Skip to main content
ACS Central Science logoLink to ACS Central Science
. 2026 Sep 9;12(9):1515–1525. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6c01081

Adamantyl-BOX Ligand Enabling Stereoselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Aldehydes Bearing Vicinal Stereogenic Centers

Er-Jun Hao †,*, Xiao-Bo Ding §, Jing-Ran Shan ‡, Zhixian Wu §, Xin Wang §, Renxu Cao §, Fangyi Jin §, K N Houk ‡,*, Lei Shi §,*
PMCID: PMC13614048  PMID: 42799138

Abstract

Biaryl frameworks combining axial and multiple central chiralities are highly valuable in synthesis and drug discovery. However, simultaneous construction of axial and vicinal central chiralities faces severe matching/mismatching limitations. Herein, we describe a dual photoredox/nickel-catalytic system for desymmetrization of biaryl dialdehydes. By employing a bisoxazoline ligand bearing bulky adamantylphenyl side arms, its chiral cavity and distal substituent effects work synergistically to achieve high stereoselectivity, furnishing homoallylic alcohols with up to >20:1 dr and 99% ee. DFT calculations demonstrate that stereoselectivity is predominantly governed by a complex network of noncovalent interactions between the ligand and substrate.


graphic file with name oc6c01081_0010.webp


graphic file with name oc6c01081_0009.webp


Axially chiral biaryl motifs are widely found in bioactive natural products, pharmaceuticals, and chiral catalysts/ligands (Figure a). − Biaryl atropisomers bearing additional contiguous stereogenic centers are particularly appealing, as their complex three-dimensional architectures can enhance molecular binding affinity and stereocontrol performance in asymmetric catalysis. − Nevertheless, the one-step concurrent construction of axial and multiple central chiralities remains an enduring synthetic challenge, largely due to inherent match/mismatch effects among stereogenic elements, which often lead to unsatisfactory stereoselectivity.

1.

1

a). Representative natural products containing both axial and chiral alcohol moieties; b) Strategy for desymmetrization of biaryl dialdehydes; c) Synthesis of axially chiral aldehydes through carbonyl allylation reaction.

Aldehyde groups serve as versatile synthetic building blocks. Accordingly, desymmetrization of biaryl dialdehydes has emerged as a powerful route to axially chiral biaryl aldehydes, and a range of related desymmetrization protocols have been developed recently (Figure b). − For instance, Xiao’s group and Meng’s team separately developed cobalt-catalyzed coupling strategies to synthesize axially chiral aldehydes via biaryl dialdehyde desymmetrization. , However, most one-step methods for constructing molecules with both axial and multiple central chiralities afford only modest stereoselectivity, rendering their simultaneous precise stereocontrol a significant challenge. −

Asymmetric carbonyl allylation provides direct access to homoallylic alcohols, a privileged scaffold in synthesis and drug discovery. − Nickel-catalyzed variants are underexplored relative to established precious metal and chromium systems, despite nickel’s advantages in cost, toxicity, and abundance, , yet suitable chiral ligands for this multistereocenter regulation remain scarce. , Herein, we report an adamantyl-BOX ligand for dual photoredox/nickel-catalyzed asymmetric desymmetrization of biaryl dialdehydes (Figure c). This protocol delivers axially chiral aldehydes bearing two vicinal stereocenters with up to 20:1 dr and 99% ee. The origin of this outstanding performance lies in the unique second-layer chiral cavity assembled by flexible adamantylphenyl side arms, which exerts precise stereocontrol via the synergy between cavity confinement and distal substituent effects, independent of direct steric contact with the active site. This work provides a valuable design framework for remote stereocontrol, supported by combined crystallographic and computational studies.

Results and Discussion

Following our initial ligand screening (detailed below), we identified the bisoxazoline (BOX) ligand L9functionalized with sterically bulky adamantylphenyl side armsas a promising candidate for constructing an efficient catalytic system that enables precise stereocontrol. With L9 as the chiral ligand, we chose the coupling between biaryl dialdehyde 1a and 4-methoxycinnamyl acetate 2a as the model reaction, followed by systematic optimization (Table ). Under optimized conditions, the desired product 3a was obtained in 78% yield with 12:1 dr and 93% ee, using 4CzIPN as the photocatalyst, NiCl2 as the metal catalyst, Hantzsch ester (HE) as the reductant, DIPEA as the base, DMF as the solvent, and irradiation with a 5 W 450 nm LED at room temperature for 12 h (entry 1). The screening of nickel sources proved to be critical for the reaction efficiency. While replacing NiCl2 with NiBr2 maintained high enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity, a slight decrease in yield was observed (entry 2). In contrast, the use of Ni­(acac)2 resulted in a substantial deterioration in both yield and stereoselectivity (entry 3). Further screening of photocatalysts revealed that although Ir­(ppy)2(dtbbpy)­PF6 (Ir-1), Ir­[dF­(CF3)­ppy]2(dtbbpy)­PF6 (Ir-2), and Ru­(bpy)3(PF6)2 Ru-1 were capable of initiating the reaction, the desired product 3a was formed in trace quantities (entries 4–6). Gratifyingly, the substitution of DMF with THF further enhanced both the yield and stereoselectivity, delivering the product in 83% yield with improved stereocontrol (15:1 dr, 95% ee) (entry 7). Despite yielding comparable stereoselectivity (12:1 dr, 95% ee), replacing DIPEA with triethylamine led to a substantial decrease in yield (50%, entry 8). A series of control experimentsomitting the photocatalyst, NiCl2, HE, DIPEA, or lightall failed to yield any product 3a, proving each component is indispensable (entries 9–10).

1. Reaction Optimization .

graphic file with name oc6c01081_0006.webp

Entry Variation from standard conditions 3a (%) dr Ee (%)
1 As shown 78 12:1 93
2 NiBr2 instead of NiCl2 69 12:1 93
3 Ni(acac)2 instead of NiCl2 34 4:1 59
4 Ir-1 instead of 4CzIPN Trace - -
5 Ir-2 instead of 4CzIPN Trace - -
6 Ru-1 instead of 4CzIPN Trace - -
7 THF instead of DMF 85(83) 15:1 95
8 Et3N instead of DIPEA 50 12:1 95
9 No 4CzIPN, or no NiCl2 0 - -
10 No HE, no DIPEA, or no light 0 - -
a

General reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol, 57.3 mg), 2a (0.4 mmol, 82.5 mg), reaction time: 12 h reaction temperature: 10 °C.

b

Determined by 1H NMR analysis of the reaction mixture using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.

c

Isolated yield.

d

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

e

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. (See the Supporting Information for the assignment of side products regarding dr.)

To elucidate the ligand structure–activity relationship and the origin of the superior performance of L9, we synthesized a series of BOX ligands bearing varied side arm substituents (L1–L9) and evaluated their performance in the model reaction under optimized conditions (Figure a). The simple methyl-substituted ligand L1 afforded product 3a with only moderate stereoselectivity (4:1 dr, 66% ee), while cyclopropyl (L2) or benzyl (L3) substituents gave marginally improved enantioselectivity (62% ee for L2, 70% ee for L3); however, excessively bulky naphthyl (L4) and anthracenyl (L5) substituents completely suppressed reactivity, defining a steric threshold for productive catalysis. Gratifyingly, increasing the steric bulk of the benzyl side arm markedly boosted stereoselectivity: para-tert-butylbenzyl-substituted L6 delivered 3a with 10:1 dr and 76% ee, while 3,5-di-tert-butylbenzyl-substituted L7 further raised enantioselectivity to 80% ee. In contrast, the electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group in L8 strongly inhibited reactivity, underscoring the critical impact of side arm electronic properties on catalysis. Consistent with the condition optimization results, ligand L9 delivered the best performance, furnishing 3a in 83% yield with excellent stereoselectivity (12:1 dr, 95% ee).

2.

2

a) Evaluation of ligand effect. b) Single crystal structure of the NiCl2·L9 complex showing encapsulation of the nickel center. Solvent molecules, counterions, and water molecules are omitted for clarity. The adamantane groups are disordered in the single crystal structure. The complete crystal structure is available in the ESI.

To elucidate the coordination mode of optimal ligand L9 and its stereocontrol origin, we grew single crystals of the NiCl2·L9 complex for X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure b). The crystal structure reveals that upon nickel coordination, the two bulky adamantylbenzyl side arms of L9 fold inward and assemble a well-defined, sterically confined chiral pocket with the Indane-derived backbone. Notably, the adamantyl groups lie at the distal end of the side arms (far from the Ni coordination sphere); their steric bulk drives side arm folding and defines the cavity boundary, constituting the structural origin of the distal substituent effect. This folded conformation encapsulates the metal center, constrains substrate binding orientation, and enforces precise stereocontrol. Weak intramolecular interactions between side arm benzylic moieties and the Indane backbone further rigidify the complex and reinforce the active-site chiral environment. Collectively, these crystallographic data confirm that the synergy between the confined chiral cavity and distal substituent effects is the dominant stereocontrol factor. This second-shell chiral cavity design effectively mitigates inherent match/mismatch effects, delivering exceptional stereoselectivity for multistereocenter construction that is not readily achievable with conventional catalytic systems.

Under the optimized conditions, we began by investigating the substrate scope of allylic acetates. As shown in Table , a variety of para-substituted electron-donating groups, such as acetoxyl (3b), diphenylamino (3c), and tert-butyl (3d), were compatible with the reaction protocol. In nearly all cases, these substrates were efficiently transformed into the desired products with good to high yields (82–85%) and nice stereocontrol (>20:1 dr, 92–95% ee). Furthermore, the reaction proved robust toward allylic substrates bearing benzyl alcohol moieties (3e), furnishing the desired axially chiral compounds smoothly. Notably, the protocol proved compatible with a range of halogen substituents (3f-3i). Including even the strongly electron-withdrawing fluorine and the highly reactive iodine, all were converted into the corresponding products. Moreover, allylic acetates bearing para-substituted electron-withdrawing groups (such as ester (3j), trifluoromethoxy (3k), and ketone (3l)) were well-tolerated in the desymmetrization, furnishing the corresponding asymmetric products with enantiomeric excess (ee) values ranging from 92% to 95%. Allylic precursors bearing cyano groups at the para-, meta-, or ortho-positions of the benzene ring also served as suitable coupling partners, affording the corresponding homoallylic alcohol products (3m-3o) in good yields (72%–83%) with nice enantioselectivity (87% ee-99% ee). The 2-phenoxy-substituted allylic acetates also proved to be a suitable substrate, affording the chiral aldehyde 3p in 90% yield with excellent enantioselectivity. Substrates bearing thioether (3q) and mesylate (3r) substituents were also viable under the standard conditions, undergoing smooth conversion to the target molecules in good efficiency. This result underscores the broad functional group tolerance of this catalytic system. Delightfully, the large steric hindrance of the multisubstituted allylic precursor performed effectively in the coupling, furnishing the desired product 3s in 85% yield with excellent stereocontrol (>20:1 dr, 98% ee). Next, high enantioselectivity (90–99% ee) was consistently achieved for substrates featuring naphthalene (3t), 1,4-benzodioxane (3u), and piperonyl (3v) rings, underscoring the generality of the asymmetric protocol. The electron-deficient pyridine-derived precursor (3w) was converted with excellent stereocontrol (>20:1 dr, 99% ee), albeit in a moderate 51% yield. Meanwhile, we determined the absolute configuration of product 3b by X-ray crystallographic analysis, and those of the remaining products were assigned by analogy.

2. Scope of Reactions Using L9-Ni as Catalyst , ,

graphic file with name oc6c01081_0008.webp

a

General reaction condition: aldehydes 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), 4CzIPN (0.006 mmol, 4.7 mg), NiCl2 (0.02 mmol, 2.6 mg), L9 (0.024 mmol, 18.7 mg), HE (0.4 mmol, 101.3 mg), DIPEA (0.4 mmol, 51.7 mg),THF (2.0 mL), 450 nm LEDs, 10 °C, 10 h.

b

Isolated yield.

c

dr was determined by 1H NMR analysis, ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. [d] HE (0.3 mmol, 76.0 mg), 5 °C, 7 h.

Next, we investigated the scope of different substituted biphenyl bialdehydes for the desymmetrization reaction. The replacement of the phenyl group with a methyl (4a) or isopropyl (4b) substituent at the 2-position proceeded effectively, affording the respective products in 77% yield (11:1 dr, 90% ee) and 84% yield (>20:1 dr, 99% ee); this notable enhancement in stereoselectivity with increased steric bulk underscores the crucial role of steric hindrance at the 2-position. The efficient coupling of 2-chloro- and 2-bromo-substituted dialdehydes with 2a proceeded to deliver the axially chiral products (4c, 4d) with good to excellent diastereoselectivity (12:1 and 18:1 dr, respectively), despite the relatively limited steric bulk of the halogen substituents. Good yields were also obtained for substrates featuring strong electron-withdrawing groups (trifluoromethyl and cyano) at the 2-position, as the system proved highly compatible with these substituents and smoothly delivered the expected products 4e–4f.

Substitution of the phenyl ring with benzyloxy, phenoxy, or vinyl groups at the 2-position proceeded effectively, delivering products 4g–4i in good yields. Polysubstituted biaryl dialdehydes likewise served as substrates, exhibiting excellent performance in the catalytic system to afford products 4j–4l without compromise to either yield or stereoselectivity (≥12:1 dr, up to 96% ee). Surprisingly, several (hetero)­aryl-substituted derivatives were fully compatible, such as quinoline, thianthrene, and dibenzofuran, yielding 4m–4o in reasonable yields with high stereoselectivities, which are less explored in previous studies.

Furthermore, a gram-scale reaction of 1c with 2a under the standard conditions afforded the desired products in good yield with excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity (Figure a). To further demonstrate the synthetic utility of this axially chiral scaffold, we performed a series of functional group transformations using 4b as a model substrate (Figure b). Reduction of the aldehyde group in 4b using sodium borohydride proceeded smoothly to furnish axially chiral benzyl alcohol 5a in 93% yield with the complete retention of enantiomeric purity. Oxidation of the hydroxyl group in 4b with Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP) provided ketone 5b in 86% yield with maintained enantiocontrol (>20:1 dr, 97% ee). Furthermore, a Knoevenagel condensation between 4b and diethyl malonate delivered product 5c in a 76% yield with an excellent enantiomeric excess (99% ee). Notably, subjecting 4b to Seyferth-Gilbert homologation conditions using dimethyl (1-diazo-2-oxopropyl)­phosphonate generated the alkyne 5d in 81% yield with 99% ee, demonstrating the robustness of the chiral axis under these transformation conditions.

3.

3

a) Gram-scale experiment and follow-up chemistry. b) Reaction conditions: (i) NaBH4 and THF/MeOH, 0 °C. (ii) DMP and THF, rt. (iii) Methylamine hydrochloride, diethyl malonate, and MeOH, rt. (iv) P-(1-diazo-2-oxopropyl)-di-Methylester, K2CO3, MeOH, rt. (see the Supporting Information for detailed procedures).

To elucidate the mechanism of this transformation, we conducted a series of experiments. First, a radical inhibition experiment was performed by adding 3.0 equiv of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl) under the standard conditions. The allylation product was still obtained in 56% yield, and no TEMPO-adduct was detected (Figure a). Furthermore, considering that Ni0 species can potentially undergo oxidative addition with the substrate 2a to form the allyl nickel­(II) complex, − a control experiment employing Ni0 as the catalyst was carried out (Figure b and c). This reaction delivered the desired product in 44% isolated yield, supporting the involvement of such a catalytic cycle. Furthermore, Stern–Volmer fluorescence quenching experiments revealed that the emission intensity of excited 4CzIPN was significantly quenched in the presence of HE, consistent with rapid single electron transfer between excited 4CzIPN and HE in the photoredox catalytic cycle. (For details see Supporting Information Figure S1.) To understand the stereochemical control of this reaction, we first performed a dynamic resolution experiment (Figure d). Under the standard conditions, the racemic product 4e was recovered unchanged, and no overallylated product was detected. To rule out accidental results, we further selected rac-4b and 4m for validation. In both cases, the products were recovered completely, maintaining their racemic configurations, and no over-reaction products were observed (see Supporting Information). This observation indicates that the enantioselectivity arises solely from desymmetrization. Subsequently, we investigated the nonlinear effect, a general method for probing the structural components of catalysts in asymmetric catalysis. In this study, a linear correlation was observed between the enantiomeric excess of the chiral BOX ligand and that of the allylation product 3a (see Supporting Information Figure S2).

4.

4

a) Reaction with TEMPO as inhibitor; b) Catalysis with Ni­(cod)2 under photoredox conditions; c) Ni­(cod)2 as catalyst; d) Kinetic Resolution experiment; e) Proposed photoredox and nickel catalytic cycles.

Guided by the above experimental results and relevant literature precedents, − a plausible catalytic mechanism involving both nickel and photoredox cycles is proposed in Figure e. Under irradiation with blue LEDs, the photoexcited 4CzIPN is reduced by HE [E1/2 ox (HE/HE•+) = 0.51 V vs Fc+/Fc in MeCN] via a single-electron transfer (SET) to generate 4CzIPN•– [E1/2 red (4CzIPN/4CzIPN•–) = −1.21 V vs SCE in MeCN]. This radical anion subsequently reduces the NiII precatalyst to a Ni0 species through two sequential SET events. ,− The Ni0 species undergoes oxidative addition with allylic acetates 2 to generate the nucleophilic allyl-NiII intermediate (9). Intermediate (9) is poised to attack the aldehyde, yielding a nickel alkoxide species (10). Finally, protonation of this intermediate liberates the product 3 and regenerates the NiII species, thereby completing the catalytic cycle. However, the involvement of a nucleophilic allyl-NiI intermediate that adds to the aldehyde cannot be excluded.

To investigate the role of the chiral BOX ligands in the stereochemical control during the reaction, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on four stereodetermining transition states (Figure ). Given the potential complexity of photoredox/nickel dual catalysis, including the multiple accessible oxidation and coordination states of the nickel center, we focused our attention here on one plausible mechanistic scenario. In this calculation, 1a and 2a were used as the model substrates. For the chiral ligand, we simplified the ligand by replacing the adamantane-substituted benzyl group with a methyl group, corresponding to L1. While ligand L1 was less effective than L9, it still afforded the product with appreciable enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity under the optimized conditions (4:1 dr, 66% ee, Figure a).

5.

5

Structures of the four stereodetermining transition states. Relative Gibbs free energies (ΔΔG‡) and electronic energies (ΔΔE‡) were calculated at the PWPB95-D4/def2-TZVPP/SMD­(DMF)//PBE-D3­(BJ)/def2-SVP level of theory at 298.15 K. Color code for 3D structures: H, white; C, gray; O, red; N, blue; Cl, green. Atoms on the chairlike six-membered ring in the Zimmerman-Traxler transition states are highlighted in pink for clarity.

We first performed geometry optimization and a conformational search of the transition state TS-( Ra,R,S ) at the PBE-D3­(BJ)/def2-SVP level of theory, which leads to the major product confirmed by the single-crystal structure. − High-accuracy single-point energies were subsequently calculated using the double-hybrid functional (with D4 dispersion correction) PWPB95-D4 with the def2-TZVPP basis set and SMD solvation model in DMF. − As shown in Figure (top left), TS-( Ra,R,S ) follows a typical chairlike six-membered Zimmerman-Traxler transition state model, in which both the o-terphenyl group on the aldehyde moiety and the aryl group on the allyl moiety occupy equatorial positions. To minimize steric repulsion, the biphenyl unit in the ortho-terphenyl group is oriented outward from the six-membered ring. The nickel center adopts a slightly distorted square-pyramidal coordination geometry.

Noncovalent interaction (NCI) analysis reveals multiple weak interactions between the chiral ligand and the substrate in TS-( Ra,R,S ). Specifically, C–H bonds on the indene and oxazoline moieties of the chiral ligand engage in van der Waals (vdW) or C–H···π interactions with the aryl group of the allyl moiety and the o-terphenyl moiety of the substrate. C–H···O interactions are also observed between the ligand and the aldehyde oxygen (see Supporting Information Figure S3 for a visualization of these interactions). − In contrast, for the competing transition state TS-( Sa,S,R ) that leads to the enantiomeric product, although a notable π–π interaction is observed between the indene moiety of the ligand and the biphenyl group of the substrate, other weak interactions are largely absent (top right, Figure S3). This may partially account for its higher energy (ΔΔG‡ = 1.4 kcal/mol, ca. 83% ee), which is qualitatively consistent with the experimentally observed ee of 66% (ca. ΔΔG‡ = 0.9 kcal/mol).

We then inverted the axial chirality of TS-( Ra,R,S ) to obtain transition state TS-( Sa,R,S ), which leads to the diastereomeric product (bottom left, Figure ). This transition state was found to be higher in energy by 1.0 kcal/mol (ca. 5:1 dr). Conformational analysis reveals that in this stable conformer of TS-( Sa,R,S ), the biphenyl unit of the o-terphenyl group also flips upward above the six-membered ring after the inversion of axial chirality while still being oriented outward from the ring. This observation is consistent with our expectations: if the biphenyl unit were to point inward upon axial inversion, then it would experience significant steric repulsion with the allyl moiety of the substrate. Finally, the fourth transition state TS-( Ra,S,R ) was located by inverting the axial chirality of TS-( Sa,S,R ). This transition state exhibited a significantly higher energy by 2.2 kcal/mol, which is likely due to the lack of stabilizing noncovalent interactions between the ligand and substrate (bottom right, Figure S3).

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a dual photoredox/nickel-catalyzed asymmetric desymmetrization of biaryl dialdehydes, filling a critical synthetic gap: one-step construction of one axial chirality and two contiguous central chiralities. A rationally designed adamantylphenyl-substituted BOX ligand, which assembles a confined second-shell chiral cavity upon coordination, enables excellent stereocontrol via the synergy of cavity confinement and distal-substituent effects. The protocol affords homoallylic alcohol products with up to >20:1 dr and 99% ee; gram-scale synthesis and diverse derivatizations validate its synthetic utility. Density functional theory calculations corroborate that a network of noncovalent interactions within the chiral pocket underpins the outstanding stereoselectivity. This work provides both an efficient route to multistereogenic axially chiral biaryls and a second-shell cavity engineering strategy for ligand design in asymmetric catalysis.

Supplementary Material

oc6c01081_si_001.pdf (17.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22471029, 22171036), the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (232300421126), the Key Scientific Research Projects of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province (21A150002), Open Research Fund of School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University (2020YB03). K.N.H. thanks the National Science Foundation (CHE-2153972 for K.N.H.) and computational resources from the Expanse at SDSC through allocation CHE040014 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program (for K.N.H. and J.-R.S.). We thank WATTCAS CHEM-TECH Co., Ltd. for kindly providing the photoreactors.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.6c01081.

  • Experimental details, characterization data of compounds, NMR spectra. Deposition number 2471651 (for 3b) and 2471652 (for L9-NiCl2) (PDF)

Deposition numbers 2471651 and 2471652 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.

∥.

(E.-J.H., X.-B.D., J.-R.S.) These authors contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Pu L.. 1,1‘-Binaphthyl Dimers, Oligomers, and Polymers: Molecular Recognition, Asymmetric Catalysis, and New Materials. Chem. Rev. 1998;98:2405–2494. doi: 10.1021/cr970463w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hembury G. A., Borovkov V. V., Inoue Y.. Chirality-Sensing Supramolecular Systems. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:1–73. doi: 10.1021/cr050005k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bringmann G., Gulder T., Gulder T. A. M., Breuning M.. Atroposelective Total Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biaryl Natural Products. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:563–639. doi: 10.1021/cr100155e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pu L.. Enantioselective Fluorescent Sensors: A Tale of BINOL. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012;45:150–163. doi: 10.1021/ar200048d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smyth J. E., Butler N. M., Keller P. A.. A Twist of Nature – the Significance of Atropisomers in Biological Systems. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:1562–1583. doi: 10.1039/C4NP00121D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang X., Yin J., Yoon J.. Recent Advances in Development of Chiral Fluorescent and Colorimetric Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4918–4959. doi: 10.1021/cr400568b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perreault S., Chandrasekhar J., Patel L.. Atropisomerism in Drug Discovery: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective Inspired by Atropisomeric Class I PI3K Inhibitors. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2581–2593. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Basilaia M., Chen M. H., Secka J., Gustafson J. L.. Atropisomerism in the Pharmaceutically Relevant Realm. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2904–2919. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gustafson J. L., Lim D., Miller S. J.. Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Biaryl Atropisomers via Peptide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Bromination. Science. 2010;328:1251–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.1188403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrett K. T., Metrano A. J., Rablen P. R., Miller S. J.. Spontaneous Rransfer of Chirality in an Atropisomerically Enriched Two-axis System. Nature. 2014;509:71–75. doi: 10.1038/nature13189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jolliffe J. D., Armstrong R. J., Smith M. D.. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomeric Biaryls by a Cation-directed O-alkylation. Nat. Chem. 2017;9:558–562. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng J. K., Xiang S., Li S., Ye L., Tan B.. Recent Advances in Catalytic Asymmetric Construction of Atropisomers. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4805–4902. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng J. K., Xiang S. H., Tan B.. Organocatalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Molecules: Development of Strategies and Skeletons. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2920–2937. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang X., Zhao K., Gu Z.. Transition Metal-Catalyzed Biaryl Atropisomer Synthesis via a Torsional Strain Promoted Ring-Opening Reaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:1620–1633. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Qin W., Liu Y., Yan H.. Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomers via Vinylidene ortho-Quinone Methides (VQMs) Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2780–2795. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liao G., Shi B.-F.. Synthesis of Axially Chiral Compounds via Transition Metal-Catalyzed Atroposelective C–H Functionalization. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025;58:1562–1579. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bao X., Rodriguez J., Bonne D.. Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomers with Multiple Stereogenic Axes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:12623–12634. doi: 10.1002/anie.202002518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ye F., Xu Z., Xu L.-W.. The Discovery of Multifunctional Chiral P Ligands for the Catalytic Construction of Quaternary Carbon/Silicon and Multiple Stereogenic Centers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54:452–470. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bai X.-F., Cui Y.-M., Cao J., Xu L.-W.. Atropisomers with Axial and Point Chirality: Synthesis and Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55:2545–2561. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Luc A., Wencel-Delord J.. One Reaction–double Stereoinduction: C–H Activation as a Privileged Route Towards Complex Atropisomeric Molecules. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:8159–8167. doi: 10.1039/D3CC01328F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang H.-H., Li T.-Z., Liu S.-J., Shi F.. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Atropisomers Bearing Multiple Chiral Elements: An Emerging Field. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202311053. doi: 10.1002/anie.202311053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moon J., Kim S., Lee S., Cho H.-A., Kim A., Ham M. K., Kim S. H., Jung J., Kwon Y.. Recent Advances in Catalytic Desymmetrization for the Synthesis of Axially Chiral Biaryls. ChemCatChem. 2024;16:e202400690. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202400690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Staniland S., Yuan B., Gimenez-Agullo N., Marcelli T., Willies S. C., Grainger D. M., Turner N. J., Clayden J.. Enzymatic Desymmetrising Redox Reactions for the Asymmetric Synthesis of Biaryl Atropisomers. Chem.Eur. J. 2014;20:13084–13088. doi: 10.1002/chem.201404509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu Y., Li M., Sun J., Zheng G., Zhang Q.. Synthesis of Axially Chiral Aldehydes by N-Heterocyclic-Carbene-Catalyzed Desymmetrization Followed by Kinetic Resolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202117340. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang Y., Song R.-P., Li X.-Y., Chen W.-L., Tian Y., Zhang S.-H., Shao Y.-D., Cheng D.-J.. Catalytic Asymmetric Reductive Amination for Axially Chiral Aryl Aldehydes via Desymmetrization/Kinetic Resolution Cascade. Org. Lett. 2024;26:7161–7165. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cai Y., Lv Y., Shu L., Jin Z., Chi Y.-R., Li T.. Access to Axially Chiral Aryl Aldehydes via Carbene-Catalyzed Nitrile Formation and Desymmetrization Reaction. Research. 2024;7:0293. doi: 10.34133/research.0293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu D., Li W., Shi W., Wang X., Wang M., Liao J.. Enantioselective Copper-Catalyzed Desymmetric Olefination via the Boron-Wittig Reaction. ACS Catal. 2025;15:12293–12299. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c02755. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang J.-Y., Du Y.-R., Cheng F.-Q., An K., Hu Y., Li Z.-Y.. Construction of Axially Chiral Dialdehydes via Rhodium-Catalyzed Enantioselective C–H Amidation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202421412. doi: 10.1002/anie.202421412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ye M., Li C., Xiao D., Qu G., Yuan B., Sun Z.. Atroposelective Synthesis of Aldehydes via Alcohol Dehydrogenase-Catalyzed Stereodivergent Desymmetrization. JACS Au. 2024;4:411–418. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hao J., Mok Y. K., Luan X., Huang Z.. Tri- and Tetra-ortho-Substituted Biaryls via Lithium Cuprate-Catalyzed Reductive Desymmetrization of Isophthaldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:42938–42948. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c15736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang H., He X.-K., Jiang X., Zhao W., Lu L.-Q., Cheng Y., Xiao W.-J.. Photoinduced Cobalt-Catalyzed Desymmetrization of Dialdehydes to Access Axial Chirality. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:6944–6952. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c00462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin C., Zhang J., Sun Z., Guo Y., Chong Q., Zhang Z., Meng F.. Cobalt-Catalyzed Enantioselective Alkenylation of Aldehydes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202405290. doi: 10.1002/anie.202405290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiao Y., Zhao Z.-Y., Irran E., Oestreich M.. Enantio-and Diastereoselective Desymmetrization of 1,1’-Biaryl-2,6-Dicarbaldehydes by Copper-Catalyzed 1,2-Addition of Silicon Nucleophiles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202414005. doi: 10.1002/anie.202414005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liang T., Wu Y., Sun J., Li M., Zhao H., Zhang J., Zheng G., Zhang Q.. Visible Light-Mediated Cobalt and Photoredox Dual-Catalyzed Asymmetric Reductive Coupling for Axially Chiral Secondary Alcohols. Chin. J. Chem. 2023;41:3253–3260. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202300398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang Y., Wang D., Wang S., Chong Q., Zhang Z., Meng F.. Cobalt-Catalyzed Regio-, Diastereo- and Enantioselective Reductive Coupling of 1,3-Dienes and Aldehydes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202413313. doi: 10.1002/anie.202413313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang F., Tao L.-F., Liu J., Qian L., Liao J.-Y.. Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of Biaryl Aldehydes Bearing Both Bxial and Central Chirality. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:4487–4490. doi: 10.1039/D3CC00708A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin C., Xu X., Chong Q., Meng F.. Simultaneous Construction of Axial and Central Stereogenicity by Cobalt-Catalyzed Stereoconvergent Reductive Coupling of Heterobiaryl Triflates and Aldehydes. Chem.Eur. J. 2025;31:e202500248. doi: 10.1002/chem.202500248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lin C., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Chong Q., Meng F.. Cobalt-catalyzed Diastereo- and Enantioselective Reductive Coupling of Cyclobutenes and Aldehydes Through Umpolung Reactivity. Chem. Sci. 2025;16:16250–16258. doi: 10.1039/D5SC03755G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Krautwald S., Carreira E. M.. Stereodivergence in Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:5627–5639. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Beletskaya I. P., Najera C., Yus M.. Stereodivergent Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:5080–5200. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xue J., Zou J., Gao S., Zheng Q., Fang W., Liu J.. Photoexcited Hantzsch Ester and Cobalt Catalysis Enable Diastereoand Enantioselective Allylation of Aldehydes. ACS Catal. 2025;15:6165–6172. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c01060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Calogero F., Pinosa E., Gualandi A., Sensoli L., Dutta S., Maity B., Cavallo L., Fermi A., Ceroni P., Cozzi P. G.. Photoredox/Nickel-Catalyzed Diastereoselective Allylation of Aldehydes with Morita-Baylis-Hillman Adducts. ACS Catal. 2025;15:8303–8316. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c00891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Denmark S. E., Fu J.. Catalytic Enantioselective Addition of Allylic Organometallic Reagents to Aldehydes and Ketones. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2763–2794. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zbieg J. R., Yamaguchi E., McInturff E. L., Krische M. J.. Enantioselective C-H Crotylation of Primary Alcohols via Hydrohydroxyalkylation of Butadiene. Science. 2012;336:324–327. doi: 10.1126/science.1219274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yus M., Gonzalez-Gomez J. C., Foubelo F.. Diastereoselective Allylation of Carbonyl Compounds and Imines: Application to the Synthesis of Natural Products. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:5595–5698. doi: 10.1021/cr400008h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Holmes M., Schwartz L. A., Krische M. J.. Intermolecular Metal-Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Dienes, Allenes, and Enynes with Carbonyl Compounds and Imines. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:6026–6052. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang Y., Perry I. B., Lu G., Liu P., Buchwald S. L.. Copper-catalyzed asymmetric addition of olefin-derived nucleophiles to ketones. Science. 2016;353:144–150. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xiong Y., Zhang G.. Enantioselective 1,2-Difunctionalization of 1,3-Butadiene by Sequential Alkylation and Carbonyl Allylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:2735–2738. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schwarz J. L., Schäfers F., Tlahuext-Aca A., Lückemeier L., Glorius F.. Diastereoselective Allylation of Aldehydes by Dual Photoredox and Chromium Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:12705–12709. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Adak T., Menard T., Albritton M., Florit F., Burke M. D., Jensen K. F., Denmark S. E.. Catalytic Allylation of Native Hexoses and Pentoses in Water with Indium. Nature. 2025;640:94–99. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08690-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nakao H., Hassan M. M. M., Nakamura Y., Toyobe M., Higashi M., Mitsunuma H., Kanai M.. Visible light–driven Stereodivergent Allylation of Cyclic Hemiacetals with Butene for Polypropionate Synthesis. Science. 2025;390:272–278. doi: 10.1126/science.adz0686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang L., Wang L., Li M., Chong Q., Meng F.. Cobalt-Catalyzed Diastereo- and Enantioselective Reductive Allyl Additions to Aldehydes with Allylic Alcohol Derivatives via Allyl Radical Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:12755–12765. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c05690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shi C., Li F., Chen Y., Lin S., Hao E., Guo Z., Wosqa U. T., Zhang D., Shi L.. Photocatalytic Umpolung Synthesis of Nucleophilic π-Allylcobalt Complexes for Allylation of AldehydesClick to copy article link. ACS Catal. 2021;11:2992–2998. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c05330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Cristòfol À., Limburg B., Kleij A. W.. Expedient Dual Co/Organophotoredox Catalyzed Stereoselective Synthesis of All-Carbon Quaternary Centers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:15266–15270. doi: 10.1002/anie.202103479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gualandi A., Calogero F., Mazzarini M., Guazzi S., Fermi A., Bergamini G., Cozzi P. G.. Cp2TiCl2-Catalyzed Photoredox Allylation of Aldehydes with Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2020;10:3857–3863. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yan H., Liao Q., Chen Y., Gurzadyan G. G., Lu B., Wu C., Shi L.. Photocatalytic Metal Hydride Hydrogen Atom Transfer Mediated Allene Functionalization by Cobalt and Titanium Dual Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202302483. doi: 10.1002/anie.202302483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Li Y.-L., Li W.-D., Gu Z.-Y., Chen J., Xia J.-B.. Photoredox Ni-Catalyzed Branch-Selective Reductive Coupling of Aldehydes with 1,3-Dienes. ACS Catal. 2020;10:1528–1534. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang Z., Han Z., Li J., Hu H., Li J., Xi C.. Photoredox/Nickel Dual-Catalyzed Allylation of Aldehydes with Allylic Alcohols and Mechanistic Insights in the Presence of CO2 . ACS Catal. 2024;14:12392–12402. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c03991. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gualandi A., Rodeghiero G., Faraone A., Patuzzo F., Marchini M., Calogero F., Perciaccante R., Jansen T. P., Ceroni P., Cozzi P. G.. Allylation of Aldehydes by Dual Photoredox and Nickel Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:6838–6841. doi: 10.1039/C9CC03344K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Carmona J. A., Rodríguez-Salamanca P., Fernández R., Lassaletta J. M., Hornillos V.. Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of 2-(Quinolin-8-yl)­Benzaldehydes: Atroposelective Iridium-Catalyzed Transfer Hydrogenative Allylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202306981. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Calogero F., Potenti S., Bassan E., Fermi A., Gualandi A., Monaldi J., Dereli B., Maity B., Cavallo L., Ceroni P., Cozzi P. G.. Nickel-Mediated Enantioselective Photoredox Allylation of Aldehydes with Visible Light. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202114981. doi: 10.1002/anie.202114981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen Y., Wang X., Shan J.-R., Wu Z., Cao R., Liu Y., Jin Y., Hao E., Houk K. N., Shi L.. Chemoselective Functionalization of Tertiary C–H Bonds of Allylic Ethers: Enantioconvergent Access to sec,tert-Vicinal Diols. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202501924. doi: 10.1002/anie.202501924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Desimoni G., Faita G., Jørgensen K. A.. C2-Symmetric Chiral Bis­(Oxazoline) Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2006;106(9):3561–3651. doi: 10.1021/cr0505324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Connon R., Roche B., Rokade B. V., Guiry P. J.. Further Developments and Applications of Oxazoline-Containing Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:6373–6521. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Romano C., Martin R.. Ni-catalysed Remote C­(sp3)–H Functionalization using Chain-Walking Strategies. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2024;8:833–850. doi: 10.1038/s41570-024-00649-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Bernhardson D. J., Hubbell A. K., Singer R. A., Szpera R., Tcyrulnikov S., Vicini A. C., Allais C.. Recent Advances in Nonprecious Metal Catalysis. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024;28:4240–4263. doi: 10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li L.-J., He Y., Yang Y., Guo J., Lu Z., Wang C., Zhu S., Zhu S.-F.. Recent Advances in Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni-Catalyzed Organic Reactions. CCS Chem. 2024;6:537–584. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.023.202303412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rono L. J., Yayla H. G., Wang D. Y., Armstrong M. F., Knowles R. R.. Enantioselective Photoredox Catalysis Enabled by Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Development of an Asymmetric Aza-Pinacol Cyclization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:17735–17738. doi: 10.1021/ja4100595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Luo J., Zhang J.. Donor–Acceptor Fluorophores for Visible-Light-Promoted Organic Synthesis: Photoredox/Ni Dual Catalytic C­(sp3)–C­(sp2) Cross-Coupling. ACS Catal. 2016;6:873–877. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zuo Z., Ahneman D. T., Chu L., Terrett J. A., Doyle A. G., MacMillan D. W. C.. Merging Photoredox with Nickelcatalysis: Coupling of α-carboxylsp 3 -carbons with Aryl Halides. Science. 2014;345:437–440. doi: 10.1126/science.1255525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhao J.-H., Guo Z.-D., Qi T., Lu Q.-X., Chen S., Wang J., Feng M.-L., Sun C., Ming J.. Synthesis of Axially Chiral Phenanthryl–Aryl Phosphines via Nickel-Catalyzed Atroposelective [4 + 2] Cycloaddition with Broad Ligand Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026;65:e19122. doi: 10.1002/anie.202519122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Qin J., Li Y., Hu Y., Huang Z., Miao W., Chu L.. Photoinduced Nickel-Catalyzed Homolytic C­(sp 3)–N Bond Activation of Isonitriles for Selective Carbo- and Hydro-Cyanation of Alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:27583–27593. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c08631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ni S., Padial N. M., Kingston C., Vantourout J. C., Schmitt D. C., Edwards J. T., Kruszyk M. M., Merchant R. R., Mykhailiuk P. K., Sanchez B. B., Yang S., Perry M. A., Gallego G. M., Mousseau J. J., Collins M. R., Cherney R. J., Lebed P. S., Chen J. S., Qin T., Baran P. S.. A Radical Approach to Anionic Chemistry: Synthesis of Ketones,Alcohols, and Amines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:6726–6739. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhao H., Yuan W.. Three-component Reductive Conjugate Addition/Aldol Tandem Reaction Enabled by Nickel/Photoredox Dual Catalysis. Chem. Sci. 2023;14:1485–1490. doi: 10.1039/D2SC06303D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Calogero F., Pinosa E., Gualandi A., Sensoli L., Dutta S., Maity B., Cavallo L., Fermi A., Ceroni P., Cozzi P. G.. Photoredox/Nickel-Catalyzed Diastereoselective Allylation ofAldehydes with Morita–Baylis–Hillman Adducts. ACS Catal. 2025;15:8303–8316. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c00891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zu W., Wan X., Wu H., Huo J., Zhang C., Li C., Huang Y., Xu Z., Xu Y., Li T., Cheng J., Ye J.-L., Wang C., Huo H.. Direct Enantioselective C­(sp 3)–H Coupling of N-alkyl Anilines via Metallaphotoredox Catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2026;18:573–584. doi: 10.1038/s41557-025-02018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Li L., Tang C., Huang G., Zhu S., Bai Y., Chu L.. Metallaphotoredox-Catalyzed Acceptorless Dehydrogenative Carbonylation Employing Benzylic C–H Bonds as Limiting Substrates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026;65:e9220846. doi: 10.1002/anie.9220846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;78:1396. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Grimme S., Antony J., Ehrlich S., Krieg H.. A Consistent and Accurate ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for The 94 Elements. H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;132:154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Grimme S., Ehrlich S., Goerigk L.. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011;32:1456–1465. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Weigend F., Ahlrichs R.. Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005;7:3297–3305. doi: 10.1039/b508541a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Weigend F.. Accurate Coulomb-fitting Basis Sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006;8:1057–1065. doi: 10.1039/b515623h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Goerigk L., Grimme S.. Efficient and Accurate Double-Hybrid-Meta-GGA Density FunctionalsEvaluation with the Extended GMTKN30 Database for General Main Group Thermochemistry, Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:291. doi: 10.1021/ct100466k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Caldeweyher E., Bannwarth C., Grimme S.. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. J. Chem. Phys. 2017;147:034112. doi: 10.1063/1.4993215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Caldeweyher E., Ehlert S., Hansen A., Neugebauer H., Spicher S., Bannwarth C., Grimme S.. A generally Applicable Atomic-charge Dependent London Dispersion Correction. J. Chem. Phys. 2019;150:154122. doi: 10.1063/1.5090222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Marenich A. V., Cramer C. J., Truhlar D. G.. Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:6378–6396. doi: 10.1021/jp810292n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Lu T., Chen Q.. Independent Gradient Model Based on Hirshfeld Partition: A new Method for Visual Study of Interactions in Chemical Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 2022;43:539–555. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lu T., Chen F.. Multiwfn: A Multifunctional Wavefunction Analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012;33:580–592. doi: 10.1002/jcc.22885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Lu T.. A Comprehensive Electron Wavefunction Analysis Toolbox for Chemists, Multiwfn. J. Chem. Phys. 2024;161:082503. doi: 10.1063/5.0216272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oc6c01081_si_001.pdf (17.5MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Central Science are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES