. GPCRs are seven-transmembrane (heptahelical) receptors located on the plasma membrane that coupled to heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) [23]. G proteins consist of three subunits—α, β, and γ. In the inactive state, the α subunit is bound to guanosine diphosphate (GDP). Upon receptor activation, GDP is released and replaced by guanosine triphosphate (GTP), leading to activation of the G protein [1]. G proteins are classified into four major families based on their α subunit: Gαi, Gαs, Gα12/13, and Gαq [55]. In the Gαq pathway, PLCβ-mediated hydrolysis of PIP2 generates IP3 and DAG [67]. IP3 induces Ca2+ release from the ER via IP3 receptors, while DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC).

In the Gαs pathway, Gαs activates a family of adenylyl cyclases (ACs), leading to an increase in intracellular levels of the second messenger cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP) [12, 22, 81, 82, 106]. Elevated cAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA), which phosphorylates multiple target proteins, including L-type Ca2+-channel (LCC), RyRs, and myosin binding protein C [23]. In the Gαi pathway, Gαi inhibits AC activity, resulting in reduced intracellular cAMP levels [109]. In the Gα12/13 pathway, Gα12/13 activates RhoA and its downstream effector Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), leading to inhibition of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis [113].

Ca2+ stored in the SR/ER plays a critical role in regulating cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. A key mechanism that prevents store depletion is the STIM1-ORAI1 interaction, which mediates store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE). STIM1 is a type I membrane protein localized in the ER and functions as a luminal Ca2+ sensor through its EF-hand domain [40]. Orai proteins are Ca2+-permeable channels located in the plasma membrane that mediate Ca2+ influx under the control of STIM proteins [73]. Upon depletion of ER Ca2+ stores and disassociation of Ca2+ from the EF-hand domain, STIM1 undergoes conformational changes, oligomerizes, and translocates to ER-plasma membrane junctions, where it directly interacts with ORAI1 [62, 92]. This interaction activates Orai channels, resulting in Ca2+ influx from extracellular space, which subsequently contributes to replenishment of ER Ca2+ stores [62, 92].

Following cellular signaling events that elevate cytosolic Ca2+, Ca2+ must be rapidly cleared to restore basal conditions. This is achieved by active transport mechanisms that move Ca2+ against its concentration gradient. The SERCA, a membrane transport protein ubiquitously expressed in the ER of eukaryotic cells [93], pumps Ca2+ from the cytosol into the SR/ER lumen through ATP hydrolysis. By maintaining low cytosolic Ca2+ levels, SERCA enables a wide range of signaling pathways and physiological processes, including synaptic transmission, muscle contraction, and fertilization [93]. At the plasma membrane, Ca2+ extrusion is mediated by two major systems: PMCA and NCX [14]. Although Ca2+ is essential for cellular function, its dysregulation can lead to deleterious effects, highlighting the importance of tight control of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis.

PMCA exhibits high affinity and low capacity for Ca2+ transport [14, 17, 18], pumping Ca2+ from the cytosol against its electrochemical gradient using energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. This high-affinity, low-capacity transport is well suited for fine-tuning cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations near resting levels. PMCA activity is regulated by multiple signaling pathways: it is stimulated by protein kinase A (PKA) [36] and Ca2+/calmodulin kinase (CaMK), and inhibited by PKC [14, 98]. This complex regulation enables PMCA to integrate multiple cellular signals in the control of Ca2+ homeostasis.

In contrast to PMCA, NCX utilizes the Na+ gradient to drive Ca2+ extrusion as a secondary active transporter [26, 114]. As illustrated in Fig. 1, NCX plays a central role in Ca2+ extrusion across the plasma membrane within the broader network of Ca2+ regulatory systems. NCX is localized to the plasma membrane and is notably absent from SR/ER membranes [8]. NCX exhibits low affinity but high capacity for Ca2+, making it particularly important for removing large Ca2+ loads during periods of intense cellular activity. Three isoforms, NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3, are expressed with distinct tissue distributions throughout the body [66]. Each isoform undergoes alternative splicing that further diversifies its functional and regulatory properties. A key functional feature of NCX is its bidirectional transport capability. NCX exchanges three Na+ ions for one Ca2+ ion in an electrogenic process. Under physiological conditions with a favorable Na+ gradient, NCX predominantly operates in forward mode, mediating Ca2+ extrusion [9, 52]. However, when the electrochemical gradient is reduced or reversed—such as during membrane depolarization or under pathological conditions associated with intracellular Na+ accumulation—NCX switches to the reverse mode, resulting in Ca2+ influx [9, 52]. This mode switching, governed by the thermodynamic balance between Na+ and Ca2+ gradients and membrane potential, distinguishes NCX from unidirectional transporters such as SERCA and PMCA and underpins its dual role in both physiological regulation and pathological Ca2+ dysregulation.

STRUCTURE ARCHITECTURE AND REGULATORY MECHANISMS OF NCX

NCX proteins are highly conserved from prokaryotes, including archaea, to eukaryotes, reflecting their fundamental importance in Ca2+ homeostasis across all domains of life. Structural studies of NCX from Methanococcus jannaschii (NCX_Mj) have provided foundational insights into the ion transport mechanisms, owing to its suitability for X-ray crystallography. In recent years, the advent in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have enabled high-resolution structural analysis of eukaryotic NCX proteins in near-native states. These studies have revealed critical regulatory features absent in prokaryotic NCX, which are essential for understanding mammalian physiology and disease. In this section, we focus on the structures of eukaryotic NCX proteins, with particular emphasis on how structural insights elucidate the mechanisms underlying bidirectional ion transport and regulatory control.

The mammalian NCX1 protein comprises approximately 938 amino acids, with a theoretical molecular mass of ~120 kDa, and contains ten transmembrane (TM) segments (TMs 1–10) (Fig. 2). The overall architecture of eukaryotic NCX consists of two major structural domains: a TM domain responsible for ion translocation and a large intracellular regulatory domain that modulates transporter activity in response to cytosolic Ca2+. Notably, the intracellular regulatory domain interrupts the primary sequence between TM5 and TM6, effectively dividing the TM domain into two homologous halves (TMs 1–5 and TMs 6–10) [19, 76, 91, 95, 101]. This structural organization is characteristic of all eukaryotic NCX isoforms and distinguishes them from their simpler prokaryotic counterparts.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Schematic structural model of the eukaryotic Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX). The transmembrane (TM) domain consists of ten helices (TMs 1–10), organized into two homologous halves (TMs 1–5 and TMs 6–10) separated by a large intracellular regulatory loop (5L6 loop). The ion translocation pathway is formed by a four-helix bundle comprising the conserved α1- (TMs 2–3) and α2-repeats (TMs 7–8). Peripheral helices (TM1 and TM6) are positioned at the outer region of the TM domain and contribute to conformational transitions during the transport cycle. The cytosolic regulatory domain contains key elements including the exchanger inhibitory peptide (XIP), the two-helix bundle (THB), and the Ca2+-binding domains (CBD) 1 and CBD2, which mediate Ca2+-dependent regulation of exchanger activity. The THB is a structural component of the cytosolic regulatory domain. The β-hub (B-hub), formed through interaction between the XIP region and a linker β-hairpin, contributes to NCX inactivation. The spatial organization highlights the structural coupling between the ion translocation core and regulatory modules that underlie NCX function and mode switching.

Within the TM domain, eight of the ten TM helices (TMs 2–5 and 7–10) form a tightly packed core that constitutes the functional center of the transporter (Fig. 2). At the core of this structure are two highly conserved α-repeats: TMs 2–3 from the α1 repeat and TMs 7–8 as the α2 repeat. These α-repeats assemble into a four-helix bundle (TM2, TM3, TM7, and TM8) that constitutes the ion translocation pathway. In contrast to the compact core, TMs 1 and 6 are longer helices located at the periphery of the TM domain, where they are more loosely packed against the core at angle of approximately 45° [112].

These peripheral helices play a crucial role in the conformational changes required for the alternating access mechanism of ion transport and serve as key interaction sites for the regulatory domain. The ion-binding pocket at the center of the α-repeats comprises four sites arranged in a diamond-shaped configuration: Sext, Smid, Sint, and SCa [33]. Twelve amino acid residues contribute to Na+ and Ca2+ coordination within this pocket—four residues from TM2, four from TM7, and two each from TM3 and TM8 [33]. Our understanding of ion occupancy at these sites has evolved significantly through combined structural and computational studies. Initial crystallographic analyses of NCX_Mj suggested that Sext, Smid, and Sint were occupied by three Na+ ions, while SCa bound one Ca2+ ion [64]. However, subsequent studies demonstrated that simultaneous occupation of all four sites by three Na+ ions and one Ca2+ ion is thermodynamically unfavorable [72]. Recent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and ion flux analyses have led to a revised model in which three Na+ ions occupy Sext, Sint, and SCa, whereas Ca2+ binds to SCa when present [72]. Importantly, Smid does not directly bind Na+ or Ca2+; instead, it coordinates a water molecule associated with a protonated aspartate residue (D240 in NCX_Mj), which may contribute to ion selectivity and transport coupling [33].

Structural analyses of eukaryotic NCX have confirmed that conserved residues from both α-repeats form the central ion-binding sites, with functional assignments analogous to those in NCX_Mj: Sext and Sint serve as dedicated Na+-binding sites, SCa functions as the primary binding site for either Ca2+ or Na+ (depending on the transport cycle), and Smid coordinates a water molecule [64, 65]. Cryo-EM structures of human NCX reveal three Na+ ions and a water molecule modeled based on the well-defined ion-ligand geometry established in NCX_Mj structures [64, 65]. The high degree of conservation in the ion-binding pocket architecture between prokaryotic and eukaryotic NCX underscores the fundamental mechanism of 3Na+:1Ca2+ exchange that has been preserved throughout evolution.

The most significant structural difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic NCX is the presence of a large cytoplasmic regulatory domain in eukaryotic variants. This domain is inserted between TM5 and TM6 and comprises an extensive intracellular loop of approximately 520 residues (termed the 5L6 loop), which contains multiple regulatory elements [57, 88]. The principal components of this regulatory domain include the exchanger inhibitory peptide (XIP), a key auto-inhibitory regulatory element, a two-helix bundle (THB), Ca2+ binding domains 1 (CBD1) and 2 (CBD2) [32, 57, 88], and a short palmitoylation helix (TMH2) [24, 112]. The two homologous CBD1 and CBD2 constitute the major structural mass of the cytosolic domain and play distinct yet complementary roles in Ca2+-dependent regulation of NCX activity [112].

CBD1 exhibits high Ca2+ affinity [112] and contains four Ca2+-binding sites that are typically occupied under physiological conditions. However, due to its considerable distance from the TM domain, Ca2+ binding at CBD1 is unlikely to directly influence ion transport activity [112]. Instead, structural studies of isolated CBD1–CBD2 domains suggest that Ca2+ binding at CBD1 primarily serves a structural role by stabilizing the hinge region between the two domains and maintaining the overall architecture of the regulatory domain [30,31,32, 97]. In contrast, CBD2 contains two Ca2+-binding sites that are often observed in the apo state in structural studies, indicating a lower Ca2+ affinity compared to CBD1 [112].

Eukaryotic NCX possesses a sophisticated Ca2+-dependent inactivation mechanism in which the Ca2+-binding properties of CBD2 play a central role. Inactivation typically occurs when NCX operates in the reverse mode (Na+ efflux, Ca2+ influx) under conditions of low cytosolic Ca2+, resulting in a Na+-loaded, inward-facing conformation. In this state, a linker β-hairpin (β1–β2) interacts with the XIP (auto-inhibitory peptide) region to form a structural assembly termed the β-hub [112]. The β-hub subsequently engages the cytosolic domain—primarily via the CH2 helix of CBD2—to generate a stable inactivation complex [112]. This complex constrains TMs 1 and 6 in an inward-facing orientation, preventing the conformational transitions required for ion transport and thereby halting exchanger activity. Importantly, this inactivation mechanism is reversible and highly sensitive to changes in cytosolic Ca2+ levels, with Ca2+ binding to CBD2 promoting the dissociation of the β-hub and restoration of transport activity.

As cytosolic Ca2+ levels rise, Ca2+ binding to CBD2 induces a pronounced conformational change. This shift promotes a direct interaction between the CH2 helix and the β-hub structure, leading to the destabilization and subsequent disassembly of the β-hub. The resulting rearrangement of the cytosolic domain relative to the TM module [112] likely displaces the XIP region from its inhibitory site. This release relieves conformational constraints on TMs 1 and 6, thereby restoring a TM configuration capable of normal ion transport cycling [112].

PHARMACOLOGICAL MODULATION OF NCX

Several classes of NCX inhibitors have been identified, differing in their specificity and isoform selectivity. Among the earliest compounds, the isothiourea derivative 2-[2-[4-(4-nitrobenzyloxy) phenyl]ethyl]isothiourea methanesulfonate (KB-R7943) was introduced in 1996 as a selective inhibitor of reverse-mode NCX1 [43, 111]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that KB-R7943 also inhibits NCX2 and NCX3, with a higher affinity for NCX3 [2] (Table 1). The inhibitory profile of KB-R7943 is concentration-dependent: it selectively inhibits the reverse mode at low concentrations (≤10 μM), whereas at higher concentrations (≥10 μM) it affects both forward and reverse modes [13, 43, 111]. Amino acid residues Val820, Gln826, and Gly833 within the α2-repeat are at least partly responsible for the interaction between NCX1 and KB-R7943 [49] (Fig. 3). Pharmacologically, KB-R7943 has been shown to attenuate increases in cytosolic Ca2+ and reduce neuronal injury in models of ischemia, mechanical brain trauma, oxygen-glucose deprivation, and glutamate excitotoxicity [13, 63, 68, 69, 99]. However, it should be noted that KB-R7943 also exhibits nonspecific effects on other ion channels and receptors [44].

Table 1. Isoform and transport mode selectivity of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) modulators.

NCX inhibition/activation Compound name Isoform selectivity Mode selectivity Determinants of NCX modulator sensitivity
Inhibitor KB-R7943 NCX3 >NCX1/NCX2
(3-fold more effective on NCX3 than on NCX1 and NCX2.) [90, 91]
Reverse mode >> forward mode
(KB-R7943 inhibits the reverse mode by NCX much more effectively than the forward mode.) [87, 88, 92, 93]
Gly833 (α2-repeat; critical), Val820 (α-2 repeat; contributing), Gln826 (α2-repeat; contributing) [99]

ORM-10962 NCX1 >> NCX2/NCX3
(ORM-10962 inhibits NCX1 specifically.) [94]
Both mode
(ORM-10962 equally inhibited both the reverse and forward mode NCX.) [95]
?

ORM-11372 NCX1.1
(ORM‐11372 is the most potent and selective NCX 1.1 inhibitor.) [96]
Both mode
(ORM‐11372 inhibited NCX 1.1 reverse and forward mode currents with a similar potency in both human iPS and rat CMs.) [96]
?

SAR296968 NCX1/NCX2/NCX3
(SAR296968 exhibited a potent inhibitory activity of NCX1 in CHO cells and similar effects were observed also for NCX2 and NCX3.) [97]
Both mode
(SAR296968 inhibited both the forward and reverse mode of the NCX current in a concentration-dependent manner.) [98]
?

SEA0400 NCX1 >> NCX2
(SEA0400 predominantly blocks NCX1, only mildly blocks uptake by NCX2, and exerts almost no influence upon uptake by NCX3.) [99]
Both mode
(SEA0400 suppresses both forward and reverse mode operation of NCX.) [100, 101]
Phe213 (TM5; critical), Gly833 (α2-repeat; indirect contribution) [99]

SM-15811 ? Reverse mode
(YM-281956 inhibits NCX reverse mode and is more potent than SEA0400.) [102]
?

SN-6 NCX1 >NCX2/NCX3
(SN-6 inhibits NCX1 more potently than NCX2 and NCX3.) [103]
Reverse mode >> forward mode
(SN-6 inhibits the unidirectional outward INCX more potently than the unidirectional inward INCX.) [104]
Val227 (XIP; critical), Tyr228 (XIP; critical), Gly833 (α2-repeat; critical) Asn839 (α2-repeat; critical), Phe213 (TM5; contributing) [103]

YM-244769 NCX3 >> NCX1/NCX2
(YM-244769 preferentially inhibits NCX3 rather than NCX1 or NCX2.) [105]
Reverse mode
(YM-244769 is a potent and highly selective NCX blocker that preferentially inhibits the reverse mode of NCX3.) [106]
Gly833 (α2-repeat; critical) [48]

Activator Neurounina-1 NCX1/NCX2
(Neurounina-1 stimulated NCX1 and NCX2 activities with an EC50 in the picomolar to low nanomolar range, whereas it did not affect NCX3 activity.) [107]
Both modes
(Neurounina-1 displayed a potent and reversible stimulatory effect on NCX1 and NCX2 in both forward and reverse modes of operation.) [107]
Val118 (α1-repeat; critical), Asn125 (α1-repeat; critical), Leu808 (α2-repeat; critical) [107]

XIP: exchanger inhibitory peptide. SN-6: (2-[4-(4-nitrobenzyloxy) benzyl] thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester). SEA0400: (2-[4-[(2,5-difuorophenyl) methoxy]phenoxy]-5-ethoxyaniline).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Structural determinants underlying isoform and transport mode selectivity of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) modulators. Amino acid sequences and residue numbering are based on the human NCX1 isoform. Key residues involved in inhibitor and activator binding are mapped onto the α1- and α2-repeat regions and the exchanger inhibitory peptide (XIP)-associated regulatory domain. These regions are structurally linked to conformational transitions between inward- and outward-facing states, suggesting that ligand binding may influence mode selectivity by stabilizing specific conformations of the exchanger.

In 2001, SEA0400 (2-[4-[(2,5-difuorophenyl) methoxy]phenoxy]-5-ethoxyaniline) was developed as a more potent and selective NCX1 inhibitor [75]. SEA0400 potently inhibits Na+-dependent Ca2+ influx via the reverse mode of NCX1 in cultured neuronal cells [75] and cardiomyocytes [105], with IC50 values of 5–33 nM and 92 nM, respectively. This represents an inhibitory potency approximately 80–100 times greater than that of KB-R7943 [49]. SEA0400 exhibits excellent specificity with minimal effects on other ion channels, transporters, and receptors. The amino acid residue Phe213 in TM5 has been identified as a critical determinant of SEA0400-mediated inhibition [49], whereas Gly833 in the α2-repeat is thought to contribute indirectly to inhibitor sensitivity [99]. Structural analyses indicate that SEA0400 does not directly bind to the XIP region but instead inhibits Ca2+ transport through an allosteric mechanism involving the TM1-2 region [24]. Recent studies have shown that SEA0400 reduces cerebral infarct volume in a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model [75] and attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart [71, 105] and kidneys [85]. These findings suggest that the protective effects of SEA0400 against ischemic injury may be superior to those of KB-R7943 [49].

Consistent with this mechanism, benzyloxyphenyl inhibitors such as SEA0400 are thought to exert their effects through allosteric modulation of the TM domain rather than direct interaction with the XIP region [24]. In 2002, SN-6 (2-[4-(4-nitrobenzyloxy) benzyl] thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester) was developed as a derivative of KB-R7943 [47]. SN-6 has a chemical structure similar to that of KB-R7943 and inhibits Ca2+ influx via NCX1 with an IC50 of 2.9 µM, showing 3- to 5-fold grater potency compared with NCX2 or NCX3 in NCX-transfected fibroblasts [47]. At concentrations of 0.3–30 µM, SN-6 does not significantly affect the Ca2+ efflux, indicating preferential inhibition of the reverse mode. Accordingly, SN-6 exhibits greater selectivity than KB-R7943 [47]. Amino acid residues Val227 and Tyr228 in XIP region, as well as Gly833 and Asn839 in the α2-repeat, are critical determinants for SN-6 inhibition, whereas Phe213 in the TM5 domain acts as an auxiliary site [47]. The benzyloxyphenyl NCX inhibitors—KB-R7943, SEA0400 and SN-6—display distinct isoform selectivity profiles [84]. KB-R7943 is more effective against NCX3 than NCX1 or NCX2 [42], whereas SEA0400 preferentially inhibits NCX1 over NCX2 and has minimal effect on NCX3 [45]. SN-6 inhibits NCX1 more potently than NCX2 or NCX3 [47].

In 2006, YM-244769 was identified as a novel inhibitor with improved selectivity [48], preferentially inhibiting Na+-dependent Ca2+ influx via NCX3 (3.8- to 5.3-fold greater than for NCX1 or NCX2) [48]. Amino acid residue Gly833 in the α2-repeat is a key determinant for YM-244769-mediated inhibition [48]. All these inhibitors share a benzyloxyphenyl moiety, suggesting that this structural feature is important for NCX affinity [46]. These compounds preferentially inhibit the reverse mode of NCX1 under unidirectional conditions [44]. In contrast, the NCX activator Neurounina-1, which preferentially enhances forward-mode NCX1 activity, require distinct structural determinants, including Val118 and Asn125 in the α1-repeat and Leu808 in the α2-repeat [80]. These features may underlie their preferential activity under pathological conditions characterized by elevated intracellular Na+ levels [46].

Other highly selective inhibitors include ORM-10103 [54], ORM-10962 [59], and GYKB-6635 [29, 59]. Although many NCX inhibitors have been limited by poor solubility for in vivo use [87], ORM-10962 represents an exception, exhibiting improved solubility [87]. Its inhibitory action is functionally asymmetrical, with a more pronounced effect on the reverse mode [86]. Furthermore, ORM-11372, identified through virtual screening of flavan derivatives [87], is currently the most potent and selective NCX1.1 inhibitor reported to date. It inhibits both reverse- and forward-mode currents with similar potency in human iPS cell-derived and rat cardiomyocytes [87]. Another significant development is SAR340835, a water-soluble prodrug of SAR296968 [90]. Following intravenous administration, SAR340835 is rapidly and completely converted to its active moiety, SAR296968, within 30 min [90]. SAR296968 has been identified as a selective NCX inhibitor across species, including humans, with no detectable effects on native voltage-dependent Ca2+ and Na+ currents in vitro [90]. In CHO cells expressing different NCX isoforms, SAR296968 exhibits high potency against NCX1, with comparable efficacy toward NCX2 and NCX3 [90]. Thus, the NCX-inhibitory activity of SAR340835 is attributable to its active metabolite SAR296968.

Parallel to the development of SAR340835, structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies have led to the identification of SM-15811, a structurally novel and highly potent NCX inhibitor [37]. SM-15811 was developed from a 3,4-dihydro-2 (1H)-quinazolinone derivative (compound 1a), as the lead structure [37]. Although the initial lead compound exhibited only moderate inhibitory activity, optimization of this scaffold resulted in SM-15811, which shows approximately two orders of magnitude increase in inhibitory potency compared with the patent compound. Experimental studies demonstrate that SM-15811 concentration-dependently attenuates increase in fura-2 fluorescence ratios induced by Na+-free conditions, indicating direct inhibition of Na+-dependent Ca2+ influx via NCX in cardiomyocytes [37]. Furthermore, SM-15811 exhibits high selectivity for NCX over other essential ion channels, including voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels [100]. Collectively, these advances in NCX inhibition development provide important insights for the design of future therapeutic strategies targeting Ca2+-related pathologies.

Although a diverse array of organic NCX inhibitors has been developed, research on NCX activators remains limited [100]. Neurounina-1 (7-nitro-5-phenyl-1-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-1H-benzo[e] [1, 4]diazepin-2 (3H)-one), a derivative generated through structural optimization of SM-15811, has demonstrated promising pharmacodynamic properties [80]. Neurounina-1 potently and reversibly enhances the activity of NCX1 and NCX2 at low nanomolar concentrations [100]. Notably, it more effectively stimulates the forward mode (Ca2+ efflux) of NCX1 than that of NCX2 and exhibits minimal activity toward the NCX3 isoform [100]. Accordingly, Neurounina-1 represents a promising lead compound for future therapeutic development.

STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS OF MODE AND ISOFORM SELECTIVITY IN NCX MODULATORS

Despite the growing number of NCX modulators identified to date, the structural basis underlying their mode and isoform selectivity remains incompletely understood. A systematic integration of pharmacological and structural findings is therefore required to elucidate how ligand binding influences NCX function.

As illustrated in Fig. 3, determinant residues for NCX modulators are primarily localized within the α-repeat regions and the XIP-associated regulatory domain, both of which are structurally coupled to conformational transitions of the exchanger. These regions undergo dynamic rearrangements during transitions between inward- and outward-facing states, suggesting that ligand binding at these sites may shift the equilibrium between transport modes. This distribution is consistent with observations in other ion transporters, where small molecules typically interact with structural elements that regulate ion translocation rather than directly targeting the ion-binding site itself. In particular, many benzyloxyphenyl inhibitors, such as KB-R7943 and SEA0400, depend on residues within the α2-repeat, which is closely associated with the Na+-binding and inward-facing conformations. This may explain their preferential inhibition of the reverse mode, which involves Na+-loaded inward-facing states and suggests functional asymmetry between the α1- and α2-repeats. In contrast, activators such as Neurounina-1 require determinant residues in both α1- and α2-repeats, indicating that activation involves coordinated modulation of multiple structural elements rather than stabilization of a single conformational state. The isoform specificity and transport mode selectivity of representative NCX modulators (Table 1) further support this structural framework, providing a basis for interpreting the mechanistic diversity of NCX modulation. Collectively, these findings suggest that the α1- and α2-repeats play distinct yet cooperative roles in regulating ion exchange activity and represent key structural determinants for pharmacological modulation of NCX.

SN-6 and SEA0400 primarily interact with the XIP region, which is involved in the regulation of NCX activity, suggesting an allosteric mechanism rather than direct interaction with the ion translocation pathway. These compounds are proposed to stabilize an inactivated state, potentially through interactions that couple the XIP region with other structural elements, such as the CH2 helix. Taken together, these findings support a model in which NCX modulators target multiple, functionally coupled structural modules—including both α-repeats and regulatory domains—highlighting the importance of conformational regulation rather than direct blockade of the ion-binding site. However, the precise structural basis linking ligand binding to mode selectivity remains incompletely understood, and further studies integrating structural and functional analyses will be required to establish a comprehensive structure–activity relationship for NCX modulators.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Calcium signaling plays a central role in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes, and dysregulation of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis is closely associated with various diseases. Given its unique bidirectional transport properties, NCX represents an attractive therapeutic target for modulating intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. However, despite extensive research efforts, the development of clinically effective NCX-targeting drugs remains limited.

Despite more than three decades of research on NCX inhibitors, no clinically approved drugs have been established, highlighting several fundamental pharmacological challenges. First, reverse-mode inhibitors such as KB-R7943 and SEA0400 have demonstrated protective effects in pathological conditions associated with Ca2+ overload. However, their limited selectivity and potential off-target effects remain major obstacles. In addition, because NCX operates bidirectionally, inhibition of the reverse mode may also interfere with physiological Ca2+ extrusion under certain conditions, raising concerns about safety and context-dependent effects. Second, NCX activators represent a promising but underexplored strategy. In contrast to inhibitors, activators such as Neurounina-1 may enhance forward-mode activity and promote Ca2+ extrusion, thereby preventing intracellular Ca2+ accumulation. This pharmacological profile suggests a fundamentally different therapeutic approach from reverse-mode blockade. However, the mechanisms underlying activation, as well as isoform selectivity and long-term effects, remain poorly understood. Third, recent structural insights into NCX inactivation mechanisms provide a potential new direction for drug development. The identification of regulatory elements such as the XIP region, β-hub, and CBD2 suggests that modulators targeting the inactivated state could achieve more precise functional control. Such compounds may regulate NCX activity by stabilizing or destabilizing specific conformational states, rather than directly blocking ion transport.

Overall, future development of NCX modulators will require an integrated understanding of structural dynamics, mode selectivity, and physiological context. In particular, the relationship between conformational states and pharmacological modulation remains a key unresolved issue, and addressing this will be essential for translating NCX-targeting strategies into clinically effective therapies.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors have nothing to report.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. 2002. Signaling through G-Protein-Linked Cell-Surface Receptors. In: Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed., Garland Science, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amran MS, Homma N, Hashimoto K. 2003. Pharmacology of KB-R7943: a Na+-Ca2+ exchange inhibitor. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 21: 255–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2003.tb00121.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bagur R, Hajnóczky G. 2017. Intracellular Ca2+ sensing: its role in calcium homeostasis and signaling. Mol Cell 66: 780–788. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berridge MJ. 2001. The versatility and complexity of calcium signalling. Novartis Found Symp 239: 52–64, discussion 64–67, 150–159. doi: 10.1002/0470846674.ch6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berridge MJ. 2002. The endoplasmic reticulum: a multifunctional signaling organelle. Cell Calcium 32: 235–249. doi: 10.1016/S0143416002001823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bers DM, Bassani JW, Bassani RA. 1996. Na-Ca exchange and Ca fluxes during contraction and relaxation in mammalian ventricular muscle. Ann N Y Acad Sci 779: 430–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb44818.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bezprozvanny I. 2005. The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Cell Calcium 38: 261–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bkaily G, Jacques D. 2023. Calcium homeostasis, transporters, and blockers in health and diseases of the cardiovascular system. Int J Mol Sci 24: 8803. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blaustein MP, Lederer WJ. 1999. Sodium/calcium exchange: its physiological implications. Physiol Rev 79: 763–854. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bootman MD, Berridge MJ. 1995. The elemental principles of calcium signaling. Cell 83: 675–678. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90179-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bootman MD, Berridge MJ, Roderick HL. 2002. Calcium signalling: more messengers, more channels, more complexity. Curr Biol 12: R563–R565. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01055-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bourne HR, Nicoll R. 1993. Molecular machines integrate coincident synaptic signals. Cell 72 Suppl: 65–75. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80029-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Breder J, Sabelhaus CF, Opitz T, Reymann KG, Schröder UH. 2000. Inhibition of different pathways influencing Na(+) homeostasis protects organotypic hippocampal slice cultures from hypoxic/hypoglycemic injury. Neuropharmacology 39: 1779–1787. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00027-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brini M, Carafoli E. 2011. The plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase and the plasma membrane sodium calcium exchanger cooperate in the regulation of cell calcium. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: a004168. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carafoli E. 1987. Intracellular calcium homeostasis. Annu Rev Biochem 56: 395–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.002143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carafoli E. 1994. Biogenesis: plasma membrane calcium ATPase: 15 years of work on the purified enzyme. FASEB J 8: 993–1002. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.13.7926378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carafoli E. 1992. The Ca2+ pump of the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem 267: 2115–2118. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45848-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carafoli E. 2005. Calcium—a universal carrier of biological signals. Delivered on 3 July 2003 at the Special FEBS Meeting in Brussels. FEBS J 272: 1073–1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04546.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chou AC, Ju YT, Pan CY. 2015. Calmodulin interacts with the sodium/calcium exchanger NCX1 to regulate activity. PLoS One 10: e0138856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christel C, Lee A. 2012. Ca2+-dependent modulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Biochim Biophys Acta 1820: 1243–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clapham DE. 2007. Calcium signaling. Cell 131: 1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cooper DM, Mons N, Karpen JW. 1995. Adenylyl cyclases and the interaction between calcium and cAMP signalling. Nature 374: 421–424. doi: 10.1038/374421a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dhyani V, Gare S, Gupta RK, Swain S, Venkatesh KV, Giri L. 2020. GPCR mediated control of calcium dynamics: A systems perspective. Cell Signal 74: 109717. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dong Y, Yu Z, Li Y, Huang B, Bai Q, Gao Y, Chen Q, Li N, He L, Zhao Y. 2024. Structural insight into the allosteric inhibition of human sodium-calcium exchanger NCX1 by XIP and SEA0400. EMBO J 43: 14–31. doi: 10.1038/s44318-023-00013-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fill M, Copello JA. 2002. Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol Rev 82: 893–922. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Formisano L, Guida N, Mascolo L, Serani A, Laudati G, Pizzorusso V, Annunziato L. 2020. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of ncx1 and ncx3 in the brain. Cell Calcium 87: 102194. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2020.102194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Foskett JK, White C, Cheung KH, Mak DOD. 2007. Inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels. Physiol Rev 87: 593–658. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Furuichi T, Furutama D, Hakamata Y, Nakai J, Takeshima H, Mikoshiba K. 1994. Multiple types of ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channels are differentially expressed in rabbit brain. J Neurosci 14: 4794–4805. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04794.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Geramipour A, Kohajda Z, Corici C, Prorok J, Szakonyi Z, Oravecz K, Márton Z, Nagy N, Tóth A, Acsai K, Virág L, Varró A, Jost N. 2016. The investigation of the cellular electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of a novel selective sodium-calcium exchanger inhibitor, GYKB-6635, in canine and guinea-pig hearts. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 94: 1090–1101. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2015-0566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Giladi M, Boyman L, Mikhasenko H, Hiller R, Khananshvili D. 2010. Essential role of the CBD1-CBD2 linker in slow dissociation of Ca2+ from the regulatory two-domain tandem of NCX1. J Biol Chem 285: 28117–28125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.127001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Giladi M, Hiller R, Hirsch JA, Khananshvili D. 2013. Population shift underlies Ca2+-induced regulatory transitions in the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX). J Biol Chem 288: 23141–23149. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.471698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Giladi M, Sasson Y, Fang X, Hiller R, Buki T, Wang YX, Hirsch JA, Khananshvili D. 2012. A common Ca2+-driven interdomain module governs eukaryotic NCX regulation. PLoS One 7: e39985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Giladi M, Tal I, Khananshvili D. 2016. Structural features of ion transport and allosteric regulation in sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) proteins. Front Physiol 7: 30. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Giorgi C, Danese A, Missiroli S, Patergnani S, Pinton P. 2018. Calcium dynamics as a machine for decoding signals. Trends Cell Biol 28: 258–273. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gomez-Ospina N, Tsuruta F, Barreto-Chang O, Hu L, Dolmetsch R. 2006. The C terminus of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(V)1.2 encodes a transcription factor. Cell 127: 591–606. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guerini D, Coletto L, Carafoli E. 2005. Exporting calcium from cells. Cell Calcium 38: 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hasegawa H, Muraoka M, Matsui K, Kojima A. 2003. Discovery of a novel potent Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitor: design, synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinazolinone derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13: 3471–3475. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(03)00744-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.He S, Ruknudin A, Bambrick LL, Lederer WJ, Schulze DH. 1998. Isoform-specific regulation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in rat astrocytes and neurons by PKA. J Neurosci 18: 4833–4841. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-13-04833.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hertle DN, Yeckel MF. 2007. Distribution of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isotypes and ryanodine receptor isotypes during maturation of the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 150: 625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hewavitharana T, Deng X, Soboloff J, Gill DL. 2007. Role of STIM and Orai proteins in the store-operated calcium signaling pathway. Cell Calcium 42: 173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hille B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Iwamoto T, Kita S, Uehara A, Inoue Y, Taniguchi Y, Imanaga I, Shigekawa M. 2001. Structural domains influencing sensitivity to isothiourea derivative inhibitor KB-R7943 in cardiac Nna+/Ca2+ exchanger. Mol Pharmacol 59: 524–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Iwamoto T, Watano T, Shigekawa M. 1996. A novel isothiourea derivative selectively inhibits the reverse mode of Na+/Ca2+ exchange in cells expressing NCX1. J Biol Chem 271: 22391–22397. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.37.22391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Iwamoto T. 2005. Sodium-calcium exchange inhibitors: therapeutic potential in cardiovascular diseases. Future Cardiol 1: 519–529. doi: 10.2217/14796678.1.4.519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iwamoto T. 2004. Forefront of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger studies: molecular pharmacology of Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitors. J Pharmacol Sci 96: 27–32. doi: 10.1254/jphs.FMJ04002X6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Iwamoto T. 2007. Na+/Ca2+ exchange as a drug target—insights from molecular pharmacology and genetic engineering. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1099: 516–528. doi: 10.1196/annals.1387.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Iwamoto T, Inoue Y, Ito K, Sakaue T, Kita S, Katsuragi T. 2004. The exchanger inhibitory peptide region-dependent inhibition of Na+/Ca2+ exchange by SN-6 [2-[4-(4-nitrobenzyloxy)benzyl]thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester], a novel benzyloxyphenyl derivative. Mol Pharmacol 66: 45–55. doi: 10.1124/mol.66.1.45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Iwamoto T, Kita S. 2006. YM-244769, a novel Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitor that preferentially inhibits NCX3, efficiently protects against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced SH-SY5Y neuronal cell damage. Mol Pharmacol 70: 2075–2083. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.028464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Iwamoto T, Kita S, Uehara A, Imanaga I, Matsuda T, Baba A, Katsuragi T. 2004. Molecular determinants of Na+/Ca2+ exchange (NCX1) inhibition by SEA0400. J Biol Chem 279: 7544–7553. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310491200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jain A, Woolley CS. 2023. Mechanisms that underlie expression of estradiol-induced excitatory synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus differ between males and females. J Neurosci 43: 1298–1309. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2080-19.2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.James G, Butt AM. 2002. P2Y and P2X purinoceptor mediated Ca2+ signalling in glial cell pathology in the central nervous system. Eur J Pharmacol 447: 247–260. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01756-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jeffs GJ, Meloni BP, Bakker AJ, Knuckey NW. 2007. The role of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) in neurons following ischaemia. J Clin Neurosci 14: 507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.John HB, Heidelberger R, Neal MW From Molecules to Networks. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/edited-volume/9780123971791/from-molecules-to-networks [accessed on April 7, 2026].
  • 54.Jost N, Nagy N, Corici C, Kohajda Z, Horváth A, Acsai K, Biliczki P, Levijoki J, Pollesello P, Koskelainen T, Otsomaa L, Tóth A, Papp JG, Varró A, Virág L. 2013. ORM-10103, a novel specific inhibitor of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, decreases early and delayed afterdepolarizations in the canine heart. Br J Pharmacol 170: 768–778. doi: 10.1111/bph.12228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kamato D, Thach L, Bernard R, Chan V, Zheng W, Kaur H, Brimble M, Osman N, Little PJ. 2015. Structure, function, pharmacology, and therapeutic potential of the G protein, Gα/q,11. Front Cardiovasc Med 2: 14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khananshvili D. 2014. Sodium-calcium exchangers (NCX): molecular hallmarks underlying the tissue-specific and systemic functions. Pflugers Arch 466: 43–60. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1405-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khananshvili D. 2020. Basic and editing mechanisms underlying ion transport and regulation in NCX variants. Cell Calcium 85: 102131. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.102131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kofuji P, Lederer WJ, Schulze DH. 1994. Mutually exclusive and cassette exons underlie alternatively spliced isoforms of the Na/Ca exchanger. J Biol Chem 269: 5145–5149. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37667-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kohajda Z, Farkas-Morvay N, Jost N, Nagy N, Geramipour A, Horváth A, Varga RS, Hornyik T, Corici C, Acsai K, Horváth B, Prorok J, Ördög B, Déri S, Tóth D, Levijoki J, Pollesello P, Koskelainen T, Otsomaa L, Tóth A, Baczkó I, Leprán I, Nánási PP, Papp JG, Varró A, Virág L. 2016. The effect of a novel highly selective inhibitor of the sodium/calcium exchanger (NCX) on cardiac arrhythmias in in vitro and in vivo experiments. PLoS One 11: e0166041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kouba S, Hague F, Ahidouch A, Ouadid-Ahidouch H. 2022. Crosstalk between Ca2+ Signaling and Cancer Stemness: The Link to Cisplatin Resistance. Int J Mol Sci 23: 10687. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kozak JA, Putney JW. 2018. Calcium Entry Channels in Non-Excitable Cells, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lewis RS. 2007. The molecular choreography of a store-operated calcium channel. Nature 446: 284–287. doi: 10.1038/nature05637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li S, Jiang Q, Stys PK. 2000. Important role of reverse Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchange in spinal cord white matter injury at physiological temperature. J Neurophysiol 84: 1116–1119. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.1116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liao J, Li H, Zeng W, Sauer DB, Belmares R, Jiang Y. 2012. Structural insight into the ion-exchange mechanism of the sodium/calcium exchanger. Science 335: 686–690. doi: 10.1126/science.1215759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liao J, Marinelli F, Lee C, Huang Y, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Jiang Y. 2016. Mechanism of extracellular ion exchange and binding-site occlusion in a sodium/calcium exchanger. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23: 590–599. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Linck B, Qiu Z, He Z, Tong Q, Hilgemann DW, Philipson KD. 1998. Functional comparison of the three isoforms of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX1, NCX2, NCX3). Am J Physiol 274: C415–C423. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.C415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Little PJ, Neylon CB, Tkachuk VA, Bobik A. 1992. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 stimulate calcium mobilization by different mechanisms in vascular smooth muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183: 694–700. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(92)90538-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Luo J, Wang Y, Chen X, Chen H, Kintner DB, Shull GE, Philipson KD, Sun D. 2007. Increased tolerance to ischemic neuronal damage by knockdown of Na+-Ca2+ exchanger isoform 1. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1099: 292–305. doi: 10.1196/annals.1387.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.MacGregor DG, Avshalumov MV, Rice ME. 2003. Brain edema induced by in vitro ischemia: causal factors and neuroprotection. J Neurochem 85: 1402–1411. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01772.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mackrill JJ. 2010. Ryanodine receptor calcium channels and their partners as drug targets. Biochem Pharmacol 79: 1535–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Magee WP, Deshmukh G, Deninno MP, Sutt JC, Chapman JG, Tracey WR. 2003. Differing cardioprotective efficacy of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitors SEA0400 and KB-R7943. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284: H903–H910. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00784.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Marinelli F, Almagor L, Hiller R, Giladi M, Khananshvili D, Faraldo-Gómez JD. 2014. Sodium recognition by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in the outward-facing conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E5354–E5362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415751111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Martin-Romero FJ, Pascual-Caro C, Lopez-Guerrero A, Espinosa-Bermejo N, Pozo-Guisado E, Martin-Romero FJ, Pascual-Caro C, Lopez-Guerrero A, Espinosa-Bermejo N, Pozo-Guisado E. 2018. Regulation of Calcium Signaling by STIM1 and ORAI1. In: Calcium and Signal Transduction, IntechOpen. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Martonosi AN. 1984. Mechanisms of Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum of skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev 64: 1240–1320. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1984.64.4.1240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Matsuda T, Arakawa N, Takuma K, Kishida Y, Kawasaki Y, Sakaue M, Takahashi K, Takahashi T, Suzuki T, Ota T, Hamano-Takahashi A, Onishi M, Tanaka Y, Kameo K, Baba A. 2001. SEA0400, a novel and selective inhibitor of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, attenuates reperfusion injury in the in vitro and in vivo cerebral ischemic models. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 249–256. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)29375-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Matsuoka S, Nicoll DA, Reilly RF, Hilgemann DW, Philipson KD. 1993. Initial localization of regulatory regions of the cardiac sarcolemmal Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 3870–3874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Michel LYM, Hoenderop JGJ, Bindels RJM. 2015. Towards understanding the role of the Na2+-Ca2+ exchanger isoform 3. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 168: 31–57. doi: 10.1007/112_2015_23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Michel LYM, Verkaart S, Koopman WJH, Willems PHGM, Hoenderop JGJ, Bindels RJM. 2014. Function and regulation of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger NCX3 splice variants in brain and skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 289: 11293–11303. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Miller RJ. 1991. The control of neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis. Prog Neurobiol 37: 255–285. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(91)90028-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Molinaro P, Cantile M, Cuomo O, Secondo A, Pannaccione A, Ambrosino P, Pignataro G, Fiorino F, Severino B, Gatta E, Sisalli MJ, Milanese M, Scorziello A, Bonanno G, Robello M, Santagada V, Caliendo G, Di Renzo G, Annunziato L. 2013. Neurounina-1, a novel compound that increases Na+/Ca2+ exchanger activity, effectively protects against stroke damage. Mol Pharmacol 83: 142–156. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.080986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Neer EJ. 1994. G proteins: critical control points for transmembrane signals. Protein Sci 3: 3–14. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Neer EJ. 1995. Heterotrimeric G proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals. Cell 80: 249–257. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90407-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Nilius B, Owsianik G. 2011. The transient receptor potential family of ion channels. Genome Biol 12: 218. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Niu CF, Watanabe Y, Ono K, Iwamoto T, Yamashita K, Satoh H, Urushida T, Hayashi H, Kimura J. 2007. Characterization of SN-6, a novel Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitor in guinea pig cardiac ventricular myocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 573: 161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.06.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ogata M, Iwamoto T, Tazawa N, Nishikawa M, Yamashita J, Takaoka M, Matsumura Y. 2003. A novel and selective Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitor, SEA0400, improves ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury. Eur J Pharmacol 478: 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.08.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Oravecz K, Kormos A, Gruber A, Márton Z, Kohajda Z, Mirzaei L, Jost N, Levijoki J, Pollesello P, Koskelainen T, Otsomaa L, Tóth A, Papp JG, Nánási PP, Antoons G, Varró A, Acsai K, Nagy N. 2018. Inotropic effect of NCX inhibition depends on the relative activity of the reverse NCX assessed by a novel inhibitor ORM-10962 on canine ventricular myocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 818: 278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Otsomaa L, Levijoki J, Wohlfahrt G, Chapman H, Koivisto AP, Syrjänen K, Koskelainen T, Peltokorpi SE, Finckenberg P, Heikkilä A, Abi-Gerges N, Ghetti A, Miller PE, Page G, Mervaala E, Nagy N, Kohajda Z, Jost N, Virág L, Varró A, Papp JG. 2020. Discovery and characterization of ORM-11372, a novel inhibitor of the sodium-calcium exchanger with positive inotropic activity. Br J Pharmacol 177: 5534–5554. doi: 10.1111/bph.15257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ottolia M, John S, Hazan A, Goldhaber JI. 2021. The cardiac Na+ -Ca2+ exchanger: from structure to function. Compr Physiol 12: 2681–2717. doi: 10.1002/j.2040-4603.2022.tb00196.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pchitskaya E, Popugaeva E, Bezprozvanny I. 2018. Calcium signaling and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Calcium 70: 87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pelat M, Barbe F, Daveu C, Ly-Nguyen L, Lartigue T, Marque S, Tavares G, Ballet V, Guillon JM, Steinmeyer K, Wirth K, Gögelein H, Arndt P, Rackelmann N, Weston J, Bellevergue P, McCort G, Trellu M, Lucats L, Beauverger P, Pruniaux-Harnist MP, Janiak P, Chézalviel-Guilbert F. 2021. SAR340835, a novel selective Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitor, improves cardiac function and restores sympathovagal balance in heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 377: 293–304. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.000238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Philipson KD, Nicoll DA. 2000. Sodium-calcium exchange: a molecular perspective. Annu Rev Physiol 62: 111–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Prakriya M. 2009. The molecular physiology of CRAC channels. Immunol Rev 231: 88–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00820.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Primeau JO, Armanious GP, Fisher ME, Young HS. 2018. The SarcoEndoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase. Subcell Biochem 87: 229–258. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7757-9_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Quednau BD, Nicoll DA, Philipson KD. 1997. Tissue specificity and alternative splicing of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger isoforms NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3 in rat. Am J Physiol 272: C1250–C1261. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.4.C1250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ren X, Philipson KD. 2013. The topology of the cardiac Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, NCX1. J Mol Cell Cardiol 57: 68–71. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Roderick HL, Berridge MJ, Bootman MD. 2003. Calcium-induced calcium release. Curr Biol 13: R425. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00358-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Salinas RK, Bruschweiler-Li L, Johnson E, Brüschweiler R. 2011. Ca2+ binding alters the interdomain flexibility between the two cytoplasmic calcium-binding domains in the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. J Biol Chem 286: 32123–32131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.249268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sanders KM. 2001. Invited review: mechanisms of calcium handling in smooth muscles. J Appl Physiol 91: 1438–1449. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.3.1438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Schröder UH, Breder J, Sabelhaus CF, Reymann KG. 1999. The novel Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitor KB-R7943 protects CA1 neurons in rat hippocampal slices against hypoxic/hypoglycemic injury. Neuropharmacology 38: 319–321. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00198-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Scognamiglio A, Corvino A, Caliendo G, Fiorino F, Perissutti E, Santagada V, Severino B. 2025. Druggability of Sodium Calcium Exchanger (NCX): Challenges and Recent Development. Int J Mol Sci 26: 8888. doi: 10.3390/ijms26188888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sharma V, O’Halloran DM. 2014. Recent structural and functional insights into the family of sodium calcium exchangers. Genesis 52: 93–109. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Soda T, Brunetti V, Berra-Romani R, Moccia F. 2023. The emerging role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the cardiovascular system: physiological implications, pathological consequences, and therapeutic perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 24: 3914. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Solovyova N, Verkhratsky A. 2002. Monitoring of free calcium in the neuronal endoplasmic reticulum: an overview of modern approaches. J Neurosci Methods 122: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00300-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Spät A, Szanda G, Csordás G, Hajnóczky G. 2008. High- and low-calcium-dependent mechanisms of mitochondrial calcium signalling. Cell Calcium 44: 51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Takahashi K, Takahashi T, Suzuki T, Onishi M, Tanaka Y, Hamano-Takahashi A, Ota T, Kameo K, Matsuda T, Baba A. 2003. Protective effects of SEA0400, a novel and selective inhibitor of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries. Eur J Pharmacol 458: 155–162. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02732-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tang WJ, Gilman AG. 1992. Adenylyl cyclases. Cell 70: 869–872. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90236-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Thrower EC, Hagar RE, Ehrlich BE. 2001. Regulation of Ins1,4,5P3 receptor isoforms by endogenous modulators. Trends Pharmacol Sci 22: 580–586. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01809-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Van Eylen F, Lebeau C, Albuquerque-Silva J, Herchuelz A. 1998. Contribution of Na/Ca exchange to Ca2+ outflow and entry in the rat pancreatic beta-cell: studies with antisense oligonucleotides. Diabetes 47: 1873–1880. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.12.1873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Villaseca S, Romero G, Ruiz MJ, Pérez C, Leal JI, Tovar LM, Torrejón M. 2022. Gαi protein subunit: a step toward understanding its non-canonical mechanisms. Front Cell Dev Biol 10: 941870. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.941870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wang M, Sun Y, Li L, Wu P, Dkw O, Shi H. 2021. Calcium channels: noteworthy regulators and therapeutic targets in dermatological diseases. Front Pharmacol 12: 702264. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.702264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Watano T, Kimura J, Morita T, Nakanishi H. 1996. A novel antagonist, No. 7943, of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current in guinea-pig cardiac ventricular cells. Br J Pharmacol 119: 555–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15708.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Xue J, Zeng W, Han Y, John S, Ottolia M, Jiang Y. 2023. Structural mechanisms of the human cardiac sodium-calcium exchanger NCX1. Nat Commun 14: 6181. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41885-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yamaguchi Y, Katoh H, Yasui H, Aoki J, Nakamura K, Negishi M. 2000. Galpha(12) and galpha(13) inhibit Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis through Rho/Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway. J Neurochem 75: 708–717. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750708.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yao A, Su Z, Nonaka A, Zubair I, Lu L, Philipson KD, Bridge JHB, Barry WH. 1998. Effects of overexpression of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger on [Ca2+]i transients in murine ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 82: 657–665. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.82.6.657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zamponi GW, Lewis RJ, Todorovic SM, Arneric SP, Snutch TP. 2009. Role of voltage-gated calcium channels in ascending pain pathways. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 60: 84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

RESOURCES