Skip to main content
Parasites & Vectors logoLink to Parasites & Vectors
. 2026 Jul 4;19:414. doi: 10.1186/s13071-026-07553-4

Trouble from the tiger: first detection of dengue virus in Aedes albopictus in Australia during a 2024 dengue outbreak on Masig Island

Mutizwa Odwell Muzari 1,#, Melissa C Graham 2,#, Gerhard Ehlers 1, Rodney Bellwood 1, Joseph Davis 1, Dunstan Peniyamina 3, Gregor J Devine 2, Brian J Johnson 2,✉
PMCID: PMC13613601  PMID: 42401942

Abstract

Background

Dengue is not endemic in Australia and outbreaks occur occasionally after viraemic travellers visit parts of Queensland where dengue vectors are prevalent. Prior to 2016, Aedes aegypti was the primary vector of dengue in Australia. However, several dengue outbreaks have occurred more recently on islands in the Torres Strait region where Ae. aegypti has been displaced by Aedes albopictus following its first detection in the islands in 2005.

Methods

In November 2024, adult female Ae. albopictus were collected during a dengue outbreak on Masig Island where Ae. aegypti is now absent after displacement by Ae. albopictus. Collected mosquitoes were pooled and screened for the presence of dengue virus by qRT-PCR and direct RNA sequencing.

Results

Dengue virus RNA was detected by qRT-PCR in 9 of 12 mosquito pools. RNA sequencing of three positive pools confirmed the virus as belonging to dengue serotype 3 (DENV-3), consistent with the clinical serotype identified during the 2024 outbreak. Sequencing further detected four insect-specific viruses, including Bio Sioux River virus, reported in Australia for the first time.

Conclusions

These results represent the first detection and whole genome sequencing of dengue virus in Ae. albopictus collected in Australia. The detection of DENV-3 RNA in Ae. albopictus during a concurrent outbreak of the same serotype in the absence of Ae. aegypti supports the ability of Ae. albopictus to drive independent dengue outbreaks. The findings confirm the risk of dengue outbreaks in mainland Australia if Ae. albopictus were to invade and expand beyond its current distribution in the Torres Strait.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 13071_2026_7553_Figa_HTML.webp

Keywords: Aedes albopictus, Dengue virus, DENV3, Australia, Aedes aegypti

Background

Dengue has emerged as the most important viral mosquito-borne disease globally with an estimated 390 million human infections per year worldwide. Dengue is caused by dengue virus (DENV), which has four different serotypes (DENV-1 to DENV-4), each of which are further subdivided into distinct genotypes [1, 2]. In Australia, dengue outbreaks have occurred frequently in parts of north Queensland, including Townsville, Cairns, and the Torres Strait islands, since the 1930s [3, 4] and occasionally in parts of central Queensland including Gladstone and Rockhampton [5]. These are areas where the vector, Aedes aegypti, has generally been abundant [3], however, Australia has no endemic transmission of dengue and outbreaks have normally been initiated by viraemic travellers returning from overseas [4–6]. Local transmission of dengue in parts of Northern Queensland has been ameliorated due to the successful Ae. aegypti Wolbachia-release strategy [7]. However, the arrival of Aedes albopictus on the mainland could reverse these gains and renew the threat of large dengue outbreaks and the possibility of dengue becoming endemic in Australia.

In 2005, established populations of Ae. albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito), a competent vector of dengue, chikungunya, and several other arboviral diseases [8], were detected for the first time on islands in the Torres Strait region of Australia [9]. An eradication campaign was rapidly established; although complete eradication was not achieved, the program successfully contained Ae. albopictus to the Torres Strait islands, preventing its establishment on the Australian mainland [10]. Since its detection, Ae. albopictus has rapidly spread to additional islands and has displaced Ae. aegypti on most islands in the Torres Strait [11].

From 2016, dengue outbreaks have occurred on some of the Torres Strait islands where Ae. aegypti has disappeared and Ae. albopictus has been the obvious suspect in local transmission [12, 13]. Despite extensive vector surveillance during these outbreaks, there had been no screening for presence of DENV in locally collected mosquitoes. This changed in November 2024, when field-collected Ae. albopictus females were screened and found to be positive for DENV-3 RNA during a DENV-3 outbreak on Masig Island (Fig. 1), where Ae. aegypti has been absent in surveys conducted in 2005, 2016, 2021 [9, 11, 14], and 2024 (Queensland Health, unpublished data).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The Torres Strait region and aerial view of Masig Island (inset), showing the small community surrounded by forested areas suitable for high Aedes albopictus populations

Here, we describe the field and laboratory investigations that led to the first confirmed detection of DENV-3 RNA in Australian Ae. albopictus, undertaken as part of the coordinated public health response to the 2024 Masig Island outbreak, and discusses the implications of this finding for future dengue outbreak risks in the Torres Strait and mainland Australia.

Methods

Study site and mosquito collection

The Torres Strait region is the northernmost part of Queensland, Australia, stretching across the Arafura Sea up to the border with Papua New Guinea and consists of at least 100 islands of which 17 are inhabited [9]. Masig Island (also known as Yorke Island) is located among the islands in the central part of the Torres Strait (Fig. 1). It has ca. 270 residents in a community surrounded mostly by dense vegetation which harbours high populations of Ae. albopictus [14]. There have been no detections of Ae. aegypti on Masig Island in recent years [11, 14]. In November 2024, a dengue outbreak was declared on the island, eventually resulting in seven confirmed cases of DENV-3, and one probable case [13]. Local transmission ceased within 2 weeks due to intervention with harbourage spraying targeting Ae. albopictus habitat [15].

Prior to commencement of harbourage spraying, the state health vector control team collected adult mosquitoes using the sweep-net method in forested areas on the fringes of the community and adjacent to residential addresses of some of the positive cases. Mosquitoes were identified using morphological keys and preserved in ethanol for storage and transport.

Dengue virus screening

Forty Ae. albopictus females were collected from Masig Island during surveillance efforts. An additional 32 male Ae. albopictus were also collected but these were not screened for the presence of virus. Collected female mosquitoes were divided into 12 pools of no more than six mosquitoes per pool. Pools were then homogenized (Beadbeater, Biospec Products Inc.) in 300 μl of DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo Research) in a 2 ml microcentrifuge tube. Total RNA was subsequently extracted from the homogenate using Quick-DNA/RNA Pathogen MagBead (Zymo Research), following the manufacturer’s protocol including Proteinase K and DNAase treatment and eluted in 50 μl. Pools were then screened for the presence of DENV by qRT-PCR using a pan-dengue assay targeting the conserved 3’ UTR region [16]. A positive control and 5-point standard curve generated from a DENV-2 isolate (New Guinea) was included in all tests. All tests were performed using the Luna Universal Probe One-Step qRT-PCR kit (New England Biolabs) and conducted in 25 μl reaction mixture containing 3 μl of total RNA, 1 × reaction mix, 600 nM of each primer, and 200 nM of each probe. The one-step qRT-PCR assay was performed twice in duplicate. The cycling conditions for all primer sets were 50 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 52 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Negative template controls (NTC) consisted of water as a template. A sample was defined as positive if the average cycle threshold (Ct) of the sample replicates was above 10 cycles and below the NTC if amplification of the NTC occurred prior to the assay cycling threshold (40 cycles). Amplicons were purified using the DNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (Zymo Research), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified PCR products were Sanger sequenced with 3.4 pmol of DENV 3’ UTR reverse primer and 5 μl of purified amplicon in 10 μl. Cycle sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit, purified using the BigDye XTerminator Purification Kit and loaded on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Applied BioSystems).

Total RNA sequencing

RNA extracts were quantified and RIN-scored with HS-RNA Tapestation on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Biosystems). To increase RNA quantity, mosquito homogenates were re-extracted with the above protocol and pooled. Three samples that were positive for Sanger sequencing were run individually and the remaining nine samples were pooled in another two samples. Samples were run alongside other RNA for an unrelated project to increase RNA diversity in the final library. Library input was 10–100 ng of RNA using Illumina Stranded Total RNA Prep with Ribo-Zero Plus (Illumina, Inc.). A secondary depletion step, incorporating ribosomal RNA sequences from Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus (oPools, Integrated DNA Technologies) was spiked in at 2 μl of 50 pmol. Library was run on the NextSeq 2000 (Illumina, Inc.) using a P1 flow cell, 2 × 150 XLEAP-SBS chemistry. Fastq reads were quality trimmed and adaptors removed using BBDuk Trimmer (v38.84 by Brian Bushnell). Reads were merged and paired using BBMerge and Geneious v2025.2.1. A BLASTN (version 2.2.25+) search using command line (Mac OS) was performed against NCBI complete virus genome database: ref_viruses_rep_genomes (accessed 2024 and 2025). Reads were compiled and aligned against reference DENV3 genome (NC_001475) using Geneious. Fasta files were also BLASTX searched using DIAMOND; DAA files mapped using MEGAN (Daniel H. Huson, v6.25.10)[17]. For insect-specific viruses (ISVs), reads were compiled and run against reference genomes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Insect specific viruses mapped from RNA sequencing data. Some of which had high genome coverage like AATV (85.5%). Most of these alignments had >99% sequence identity. 

Virus Identity NCBI % Ref Seq Coverage # of Reads % Identity
Australian Anopheles totivirus NC_035674 85.5 1097 92.3
Mac Peak Virus NC_035187 16.6 281 100
Casuarina virus NC_023986 32.4 511 99.5
Big Sioux River virus NC_035184 23.4 434 98.8

Results

Dengue detection and total RNA sequencing

Nine out of 12 pools as well as the storage supernatant tested positive for DENV RNA by qRT-PCR. The Ct value of positive pools ranged from 23.8 to 32.3, with a mean Ct of 29.3 (95% CI 26.9–31.6). Amplicons produced from positive pools were sequenced and three samples returned good quality sequences, aligning to DENV-3 (NC_001475) (Fig. 2). Total RNA sequencing of these three pools resulted in 5.9 to 31.5 million reads per sample. Reads were mapped back to DENV-3 resulting in 99.0% of the whole genome sequenced (10,533 of 10,655 bp) and 98% sequence similarity to DENV-3 (NC_001475).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Alignment of blastn reads to dengue virus-3 complete genome NC_001475 using Geneious resulting in 99% of complete genome sequenced and 98.0% similarity to the reference genome

A multiple sequence alignment was performed against 27 DENV-3 complete genomes isolated from human cases in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, and Indonesia. The DENV-3 sequence obtained from analysed Ae. albopictus pools (Consensus DENV-3 Masig) was most closely related to isolates from Sri Lanka (AY099336 and NC_001475) and Thailand (OR418423) than to the two isolates collected on neighbouring Mer Island in May 2024, suggesting the outbreaks were driven by separate viral incursions (Fig. 3). While there is no direct evidence of epidemiological links to these regions, frequent human movement within the Torres Strait and across the broader Indo-Pacific region provides a plausible mechanism for independent viral introductions, potentially via intermediate locations.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree for (27) DENV-3 strains: Australia, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, and Indonesia. Sequence obtained from Ae. albopictus mosquitoes collected on Masig Island (Consensus DENV-3 Masig) is most closely related to strains isolated from Sri Lanka (AY099336 and NC_001475) and Thailand (OR418423). The genome sequence obtained on Masig Island is not closely related to the two isolates obtained from human cases on neighbouring Mer Island (Torres Strait, Australia) during an earlier outbreak in 2024

Detection of other viruses

No RNA of other pathogenic viruses was detected from the screened pools, however, RNA sequencing produced sequences aligning to several ISVs. Four of these were mapped to their respective reference genomes with reads obtained ranging from just 281 to over 1000 (Table 1). This includes Australian Anopheles totivirus (NC_035674, 85.5%), a recently discovered orbivirus from Eastern Australia [18], for which nearly the whole genome was obtained. Casuarina virus (Mesoniviridae, discovered in 2014 in Australia) [19] and Mac Peak virus (Flaviviridae, discovered in 2017 in Australia) [20] (32.4% and 16.6% reference genome coverage, respectively) were also well characterised. Big Sioux River virus (NC_035184) was also detected.

Discussion

The detection of DENV-3 RNA in Ae. albopictus collected during a concurrent outbreak of the same serotype on Masig Island corroborates the ability of Ae. albopictus to drive major dengue outbreaks under Australian conditions in the absence of Ae. aegypti. This result also incriminates Ae. albopictus as the key vector in other Torres Strait islands where dengue outbreaks occurred following the displacement of Ae. aegypti.

The role and impact of Ae. albopictus in dengue transmission tends to vary among geographical locations. For example, in parts of India and Taiwan, Ae. albopictus has been reported to be a secondary vector in outbreaks largely driven by Ae. aegypti [21, 22]. On the other hand, Ae. albopictus has been the primary vector of large dengue outbreaks in Macao [23], Guangzhou [24], and Tokyo [25]. It is reasonable to expect that Ae. albopictus could cause similar large outbreaks in Australia.

The relatively high proportion of DENV-positive mosquito pools observed in this study may, in part, reflect the unique ecological and epidemiological context of the Torres Strait islands. These settings are characterized by confined geography and reduced host and mosquito diversity [26, 27]. On Masig Island, the limited availability of alternative, non-human vertebrate hosts, together with the dominance of Ae. albopictus in the absence of Ae. aegypti [11], likely creates conditions conducive to intense focal transmission, thereby increasing the likelihood of detecting infected mosquitoes compared to more heterogeneous mainland environments. Furthermore, confinement of mosquito collections close to addresses of confirmed human cases during the outbreak may have contributed to the relatively high proportion of DENV-positive mosquitoes.

Although detection of viral RNA alone does not confirm the presence of infectious virus, our total RNA sequencing data provides additional support for biologically meaningful infection. Reconstruction of approximately 99% of the DENV genome from positive samples is unlikely to result solely from fragmented or degraded RNA and is more consistent with the presence of abundant viral RNA as expected during active replication within the mosquito host. Nonetheless, given that specimens were preserved in ethanol, precluding virus isolation, these findings should be interpreted with appropriate caution.

The outbreak on Masig Island was likely to increase beyond the initial eight cases, but dengue transmission ceased early [13] due to early detection, the small size of the island, and rapid inter-agency response incorporating an effective vector control strategy against Ae. albopictus [15]. In contrast, an outbreak of up to 74 cases on neighbouring Mer Island was detected relatively late, some 14 weeks from the first probable case, and continued until a week-long intervention was completed within 5 days of the first formally notified case [12].

The observations from Mer and Masig Islands demonstrate the enormous risk posed by Ae. albopictus if this species were to successfully expand onto mainland Australia, where several high population cities have been identified as having climatic conditions suitable for its establishment [28]. Control of dengue outbreaks caused by Ae. albopictus on the Australian mainland would not be as effective as have been recorded on the islands due to the vastness and complexity of the areas at risk and greater connectivity of major population centres, factors that have attributed to the failure to control or limit the spread of this species in other countries [29–31].

In recent years, local transmission of dengue on the Australian mainland has been greatly reduced due to the successful Wolbachia-release strategy against Ae. aegypti in parts of northern Queensland [7]. However, the arrival of Ae. albopictus on the mainland could reverse these gains and renew the threat of large dengue outbreaks and the possibility of dengue becoming endemic in Australia. The threat of Ae. albopictus-driven dengue transmission on the mainland underscores the importance of sustained political and financial support to maintain and strengthen the current strategies that minimise the risk of this species expanding beyond the Torres Strait [15]. Beyond dengue, of the four concurrently identified ISVs, Big Sioux River virus is reported here for the first time in Australia. Although ISVs are not associated with vertebrate disease32, 33, there is increasing evidence to suggest that ISVs can interact with pathogenic arboviruses, either through superinfection or competitive interference [34–36], thereby possibly modulating mosquito vector competence and shaping local transmission dynamics. The significance of this potential interaction requires further investigations.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm that Ae. albopictus can drive dengue outbreaks under Australian conditions in the absence of Ae. aegypti and demonstrate the critical importance of rapid detection and targeted control responses. The contrasting outbreak trajectories on Masig and Mer Islands in 2024 highlight the consequences of delayed intervention, while climatic suitability across major mainland cities underscores the substantial risk should Ae. albopictus expand beyond the Torres Strait into mainland Australia. Such an incursion could erode gains achieved through Wolbachia-based replacement strategies targeting Ae. aegypti and increase the likelihood of large dengue outbreaks. These results reinforce the importance of maintaining strong surveillance and biosecurity measures to prevent Ae. albopictus establishment on the mainland.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Torres Strait Island Regional Council, Masig Island community and Masig Island Health Centre for their support during the dengue outbreak response, and Peter Horne for his mapping skills. Original images of the Graphical Abstract and Fig. 1 were enhanced and resolution-upscaled using Microsoft Copilot (powered by OpenAI GPT-4o) to improve clarity and detail visibility. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Abbreviations

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

DENV

Dengue virus

RNA

Ribonucleic acid

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ISV

Insect specific virus

RIN

RNA integrity number

HS

High sensitivity

Author contributions

Conceptualization: MOM, MCG, GE, JD, and GJD. Data Curation: MOM and MCG. Formal analysis: MOM and MCG. Investigation: MOM, MCG, GE, RB, JD, and DP. Methodology: MOM and MCG. Visualization: MOM and MCG. Writing—original draft preparation: MOM, MCG, and BJJ. Writing—review and editing: MOM, MCG, GJD, GH, and BJJ.

Funding

The mosquito collections on Masig Island were funded by Queensland Health, through Torres and Cape Public Health Unit, and Cairns Public Health Unit. BJJ is supported by the Mosquito and Arbovirus Research Committee and by the National Health and Medical Research Council Targeted Calls for Research (NHMRC TCR; 2039802).

Data availability

The consensus genomic DENV-3 sequence generated as part of this study is available at NCBI GenBank (accession: PZ516052).

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Photo credit for the images of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti included in the Graphical Abstract belongs to Chen Wu.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mutizwa Odwell Muzari and Melissa C. Graham authors have contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:504–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu L, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Chen B, Liu M, Tang W, et al. Detection of DENV in Aedes albopictus during the 2024 sporadic dengue outbreak in Wuhan city, Hubei Province, China. Virol J. 2025;22:163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Russell RC, Currie BJ, Lindsay MD, Mackenzie JS, Ritchie SA, Whelan PI. Dengue and climate change in Australia: predictions for the future should incorporate knowledge from the past. Med J Aust. 2009;190:265–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Hills SL, van den Hurk AF, Spark RL, Phillips DA, et al. An epidemic of dengue 3 in far north Queensland, 1997–1999. Med J Aust. 2001;174:178–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walker J, Pyke A, Florian P, Moore F, Smoll N, Adegbija O, et al. Re-emergence of dengue virus in regional Queensland: 2019 dengue virus outbreak in Rockhampton, Central Queensland, Australia. Commun Dis Intell. 2021;45. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Ritchie SA, Pyke AT, Hall-Mendelin S, Day A, Mores CN, Christofferson RC, et al. An explosive epidemic of DENV-3 in Cairns, Australia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e68137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ryan PA, Turley AP, Wilson G, Hurst TP, Retzki K, Brown-Kenyon J, et al. Establishment of wMel Wolbachia in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and reduction of local dengue transmission in Cairns and surrounding locations in northern Queensland, Australia. Gates Open Res. 2020;3:1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gratz N. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18:215–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ritchie SA, Moore P, Carruthers M, Williams C, Montgomery B, Foley P, et al. Discovery of a widespread infestation of Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc. 2006;22:358–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van den Hurk AF, Nicholson J, Beebe NW, Davis J, Muzari OM, Russell RC, et al. Ten years of the Tiger: Aedes albopictus presence in Australia since its discovery in the Torres Strait in 2005. One Health. 2016;2:19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Muzari MO, Davis J, Bellwood R, Crunkhorn B, Gunn E, Sabatino U, et al. Dominance of the tiger: The displacement of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus in parts of the Torres Strait, Australia. Commun Dis Intell. 2019;43. [PubMed]
  • 12.Hempenstall A, Pyke A, Taunton C, Sabatino U, Kaigey S, Pickering E, et al. An outbreak of dengue virus type 3 on Mer Island in the Torres Strait, Australia in 2024. Commun Dis Intell. 2024; 48. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Cashman C, Lui-Gamia N, Taunton C, Peniyamina D, Davis J, Hempenstall A. Dengue rapid antigen tests enable prompt outbreak detection and a rapid public health response in the remote Torres Strait, Australia. Commun Dis Intell. 2025;49. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Swan T, Ritmejerytė E, Sebayang B, Jones R, Devine G, Graham M, et al. Sugar prevalence in Aedes albopictus differs by habitat, sex and time of day on Masig Island, Torres Strait, Australia. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muzari MO, Devine G, Davis J, Crunkhorn B, Van Den Hurk A, Whelan P, et al. Holding back the tiger: successful control program protects Australia from Aedes albopictus expansion. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye YH, Ng TS, Frentiu FD, Walker T, Van Den Hurk AF, O’Neill SL, et al. Comparative susceptibility of mosquito populations in North Queensland, Australia to oral infection with dengue virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:422–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bağcı C, Patz S, Huson DH. DIAMOND+ MEGAN: fast and easy taxonomic and functional analysis of short and long microbiome sequences. Curr Protocols. 2021;1:e59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Colmant AM, Etebari K, Webb CE, Ritchie SA, Jansen CC, van den Hurk AF, et al. Discovery of new orbiviruses and totivirus from Anopheles mosquitoes in Eastern Australia. Arch Virol. 2017;162:3529–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warrilow D, Watterson D, Hall RA, Davis SS, Weir R, Kurucz N, et al. A new species of mesonivirus from the Northern Territory, Australia. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colmant AM, Hobson-Peters J, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, van den Hurk AF, Hall-Mendelin S, Chow WK, et al. A new clade of insect-specific flaviviruses from Australian Anopheles mosquitoes displays species-specific host restriction. MSphere. 2017;2:10–1128. 10.1128/msphere.00262-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumari R, Kumar K, Chauhan LS. First dengue virus detection in Aedes albopictus from Delhi, India: its breeding ecology and role in dengue transmission. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16:949–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang C-F, Hou J-N, Chen T-H, Chen W-J. Discriminable roles of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in establishment of dengue outbreaks in Taiwan. Acta Trop. 2014;130:17–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Almeida APG, Baptista SS, Sousa CA, Novo MTL, Ramos HC, Panella NA, Godsey M, Simões MJ, Anselmo ML, Komar N, Mitchell CJ, Rieiro H. Bioecology and vectorial capacity of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Macao, China, in relation to dengue virus transmission. J Med Entomol. 2005; 42(3):419-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luo L, Jiang L-Y, Xiao X-C, Di B, Jing Q-L, Wang S-Y, et al. The dengue preface to endemic in mainland China: the historical largest outbreak by Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou, 2014. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kobayashi D, Murota K, Fujita R, Itokawa K, Kotaki A, Moi ML, et al. Dengue virus infection in Aedes albopictus during the 2014 autochthonous dengue outbreak in Tokyo Metropolis, Japan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:1460–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lavery TH, Watson JJ, Leung LK. Terrestrial vertebrate richness of the inhabited Torres Strait Islands. Australia Aust J Zool. 2012;60:180–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Steiger DB, Ritchie SA, Laurance SG. Land use influences mosquito communities and disease risk on remote tropical islands: a case study using a novel sampling technique. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ritchie S, Williams CR, Russell R, Sutherst R. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus-a dengue threat for southern Australia? Commun Dis Intell Q. 2005;29:296–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yee DA. Thirty years of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in America: an introduction to current perspectives and future challenges. J Med Entomol. 2016;53:989–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baldacchino F, Caputo B, Chandre F, Drago A, della Torre A, Montarsi F, Rizzoli A. Control methods against invasive Aedes mosquitoes in Europe: a review. Pest Manag Sci. 2015; 71(11):1471-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Longbottom J, Walekhwa AW, Mwingira V, Kijanga O, Mramba F, Lord JS. Aedes albopictus invasion across Africa: the time is now for cross-country collaboration and control. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e623–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hall RA, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, McLean BJ, O’Brien CA, Colmant AM, Piyasena TB, et al. Commensal viruses of mosquitoes: host restriction, transmission, and interaction with arboviral pathogens. Evol Bioinform. 2016;12:S40740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roundy CM, Azar SR, Rossi SL, Weaver SC, Vasilakis N. Insect-specific viruses: a historical overview and recent developments. Adv Virus Res. 2017;98:119–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vasilakis N, Tesh RB. Insect-specific viruses and their potential impact on arbovirus transmission. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15:69–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Salas-Benito JS, De Nova-Ocampo M. Viral interference and persistence in mosquito-borne flaviviruses. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:873404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peterson AJ, Hall RA, Harrison JJ, Hobson-Peters J, Hugo LE. Unleashing nature’s allies: comparing the vertical transmission dynamics of insect-specific and vertebrate-infecting flaviviruses in mosquitoes. Viruses. 2024;16:1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The consensus genomic DENV-3 sequence generated as part of this study is available at NCBI GenBank (accession: PZ516052).


Articles from Parasites & Vectors are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES