Abstract
Direct air capture (DAC) is a promising strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 accumulation, yet sorbent evaluation remains dominated by equilibrium uptake under static conditions that fail to capture kinetic, humid, and process-level constraints relevant to real operation. Here we establish a dynamic evaluation framework that replaces equilibrium-centric metrics with a unified platform integrating high-precision gravimetric measurements, ppm-level CO2 nondispersion infrared detection, and capacitive humidity sensing, enabling direct quantification of adsorption kinetics, H2O/CO2 coadsorption, breakthrough behavior, and regeneration energy under low CO2 concentration and dry/humid conditions. Using TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) as a benchmark system, we introduce a sonication-assisted impregnation strategy that enables coordinated amine anchoring with preserved porosity and strong CO2 chemisorption. The optimized material exhibits a high equilibrium CO2 of 3.12 mmol g–1 (13.8 wt %) at 298 K, a dynamic breakthrough capacity of 12.4 wt % under dry conditions, and a retained capacity of 9.7 wt % at 50% relative humidity. Complete regeneration is achieved at 50 °C, enabling low-energy temperature-swing operation. This work establishes a generalizable dynamic benchmarking framework for DAC sorbents and positions TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) as a reference platform bridging molecular design, kinetic performance, and process-level energy requirements to complement conventional equilibrium evaluation.


Introduction
Direct air capture (DAC) is not only an indispensable technology for mitigating atmospheric CO2 but also a sustainable route for producing fuels within a circular carbon economy. − Compared with conventional liquid absorption, , solid adsorbents offer intrinsically lower energy penalties and greater process feasibility. − However, the ultradilute concentration of atmospheric CO2 (∼420 ppm) combined with ubiquitous moisture imposes stringent design requirements on DAC adsorbents, including high low-pressure CO2 affinity, rapid mass transfer, and low regeneration energy. −
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a highly promising and tunable platform for DAC, − owing to their controllable pore architectures and functionalizable pore environments, − particularly when amine-functionalized for chemisorption under ambient conditions. − Despite this potential, current evaluations of MOFs and other DAC adsorbents largely rely on static, single-component equilibrium measurements, which cannot fully reflect real-world kinetic uptake, diffusion limitations and dynamic breakthrough behavior under ultradilute humid continuous-flow conditions. , As DAC progresses toward industrial deployment, adsorption kinetics and multicomponent competition (especially CO2/H2O) increasingly govern overall process efficiency, productivity, and energy consumption. − Accordingly, rigorous characterization must prioritize coupled diffusion–chemisorption kinetics at ultradilute CO2 concentrations, competitive adsorption dynamics, regeneration energy, and cycling stability. − MIL-101(Cr) is chosen here as a mechanistic model rather than an industrial sorbent; despite poor scalability of Cr-based materials, its ordered pores and open metal sites support clear analysis of amine functionalization and CO2/H2O coadsorption.
Here, we establish a dynamic, flow-based evaluation platform that integrates breakthrough analysis with time-resolved gravimetric uptake profiling using a precision balance equipped with dedicated CO2 and humidity sensors. , As widely pioneered by Brandani, Ruthven, and co-workers, standard volumetric or gravimetric uptake profiles measured in shallow beds often represent empirical, convolution-heavy responses governed by system-level nonisothermal heat dissipation, carrier gas flow rates, bed configurations, and localized competitive equilibria, rather than intrinsic molecular diffusion coefficients. , Fully acknowledging these interpretive limits, our unified platform does not aim to extract idealized, intrinsic material constants via microscopic mathematical fitting. This platform enables simultaneous quantification of kinetic descriptors alongside equilibrium capacities under DAC-relevant conditions (ultralow CO2, carrier gases, and controlled humidity), providing a multidimensional and realistic assessment of adsorbent performance and directly informing practical applicability.
Guided by this protocol, we further develop a nanocomposite adsorbent, TAEA@MIL-101, − via ultrasound-assisted impregnation of metal-coordinated polyamines within MOFs, achieving enhanced CO2 capture under continuous-flow conditions. TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) demonstrates exceptional performance under practical DAC conditions, including a CO2 uptake of 3.12 mmol g–1 at 0.4 mbar and 298 K, a dynamic breakthrough capacity of 12.86 wt%, and regeneration at only 50 °C while retaining 92.2% CO2 capture over 10 cycles, substantially reducing thermal energy requirements. Notably, confinement of amine functionalities within the pore environment synergistically optimizes adsorption affinity and transport kinetics, enhancing dynamic capture efficiency while minimizing regeneration penalty.
This work not only advances the design of high-performance DAC adsorbents but, more importantly, establish a generalizable evaluation paradigm combining equilibrium characterization and dynamic kinetic testing to comprehensively assess practical adsorbent performance under realistic operating conditions, providing new insights into structure–performance relationships under realistic operating conditions.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of MIL-101(Cr)
A mixture of Cr(NO3)3·9H2O (3.0 g, 7.5 mmol) and H2BDC (1.26 g, 7.5 mmol) was prepared with 30 mL of deionized water and ultrasonicated to form a dispersion. The mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and heated to 200 °C for 16 h. The crude product was collected by centrifugation, washed with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) three times, and then immersed in DMF at 70 °C for 24 h to remove unreacted reagents. The obtained solid was washed with methanol (MeOH) three times to complete solvent exchange. Finally, the sample was activated under vacuum at 150 °C overnight.
Synthesis and Activation of TAEA@MIL-101
100 mg of tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (TAEA) and 100 mg of activated MIL-101(Cr) were separately dispersed in 2 mL of ethanol (EtOH) and sonicated for 5 min to achieve uniform dispersion. Under continuous sonication, the TAEA solution was added to the MIL-101(Cr) dispersion, and sonication was continued for 30 min. Finally, the mixture was evaporated to dryness at 50 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The sample was activated overnight at 80 °C under vacuum. Elemental analysis: Calcd for [Cr3O(OH)(BDC)3(TAEA)3.67]·1.62TAEA·1.54H2O: C, 45.65; H, 7.65; N, 20.21%. Found: C, 45.20; H, 8.55; N, 20.37%. The sample was activated overnight at 80 °C under vacuum.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
TGA was conducted on a PerkinElmer TGA 4000 instrument at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1 from room temperature to 550 °C under nitrogen flow.
Transmission Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (TEM-EDS)
TEM was conducted on a JEOL JEM-1400Plus transmission electron microscope equipped with EDS for mapping and line scan, to observe the morphology and elemental distribution of the samples.
Adsorption Instrument
Gas adsorption experiments were conducted on a MicrotracBEL Belsorp Max2-SN88 high-throughput surface area analyzer and an Autosorb-iQ-MP-AG BET gas adsorption surface area analyzer.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS was conducted on a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer to characterize the surface elemental composition and relative contents of the samples, and further analyze the coordination environment between MIL-101 and amine molecules. Before measurement, the samples were degassed under vacuum to remove residual solvents, and the powder samples were then pressed into pellets using a tablet press.
Solid-State 13C HPDEC/MAS NMR
Solid-state 13C HPDEC/MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 400 MHz spectrometer (9.4 T) using a 4.0 mm ZrO2 rotor at a spinning rate of 10 kHz. For 13CO2 dosing experiments, the activated sample was packed in an N2-filled glovebox, degassed under dynamic vacuum, and subsequently equilibrated with 1 bar of 13CO2 for 12 h. The chemical shifts were referenced to the carboxylic carbon of glycine at 176.2 ppm relative to TMS.
Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS) Measurements
Dynamic CO2 uptake isotherms were gravimetrically recorded using a dynamic vapor sorption analyzer (DVS Carbon, Surface Measurement Systems) at 25 °C. Prior to measurements, ca. 10–20 mg samples were activated under high vacuum (<10–5 Torr) for 12 h, transferred to the DVS chamber, and further activated at 80 °C under a N2 flow (200 sccm) for 2 h. Upon cooling to 25 °C, the sample were equilibrated with a 400 ppm of CO2 flow (200 sccm) until the mass change rate (dm/dt) was less than 0.002% min–1.
Heat of Adsorption by Experimental Measurement
The adsorption heat of CO2 was measured using Microtac BELsorp Max2 sorption analyzer coupled to a calorimetry tester (SenSys EVO). Heat changes were collected by thermal analysis. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) measurements were performed by heating and cooling the samples on a TA DSC Q2000 instrument, with a heat rate of 40 K min–1 under the N2 atmosphere.
Breakthrough Measurements
Dynamic breakthrough experiments were conducted using a BTA Frontier (Surface Measurement Systems). Approximately 40 mg of the sample was packed into a silanized glass column (3 mm inner diameter) to form a fixed bed with a height of ca. 30 mm. Prior to the measurement, the sample underwent a strict activation protocol to ensure the complete removal of preadsorbed species: the material was first activated at 80 °C under high vacuum (10–5 Torr) for 20 h, followed by in situ activation at 80 °C under a pure N2 flow (50 sccm) for 2 h. After cooling to the adsorption temperature of 25 °C, the gas stream was switched from N2 to a feed gas containing 410 ppm of CO2 at a total flow rate of 50 sccm to initiate the adsorption process. The effluent gas concentration at the outlet was monitored using integrated NDIR sensor for CO2, a capacitive humidity sensor for H2O. To account for the sensor delay and the dead volume corrections blank adsorption and desorption experiments were carried out in same way except instead of the adsorbent a similar volume of glass beads were loaded in the column.
To evaluate the stability of the amine-functionalized adsorbent, the effluent gas during desorption was continuously monitored using an integrated Photoionization Detector (PID). PIDs are sensitive to amines and a broad range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); however, given that the working temperature range following initial activation and subsequent adsorption is unlikely to volatilize organic species from our material other than amine-based degradation products, changes in PID signal can be predominantly attributed to amine leaching or decomposition. The PID signals were thus recorded to detect the elution of any volatile amine species or degradation products, serving as a semiquantitative indicator of material stability.
CO2/H2O Competitive Adsorption Kinetics
To strictly evaluate and compare the adsorption rates, the apparent dynamic data were analyzed based on the intraparticle diffusion model. The slope of this curve serves as the kinetic parameter, and the square of the ratio of the slopes for the two guest molecules constitutes the apparent relative uptake rate ratio. The fractional uptake (Mt /M e ) during the initial adsorption stage is proportional to the square root of time, described by the following equation:
Where:
M t is the adsorption uptake as the time-dependent;
Me is the adsorption uptake at equilibrium;
k is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant (slope), representing the diffusion rate;
C is a constant related to the boundary layer effect.
Results and Discussion
Optimized Loading Strategy and Structural Integrity of TAEA@MIL-101
Current evaluations of amine-functionalized adsorbents for direct air capture often overemphasize absolute amine loading and adsorption capacity, disregarding the detrimental pore clogging that hinders mass transfer kinetics. Inspiration for selecting the metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr), − was based on the fact that its expansive mesoporous cages serve as an ideal host to harness spatial confinement, thereby balancing the inherent trade-offs between adsorption thermodynamics and mass transport kinetics. As illustrated in Scheme , the TAEA@MIL-101 composite was prepared through an ultrasound-assisted wet impregnation strategy. Through this optimized loading method, TAEA molecules are precisely confined within the mesoporous voids rather than aggregating on the exterior surface. This architecture maximizes the accessibility of amine active sites while preserving the structural integrity of the framework, which will be further elucidated in the subsequent sections. As shown in the SEM image (Figure a), the composite consists of regular octahedral particles resembling MIL-101(Cr). Compared to the pristine porous support (Figures S1 and S2), the morphologies and sizes remained nearly intact after amine impregnation. Notably, no obvious particle agglomeration or amorphous surface coating was observed. To understand the amine distribution within the crystal, EDX line scans and maps were collected (Figure b and c), revealing that the N content remained nearly constant at different positions and exhibited uniform distributions of Cr and N, which confirms that amines were really loaded into MIL-101 pores and indicates the absence of aggregation. The structural integrity of the composite was further corroborated by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and TGA (Figures S3 and S4). The TGA profiles indicate exceptional thermal stability up to approximately 280 °C, consistent with the robust Cr(III)-carboxylate coordination network.
1. Ultrasound-Assisted Impregnation of Metal-Bound Polyamines for Optimized TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) Nanocomposites in Direct Air Capture.

1.

Compositional, structural and porosity characterization of TAEA@MIL-101(Cr), confirming optimal polyamine incorporation. (a) SEM image showing uniform octahedral crystals after polyamine impregnation (inset: size distribution). (b) EDS elemental mapping (Cr, C, N), showing homogeneous polyamine distribution. (c) HAADF-STEM image and cross-sectional EDS line scan, confirming absence of surface blockage. (d) High-resolution XPS (Cr 2p) before and after sonication, indicating increased exposure of metal sites. (e) High-resolution XPS (Cr 2p) after polyamine impregnation, indicating coordination to amine species. (f) High-resolution XPS (N 1s), confirming incorporation of metal-bound amines. (g) N2 adsorption isotherms (77 K) with pore size distribution (inset), showing pore occupation relative to pristine MIL-101. (h) CO2 adsorption isotherms (298 K), showing enhanced uptake at low pressure relative to pristine MIL-101. (i) H2O adsorption isotherms (298 K), showing reduced hygroscopicity after amine incorporation.
Furthermore, the host–guest interaction was probed by XPS. N 1s spectrum displays characteristic amine peaks (Figure f) while the Cr 2p binding energy exhibits a distinct negative shift of ∼ 0.5 eV (from 576.7 to 576.2 eV, Figure e). This phenomenon is attributed to the electron donation from TAEA amine groups to the unsaturated Cr centers, forming robust coordinate bonds (N→Cr) to stabilize the guests. , Notably, this efficient coordination is facilitated by the activation process, which effectively strips the precoordinated water molecules to expose electron-deficient open metal sites (as indicated by the intermediate positive shift to 577.4 eV, Figure d), thereby driving the subsequent amine substitution.
Upon amine loading, the specific surface area decreased significantly from 3300 to 840 m2 g–1 (Table S1). The complete disappearance of characteristic mesoporous peaks in the pore size distribution (PSD) profiles, accompanied by the partial retention of micropores, unambiguously confirms that TAEA molecules are deeply confined within the mesoporous voids (Figure g). Despite this reduction in textural porosity, the introduction of abundant amine active sites drastically reverses the adsorption behavior. In stark contrast to the linear physisorption profile of pristine MIL-101, the steep Type-I isotherm of the composite at low pressures highlights the efficacy of the spatially confined amines. Consequently, TAEA@MIL-101 exhibits a steep CO2 uptake at extremely low partial pressures (Figure h), unlocking the critical capability to capture trace-level CO2. Concurrently, the water vapor uptake is significantly suppressed (Figure i), indicating an enhanced hydrophobicity. This synergistic combination of ultralow-pressure CO2 affinity and moisture resistance establishes a robust foundation for practical direct air capture.
The strategic selection of TAEA as the amine modifier rather than conventional polymeric polyethylenimine (PEI) or linear polyamines (e.g., TEPA) stems from its optimal molecular balance between chemical capture affinity and mass transport kinetics. Polymeric components like PEI, though nonvolatile, often suffer from molecular entanglement and random aggregation, blocking the mesoporous entry windows of the host framework and deteriorating the overall amine efficiency. In contrast, the tripodal branched geometry of TAEA prevents tight intramolecular packing under spatial confinement, guaranteeing that its high density of reactive terminal primary amine sites remains fully accessible to diffuse trace CO2 molecules. Furthermore, the strong electron-donating nature of its nitrogen atoms facilitates multidentate coordination with the open Cr(III) metal nodes.
Exceptional CO2 Uptake Capacity and Chemisorption Mechanism
The thermodynamic behavior of CO2 capture for TAEA@MIL-101 was evaluated from static adsorption isotherms at varying temperatures. The material exhibited a remarkably high adsorption affinity and an exceptional uptake capacity of 3.12 mmol g–1 at an ultralow partial pressure of 0.04 kPa (400 ppm) at 298 K, demonstrating its robust potential across a broad temperature window. (Figure a). The dynamic adsorption performance was subsequently demonstrated via DVS measurements. Under a continuous flow of 400 ppm of CO2 at 298 K, the material achieves a high dynamic capacity of 12.8 wt % and reaches equilibrium rapidly in less than 100 min. (Figure b and Figure S7). Notably, efficient CO2 adsorption can be achieved at different CO2 concentrations (Figure S8), corroborating its practical viability for direct air capture.
2.

CO 2 capture performance and mechanistic investigation of TAEA@MIL-101(Cr), establishing chemical adsorption for direct air capture. (a) CO2 adsorption isotherms (at 288, 298, and 308 K), showing steep uptake at ultralow pressures relevant to DAC. (b) CO2 uptake at 400 ppm (at 288, 298, and 308 K), showing rapid adsorption kinetics. (c) In situ microcalorimetry at 298 K, revealing high adsorption enthalpy characteristic of chemical adsorption. (d) FT-IR spectra of MIL-101, TAEA@MIL-101, and CO2-loaded TAEA@MIL-101, confirming amine incorporation (normalized to 1018 cm–1). (e) FT-IR (1300–1700 cm–1), showing formation of −NH–COO– species upon CO2 chemisorption. (f) Solid-state 13C NMR (HPDEC/MAS) before and after 13CO2 loading, confirming carbamate formation.
The host–guest interaction strength was quantified by direct calorimetric measurements of the adsorption heat, with the resulting profiles corroborating the chemisorption mechanism (Figure c). To gain molecular-level insights into the chemisorption mechanism suggested by the thermodynamic data, Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed. For rigorous comparability, the spectra were normalized against the robust framework vibration band at 1018 cm–1 as an internal reference (Figure d). As illustrated in the magnified region (Figure e and Figure S5), pristine TAEA@MIL-101 exhibits characteristic δ NH2 and ν N–H vibrations at 1595 cm–1 and 3200–3400 cm–1, respectively, confirming the successful loading of the TAEA molecules. In distinct contrast, the CO2-dosed sample displays prominent new bands in this region. These diagnostic peaks are unambiguously assigned to carbamate species (−NH–COO−). ,
This chemisorption mechanism was further corroborated by solid-state 13C NMR (Figure f), verifying the specific bonding between CO2 and TAEA. Following exposure to 13C-labeled CO2, a sharp and narrow peak at 164.7 ppm. This signal serves as a characteristic fingerprint of the carbonyl carbon within ammonium carbamate species. The direct NMR evidence, in conjunction with the FT-IR anaysis, unequivocally confirms that the TAEA@MIL-101 captures CO2 via a chemical pathway, culminating in the formation of stable ammonium carbamate ion pairs.
Adsorption Kinetics, Uptake Capacity, and CO2/H2O Selectivity under Humid Conditions
Real-world direct air capture deployment inevitably faces the challenge of moisture. To evaluate the CO2/H2O separation performance under practical humid conditions, time-dependent CO2 and H2O uptake profiles were recorded at varying relative humidities (Figure a). As depicted in the raw uptake curves, the two adsorbates exhibit distinct kinetic behaviors upon initial exposure. To qualitatively compare relative adsorption trends among samples under fully unified experimental conditions, uptake curves were fitted via the intraparticle diffusion model. The obtained slope is only an apparent empirical parameter for internal comparison within this work under identical flow, temperature and sample loading; such fitted values cannot be treated as intrinsic material diffusion descriptors.75,76 The measured initial uptake slope of H2O is steeper than dilute CO2 under identical humid flow conditions, reflecting integrated overall mass transfer signals rather than intrinsic molecular diffusion rates. Quantitative comparison of intraparticle diffusion constants at 30%, 50% and 80% RH (Tables S2–S4) shows the H2O/CO2 kinetic selectivity reaches 7.17 at 50% RH and further rises to 8.65 at 80% RH, quantitatively confirming much faster mass transfer of water vapor during coadsorption. These numerical discrepancies directly illustrate how humidity modulates dynamic CO2 working capacity, strongly demonstrating that adsorption kinetics, instead of equilibrium uptake, dominate practical DAC performance under dilute humid air.
3.

H 2 O/CO 2 competitive adsorption and kinetic selectivity of TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) under humid conditions approaching direct air capture. (a) H2O uptake at 30%, 50%, and 80% RH vs 400 ppm of CO2, showing faster H2O adsorption kinetics. (b) Intraparticle diffusion fitting, yielding apparent diffusion rate constants (k). (c) H2O/CO2 kinetic selectivity as a function of relative humidity, quantifying competitive adsorption. (d) CO2 uptake (400 ppm) after H2O preadsorption (30–80% RH), retaining high capacity under humid conditions. (e) Intraparticle diffusion analysis of CO2 uptake, showing humidity-dependent CO2 adsorption kinetics. (f) Equilibrium CO2 uptake under dry and humid conditions (30–80% RH), retaining substantial capacity.
Following the kinetic evaluation methodology detailed in the Supporting Information, these dynamic profiles were further analyzed. To deconvolute the competitive H2O/CO2 adsorption dynamics. In Figure a, a comparative analysis based on the intraparticle diffusion model reveals substantial disparities in the diffusion rates of the two species. The fitted slopes represent comprehensive apparent response signals affected by competitive adsorption, thermal gradients and bed mass transfer. Kinetic analysis using the intraparticle diffusion model (Figures b) reveals that due to the combined influence of multiple factors, including competitive adsorption, amine–water hydrogen bonding, molecular size and polarity, exhibit significantly faster apparent diffusion kinetics (k H2O) than dilute CO2 (k CO2 ) across the humidity range of 30–80% RH (Table S2). For instance, at 50% RH, k H2O surpasses k CO2 by over 2-fold, implying that moisture rapidly occupies the mesoporous channels prior to significant CO2 uptake.
Sequential adsorption experiments confirmed that the accessibility of the amine sites remains unimpaired by preadsorbed water, ensuring the structural availability of active sites even under moisture-saturated conditions. Even after the material was pre-equilibrated with water vapor (at 30%, 50% and 80% RH), the subsequent introduction of 400 ppm of CO2 triggered a rapid and substantial secondary mass gain (Figure d). The intraparticle diffusion fitting for this secondary CO2 uptake phase (Figure e and Table S3) confirms that the internal amine sites remain highly accessible to CO2 molecules. The ultimate impact of moisture on the mixed-gas adsorption capacity is rigorously quantified (Figure f). Notably, TAEA@MIL-101 demonstrates exceptional humidity tolerance, retaining a high CO2 working uptake capacity of 8.95 wt % under a 400 ppm of CO2 stream even after reaching saturation with moisture at 50% RH (Figure d and Table S3). Furthermore, comparative kinetic analysis reveals that the extensive coadsorption of water does not severely inhibit the subsequent CO2 uptake (Tables S4). This close similarity in kinetic parameters (k H2O) suggests minimal competitive interference between H2O and CO2 molecules within the amine-functionalized mesoporous channels (Figure f). This behavior indicates that the amine-mediated chemisorption process remains highly effective regardless of the CO2/H2O adsorption order, ensuring reliable carbon capture from humid gas streams. − This relative independence between the two species facilitates a robust carbon capture performance, even under the competitive constraints of realistic humid DAC conditions.
Practical Viability in Direct Air Capture and Comprehensive Benchmarking
The practical applicability of TAEA@MIL-101 was evaluated via dynamic gas-adsorption breakthrough experiments using simulated ambient air (400 ppm of CO2 balanced with N2, Figure a, b). Specifically, packed beds containing 40 mg and 39 mg of the adsorbent were tested under dry and humid (50% RH) conditions, respectively.
4.

Practical direct air capture performance of TAEA@MIL-101(Cr): breakthrough behavior, regeneration, cyclic stability, and benchmarking. (a) CO2 breakthrough (400 ppm of CO2/N2, dry), showing fast kinetics and extended CO2 retention (12.4 wt %). (b) CO2 desorption under, achieving complete regeneration at 50 °C. (c) CO2/H2O breakthrough (400 ppm of CO2/N2, 50% RH), retaining high CO2 capacity (9.7 wt %) under humid conditions. (d) CO2 and H2O desorption profiles, confirming full regeneration at 50 °C. (e) Temperature-swing adsorption (25–50 °C) over 10 cycles, showing stable performance and low-temperature regeneration. (f) Radar comparison of DAC metrics (capacity, kinetics, stability, amine efficiency, regeneration energy), highlighting balanced performance. (g) Benchmarking of CO2 uptake (400 ppm, 298 K) against state-of-the-art adsorbents, establishing TAEA@MIL-101(Cr) as a leading platform for direct air capture.
Strikingly, TAEA@MIL-101 exhibits sharp breakthrough fronts, with the breakthrough time under humid conditions remaining nearly identical to that observed under dry conditions. A slight rollup of water does indicate slight water displacement in the presence of CO2. This kinetic consistency is of paramount significance within our DAC evaluation framework: the material maintains a substantial dynamic capacity of 9.69 wt % at 50% RH even with a preadsorbed moisture content of 34.96 wt%retaining the vast majority of its dry capacity (12.39 wt %). This result rigorously confirms the high degree of site-specific immunity to moisture interference, representing a critical technical advantage for practical deployment.
Reducing regeneration energy is a key metric for minimizing the operating expenditure associated with DAC systems. The regeneration process of TAEA@MIL-101 was implemented by heating the column to 50 °C under N2 purge (Figure c, d). As revealed by the desorption profiles, the enriched concentration CO2 was released rapidly, and complete desorption was achieved within approximately 100 min of real time.
This ultralow regeneration temperature is of paramount value within our evaluation framework: it not only significantly mitigates the parasitic energy penalty but also enables direct thermal integration with low-grade industrial waste heat. This stands in stark contrast to conventional amine-based adsorbents, which typically necessitate much high regeneration temperatures.
Notably, real-time monitoring of the effluent gas via a photoionization detector (PID) during the regeneration phase reveals negligible signals for volatile amine species, thereby corroborating the robust spatial confinement of TAEA and ruling out significant amine leaching (Figure S12).
The long-term durability of an adsorbent serves as the ultimate benchmark for assessing its potential for practical deployment. − TAEA@MIL-101 demonstrated exceptional stability with negligible capacity attenuation over 10 consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles, confirming its robustness for sustained DAC operations (Figure e and Figure S9). Comparative benchmarking against an extensive library of representative adsorbents (Figure g and Table S5) reveals the superior CO2 uptake of TAEA@MIL-101, positioning it among the top-tier performers across diverse material categories. However, practical viability necessitates more than just high capacity. As illustrated in the radar plot (Figure f), TAEA@MIL-101 exhibits a balanced and exceptional profile across all critical performance metrics.
Conclusion
In summary, this work establishes a strategic blueprint for the rational design and industrial feasibility assessment of high-performance direct air capture adsorbents by leveraging the spatial confinement of long-chain polyamines within mesoporous frameworks. The encapsulation of TAEA into the MIL-101(Cr) cages yields a superior dynamic CO2 breakthrough capacity of 12.39 wt% under simulated ambient air (400 ppm), demonstrating that site-specific structural optimization can effectively circumvent the pore-clogging issues and kinetic limitations that typically plague traditional amine impregnation methods.
Beyond CO2 uptake capture, we have introduced a comprehensive evaluation protocol to rigorously vet the industrial potential of TAEA@MIL-101. This systematic assessment confirms that TAEA@MIL-101 achieves a rare equilibrium among high dynamic capture efficiency, robust moisture immunity, and ultralow-temperature regeneration. By excelling across these diverse metrics, this study not only presents a top-tier candidate for large-scale carbon management but also establishes a new performance benchmark and a standard evaluation framework for the next generation of direct air capture technologies.
Such insight directly guides the rigorous optimization of low-temperature swing trajectories that minimize high-grade heat demand while mitigating thermal-driven amine degradation. More importantly, the concurrent monitoring of coadsorbed water vapor desorption offers a strategic avenue to directly evaluate and deconvolute the parasitic sensible and latent heat penalties that dominate the energetic viability of humid direct air capture systems, bridging the gap between fundamental chemistry and practical engineering design.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 92356301 and 22171075). The authors thank Center of High-Resolution Electron Microscopy (CℏEM; #EM02161943) for support of SEM facilities, the Analytical Instrumentation Center (#SPST-AIC10112914) for support of gas adsorption, XRD, and characterization at the School of Physical Science and Technology, and the HPC Platform of ShanghaiTech University for theoretical calculation. We thank Yongyu Pan for them valuable discussions on the research work.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.6c00769.
Synthetic details, static gas/vapor adsorption isotherms, CO2/H2O competitive adsorption kinetics, mimic direct air capture environment adsorption breakthrough, TGA, PXRD, SEM, XPS, and Q st (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Johnson N., Staffell I.. Democratizing Climate Change Mitigation Pathways Using Modernized Stabilization Wedges. Science. 2026;391:eadr2118. doi: 10.1126/science.adr2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breyer C., Fasihi M., Bajamundi C., Creutzig F.. Direct Air Capture of CO2: A Key Technology for Ambitious Climate Change Mitigation. Joule. 2019;3:2053–2065. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, S. M. ; Geden, O. ; Gidden, M. J. ; Lamb, W. F. ; Nemet, G. F. ; Minx, J. C. ; Buck, H. ; Burke, J. ; Cox, E. ; Edwards, M. R. ; Fuss, S. ; Johnstone, I. ; Müller-Hansen, F. ; Pongratz, J. ; Probst, B. S. ; Roe, S. ; Schenuit, F. ; Schulte, I. ; Vaughan, N. E. , Eds. The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024, 2nd ed.; Open Science Framework, 2024. 10.17605/OSF.IO/F85QJ [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang P., Clark D. S., Yaghi O. M.. Envisioning the “Air Economy”Powered by Reticular Chemistry and Sunlight for Clean Air, Clean Energy, and Clean Water. Mol. Front. J. 2021;5:30. doi: 10.1142/S2529732521400046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ye J., Dimitratos N., Rossi L. M., Thonemann N., Beale A. M., Wojcieszak R.. Hydrogenation of CO2 for Sustainable Fuel and Chemical Production. Science. 2025;387:943. doi: 10.1126/science.adn9388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kar S., Kim D., Bin Mohamad Annuar A., Sarma B. B., Stanton M., Lam E., Bhattacharjee S., Karak S., Greer H. F., Reisner E.. Direct Air Capture of CO2 for Solar Fuel Production in Flow. Nat. Energy. 2025;10:448–459. doi: 10.1038/s41560-025-01714-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lackner, K. S. ; Ziock, H.-J. ; Grimes, P. . Carbon Dioxide Extraction from Air: Is It an Option? Presented at the 24th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL, March 8–11, U.S. Department of Energy, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Lackner K. S., Brennan S., Matter J. M., Park A.-H. A., Wright A., van der Zwaan B.. The Urgency of the Development Of CO2 Capture from Ambient Air. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012;109:13156–13162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108765109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keith D. W., Holmes G., St Angelo D., Heidel K.. A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere. Joule. 2018;2:1573–1594. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eisaman M. D.. Negative Emissions Technologies: The Tradeoffs of Air-Capture Economics. Joule. 2020;4:516–520. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sabatino F., Grimm A., Gallucci F., van Sint Annaland M., Kramer G. J., Gazzani M.. A Comparative Energy and Costs Assessment and Optimization for Direct Air Capture Technologies. Joule. 2021;5:2047–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tan J. Z. Y., Uratani J. M., Griffiths S., Andresen J. M., Maroto-Valer M. M.. Chemistry Advances Driving Industrial Carbon Capture Technologies. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2025;9:656–671. doi: 10.1038/s41570-025-00733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erans M., Sanz-Pérez E. S., Hanak D. P., Clulow Z., Reiner D. M., Mutch G. A.. Direct Air Capture: Process Technology, Techno-Economic and Socio-Political Challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022;15:1360–1405. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03523A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z., Gao J., Zhang Y., Liu W., Tang Z., Zhou Q., Du Q., Dong H.. Scenario-Specific Applications of Direct Air Capture Technology and System Optimization Approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026;226:116270. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz-Pérez E. S., Murdock C. R., Didas S. A., Jones C. W.. Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:11840–11876. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi X., Xiao H., Azarabadi H., Song J., Wu X., Chen X., Lackner K. S.. Sorbents for the Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:6984–7006. doi: 10.1002/anie.201906756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu X., Xie W., Wu J., Miao Y., Xiang C., Chen C., Ge B., Gan Z., Yang F., Zhang M., O’Hare D., Li J., Ge T., Wang R.. Recent Advances in Direct Air Capture by Adsorption. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51:6574–6651. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00970B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunstan M. T., Donat F., Bork A. H., Grey C. P., Müller C. R.. CO2 Capture at Medium to High Temperature Using Solid Oxide-Based Sorbents: Fundamental Aspects, Mechanistic Insights, and Recent Advances. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:12681–12745. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z., Ma T., Zhang H., Chheda S., Li H., Wang K., Ehrling S., Giovine R., Li C., Alawadhi A. H., Abduljawad M. M., Alawad M. O., Gagliardi L., Sauer J., Yaghi O. M.. Carbon Dioxide Capture from Open Air Using Covalent Organic Frameworks. Nature. 2024;635:96–101. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z., Ma T., Zhang H., Sabeva N. S., Yaghi O. M.. Fast and Selective CO2 Capture from Outdoor Air by Covalent Organic Frameworks. Nat. Sustain. 2026;9:431–438. doi: 10.1038/s41893-025-01735-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li H., Zick M. E., Trisukhon T., Signorile M., Liu X., Eastmond H., Sharma S., Spreng T. L., Taylor J., Gittins J. W., Farrow C., Lim S. A., Crocellà V., Milner P. J., Forse A. C.. Capturing Carbon Dioxide From Air With Charged-Sorbents. Nature. 2024;630:654–659. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07449-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charalambous C., Moubarak E., Schilling J., Sanchez Fernandez E., Wang J.-Y., Herraiz L., Mcilwaine F., Peh S. B., Garvin M., Jablonka K. M., Moosavi S. M., Van Herck J., Ozturk A. Y., Pourghaderi A., Song A.-Y., Mouchaham G., Serre C., Reimer J. A., Bardow A., Smit B., Garcia S.. A Holistic Platform for Accelerating Sorbent-Based Carbon Capture. Nature. 2024;632:89–94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07683-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yaghi, O. M. ; Kalmutzki, M. J. ; Diercks, C. S. . Introduction to Reticular Chemistry: Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Li H., Rampal N., Yaghi O. M.. Reticular Chemistry: Past, Present, and Future. Mol. Front. J. 2025;9:1–14. doi: 10.1142/S2529732525300034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yaghi, O. M. Metal–Organic Frameworks: From Molecules to Society. Nobel Lect.; Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025; Nobel Prize Outreach: Stockholm, Sweden, 2025. 10.59327/nobel.2025.lecture.yaghi. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trickett C. A., Helal A., Al-Maythalony B. A., Yamani Z. H., Cordova K. E., Yaghi O. M.. The Chemistry of Metal–Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture, Regeneration and Conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17045. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou D.-D., Zhang X.-W., Mo Z.-W., Xu Y.-Z., Tian X.-Y., Li Y., Chen X.-M., Zhang J.-P.. Adsorptive Separation of Carbon Dioxide: From Conventional Porous Materials to Metal–Organic Frameworks. EnergyChem. 2019;1:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ye Z.-M., Xie Y., Kirlikovali K. O., Xiang S., Farha O. K., Chen B.. Architecting Metal–Organic Frameworks at Molecular Level toward Direct Air Capture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:5495–5514. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c12200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaidhyanathan R., Iremonger S. S., Shimizu G. K. H., Boyd P. D. W., Alavi S., Woo T. K.. Direct Observation and Quantification of CO2 Binding Within an Amine-Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework. Science. 2010;330:650–653. doi: 10.1126/science.1194237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin J.-B., Nguyen T. T. T., Vaidhyanathan R., Burner J., Taylor J. M., Durekova H., Akhtar F., Mah R. K., Ghaffari-Nik O., Marx S., Fylstra N., Iremonger S. S., Dawson K. W., Sarkar P., Hovington P., Rajendran A., Woo T. K., Shimizu G. K. H.. A Scalable Metal–Organic Framework as a Durable Physisorbent for Carbon Dioxide Capture. Science. 2021;374:1464–1469. doi: 10.1126/science.abi7281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nugent P., Belmabkhout Y., Burd S. D., Cairns A. J., Luebke R., Forrest K., Pham T., Ma S., Space B., Wojtas L., Eddaoudi M., Zaworotko M. J.. Porous Materials with Optimal Adsorption Thermodynamics and Kinetics For CO2 Separation. Nature. 2013;495:80–84. doi: 10.1038/nature11893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shekhah O., Belmabkhout Y., Chen Z., Guillerm V., Cairns A., Adil K., Eddaoudi M.. Made-To-Order Metal-Organic Frameworks for Trace Carbon Dioxide Removal and Air Capture. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4228. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhatt P. M., Belmabkhout Y., Cadiau A., Adil K., Shekhah O., Shkurenko A., Barbour L. J., Eddaoudi M.. A Fine-Tuned Fluorinated MOF Addresses the Needs for Trace CO2 Removal and Air Capture Using Physisorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:9301–9307. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao P.-Q., Chen H., Zhou D.-D., Liu S.-Y., He C.-T., Rui Z., Ji H., Zhang J.-P., Chen X.-M.. Monodentate Hydroxide as a Super Strong yet Reversible Active Site for CO2 Capture from High-Humidity Flue Gas. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:1011–1016. doi: 10.1039/C4EE02717E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liao P.-Q., Chen X.-W., Liu S.-Y., Li X.-Y., Xu Y.-T., Tang M., Rui Z., Ji H., Zhang J.-P., Chen X.-M.. Putting an Ultrahigh Concentration of Amine Groups into a Metal–Organic Framework for CO2 Capture at Low Pressures. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:6528–6533. doi: 10.1039/C6SC00836D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohde R. C., Carsch K. M., Dods M. N., Jiang H. Z. H., McIsaac A. R., Klein R. A., Kwon H., Karstens S. L., Wang Y., Huang A. J., Taylor J. W., Yabuuchi Y., Tkachenko N. V., Meihaus K. R., Furukawa H., Yahne D. R., Engler K. E., Bustillo K. C., Minor A. M., Reimer J. A., Head-Gordon M., Brown C. M., Long J. R.. High-Temperature Carbon Dioxide Capture In A Porous Material With Terminal Zinc Hydride Sites. Science. 2024;386:814–819. doi: 10.1126/science.adk5697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald T. M., Lee W. R., Mason J. A., Wiers B. M., Hong C. S., Long J. R.. Capture of Carbon Dioxide from Air and Flue Gas in the Alkylamine-Appended Metal-Organic Framework mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:7056–7065. doi: 10.1021/ja300034j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald T. M., Mason J. A., Kong X., Bloch E. D., Gygi D., Dani A., Crocellà V., Giordanino F., Odoh S. O., Drisdell W. S., Vlaisavljevich B., Dzubak A. L., Poloni R., Schnell S. K., Planas N., Lee K., Pascal T., Wan L. F., Prendergast D., Neaton J. B., Smit B., Kortright J. B., Gagliardi L., Bordiga S., Reimer J. A., Long J. R.. Cooperative Insertion of CO2 in Diamine-Appended Metal-Organic Frameworks. Nature. 2015;519:303–308. doi: 10.1038/nature14327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim E. J., Siegelman R. L., Jiang H. Z. H., Forse A. C., Lee J.-H., Martell J. D., Milner P. J., Falkowski J. M., Neaton J. B., Reimer J. A., Weston S. C., Long J. R.. Cooperative Carbon Capture and Steam Regeneration with Tetraamine-Appended Metal–Organic Frameworks. Science. 2020;369:392–396. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choe J. H., Kim H., Yun H., Kurisingal J. F., Kim N., Lee D., Lee Y. H., Hong C. S.. Extended MOF-74-Type Variant with an Azine Linkage: Efficient Direct Air Capture and One-Pot Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:19337–19349. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c05318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choe J. H., Kim H., Yun H., Kang M., Park S., Yu S., Hong C. S.. Boc Protection for Diamine-Appended MOF Adsorbents to Enhance CO2 Recyclability Under Realistic Humid Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:646–659. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c10475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fracaroli A. M., Furukawa H., Suzuki M., Dodd M., Okajima S., Gándara F., Reimer J. A., Yaghi O. M.. Metal–Organic Frameworks with Precisely Designed Interior for Carbon Dioxide Capture in the Presence of Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:8863–8866. doi: 10.1021/ja503296c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flaig R. W., Osborn Popp T. M., Fracaroli A. M., Kapustin E. A., Kalmutzki M. J., Altamimi R. M., Fathieh F., Reimer J. A., Yaghi O. M.. The Chemistry of CO2 Capture in an Amine-Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework under Dry and Humid Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:12125–12128. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegelman R. L., Kim E. J., Long J. R.. Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separations to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:1060–1072. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dods M. N., Long J. R.. Best Practices in the Characterization of Porous Materials for CO2 Capture. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2025;2:515–519. doi: 10.1038/s44286-025-00266-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kolle J. M., Fayaz M., Sayari A.. Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:7280–7345. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soubeyrand-Lenoir E., Vagner C., Yoon J. W., Bazin P., Ragon F., Hwang Y. K., Serre C., Chang J. S., Llewellyn P. L.. How Water Fosters a Remarkable 5-Fold Increase in Low-Pressure CO2 Uptake within Mesoporous MIL-100(Fe) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:10174–10181. doi: 10.1021/ja302787x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason J. A., McDonald T. M., Bae T.-H., Bachman J. E., Sumida K., Dutton J. J., Kaye S. S., Long J. R.. Application of a High-Throughput Analyzer in Evaluating Solid Adsorbents for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture via Multicomponent Adsorption of CO2, N2, and H2O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:4787–4803. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar A., Madden D. G., Lusi M., Chen K.-J., Daniels E. A., Curtin T., Perry J. J., Zaworotko M. J.. Direct Air Capture of CO2 by Physisorbent Materials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:14372–14377. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Z., Tao Y., Wu J., Zhang C., He H., Long L., Lee Y., Li T., Zhang Y.-B.. Robust Metal–Triazolate Frameworks for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:2750–2754. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen O. I.-F., Liu C.-H., Wang K., Borrego-Marin E., Li H., Alawadhi A. H., Navarro J. A. R., Yaghi O. M.. Water-Enhanced Direct Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide in Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:2835–2844. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c14125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hastings J., Wang Z., Liu J., Formalik F., Xie H., Lassitter T., Farha O. K., Snurr R. Q., Hupp J. T., Glover T. G.. Unexpected Impacts of CO2/H2O Adsorption Order on the Mixed-Gas Adsorption Capacity of a Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:37999–38007. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c08171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deutz S., Bardow A.. Life-Cycle Assessment of an Industrial Direct Air Capture Process Based on Temperature–Vacuum Swing Adsorption. Nat. Energy. 2021;6:203–213. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00771-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Miao Y., He Z., Zhu X., Izikowitz D., Li J.. Operating Temperatures Affect Direct Air Capture of CO2 in Polyamine-Loaded Mesoporous Silica. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;426:131875. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin L.-C., Berger A. H., Martin R. L., Kim J., Swisher J. A., Jariwala K., Rycroft C. H., Bhown A. S., Deem M. W., Haranczyk M., Smit B.. In Silico Screening of Carbon-Capture Materials. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:633–641. doi: 10.1038/nmat3336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quang D. V., Dindi A., Rayer A. V., Hadri N. E., Abdulkadir A., Abu-Zahra M. R. M.. Effect of Moisture on the Heat Capacity and The Regeneration Heat Required for CO2 Capture Process using PEI Impregnated Mesoporous Precipitated Silica. Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol. 2015;5:91–101. doi: 10.1002/ghg.1427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Carneiro J. S. A., Innocenti G., Moon H. J., Guta Y., Proaño L., Sievers C., Sakwa-Novak M. A., Ping E. W., Jones C. W.. Insights into the Oxidative Degradation Mechanism of Solid Amine Sorbents for CO2 Capture from Air: Roles of Atmospheric Water. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e2023028. doi: 10.1002/anie.202302887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saenz Cavazos P. A., Hunter-Sellars E., Iacomi P., McIntyre S. R., Danaci D., Williams D. R.. Evaluating Solid Sorbents For CO2 Capture: Linking Material Properties and Process Efficiency Via Adsorption Performance. Front. Energy Res. 2023;11:1167043. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1167043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Mamoori A., Saed U. A., Saoud A. A., Abdul Jabbar M. F., Jasim A., Majdi H. S., Hanif A., Iacomi P.. Modification of the Zeolite ZSM-5 Adsorbent for CO2 Capture. ACS Omega. 2025;10:20129–20141. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Férey G., Mellot-Draznieks C., Serre C., Millange F., Dutour J., Surblé S., Margiolaki I.. A Chromium Terephthalate-Based Solid with Unusually Large Pore Volumes and Surface Area. Science. 2005;309:2040–2042. doi: 10.1126/science.1116275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bromberg L., Diao Y., Wu H., Speakman S. A., Hatton T. A.. Chromium (III) Terephthalate Metal Organic Framework (MIL-101): HF-Free Synthesis, Structure, Polyoxometalate Composites, and Catalytic Properties. Chem. Mater. 2012;24:1664–1675. doi: 10.1021/cm2034382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin Y., Yan Q., Kong C., Chen L.. Polyethyleneimine Incorporated Metal-Organic Frameworks Adsorbent for Highly Selective CO2 Capture. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1859. doi: 10.1038/srep01859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mutyala S., Jonnalagadda M., Mitta H., Gundeboyina R.. CO2 Capture and Adsorption Kinetic Study of Amine-Modified MIL-101 (Cr) Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019;143:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2019.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darunte L. A., Oetomo A. D., Walton K. S., Sholl D. S., Jones C. W.. Direct Air Capture of CO2 Using Amine Functionalized MIL-101(Cr) ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016;4:5761–5768. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Justin A., Espín J., Pougin M. J., Stoian D., Schertenleib T., Mensi M., Kochetygov I., Ortega-Guerrero A., Queen W. L.. Post-Synthetic Covalent Grafting of Amines to NH2-MOF for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2307430. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202307430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Espín J., Justin A., Hueber A., Belin A., Venkatachalam S., Singh H. D., Oveisi E., Queen W. L.. A Ship-in-a-Bottle Strategy: Crosslinking Amines and Epoxides inside MOF Pores for Enhanced CO2 Capture Performance. Adv. Mater. 2025;37:e10138. doi: 10.1002/adma.202410138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun X., Shen X., Wang H., Yan F., Hua J., Li G., Zhang Z.. Atom-Level Interaction Design Between Amines and Support for Achieving Efficient and Stable CO2 Capture. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:5068. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48994-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stawicka K., Ziolek M.. Tris(2-Aminoethyl)Amine/Metal Oxides Hybrid MaterialsPreparation, Characterization and Catalytic Application. Molecules. 2020;25:4689. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chhillar P., Kumar A., Dhamaniya B. P., Chandratre K., Pareek S., Pathak S. K., Karak S.. Understanding the Role of Tris(2-Aminoethyl)Amine in Stabilizing Mixed-Cation Perovskites under Humid and Thermal Stress Conditions. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2023;11:16806–16817. doi: 10.1039/D3TC02644B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hadjiivanov K. I., Panayotov D. A., Mihaylov M. Y., Ivanova E. Z., Chakarova K. K., Andonova S. M., Drenchev N. L.. Power of Infrared and Raman Spectroscopies to Characterize Metal-Organic Frameworks and Investigate Their Interaction with Guest Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:1286–1424. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Z., Tsai H., Parker S. T., Lee J.-H., Yabuuchi Y., Jiang H. Z. H., Wang Y., Xiong S., Forse A. C., Dinakar B., Huang A., Dun C., Milner P. J., Smith A., Guimarães Martins P., Meihaus K. R., Urban J. J., Reimer J. A., Neaton J. B., Long J. R.. High-Capacity, Cooperative CO2 Capture in a Diamine-Appended Metal–Organic Framework through a Combined Chemisorptive and Physisorptive Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:6072–6083. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c13381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flaig R. W., Osborn Popp T. M., Fracaroli A. M., Kapustin E. A., Kalmutzki M. J., Altamimi R. M., Fathieh F., Reimer J. A., Yaghi O. M.. The Chemistry of CO2 Capture in an Amine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework under Dry and Humid Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:12125. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J.-Y., Mangano E., Brandani S., Ruthven D. M.. A review of common practicesin gravimetric and volumetric adsorption kinetic experiments. Adsorption. 2021;27:295–318. doi: 10.1007/s10450-020-00276-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karger, J. ; Wang, Y. . Mass Transfer in MOFs. In Gas Adsorption in Metal-OrganicFrameworks: Fundamentals and Applications; Glover, T. G. , Mu, B. , Eds.; CRC Taylor& Francis, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
