Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2006 Feb;140(2):528–536. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073668

Ectopic Expression of Pumpkin Gibberellin Oxidases Alters Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Development of Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants1

Abeer Radi 1, Theo Lange 1, Tomoya Niki 1, Masaji Koshioka 1, Maria João Pimenta Lange 1,*
PMCID: PMC1361321  PMID: 16384902

Abstract

Immature pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) seeds contain gibberellin (GA) oxidases with unique catalytic properties resulting in GAs of unknown function for plant growth and development. Overexpression of pumpkin GA 7-oxidase (CmGA7ox) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) resulted in seedlings with elongated roots, taller plants that flower earlier with only a little increase in bioactive GA4 levels compared to control plants. In the same way, overexpression of the pumpkin GA 3-oxidase1 (CmGA3ox1) resulted in a GA overdose phenotype with increased levels of endogenous GA4. This indicates that, in Arabidopsis, 7-oxidation and 3-oxidation are rate-limiting steps in GA plant hormone biosynthesis that control plant development. With an opposite effect, overexpression of pumpkin seed-specific GA 20-oxidase1 (CmGA20ox1) in Arabidopsis resulted in dwarfed plants that flower late with reduced levels of GA4 and increased levels of physiological inactive GA17 and GA25 and unexpected GA34 levels. Severe dwarfed plants were obtained by overexpression of the pumpkin GA 2-oxidase1 (CmGA2ox1) in Arabidopsis. This dramatic change in phenotype was accompanied by a considerable decrease in the levels of bioactive GA4 and an increase in the corresponding inactivation product GA34 in comparison to control plants. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of four pumpkin GA oxidase-encoding genes to modulate the GA plant hormone pool and alter plant stature and development.


The gibberellin (GA) plant hormones are known for playing an important role in many aspects of plant growth and development, including germination, stem growth, flowering, and fruit development (Hedden and Proebsting, 1999; Richards et al., 2001; Olszewski et al., 2002). The GA biosynthetic pathway has been characterized and the genes encoding most of the GA biosynthetic enzymes have been cloned in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other species (Lange, 1998; Hedden and Phillips, 2000a). GA biosynthesis in plants can be divided into three major parts according to the type of enzymes involved and their subcellular localization (Lange, 1998; Hedden and Phillips, 2000a). The first part takes place in plastids and results in the formation of ent-kaurene from the precursor geranylgeranyl diphosphate by the action of diterpene cyclases. This part of the pathway is common to all plant systems that have been studied. The second part of the pathway takes place at the endoplasmic reticulum and cytochrome-P450-dependent monooxygenases are involved in the conversion of ent-kaurene to GA12-aldehyde and GA12. The final part of GA biosynthesis involves soluble 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases and leads to the production of the GA plant hormone and inactive GAs. GA dioxygenases are often multifunctional with broad substrate specificity, resulting in many side reactions and numerous GAs (Hedden and Kamiya, 1997; Lange, 1998; Hedden and Phillips, 2000a).

In Arabidopsis, two pathways are described diverging from GA12 to GA plant hormones: a non-13-hydroxylation pathway leading to GA4 and a 13-hydroxylation pathway leading to GA1 (Fig. 1). These steps are catalyzed by GA 20-oxidase and GA 3-oxidase enzymes, each encoded by small multigene families (Sponsel and Hedden, 2004). Eight GA-2 oxidases have been identified in Arabidopsis with specificity for either C19- (Thomas et al., 1999) or C20-GAs (Schomburg et al., 2003).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The third part of the GA biosynthetic pathway leading to the formation of bioactive GAs in Arabidopsis. Biosynthetic steps resulting from the overexpression of pumpkin GA oxidases. a, 7-Oxidase (CmGA7ox). b, Seed-specific 20-oxidase1 (CmGA20ox1). c, Seed-specific 3-oxidase1 (CmGA3ox1). d, 2-Oxidase1 (CmGA2ox1). Main pathways are indicated by thick arrows. The boxed GAs indicate bioactive GAs. Metabolic relationships are discussed in the text.

Developing pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) seeds express a set of GA oxidases with unique catalytic properties that, to our knowledge, have not been identified in other plant species to date and that synthesize GAs of unknown function in plant development (Fig. 1; Lange, 1998). A multifunctional GA 7-oxidase from pumpkin (CmGA7ox) oxidizes GA12-aldehyde to GA12 and, less efficiently, GA12 to GA14 (Fig. 1; Lange, 1997; Frisse et al., 2003). The seed-specific GA 20-oxidase1 from pumpkin (CmGA20ox1) is, like other GA 20-oxidases, multifunctional with broad substrate specificity but produces mainly C20-GAs (e.g. GA25) instead of C19-GAs (e.g. GA9; Fig. 1; Lange, 1994, 1998; Lange et al., 1994; Frisse et al., 2003). Unlike most plant species that have been investigated so far in pumpkin, GA 3-oxidase1 (CmGA3ox1, formerly named 2β,3β-hydroxylase; Lange et al., 1997) is a bifunctional enzyme. In addition to its 3-oxidation catalytic properties that can lead to the formation of GA plant hormones (e.g. GA4; Fig. 1), it also exhibits a 2-oxidation catalytic function (Lange et al., 1997). Moreover, 3-oxidases from other plant species act mainly on C19-GAs, but CmGA3ox1 prefers C20-GAs as the substrate (Fig. 1; Lange et al., 1997; Hedden, 1999). Finally, the pumpkin GA 2-oxidase1 (CmGA2ox1) shares very high sequence identity with an unidentified dioxygenase from Marah macrocarpus and the recombinant protein uses C19-GAs as the substrate (Fig. 1; MacMillan et al., 1997; Frisse et al., 2003).

The multiple roles of GAs and the large number of enzymes and genes involved in the biosynthetic pathway suggest that regulation of GA levels in planta is likely to be rather complex (Hedden and Phillips, 2000a). Transgenic plants overexpressing genes of the GA biosynthetic pathway have been produced to investigate their effects on GA biosynthesis, GA homeostasis, and plant morphology. Furthermore, this approach can be of benefit for controlling plant stature in agriculture and horticulture (Phillips, 2004).

Up-regulation of early steps of the pathway has been achieved by overexpressing AtCPS and AtKS in Arabidopsis and resulted in accumulation of early intermediates of the biosynthetic pathway, but caused no changes in plant morphology and levels of active GAs, showing the ability of plants to maintain GA homeostasis (Fleet et al., 2003). However, GA overdose morphologies were obtained by overexpression of GA 20-oxidases in Arabidopsis (Huang et al., 1998; Coles et al., 1999) and potato (Solanum tuberosum; Carrera et al., 2000). Similarly, overexpression of Arabidopsis GA 20-oxidase in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × Populus tremuloides; Eriksson et al., 2000) and overexpression of a GA 20-oxidase from citrus or Arabidopsis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (Vidal et al., 2001; Biemelt et al., 2004) resulted in elongated phenotypes associated with GA overproduction. In hybrid aspen and Arabidopsis, overexpression of an Arabidopsis GA 3-oxidase resulted in no major changes in morphology (Israelsson et al., 2004; Phillips, 2004) and in the case of hybrid aspen, the authors suggest that 20-oxidation is the limiting biosynthetic step for GA-controlled shoot elongation.

The green revolution that originated an increased yield in cereal crop cultivars resulted from the introduction of dwarfed varieties (Peng et al., 1999; Monna et al., 2002; Sasaki et al., 2002; Spielmeyer et al., 2002). Ectopic overexpression of the seed-specific GA 20-oxidase1 from pumpkin (CmGA20ox1), which produces mainly inactive GA products, might result in a reduction of bioactive GAs by diverting the pathway to the tricarboxylic acids (Fig. 1) and therefore originate dwarfed phenotypes. This has been achieved successfully in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) plants, where CmGA20ox1 was introduced under a very strong promoter cassette and dwarfed lettuce plants were obtained (Niki et al., 2001). However, in Arabidopsis and Solanum dulcamara, this strategy to reduce GA content and produce dwarfed plants was not achieved, weakening the usefulness of this approach to alter GA levels and reduce plant height in other plant species (Xu et al., 1999; Curtis et al., 2000). The overexpression of CmGA20ox1 resulted in semidwarfed plants in S. dulcamara and slight reduction in plant height in Arabidopsis, suggesting that a feedback control of the endogenous GA 20-oxidases (S. dulcamara and Arabidopsis) and GA 3-oxidases (Arabidopsis) compensates for the effect of the CmGA20ox1 transgene (Xu et al., 1999; Curtis et al., 2000). GA 2-oxidases are catabolic enzymes and can potentially be used to decrease GA levels and create dwarfed phenotypes. Overexpression of GA 2-oxidase genes in Arabidopsis, tobacco, rice (Oryza sativa), and poplar (Populus spp.) resulted in the expected dwarfed phenotypes (Busov et al., 2003; Sakamoto et al., 2003; Schomburg et al., 2003; Biemelt et al., 2004), but the developmental role of GA 2-oxidases in plants is not well understood.

To our knowledge, no attempt had been made to overexpress the multifunctional CmGA7ox from pumpkin and investigate its potential regulatory function in controlling the levels of bioactive GAs. Here we discuss the feasibility of increasing bioactive GAs and altering plant morphology, changing the flux through the pathway by overexpressing CmGA7ox in Arabidopsis. Moreover, we also show that overexpression of the bifunctional CmGA3ox1 in Arabidopsis results in increased plant height and increased GA4 levels despite the enzyme's preferences for oxidizing C20-GAs instead of C19-GAs.

In this work, we obtained dwarfed Arabidopsis plants and diverted GA precursors into inactive forms by overexpressing the CmGA20ox1 gene using a very strong promoter cassette (Niki et al., 2001) and confirmed the importance of this approach in controlling plant stature. In Arabidopsis, GA 2-oxidase is encoded by a gene family (Thomas et al., 1999; Hedden and Phillips, 2000a; Schomburg et al., 2003), but, up to now, only one active GA 2-oxidase gene has been cloned from pumpkin (CmGA2ox1; Frisse et al., 2003). GA 2-oxidases have been overexpressed in Arabidopsis (Hedden and Phillips, 2000b; Singh et al., 2002; Schomburg et al., 2003). To understand the role of CmGA2ox1 in plant development, we overexpressed the corresponding cDNA in Arabidopsis, resulting in extreme dwarfed phenotypes and reduction of active GA levels.

RESULTS

Generation of Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants Expressing Pumpkin GA Oxidases

Arabidopsis plants were transformed with constructs containing sense (S) copies of CmGA20ox1 and S or antisense (AS) copies of CmGA7ox, CmGA3ox1, or CmGA2ox1. Transgenic plants were selected in the presence of kanamycin and the integration of the pumpkin GA-oxidase S or AS copies of 10 lines were analyzed by PCR (data not shown). The AS lines were used together with the wild-type plants as controls. From the 10 lines, three homozygous (T4) lines showing altered phenotypes were chosen and expression of pumpkin GA oxidases was estimated by quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (Table I).

Table I.

Levels of pumpkin GA oxidase mRNAs in Arabidopsis overexpression lines as determined by quantitative RT-PCR

n.d., Not detectable.

Transcript Levels (μg/g Total RNA)
CmGA7ox
CmGA20ox1
CmGA3ox1
CmGA2ox1
Lines: S13.1 S8.9 S12.8 S10.8 S2.2 S17.2 S1.3 S19.4 S17.7 S9.7 S5.5 S12.9
60 80 100 n.d. n.d. 10 20 100 1,000 20 90 125

Transgenic lines expressing CmGA7ox (S13.1, S8.9, and S12.8) and CmGA3ox1 (S1.3, S19.4, and S17.7) were slender, while transgenic lines expressing CmGA20ox1 (S17.2) and CmGA2ox1 (S9.7, S5.5, and S12.9) were dwarfed. Lines S10.8 and S2.2 expressed semidwarfed phenotypes in spite of the fact that, in both lines, no CmGA20ox1 transcripts were detectable (Table I; data not shown). Transcripts of the four pumpkin GA oxidase-encoding genes were found in neither wild-type Arabidopsis plants nor AS lines (data not shown). Lines with the highest expression levels of each pumpkin GA oxidase gene always showed the strongest phenotype and were chosen for further investigation (Fig. 2; Table II).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Overexpression of pumpkin GA oxidases in Arabidopsis: effects on plant development. A, Phenotypes of 14-d-old seedlings grown in Murashige and Skoog medium. Wild-type seedlings (left) compared to seedlings expressing S copies of CmGA7ox (line S12.8, middle) or expressing S copies of CmGA3ox1 (line S17.7, right). Bar = 1 cm. B, Phenotypes of 7-week-old plants transferred to soil after 28 d in Murashige and Skoog medium. Nontransformed plants (wild type, left) compared to AS and S lines transformed with CmGA7ox (middle) or CmGA3ox1 (right). C, Phenotypes of 7-week-old plants transferred to soil after 28 d in Murashige and Skoog medium containing 10−6 m GA3. Nontransformed plants (wild type, left) compared to different AS and S lines transformed with CmGA20ox1 (middle) or CmGA2ox1 (right).

Table II.

Phenotypic characteristics of wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing pumpkin GA oxidases

Results are shown as mean ± se (n = 5).

Wild Type
CmGA7ox
CmGA3ox1
Wild Typea
CmGA20ox1a CmGA2ox1a
AS15.9 S12.8 AS5.9 S17.7 S17.2 AS7.7 S12.9
Final heightb (cm) 35.0 ± 2.4 36.7 ± 1.8 50.8 ± 0.6 30.7 ± 1.0 52.6 ± 2.0 38.9 ± 2.4 11 ± 0.8 39.3 ± 2.2 4.84 ± 0.4
Internode lengthbc (cm) 1.38 ± 0.1 1.70 ± 0.3 2.42 ± 0.1 1.30 ± 0.1 2.44 ± 0.2 1.40 ± 0.1 0.90 ± 0.1 1.90 ± 0.1 0.68 ± 0.1
Siliquesbd (no.) 22.0 ± 1.8 27.2 ± 0.7 43.8 ± 0.7 22.4 ± 1.0 54.2 ± 1.5 36.4 ± 0.5 10.4 ± 2.6 40.2 ± 1.0 6.8 ± 1.8
Flowering timee (d) 42.6 ± 1.0 41.4 ± 0.5 34.2 ± 1.5 42.6 ± 0.5 30 ± 1.6 41.2 ± 0.4 50.4 ± 1.3 42.0 ± 1.4 57.0 ± 0.9
a

Plants were transferred to soil after 28 d in Murashige and Skoog medium containing 10−6 m GA3.

b

Nine-week-old plants.

c

The first internode of the main inflorescence.

d

Number per plant.

e

When the first flower appears.

Arabidopsis Plants Overexpressing CmGA7ox or CmGA3ox1 Show Accelerated Development

Arabidopsis 14-d-old seedlings overexpressing CmGA7ox or CmGA3ox1 showed altered root shapes when compared to wild-type seedlings (Fig. 2A). The seedlings of CmGA7ox overexpressors showed one thin, long primary root with very few lateral roots, while the seedlings of CmGA3ox1 overexpressors developed many thick lateral roots. Seedlings overexpressing CmGA3ox1 also showed enlarged leaves and an increased number of trichomes when compared to seedlings overexpressing CmGA7ox or wild-type seedlings (Fig. 2A). Arabidopsis plants overexpressing CmGA7ox or CmGA3ox1 showed slender phenotypes when compared to plants transformed with AS copies of the respective genes or to wild-type plants (Fig. 2B; Table II). The strongest CmGA7ox overexpressing line, according to the RT-PCR results (S12.8; Table I), was chosen for phenotypic characterization. Line S12.8 had an increase of about 50% in final height, with a similar increase in internode length, developed twice as many siliques, and flowered earlier when compared to wild-type plants or to the AS line AS15.9 (Fig. 2B; Table II). Line S17.7 showed the strongest overexpression of CmGA3ox1 by RT-PCR (Table I) and developed longer shoots, longer internodes, and flowered much earlier than wild-type plants or plants transformed with AS copies of the respective gene (line AS5.9). However, compared to line S12.8 (CmGA7ox overexpressor), in line S17.7 branching was more frequent and the total number of siliques increased (Fig. 2B; Table II).

Overexpression of CmGA20ox1 or CmGA2ox1 in Arabidopsis Results in Retarded Development

To get T4 homozygous Arabidopsis plants expressing CmGA20ox1 or CmGA2ox1, selection in the presence of kanamycin and correct segregations ratios could be obtained only in the presence of GA3. Therefore, to compare phenotypes, seeds of CmGA20ox1 and CmGA2ox1 expressing lines, as well as seeds of the CmGA2ox1 AS line and a second set of wild-type plants, were all germinated in Murashige and Skoog medium containing 10−6 m GA3. Arabidopsis plants expressing CmGA20ox1 or CmGA2ox1 were dwarfed with slightly darker green leaves compared to wild-type plants or plants transformed with AS copies of CmGA2ox1 (Fig. 2C). Line S17.2 showed the strongest expression of CmGA20ox1 and was therefore subjected to more extensive phenotype characterization. S17.2 plants showed reduced development, flowered later, and were much shorter, reaching only 28% of the final height of similarly grown wild-type plants (Fig. 2C; Table II). The number of siliques of the dwarfed plants was reduced to only 29%, compared to wild-type plants grown under the same conditions (Table II). Expression of CmGA2ox1 in Arabidopsis resulted in severely dwarfed phenotypes (Fig. 2C). Line S12.9 expressed the strongest transcript levels as determined by RT-PCR (Table I), and it reached only 12% of the final height of its respective AS line (AS7.7) grown under similar conditions (Table II). These plants showed a reduced development and flowered very late (Fig. 2C; Table II). The dwarfed plants had an extremely low number of siliques, only about 17% of their respective AS lines (Table II).

Analysis of Endogenous GA Levels in Arabidopsis Plants Overexpressing Pumpkin GA Oxidases

Endogenous GA levels were determined by combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring in the transgenic Arabidopsis lines expressing the highest levels of pumpkin GA oxidases to identify which steps of the GA biosynthetic pathway were affected in these plants (Table III). Similarly, endogenous GA levels were also determined in control Arabidopsis plants (plants expressing AS copies of pumpkin GA oxidases and wild-type plants). Arabidopsis slender plants expressing CmGA7ox had a 3- to 4-fold increase in GA12 levels in comparison to control plants, but only a very slight increase in biologically active GA4 and catabolic GA34 levels. GA levels of the early 3-hydroxylated pathway (GA14, GA36, and GA37) and of precursors of the 13-hydroxylated pathway (GA53 and GA44) decreased. No changes of levels for the other GAs were observed. In contrast, Arabidopsis slender plants expressing CmGA3ox1 showed increased GA4 levels as well as increased levels of the corresponding inactivation product GA34 and no changes in other GA levels when compared to their respective control plants (Fig. 1; Table III). The Arabidopsis dwarfed plants expressing CmGA20ox1 showed reduced levels of the bioactive GA4, increased levels of the respective inactivation product GA34, and increased levels of the tricarboxylic C20-GAs, GA25, and, particularly, GA17, when compared to wild-type plants (Table III). The dwarfed plants also showed a slight decrease in GA12-aldehyde and GA12 and an increase in GA36 (Table III). The level of bioactive GA4 was considerably reduced in the severe dwarfed Arabidopsis plants expressing CmGA2ox1 accompanied by an increase in the respective inactivation product GA34, when compared to their respective control wild-type plants or AS lines. The dwarfed plants showed also a slight decrease in GA12 and GA36 levels (Table III).

Table III.

GA-levels (ng/plant) in 7-week-old wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing S or AS copies of the CmGA7ox, CmGA20ox1, CmGA3ox1, or CmGA2ox1 gene

Measurements have been repeated at least once with similar results.

Wild Type
Wild Typea
CmGA7ox
CmGA20ox1a CmGA3ox1
CmGA2ox1a
AS15.9 S12.8 S17.2 AS5.9 S17.7 AS7.7 S12.9
GA12-aldehyde 0.37 0.31 0.52 0.64 0.17 0.38 0.24 0.20 0.16
GA12 2.24 1.64 3.24 9.06 1.27 2.14 2.64 1.36 1.09
GA15 0.52 0.30 0.51 0.39 0.39 0.46 0.39 0.32 0.42
GA24 1.34 1.06 2.12 1.45 0.96 1.55 1.65 1.03 0.91
GA9 0.14 0.15 0.11 0.18 0.13 0.18 0.19 0.11 0.08
GA25 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.15 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.08 0.09
GA4 0.32 0.27 0.32 0.35 0.18 0.29 0.54 0.22 0.09
GA34 0.54 0.37 0.41 0.57 1.24 0.50 0.61 0.34 0.45
GA53 0.34 0.17 0.44 0.24 0.18 0.34 0.33 0.17 0.15
GA44 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07
GA20 n.d.b 0.01 0.01 0.01 n.d.b 0.01 0.01 0.01 n.d.b
GA17 0.09 n.d.b n.d.b 0.04 0.51 0.01 0.03 n.d.b 0.04
GA1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 n.d.b
GA8 c c c c 0.01 0.01 c 0.01 0.01
GA14 0.01 n.d.b 0.07 n.d.b n.d.b n.d.b n.d.b n.d.b n.d.b
GA36 0.92 0.48 1.32 0.82 0.87 1.13 0.91 0.55 0.31
GA37 0.03 n.d.b 0.01 n.d.b 0.01 0.01 0.01 n.d.b n.d.b
a

Plants have been transferred to soil after 28 d in Murashige and Skoog medium containing 10−6 m GA3.

b

No dilution of internal standard.

c

Not determined.

DISCUSSION

Genes of the GA biosynthetic pathway have been overexpressed in plants to investigate their effects on GA biosynthesis, GA homeostasis, and plant morphology (Phillips, 2004). Developing pumpkin seeds express GA dioxygenases with unique catalytic properties resulting in GAs of unknown function for plant development. To investigate their potential role for modulation of GA biosynthesis, pushing the flux through the pathway, and possibly leading to a change in bioactive GAs, we overexpressed pumpkin GA oxidases in Arabidopsis.

Overexpression of ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase and ent-kaurene synthase alone or in combination in Arabidopsis resulted in high accumulation of ent-kaurene and ent-kaurenoic acid (1,000-fold more), GA12 (about 10-fold), and GA24 levels (about 4-fold) compared to wild-type plants (Fleet et al., 2003). Surprisingly, no changes in bioactive GA levels or plant morphology were observed. The authors propose that P450 ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase, producing GA12, may be limiting for production of middle and later GA intermediates. In contrast, Arabidopsis plants expressing CmGA7ox (although in a different ecotype) show accelerated development, have longer stems and internodes, increase in number of siliques, and flower earlier than wild-type Arabidopsis plants (Fig. 2, B and C; Table II). All these phenotypic changes took place despite a 3- to 4-fold increase of GA12 levels, with no considerable changes in GA4 levels, the primary active GA in Arabidopsis (Talon et al., 1990; Cowling et al., 1998; Table III). This apparent discrepancy might be due to variations in GA levels between various types of tissues and during different stages of plant development. For instance, overexpression of GA 20-oxidase genes in Arabidopsis have been reported to result in GA overproduction phenotypes with no consistent differences in GA4 and GA1 levels between shoot tips of the transgenic lines and wild-type plants, while a 2- to 3-fold increase in GA4 levels was observed when the rosette leaves of the transgenic lines were analyzed (Coles et al., 1999). In the case of 14-d-old Arabidopsis CmGA7ox overexpressors (using intact seedlings for the GA analysis), again GA4 levels did not increase considerably compared to wild-type seedlings (data not shown). Therefore, in Arabidopsis, GA levels might be tightly regulated with only small changes in the GA plant hormone pool sufficient for modulating plant growth and development. No increase of early 3-hydroxylated GA levels (GA14, GA37, and GA36) was observed, indicating that the 3-hydroxylation side activity of CmGA7ox that has been identified with recombinant CmGA7ox (Lange, 1997; Frisse et al., 2003) had no major impact in GA biosynthesis of the transgenic Arabidopsis line. However, the existence of yet unidentified GA biosynthetic pathways in Arabidopsis that play a role in plant development cannot be excluded.

In hybrid aspen, overexpression of a GA 3-oxidase from Arabidopsis resulted in no major changes in morphology and in only small changes of bioactive GA1 and GA4 levels (Israelsson et al., 2004). The authors conclude that in hybrid aspen, 20-oxidation rather than 3-oxidation is the limiting step in the formation of GA1 and GA4, and that expression of GA 3-oxidases alone does not increase the flux toward bioactive GAs. Moreover, Phillips (2004) reported that in Arabidopsis, overexpression of GA 3-oxidase does not affect plant development. However, our results demonstrate that ectopic overexpression of the seed-specific CmGA3ox1 in Arabidopsis leads to dramatic changes in plant growth and development (Fig. 2, A and B; Table II). Arabidopsis seedlings overexpressing CmGA3ox1 have elevated hypocotyl and leaf growth and an increased number of trichomes compared to wild-type plants, which are all known, typical GA effects (Perazza et al., 1998; Olszewski et al., 2002). Adult overexpressors of CmGA3ox1 develop similar to plants overexpressing CmGA7ox . They show a slender phenotype and flower earlier compared to wild-type plants or plants expressing AS copies of CmGA3ox1. Moreover, the number of siliques observed per plant was higher in CmGA3ox1 even as compared to CmGA7ox overexpressors, suggesting that flower formation and/or seed set are favored in these lines (Table II). In spite of the fact that CmGA3ox1 prefers C20-GAs as the substrate, the phenotypic changes are accompanied by a 2-fold increase in bioactive GA4 levels and a slight increase in the corresponding inactivation product GA34 in the CmGA3ox1 overexpressors that would account for the obtained morphological changes (Fig. 1; Table III).

Root and shoot organs react differently to GA levels (e.g. for normal root growth, a much lower concentration of GAs are required than for normal shoot growth; Tanimoto, 1990). Root morphology of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings overexpressing pumpkin CmGA7ox and CmGA3ox1 has changed dramatically (Fig. 2A). CmGA7ox overexpressors develop much longer primary roots compared to wild-type plants, indicating that a little increase in endogenous GA levels of these plants favors root elongation. However, CmGA3ox1 transgenic lines develop more lateral roots that are thicker compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2A), indicating that a considerable increase of endogenous GA levels does not help root elongation but helps lateral root formation. Recently, Fu and Harberd (2003) found that GAs regulate root growth by repressing GAI (GA insensitive) and RGA (repressor of ga1-3), two DELLA proteins involved in GA signaling (Fleet and Sun, 2005). However, little is known about how GA signaling components modulate GA biosynthesis (Richards et al., 2001; Olszewski et al., 2002; Sun and Gubler, 2004; Thomas and Sun, 2004; Fleet and Sun, 2005). Moreover, other plant hormones (e.g. auxins) are known to interact with the components of the GA biosynthetic pathway that affects plant development (e.g. the development of lateral roots; Achard et al., 2003; Casimiro et al., 2003; Fu and Harberd, 2003; Fleet and Sun, 2005).

Seed-specific GA 20-oxidase1 from pumpkin (CmGA20ox1) encodes an enzyme with unique catalytic GA 20-oxidation properties: It is the only known GA 20-oxidase that produces mainly tricarboxylic C20-GAs (e.g. GA25 and GA17) that have no known physiological function, rather than C19-GAs (e.g. GA9 and GA20) that serve as precursors in GA plant hormone synthesis (Fig. 1; Lange, 1994, 1998; Lange et al., 1994; Frisse et al., 2003). Therefore, overexpression of CmGA20ox1 might be a useful strategy for reduction of bioactive GAs in planta (Hedden and Phillips, 2000b). This hypothesis has been tested already by several groups using different plant species. In lettuce, overexpression of CmGA20ox1 resulted in dwarfed plants with reduced levels of GA1 and GA4 and increased levels of GA17 and GA25 (Niki et al., 2001). However, in Arabidopsis and S. dulcamara, overexpression of CmGA20ox1 resulted in only a slight reduction of plant height associated with a semidwarfed phenotype (Xu et al., 1999; Curtis et al., 2000). In the case of Arabidopsis, CmGA20ox1 overexpressing plants showed reduced levels of GA4 and no clear effect on GA1 levels. In the case of S. dulcamara, GA4 levels were unaltered in stems and increased in leaves and GA1 levels were reduced. It was suggested that a feedback type of regulation, resulting in increased transcript levels of the endogenous GA 20-oxidase-encoding genes (Arabidopsis and S. dulcamara) and GA 3-oxidase-encoding gene (Arabidopsis), was responsible for the limited success in reducing plant height. We reinvestigated overexpression of CmGA20ox1 in Arabidopsis plants using a strong promoter cassette similar to the one that drove expression of CmGA20ox1 in lettuce (Niki et al., 2001) and obtained Arabidopsis plants with severe dwarfed phenotypes. As in transgenic lettuce, flowering was delayed and seed number was dramatically reduced in the dwarfed Arabidopsis plants (Table II). However, in contrast to what was reported for lettuce, we found that seed germination was affected and transgenic seeds were not able to germinate in the absence of applied GA3 (data not shown). The transgenic Arabidopsis accumulated tricarboxylic GA25 and GA17 and had reduced levels of the bioactive GA4 similar to the findings of Xu et al. (1999). In addition, increased endogenous levels of GA34 indicate a surprising increase of 2-oxidation activity in transgenic plants.

Genetic manipulation of catabolic GA 2-oxidases offers another suitable strategy for modulating plant development (Hedden and Phillips, 2000b). Dwarfed phenotypes with decreased GA levels in planta have been achieved by overexpression of GA 2-oxidases in several plant species, including tobacco, rice, and poplar (Busov et al., 2003; Sakamoto et al., 2003; Biemelt et al., 2004). In Arabidopsis, GA 2-oxidases are encoded by a complex gene family (Thomas et al., 1999; Schomburg et al., 2003; Sponsel and Hedden, 2004). Overexpression of two of them that hydroxylate C20- rather that C19-GA precursors resulted in dwarfed phenotypes in Arabidopsis (Schomburg et al., 2003). Recombinant pumpkin CmGA2ox1 hydroxylates C19-GAs and thus efficiently inactivates GA plant hormones, including GA1 and GA4 (Frisse et al., 2003). Expression studies indicate that CmGA2ox1 transcript levels are most abundant in roots of pumpkin plants (Lange et al., 2005). To test the influence of this gene on modulating Arabidopsis plant growth and its GA hormone pool, we used a strong promoter cassette (Niki et al., 2001) to express constitutively CmGA2ox1 in Arabidopsis. The transgenic plants express extremely dwarfed phenotypes and seeds of those lines are unable to germinate in the absence of exogenous applied GA. Compared to control plants, CmGA2ox1 overexpressors show severe reduced stem elongation and flower late, with dramatic decrease in the silique number (Fig. 2C; Table II). Rice plants overexpressing GA 2-oxidase constitutively, by the action of the actin promoter, showed severe dwarfism and failed to set grain. However, ectopic expression of the same gene in shoots under the control of the promoter of the GA biosynthesis gene, OsGA3ox2, resulted in semidwarfed phenotypes that are normal in flowering and grain development (Sakamoto et al., 2003). The dramatic changes observed in the phenotype of CmGA2ox1 overexpressors were accompanied by a severe reduction of the GA4 levels and, as expected, in an increase of the corresponding inactivation product GA34.

The four pumpkin GA oxidases utilized in this study offer a set of tools for manipulating GA biosynthesis and for regulation of plant development that might gain enormous benefits for designing optimized plant species important for agriculture and horticulture. Our results demonstrate that, by overexpression of the CmGA7ox and CmGA3ox1, it becomes possible to increase GA levels and elevate plant development in Arabidopsis. With an opposite effect, overexpression of CmGA20ox1 and CmGA2ox1 in Arabidopsis decreases GA levels, resulting in severe dwarfed phenotypes. Moreover, our results demonstrate the usefulness of overexpressing CmGA20ox1 under the control of a strong promoter cassette and thus offer an attractive alternative strategy for reducing GA content and modulating plant development. GA 20-oxidation steps have been shown to limit production of bioactive GAs with associated GA phenotypes (Huang et al., 1998; Coles et al., 1999; Carrera et al., 2000; Eriksson et al., 2000; Vidal et al., 2001; Biemelt et al., 2004). Our results indicate that, in addition, GA 7-oxidase and GA 3-oxidase also catalyze rate-limiting steps of the GA biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. It is possible that local modulation of GA levels in the overexpressor lines account for the differences in plant development. As reviewed by Sponsel and Hedden (2004), expression studies on rice genes involved in GA biosynthesis and signaling suggest that bioactive GAs are produced close to or at their site of action. Further studies are necessary to understand the impact of the sites of GA biosynthesis, perception, and signaling as well as cross talk with other plant hormones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Columbia was used in all experiments. Seeds were sown on soil and stratified at 4°C for 2 to 3 d before transfer to a growth chamber under long-day conditions: 16-h light (approximately 120 μmol m−2 s−1) and 8-h dark. The temperature was kept at 22°C during the light and 20°C during the dark periods, respectively. For plate growth assays, seeds were sterilized and plated on 0.8% plant agar in 0.5× Murashige and Skoog medium (Duchefa) containing, when appropriate, 50 μg mL−1 kanamycin and 10−6 m GA3. The seeds were stratified and grown as above and transferred to soil after 2 to 4 weeks. For RT-PCR analysis, the rosette leaves of 8-week-old plants (for wild-type, CmGA7ox, and CmGA3-ox1 transgenic lines) or the rosette leaves of 9-week-old plants (for CmGA20ox1 and CmGA2ox1 transgenic lines) were collected and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. For GA quantification, the aerial part of 7-week-old wild-type and transgenic plants was harvested and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen.

Plasmid Constructs and Plant Transformation

To enhance the CmGA20ox1 expression, a construct containing a strong promoter cassette and a translational enhancer (E12-35-Ω) was used as described by Mitsuhara et al. (1996) and Niki et al. (2001). The constructs for expression of S or AS copies of CmGA7ox, CmGA3ox1, or CmGA2ox1 were similar to the one used for expressing CmGA20ox1, but the S or AS copies of the different cDNAs were cloned at a unique EcoRI site of a multicloning site of the vector modified from pBE2113, as described by Mitsuhara et al. (1996), replacing CmGA20ox1.

The constructs carrying the S or AS copies of the different pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) GA oxidases were introduced in Arabidopsis wild-type plants via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation using the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). To identify transgenic plants, seeds from the dipped plants were grown on Murashige and Skoog medium plates supplemented with 50 μg mL−1 kanamycin. The seeds of the kanamycin-resistant plants were further analyzed for kanamycin resistance and segregation. T2 seedlings of CmGA20ox1 and CmGA2ox1 S lines showed a segregation ratio of 3:1 only when GA3 was added to the Murashige and Skoog plates. Therefore, T2 and further generation seeds of S lines of CmGA20-ox1 and S and AS CmGA2ox1 lines were all germinated in the presence of 10−6 m GA3. A second set of wild-type plants was generated where the seeds were germinated in the presence of 10−6 m GA3 and used as a control in the experiments involving CmGA20ox1 and CmGA2ox1 lines. The presence of every transgene was checked by PCR in 10 of the T2 S lines and five of the T2 AS lines that showed a segregation ratio of 3:1. Specific pumpkin GA oxidase primers, identical to the ones described below for the RT-PCR experiments, and a vector-specific primer 5′-CTACAACTACATCTAGAGG-3′ were used, respectively, as reverse and forward primers in the PCR experiments. After scoring at T3, three homozygous S lines and two homozygous AS lines for every gene were taken to generate T4 homozygous plants used for phenotype, biochemical, and molecular characterization.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Transcript levels of CmGA7ox, CmGA20ox1, and CmGA3ox1 (previously named 2β,3β-hydroxylase) were quantified as described previously by Lange et al. (1997), except that 50 ng of total RNA were reverse transcribed using a RevertAidH Minus first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (MBI Fermentas). For quantification of CmGA2ox1, three specific oligonucleotides were synthesized based on its cDNA sequence: CmGA2ox1 F (5′-CTCTGCAGCATTCTACTCTGGGATTCC-3′), CmGA2ox1 R (5′-GGCCCACCGAAGTAGATCATTGAAACC-3′), and CmGA2ox1 RT (5′-AGATGTTCGAATCC-3′). For preparation of the internal RNA standard, pBluescript SK plasmid containing the CmGA2ox1 cDNA was digested with HindIII that released a 448-bp fragment. The vector was religated and used for RNA synthesis. The annealing temperature used for PCR was 60°C.

Quantification of Endogenous GAs

For quantitative determination of endogenous GAs, frozen plant tissue from the aerial part (2 g fresh weight) was spiked with 17,17-d2-GA standards (2 ng each; from Professor L. Mander, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) and pulverized under liquid nitrogen. Samples were extracted, purified, derivatized, and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring as described elsewhere (Lange et al., 2005).

Acknowledgments

We thank Anja Liebrandt for technical assistance.

1

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft priority program Molecular Analysis of Phytohormone Action (grant no. La880/4–3) and by a Ph.D. fellowship from the Egyptian government (to A.R.).

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Maria João Pimenta Lange (m.pimenta@tu-bs.de).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.105.073668.

References

  1. Achard P, Vriezen WH, van der Straeten D, Harberd NP (2003) Ethylene regulates Arabidopsis development via the modulation of DELLA protein growth repressor function. Plant Cell 15: 2816–2825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biemelt S, Tschiersch H, Sonnewald U (2004) Impact of altered gibberellin metabolism on biomass accumulation, lignin biosynthesis, and photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 135: 254–265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Busov VB, Meilan R, Pearce DW, Ma C, Rood SB, Strauss H (2003) Activation tagging of a dominant gibberellin catabolism gene (GA 2-oxidase) from poplar that regulates tree stature. Plant Physiol 132: 1283–1291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrera E, Bou J, García-Martinez JL, Prat S (2000) Changes in GA 20-oxidase gene expression strongly affect stem length, tuber induction and tuber yield of potato plants. Plant J 22: 247–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casimiro I, Beeckman T, Graham N, Bhalerao R, Zhang H, Casero P, Sandberg G, Bennet MJ (2003) Dissecting Arabidopsis lateral root development. Trends Pharmacol Sci 8: 165–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clough JP, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coles J, Phillips AL, Croker SJ, García-Lepe R, Lewis MJ, Hedden P (1999) Modification of gibberellin production and plant development in Arabidopsis by sense and antisense expression of gibberellin 20-oxidase genes. Plant J 17: 547–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cowling RJ, Kamiya Y, Seto H, Harberd NP (1998) Gibberellin dose-response regulation of GA4 gene transcript levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 117: 1195–1203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtis IS, Ward DA, Thomas SG, Phillips AL, Davey MR, Power JB, Lowe KC, Croker SJ, Lewis MJ, Magness SL, et al (2000) Induction of dwarfism in transgenic Solanum dulcamara by over-expression of a gibberellin 20-oxidase cDNA from pumpkin. Plant J 23: 329–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T (2000) Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nat Biotechnol 18: 784–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fleet CM, Sun TP (2005) A DELLAcate balance: the role of gibberellin in plant morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 77–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fleet CM, Yamaguchi S, Hanada A, Kawaide H, David CJ, Kamiya Y, Sun TP (2003) Overexpression of AtCPS and AtKS in Arabidopsis confers increased ent-kaurene production but no increase in bioactive gibberellins. Plant Physiol 132: 830–839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frisse A, Pimenta MJ, Lange T (2003) Expression studies of gibberellin oxidases in developing pumpkin seeds. Plant Physiol 131: 1220–1227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu X, Harberd P (2003) Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature 421: 740–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hedden P (1999) Regulation of gibberellin biosynthesis. In PJJ Hooykaas, MA Hell, KR Libbenga, eds, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plant Hormones. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 161–188
  16. Hedden P, Kamiya Y (1997) Gibberellin biosynthesis: enzymes, genes and their regulation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 431–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hedden P, Phillips AL (2000. a) Gibberellin metabolism: new insights revealed by the genes. Trends Plant Sci 5: 523–530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hedden P, Phillips AL (2000. b) Manipulation of hormone biosynthetic genes in transgenic plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11: 130–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hedden P, Proebsting WM (1999) Genetic analysis of gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 119: 365–370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang S, Raman AS, Ream JE, Fujiwara H, Cerny RE, Brown SM (1998) Overexpression of 20-oxidase confers a gibberellin overproduction phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 118: 773–781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Israelsson M, Mellerowicz E, Chono M, Gullberg J, Moritz T (2004) Cloning and overproduction of gibberellin 3-oxidase in hybrid aspen trees: effects on gibberellin homeostasis and development. Plant Physiol 135: 221–230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lange T (1994) Purification and partial amino-acid-sequence of gibberellin 20-oxidase from Curcubita maxima L. endosperm. Planta 195: 108–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lange T (1997) Cloning gibberellin dioxygenase genes from pumpkin endosperm by heterologous expression of enzyme activities in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 6553–6558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lange T (1998) Molecular biology of gibberellin synthesis. Planta 204: 409–419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lange T, Hedden P, Graebe JE (1994) Expression cloning of a gibberellin 20-oxidase, a multifunctional enzyme involved in gibberellin biosyntheses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8552–8556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lange T, Kappler J, Fischer A, Frisse A, Padeffke T, Schmidtke S, Pimenta Lange MJ (2005) Gibberellin biosynthesis in developing pumpkin seedlings. Plant Physiol 139: 213–223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lange T, Robatzek S, Frisse A (1997) Cloning and expression of gibberellin 2β,3β-hydroxylase cDNA from pumpkin endosperm. Plant Cell 9: 1459–1467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. MacMillan J, Ward DA, Phillips AL, Sánchez-Beltrán MJ, Gaskin P, Lange T, Hedden P (1997) Gibberellin biosynthesis from gibberellin A12-aldehyde in endosperm and embryos of Marah macrocarpus. Plant Physiol 113: 1369–1377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitsuhara I, Ugaki M, Hirochika H, Ohshima M, Murakami T, Gotoh Y, Katayose Y, Nakamura S, Honkura R, Nishimiya S, et al (1996) Efficient promoter cassettes for enhanced expression of foreign genes in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol 37: 49–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Susuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y, Tanji M, Sato M, Nazu S, Minobe Y (2002) Positional cloning of rice semidwarf gene, sd-1: rice “green revolution gene” encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 9: 11–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Niki T, Nishijima T, Nakayama M, Hisamatsu T, Oyama-Okubo N, Yamazaki H, Hedden P, Lange T, Mander LN, Koshioka M (2001) Production of dwarf lettuce by overexpressing a pumpkin gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Plant Physiol 126: 965–972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Olszewski N, Sun TP, Gubler F (2002) Gibberellin signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways. Plant Cell (Suppl) 14: S61–S80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F, et al (1999) “Green revolution” genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400: 256–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perazza D, Vachon G, Herzog M (1998) Gibberellins promote trichome formation by up-regulating GLABROUS1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 117: 375–383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Phillips AL (2004) Genetic and transgenic approaches to improving crop performance. In PJ Davies, ed, Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action! Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 582–609
  36. Richards DE, King KE, Ait-Ali T, Harberd NP (2001) How gibberellin regulates plant growth and development: a molecular genetic analysis of gibberellin signaling. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 67–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sakamoto T, Morinaka Y, Ishiyama K, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Kayano T, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M, Tanaka H (2003) Genetic manipulation of gibberellin metabolism in transgenic rice. Nat Biotechnol 21: 909–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Uegushi-Tanaka M, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, et al (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416: 701–702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schomburg FM, Bizzell CM, Lee DJ, Zeevaart JAD, Amasino RM (2003) Overexpression of a novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases decreases gibberellin levels and creates dwarf plants. Plant Cell 15: 151–163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Singh DP, Jermakow AM, Swain SA (2002) Gibberellins are required for seed development and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 1–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9043–9048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sponsel VM, Hedden P (2004) Gibberellin biosynthesis and inactivation. In PJ Davies, ed, Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action! Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 63–94
  43. Sun TP, Gubler F (2004) Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 197–223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Talon M, Koornneef M, Zeevaart JAD (1990) Endogenous gibberellins in Arabidopsis thaliana and possible steps blocked in the biosynthetic pathways of semidwarf ga4 and ga5 mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7983–7987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tanimoto E (1990) Gibberellin requirement for the normal growth of roots. In N Takahashi, BO Phinney, J MacMillan, eds, Gibberellins. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 229–240
  46. Thomas SG, Phillips AL, Hedden P (1999) Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidases, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 4698–4703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomas SG, Sun TP (2004) Update on gibberellin signaling: a tale of the tall and the short. Plant Physiol 135: 668–676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vidal AM, Gisbert C, Talón M, Primo-Millo E, López-Dias I, García-Martinez JL (2001) The ectopic overexpression of a citrus gibberellin 20-oxidase enhances the non-13-hydroxylation pathway of gibberellin biosynthesis and induces extremely elongated phenotype in tobacco. Physiol Plant 112: 251–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu YL, Li L, Gage DA, Zeevaart JAD (1999) Feedback regulation of GA5 expression and metabolic engineering of gibberellin levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 927–935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES