Skip to main content
Acta Neuropathologica Communications logoLink to Acta Neuropathologica Communications
. 2026 Jul 18;14:195. doi: 10.1186/s40478-026-02361-4

Multimodal molecular mapping of the vasculature in human cortex reveals lipid markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Cody R Marshall 1,2,3,#, Felipe A Moser 4,#, Claire F Scott 2,3,5, Lissa Ventura-Antunes 8,9, Wilber Romero-Fernandez 9, Łukasz G Migas 2,4, Léonore E M Tideman 4, Madeline E Colley 2,3,6, Martin Dufresne 2,3,6, Matthew S Schrag 8,9,10, Raf Van de Plas 2,3,4,6, Jeffrey M Spraggins 1,2,3,5,6,7,✉
PMCID: PMC13613707  PMID: 42471701

Abstract

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) commonly co-occurs with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet the molecular changes that accompany vascular β -amyloid deposition in human tissue remain incompletely defined. Herein, we use a novel imaging approach that combines matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) with immunofluorescence microscopy on the same sections of postmortem human frontal cortex to map the lipid microenvironment of leptomeningeal vasculature in cases with and without CAA. Autofluorescence-guided regions-of-interest were imaged by IMS in both negative and positive ion modes and registered to post-IMS-acquired microscopy images. Immunofluorescence microscopy using markers for collagen IV, α -smooth muscle actin (α SMA), and thiazine red enabled automated segmentation of total, amyloid-positive, and amyloid-negative vasculature regions. A CAA index, the ratio of amyloid-positive area to total vasculature area in a region imaged by IMS, was used to define vasculature and classify each case into having CAA, or CAA-present, and not having CAA, or CAA-absent. An interpretable machine learning approach (XGBoost models with Shapley additive explanations for interpretation) was trained on pixel-level spectra and identified lipid signatures of vascular identity shared across groups as well as class-specific marker candidates that distinguished CAA-present from CAA-absent vasculature. CAA-absent vessels were characterized by higher contributions from phosphatidylserines (e.g., long-chain polyunsaturated PS species). Univariate differences were inconsistent between the two groups, but multivariate models in negative mode yielded stable discriminatory features. These results define spatial lipid correlates of vascular amyloid pathology in the human brain and establish a multimodal framework for mechanistically linking lipid metabolism, vascular integrity, and CAA in AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex neurological disorder and while its most famous neuropathological features are β -amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, most autopsy studies suggest that a wide range of pathologies contribute to disease progression [1]. Emerging drug treatment strategies for AD, focusing on clearing β -amyloid from the brain using monoclonal antibodies, have had some success in slowing AD symptoms, but they have not yet been successful at preventing disease onset or progression [2]. Furthermore, patients with concurrent vascular deposition of β -amyloid, a condition called cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), treated with anti-β -amyloid immunotherapies have tended to have a high rate of side effects from these new treatments [3–5]. These complexities suggest a more elaborate molecular picture of AD than previously supposed and have increased the priority of understanding the molecular underpinnings of CAA and other common AD co-pathologies. A systems biology approach will enhance our understanding of associated pathologies, such as CAA, and their interconnectedness with AD.

CAA frequently co-occurs with AD, with 80% of patients with AD having some level of CAA pathology [6]. CAA is independently associated with cognitive impairment and intracerebral hemorrhage [7, 8], and has so far been molecularly defined by β -amyloid deposition within the walls of the cerebrovasculature [9]. However, several researchers have reported β -amyloid deposition occurring at spatially distinct regions away from vessel wall breakdown, suggesting the relationship between β -amyloid and vascular degeneration may be indirect [8, 10]. The molecular mechanisms involved in the transition from β -amyloid deposition to cognitive decline and hemorrhage remain largely unknown. Genomic studies show that CAA-risk is increased in patients carrying one or more \upvarepsilon 4 alleles of apolipoprotein E (APOE4), a gene likely involved in lipid metabolism [11]. In addition, large-scale lipidomic studies suggest that aberrant lipid metabolism plays a critical role in AD and CAA progression [12–17]. Furthermore, prior reports have also noted that various matrix metalloproteinases play a role in vascular degeneration within the context of CAA [18, 19]. Vessels containing CAA degenerate over time, as observed by a loss of vascular smooth muscle (VSM) [20]. This process hinders the vessel’s ability to autoregulate blood flow, exacerbating the brain’s ability to mitigate disease [21]. Collectively, these observations suggest a more complicated molecular picture of how β -amyloid deposition leads to CAA’s effects and, ultimately, vessel rupture. Deeper characterization of the vascular microenvironment is needed to provide further molecular insight into AD and CAA pathogenesis.

Spatial multi-omics and molecular imaging are rapidly growing strategies to expand beyond traditional bulk omics by adding spatial context to molecular information and thereby enhancing our understanding of the tissue microenvironment [22]. By linking genomic clues to lipid metabolism, differential lipidomic expression in bulk mass spectrometry analysis, and the role of vascular smooth muscle cells, spatial lipidomic analysis combined with imaging of cell types in the vasculature could reveal important information regarding the microenvironment of AD and AD-associated pathologies like CAA.

While the importance of lipids in AD and CAA is clear, imaging a wide variety of lipid species is often not feasible through traditional imaging approaches, such as immunofluorescence microscopy, due to lack of specificity and the need for a prohibitively large number of highly specific markers for a molecular profile that is unknown a priori. In contrast, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) [23] is a molecular imaging technology uniquely suited to imaging lipids as the use of probes is not necessary [24–30]. MALDI IMS has been demonstrated in the brain as a powerful tool for imaging a wide range of molecules [31–36], with some researchers successfully using it to characterize amyloid isoform composition within neuritic plaques [36–38]. MALDI IMS has even been used to image the spatial lipidomic environment surrounding amyloid plaques [39–42]. To leverage the lipid imaging capabilities of MALDI IMS in the study of AD-associated pathologies like CAA, multimodal imaging approaches are needed to correlate IMS data with vasculature features observed in immunofluorescence microscopy. For example, newly developed integration strategies combining MALDI IMS and immunofluorescence microscopy have linked lipid information to specific cell types within tissues, such as the human kidney [43].

Herein, we utilize an integrated multimodal molecular imaging approach to distinguish lipid profiles between healthy and CAA-diseased tissue features and cell types. We focus specifically on the leptomeninges, vascular tissue most vulnerable to CAA [44], to link spatial lipid markers with histopathology. Using autofluorescence microscopy-guided MALDI IMS, we imaged leptomeningeal vessels at 10 μ m pixel size. This was then registered to post-IMS-acquired immunofluorescence images of the same sections, based on which vasculature and CAA features were segmented automatically. We propose a quantitative CAA index (β -amyloid/vasculature area) to stratify tissues and cases into CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature subgroups, enabling pixel-specific comparisons within vasculature rather than using bulk tissue. We then employ an interpretable machine learning approach to identify, among hundreds of measured lipid species, those that exhibit marker potential for vasculature in general as well as for CAA presence or absence [45, 46]. This approach uses eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models to mine these large, high-dimensional datasets for such relationships, and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) as a model interpretability method to determine which molecular species inputs hold marker potential [47–49]. The resulting spatial lipid signatures suggest the loss or redistribution of structural phospholipids in CAA and a potential mechanistic link between lipid metabolism and β -amyloid deposition. Together, this multimodal framework establishes a basis for identifying potential biomarkers and therapies at the neurovascular interface in AD.

Materials and methods

Materials

Human brain samples were obtained from an ongoing tissue resource at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, with supervision from the institutional review board, IRB #180287. Tissue cases and/or their surrogates provided written informed consent to permit tissue use in research applications. All specimens were thoroughly de-identified to limit any risk to patient privacy. Ammonium formate, tris-buffered saline (TBS), fish gelatin, 100 mM glycine, 0.1% Triton X-100, bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Tween-20 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The matrix aminocinnamic acid (ACA) and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) were bought from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade acetone was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburg, PA). Alpha smooth muscle actin (α SMA) (AB124964) and normal donkey serum (AB7475) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Collagen IV (M3F7) was purchased from NeoBiotechnologies (Union City, CA). Thiazine red was purchased from Chemsavers (Bluefield, VA). DAPI fluoromount-G was purchased from Southern Biotech (Homewood, Alabama).

Sample preparation

The frontal cortex of postmortem human brains was frozen in liquid nitrogen, embedded in 15% fish gelatin, and stored at -80 Inline graphicC. A total of 13 human cases with varying levels of AD and CAA, as determined by the Vonsattel scale [50], were selected for the imaging study. The pre-central gyrus was targeted, and specimen sizes were approximately 1 cm x 1 cm, including the full thickness of the cortex and a roughly equal portion of underlying white matter with care to preserve adhered leptomeningeal tissue. Samples were embedded in a specific orientation to ensure that subsequent sections contained the leptomeninges. A total of 6 serial tissue sections were collected from each of 13 human cases. Four sections were omitted due to technical difficulties with sample handling, resulting in 74 vasculature sections being imaged (Figs. S1–S3). Three out of the six serial sections per case were used as technical replicates for negative ion mode IMS. The other three were used as technical replicates for positive ion mode IMS. The tissue was cryosectioned at 10 μ m thickness using a CM3050 S cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were thaw-mounted on a warm plate at 30 Inline graphicC onto indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass slides (Delta Technologies, Loveland, CO). Autofluorescence microscopy images of the samples were collected immediately before subsequent vacuum sealing and preservation at -80 Inline graphicC, and before any subsequent imaging workflows.

The autofluorescence microscopy employed standard DAPI, eGFP, and DSRed fluorescent filters using a Zeiss AxioScan.Z1 slide scanner (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany), equipped with a Colibri7 LED light source. Tissue sections were washed three times with chilled 150 mM ammonium formate at 4 Inline graphicC for 45 s each to remove endogenous salts and then dried with nitrogen gas to remove excess solution. Matrix sublimation was performed using an in-house developed sublimation device following previously published protocols [51, 52]. In short, 2 mL of 4-aminocinnamic acid at 5 mg/mL in acetone was loaded into the sublimation chamber well for simultaneous sublimation of 3 sample slides. The matrix sublimation temperature was maintained at 200 Inline graphicC for at least 15 min, while the samples were simultaneously cooled to -78 Inline graphicC using a dry ice-acetone slurry. These conditions lead to complete sublimation of the matrix from the chamber well onto the sample slides, yielding a final on-slide surface density of 0.38 μ g/mmInline graphic, as determined by weighing the slides before and after matrix sublimation [53]. After sublimation, the slides were placed on a 100 Inline graphicC hot plate for 15 s to anneal the matrix layer, facilitating further crystallization.

MALDI IMS acquisition

MALDI IMS experiments were performed on a prototype MALDI timsTOF (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) in both negative and positive ionization Q-TOF mode [30]. Autofluorescence microscopy images were imported into flexImaging and used to manually define regions of interest (ROIs) containing leptomeningeal tissue. Each established ROI comprises approximately 50,000 MALDI IMS pixels for each polarity. In both negative and positive ion modes, the IMS data were collected with the beam scan off, a 10 μ m pitch, and a 10 μ m spot diameter. The laser power was set to 35% with 40 shots per pixel, in both modalities. See Table S1 for more information on MALDI IMS instrument parameters.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

After acquiring the post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image, immunofluorescence microscopy was performed on the same tissue section. The MALDI matrix was removed from the tissue with a series of ethanol (EtOH) washes (70% to 90% EtOH). The tissue was fixed in 4% PFA solution for 15 min. The PFA was removed using a series of increasing sucrose solutions (10% to 30% sucrose). The tissue was placed in a sealed petri dish with 1X TBS and photobleached for 48 h using an LED lamp (BESTVA DC Series 1200W LED Grow Light Full Spectrum) at 4 Inline graphicC. The sections were then washed with a 100 mM glycine/1X TBS/0.1% Triton X-100 buffer for 30 min. Sections were blocked for 60 min at 37 Inline graphicC in a solution containing 10% normal donkey serum in 1X TBS/0.1% bovine serum albumin. Primary antibodies for collagen IV, α SMA, and a thiazine red stain were used to stain the tissue. Tissue was then washed 4 times for 10 min each in 1X TBS/0.05% Tween-20 and then cover slipped with a DAPI fluoromount.

Multimodal image registration and data analysis

To analyze the different types of images acquired from the same section in a multimodal manner, each modality was registered to a common spatial coordinate system using in-house developed registration software. The immunofluorescence microscopy images and pre-IMS autofluorescence microscopy images were co-registered with post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy images using the wsireg software, employing a combination of rigid and affine transformations [54]. The pre-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image was used as a pass-through modality for the registration of the immunofluorescence microscopy image onto the post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image. The MALDI IMS pixels were then registered to the post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image by manually matching a subset of these pixels to the corresponding laser ablation marks using the in-house developed tool image2image [55–57]. The full-resolution, co-registered images were stored in a vendor-neutral pyramidal OME-TIFF file format. After registering all modalities to their corresponding post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image, spatial delineations (i.e., segmentations) of the vasculature based on the immunofluorescence microscopy modality were used for further analysis.

Tissue feature annotations

To perform tissue segmentation within the leptomeningeal vasculature, we first defined a ROI delineating vasculature within the leptomeninge, overlapping with the area where MALDI IMS was acquired based on post-autofluorescence data. This ROI established the boundaries for all subsequent analyses, cropping out the surrounding area. Then, a leptomeninge mask was generated to enable exclusion of all non-leptomeninge tissue. This mask was obtained through an initial prediction using the Segment Anything Model (SAM) [58–60], and was further manually curated in the open-source digital pathology software QuPath [61]. The images and leptomeninges masks were then cropped using the vasculature ROI.

Next, vasculature segmentation was performed on the Cy5 (collagen IV) channel of each cropped image using the Moran quadrant map method proposed by Tideman et al. [62]. For this, each image was first downsampled by a factor of 4 to reduce noise and minimize artifacts caused by IMS-related tissue damage (e.g., laser ablation damage). Then, the local Moran’s I was calculated using a cumulative fifth-order Queen contiguity criterion. Pixels that exhibit a positive local Moran’s I together with above average intensity were designated as vasculature with a value of 1, while the rest were designated as background with a value of 0. This vasculature segmentation mask was then upsampled back to the original pixel size using a bilinear interpolation, and binarized using a 0.5 threshold.

Finally, the thiazine red (amyloid) and Cy7 (smooth muscle actin) channels were binarized using manual thresholding and then combined with the vasculature masks to produce segmentations of the plaque and actin regions. This was then refined by filling small holes (<200 pixels, 84.5 μ mInline graphic) and removing small objects (<200 pixels, 84.5 μ mInline graphic), mitigating artifacts related to damage introduced during the MALDI IMS acquisition.

MALDI IMS data preprocessing

The MALDI IMS measurements were exported from the Bruker timsTOF format (.d) into a custom binary format for downstream analysis. Each pixel reported centroided mass spectral peaks spanning the full acquisition range, and these were reconstructed into pseudo-profile spectra using Bruker’s SDK (v2.21). We performed mass alignment on these profiles using the msalign library (v0.2.0) [63], using at least six reference peaks present in at least 50% of all pixels. Then, the dataset’s mass axis was calibrated to approximately ±1 ppm accuracy using theoretical m/z values of at least five reference peaks. After calibration, spectra were intensity normalized using a standard total ion current (TIC) metric. Subsequently, an average mass spectrum was computed for each tissue section, aggregating all pixel spectra within that section’s MALDI IMS ROI. Peak picking of these average spectra yielded 639 and 471 distinct m/z features in negative and positive ionization modes, respectively. Notably, isotopic peaks were retained and not excluded from the subsequent classification workflow.

LC-MS/MS

Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify lipid species that could not be confidently identified from MALDI IMS measurements, which includes isomeric and isobaric species. For each case, 3-4 sections of 10 μ m thickness were allocated to glass vials in addition to 5 μ L of 100 μ g/mL internal standards Avanti Equisplash, C24:1 mono-sulfo galactosyl(ß) ceramide-d7 (d18:1/24:1) (Avanti), and 18:2 Cardiolipin-d5 (Avanti) and methanol was added until the tissue was submerged. Metal beads were added to each vial, and the tissue was homogenized with a vortex for 1 min. Vials were placed on dry ice for 5 min and sonicated on ice for 30 min. Lipids were extracted from the solution with 1600 μ L of ice-cold MTBE and 400 μ L of ice-cold water, then diluted to 400 μ L in ice-cold methanol. All vials were then centrifuged at 100× g for 10 min at 4 Inline graphicC, then held on ice for 10 min. The top layer, which was 600 μ L, was extracted to a new vial and dried under nitrogen. The sample was resuspended in 300 μ L of methanol. Reverse-phase separation was performed on a Waters Premier UHPLC with a 2.1× 100 mm Waters Premier CSH-C18 column heated to 60 Inline graphicC. Mobile phase A consisted of 60:40 ACN:HInline graphicO with 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. Mobile Phase B consisted of 90:10 IPA:ACN with 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. The total analysis time was 25 min, followed by a 10-minute equilibration time. A timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer used parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF) and MS/MS stepping to determine the collision cross section (CCS) of each species, enabling simultaneous measurement of both low-mass fragments and higher-molecular-weight lipids.

Univariate molecular comparison

The MALDI IMS ion images were normalized by TIC and subsequently inter-sample normalized using the mean-fold change method [64]. This normalization approach ensured consistent median intensities across the cohort while preserving relative biological signatures. Ion intensities were then extracted from defined vasculature masks to compare CAA-present and CAA-absent samples. For each ion, a single representative value per sample was calculated by averaging the intensities of all pixels within the respective mask. Statistical significance was determined using a univariate analysis with bootstrap resampling (10,000 iterations). This process produced robust molecular distributions from which p-values were derived. Multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (multipletests from statsmodels.stats.multitest Python library) to control the False Discovery Rate (FDR), yielding q-values. The relationship between effect size and statistical significance was visualized using volcano plots, with logInline graphic(fold change) plotted against -logInline graphic(p-value). Molecular features were classified as significantly enriched in the CAA-present group (p≤ 0.05; Inline graphic), significantly depleted (p≤ 0.05; Inline graphic), or non-significant.

Supervised machine learning and interpretation by Shapley additive explanations

To identify lipid species predictive of vascular identity and amyloid-associated pathology, we implemented the interpretable supervised machine learning workflow described in Tideman et al. [45]. This approach uses XGBoost models to search for relationships between IMS-observed ion species and the microscopy-derived spatial mask of a tissue structure, cell type, or region of interest [47]. After training an XGBoost classification model with strong predictive performance, SHAP is used as a model interpretability method to determine which, out of the hundreds of ion species measured, are driving the model’s class prediction and, thus which molecular species hold marker potential for recognizing the tissue region of interest [48, 49].

Two classification tasks were defined: (1) distinguishing vasculature from background regions within the MALDI IMS ROI, and (2) differentiating CAA-present vasculature from CAA-absent vasculature based on immunofluorescence microscopy segmentation masks. These classification tasks were performed separately for both positive and negative ion mode datasets. Each MALDI IMS pixel, defined by its detected peak features (see MALDI IMS data preprocessing section), served as an input feature vector, while the spatial segmentation masks from collagen IV, labeled using α SMA+ or thiazine red+ threshold results, provided the class labels for model training.

For each classification task, we employed a one-versus-all strategy using an ensemble of 10 XGBoost models, each initialized with a different random seed. The training data for each model consisted of randomly sampled pixels from the relevant masks, with random under-sampling of the majority class (e.g., background or CAA-absent) and random over-sampling of the minority class (e.g., vasculature) to address class imbalance. Ensemble modeling helped reduce the risk of overfitting and ensured that biologically meaningful patterns were preserved while minimizing spurious correlations. Model performance was evaluated using out-of-sample predictions, and pixels not used during training were held out for testing. Specifically, 66% of the available samples were randomly assigned to the training set, while the remaining 34% were reserved as an independent test set. See Table S2 for the model performance metrics of each task.

To interpret the models trained for the different recognition scenarios, we employed SHAP to quantify the contribution of each ion species to the models’ predictions. For each molecular feature (ion), SHAP provided local importance scores (Shapley values) per pixel, and tissue-wide importance scores were calculated by averaging the local Shapley values across all pixels in the dataset. Final global SHAP scores for each ion were computed as the mean of the tissue-wide importance scores across the 10-model ensemble. These global SHAP scores were used to rank the IMS-reported features by predictive relevance to vascular classification or CAA status, and the top-ranked ions were considered candidate molecular markers. Annotation of these ion species was done manually after SHAP analysis using an LC-MS/MS library (see LC-MS/MS section) and lipidmaps.org. [65, 66]. Final manual annotations are summarized in Tables S3 & S4.

To assess the relationship between lipid abundance and marker potential (i.e., SHAP-based feature importance), we computed Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients (ρ ) between ion intensity values and corresponding local Shapley values. This analysis was used to infer the directionality of a lipid’s association with a classification outcome. If this correlation is positive, increased presence of the lipid species in a pixel tends to increase the probability that this pixel is part of the tissue structure of interest (i.e., the lipid species is a positive marker candidate). Negative correlation suggests that a decreased presence of the lipid species increases the probability that the tissue structure of interest is present (i.e., the lipid species is a negative marker candidate). Overall, features with |ρ | > 0.2 were considered to show a meaningful monotonic relationship between ion intensity and classification probability. In visualizations such as summary bubble plots, the global SHAP score determined marker size, while Spearman correlation determined marker color, providing an interpretable view of both predictive importance and biological association.

MALDI IMS automatic identification

The average mass spectrum was scaled between 0 and 1, peak picked, deisotoped, and filtered using a signal-to-noise ratio threshold of 0.03 (calculated as the fraction of the base peak of the mass spectrum). Features below this threshold were excluded from the identification process. IMS identification was performed using in-house-developed software that associated detected peaks with tentative lipids from the LIPID MAPS Structure Database and custom LC-MS/MS database (discussed above). Parameters for annotating peaks include [M + H]Inline graphic, [M + Na]Inline graphic, and [M + K]Inline graphic adducts in positive mode and [M − H]Inline graphic and [M − CHInline graphic]Inline graphic in negative mode and a search window of ±5 ppm. To provide more confident identification, IMS identification was subsequently associated with LC-MS/MS identifications.

Results

Multimodal molecular imaging workflow enables vasculature focused analysis

To investigate spatial lipidomic signatures and changes associated with the vasculature and CAA features, we applied the multimodal molecular imaging workflow described in Fig. 1 to the leptomeninges in postmortem human frontal cortex tissue. We analyzed 13 cases with varying presence of AD and CAA pathology. Preliminary characterization of CAA was done according to the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) (Table S5) to include sufficient control cases and cases with CAA pathology. CAA is staged according to the Vonsattel criteria defined by four grades: absent, mild, moderate, or severe. We viewed cases with moderate to severe CAA as having clinically relevant CAA [50]. For each case, we examined six serial sections: three technical replicates for negative ion mode MALDI IMS lipid imaging, and three technical replicates for positive ion mode imaging (Fig. 1a). Additional tissue sections were collected for downstream LC-MS/MS (Fig. 1e), to enable confident lipid identification and to support annotation of MALDI IMS peaks through the online database at lipidmaps.org. [65, 66]. Autofluorescence microscopy images acquired prior to MALDI IMS imaging (Fig. 1b) guided the selection of ROIs enriched for clearly visible leptomeninges, which are cortex-related structures particularly vulnerable to vasculature amyloid deposition, resulting in CAA (Fig. 2a, Figs. S1–S3) [8, 67–69]. Four ROIs were removed in analysis due to technical difficulties. This workflow, using autofluorescence microscopy-directed MALDI IMS imaging [70] allowed us to expand our study across a large cohort of tissues.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Multimodal molecular imaging workflow. Sample preparation and tissue handling is shown in red. Data acquisition and imaging is shown in green. LC-MS/MS completed in parallel is shown in yellow. Data curation, integration, and analysis is shown in blue. a Post-mortem human frontal cortex tissue cryosectioned at 10 μ m thickness. b Autofluorescence microscopy acquired on Zeiss AxioScan.Z1 to locate leptomeninges. c Matrix 4-aminocinnamic acid sublimated onto the samples (5 mg/ml) using an in-house developed sublimation device. IMS data acquired on a MALDI timsTOF flex mass spectrometer. d Matrix removed with ethanol washes. Antibody markers collagen IV, actin smooth muscle, and thiazine red stain were used to mark vasculature and pathogenic features. e Lipid IDs validated using in-house generated LC-MS/MS library and lipidmaps.org. f Peak alignment, mass calibration, intensity normalization, peak identification and supervised ML analysis. g Automated segmentation of leptomeninge vasculature, plus healthy and CAA-diseased regions. h Co-registration of IMS, autofluorescence and immunofluorescence microscopy data.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Data acquisition. MALDI IMS coupled with immunofluorescence microscopy and LC-MS/MS were acquired on 13 donors with and without cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) disease pathology. a Autofluorescence microscopy enables directed imaging of leptomeninges where CAA is most prominent. MALDI IMS heat maps of lipids, b SHexCer 40:0;2O and c PI 16:0_20:4 are shown. d Immunofluorescence microscopy with collagen IV, smooth muscle cells, and amyloid markers was used to identify vasculature features and CAA. e The average spectrum of negative mode imaging data across 3 technical replicates for case 4. The spectral pattern of this MALDI IMS region (shown in a through d) is similar across three technical replicates. f Summary plot of lipid classes found from LC-MS/MS data captured on sections from all 13 cases shows a wide range of lipids within the sample. Scale bar is equal to 1 mm.

Overall, the MALDI IMS imaging dataset consisted of 74 ROIs (Fig. 1c). MALDI IMS at 10 μ m pixel size enabled sensitive and reproducible lipid detection within the vasculature of the leptomeninges (Fig. 2b and c), preserving antigenicity for downstream immunofluorescence microscopy imaging on the same sections (Fig. 2d). Average mass spectra (Fig. 2e, Fig. S4) and Levey-Jennings plots (Fig. S5) display consistent signal to noise ratios and total ion currents across technical replicates. Automated IMS identification using in-house-developed software (see Methods-MALDI IMS Tentative Identification) detected 419 lipid features in negative ion mode (Fig. S6a), while another 537 lipids were detected in positive ion mode (Fig. S6b). Most of these molecular species exhibited distinct distributions within the brain tissue, including a subset that displayed spatial distributions matching vasculature patterns observed in the autofluorescence microscopy image (Fig. 2b and c). Notable lipids in negative mode such as SHexCer 40:0;2O (m/z 864.623) and PI 16:0_20:4 (m/z 857.520) showed clear localization to vasculature elements in the leptomeninges. Overall, the LC-MS/MS negative mode workflow confirmed the presence of at least 15 lipid classes within the dataset, including phosphatidylserines (PS), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), ceramides (Cer), and inositol-containing lipids (PI), among others (Fig. 2f). The LC-MS/MS positive ion mode workflow confirmed the presence of an additional 14 lipid classes, including triglycerides (TG), sphingomyelins (SM), phosphatidylinositols (PI), and phosphatidylcholines (PC), among others (Fig. S7).

Following MALDI IMS, the same tissue sections were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1d), allowing for segmentation of specific vasculature and CAA features (Fig. 1g). All image co-registration (Fig. 1h) was performed on modalities that measured the same tissue section. Co-registration of the MALDI IMS image with the post-IMS autofluorescence microscopy image was highly accurate (Fig. S8), enabling precise spatially resolved molecular analysis of structurally annotated vasculature and CAA features (Fig. 1f).

Automated segmentation enables molecular analysis of healthy vasculature and CAA-diseased features

Combining immunofluorescence microscopy with MALDI IMS enables us to derive the presence or absence of CAA pathology from the microscopy and provide contextual information for spatial molecular data obtained via IMS. Collagen IV staining highlights the vascular basement membrane within the leptomeninges and serves as a broader marker of the total vasculature [69]. Smooth muscle actin (α SMA) was chosen to identify smooth muscle cells and areas of healthy vasculature. This builds on prior research suggesting that vasculature β -amyloid deposition occurs in a location similar to that of smooth muscle cells, potentially replacing the smooth muscle cell layer within the vasculature tissue in severely diseased vessels [8, 69]. Collagen IV signal is continuously present across vasculature, while α SMA is variably expressed depending on vessel type and vasculature integrity [69]. Thiazine red, which binds β -sheet-rich amyloid aggregates, reveals regions of vascular amyloid deposition consistent with CAA pathology [69]. Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images show clear demarcation between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative areas in the vasculature based on the location of thiazine red (Fig. 3a and b). This is critical for determining whether the vasculature across cases is CAA-present (diseased) or CAA-absent (healthy). This pathogenic heterogeneity evident in the immunofluorescence microscopy data allows for image segmentation and spatial lipidomic comparisons between diseased or healthy vascular tissue.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Workflow for CAA Index. a Whole slide immunofluorescence microscopy image. b Zoomed in immunofluorescence image of region acquired by MALDI IMS. c Thiazine red stains amyloid plaques, d smooth muscle actin stains smooth muscle, and e collagen IV stains the basement membrane of vasculature. Segmentation masks obtained for f amyloid, g smooth muscle cells, and h collagen IV. Below are examples of tissue sections above the CAA index (i1–i3) and below the CAA index (j1–j3). The IF image (i1 and j1), amyloid mask (i2 and j2) and collagen IV mask (i3 and j3) are shown. Calculated values for the area amyloid, the area vasculature, the CAA index (ratio of amyloid-positive/total vasculature), and the class (CAA-present above 0.01 CAA index and CAA-absent below 0.01) are shown below. Scale bar is equal to 1 mm.

To develop a robust method for automatically, rapidly, and reliably annotating the vasculature across a dataset, we first used the collagen IV signal (Fig. 3e) to define a broad vasculature mask (Fig. 3h). This was done using a custom spatial segmentation method (see Methods-Tissue Feature Annotations). Within this vasculature mask, we utilized the thiazine red marker (Fig. 3c) and the actin smooth muscle cell marker (Fig. 3d) to define two additional regions using a thresholding segmentation method (see Methods-Tissue Feature Annotations). Taken together, we defined a total of three regions: total vasculature (based on collagen IV) (Fig. 3h), amyloid-positive vasculature (based on thiazine red+ only) (Fig. 3f), and amyloid-negative vasculature (based on α SMA+ only) (Fig. 3g). All immunofluorescence microscopy images and segmentation results for the cohort are available in the supplement (Figs. S9–S82).

Because CAA is a pathology defined by a complex vasculature microenvironment [69], we chose not to restrict our search to tissue that directly co-localized with amyloid deposits. Instead, we focused our analysis on molecular data within the broad vasculature, as defined by collagen IV, using information from its amyloid plaque area to classify the entire vasculature mask as either CAA-present (a more CAA-diseased region) or CAA-absent (a healthier region). While the NACC characterization provides a reliable diagnosis for the sample as a whole, it is qualitative in nature, relying on observational or descriptive criteria rather than quantitative measurements. Additionally, it does not inform on the nature of the pathology at a local structure level. To account for this, we define a CAA index based on the ratio of amyloid plaque area to total vasculature area per each IMS ROI in the section, which is then thresholded to classify the vasculature masks into CAA-present and CAA-absent. A threshold value of 0.01 was selected as it provided an optimal match with the NACC diagnosis (see Table S5 and Fig. S83), which was corroborated by expert neuropathologists, while also offering a simple and intuitive inflection point: 1% of the total vasculature area. For example, Fig. 3i shows a vascular tissue area with a high CAA index. The first image shows immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3i1) with a high degree of amyloid. Below it is an image showing the results of the generated amyloid mask (Fig. 3i2), which has a relatively high area overlapping with the total collagen IV mask (Fig. 3i3). That example’s CAA index was calculated as 0.275, well above the established 0.01 threshold. Therefore, this section was defined as CAA-present. Figure 3j shows a vascular tissue area with a lower CAA index. The first image shows immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3j1) with little to no amyloid present. Below it is an image showing the results of the generated amyloid mask (Fig. 3j2), which has a low area overlapping with the collagen IV mask (Fig. 3j3). The CAA index for this example was calculated as 0.002, well below the 0.01 threshold, and was therefore defined as CAA-absent.

This workflow was repeated for each of the six sections acquired per case. The raw CAA index values for each ROI across the entire dataset can be visualized in the CAA index heat map (Fig. S83a). All ROIs with index values above the threshold of 0.01 were categorized as CAA-present, while all sections below the threshold were categorized as CAA-absent (Fig. S83b). The average value across the sections was used to assign a case to the CAA-present or CAA-absent group. In total, 7 cases were categorized as CAA-present, and 6 as CAA-absent. The final grouping is shown in Table S6. The categorizations for each case are also in agreement with the preliminary characterization by NACC (Table S5).

Importantly, the CAA index is not intended to quantify disease burden within each IMS ROI. Because CAA severity exists on a continuum, the index is used to classify each vasculature mask as relatively more CAA-like or non-CAA-like. This grouping enables direct downstream comparisons, particularly with binary classification models, even if the index does not precisely measure disease severity.

Molecular signatures differentiate CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature

With the sections classified as diseased or healthy, we can now search for a link between these labels and corresponding IMS observations, i.e., we can pursue identification of disease-associated lipid changes. We first performed a traditional univariate comparison between MALDI IMS ion intensities that stem from CAA-present or CAA-absent vasculature segments. We specifically examined ion intensity within the vasculature segmentation mask generated by collagen IV, thereby excluding confounding signal contributions from the perivascular space or adjacent grey and white matter. Since both CAA-present and CAA-absent segments represent the same cell types in the leptomeninges, we anticipated substantial overlap in their molecular profiles. Because we separated the two groups of similar vasculature tissue strictly by their ratio of amyloid-positive/total vasculature (see Automated segmentation enables molecular analysis of healthy vasculature and CAA-diseased features section), any observed differences would be expected to reflect lipid features that positively or negatively associate with amyloid deposition rather than cell-type composition.

Group-level molecular differences were analyzed using a difference spectrum derived from subtraction of the mean normalized spectra of CAA-absent vasculature from CAA-present vasculature across all m/z features (Fig. S84a & b). In these diagrams, mass spectra shown in blue represent ions with higher intensity in the average mass spectrum of the entire CAA-absent vasculature mask group, while mass spectra in orange represent ions with higher intensity across the average mass spectrum of the entire CAA-present group. These differences were subtle, which is consistent with the expectation that amyloid-associated changes occur against a largely conserved vascular lipid profile.

We also accounted for inter-donor variability, extending this analysis to donor-level univariate comparisons using average spectra representing CAA-present and CAA-absent vascular regions from individual donors. Across both negative (Fig. S85) and positive (Fig. S86) ion modes, these comparisons similarly revealed only marginal differences between CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature. Collectively, these results suggest that CAA-associated lipid changes are not dominated by large, isolated abundance changes in individual molecules, but instead may manifest as more subtle multivariate shifts in the vascular lipidome as molecules respond in concert to amyloid deposition.

To capture these multivariate patterns, we transitioned from univariate analysis to an interpretable machine learning framework that combines classification by eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) [45–49]. XGBoost models integrate information from many ions simultaneously, enabling multivariate classification of vascular regions with or without CAA. SHAP complements this approach by quantifying the contribution of each ion species to the model predictions, thereby identifying lipid features whose combined effects most strongly distinguish CAA from healthy vasculature.

As an initial validation of this approach, we trained an XGBoost classifier to distinguish IMS pixels within the vasculature mask from those in the surrounding background tissue (i.e., non-vasculature regions). The performance metrics for the model can be seen in Table S2. This analysis established lipid profiles that broadly define vascular tissue and that differentiate it from non-vascular tissue. We initially compared the vasculature masks from the CAA-present group with the corresponding background masks (Fig. S87a). The top-ranked lipid features that drove the classification model to differentiate between CAA-present vasculature and other surrounding tissue regions are shown in Fig. S87b. The ions m/z 864.623 (SHexCer 40:0;2O) and m/z 1027.687 (unknown) ranked among the top differentiating features and were also found to have significantly higher intensity within the univariate comparison (Fig. S85b).

We performed a comparable analysis for the CAA-absent vasculature group (Table S2, Fig. S88a), which revealed a similar set of lipid marker candidates (Fig. S88b). Ion images for the key lipids found to define vasculature in general (i.e., both CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature) are shown in Fig. 4. The substantial overlap in lipid identifications between these two analyses highlights the strong molecular similarity between CAA-present and CAA-absent vessels. These shared molecular species most likely correspond to structural lipids necessary for vasculature integrity. This is expected since the primary driver here is the difference between the cell types of the vasculature (e.g., endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells) and the other cell types of the brain. Looking beyond the top-ranked features, we do see more well-defined changes when comparing features with lower SHAP scores. For example, m/z 788.545 (PS 18:0_18:1) seems to be a stronger marker candidate for the CAA-absent group compared to CAA-present vasculature (Fig. S89).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Molecular marker candidates for vasculature in general. Interpretable machine learning using SHAP on negative mode data identified markers that map the vasculature. Top hits are shown, including a m/z 722.513 (PE O-16:1_20:4), b m/z 788.545 (PS 18:0_18:1), c m/z 864.623 (SHexCer 40:0;2O), d m/z 1027.687 (Unknown). Scale bar is equal to 1 mm.

Next, we performed the same task on the positive ion mode dataset cohort. When training a classifier to differentiate CAA-present vasculature masks from non-vasculature background masks (Table S2, Fig. S90a), we identified several lipid marker candidates that positively correlated with vasculature (Fig. S90b). This workflow was repeated to differentiate between CAA-absent vasculature masks and non-vasculature background masks (Table S2, Fig. S91a), revealing a similar set of top-ranked lipid marker candidates (Fig. S91b). Overlapping marker candidates between CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature, such as m/z 703.575 (SM 16:1;O2/18:0), 705.584 (SM 34:0;O2), m/z 701.559 (SM 20:2;O2/14:0), m/z 766.574 (PE P-17:0_22:4), and m/z 741.530 (Unidentified), most likely play key roles in vasculature structure and integrity, similar to the overlapping marker candidates in the negative mode dataset.

To determine lipidomic differences specifically between vessels with amyloid and healthy vessels, we performed a second type of classification task that was limited to pixels associated with vascular masks. MALDI IMS data associated with CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature were used to train a classification model to distinguish between the two conditions in both negative and positive ion modes, while ignoring non-vascular related pixels (see Table S2 for performance metrics).

The negative ion mode analysis revealed a set of features with high-ranking SHAP scores, correlating either with CAA-present tissue regions (in red) or CAA-absence (in blue) (Fig. 5a and b). Molecular features that were positively correlated to CAA-present vessels include m/z 1544.867 (GM1 36:1;O2), m/z 774.544 (PE O-18:1_22:6), m/z 834.529 (PS 18:0_22:6), m/z 568.268 (LPS 22:6), m/z 760.514 (PS 16:0_18:1), and m/z 746.513 (PE O-16:1_22:6), with m/z 1544.867 (GM1 36:1;O2) standing out in terms of marker potential. Molecular features that were positively correlated to CAA-absent vessels include m/z 838.559 (PS 18:0_22:4), m/z 836.539 (PS 18:0_22:5), m/z 888.624 (SHexCer 42:2;2O), m/z 883.533 (PI 18:1_20:4), 786.529 (PS 18:1_18:1), m/z 788.545 (PS 18:0_18:1), and m/z 794.570 (PE 18:0_22:4). Interestingly, PS 18:0_22:4 and PS 18:0_22:5 had the largest global SHAP importance scores, indicating that out of all molecular features measured in these experiments these two lipids hold the most potential to serve as markers for distinguishing healthy and diseased vasculature. This suggested relationship was confirmed in their localizations, which correlate distinctly to CAA-absent vascular regions. When examining the individual ion images, these lipids show uniform high intensity throughout the grey matter regions across all cases, but more focused analysis within the vascular regions makes it clear that these lipids are found with greater intensity and specific localization to vasculature elements in the CAA-absent cases compared to the CAA-present cases (Fig. 5c). All negative mode annotations can be seen in Table S3.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Molecular marker candidates for CAA. a Ranked list of molecular features distinguishing between CAA-present (red) and CAA-absent (blue) vasculature masks. b Ranked list of molecular features and corresponding lipid annotations. c Ion image of top-ranked lipid, m/z 838.559 (PS 18:0_22:4), comparing three replicates of CAA-present tissue (above) and CAA-absent tissue (below), with higher intensity in CAA-absent vasculature. Scale bar is equal to 1 mm.

Lipid features in positive ion mode that correlate to CAA-present vasculature included m/z 731.606 (SM 36:1;O2), m/z 729.590 (SM 18:1;O2/18:1), m/z 812.611 (PC 38:3), m/z 798.541 (unknown), m/z 703.575 (SM 16:1;O2/18:0), and m/z 787.688 (SM 40:1;O2) (Table S2, Fig. S92). Lipids m/z 786.600 (PE 39:2) and 759.638 (SM 20:1;O2/18:0) correlated to CAA-absent vasculature (Table S2, Fig. S92). Overall, in positive ion mode, our analysis did not find standout molecular features with clear marker potential. All positive mode annotations can be seen in Table S4.

To complement the multivariate SHAP-based marker discovery workflow, we performed targeted univariate comparisons for the top SHAP-ranked candidate lipids between CAA-present and CAA-absent vasculature masks (Fig. S93). These violin plots show that the CAA-absent associated PS lipids, including PS 18:0_22:4 and PS 18:0_22:5, generally exhibit higher relative intensity in the CAA-absent group, whereas the univariate behavior of GM1 36:1;O2 was less conclusive, reinforcing that some CAA-associated lipid features are relevant only in the context of a multivariate lipid panel and cannot not necessarily function as markers in isolation. The SHAP-based multivariate framework captures these collective molecular patterns and is better suited to identifying lipid features whose marker relevance is driven as part of a coordinated panel rather than as individual molecules.

Discussion

CAA is a common yet understudied vascular pathology that is closely associated with Alzheimer’s disease, and the molecular mechanisms linking β -amyloid deposition to vasculature degeneration remain poorly understood [8, 9, 35, 68, 71, 72]. In this study, we employed a multimodal molecular imaging approach to investigate the spatial lipidomic profiles of vasculature in postmortem human cortex from cases with and without CAA pathology. By integrating MALDI IMS with immunofluorescence microscopy and applying our SHAP-based interpretable supervised machine learning pipeline, we identified distinct lipid signatures associated with CAA-present vasculature and CAA-absent vasculature (Fig. 1). These findings reveal new insights into the molecular microenvironment of CAA and highlight lipid dysregulation as a key feature of vascular amyloid pathology.

Our use of autofluorescence microscopy-guided MALDI IMS allowed for precise imaging of leptomeningeal vessels, a niche particularly vulnerable to CAA pathology. High-resolution lipid imaging across 13 cases captured 956 total lipid features (Fig. S6), demonstrating broad lipidomic coverage within these vascular structures. Importantly, our imaging strategy preserved tissue antigenicity, enabling downstream immunofluorescence microscopy and the segmentation of vasculature into vasculature regions as well as into amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative subsets (Fig. 3). Highly precise multimodal image co-registration enabled lipid signals to be assigned to discrete vascular features, which is an advantage over traditional bulk lipidomics and non-spatial omics techniques [22]. Automated vasculature segmentation using the Moran quadrant map, a method developed by Tideman et al.[62], allowed for accurate segmentation of vasculature tissue features. Combined with thiazine red staining, this enabled robust binary classification of vessels based on amyloid presence, and it allowed us to define a quantitative CAA index.

By more precisely focusing our analysis on vasculature-specific ROIs, we further refined our assessment of lipid changes associated with CAA pathology. The specificity of our approach allowed us to implement the interpretable supervised machine learning method described in Tideman et al. [45]. This involved training an XGBoost classification model to differentiate CAA-present samples from CAA-absent samples, using only the IMS-measured lipid species as inputs. Once the model successfully differentiated, SHAP was used to probe the decision process of the model, which in turn allowed us to rank all lipid features according to their relevance in differentiating. This implicitly identified potential marker candidates for both vascular identity and pathology, while minimizing confounding chemical signals from grey matter, white matter, perivascular space in the leptomeninges, or other regions of the frontal cortex. Classifiers trained to distinguish vasculature from surrounding tissue identified consistent lipid marker candidates of vascular structure across human donors, such as m/z 864.623 (SHexCer 40:0;2O) and m/z 703.575 (SM 16:1;O2/18:0). Notably, some of these marker candidates, particularly in negative ion mode, showed reduced predictive strength in CAA-present vasculature compared to CAA-absent vasculature, suggesting that core structural lipids may be diminished or redistributed during CAA-associated vascular degeneration. When classifiers were trained to distinguish CAA-present from CAA-absent vasculature, a distinct lipid signature was revealed. In amyloid-absent vessels, the strongest marker candidates were long-chain polyunsaturated phosphatidylserines, including m/z 838.559 (PS 18:0_22:4) and m/z 836.539 (PS 18:0_22:5) (Fig. 5), while m/z 788.545 (PS 18:0_18:1) showed reduced marker candidate strength in CAA-present vasculature compared to CAA-absent vasculature when classifying against background tissue (Fig. S89). These species were not identified as amyloid plaque-enriched lipids in our analysis; rather, they were most strongly associated with vasculature below the CAA index. Although PS 18:0_22:4 and PS 18:0_22:5 have not, to our knowledge, been established as specific markers of cerebral vasculature, vascular smooth muscle cells, or CAA pathology, PS 18:0/22:4 has been reported in vascular lipidomics studies outside the brain [73]. Furthermore, recent isolated vessel lipidomics in AD human brains showed PS (20:0-20:4/18:0-22:4) reductions associated with an increase in the number of APOE4 alleles, a genetic variant associated with increased CAA risk [74]. This suggests that the reduced association of PS 18:0_22:4 and PS 18:0_22:5 with CAA-present vessels may reflect selective remodeling or depletion of a PUFA-rich vascular phosphatidylserine signature. Given that phosphatidylserines contribute to membrane organization, apoptotic/efferocytic signaling, coagulation biology, and CNS inflammatory responses, and that PS-containing membranes can influence Aβ binding and aggregation while externalized PS around amyloid plaques can recruit microglia through TREM2-dependent mechanisms, these changes may link vascular amyloid deposition to membrane destabilization, vascular cell loss, and altered inflammatory or clearance signaling at the neurovascular interface [75–78]. In the context of vascular smooth muscle degeneration in CAA, extracellular matrix remodeling, and vessel wall dysfunction, these findings support a hypothesis in which amyloid-laden vessels lose or remodel a PS-rich membrane environment, although functional validation will be required to determine whether these changes are causal, compensatory, or secondary to vascular injury [20, 69, 79, 80].

While our analysis does not show that GM1 is necessarily a marker candidate in isolation, it seems to be relevant in the context of the other marker candidates. This lipid has been previously implicated in amyloid pathology and oxidative stress [72, 81–88]. The association of GM1 in vasculature with CAA is notable given the established implication of GM1 ganglioside in AD amyloid biology. Aβ protein bound to GM1 has long been proposed to act as an early membrane-associated seed for β -amyloid plaque formation, and GM1-enriched membrane environments can promote Aβ conformational changes and β -amyloid assembly [89, 90]. More recent spatial lipidomic studies further suggest that gangliosides are not uniformly distributed across amyloid pathology [41, 91]. In a tgAPPArcSwe mouse brain, GM1 preferentially localized to mature amyloid plaque cores and is spatially correlated with Aβ 1-40arc, whereas GM2 and GM3 gangliosides were observed toward the diffuse plaque periphery [91]. Because vascular amyloid in CAA is typically enriched in Aβ 40 [92, 93], the enrichment of GM1 in CAA-present vessels suggests that GM1 may be marking mature Aβ 40 within the vasculature. This extends prior research on GM1’s role in parenchymal plaques into the vascular compartments of the brain, supporting the idea that CAA-present vessels undergo substantial molecular remodeling in addition to mere amyloid deposits. GM1 enrichment may even seed the organization and stabilization of Aβ 40 amyloid within the vessel wall. Future studies integrating lipid imaging, peptide-specific mapping, and markers of vascular wall remodeling could determine whether GM1 accumulation actively contributes to the organization and stabilization of Aβ 40 vascular amyloid or instead reflects a downstream consequence of CAA progression. Together, these findings provide molecular context for prior histological observations of vascular smooth muscle cell loss and extracellular matrix remodeling in CAA [20, 69, 79, 80]. The altered abundance of phosphatidylserines may underlie the degeneration of vascular integrity, while the accumulation of glycosphingolipids may either promote amyloid aggregation or arise as a consequence of CAA. Our findings align with genomic associations linking CAA risk and APOE4, a key regulator of lipid metabolism, and with prior bulk lipidomic analyses linking lipid dysregulation to cerebrovascular disease [94–97].

Unlike prior studies, our work provides spatially resolved molecular profiles at the level of individual vessels with multimodal imaging techniques, enabling direct correlation of lipid features with histopathological evidence of CAA. This spatial context is important because bulk AD and CAA lipidomic studies average molecular signal across neurons, glia, plaques, white matter, parenchymal vessels, leptomeninges, and surrounding tissue. This averaging in bulk analyses makes it difficult to attribute lipid changes to specific tissue compartments, particularly for distinguishing vascular-associated signals from those driven by adjacent parenchymal pathology [15, 17, 22, 74]. By focusing specifically on leptomeningeal vasculature and comparing vessels with and without amyloid burden, our approach preserves the anatomical context most relevant to CAA. This vessel-focused analysis may explain why PS 18:0_22:4 and PS 18:0_22:5 have not been consistently emphasized in prior bulk or plaque-focused AD lipidomic studies. In our data, these species were specifically associated with CAA-absent vasculature. Prior analyses with whole-tissue datasets may not have resolved these signals because PS changes specific to the vessels were diluted or masked by the dominant molecular contributions of surrounding pathologies and other non-vascular features [15, 17, 74, 75]. This spatial distinction is also useful for interpreting GM1. Prior studies have largely implicated gangliosides in parenchymal amyloid plaques, where GM1 and related gangliosides have been linked to Aβ binding, aggregation, and plaque-associated lipid remodeling [38, 81, 83, 84].

Finally, the integration of spatial lipidomics with immunofluorescence microscopy-based segmentation provides a platform for future investigation of other pathological processes in CAA, including inflammatory cell infiltration, matrix metalloproteinase activity, and perivascular clearance mechanisms. Future studies incorporating spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, or other highly multiplexed imaging modalities (e.g., co-detection by indexing immunofluorescence microscopy) could further link lipid alterations to specific cell types and molecular pathways [98–100]. Moreover, the observed heterogeneity across cases suggests that lipid alterations in CAA may vary with genetic background, comorbid pathology, or treatment history, which warrants further investigation in larger, clinically annotated cohorts. Lastly, while accurate mass and LC-MS/MS confirmation support lipid assignments, some molecular features remain unannotated, and functional validation of lipid candidates will be necessary to determine their roles in CAA pathogenesis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a multimodal molecular imaging framework that integrates spatially resolved lipid IMS with fluorescence microscopy and interpretable supervised machine learning to enable vessel-specific molecular profiling of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the human brain. Using a custom, quantitative CAA index consistent with neuropathological assessment, this approach directly links lipid profiles to leptomeningeal vessels with and without CAA. Our findings demonstrate that CAA is associated with coordinated lipid remodeling rather than isolated molecular changes, characterized by reduced phosphatidylserine levels and enrichment of glycosphingolipids within diseased vessels. These vasculature lipid signatures provide unique insights into lipid metabolism, vascular degeneration, and amyloid deposition, which cannot be captured adequately by bulk or univariate analyses. While larger cohorts and complementary spatial omics will be required to establish causality and clinical relevance, this work establishes spatial lipidomics as a powerful platform for interrogating cerebrovascular pathology and offers a molecular toolbox for uncovering lipidomic features of CAA in Alzheimer’s disease.

Additional file

Author contributions

C.R.M. and F.A.M. contributed equally to this work and led the study. C.R.M. conceived the project, performed the experiments, curated and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. F.A.M. contributed to project conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript writing. C.F.S. contributed to study conceptualization. L.V.-A. and W.R.-F. contributed to conceptualization, experimental design, and provided methodological guidance and domain expertise. L.G.M. and L.E.M.T. contributed to data analysis and the development of analytical methods. M.E.C. acquired experimental data and contributed to the Methods section. M.D. contributed to methodological development and experimental methods. M.S.S. contributed to study design and experimental planning and provided clinical and pathological expertise. R.V.d.P. contributed to data analysis and study conceptualization. J.M.S. supervised the study, contributed to manuscript writing, and secured funding. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s National Institute on Aging (R01AG078803), awarded to J.M.S., R.V., and M.S.S., National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK134302 and U01DK133766), and National Cancer Institute (U01CA294527), awarded to J.M.S. It was furthermore supported in part by grant numbers 2021-240339 and 2022-309518 (L.G.M and R.V.) of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative D.A.F, an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation. C.R.M was supported by an Interdisciplinary Alzheimer’s Disease T32 training grant (5T32AG058524-07). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Data availability

All data will be provided upon request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical oversight for brain tissue donation was provided by the institutional review board (IRB) of Vanderbilt University Medical Center (IRB #180287), and written informed consent was obtained from patients or their surrogate decision makers. All specimens used in the study were de-identified. The study has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Cody R. Marshall and Felipe A. Moser have contributed equally to this work.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-026-02361-4.

References

  • 1.Long JM, Holtzman DM (2019) Alzheimer disease: an update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell 179(2):312–339. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, Kanekiyo M, Li D, Reyderman L, Cohen S (2023) Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 388(1):9–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Söderberg L, Johannesson M, Gkanatsiou E, Nygren P, Fritz N, Zachrisson O, Rachalski A, Svensson A-S, Button E, Dentoni G (2024) Amyloid-beta antibody binding to cerebral amyloid angiopathy fibrils and risk for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. Sci Rep 14(1):10868. 10.1038/s41598-024-61691-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doran SJ, Sawyer RP (2024) Risk factors in developing amyloid related imaging abnormalities (aria) and clinical implications. Front Neurosci 18:1326784. 10.3389/fnins.2024.1326784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jeong SY, Suh CH, Lim J-S, Shim WH, Heo H, Choi Y, Kim HS, Kim SJ, Lee J-H (2025) Incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in phase iii clinical trials of anti-amyloid- immunotherapy: an updated meta-analysis. Neurology 104(8):213483. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Attems J, Jellinger KA (2014) The overlap between vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease-lessons from pathology. BMC Med 12(1):206. 10.1186/s12916-014-0206-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, DeCarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C, Launer LJ, Laurent S, Lopez OL, Nyenhuis D (2011) Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42(9):2672–2713. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Gurol ME, Ayata C, Bacskai BJ, Frosch MP, Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM (2017) Emerging concepts in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 140(7):1829–1850. 10.1093/brain/awx047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamada M, Naiki H (2012) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 107:41–78. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385883-2.00006-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Veluw SJ, Biessels GJ, Bouvy WH, Spliet WG, Zwanenburg JJ, Luijten PR, Macklin EA, Rozemuller AJ, Gurol ME, Greenberg SM (2016) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity is linked to dilation of juxtacortical perivascular spaces. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 36(3):576–580. 10.1177/0271678X15620434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim J, Basak JM, Holtzman DM (2009) The role of apolipoprotein e in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 63(3):287–303. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haughey NJ, Bandaru VV, Bae M, Mattson MP (2010) Roles for dysfunctional sphingolipid metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease neuropathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1801(8):878–886. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Jones L, Harold D, Williams J (2010) Genetic evidence for the involvement of lipid metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1801(8):754–761. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussain G, Wang J, Rasul A, Anwar H, Imran A, Qasim M, Zafar S, Kamran SKS, Razzaq A, Aziz N (2019) Role of cholesterol and sphingolipids in brain development and neurological diseases. Lipids Health Dis 18(1):26. 10.1186/s12944-019-0965-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chew H, Solomon VA, Fonteh AN (2020) Involvement of lipids in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and potential therapies. Front Physiol 11:598. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Di Paolo G, Kim T-W (2011) Linking lipids to Alzheimer’s disease: cholesterol and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(5):284–296. 10.1038/nrn3012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Su H, Masters CL, Bush AI, Barnham KJ, Reid GE, Vella LJ (2024) Exploring the significance of lipids in Alzheimer’s disease and the potential of extracellular vesicles. Proteomics 24(11):2300063. 10.1002/pmic.202300063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Raffetto JD, Khalil RA (2008) Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in vascular remodeling and vascular disease. Biochem Pharmacol 75(2):346–359. 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang X, Khalil RA (2018) Matrix metalloproteinases, vascular remodeling, and vascular disease. Adv Pharmacol 81:241–330. 10.1016/bs.apha.2017.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christie R, Yamada M, Moskowitz M, Hyman B (2001) Structural and functional disruption of vascular smooth muscle cells in a transgenic mouse model of amyloid angiopathy. Am J Pathol 158(3):1065–1071. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64053-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kimbrough IF, Robel S, Roberson ED, Sontheimer H (2015) Vascular amyloidosis impairs the gliovascular unit in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 138(12):3716–3733. 10.1093/brain/awv327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marshall CR, Farrow MA, Djambazova KV, Spraggins JM (2023) Untangling Alzheimer’s disease with spatial multi-omics: a brief review. Front Aging Neurosci 15:1150512. 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1150512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spraggins, J.M., Hummon, A.B., Ellis, S.R. et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Nat Rev Methods Primers 6, 44 (2026) 10.1038/s43586-026-00492-5 [DOI]
  • 24.Caprioli RM, Farmer TB, Gile J (1997) Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal Chem 69(23):4751–4760. 10.1021/ac970888i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spengler B, Hubert M (2002) Scanning microprobe matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (SMALDI) mass spectrometry: instrumentation for sub-micrometer resolved LDI and MALDI surface analysis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 13(6):735–748. 10.1016/S1044-0305(02)00376-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gode D, Volmer DA (2013) Lipid imaging by mass spectrometry—a review. Analyst 138(5):1289–1315. 10.1039/C2AN36337B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Djambazova KV, Dufresne M, Migas LG, Kruse AR, Van de Plas R, Caprioli RM, Spraggins JM (2022) Maldi tims ims of disialoganglioside isomers-GD1a and GD1b in murine brain tissue. Anal Chem 95(2):1176–1183. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zemski Berry KA, Hankin JA, Barkley RM, Spraggins JM, Caprioli RM, Murphy RC (2011) Maldi imaging of lipid biochemistry in tissues by mass spectrometry. Chem Rev 111(10):6491–6512. 10.1021/cr200280p [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Angel PM, Spraggins JM, Baldwin HS, Caprioli R (2012) Enhanced sensitivity for high spatial resolution lipid analysis by negative ion mode matrix assisted laser desorption ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 84(3):1557–1564. 10.1021/ac202383m [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spraggins JM, Djambazova KV, Rivera ES, Migas LG, Neumann EK, Fuetterer A, Suetering J, Goedecke N, Ly A, Van de Plas R (2019) High-performance molecular imaging with MALDI trapped ion-mobility time-of-flight (timsTOF) mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 91(22):14552–14560. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nilsson A, Goodwin RJ, Shariatgorji M, Vallianatou T, Webborn PJ, Andren PE (2015) Mass spectrometry imaging in drug development. Anal Chem 87(3):1437–1455. 10.1021/ac504734s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shariatgorji M, Nilsson A, Fridjonsdottir E, Vallianatou T, Källback P, Katan L, Sävmarker J, Mantas I, Zhang X, Bezard E (2019) Comprehensive mapping of neurotransmitter networks by MALDI-MS imaging. Nat Methods 16(10):1021–1028. 10.1038/s41592-019-0551-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kaya I, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Hanrieder J (2018) Shedding light on the molecular pathology of amyloid plaques in transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice using multimodal maldi imaging mass spectrometry. ACS Chem Neurosci 9(7):1802–1817. 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koutarapu S, Ge J, Jha D, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Lashley T, Michno W, Hanrieder J (2023) Correlative chemical imaging identifies amyloid peptide signatures of neuritic plaques and dystrophy in human sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Connectivity 13(5):297–306. 10.1089/brain.2022.0047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Enzlein T, Cordes J, Munteanu B, Michno W, Serneels L, De Strooper B, Hanrieder J, Wolf I, Chávez-Gutiérrez L, Hopf C (2020) Computational analysis of Alzheimer amyloid plaque composition in 2D-and elastically reconstructed 3D-MALDI MS images. Anal Chem 92(21):14484–14493. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Michno W, Stringer KM, Enzlein T, Passarelli MK, Escrig S, Vitanova K, Wood J, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Meibom A (2021) Following spatial a aggregation dynamics in evolving Alzheimer’s disease pathology by imaging stable isotope labeling kinetics. Sci Adv 7(25):4855. 10.1126/sciadv.abg4855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kasri A, Camporesi E, Gkanatsiou E, Boluda S, Brinkmalm G, Stimmer L, Ge J, Hanrieder J, Villain N, Duyckaerts C (2024) Amyloid- peptide signature associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy in familial Alzheimer’s disease with app dup and down syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 148(1):8. 10.1007/s00401-024-02756-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michno W, Wehrli PM, Koutarapu S, Marsching C, Minta K, Ge J, Meyer SW, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Henkel C (2022) Structural amyloid plaque polymorphism is associated with distinct lipid accumulations revealed by trapped ion mobility mass spectrometry imaging. J Neurochem 160(4):482–498. 10.1111/jnc.15557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hanrieder J (2024) Lipid imaging of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Neurochem 168(7):1175–1178. 10.1111/jnc.16079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jha D, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Savas JN, Hanrieder J (2024) Spatial neurolipidomics-MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of lipids in brain pathologies. J Mass Spectrom 59(3):5008. 10.1002/jms.5008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ge J, Koutarapu S, Jha D, Dulewicz M, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Hanrieder J (2023) Tetramodal chemical imaging delineates the lipid-amyloid peptide interplay at single plaques in transgenic Alzheimer’s disease models. Anal Chem 95(10):4692–4702. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kaya I, Michno W, Brinet D, Iacone Y, Zanni G, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Hanrieder J (2017) Histology-compatible MALDI mass spectrometry based imaging of neuronal lipids for subsequent immunofluorescent staining. Anal Chem 89(8):4685–4694. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Esselman AB, Moser FA, Tideman LE, Migas LG, Djambazova KV, Colley ME, Pingry EL, Patterson NH, Farrow MA, Yang H, Fogo AB, de Caestecker M, Van de Plas R, Spraggins JM (2025) In situ molecular profiles of glomerular cells by integrated imaging mass spectrometry and multiplexed immunofluorescence microscopy. Kidney Int 107(2):332–337. 10.1016/j.kint.2024.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weller RO, Preston SD, Subash M, Carare RO (2009) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the aetiology and immunotherapy of Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer’s Res Therapy 1(2):6. 10.1186/alzrt6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tideman LE, Migas LG, Djambazova KV, Patterson NH, Caprioli RM, Spraggins JM, Van de Plas R (2021) Automated biomarker candidate discovery in imaging mass spectrometry data through spatially localized Shapley additive explanations. Anal Chim Acta 1177:338522. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Farrow MA, Tideman LE, Neumann EK, Migas LG, Patterson NH, Colley ME, Allen JL, Pingry EL, Dufresne M, Yang H, Brewer M, Rivera ES, Romer CE, Djambazova K, Sharman K, Kruse ARS, Gutierrez DB, Harris RC, Fogo AB, de Caestecker MP, Caprioli RM, Van de Plas R, Spraggins JMI (2025) A lipid atlas of the human kidney. Sci Adv 11(24):3730. 10.1126/sciadv.adu3730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. KDD ’16, pp 785–794. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA . 10.1145/2939672.2939785 [DOI]
  • 48.Lundberg SM, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 30
  • 49.Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee S-I (2020) From local explanations to global understanding with explainable ai for trees. Nat Mach Intell 2(1):56–67. 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vonsattel JPG, Myers RH, Tessa Hedley-Whyte E, Ropper AH, Bird ED, Richardson Jr EP (1991) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy without and with cerebral hemorrhages: a comparative histological study. Ann Neurol Off J Am Neurol Assoc Child Neurol Soc 30(5):637–649. 10.1002/ana.410300503 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 51.Hankin JA, Barkley RM, Murphy RC (2007) Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18(9):1646–1652. 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dufresne M, Migas LG, Djambazova K, Colley ME, Van de Plas R, Spraggins JM (2025) Aminated cinnamic acid analogs as dual polarity matrices for high spatial resolution MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 344423: 10.1016/j.aca.2025.344423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Tuck M, Grélard F, Blanc L, Desbenoit N (2022) MALDI-MSI towards multimodal imaging: challenges and perspectives. Front Chem 10:904688. 10.3389/fchem.2022.904688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Patterson NH, Manz T wsireg. https://github.com/nhpatterson/wsireg
  • 55.Patterson NH, Tuck M, Van de Plas R, Caprioli RM (2018) Advanced registration and analysis of MALDI imaging mass spectrometry measurements through autofluorescence microscopy. Anal Chem 90(21):12395–12403. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Migas LG Imag2Image. https://github.com/vandeplaslab/image2image
  • 57.Migas LG Imag2Image-IO. https://github.com/vandeplaslab/image2image-io
  • 58.Zhang C, Han D, Qiao Y, Kim JU, Bae S-H, Lee S, Hong CS (2023) Faster segment anything: Towards lightweight SAM for mobile applications. 10.48550/arXiv.2306.14289arXiv:2306.14289 [DOI]
  • 59.Kirillov A, Mintun E, Ravi N, Mao H, Rolland C, Gustafson L, Xiao T, Whitehead S, Berg AC, Lo W-Y (2023) Segment anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp 4015–4026
  • 60.Sugawara K (2023) Training deep learning models for cell image segmentation with sparse annotations. BioRxiv, 2023–06 10.1101/2023.06.13.544786 [DOI]
  • 61.Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, McQuaid S, Gray RT, Murray LJ, Coleman HG (2017) QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep 7(1):1–7. 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tideman LE, Moser FA, Migas LG, Spathies J, Djambazova KV, Marshall CR, Schrag MS, Skaar EP, Spraggins JM, Van de Plas R (2025) Spatial dependence and heterogeneity in molecular imaging: Moran quadrant maps enable advanced spatial-statistical analysis. bioRxiv, 2025–10 10.1101/2025.10.27.684518 [DOI]
  • 63.Monchamp P, Andrade-Cetto L, Zhang J, Henson R, Alterovitz G, Ramoni M (2007) Systems bioinformatics: an engineering case-based approach. Artech House Publishers London, UK [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Veselkov K, Sleeman J, Claude E, Vissers JP, Galea D, Mroz A, Laponogov I, Towers M, Tonge R, Mirnezami R (2018) Basis: high-performance bioinformatics platform for processing of large-scale mass spectrometry imaging data in chemically augmented histology. Sci Rep 8(1):4053. 10.1038/s41598-018-22499-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Conroy MJ, Andrews RM, Andrews S, Cockayne L, Dennis EA, Fahy E, Gaud C, Griffiths WJ, Jukes G, Kolchin M (2024) Lipid maps: update to databases and tools for the lipidomics community. Nucleic Acids Res 52(D1):1677–1682. 10.1093/nar/gkad896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sud M, Fahy E, Cotter D, Brown A, Dennis EA, Glass CK, Merrill Jr AH, Murphy RC, Raetz CR, Russell DW (2007) LMSD: lipid maps structure database. Nucleic Acids Res 35(suppl_1):527–532. 10.1093/nar/gkl838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Biffi A, Greenberg SM (2011) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a systematic review. J Clin Neurol 7(1):1–9. 10.3988/jcn.2011.7.1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gatti L, Tinelli F, Scelzo E, Arioli F, Di Fede G, Obici L, Pantoni L, Giaccone G, Caroppo P, Parati EA (2020) Understanding the pathophysiology of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Int J Mol Sci 21(10):3435. 10.3390/ijms21103435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ventura-Antunes L, Nackenoff A, Romero-Fernandez W, Wang Y, Bosworth AM, Prusky A, Wang E, Carvajal-Tapia C, Shostak A, Harmsen H (2025) Arteriolar degeneration and stiffness in cerebral amyloid angiopathy are linked to a deposition and lysyl oxidase. Alzheimer’s Dement 21(6):70254. 10.1002/alz.70254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Patterson NH, Tuck M, Lewis A, Kaushansky A, Norris JL, Van de Plas R, Caprioli RM (2018) Next generation histology-directed imaging mass spectrometry driven by autofluorescence microscopy. Anal Chem 90(21):12404–12413. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yamada M (2015) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: emerging concepts. J Stroke 17(1):17. 10.5853/jos.2015.17.1.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Uekawa K, Hattori Y, Ahn SJ, Seo J, Casey N, Anfray A, Zhou P, Luo W, Anrather J, Park L (2023) Border-associated macrophages promote cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cognitive impairment through vascular oxidative stress. Mol Neurodegener 18(1):73. 10.1186/s13024-023-00660-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang L, Xiong L, Fan L, Diao H, Tang M, Luo E, Guo W, Yang X, Xing S (2023) Vascular lipidomics analysis reveales increased levels of phosphocholine and lysophosphocholine in atherosclerotic mice. Nutr Metab 20(1):1. 10.1186/s12986-022-00723-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Inoue Y, Wang H, Heckman MG, Ren Y, White LJ, Lu W, Wang P, Tcw J, Koga S, Alnobani A (2025) Impact of APOE on cerebrovascular lipid profile in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 150(1):39. 10.1007/s00401-025-02949-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nitsch RM, Blusztajn JK, Pittas AG, Slack BE, Growdon JH, Wurtman RJ (1992) Evidence for a membrane defect in Alzheimer disease brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89(5):1671–1675. 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ma X, Li X, Wang W, Zhang M, Yang B, Miao Z (2022) Phosphatidylserine, inflammation, and central nervous system diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 14:975176. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.975176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Park J-C, Han JW, Lee W, Kim J, Lee S-E, Lee D, Choi H, Han J, Kang YJ, Diep YN (2024) Microglia gravitate toward amyloid plaques surrounded by externalized phosphatidylserine via trem2. Adv Sci 11(34):2400064. 10.1002/advs.202400064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Robinson J, Sarangi NK, Keyes TE (2023) Role of phosphatidylserine in amyloid-beta oligomerization at asymmetric phospholipid bilayers. Phys Chem Chem Phys 25(11):7648–7661. 10.1039/D2CP03344E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Aldea R, Weller RO, Wilcock DM, Carare RO, Richardson G (2019) Cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells as the drivers of intramural periarterial drainage of the brain. Front Aging Neurosci 11:1. 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mok SS, Losic D, Barrow CJ, Turner BJ, Masters CL, Martin LL, Small DH (2006) The -amyloid peptide of Alzheimer’s disease decreases adhesion of vascular smooth muscle cells to the basement membrane. J Neurochem 96(1):53–64. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03539.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yanagisawa K (2007) Role of gangliosides in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1768(8):1943–1951. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 82.Finsterwald C, Dias S, Magistretti PJ, Lengacher S (2021) Ganglioside gm1 targets astrocytes to stimulate cerebral energy metabolism. Front Pharmacol 12:653842. 10.3389/fphar.2021.653842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Oikawa N, Yamaguchi H, Ogino K, Taki T, Yuyama K, Yamamoto N, Shin R-W, Furukawa K, Yanagisawa K (2009) Gangliosides determine the amyloid pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroReport 20(12):1043–1046. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832e4b9d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sipione S, Monyror J, Galleguillos D, Steinberg N, Kadam V (2020) Gangliosides in the brain: physiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic applications. Front Neurosci 14:572965. 10.3389/fnins.2020.572965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Fazzari M, Lunghi G, Chiricozzi E, Mauri L, Sonnino S (2022) Gangliosides and the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: a long Italian tradition. Biomedicines 10(2):363. 10.3390/biomedicines10020363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ariga T, McDonald MP, Robert KY (2008) Thematic review series: sphingolipids. Role of ganglioside metabolism in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease–a review. J Lipid Res 49(6):1157–1175. 10.1194/jlr.R800007-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Huang F, Bailey LS, Gao T, Jiang W, Yu L, Bennett DA, Zhao J, Basso KB, Guo Z (2022) Analysis and comparison of mouse and human brain gangliosides via two-stage matching of MS/MS spectra. ACS Omega 7(7):6403–6411. 10.1021/acsomega.1c07070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dodge JC, Tamsett TJ, Treleaven CM, Taksir TV, Piepenhagen P, Sardi SP, Cheng SH, Shihabuddin LS (2022) Glucosylceramide synthase inhibition reduces ganglioside GM3 accumulation, alleviates amyloid neuropathology, and stabilizes remote contextual memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res Therapy 14(1):19. 10.1186/s13195-022-00966-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yanagisawa K, Odaka A, Suzuki N, Ihara Y (1995) GM1 ganglioside-bound amyloid -protein (a): a possible form of preamyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 1(10):1062–1066. 10.1038/nm1095-1062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kakio A, Nishimoto S-I, Yanagisawa K, Kozutsumi Y, Matsuzaki K (2002) Interactions of amyloid -protein with various gangliosides in raft-like membranes: importance of gm1 ganglioside-bound form as an endogenous seed for Alzheimer amyloid. Biochemistry 41(23):7385–7390. 10.1021/bi0255874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Michno W, Wehrli PM, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Hanrieder J (2019) Gm1 locates to mature amyloid structures implicating a prominent role for glycolipid-protein interactions in Alzheimer pathology. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom 1867(5):458–467. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 92.Noto NM, Speth RC, Robison LS (2025) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a narrative review. Front Aging Neurosci 17:1632252. 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Greenberg SM, Bacskai BJ, Hernandez-Guillamon M, Pruzin J, Sperling R, Veluw SJ (2020) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease-one peptide, two pathways. Nat Rev Neurol 16(1):30–42. 10.1038/s41582-019-0281-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Montagne A, Nation DA, Sagare AP, Barisano G, Sweeney MD, Chakhoyan A, Pachicano M, Joe E, Nelson AR, D’Orazio LM (2020) Apoe4 leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature 581(7806):71–76. 10.1038/s41586-020-2247-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xiong M, Wang C, Gratuze M, Saadi F, Bao X, Bosch ME, Lee C, Jiang H, Serrano JR, Gonzales ER (2023) Astrocytic apoe4 removal confers cerebrovascular protection despite increased cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Mol Neurodegener 18(1):17. 10.1186/s13024-023-00610-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shinohara M, Murray ME, Frank RD, Shinohara M, DeTure M, Yamazaki Y, Tachibana M, Atagi Y, Davis MD, Liu C-C (2016) Impact of sex and apoe4 on cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 132(2):225–234. 10.1007/s00401-016-1580-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Fernandez CG, Hamby ME, McReynolds ML, Ray WJ (2019) The role of apoe4 in disrupting the homeostatic functions of astrocytes and microglia in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 11:14. 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Angelo M, Bendall SC, Finck R, Hale MB, Hitzman C, Borowsky AD, Levenson RM, Lowe JB, Liu SD, Zhao S (2014) Multiplexed ion beam imaging of human breast tumors. Nat Med 20(4):436–442. 10.1038/nm.3488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Black S, Phillips D, Hickey JW, Kennedy-Darling J, Venkataraaman VG, Samusik N, Goltsev Y, Schürch CM, Nolan GP (2021) Codex multiplexed tissue imaging with DNA-conjugated antibodies. Nat Protoc 16(8):3802–3835. 10.1038/s41596-021-00556-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pham T, Farrow MA, Migas LG, Dufresne M, Colley ME, Allen JL, Caestecker MP, Van de Plas R, Spraggins JM (2025) A multimodal imaging pipeline for the discovery of molecular markers of cellular neighborhoods. bioRxiv, 2025–04 10.1101/2025.04.07.647675 [DOI]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data will be provided upon request.


Articles from Acta Neuropathologica Communications are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES