Key Points
Question
What specific actions do physicians with large improvements in burnout and professional fulfillment believe contributed to their progress?
Findings
In this qualitative study using a mixed-methods approach of 30 physicians who experienced substantial improvements in burnout and professional fulfillment, 4 categories were reported: active (ie, intentional) work changes, passive work changes, active personal changes, and passive personal changes. The majority of physicians (86.7%) attributed their improved occupational well-being to active work or personal changes.
Meaning
These insights from colleagues who have experienced improvement may be helpful to peers considering actions to enhance occupation well-being.
This qualitative study examines physicians’ specific actions associated with improvement in experiences of burnout and professional fulfillment.
Abstract
Importance
Occupational distress among physicians is a highly prevalent problem that limits the effectiveness of the health care delivery system. While system change is necessary, individual physicians must also consider personal actions to mitigate occupational distress.
Objective
To identify physician actions associated with large-effect-size improvements in burnout and/or professional fulfillment over a 6-month interval.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This qualitative study using a mixed-methods approach recruited US physicians from the American Medical Association Physician Data file. The study used 2 quantitative online surveys that were administered 6 months apart (October 2 to November 13, 2024, and April 2 to May 16, 2025) to identify physicians with large-effect-size (≥0.8 SD) improvement in burnout and/or professional fulfillment. These physicians were subsequently recruited to participate in a qualitative study using structured interviews to identify changes they believed contributed to this improvement.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Burnout and professional fulfillment were assessed using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index.
Results
A total of 359 practicing physicians responded to both the baseline and follow-up surveys, among whom 87 (24.3%) had an effect size improvement of 0.8 SD or greater in burnout and/or professional fulfillment and were invited to participate in qualitative interviews. Thirty physicians (20 participants [66.7%] aged 30-49 years and 10 [33.3%] aged ≥50 years; 22 [73.3%] female) completed interviews. Thematically, these physicians reported changes in 4 categories: active (ie, intentional) work changes, passive work changes, active personal changes, and passive personal changes. A majority of participants (26 [86.7%]) reported active work and/or personal changes. Active work changes included changes to workload and work schedule, developing new skills or changing the focus of work, changing job or position, taking on or giving up a leadership position, improving efficiency, and advocating for personal needs. Active personal changes included deliberate changes in mindset, contemplative practices, taking time away, working with a therapist or coach, and prioritizing self-care. Passive work changes occurred independent of action by the individual physician and included new leadership, staffing changes, system-initiated workflow changes, and advances in technology. Passive personal changes were infrequently reported.
Conclusions and Relevance
Physicians with large improvements in burnout and professional fulfillment reported specific actions at work or in their personal life that they believed led to this improvement. These findings suggest that both individual- and system-level changes may be necessary to optimize occupational well-being among physicians.
Introduction
Occupational distress among physicians remains a highly prevalent problem that limits the effectiveness of the health care delivery system.1,2 Burnout and other forms of occupational distress undermine quality of care,3,4 increase the cost of care,5,6,7,8,9 contribute to unprofessional behavior,9,10,11 and diminish patient experience.10,11,12 Occupational distress also limits change capacity at a time many organizations must make substantive changes to provide increasingly complex care to a larger number of patients at a lower cost.13,14
The organization-level causes of physicians’ occupational distress include administrative burden,15 physician-organization values misalignment,16,17 lack of agency and control over work,18 inefficiency in the practice environment,15,19,20 suboptimal teamwork,21,22,23,24 moral injury,25,26,27 mistreatment experiences,28,29 and a productivity-based compensation model that is misaligned with the nature of physicians’ work.16,30 Individual factors affected by the work environment also contribute markedly to occupational distress31 and include low self-valuation,32,33 social isolation,34,35 disappointment in accomplishments,36 and impact of work on personal relationships.2 Vanguard organizations use a holistic, system-level approach to address these challenges and have established a leadership structure to drive meaningful change.37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 Early system-based interventions to address root cause contributing factors have shown efficacy and provided proof of concept to spur additional organizational efforts.41,45,46,47,48,49,50,51
While such structural efforts are accelerating,43,52 these changes take time. Even as they partner with their organizations to effect change in professional culture and the practice environment, individual physicians struggling with burnout must also consider personal actions to mitigate occupational distress.45,46,53,54,55 Unfortunately, many are choosing to address the problem by reducing clinical work effort,56,57,58 leaving their current position,5,12,58,59 or exiting the physician workforce altogether.57,58
Few studies have longitudinally assessed occupational well-being among physicians and explored the actions taken by those who experienced an improvement in professional well-being.60 This study used a mixed-methods approach to identify physicians with large-effect-size improvement in burnout and professional fulfillment over a 6-month interval and to ascertain specific changes that contributed to this improvement through qualitative interviews.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
This qualitative study used a 2-phase mixed-methods approach. The first phase, a quantitative analysis of longitudinal surveys of practicing US physicians, was performed to identify physicians who experienced a large improvement in burnout and/or professional fulfillment. The second phase consisted of qualitative interviews with these individuals. The Stanford University and University of Illinois Chicago Institutional Review Boards reviewed and approved the study, and participants provided electronic and written informed consent. This study followed the Standards of Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) reporting guideline.
A national sample of actively practicing physicians from all specialty disciplines was assembled from the American Medical Association Physician Professional Data file, a near-complete record of all US physicians independent of American Medical Association membership. Based on protocol-specified assumptions (eMethods in Supplement 1) and the desire to conduct qualitative interviews of at least 30 physicians with a moderate- or large-effect-size improvement in burnout, a sample of 6000 physicians was invited to participate in the initial survey (eTable 1 in Supplement 1).
Participants were surveyed between October 2 and November 13, 2024. Study details and consent information were provided on the first page of the online survey (eMethods in Supplement 1). The survey collected self-reported demographic information. Race and ethnicity were not included in the survey. Burnout and professional fulfillment were assessed using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index, a well-validated and widely used standardized instrument designed to be sensitive to change.61,62,63 Physicians who responded to the baseline survey were asked to respond to the follow-up survey between April 2 and May 16, 2025. Physicians who completed both surveys received a $50 electronic gift card. Paired responses for burnout and professional fulfillment on these 2 surveys were analyzed as continuous variables to identify physicians with a large-effect-size (≥0.8 SD) improvement in burnout and/or professional fulfillment based on Wilcoxon signed rank test. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. The individuals who met this criterion were invited to participate in interviews (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).
Participation in interviews was voluntary. Physicians who completed the interviews received a $100 electronic gift card. Interviews (average duration of 30 minutes) were conducted via Zoom Workplace, version 6.5.7 (9933) (Zoom Communications, Inc) between June 21 and July 30, 2025. The full interview guide is provided in eTable 3 in Supplement 1. As the central component of the interviews, participants were asked to indicate what changes they believed contributed to their improvement in burnout and professional fulfillment (Table 1). Interviews were recorded and transcribed by a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant, institutionally approved, third-party vendor to create qualitative text for analysis.
Table 1. Interview Questions Analyzed.
| Category | Question |
|---|---|
| General changes | In the past 6 mo, have there been changes that have positively affected your occupational well-being? |
| Work changes | In the past 6 mo, have there been any changes to the way you work, the focus of your work, and/or the amount of time you work? |
| Organizational changes | Have there been any changes within your organization that have affected your occupational well-being? How would you describe your current work culture and your relationships at work (leaders, colleagues, peers, learners)? Has anything changed in the past 6 mo? |
| Work-life integration | What are specific strategies you have used to integrate or balance your personal and professional responsibilities in the past 6 mo? |
Data Analysis
Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was subsequently conducted using both deductive and inductive methods.60,64 A constructivist approach involving independent review and scoring of transcripts, team discussions, evaluation of the interpretations, and development of consensus was used to identify key themes.65 Interviews were independently coded by 2 investigators (B.H. and N.K.M.) using Dedoose, version 10.0.23 (Sociocultural Resource Consultants, LLC) qualitative software. Discrepancies in coding between the 2 investigators were discussed and resolved by consensus. The codes were organized into categories and subdomains within the qualitative software. The thematic analysis focused on identifying strategies and specific actions individual physicians may take to improve occupational well-being. Themes and representative quotes were subsequently shared with coauthors, resulting in additional discussion regarding subdomains and grouping of themes and subdomains.
Results
A total of 484 physicians responded to the baseline survey in 2024, of whom 359 (74.2%) responded to the follow-up survey in 2025. Among the follow-up survey respondents, 87 physicians (24.3%) with large-effect-size (≥0.8 SD) improvement in burnout and/or professional fulfillment were invited to participate in the interviews (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). Of these individuals, 30 (aged 30-49 years, 20 participants [66.7%]; aged ≥50 years, 10 participants [33.3%]; 22 female [73.3%] and 8 male [26.7%]) completed qualitative interviews. The personal and professional characteristics of participants are provided in Table 2.
Table 2. Characteristics of Physicians Participating in Interviews (N = 30).
| Characteristic | Physicians, No. (%) | Difference | Effect size change | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow-up | ||||
| Practice setting | |||||
| Nonacademic private practice or group | 15 (50.0) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Academic medical center | 14 (46.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Veterans hospital | 1 (3.3) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 22 (73.3) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Male | 8 (26.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Age group, y | |||||
| 30-39 | 14 (46.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 40-49 | 6 (20.0) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 50-59 | 5 (16.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| ≥60 | 5 (16.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Relationship status | |||||
| Single | 9 (30.0) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Married | 20 (66.7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Partnered | 1 (3.3) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Work time, median (IQR), h/wk | 50.0 (40.0 to 60.0) | 50.0 (40.0 to 60.0) | 0 (−4.5 to 5.0) | 0.04 | .89 |
| Clinical work, median (IQR), % | 77.5 (58.8 to 95.0) | 82.0 (60.3 to 95.0) | 0 (−5.0 to 4.8) | −0.12 | .64 |
| Burnout score, mean (SD)a | 4.1 (2.2) | 2.8 (1.8) | −1.4 (1.4) | −0.99 | <.001 |
| Professional fulfillment score, mean (SD)b | 5.2 (2.2) | 6.9 (1.7) | 1.7 (1.6) | 1.06 | <.001 |
| Impact of work on personal relationships score, mean (SD)c | 3.5 (2.5) | 2.6 (2.3) | −0.9 (2.3) | −0.39 | .04 |
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Range of 0 to 10; scores ≥3.3 indicate high levels of burnout.
Range of 0 to 10; scores ≥7.5 indicate high levels of professional fulfillment.
Range of 0 to 10; scores ≥6.0 indicate high adverse impact of work on personal relationships.
Saturation of themes was achieved after approximately 20 interviews. Thematically, physicians with improved occupational well-being reported changes in 4 categories: active (ie, intentional) work changes by the physician, passive work changes, active personal changes, and passive personal changes (Figure). The majority (26 [86.7%]) of physicians with large-effect-size improvement reported active work and/or personal changes.
Figure. Schematic Diagram of the 4 Categories of Change Strategies.

Active Work Changes
Intentional work changes made by the individual physician were reported by 12 participants (40.0%). This category had several domains, including changes to workload and work schedule, developing new skills and/or changing the focus of work; changing job or organization, taking on or giving up a leadership position, improving efficiency, and advocating for personal needs (Table 3).
Table 3. Active and Passive Work Changes.
| Theme and subdomain | Exemplar quotes |
|---|---|
| Active work changes | |
| Changes to workload and work schedule |
|
| Developing new skills and/or changing focus of work |
|
| Changing job or organization |
|
| Taking on or stepping away from a leadership role |
|
| Improving efficiencies (streamlining processes, delegating, outsourcing) and advocating for individual needs at work |
|
| Passive work changes | |
| Changes in leadership |
|
| Changes in staffing |
|
| Changes in processes, resources, and technology |
|
Changes to Workload and Work Schedule
The most common active work changes involved adjustments to workload or work schedule, including allocating time for administrative tasks and reducing full-time equivalent status. For example, one physician spoke about transitioning to less than full time: “I have made steps to decrease my FTE [full-time equivalency]. Partially to make sure that I have time with my family.” Other physicians also reported changing the volume of patients cared for each day.
Developing New Skills and/or Changing the Focus of Work
Several physicians reported developing new skills and/or changing the focus of their work. One stated, “I was working on organizational behavior–type learning to get better at managing people…and being able to communicate more effectively with people whose points of view might differ from mine.”
Changing Job or Organization
Some physicians reported changing their job or role within their organization or moving to a new organization expressly to improve professional satisfaction. One physician stated, “I have changed jobs where I’m getting more support and mentorship.” Another said, “I still do what I do but in a different company. That has definitely helped me in work-life balance for sure.”
Taking on or Stepping Away From a Leadership Role
A subset of physicians reported taking on or giving up a leadership role. One physician noted, “Now that I think about that timeframe [when burnout improved], it’s most likely attributed to the change in my position within the academic leadership.” Another noted a newfound sense of purpose when given the opportunity to lead teams and initiatives: “I think there’s a bit more appreciation for other skills, leadership skills that I have that can help the actual organization.…There’s been some positive progress and a bit of recognition in that standpoint.”
Improving Efficiencies: Streamlining Processes, Delegating, and Outsourcing
Many physicians improved efficiency at work by implementing new workflows and leveraging team-based care. One noted, “[I am] trying to change some of my work practices in terms of how I do some of my day-to-day work and how I delegate some activities to some other colleagues.” Some physicians reported outsourcing operational functions (eg, personnel management, billing) to focus more on patient care. Others described allocating time to complete documentation without distractions, such as “setting a specific time to complete certain tasks and then trying to focus on what is important and what is needed.”
Advocating for Individual Needs at Work
Some physicians reported that engaging with their leader to discuss their experience enabled them to advocate for personal needs. One physician shared, “I was definitely at a point where I was getting burnt out…that’s when I was like, ‘Okay, I’m going to put it out on the line. I’m going to explain my concerns. If they want to be open to those discussions, great. We can figure out what needs to change. Otherwise, it might be a situation where I just have to leave the environment,’ which I’m glad that wasn’t the situation.”
Passive Work Changes
Passive work changes were reported by 8 participants (26.7%) and included evolution of the work environment that occurred independent of action by the individual physician. This category included domains such as new leadership, staffing changes, system-initiated workflow or process changes, and advances in technology or resources (Table 3). One physician attributed their improvement simply to gaining experience: “[A]s a new attending, everything seemed hard at first…because in a new institution that I’m not used to, with workflow and support staff that I’m not familiar with, I think everything did feel more difficult in the beginning, whereas I think now just the workflow works a little bit better.”
Changes in Leadership
Several physicians reported that a leadership change at work had resulted in an improvement in their occupational well-being. One physician noted, “There was a shift in just the overall leadership within the academic administration.”
Changes in Staffing
Some physicians identified improved staffing as a key contributor to their improved occupational well-being. Such improvements included filling empty positions, adding incremental staff, enhancing support through professional development of existing staff, and working with the same coworkers more consistently. One physician stated, “I currently have really good staff, which is huge.” Another shared, “[I now] have enough colleagues in my specialty. That I think is a big one…the flipside of things is not having enough colleagues to the point where there’s an excessive number of patients crying out for help, and you’re just physically incapable of addressing thousands of people.” This category also included having enough colleagues and staff to take time off: “You can take vacations and PTO [paid time off] without somebody being like, ‘Oh, but there’s not enough doctors.’”
Changes in Processes, Resources, and Technology
Many participants discussed the positive impact of new technological support, including artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Referring to ambient AI documentation support, one physician noted, “[I]t’s a game-changer. I think that’s the biggest thing in my burnout; having this, it’s the singular thing.” Another physician spoke about enhanced support for documentation: “That has actually been very nice. Although there’s a lot that probably could be better with it, I think, again, that light at the end of the tunnel of some of the documentation burden is going to be decreased. It’s helpful.”
Active Personal Changes
Active personal changes were reported by 14 participants (46.7%). This category included changes in mindset, contemplative practices, taking time away, working with a therapist or coach, and prioritizing self-care (Table 4).
Table 4. Active and Passive Personal Changes.
| Theme and subdomain | Exemplar quotes |
|---|---|
| Active personal changes | |
| Changes in mindset |
|
| Contemplative practices and relaxation methods |
|
| Taking time away |
|
| Working with a therapist or coach |
|
| Prioritizing self-care and personal relationships |
|
| Passive personal changes | |
| Kids becoming more self-sufficient |
|
Changes in Mindset
Many physicians reported intentional shifts in mindset as key to improved occupational well-being. These mindset shifts included cultivating a positive outlook, embracing change, and intentionally investing in others. Many physicians reported the importance of recognizing their self-worth apart from professional accomplishments (ie, self-valuation). As one physician articulated this shift, “I’ve also been able to separate my identity from work.…It’s work that I do that’s fulfilling. It pays me well. It keeps me busy and occupied, but it’s not like…shortcomings feel personal to me anymore.”
Contemplative Practices and Relaxation Methods
Contemplative practices and relaxation methods were also frequently reported as having helped with improving burnout and professional fulfillment. One physician reported the calming benefits of deep breathing: “I think, as simple as deep breathing, a lot of breathing exercises during the cases when it becomes challenging, and being aware of the situation, being in the moment.” Another noted, “One of my colleagues [who was] trying to be happier [and] combat burnout [and] I talked about meditating. I’ve tried to do that or be more purposeful, like when I’m going to work, about thinking about things.”
Taking Time Away
Many physicians described taking time off (eg, vacations with family, medical leave, sabbatical) during the interval in which scores improved. A common sentiment was described by one physician: “I think a lot of [what] contributes to occupational distress is the emotional burden that goes on when you’re doing our line of work. People come in with their burdens and their pains and their struggles, and sometimes their frustrations, and you’re just taking that on every 20 minutes. I found that having a break from that is greatly helpful.” Another physician noted, “During the summertime, I work a little bit less because I have some more activities with my family, kids are out of school. That helps with well-being because you plan more trips.”
Working With a Therapist or Coach
Several physicians mentioned working with a therapist or coach. Referring to their work with a therapist, one said, “We spend a lot of reflective time. I’m in my own treatment…a lot of the work involved is understanding your own reaction to things and understanding like the transference and countertransference involved. Knowing where to take a step back and when to escalate.”
Prioritizing Self-Care and Personal Relationships
Prioritizing self-care and personal relationships were frequently reported as active personal changes: “I am also somebody who really values my own health, and being able to spend time exercising is a really good stress relief for me…I think really helps just recenter me.” Other physicians mentioned characteristics or beliefs that have helped them through hard times, including faith, resilience, patience, and a strong work ethic.
Passive Personal Changes
Passive personal changes were also reported to contribute to improvements in burnout and professional fulfillment, although this category was reported by only 2 participants (6.7%). Examples included evolution in personal life demands and responsibilities that occurred naturally with time (eg, kids becoming more self-sufficient) (Table 4).
Discussion
While meaningful structural changes have begun to be implemented across health care organizations,37,41,52 many individual physicians need immediate help and desire insight regarding what actions might be helpful. This qualitative study using a mixed-methods approach involved structured interviews of physicians with large-effect-size improvements in burnout and/or professional fulfillment to identify changes they believed contributed to improved occupational well-being. While physicians reported both active and passive work and personal changes as contributing to improvement, the overwhelming majority emphasized active changes.
Forty percent of physicians with large-effect-size improvements reported active work-related changes, which often involved a job change (eg, moving to a new organization), taking on or stepping down from a leadership role, or shifting to less than full-time work. Notably, many of the active work-related changes involved physician-initiated structural changes to workflow (eg, blocking time on their calendar for documentation or administrative tasks) and outsourcing of nonclinical tasks (eg, office management, billing, personnel management). Several physicians reported engaging leadership to advocate for new resources or structural changes and collaborating with these leaders to improve the work environment. These latter actions, in which individual physicians took initiative that catalyzed system change, illustrate the intersection between system and individual interventions to improve occupational well-being.
Approximately 1 in 4 physicians who experienced large-effect-size improvements attributed the improvement to changes at work that occurred without a direct action on their part (ie, passive work change). Themes in this category included a change in leadership and changes in staffing (eg, filling an open position, adding new physicians or support staff). System-initiated improvement to workflows or provision of additional support resources were also frequently noted in this category. Consistent with the empirical evidence,49,66,67,68,69 ambient AI documentation support was one frequently noted support resource. In many ways, the changes described in this category affirm the benefit of system-level interventions to improve occupational well-being, although in some cases, they occurred independent of organizational action (eg, an early-career physician becoming more efficient with experience).
Active personal changes were reported by nearly half of physicians with large-effect-size improvements in burnout and professional fulfillment, including changes in mindset. Some physicians described shifting from a mindset of self-worth contingent on their professional identify and accomplishments (ie, my value as a human being is based on the fact that I am a physician) to a more holistic view (I have value as a human being; practicing medicine is an important part of who I am, but not the only part). Changes in mindset also involved intentional efforts to look at work in new ways (ie, embracing change) or a shift in focus at work (eg, embracing teamwork, development of others [colleagues, coworkers, trainees]). Incorporation of contemplative practices (eg, self-awareness, focusing on the moment, an attitude of curiosity rather than judgment), an approach supported by empirical evidence,70,71,72 was another frequently reported theme in the category of active personal change. Other active personal changes connected to improvement in occupational well-being included intentional and strategic use of time away from work and greater emphasis on self-care and personal relationships. Consistent with the results of controlled trials,73,74,75,76 in a number of cases, physicians reported that working with a therapist or professional coach had helped effect change.
Limitations
Our study had several important limitations. First, as is typical with national physician surveys,77,78,79,80 participation in the survey phase of the study was low. Although this low participation raises the possibility of response bias, the purpose of the survey was not to define the prevalence of burnout and professional fulfillment in a representative sample of physicians but, rather, to identify physicians with large improvements in occupational well-being to participate in interviews. Second, while we identified changes reported by physicians with large improvement in these domains, causality cannot be determined beyond that the participating physicians believed that these changes contributed to their improvement. Third, the majority of the physicians interviewed were women, raising questions regarding generalizability of some findings to men.
Conclusions
This qualitative study using a mixed-methods approach including both longitudinal surveys and qualitative interviews found that physicians with large-effect-size improvements in burnout and/or professional fulfillment were typically able to identify specific actions at work and in their personal lives that they believed led to the improvement. Insights from these physicians may be helpful to colleagues who are considering taking action to improve occupational well-being. Ultimately, both individual- and system-level actions may be necessary to reduce occupational distress and promote professional fulfillment among physicians.
eMethods.
eTable 1. Demographic Characteristics of the Survey Population
eTable 2. Demographic Characteristics of Individuals Invited to Participate in Interviews and Those Who Participated
eTable 3. Full-Length Interview Guide
Data Sharing Statement
References
- 1.Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sinsky C, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2023. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100(7):1142-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Trockel MT, Dyrbye LN, West CP, et al. Impact of work on personal relationships and physician well-being. Mayo Clin Proc. 2024;99(10):1567-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tawfik DS, Scheid A, Profit J, et al. Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):555-567. doi: 10.7326/M19-1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Johnson J, et al. Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;378:e070442. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hamidi MS, Bohman B, Sandborg C, et al. Estimating institutional physician turnover attributable to self-reported burnout and associated financial burden: a case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):851. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3663-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Han S, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA, et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(11):784-790. doi: 10.7326/M18-1422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sinsky CA, Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sabety AH, Carlasare LE, West CP. Health care expenditures attributable to primary care physician overall and burnout-related turnover: a cross-sectional analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(4):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1826-1832. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dyrbye LN, West CP, Hunderfund AL, et al. Relationship between burnout, professional behaviors, and cost-conscious attitudes among US physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(5):1465-1476. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05376-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Welle D, Trockel MT, Hamidi MS, et al. Association of occupational distress and sleep-related impairment in physicians with unsolicited patient complaints. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(4):719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trockel J, Bohman B, Wang H, Cooper W, Welle D, Shanafelt TD. Assessment of the relationship between an adverse impact of work on physicians’ personal relationships and unsolicited patient complaints. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(9):1680-1691. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Windover AK, Martinez K, Mercer MB, Neuendorf K, Boissy A, Rothberg MB. Correlates and outcomes of physician burnout within a large academic medical center. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(6):856-858. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goldberg DG, Soylu TG, Kitsantas P, Grady VM, Elward K, Nichols LM. Burnout among primary care providers and staff: evaluating the association with practice adaptive reserve and individual behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(5):1222-1228. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06367-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huynh C, Bowles D, Yen MS, et al. Change implementation: the association of adaptive reserve and burnout among inpatient medicine physicians and nurses. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(5):549-555. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1451307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):836-848. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Agarwal SD, Pabo E, Rozenblum R, Sherritt KM. Professional dissonance and burnout in primary care: a qualitative study. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(3):395-401. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shanafelt TD, Wang H, Leonard M, et al. Assessment of the association of leadership behaviors of supervising physicians with personal-organizational values alignment among staff physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2035622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sinsky CA, Brown RL, Rotenstein L, Carlasare LE, Shah P, Shanafelt TD. Association of work control with burnout and career intentions among us physicians: a multi-institution study. Ann Intern Med. 2025;178(1):20-28. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Olson K, Sinsky C, Rinne ST, et al. Cross-sectional survey of workplace stressors associated with physician burnout measured by the Mini-Z and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Stress Health. 2019;35(2):157-175. doi: 10.1002/smi.2849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burden M, Dyrbye L. Evidence-based work design - bridging the divide. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(11):1044-1046. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2412389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Welp A, Meier LL, Manser T. The interplay between teamwork, clinicians’ emotional exhaustion, and clinician-rated patient safety: a longitudinal study. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1282-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rotenstein L, Wang H, West CP, et al. Teamwork climate, safety climate, and physician burnout: a national, cross-sectional study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024;50(6):458-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Helfrich CD, Simonetti JA, Clinton WL, et al. The association of team-specific workload and staffing with odds of burnout among VA primary care team members. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(7):760-766. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4011-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Willard-Grace R, Hessler D, Rogers E, Dubé K, Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Team structure and culture are associated with lower burnout in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(2):229-238. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lamiani G, Borghi L, Argentero P. When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: a systematic review of moral distress and its correlates. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(1):51-67. doi: 10.1177/1359105315595120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Usset TJ, Baker LD, Griffin BJ, et al. Burnout and turnover risks for healthcare workers in the United States: downstream effects from moral injury exposure. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):24915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74086-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tutty MA, West CP, Dyrbye LN, et al. Moral distress and occupational burnout in US physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(3):e263161. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rowe SG, Stewart MT, Van Horne S, et al. Mistreatment experiences, protective workplace systems, and occupational distress in physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210768. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dyrbye LN, West CP, Sinsky CA, et al. Physicians’ experiences with mistreatment and discrimination by patients, families, and visitors and association with burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2213080. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nurok M, Gewertz B. Relative value units and the measurement of physician performance. JAMA. 2019;322(12):1139-1140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bohman BD, Makowski MS, Wang H, Menon NK, Shanafelt TD, Trockel MT. Empirical assessment of well-being: the Stanford Model of Occupational Well-Being. Acad Med. 2025;100(8):960-967. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trockel MT, Hamidi MS, Menon NK, et al. Self-valuation: attending to the most important instrument in the practice of medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(10):2022-2031. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Trockel M, Sinsky C, West CP, et al. Self-valuation challenges in the culture and practice of medicine and physician well-being. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(8):2123-2132. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.West CP, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky CA, et al. Social isolation and burnout, professional fulfillment, and suicidal ideation among US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100(12):2115-2127. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carlasare LE, Shah P, Turzi A, Nankivil N, Fogg J, Rotenstein LS. Sense of belonging, burnout, and work intentions among US physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(3):e264171. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.4171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Imposter phenomenon in US physicians relative to the US working population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(11):1981-1993. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(1):129-146. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Ripp J, Murphy ML, Sandborg C, Bohman B. Building a program on well-being: key design considerations to meet the unique needs of each organization. Acad Med. 2019;94(2):156-161. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ripp J, Shanafelt T. The health care chief wellness officer: what the role is and is not. Acad Med. 2020;95(9):1354-1358. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sinsky CA, Biddison LD, Mallick A, et al. Organizational evidence-based and promising practices for improving clinician well-being. NAM Perspect. 2020;2020. doi: 10.31478/202011a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shanafelt TD, Larson D, Bohman B, et al. Organization-wide approaches to foster effective unit-level efforts to improve clinician well-being. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(1):163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Stolz S, Murphy D, Bohman B. Ten principles to advance occupational well-being in health care organizations. Mayo Clin Proc. Published online May 3, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Joy in Medicine: recognized organizations. American Medical Association. June 3, 2026. Accessed August 19, 2026. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/physician-health/joy-medicine-recognized-organizations
- 44.Shanafelt T, Trockel M, Rodriguez A, Logan D. Wellness-centered leadership: equipping health care leaders to cultivate physician well-being and professional fulfillment. Acad Med. 2021;96(5):641-651. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2272-2281. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195-205. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.DeChant PF, Acs A, Rhee KB, et al. Effect of organization-directed workplace interventions on physician burnout: a systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019;3(4):384-408. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Swensen S, Kabcenell A, Shanafelt T. Physician-organization collaboration reduces physician burnout and promotes engagement: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Healthc Manag. 2016;61(2):105-127. doi: 10.1097/00115514-201603000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shah SJ, Devon-Sand A, Ma SP, et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes: physician burnout and perspectives on usability and documentation burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025;32(2):375-380. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Misurac J, Knake LA, Blum JM. The effect of ambient artificial intelligence notes on provider burnout. Appl Clin Inform. 2025;16(2):252-258. doi: 10.1055/a-2461-4576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.You JG, Dbouk RH, Landman A, et al. Ambient documentation technology in clinician experience of documentation burden and burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(8):e2528056. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Longo BA, Schmaltz SP, Williams SC, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA, Baker DW. Clinician well-being assessment and interventions in joint commission-accredited hospitals and federally qualified health centers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49(10):511-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De Simone S, Vargas M, Servillo G. Organizational strategies to reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(4):883-894. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01368-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shanafelt TD. Physician well-being 2.0: where are we and where are we going? Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(10):2682-2693. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tung MG, Palamara K, Ripp JA, Saddawi-Konefka D. Meaning and comfort in physician well-being: an integrated framework. JAMA. 2026;335(11):935-936. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.0472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shanafelt T, Mungo M, Schmitgen J, et al. Longitudinal study evaluating the association between physician burnout and changes in professional work effort. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(4):422-431. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Tutty M, Shanafelt TD. Professional satisfaction and the career plans of US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP, et al. Career plans of US physicians after the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(11):1629-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Willard-Grace R, Knox M, Huang B, Hammer H, Kivlahan C, Grumbach K. Burnout and health care workforce turnover. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):36-41. doi: 10.1370/afm.2338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Amano A, Makowski MS, Trockel MT, et al. A Qualitative Study of Strategies to Improve Occupational well-being in physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(8):674-684. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trockel M, Bohman B, Lesure E, et al. A brief instrument to assess both burnout and professional fulfillment in physicians: reliability and validity, including correlation with self-reported medical errors, in a sample of resident and practicing physicians. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ligibel JA, Goularte N, Berliner JI, et al. Well-being parameters and intention to leave current institution among academic physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2347894. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stewart MT, Mete M, Quinn M, Brazeau C, Olson K, Rowe SG. Mediating factors and well-being differences by gender among academic physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(3):e262279. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Laari L. Inductive-deductive qualitative data analysis logic in health sciences research: a framework for analysing qualitative data. Int J Qual Methods. Published online September 18, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cofie N, Braund H, Dalgarno N. Eight ways to get a grip on intercoder reliability using qualitative-based measures. Can Med Educ J. 2022;13(2):73-76. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lukac PJ, Turner W, Vangala S, et al. Ambient AI scribes in clinical practice: a randomized trial. NEJM AI. Published online November 26, 2025. doi: 10.1056/AIoa2501000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Afshar M, Baumann MR, Resnik F, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of ambient artificial intelligence to improve health practitioner well-being. NEJM AI. 2025;2(12). doi: 10.1056/AIoa2500945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Duggan MJ, Gervase J, Schoenbaum A, et al. Clinician experiences with ambient scribe technology to assist with documentation burden and efficiency. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(2):e2460637. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Olson KD, Meeker D, Troup M, et al. Use of ambient AI scribes to reduce administrative burden and professional burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(10):e2534976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Krasner MS, Epstein RM, Beckman H, et al. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1284-1293. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Salvado M, Marques DL, Pires IM, Silva NM. Mindfulness-based interventions to reduce burnout in primary healthcare professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(10):1342. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ong NY, Teo FJJ, Ee JZY, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on the well-being of healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Psychiatr. 2024;37(3):e101115. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Gill PR, Satele DV, West CP. Effect of a professional coaching intervention on the well-being and distress of physicians: a pilot randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1406-1414. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dyrbye LN, Gill PR, Satele DV, West CP. Professional coaching and surgeon well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4):565-571. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mann A, Shah AN, Thibodeau PS, et al. Online well-being group coaching program for women physician trainees: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(10):e2335541. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.McGonagle AK, Schwab L, Yahanda N, et al. Coaching for primary care physician well-being: a randomized trial and follow-up analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2020;25(5):297-314. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Afonso AM, Cadwell JB, Staffa SJ, Sinskey JL, Vinson AEUS. U.S. attending anesthesiologist burnout in the postpandemic era. Anesthesiology. 2024;140(1):38-51. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Allegra CJ, Hall R, Yothers G. Prevalence of burnout in the U.S. oncology community: results of a 2003 survey. J Oncol Pract. 2005;1(4):140-147. doi: 10.1200/jop.2005.1.4.140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kuerer HM, Eberlein TJ, Pollock RE, et al. Career satisfaction, practice patterns and burnout among surgical oncologists: report on the quality of life of members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3043-3053. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9579-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps GJ, et al. Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):463-471. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ac4dfd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eMethods.
eTable 1. Demographic Characteristics of the Survey Population
eTable 2. Demographic Characteristics of Individuals Invited to Participate in Interviews and Those Who Participated
eTable 3. Full-Length Interview Guide
Data Sharing Statement
