Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2026 Sep 25;9(10):e72950. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.72950

Markers of Systemic Metabolic Dysfunction in Vitiligo and Their Potential Role in Disease Pathogenesis: A Narrative Review

Federica Papaccio 1, Simona Scano 1, Barbara Bellei 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13614073  PMID: 42799418

ABSTRACT

Background

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the progressive destruction of melanocytes, resulting in depigmented skin macules. While traditionally viewed as a cutaneous disorder driven by a specific CD8+ T cell‐mediated interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) signature, emerging research suggests that vitiligo may be a systemic condition linked to metabolic syndrome (MetS) and broader metabolic dysregulation.

Methods

This review synthesizes current experimental and clinical evidence regarding systemic metabolic alterations in vitiligo. We analyzed studies investigating disruptions in glucose utilization, lipid profile imbalances, and amino acid metabolism, alongside their mechanistic links to oxidative stress and immune activation.

Results

Evidence indicates that metabolic dysfunction, including aberrant glucose metabolism and lipid alterations, precedes or exacerbates immune mobilization. Key systemic factors such as advanced glycation end‐products (AGEs), proinflammatory adipokines and reduced protective factors (vitamins and small antioxidants) create a permissive environment for melanocyte apoptosis. Furthermore, some studies concerning metabolic profiling reveal that systemic biomarkers (e.g., homocysteine, total cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio, and urinary metabolites) correlate with disease activity and treatment response.

Conclusions

Vitiligo involves a complex interplay between systemic metabolic shifts and cutaneous autoimmunity. Integrating metabolic profiling into clinical practice offers a transformative approach for identifying subclinical abnormalities, discovering biomarkers for early diagnosis, and developing personalized management strategies that address the disease beyond its dermatological manifestations.

Keywords: metabolic syndrome, metabolism, vitiligo

1. Introduction

Vitiligo is an acquired skin condition characterized by the loss or dysfunction of epidermal melanocytes. While vitiligo has traditionally been estimated to affect 0.5% to 2% of the global population, recent modeling analyzes suggest a lower global lifetime prevalence of approximately 0.36% [1]. Nearly half of all cases develop before the age of 20 [2, 3]. However, vitiligo can manifest at any age and does not exhibit a significant difference in prevalence between sexes [4]. Due to the chronic and non‐resolving feature, vitiligo patients often experience a significant reduction in quality of life due to the stigma, which can severely affect social relationships [5]. Therefore, it is important to recognize that vitiligo should not be simply considered a cosmetic issue. The characteristic depigmented spots associated with vitiligo are explained by a complex interaction of multiple etiological factors, including genetics, oxidative stress, and production of inflammatory mediators, culminating in autoimmune destruction of melanocytes [6]. Despite numerous clinical and molecular studies, the exact mechanism behind dyschromia in vitiligo remains unclear. The vitiligo patch resembles a non‐healing wound; lacking pigment‐producing cells, it fails to regenerate, permanently disrupting skin homeostasis. Extensive research now indicates that depigmentation is not the sole hallmark of the disease. Instead, vitiligo pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between non‐melanocytic cutaneous cells and extracutaneous systemic factors [7, 8]. In vitiligo, defects are not limited to melanocytes but also affect other cell types in the skin [8, 9]. Keratinocytes exhibit oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired support of melanocyte survival. Additionally, fibroblasts exhibit phenotypic changes and secrete factors that inhibit pigmentation [10], reflecting a complex cellular network disruption in vitiligo [11, 12, 13, 14]. Furthermore, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from these patients show functional and biochemical defects, including altered lipid membrane composition, increased Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production, and abnormal DNA methylation, collectively contributing to immune dysregulation and disease pathogenesis [15, 16].

The demonstration of several systemic vitiligo‐associated markers argues for a non‐organ‐restricted disease, implying that vitiligo is not just a skin manifestation (Figure 1). Moreover, among the broad spectrum of non‐cutaneous comorbidities associated with vitiligo recently reviewed [17], metabolic dysfunctions are among the most frequently reported, as evidenced by both epidemiological studies and genetic research [18]. Genetically, there is increasing recognition that vitiligo shares common risk factors with other metabolic and systemic autoimmune diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disorders. Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic loci overlapping vitiligo and diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2) [18]. Mendelian Randomization analyzes further demonstrate a significant causal relationship between diabetes predisposition and increased vitiligo risk [18]. Subtype analyzes confirm this association for both immune‐mediated T1D and T2D [19], which is primarily driven by metabolic mechanisms, are associated with a higher risk of vitiligo. These findings suggest the existence of shared molecular pathways between vitiligo and metabolic disorders, further supporting the role of non‐autoimmune components in vitiligo pathogenesis (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Markers of systemic alterations in subjects with vitiligo. Schematic representation of well‐documented extracutaneous anomalies, possibly implicated in the mechanism of depigmentation. Together, these systemic disturbances may trigger, intensify and perpetuate the depigmentation process in genetically predisposed individuals.

Table 1.

Summary of different pathogenetic aspects of vitiligo.

Category Altered markers Change Clinical/functional Implication
Glucose metabolism Fasting glucose Insulin, HOMA‐ IR, c‐peptide ↑ Insulin resistance, risk of T2D, Oxidative stress
Circulating IGF‐1 ↓ Reduced insulin/IGF‐1 sensitivity Impaired oxidative stress resistance
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) ↑ Inflammation via RAGE, ROS, mitochondrial dysfunction
Lipid metabolism LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol ↑ Positive correlation with VIDA score, oxidative stress
HDL cholesterol ↓ Reduced antioxidant protection
FABP4 ↑ Insulin resistance, inflammation, TRM activation, disease reactivation
Desnutrin ↓ Mitochondrial dysfunction, hyperglycemia
Vitamins Vitamin E ↓ Reduced repigmentation capacity, antioxidant protection, collagen synthesis
Vitamin C
α‐lipoic acid
Carotenoids
Homocysteine ↑ Melanocytes apoptosis
Vitamin B12 ↓/↑ Controversial results in terms of beneficial effects of supplementation
Vitamin D ↓ Reduced immune regulation, activation of proinflammatory cytokines, reduced melanogenesis
Adipokines Leptin ↑ Pro‐inflammatory, CD8 + T cell activation
Adiponectin ↓ Reduced anti‐inflammatory activity
Hormonal markers Neuropeptide Y (NPY) ↑ Neuroimmune crosstalk, cytokine activation
Norepinephrine ↑ ROS generation, damaged melanocyte
α‐MSH ↓ Reduced melanogenesis, impaired photoprotection, oxidative stress
MCHCR1 ↑ Impaired melanogenesis, autoimmunity
Oxidative stress H2O2, ROS ↑ Mitochondrial dysfunction
Catalase, SOD, GSH ↓/altered Antioxidant imbalance, immune dysregulation, cell death
Microbiome Bifidobacterium; Staphylococcus; Propionibacterium Altered Dysbiosis linked to IFN‐γ signature, oxidative stress
Urinary markers Biopterin metabolism, catecholamines Altered Defective melanin synthesis, stress hormones

Note: The intricate pathogenic network underlying vitiligo at the cellular level leads to equally intricate phenotypic and systemic changes.

In this review, we aimed to summarize the most frequently reported markers of systemic metabolic alterations implicated in vitiligo, thereby shedding light on the broader systemic implications of the disease.

2. Systemic Markers of Metabolic Impairment in Vitiligo Patients

Increasing evidence has proven that individuals with vitiligo may have a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of interrelated conditions including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension [20, 21, 22, 23]. Since cutaneous abnormalities are more than a simple complication associated with MetS, the intricated reciprocal relationship between MetS and skin disorders has gained interest [24, 25]. An integrated analysis of Mendelian Randomization and circulating metabolic profile to assess vitiligo risk demonstrated that the disease is associated with various metabolic abnormalities [26]. The study corroborates these findings in C57BL/6 mouse models, demonstrating that systemic metabolic shifts precede clinical onset and exacerbate autoimmune‐mediated depigmentation. Non‐targeted metabolomics analysis on the serum of vitiligo mice validated the pathway enrichment results, suggesting that the alteration in metabolic process can influence the genetic inheritance. This evidence suggests that specific metabolites are not merely biomarkers of the disease state, but potential causal drivers that create a permissive environment for melanocyte destruction. The prevalence of MetS has been correlated with disease activity and severity [27]. Recognizing metabolic dysfunction is essential for a more comprehensive clinical evaluation and for guiding targeted therapeutic strategies.

2.1. Alteration of Glucidic Metabolism

Alterations in glucose metabolism in vitiligo skin may reflect a more complex, comprehensive condition (Figure 2). Epidemiological and genetic investigations also reveal that vitiligo patients are at significantly increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus [21], a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia, resulting from impaired glucose uptake and utilization. Insulin resistance is characterized by compromised glucose transport and utilization. To compensate for reduced cellular responsiveness, the pancreas increases insulin secretion. However, when β‐cell activity can no longer meet this heightened demand, these compensatory mechanisms fail, leading to chronic hyperglycemia [28]. Insulin (Ins) and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) are closely related hormones that, in addition to binding their respective receptors, can also cross‐activate each other's receptors, albeit with lower affinity. These hormones operate through parallel signaling pathways; notably, an investigation of the 50 most highly regulated genes in cells exclusively expressing either insulin receptors (IR) or IGF‐1 receptors (IGF1R) failed to identify any genes that were differentially regulated by one receptor over the other [29]. Insulin resistance impacts tissues differently based on their insulin dependence and cell‐specific sensitivity. This sensitivity is primarily driven by the density of IR and IGF‐1 receptors and the cell's metabolic intensity [30, 31]. Consequently, a diminished intracellular signaling cascade can define cellular insulin resistance even without the systemic clinical markers of Metabolic Syndrome [32]. In the skin, the presence of functional IR and IGFR in keratinocytes, melanocytes, and fibroblasts highlights the vital role of Ins/IGF‐1 signaling in maintaining cutaneous biology and cellular function [33, 34]. Very recently, our group provided evidence of generalized Ins/IGF resistance in both dermal and epidermal cells, associated with exacerbated glucose uptake, oxidative stress, and paracrine release of glucose‐related by‐products [35]. Furthermore, the finding that intensified metabolic activity may trigger autoinflammation in vitiligo keratinocytes supports the concept of a metabolic imprint in the inflammatory processes underlying the disease [35]. Reduced circulating desnutrin, alongside elevated glucose and insulin, supports the role of subclinical insulin resistance in vitiligo onset [36]. Studies consistently report higher fasting glucose, insulin, C‐peptide, and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) levels in vitiligo patients compared to controls, suggesting a potential link to diabetes [37, 38]. Furthermore, oxidative stress and persistent inflammation are implicated in the pathogenesis of both metabolic syndrome and vitiligo, collectively disrupting cellular metabolism and exacerbating insulin resistance [21, 22, 39, 40, 41]. Specifically, inflammasome activation leads to decreased protein synthesis and mitochondrial dysfunction, partly driven by mitochondrial reactive ROS production, which contributes to the impaired function of vitiligo cells. On the other hand, mitochondrial regulation has emerged as a key axis in controlling inflammasome activity [42]. Since insulin and IGF‐1 coordinately regulate metabolic activity and share structural similarities, both IGF‐1 resistance [43, 44] and deficiency are predictably linked to metabolic syndrome [45]. Moreover, defective insulin and IGF‐1 signaling have also been demonstrated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) [44, 46]. Neuronal resistance to Ins/IGF‐1 has been proposed as a possible molecular link between diabetes and AD, indicating AD as “brain‐type diabetes” or type 3 diabetes [47]. In AD, fluctuations in glucose transporters, particularly GLUT1 and GLUT3, which are crucial for glucose uptake in the brain, are commonly observed and are associated with insulin resistance in the brain [48]. Attenuated insulin signaling impairs GLUT4 translocation, triggering neuroinflammation and cognitive decline as energy deficits disrupt ion gradients and neurotransmission [49, 50] In AD, this dysfunction also hinders Aβ clearance, promoting toxic deposition and neuronal death [51]. While traditionally viewed because of brain atrophy, emerging evidence suggests that hypometabolism may precede and trigger neuronal loss and clinical symptoms [51]. In vitiligo, the peculiar vitiligo hypometabolic feature is the reduced capacity to convert glucose into ATP [35]. While augmented glucose uptake and increased expression of glycolytic enzymes (e.g., Hexokinase2 (HK2), Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase 1(PDK1), and Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2)) partially compensate for metabolic dysfunction, defective mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation simultaneously drives oxidative stress and cellular damage [35, 52]. This growing evidence suggests a pathogenic mechanism where immune mobilization is secondary to chronic metabolic dysfunction. Notably, the shared neuroectodermal origin of melanocytes and neurons explains their common susceptibility to disrupted energy homeostasis and oxidative stress, linking the propensity for neurodegenerative and pigmentary disorders [53, 54, 55]. In this respect, AD and vitiligo converge in exhibiting low ATP production, albeit caused by different mechanisms: reduced glucose imports in AD and intrinsic defects in its utilization in vitiligo. A weakened Ins/IGF‐1 axis in vitiligo may be further exacerbated by insufficient production of these factors, as IGF‐1 levels have been found significantly reduced in both the skin and blood of vitiligo patients [56]. IGF‐1 supports Ins sensitivity and promotes its secretion [57, 58]. Low circulating IGF‐1 levels have also been associated with reduced insulin responsiveness, glucose intolerance, and T2D [58, 59]. Inflammatory cytokines can suppress IGF‐1 production and activity [60]. Transgenic mice overexpressing IL‐6 exhibit significantly lower IGF‐1, an effect partially reversed by anti‐IL‐6 antibodies [61]. IL‐6 decreases IGF‐1 binding protein 3 (IGFBP‐3), which accelerates IGF‐1 clearance, lowering its circulating concentrations [62]. While the exact mechanism remains unclear, IGF‐1 likely enhances insulin signaling through indirect pathways independent of its low affinity for the insulin receptor [63]. Furthermore, IGF‐1 regulates lipid metabolism by lowering circulating free fatty acids [64], thereby improving insulin sensitivity by counteracting systemic lipotoxicity [65]. Additionally, IGF‐1 exerts protective effects on mitochondria by preventing oxidative damage associated with increased metabolic activity, enhancing ATP production, and reducing intramitochondrial ROS generation [65, 66]. Furthermore, abnormally high levels of advanced glycosylation end‐products (AGEs) have been detected in the serum of vitiligo patients compared to healthy individuals [67]. In line with this, studying the metabolic profile of vitiligo cell culture, we observed a higher production level of AGEs, which corresponded to the extracellular release [35]. In vitro data pointed attention to the intense release of AGEs by vitiligo keratinocytes, suggesting that they are implicated in the pathogenic mechanisms [35]. Keratinocytes are highly metabolically active due to their rapid proliferation, supporting epidermal turnover and the synthesis of proteins and lipids for the stratum corneum. As the dominant skin cell type, they play key roles in inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases. AGEs, formed through non‐enzymatic modification of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids under chronic hyperglycemia, act as Damage‐Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) by binding to the Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts. (RAGE). This interaction induces oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [68, 69]. AGEs interact with RAGE receptors on cutaneous immune cells, triggering inflammatory pathways linked to dermatological conditions [70]. In diabetes, this interaction induces ROS formation and pro‐inflammatory cytokine activation. Specifically, RAGE+ T cells in type 1 diabetes exhibit a predisposed inflammatory phenotype characterized by constitutive NF‐κB and IFN‐γ signaling upon activation [71]. Given the aberrant glucose utilization in vitiligo, research indicates that in vitro, the anti‐diabetic PPARγ agonist, Pioglitazone, improves glucose metabolism and reverses metabolic abnormalities, offering a potential therapeutic strategy for underlying dysfunction. Supporting this, bioinformatic analyzes identify PPARγ signaling as one of the three primary non‐pigmentary functional changes driving vitiligo pathogenesis [72, 73]. The activity of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), a housekeeping enzyme that prevents cellular damage from ROS by producing NADPH (Nicotinamide Adenosine Dinucleotide Phosphate), has been implicated in vitiligo progression since melanocytes in vitiligo patients are more sensitive to its inhibition than normal melanocytes [74, 75]. Moreover, the expression of this metabolic regulator correlates with the activation of pigmentary gene expression [76]. A study on the Gujarat population found a genetic and biochemical association between the G6PD 3'UTR rs1050757 polymorphism and vitiligo [75]. Sustaining a role for G6PD in vitiligo pathogenesis, miRNA expression profiling in whole blood and PBMC of patients identified a pattern of small RNA molecules, including miR‐1, a regulator of mitochondrial death pathway and anti‐oxidant G6PD [77]. The overall analysis of circulating and lesional miRNA profile offered an additional connection between metabolism and vitiligo [78, 79]. Specifically, prioritization score analysis showed miRNA‐155 and miRNA‐9 were directly related to the disease [80]. miRNA‐9 regulates the release of insulin in pancreatic β‐cells in rat and mouse models [81]. miRNA‐155 is implicated in insulin signaling, glucose tolerance and uptake, obesity‐related processes and in the inflammatory status of adipocytes [82, 83]. The disruption of miRNA‐regulated transcriptomics revealed three significantly upregulated miRNAs, miR‐31‐5p, miR‐31‐3p, and miR‐194‐3p, in lesional epidermis. miR‐31 is a key keratinocyte‐specific miRNA with minimal expression in other cell types. While scarcely expressed in normal skin, miR‐31 is significantly upregulated in various skin diseases, where it can either aid homeostasis or drive hyperproliferation. Its overexpression promotes keratinocyte apoptosis and NF‐κB activation, triggering inflammatory cytokine production and leukocyte recruitment. Additionally, miR‐31‐3p, found in oxidative‐stress‐induced exosomes, contributes to melanocyte death and suppresses melanogenesis by disrupting MITF signaling. It also enhances CD8 + T cell activation, likely by reducing immunosuppression and promoting T‐cell proliferation. miR‐31‐5p from stressed keratinocytes may thus mediate oxidative stress‐induced melanocyte loss in vitiligo. Additionally, this miRNA has been linked to shifts in M1/M2 macrophage polarization via AMPK/SIRT/NLRP3 signaling under ATP/ADP imbalance [84].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The complexity of glucose uptake in vitiligo pathogenesis. The detrimental glucose metabolism in vitiligo cells is illustrated in the scheme, which shows intracellular glucose‐related dysfunctions affecting both epidermal and dermal cell populations. These metabolic defects create a hostile microenvironment that compromises melanocyte survival and function, thereby playing a key role in recruiting the immune system. Such impairments include reduced ATP production, altered activity of glycolytic enzymes, and mitochondrial dysfunction, which contribute to oxidative stress and inflammation, central factors in vitiligo pathogenesis. This metabolic imbalance not only weakens cell energy but also promotes an environment that facilitates immune cell activation and disease progression.

2.2. Dyslipidemia

The relationship between vitiligo and lipid imbalances has attracted growing interest in recent years. Several studies have reported a higher prevalence of obesity among individuals with vitiligo [85, 86]. Conversely, some studies found no significant link between vitiligo and anthropometric markers like BMI or waist circumference [87], necessitating further longitudinal research. However, recent work by Guanglu et al. emphasizes the role of lipids, identifying 10 lipid‐related molecules among 36 abnormal metabolites in vitiligo patients [26]. Among these, myristoleate showed the highest risk effect for vitiligo development. Another study employing untargeted metabolomics in a population of progressive vitiligo patients identified lower piperine and pantothenic acid, and upregulated 1‐stearoylglycerol, stearoyl ethanolamide, and imidazoleacetic acid, all related to the biosynthesis pathway of unsaturated fatty acids [88]. Vitiligo patients frequently exhibit elevated LDL and reduced HDL cholesterol [17, 22, 67, 88]. This dyslipidemia, alongside factors like hypertension and smoking, activates the NADPH oxidase system, inducing excessive superoxide production and oxidative stress. Notably, a positive correlation exists between the Vitiligo Disease Activity (VIDA) score and serum cholesterol, LDL levels, and the LDL/HDL ratio [89]. Consistent with these findings, HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors like simvastatin have been reported to occasionally reverse depigmentation [90, 91]. Supporting the therapeutic potential of simvastatin, its use in vitro on human melanocyte cultures protects from oxidative stress by activating detoxifying pathways [92]. However, clinical trials investigating oral and topical administration of statins failed in significant repigmentation [93, 94]. One key finding is the increase in circulating levels of fatty acid‐binding protein 4 (FABP4) in vitiligo patients compared to matched healthy controls [95]. FABP4 is involved in insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, inflammation, and glucose production, linking it to states of hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia commonly observed in vitiligo cases [96]. A significant association between high FABP4 levels and MetS has been observed in vitiligo patients [97]. FABP4 has proinflammatory properties in macrophages. Furthermore, decreasing the levels or activity of FABP4 has been shown to improve metabolic health. Due to the double role in lipid metabolism and inflammation [97, 98], FABP4 might represent a bridge between the metabolic aspect and autoimmunity of vitiligo. FABP4 has been found to induce insulin resistance by increasing the intracellular lipid contents [99], and recently, abnormal high FABP4 has been observed in newly diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared to controls [100]. Chronic activation of FABP4 under conditions of metabolic stress, such as obesity, is habitually associated with intensified lipolysis and contributes to the progression of various immunometabolic disorders [101]. Plasma levels of desnutrin, a member of the family of proteins involved in adipose tissue lipolysis, are significantly reduced in individuals with vitiligo compared to healthy controls [36]. Decreased desnutrin in subjects with vitiligo significantly correlates with fasting insulin levels, HOMA‐IR, VLDL, LDL, and fasting blood glucose, amount of serum insulin and glucose, but not with HDL, triglyceride, and cholesterol levels [36]. Desnutrin promotes mitochondrial function essential for insulin secretion by pancreatic islet cells. Experimental ablation of desnutrin in mice leads to impaired mitochondrial dynamics, characterized by hyperfused mitochondria, and results in hyperglycemia [102]. Leptin, an adipokine regulating energy homeostasis and immune function, is significantly elevated in vitiligo, where high serum levels of both leptin and resistin correlate with increased disease activity [103]. Leptin promotes melanocyte destruction by activating CD8+ T cells and enhancing the production of pro‐inflammatory mediators, including IFN‐γ, perforin, and granzyme B [103, 104]. Conversely, circulating levels of the protective adipokine, adiponectin, are notably reduced in these patients [103].

2.3. Hormonal Factors in Vitiligo Pathogenesis

An emerging concept suggests that vitiligo pathogenesis involves a functional interplay between the neuroendocrine and immune systems [105]. The cutaneous neuroendocrine network is crucial for skin homeostasis, including pigmentation control. Neuropeptides and hormones from peripheral nerves can interact with pro‐inflammatory cytokines, disrupting melanocyte function and survival [105]. Elevated levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY) have been consistently observed in both lesional tissue and plasma samples from patients with vitiligo, compared to healthy individuals [106, 107]. Moreover, polymorphisms in the NPY gene, specifically −399 T/C (rs16147) and +1128 T/C (rs16139), have been implicated in increased transcriptional activity and are associated with heightened susceptibility to vitiligo and the concurrent inflammatory cytokines [108, 109]. These findings highlight a potential neuroimmune mechanism contributing to melanocyte degeneration in vitiligo. Anomalous high norepinephrine (also known as noradrenaline) levels have been detected in the melanocyte microenvironment and plasma of patients with vitiligo [110]. Elevated local or systemic norepinephrine can modulate keratinocyte and immune cell activity, indirectly impairing melanocyte viability by stimulating cytokine release and immune cell recruitment [111]. These findings suggest that neuroendocrine‐immune axis dysregulation triggers or exacerbates vitiligo. Additionally, dysregulated norepinephrine is linked to hypertension and mood disorders [112]. The psychosocial burden and chronic stress of visible lesions further elevate anxiety and depression [113, 114], creating a self‐sustaining loop that drives disease progression. Corticotropin hormone in the skin upregulates the synthesis and secretion of proopiomelanocortin and its derived peptides, with POMC being an important regulator of melanogenesis [115]. The expression of POMC and its receptors, melanocortin receptor‐1 (MC1R) and −4 (MC4R), is significantly decreased in lesional vitiligo skin, but increased in non‐lesional vitiligo skin [116]. Notably, α‐MSH levels are significantly reduced in both the epidermis and blood of patients with vitiligo [117, 118]. Based on this observation, the use of Afamelanotide, an α‐MSH synthetic analog, in combination with phototherapy has been proposed as a potential treatment option [119]. Beyond its well‐known role in regulating pigmentation, α‐MSH also exerts multiple effects in the skin, including protection against oxidative stress, anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrotic actions [120, 121, 122]. The melanin‐concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1), identified as an autoantigen in vitiligo, also links vitiligo to diabetes. Function‐blocking antibodies against MCHR1, produced by B cells, have been found in vitiligo patients [123, 124] and individuals with diabetes [125]. This autoantigen is of particular interest because it is the only known cell surface antigen identified in vitiligo. The ligand melanin‐concentrating hormone (MCH) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that regulates food intake and energy balance, partly by stimulating insulin secretion [126]. It is plausible that MCHR1 antibodies in vitiligo patients exert a non‐physiological stimulatory effect on pancreatic islet cells, leading to systemic metabolic implications. In melanocytes, MCH acts as an antagonist of α‐MSH, which is the primary regulator of melanogenesis [127]. In vitro stimulation of human melanocytes with MCH leads to a pronounced reduction in melanogenic activity [127]. Moreover, MCH mRNA expression is upregulated in both lesional and non‐lesional skin of vitiligo patients compared to healthy controls.

2.4. Micronutrients

Increasing attention has focused on nutritional factors, particularly vitamins, in vitiligo pathogenesis. Studies suggest that deficiencies or supplementation may influence progression and repigmentation via antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and melanocyte‐supporting effects. While definitive conclusions are lacking, antioxidant micronutrients may primarily act by increasing the minimal erythema dose (MED), thereby enhancing phototherapy efficacy by shielding melanocytes from oxidative and immune damage [128]. The imbalances in serum levels of antioxidants, such as selenium, copper, and zinc, have been associated with increased vitiligo risk, suggesting that nutritional deficiencies may contribute to melanocyte degeneration [129, 130]. Vitamin C, a potent antioxidant often deficient in vitiligo patients, may aid pigmentation by preventing oxidative damage, supporting collagen synthesis, and promoting melanin production. However, clinical evidence for its effectiveness as a standalone treatment is limited, with most studies focusing on its use alongside other antioxidants [131]. Vitamin D plays a multifaceted role in skin homeostasis, immune regulation, and melanocyte biology. Through the Vitamin D receptor (VDR), it promotes melanogenesis and protects melanocytes from apoptosis by inhibiting pro‐inflammatory cytokines [132]. Although serum levels are frequently lower in vitiligo patients, particularly those with limited sun exposure, findings vary by geography, environment, and ethnicity [133]. Notably, topical analogs like calcipotriol and tacalcitol have shown efficacy in repigmentation, especially when combined with narrowband UVB or topical corticosteroids [134]. However, genetic studies examining VDR polymorphisms have revealed inconsistent associations with vitiligo susceptibility across different ethnic populations [135, 136]. Animal studies with diets enriched in vitamins and antioxidants, including green tea polyphenols, suggest these may aid repigmentation by reducing cellular oxidative stress. However, polyphenol effects may be limited to the epidermis due to poor systemic absorption [137, 138]. Oral vitamin E, often administered in combination with other antioxidants such as α‐lipoic acid, vitamin C, carotenoids, and fruit extracts, has shown some promise in promoting repigmentation; however, the independent effect of single factors remains unclear [139, 140]. Research on vitamin B12 has yielded mixed results. While some uncontrolled studies report halted disease progression and partial repigmentation, controlled clinical trials have not confirmed significant therapeutic benefits [141]. While vitamins D and E may be useful adjuncts, particularly with phototherapy or immunomodulators, current evidence is insufficient to support their routine use, highlighting the need for well‐designed trials to establish optimal dosages, combinations, and strategies.

2.5. Disturbance of the Physiological Oxidative‐Reductive Equilibrium in Vitiligo

Although the local oxidative imbalance in the skin microenvironment has been widely studied, cumulative research indicates that oxidative stress is present not only in lesional skin but also in the systemic circulation of patients with vitiligo [74]. Elevated levels of ROS and reduced levels of antioxidants have been detected in the peripheral blood of vitiligo individuals, suggesting a pro‐oxidant state at the systemic level [142]. Furthermore, some studies have reported correlations between the degree of oxidative stress in the blood and disease activity or progression, suggesting these markers could be useful for monitoring disease status or therapeutic response [143]. This systemic oxidative milieu could potentially amplify melanocyte‐specific autoimmunity by promoting antigen presentation, T‐cell activation, and the release of inflammatory cytokines [144]. Oxidative stress plays a central role in the development of both vitiligo and MetS [145]. This is particularly important because oxidative stress can lead to the activation of inflammatory pathways that impair cellular functions. Some studies report elevated levels of both oxidants and antioxidants, while others find no difference, or even lower levels of these parameters in vitiligo patients compared to controls. Individual antioxidant levels, particularly for Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and catalase, have been extensively studied in vitiligo, but data on total antioxidant capacity are scarce. Some studies report significantly higher levels of SOD [146, 147, 148, 149], while others, including our recent report, detected lower activity in vitiligo patients [67, 150, 151]. The increased ROS levels, by altering the structure of lineage‐specific proteins such as tyrosinase and Melanoma Antigen Recognized by T cells 1 (MELAN‐A), may lead to the formation of new epitopes, triggering an autoimmune response. Increased markers of oxidative stress in the early stages of vitiligo, along with elevated levels of autoantibodies in the advanced stages, suggest that oxidative stress plays a role in the initiation of vitiligo pathophysiology [152]. Elevated levels of homocysteine, an amino acid metabolite, have been identified as a circulating marker of oxidative stress and a risk factor for vitiligo [153, 154]. Dysregulation in homocysteine metabolism in vitiligo may further contribute to the disease's pathogenesis. Homocysteine induces melanocyte apoptosis by activating ROS and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway [155]. Moreover, homocysteine has been shown to disrupt melanogenesis; however, this defect can be reversed through folic acid supplementation, which restores normal melanocyte function [155]. Recent studies evaluating cysteine, a downstream product of homocysteine metabolism, have revealed reduced levels in patients with vitiligo, confirming impaired homocysteine metabolism [67, 156]. The imbalance in oxidative stress also affects lipid metabolism, as seen in the alteration of fatty acid (FA) pathways in vitiligo patients, which shows a shift toward pro‐inflammatory n‐6 fatty acids [157]. Oxidative stress is closely linked to mitochondrial dysfunction, which in vitiligo patients manifests as abnormal glucose metabolism and increased ROS production [52, 72, 158, 159]. In mitochondria, ROS are generated as by‐products during the biosynthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), making mitochondria a primary source of cellular ROS. At the cellular level, melanin synthesis itself represents a significant source of intracellular oxidative stress, as it generates ROS during its biosynthetic pathway [160]. Melanin plays a dual role: on one hand, it protects against UV‐induced DNA damage; on the other, the melanogenesis process itself generates ROS [161]. While eumelanin offers more protection against oxidative stress and correlates inversely with basal ROS levels, pheomelanin exerts an intrinsic phototoxic/pro‐oxidant role associated with increased oxidative DNA and lipid damage [162]. Excess ROS can impair dendrite formation in melanocytes, weaken their adhesion to the basal layer of the epidermis, and ultimately lead to melanocyte detachment [163]. This detachment facilitates melanocyte migration and may act as a trigger factor for the activation of immune responses in the skin [163].

2.6. Altered Immunometabolism in Vitiligo

The function of immune cells largely depends on their metabolic activities, which are deeply influenced by intrinsic characteristics and the metabolic dialog with the microenvironment. Collectively, metabolic regulation of immune function is indicated as “immunometabolism”. In the case of inflammatory stimuli, the primary alteration in bioenergetic metabolism involves promoting glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation [164]. Altered metabolic pathways in immune cells promote inflammation and sustain the disease's chronicity, linking metabolism closely with immune dysregulation in vitiligo. Thus, immunometabolism is emerging as a promising area of research in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. Studies suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, and defects in specific metabolic pathways contribute to the dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses in vitiligo [165]. Skin aberrant activation of innate immune cells includes inflammatory dendritic cells, which secrete pro‐inflammatory cytokines and present melanocyte‐derived antigens to T cells, thereby activating them. These autoreactive T cells then directly target and destroy melanocytes [166]. Abnormal lipid metabolism significantly impacts T cell dysfunction in vitiligo. Skin tissue‐resident memory T cells (TRM) possess a unique metabolic profile characterized by increased mitochondrial mass and fatty acid beta‐oxidation (FAO) to ensure longevity and rapid recall [167]. In vitiligo, autoreactive CD8+ TRM cells release IFN‐γ, promoting melanocyte destruction and recruiting additional cytotoxic cells [168]. In vitro studies highlight the overexpression of FABP4 in these autoreactive populations [169], suggesting it promotes immune‐mediated mechanisms beyond lipid transport, such as endothelial activation and inflammatory cytokine upregulation [170]. Because TRM cells depend on exogenous free fatty acids (FFAs) for skin residency, targeting these metabolic pathways, for instance, using trimetazidine to block mitochondrial FAO, can reduce their lifespan [171, 172]. Clinically, lipid‐lowering agents like statins may reduce disease activity, offering a potential therapeutic avenue beyond their cardiovascular benefits [173]. Statins (HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors), commonly used to manage hyperlipidemia, have been incidentally associated with vitiligo regression in some clinical observations [174]. A particularly noteworthy observation is that statins may exert anti‐inflammatory effects by targeting memory T cells, reducing their numbers, and limiting their cytokine production at sites of inflammation [174]. Furthermore, in vitro experiments have shown that statins inhibit the proliferation and cytotoxic activity of melanocyte‐specific CD8+ T cells. In a mouse model of vitiligo, simvastatin was able to both prevent and reverse depigmentation by interfering with IFN‐γ signaling [90]. Alteration of the antioxidant patterns described in melanocytes has also been demonstrated in PBMC of patients in the active phase of the disease, indicating susceptibility to oxidative stress of immune cells [175, 176]. Accordingly, PBMC in active vitiligo patients present compromised mitochondrial membrane potential and the tendency to accumulate intracellular ROS [175]. The precarious redox balance is implicated also in the regulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs), a population of immune cells having a suppressive function against CD4+ and CD8+ cells. The relative amount of Tregs resulted lower in lesional, peri‐lesional and normally pigmented vitiligo skin compared to healthy controls [177, 178] with a significant difference between active and stable disease [179], indicating a central role in the disruption of self‐immune tolerance in vitiligo. Independent of the amount, vitiligo Tregs demonstrated defects in secreting immunosuppressive cytokines, a deficiency that could be restored normalizing the expression of heme oxygenase1 (HO‐1) [179].

2.7. Possible Role of Dysbiosis in Vitiligo

The skin microbiome comprises a heterogeneous microbial community of beneficial microorganisms that undergo continuous dynamic changes influenced by host‐related factors, such as sex, age, skin pH, sebum composition, and anatomical variations, as well as environmental agents including UV radiation, climate, nutrient availability (dependent on diet and metabolism), moisture, and pollution [180]. The initial alteration in the skin microbiome typically occurs during pathogenic invasion. Viruses, bacteria, and fungi can colonize the skin, displacing commensal microorganisms. This results in skin barrier disruption, toxin release, and a pronounced inflammatory response [181]. Microbial imbalance, generally referred to as dysbiosis, has been implicated in several dermatological conditions, including atopic dermatitis, acne, psoriasis, rosacea, eczema, vitiligo, alopecia areata, chronic wounds, and skin cancers [182, 183, 184]. In vitiligo, dysbiosis has been investigated both at the skin and gut levels. A recent systematic review of six studies identifies a reduction in gut bacterial diversity associated with systemic dysbiosis. Conversely, skin microbiome findings remain heterogeneous and occasionally conflicting, often due to varying sampling methods between lesional and healthy sites. While microbial alterations are evident, the authors conclude that small sample sizes necessitate larger cohorts to confirm a definitive pathogenic role in vitiligo [185]. The observation of increased abundance of bacterial genes involved in mucus degradation suggested a potential compromise of the intestinal mucus barrier in vitiligo. Functional analyzes also identified a higher abundance of genes related to fatty acid and lipid metabolism in vitiligo patients. The richness and distribution of bacterial species found in the stool of vitiligo patients resembled profiles previously reported in autoimmune skin conditions such as scleroderma and psoriasis, and more broadly, in systemic autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes, Graves' disease, lupus, and multiple sclerosis [186]. In 2016, Ganju et al. were the first to demonstrate dysbiosis in the microbial community structure of vitiligo, revealing significant differences in microbial diversity between lesional and matched non‐lesional skin [187]. Subsequent studies extended the characterization of disease‐specific microbial profiles to the gut microbiome as well [188]. More recently, a comprehensive investigation compared both gut and skin microbiomes in vitiligo patients and healthy controls. The findings revealed that vitiligo patients shared similar microbial compositions across skin and gut sites, distinctly different from those of healthy individuals, suggesting the existence of a gut–skin axis in vitiligo [189]. In this study, the use of both swab and excision biopsy sampling allowed a detailed comparison between patients and controls. Notable differences were observed in tissue biopsies between vitiligo patients and healthy subjects, while no significant variation emerged between lesional and non‐lesional skin in vitiligo patients. A unique feature identified in some vitiligo subjects was the near‐complete absence of Bifidobacterium in the skin microbiota, an organism known for its protective effects against innate immune activation [190]. These individuals also exhibited elevated levels of circulating IFN‐γ, CXCL9, and the stress marker CXCL16. This immune signature was associated with the presence of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments, suggesting mitochondrial damage as a potential trigger for microbial alterations [190]. Dou et al. further confirmed reduced gut microbial diversity in vitiligo patients and identified Bacteroides and Parabacteroides as disease‐specific microbial markers. These taxes were significantly associated with the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) and disease duration [191]. Notably, narrowband UVB phototherapy has been shown to modulate the cutaneous microbiota in vitiligo patients, potentially counteracting dysbiosis and contributing to therapeutic effects [192]. Skin microbiota differences between active and stable vitiligo have been explored to elucidate mechanisms of disease progression [193]. Active vitiligo is characterized by significantly reduced microbial diversity in both lesional and non‐lesional skin compared to stable patients and healthy controls, indicating systemic dysbiosis [194]. This state is associated with an increased abundance of potentially pathogenic taxa, such as Staphylococcus and Propionibacterium, which are linked to cutaneous inflammation [181, 194]. In contrast, stable vitiligo exhibits a more balanced microbiome, with higher levels of commensal bacteria like Corynebacterium, closely resembling healthy skin [194]. These findings suggest that microbial dysbiosis correlates with disease activity and a pro‐inflammatory environment. Consequently, restoring a healthy skin microbiome represents a promising therapeutic strategy, while the microbiota itself holds potential as a biomarker for monitoring disease activity and treatment response [195]. Parallel analyzes of the gut microbiome and patient serum metabolome have revealed correlations with specific metabolites, including taurine, uridine, and nicotinamide, suggesting a relationship between substrate availability and microbial colonization [188]. Insights into microbiome‐associated metabolism have also provided relevant information. Metagenomic analysis of the vitiligo microbiome has identified several interconnected microbial metabolic pathways potentially implicated in disease pathogenesis. Increased galactose degradation has garnered attention, as galactose fermentation produces pyruvate, which can be further converted to acetyl‐CoA, both of which may promote oxidative stress [195]. Additionally, biochemical predictions indicate reduced cysteine degradation in the vitiligo microbiome. This potentially reflects altered metabolism in both the microbiota and the host, as elevated serum homocysteine, a cysteine precursor, is characteristic of vitiligo patients [67, 196]. These findings highlight a complex interplay between microbiome composition, microbial metabolism, and host biochemical pathways. It is hypothesized that such microbial imbalances could exacerbate mitochondrial dysfunction by increasing oxidative stress or disrupting mitochondrial dynamics [165]. An intriguing aspect consists of the demonstration that some bacterial proteins have mitochondrial targeting sequences and thus a propensity to be translocated into host mitochondria [197]. Emerging evidence suggests that restoring a healthy skin microbiome, through interventions such as probiotics or prebiotics, may modulate immune responses and enhance mitochondrial function, offering a potential adjunct to conventional immune‐modulating therapies [198]. At the intestinal level, the crosstalk between host and microbiota plays a key role in regulating mitochondrial activity and ROS production [198]. Despite its relevance, the skin mycobiome remains under‐investigated. Kuroda et al. reported slightly higher α‐diversity of fungal flora in vitiligo patients [199]. Alterations in the fungal repertoire may be particularly significant as certain species, such as those in the order Capnodiales, produce melanin and related pigments [200]. These fungal‐derived molecules are structurally like human melanocyte antigens and may act as molecular mimics, potentially triggering host autoimmune responses.

2.8. Urinary Metabolomic and Proteomic Profiling in Vitiligo

Despite being a useful, non‐invasive, and rapid approach to characterize urinary metabolite patterns associated with pathological conditions; few studies have explored urinary profiling in vitiligo. Previous research has mainly focused on specific metabolites, such as circulating and urinary catecholamines and vanillylmandelic acid [201, 202], with no comprehensive urinary metabolomic investigation available to date. Notably, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and metanephrine are significantly associated with progressive or recent‐onset disease [203]. Qian and colleagues conducted an untargeted urinary metabolomic analysis that identified 71 metabolites distinguishing vitiligo patients from healthy controls [204]. Significant pathway enrichment was observed in cytochrome P450 drug metabolism, biopterin metabolism, vitamin B9 (folate) metabolism, selenoamino acid metabolism, and methionine and cysteine metabolism [205]. Defects in biopterin synthesis and regulation are key contributors to vitiligo pathogenesis. H2O2 oxidizes (6 R)‐l‐erythro‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydrobiopterin to cytotoxic 6‐biopterin, damaging melanocytes in vitro. Low activity of 4a‐hydroxy‐tetrahydrobiopterin dehydratase leads to accumulation of 7‐tetrahydrobiopterin, which inhibits epidermal phenylalanine hydroxylase and disrupts melanin synthesis, contributing to depigmentation [206]. Notably, the alkaloid biosynthesis pathway correlated with disease activity; for example, (S)−3‐hydroxy‐N‐methylcoclaurine, an isoquinoline alkaloid intermediate, was elevated during effective treatment compared to the active phase [207]. These findings, along with identified steroid hormone‐related metabolites, suggest potential for treatment monitoring, though further validation is required. These included dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), cortexolone, and 4‐methoxy‐17β‐estradiol. DHEA, a stress‐related hormone, increased with treatment, consistent with Gurpinar et al. [208], who found that low DHEAS levels may predict poor treatment response. Cortisol, associated with stress and depression in vitiligo, decreased during treatment, indicating its link to the active disease stage [209]. 4‐methoxy‐17β‐estradiol also increased with clinical improvement, possibly due to its effect on tyrosinase activity in melanocytes. These findings highlight the complex interplay of neurological, psychological, and endocrine disturbances in vitiligo. Furthermore, a urinary proteomic study of 58 patients with advanced non‐segmental vitiligo revealed 242 differentially expressed proteins before steroid treatment, with RBP‐1 and TOR1AIP‐1 proposed as biomarkers of glucocorticoid (GC) efficacy [207]. These studies encourage the consideration of metabolomic and proteomic urinary profiles as promising tools for early diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prediction of disease progression [205, 209].

3. Conclusions

While vitiligo is primarily known for its visible depigmentation, emerging clinical evidence (listed in Supplementary Table 1), highlights a complex interplay between metabolic dysfunction, immune alterations, nutritional factors, and microbial imbalance in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. Although the relationship between vitiligo and insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and obesity is still unclear, these conditions share underlying mechanisms like oxidative stress and inflammation. These local microenvironmental factors are potentially determinative in predisposing the skin to autoimmune activation. A critical element involves the interplay between systemic metabolic deficiencies and local triggers, including mechanical stress chemical insults, and UV exposure. These synergistic interactions may lower the threshold for immune dysregulation and the subsequent onset of autoimmunity. Skin and gut dysbiosis, through the gut‐skin axis, play key roles in immune regulation and melanocyte survival, and microbiome modulation may complement existing treatments. Also, vitamins D and E represent promising complementary nutritional interventions, but robust clinical evidence is lacking. Currently, no metabolic or microbial marker has been sufficiently validated for routine clinical use to predict disease course or to predict treatment response. So far, an integrated multi‐omic approach is needed to improve understanding and treatment of vitiligo, with further large‐scale studies required to develop effective targeted therapies.

Author Contributions

Federica Papaccio: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation. Simona Scano: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation. Barbara Bellei: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation, supervision.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Transparency Statement

Barbara Bellei, as author guarantor affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported and no important aspects of the study have been omitted and any discrepancies from the study as planned.

Supporting information

Supporting File

HSR2-9-e72950-s001.docx (32.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by project grants PNRR‐MCNT2‐2023‐12377707 and Ricerca Corrente RC2025 and RC2026 from the Italian Ministry of Health (MoH). The financial support had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication.

Papaccio F., Scano S., and Bellei B., “Markers of Systemic Metabolic Dysfunction in Vitiligo and Their Potential Role in Disease Pathogenesis: A Narrative Review,” Health Science Reports 9 (2026): e72950, 10.1002/hsr2.72950.

Federica Papaccio and Simona Scano contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Akl J., Lee S., Ju H. J., et al., “Estimating the Burden of Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Modelling Study,” Lancet Public Health 9 (2024): e386–e396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bergqvist C. and Ezzedine K., “Vitiligo: A Review,” Dermatology 236 (2020): 571–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Picardo M., Dell'Anna M. L., Ezzedine K., et al., “Vitiligo,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 1 (2015): 15011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Matarrese P., Puglisi R., Mattia G., et al., “An Overview of the Biological Complexity of Vitiligo,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2024 (2024): 3193670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Böhm M., Sommer R., Gieler U., et al., “Vitiligo ‐ a Disease: A Position Paper on Stigmatization, Life Quality Impairment and Psychosocial Comorbidity,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology: JDDG 22 (2024): 1327–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Upadhya S., Andrade M. J., Shukla V., et al., “Genetic and Immune Dysregulation in Vitiligo: Insights into Autoimmune Mechanisms and Disease Pathogenesis,” Autoimmunity Reviews 24 (2025): 103841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhu Y. and Zhang C., “Between Light and Shadow: The Enigma of Nonlesional Skin in Vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 145 (2025): 1547–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bastonini E., Bellei B., Filoni A., et al., “Involvement of Non‐Melanocytic Skin Cells in Vitiligo,” Experimental Dermatology 28 (2019): 667–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kovacs D., Bastonini E., Ottaviani M., et al., “Vitiligo Skin: Exploring the Dermal Compartment,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 138 (2018): 394–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wang Y., Viennet C., Robin S., et al., “Precise Role of Dermal Fibroblasts on Melanocyte Pigmentation,” Journal of Dermatological Science 88 (2017): 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cao C., Xu W., Lei J., et al., “The IL‐6 Autocrine Loop Promoting IFN‐γ‐induced Fibroblast Senescence Is Involved in Psychological Stress‐Mediated Exacerbation of Vitiligo,” Inflammation Research 74 (2025): 72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wu Y., Yang Y., Lin Y., et al., “Emerging Role of Fibroblasts in Vitiligo: A Formerly Underestimated Rising Star,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 144 (2024): 1696–1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ma J., Zhou Y., Chen J., et al., “Exosomes Enriched With miR‐31‐3p From Keratinocytes under Oxidative Stress Promote Vitiligo Progression by Destructing Melanocytes and Activating CD8(+) T Cells,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 310 (2025): 143070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Touni A. A., Shivde R. S., Echuri H., et al., “Melanocyte‐Keratinocyte Cross‐Talk in Vitiligo,” Front Med (Lausanne) 10 (2023): 1176781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dell'Anna M. L., Ottaviani M., Bellei B., et al., “Membrane Lipid Defects Are Responsible for the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Vitiligo Patients,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 223 (2010): 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhao M., Gao F., Wu X., et al., “Abnormal Dna Methylation in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Patients With Vitiligo,” British Journal of Dermatology 163 (2010): 736–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Paganelli A., Papaccio F., Picardo M., et al., “Metabolic Anomalies in Vitiligo: A New Frontier for Drug Repurposing Strategies,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 16 (2025): 1546836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhao L., Hu M., and Li L., “Identifying the Genetic Associations Between Diabetes Mellitus and the Risk of Vitiligo,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 17 (2024): 2261–2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kim D. H., Kim Y., Moon I. J., et al., “The Association Between Melanoma and Autoimmune Diseases: A Nationwide Population‐Based Study in the Republic of Korea,” Journal of Dermatology (2025): [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ataş H. and Gönül M., “Increased Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Vitiligo,” Balkan Medical Journal 34 (2017): 219–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chang H., Lin M., Huang Y., et al., “The Association Between Vitiligo and Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 81 (2019): 1442–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tanacan E. and Atakan N., “Higher Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome Components in Vitiligo Patients: A Prospective Cross‐Sectional Study,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 95 (2020): 165–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liang X., Guo F., Zhang M., et al., “Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients With Vitiligo: An Analysis of Current Evidence,” Annals of Medicine 56 (2024): 2326297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Stefanadi E. C., Dimitrakakis G., Antoniou C., et al., “Metabolic Syndrome and the Skin: A More Than Superficial Association. Reviewing the Association Between Skin Diseases and Metabolic Syndrome and a Clinical Decision Algorithm for High Risk Patients,” Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 10 (2018): 9–z. eCollection 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gruber F., Kremslehner C., and Narzt M., “The Impact of Recent Advances in Lipidomics and Redox Lipidomics on Dermatological Research,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine 144 (2019): 256–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Li G., Qu B., Zheng T., et al., “Assessing the Causal Effect of Genetically Predicted Metabolites and Metabolic Pathways on Vitiligo: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization and Animal Experiments,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 247 (2025): 106677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bathina N., Ganni S., Kolalapudi S. A., et al., “Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Vitiligo Patients and Its Relation to Vitiligo Severity ‐ A Cross‐Sectional Study,” Indian Dermatology Online Journal 15 (2024): 612–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Freeman A. M., Acevedo L. A., and Pennings N., “Insulin Resistance,” in Anonymous StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Boucher J., Tseng Y., and Kahn C. R., “Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth factor‐1 Receptors Act as Ligand‐Specific Amplitude Modulators of a Common Pathway Regulating Gene Transcription,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 285 (2010): 17235–17245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Siddle K., Ursø B., Niesler C. A., et al., “Specificity in Ligand Binding and Intracellular Signalling by Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Receptors,” Biochemical Society Transactions 29 (2001): 513–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Okuyama T., Kyohara M., Terauchi Y., et al., “The Roles of the Igf Axis in the Regulation of the Metabolism: Interaction and Difference Between Insulin Receptor Signaling and Igf‐I Receptor Signaling,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (2021): 6817, 10.3390/ijms22136817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shulman G. I., “Cellular Mechanisms of Insulin Resistance,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 106 (2000): 171–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Tavakkol A., Elder J. T., Griffiths C. E., et al., “Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor, Insulin‐Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF‐1) and IGF‐1 Receptor Mrna and Proteins in Human Skin,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 99 (1992): 343–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Edmondson S. R., Russo V. C., McFarlane A. C., et al., “Interactions Between Growth Hormone, Insulin‐Like Growth Factor I, and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Melanocyte Growth,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 84 (1999): 1638–1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Caputo S., Papaccio F., Marrapodi R., et al. “Defective Intracellular Insulin/IGF‐1 Signaling Elucidates the Link Between Metabolic Defect and Autoimmunity in Vitiligo,” Cells 14, no: 8 (2025): 565, 10.3390/cells14080565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. El‐Hamd M. A., Sedky A., Mahmoud A. B., et al., “Desnutrin as a Biomarker for Insulin Resistance in Patients With Vitiligo Vulgaris,” Indian Journal of Dermatology 68 (2023): 366–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Karadag A. S., Tutal E., and Ertugrul D. T., “Insulin Resistance Is Increased in Patients With Vitiligo,” Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 91 (2011): 541–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ibrahim S., El‐Tahlawi S., Mogawer R. M., et al., “Different Vitiligo Characteristics as Predictors of Increased Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance: A Case‐Control Study,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 21 (2022): 7170–7177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Alkhateeb A., Fain P. R., Thody A., et al., “Epidemiology of Vitiligo and Associated Autoimmune Diseases in Caucasian Probands and Their Families,” Pigment Cell Research 16 (2003): 208–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Han J., “Immuno‐Metabolic Diseases and Therapeutics: Molecular Mechanisms via Inflammasome Signaling,” Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS 23 (2025): 373–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mitra S., De Sarkar S., Pradhan A., et al., “Levels of Oxidative Damage and Proinflammatory Cytokines Are Enhanced in Patients With Active Vitiligo,” Free Radical Research 51 (2017): 986–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Spector L. and Subramanian N., “Revealing the Dance of NLRP3: Spatiotemporal Patterns in Inflammasome Activation,” Immunometabolism (Cobham) 7 (2025): e00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Friedrich N., Thuesen B., Jørgensen T., et al., “The Association Between Igf‐I and Insulin Resistance: A General Population Study in Danish Adults,” Diabetes Care 35 (2012): 768–773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Moloney A. M., Griffin R. J., Timmons S., et al., “Defects in IGF‐1 Receptor, Insulin Receptor and IRS‐1/2 in Alzheimer's Disease Indicate Possible Resistance to IGF‐1 and Insulin Signalling,” Neurobiology of Aging 31 (2010): 224–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Aguirre G. A., De Ita J. R., de la Garza R. G., et al., “Insulin‐Like Growth factor‐1 Deficiency and Metabolic Syndrome,” Journal of Translational Medicine 14 (2016): 3–z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Freude S., Hettich M. M., Schumann C., et al., “Neuronal IGF‐1 Resistance Reduces Abeta Accumulation and Protects Against Premature Death in a Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” FASEB Journal 23 (2009): 3315–3324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Atabi F., Moassesfar M., Nakhaie T., et al., “A Systematic Review on Type 3 Diabetes: Bridging the Gap Between Metabolic Dysfunction and Alzheimer's Disease,” Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 17 (2025): 356–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. An Y., Varma V. R., Varma S., et al., “Evidence for Brain Glucose Dysregulation in Alzheimer's Disease,” Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 14 (2018): 318–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Albaik M., Sheikh Saleh D., Kauther D., et al., “Bridging the Gap: Glucose Transporters, Alzheimer's, and Future Therapeutic Prospects,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 12 (2024): 1344039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bordone M. P., Salman M. M., Titus H. E., et al., “The Energetic Brain ‐ A Review From Students to Students,” Journal of Neurochemistry 151 (2019): 139–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ahlawat A., Walia V., and Garg M., “Brain Insulin Resistance Mediated Cognitive Impairment and Neurodegeneration: Type‐3 Diabetes or Alzheimer's Disease,” Acta Neurologica Belgica 125 (2025): 941–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Dell'Anna M. L., Ottaviani M., Kovacs D., et al., “Energetic Mitochondrial Failing in Vitiligo and Possible Rescue by Cardiolipin,” Scientific Reports 7 (2017): 13663–13665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Li M., Knapp S. K., and Iden S., “Mechanisms of Melanocyte Polarity and Differentiation: What Can We Learn From Other Neuroectoderm‐Derived Lineages?,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology 67 (2020): 99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Chang T., Tai Y., Dai Y., et al., “Association Between Vitiligo and Subsequent Risk of Dementia: A Population‐Based Cohort Study,” Journal of Dermatology 48 (2021): 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Kridin K., Ofir L., Weinstein O., et al., “Clarifying the Association Between Parkinson's Disease and Vitiligo: A Population‐Based Large‐Scale Study,” Frontiers in Neurology 15 (2024): 1387404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. El‐Komy M. H. M., Sayed K. S., Mostafa W. Z., et al., “Insulin‐Like Growth Factor 1: A New Prime Mover in the Pathogenesis of Vitiligo,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology 64 (2023): e188–e191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Clemmons D. R., “Metabolic Actions of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I in Normal Physiology and Diabetes,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America 41 (2012): 425–445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Succurro E., Andreozzi F., Marini M. A., et al., “Low Plasma Insulin‐Like Growth factor‐1 Levels Are Associated With Reduced Insulin Sensitivity and Increased Insulin Secretion in Nondiabetic Subjects,” Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases 19 (2009): 713–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Mannino G. C., Greco A., De Lorenzo C., et al., “A Fasting Insulin‐Raising Allele at IGF1 Locus Is Associated With Circulating Levels of IGF‐1 and Insulin Sensitivity,” PLoS One 8 (2013): e85483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. O'Connor J. C., McCusker R. H., Strle K., et al., “Regulation of Igf‐I Function by Proinflammatory Cytokines: at the Interface of Immunology and Endocrinology,” Cellular Immunology 252 (2008): 91–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. De Benedetti F., Alonzi T., Moretta A., et al., “Interleukin 6 Causes Growth Impairment in Transgenic Mice Through a Decrease in Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I. A Model for Stunted Growth in Children With Chronic Inflammation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 99 (1997): 643–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Witkowska‐Sędek E. and Pyrżak B., “Chronic Inflammation and the Growth Hormone/Insulin‐Like Growth factor‐1 Axis,” Central European Journal of Immunology 45, no. 2020: 469–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Clemmons D. R., “Involvement of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I in the Control of Glucose Homeostasis,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology 6 (2006): 620–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Møller N., Gjedsted J., Gormsen L., et al., “Effects of Growth Hormone on Lipid Metabolism in Humans,” supplement, Growth Hormone & IGF Research 13 Suppl A (2003): 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Puche J. E., García‐Fernández M., Muntané J., et al. “Low Doses of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I Induce Mitochondrial Protection in Aging rats,” 149 (2008): 2620–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Pérez R., García‐Fernández M., Díaz‐Sánchez M., et al., “Mitochondrial Protection by Low Doses of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐ I in Experimental Cirrhosis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 14 (2008): 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Papaccio F., Ottaviani M., Truglio M., et al., “Markers of Metabolic Abnormalities in Vitiligo Patients,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25 (2024): 10201, 10.3390/ijms251810201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Lane R. K., Hilsabeck T., and Rea S. L., “The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Age‐Related Diseases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta/General Subjects 1847 (2015): 1387–1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ward M. S., Fortheringham A. K., Cooper M. E., et al., “Targeting Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Disease,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology 13 (2013): 654–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Hu H., Jiang H., Ren H., et al., “Ages and Chronic Subclinical Inflammation in Diabetes: Disorders of Immune System,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 31 (2015): 127–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Durning S. P., Preston‐Hurlburt P., Clark P. R., et al., “The Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts Drives T Cell Survival and Inflammation in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus,” Journal of Immunology 197 (2016): 3076–3085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Papaccio F., Bellei B., Ottaviani M., et al. “A Possible Modulator of Vitiligo Metabolic Impairment: Rethinking a PPARγ Agonist,” 11 (2022): 3583, 10.3390/cells11223583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Liu B., Xie Y., and Wu Z., “Identification of Candidate Genes and Pathways in Nonsegmental Vitiligo Using Integrated Bioinformatics Methods,” Dermatology 237 (2021): 464–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Arican O. and Kurutas E. B., ““Oxidative Stress in the Blood of Patients With Active Localized Vitiligo,” Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 17 (2008): 12–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Mansuri M. S., Singh M., Jadeja S. D., et al., “Association of Glucose 6‐phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) 3'UTR Polymorphism With Vitiligo and in Vitro Studies on G6PD Inhibition in Melanocytes,” Journal of Dermatological Science 93 (2019): 133–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Yang Y., Long H., Long L., et al., “Mechanism of Desuccinylation of G6PD Mediated by SIRT7 to Promote Vitiligo Disease Progression,” Immunity, Inflammation and Disease 12 (2024): e1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Mansuri M. S., Singh M., and Begum R., “Mirna Signatures and Transcriptional Regulation of Their Target Genes in Vitiligo,” Journal of Dermatological Science 84 (2016): 50–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Feghahati F. S. and Ghafouri‐Fard S., “A Comprehensive Outline of the Role of Non‐Coding Rnas in Vitiligo,” Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports 41 (2025): 101916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Yu X., Cui Y., Zhu X., et al., “Micrornas: Emerging Players in the Pathogenesis of Vitiligo,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10 (2022): 964982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Abdallah H. Y., Faisal S., Tawfik N. Z., et al., “Expression Signature of Immune‐Related Micrornas in Autoimmune Skin Disease: Psoriasis and Vitiligo Insights,” Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 27 (2023): 405–423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Williams M. D. and Mitchell G. M., “Micrornas in Insulin Resistance and Obesity,” Experimental Diabetes Research 2012 (2012): 484696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhang B., Shen C., Zhu B., et al., “Insight into Mirnas Related With Glucometabolic Disorder,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 111 (2019): 657–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Landrier J., Derghal A., and Mounien L.. “MicroRNAs in Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders,” Cells 8, no: 8 (2019): 859, 10.3390/cells8080859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Yuan Y., Deng S., Yang J., et al., “Antagomir of miR‐31‐5p Modulates Macrophage Polarization via the AMPK/SIRT1/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway to Protect Against Dss‐Induced Colitis in Mice,” Aging (Albany NY) 16 (2024): 5336–5353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Kang P., Zhang W., Ji Z., et al., “Association Between Vitiligo and Relevant Components of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology: JDDG 20 (2022): 629–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Rodríguez‐Martín M., de Paz N. M., Mehtani P., et al., “Patients With Vitiligo Present Fewer Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Results From a Case‐Control Study,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 27 (2013): 124–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Dragoni F., Conti R., Cazzaniga S., et al., “No Association Between Vitiligo and Obesity: A Case‐Control Study,” Medical Principles and Practice 26 (2017): 421–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Ye Z., Chen J., Du P., et al., “Metabolomics Signature and Potential Application of Serum Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Metabolism in Patients With Vitiligo,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022): 839167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Shaker E. S. E., Allam S. H., Mabrouk M. M., et al., “Simvastatin and Non‐Segmental Vitiligo: A New Potential Treatment Option?,” Dermatologic Therapy 35 (2022): e15969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Agarwal P., Rashighi M., Essien K. I., et al., “Simvastatin Prevents and Reverses Depigmentation in a Mouse Model of Vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 135 (2015): 1080–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Noël M., Gagné C., Bergeron J., et al., “Positive Pleiotropic Effects of Hmg‐Coa Reductase Inhibitor on Vitiligo,” Lipids in Health and Disease 3 (2004): 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Chang Y., Li S., Guo W., et al., “Simvastatin Protects Human Melanocytes From H(2)O(2)‐Induced Oxidative Stress by Activating Nrf2,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 137 (2017): 1286–1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Zhang S., Zdravković T. P., Wang T., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Oral Simvastatin in the Treatment of Patients With Vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Medicine 69 (2021): 393–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Niezgoda A., Winnicki A., Krysiński J., et al., “Topical Application of Simvastatin Acid Sodium Salt and Atorvastatin Calcium Salt in Vitiligo Patients. Results of the Randomized, Double‐Blind Evraas Pilot Study,” Scientific Reports 14 (2024): 14612–w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Farag A. G. A., Badr E. A. E., El‐Shafey A. E. S., et al., “Fatty Acid‐Binding Protein 4 Circulating Levels in Non‐Segmental Vitiligo,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 97 (2022): 28–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Trojnar M., Patro‐Małysza J., Kimber‐Trojnar, et al. “Associations between Fatty Acid‐Binding Protein 4−A Proinflammatory Adipokine and Insulin Resistance, Gestational and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” 8 (2019): 227, 10.3390/cells8030227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Terra X., Quintero Y., Auguet T., et al., “Fabp 4 Is Associated With Inflammatory Markers and Metabolic Syndrome in Morbidly Obese Women,” European Journal of Endocrinology 164 (2011): 539–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Furuhashi M., Saitoh S., Shimamoto K., et al., “Fatty Acid‐Binding Protein 4 (FABP4): Pathophysiological Insights and Potent Clinical Biomarker of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases,” Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology 8 (2015): 23–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Xu A., Wang Y., Xu J. Y., et al., “Adipocyte Fatty Acid‐Binding Protein Is a Plasma Biomarker Closely Associated With Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome,” Clinical Chemistry 52 (2006): 405–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Prentice K. J., Saksi J., and Hotamisligil G. S., “Adipokine FABP4 Integrates Energy Stores and Counterregulatory Metabolic Responses,” Journal of Lipid Research 60 (2019): 734–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Makowski L. and Hotamisligil G. S., “The Role of Fatty Acid Binding Proteins in Metabolic Syndrome and Atherosclerosis,” Current Opinion in Lipidology 16 (2005): 543–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Tang T., Abbott M. J., Ahmadian M., et al., “Desnutrin/Atgl Activates PPARδ to Promote Mitochondrial Function for Insulin Secretion in Islet β Cells,” Cell Metabolism 18 (2013): 883–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Shao X., Pan X., Chen T., et al., “Exploring the Role of Adipose Tissue Dysregulation in Vitiligo Pathogenesis: A Body Composition Analysis,” Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 104 (2024): adv41018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Wu M., Wang L., Wu H., et al., “Leptin Deficiency in CD8(+) T Cells Ameliorates Non‐Segmental Vitiligo by Reducing interferon‐γ and Granzyme B,” Frontiers in Immunology 14 (2023): 1158883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Liu W., Ma W., Xue X., et al., “The Neuro‐Endocrinal Regulation in Vitiligo,” Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 38 (2025): e70029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Al'Abadie M. S., Senior H. J., Bleehen S. S., et al., “Neuropeptide and Neuronal Marker Studies in Vitiligo,” British Journal of Dermatology 131, no. 1994: 160–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Tu C., Zhao D., and Lin X., “Levels of Neuropeptide‐Y in the Plasma and Skin Tissue Fluids of Patients With Vitiligo,” Journal of Dermatological Science 27 (2001): 178–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Bakry O., Mariee A., Badr I., et al., “Npy Gene Polymorphism in Vitiligo: A Case‐Control Study in Egyptian Patients,” Indian Journal of Dermatology 65 (2020): 65–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Laddha N. C., Dwivedi M., Mansuri M. S., et al., “Association of Neuropeptide Y (Npy), interleukin‐1B (IL1B) Genetic Variants and Correlation of IL1B Transcript Levels With Vitiligo Susceptibility,” PLoS One 9 (2014): e107020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Namazi N., Amani M., Haghighatkhah H. R., et al., “Increased Risk of Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Vitiligo: A Real Association or a Coincidence?,” Dermatologic Therapy 34 (2021): e14803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Slominski A. T., Zmijewski M. A., Skobowiat C., et al., “Sensing the Environment: Regulation of Local and Global Homeostasis by the Skin's Neuroendocrine System,” Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology 212, no. 2012): v, vii: 1–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Goddard A. W., Ball S. G., Martinez J., et al., “Current Perspectives of the Roles of the Central Norepinephrine System in Anxiety and Depression,” Depression and Anxiety 27 (2010): 339–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Talsania N., Lamb B., and Bewley A., “Vitiligo Is More Than Skin Deep: A Survey of Members of the Vitiligo Society,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 35 (2010): 736–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Amer A. A. A. and Gao X., “Quality of Life in Patients With Vitiligo: An Analysis of the Dermatology Life Quality Index Outcome over the Past Two Decades,” International Journal of Dermatology 55 (2016): 608–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Slominski A., Tobin D. J., Shibahara S., et al., “Melanin Pigmentation in Mammalian Skin and Its Hormonal Regulation,” Physiological Reviews 84 (2004): 1155–1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Kingo K., Aunin E., Karelson M., et al., “Gene Expression Analysis of Melanocortin System in Vitiligo,” Journal of Dermatological Science 48 (2007): 113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Graham A., Westerhof W., and Thody A. J., “The Expression of Alpha‐Msh by Melanocytes Is Reduced in Vitiligo,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 885 (1999): 470–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Pichler R., Sfetsos K., Badics B., et al. “Vitiligo Patients Present Lower Plasma Levels of Alpha‐Melanotropin Immunoreactivities,” Neuropeptides 40, no: 3 (2006): 177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Ismail I. B., Bhat Y. J., and Ul Islam M. S., “Treatment Advances in Vitiligo: An Updated Review,” Dermatology Practical & Conceptual 15 (2025): 4600, 10.5826/dpc.1501a4600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Valverde P., Manning P., Todd C., et al., “Tyrosinase May Protect Human Melanocytes From the Cytotoxic Effects of the Superoxide Anion,” Experimental Dermatology 5 (1996): 247–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Haycock J. W., Rowe S. J., Cartledge S., et al., “Alpha‐Melanocyte‐Stimulating Hormone Reduces Impact of Proinflammatory Cytokine and Peroxide‐Generated Oxidative Stress on Keratinocyte and Melanoma Cell Lines,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 (2000): 15629–15636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Böhm M., Schiller M., and Luger T. A., ““Non‐Pigmentary Actions of Alpha‐Melanocyte‐Stimulating Hormone‐‐Lessons From the Cutaneous Melanocortin System,” Cellular and Molecular Biology 52 (2006): 61–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Unal A., Ozkol H. U., Bayram Y., et al., “Comparison of Tyrosinase Antibody, Tyrosinase‐Related protein‐1 and −2 Antibodies, Melanin‐Concentrating Hormone Receptor Antibody Levels With Autologous Serum Skin Test and Autologous Plasma Skin Test Results in Patients With Vitiligo,” Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Post?py Dermatologii i Alergologii 38 (2021): 473–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Zhou M., Guan C., Lin F., et al., “Immunodetection of the MCHR1 Antibody in Vitiligo Patient Sera,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine 27 (2011): 725–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Kemp E. H., Waterman E. A., Hawes B. E., et al., “The Melanin‐Concentrating Hormone Receptor 1, a Novel Target of Autoantibody Responses in Vitiligo,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 109 (2002): 923–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Georgescu D., Sears R. M., Hommel J. D., et al., “The Hypothalamic Neuropeptide Melanin‐Concentrating Hormone Acts in the Nucleus Accumbens to Modulate Feeding Behavior and Forced‐Swim Performance,” Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005): 2933–2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Hoogduijn M. J., Ancans J., Suzuki I., et al., “Melanin‐Concentrating Hormone and Its Receptor Are Expressed and Functional in Human Skin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 296 (2002): 698–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Don P., Iuga A., Dacko A., et al., “Treatment of Vitiligo With Broadband Ultraviolet B and Vitamins,” International Journal of Dermatology 45 (2006): 63–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Genov D., Bozhkov B., and Zlatkov N. B., “Copper Pathochemistry in Vitiligo,” Clinica Chimica Acta 37 (1972): 207–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Hassan I., Bhat Y. J., Majid S., et al., “Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Serum 25‐Hydroxy Vitamin D Levels in Vitiligo ‐ A Case‐Control Study,” Indian Dermatology Online Journal 10 (2019): 131–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Fallah M., Abedini R., Mahiabadi S. A., et al., “The Effect of Vitamin C on Oxidative Stress Indices and Skin Regimentation of Vitiligo Patients,” Archives of Dermatological Research 315 (2023): 2655–2660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Mahmmod Z. and Ismael D. K.. “Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients With Vitiligo: A Cross‐Sectional Study From Basrah, Iraq,” Cureus 13, no: 12 (2021): e20733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Sendrasoa F. A., Ranaivo I. M., Sata M., et al., “Treatment Responses in Patients With Vitiligo to Very Potent Topical Corticosteroids Combined With Vitaminotherapy in Madagascar,” International Journal of Dermatology 58 (2019): 908–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Shieh A., Chun R. F., Ma C., et al., “Effects of High‐Dose Vitamin D2 Versus D3 on Total and Free 25‐Hydroxyvitamin D and Markers of Calcium Balance,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 101 (2016): 3070–3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Naik P. P. and Farrukh S. N., “Influence of Ethnicities and Skin Color Variations in Different Populations: A Review,” Skin Pharmacology and Physiology 35 (2022): 65–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Kim T., Kim S. K., Shin M. K., et al., “Serum 25‐Hydroxy Vitamin D Levels and Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Vitiligo,” Journal of Korean Medical Science 37 (2022): e110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Di Nardo V., Barygina V., França K., et al., “Functional Nutrition as Integrated Approach in Vitiligo Management,” Dermatologic Therapy 32 (2019): e12625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Diaz M. J., Tran J. T., Rose D., et al. “Dietary Interventions, Supplements, and Plant‐Derived Compounds for Adjunct Vitiligo Management: A Review of the Literature,” Nutrients 17, no: 2 (2025): 357, 10.3390/nu17020357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Jalel A., Soumaya G. S., and Hamdaoui M. H., “Vitiligo Treatment With Vitamins, Minerals and Polyphenol Supplementation,” Indian Journal of Dermatology 54 (2009): 357–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Colucci R., Dragoni F., Conti R., et al., “Evaluation of An Oral Supplement Containing Phyllanthus Emblica Fruit Extracts, Vitamin E, and Carotenoids in Vitiligo Treatment,” Dermatologic Therapy 28 (2015): 17–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Speeckaert R., Bulat V., Speeckaert M. M., et al., “The Impact of Antioxidants on Vitiligo and Melasma: A Scoping Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Antioxidants (Basel) 12 (2023): 2082, 10.3390/antiox12122082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Hazneci E., Karabulut A. B., Oztürk C., et al., “A Comparative Study of Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase, and Glutathione Peroxidase Activities and Nitrate Levels in Vitiligo Patients,” International Journal of Dermatology 44 (2005): 636–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Mathachan S. R., Khurana A., Gautam R. K., et al., “Does Oxidative Stress Correlate With Disease Activity and Severity in Vitiligo? An Analytical Study,” Journal of cosmetic dermatology 20 (2021): 352–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Laddha N. C., Dwivedi M., Mansuri M. S., et al., “Role of Oxidative Stress and Autoimmunity in Onset and Progression of Vitiligo,” Experimental Dermatology 23 (2014): 352–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Białczyk A., Kamińska B., and Czajkowski R., “The Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Vitiligo: A Systematic Review,” Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Post?py Dermatologii i Alergologii 42 (2025): 134–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Sravani P. V., Babu N. K., Gopal K. V. T., et al., “Determination of Oxidative Stress in Vitiligo by Measuring Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase Levels in Vitiliginous and Non‐Vitiliginous Skin,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 75 (2009): 268–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Kassab A., Khalij Y., Ayed Y., et al., “Serum Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Markers in Patients With Vitiligo,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12 (2023): 5861, 10.3390/jcm12185861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Jain A., Mal J., Mehndiratta V., et al., “Study of Oxidative Stress in Vitiligo,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry 26 (2011): 78–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Ozel Turkcu U., Solak Tekin N., Gokdogan Edgunlu T., et al. “The Association of FOXO3A Gene Polymorphisms With Serum FOXO3A Levels and Oxidative Stress Markers in Vitiligo Patients,” Gene 536 (2014): 129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Koca R., Armutcu F., Altinyazar H. C., et al., “Oxidant‐Antioxidant Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation in Generalized Vitiligo,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 29 (2004): 406–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Khan R., Satyam A., Gupta S., et al., “Circulatory Levels of Antioxidants and Lipid Peroxidation in Indian Patients With Generalized and Localized Vitiligo,” Archives of Dermatological Research 301 (2009): 731–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Sun C., Ding H., Zhang L., et al., “Co‐Regulatory Mechanisms and Potential Markers of Oxidative Stress‐Related Genes in Vitiligo and Alopecia Areata,” Skin Research and Technology 30 (2024): e70001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Tsai T., Kuo C., and Huang Y., “Serum Homocysteine, Folate, and Vitamin B(12) Levels in Patients With Vitiligo and Their Potential Roles as Disease Activity Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 80 (2019): 646–654.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Singh S., Singh U., and Pandey S. S., “Increased Level of Serum Homocysteine in Vitiligo,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 25 (2011): 110–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Chen J., Zhuang T., Chen J., et al., “Homocysteine Induces Melanocytes Apoptosis via PERK‐eIF2α‐CHOP Pathway in Vitiligo,” Clinical Science (London) 134 (2020): 1127–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Marzabani R., Rezadoost H., Choopanian P., et al., “Metabolomic Signature of Amino Acids in Plasma of Patients With Non‐Segmental Vitiligo,” Metabolomics 17 (2021): 92, 10.1007/s11306-021-01843-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Liang L., Li Y., Tian X., et al., “Comprehensive Lipidomic, Metabolomic and Proteomic Profiling Reveals the Role of Immune System in Vitiligo,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 44 (2019): e216–e223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Bellei B., Pitisci A., Ottaviani M., et al., “Vitiligo: A Possible Model of Degenerative Diseases,” PLoS One 8 (2013): e59782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Kovacs D., Bastonini E., Briganti S., et al., “Altered Epidermal Proliferation, Differentiation, and Lipid Composition: Novel Key Elements in the Vitiligo Puzzle,” Science Advances 8 (2022): eabn9299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Manful C. F., Fordjour E., Subramaniam D., et al., “Antioxidants and Reactive Oxygen Species: Shaping Human Health and Disease Outcomes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26 (2025): 7520, 10.3390/ijms26157520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Brenner M. and Hearing V. J., “The Protective Role of Melanin Against Uv Damage in Human Skin,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 84 (2008): 539–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Kim E., Panzella L., Napolitano A., et al., “Redox Activities of Melanins Investigated by Electrochemical Reverse Engineering: Implications for Their Roles in Oxidative Stress,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 140 (2020): 537–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Denat L., Kadekaro A. L., Marrot L., et al., “Melanocytes as Instigators and Victims of Oxidative Stress,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134 (2014): 1512–1518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Sabogal‐Guáqueta A. M., Marmolejo‐Garza A., Trombetta‐Lima M., et al., “Species‐Specific Metabolic Reprogramming in Human and Mouse Microglia During Inflammatory Pathway Induction,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 6454–6457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Lyu C. and Sun Y., “Immunometabolism in the Pathogenesis of Vitiligo,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022): 1055958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Wang C. Q. F., Cruz‐Inigo A. E., Fuentes‐Duculan J., et al., “Th17 Cells and Activated Dendritic Cells Are Increased in Vitiligo Lesions,” PLoS One 6 (2011): e18907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Pan Y. and Kupper T. S., “Metabolic Reprogramming and Longevity of Tissue‐Resident Memory T Cells,” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2018): 1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Riding R. L. and Harris J. E., “The Role of Memory CD8(+) T Cells in Vitiligo,” Journal of Immunology 203 (2019): 11–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Frączek A., Owczarczyk‐Saczonek A., and Placek W., “The Role of T(RM) Cells in the Pathogenesis of Vitiligo‐A Review of the Current State‐Of‐The‐Art,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (2020): 3552, 10.3390/ijms21103552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Furuhashi M., “Fatty Acid‐Binding Protein 4 in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 26 (2019): 216–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Pan Y., Tian T., Park C. O., et al. “Survival of Tissue‐Resident Memory T Cells Requires Exogenous Lipid Uptake and Metabolism,” Nature 543 (2017): 252–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Liu G., Wang Z., and Li S., “Heterogeneity and Plasticity of Tissue‐Resident Memory T Cells in Skin Diseases and Homeostasis: A Review,” Frontiers in Immunology 15 (2024): 1378359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Verma D., Hussain K., Namiq K. S., et al. “Vitiligo: The Association With Metabolic Syndrome and the Role of Simvastatin as an Immunomodulator,” Cureus 13, no: 3 (2021): e14029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Saheb Sharif‐Askari N., Alabed M., Selvakumar B., et al., “Simvastatin Reduced Infiltration of Memory Subsets of T Lymphocytes in the Lung Tissue During Th2 Allergic Inflammation,” International Immunopharmacology 113 (2022): 109347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Dell'Anna M. L., Maresca V., Briganti S., et al., “Mitochondrial Impairment in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells During the Active Phase of Vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 117 (2001): 908–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Maresca V., Roccella M., Roccella F., et al., “Increased Sensitivity to Peroxidative Agents as a Possible Pathogenic Factor of Melanocyte Damage in Vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 109 (1997): 310–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Klarquist J., Denman C. J., Hernandez C., et al., “Reduced Skin Homing by Functional Treg in Vitiligo,” Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 23 (2010): 276–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Dwivedi M., Laddha N. C., Arora P., et al., “Decreased Regulatory T‐Cells and CD4(+)/CD8(+) Ratio Correlate With Disease Onset and Progression in Patients With Generalized Vitiligo,” Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 26 (2013): 586–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Zhang Q., Cui T., Chang Y., et al., “HO‐1 Regulates the Function of Treg: Association With the Immune Intolerance in Vitiligo,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 22 (2018): 4335–4343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Fitz‐Gibbon S., Tomida S., Chiu B., et al., “Propionibacterium Acnes Strain Populations in the Human Skin Microbiome Associated With Acne,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 133 (2013): 2152–2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Byrd A. L., Belkaid Y., and Segre J. A., “The Human Skin Microbiome,” Nature Reviews Microbiology 16 (2018): 143–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Moreno‐Arrones O. M., Serrano‐Villar S., Perez‐Brocal V., et al., “Analysis of the Gut Microbiota in Alopecia Areata: Identification of Bacterial Biomarkers,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 34 (2020): 400–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Pan L., Li C., Liang Z., et al., “Exploring the Association Between Skin Microbiota and Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A Two‐Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis,” Archives of Dermatological Research 316 (2024): 677, 10.1007/s00403-024-03433-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Scharschmidt T. C. and Segre J. A., “Skin Microbiome and Dermatologic Disorders,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 135 (2025): e184315, 10.1172/JCI184315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Nigro A., Osman A., Suryadevara P., et al., “Vitiligo and the Microbiome of the Gut and Skin: A Systematic Review,” Archives of Dermatological Research 317 (2025): 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Renaud G., Stenzel U., Maricic T., et al., “Deml: Robust Demultiplexing of Illumina Sequences Using a Likelihood‐Based Approach,” Bioinformatics 31 (2015): 770–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Ganju P., Nagpal S., Mohammed M. H., et al., “Microbial Community Profiling Shows Dysbiosis in the Lesional Skin of Vitiligo Subjects,” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 18761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Ni Q., Ye Z., Wang Y., et al., “Gut Microbial Dysbiosis and Plasma Metabolic Profile in Individuals With Vitiligo,” Frontiers in Microbiology 11 (2020): 592248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Bzioueche H., Simonyté Sjödin K., West C. E., et al., “Analysis of Matched Skin and Gut Microbiome of Patients With Vitiligo Reveals Deep Skin Dysbiosis: Link With Mitochondrial and Immune Changes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 141 (2021): 2280–2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Iacob S. and Iacob D. G., “Infectious Threats, the Intestinal Barrier, and Its Trojan Horse: Dysbiosis,” Frontiers in Microbiology 10 (2019): 1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Dou Y., Niu Y., Shen H., et al., “Identification of Disease‐Specific Gut Microbial Markers in Vitiligo,” Frontiers in Microbiology 16 (2025): 1499035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Yuan X., Wang L., Meng D., et al., “The Impact of Nbuvb on Microbial Community Profiling in the Lesional Skin of Vitiligo Subjects,” Microbial Pathogenesis 140 (2020): 103943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Caporaso J. G., Lauber C. L., Walters W. A., et al., “Ultra‐High‐Throughput Microbial Community Analysis on the Illumina Hiseq and Miseq Platforms,” The ISME Journal: Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology 6 (2012): 1621–1624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Lu H., Xu J., Hu Y., et al., “Differences in the Skin Microbial Community Between Patients With Active and Stable Vitiligo Based on 16S Rrna Gene Sequencing,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology 62 (2021): e516–e523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Luan M., Niu M., Yang P., et al., “Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals Altered Gut Microbial Compositions and Gene Functions in Patients With Non‐Segmental Vitiligo,” BMC Microbiology 23 (2023): 265–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Silverberg J. I. and Silverberg N. B., “Serum Homocysteine as a Biomarker of Vitiligo Vulgaris Severity: A Pilot Study,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 64 (2011): 445–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Lucattini R., Likic V. A., and Lithgow T., “Bacterial Proteins Predisposed for Targeting to Mitochondria,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (2004): 652–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Saint‐Georges‐Chaumet Y. and Edeas M., “Microbiota‐Mitochondria Inter‐Talk: Consequence for Microbiota‐Host Interaction,” Pathogens and Disease 74 (2016): ftv096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Kuroda Y., Yang L., Shibata T., et al., “High α‐diversity of Skin Microbiome and Mycobiome in Japanese Patients With Vitiligo,” Journal of Dermatological Science 114 (2024): 34–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Kalra R., Conlan X. A., and Goel M., “Fungi as a Potential Source of Pigments: Harnessing Filamentous Fungi,” Frontiers in Chemistry 8 (2020): 369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Shahin Z., Leheta T. M., Abdel Hay R. M., et al., “Detection of Plasma and Urinary Monoamines and Their Metabolites in Nonsegmental Vitiligo,” Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica 20 (2012): 14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Basnet B., Bhushan A., Khan R., et al., “Plasma & Urinary Catecholamines & Urinary Vanillylmandelic Acid Levels in Patients With Generalized Vitiligo,” Indian Journal of Medical Research 147 (2018): 384–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Cucchi M. L., Frattini P., Santagostino G., et al., “Higher Plasma Catecholamine and Metabolite Levels in the Early Phase of Nonsegmental Vitiligo,” Pigment Cell Research 13 (2000): 28–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Qian Y., Liu X., Sun H., et al., “Urinary Proteomics Analysis of Active Vitiligo Patients: Biomarkers for Steroid Treatment Efficacy Prediction and Monitoring,” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 9 (2022): 761562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Liu W., Liu X., Qian Y., et al., “Urinary Metabolomic Investigations in Vitiligo Patients,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 17989–17980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Klemetti P., Björses P., Tuomi T., et al., “Autoimmunity to Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase in Patients With Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy‐Candidiasis‐Ectodermal Dystrophy (Apeced),” Clinical and Experimental Immunology 119, no. 2000: 419–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Gianfaldoni S., Tchernev G., Lotti J., et al., “Unconventional Treatments for Vitiligo: Are They (Un) Satisfactory?,” Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 6 (2018): 170–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Gürpınar A., Doğan Günaydın S., Kılıç C., et al., “Association of Serum Cortisol and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (Dheas) Levels With Psychological Stress in Patients With Vitiligo,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 49 (2019): 832–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Henning S. W., Jaishankar D., Barse L. W., et al., “The Relationship Between Stress and Vitiligo: Evaluating Perceived Stress and Electronic Medical Record Data,” PLoS One 15 (2020): e0227909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File

HSR2-9-e72950-s001.docx (32.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES