Abstract
Colossal permittivity (In,Nb) codoped TiO2 ceramics are promising for microelectronic applications but suffer from high low-frequency dielectric loss primarily due to leakage currents across grain boundaries. This work demonstrates that Zr4+ doping at Ti-sites in (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 effectively mitigates this issue. A series of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95‑xZr x O2 (x = 0–0.20) ceramics were synthesized via solid-state reaction. Zr4+ incorporation refines grain size from ∼56.1 μm (undoped) to ∼2.5 μm (x = 0.20) and promotes the precipitation of an insulating ZrTiO4 secondary phase at grain boundaries for compositions with x ≥ 0.10. These microstructural modifications synergistically enhance the grain boundary resistance, which peaks at 10.50 × 106 Ω·cm for the x = 0.10 composition, nearly an order of magnitude higher than the undoped ceramic. Consequently, the low-frequency dielectric loss is significantly reduced, with the x = 0.10 composition sintered at 1450 °C exhibiting a minimal loss tangent. Complex impedance analysis reveals the introduction of a new interfacial polarization associated with the ZrTiO4/INTO phase boundaries. XPS analysis confirms that Zr doping suppresses oxygen vacancy concentration without altering the Ti3+/Ti4+ ratio crucial for electron-pinned defect dipoles. The optimized composition (x = 0.10) also shows improved nonlinear coefficient (α = 2.8) and breakdown field (Eb = 530 V/cm), alongside stable low loss (tanδ < 0.05) over a broad temperature range at 1 kHz. This study presents a viable defect-engineering strategy utilizing Zr4+ doping to achieve low-loss colossal permittivity in (In,Nb) codoped TiO2-based ceramics for practical applications.


1. Introduction
Colossal permittivity (CP) materials are crucial for advancing next-generation microelectronics, including miniaturized capacitors, high-voltage filters, and energy-storage devices, due to their exceptional ability to store large amounts of electric charge in compact volumes. Among various CP candidates, (In,Nb) codoped TiO2 (INTO) ceramics have attracted considerable attention for their remarkably high permittivity (ε′, > 104), relatively low dielectric loss (tan δ, < 0.05 at 1 kHz), and good temperature stability. − However, a persistent challenge hindering their practical application is the typically high low-frequency dielectric loss, which is primarily governed by leakage currents across grain boundaries. Therefore, developing effective strategies to suppress this loss is imperative for realizing the full potential of INTO-based dielectrics in high-performance applications.
The origin of CP in INTO ceramics is widely understood to stem from the synergy of two mechanisms. At the atomic scale, the codoping of In3+ and Nb5+ into the TiO2 lattice induces the formation of complex defect clusters, such as [In3+-V O -Ti3+] and [Nb5+-Ti3+] associated with oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ ions. These defect clusters act as highly polarizable dipoles that can effectively localize free electrons, preventing long-range charge transport. Under an external electric field, the bound electrons within these defect dipoles can undergo short-range hopping, generating a large local polarization that contributes to the overall high dielectric permittivity. ,− Concurrently, an extrinsic internal barrier layer capacitor (IBLC) effect arises from the electrically heterogeneous microstructure, where semiconducting grains are separated by more insulating grain boundaries. ,− The resistance of these grain boundaries (Rgb) is a critical parameter that directly controls the low-frequency dielectric loss. Consequently, effective loss reduction strategies must focus on optimizing both grain and grain boundary properties. Grain refinement increases the density of grain boundary barriers, impeding long-range charge migration. − More directly, enhancing the intrinsic resistivity of the grain boundaries themselves is a powerful approach to suppress leakage currents and minimize energy dissipation. ,,−
Existing strategies to enhance grain boundary resistance in dielectric ceramics primarily encompass optimizing sintering parameters, introducing secondary insulating phases, and employing chemical doping to modify grain boundary compositions. Among these approaches, chemical doping has demonstrated significant efficacy in regulating grain boundary properties owing to its capacity to tailor defect structures and phase formations. − Specifically, Zr4+ doping demonstrates efficacy in modifying grain boundary characteristics across diverse titanate-based ceramics, leveraging its inherent chemical stability and tendency to form insulating titanium compounds. − With an ionic radius (0.80 Å) larger than that of Ti4+ (0.68 Å) and an equivalent high valence state, Zr4+ substitutes for Ti4+ sites to refine grain size while concurrently promoting the precipitation of secondary insulating phases such as ZrTiO4. −
In this work, we systematically investigate the effects of Zr4+ doping on the microstructure, defect chemistry, and dielectric properties of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 ceramics. A series of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95‑xZr x O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.20) compositions were synthesized via solid-state reaction. We demonstrate that Zr4+ doping effectively mitigates the low-frequency dielectric loss through a synergistic mechanism involving substantial grain refinement, the formation of insulating ZrTiO4 phase at grain boundaries for x ≥ 0.10, and the suppression of oxygen vacancy concentration. These modifications collectively lead to a dramatic increase in grain boundary resistance and a significant reduction in dielectric loss, while maintaining CP characteristics. The optimized composition exhibits excellent temperature stability, presenting a viable defect-engineering strategy for developing low-loss CP materials for capacitive applications.
2. Experimental Details
The (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95‑xZr x O2 (denoted as Zr-INTO, with x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20, corresponding to Zr05-INTO, Zr10-INTO, Zr15-INTO, and Zr20-INTO, respectively) ceramics were synthesized via a conventional solid-state reaction route. High-purity commercial powders of In2O3, Nb2O5, TiO2, and ZrO2 (99.99%, Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) were used as starting materials. Stoichiometric amounts of the raw powders were mixed and ball-milled in deionized water for 12 h at 120 rpm. The resultant slurry was dried and subsequently calcined at 1050 °C for 5 h in air. The calcined powder was subjected to a second ball-milling step for 12 h, followed by drying to obtain the final Zr-doped INTO powder. The powder was uniaxially pressed under 180 MPa into green pellets with dimensions of 12 mm in diameter and approximately 1 mm in thickness. The pellets were sintered in air at temperatures ranging from 1350 to 1500 °C for 2 h, with controlled heating and cooling rates of 10 °C/min and 20 °C/min, respectively. For comparison, undoped (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 (denoted as INTO) ceramics were prepared following identical procedures.
The bulk densities of the sintered ceramics were measured by the Archimedes method using deionized water as the immersion medium. Prior to microstructural observation, the ceramic surfaces were polished and then thermally etched in air at 1150 °C for 30 min. The microstructures of the powder precursors (after calcination and ball milling) and the sintered ceramics were examined using a JEOL JSM-7900F thermal field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). The crystal structures and phase compositions were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Beijing Purkinje XD-2 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The chemical states of elements were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250 XI spectrometer equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source. The XPS spectra were fitted using a combination of Gaussian–Lorentzian line shapes after Shirley background subtraction with the XPSPEAK software. For electrical measurements, silver electrodes were coated on both surfaces of the polished ceramics and fired at 650 °C for 30 min. The dielectric spectra and complex impedance were measured using an Agilent E4980A LCR meter under an applied voltage of 0.5 V, over a frequency range of 20 Hz to 2 MHz and a temperature range from room temperature to 250 °C. The current density-electric field (J-E) characteristics were evaluated using a Keithley 2410 source measurement unit. The nonlinear coefficient (α) was calculated from the formula α = log(J1/J2)/log(E1/E2), where E1 and E2 are the electric fields corresponding to current densities of J1 = 0.1 mA/cm2 and J2 = 1 mA/cm2, respectively. The breakdown field strength (Eb) was defined as the macroscopic average electric field at which the current density reached 1 mA/cm2.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure compares the room-temperature dielectric spectra of Zr10-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered from 1350 to 1500 °C. As shown in Figure (a1), the Zr10-INTO ceramics exhibit ε′ consistently above 103, with the low-frequency ε′ increasing progressively with sintering temperature, reaching approximately 3 × 104 at 1500 °C. However, this value is significantly lower than that of the INTO ceramic sintered at the same temperatures, as shown in Figure (b1). The dielectric loss spectra reveal distinct relaxation behaviors. For Zr10-INTO (Figure (a2)), two clear dielectric relaxations are observed, with one peak located in the 100 Hz-10 kHz range and the other above 1 MHz. The magnitude of the low-frequency tanδ shows a nonmonotonic dependence on sintering temperature, reaching a minimum for the sample sintered at 1450 °C. In contrast, the INTO ceramics (Figure (b2)) also exhibit two relaxations, one below 1 kHz and the other above 1 MHz, but with consistently high low-frequency loss (>0.1) across all temperatures, which increases with sintering temperature. A key observation is that Zr doping modifies the relaxation behavior. The low-frequency relaxation observed in INTO ceramics (below 1 kHz) is attributed to the electrode effect arising from a non-Ohmic contact between the sample and the electrodes. , In Zr10-INTO ceramics, the corresponding electrode relaxation shifts to frequencies below the measured range (<20 Hz), rendering it invisible. Concurrently, Zr doping introduces a new, distinct relaxation peak in the 100 Hz-10 kHz range for Zr10-INTO, which is not observed in INTO. These changes suggest that Zr4+ substitution alters the underlying defect structures and polarization mechanisms governing the low-frequency response.
1.

Sintering temperature-dependent dielectric spectra of (a) Zr10-INTO and (b) INTO ceramics sintered at 1350–1500 °C. (a1, b1) real permittivity (ε′) and (a2, b2) loss tangent (tanδ), respectively.
Figure presents the room-temperature dielectric spectra of all Zr-INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C. All compositions exhibit giant ε′, although the low-frequency ε′ decreases progressively with increasing Zr content x, from >104 at x = 0.05 to ∼103 at x = 0.20. For Zr05-INTO, a distinct low-frequency relaxation (analogous to that in the INTO ceramics) is evident in the tanδ spectrum. As the doping content increases to x ≥ 0.10, this relaxation shifts to frequencies below the measured range, becoming no longer discernible within the measured frequency range. Concurrently, a new relaxation peak emerges in the 100 Hz-10 kHz range for x ≥ 0.10. The low-frequency tanδ exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on the Zr content, initially decreasing to a minimum for the x = 0.10 composition and then increasing for x = 0.15 and 0.20.
2.

Zr content-dependent dielectric spectra of all Zr-INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C. (a) ε′ and (b) tanδ, respectively.
The phase composition and structural evolution of the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C were investigated by XRD. Figure provides the XRD patterns. For INTO and Zr05-INTO, all diffraction peaks correspond to the tetragonal rutile TiO2 phase (space group P42/mnm), indicating phase purity. For the Zr-INTO with higher Zr content (x ≥ 0.10), additional peaks belonging to the orthorhombic ZrTiO4 phase emerge, with intensity increasing with the Zr content. Rietveld refinement was performed to determine the lattice parameters. Figure describes the Rietveld refinement profiles, and the refined parameters are summarized in Table . As Zr content increases from 0 to 0.15, both a and c parameters expand continuously, confirming the substitution of smaller Ti4+ (0.68 Å) by larger Zr4+ (0.80 Å) in the rutile lattice. At x = 0.20, a slight lattice contraction occurs, attributed to the pronounced precipitation of ZrTiO4 phase which consumes Zr and Ti from the solid solution, likely introducing lattice strain. Quantitative phase analysis reveals ZrTiO4 mass fractions of ∼ 6.2, 16.2, and 26.0 wt % for x = 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20, respectively. Based on this, the solid solubility limit of Zr in the (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 matrix under these conditions is estimated to be ∼ 7–8 mol %. In analogous codoped TiO2 ceramics, secondary phases that form upon exceeding the dopant solubility limit have been consistently demonstrated to be predominantly located at grain boundaries. ,, Therefore, the ZrTiO4 phase in the Zr-INTO ceramics is also inferred to primarily resides at the grain boundaries.
3.

XRD patterns of the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C.
4.

Rietveld refinement of XRD data for the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C.
1. Refined Lattice Parameters of the Zr-INTO and INTO Ceramics Sintered at 1450 °C.
| Sample |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice parameter (Å) | x = 0.05 | x = 0.10 | x = 0.15 | x = 0.20 | x = 0 |
| a = b | 4.603 | 4.603 | 4.611 | 4.601 | 4.598 |
| c | 2.974 | 2.977 | 2.986 | 2.982 | 2.966 |
Figure gives the SEM image of the calcined and ball-milled powder for the representative Zr15-INTO, consisting of well-dispersed submicron particles (0.2–1 μm). Figure reveals SEM images of thermally etched surfaces for all Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C, with corresponding grain size distribution histograms as insets. The microstructure is significantly influenced by Zr content. The INTO ceramic exhibits relatively uniform, oversized grains with an average size of ∼56.1 μm. In contrast, all Zr-INTO ceramics show broader grain size distributions and progressive grain refinement. The average grain size decreases to ∼9.7, 7.1, 3.5, and 2.5 μm for x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20, respectively, indicating effective inhibition of grain growth by Zr doping. For the ceramics with x = 0.15 and 0.20, granular or rod-like features with lengths ranging from several hundred nanometers to 2 μm are observed between the grains. To identify the composition of these features, EDS point analysis was performed on the x = 0.15 ceramic. As shown in Figure , these features contain a high Zr content. Combined with the XRD results, these features are identified as the ZrTiO4 phase. The grain refinement induced by Zr doping in the Zr-INTO ceramics originates from two synergistic mechanisms: at lower Zr concentrations, the solute drag effect due to lattice strain from Zr4+ substitution impedes grain boundary migration; for x ≥ 0.10, the Zener pinning effect by insulating ZrTiO4 particles precipitated at grain boundaries further suppresses grain coarsening. Furthermore, porosity is observed to increase with higher Zr doping levels. As summarized in Table , while the theoretical density (calculated from refined lattice parameters, neglecting secondary phases) increases with x, the measured bulk density shows a decreasing trend, consistent with the increased porosity observed via SEM. This increase in porosity is caused by the suppression of grain growth through Zr doping, which leads to the formation of numerous pores between grains.
5.

SEM image of the Zr10-INTO powder after calcination and ball milling.
6.

SEM image of thermal etching the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C. (a) Zr05-INTO, (b) Zr10-INTO, (c) Zr15-INTO, (d) Zr20-INTO, and (e) INTO, respectively. The inset shows the grain size distribution.
7.

EDS point of the Zr15-INTO ceramic sintered at 1450 °C.
2. Densities of the Zr-INTO and INTO Ceramics Sintered at 1450 °C.
| Sample | Density (g/cm3) | Theoretical density (g/cm3) | Relative theoretical density (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| x = 0.05 | 4.231 | 4.472 | 94.6 |
| x = 0.10 | 4.220 | 4.582 | 92.1 |
| x = 0.15 | 4.167 | 4.666 | 89.3 |
| x = 0.20 | 4.089 | 4.805 | 85.1 |
| x = 0 | 4.170 | 4.380 | 95.2 |
The electrical heterogeneity of codoped TiO2 ceramics is typically modeled using an equivalent circuit comprising series-connected RC units, representing contributions from grains, grain boundaries, and other interfaces. , To comprehensively understand the impact of Zr doping, complex impedance spectra for all Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C were analyzed, as displayed in Figure . Equivalent circuit models were tailored based on the discernible semicircular arcs within the measured frequency range. For INTO and Zr05-INTO, only one dominant arc is observed, which is modeled by a single parallel RgbCgb element in series with a grain resistance R g, the latter indicated by the nonzero intercept on the Z′ axis in the high-frequency region (inset, Figure a). In contrast, the Zr-INTO ceramics with higher Zr content (x ≥ 0.10) exhibit two clear arcs. The low-frequency arc corresponds to the grain boundary response, while a new intermediate-frequency arc emerges. This new arc is associated with the distinct dielectric relaxation peak below 10 kHz observed in the loss spectra, necessitating an additional parallel R x C x element in the equivalent circuit (inset, Figure b). The high-frequency response of the grains (Rgb) is again indicated by the nonzero intercept on the Z′ axis. The fitted resistance parameters for all ceramics are summarized in Table . Zr doping markedly alters the electrical landscape. R g increases monotonically with Zr content, from 43.29 Ω·cm (INTO) to 450.8 Ω·cm (Zr20-INTO). More dramatically, Rgb first surges to a maximum of 10.50 × 106 Ω·cm for Zr10-INTO, which is nearly an order of magnitude higher than that of the undoped ceramic, and then decrease to 2.74 × 106 Ω·cm for Zr20-INTO. The newly introduced resistance R x also increases significantly with Zr content, reaching 45.92 × 105 Ω·cm for Zr20-INTO. To further deconvolute the electrical contributions and investigate their thermal activation behaviors, temperature-dependent impedance spectroscopy was performed on Zr10-INTO ceramic, as presented in Figure . Notably, the arc corresponding to the R x C x element became indistinguishable at temperatures above 60 °C. The fitted R g, R x , and Rgb values (Table ) all decrease with increasing temperature, confirming their thermally activated conduction nature. The activation energies (E a) for these processes, extracted from Arrhenius plots of conductivity, are approximately 0.021, 0.139, and 0.59 eV for R g, R x , and Rgb, respectively. The very low E a for R g (∼0.02 eV) is characteristic of electron hopping between Ti3+ and Ti4+ within the semiconducting grains. The intermediate E a for R x suggests a polarization process related to the ZrTiO4/Zr-INTO phase boundaries, possibly involving trapped charge carriers at these interfaces. The highest E a for Rgb is consistent with conduction across grain boundary barriers, often associated with oxygen vacancy migration or emission/capture at deep trap states. These distinct activation energies provide strong, property-based evidence for the separation of electrical components. They confirm that the high-frequency relaxation (>1 MHz) is attributed to interfacial polarization at the grain/grain-boundary interfaces, while the new intermediate-frequency peak (<10 kHz) is associated with polarization at the ZrTiO4/INTO phase boundaries.
8.

Complex impedance spectra and equivalent circuit of the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C.
3. Fitted Resistance Parameters of the Zr-INTO and INTO Ceramics Sintered at 1450 °C.
| Sample |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x = 0.00 | x = 0.05 | x = 0.10 | x = 0.15 | x = 0.20 | |
| R g /Ω·cm | 43.29 | 48.53 | 71.5 | 262.6 | 450.8 |
| R x /105 Ω·cm | 6.86 | 17.45 | 45.92 | ||
| R gb /106 Ω·cm | 1.38 | 3.94 | 10.50 | 7.46 | 2.74 |
9.

(a, b) Temperature-dependent complex impedance spectra and (c) Arrhenius plot of resistivity for the Zr10-INTO ceramic sintered at 1450 °C.
4. Temperature-Dependent Fitted Resistance Parameters of the Zr10-INTO Ceramics Sintered at 1450 °C.
| Temperature/°C |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 60 | 100 | |
| R g /Ω·cm | 71.5 | 59.4 | 50.7 |
| R x /105 Ω·cm | 6.86 | 3.93 | |
| R gb /106 Ω·cm | 10.50 | 0.97 | 0.11 |
To elucidate the origin of the colossal permittivity, XPS was employed to investigate the chemical states. Figure depicts the results for the Zr10-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C. For Zr10-INTO, the Zr 3d spectrum exhibits characteristic doublet peaks at binding energies of 181.8 eV (3d5/2) and 184.2 eV (3d3/2), confirming the exclusive presence of Zr4+. Parallel analyses confirmed that In and Nb maintain +3 and +5 oxidation states (not described in figures), respectively, in both compositions. Detailed deconvolution of the Ti 2p spectrum reveals the coexistence of Ti4+ and Ti3+ states. Quantitative analysis shows the Ti3+ concentration is ∼5.7% of the total titanium content in the Zr10-INTO ceramic, a value that exhibits negligible variation from the 5.5% Ti3+ concentration observed in the undoped counterpart. This remarkable consistency suggests that Zr incorporation does not significantly alter the distribution of titanium valence states in INTO ceramics. Analysis of the O 1s spectrum provides crucial insight into the oxygen defect chemistry. Spectral fitting reveals a substantial reduction in oxygen vacancy concentration from 25.1% in the undoped ceramic to 20.9% in the Zr10-INTO ceramic, demonstrating that Zr incorporation significantly suppresses oxygen vacancies, likely due to lattice expansion raising their formation energy.
10.

XPS spectra of the (a) Zr10-INTO and (b) INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C.
The integration of impedance and XPS results clarifies the mechanisms behind the dielectric evolution. The increase in R g with Zr content is attributed to the dilution of the Ti3+/Ti4+ conductive network as Zr4+ occupies Ti sites, reducing carrier concentration and mobility. The initial surge in Rgb is ascribed to the synergistic effect of increased grain boundary density from grain refinement and, more importantly, the blocking effect of precipitated insulating ZrTiO4 phases at the boundaries. While the decrease in Rgb for x ≥ 0.15 correlates with the increased porosity observed via SEM, which may disrupt the continuity of the insulating boundary network. The preserved Ti3+ concentration maintains the source of localized dipole polarizability essential for intrinsic high permittivity. However, the overall decrease in permittivity with increasing Zr content stems from the attenuated contributions of both primary polarization mechanisms. For the EPDD mechanism, the reduced spatial density of Ti3+ sites and the lower oxygen vacancy concentration diminish the effective dipole density. For the IBLC effect, the precipitation of the insulating ZrTiO4 secondary phase replaces part of the semiconducting Zr-INTO matrix, reducing the effective area for interfacial polarization at the primary Zr-INTO/grain boundary interfaces. Although the ZrTiO4/Zr-INTO interface introduces a new dielectric relaxation, its contribution to the total static permittivity is less significant compared to the attenuation of the dominant IBLC effect. Concurrently, increased porosity between grains further reduces the overall permittivity. The reduction in low-frequency loss is explained by the shift of the electrode/sample interface relaxation to lower frequencies, caused by the drastically increased bulk resistivity (particularly Rgb), which limits charge carrier flux to the interface and prolongs the relaxation time (τ, where f max ∝ 1/τ). The nonmonotonic behavior of the low-frequency loss at high Zr contents (x ≥ 0.15) correlates directly with the nonmonotonic trend of Rgb.
The nonlinear J-E characteristics of all Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C are presented in Figure . All ceramics exhibit distinct non-Ohmic behavior, characteristic of an IBLC structure. Both α and Eb are summarized in Table . These parameters exhibit a nonmonotonic dependence on Zr content, with their optimal values achieved at x = 0.10 (α = 2.8, Eb = 530 V/cm). This enhancement is directly correlated with the microstructural and electrical evolution. For Zr10-INTO, grain refinement increases the volumetric grain boundary area. These boundaries, along with the precipitated ZrTiO4 phases, act as additional barriers that prolong the breakdown path, elevating Eb. Simultaneously, the peak Rgb effectively suppresses leakage currents and strengthens the Schottky-type barriers, leading to a higher α. The degradation of α and Eb at x ≥ 0.15 coincides with the reduction in Rgb and pronounced increase in porosity. Excessive porosity disrupts the continuity of grain boundary networks, creating localized current pathways and electric field concentrations that prematurely trigger breakdown, while the decline in Rgb weakens the barrier effect.
11.

Nonlinear J-E characteristics of the Zr-INTO and INTO ceramics sintered at 1450 °C.
5. Nonlinear Coefficient (α) and Breakdown Electric Field (Eb) of the Zr-INTO and INTO Ceramics Sintered at 1450 °C.
| Sample | α | Eb (V/cm) |
|---|---|---|
| x = 0.05 | 2.1 | 270 |
| x = 0.10 | 2.2 | 300 |
| x = 0.15 | 2.8 | 530 |
| x = 0.20 | 2.5 | 370 |
| x = 0 | 2.5 | 350 |
To comprehensively assess the dielectric performance of the Zr10-INTO ceramic sintered at 1450 °C, its temperature-dependent behavior was evaluated. Figure describes the temperature-dependent dielectric spectra for this composition. At room temperature, two distinct dielectric relaxations are observed. As the temperature increases, a third relaxation emerges below 1 kHz. All three relaxation peaks shift systematically toward higher frequencies with increasing temperature, confirming the thermally activated nature of the underlying charge transport processes. Figure details the thermal evolution of ε′ and tanδ at selected frequencies. A significant increase in ε′ is observed with rising temperature. This enhancement is attributed to increased charge carrier mobility and intensified contributions from interfacial polarization, particularly associated with the low-frequency relaxation visible in Figure . As the measurement frequency increases, the characteristic temperatures corresponding to these relaxations shift to higher values, providing further evidence of their thermally activated character. Notably, the tanδ exhibits excellent stability within specific temperature windows at lower frequencies. At 100 Hz, tan δ remains below 0.05 from below room temperature up to 115 °C. At 1 kHz, tan δ is maintained below 0.05 across a wide temperature range from 40 to 155 °C. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of Zr doping in preserving low dielectric loss under elevated temperature conditions, a crucial property for practical capacitor applications where operational heating is inevitable.
12.

Temperature-dependent dielectric spectra of the Zr10-INTO ceramic sintered at 1450 °C. (a) ε′ and (b) tanδ, respectively.
13.

Thermal evolution of (a) ε′ and (b) tanδ at selected frequencies for the Zr10-INTO ceramic sintered at 1450 °C.
4. Conclusion
In this work, we demonstrate that Zr4+ doping in (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 ceramics achieves a synergistic combination of grain refinement and the formation of an insulating ZrTiO4 secondary phase at grain boundaries, which dramatically enhances the grain boundary resistance. The optimized composition, x = 0.10 sintered at 1450 °C, exhibits a relative low low-frequency dielectric loss (tanδ < 0.05 at 1 kHz) while maintaining a colossal permittivity (ε′ > 104). This well performance is attributed to the optimal balance among grain size, secondary phase content, and microstructural densification, which collectively maximize Rgb to 10.50 × 106 Ω·cm. Furthermore, XPS analysis confirms that Zr doping suppresses oxygen vacancy concentration without compromising the Ti3+/Ti4+ ratio essential for electron-pinned defect dipoles. This work provides a viable defect-engineering strategy for achieving low-loss colossal permittivity in (In,Nb) codoped TiO2-based ceramics, highlighting the critical role of grain boundary engineering in optimizing the performance of giant dielectric materials for practical capacitive applications.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Nos. ZR2026MS0826 and ZR2023MF081), Shandong Provincial Outstanding Young Innovation Team in Higher Education Institutions (No. 2023KJ286) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12204355).
Data will be made available on request.
Panpan Xu: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft. Xiaole Qiu: Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision. Bing Sun: Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision. Li Sun: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision. Ensi Cao: Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision. Wentao Hao: Conceptualization, Resources, Funding Acquisition, Writing - Review and Editing.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Hu W., Liu Y., Withers R. L., Frankcombe T. J., Noren L., Snashall A., Kitchin M., Smith P., Gong B., Chen H., Schiemer J., Brink F., Wong-Leung J.. Electron-pinned defect-dipoles for high-performance colossal permittivity materials. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:821–826. doi: 10.1038/nmat3691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homes C. C., Vogt T.. Doping for superior dielectrics. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:782–783. doi: 10.1038/nmat3744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Li F., Zhuang Y., Jin L., Wang L., Wei X., Xu Z., Zhang S.. Microstructure and dielectric properties of (Nb + In) co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;116(7):074105. doi: 10.1063/1.4893316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nachaithong T., Thongbai P., Maensiri S.. Colossal permittivity in (In1/2Nb1/2)xTi1‑xO2 ceramics prepared by a glycine nitrate process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017;37:655–660. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nachaithong T., Kidkhunthod P., Thongbai P., Maensiri S.. Surface barrier layer effect in (In + Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics: an alternative route to design low dielectric loss. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017;100:1452–1459. doi: 10.1111/jace.14688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Wu J., Xiao D., Zhu J., Wu W.. Colossal permittivity in titanium dioxide ceramics modified by tantalum and trivalent elements. Acta Mater. 2016;103:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mandal S., Pal S., Kundu A. K., Menon K. S. R., Hazarika A., Rioult M., Belkhou R.. Direct view at colossal permittivity in donor-acceptor (Nb, In) co-doped rutile TiO2 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;109:092906. doi: 10.1063/1.4962219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L., Liu X., Zhang M., Bi X., Ma Z., Li J., Chen J., Sun X.. Colossal dielectric behavior of (Nb, Ga) co-doped TiO2 single crystal. J. Alloys Compd. 2022;921:166053. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y. Q., Zhao X., Zhang J. L., Su W. B., Liu J.. Huge low-frequency dielectric response of (Nb,In)-doped TiO2 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;107:242904. doi: 10.1063/1.4938124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J. L., Li F., Li C., Yang G., Xu Z., Zhang S. J.. Evidences of grain boundary capacitance effect on the colossal dielectric permittivity in (Nb+In) co-doped TiO2 ceramics. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8295. doi: 10.1038/srep08295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng X., Li Z., Wu J.. Colossal permittivity in ceramics of TiO2 co-doped with niobium and trivalent cation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:5805–5810. doi: 10.1039/C5TA00141B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng H., Shang B., Wang X., Peng Z., Chao X., Liang P., Yang Z.. Origin of giant permittivity in Ta, Al co-doped TiO2: surface layer and internal barrier capacitance layer effects. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:5768–5773. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang M., Li L., Zhang K., Xie J.. Colossal permittivity Ti1‑x(Eu0.5Ta0.5)xO2 ceramics with excellent thermal stability. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020;2:1700–1708. doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.0c00240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thongyong N., Tuichai W., Chanlek N., Thongbai P.. Effect of Zn2+ and Nb5+ co-doping ions on giant dielectric properties of rutile-TiO2 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2017;43:15466–15471. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Zhao C., Wu B., Wu J.. Reduced dielectric loss in new colossal permittivity (Pr, Nb)TiO2 ceramics by suppressing adverse effects of secondary phases. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:21814–21821. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03304H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li T., Si R., Wang J., Wang S., Sun J., Wang C.. Microstructure, colossal permittivity, and humidity sensitivity of (Na, Nb) co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:6688–6696. doi: 10.1111/jace.16517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z., Li L., Wang W., Lu T.. Colossal permittivity and ultralow dielectric loss in (Nd0.5Ta0.5)xTi1‑xO2 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:17318–17324. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao C., Li Z., Wu J.. Role of trivalent acceptors and pentavalent donors in colossal permittivity of titanium dioxide ceramics. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019;7:4235–4243. doi: 10.1039/C9TC00578A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y., Liu P., Wu W., Zhou Q.. High-performance colossal permittivity for textured (Al+Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics sintered in nitrogen atmosphere. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021;41:4146–4152. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tse M.-Y., Tsang M.-K., Wong Y.-T., Chan Y.-L., Hao J.. Simultaneous observation of up/down conversion photoluminescence and colossal permittivity properties in (Er+Nb) co-doped TiO2 materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;109:042903. doi: 10.1063/1.4959829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao C., Wu J.. Effects of secondary phases on the high-performance colossal permittivity in titanium dioxide ceramics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:3680–3688. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b18356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan J., Chen Y., Long Z., He G., Hu Z.. Grain-boundary engineering inducing thermal stability, low dielectric loss and high energy storage in Ta+Ho co-doped TiO2 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022;48:21543–21551. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Chen H., Nian W., Fan J., Li Y., Wang X., Ma X.. Grain boundary effect on dielectric properties of (Nd0.5Nb0.5)xTi1‑xO2 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;785:875–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hao W., Xu P., Sun L., Cao E.. Reduce the low-frequency dielectric losses of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 ceramics by increasing grain boundary density and resistance. Ceram. Int. 2024;50:8845–8852. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu P., Guo C., Hao W., Sun L., Cao E.. Enhancing grain boundary contributions to improve the dielectric properties of (In0.5Nb0.5)0.05Ti0.95O2 ceramics by Bi aided sintering. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2024;187:111881. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.111881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sawangwan N., Barrel J., MacKenzie K., Tunkasiri T.. The effect of Zr content on electrical properties of Ba(Ti1‑xZrx)O3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2008;90:723–727. doi: 10.1007/s00339-007-4342-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jesurani S., Kanagesan S., Hashim M., Ismail I.. Dielectric roperties of Zr doped CaCu3Ti4O12 synthesized by sol-gel route. J. Alloys Compd. 2013;551:456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Issmaeli Y. E., Lahrichi A., Madila E. E. N., Lamcharfi T.-d., Abdi F., Duong A.. Novel dielectric response in B-site zirconium-doped CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics: a structural, optical and electrical study. Solid State Sci. 2022;134:107050. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2022.107050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang C., Tse M. Y., Wei X., Hao J.. Colossal permittivity of (Mg + Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics with low dielectric loss. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:5170–5175. doi: 10.1039/C7TC01020F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Zeng Y., Fang Y.. et al. Synthesis of (La + Nb) co-doped TiO2 rutile nanoparticles and dielectric properties of their derived ceramics composed of submicron-sized grains. Ceram. Int. 2021;47:8850. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Lu T., Zhang N., Li J., Cai Z.. The effect of segregation structure on the colossal permittivity properties of (La0.5Nb0.5)xTi1‑xO2 ceramics. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018;6:2283–2294. doi: 10.1039/C7TC05277D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thanamoon N., Thongyong N., Sreejivungsa K., Chanlek N., Thongbai P.. Enhanced humidity-sensing performance of (Zr4+/Sb5+)-codoped TiO2 ceramics with giant dielectric properties. J. Adv. Ceram. 2025;14:9221005. doi: 10.26599/JAC.2024.9221005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tuichai W., Danwittayakul S., Chanlek N., Srepusharawoot P., Thongbai P., Maensiri S.. Origin(s) of the apparent colossal permittivity in (In1/2Nb1/2)xTi1‑xO2: clarification on the strongly induced Maxwell-Wagner polarization relaxation by DC bias. RSC Adv. 2017;7:95–105. doi: 10.1039/C6RA26728A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mingmuang Y., Chanlek N., Takesada M., Harnchana V., Jarernboon W., Moontragoon P., Srepusharawoot P., Swatsitang E., Thongbai P.. Mechanisms of enhanced performance in Zr4+/Ta5+ codoped rutile-TiO2 ceramics via broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:23406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73732-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Chen H., Nian W., Fan J., Li Y., Wang X.. Bismuth oxide modified europium and niobium co-doped titanium dioxide ceramics: colossal permittivity and low dielectric loss design. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;777:317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X. W., Liang B. K., Zheng Y. P., Li S. N., Liang Y. F., Sun Y. Q., Li Y. Y., Shi Y. C., Zhang B. H., Shang S. Y., Shang J., Hu Y. C., Yin S. Q.. Colossal dielectric properties in (TaxSm1‑x)0.04Ti0.96O2 . Physica B. 2020;598:412426. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xia Y., Mou J., Deng G., Wan S., Tieu K., Zhu H., Xue Q.. Sintered ZrO2-TiO2 ceramic composite and its mechanical appraisal. Ceram. Int. 2020;46:775–785. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nes E., Ryum N., Hunderi O.. On the Zener drag. Acta Metall. 1985;33:11–22. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nachaithong T., Tuichai W., Moontragoon P., Chanlek N., Thongbai P.. Giant dielectric permittivity and dielectric relaxation behaviour in (Fe1/2Nb1/2)xTi1‑xO2 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:S186–S188. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
