Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2026 Sep 24;9(9):e2635834. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.35834

Childhood Adversity and Health in Emerging Adulthood

Jeff R Temple 1,✉, Elizabeth Baumler 1, Leila Wood 1, Leslie Taylor 1
PMCID: PMC13613176  PMID: 42783369

Key Points

Question

How are conventional and community-level adverse childhood experiences associated with mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and educational outcomes during emerging adulthood?

Findings

In this cohort study of 1850 emerging adults, higher adverse childhood experience exposure was associated with elevated rates of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, suicidality, interpersonal violence, lower academic achievement, and use of narcotics, opioids, and other illicit substances. Both adverse childhood experience types contributed to risk; however, specific domains—particularly emotional abuse, sexual abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and discrimination—demonstrated more consistent associations.

Meaning

In this study, adversity across households and communities showed graded associations with functioning, underscoring the need for prevention strategies addressing cumulative burden and high-impact adversities, including structural conditions.


This cohort study examines associations between adverse childhood experiences and mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and educational outcomes in emerging adulthood.

Abstract

Importance

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are robust estimators of poor health across the lifespan, yet most research relies on retrospective reports from adult samples and conventional ACE measures that exclude community-level adversity. Focusing on emerging adulthood—a developmental period when adversity may exert increased lifetime associations—provides a clearer view of near-term impacts and a critical window for intervention.

Objectives

To examine associations between conventional and community-level ACEs and mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and educational outcomes in emerging adulthood, and to assess the relative contributions of ACE domains to key outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Longitudinal cohort study using data collected in waves 5 (March to August 2023) and 6 (February to August 2024) of a population-based sample recruited from urban and suburban schools in the Southern US. Of 2768 participants, 1850 with complete data were included in the present analyses.

Exposures

Conventional and community-level ACEs assessed at wave 6, categorized as 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 5, or 6 or more exposures.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, suicidality, substance use, dating violence (DV), sexual assault, and academic mobility.

Results

Among the 1850 participants (mean [SD] age at wave 6, approximately 19 [0.6 years; 1395 [50.4%] female; 389 [14.1%] Asian, 709 [25.6%] Black, 1025 [37.0%] Hispanic, 200 [7.2%] White, and 445 [16.1%] other race and ethnicity), higher ACE exposure showed graded associations with nearly all outcomes. Compared with 0 ACEs, those with 4 to 5 and 6 or more ACEs had higher rates of depression (70 [21.0%] individuals with 0 ACEs vs 165 [46.5%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 141 [56.9%] with 6 or more ACEs), PTSD (7 [2.1%] with 0 ACEs vs 54 [15.2%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 77 [30.9%]), suicidal ideation (20 [6.0%] with 0 ACEs vs 98 [27.8%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 103 [41.4%] with 6 or more ACEs), illicit substance use (ie, speed, hallucinogens, heroin, or ecstasy; 1 [0.3%] with 0 ACEs vs 22 [6.3%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 27 [10.8%] with 6 or more ACEs), and interpersonal violence (eg, experiencing physical DV, 9 [2.7%] with 0 ACEs vs 30 [8.5%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 37 [14.9%] with 6 or more ACEs). Academic achievement and college attendance decreased with increasing ACE exposure. Ten of 14 ACE domains were independently associated with key outcomes and 11 with experiencing DV. Emotional abuse, sexual abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and discrimination showed the most consistent associations.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of emerging adults, both conventional and community-level ACEs were associated with poorer mental health, interpersonal violence, substance use, and reduced academic mobility. These findings highlighted emerging adulthood as a critical period for intervention and suggested that, beyond cumulative exposure, specific forms of adversity were more consistently associated with adverse outcomes than others.

Introduction

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are well-established risk factors for poor health across the lifespan.1,2,3,4,5 Although the original ACE framework focused on abuse and household dysfunction,1 its measurement was shaped largely by White, insured, middle-class adults.1,2,6 More recent work has expanded ACEs to include community-level adversities, such as neighborhood violence, discrimination, and unsafe neighborhood conditions whose impacts fall disproportionately on racially and socioeconomically marginalized individuals.6,7,8

Despite these conceptual advances, 3 major gaps remain. First, most ACE studies still rely on retrospective reports from middle-aged adults,9,10,11,12 a practice that introduces recall bias and obscures the near-term developmental consequences of early adversity. Second, relatively little work has examined ACEs in ethnically diverse emerging adults (age, 18-25 years), even though adversity’s associations with mental, behavioral, and educational outcomes are often most pronounced during this developmental period.13,14 Finally, the relative impact of individual ACEs is often lost when summary scores are used exclusively for analysis.15

To address these gaps, we examined conventional and community-level ACEs in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of emerging adults, focusing on mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and academic mobility. We also assessed whether specific ACE domains were more associated with key mental health and interpersonal violence outcomes.

Method

Study Design and Participants

We used waves 5 (2023) and 6 (2024) of an ongoing longitudinal cohort established in 2018 as part of a cluster-randomized trial of a school-based healthy relationships intervention. Students in participating classrooms at middle schools in 2 urban and suburban southeast Texas districts were eligible. Written parental consent and student assent were obtained at baseline; no additional inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied. Participants have been followed annually. Race and ethnicity were self-reported by participants and were included because prior research has demonstrated differences in both ACE exposure and health outcomes across racial and ethnic groups. Retention was high, with 76.0% (n = 2104) participating at wave 5 (mean age = 18 years) and 73.4% (n = 2033) at wave 6 (mean age = 19 years). The analytic sample included 1850 participants with follow-up at waves 5 and 6. We used a complete case analysis approach on relevant variables at both waves. The study was approved by the UTHealth Houston institutional review board. This study used Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines.

Exposure Measure

At wave 6, when participants were at least 18 years old, we used the 21-item Philadelphia ACEs survey to assess conventional (eg, child maltreatment) and community-level (eg, neighborhood safety) forms of childhood trauma that participants reported retrospectively.6 Using the prescribed scale measurement coding,6 individual survey items were grouped into 14 ACE domains representing distinct types of adversity (eg, emotional abuse as a child, physical abuse as a child, experiencing discrimination, exposure to adverse neighborhood experiences; see eTable 1 in Supplement 1). The total number of ACEs was calculated for each participant by summing the number of ACEs endorsed. Sensitivity analyses were then conducted to create categories of 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 5, and 6 or more. Domain-level indicators were used for each of the 14 domains to examine cooccurrence and to estimate independent and associations with selected outcomes.

Outcome Measures

At wave 5, we assessed depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-1016; scores of 10 or higher were considered positive.16,17 Among participants reporting a traumatic event (n = 447), we assessed PTSD with the Primary Care–posttraumatic stress disorder–518; endorsement of at least 3 or more items was considered positive. We created 2 items to assess individuals with suicidal ideation (ie, “Have you thought about suicide in the past year?”; yes or no) and attempts (ie, “Have you attempted suicide in the past year?”; yes, no, or I have attempted suicide, but it was more than a year ago). This dichotomous outcome was coded yes for any suicide attempt.

At wave 5, we assessed past-month binge drinking (≥4 drinks on 1 occasion for females; ≥5 for males), as well as past year use (yes or no) of marijuana and illicit substances. For the latter, we considered participants who endorsed any past year use of speed, hallucinogens, heroin, or ecstasy as positive for use of narcotics, opioids, and other illicit substances.

At wave 5, we used the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory19 to assess past-year experiences of dating violence (DV) and perpetration of DV, including physical, sexual, psychological, and threatening abuse. Any endorsement was coded positive, except psychological abuse, which required endorsement of at least 4 or more items.20,21 We used a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey22 to assess lifetime history of sexual assault. Additionally, we asked participants (yes or no) if they had been in a physical fight in the last year. At wave 5, we asked participants about their academic achievement in high school (yes or no to an A or B average) and whether (yes or no) they graduated, as well as whether they are attending a 4-year college (yes or no).

Statistical Methods

We calculated ACE sum scores and, based on sensitivity analyses and prior literature, categorized exposure as 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 5, or at least 6 or more ACEs. We estimated prevalence and 95% CIs overall and by ACE category. We used multilevel logistic regression models to estimate associations between ACE category and each outcome, adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, perceived income, sexual orientation, and treatment group, with clustering by school. Odds ratios represent the association between ACE exposure and each outcome relative to participants with no ACE exposure. Although ACEs were assessed retrospectively at wave 6 (February to August 2024), participants were asked to report experiences that occurred before age 18 years. Most outcomes were assessed at wave 5 (March to August 2023) and referred to the preceding year or current symptoms. Thus, despite the later administration of the ACE measure, the reported exposures generally preceded the outcomes conceptually, although some overlap around age 18 was possible.

We estimated the prevalence and 95% CIs for each of the 14 ACEs domains. We then calculated the bivariate correlations across each of the 14 ACE domains to assess cooccurrence (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). To examine domain-specific ACEs associations, we fit multilevel logistic regression models adjusted for sex, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, income, and treatment group. Given the large number of potential comparisons, ACE domain analyses were limited a priori to depression, PTSD, experiences of DV, and perpetration of DV. Model 1 estimated associations for each domain separately; model 2 included all 14 domains simultaneously to estimate relative associations. Statistical significance was 2-sided and determined using an a priori hypothesis test set at P < .05.

Results

The analytic sample consisted of 1850 participants (mean [SD] age, 19 [0.6] years), of whom 1002 (54.2%) were female, 309 (16.7%) were Asian, 425 (23.0%) were Black, 674 (36.4%) were Hispanic, 110 (5.9%) were White, and 332 (17.9%) identified as another race and ethnicity (Table 1). As shown in Table 2, rates of mental health, substance use, and interpersonal violence (eg, DV, peer fight, and sexual assault) outcomes increased with greater ACE exposure. Compared with 0 ACEs, those with 4 to 5 and 6 or more ACEs had higher rates of depression (70 [21.0%] individuals with 0 ACEs vs 165 [46.5%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 141 [56.9%] with 6 or more ACEs), PTSD (7 [2.1%] with 0 ACEs vs 54 [15.2%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 77 [30.9%]), suicidal ideation (20 [6.0%] with 0 ACEs vs 98 [27.8%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 103 [41.4%] with 6 or more ACEs), illicit substance use (ie, speed, hallucinogens, heroin, or ecstasy; 1 [0.3%] with 0 ACEs vs 22 [6.3%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 27 [10.8%] with 6 or more ACEs), and interpersonal violence (eg, experiencing physical DV, 9 [2.7%] with 0 ACEs vs 30 [8.5%] with 4 to 5 ACEs and 37 [14.9%] with 6 or more ACEs). Similarly, ACE exposure was inversely associated with all 3 academic mobility outcomes. As shown in Table 3, exposure to 4 to 5 or 6 or more ACEs was associated with significantly higher odds of all examined mental health, substance use, and interpersonal violence outcomes compared with no ACEs. Some outcomes, including depression, PTSD, suicidality, psychological DV, sexual assault, and marijuana and illicit substance use, showed elevated risk even for those with exposure to 1 to 3 ACEs. College enrollment was inversely associated with the highest level of ACEs exposure (6 or greater). Furthermore, high school academic achievement was inversely associated with all categories of exposure to ACEs.

Table 1. Participant Characteristics.

Characteristic Participants, No. (%)
Baseline cohort
(n = 2768)
Analytical sample
(n = 1850)
Sex
Female 1395 (50.4) 1002 (54.2)
Male 1373 (49.6) 848 (45.8)
Race and ethnicitya
Asian 389 (14.1) 309 (16.7)
Black 709 (25.6) 425 (23.0)
Hispanic 1025 (37.0) 674 (36.4)
White 200 (7.2) 110 (5.9)
Otherb 445 (16.1) 332 (17.9)
a

Race and ethnicity categories are mutually exclusive. Participants self-reported their race and ethnicity.

b

Includes participants who endorsed American Indian or Alaska Native, other, or multiple.

Table 2. Outcome Descriptives Overall and Stratified by ACE Category.

Outcome No. (%) [95% CI]a
Overall (N = 1850)b No ACEs (n = 337) 1 to 3ACEs (n = 878) 4 to 5 ACEs (n = 355) 6 or more ACEs (n = 253)
Mental health
Depression 695 (37.9) [35.7- 40.2] 70 (21.0) [16.6 to 25.4] 313 (36.0) [32.8-39.2] 165 (46.5) [41.3-51.7] 141 (56.9) [50.7-63.1]
PTSD 210 (11.4) [10.0-12.9] 7 (2.1) [0.6-3.6] 69 (7.5) [6.1-9.7] 54 (15.2) [11.5-19.0] 77 (30.9) [25.1-36.7]
Suicide ideation 390 (21.3) [19.4-23.2] 20 (6.0) [3.4-8.5] 166 (19.1) [16.5-21.7] 98 (27.8) [23.1-32.6] 103 (41.4) [35.2-47.5]
Suicide attemptc 278 (15.1) [13.5-16.8] 15 (4.5) [2.3-6.7] 95 (10.9) [8.8-13.0] 72 (20.4) [16.2-24.6] 93 (37.2) [31.2-43.2]
Experiencing DV by type
Physical 109 (6.0) [4.9-7.0] 9 (2.7) [1.0-4.5] 32 (3.7) [2.4-4.9] 30 (8.5) [5.6-11.5] 37 (14.9) [10.4-19.3]
Sexual 81 (4.4) [3.4-5.3] 4 (1.2) [0.03-2.4] 26 (3.0) [1.9-4.1] 21 (5.9) [3.5-8.4] 29 (11.6) [7.6-15.6]
Threatening 122 (6.7) [5.5-7.8] 8 (2.4) [0.8-4.1] 43 (4.9) [3.5-6.4] 32 (9.1) [6.1-12.1] 39 (15.6) [11.1-20.1]
Psychological 306 (16.6) [14.9-18.3] 24 (7.1) [4.4-9.9] 123 (14.0) [11.7-16.4] 87 (24.5) [20.0-29.0] 71 (28.3) [22.7-33.9]
DV perpetration by type
Physical 96 (5.2) [4.2-6.3] 5 (1.5) [0.2-2.8] 31 (3.6) [2.3-4.8] 25 (7.1) [4.4-9.8] 35 (14.1) [9.7-18.4]
Sexual 31 (1.7) [1.1-2.3] 0 (0.0) [NA] 12 (1.4) [0.1-2.2] 6 (1.7) [0.03-3.0] 13 (5.2) [2.4-8.0]
Threatening 101 (5.5) [4.5-6.6] 5 (1.5) [0.2-2.8] 29 (3.3) [2.1-4.5] 25 (7.1) [4.4-9.8] 40 (16.0) [11.1-20.6]
Psychological 272 (14.7) [13.1-16.4] 18 (5.4) [2.9-7.8] 101 (11.5) [9.4-13.7] 74 (20.8) [16.6-25.1] 76 (30.3) [24.6-36.0]
Other violence
Sexual assaultc 182 (9.9) [8.6-11.3] 8 (2.4) [0.8-4.1] 58 (6.6) [5.0-8.3] 44 (12.5) [9.0-16.0] 69 (27.6) [22.0-33.2]
Physical fight 140 (7.6) [6.4-8.9] 8 (2.4) [0.8-4.1] 40 (4.6) [3.2-6.0] 43 (12.1) [8.7-15.5] 48 (19.2) [14.3-24.1]
Substance use
Binge drinking 194 (10.7) [9.2-12.1] 20 (6.0) [3.5-8.6] 78 (9.0) [7.1-10.9] 51 (14.5) [10.8-18.2] 42 (17.1) [12.3-21.8]
Marijuana use 406 (22.1) [20.2-24.0] 37 (11.1) [7.7-14.5] 156 (17.8) [15.3-20.4] 107 (30.2) [24.4-35.0] 98 (39.2) [33.1-45.3]
Illicit substance used 79 (4.3) [3.4-5.2] 1 (0.3) [0.0-0.9] 27 (3.1) [1.9-4.2] 22 (6.3) [3.7-8.8] 27 (10.8) [6.9-14.7]
Academic mobility
Academic performance in HS 1568 (85.0) [83.4-86.7] 314 (93.5) [90.8-96.1] 760 (86.7) [84.4-88.9] 290 (81.9) [77.9-86.0] 182 (72.5) [66.9-78.1]
Graduated HS 1715 (92.9) [91.7-94.0] 318 (94.4) [91.9-96.8] 820 (93.5) [91.9-95.1] 335 (94.4) [92.0-96.8] 219 (86.6) [82.3-90.8]
Enrolled in college 849 (46.6) [44.3-48.8] 186 (55.2) [49.9-60.5] 424 (48.4) [45.1-51.7] 155 (43.7) [38.5-48.9] 84 (33.2) [27.4-39.0]

Abbreviation: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; DV, dating violence; HS, high school; NA, not applicable; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

a

Valid percentage reported, in all cases missing values are less than 2.2%.

b

Twenty seven (1.5%) participants were missing data for the ACEs measure.

c

Lifetime prevalence.

d

Illicit substance use includes use of narcotics, stimulants, opioids, and hallucinogens.

Table 3. Multilevel Model Logistic Regressions Showing the Association of Outcomes and Number of ACE Exposures.

Outcome Model, No. (ICC) 1 to 3 ACEs 4 to 5 ACEs 6 or more ACEs
OR (95% CI)a P valueb OR (95% CI)a P valueb OR (95% CI)a P valueb
Mental health
Depression 1798 (0.000) 2.13 (1.56-2.91) <.001 3.09 (2.16-4.41) <.001 4.53 (3.06-6.70) <.001
PTSD 1802 (0.009) 3.68 (1.66-8.17) .001 6.67 (2.94-15.13) <.001 16.58 (7.31-37.61) <.001
Suicide ideation 1797 (0.020) 3.73 (2.25-6.20) <.001 5.36 (3.12-9.21) <.001 9.71 (5.56-16.99) <.001
Suicide attempt 1800 (0.000) 2.31 (1.30-4.08) .004 4.09 (2.25-7.43) <.001 9.04 (4.95-16.51) <.001
Experiencing DV by type
Physical 1795 (0.006) 1.13 (0.53-2.43) .75 2.59 (1.19-5.63) .02 4.45 (2.05-9.68) <.001
Sexual 1805 (0.000) 2.23 (0.77-6.51) .14 4.32 (1.44-12.94) .009 8.53 (2.87-25.39) <.001
Threatening 1798 (0.002) 1.90 (0.88-4.13) .10 3.52 (1.57-7.89) .002 6.33 (2.83-14.17) <.001
Psychological 1810 (0.000) 1.99 (1.26-3.16) .003 3.87 (2.72-7.63) <.001 4.55 (2.72-7.63) <.001
DV perpetration by type
Physical 1796 (0.000) 2.19 (0.84-5.72) .11 3.93 (1.47-10.52) .007 7.66 (2.88-20.34) <.001
Sexualc 1804 (0.078) NA NA 1.56 (0.57-4.29) .38 4.94 (2.12-11.52) <.001
Threatening 1796 (0.000) 2.06 (0.78-5.39) .14 4.15 (1.55-11.10) .005 9.80 (3.72-25.81) <.001
Psychological 1810 (0.010) 2.28 (1.35-3.85) .002 4.58 (2.63-7.96) <.001 7.50 (4.24-13.24) <.001
Other violence
Sexual assault 1800 (0.009) 2.76 (1.28-5.92) .009 4.84 (2.19-10.69) <.001 13.18 (5.98-29.02) <.001
Physical fight 1798 (0.000) 1.72 (0.79-3.74) .17 4.55 (2.08-9.96) <.001 7.47 (3.39-16.47) <.001
Substance use
Binge drinking 1786 (0.008) 1.37 (0.82-2.30) .24 2.35 (1.34-4.10) .003 2.79 (1.55-5.02) .001
Marijuana use 1804 (0.007) 1.58 (1.07-2.34) .02 2.88 (1.89-4.39) <.001 4.00 (2.56-6.24) <.001
Illicit substance use 1802 (0.028) 9.14 (1.23-67.84) .03 16.88 (2.24-127.14) .006 27.83 (3.70-209.31) .001
Academic mobility
Academic performance in HS 1809 (0.035) 0.57 (0.35-0.92) .02 0.43 (0.25-0.73) .002 0.29 (0.17-0.49) <.001
Graduated HS 1813 (0.045) 1.09 (0.63-1.89) .77 1.40 (0.71-2.73) .33 0.59 (0.32-1.11) .10
Enrolled in college 1812 (0.120) 0.99 (0.74-1.34) .96 0.88 (0.61-1.25) .47 0.62 (0.42-0.93) .02

Abbreviations: ACE, adverse childhood experience; DV, dating violence; HS, high school; ICC, intraclass correlation; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

a

Referent category, ACEs.

b

P values from Wald test of regression coefficient.

c

Referent category, ACEs and 1 to 3 ACES combined due to small cell counts.

As shown in Table 4, in our expanded measurement of ACEs, exposure to adverse neighborhood experiences was the most frequently endorsed ACE domain (815 [44.7%]), followed by experiencing discrimination (690 [37.9%]), emotional abuse as a child (532 [29.4%]), mental illness in the household as a child (489 [26.8%]), and physical abuse as a child (483 [26.7%]). As shown in eTable 2 in Supplement 1, all domains were correlated with at least one other domain. The correlations most clearly observed were between physical and emotional abuse as a child and between bullying and witnessing domestic violence (both ρ = 0.54). We next examined the independent and relative associations of individual ACE domains (ie, specific types of adversity) with selected mental health (ie, depression and PTSD) and interpersonal violence (ie, experiencing and perpetrating physical, threatening, and sexual DV) outcomes.

Table 4. Endorsement of ACEs.

ACEs domain No. (%)
Overall (n = 1824) Experienced DV subsample (n = 197) DV perpetration subsample (n = 144) PTSD subsample (n = 207) Depression subsample (n = 689)
Emotional abuse 532 (29.4) 85 (43.4) 58 (40.6) 109 (52.7) 306 (44.7)
Physical abuse 483 (26.7) 79 (40.5) 67 (47.2) 92 (44.7) 251 (36.6)
Sexual abuse 192 (10.5) 46 (23.4) 35 (24.3) 67 (32.4) 116 (16.8)
Emotional neglect 174 (9.5) 21 (10.7) 19 (13.2) 25 (12.1) 74 (10.7)
Physical neglect 190 (10.4) 28 (14.2) 22 (15.3) 29 (14.0) 63 (9.1)
Domestic violence 298 (16.4) 61 (31.0) 57 (39.6) 57 (27.5) 140 (20.4)
Substance use 429 (23.6) 75 (38.5) 60 (42.3) 91 (44.0) 209 (30.4)
Mental illness 489 (26.8) 87 (44.4) 66 (46.2) 98 (47.3) 260 (37.8)
Incarcerated 260 (14.3) 49 (25.0) 43 (30.1) 61 (29.5) 123 (17.9)
Witnessed violence 310 (17.0) 46 (23.5) 33 (23.1) 48 (23.3) 108 (15.7)
Felt discrimination 690 (37.8) 102 (51.8) 82 (56.9) 114 (55.1) 298 (43.3)
Neighborhood cohesion and safety 815 (44.7) 102 (51.8) 79 (54.9) 131 (63.3) 360 (52.2)
Bullied 267 (14.7) 47 (24.0) 33 (23.1) 41 (19.9) 112 (16.3)
Foster care 68 (3.7) 18 (9.2) 20 (14.0) 13 (6.3) 34 (5.0)

Abbreviations: ACEs, adverse childhood experiences; DV, dating violence; PTSD, Posttraumatic stress disorder.

As shown in Table 5, 10 of the 14 ACE domains were independently associated with higher odds of depression, PTSD, and DV perpetration. For experiencing DV, 11 ACE domains were independently linked. Furthermore, 8 ACE domains were consistently associated with all 4 selected outcomes (ie, emotional abuse as a child, physical abuse as a child, sexual abuse as a child, witnessing domestic violence, substance use in the household, mental illness in the household, incarceration of a household member, and experiencing discrimination). Being in foster care was associated with all outcomes except PTSD. Exposure to adverse neighborhood experiences was associated with depression and PTSD, while being bullied was associated with experiencing and perpetrating DV. Experiencing physical and emotional neglect as a child was not independently associated with any of the 4 selected outcome measures.

Table 5. Multilevel Logistic Regression Models of Associations of ACE Domains.

ACE domain Depressiona PTSDb Experienced DV a DV perpetrationa
No. OR (95% CI) P value No. OR (95% CI) P value No. OR (95% CI) P value No. OR (95% CI) P value
Model 1: independent associations of ACE domains
Emotional abuse 1782 2.90 (2.90-3.62) <.001 1787 2.58 (1.89-3.53) <.001 1780 1.81 (1.32-2.49) <.001 1776 1.51 (1.05-2.19) .03
Physical abuse 1781 2.19 (1.75-2.75) <.001 1786 2.33 (1.70-3.20) <.001 1779 1.91 (1.39-2.63) <.001 1775 2.54 (1.77-3.64) <.001
Sexual abuse 1793 2.26 (1.63-3.15) <.001 1798 4.13 (2.85-5.98) <.001 1792 2.64 (1.78-3.90) <.001 1788 2.46 (1.59-3.80) <.001
Emotional neglect 1795 1.14 (0.82-1.59) .44 1800 1.18 (0.74-1.90) .49 1793 1.04 (0.64-1.71) .86 1789 1.29 (0.76-2.19) .35
Physical neglect 1795 0.79 (0.56-1.10) .16 1800 1.19 (0.75-1.89) .45 1793 1.32 (0.84-2.07) .23 1789 1.26 (0.76-2.08) .37
Domestic violence 1784 1.64 (1.26-2.14) <.001 1789 2.05 (1.43-2.94) <.001 1782 2.55 (1.80-3.60) <.001 1778 3.65 (2.51-5.31) <.001
Substance use 1792 1.70 (1.35-2.15) <.001 1796 2.48 (1.80-3.41) <.001 1789 1.85 (1.34-2.56) <.001 1785 2.21 (1.53-3.19) <.001
Mental illness 1793 2.14 (1.71-2.69) <.001 1798 2.18 (1.59-3.00) <.001 1791 2.03 (1.47-2.78) <.001 1787 2.24 (1.56-3.21) <.001
Incarcerated 1792 1.53 (1.15-2.03) .004 1797 2.55 (1.77-3.68) <.001 1790 1.76 (1.21-2.55) .003 1786 2.29 (1.53-3.42) <.001
Witnessed violence 1794 0.95 (0.72-1.24) .69 1799 1.68 (1.15-2.45) <.001 1792 1.52 (1.05-2.20) .028 1788 1.35 (0.88-2.06) .17
Felt discrimination 1794 1.47 (1.19-1.81) <.001 1799 2.12 (1.54-2.90) <.001 1792 1.81 (1,32-2.47) <.001 1788 2.01 (1.41-2.88) <.001
Neighborhood 1795 1.54 (1.25-1.88) <.001 1800 2.01 (1.46-2.75) <.001 1793 1.13 (0.83-1.54) .43 1789 1.31 (0.92-1.86) .14
Bullied 1794 1.25 (0.95-1.66) .12 1799 1.40 (0.94-2.08) .10 1792 1.85 (1.28-2.67) .001 1788 1.54 (1.01-2.36) .05
Foster care 1791 2.03 (1.22-3.39) .007 1796 1.93 (0.99-3.78) .05 1789 3.12 (1.74-5.59) <.001 1785 5.12 (2.87-9.13) <.001
Model 2: relative associations of ACE domains
No. 1761 NA NA 1765 NA NA 1759 NA NA 1759 NA NA
ICC 0.000 NA NA 0.008 NA NA 0.000 NA NA 0.000 NA NA
Emotional abuse NA 2.17 (1.65-2.86) <.001 NA 1.58 (1.06-2.36) .03 NA 1.30 (0.87-1.95) .20 NA 0.76 (0.47-1.23) .27
Physical abuse NA 1.12 (0.83-1.52) .45 NA 1.04 (0.68-1.61) .85 NA 0.93 (0.60-1.44) .76 NA 1.38 (0.84-2.29) .21
Sexual abuse NA 1.39 (0.96-2.02) .08 NA 2.37 (1.56-3.60) <.001 NA 1.67 (1.06-2.61) .03 NA 1.28 (0.77-2.13) .34
Emotional neglect NA 0.99 (0.69-1.43) .97 NA 0.88 (0.52-1.47) .62 NA 0.92 (0.54-1.55) .74 NA 1.05 (0.59-1.86) .87
Physical neglect NA 0.62 (0.42-0.91) .02 NA 0.83 (0.49-1.39) .48 NA 0.87 (0.52-1.44) .58 NA 0.77 (0.43-1.36) .37
Domestic violence NA 0.95 (0.68-1.33) .76 NA 1.03 (0.66-1.63) .89 NA 1.52 (0.98-2.37) .06 NA 1.99 (1.22-3.24) .006
Substance use NA 1.04 (0.78-1.39) .79 NA 1.31 (0.88-1.96) .18 NA 1.14 (0.76-1.71) .53 NA 1.32 (0.83-2.10) .24
Mental illness NA 1.55 (1.18-2.02) .001 NA 1.18 (0.81-1.73) .40 NA 1.38 (0.94-2.03) .10 NA 1.29 (0.82-2.03) .27
Incarcerated NA 0.97 (0.68-1.33) .85 NA 1.42 (0.93-2.19) .11 NA 1.05 (0.68-1.63) .83 NA 1.22 (0.75-1.98) .42
Witnessed violence NA 0.75 (0.53-1.06) .11 NA 1.33 (0.83-2.12) .23 NA 0.96 (0.60-1.54) .87 NA 0.80 (0.46-1.38) .42
Felt discrimination NA 1.34 (1.05-1.70) .02 NA 1.75 (1.23-2.49) .002 NA 1.43 (1.01-2.04) .05 NA 1.61 (1.07-2.42) .02
Neighborhood cohesion and safety NA 1.28 (1.03-1.59) .03 NA 1.59 (1.13-2.24) .008 NA 0.95 (0.68-1.34) .78 NA 1.11 (0.75-1.64) .61
Bullied NA 1.39 (0.96-2.00) .08 NA 0.91 (0.56-1.48) .69 NA 1.40 (0.88-2.21) .16 NA 1.04 (0.60-1.79) .88
Foster care NA 1.21 (0.68-2.16) .52 NA 0.85 (0.39-1.85) .68 NA 1.35 (0.69-2.68) .38 NA 2.32 (1.17-4.60) .02

Abbreviations: ACE, adverse childhood experience; DV, dating violence; ICC, intraclass correlation; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder

a

ICC estimated less than 0.000 for all models.

b

ICC ranged from 0.005 to 0.016.

Four ACE domains exhibited a relative association to depression, with the most prevalent being for emotional abuse as a child (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.65-2.86; P < .001), followed by mental illness in the household (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.18-2.02; P = .001), experiencing discrimination (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.70; P = .02), and exposure to adverse neighborhood experiences (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.59; P = .03). Physical neglect as a child showed a relative protective association to the incidence of depression (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91; P = .02). Four domains were linked to PTSD, with sexual abuse as a child exhibiting the most apparent relative association (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.56-3.60; P < .001), followed by experiencing discrimination (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.23-2.49;, P = .002), exposure to adverse neighborhood experiences (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.13-2.24; P = .008), and emotional abuse as a child (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.36; P = .03). Two domains had a relative association with emerging adult exposure to DV (sexual abuse as a child, OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.06- 2.61; P = .03, and experiencing discrimination, OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.04; P = .046) and perpetration (witnessing domestic violence, OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.22-3.24; P = .006, and experiencing discrimination (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.42; P = .02). These findings suggest that although ACE domains frequently co-occur, several domains—particularly emotional abuse as a child, sexual abuse as a child, witnessing domestic violence, and experiencing discrimination—were more consistently associated with multiple outcomes than others.

Discussion

In this racially and ethnically diverse cohort of emerging adults, we observed graded associations between adverse childhood experiences and mental, behavioral, and educational outcomes. ACE exposure was common, cumulative, and consistently associated with poorer functioning across domains. Together, these findings suggest that ACEs may be more informatively conceptualized, not only as cumulative burden, but as a constellation of specific adversities that may be differentially associated with risk. While the graded association between cumulative ACE exposure and adverse outcomes is well established, our findings extend this literature by demonstrating that specific forms of childhood adversity appeared to be associated with greater risk than others in emerging adulthood. In particular, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and experiencing discrimination were more consistently associated with depression, PTSD, and DV than other ACE domains, even after accounting for the co-occurrence of multiple adversities. These findings suggest that conceptualizing ACEs solely as a cumulative score may obscure meaningful heterogeneity in risk across different forms of childhood adversity.

These findings are consistent with prior work connecting ACEs to adverse mental health and behavioral outcomes.1,2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 Importantly, domain-specific analyses indicated that these associations were not uniform across types of adversity; rather, certain ACE domains—especially emotional abuse as a child, sexual abuse as a child, witnessing domestic violence, and experiencing discrimination—demonstrated prevalent and more consistent associations with key mental health and interpersonal violence outcomes in emerging adulthood than others. As demonstrated in previous research, bullying in childhood was associated with emerging adult DV experiences. Other notable findings included a lack of association between neglect in childhood and mental health, violence, or academic mobility outcomes. We also found significant connections between discrimination and both experiencing and perpetrating DV in emerging adulthood.

Our study extends the ACEs literature in 5 important ways. First, by using the Philadelphia ACEs measure, which includes community-level adversities (eg, racism, neighborhood safety), we assessed forms of trauma disproportionately experienced by racially and economically marginalized youths. Our findings that both conventional and community-level ACEs contributed to elevated risk underscore the importance of measuring adversity in ways that reflect the lived experiences of diverse populations. Indeed, we observed associations between experiencing discrimination and neighborhood adversity with both depression and PTSD, highlighting the mental health burden of community-level exposures. Experiencing discrimination also co-occurred with other ACE domains, suggesting that these experiences rarely occur in isolation. Together, our findings support the value of an expanded ACE framework that incorporates adverse experiences that arise in community and structural contexts (eg, neighborhood violence, discrimination) to more fully capture risk and better understand their impact on mental health.

Second, we measured outcomes during emerging adulthood—a developmental period when early adversity may exert especially potent effects on mental health, relationship functioning, and educational trajectories, and when prevention efforts may be especially impactful.13 Measuring ACEs close to the developmental period in which they occurred reduces this concern and allows for a clearer view of near-term impacts.31 These findings emphasize emerging adulthood as a critical window for intervention. Additionally, our diverse sample of emerging adults was majority (53%) noncollege attending, extending our knowledge of the affect of ACEs in the time point beyond traditionally used college samples.

Third, we examined a wide range of outcomes simultaneously, demonstrating that ACE exposure is associated with adverse outcomes across multiple domains of functioning, including mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and academic mobility. This broad pattern of associations is consistent with the conceptualization of ACEs as a cross-cutting risk factor that affects multiple aspects of health and functioning.2,7 While exposure to 1 to 3 events indicated substantial health risks across mental health, and 4 or more for substance use and interpersonal violence domains, those exposed to 6 or more ACEs demonstrated the most apparent associations with adverse health outcomes. We also move beyond the conventional ACE threshold of 4 or more exposures established in seminal research1 by examining graded categories, allowing for a more nuanced assessment of dose-response associations across levels of adversity.

Fourth, by examining the relative contributions of individual ACE domains (ie, specific forms of adversity), we move beyond cumulative risk models and suggest a shift in how ACEs are conceptualized—from a simple count of exposures to a construct in which specific forms of adversity appear to be associated with distinct and sometimes disproportionately greater risk. Although ACEs were highly interrelated, several domains, including emotional abuse as a child, sexual abuse as a child, witnessing domestic violence, and experiencing discrimination emerged as particularly consistent estimators of depression, PTSD, and DV, whereas others (eg, neglect as a child) were not independently associated when accounting for cooccurring adversities. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of adversity and suggest that both type and accumulation matter for understanding risk.

Finally, our findings suggest that the effects of ACEs in emerging adulthood extend beyond health to include meaningful economic consequences. The reduced academic mobility observed among participants with 6 or more ACEs may place individuals at increased risk for long-term financial instability. One plausible pathway is through mental health: ACE-associated symptoms (eg, depression) may undermine academic engagement, leading to poorer grades, reduced attendance, and decreased likelihood of college enrollment or completion.32 Because educational attainment is closely tied to lifetime earnings33 and upward mobility,34 supporting the academic success of young people with high ACE exposure is critical for improving long-term economic outcomes.

Given the substantial burden of poor mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and educational disruption in emerging adulthood, these findings highlight the need for trauma-informed prevention and early intervention. Our findings are consistent with broader evidence suggesting that routine screening for adversity in clinical and educational settings may help identify youths at heightened risk.35 Our findings further suggest that screening and intervention efforts may benefit from greater specificity. Because certain ACE domains (eg, emotional abuse as a child, sexual abuse as a child, and experiencing discrimination) exhibited relative associations with key selected outcomes, identifying these experiences may help prioritize individuals at highest risk and inform more tailored intervention strategies. Programs addressing shared risk and protective factors (eg, Fourth R36) may mitigate downstream effects of adversity. Because community-level adversities like experiencing discrimination and exposure to neighborhood violence also confer substantial risk, our findings, together with the broader literature, suggest that effective prevention should extend beyond the classroom, clinic, and home and include broader structural interventions that reduce childhood poverty, improve neighborhood safety, and address discrimination writ large. In addition, the prominent role of experiencing discrimination and other community-level adversities underscore the need for interventions that explicitly address structural inequities alongside individual- and family-level risk.

Limitations

Limitations include reliance on self-reported data and the observational design of the study. Although participants were relatively close in age to the reported adversities, responses remained subject to recall bias. While the study design precludes causal inference, the temporality of adversity preceding outcomes lends plausibility to the observed associations. Although the ACE measure captured adversities occurring before age 18 years, it did not assess their timing, duration, frequency, or chronicity. Consequently, we could not examine whether the developmental timing or persistence of specific adversities associated with emerging adult outcomes. Although our diverse sample enhances generalizability, findings may not extend beyond urban US populations. ACE domain analyses were limited to selected mental health and interpersonal violence outcomes to maintain model parsimony and may not generalize to other outcomes. Because multiple related outcomes were examined, some statistically significant findings may reflect type I error despite the consistency of the overall pattern of associations. Future research should include more robust physical health outcomes.

Conclusion

In this cohort study of emerging adults, conventional and community-level adverse childhood experiences were associated with poorer mental health, substance use, interpersonal violence, and reduced academic mobility. Importantly, specific forms of adversity were more consistently associated with adverse outcomes than others, suggesting that prevention and intervention efforts may be strengthened by targeting the most consequential domains of childhood adversity. Treating ACEs as interchangeable exposures may obscure important differences in risk, particularly for high-impact adversities such as abuse and discrimination. Comprehensive, multilevel prevention strategies that integrate trauma-informed care with structural interventions may help reduce the burden of adverse outcomes associated with childhood adversity during emerging adulthood and potentially improve longer-term health and social trajectories.

Supplement 1.

eTable 1. Coding and Prevalence of ACE Domains (Analytic Sample, n = 1850)

eTable 2. Correlation Among Types of ACEs

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-258. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, et al. Vital signs: estimated proportion of adult health problems attributable to adverse childhood experiences and implications for prevention—25 States, 2015–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(44):999-1005. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6844e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Shattuck A, Hamby SL. Prevalence of childhood exposure to violence, crime, and abuse: results from the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):746-754. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madigan S, Deneault AA, Racine N, et al. Adverse childhood experiences: a meta-analysis of prevalence and moderators among half a million adults in 206 studies. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(3):463-471. doi: 10.1002/wps.21122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cronholm PF, Forke CM, Wade R, et al. Adverse childhood experiences: expanding the concept of adversity. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wade R Jr, Cronholm PF, Fein JA, et al. Household and community-level Adverse Childhood Experiences and adult health outcomes in a diverse urban population. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;52:135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McEwen CA, Gregerson SF. A critical assessment of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study at 20 years. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(6):790-794. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Font SA, Maguire-Jack K. Pathways from childhood abuse and other adversities to adult health risks: the role of adult socioeconomic conditions. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;51:390-399. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Y, Croft JB, Chapman DP, et al. Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and unemployment among adults from five U.S. states. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(3):357-369. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0554-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Merrick MT, Ports KA, Ford DC, Afifi TO, Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A. Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental health. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;69:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, Guinn AS. Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences from the 2011-2014 behavioral risk factor surveillance system in 23 states. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):1038-1044. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469-480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wood D, Crapnell T, Lau L, et al. Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course. In: Halfon N, Forres CB, Lerner RM, Faustman EM, eds. Handbook of Life Course Health Development. Springer; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sahle BW, Reavley NJ, Li W, et al. The association between adverse childhood experiences and common mental disorders and suicidality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022;31(10):1489-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01745-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bradley KL, Bagnell AL, Brannen CL. Factorial validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression 10 in adolescents. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010;31(6):408-412. doi: 10.3109/01612840903484105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prins A, Bovin MJ, Smolenski DJ, et al. The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): development and evaluation within a veteran primary care sample. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(10):1206-1211. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3703-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wolfe DA, Scott K, Reitzel-Jaffe D, Wekerle C, Grasley C, Straatman AL. Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychol Assess. 2001;13(2):277-293. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Follingstad D. Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues. Aggress Violent Behav. 2007;12(4):439-458. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choi HJ, Temple JR. Do gender and exposure to interparental violence moderate the stability of teen dating violence?: latent transition analysis. Prev Sci. 2016;17(3):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0621-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koss MP, Anderson R, Peterson ZD, et al. The Revised Sexual Experiences Survey victimization version (ses-v): conceptualization, modifications, items and scoring. J Sex Res. 2024;61(6):839-867. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2358407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daníelsdóttir HB, Aspelund T, Shen Q, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and adult mental health outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(6):586-594. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu J, Racine N, Devereux C, Hodgins DC, Madigan S. Associations between adverse childhood experiences and substance use: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl. 2023;106431. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nikulina V, Gelin M, Zwilling A. Is there a cumulative association between adverse childhood experiences and intimate partner violence in emerging adulthood?. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(1-4):NP1205-1232NP. doi: 10.1177/0886260517741626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hilton NZ, Ham E, Green MM. Adverse childhood experiences and criminal propensity among intimate partner violence offenders. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(19):4137-4161. doi: 10.1177/0886260516674943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Evans G, Kim P. Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Dev Perspect. 2013;7:43-48. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hughes M, Tucker W. Poverty as an adverse childhood experience. N C Med J. 2018;79(2):124-126. doi: 10.18043/ncm.79.2.124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Metzler M, Merrick MT, Klevens J, Ports KA, Ford DC. Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: Shifting the narrative. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;72:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ye D, Reyes-Salvail F. Adverse childhood experiences among Hawai’i adults: Findings from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(6):181-190. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baldwin JR, Reuben A, Newbury JB, Danese A. Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(6):584-593. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bae SM. Long-term effect of adverse childhood experiences, school disengagement, and reasons for leaving school on delinquency in adolescents who dropout. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tamborini CR, Kim C, Sakamoto A. Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography. 2015;52(4):1383-1407. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0407-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Montalvo-Clavijo C, Castillo-Chavez C, Perrings C, Mubayi A. Neighborhood effects, college education, and social mobility. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2023;86:101471. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101471 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ridout K, Ridout S, Harris B, Felitti V. Universal adverse childhood experience screening in primary care. NEJM Catal. 2023;4(3). doi: 10.1056/CAT.22.0106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Temple JR, Baumler E, Wood L, Thiel M, Peskin M, Torres E. A dating violence prevention program for middle school youth: A cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2021;148(5):e2021052880. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eTable 1. Coding and Prevalence of ACE Domains (Analytic Sample, n = 1850)

eTable 2. Correlation Among Types of ACEs

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES